5.00 score from hupso.pl for:
xxjycn.com



HTML Content


Titlethe protect yourself blog

Length: 25, Words: 4
Description find out the latest news and discussions at xxjycn.com

Length: 54, Words: 10
Keywords pusty
Robots noodp
Charset UTF-8
Og Meta - Title exist
Og Meta - Description exist
Og Meta - Site name exist
Tytuł powinien zawierać pomiędzy 10 a 70 znaków (ze spacjami), a mniej niż 12 słów w długości.
Meta opis powinien zawierać pomiędzy 50 a 160 znaków (łącznie ze spacjami), a mniej niż 24 słów w długości.
Kodowanie znaków powinny być określone , UTF-8 jest chyba najlepszy zestaw znaków, aby przejść z powodu UTF-8 jest bardziej międzynarodowy kodowaniem.
Otwarte obiekty wykresu powinny być obecne w stronie internetowej (więcej informacji na temat protokołu OpenGraph: http://ogp.me/)

SEO Content

Words/Characters 2832
Text/HTML 51.46 %
Headings H1 1
H2 4
H3 0
H4 0
H5 0
H6 0
H1
xxjycn information blog
H2

corporate survival guide for npe litigation
the top 3 local seo ranking factors
drive guests back to your hotel with a pms
H3
H4
H5
H6
strong
patent litigation
1 . assess the allegation
indemnity
patent fatigue
u .s. patent and trademark office
2 . figure out resolution timing
freeborn & peters
3 . cost management methods
freeborn and peters
expert studies
reverse contingency
patent litigation insurance
freeborn peters
1. articles & metadata
organic search
rank brain
2. users’ experience
3. nap & uniformity with offsite citations
yelp
citysearch
j2h boston seo.
property management system
creating your message
communications strategy
sending out your message
email:
blacklisted
direct mail:
telephone calls:
b
i
patent litigation
1 . assess the allegation
indemnity
patent fatigue
u .s. patent and trademark office
2 . figure out resolution timing
freeborn & peters
3 . cost management methods
freeborn and peters
expert studies
reverse contingency
patent litigation insurance
freeborn peters
1. articles & metadata
organic search
rank brain
2. users’ experience
3. nap & uniformity with offsite citations
yelp
citysearch
j2h boston seo.
property management system
creating your message
communications strategy
sending out your message
email:
blacklisted
direct mail:
telephone calls:
em
Bolds strong 29
b 0
i 29
em 0
Zawartość strony internetowej powinno zawierać więcej niż 250 słów, z stopa tekst / kod jest wyższy niż 20%.
Pozycji używać znaczników (h1, h2, h3, ...), aby określić temat sekcji lub ustępów na stronie, ale zwykle, użyj mniej niż 6 dla każdego tagu pozycje zachować swoją stronę zwięzły.
Styl używać silnych i kursywy znaczniki podkreślić swoje słowa kluczowe swojej stronie, ale nie nadużywać (mniej niż 16 silnych tagi i 16 znaczników kursywy)

Statystyki strony

twitter:title pusty
twitter:description pusty
google+ itemprop=name pusty
Pliki zewnętrzne 14
Pliki CSS 5
Pliki javascript 9
Plik należy zmniejszyć całkowite odwołanie plików (CSS + JavaScript) do 7-8 maksymalnie.

Linki wewnętrzne i zewnętrzne

Linki 40
Linki wewnętrzne 0
Linki zewnętrzne 40
Linki bez atrybutu Title 39
Linki z atrybutem NOFOLLOW 0
Linki - Użyj atrybutu tytuł dla każdego łącza. Nofollow link jest link, który nie pozwala wyszukiwarkom boty zrealizują są odnośniki no follow. Należy zwracać uwagę na ich użytkowania

Linki wewnętrzne

pusty

Linki zewnętrzne

home http://xxjycn.com/
about http://xxjycn.com/about/
privacy policy http://xxjycn.com/privacy-policy/
terms of service http://xxjycn.com/terms-of-service/
contact us http://xxjycn.com/contact-us/
xxjycn information blog http://xxjycn.com/
home http://xxjycn.com/
about http://xxjycn.com/about/
privacy policy http://xxjycn.com/privacy-policy/
terms of service http://xxjycn.com/terms-of-service/
contact us http://xxjycn.com/contact-us/
corporate survival guide for npe litigation http://xxjycn.com/corporate-survival-guide-npe-litigation/
patent litigation http://www.generalpatent.com/patent-litigation
indemnity http://www.investopedia.com/terms/i/indemnity.asp
patent fatigue http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2015/01/troll-fatigue-earnest-debate-on-patent-abuse-at-ces/
u .s. patent and trademark office http://www.uspto.gov/
freeborn & peters https://www.glassdoor.com/overview/working-at-freeborn-and-peters-ei_ie264303.11,30.htm
freeborn and peters https://www.linkedin.com/company/freeborn-&-peters-llp
expert studies https://hbr.org/2007/07/the-making-of-an-expert
reverse contingency http://us.practicallaw.com/7-511-2268
patent litigation insurance http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2011/03/27/intellectual-property-insurance-what-attorneys-need-to-know/id=15904/
freeborn peters http://www.americanlawyer.com/id=1202733416804/chicagos-freeborn--peters-snags-fastmoving-lateral?slreturn=20160426133812
http://xxjycn.com/corporate-survival-guide-npe-litigation/
stanton http://xxjycn.com/author/jtwoh/
the top 3 local seo ranking factors http://xxjycn.com/local-seo-ranking-factors/
organic search https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/organic_search
rank brain http://searchengineland.com/faq-all-about-the-new-google-rankbrain-algorithm-234440
yelp http://www.yelp.com/biz/j2h-digital-boston
citysearch http://www.citysearch.com/
j2h boston seo http://j2hbostonseo.com
http://xxjycn.com/local-seo-ranking-factors/
stanton http://xxjycn.com/author/jtwoh/
drive guests back to your hotel with a pms http://xxjycn.com/hotel-with-pms/
property management system https://www.innroad.com/solutions/property-management-system/
communications strategy http://www.odi.org/publications/5186-communications-strategy-planning
blacklisted https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/blacklist_(computing)
http://xxjycn.com/hotel-with-pms/
stanton http://xxjycn.com/author/jtwoh/
wordpress http://wordpress.org
stylishwp https://stylishwp.com/blogolifewpo

