2.84 score from hupso.pl for:
violentmetaphors.com



HTML Content


Titleviolent metaphors – thoughts from the intersection of science, pseudoscience, and conflict.

Length: 97, Words: 11
Description thoughts from the intersection of science, pseudoscience, and conflict.

Length: 71, Words: 9
Keywords pusty
Robots
Charset UTF-8
Og Meta - Title exist
Og Meta - Description exist
Og Meta - Site name exist
Tytuł powinien zawierać pomiędzy 10 a 70 znaków (ze spacjami), a mniej niż 12 słów w długości.
Meta opis powinien zawierać pomiędzy 50 a 160 znaków (łącznie ze spacjami), a mniej niż 24 słów w długości.
Kodowanie znaków powinny być określone , UTF-8 jest chyba najlepszy zestaw znaków, aby przejść z powodu UTF-8 jest bardziej międzynarodowy kodowaniem.
Otwarte obiekty wykresu powinny być obecne w stronie internetowej (więcej informacji na temat protokołu OpenGraph: http://ogp.me/)

SEO Content

Words/Characters 5706
Text/HTML 28.42 %
Headings H1 1
H2 13
H3 12
H4 0
H5 0
H6 0
H1
violent metaphors
H2
thoughts from the intersection of science, pseudoscience, and conflict.
you’re not entitled to your own facts (or to hang the people who prove you wrong).
debunking pseudogenetics at skepticon
genetic mythologies: “nephilim dna” from the paracas skulls
archaeological fantasies and the genetic history of the americas
guest post by rosi sexton: why ‘why’ matters
pseudoscience is common among elite athletes outside of the olympics too…and it makes me furious.
#vaxxed, reviewed: what happened outside of the movie.
#vaxxed, reviewed: what happened inside the movie
how to flunk out of the university of google
a skeptic on the conspirasea cruise
the conspirasea posts
media coverage
H3
print
audio
video
 and the far out
blog stats
follow me via email!
archive of posts
follow violent metaphors on facebook!
follow jennifer raff on twitter!
recent posts
search
tags
H4
H5
H6
strong
the good fight
crowdfunding campaign
day one
day two
day three
day four
day five part one
day 5 part two
day 6
day 7
bonus
anna merlan
brilliant piece
bronwyn
dickey
‘s
dina litovsky
aeon magazine
wired magazine
factor
they said
kylie sturgess
token skeptic podcast
prism podcast
the conspirasea cruise
andrew wakefield
dr. clay jones
dr. grant ritchie
the publicity
b
i
the good fight
crowdfunding campaign
day one
day two
day three
day four
day five part one
day 5 part two
day 6
day 7
bonus
anna merlan
brilliant piece
bronwyn
dickey
‘s
dina litovsky
aeon magazine
wired magazine
factor
they said
kylie sturgess
token skeptic podcast
prism podcast
the conspirasea cruise
andrew wakefield
dr. clay jones
dr. grant ritchie
the publicity
em the good fight
crowdfunding campaign
day one
day two
day three
day four
day five part one
day 5 part two
day 6
day 7
bonus
anna merlan
brilliant piece
bronwyn
dickey
‘s
dina litovsky
aeon magazine
wired magazine
factor
they said
kylie sturgess
token skeptic podcast
prism podcast
the conspirasea cruise
andrew wakefield
dr. clay jones
dr. grant ritchie
the publicity
Bolds strong 29
b 0
i 29
em 29
Zawartość strony internetowej powinno zawierać więcej niż 250 słów, z stopa tekst / kod jest wyższy niż 20%.
Pozycji używać znaczników (h1, h2, h3, ...), aby określić temat sekcji lub ustępów na stronie, ale zwykle, użyj mniej niż 6 dla każdego tagu pozycje zachować swoją stronę zwięzły.
Styl używać silnych i kursywy znaczniki podkreślić swoje słowa kluczowe swojej stronie, ale nie nadużywać (mniej niż 16 silnych tagi i 16 znaczników kursywy)

Statystyki strony

twitter:title pusty
twitter:description pusty
google+ itemprop=name pusty
Pliki zewnętrzne 38
Pliki CSS 8
Pliki javascript 30
Plik należy zmniejszyć całkowite odwołanie plików (CSS + JavaScript) do 7-8 maksymalnie.

Linki wewnętrzne i zewnętrzne

Linki 316
Linki wewnętrzne 3
Linki zewnętrzne 313
Linki bez atrybutu Title 215
Linki z atrybutem NOFOLLOW 0
Linki - Użyj atrybutu tytuł dla każdego łącza. Nofollow link jest link, który nie pozwala wyszukiwarkom boty zrealizują są odnośniki no follow. Należy zwracać uwagę na ich użytkowania

