5.00 score from hupso.pl for:
timeframesandtaboodata.com



HTML Content


Titletime frames and taboo data blog | the official blog for time frames and taboo data, by c.m. houck.

Length: 98, Words: 19
Description the official blog for time frames and taboo data, by c.m. houck.

Length: 64, Words: 13
Keywords pusty
Robots
Charset UTF-8
Og Meta - Title exist
Og Meta - Description exist
Og Meta - Site name exist
Tytuł powinien zawierać pomiędzy 10 a 70 znaków (ze spacjami), a mniej niż 12 słów w długości.
Meta opis powinien zawierać pomiędzy 50 a 160 znaków (łącznie ze spacjami), a mniej niż 24 słów w długości.
Kodowanie znaków powinny być określone , UTF-8 jest chyba najlepszy zestaw znaków, aby przejść z powodu UTF-8 jest bardziej międzynarodowy kodowaniem.
Otwarte obiekty wykresu powinny być obecne w stronie internetowej (więcej informacji na temat protokołu OpenGraph: http://ogp.me/)

SEO Content

Words/Characters 7451
Text/HTML 53.48 %
Headings H1 1
H2 14
H3 0
H4 0
H5 0
H6 0
H1
time frames and taboo data blog
H2
rise of holy agitators (in usa)
making holy myths
uncertainties in sacred texts
corporate style faith systems
examples of scriptural immorality
paradox of modern man
faith based fraud in us government
pages
blogroll
buy the book
social networking
flickr photos
archives
meta
H3
H4
H5
H6
strong
i
o
b
c
e
f
a
:
:
f
m
s
b
i
em i
o
b
c
e
f
a
:
:
f
m
s
Bolds strong 12
b 0
i 0
em 12
Zawartość strony internetowej powinno zawierać więcej niż 250 słów, z stopa tekst / kod jest wyższy niż 20%.
Pozycji używać znaczników (h1, h2, h3, ...), aby określić temat sekcji lub ustępów na stronie, ale zwykle, użyj mniej niż 6 dla każdego tagu pozycje zachować swoją stronę zwięzły.
Styl używać silnych i kursywy znaczniki podkreślić swoje słowa kluczowe swojej stronie, ale nie nadużywać (mniej niż 16 silnych tagi i 16 znaczników kursywy)

Statystyki strony

twitter:title pusty
twitter:description pusty
google+ itemprop=name pusty
Pliki zewnętrzne 26
Pliki CSS 4
Pliki javascript 22
Plik należy zmniejszyć całkowite odwołanie plików (CSS + JavaScript) do 7-8 maksymalnie.

Linki wewnętrzne i zewnętrzne

Linki 189
Linki wewnętrzne 1
Linki zewnętrzne 188
Linki bez atrybutu Title 185
Linki z atrybutem NOFOLLOW 0
Linki - Użyj atrybutu tytuł dla każdego łącza. Nofollow link jest link, który nie pozwala wyszukiwarkom boty zrealizują są odnośniki no follow. Należy zwracać uwagę na ich użytkowania

