2.94 score from hupso.pl for:
violentmetaphors.com



HTML Content


Titleviolent metaphors – thoughts from the intersection of science, pseudoscience, and conflict.

Length: 97, Words: 11
Description thoughts from the intersection of science, pseudoscience, and conflict.

Length: 71, Words: 9
Keywords pusty
Robots
Charset UTF-8
Og Meta - Title exist
Og Meta - Description exist
Og Meta - Site name exist
Tytuł powinien zawierać pomiędzy 10 a 70 znaków (ze spacjami), a mniej niż 12 słów w długości.
Meta opis powinien zawierać pomiędzy 50 a 160 znaków (łącznie ze spacjami), a mniej niż 24 słów w długości.
Kodowanie znaków powinny być określone , UTF-8 jest chyba najlepszy zestaw znaków, aby przejść z powodu UTF-8 jest bardziej międzynarodowy kodowaniem.
Otwarte obiekty wykresu powinny być obecne w stronie internetowej (więcej informacji na temat protokołu OpenGraph: http://ogp.me/)

SEO Content

Words/Characters 5311
Text/HTML 29.43 %
Headings H1 1
H2 11
H3 9
H4 0
H5 0
H6 0
H1
violent metaphors
H2
thoughts from the intersection of science, pseudoscience, and conflict.
what napoleon’s army ate
having a baby doesn’t change the facts on vaccines.
is donald trump really a great negotiator?
you’re not entitled to your own facts (or to hang the people who prove you wrong).
debunking pseudogenetics at skepticon
genetic mythologies: “nephilim dna” from the paracas skulls
archaeological fantasies and the genetic history of the americas
guest post by rosi sexton: why ‘why’ matters
pseudoscience is common among elite athletes outside of the olympics too…and it makes me furious.
#vaxxed, reviewed: what happened outside of the movie.
H3
continue reading →
blog stats
follow me via email!
archive of posts
follow violent metaphors on facebook!
follow jennifer raff on twitter!
recent posts
search
tags
H4
H5
H6
strong
b
i
em
Bolds strong 0
b 0
i 0
em 0
Zawartość strony internetowej powinno zawierać więcej niż 250 słów, z stopa tekst / kod jest wyższy niż 20%.
Pozycji używać znaczników (h1, h2, h3, ...), aby określić temat sekcji lub ustępów na stronie, ale zwykle, użyj mniej niż 6 dla każdego tagu pozycje zachować swoją stronę zwięzły.
Styl używać silnych i kursywy znaczniki podkreślić swoje słowa kluczowe swojej stronie, ale nie nadużywać (mniej niż 16 silnych tagi i 16 znaczników kursywy)

Statystyki strony

twitter:title pusty
twitter:description pusty
google+ itemprop=name pusty
Pliki zewnętrzne 36
Pliki CSS 8
Pliki javascript 28
Plik należy zmniejszyć całkowite odwołanie plików (CSS + JavaScript) do 7-8 maksymalnie.

Linki wewnętrzne i zewnętrzne

Linki 287
Linki wewnętrzne 3
Linki zewnętrzne 284
Linki bez atrybutu Title 186
Linki z atrybutem NOFOLLOW 0
Linki - Użyj atrybutu tytuł dla każdego łącza. Nofollow link jest link, który nie pozwala wyszukiwarkom boty zrealizują są odnośniki no follow. Należy zwracać uwagę na ich użytkowania