Linki wewnętrzne

Linki zewnętrzne

home https://violentmetaphors.com/
about me https://violentmetaphors.com/about/
public speaking https://violentmetaphors.com/public-speaking/
site policies https://violentmetaphors.com/site-policies/
support violent metaphors https://violentmetaphors.com/support-violent-metaphors/
vita https://violentmetaphors.com/cv/
violent metaphors https://violentmetaphors.com/
you’re not entitled to your own facts (or to hang the people who prove you wrong). https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/12/30/youre-not-entitled-to-your-own-facts-or-to-hang-the-people-who-prove-you-wrong/
https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/12/30/youre-not-entitled-to-your-own-facts-or-to-hang-the-people-who-prove-you-wrong/
colin https://violentmetaphors.com/author/kmcrober/
21 comments https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/12/30/youre-not-entitled-to-your-own-facts-or-to-hang-the-people-who-prove-you-wrong/#comments
agenda 31 http://www.agenda31.org/a31-112-original-jurisdiction-by-statute/
malheur occupiers http://koin.com/2016/09/26/testimony-continues-in-malheur-standoff-trial/
good fight http://goodfightbook.com/
continue reading https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/12/30/youre-not-entitled-to-your-own-facts-or-to-hang-the-people-who-prove-you-wrong/#more-3982
https://en.support.wordpress.com/about-these-ads/
communication https://violentmetaphors.com/category/communication-2/
pseudolaw https://violentmetaphors.com/category/pseudolaw/
conspiracy theories https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/conspiracy-theories/
law https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/law/
debunking pseudogenetics at skepticon https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/12/18/debunking-pseudogenetics-at-skepticon/
https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/12/18/debunking-pseudogenetics-at-skepticon/
jennifer raff https://violentmetaphors.com/author/batgirlraff/
6 comments https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/12/18/debunking-pseudogenetics-at-skepticon/#comments
skepticon 9 https://skepticon.org/
genetic astrology http://www.ucl.ac.uk/mace-lab/debunking
“nephilim dna” from the paracas skulls https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/09/20/genetic-mythologies-nephilim-dna-from-the-paracas-skulls/
“rutherford’s law” https://smile.amazon.com/brief-history-everyone-ever-lived/dp/0297609378/ref=sr_1_1?ie=utf8&qid=1477428876&sr=8-1&keywords=a+brief+history+of+everyone+who+ever+lived#reader_0297609378
“debunking genetic astrology” http://www.ucl.ac.uk/mace-lab/debunking
mark thomas https://twitter.com/mt_genes
debbie kennett https://twitter.com/debbiekennett
science https://violentmetaphors.com/category/science-2/
genetic mythologies: “nephilim dna” from the paracas skulls https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/09/20/genetic-mythologies-nephilim-dna-from-the-paracas-skulls/
https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/09/20/genetic-mythologies-nephilim-dna-from-the-paracas-skulls/
jennifer raff https://violentmetaphors.com/author/batgirlraff/
26 comments https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/09/20/genetic-mythologies-nephilim-dna-from-the-paracas-skulls/#comments
continue reading https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/09/20/genetic-mythologies-nephilim-dna-from-the-paracas-skulls/#more-3665
science https://violentmetaphors.com/category/science-2/
ancient dna https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/ancient-dna/
anthropological genetics https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/anthropological-genetics/
anthropology https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/anthropology/
archaeology https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/archaeology/
genetics https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/genetics/
nephilim https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/nephilim/
paracas https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/paracas/
peru https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/peru/
archaeological fantasies and the genetic history of the americas https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/08/15/archaeological-fantasies-and-the-genetic-history-of-the-americas/
https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/08/15/archaeological-fantasies-and-the-genetic-history-of-the-americas/
jennifer raff https://violentmetaphors.com/author/batgirlraff/
9 comments https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/08/15/archaeological-fantasies-and-the-genetic-history-of-the-americas/#comments
archaeological fantasies http://www.archaeologypodcastnetwork.com/archyfantasies/
here’s a link http://www.archaeologypodcastnetwork.com/archyfantasies/50
here http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1179/2055556315z.00000000040
academia.edu https://kansas.academia.edu/jenniferraff
this post. https://violentmetaphors.com/2014/02/07/how-to-tell-if-an-ancient-dna-study-is-legit/
continue reading https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/08/15/archaeological-fantasies-and-the-genetic-history-of-the-americas/#more-3618
science https://violentmetaphors.com/category/science-2/
ancient dna https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/ancient-dna/
anthropological genetics https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/anthropological-genetics/
archaeological fantasies https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/archaeological-fantasies/
archaeology https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/archaeology/
communication https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/communication/
my research https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/my-research/
podcast https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/podcast/
science https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/science/
solutrean hypothesis https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/solutrean-hypothesis/
guest post by rosi sexton: why ‘why’ matters https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/08/12/guest-post-by-rosi-sexton-why-why-matters/
https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/08/12/guest-post-by-rosi-sexton-why-why-matters/
jennifer raff https://violentmetaphors.com/author/batgirlraff/
20 comments https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/08/12/guest-post-by-rosi-sexton-why-why-matters/#comments
this post https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/08/09/pseudoscience-is-common-among-elite-athletes-outside-of-the-olympics-too-and-it-makes-me-furious/
science https://violentmetaphors.com/category/science-2/
pseudoscience is common among elite athletes outside of the olympics too…and it makes me furious. https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/08/09/pseudoscience-is-common-among-elite-athletes-outside-of-the-olympics-too-and-it-makes-me-furious/
https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/08/09/pseudoscience-is-common-among-elite-athletes-outside-of-the-olympics-too-and-it-makes-me-furious/
jennifer raff https://violentmetaphors.com/author/batgirlraff/
57 comments https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/08/09/pseudoscience-is-common-among-elite-athletes-outside-of-the-olympics-too-and-it-makes-me-furious/#comments
great post http://scienceblogs.com/insolence/2016/07/01/whats-the-harm-cupping-edition/
is common http://policyoptions.irpp.org/magazines/august-2016/olympic-debunk/
this story https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/shortcuts/2016/aug/08/does-cupping-do-olympic-athletes-any-good
magical thinking https://violentmetaphors.com/2014/02/23/the-dangers-of-magical-thinking-in-the-martial-arts/
‘desperately implausible’ http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/rio-2016-cupping-what-is-it-olympics-athletes-suction-cups-skin-marks-a7178731.html
david colquhoun http://twitter.com/david_colquhoun
rosi sexton https://rosisexton.wordpress.com/2015/02/21/become-a-better-bullshit-detector/
jeff westfall http://rpmartialarts.com/the-martial-brain/
science https://violentmetaphors.com/category/science-2/
cupping https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/cupping/
martial arts https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/martial-arts/
mma https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/mma/
olympics https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/olympics/
pseudoscience https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/pseudoscience/
quackery https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/quackery/
#vaxxed, reviewed: what happened outside of the movie. https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/06/13/vaxxed-reviewed-what-happened-outside-of-the-movie/
https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/06/13/vaxxed-reviewed-what-happened-outside-of-the-movie/
jennifer raff https://violentmetaphors.com/author/batgirlraff/
78 comments https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/06/13/vaxxed-reviewed-what-happened-outside-of-the-movie/#comments
part i https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/06/13/vaxxed-reviewed-what-happened-inside-the-movie/#more-3522
continue reading https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/06/13/vaxxed-reviewed-what-happened-outside-of-the-movie/#more-3437
science https://violentmetaphors.com/category/science-2/
#vaxxed, reviewed: what happened inside the movie https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/06/13/vaxxed-reviewed-what-happened-inside-the-movie/
https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/06/13/vaxxed-reviewed-what-happened-inside-the-movie/
colin https://violentmetaphors.com/author/kmcrober/
68 comments https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/06/13/vaxxed-reviewed-what-happened-inside-the-movie/#comments
here https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/06/13/vaxxed-reviewed-what-happened-outside-of-the-movie/
wakefield https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/02/15/an-interview-with-andrew-wakefield/
continue reading https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/06/13/vaxxed-reviewed-what-happened-inside-the-movie/#more-3522
science https://violentmetaphors.com/category/science-2/
how to flunk out of the university of google https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/06/03/how-to-flunk-out-of-the-university-of-google/
https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/06/03/how-to-flunk-out-of-the-university-of-google/
jennifer raff https://violentmetaphors.com/author/batgirlraff/
17 comments https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/06/03/how-to-flunk-out-of-the-university-of-google/#comments
how to read and understand a scientific article https://violentmetaphors.com/2013/08/25/how-to-read-and-understand-a-scientific-paper-2/
cultural cognition effect http://www.culturalcognition.net/
continue reading https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/06/03/how-to-flunk-out-of-the-university-of-google/#more-3380
science https://violentmetaphors.com/category/science-2/
pseudoscience https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/pseudoscience/
science https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/science/
science literacy https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/science-literacy/
university of google https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/university-of-google/
a skeptic on the conspirasea cruise https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/05/29/a-skeptic-on-the-conspirasea-cruise/
https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/05/29/a-skeptic-on-the-conspirasea-cruise/
colin https://violentmetaphors.com/author/kmcrober/
4 comments https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/05/29/a-skeptic-on-the-conspirasea-cruise/#comments
the good fight http://i’m no longer on the conspirasea cruise doing research for a book on irrational beliefs. now i’m home (briefly) and writing up my experiences. this is a fuller explanation of what happened on the fifth day. you can read day 1 here, day 2 here , day 3 here, day 4 here, day 5 part 1 here, and an explanation for what i was doing here.
crowdfunding campaign https://violentmetaphors.com/2015/09/09/deep-conspirasea-fishing-a-fundraising-drive/
day one https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/01/26/a-skeptic-on-the-conspira-sea-cruise-day-1/
day two https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/01/27/reverse-the-constitutional-polarity-of-the-baryonic-trustee-matrix-legal-gibberish-on-the-conspirasea-cruise-day-2/
day three https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/01/28/nothing-to-fear-conspirasea-cruise-day-3/
day four https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/01/30/troubled-waters-conspirasea-cruise-day-4ish/
day five part one https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/01/30/a-skeptic-on-the-conspirasea-cruise-day-5-i-just-cant-do-another-nautical-pun/
day 5 part two https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/02/04/conspirasea-cruise-day-5-part-2-i-took-the-bait/
day 6 https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/02/07/conspirasea-day-six-you-know-who-exposes-real-conspiracies-the-media/
day 7 https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/02/09/conspirasea-day-7-i-failed/
bonus https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/02/15/an-interview-with-andrew-wakefield/
anna merlan https://twitter.com/annamerlan
brilliant piece http://jezebel.com/sail-far-away-at-sea-with-americas-largest-floating-1760900554
bronwyn dickey https://twitter.com/bronwendickey
dina litovsky http://dinalitovsky.com/
aeon magazine https://aeon.co/opinions/here-comes-pseudolaw-a-weird-little-cousin-of-pseudoscience
wired magazine http://www.wired.com/2016/02/conspira-sea-cruise-know-truth/?mbid=social_fb
factor http://factorelblog.com/2016/04/03/conspira-sea/
they said http://factorelblog.com/2016/04/03/entrevista-a-mcroberts/
kylie sturgess https://twitter.com/kyliesturgess?lang=en
token skeptic podcast http://tokenskeptic.org/2016/02/10/episode-two-hundred-and-fifteen-on-the-conspirasea-cruise-interview-with-colin-mcroberts/
prism podcast http://www.prismpodcast.com/
the conspirasea cruise http://www.prismpodcast.com/57_mcroberts/
andrew wakefield http://www.prismpodcast.com/58-colin-part2/
dr. clay jones https://twitter.com/skepticpedi
dr. grant ritchie https://twitter.com/skepticaldds
the publicity http://web.archive.org/web/20160415124946/http://www.waronwethepeople.com/colin-mcroberts/
communication https://violentmetaphors.com/category/communication-2/
pseudolaw https://violentmetaphors.com/category/pseudolaw/
science https://violentmetaphors.com/category/science-2/
andrew wakefield https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/andrew-wakefield/
conspiracy https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/conspiracy/
conspiracy theory https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/conspiracy-theory/
conspirasea https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/conspirasea/
index https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/index/
wakefield https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/wakefield/
previous articles https://violentmetaphors.com/page/2/
- http://discover.wordpress.com/
follow violent metaphors on facebook! https://www.facebook.com/scienceliteracy
follow violent metaphors on facebook! https://www.facebook.com/scienceliteracy
you’re not entitled to your own facts (or to hang the people who prove you wrong). https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/12/30/youre-not-entitled-to-your-own-facts-or-to-hang-the-people-who-prove-you-wrong/
debunking pseudogenetics at skepticon https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/12/18/debunking-pseudogenetics-at-skepticon/
genetic mythologies: “nephilim dna” from the paracas skulls https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/09/20/genetic-mythologies-nephilim-dna-from-the-paracas-skulls/
archaeological fantasies and the genetic history of the americas https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/08/15/archaeological-fantasies-and-the-genetic-history-of-the-americas/
guest post by rosi sexton: why ‘why’ matters https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/08/12/guest-post-by-rosi-sexton-why-why-matters/
pseudoscience is common among elite athletes outside of the olympics too…and it makes me furious. https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/08/09/pseudoscience-is-common-among-elite-athletes-outside-of-the-olympics-too-and-it-makes-me-furious/
#vaxxed, reviewed: what happened outside of the movie. https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/06/13/vaxxed-reviewed-what-happened-outside-of-the-movie/
#vaxxed, reviewed: what happened inside the movie https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/06/13/vaxxed-reviewed-what-happened-inside-the-movie/
how to flunk out of the university of google https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/06/03/how-to-flunk-out-of-the-university-of-google/
a skeptic on the conspirasea cruise https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/05/29/a-skeptic-on-the-conspirasea-cruise/
behind the scenes at nasa: the hera project https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/05/04/behind-the-scenes-at-nasa-the-hera-project/
another open thread on vaccines https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/04/19/another-open-thread-on-vaccines/
no, we don’t actually know that modern humans killed off the hobbits https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/04/04/no-we-dont-actually-know-that-modern-humans-killed-off-the-hobbits/
vaxxed: from coverup to catastrophe to cancellation to insignificance https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/03/31/vaxxed-from-coverup-to-catastrophe-to-cancellation-to-insignificance/
surviving my first year as a new professor: tools of the trade https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/03/31/surviving-my-first-year-as-a-new-professor-tools-of-the-trade/
an interview with andrew wakefield https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/02/15/an-interview-with-andrew-wakefield/
conspirasea day 7: i failed. https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/02/09/conspirasea-day-7-i-failed/
sexual harassment in physical anthropology https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/02/09/sexual-harassment-in-physical-anthropology/
conspirasea day six: you know who exposes real conspiracies? the media. https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/02/07/conspirasea-day-six-you-know-who-exposes-real-conspiracies-the-media/
conspirasea cruise day 5 part 2: i took the bait https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/02/04/conspirasea-cruise-day-5-part-2-i-took-the-bait/
a skeptic on the conspirasea cruise, day 5: i just can’t do another nautical pun https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/01/30/a-skeptic-on-the-conspirasea-cruise-day-5-i-just-cant-do-another-nautical-pun/
troubled waters: conspirasea cruise day 4(ish) https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/01/30/troubled-waters-conspirasea-cruise-day-4ish/
nothing to fear: conspirasea cruise day 3 https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/01/28/nothing-to-fear-conspirasea-cruise-day-3/
reverse the constitutional polarity of the baryonic trustee matrix: legal gibberish on the conspirasea cruise (day 2) https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/01/27/reverse-the-constitutional-polarity-of-the-baryonic-trustee-matrix-legal-gibberish-on-the-conspirasea-cruise-day-2/
a skeptic on the conspira-sea cruise: day 1 https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/01/26/a-skeptic-on-the-conspira-sea-cruise-day-1/
anchors aweigh! the conspiracy cruise sails soon. https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/01/22/anchors-aweigh-the-conspiracy-cruise-sails-soon/
why there still are monkeys: lessons learned from teaching evolution in kansas. https://violentmetaphors.com/2015/12/28/why-there-are-still-monkeys-lessons-learned-from-teaching-evolution-in-kansas/
responses to some questions about our recently published paper on haplogroup x and north american prehistory https://violentmetaphors.com/2015/11/11/responses-to-some-questions-about-our-recently-published-paper-on-haplogroup-x-and-north-american-prehistory/
ancient dna from two 11,500 year old burials in alaska https://violentmetaphors.com/2015/10/26/ancient-dna-from-two-11500-year-old-burials-in-alaska/
the lost city that isn’t. https://violentmetaphors.com/2015/10/19/the-lost-city-that-isnt/
republicans aren’t anti-vaccine. (yet) https://violentmetaphors.com/2015/09/17/republicans-arent-anti-vaccine-yet/
deep (conspira)sea fishing: a fundraising drive https://violentmetaphors.com/2015/09/09/deep-conspirasea-fishing-a-fundraising-drive/
open access and pseudoarchaeology: an encouraging update! https://violentmetaphors.com/2015/09/03/open-access-and-pseudoarchaeology-an-encouraging-update/
mixed messages during national immunization awareness month https://violentmetaphors.com/2015/08/21/mixed-messages-during-national-immunization-awareness-month/
good science communication means never calling them “retard” – even if you’re nassim taleb https://violentmetaphors.com/2015/08/14/good-science-communication-means-never-calling-them-retard-even-if-youre-nassim-taleb/
public outreach that’s inaccessible to the public. https://violentmetaphors.com/2015/07/21/public-outreach-thats-inaccessible-by-the-public/
encouraging science journalism: the genome of kennewick man. https://violentmetaphors.com/2015/06/22/encouraging-science-journalism-the-genome-of-kennewick-man/
no, seriously, don’t politicize anti-vax sentiment https://violentmetaphors.com/2015/06/17/no-seriously-dont-politicize-anti-vax-sentiment/
a normal person’s review of the apple watch https://violentmetaphors.com/2015/05/18/a-normal-persons-review-of-the-apple-watch/
the most important playground conversation, a presentation https://violentmetaphors.com/2015/05/13/the-most-important-playground-conversation-a-presentation/
the genetic analysis of the alaskan north slope https://violentmetaphors.com/2015/05/09/1709/
new study overturns yet another anti-vaccine talking point https://violentmetaphors.com/2015/04/22/new-study-overturns-yet-another-anti-vaccine-talking-point/
why the food babe is wrong (it’s not just because she’s ignorant) https://violentmetaphors.com/2015/04/10/why-the-food-babe-is-wrong-its-not-just-because-shes-ignorant/
new paper deals blow to hypothesis that native americans have european ancestry https://violentmetaphors.com/2015/03/31/new-paper-deals-blow-to-hypothesis-that-native-americans-have-european-ancestry/
darwin day! https://violentmetaphors.com/2015/02/12/darwin-day/
please don’t politicize vaccine refusal https://violentmetaphors.com/2015/02/04/please-dont-politicize-vaccine-refusal/
mike adams of natural news: as fine a lawyer as he is a scientist https://violentmetaphors.com/2015/02/01/mike-adams-of-natural-news-as-fine-a-lawyer-as-he-is-a-scientist2/
dear parents, let’s talk about measles https://violentmetaphors.com/2015/01/31/dear-parents-lets-talk-about-measles/
the good fight part 1: the fine art of talking to people who are wrong https://violentmetaphors.com/2015/01/29/are-you-arguing-with-yourself/
a bit of personal news https://violentmetaphors.com/2015/01/26/a-bit-of-personal-news/
adventure https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/adventure/
alaska https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/alaska/
ancient dna https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/ancient-dna/
andrew wakefield https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/andrew-wakefield/
andy hurley https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/andy-hurley/
animals https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/animals/
anthropological genetics https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/anthropological-genetics/
anthropology https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/anthropology/
anti-science https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/anti-science/
anti-vaccine https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/anti-vaccine/
anti-vax https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/anti-vax/
archaeology https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/archaeology/
arctic prehistory https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/arctic-prehistory/
astrology https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/astrology/
astronomy https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/astronomy/
autism https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/autism/
bats https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/bats/
books https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/books/
carl sagan https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/carl-sagan/
cats https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/cats/
caves https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/caves/
colin https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/colin/
communication https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/communication/
conflict https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/conflict/
conservation https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/conservation/
conspiracy theories https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/conspiracy-theories/
conspirasea cruise https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/conspirasea-cruise/
conversation https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/conversation/
creationism https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/creationism/
cultural cognition https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/cultural-cognition/
debate https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/debate/
discovery institute https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/discovery-institute/
education https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/education/
erick erickson https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/erick-erickson/
evolution https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/evolution/
fall out boy https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/fall-out-boy/
friendship https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/friendship/
genetics https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/genetics/
genomics https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/genomics/
gmo https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/gmo/
gmos https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/gmos/
greg jackson https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/greg-jackson/
guest post https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/guest-post/
health https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/health/
history https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/history/
homeopathy https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/homeopathy/
human genetic diversity https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/human-genetic-diversity/
immunization https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/immunization/
intelligent design https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/intelligent-design/
interview https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/interview/
inuit prehistory https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/inuit-prehistory/
iss https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/iss/
journal club https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/journal-club/
ken ham https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/ken-ham/
law https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/law/
martial arts https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/martial-arts/
media https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/media/
medicine https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/medicine/
methodology https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/methodology/
mike adams https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/mike-adams/
mitochondrial dna https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/mitochondrial-dna/
mma https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/mma/
monsanto https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/monsanto/
music https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/music/
my research https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/my-research/
native american prehistory https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/native-american-prehistory/
natural news https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/natural-news/
negotiation https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/negotiation/
nicholas wade https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/nicholas-wade/
outreach https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/outreach/
paleontology https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/paleontology/
patrick stump https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/patrick-stump/
peopling of the americas https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/peopling-of-the-americas/
personal https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/personal/
philosophy https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/philosophy/
politics https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/politics/
population genetics https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/population-genetics/
pseudolaw https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/pseudolaw/
pseudoscience https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/pseudoscience/
public health https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/public-health/
publishing https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/publishing/
quackery https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/quackery/
race https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/race/
racism https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/racism/
research https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/research/
science https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/science/
science communication https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/science-communication/
scientology https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/scientology/
skepticism https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/skepticism/
solutrean hypothesis https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/solutrean-hypothesis/
soyuz https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/soyuz/
space https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/space/
television https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/television/
universe https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/universe/
university of google https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/university-of-google/
vaccines https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/vaccines/
wakefield https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/wakefield/
web links https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/web-links/
wildlife https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/wildlife/
women in science https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/women-in-science/
blog at wordpress.com. https://wordpress.com/?ref=footer_blog