Linki wewnętrzne

cancel #

Linki zewnętrzne

time frames and taboo data blog https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/
rise of holy agitators (in usa) https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2017/03/02/rise-of-holy-agitators-in-usa-2/
belief https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/belief/
bible https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/bible/
corporate style faiths https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/corporate-style-faiths/
faith https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/faith/
fundamentalism https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/fundamentalism/
government https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/government/
leave a comment » https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2017/03/02/rise-of-holy-agitators-in-usa-2/#respond
making holy myths https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2017/02/27/__trashed/
belief https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/belief/
bible https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/bible/
christianity https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/christianity/
faith https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/faith/
mother nature https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/mother-nature/
pagan gods https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/pagan-gods/
religion https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/religion/
sacred texts https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/sacred-texts/
scriptures https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/scriptures/
leave a comment » https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2017/02/27/__trashed/#respond
uncertainties in sacred texts https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2017/02/18/uncertainties-in-sacred-texts/
bible https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/bible/
dead sea scrolls https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/dead-sea-scrolls/
hebrew scripture https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/hebrew-scripture/
religion https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/religion/
sacred texts https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/sacred-texts/
thoughts https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/thoughts/
leave a comment » https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2017/02/18/uncertainties-in-sacred-texts/#respond
corporate style faith systems https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2017/01/01/corporate-style-faith-systems/
atheist https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/atheist/
belief https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/belief/
ego and belief https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/ego-and-belief/
ethics and morality https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/ethics-and-morality/
monotheism https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/monotheism/
random https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/random/
religion https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/religion/
thoughts https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/thoughts/
leave a comment » https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2017/01/01/corporate-style-faith-systems/#respond
examples of scriptural immorality https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2016/12/01/examples-of-scriptural-immorality/
abraham https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/abraham/
agnostic https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/agnostic/
atheist https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/atheist/
belief https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/belief/
biblical "values" https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/biblical-values/
ethics and morality https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/ethics-and-morality/
religion https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/religion/
scriptures https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/scriptures/
theology https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/theology-2/
leave a comment » https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2016/12/01/examples-of-scriptural-immorality/#respond
paradox of modern man https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2016/11/17/paradox-of-modern-man/
atheist https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/atheist/
belief https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/belief/
enlightenment https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/enlightenment/
faith https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/faith/
life https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/science/life-science/
religion https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/religion/
scriptures https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/scriptures/
thoughts https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/thoughts/
leave a comment » https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2016/11/17/paradox-of-modern-man/#respond
faith based fraud in us government https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2016/11/01/faith-based-fraud-in-us-government/
agnostic https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/agnostic/
atheist https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/atheist/
belief https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/belief/
biblical "values" https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/biblical-values/
christianity https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/christianity/
culture https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/culture/
government https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/government/
politics https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/politics/
random https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/random/
religion https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/religion/
social https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/social/
thoughts https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/thoughts/
leave a comment » https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2016/11/01/faith-based-fraud-in-us-government/#respond
« older entries https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/page/2/
about the book https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/about/
wordpress.com http://wordpress.com/
wordpress.org http://wordpress.org/
buy time frames and taboo data at barnesandnoble.com http://search.barnesandnoble.com/time-frames-and-taboo-data/c-m-houck/e/9780595677689/?itm=3
- http://www.iuniverse.com/bookstore/bookdetail.aspx?bookid=sku-000036043
buy time frames and taboo data on amazon.com http://www.amazon.com/time-frames-taboo-data-misdirected/dp/059539986x/ref=sr_1_5?ie=utf8&s=books&qid=1235598055&sr=1-5
facebook profile http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1469708115&ref=name
goodreads http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/4240601.time_frames_and_taboo_data_a_history_of_mankind_s_misdirected_beliefs
goodreads profile http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/2072644
librarything profile http://www.librarything.com/profile/chouck017894
myspace profile http://www.myspace.com/timeframesandtaboodata
shelfari http://www.shelfari.com/books/1996292/time-frames-and-taboo-data-a-history-of-mankind-s-misdirected-be
shelfari profile http://www.shelfari.com/timeframesandtaboodata
twitter https://twitter.com/chouck017894
- https://www.flickr.com/photos/35617818@n02/3298666936/
more photos https://www.flickr.com/photos/35617818@n02/
march 2017 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2017/03/
february 2017 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2017/02/
january 2017 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2017/01/
december 2016 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2016/12/
november 2016 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2016/11/
october 2016 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2016/10/
september 2016 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2016/09/
august 2016 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2016/08/
july 2016 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2016/07/
june 2016 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2016/06/
may 2016 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2016/05/
april 2016 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2016/04/
march 2016 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2016/03/
february 2016 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2016/02/
january 2016 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2016/01/
december 2015 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2015/12/
march 2015 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2015/03/
february 2015 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2015/02/
january 2015 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2015/01/
december 2014 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2014/12/
november 2014 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2014/11/
october 2014 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2014/10/
september 2014 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2014/09/
august 2014 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2014/08/
july 2014 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2014/07/
june 2014 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2014/06/
may 2014 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2014/05/
april 2014 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2014/04/
march 2014 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2014/03/
february 2014 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2014/02/
january 2014 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2014/01/
december 2013 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2013/12/
november 2013 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2013/11/
october 2013 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2013/10/
september 2013 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2013/09/
august 2013 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2013/08/
july 2013 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2013/07/
june 2013 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2013/06/
may 2013 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2013/05/
april 2013 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2013/04/
march 2013 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2013/03/
february 2013 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2013/02/
january 2013 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2013/01/
december 2012 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2012/12/
november 2012 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2012/11/
october 2012 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2012/10/
september 2012 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2012/09/
august 2012 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2012/08/
july 2012 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2012/07/
june 2012 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2012/06/
may 2012 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2012/05/
april 2012 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2012/04/
march 2012 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2012/03/
february 2012 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2012/02/
january 2012 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2012/01/
december 2011 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2011/12/
november 2011 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2011/11/
october 2011 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2011/10/
september 2011 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2011/09/
august 2011 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2011/08/
july 2011 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2011/07/
june 2011 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2011/06/
may 2011 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2011/05/
april 2011 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2011/04/
march 2011 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2011/03/
february 2011 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2011/02/
january 2011 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2011/01/
december 2010 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2010/12/
november 2010 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2010/11/
october 2010 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2010/10/
september 2010 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2010/09/
august 2010 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2010/08/
july 2010 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2010/07/
june 2010 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2010/06/
may 2010 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2010/05/
april 2010 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2010/04/
march 2010 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2010/03/
february 2010 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2010/02/
january 2010 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2010/01/
december 2009 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2009/12/
november 2009 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2009/11/
october 2009 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2009/10/
september 2009 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2009/09/
august 2009 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2009/08/
july 2009 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2009/07/
june 2009 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2009/06/
may 2009 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2009/05/
april 2009 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2009/04/
march 2009 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2009/03/
february 2009 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2009/02/
register https://wordpress.com/start?ref=wplogin
log in https://timeframesandtaboodata.wordpress.com/wp-login.php
entries rss https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/feed/
comments rss https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/comments/feed/
wordpress.com https://wordpress.com/
blog at wordpress.com. https://wordpress.com/?ref=footer_blog
time frames and taboo data blog https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/
create a free website or blog at wordpress.com. https://wordpress.com/?ref=footer_website