Linki wewnętrzne

Linki zewnętrzne

home https://violentmetaphors.com/
about me https://violentmetaphors.com/about/
public speaking https://violentmetaphors.com/public-speaking/
site policies https://violentmetaphors.com/site-policies/
support violent metaphors https://violentmetaphors.com/support-violent-metaphors/
vita https://violentmetaphors.com/cv/
violent metaphors https://violentmetaphors.com/
what napoleon’s army ate https://violentmetaphors.com/2017/04/19/what-napoleons-army-ate/
https://violentmetaphors.com/2017/04/19/what-napoleons-army-ate/
jennifer raff https://violentmetaphors.com/author/batgirlraff/
1 comment https://violentmetaphors.com/2017/04/19/what-napoleons-army-ate/#comments
reconstructing diet in napoleon’s grand army using stable carbon and nitrogen isotope analysis. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com.www2.lib.ku.edu/doi/10.1002/ajpa.23184/abstract
the past and the curious. https://www.theguardian.com/science/2017/apr/18/food-for-thought-reconstructing-the-diet-of-napoleons-grand-army?cmp=share_iosapp_other
science https://violentmetaphors.com/category/science-2/
having a baby doesn’t change the facts on vaccines. https://violentmetaphors.com/2017/04/08/having-a-baby-doesnt-change-the-facts-on-vaccines/
https://violentmetaphors.com/2017/04/08/having-a-baby-doesnt-change-the-facts-on-vaccines/
jennifer raff https://violentmetaphors.com/author/batgirlraff/
40 comments https://violentmetaphors.com/2017/04/08/having-a-baby-doesnt-change-the-facts-on-vaccines/#comments
dear parents https://violentmetaphors.com/2014/03/25/parents-you-are-being-lied-to/
vast majority https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2014/p0828-infant-vaccination.html
overwhelming scientific evidence https://www.healthychildren.org/english/safety-prevention/immunizations/pages/vaccine-studies-examine-the-evidence.aspx
motivated reasoning https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/motivated_reasoning
the informed parent: a science-based resource  https://www.amazon.com/informed-parent-science-based-resource-childs/dp/0399171061
this book https://www.amazon.com/death-expertise-campaign-established-knowledge/dp/0190469412
making money http://www.vox.com/science-and-health/2017/4/6/15160486/alex-jones-vaccines-autism-gates-fungus-health-conspiracy-theories?utm_campaign=vox&utm_content=entry&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter
here’s https://violentmetaphors.com/2013/12/20/the-most-important-playground-conversation-how-to-persuade-a-friend-to-vaccinate/
science https://violentmetaphors.com/category/science-2/
anti-vaccine https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/anti-vaccine/
parenting https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/parenting/
pseudoscience https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/pseudoscience/
science https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/science/
vaccination https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/vaccination/
is donald trump really a great negotiator? https://violentmetaphors.com/2017/01/31/is-donald-trump-really-a-great-negotiator/
https://violentmetaphors.com/2017/01/31/is-donald-trump-really-a-great-negotiator/
colin https://violentmetaphors.com/author/kmcrober/
9 comments https://violentmetaphors.com/2017/01/31/is-donald-trump-really-a-great-negotiator/#comments
a new company http://www.vashmc.com/
continue reading https://violentmetaphors.com/2017/01/31/is-donald-trump-really-a-great-negotiator/#more-4294
communication https://violentmetaphors.com/category/communication-2/
you’re not entitled to your own facts (or to hang the people who prove you wrong). https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/12/30/youre-not-entitled-to-your-own-facts-or-to-hang-the-people-who-prove-you-wrong/
https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/12/30/youre-not-entitled-to-your-own-facts-or-to-hang-the-people-who-prove-you-wrong/
colin https://violentmetaphors.com/author/kmcrober/
24 comments https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/12/30/youre-not-entitled-to-your-own-facts-or-to-hang-the-people-who-prove-you-wrong/#comments
agenda 31 http://www.agenda31.org/a31-112-original-jurisdiction-by-statute/
malheur occupiers http://koin.com/2016/09/26/testimony-continues-in-malheur-standoff-trial/
good fight http://goodfightbook.com/
continue reading https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/12/30/youre-not-entitled-to-your-own-facts-or-to-hang-the-people-who-prove-you-wrong/#more-3982
communication https://violentmetaphors.com/category/communication-2/
pseudolaw https://violentmetaphors.com/category/pseudolaw/
conspiracy theories https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/conspiracy-theories/
law https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/law/
debunking pseudogenetics at skepticon https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/12/18/debunking-pseudogenetics-at-skepticon/
https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/12/18/debunking-pseudogenetics-at-skepticon/
jennifer raff https://violentmetaphors.com/author/batgirlraff/
8 comments https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/12/18/debunking-pseudogenetics-at-skepticon/#comments
skepticon 9 https://skepticon.org/
genetic astrology http://www.ucl.ac.uk/mace-lab/debunking
“nephilim dna” from the paracas skulls https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/09/20/genetic-mythologies-nephilim-dna-from-the-paracas-skulls/
“rutherford’s law” https://smile.amazon.com/brief-history-everyone-ever-lived/dp/0297609378/ref=sr_1_1?ie=utf8&qid=1477428876&sr=8-1&keywords=a+brief+history+of+everyone+who+ever+lived#reader_0297609378
“debunking genetic astrology” http://www.ucl.ac.uk/mace-lab/debunking
mark thomas https://twitter.com/mt_genes
debbie kennett https://twitter.com/debbiekennett
science https://violentmetaphors.com/category/science-2/
genetic mythologies: “nephilim dna” from the paracas skulls https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/09/20/genetic-mythologies-nephilim-dna-from-the-paracas-skulls/
https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/09/20/genetic-mythologies-nephilim-dna-from-the-paracas-skulls/
jennifer raff https://violentmetaphors.com/author/batgirlraff/
29 comments https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/09/20/genetic-mythologies-nephilim-dna-from-the-paracas-skulls/#comments
continue reading https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/09/20/genetic-mythologies-nephilim-dna-from-the-paracas-skulls/#more-3665
science https://violentmetaphors.com/category/science-2/
ancient dna https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/ancient-dna/
anthropological genetics https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/anthropological-genetics/
anthropology https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/anthropology/
archaeology https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/archaeology/
genetics https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/genetics/
nephilim https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/nephilim/
paracas https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/paracas/
peru https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/peru/
archaeological fantasies and the genetic history of the americas https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/08/15/archaeological-fantasies-and-the-genetic-history-of-the-americas/
https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/08/15/archaeological-fantasies-and-the-genetic-history-of-the-americas/
jennifer raff https://violentmetaphors.com/author/batgirlraff/
9 comments https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/08/15/archaeological-fantasies-and-the-genetic-history-of-the-americas/#comments
archaeological fantasies http://www.archaeologypodcastnetwork.com/archyfantasies/
here’s a link http://www.archaeologypodcastnetwork.com/archyfantasies/50
here http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1179/2055556315z.00000000040
academia.edu https://kansas.academia.edu/jenniferraff
this post. https://violentmetaphors.com/2014/02/07/how-to-tell-if-an-ancient-dna-study-is-legit/
continue reading https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/08/15/archaeological-fantasies-and-the-genetic-history-of-the-americas/#more-3618
science https://violentmetaphors.com/category/science-2/
ancient dna https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/ancient-dna/
anthropological genetics https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/anthropological-genetics/
archaeological fantasies https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/archaeological-fantasies/
archaeology https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/archaeology/
communication https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/communication/
my research https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/my-research/
podcast https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/podcast/
science https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/science/
solutrean hypothesis https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/solutrean-hypothesis/
guest post by rosi sexton: why ‘why’ matters https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/08/12/guest-post-by-rosi-sexton-why-why-matters/
https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/08/12/guest-post-by-rosi-sexton-why-why-matters/
jennifer raff https://violentmetaphors.com/author/batgirlraff/
20 comments https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/08/12/guest-post-by-rosi-sexton-why-why-matters/#comments
this post https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/08/09/pseudoscience-is-common-among-elite-athletes-outside-of-the-olympics-too-and-it-makes-me-furious/
science https://violentmetaphors.com/category/science-2/
pseudoscience is common among elite athletes outside of the olympics too…and it makes me furious. https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/08/09/pseudoscience-is-common-among-elite-athletes-outside-of-the-olympics-too-and-it-makes-me-furious/
https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/08/09/pseudoscience-is-common-among-elite-athletes-outside-of-the-olympics-too-and-it-makes-me-furious/
jennifer raff https://violentmetaphors.com/author/batgirlraff/
57 comments https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/08/09/pseudoscience-is-common-among-elite-athletes-outside-of-the-olympics-too-and-it-makes-me-furious/#comments
great post http://scienceblogs.com/insolence/2016/07/01/whats-the-harm-cupping-edition/
is common http://policyoptions.irpp.org/magazines/august-2016/olympic-debunk/
this story https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/shortcuts/2016/aug/08/does-cupping-do-olympic-athletes-any-good
magical thinking https://violentmetaphors.com/2014/02/23/the-dangers-of-magical-thinking-in-the-martial-arts/
‘desperately implausible’ http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/rio-2016-cupping-what-is-it-olympics-athletes-suction-cups-skin-marks-a7178731.html
david colquhoun http://twitter.com/david_colquhoun
rosi sexton https://rosisexton.wordpress.com/2015/02/21/become-a-better-bullshit-detector/
jeff westfall http://rpmartialarts.com/the-martial-brain/
science https://violentmetaphors.com/category/science-2/
cupping https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/cupping/
martial arts https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/martial-arts/
mma https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/mma/
olympics https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/olympics/
pseudoscience https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/pseudoscience/
quackery https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/quackery/
#vaxxed, reviewed: what happened outside of the movie. https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/06/13/vaxxed-reviewed-what-happened-outside-of-the-movie/
https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/06/13/vaxxed-reviewed-what-happened-outside-of-the-movie/
jennifer raff https://violentmetaphors.com/author/batgirlraff/
83 comments https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/06/13/vaxxed-reviewed-what-happened-outside-of-the-movie/#comments
part i https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/06/13/vaxxed-reviewed-what-happened-inside-the-movie/#more-3522
continue reading https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/06/13/vaxxed-reviewed-what-happened-outside-of-the-movie/#more-3437
science https://violentmetaphors.com/category/science-2/
previous articles https://violentmetaphors.com/page/2/
- http://discover.wordpress.com/
follow violent metaphors on facebook! https://www.facebook.com/scienceliteracy
follow violent metaphors on facebook! https://www.facebook.com/scienceliteracy
what napoleon’s army ate https://violentmetaphors.com/2017/04/19/what-napoleons-army-ate/
having a baby doesn’t change the facts on vaccines. https://violentmetaphors.com/2017/04/08/having-a-baby-doesnt-change-the-facts-on-vaccines/
is donald trump really a great negotiator? https://violentmetaphors.com/2017/01/31/is-donald-trump-really-a-great-negotiator/
you’re not entitled to your own facts (or to hang the people who prove you wrong). https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/12/30/youre-not-entitled-to-your-own-facts-or-to-hang-the-people-who-prove-you-wrong/
debunking pseudogenetics at skepticon https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/12/18/debunking-pseudogenetics-at-skepticon/
genetic mythologies: “nephilim dna” from the paracas skulls https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/09/20/genetic-mythologies-nephilim-dna-from-the-paracas-skulls/
archaeological fantasies and the genetic history of the americas https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/08/15/archaeological-fantasies-and-the-genetic-history-of-the-americas/
guest post by rosi sexton: why ‘why’ matters https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/08/12/guest-post-by-rosi-sexton-why-why-matters/
pseudoscience is common among elite athletes outside of the olympics too…and it makes me furious. https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/08/09/pseudoscience-is-common-among-elite-athletes-outside-of-the-olympics-too-and-it-makes-me-furious/
#vaxxed, reviewed: what happened outside of the movie. https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/06/13/vaxxed-reviewed-what-happened-outside-of-the-movie/
#vaxxed, reviewed: what happened inside the movie https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/06/13/vaxxed-reviewed-what-happened-inside-the-movie/
how to flunk out of the university of google https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/06/03/how-to-flunk-out-of-the-university-of-google/
a skeptic on the conspirasea cruise https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/05/29/a-skeptic-on-the-conspirasea-cruise/
behind the scenes at nasa: the hera project https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/05/04/behind-the-scenes-at-nasa-the-hera-project/
another open thread on vaccines https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/04/19/another-open-thread-on-vaccines/
no, we don’t actually know that modern humans killed off the hobbits https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/04/04/no-we-dont-actually-know-that-modern-humans-killed-off-the-hobbits/
vaxxed: from coverup to catastrophe to cancellation to insignificance https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/03/31/vaxxed-from-coverup-to-catastrophe-to-cancellation-to-insignificance/
surviving my first year as a new professor: tools of the trade https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/03/31/surviving-my-first-year-as-a-new-professor-tools-of-the-trade/
an interview with andrew wakefield https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/02/15/an-interview-with-andrew-wakefield/
conspirasea day 7: i failed. https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/02/09/conspirasea-day-7-i-failed/
sexual harassment in physical anthropology https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/02/09/sexual-harassment-in-physical-anthropology/
conspirasea day six: you know who exposes real conspiracies? the media. https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/02/07/conspirasea-day-six-you-know-who-exposes-real-conspiracies-the-media/
conspirasea cruise day 5 part 2: i took the bait https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/02/04/conspirasea-cruise-day-5-part-2-i-took-the-bait/
a skeptic on the conspirasea cruise, day 5: i just can’t do another nautical pun https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/01/30/a-skeptic-on-the-conspirasea-cruise-day-5-i-just-cant-do-another-nautical-pun/
troubled waters: conspirasea cruise day 4(ish) https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/01/30/troubled-waters-conspirasea-cruise-day-4ish/
nothing to fear: conspirasea cruise day 3 https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/01/28/nothing-to-fear-conspirasea-cruise-day-3/
reverse the constitutional polarity of the baryonic trustee matrix: legal gibberish on the conspirasea cruise (day 2) https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/01/27/reverse-the-constitutional-polarity-of-the-baryonic-trustee-matrix-legal-gibberish-on-the-conspirasea-cruise-day-2/
a skeptic on the conspira-sea cruise: day 1 https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/01/26/a-skeptic-on-the-conspira-sea-cruise-day-1/
anchors aweigh! the conspiracy cruise sails soon. https://violentmetaphors.com/2016/01/22/anchors-aweigh-the-conspiracy-cruise-sails-soon/
why there still are monkeys: lessons learned from teaching evolution in kansas. https://violentmetaphors.com/2015/12/28/why-there-are-still-monkeys-lessons-learned-from-teaching-evolution-in-kansas/
responses to some questions about our recently published paper on haplogroup x and north american prehistory https://violentmetaphors.com/2015/11/11/responses-to-some-questions-about-our-recently-published-paper-on-haplogroup-x-and-north-american-prehistory/
ancient dna from two 11,500 year old burials in alaska https://violentmetaphors.com/2015/10/26/ancient-dna-from-two-11500-year-old-burials-in-alaska/
the lost city that isn’t. https://violentmetaphors.com/2015/10/19/the-lost-city-that-isnt/
republicans aren’t anti-vaccine. (yet) https://violentmetaphors.com/2015/09/17/republicans-arent-anti-vaccine-yet/
deep (conspira)sea fishing: a fundraising drive https://violentmetaphors.com/2015/09/09/deep-conspirasea-fishing-a-fundraising-drive/
open access and pseudoarchaeology: an encouraging update! https://violentmetaphors.com/2015/09/03/open-access-and-pseudoarchaeology-an-encouraging-update/
mixed messages during national immunization awareness month https://violentmetaphors.com/2015/08/21/mixed-messages-during-national-immunization-awareness-month/
good science communication means never calling them “retard” – even if you’re nassim taleb https://violentmetaphors.com/2015/08/14/good-science-communication-means-never-calling-them-retard-even-if-youre-nassim-taleb/
public outreach that’s inaccessible to the public. https://violentmetaphors.com/2015/07/21/public-outreach-thats-inaccessible-by-the-public/
encouraging science journalism: the genome of kennewick man. https://violentmetaphors.com/2015/06/22/encouraging-science-journalism-the-genome-of-kennewick-man/
no, seriously, don’t politicize anti-vax sentiment https://violentmetaphors.com/2015/06/17/no-seriously-dont-politicize-anti-vax-sentiment/
a normal person’s review of the apple watch https://violentmetaphors.com/2015/05/18/a-normal-persons-review-of-the-apple-watch/
the most important playground conversation, a presentation https://violentmetaphors.com/2015/05/13/the-most-important-playground-conversation-a-presentation/
the genetic analysis of the alaskan north slope https://violentmetaphors.com/2015/05/09/1709/
new study overturns yet another anti-vaccine talking point https://violentmetaphors.com/2015/04/22/new-study-overturns-yet-another-anti-vaccine-talking-point/
why the food babe is wrong (it’s not just because she’s ignorant) https://violentmetaphors.com/2015/04/10/why-the-food-babe-is-wrong-its-not-just-because-shes-ignorant/
new paper deals blow to hypothesis that native americans have european ancestry https://violentmetaphors.com/2015/03/31/new-paper-deals-blow-to-hypothesis-that-native-americans-have-european-ancestry/
darwin day! https://violentmetaphors.com/2015/02/12/darwin-day/
please don’t politicize vaccine refusal https://violentmetaphors.com/2015/02/04/please-dont-politicize-vaccine-refusal/
mike adams of natural news: as fine a lawyer as he is a scientist https://violentmetaphors.com/2015/02/01/mike-adams-of-natural-news-as-fine-a-lawyer-as-he-is-a-scientist2/
adventure https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/adventure/
alaska https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/alaska/
ancient dna https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/ancient-dna/
andrew wakefield https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/andrew-wakefield/
andy hurley https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/andy-hurley/
animals https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/animals/
anthropological genetics https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/anthropological-genetics/
anthropology https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/anthropology/
anti-science https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/anti-science/
anti-vaccine https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/anti-vaccine/
anti-vax https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/anti-vax/
archaeology https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/archaeology/
arctic prehistory https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/arctic-prehistory/
astrology https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/astrology/
astronomy https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/astronomy/
autism https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/autism/
bats https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/bats/
books https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/books/
carl sagan https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/carl-sagan/
cats https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/cats/
caves https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/caves/
colin https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/colin/
communication https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/communication/
conflict https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/conflict/
conservation https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/conservation/
conspiracy theories https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/conspiracy-theories/
conspirasea cruise https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/conspirasea-cruise/
conversation https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/conversation/
creationism https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/creationism/
cultural cognition https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/cultural-cognition/
debate https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/debate/
discovery institute https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/discovery-institute/
education https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/education/
evolution https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/evolution/
fall out boy https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/fall-out-boy/
friendship https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/friendship/
genetics https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/genetics/
genomics https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/genomics/
gmo https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/gmo/
gmos https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/gmos/
greg jackson https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/greg-jackson/
guest post https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/guest-post/
health https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/health/
history https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/history/
homeopathy https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/homeopathy/
human genetic diversity https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/human-genetic-diversity/
immunization https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/immunization/
intelligent design https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/intelligent-design/
interview https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/interview/
inuit prehistory https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/inuit-prehistory/
iss https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/iss/
journal club https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/journal-club/
ken ham https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/ken-ham/
law https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/law/
martial arts https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/martial-arts/
media https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/media/
medicine https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/medicine/
methodology https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/methodology/
mike adams https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/mike-adams/
mitochondrial dna https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/mitochondrial-dna/
mma https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/mma/
monsanto https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/monsanto/
music https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/music/
my research https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/my-research/
native american prehistory https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/native-american-prehistory/
natural news https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/natural-news/
negotiation https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/negotiation/
nicholas wade https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/nicholas-wade/
outreach https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/outreach/
paleontology https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/paleontology/
patrick stump https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/patrick-stump/
peopling of the americas https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/peopling-of-the-americas/
personal https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/personal/
philosophy https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/philosophy/
politics https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/politics/
population genetics https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/population-genetics/
pseudolaw https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/pseudolaw/
pseudoscience https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/pseudoscience/
public health https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/public-health/
publishing https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/publishing/
quackery https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/quackery/
race https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/race/
racism https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/racism/
research https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/research/
science https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/science/
science communication https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/science-communication/
scientology https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/scientology/
skepticism https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/skepticism/
solutrean hypothesis https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/solutrean-hypothesis/
soyuz https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/soyuz/
space https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/space/
television https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/television/
universe https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/universe/
university of google https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/university-of-google/
vaccination https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/vaccination/
vaccines https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/vaccines/
wakefield https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/wakefield/
web links https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/web-links/
wildlife https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/wildlife/
women in science https://violentmetaphors.com/tag/women-in-science/
blog at wordpress.com. https://wordpress.com/?ref=footer_blog