Zdjęcia

Zdjęcia 12
Zdjęcia bez atrybutu ALT 3
Zdjęcia bez atrybutu TITLE 12
Korzystanie Obraz ALT i TITLE atrybutu dla każdego obrazu.

Zdjęcia bez atrybutu TITLE

https://violentmetaphors.files.wordpress.com/2016/12/white-male-1871394_1280.jpg?w=300&h=300
https://violentmetaphors.files.wordpress.com/2014/04/distortion.jpg?w=636
https://violentmetaphors.files.wordpress.com/2016/08/screen-shot-2016-08-09-at-9-43-06-am.png?w=636
https://violentmetaphors.files.wordpress.com/2016/06/2016-06-11-17-08-33.jpg?w=363&h=205
https://violentmetaphors.files.wordpress.com/2016/06/flunking-out.png?w=636
https://violentmetaphors.files.wordpress.com/2016/01/itinerary-and-cunning-hat.jpg?w=2040
https://violentmetaphors.files.wordpress.com/2016/05/car.jpg?w=219&h=123
https://violentmetaphors.files.wordpress.com/2016/05/vdo.jpg?w=218&h=123
https://violentmetaphors.files.wordpress.com/2016/05/pw.jpg?w=148&h=123
https://s1.wp.com/i/badges/freshly-pressed-rectangle.png
https://sb.scorecardresearch.com/p?c1=2&c2=7518284&c3=&c4=&c5=&c6=&c15=&cv=2.0&cj=1
https://pixel.wp.com/b.gif?v=noscript

Zdjęcia bez atrybutu ALT

https://s1.wp.com/i/badges/freshly-pressed-rectangle.png
https://sb.scorecardresearch.com/p?c1=2&c2=7518284&c3=&c4=&c5=&c6=&c15=&cv=2.0&cj=1
https://pixel.wp.com/b.gif?v=noscript

Ranking:


Alexa Traffic
Daily Global Rank Trend
Daily Reach (Percent)









Majestic SEO











Text on page:

skip to content primary menu homeabout mepublic speakingsite policiessupport violent metaphorsvita search search for: violent metaphors thoughts from the intersection of science, pseudoscience, and conflict. you’re not entitled to your own facts (or to hang the people who prove you wrong). december 30, 2016december 30, 2016colin21 comments “there is evidence for being able to hang these [public officials]. i am so tired of ‘em. i’m just sick of it. i’ve had it, the second amendment is there for a reason.” corey eib, agenda 31. you’re entitled to your own opinion, but not your own facts–that’s the simplest, most basic credo of skepticism. want to hold the opinion that extraterrestrial life exists out there? great, me too. want to insist that it built the pyramids? now we’re talking pseudoscience. i’ve been following a budding pseudolegal guru who’s become very frustrated and angry that his nonsense theories about citizenship and jurisdiction have yet to make him immune to the laws of the united states, where he lives. his case highlights an interesting difference between pseudoscience and pseudolaw. both turn on theories that don’t really fit the available facts, whether those facts relate to the building of the pyramids, the origin of species, or the text of the fourteenth amendment. when the theory doesn’t fit the facts, pseudoscientists and pseudolawyers both build walled gardens to protect their theories–that’s one of the crucial differences between a “pseudo” scientist or lawyer and the real thing. those walls might be a community that doesn’t ask critical questions or conspiracy theories that provide a mechanism for disqualifying and ignoring such questions. a creationist, for example, can pretend that carbon dating proves the earth is just 6,000 years old. and they’ll never have to emerge from their walled garden to compare that theory to the facts available to actual scientists. they can just keep reading creationist blogs and books and avoid the awkward mismatch between their beliefs and the outside world. a pseudolawyer is in a different boat. legal theories usually get decided in court, sooner or later. it forces a comparison between the irrational belief and reality, and exposes its flaws. that can happen with scientific and medical theories, such as when a miracle cancer cure fails to cure any cancer, but it’s less common for any individual believer to experience that. in the legal world, if you decide you’re allowed to drive without a driver’s license because you’re a special kind of super-citizen, sooner or later the system is going to force you to test that belief. and the theory is going to fail, because it’s wrong. when those cherished, irrational beliefs fail, it’s at the end of a long and difficult process. the tribulations of trials encourage pseudolegal gurus to double down on their beliefs–they have to be truly committed to spend months litigating their beliefs, much less risk jail for them. and when the process that’s welded them more tightly to their ideology then exposes that ideology as false, the result is often going to be immense frustration and anger. this is an exploration of one pseudolawyer’s mistaken ideas about the us constitution, how they failed that empirical test, and how he’s responded with frustration, anger, and paranoia rather than reconsidering his own beliefs. it’s also about why just losing in court again and again and again isn’t enough to dissuade a budding guru. i’m not trying to do that with this piece, either. i don’t think it’s possible to talk such a person out of their beliefs. but because this guru’s recent rhetoric has become extremely frantic and even he’s even suggested violence, it’s important to engage with the theories he preaches in case that helps dissuade people from falling for them. i don’t think this particular pseudolawyer is actually going to become violent, but the communities that form around such ideas can become unpredictable. (just ask the malheur occupiers.) so in addition to discussing those theories as a case study, at the end of this piece i’m going to outline some of the simplest and most obvious flaws with them. engaging irrational beliefs that hurt people is, after all, the good fight. continue reading → communication, pseudolawconspiracy theories, law debunking pseudogenetics at skepticon december 18, 2016december 19, 2016jennifer raff6 comments a few weeks ago i gave a talk at skepticon 9 about pseudoscience, specifically the use of genetics to promote ideas like genetic astrology, “nephilim dna” from the paracas skulls, and genetic determinism (with a special emphasis on “rutherford’s law”). the conference organizers filmed it and uploaded it to youtube, and so i’ve embedded it below if you’d like to see it. sorry for the scarce posting over the last few months! i’ve been incredibly busy this semester: adjusting to teaching my full course load (last year i had a release from half my courses), trying to get the first batch of my students trained in the lab, and pulling together some publications and grant proposals. i have a lot of new things to write about as soon as my grades are entered on monday, so stay tuned! eta: since i didn’t give it in my talk, i want to be sure to link here to the fabulous “debunking genetic astrology” site, which is written and hosted by mark thomas (who first coined the term “genetic astrology”,  debbie kennett, and adrian timpson. science genetic mythologies: “nephilim dna” from the paracas skulls september 20, 2016september 20, 2016jennifer raff26 comments as longtime readers here know, i’m endlessly fascinated by the ways in which people attempt to misuse genetics to legitimize pseudoscientific ideas. today i’m going to write about one example which i’ve been meaning to address for some time: pseudoscientific claims about the genetic distinctiveness of the paracas peoples. (please note that i don’t usually show images of native american remains on this blog, but there was no other way to illustrate the details of this issue. under the cut is an embedded video of the unwrapping of a paracas mummy, as well as a photo with the mummy under its wrappings.) continue reading → scienceancient dna, anthropological genetics, anthropology, archaeology, genetics, nephilim, paracas, peru archaeological fantasies and the genetic history of the americas august 15, 2016jennifer raff9 comments the excellent podcast archaeological fantasies recently had me on as a guest for a wide ranging discussion on genetics. we covered everything from the genetic prehistory of the americas to issues surrounding ancestry testing companies. here’s a link to the episode (apologies for the fact that i kept cutting in and out–apparently our university wireless connection isn’t very good). since so much of our discussion focused on haplogroup x2a and models for ancient american prehistory, i decided to break from the normal tradition here at vm and actually re-publish a post to make it easier for people to get answers to any questions they might have. and if you have specific questions about content from the podcast, please feel free to leave them in the comments on this post. this post was originally published last year to address some questions that deborah bolnick and i were getting about our paper “does mitochondrial haplogroup x indicate ancient trans-atlantic migration to the americas? a critical re-evaluation.”  i’ve edited it slightly to reflect the fact that the paper itself is now open access, and you should be able to download it here or at my academia.edu page. (i’m actually really shocked at the number of downloads it’s gotten…apparently this is a topic that a lot of people find interesting!). as soon as my syllabi for the upcoming semester are finished, i will try to write up another post that summarizes recent findings in north american anthropological genetics, and what they mean for our understanding of the initial peopling of the americas. in the meantime, if you’re interested in ancient dna i highly recommend you get up to speed on some of the methods by reading this post. continue reading → scienceancient dna, anthropological genetics, archaeological fantasies, archaeology, communication, my research, podcast, science, solutrean hypothesis guest post by rosi sexton: why ‘why’ matters august 12, 2016jennifer raff20 comments a few days ago, i published this post about the pseudoscience i see frequently in mma communities. for a different perspective, i invited former professional fighter, osteopath, and all around brilliant person rosi sexton to share her thoughts with us. while her position is a bit ‘softer’ than mine, i think it’s important to get a diversity of perspectives, particularly from people who are actually treating patients. enjoy! –jennifer cupping seems to be the new therapy buzzword around these olympics. i’ve had a few discussions with people asking me what i think about all these athletes sporting cupping marks on their backs and shoulders. my answer? “well, that depends”. let’s get a few things straight before i go any further. in common with most of the skeptics who have already commented on this latest trend, i think it’s very unlikely that cupping has much of a direct physiological effect. there’s no evidence to suggest that it affects the underlying tissues very much at all, never mind in a way that’s likely to be performance enhancing. so case closed? cupping is nonsense, as with so many other ‘trendy’ interventions. not so fast. in the absence of claims made for specific physical outcomes, cupping is just a physical activity. it makes no more sense to say that “cupping is nonsense”, any more than it makes sense to say that morris dancing is nonsense: both activities seem a little odd to me, but if there are people who enjoy them for their own sake, then i’m not about to argue with their experience. although i’ve never had a cupping treatment, several friends tell me they find it nice and relaxing. “but where’s the evidence for that?” the skeptics ask; and here’s where i think the problem lies. sometimes we fail to distinguish adequately between objective claims about fact (“this treatment will make your muscles stronger”) and subjective claims about personal experience (“i had this treatment, and it made me feel really good”). when we start to imply that people’s individual experience is invalid, or wrong, because they don’t have scientific evidence to support it – that’s when sportspeople start to complain that the scientists are arrogant, out of touch curmudgeonly killjoys. imagine that someone has conducted a large survey about leisure activities. suppose the results come back, and it turns out that on average people find quiet country walks and loud, alcohol fuelled parties equally enjoyable. does this mean that you that your introverted great aunt agatha will be persuaded to forgo her gentle sunday afternoon stroll in favour of accompanying you to a nightclub? unlikely. telling her there’s evidence that the two activities are equally enjoyable probably wouldn’t be persuasive – because enjoyment is subjective, and aunt agatha knows what she likes. the fact that things like pain, discomfort, pleasure and happiness are all subjective and difficult to measure isn’t a reason not to research them – but it does raise difficulties that should be taken into account. i have misgivings about measuring something as complicated as pain on a 1-10 scale, for example; but we have to start somewhere. it also means that we should be very clear about what the research does, and doesn’t, say when we apply it to individuals. it’s not quite that simple, of course. perhaps that athlete finds the treatment pleasant and relaxing because he’s been told it’ll have beneficial effects on his performance, when in fact this is highly questionable. the ethics of using placebo effects in top level sport – where winning and losing can be measured in milliseconds – is a subject that needs a whole separate post, but that’s not what i’m advocating here. i think it’s possible to be clear and honest about what’s known about a treatment, and to allow for a person’s individual subjective experience at the same time. talking openly with the athlete about why they are using a particular treatment, and being very clear about what they expect it to achieve is an important part of that process. if an athlete i’m treating tells me that she wants to use a treatment like cupping, then my first question is to ask why she’s doing it. i want her to think about what she’s likely to get out of it, and to ensure that it’s not being used instead of evidence based treatment to address any underlying problems. if it’s only giving some temporary relief, could the time and money might be better spent elsewhere? what are the risks of adverse effects, and are the benefits worth it? as a clinician, i find that framing the conversation in this way to be a more effective way of communicating with my athletes. by taking a hard line against misleading claims but not against the practice itself (except where it’s likely to be actually harmful), it encourages the athlete to apply their own critical thinking. we talk about how athletes can monitor their own experience more methodically, to see whether particular changes to their plan have a consistent (subjective) effect or not. learning how to sensibly navigate the large gaps between our small islands of knowledge is something that those in high level sport constantly struggle with. no athlete can afford to use only methods that have been proven rigorously by science – despite the best efforts of sports science there is simply too little evidence out there. at the same time, it’s easy to get suckered in by the latest trendy therapy or product; when winning and losing come down to tiny margins, many athletes feel that they can’t afford to take the risk of not using something just in case it does make a difference. applying a sceptical thought process while at the same time allowing for personal experience and individual circumstances gives a framework for evaluating these unknowns, whether it’s a “wacky” therapy like cupping, a new training method or a cortisone injection. two questions you should never be afraid to ask: “what, exactly, is this supposed to achieve?” “what reason do i have to think it can do that?” i’ve never experienced cupping, but i did have a hot stone massage once. it was lovely. it didn’t cure my neck pain, of course (nor was i expecting it to) – but it was a very pleasant distraction from it for an hour or so. your mileage may vary. science pseudoscience is common among elite athletes outside of the olympics too…and it makes me furious. august 9, 2016august 9, 2016jennifer raff57 comments the many stories yesterday featuring olympians appearing with cupping marks on their skin have brought renewed attention to pseudoscience in sports. cupping, which involves putting a hot jar onto the skin, forming a suction that “draws out” toxins or unblocks energy meridians or something like that, might seem like a relatively benign form of pseudoscience, but it can be quite harmful.  orac has a great post (complete with a gruesome photo) describing the harms of this particular practice: cupping is nothing more than an ancient medical practice based on a prescientific understanding of the body and disease, much like bloodletting and treatments based on the four humors. as the case of lin lin shows, it’s all risk for no benefit. it has no place in modern medicine, or at least shouldn’t. i’m completely unsurprised to find that pseudoscience is common among the elite athletes competing in the olympics. i’ve seen similar things rampant in the combat sports world as well. over the course of my martial arts career, i’ve had the opportunity to train with many extraordinary mma fighters. what i observed in these elite professional fighters–most of them either competing in the ufc, or well on their way to it–was a razor-sharp focus on doing whatever it took to improve. this meant grueling eight hour training days, and equally grueling recovery practices to allow them to sustain that level of activity. the recovery practices included ice baths, contrast showers, yoga, expensive massages and bodywork, and a whole host of alternative medical treatments including acupuncture, energy work, and dubious supplements. and behind nearly every fighter, there’s usually at least one chiropractor lurking around in background. [my interactions with these mma chiropractors are so similar that they almost follow a script.  he (and it’s always a he) invariably introduces himself as “dr. first name”, even in casual social situations, and tries to impress his listeners by boasting about how many important clients he has.] this story gets at the psychological aspects of why elite athletes pursue useless–and sometimes even harmful–alternative practices. what i’ve observed among fighters is this exact mentality.   