Zdjęcia

Zdjęcia 6
Zdjęcia bez atrybutu ALT 3
Zdjęcia bez atrybutu TITLE 6
Korzystanie Obraz ALT i TITLE atrybutu dla każdego obrazu.

Zdjęcia bez atrybutu TITLE

http://xxjycn.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/office-980x649-850x478.jpg
http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/2676726ed776070aa23d81361e79d6a4?s=20&d=mm&r=g
http://xxjycn.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/local-seo-strategies-850x478.jpg
http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/2676726ed776070aa23d81361e79d6a4?s=20&d=mm&r=g
http://xxjycn.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/dt_coupledining_36_677x380_fittoboxsmalldimension_center.jpg
http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/2676726ed776070aa23d81361e79d6a4?s=20&d=mm&r=g

Zdjęcia bez atrybutu ALT

http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/2676726ed776070aa23d81361e79d6a4?s=20&d=mm&r=g
http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/2676726ed776070aa23d81361e79d6a4?s=20&d=mm&r=g
http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/2676726ed776070aa23d81361e79d6a4?s=20&d=mm&r=g

Ranking:


Alexa Traffic
Daily Global Rank Trend
Daily Reach (Percent)









Majestic SEO











Text on page:

home about privacy policy terms of service contact us xxjycn information blog home about privacy policy terms of service contact us corporate survival guide for npe litigation in the “old days,” solely technology innovation organizations needed to be worried about patent litigation. patent lawsuits had been fights between competitors—often manufacturers—over legal rights to their recent technology along with the income created by those technologies. ah, the good old days. nowadays, each and every organization that makes use of technology might become victim to a patent infringement lawsuit. living in our technology-driven world, that implies every organization is at risk. recently, particular kinds of non-practicing entities ( often called “patent trolls” ) have declared infringement accusations against just about any business that utilizes an internet site or a bar-code scanner. what exactly should you do should an npe claims an infringement declaration against your firm? there is absolutely no easy response. depending on the strength of the allegation, the reasonableness of the npe, your risk threshold, along with your capacity to shift—or at the least spread—your possible threats and expenses. this article will tackle some of the factors you might want to think about all of which will offer some “best practice” recommendations. 1 . assess the allegation determine what goods or actions are allegedly being infringed and exactly what the npe is asking for. when you do, it is possible to figure out the following: ( a ) must another person take or share your legal responsibility? if you happen to be a retail store, your vendor might owe you an indemnity responsibility. when the answer is not clear, the vendor still might be able to work out some expense sharing arrangement instead of challenging its client on an indemnity claim. ( b ) how much is the npe asking for? certain npes claim tens or perhaps many hundreds of infringement lawsuits with relatively modest requirements. most of these npes value their claim to ensure that it will be less expensive to compensate instead of to challenge. in certain situations, it might be less costly to buy a license rather than to examine the patent concerns. the most affordable answer might be to compensate the npe. for certain organizations, this method saves dollars merely in the short-run. you should think about whether you are welcoming potential allegations by “rolling over” without any resistance. ( c ) are your possible risks considerable? the response will alter your cost/ benefit calculations. when the stakes are substantial, you might want to spend more funds and assets into your defense. the tougher you appear, the more potential you will find a defense that increases your negotiating power or positions you for a litigation win. when the suit is just an annoyance, therefore you don’t wish to challenge it on principle, your defense expenses will soon exceed your risks. subsequently, you will need an efficient and innovative defense strategy. optimally, the lawyer expenses along with your compensation expense are lower than the npe’s original claim. your edge in these types of nuisance cases is the fact that you have minimal to lose as well as the npe has minimal to gain. put simply; the npe might have more motivation to reconcile than you do. realizing this truth will help you influence a much better agreement. ( d ) do you possess a basic ( inexpensive ) defense? battling a patent infringement case on its strengths can be extremely costly or may be needless. search for different, non-technical defenses that may wipe out the claim or offer negotiating power. these types of arguments consist of patent fatigue, license ( an upstream user’s license might take care of your usage of the technology ), insufficient rights ( i.e., in case the npe has not obtained adequate legal rights under the patent to sue ), and so on. damage restriction “defenses” additionally offer influence by minimizing the claim price. as an example, a patent marking issue or a laches problem can significantly decrease the possible damage and deflate the npe’s optimism for a huge payout. verify the patent’s litigation background for a fast and low-cost solution to determine possible defenses. in some instances, an additional defendant might have completed your job for you ( e.g., won a decision that is valid for you too ). similarly, if you recognize a disadvantage in the patent that other folks have overlooked, you could put yourself up as the defendant that the npe would prefer not to challenge. ( e ) are you able to fight the patent out of district court litigation? should you have a stable invalidity situation, contemplate fighting the patent in the u .s. patent and trademark office ( pto ). along with reexamination, new processes such as inter-parties review ( ipr ) and post-grant review ( pgr ) might be beneficial options for contesting the npe’s patent. the pto operations include dangers and advantages, yet they might permit you to place a district court lawsuit on pause, which can let you save—or at the minimum, postpone—litigation defense expenses. ( f ) are you able to stay away from the technology? if you can live without the allegedly infringing technology, you could reduce your possible damages and acquire negotiating influence. npes usually negotiate lump sum payment, fully-paid up licenses that lengthen until the patent ends. when you can live without the accused products, you will have absolutely nothing to worry from an injunction ( still it is hard for an npe to gain an injunction anyhow). then, you can lower the npe’s “standard rate” for the reason that you are concerned only in a restricted “license” paying past usage. if your past usage is nominal, but you are still prepared to cancel the accused technology, the npe could quit pursuing you entirely. 