Zdjęcia

Zdjęcia 8
Zdjęcia bez atrybutu ALT 3
Zdjęcia bez atrybutu TITLE 8
Korzystanie Obraz ALT i TITLE atrybutu dla każdego obrazu.

Zdjęcia bez atrybutu TITLE

https://violentmetaphors.files.wordpress.com/2017/04/img_24491.jpg?w=284&h=505
https://violentmetaphors.files.wordpress.com/2017/01/trump-1843504_1280.jpg?w=636
https://violentmetaphors.files.wordpress.com/2016/12/white-male-1871394_1280.jpg?w=300&h=300
https://violentmetaphors.files.wordpress.com/2014/04/distortion.jpg?w=636
https://violentmetaphors.files.wordpress.com/2016/08/screen-shot-2016-08-09-at-9-43-06-am.png?w=636
https://s1.wp.com/i/badges/freshly-pressed-rectangle.png
https://sb.scorecardresearch.com/p?c1=2&c2=7518284&c3=&c4=&c5=&c6=&c15=&cv=2.0&cj=1
https://pixel.wp.com/b.gif?v=noscript

Zdjęcia bez atrybutu ALT

https://s1.wp.com/i/badges/freshly-pressed-rectangle.png
https://sb.scorecardresearch.com/p?c1=2&c2=7518284&c3=&c4=&c5=&c6=&c15=&cv=2.0&cj=1
https://pixel.wp.com/b.gif?v=noscript

Ranking:


Alexa Traffic
Daily Global Rank Trend
Daily Reach (Percent)









Majestic SEO











Text on page:

skip to content primary menu homeabout me public speaking site policies support violent metaphors vita search search for: violent metaphors thoughts from the intersection of science, pseudoscience, and conflict. what napoleon’s army ate april 19, 2017jennifer raff1 comment i have a new blog on archaeology out over at the guardian’s science page, where i’m contributing a piece about once a month on archaeology and biological anthropology. as i write things there, i’ll link to them here for interested readers. here’s an excerpt: napoleon’s russian campaign of 1812 was marked by terrible logistical disaster and resulted in profound loss of life within his own army. although his forces reached moscow, they found the city abandoned and burning—a deliberate tactic on the part of the russian army to prevent the french soldiers from finding provisions. the practice of requiring soldiers to “live off the land” to supplement their rations likely contributed a great deal to this loss of life. this rendered them extremely vulnerable to the russians’ scorched earth tactics which left them little to forage or steal. but napoleon’s grande armée was ethnically and socially heterogeneous. were their origins, social status, and access to food during this time of deprivation reflected in their diet? this is one of the questions that holder et al. set out to address in their new paper, reconstructing diet in napoleon’s grand army using stable carbon and nitrogen isotope analysis. you can read the rest of my discussion of this paper at  the past and the curious. advertisements science having a baby doesn’t change the facts on vaccines. april 8, 2017april 8, 2017jennifer raff40 comments i normally avoid sharing personal details and information about my family publicly on social media. this post is going to be one of the rare exceptions. when my dear parents post went viral a few years ago, i heard from a lot of people who opposed vaccines demanding to know whether i had children, and insisting that if/when i did, i would come to understand how evil vaccination was. i found this line of argument irritating because the vast majority of parents understand how beneficial vaccination is for their children and their communities, and appreciate that they are able to save their children from diseases that were once significant threats to their health and safety. what’s really interesting to me is how much this statement reveals about the way an anti-vaccine or vaccine hesitant (i make a distinction between the two) parent thinks. the overwhelming scientific evidence showing the safety and efficacy of vaccines will not suddenly change just because someone becomes pregnant. instead, this argument shows that the person making it is not taking that evidence into account at all. he or she is relying on emotional reasoning, selectively listening to “facts”, arguments, and people that support a predetermined decision (to delay vaccination or not to vaccinate at all), and ignoring everything that contradicts that decision. this is a cognitive process known as motivated reasoning, and we are all prone to it. however, the consequences resulting from employing motivated reasoning to buy something we don’t need and to make decisions like whether or not to vaccinate should be obvious. allowing the voices of anti-vaccine advocates to frighten you into delaying or forgoing vaccinations could potentially cause great harm to your child and your community. so now i’m having a baby. my partner and i are very excited, happy, and nervous about what will change in our lives. but do you know what has not–or will not–change? my understanding of science, my trust in my doctors’ expert opinions, and my commitment to fully vaccinating my child on schedule. we shared our news on facebook, but i forgot to set the privacy of the announcement to “friends only”. (if you friend me on fb, please don’t be offended that i don’t accept your request; i post a mixture of public and private content and i try to keep the latter for family and close friends). amid the happy congratulations, i began to get some other types of comments. this went on for a few days, until i gently pointed out to the person posting that it was a bit rude to spam someone’s pregnancy announcement. to their credit, they apologized and deleted the thread.  it was a jarring, to say the least, and another good reminder that my policy of keeping personal details private is there for a reason. i’m about to break that policy again when i say (without going into things too much), that for several reasons my pregnancy is classified as “high risk”.  one of the things that i learned very early on as a result is the shocking amount of bad information that exists out there for expectant mothers. for me, this has led to a general policy of simply staying off of internet parenting groups entirely. (obviously that’s not a solution for many mothers, as they find the support and community valuable). if i do have a question (as i did the other day about whether a city i’m traveling to soon is a zika risk) i take it straight to my doctor’s office, either in person or on the phone. tara haelle and emily willingham’s book the informed parent: a science-based resource  has also been incredibly helpful. i hope other parents will find it useful too. to those parents who are trying to sort through the contradictory information thrown at them, you have my complete sympathy. but i encourage you to recognize the value of expertise over emotion in making important decisions (this book is next on my reading list). understand that while most parents who are vaccine hesitant are simply frightened and misled, many of the loudest voices arguing against mainstream scientific consensus are making money by deceiving you. if you are looking for resources to help you talk to your vaccine hesitant friends or family, here’s a guide that colin (an expert in negotiation) wrote. scienceanti-vaccine, parenting, pseudoscience, science, vaccination is donald trump really a great negotiator? january 31, 2017january 31, 2017colin9 comments this isn’t violent metaphor’s usual content, but it’s not as far away as you might think. we all want to have stronger skills for detecting pseudoscience and holding legitimate science to the highest standards. one of the most important skills for doing that is discriminating between hype and fact. when it comes to science, i can’t do that. i’m not a scientist. what i am is a negotiator. i have spent years helping clients with their negotiations through training and consulting, and i have a new company doing exactly that. once donald trump became a serious contender for president people began asking me whether he’s really as great a negotiator as he claims to be. the answer is that based on the information we have, it’s very doubtful. just as in science, the evidence matters more than the claims. this is relevant to science and scientists in another way, too. there are strong indications that the administration and its congressional allies will try to limit funding for scientific research. those cuts will probably be resolved through political negotiations. of course trump won’t be the only negotiator at the table, or even the only negotiator on his side of the table. nevertheless his style of negotiation is going to heavily influence the results. he’s likely to push hard to negotiate from a position of strength, which can distort the negotiations in harmful ways. this is a short and simple analysis of how that works. continue reading → communication you’re not entitled to your own facts (or to hang the people who prove you wrong). december 30, 2016december 30, 2016colin24 comments “there is evidence for being able to hang these [public officials]. i am so tired of ‘em. i’m just sick of it. i’ve had it, the second amendment is there for a reason.” corey eib, agenda 31. you’re entitled to your own opinion, but not your own facts–that’s the simplest, most basic credo of skepticism. want to hold the opinion that extraterrestrial life exists out there? great, me too. want to insist that it built the pyramids? now we’re talking pseudoscience. i’ve been following a budding pseudolegal guru who’s become very frustrated and angry that his nonsense theories about citizenship and jurisdiction have yet to make him immune to the laws of the united states, where he lives. his case highlights an interesting difference between pseudoscience and pseudolaw. both turn on theories that don’t really fit the available facts, whether those facts relate to the building of the pyramids, the origin of species, or the text of the fourteenth amendment. when the theory doesn’t fit the facts, pseudoscientists and pseudolawyers both build walled gardens to protect their theories–that’s one of the crucial differences between a “pseudo” scientist or lawyer and the real thing. those walls might be a community that doesn’t ask critical questions or conspiracy theories that provide a mechanism for disqualifying and ignoring such questions. a creationist, for example, can pretend that carbon dating proves the earth is just 6,000 years old. and they’ll never have to emerge from their walled garden to compare that theory to the facts available to actual scientists. they can just keep reading creationist blogs and books and avoid the awkward mismatch between their beliefs and the outside world. a pseudolawyer is in a different boat. legal theories usually get decided in court, sooner or later. it forces a comparison between the irrational belief and reality, and exposes its flaws. that can happen with scientific and medical theories, such as when a miracle cancer cure fails to cure any cancer, but it’s less common for any individual believer to experience that. in the legal world, if you decide you’re allowed to drive without a driver’s license because you’re a special kind of super-citizen, sooner or later the system is going to force you to test that belief. and the theory is going to fail, because it’s wrong. when those cherished, irrational beliefs fail, it’s at the end of a long and difficult process. the tribulations of trials encourage pseudolegal gurus to double down on their beliefs–they have to be truly committed to spend months litigating their beliefs, much less risk jail for them. and when the process that’s welded them more tightly to their ideology then exposes that ideology as false, the result is often going to be immense frustration and anger. this is an exploration of one pseudolawyer’s mistaken ideas about the us constitution, how they failed that empirical test, and how he’s responded with frustration, anger, and paranoia rather than reconsidering his own beliefs. it’s also about why just losing in court again and again and again isn’t enough to dissuade a budding guru. i’m not trying to do that with this piece, either. i don’t think it’s possible to talk such a person out of their beliefs. but because this guru’s recent rhetoric has become extremely frantic and even he’s even suggested violence, it’s important to engage with the theories he preaches in case that helps dissuade people from falling for them. i don’t think this particular pseudolawyer is actually going to become violent, but the communities that form around such ideas can become unpredictable. (just ask the malheur occupiers.) so in addition to discussing those theories as a case study, at the end of this piece i’m going to outline some of the simplest and most obvious flaws with them. engaging irrational beliefs that hurt people is, after all, the good fight. continue reading → communication, pseudolawconspiracy theories, law debunking pseudogenetics at skepticon december 18, 2016december 19, 2016jennifer raff8 comments a few weeks ago i gave a talk at skepticon 9 about pseudoscience, specifically the use of genetics to promote ideas like genetic astrology, “nephilim dna” from the paracas skulls, and genetic determinism (with a special emphasis on “rutherford’s law”). the conference organizers filmed it and uploaded it to youtube, and so i’ve embedded it below if you’d like to see it. sorry for the scarce posting over the last few months! i’ve been incredibly busy this semester: adjusting to teaching my full course load (last year i had a release from half my courses), trying to get the first batch of my students trained in the lab, and pulling together some publications and grant proposals. i have a lot of new things to write about as soon as my grades are entered on monday, so stay tuned! eta: since i didn’t give it in my talk, i want to be sure to link here to the fabulous “debunking genetic astrology” site, which is written and hosted by mark thomas (who first coined the term “genetic astrology”,  debbie kennett, and adrian timpson. science genetic mythologies: “nephilim dna” from the paracas skulls september 20, 2016september 20, 2016jennifer raff29 comments as longtime readers here know, i’m endlessly fascinated by the ways in which people attempt to misuse genetics to legitimize pseudoscientific ideas. today i’m going to write about one example which i’ve been meaning to address for some time: pseudoscientific claims about the genetic distinctiveness of the paracas peoples. (please note that i don’t usually show images of native american remains on this blog, but there was no other way to illustrate the details of this issue. under the cut is an embedded video of the unwrapping of a paracas mummy, as well as a photo with the mummy under its wrappings.) continue reading → scienceancient dna, anthropological genetics, anthropology, archaeology, genetics, nephilim, paracas, peru archaeological fantasies and the genetic history of the americas august 15, 2016jennifer raff9 comments the excellent podcast archaeological fantasies recently had me on as a guest for a wide ranging discussion on genetics. we covered everything from the genetic prehistory of the americas to issues surrounding ancestry testing companies. here’s a link to the episode (apologies for the fact that i kept cutting in and out–apparently our university wireless connection isn’t very good). since so much of our discussion focused on haplogroup x2a and models for ancient american prehistory, i decided to break from the normal tradition here at vm and actually re-publish a post to make it easier for people to get answers to any questions they might have. and if you have specific questions about content from the podcast, please feel free to leave them in the comments on this post. this post was originally published last year to address some questions that deborah bolnick and i were getting about our paper “does mitochondrial haplogroup x indicate ancient trans-atlantic migration to the americas? a critical re-evaluation.”  