magical thinking has long been endemic to martial arts, and there are few voices in the community who challenge these ideas, particularly when they’re promoted by influential teachers and coaches. competitive martial artists, like mma fighters, are so determined to do anything it takes to give themselves the extra edge that they are especially likely to listen to anyone who promises them a benefit to training, to recovery, to mental conditioning.  another important motivation is the money that fighters can make through sponserships from alt med practitioners and supplement manufacturers. these athletes make so little money from fight contracts that they can’t afford to turn down any source of additional revenue.  this makes them vulnerable to all kinds of practices that are ‘desperately implausible’ , as the formidable enemy of pseudoscience david colquhoun characterizes them. if i sound angry here, it’s because i am. i see these quacks taking large fees from vulnerable fighters who can’t afford them…. but are convinced that they can’t afford not to pursue any possible advantage.  i’ve seen creepy alt med sponsors lurking around events and attaching themselves to athletes as if they were coaches. i’ve seen more than one person in the mma world injured by pseudoscientific ‘treatments’, and more than one athletic career ruined by supplements.  this exploitation makes me furious. i hope that as more attention is focused on pseudoscience in the olympics, more attention will also be paid to these issues in mma, and the work of people who are trying to push back against the bs in the community, like  rosi sexton, and jeff westfall. sciencecupping, martial arts, mma, olympics, pseudoscience, quackery #vaxxed, reviewed: what happened outside of the movie. june 13, 2016jennifer raff78 comments this is part ii of our series on the movie “vaxxed”, which colin, my sister julie, and i saw in kansas city on june 11. in part i, colin focused on some of the factual inaccuracies of the movie. he talked about how a person attending the movie would have walked away with an extremely distorted understanding of the cdc, a distortion deliberately encouraged by mr. wakefield and the makers of the documentary. here, i’m going to focus not so much on the documentary itself as on what happened after the documentary: what the “vaxxed” team said during the q&a session, how the audience responded, conversations that i had with protestors after the movie, and a conversation that colin and i had with mr. wakefield. continue reading → science #vaxxed, reviewed: what happened inside the movie june 13, 2016june 14, 2016colin68 comments jennifer and i saw vaxxed in kansas city on june 11, along with her sister julie. we have a lot of observations and thoughts about the movie, so we’ll probably be doing several articles discussing the film itself, the audience’s reaction to it, the protestors, our responses, and a lot more. jenny’s post is here, and covers some of what happened after and as we left the movie. not exactly a full house; theater staff said about 1,100 tickets were sold for the entire week. the number may go up, but that’s consistent with the movie’s low numbers. my first, strong reaction was that very few people leaving the movie would have any idea what happened with the “cdc whistleblower.” the audience left knowing next to nothing about the events it’s supposedly about; i confirmed that by talking to people afterwards, and they had very little grasp on the facts. that’s no surprise. the movie is propaganda—it’s not educational, it’s manipulative and inflammatory. we can’t fact-check every statement or point out every strategic omission in the movie, so here are some simple and obvious illustrations of how it deceives audiences. to fans of the movie who have seen it: i don’t expect this will change your mind. i don’t think much of anything would, really; i asked people on the conspirasea cruise what evidence would change their minds, and not a single person could describe evidence that would persuaded them they were wrong. (even wakefield gave me a roundabout, evasive response.) doesn’t that sound like ideology to you? even if this doesn’t change your mind, i hope it makes you think. do you know what william thompson really thinks about vaccines? or about wakefield or hooker? do you know what data the cdc supposedly destroyed, or whether anyone has ever found any actual problems with the study it performed? do you know what other independent organizations have found the same thing the cdc did—a total lack of any causal connection between vaccines and autism? most fans of the movie don’t know anything about these subjects. if it leaves you scared and angry but misinformed, doesn’t that make it propaganda? and if you think it did leave you informed, well, see how many of these facts you actually knew. continue reading → science how to flunk out of the university of google june 3, 2016june 3, 2016jennifer raff17 comments as i’m putting the (hopefully) final touches on a short textbook that i’m writing entitled “handbook on science literacy”, i’ve been thinking a lot about how to recommend a person go about systematically investigating a scientific issue without having any background in it. sure, you can learn how to read and understand a scientific article, but let’s be honest—far too many people choose instead to do a quick web search and let that settle the question. this practice works okay in some instances, but in others it produces misleading or wrong answers. i want to share with you my strategies for flunking out of the university of google. this is one instance where flunking is a good thing. a graduate of the university of google chooses to accept only information that supports his or her position, and ignores or dismisses information in conflict with it. a graduate of the university of google will not be able to answer the question “what kind of evidence would change your mind on this subject?” it’s insidious, because once their opinions are formed in this way, they tend to identify with other people who share those opinions, and any new information that comes their way will either be accepted or rejected on the basis of which position they’ve already taken (the cultural cognition effect) none of us want to be that kind of person. flunking out requires a decent amount of work, and the willingness to accept that you might be wrong about a subject from time to time. you’ll need to become more aware of your own cognitive biases, and have some strategies for overcoming them. so as a preliminary step down the road to science literacy, i’ve put my thoughts on this together into a guide to learning about a subject in which you have no background. it’s an exercise; please don’t shortcut the process and go to wikipedia, or you’ll miss the whole point. how to flunk out of the university of google. continue reading → sciencepseudoscience, science, science literacy, university of google a skeptic on the conspirasea cruise may 29, 2016may 29, 2016colin4 comments this is an index to our posts relating to my experiences on the conspirasea cruise. eventually we’ll convert this to a permanent page and keep it updated with new pieces and media coverage. look forward to more indices as well, covering major violent metaphors topics. in january 2016, i attended the seminar-at-sea for conspiracy theorists as background research for my book, tentatively titled “the good fight.” supporters generously helped offset the costs of my attendance by contributing to my crowdfunding campaign, which explains a bit of my methodology–in short, i went to listen, not to argue or disrupt. this photo went out in our first update; at least one person on the cruise recognized the hat. the conspirasea posts i wrote a series of posts covering the details of the cruise, one per day: day one: a skeptic on the conspirasea cruise an explanation of the project and an introduction to each of the conspiracy theorists presenting on the cruise. day two: reverse the constitutional polarity of the baryonic trustee matrix: legal gibberish on the conspirasea cruise pseudolaw, the pinstriped cousin of pseudoscience. and a quick end to my plan to withhold all criticism until after the cruise, as i see some exceptionally objectionable nonsense foisted off on an unsuspecting crowd by two speakers under indictment for serious federal crimes. day three: nothing to fear how cruisegoers reacted to me, and how i reacted to them. day four: troubled waters a showcase of angry paranoia, as some of the conspiracy theorists misbehave. day five part one: i just can’t do another nautical pun continuing the story of an alarming and bizarre confrontation, and beginning the story of andrew wakefield’s angry lecture to me. day 5 part two: i took the bait andrew wakefield, having failed to draw in the actual journalists, springs his trap on me and reveals a core of anger under his work to suppress vaccination rates. day 6: you know who exposes real conspiracies? the media. profiling andrew wakefield, jeffrey smith, leonard horowitz, sherri kane, and their attempts to protect their various conspiracy theories from public scrutiny. day 7: i failed a personal plea to one particular conference attendee, who very nearly fell afoul of the pseudolegal nonsense being preached by sean david morton–a self-proclaimed legal warrior who knows how to beat the system, but got arrested by federal agents immediately upon leaving the cruise and is currently awaiting trial on serious fraud charges. bonus: an interview with andrew wakefield in which andrew wakefield grants a personal interview, and we fact-check his claims. they do not do well.  as i write additional pieces relevant to the conspirasea cruise, we’ll link them here as well. media coverage the conspirasea cruise itself got plenty of media coverage, as did my book project and the series of blog posts above. we’ve collected some links here and again we’ll update them when we have something to add. print anna merlan of jezebel wrote a brilliant piece that captured the who/what/where/when/why as well as the overall feel of the cruise. (check out the art, too–every section heading is a dainty masterpiece.) we’re eagerly awaiting bronwyn dickey‘s piece in popular mechanics, which should be out soon with photography from the supremely talented dina litovsky. aeon magazine asked me to write a piece about pseudolaw, which is not as widely understood as pseudoscience. it lead to an interesting discussion in the comments about which is more dangerous, a question i’m not sure can be answered. wired magazine interviewed me for a great piece that again resulted in energetic comments, a few of which demonstrated the kind of feverish paranoia that drives conspiracy theories. factor, a spanish-language blog, interviewed me for a couple of pieces about the conspirasea cruise. writing about me, they said: colin es un amor: un pacifista del escepticismo. it’s a lovely summary of my philosophy, and i try to live up to it every day. audio kylie sturgess and i talked for an episode of the token skeptic podcast; it was a conversation between her home base in australia and my hotel room in copenhagen about a cruise from los angeles to mexico. international intrigue! the consistently excellent prism podcast ran two episodes about the conspirasea cruise and my thoughts on andrew wakefield. it was a real treat to chat with dr. clay jones and dr. grant ritchie. video nothing yet, and it’s hardly my focus. we have had a serious inquiry about the film/tv rights, though. they’re still available. personally i suggest casting vincent d’onofrio as the noble, humble, brave, heroic writer. or maybe peter weller.  and the far out if you write about conspiracy theorists, sooner or later someone’s going to call for your “indictment for genocide by prosecutors at the international criminal court.” and sure enough, a couple of the people we profiled pounded out not one but several feverish attacks on my “criminal psychopathology and moral turpitude” and “obese darkness.” we appreciate the publicity, even if it’s completely inaccurate and completely goofy. communication, pseudolaw, scienceandrew wakefield, conspiracy, conspiracy theory, conspirasea, index, wakefield previous articles blog stats 4,342,095 hits follow me via email! enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. join 24,798 other followers archive of posts archive of posts select month december 2016 september 2016 august 2016 june 2016 may 2016 april 2016 march 2016 february 2016 january 2016 december 2015 november 2015 october 2015 september 2015 august 2015 july 2015 june 2015 may 2015 april 2015 march 2015 february 2015 january 2015 december 2014 november 2014 october 2014 september 2014 august 2014 july 2014 june 2014 may 2014 april 2014 march 2014 february 2014 january 2014 december 2013 november 2013 october 2013 september 2013 august 2013 july 2013 june 2013 may 2013 april 2013 follow violent metaphors on facebook! follow violent metaphors on facebook! follow jennifer raff on twitter!my tweets recent posts you’re not entitled to your own facts (or to hang the people who prove you wrong). debunking pseudogenetics at skepticon genetic mythologies: “nephilim dna” from the paracas skulls archaeological fantasies and the genetic history of the americas guest post by rosi sexton: why ‘why’ matters pseudoscience is common among elite athletes outside of the olympics too…and it makes me furious. #vaxxed, reviewed: what happened outside of the movie. #vaxxed, reviewed: what happened inside the movie how to flunk out of the university of google a skeptic on the conspirasea cruise behind the scenes at nasa: the hera project another open thread on vaccines no, we don’t actually know that modern humans killed off the hobbits vaxxed: from coverup to catastrophe to cancellation to insignificance surviving my first year as a new professor: tools of the trade an interview with andrew wakefield conspirasea day 7: i failed. sexual harassment in physical anthropology conspirasea day six: you know who exposes real conspiracies? the media. conspirasea cruise day 5 part 2: i took the bait a skeptic on the conspirasea cruise, day 5: i just can’t do another nautical pun troubled waters: conspirasea cruise day 4(ish) nothing to fear: conspirasea cruise day 3 reverse the constitutional polarity of the baryonic trustee matrix: legal gibberish on the conspirasea cruise (day 2) a skeptic on the conspira-sea cruise: day 1 anchors aweigh! the conspiracy cruise sails soon. why there still are monkeys: lessons learned from teaching evolution in kansas. responses to some questions about our recently published paper on haplogroup x and north american prehistory ancient dna from two 11,500 year old burials in alaska the lost city that isn’t. republicans aren’t anti-vaccine. (yet) deep (conspira)sea fishing: a fundraising drive open access and pseudoarchaeology: an encouraging update! mixed messages during national immunization awareness month good science communication means never calling them “retard” – even if you’re nassim taleb public outreach that’s inaccessible to the public. encouraging science journalism: the genome of kennewick man. no, seriously, don’t politicize anti-vax sentiment a normal person’s review of the apple watch the most important playground conversation, a presentation the genetic analysis of the alaskan north slope new study overturns yet another anti-vaccine talking point why the food babe is wrong (it’s not just because she’s ignorant) new paper deals blow to hypothesis that native americans have european ancestry darwin day! please don’t politicize vaccine refusal mike adams of natural news: as fine a lawyer as he is a scientist dear parents, let’s talk about measles the good fight part 1: the fine art of talking to people who are wrong a bit of personal news search search for: tagsadventure alaska ancient dna andrew wakefield andy hurley animals anthropological genetics anthropology anti-science anti-vaccine anti-vax archaeology arctic prehistory astrology astronomy autism bats books carl sagan cats caves colin communication conflict conservation conspiracy theories conspirasea cruise conversation creationism cultural cognition debate discovery institute education erick erickson evolution fall out boy friendship genetics genomics gmo gmos greg jackson guest post health history homeopathy human genetic diversity immunization intelligent design interview inuit prehistory iss journal club ken ham law martial arts media medicine methodology mike adams mitochondrial dna mma monsanto music my research native american prehistory natural news negotiation nicholas wade outreach paleontology patrick stump peopling of the americas personal philosophy politics population genetics pseudolaw pseudoscience public health publishing quackery race racism research science science communication scientology skepticism solutrean hypothesis soyuz space television universe university of google vaccines wakefield web links wildlife women in science blog at wordpress.com. post to cancel