2 . figure out resolution timing timing is crucial. “conventional wisdom” asserts you don’t desire to be the first to reconcile or the last. the first to reconcile might be presented a “sweetheart” package, however, in reality, might wind up paying out more. when the npe has affirmed its suit against a sizable group, many attorneys such as freeborn & peters are going to be looking for flaws in the petition. when somebody discovers an achilles heel, the npe might decrease its request, or it might get itself the loss of a summary judgment motion. people who settle “too soon” lose that advantage. alternatively, many astute npes will increase the request whenever somebody shoots at the patent and misses. individuals who wait around for someone else to wipe out the patent might pay an expense for the opportunity of standing on the sidelines. being the last “infringer” remaining might find oneself litigating by itself against the npe. in a nutshell, you encounter risk at any move you make. you must understand how much risk you will be prepared to accept. if you believe that the suit is flimsy, and you can take the danger of an increasing claim, then stand your base. when the guarantee is essential to you, or your exposure risk is too much for you, reconcile earlier. 3 . cost management methods ( a ) are you able to share expenses along with other accused infringers? a lot of npes sue several people at the same court. frequently, law firms offer to represent several defendants to stretch standard costs across the parties. this plan will work well when: ( a ) you have confidence in the law firm like freeborn and peters, ( b ) you will discover no probable clashes ( e.g., . , should the accused goods operate in basically the identical way for all defendants in the grouping ) , and ( c ) you don’t care about relinquishing some level of management over your defense . conversely, you could get your representation and make deals with other defendants to share court expenses for certain activities, like expert studies, file examination, dispositive motions, and so on. in case you are part of a large defense grouping, you could conserve plenty of cash that way. however, big defense groupings offer inefficiencies of their very own. weekly conference calls for many hours with twenty-five attorneys can be very expensive not to mention frequently unproductive ( usually, certain active members bring value yet often individuals with the bare minimum talk the most ). ( b ) could you secure a different payment deal from your external representation? different payments can help you manage expenses. moreover, there are numerous choices. still, you need to understand, at least approximately, the price of the claim. to do this, you assess your possible exposure against your chance of victory and the npe’s request. the claim price provides you with an idea for in which you have to limit your defense expenditures. with that limit at heart, you could work out various alternative payment deals with external representation, for starters: • flat fee whether for the total defense or on a project-by-project schedule ( e.g., $x for preliminary pleadings, $y for fact discovery, and the like . ) • expenses stretched over time to prevent massive spikes • reverse contingency ( x fee for accomplishing deal of y or greater ) • hourly fee deal with results reward kicker • soft caps hourly rates which are reduced as costs reach predefined cap limits. ( e .g . , x% lower price for charges that surpass the limit by 10% and y% discounted for expenses that exceed the limit by 20%, etc . ) ( c ) are you able to obtain patent litigation insurance coverage? your company’s general liability coverage most likely will not insure patent infringement. individual insurance providers offer protection for patent infringement liability, legal expenses, or both of them. since patent litigation may create massive liability, these insurance policies more often than not have high premiums, high deductibles, as well as low caps. the low caps make these types of policies undesirable for high-stakes claims. and for nuisance claims, these types of policies might not offer great value due to the relatively high deductible. however for certain organizations, these policies strike a sweet spot and might provide a quality hedge against a substantial percentage of their standard npe litigation risk exposure. ( d ) are you able to reap the benefits of an alternative cost-spreading venture? in reaction to the increase of npe litigation, companies purchase “high threat” patents “defensively” for their users. they pinpoint high-threat patents and buy them to remove them from circulation and stop them from slipping into the clutches of some organization which will use them against the group’s subscribers. these groups never operate evenly for all business sectors. they often do best in industries in which big players will likely subscribe to membership and where high-risk patents are better to recognize. however if you work in one of these business sectors, you must think about the advantages that these companies can propose. to understand patent trolls and how to defend against them, please visit freeborn peters. may 27, 2016august 19, 2016 stanton the top 3 local seo ranking factors although we don’t comprehend the particular signs that enter google’s ranking algorithms, we are aware of what’s showing results within the real world to help sites appear for even more local searches. here’s a brief summary of a few of the leading local seo ranking components and ways to take full advantage of them to boost your website’s search performance. 