i’ve edited it slightly to reflect the fact that the paper itself is now open access, and you should be able to download it here or at my academia.edu page. (i’m actually really shocked at the number of downloads it’s gotten…apparently this is a topic that a lot of people find interesting!). as soon as my syllabi for the upcoming semester are finished, i will try to write up another post that summarizes recent findings in north american anthropological genetics, and what they mean for our understanding of the initial peopling of the americas. in the meantime, if you’re interested in ancient dna i highly recommend you get up to speed on some of the methods by reading this post. continue reading → scienceancient dna, anthropological genetics, archaeological fantasies, archaeology, communication, my research, podcast, science, solutrean hypothesis guest post by rosi sexton: why ‘why’ matters august 12, 2016jennifer raff20 comments a few days ago, i published this post about the pseudoscience i see frequently in mma communities. for a different perspective, i invited former professional fighter, osteopath, and all around brilliant person rosi sexton to share her thoughts with us. while her position is a bit ‘softer’ than mine, i think it’s important to get a diversity of perspectives, particularly from people who are actually treating patients. enjoy! –jennifer cupping seems to be the new therapy buzzword around these olympics. i’ve had a few discussions with people asking me what i think about all these athletes sporting cupping marks on their backs and shoulders. my answer? “well, that depends”. let’s get a few things straight before i go any further. in common with most of the skeptics who have already commented on this latest trend, i think it’s very unlikely that cupping has much of a direct physiological effect. there’s no evidence to suggest that it affects the underlying tissues very much at all, never mind in a way that’s likely to be performance enhancing. so case closed? cupping is nonsense, as with so many other ‘trendy’ interventions. not so fast. in the absence of claims made for specific physical outcomes, cupping is just a physical activity. it makes no more sense to say that “cupping is nonsense”, any more than it makes sense to say that morris dancing is nonsense: both activities seem a little odd to me, but if there are people who enjoy them for their own sake, then i’m not about to argue with their experience. although i’ve never had a cupping treatment, several friends tell me they find it nice and relaxing. “but where’s the evidence for that?” the skeptics ask; and here’s where i think the problem lies. sometimes we fail to distinguish adequately between objective claims about fact (“this treatment will make your muscles stronger”) and subjective claims about personal experience (“i had this treatment, and it made me feel really good”). when we start to imply that people’s individual experience is invalid, or wrong, because they don’t have scientific evidence to support it – that’s when sportspeople start to complain that the scientists are arrogant, out of touch curmudgeonly killjoys. imagine that someone has conducted a large survey about leisure activities. suppose the results come back, and it turns out that on average people find quiet country walks and loud, alcohol fuelled parties equally enjoyable. does this mean that you that your introverted great aunt agatha will be persuaded to forgo her gentle sunday afternoon stroll in favour of accompanying you to a nightclub? unlikely. telling her there’s evidence that the two activities are equally enjoyable probably wouldn’t be persuasive – because enjoyment is subjective, and aunt agatha knows what she likes. the fact that things like pain, discomfort, pleasure and happiness are all subjective and difficult to measure isn’t a reason not to research them – but it does raise difficulties that should be taken into account. i have misgivings about measuring something as complicated as pain on a 1-10 scale, for example; but we have to start somewhere. it also means that we should be very clear about what the research does, and doesn’t, say when we apply it to individuals. it’s not quite that simple, of course. perhaps that athlete finds the treatment pleasant and relaxing because he’s been told it’ll have beneficial effects on his performance, when in fact this is highly questionable. the ethics of using placebo effects in top level sport – where winning and losing can be measured in milliseconds – is a subject that needs a whole separate post, but that’s not what i’m advocating here. i think it’s possible to be clear and honest about what’s known about a treatment, and to allow for a person’s individual subjective experience at the same time. talking openly with the athlete about why they are using a particular treatment, and being very clear about what they expect it to achieve is an important part of that process. if an athlete i’m treating tells me that she wants to use a treatment like cupping, then my first question is to ask why she’s doing it. i want her to think about what she’s likely to get out of it, and to ensure that it’s not being used instead of evidence based treatment to address any underlying problems. if it’s only giving some temporary relief, could the time and money might be better spent elsewhere? what are the risks of adverse effects, and are the benefits worth it? as a clinician, i find that framing the conversation in this way to be a more effective way of communicating with my athletes. by taking a hard line against misleading claims but not against the practice itself (except where it’s likely to be actually harmful), it encourages the athlete to apply their own critical thinking. we talk about how athletes can monitor their own experience more methodically, to see whether particular changes to their plan have a consistent (subjective) effect or not. learning how to sensibly navigate the large gaps between our small islands of knowledge is something that those in high level sport constantly struggle with. no athlete can afford to use only methods that have been proven rigorously by science – despite the best efforts of sports science there is simply too little evidence out there. at the same time, it’s easy to get suckered in by the latest trendy therapy or product; when winning and losing come down to tiny margins, many athletes feel that they can’t afford to take the risk of not using something just in case it does make a difference. applying a sceptical thought process while at the same time allowing for personal experience and individual circumstances gives a framework for evaluating these unknowns, whether it’s a “wacky” therapy like cupping, a new training method or a cortisone injection. two questions you should never be afraid to ask: “what, exactly, is this supposed to achieve?” “what reason do i have to think it can do that?” i’ve never experienced cupping, but i did have a hot stone massage once. it was lovely. it didn’t cure my neck pain, of course (nor was i expecting it to) – but it was a very pleasant distraction from it for an hour or so. your mileage may vary. science pseudoscience is common among elite athletes outside of the olympics too…and it makes me furious. august 9, 2016august 9, 2016jennifer raff57 comments the many stories yesterday featuring olympians appearing with cupping marks on their skin have brought renewed attention to pseudoscience in sports. cupping, which involves putting a hot jar onto the skin, forming a suction that “draws out” toxins or unblocks energy meridians or something like that, might seem like a relatively benign form of pseudoscience, but it can be quite harmful.  orac has a great post (complete with a gruesome photo) describing the harms of this particular practice: cupping is nothing more than an ancient medical practice based on a prescientific understanding of the body and disease, much like bloodletting and treatments based on the four humors. as the case of lin lin shows, it’s all risk for no benefit. it has no place in modern medicine, or at least shouldn’t. i’m completely unsurprised to find that pseudoscience is common among the elite athletes competing in the olympics. i’ve seen similar things rampant in the combat sports world as well. over the course of my martial arts career, i’ve had the opportunity to train with many extraordinary mma fighters. what i observed in these elite professional fighters–most of them either competing in the ufc, or well on their way to it–was a razor-sharp focus on doing whatever it took to improve. this meant grueling eight hour training days, and equally grueling recovery practices to allow them to sustain that level of activity. the recovery practices included ice baths, contrast showers, yoga, expensive massages and bodywork, and a whole host of alternative medical treatments including acupuncture, energy work, and dubious supplements. and behind nearly every fighter, there’s usually at least one chiropractor lurking around in background. [my interactions with these mma chiropractors are so similar that they almost follow a script.  he (and it’s always a he) invariably introduces himself as “dr. first name”, even in casual social situations, and tries to impress his listeners by boasting about how many important clients he has.] this story gets at the psychological aspects of why elite athletes pursue useless–and sometimes even harmful–alternative practices. what i’ve observed among fighters is this exact mentality.   magical thinking has long been endemic to martial arts, and there are few voices in the community who challenge these ideas, particularly when they’re promoted by influential teachers and coaches. competitive martial artists, like mma fighters, are so determined to do anything it takes to give themselves the extra edge that they are especially likely to listen to anyone who promises them a benefit to training, to recovery, to mental conditioning.  another important motivation is the money that fighters can make through sponserships from alt med practitioners and supplement manufacturers. these athletes make so little money from fight contracts that they can’t afford to turn down any source of additional revenue.  this makes them vulnerable to all kinds of practices that are ‘desperately implausible’ , as the formidable enemy of pseudoscience david colquhoun characterizes them. if i sound angry here, it’s because i am. i see these quacks taking large fees from vulnerable fighters who can’t afford them…. but are convinced that they can’t afford not to pursue any possible advantage.  i’ve seen creepy alt med sponsors lurking around events and attaching themselves to athletes as if they were coaches. i’ve seen more than one person in the mma world injured by pseudoscientific ‘treatments’, and more than one athletic career ruined by supplements.  this exploitation makes me furious. i hope that as more attention is focused on pseudoscience in the olympics, more attention will also be paid to these issues in mma, and the work of people who are trying to push back against the bs in the community, like  rosi sexton, and jeff westfall. sciencecupping, martial arts, mma, olympics, pseudoscience, quackery #vaxxed, reviewed: what happened outside of the movie. june 13, 2016jennifer raff83 comments this is part ii of our series on the movie “vaxxed”, which colin, my sister julie, and i saw in kansas city on june 11. in part i, colin focused on some of the factual inaccuracies of the movie. he talked about how a person attending the movie would have walked away with an extremely distorted understanding of the cdc, a distortion deliberately encouraged by mr. wakefield and the makers of the documentary. here, i’m going to focus not so much on the documentary itself as on what happened after the documentary: what the “vaxxed” team said during the q&a session, how the audience responded, conversations that i had with protestors after the movie, and a conversation that colin and i had with mr. wakefield. continue reading → science previous articles blog stats 4,664,414 hits follow me via email! enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. join 26,533 other followers archive of posts archive of posts select month april 2017 january 2017 december 2016 september 2016 august 2016 june 2016 may 2016 april 2016 march 2016 february 2016 january 2016 december 2015 november 2015 october 2015 september 2015 august 2015 july 2015 june 2015 may 2015 april 2015 march 2015 february 2015 january 2015 december 2014 november 2014 october 2014 september 2014 august 2014 july 2014 june 2014 may 2014 april 2014 march 2014 february 2014 january 2014 december 2013 november 2013 october 2013 september 2013 august 2013 july 2013 june 2013 may 2013 april 2013 follow violent metaphors on facebook! follow violent metaphors on facebook! follow jennifer raff on twitter!my tweets recent posts what napoleon’s army ate having a baby doesn’t change the facts on vaccines. is donald trump really a great negotiator? you’re not entitled to your own facts (or to hang the people who prove you wrong). debunking pseudogenetics at skepticon genetic mythologies: “nephilim dna” from the paracas skulls archaeological fantasies and the genetic history of the americas guest post by rosi sexton: why ‘why’ matters pseudoscience is common among elite athletes outside of the olympics too…and it makes me furious. #vaxxed, reviewed: what happened outside of the movie. #vaxxed, reviewed: what happened inside the movie how to flunk out of the university of google a skeptic on the conspirasea cruise behind the scenes at nasa: the hera project another open thread on vaccines no, we don’t actually know that modern humans killed off the hobbits vaxxed: from coverup to catastrophe to cancellation to insignificance surviving my first year as a new professor: tools of the trade an interview with andrew wakefield conspirasea day 7: i failed. sexual harassment in physical anthropology conspirasea day six: you know who exposes real conspiracies? the media. conspirasea cruise day 5 part 2: i took the bait a skeptic on the conspirasea cruise, day 5: i just can’t do another nautical pun troubled waters: conspirasea cruise day 4(ish) nothing to fear: conspirasea cruise day 3 reverse the constitutional polarity of the baryonic trustee matrix: legal gibberish on the conspirasea cruise (day 2) a skeptic on the conspira-sea cruise: day 1 anchors aweigh! the conspiracy cruise sails soon. why there still are monkeys: lessons learned from teaching evolution in kansas. responses to some questions about our recently published paper on haplogroup x and north american prehistory ancient dna from two 11,500 year old burials in alaska the lost city that isn’t. republicans aren’t anti-vaccine. (yet) deep (conspira)sea fishing: a fundraising drive open access and pseudoarchaeology: an encouraging update! mixed messages during national immunization awareness month good science communication means never calling them “retard” – even if you’re nassim taleb public outreach that’s inaccessible to the public. encouraging science journalism: the genome of kennewick man. no, seriously, don’t politicize anti-vax sentiment a normal person’s review of the apple watch the most important playground conversation, a presentation the genetic analysis of the alaskan north slope new study overturns yet another anti-vaccine talking point why the food babe is wrong (it’s not just because she’s ignorant) new paper deals blow to hypothesis that native americans have european ancestry darwin day! please don’t politicize vaccine refusal mike adams of natural news: as fine a lawyer as he is a scientist search search for: tagsadventure alaska ancient dna andrew wakefield andy hurley animals anthropological genetics anthropology anti-science anti-vaccine anti-vax archaeology arctic prehistory astrology astronomy autism bats books carl sagan cats caves colin communication conflict conservation conspiracy theories conspirasea cruise conversation creationism cultural cognition debate discovery institute education evolution fall out boy friendship genetics genomics gmo gmos greg jackson guest post health history homeopathy human genetic diversity immunization intelligent design interview inuit prehistory iss journal club ken ham law martial arts media medicine methodology mike adams mitochondrial dna mma monsanto music my research native american prehistory natural news negotiation nicholas wade outreach paleontology patrick stump peopling of the americas personal philosophy politics population genetics pseudolaw pseudoscience public health publishing quackery race racism research science science communication scientology skepticism solutrean hypothesis soyuz space television universe university of google vaccination vaccines wakefield web links wildlife women in science blog at wordpress.com. post to cancel