Here you find all texts from your page as Google (googlebot) and others search engines seen it.

Words density analysis:

Numbers of all words: 5500

One word

Two words phrases

Three words phrases

the - 7.27% (400)
and - 2.71% (149)
that - 1.62% (89)
out - 1.45% (80)
her - 1.35% (74)
for - 1.18% (65)
his - 1.04% (57)
you - 0.91% (50)
all - 0.89% (49)
about - 0.87% (48)
our - 0.84% (46)
per - 0.8% (44)
science - 0.73% (40)
this - 0.69% (38)
not - 0.69% (38)
with - 0.67% (37)
here - 0.62% (34)
art - 0.62% (34)
are - 0.62% (34)
can - 0.56% (31)
one - 0.55% (30)
what - 0.51% (28)
it’s - 0.51% (28)
lin - 0.51% (28)
have - 0.49% (27)
2016 - 0.49% (27)
cruise - 0.47% (26)
some - 0.47% (26)
any - 0.47% (26)
day - 0.45% (25)
let - 0.45% (25)
genetic - 0.44% (24)
end - 0.44% (24)
they - 0.44% (24)
post - 0.4% (22)
but - 0.4% (22)
from - 0.4% (22)
ever - 0.4% (22)
people - 0.4% (22)
who - 0.4% (22)
how - 0.38% (21)
thing - 0.38% (21)
med - 0.38% (21)
them - 0.38% (21)
very - 0.36% (20)
their - 0.36% (20)
- 0.36% (20)
conspirasea - 0.36% (20)
fact - 0.35% (19)
use - 0.35% (19)
law - 0.33% (18)
over - 0.33% (18)
like - 0.33% (18)
own - 0.31% (17)
pseudoscience - 0.31% (17)
person - 0.31% (17)
low - 0.29% (16)
think - 0.29% (16)
movie - 0.29% (16)
now - 0.29% (16)
i’ve - 0.29% (16)
make - 0.27% (15)
athlete - 0.27% (15)
wakefield - 0.27% (15)
part - 0.27% (15)
new - 0.27% (15)
i’m - 0.25% (14)
cupping - 0.25% (14)
kept - 0.25% (14)
know - 0.25% (14)
form - 0.25% (14)
more - 0.25% (14)
able - 0.25% (14)
treat - 0.25% (14)
skeptic - 0.24% (13)
see - 0.24% (13)
your - 0.24% (13)
comments - 0.24% (13)
which - 0.24% (13)
read - 0.24% (13)
get - 0.24% (13)
ice - 0.24% (13)
other - 0.22% (12)
conspiracy - 0.22% (12)
fight - 0.22% (12)
when - 0.22% (12)
talk - 0.22% (12)
2015 - 0.22% (12)
story - 0.22% (12)
time - 0.22% (12)
there - 0.22% (12)
2014 - 0.22% (12)
don’t - 0.22% (12)
these - 0.22% (12)
genetics - 0.22% (12)
even - 0.22% (12)
question - 0.22% (12)
theories - 0.22% (12)
mma - 0.2% (11)
iss - 0.2% (11)
actual - 0.2% (11)
too - 0.2% (11)
had - 0.2% (11)
june - 0.2% (11)
does - 0.2% (11)
under - 0.2% (11)
treatment - 0.2% (11)
just - 0.2% (11)
why - 0.2% (11)
she - 0.2% (11)
search - 0.2% (11)
ask - 0.2% (11)
jennifer - 0.18% (10)
well - 0.18% (10)
its - 0.18% (10)
subject - 0.18% (10)
way - 0.18% (10)
pseudolaw - 0.18% (10)
piece - 0.18% (10)
athletes - 0.18% (10)
real - 0.18% (10)
evidence - 0.18% (10)
facts - 0.16% (9)
come - 0.16% (9)
experience - 0.16% (9)
2013 - 0.16% (9)
may - 0.16% (9)
university - 0.16% (9)
because - 0.16% (9)
public - 0.16% (9)
will - 0.16% (9)
wrong - 0.16% (9)
sure - 0.16% (9)
where - 0.16% (9)
dna - 0.16% (9)
andrew - 0.16% (9)
has - 0.16% (9)
was - 0.16% (9)
that’s - 0.16% (9)
belief - 0.16% (9)
history - 0.16% (9)
raff - 0.15% (8)
going - 0.15% (8)
follow - 0.15% (8)
again - 0.15% (8)
august - 0.15% (8)
los - 0.15% (8)
each - 0.15% (8)
google - 0.15% (8)
colin - 0.15% (8)
try - 0.15% (8)
reading - 0.15% (8)
few - 0.15% (8)
book - 0.15% (8)
practice - 0.15% (8)
plea - 0.15% (8)
between - 0.15% (8)
vaccine - 0.15% (8)
sense - 0.15% (8)
fail - 0.15% (8)
vaxxed - 0.15% (8)
december - 0.15% (8)
hang - 0.15% (8)
science, - 0.15% (8)
legal - 0.15% (8)
posts - 0.15% (8)
happen - 0.15% (8)
scientific - 0.15% (8)
ancient - 0.15% (8)
sport - 0.13% (7)
case - 0.13% (7)
write - 0.13% (7)
many - 0.13% (7)
makes - 0.13% (7)
particular - 0.13% (7)
actually - 0.13% (7)
been - 0.13% (7)
first - 0.13% (7)
back - 0.13% (7)
would - 0.13% (7)
most - 0.13% (7)
ken - 0.13% (7)
after - 0.13% (7)
personal - 0.13% (7)
good - 0.13% (7)
test - 0.13% (7)
you’re - 0.13% (7)
hot - 0.13% (7)
two - 0.13% (7)
want - 0.13% (7)
soon - 0.13% (7)
can’t - 0.13% (7)
questions - 0.13% (7)
find - 0.13% (7)
work - 0.13% (7)
beliefs - 0.13% (7)
happened - 0.13% (7)
should - 0.13% (7)
much - 0.13% (7)
media - 0.13% (7)
effect - 0.13% (7)
2016jennifer - 0.13% (7)
blog - 0.13% (7)
alt - 0.13% (7)
mean - 0.13% (7)
thought - 0.11% (6)
prehistory - 0.11% (6)
research - 0.11% (6)
olympics - 0.11% (6)
likely - 0.11% (6)
conversation - 0.11% (6)
violent - 0.11% (6)
method - 0.11% (6)
interview - 0.11% (6)
another - 0.11% (6)
did - 0.11% (6)
paracas - 0.11% (6)
american - 0.11% (6)
claims - 0.11% (6)
americas - 0.11% (6)
september - 0.11% (6)
here’s - 0.11% (6)
tend - 0.11% (6)
continue - 0.11% (6)
focus - 0.11% (6)
doesn’t - 0.11% (6)
than - 0.11% (6)
nonsense - 0.11% (6)
fighters - 0.11% (6)
them. - 0.11% (6)
old - 0.11% (6)
every - 0.11% (6)
it. - 0.11% (6)
important - 0.11% (6)
down - 0.11% (6)
those - 0.11% (6)
flunk - 0.11% (6)
communication - 0.11% (6)
idea - 0.11% (6)
lawyer - 0.11% (6)
- 0.11% (6)
never - 0.11% (6)
he’s - 0.11% (6)
less - 0.11% (6)
cupping, - 0.09% (5)
mind - 0.09% (5)
native - 0.09% (5)
call - 0.09% (5)
ideas - 0.09% (5)
open - 0.09% (5)
issue - 0.09% (5)
become - 0.09% (5)
angry - 0.09% (5)
itself - 0.09% (5)
were - 0.09% (5)
process - 0.09% (5)
scientist - 0.09% (5)
elite - 0.09% (5)
review - 0.09% (5)
individual - 0.09% (5)
outside - 0.09% (5)
us. - 0.09% (5)
common - 0.09% (5)
might - 0.09% (5)
kind - 0.09% (5)
take - 0.09% (5)
titled - 0.09% (5)
fit - 0.09% (5)
really - 0.09% (5)
afford - 0.09% (5)
pseudoscience, - 0.09% (5)
recent - 0.09% (5)
answer - 0.09% (5)
subjective - 0.09% (5)
martial - 0.09% (5)
prove - 0.09% (5)
course - 0.09% (5)
train - 0.09% (5)
link - 0.09% (5)
something - 0.09% (5)
thoughts - 0.09% (5)
around - 0.09% (5)
enjoy - 0.09% (5)
me, - 0.09% (5)
year - 0.09% (5)
talking - 0.09% (5)
metaphors - 0.09% (5)
change - 0.09% (5)
nothing - 0.09% (5)
lot - 0.09% (5)
cdc - 0.07% (4)
rosi - 0.07% (4)
support - 0.07% (4)
cruise. - 0.07% (4)
allow - 0.07% (4)
astrology - 0.07% (4)
off - 0.07% (4)
archaeology - 0.07% (4)
entitled - 0.07% (4)
suppose - 0.07% (4)
such - 0.07% (4)
movie. - 0.07% (4)
pseudolawyer - 0.07% (4)
update - 0.07% (4)
great - 0.07% (4)
reviewed: - 0.07% (4)
we’ll - 0.07% (4)
whether - 0.07% (4)
being - 0.07% (4)
opinion - 0.07% (4)
audience - 0.07% (4)
same - 0.07% (4)
little - 0.07% (4)
#vaxxed, - 0.07% (4)
treatment, - 0.07% (4)
january - 0.07% (4)
tell - 0.07% (4)
yet - 0.07% (4)
cruise, - 0.07% (4)
simple - 0.07% (4)
got - 0.07% (4)
turn - 0.07% (4)
used - 0.07% (4)
anger - 0.07% (4)
bit - 0.07% (4)
only - 0.07% (4)
serious - 0.07% (4)
city - 0.07% (4)
sexton - 0.07% (4)
guru - 0.07% (4)
theory - 0.07% (4)
theorists - 0.07% (4)
sports - 0.07% (4)
high - 0.07% (4)
background - 0.07% (4)
fantasies - 0.07% (4)
archaeological - 0.07% (4)
among - 0.07% (4)
genetics, - 0.07% (4)
anthropological - 0.07% (4)
photo - 0.07% (4)
cut - 0.07% (4)
exposes - 0.07% (4)
show - 0.07% (4)
address - 0.07% (4)
formed - 0.07% (4)
learn - 0.07% (4)
base - 0.07% (4)
month - 0.07% (4)
isn’t - 0.07% (4)
understand - 0.07% (4)
april - 0.07% (4)
things - 0.07% (4)
seen - 0.07% (4)
load - 0.07% (4)
world - 0.07% (4)
practices - 0.07% (4)
hera - 0.07% (4)
arts - 0.07% (4)
risk - 0.07% (4)
failed - 0.07% (4)
guest - 0.07% (4)
drive - 0.07% (4)
paper - 0.07% (4)
feel - 0.07% (4)
please - 0.07% (4)
long - 0.07% (4)
del - 0.07% (4)
vaccines - 0.07% (4)
discussion - 0.07% (4)
short - 0.05% (3)
flunking - 0.05% (3)
completely - 0.05% (3)
plan - 0.05% (3)
consistent - 0.05% (3)
point - 0.05% (3)
series - 0.05% (3)
money - 0.05% (3)
put - 0.05% (3)
conflict - 0.05% (3)
apply - 0.05% (3)
miss - 0.05% (3)
well. - 0.05% (3)
clear - 0.05% (3)
effects - 0.05% (3)
work, - 0.05% (3)
study - 0.05% (3)
benefit - 0.05% (3)
either - 0.05% (3)
pain - 0.05% (3)
recovery - 0.05% (3)
information - 0.05% (3)
accept - 0.05% (3)
taken - 0.05% (3)
took - 0.05% (3)
reason - 0.05% (3)
film - 0.05% (3)
project - 0.05% (3)
hope - 0.05% (3)
using - 0.05% (3)
“what - 0.05% (3)
kansas - 0.05% (3)
doing - 0.05% (3)
she’s - 0.05% (3)
documentary - 0.05% (3)
well, - 0.05% (3)
thinking - 0.05% (3)
furious. - 0.05% (3)
based - 0.05% (3)
listen - 0.05% (3)
skin - 0.05% (3)
expect - 0.05% (3)
extra - 0.05% (3)
supposed - 0.05% (3)
here, - 0.05% (3)
attention - 0.05% (3)
exact - 0.05% (3)
said - 0.05% (3)
anything - 0.05% (3)
here. - 0.05% (3)
whole - 0.05% (3)
against - 0.05% (3)
treatments - 0.05% (3)
training - 0.05% (3)
movie, - 0.05% (3)
level - 0.05% (3)
four - 0.05% (3)
supplement - 0.05% (3)
least - 0.05% (3)
top - 0.05% (3)
scientists - 0.05% (3)
haplogroup - 0.05% (3)
grant - 0.05% (3)
home - 0.05% (3)
skulls - 0.05% (3)
email - 0.05% (3)
pseudoscientific - 0.05% (3)
system - 0.05% (3)
example - 0.05% (3)
later - 0.05% (3)
special - 0.05% (3)
decide - 0.05% (3)
dr. - 0.05% (3)
cure - 0.05% (3)
anti-vaccine - 0.05% (3)
encourage - 0.05% (3)
medical - 0.05% (3)
issues - 0.05% (3)
irrational - 0.05% (3)
episode - 0.05% (3)
sooner - 0.05% (3)
focused - 0.05% (3)
specific - 0.05% (3)
usually - 0.05% (3)
alaska - 0.05% (3)
lead - 0.05% (3)
published - 0.05% (3)
difficult - 0.05% (3)
term - 0.05% (3)
north - 0.05% (3)
ideology - 0.05% (3)
court - 0.05% (3)
losing - 0.05% (3)
possible - 0.05% (3)
also - 0.05% (3)
access - 0.05% (3)
paranoia - 0.05% (3)
addition - 0.05% (3)
national - 0.05% (3)
anthropology - 0.05% (3)
result - 0.05% (3)
then - 0.05% (3)
communication, - 0.05% (3)
give - 0.05% (3)
debunking - 0.05% (3)
skepticon - 0.05% (3)
july - 0.05% (3)
october - 0.05% (3)
“nephilim - 0.05% (3)
dna” - 0.05% (3)
november - 0.05% (3)
last - 0.05% (3)
february - 0.05% (3)
full - 0.05% (3)
march - 0.05% (3)
number - 0.05% (3)
leave - 0.05% (3)
understanding - 0.05% (3)
say - 0.05% (3)
interesting - 0.05% (3)
let’s - 0.05% (3)
laws - 0.05% (3)
me. - 0.05% (3)
suggest - 0.05% (3)
pun - 0.05% (3)
pseudolegal - 0.05% (3)
physical - 0.05% (3)
pseudoscience. - 0.05% (3)
activities - 0.05% (3)
therapy - 0.05% (3)
seem - 0.05% (3)
several - 0.05% (3)
journal - 0.05% (3)
problem - 0.05% (3)
start - 0.05% (3)
it, - 0.05% (3)
large - 0.05% (3)
pseudolaw, - 0.05% (3)