1. articles & metadata listen from google: the articles on your website is a top ranking reason for positioning in organic search. fantastic site articles contains your main search terms organically put into your site’s articles , optimized web page titles and descriptions (e .g ., metadata), together with search-friendly picture content. although google not too long ago verified that backlinks and rank brain are the additional two main ranking factors for search engine optimization , each of them are enhanced if you have strong , applicable content on your website that folks wish to involve with and connect to . 2. users’ experience exactly what can a website’s user experience need to do with its google rank? plenty, in fact. from precisely how mobile-friendly your site will be to how simple it should be for a user to get around and locate info, your website’s framework is recognized in your google rank. google aspires to offer the best information possible to a user, regardless of how they decide to search, which entails not just if your content complements a search term. 3. nap & uniformity with offsite citations one of the greatest elements google looks at for local queries is if the name , address , and also telephone number, or simply nap, on your site is in line with local citations ( or entries and websites such as google maps, yelp, citysearch, even more). that’s since this data complements, google can observe that info as reliable and trustworthy, allowing your website (as well as your local listings) an increase in the listings for queries with local objective. for more information on local search ranking factors, please visit j2h boston seo. april 22, 2016november 20, 2016 stanton drive guests back to your hotel with a pms finding new hotel guests is a recurring quest for each and every hotelier. reserving new guests is vital for raising sales, reputation-establishing and moving the hotel forward. despite effectively exerting the effort necessary to get them onto the property, it’s essential that businesses have a strategy to persuade them to come back down the road. returning visitors must be seen as “low-hanging fruit” for property owners. they’re no stranger to the location and, ideally, had an excellent on-property experience. although some visitors will never come back because they wish to check out new areas, you will still find lots of visitors that will happily make return trips to the locations they enjoy. it’s the hotel’s duty to make sure they keep the top of mind with these visitors. to accomplish this, properties should cultivate and offer a persuasive message which will motivate these visitors to come back. it’s essential that hoteliers maintain visitor contact details on file and up-to-date utilizing a property management system. creating your message creating an impactful message might be difficult, however giving past visitors a bonus is an excellent approach to get their attention. for instance, giving “25% off for returning guests” will certainly stir up curiosity from visitors who haven’t been to in some time. despite the enthusiasm created from the offer, proprietors need to continue to safeguard their financial requirements. by structuring the offer, so it’s just redeemable by confirmed returning visitors in the course of low occupancy intervals, visitors can get a great deal while properties fill hotel rooms that might have likely stayed empty. also, we realize that all hotels are unable financially to absorb an exclusive deal or lower price, therefore just allowing past visitors’ learn what’s new and appealing at the property is an excellent communications strategy. new renovations and new features, along with new visitors’ attractions and dining places in the area, are all newsworthy and will be of great interest to visitors, thus creating a message around an improved experience is a smart approach to motivate their vacation selections. sending out your message as critical as creating an excellent message is correctly delivering it. the solution to this method is the quality of contact details that there is on file for past visitors. with a dependable hotel property management system, proprietors can fetch names, mailing addresses, electronic mail addresses and telephone numbers. then, owners need to choose how to deliver their message. here are a few suggestions for re-connecting with past visitors: email: to stay away from getting “blacklisted” as spam, it’s advised to work with a company that is dedicated to e-mail marketing or utilize a do-it-yourself program, such as constant contact and mailchimp. in both of these instances, special software allows proprietors handle marketing efforts from idea to distribution. direct mail: much like email, it’s wise to work with a mailing shop that is dedicated to bulk mailings. they can assist with creating the appropriately sized mailer. as a result, production and postage expenses don’t offset future earnings. telephone calls: this is the simplest, yet very time intensive, communication strategy. just as before, you will discover call centers which can be hired for outreach, however, this can be performed by property staff members. contacting directly gives a personal feel that is not accomplished by email or direct mail, yet transforming phone calls into bookings can provide a unique set of circumstances. the final section of the outreach formula is timing and regularity. should proprietors want to fill hotel rooms before the summer rush, they’ll probably have to kick-off their communications plan shortly after the new year. or if perhaps autumn is the preferred travel time, waiting around until after july 4th can help with getting the attention of visitors. furthermore, numerous rounds of outreach will be required to attain bookings’ goals. this method will need some time, in addition to some experimentation, yet building a core of returning hotel guests helps properties maintain their year-over-year success. january 21, 2016may 25, 2016 stanton proudly powered by wordpress. design by stylishwp