Here you find all texts from your page as Google (googlebot) and others search engines seen it.

Words density analysis:

Numbers of all words: 5139

One word

Two words phrases

Three words phrases

the - 7.12% (366)
and - 2.74% (141)
that - 1.91% (98)
her - 1.48% (76)
for - 1.34% (69)
his - 1.21% (62)
out - 1.15% (59)
all - 1.03% (53)
are - 0.9% (46)
our - 0.88% (45)
this - 0.86% (44)
you - 0.82% (42)
science - 0.82% (42)
not - 0.7% (36)
here - 0.7% (36)
ate - 0.68% (35)
about - 0.64% (33)
can - 0.6% (31)
lin - 0.53% (27)
one - 0.53% (27)
with - 0.53% (27)
have - 0.49% (25)
what - 0.49% (25)
their - 0.49% (25)
end - 0.47% (24)
genetic - 0.47% (24)
from - 0.45% (23)
it’s - 0.43% (22)
but - 0.43% (22)
they - 0.41% (21)
use - 0.41% (21)
some - 0.41% (21)
post - 0.41% (21)
2016 - 0.39% (20)
them - 0.39% (20)
like - 0.39% (20)
- 0.37% (19)
any - 0.37% (19)
fact - 0.35% (18)
people - 0.35% (18)
how - 0.35% (18)
own - 0.35% (18)
able - 0.33% (17)
day - 0.33% (17)
very - 0.33% (17)
who - 0.33% (17)
i’m - 0.31% (16)
there - 0.31% (16)
pseudoscience - 0.31% (16)
vaccine - 0.31% (16)
ice - 0.29% (15)
new - 0.29% (15)
other - 0.29% (15)
law - 0.29% (15)
make - 0.29% (15)
athlete - 0.29% (15)
when - 0.27% (14)
read - 0.27% (14)
person - 0.27% (14)
i’ve - 0.27% (14)
cupping - 0.27% (14)
now - 0.25% (13)
comment - 0.25% (13)
over - 0.25% (13)
led - 0.25% (13)
part - 0.25% (13)
think - 0.25% (13)
way - 0.23% (12)
get - 0.23% (12)
med - 0.23% (12)
form - 0.23% (12)
genetics - 0.23% (12)
2015 - 0.23% (12)
2014 - 0.23% (12)
just - 0.23% (12)
your - 0.23% (12)
science, - 0.21% (11)
more - 0.21% (11)
treatment - 0.21% (11)
don’t - 0.21% (11)
under - 0.21% (11)
going - 0.21% (11)
question - 0.21% (11)
comments - 0.21% (11)
was - 0.21% (11)
cause - 0.21% (11)
time - 0.21% (11)
has - 0.21% (11)
will - 0.21% (11)
she - 0.21% (11)
kept - 0.21% (11)
parent - 0.21% (11)
try - 0.19% (10)
find - 0.19% (10)
athletes - 0.19% (10)
know - 0.19% (10)
does - 0.19% (10)
these - 0.19% (10)
too - 0.19% (10)
evidence - 0.19% (10)
fight - 0.19% (10)
because - 0.19% (10)
real - 0.19% (10)
theories - 0.19% (10)
had - 0.19% (10)
come - 0.19% (10)
see - 0.19% (10)
jennifer - 0.19% (10)
why - 0.19% (10)
search - 0.19% (10)
skeptic - 0.19% (10)
ask - 0.19% (10)
facts - 0.19% (10)
dna - 0.18% (9)
hang - 0.18% (9)
2013 - 0.18% (9)
belief - 0.18% (9)
scientific - 0.18% (9)
mma - 0.18% (9)
conspirasea - 0.18% (9)
talk - 0.18% (9)
public - 0.18% (9)
its - 0.18% (9)
cruise - 0.18% (9)
alt - 0.18% (9)
even - 0.18% (9)
raff - 0.18% (9)
side - 0.18% (9)
history - 0.18% (9)
practice - 0.16% (8)
august - 0.16% (8)
old - 0.16% (8)
actual - 0.16% (8)
december - 0.16% (8)
follow - 0.16% (8)
great - 0.16% (8)
likely - 0.16% (8)
experience - 0.16% (8)
here’s - 0.16% (8)
most - 0.16% (8)
reading - 0.16% (8)
important - 0.16% (8)
reason - 0.16% (8)
that’s - 0.16% (8)
april - 0.16% (8)
he’s - 0.16% (8)
where - 0.16% (8)
again - 0.16% (8)
ancient - 0.16% (8)
few - 0.16% (8)
much - 0.16% (8)
between - 0.16% (8)
questions - 0.16% (8)
sport - 0.14% (7)
should - 0.14% (7)
scientist - 0.14% (7)
us. - 0.14% (7)
colin - 0.14% (7)
many - 0.14% (7)
iss - 0.14% (7)
claims - 0.14% (7)
really - 0.14% (7)
things - 0.14% (7)
than - 0.14% (7)
another - 0.14% (7)
year - 0.14% (7)
pseudolaw - 0.14% (7)
never - 0.14% (7)
mean - 0.14% (7)
beliefs - 0.14% (7)
book - 0.14% (7)
understand - 0.14% (7)
those - 0.14% (7)
which - 0.14% (7)
less - 0.14% (7)
rest - 0.14% (7)
been - 0.14% (7)
whether - 0.14% (7)
2017 - 0.14% (7)
you’re - 0.14% (7)
movie - 0.14% (7)
particular - 0.12% (6)
archaeology - 0.12% (6)
paper - 0.12% (6)
lawyer - 0.12% (6)
effect - 0.12% (6)
sense - 0.12% (6)
risk - 0.12% (6)
violent - 0.12% (6)
2016jennifer - 0.12% (6)
blog - 0.12% (6)
vaccination - 0.12% (6)
actually - 0.12% (6)
high - 0.12% (6)
result - 0.12% (6)
subject - 0.12% (6)
soon - 0.12% (6)
january - 0.12% (6)
fail - 0.12% (6)
research - 0.12% (6)
want - 0.12% (6)
can’t - 0.12% (6)
negotiator - 0.12% (6)
june - 0.12% (6)
change - 0.12% (6)
negotiation - 0.12% (6)
anti-vaccine - 0.12% (6)
makes - 0.12% (6)
olympics - 0.12% (6)
only - 0.12% (6)
vaccines - 0.12% (6)
off - 0.12% (6)
sure - 0.12% (6)
case - 0.12% (6)
fighters - 0.12% (6)
american - 0.12% (6)
train - 0.12% (6)
september - 0.12% (6)
communication - 0.12% (6)
course - 0.12% (6)
americas - 0.12% (6)
prehistory - 0.12% (6)
paracas - 0.12% (6)
friend - 0.12% (6)
harm - 0.12% (6)
test - 0.12% (6)
based - 0.1% (5)
legal - 0.1% (5)
become - 0.1% (5)
- 0.1% (5)
prove - 0.1% (5)
happen - 0.1% (5)
individual - 0.1% (5)
down - 0.1% (5)
common - 0.1% (5)
show - 0.1% (5)
continue - 0.1% (5)
friends - 0.1% (5)
subjective - 0.1% (5)
around - 0.1% (5)
first - 0.1% (5)
isn’t - 0.1% (5)
native - 0.1% (5)
outside - 0.1% (5)
recent - 0.1% (5)
enjoy - 0.1% (5)
might - 0.1% (5)
fit - 0.1% (5)
ideas - 0.1% (5)
cupping, - 0.1% (5)
army - 0.1% (5)
child - 0.1% (5)
allow - 0.1% (5)
elite - 0.1% (5)
wrong - 0.1% (5)
something - 0.1% (5)
focus - 0.1% (5)
good - 0.1% (5)
say - 0.1% (5)
conversation - 0.1% (5)
afford - 0.1% (5)
month - 0.1% (5)
method - 0.1% (5)
work - 0.1% (5)
may - 0.1% (5)
pseudoscience, - 0.1% (5)
napoleon’s - 0.1% (5)
personal - 0.1% (5)
wakefield - 0.1% (5)
address - 0.1% (5)
ken - 0.1% (5)
doesn’t - 0.1% (5)
martial - 0.1% (5)
parents - 0.1% (5)
it. - 0.1% (5)
take - 0.1% (5)
community - 0.1% (5)
process - 0.1% (5)
did - 0.1% (5)
into - 0.08% (4)
supplement - 0.08% (4)
life - 0.08% (4)
world - 0.08% (4)
city - 0.08% (4)
practices - 0.08% (4)
decision - 0.08% (4)
arts - 0.08% (4)
little - 0.08% (4)
anthropology - 0.08% (4)
open - 0.08% (4)
load - 0.08% (4)
hera - 0.08% (4)
content - 0.08% (4)
well - 0.08% (4)
anthropological - 0.08% (4)
genetics, - 0.08% (4)
archaeological - 0.08% (4)
information - 0.08% (4)
conspiracy - 0.08% (4)
discussion - 0.08% (4)
posts - 0.08% (4)
pseudolawyer - 0.08% (4)
such - 0.08% (4)
fantasies - 0.08% (4)
happened - 0.08% (4)
term - 0.08% (4)
access - 0.08% (4)
social - 0.08% (4)
trying - 0.08% (4)
guru - 0.08% (4)
nonsense - 0.08% (4)
turn - 0.08% (4)
back - 0.08% (4)
guest - 0.08% (4)
rosi - 0.08% (4)
were - 0.08% (4)
sexton - 0.08% (4)
after - 0.08% (4)
usual - 0.08% (4)
me, - 0.08% (4)
imply - 0.08% (4)
doing - 0.08% (4)
tell - 0.08% (4)
them. - 0.08% (4)
astrology - 0.08% (4)
simple - 0.08% (4)
trump - 0.08% (4)
help - 0.08% (4)
encourage - 0.08% (4)
support - 0.08% (4)
through - 0.08% (4)
two - 0.08% (4)
also - 0.08% (4)
money - 0.08% (4)
against - 0.08% (4)
metaphors - 0.08% (4)
used - 0.08% (4)
treatment, - 0.08% (4)
link - 0.08% (4)
scientists - 0.08% (4)
understanding - 0.08% (4)
write - 0.08% (4)
among - 0.08% (4)
skin - 0.08% (4)
harmful - 0.08% (4)
using - 0.08% (4)
review - 0.08% (4)
please - 0.08% (4)
hot - 0.08% (4)
training - 0.08% (4)
sports - 0.08% (4)
once - 0.08% (4)
media - 0.06% (3)
communities - 0.06% (3)
skulls - 0.06% (3)
ago - 0.06% (3)
march - 0.06% (3)
dna” - 0.06% (3)
alaska - 0.06% (3)
last - 0.06% (3)
“nephilim - 0.06% (3)
october - 0.06% (3)
pseudoscientific - 0.06% (3)
fall - 0.06% (3)
ways - 0.06% (3)
debunking - 0.06% (3)
skepticon - 0.06% (3)
give - 0.06% (3)
july - 0.06% (3)
november - 0.06% (3)
february - 0.06% (3)
obvious - 0.06% (3)
example - 0.06% (3)
exact - 0.06% (3)
physical - 0.06% (3)
thought - 0.06% (3)
activities - 0.06% (3)
seem - 0.06% (3)
she’s - 0.06% (3)
there’s - 0.06% (3)
therapy - 0.06% (3)
least - 0.06% (3)
treatments - 0.06% (3)
attention - 0.06% (3)
furious. - 0.06% (3)
expect - 0.06% (3)
same - 0.06% (3)
clear - 0.06% (3)
large - 0.06% (3)
equally - 0.06% (3)
pain - 0.06% (3)
forgo - 0.06% (3)
apply - 0.06% (3)
start - 0.06% (3)
here. - 0.06% (3)
level - 0.06% (3)
top - 0.06% (3)
effects - 0.06% (3)
days - 0.06% (3)
seen - 0.06% (3)
source - 0.06% (3)
issues - 0.06% (3)
benefit - 0.06% (3)
listen - 0.06% (3)
extra - 0.06% (3)
here, - 0.06% (3)
#vaxxed, - 0.06% (3)
documentary - 0.06% (3)
cut - 0.06% (3)
movie. - 0.06% (3)
reviewed: - 0.06% (3)
university - 0.06% (3)
focused - 0.06% (3)
itself - 0.06% (3)
north - 0.06% (3)
recovery - 0.06% (3)
hypothesis - 0.06% (3)
every - 0.06% (3)
published - 0.06% (3)
haplogroup - 0.06% (3)
normal - 0.06% (3)
specific - 0.06% (3)
feel - 0.06% (3)
email - 0.06% (3)
irrational - 0.06% (3)
talking - 0.06% (3)
donald - 0.06% (3)
yet - 0.06% (3)
laws - 0.06% (3)
opinion - 0.06% (3)
hold - 0.06% (3)
taking - 0.06% (3)
it, - 0.06% (3)
baby - 0.06% (3)
having - 0.06% (3)
difference - 0.06% (3)
both - 0.06% (3)
critical - 0.06% (3)
too. - 0.06% (3)
known - 0.06% (3)
found - 0.06% (3)
complete - 0.06% (3)
extremely - 0.06% (3)
during - 0.06% (3)