equally - 0.05% (3)
wakefield, - 0.05% (3)
there’s - 0.05% (3)
trying - 0.05% (3)
both - 0.05% (3)
available - 0.05% (3)
position - 0.05% (3)
hypothesis - 0.05% (3)
fall - 0.05% (3)
difference - 0.05% (3)
pieces - 0.05% (3)
trial - 0.05% (3)
critical - 0.05% (3)
share - 0.05% (3)
news - 0.05% (3)
community - 0.05% (3)
coverage - 0.05% (3)
medicine - 0.04% (2)
fact-check - 0.04% (2)
natural - 0.04% (2)
adams - 0.04% (2)
having - 0.04% (2)
encouraging - 0.04% (2)
supposedly - 0.04% (2)
methodology - 0.04% (2)
philosophy - 0.04% (2)
skepticism - 0.04% (2)
leaving - 0.04% (2)
club - 0.04% (2)
informed, - 0.04% (2)
mike - 0.04% (2)
gmo - 0.04% (2)
blow - 0.04% (2)
anti-vax - 0.04% (2)
politicize - 0.04% (2)
outreach - 0.04% (2)
fine - 0.04% (2)
erick - 0.04% (2)
writing - 0.04% (2)
human - 0.04% (2)
asked - 0.04% (2)
education - 0.04% (2)
immunization - 0.04% (2)
health - 0.04% (2)
autism - 0.04% (2)
problems - 0.04% (2)
found - 0.04% (2)
fans - 0.04% (2)
constitutional - 0.04% (2)
choose - 0.04% (2)
waters - 0.04% (2)
section - 0.04% (2)
links - 0.04% (2)
29, - 0.04% (2)
index - 0.04% (2)
awaiting - 0.04% (2)
media. - 0.04% (2)
page - 0.04% (2)
conspiracies? - 0.04% (2)
core - 0.04% (2)
covering - 0.04% (2)
draw - 0.04% (2)
bait - 0.04% (2)
two: - 0.04% (2)
nautical - 0.04% (2)
“the - 0.04% (2)
magazine - 0.04% (2)
went - 0.04% (2)
troubled - 0.04% (2)
hat. - 0.04% (2)
reacted - 0.04% (2)
fear - 0.04% (2)
wrote - 0.04% (2)
federal - 0.04% (2)
indictment - 0.04% (2)
crowd - 0.04% (2)
one: - 0.04% (2)
gibberish - 0.04% (2)
matrix: - 0.04% (2)
trustee - 0.04% (2)
baryonic - 0.04% (2)
dina - 0.04% (2)
literacy, - 0.04% (2)
quick - 0.04% (2)
enter - 0.04% (2)
web - 0.04% (2)
responses - 0.04% (2)
evolution - 0.04% (2)
strategies - 0.04% (2)
reverse - 0.04% (2)
google. - 0.04% (2)
instance - 0.04% (2)
no, - 0.04% (2)
facebook! - 0.04% (2)
graduate - 0.04% (2)
polarity - 0.04% (2)
once - 0.04% (2)
opinions - 0.04% (2)
archive - 0.04% (2)
criminal - 0.04% (2)
interviewed - 0.04% (2)
comes - 0.04% (2)
cultural - 0.04% (2)
far - 0.04% (2)
 and - 0.04% (2)
cognition - 0.04% (2)
still - 0.04% (2)
international - 0.04% (2)
you’ll - 0.04% (2)
need - 0.04% (2)
aware - 0.04% (2)
live - 0.04% (2)
lovely - 0.04% (2)
couple - 0.04% (2)
feverish - 0.04% (2)
strong - 0.04% (2)
content - 0.04% (2)
exactly - 0.04% (2)
video - 0.04% (2)
connection - 0.04% (2)
ancestry - 0.04% (2)
wide - 0.04% (2)
recently - 0.04% (2)
excellent - 0.04% (2)
archaeology, - 0.04% (2)
dna, - 0.04% (2)
scienceancient - 0.04% (2)
mummy - 0.04% (2)
details - 0.04% (2)
answers - 0.04% (2)
blog, - 0.04% (2)
attempt - 0.04% (2)
ways - 0.04% (2)
20, - 0.04% (2)
mythologies: - 0.04% (2)
astrology” - 0.04% (2)
didn’t - 0.04% (2)
since - 0.04% (2)
together - 0.04% (2)
teaching - 0.04% (2)
normal - 0.04% (2)
have. - 0.04% (2)
conference - 0.04% (2)
‘why’ - 0.04% (2)
olympics. - 0.04% (2)
treating - 0.04% (2)
particularly - 0.04% (2)
diversity - 0.04% (2)
while - 0.04% (2)
brilliant - 0.04% (2)
fighter, - 0.04% (2)
professional - 0.04% (2)
days - 0.04% (2)
matters - 0.04% (2)
sexton: - 0.04% (2)
podcast, - 0.04% (2)
solutrean - 0.04% (2)
methods - 0.04% (2)
recommend - 0.04% (2)
highly - 0.04% (2)
peopling - 0.04% (2)
semester - 0.04% (2)
topic - 0.04% (2)
download - 0.04% (2)
mitochondrial - 0.04% (2)
post. - 0.04% (2)
embedded - 0.04% (2)
promote - 0.04% (2)
skeptics - 0.04% (2)
him - 0.04% (2)
creationist - 0.04% (2)
keep - 0.04% (2)
garden - 0.04% (2)
thing. - 0.04% (2)
protect - 0.04% (2)
walled - 0.04% (2)
build - 0.04% (2)
text - 0.04% (2)
origin - 0.04% (2)
facts, - 0.04% (2)
budding - 0.04% (2)
different - 0.04% (2)
we’re - 0.04% (2)
life - 0.04% (2)
hold - 0.04% (2)
amendment - 0.04% (2)
second - 0.04% (2)
2016december - 0.04% (2)
30, - 0.04% (2)
wrong). - 0.04% (2)
(or - 0.04% (2)
for: - 0.04% (2)
books - 0.04% (2)
decided - 0.04% (2)
gave - 0.04% (2)
dissuade - 0.04% (2)
ago - 0.04% (2)
pseudogenetics - 0.04% (2)
fight. - 0.04% (2)
all, - 0.04% (2)
flaws - 0.04% (2)
obvious - 0.04% (2)
simplest - 0.04% (2)
discussing - 0.04% (2)
communities - 0.04% (2)
extremely - 0.04% (2)
enough - 0.04% (2)
theories, - 0.04% (2)
beliefs. - 0.04% (2)
responded - 0.04% (2)
frustration - 0.04% (2)
months - 0.04% (2)
process. - 0.04% (2)
wrong. - 0.04% (2)
fail, - 0.04% (2)
force - 0.04% (2)
without - 0.04% (2)
cancer - 0.04% (2)
marks - 0.04% (2)
already - 0.04% (2)
left - 0.04% (2)
chiropractor - 0.04% (2)
edge - 0.04% (2)
themselves - 0.04% (2)
coaches. - 0.04% (2)
they’re - 0.04% (2)
arts, - 0.04% (2)
pursue - 0.04% (2)
 he - 0.04% (2)
background. - 0.04% (2)
lurking - 0.04% (2)
nearly - 0.04% (2)
mental - 0.04% (2)
behind - 0.04% (2)
supplements. - 0.04% (2)
alternative - 0.04% (2)
host - 0.04% (2)
grueling - 0.04% (2)
meant - 0.04% (2)
observed - 0.04% (2)
similar - 0.04% (2)
competing - 0.04% (2)
modern - 0.04% (2)
anyone - 0.04% (2)
additional - 0.04% (2)
body - 0.04% (2)
talked - 0.04% (2)
reaction - 0.04% (2)
articles - 0.04% (2)
11, - 0.04% (2)
2016june - 0.04% (2)
inside - 0.04% (2)
wakefield. - 0.04% (2)
protestors - 0.04% (2)
during - 0.04% (2)
“vaxxed” - 0.04% (2)
mr. - 0.04% (2)
saw - 0.04% (2)
vulnerable - 0.04% (2)
sister - 0.04% (2)
13, - 0.04% (2)
quackery - 0.04% (2)
jeff - 0.04% (2)
mma, - 0.04% (2)
olympics, - 0.04% (2)
career - 0.04% (2)
events - 0.04% (2)
sound - 0.04% (2)
david - 0.04% (2)
place - 0.04% (2)
energy - 0.04% (2)
latest - 0.04% (2)
someone - 0.04% (2)
into - 0.04% (2)
measure - 0.04% (2)
pain, - 0.04% (2)
knows - 0.04% (2)
probably - 0.04% (2)
enjoyable - 0.04% (2)
persuaded - 0.04% (2)
agatha - 0.04% (2)
aunt - 0.04% (2)
turns - 0.04% (2)
touch - 0.04% (2)
quite - 0.04% (2)
imply - 0.04% (2)
sometimes - 0.04% (2)
that?” - 0.04% (2)
friends - 0.04% (2)
argue - 0.04% (2)
activity. - 0.04% (2)
made - 0.04% (2)
performance - 0.04% (2)
underlying - 0.04% (2)
unlikely - 0.04% (2)
means - 0.04% (2)
pleasant - 0.04% (2)
onto - 0.04% (2)
line - 0.04% (2)
putting - 0.04% (2)
too…and - 0.04% (2)
hour - 0.04% (2)
to) - 0.04% (2)
massage - 0.04% (2)
tiny - 0.04% (2)
trendy - 0.04% (2)
time, - 0.04% (2)
learning - 0.04% (2)
misleading - 0.04% (2)
hard - 0.04% (2)
relaxing - 0.04% (2)
taking - 0.04% (2)
could - 0.04% (2)
giving - 0.04% (2)
instead - 0.04% (2)
achieve - 0.04% (2)
time. - 0.04% (2)
person’s - 0.04% (2)
known - 0.04% (2)
honest - 0.04% (2)
winning - 0.04% (2)
cancel - 0.04% (2)
of the - 0.87% (48)
on the - 0.42% (23)
at the - 0.4% (22)
a cruise - 0.33% (18)
conspirasea cruise - 0.29% (16)
the movie - 0.29% (16)
in the - 0.27% (15)
and the - 0.25% (14)
the conspirasea - 0.24% (13)
to the - 0.24% (13)
out the - 0.22% (12)
that the - 0.16% (9)
about the - 0.16% (9)
that i - 0.16% (9)
from the - 0.16% (9)
andrew wakefield - 0.16% (9)
or the - 0.16% (9)
with the - 0.16% (9)
of google - 0.15% (8)
jennifer raff - 0.15% (8)
university of - 0.15% (8)
going to - 0.15% (8)
how to - 0.13% (7)
this is - 0.13% (7)
if you - 0.13% (7)
what happened - 0.13% (7)
it’s a - 0.13% (7)
for the - 0.13% (7)
the fact - 0.13% (7)
people who - 0.13% (7)
out of - 0.13% (7)
the university - 0.11% (6)
have a - 0.11% (6)
a person - 0.11% (6)
and it - 0.11% (6)
think it - 0.11% (6)
the americas - 0.11% (6)
continue reading - 0.11% (6)
about a - 0.11% (6)
pseudoscience i - 0.11% (6)
reading → - 0.11% (6)
skeptic on - 0.09% (5)
that they - 0.09% (5)
violent metaphors - 0.09% (5)
it makes - 0.09% (5)
some of - 0.09% (5)
→ science - 0.09% (5)
a skeptic - 0.09% (5)
the genetic - 0.09% (5)
able to - 0.09% (5)
ancient dna - 0.09% (5)
your own - 0.09% (5)
to get - 0.09% (5)
want to - 0.09% (5)
you know - 0.09% (5)
i don’t - 0.09% (5)
as well - 0.09% (5)
conspiracy theories - 0.09% (5)
i think - 0.09% (5)
write a - 0.09% (5)
on this - 0.09% (5)
conspiracy theorists - 0.07% (4)
it’s not - 0.07% (4)
what the - 0.07% (4)
can be - 0.07% (4)
the same - 0.07% (4)
to write - 0.07% (4)
it was - 0.07% (4)
archaeological fantasies - 0.07% (4)
this post - 0.07% (4)
but it - 0.07% (4)
likely to - 0.07% (4)
rosi sexton - 0.07% (4)
martial arts - 0.07% (4)
i’ve been - 0.07% (4)
the movie. - 0.07% (4)
outside of - 0.07% (4)
#vaxxed, reviewed: - 0.07% (4)
have to - 0.07% (4)
they can - 0.07% (4)
should be - 0.07% (4)
kind of - 0.07% (4)
the paracas - 0.07% (4)
can’t afford - 0.07% (4)
about how - 0.07% (4)
the olympics - 0.07% (4)
more than - 0.07% (4)
as the - 0.07% (4)
we have - 0.07% (4)
elite athletes - 0.07% (4)
think it’s - 0.07% (4)
on their - 0.07% (4)
reviewed: what - 0.07% (4)
cupping is - 0.07% (4)
their own - 0.05% (3)
that you - 0.05% (3)
that it - 0.05% (3)
i’ve had - 0.05% (3)
who are - 0.05% (3)
not to - 0.05% (3)
claims about - 0.05% (3)
is common - 0.05% (3)
at least - 0.05% (3)
do you - 0.05% (3)
after the - 0.05% (3)
focused on - 0.05% (3)
in kansas - 0.05% (3)
is part - 0.05% (3)
here are - 0.05% (3)
change your - 0.05% (3)
much of - 0.05% (3)
even if - 0.05% (3)
of pseudoscience - 0.05% (3)
to all - 0.05% (3)
know what - 0.05% (3)
treatment, and - 0.05% (3)
work, and - 0.05% (3)
flunk out - 0.05% (3)
i’ve seen - 0.05% (3)
pseudoscience is - 0.05% (3)
lot of - 0.05% (3)
they can’t - 0.05% (3)
your mind - 0.05% (3)
afford to - 0.05% (3)
to flunk - 0.05% (3)
i want - 0.05% (3)
my first - 0.05% (3)
me furious. - 0.05% (3)
the movie, - 0.05% (3)
i have - 0.05% (3)
in which - 0.05% (3)
irrational belief - 0.05% (3)
or later - 0.05% (3)
history of - 0.05% (3)
cruise day - 0.05% (3)
anthropological genetics, - 0.05% (3)
the people - 0.05% (3)
of posts - 0.05% (3)
way to - 0.05% (3)
when the - 0.05% (3)
makes me - 0.05% (3)
the facts - 0.05% (3)
i’m not - 0.05% (3)
trying to - 0.05% (3)
paracas skulls - 0.05% (3)
which is - 0.05% (3)
don’t think - 0.05% (3)
write about - 0.05% (3)
dna” from - 0.05% (3)
“nephilim dna” - 0.05% (3)
at skepticon - 0.05% (3)
guest post - 0.05% (3)
the conspiracy - 0.05% (3)