Here you find all texts from your page as Google (googlebot) and others search engines seen it.

Words density analysis:

Numbers of all words: 2877

One word

Two words phrases

Three words phrases

the - 6.64% (191)
you - 3.79% (109)
for - 2.26% (65)
and - 1.98% (57)
our - 1.84% (53)
your - 1.53% (44)
are - 1.25% (36)
that - 1.15% (33)
with - 1.11% (32)
all - 1.04% (30)
npe - 0.94% (27)
patent - 0.9% (26)
will - 0.9% (26)
out - 0.87% (25)
might - 0.76% (22)
can - 0.76% (22)
able - 0.63% (18)
visit - 0.63% (18)
visitor - 0.56% (16)
off - 0.56% (16)
visitors - 0.52% (15)
how - 0.52% (15)
have - 0.52% (15)
site - 0.49% (14)
owe - 0.49% (14)
defense - 0.49% (14)
expense - 0.49% (14)
use - 0.49% (14)
low - 0.45% (13)
these - 0.45% (13)
some - 0.45% (13)
over - 0.45% (13)
claim - 0.42% (12)
mail - 0.42% (12)
not - 0.42% (12)
from - 0.38% (11)
search - 0.38% (11)
hotel - 0.38% (11)
expenses - 0.38% (11)
offer - 0.38% (11)
this - 0.38% (11)
their - 0.38% (11)
its - 0.38% (11)
gain - 0.35% (10)
one - 0.35% (10)
litigation - 0.35% (10)
more - 0.35% (10)
any - 0.35% (10)
they - 0.35% (10)
them - 0.35% (10)
new - 0.35% (10)
when - 0.35% (10)
risk - 0.31% (9)
which - 0.31% (9)
get - 0.31% (9)
google - 0.31% (9)
rank - 0.31% (9)
cost - 0.28% (8)
law - 0.28% (8)
deal - 0.28% (8)
stand - 0.28% (8)
here - 0.28% (8)
should - 0.28% (8)
web - 0.28% (8)
against - 0.28% (8)
fact - 0.28% (8)
pay - 0.28% (8)
need - 0.28% (8)
technology - 0.28% (8)
local - 0.28% (8)
possible - 0.28% (8)
about - 0.28% (8)
website - 0.24% (7)
could - 0.24% (7)
on. - 0.24% (7)
high - 0.24% (7)
like - 0.24% (7)
certain - 0.24% (7)
property - 0.24% (7)
long - 0.24% (7)
work - 0.24% (7)
message - 0.24% (7)
call - 0.24% (7)
infringement - 0.24% (7)
suit - 0.24% (7)
very - 0.24% (7)
each - 0.24% (7)
defend - 0.21% (6)
user - 0.21% (6)
sure - 0.21% (6)
back - 0.21% (6)
past - 0.21% (6)
it’s - 0.21% (6)
take - 0.21% (6)
organization - 0.21% (6)
2016 - 0.21% (6)
contact - 0.21% (6)
what - 0.21% (6)
just - 0.21% (6)
make - 0.21% (6)
however - 0.21% (6)
along - 0.21% (6)
ranking - 0.21% (6)
still - 0.17% (5)
time - 0.17% (5)
firm - 0.17% (5)
often - 0.17% (5)
yet - 0.17% (5)
don’t - 0.17% (5)
npe’s - 0.17% (5)
cap - 0.17% (5)
info - 0.17% (5)
great - 0.17% (5)
return - 0.17% (5)
come - 0.17% (5)
defendant - 0.17% (5)
help - 0.17% (5)
creating - 0.17% (5)
guests - 0.17% (5)
there - 0.17% (5)
manage - 0.17% (5)
much - 0.17% (5)
npes - 0.17% (5)
way - 0.17% (5)
main - 0.17% (5)
part - 0.17% (5)
advantage - 0.17% (5)
may - 0.17% (5)
license - 0.17% (5)
• - 0.17% (5)
article - 0.17% (5)
price - 0.17% (5)
limit - 0.17% (5)
live - 0.14% (4)
represent - 0.14% (4)
other - 0.14% (4)
too - 0.14% (4)
site’s - 0.14% (4)
returning - 0.14% (4)
strategy - 0.14% (4)
provide - 0.14% (4)
top - 0.14% (4)
under - 0.14% (4)
discover - 0.14% (4)
sum - 0.14% (4)
management - 0.14% (4)
fee - 0.14% (4)
policies - 0.14% (4)
lawsuit - 0.14% (4)
articles - 0.14% (4)
court - 0.14% (4)
quest - 0.14% (4)
accused - 0.14% (4)
real - 0.14% (4)
etc - 0.14% (4)
then - 0.14% (4)
such - 0.14% (4)
experience - 0.14% (4)
reach - 0.14% (4)
around - 0.14% (4)
increase - 0.14% (4)
even - 0.14% (4)
payment - 0.14% (4)
addition - 0.14% (4)
than - 0.14% (4)
well - 0.14% (4)
many - 0.14% (4)
into - 0.14% (4)
find - 0.14% (4)
most - 0.14% (4)
must - 0.14% (4)
method - 0.14% (4)
business - 0.14% (4)
lower - 0.14% (4)
set - 0.14% (4)
legal - 0.14% (4)