origin - 0.06% (3)
while - 0.06% (3)
theory - 0.06% (3)
being - 0.06% (3)
comes - 0.06% (3)
health - 0.06% (3)
children - 0.06% (3)
argument - 0.06% (3)
line - 0.06% (3)
interesting - 0.06% (3)
strong - 0.06% (3)
answer - 0.06% (3)
someone - 0.06% (3)
matters - 0.06% (3)
hesitant - 0.06% (3)
making - 0.06% (3)
distort - 0.06% (3)
years - 0.06% (3)
that. - 0.06% (3)
family - 0.06% (3)
details - 0.06% (3)
negotiations - 0.06% (3)
lot - 0.06% (3)
would - 0.06% (3)
analysis - 0.06% (3)
entitled - 0.06% (3)
usually - 0.06% (3)
vulnerable - 0.06% (3)
possible - 0.06% (3)
then - 0.06% (3)
bit - 0.06% (3)
drive - 0.06% (3)
expert - 0.06% (3)
simply - 0.06% (3)
special - 0.06% (3)
russian - 0.06% (3)
difficult - 0.06% (3)
long - 0.06% (3)
force - 0.06% (3)
voices - 0.06% (3)
policy - 0.06% (3)
piece - 0.06% (3)
cure - 0.06% (3)
decide - 0.06% (3)
exposes - 0.06% (3)
news - 0.06% (3)
medical - 0.06% (3)
either - 0.06% (3)
losing - 0.06% (3)
amid - 0.06% (3)
reasoning - 0.06% (3)
keep - 0.06% (3)
safety - 0.04% (2)
lives. - 0.04% (2)
work, - 0.04% (2)
supplements. - 0.04% (2)
trendy - 0.04% (2)
could - 0.04% (2)
trust - 0.04% (2)
massage - 0.04% (2)
frighten - 0.04% (2)
lurking - 0.04% (2)
 he - 0.04% (2)
shows - 0.04% (2)
to) - 0.04% (2)
chiropractor - 0.04% (2)
announcement - 0.04% (2)
behind - 0.04% (2)
pursue - 0.04% (2)
hour - 0.04% (2)
“what - 0.04% (2)
account - 0.04% (2)
need - 0.04% (2)
arts, - 0.04% (2)
body - 0.04% (2)
vaccinate - 0.04% (2)
energy - 0.04% (2)
nothing - 0.04% (2)
four - 0.04% (2)
ignoring - 0.04% (2)
place - 0.04% (2)
modern - 0.04% (2)
competing - 0.04% (2)
similar - 0.04% (2)
everything - 0.04% (2)
delay - 0.04% (2)
observed - 0.04% (2)
motivated - 0.04% (2)
all. - 0.04% (2)
allowing - 0.04% (2)
host - 0.04% (2)
alternative - 0.04% (2)
decisions - 0.04% (2)
jar - 0.04% (2)
onto - 0.04% (2)
reasoning, - 0.04% (2)
took - 0.04% (2)
meant - 0.04% (2)
grueling - 0.04% (2)
too…and - 0.04% (2)
ago, - 0.04% (2)
outreach - 0.04% (2)
immunization - 0.04% (2)
encouraging - 0.04% (2)
politicize - 0.04% (2)
anti-vax - 0.04% (2)
point - 0.04% (2)
study - 0.04% (2)
loss - 0.04% (2)
although - 0.04% (2)
interview - 0.04% (2)
no, - 0.04% (2)
thread - 0.04% (2)
andrew - 0.04% (2)
forces - 0.04% (2)
evolution - 0.04% (2)
pun - 0.04% (2)
interested - 0.04% (2)
mike - 0.04% (2)
for: - 0.04% (2)
ham - 0.04% (2)
thoughts - 0.04% (2)
medicine - 0.04% (2)
site - 0.04% (2)
cancel - 0.04% (2)
skepticism - 0.04% (2)
club - 0.04% (2)
journal - 0.04% (2)
conflict - 0.04% (2)
natural - 0.04% (2)
adams - 0.04% (2)
2017jennifer - 0.04% (2)
gmo - 0.04% (2)
19, - 0.04% (2)
human - 0.04% (2)
deliberate - 0.04% (2)
tactic - 0.04% (2)
went - 0.04% (2)
time, - 0.04% (2)
quackery - 0.04% (2)
media. - 0.04% (2)
kansas - 0.04% (2)
avoid - 0.04% (2)
mr. - 0.04% (2)
mma, - 0.04% (2)
olympics, - 0.04% (2)
edge - 0.04% (2)
themselves - 0.04% (2)
determined - 0.04% (2)
what’s - 0.04% (2)
mental - 0.04% (2)
career - 0.04% (2)
beneficial - 0.04% (2)
vaccines. - 0.04% (2)
“vaxxed” - 0.04% (2)
facebook! - 0.04% (2)
earth - 0.04% (2)
food - 0.04% (2)
deal - 0.04% (2)
finding - 0.04% (2)
soldiers - 0.04% (2)
google - 0.04% (2)
al. - 0.04% (2)
set - 0.04% (2)
archive - 0.04% (2)
enter - 0.04% (2)
select - 0.04% (2)
carbon - 0.04% (2)
diet - 0.04% (2)
grand - 0.04% (2)
coaches. - 0.04% (2)
exists - 0.04% (2)
available - 0.04% (2)
facts, - 0.04% (2)
archaeology, - 0.04% (2)
recently - 0.04% (2)
him - 0.04% (2)
pseudolegal - 0.04% (2)
angry - 0.04% (2)
ancestry - 0.04% (2)
build - 0.04% (2)
dna, - 0.04% (2)
garden - 0.04% (2)
creationist - 0.04% (2)
books - 0.04% (2)
walled - 0.04% (2)
photo - 0.04% (2)
scienceancient - 0.04% (2)
mummy - 0.04% (2)
budding - 0.04% (2)
insist - 0.04% (2)
peopling - 0.04% (2)
wrong). - 0.04% (2)
30, - 0.04% (2)
(or - 0.04% (2)
highly - 0.04% (2)
solutrean - 0.04% (2)
methods - 0.04% (2)
semester - 0.04% (2)
download - 0.04% (2)
second - 0.04% (2)
podcast, - 0.04% (2)
amendment - 0.04% (2)
post. - 0.04% (2)
mitochondrial - 0.04% (2)
2016december - 0.04% (2)
reflect - 0.04% (2)
different - 0.04% (2)
decided - 0.04% (2)
pseudogenetics - 0.04% (2)
frustration - 0.04% (2)
failed - 0.04% (2)
ideology - 0.04% (2)
raff8 - 0.04% (2)
promote - 0.04% (2)
process. - 0.04% (2)
months - 0.04% (2)
communication, - 0.04% (2)
all, - 0.04% (2)
addition - 0.04% (2)
court - 0.04% (2)
dissuade - 0.04% (2)
simplest - 0.04% (2)
beliefs. - 0.04% (2)
responded - 0.04% (2)
flaws - 0.04% (2)
fail, - 0.04% (2)
later - 0.04% (2)
theories, - 0.04% (2)
astrology” - 0.04% (2)
cancer - 0.04% (2)
mythologies: - 0.04% (2)
20, - 0.04% (2)
sooner - 0.04% (2)
readers - 0.04% (2)
didn’t - 0.04% (2)
since - 0.04% (2)
kind - 0.04% (2)
embedded - 0.04% (2)
(with - 0.04% (2)
teaching - 0.04% (2)
full - 0.04% (2)
stay - 0.04% (2)
without - 0.04% (2)
sexton: - 0.04% (2)
‘why’ - 0.04% (2)
taken - 0.04% (2)
incredibly - 0.04% (2)
hope - 0.04% (2)
means - 0.04% (2)
straight - 0.04% (2)
pleasant - 0.04% (2)
quite - 0.04% (2)
parenting - 0.04% (2)
measure - 0.04% (2)
pain, - 0.04% (2)
turns - 0.04% (2)
results - 0.04% (2)
suppose - 0.04% (2)
emotion - 0.04% (2)
aunt - 0.04% (2)
enjoyable - 0.04% (2)
agatha - 0.04% (2)
relaxing - 0.04% (2)
early - 0.04% (2)
began - 0.04% (2)
days, - 0.04% (2)
posting - 0.04% (2)
instead - 0.04% (2)
giving - 0.04% (2)
close - 0.04% (2)
happy - 0.04% (2)
achieve - 0.04% (2)
pregnancy - 0.04% (2)
winning - 0.04% (2)
several - 0.04% (2)
learned - 0.04% (2)
break - 0.04% (2)
whole - 0.04% (2)
person’s - 0.04% (2)
reason. - 0.04% (2)
(an - 0.04% (2)
negotiator? - 0.04% (2)
olympics. - 0.04% (2)
probably - 0.04% (2)
treating - 0.04% (2)
marks - 0.04% (2)
skeptics - 0.04% (2)
unlikely - 0.04% (2)
latest - 0.04% (2)
particularly - 0.04% (2)
diversity - 0.04% (2)
fighter, - 0.04% (2)
professional - 0.04% (2)
position - 0.04% (2)
hard - 0.04% (2)
share - 0.04% (2)
table. - 0.04% (2)
push - 0.04% (2)
suggest - 0.04% (2)
underlying - 0.04% (2)
sometimes - 0.04% (2)
problem - 0.04% (2)
that?” - 0.04% (2)
skills - 0.04% (2)
stronger - 0.04% (2)
31, - 0.04% (2)
away - 0.04% (2)
spent - 0.04% (2)
clients - 0.04% (2)
made - 0.04% (2)
performance - 0.04% (2)
mind - 0.04% (2)
asking - 0.04% (2)
activity. - 0.04% (2)
exactly - 0.04% (2)
serious - 0.04% (2)
private - 0.04% (2)
of the - 0.76% (39)
at the - 0.51% (26)
to the - 0.33% (17)
on the - 0.31% (16)
in the - 0.29% (15)
that i - 0.25% (13)
that the - 0.23% (12)
and the - 0.21% (11)
this is - 0.19% (10)
jennifer raff - 0.18% (9)
going to - 0.18% (9)
from the - 0.16% (8)
the fact - 0.16% (8)
if you - 0.14% (7)
with the - 0.14% (7)
for the - 0.14% (7)
conspirasea cruise - 0.14% (7)
have a - 0.14% (7)
the movie - 0.14% (7)
able to - 0.12% (6)
to get - 0.12% (6)
that they - 0.12% (6)
people who - 0.12% (6)
the americas - 0.12% (6)
i have - 0.12% (6)
more than - 0.1% (5)
ancient dna - 0.1% (5)
the genetic - 0.1% (5)
likely to - 0.1% (5)
reading → - 0.1% (5)
continue reading - 0.1% (5)
i think - 0.1% (5)
what i - 0.1% (5)
this post - 0.1% (5)
but it - 0.1% (5)
to your - 0.1% (5)
one of - 0.1% (5)
about what - 0.1% (5)
that it - 0.08% (4)
a great - 0.08% (4)
out of - 0.08% (4)
out to - 0.08% (4)
what the - 0.08% (4)
your own - 0.08% (4)
of this - 0.08% (4)
on their - 0.08% (4)
who are - 0.08% (4)
want to - 0.08% (4)
trying to - 0.08% (4)
the olympics - 0.08% (4)
think it’s - 0.08% (4)
that a - 0.08% (4)
it’s not - 0.08% (4)
cupping is - 0.08% (4)
should be - 0.08% (4)
it makes - 0.08% (4)
in and - 0.08% (4)
can’t afford - 0.08% (4)
the paracas - 0.08% (4)
with a - 0.08% (4)
led to - 0.08% (4)
outside of - 0.08% (4)
to address - 0.08% (4)
elite athletes - 0.08% (4)
martial arts - 0.08% (4)
their beliefs - 0.08% (4)
the facts - 0.08% (4)
about the - 0.08% (4)
it was - 0.08% (4)
i don’t - 0.08% (4)
violent metaphors - 0.08% (4)
not to - 0.08% (4)
to their - 0.08% (4)
is going - 0.08% (4)
understanding of - 0.08% (4)
on vaccines - 0.08% (4)
is the - 0.08% (4)
reviewed: what - 0.06% (3)
when the - 0.06% (3)
of people - 0.06% (3)
and to - 0.06% (3)
i’ve seen - 0.06% (3)
guest post - 0.06% (3)
skeptic on - 0.06% (3)
i’ve had - 0.06% (3)
pseudoscience is - 0.06% (3)
i’m going - 0.06% (3)
to write - 0.06% (3)
their own - 0.06% (3)
why the - 0.06% (3)
having a - 0.06% (3)
the same - 0.06% (3)
to make - 0.06% (3)
makes me - 0.06% (3)
dna” from - 0.06% (3)
or not - 0.06% (3)
comments a - 0.06% (3)
fact that - 0.06% (3)
the conspirasea - 0.06% (3)
at skepticon - 0.06% (3)
they are - 0.06% (3)
focused on - 0.06% (3)
afford to - 0.06% (3)
anthropological genetics, - 0.06% (3)
they can’t - 0.06% (3)
a skeptic - 0.06% (3)