fact that - 0.05% (3)
i’m going - 0.05% (3)
why the - 0.05% (3)
might be - 0.05% (3)
hang the - 0.05% (3)
haplogroup x - 0.05% (3)
media coverage - 0.05% (3)
own facts - 0.05% (3)
to your - 0.05% (3)
good fight - 0.05% (3)
understanding of - 0.05% (3)
to address - 0.05% (3)
native american - 0.05% (3)
and again - 0.05% (3)
andrew wakefield, - 0.05% (3)
3, 2016jennifer - 0.04% (2)
sexton: why - 0.04% (2)
by rosi - 0.04% (2)
the number - 0.04% (2)
leaving the - 0.04% (2)
3, 2016june - 0.04% (2)
the film - 0.04% (2)
a scientific - 0.04% (2)
‘why’ matters - 0.04% (2)
a quick - 0.04% (2)
common among - 0.04% (2)
too…and it - 0.04% (2)
talking to - 0.04% (2)
questions about - 0.04% (2)
and they - 0.04% (2)
bait a - 0.04% (2)
open access - 0.04% (2)
nothing to - 0.04% (2)
would change - 0.04% (2)
if you’re - 0.04% (2)
nautical pun - 0.04% (2)
do another - 0.04% (2)
just can’t - 0.04% (2)
movie, so - 0.04% (2)
my research - 0.04% (2)
of any - 0.04% (2)
and angry - 0.04% (2)
conspirasea day - 0.04% (2)
art of - 0.04% (2)
doesn’t that - 0.04% (2)
google a - 0.04% (2)
happened outside - 0.04% (2)
how many - 0.04% (2)
happened inside - 0.04% (2)
exposes real - 0.04% (2)
of google. - 0.04% (2)
indictment for - 0.04% (2)
project and - 0.04% (2)
couple of - 0.04% (2)
interviewed me - 0.04% (2)
the cruise. - 0.04% (2)
the constitutional - 0.04% (2)
polarity of - 0.04% (2)
me for - 0.04% (2)
the baryonic - 0.04% (2)
is not - 0.04% (2)
trustee matrix: - 0.04% (2)
legal gibberish - 0.04% (2)
to fear - 0.04% (2)
series of - 0.04% (2)
reacted to - 0.04% (2)
conspirasea cruise, - 0.04% (2)
can’t do - 0.04% (2)
another nautical - 0.04% (2)
interview with - 0.04% (2)
cruise and - 0.04% (2)
the story - 0.04% (2)
5 part - 0.04% (2)
to protect - 0.04% (2)
took the - 0.04% (2)
me and - 0.04% (2)
the details - 0.04% (2)
try to - 0.04% (2)
a graduate - 0.04% (2)
of which - 0.04% (2)
to accept - 0.04% (2)
fantasies and - 0.04% (2)
graduate of - 0.04% (2)
mythologies: “nephilim - 0.04% (2)
conspiracies? the - 0.04% (2)
be able - 0.04% (2)
facebook! follow - 0.04% (2)
the question - 0.04% (2)
of evidence - 0.04% (2)
metaphors on - 0.04% (2)
information that - 0.04% (2)
flunking out - 0.04% (2)
wrote a - 0.04% (2)
science literacy, - 0.04% (2)
my thoughts - 0.04% (2)
please don’t - 0.04% (2)
follow violent - 0.04% (2)
on facebook! - 0.04% (2)
may 29, - 0.04% (2)
archive of - 0.04% (2)
this to - 0.04% (2)
bit of - 0.04% (2)
to argue - 0.04% (2)
and it’s - 0.04% (2)
know who - 0.04% (2)
search for: - 0.04% (2)
inside the - 0.04% (2)
make it - 0.04% (2)
and so - 0.04% (2)
of new - 0.04% (2)
as soon - 0.04% (2)
genetic mythologies: - 0.04% (2)
september 20, - 0.04% (2)
comments as - 0.04% (2)
genetics to - 0.04% (2)
details of - 0.04% (2)
scienceancient dna, - 0.04% (2)
genetic history - 0.04% (2)
so much - 0.04% (2)
of our - 0.04% (2)
on haplogroup - 0.04% (2)
post to - 0.04% (2)
to any - 0.04% (2)
pseudogenetics at - 0.04% (2)
this post. - 0.04% (2)
in mma - 0.04% (2)
why ‘why’ - 0.04% (2)
rosi sexton: - 0.04% (2)
post by - 0.04% (2)
dna, anthropological - 0.04% (2)
→ scienceancient - 0.04% (2)
peopling of - 0.04% (2)
and if - 0.04% (2)
north american - 0.04% (2)
of people - 0.04% (2)
some questions - 0.04% (2)
last year - 0.04% (2)
the comments - 0.04% (2)
you have - 0.04% (2)
it and - 0.04% (2)
good fight. - 0.04% (2)
to share - 0.04% (2)
is going - 0.04% (2)
not entitled - 0.04% (2)
(or to - 0.04% (2)
prove you - 0.04% (2)
but not - 0.04% (2)
an interesting - 0.04% (2)
theories that - 0.04% (2)
fit the - 0.04% (2)
the theory - 0.04% (2)
protect their - 0.04% (2)
is just - 0.04% (2)
pseudolawyer is - 0.04% (2)
between the - 0.04% (2)
a special - 0.04% (2)
the system - 0.04% (2)
you to - 0.04% (2)
the simplest - 0.04% (2)
do that - 0.04% (2)
this piece - 0.04% (2)
to become - 0.04% (2)
this particular - 0.04% (2)
them. i - 0.04% (2)
it’s important - 0.04% (2)
possible to - 0.04% (2)
again and - 0.04% (2)
irrational beliefs - 0.04% (2)
in court - 0.04% (2)
about why - 0.04% (2)
the us - 0.04% (2)
to their - 0.04% (2)
and difficult - 0.04% (2)
end of - 0.04% (2)
a different - 0.04% (2)
important to - 0.04% (2)
had with - 0.04% (2)
is this - 0.04% (2)
among elite - 0.04% (2)
athletes outside - 0.04% (2)
olympics too…and - 0.04% (2)
august 9, - 0.04% (2)
comments the - 0.04% (2)
a great - 0.04% (2)
based on - 0.04% (2)
case of - 0.04% (2)
competing in - 0.04% (2)
as well. - 0.04% (2)
over the - 0.04% (2)
to train - 0.04% (2)
a whole - 0.04% (2)
least one - 0.04% (2)
martial arts, - 0.04% (2)
you should - 0.04% (2)
june 13, - 0.04% (2)
a conversation - 0.04% (2)
how the - 0.04% (2)
mr. wakefield - 0.04% (2)
movie would - 0.04% (2)
city on - 0.04% (2)
comments this - 0.04% (2)
more attention - 0.04% (2)
the community - 0.04% (2)
i hope - 0.04% (2)
than one - 0.04% (2)
one person - 0.04% (2)
alt med - 0.04% (2)
to listen - 0.04% (2)
they are - 0.04% (2)
it for - 0.04% (2)
like cupping, - 0.04% (2)
these athletes - 0.04% (2)
and losing - 0.04% (2)
marks on - 0.04% (2)
not so - 0.04% (2)
to say - 0.04% (2)
evidence for - 0.04% (2)
where i - 0.04% (2)
personal experience - 0.04% (2)
this mean - 0.04% (2)
aunt agatha - 0.04% (2)
evidence that - 0.04% (2)
equally enjoyable - 0.04% (2)
a reason - 0.04% (2)
– but - 0.04% (2)
it does - 0.04% (2)
clear about - 0.04% (2)
it’s possible - 0.04% (2)
in case - 0.04% (2)
find that - 0.04% (2)
winning and - 0.04% (2)
by the - 0.04% (2)
there is - 0.04% (2)
level sport - 0.04% (2)
talk about - 0.04% (2)
this way - 0.04% (2)
are the - 0.04% (2)
to allow - 0.04% (2)
if it’s - 0.04% (2)
and to - 0.04% (2)
think about - 0.04% (2)
to ask - 0.04% (2)
to achieve - 0.04% (2)
what they - 0.04% (2)
to cancel - 0.04% (2)
the conspirasea cruise - 0.22% (12)
on the conspirasea - 0.15% (8)
university of google - 0.15% (8)
continue reading → - 0.11% (6)
of the university - 0.11% (6)
of the movie - 0.09% (5)
of the americas - 0.09% (5)
out of the - 0.09% (5)
a skeptic on - 0.09% (5)
reading → science - 0.09% (5)
skeptic on the - 0.09% (5)
reviewed: what happened - 0.07% (4)
some of the - 0.07% (4)
outside of the - 0.07% (4)
#vaxxed, reviewed: what - 0.07% (4)
understanding of the - 0.05% (3)
makes me furious. - 0.05% (3)
that they can’t - 0.05% (3)
pseudoscience is common - 0.05% (3)
they can’t afford - 0.05% (3)
to flunk out - 0.05% (3)
of the movie. - 0.05% (3)
you know what - 0.05% (3)
the fact that - 0.05% (3)
change your mind - 0.05% (3)
to write a - 0.05% (3)
sooner or later - 0.05% (3)
your own facts - 0.05% (3)
the paracas skulls - 0.05% (3)
conspirasea cruise day - 0.05% (3)
at the same - 0.05% (3)
entitled to your - 0.05% (3)
to hang the - 0.05% (3)
from the paracas - 0.05% (3)
i don’t think - 0.05% (3)
people who are - 0.05% (3)
i think it’s - 0.05% (3)
“nephilim dna” from - 0.05% (3)
sense to say - 0.04% (2)
archive of posts - 0.04% (2)
the people who - 0.04% (2)
(or to hang - 0.04% (2)
not entitled to - 0.04% (2)
metaphors on facebook! - 0.04% (2)
violent metaphors on - 0.04% (2)
it’s important to - 0.04% (2)
it’s possible to - 0.04% (2)
about the conspirasea - 0.04% (2)
debunking pseudogenetics at - 0.04% (2)
interview with andrew - 0.04% (2)
exposes real conspiracies? - 0.04% (2)
day 5 part - 0.04% (2)
the story of - 0.04% (2)
story of an - 0.04% (2)
do another nautical - 0.04% (2)
prove you wrong). - 0.04% (2)
rosi sexton: why - 0.04% (2)
at the end - 0.04% (2)
the conspirasea cruise, - 0.04% (2)
search search for: - 0.04% (2)
on haplogroup x - 0.04% (2)
matrix: legal gibberish - 0.04% (2)
the baryonic trustee - 0.04% (2)
constitutional polarity of - 0.04% (2)
people who prove - 0.04% (2)
another nautical pun - 0.04% (2)
just can’t do - 0.04% (2)
took the bait - 0.04% (2)
guest post by - 0.04% (2)
you know who - 0.04% (2)
an interview with - 0.04% (2)
of google a - 0.04% (2)
what happened inside - 0.04% (2)
too…and it makes - 0.04% (2)
of the olympics - 0.04% (2)
elite athletes outside - 0.04% (2)
is common among - 0.04% (2)
legal gibberish on - 0.04% (2)
nothing to fear - 0.04% (2)
of the conspiracy - 0.04% (2)
baryonic trustee matrix: - 0.04% (2)
by rosi sexton: - 0.04% (2)
what happened after - 0.04% (2)
archaeological fantasies and - 0.04% (2)
on some of - 0.04% (2)
city on june - 0.04% (2)
the genetic history - 0.04% (2)
more than one - 0.04% (2)
in the comments - 0.04% (2)
be able to - 0.04% (2)
olympics too…and it - 0.04% (2)
dna, anthropological genetics, - 0.04% (2)
why ‘why’ matters - 0.04% (2)
among elite athletes - 0.04% (2)
winning and losing - 0.04% (2)
cupping marks on - 0.04% (2)
in this way - 0.04% (2)
very clear about - 0.04% (2)
think it’s possible - 0.04% (2)
clear about what - 0.04% (2)
i had with - 0.04% (2)
reading → scienceancient - 0.04% (2)
polarity of the - 0.04% (2)
university of google. - 0.04% (2)
– but it - 0.04% (2)
conspirasea cruise an - 0.04% (2)
the good fight. - 0.04% (2)
on the cruise - 0.04% (2)
the conspirasea cruise. - 0.04% (2)
this is an - 0.04% (2)
have a lot - 0.04% (2)
to write about - 0.04% (2)
as soon as - 0.04% (2)
happened inside the - 0.04% (2)
i want to - 0.04% (2)
mythologies: “nephilim dna” - 0.04% (2)
and if you - 0.04% (2)
fans of the - 0.04% (2)
own facts (or - 0.04% (2)
as well as - 0.04% (2)
talking to people - 0.04% (2)
in kansas city - 0.04% (2)
peopling of the - 0.04% (2)

Here you can find chart of all your popular one, two and three word phrases. Google and others search engines means your page is about words you use frequently.

Copyright © 2015-2016 hupso.pl. All rights reserved. FB | +G | Twitter

Hupso.pl jest serwisem internetowym, w którym jednym kliknieciem możesz szybko i łatwo sprawdź stronę www pod kątem SEO. Oferujemy darmowe pozycjonowanie stron internetowych oraz wycena domen i stron internetowych. Prowadzimy ranking polskich stron internetowych oraz ranking stron alexa.