less - 0.14% (4)
types - 0.14% (4)
has - 0.14% (4)
excellent - 0.14% (4)
factors - 0.14% (4)
case - 0.14% (4)
phone - 0.14% (4)
proprietors - 0.14% (4)
reconcile - 0.14% (4)
put - 0.14% (4)
alter - 0.14% (4)
insurance - 0.1% (3)
content - 0.1% (3)
good - 0.1% (3)
exposure - 0.1% (3)
value - 0.1% (3)
expensive - 0.1% (3)
likely - 0.1% (3)
old - 0.1% (3)
defendants - 0.1% (3)
understand - 0.1% (3)
defenses - 0.1% (3)
every - 0.1% (3)
essential - 0.1% (3)
liability - 0.1% (3)
caps - 0.1% (3)
visitors. - 0.1% (3)
alternative - 0.1% (3)
want - 0.1% (3)
think - 0.1% (3)
communication - 0.1% (3)
different - 0.1% (3)
website’s - 0.1% (3)
members - 0.1% (3)
allegation - 0.1% (3)
calls - 0.1% (3)
direct - 0.1% (3)
email - 0.1% (3)
standard - 0.1% (3)
claims - 0.1% (3)
file - 0.1% (3)
exactly - 0.1% (3)
representation - 0.1% (3)
grouping - 0.1% (3)
share - 0.1% (3)
request - 0.1% (3)
mailing - 0.1% (3)
claim. - 0.1% (3)
individual - 0.1% (3)
idea - 0.1% (3)
negotiating - 0.1% (3)
never - 0.1% (3)
patents - 0.1% (3)
solution - 0.1% (3)
stay - 0.1% (3)
who - 0.1% (3)
influence - 0.1% (3)
power - 0.1% (3)
additional - 0.1% (3)
wish - 0.1% (3)
information - 0.1% (3)
e.g., - 0.1% (3)
challenge - 0.1% (3)
best - 0.1% (3)
strategy. - 0.1% (3)
terms - 0.1% (3)
fight - 0.1% (3)
recognize - 0.1% (3)
stanton - 0.1% (3)
damage - 0.1% (3)
properties - 0.1% (3)
rights - 0.1% (3)
although - 0.1% (3)
create - 0.1% (3)
usage - 0.1% (3)
expenses. - 0.1% (3)
freeborn - 0.1% (3)
sue - 0.1% (3)
however, - 0.1% (3)
timing - 0.1% (3)
organizations - 0.1% (3)
address - 0.1% (3)
telephone - 0.1% (3)
reason - 0.1% (3)
outreach - 0.1% (3)
seo - 0.1% (3)
data - 0.1% (3)
without - 0.1% (3)
accomplish - 0.1% (3)
attention - 0.07% (2)
enter - 0.07% (2)
time, - 0.07% (2)
few - 0.07% (2)
appear - 0.07% (2)
sites - 0.07% (2)
world - 0.07% (2)
after - 0.07% (2)
mail, - 0.07% (2)
before - 0.07% (2)
bookings - 0.07% (2)
what’s - 0.07% (2)
location - 0.07% (2)
two - 0.07% (2)
leading - 0.07% (2)
giving - 0.07% (2)
citations - 0.07% (2)
queries - 0.07% (2)
name - 0.07% (2)
also - 0.07% (2)
offer, - 0.07% (2)
simply - 0.07% (2)
line - 0.07% (2)
approach - 0.07% (2)
allowing - 0.07% (2)
complements - 0.07% (2)
listings - 0.07% (2)
details - 0.07% (2)
drive - 0.07% (2)
maintain - 0.07% (2)
motivate - 0.07% (2)
despite - 0.07% (2)
effort - 0.07% (2)
and, - 0.07% (2)
nap - 0.07% (2)
financial - 0.07% (2)
full - 0.07% (2)
deliver - 0.07% (2)
mail: - 0.07% (2)
metadata - 0.07% (2)
utilize - 0.07% (2)
marketing - 0.07% (2)
organic - 0.07% (2)
dedicated - 0.07% (2)
company - 0.07% (2)
getting - 0.07% (2)
owners - 0.07% (2)
search, - 0.07% (2)
addresses - 0.07% (2)
it. - 0.07% (2)
thus - 0.07% (2)
communications - 0.07% (2)
connect - 0.07% (2)
visitors’ - 0.07% (2)
rooms - 0.07% (2)
fill - 0.07% (2)
simple - 0.07% (2)
please - 0.07% (2)
home - 0.07% (2)
trolls - 0.07% (2)
therefore - 0.07% (2)
challenge. - 0.07% (2)
costly - 0.07% (2)
buy - 0.07% (2)
npe. - 0.07% (2)
organizations, - 0.07% (2)
whether - 0.07% (2)
potential - 0.07% (2)
risks - 0.07% (2)
response - 0.07% (2)
benefit - 0.07% (2)
stakes - 0.07% (2)
soon - 0.07% (2)
requirements. - 0.07% (2)
exceed - 0.07% (2)
edge - 0.07% (2)
nuisance - 0.07% (2)
minimal - 0.07% (2)
lose - 0.07% (2)
better - 0.07% (2)
basic - 0.07% (2)
wipe - 0.07% (2)
care - 0.07% (2)
decrease - 0.07% (2)
instances, - 0.07% (2)
valid - 0.07% (2)
compensate - 0.07% (2)
relatively - 0.07% (2)