and how - 0.06% (3)
the result - 0.06% (3)
history of - 0.06% (3)
for an - 0.06% (3)
you to - 0.06% (3)
i’m not - 0.06% (3)
between the - 0.06% (3)
claims about - 0.06% (3)
from a - 0.06% (3)
lot of - 0.06% (3)
just a - 0.06% (3)
there are - 0.06% (3)
there for - 0.06% (3)
really a - 0.06% (3)
donald trump - 0.06% (3)
hang the - 0.06% (3)
native american - 0.06% (3)
here’s a - 0.06% (3)
own facts - 0.06% (3)
the documentary - 0.06% (3)
same time - 0.06% (3)
entitled to - 0.06% (3)
of course - 0.06% (3)
way to - 0.06% (3)
about how - 0.06% (3)
vaccine hesitant - 0.06% (3)
to hang - 0.06% (3)
based on - 0.06% (3)
cruise day - 0.06% (3)
a baby - 0.06% (3)
science and - 0.06% (3)
treatment, and - 0.06% (3)
on this - 0.06% (3)
try to - 0.06% (3)
against the - 0.04% (2)
how to - 0.04% (2)
and losing - 0.04% (2)
but not - 0.04% (2)
possible to - 0.04% (2)
of google - 0.04% (2)
very clear - 0.04% (2)
and relaxing - 0.04% (2)
on his - 0.04% (2)
level sport - 0.04% (2)
that we - 0.04% (2)
we have - 0.04% (2)
link to - 0.04% (2)
what she - 0.04% (2)
and difficult - 0.04% (2)
post to - 0.04% (2)
winning and - 0.04% (2)
peopling of - 0.04% (2)
a treatment - 0.04% (2)
to use - 0.04% (2)
like cupping, - 0.04% (2)
please don’t - 0.04% (2)
to think - 0.04% (2)
about why - 0.04% (2)
the athlete - 0.04% (2)
a whole - 0.04% (2)
here. i - 0.04% (2)
my research - 0.04% (2)
the risk - 0.04% (2)
are the - 0.04% (2)
open access - 0.04% (2)
of posts - 0.04% (2)
of new - 0.04% (2)
archive of - 0.04% (2)
on facebook! - 0.04% (2)
follow violent - 0.04% (2)
had with - 0.04% (2)
not so - 0.04% (2)
of our - 0.04% (2)
of science, - 0.04% (2)
with an - 0.04% (2)
wakefield and - 0.04% (2)
metaphors on - 0.04% (2)
facebook! follow - 0.04% (2)
prove you - 0.04% (2)
(or to - 0.04% (2)
pseudogenetics at - 0.04% (2)
my first - 0.04% (2)
university of - 0.04% (2)
andrew wakefield - 0.04% (2)
not entitled - 0.04% (2)
search for: - 0.04% (2)
is donald - 0.04% (2)
trump really - 0.04% (2)
conspirasea day - 0.04% (2)
happened outside - 0.04% (2)
more attention - 0.04% (2)
most important - 0.04% (2)
analysis of - 0.04% (2)
too…and it - 0.04% (2)
9, 2016jennifer - 0.04% (2)
pseudoscience in - 0.04% (2)
common among - 0.04% (2)
– but - 0.04% (2)
personal experience - 0.04% (2)
new paper - 0.04% (2)
is this - 0.04% (2)
it can - 0.04% (2)
north american - 0.04% (2)
the four - 0.04% (2)
these athletes - 0.04% (2)
alt med - 0.04% (2)
vulnerable to - 0.04% (2)
because i - 0.04% (2)
than one - 0.04% (2)
are so - 0.04% (2)
lurking around - 0.04% (2)
at least - 0.04% (2)
on haplogroup - 0.04% (2)
recovery practices - 0.04% (2)
to allow - 0.04% (2)
napoleon’s army - 0.04% (2)
you should - 0.04% (2)
facts (or - 0.04% (2)
you’re not - 0.04% (2)
the people - 0.04% (2)
who prove - 0.04% (2)
december 30, - 0.04% (2)
you wrong). - 0.04% (2)
→ communication - 0.04% (2)
the only - 0.04% (2)
great a - 0.04% (2)
asking me - 0.04% (2)
he claims - 0.04% (2)
is that - 0.04% (2)
will try - 0.04% (2)
it’s very - 0.04% (2)
evidence for - 0.04% (2)
it, the - 0.04% (2)
you’re a - 0.04% (2)
napoleon’s grand - 0.04% (2)
questions that - 0.04% (2)
the end - 0.04% (2)
his own - 0.04% (2)
for them. - 0.04% (2)
sooner or - 0.04% (2)
a different - 0.04% (2)
a budding - 0.04% (2)
is there - 0.04% (2)
pseudolegal guru - 0.04% (2)
fit the - 0.04% (2)
walled garden - 0.04% (2)
theories that - 0.04% (2)
with their - 0.04% (2)
that is - 0.04% (2)
to vaccinate - 0.04% (2)
is not - 0.04% (2)
and ignoring - 0.04% (2)
are all - 0.04% (2)
you know - 0.04% (2)
we don’t - 0.04% (2)
the person - 0.04% (2)
just because - 0.04% (2)
understand how - 0.04% (2)
april 8, - 0.04% (2)
is for - 0.04% (2)
their children - 0.04% (2)
will not - 0.04% (2)
doesn’t change - 0.04% (2)
post a - 0.04% (2)
personal details - 0.04% (2)
great negotiator? - 0.04% (2)
vaccination is - 0.04% (2)
january 31, - 0.04% (2)
but it’s - 0.04% (2)
the most - 0.04% (2)
skills for - 0.04% (2)
you have - 0.04% (2)
i hope - 0.04% (2)
to break - 0.04% (2)
a reason. - 0.04% (2)
that for - 0.04% (2)
exists out - 0.04% (2)
policy of - 0.04% (2)
and again - 0.04% (2)
don’t think - 0.04% (2)
solutrean hypothesis - 0.04% (2)
scienceancient dna, - 0.04% (2)
by rosi - 0.04% (2)
sexton: why - 0.04% (2)
few days - 0.04% (2)
‘why’ matters - 0.04% (2)
on some - 0.04% (2)
if you’re - 0.04% (2)
this post. - 0.04% (2)
questions about - 0.04% (2)
about our - 0.04% (2)
on vaccines. - 0.04% (2)
what they - 0.04% (2)
people find - 0.04% (2)
ago, i - 0.04% (2)
it’s important - 0.04% (2)
for their - 0.04% (2)
say that - 0.04% (2)
i’ve never - 0.04% (2)
they find - 0.04% (2)
when we - 0.04% (2)
the evidence - 0.04% (2)
sense to - 0.04% (2)
evidence to - 0.04% (2)
think about - 0.04% (2)
olympics. i’ve - 0.04% (2)
cupping marks - 0.04% (2)
most of - 0.04% (2)
the skeptics - 0.04% (2)
much of - 0.04% (2)
of life - 0.04% (2)
to see - 0.04% (2)
genetics to - 0.04% (2)
in their - 0.04% (2)
over the - 0.04% (2)
loss of - 0.04% (2)
been incredibly - 0.04% (2)
2016jennifer raff8 - 0.04% (2)
debunking pseudogenetics - 0.04% (2)
such a - 0.04% (2)
it’s possible - 0.04% (2)
important to - 0.04% (2)
in case - 0.04% (2)
irrational beliefs - 0.04% (2)
but the - 0.04% (2)
soon as - 0.04% (2)
i want - 0.04% (2)
fantasies and - 0.04% (2)
dna, anthropological - 0.04% (2)
me public - 0.04% (2)
comments the - 0.04% (2)
part of - 0.04% (2)
the russian - 0.04% (2)
→ scienceancient - 0.04% (2)
off the - 0.04% (2)
mythologies: “nephilim - 0.04% (2)
genetic astrology” - 0.04% (2)
by the - 0.04% (2)
write about - 0.04% (2)
other way - 0.04% (2)
start to - 0.04% (2)
side of the - 0.1% (5)
this is a - 0.08% (4)
is going to - 0.08% (4)
going to be - 0.06% (3)
entitled to your - 0.06% (3)
understanding of the - 0.06% (3)
to hang the - 0.06% (3)
the fact that - 0.06% (3)
of the movie. - 0.06% (3)
“nephilim dna” from - 0.06% (3)
the paracas skulls - 0.06% (3)
having a baby - 0.06% (3)
dna” from the - 0.06% (3)
i’m going to - 0.06% (3)
some of the - 0.06% (3)
to your own - 0.06% (3)
they can’t afford - 0.06% (3)
#vaxxed, reviewed: what - 0.06% (3)
on the conspirasea - 0.06% (3)
skeptic on the - 0.06% (3)
at the same - 0.06% (3)
the conspirasea cruise - 0.06% (3)
– but it - 0.04% (2)
is common among - 0.04% (2)
elite athletes outside - 0.04% (2)
violent metaphors on - 0.04% (2)
who are trying - 0.04% (2)
competing in the - 0.04% (2)
too…and it makes - 0.04% (2)
of the olympics - 0.04% (2)
what happened outside - 0.04% (2)
more than one - 0.04% (2)
is donald trump - 0.04% (2)
common among elite - 0.04% (2)
sexton: why ‘why’ - 0.04% (2)
post by rosi - 0.04% (2)
athletes outside of - 0.04% (2)
the olympics too…and - 0.04% (2)
university of google - 0.04% (2)
it makes me - 0.04% (2)
genetic mythologies: “nephilim - 0.04% (2)
pseudogenetics at skepticon - 0.04% (2)
facts on vaccines. - 0.04% (2)
doesn’t change the - 0.04% (2)
can’t afford to - 0.04% (2)
really a great - 0.04% (2)
people who prove - 0.04% (2)
own facts (or - 0.04% (2)
metaphors on facebook! - 0.04% (2)
marks on their - 0.04% (2)
reading → communication - 0.04% (2)
the most important - 0.04% (2)
a great negotiator? - 0.04% (2)
you’re not entitled - 0.04% (2)
facts (or to - 0.04% (2)
the end of - 0.04% (2)
who prove you - 0.04% (2)
hang the people - 0.04% (2)
donald trump really - 0.04% (2)
parents who are - 0.04% (2)
baby doesn’t change - 0.04% (2)
have a new - 0.04% (2)
napoleon’s army ate - 0.04% (2)
the facts on - 0.04% (2)
that they are - 0.04% (2)
there for a - 0.04% (2)
not to vaccinate - 0.04% (2)
i don’t think - 0.04% (2)
at the end - 0.04% (2)
likely to be - 0.04% (2)
search search for: - 0.04% (2)
comments a few - 0.04% (2)
to say that - 0.04% (2)
about what the - 0.04% (2)
it’s possible to - 0.04% (2)
winning and losing - 0.04% (2)
rosi sexton: why - 0.04% (2)
guest post by - 0.04% (2)
→ scienceancient dna, - 0.04% (2)
soon as my - 0.04% (2)
debunking pseudogenetics at - 0.04% (2)
fantasies and the - 0.04% (2)
genetic history of - 0.04% (2)
lot of people - 0.04% (2)
link to the - 0.04% (2)
clear about what - 0.04% (2)

Here you can find chart of all your popular one, two and three word phrases. Google and others search engines means your page is about words you use frequently.

Copyright © 2015-2016 hupso.pl. All rights reserved. FB | +G | Twitter

Hupso.pl jest serwisem internetowym, w którym jednym kliknieciem możesz szybko i łatwo sprawdź stronę www pod kątem SEO. Oferujemy darmowe pozycjonowanie stron internetowych oraz wycena domen i stron internetowych. Prowadzimy ranking polskich stron internetowych oraz ranking stron alexa.