yourself - 0.07% (2)
assess - 0.07% (2)
privacy - 0.07% (2)
policy - 0.07% (2)
service - 0.07% (2)
lawsuits - 0.07% (2)
had - 0.07% (2)
been - 0.07% (2)
recent - 0.07% (2)
created - 0.07% (2)
particular - 0.07% (2)
absolutely - 0.07% (2)
strength - 0.07% (2)
least - 0.07% (2)
determine - 0.07% (2)
perhaps - 0.07% (2)
goods - 0.07% (2)
actions - 0.07% (2)
allegedly - 0.07% (2)
being - 0.07% (2)
asking - 0.07% (2)
figure - 0.07% (2)
person - 0.07% (2)
vendor - 0.07% (2)
indemnity - 0.07% (2)
answer - 0.07% (2)
instead - 0.07% (2)
tens - 0.07% (2)
folks - 0.07% (2)
prefer - 0.07% (2)
advantages - 0.07% (2)
massive - 0.07% (2)
operate - 0.07% (2)
deals - 0.07% (2)
examination, - 0.07% (2)
plenty - 0.07% (2)
big - 0.07% (2)
frequently - 0.07% (2)
minimum - 0.07% (2)
external - 0.07% (2)
numerous - 0.07% (2)
this, - 0.07% (2)
flat - 0.07% (2)
hourly - 0.07% (2)
costs - 0.07% (2)
results - 0.07% (2)
soft - 0.07% (2)
obtain - 0.07% (2)
coverage - 0.07% (2)
liability, - 0.07% (2)
both - 0.07% (2)
since - 0.07% (2)
sweet - 0.07% (2)
quality - 0.07% (2)
substantial - 0.07% (2)
companies - 0.07% (2)
subscribe - 0.07% (2)
plan - 0.07% (2)
stretch - 0.07% (2)
district - 0.07% (2)
but - 0.07% (2)
pto - 0.07% (2)
review - 0.07% (2)
place - 0.07% (2)
let - 0.07% (2)
away - 0.07% (2)
technology, - 0.07% (2)
reduce - 0.07% (2)
usually - 0.07% (2)
until - 0.07% (2)
injunction - 0.07% (2)
then, - 0.07% (2)
paying - 0.07% (2)
prepared - 0.07% (2)
several - 0.07% (2)
first - 0.07% (2)
attorneys - 0.07% (2)
itself - 0.07% (2)
summary - 0.07% (2)
people - 0.07% (2)
individuals - 0.07% (2)
wait - 0.07% (2)
last - 0.07% (2)
move - 0.07% (2)
danger - 0.07% (2)
you, - 0.07% (2)
lot - 0.07% (2)
somebody - 0.07% (2)
the npe - 0.59% (17)
of the - 0.56% (16)
in the - 0.45% (13)
at the - 0.35% (10)
the patent - 0.31% (9)
if you - 0.28% (8)
to the - 0.24% (7)
might be - 0.24% (7)
are you - 0.24% (7)
you will - 0.24% (7)
you do - 0.21% (6)
with a - 0.21% (6)
out the - 0.21% (6)
along with - 0.21% (6)
able to - 0.21% (6)
you able - 0.17% (5)
you have - 0.17% (5)
the npe’s - 0.17% (5)
when the - 0.17% (5)
will be - 0.17% (5)
your website - 0.17% (5)
you could - 0.17% (5)
is the - 0.17% (5)
or the - 0.17% (5)
patent in - 0.17% (5)
these types - 0.14% (4)
the claim - 0.14% (4)
can be - 0.14% (4)
patent infringement - 0.14% (4)
types of - 0.14% (4)
your defense - 0.14% (4)
your possible - 0.14% (4)
for the - 0.14% (4)
you can - 0.14% (4)
you are - 0.14% (4)
need to - 0.14% (4)
that is - 0.14% (4)
past visitors - 0.14% (4)
an excellent - 0.14% (4)
a patent - 0.1% (3)
to reconcile - 0.1% (3)
your site - 0.1% (3)
on your - 0.1% (3)
2016 stanton - 0.1% (3)
npe has - 0.1% (3)
ranking factors - 0.1% (3)
with the - 0.1% (3)
have a - 0.1% (3)
not to - 0.1% (3)
of them - 0.1% (3)
to get - 0.1% (3)
might have - 0.1% (3)
for certain - 0.1% (3)
to work - 0.1% (3)
( e.g., - 0.1% (3)
against the - 0.1% (3)
well as - 0.1% (3)
npe litigation - 0.1% (3)
on the - 0.1% (3)
them to - 0.1% (3)
wish to - 0.1% (3)
want to - 0.1% (3)
you don’t - 0.1% (3)
patent trolls - 0.07% (2)
can help - 0.07% (2)
to understand - 0.07% (2)
and the - 0.07% (2)
in which - 0.07% (2)
one of - 0.07% (2)
have to - 0.07% (2)
for in - 0.07% (2)
of npe - 0.07% (2)
deals with - 0.07% (2)
limit by - 0.07% (2)
the limit - 0.07% (2)
of policies - 0.07% (2)
them from - 0.07% (2)
home about - 0.07% (2)
local search - 0.07% (2)
and how - 0.07% (2)
around an - 0.07% (2)
fill hotel - 0.07% (2)
phone calls - 0.07% (2)
which can - 0.07% (2)
will discover - 0.07% (2)
both of - 0.07% (2)
dedicated to - 0.07% (2)
work with - 0.07% (2)
stay away - 0.07% (2)
here are - 0.07% (2)
on file - 0.07% (2)
creating an - 0.07% (2)
the property - 0.07% (2)
please visit - 0.07% (2)
hotel rooms - 0.07% (2)
the offer, - 0.07% (2)
from the - 0.07% (2)
essential that - 0.07% (2)
of visitors - 0.07% (2)
returning visitors - 0.07% (2)
to come - 0.07% (2)
it’s essential - 0.07% (2)
guests is - 0.07% (2)
, each - 0.07% (2)
seo ranking - 0.07% (2)
the top - 0.07% (2)
payment deal - 0.07% (2)
that you - 0.07% (2)
of their - 0.07% (2)
work out - 0.07% (2)
the technology - 0.07% (2)
minimal to - 0.07% (2)
will need - 0.07% (2)
suit is - 0.07% (2)
you might - 0.07% (2)
are your - 0.07% (2)
the npe. - 0.07% (2)
to compensate - 0.07% (2)
the most - 0.07% (2)
it might - 0.07% (2)
be less - 0.07% (2)
how much - 0.07% (2)
instead of - 0.07% (2)
is not - 0.07% (2)
possible damage - 0.07% (2)
an indemnity - 0.07% (2)
when you - 0.07% (2)
might want - 0.07% (2)
with your - 0.07% (2)
your risk - 0.07% (2)
absolutely no - 0.07% (2)
there is - 0.07% (2)
every organization - 0.07% (2)
each and - 0.07% (2)
legal rights - 0.07% (2)
litigation in - 0.07% (2)
service contact - 0.07% (2)
terms of - 0.07% (2)
so on. - 0.07% (2)
in some - 0.07% (2)
in case - 0.07% (2)
past usage - 0.07% (2)
defendants to - 0.07% (2)
with other - 0.07% (2)
for all - 0.07% (2)
the law - 0.07% (2)
and you - 0.07% (2)
the suit - 0.07% (2)
you must - 0.07% (2)
the last - 0.07% (2)
patent and - 0.07% (2)
npe might - 0.07% (2)
first to - 0.07% (2)
the first - 0.07% (2)
prepared to - 0.07% (2)
if your - 0.07% (2)
as the - 0.07% (2)
privacy policy - 0.07% (2)
the reason - 0.07% (2)
to gain - 0.07% (2)
an npe - 0.07% (2)
an injunction - 0.07% (2)
without the - 0.07% (2)
can live - 0.07% (2)
away from - 0.07% (2)
to stay - 0.07% (2)
district court - 0.07% (2)
you to - 0.07% (2)
review ( - 0.07% (2)
should you - 0.07% (2)
hotel guests - 0.07% (2)
) are you - 0.21% (6)
are you able - 0.17% (5)
you able to - 0.17% (5)
and so on. - 0.07% (2)
that is dedicated - 0.07% (2)
to stay away - 0.07% (2)
is an excellent - 0.07% (2)
fill hotel rooms - 0.07% (2)
to the location - 0.07% (2)
it’s essential that - 0.07% (2)
each and every - 0.07% (2)
local seo ranking - 0.07% (2)
types of policies - 0.07% (2)
the limit by - 0.07% (2)
the claim price - 0.07% (2)
home about privacy - 0.07% (2)
expenses along with - 0.07% (2)
policy terms of - 0.07% (2)
first to reconcile - 0.07% (2)
live without the - 0.07% (2)
you can live - 0.07% (2)
stay away from - 0.07% (2)
wipe out the - 0.07% (2)
the npe might - 0.07% (2)
you might want - 0.07% (2)
for certain organizations, - 0.07% (2)
along with your - 0.07% (2)
service contact us - 0.07% (2)
you will discover - 0.07% (2)

Here you can find chart of all your popular one, two and three word phrases. Google and others search engines means your page is about words you use frequently.

Copyright © 2015-2016 hupso.pl. All rights reserved. FB | +G | Twitter

Hupso.pl jest serwisem internetowym, w którym jednym kliknieciem możesz szybko i łatwo sprawdź stronę www pod kątem SEO. Oferujemy darmowe pozycjonowanie stron internetowych oraz wycena domen i stron internetowych. Prowadzimy ranking polskich stron internetowych oraz ranking stron alexa.