Zdjęcia

Zdjęcia 4
Zdjęcia bez atrybutu ALT 2
Zdjęcia bez atrybutu TITLE 2
Korzystanie Obraz ALT i TITLE atrybutu dla każdego obrazu.

Zdjęcia bez atrybutu TITLE

https://sb.scorecardresearch.com/p?c1=2&c2=7518284&c3=&c4=&c5=&c6=&c15=&cv=2.0&cj=1
https://pixel.wp.com/b.gif?v=noscript

Zdjęcia bez atrybutu ALT

https://sb.scorecardresearch.com/p?c1=2&c2=7518284&c3=&c4=&c5=&c6=&c15=&cv=2.0&cj=1
https://pixel.wp.com/b.gif?v=noscript

Ranking:


Alexa Traffic
Daily Global Rank Trend
Daily Reach (Percent)









Majestic SEO











Text on page:

time frames and taboo data blog the official blog for time frames and taboo data, by c.m. houck. rise of holy agitators (in usa) posted in belief, bible, corporate style faiths, faith, fundamentalism, government on march 2, 2017 by chouck017894 in the early 1950’s, television was a new craze.  quick to note the craze some enterprising guys, still clutching their freshly printed bible-mill studies diplomas, sought to serve the lord by preaching their revealed wisdom using that promising medium.  the lord seems to have been well pleased.  later, for example, by may of 1985 the evangelical marketer pat robertson was even featured in a cable magazine called on cable.  filled with boundless self-righteousness and spiritual vanity robertson declared that he sought to remake america into a “biblical based nation.”  his fiery right-wing politics was characterized by him as “conservative, religious, and a biblical point of view.”  he didn’t  mention the authors of those biblical views had written their point of view in the bronze age.  blissfully unconcerned,  robertson latched onto that view and it was so slickly packaged that by 1985 his organization efforts was siphoning in more than $70 million a year from bedazzled followers. the long-standing constitutional ideals and values the nation’s founders placed upon diversity, variety and plurality for the american people were regarded by robertson as being “extreme dangers” to a secular state.  respecting the rights of minorities was being threatened in his lofty opinion of how a “biblical based nation” was to be run.  robertson pontificated that children in  public schools were being taught “a collective philosophy that would lead citizens away from god toward marxism, socialism or a communistic type of ideology.”   oh he was good at scaring the be-jesus out of the gullible.  in his humble opinion, therefore, he found it logical to denounce the department of education as being “unconstitutional”! not shy about telling the nation what god wanted for it, robertson asserted that the united states supreme court had departed from history and the constitution.  he reasoned and worried publicly about the “encroachment” of the judiciary.  they just didn’t seem favorable to his idea of a theocracy.  thus robertson charted course to “engage” in what he termed “advocacy journalism,” and his christian broadcast network news teams began spewing out reams of propagandist mini-documentaries with heavy “conservative” (read theocratic) messages.  later, he must have been delighted when the supreme court became composed with five of the nine justices being republican and staunch roman catholics. and it was a later republican dominated supreme court that would step in and tell the nation that our redeeming leader was to be the born again george w. bush.  hallelujah! robertson’s christian broadcast network news teams were headed by a man who was once editor of the washington times, which just happened at that time to be owned by the “reverend” sun myung.  this strange bedfellow happened to be loaded down with questionable north korean connections.  not to fear, for the “born again” population, robertson averred, was seriously under-represented in our national government.  posing as a caring messenger, he declared, “the basic thing people do not understand is that evangelicals in america are not plotting to take away the rights of everyone else.”  (trying to eliminate the department of education would therefore simply be a money saving move.) robertson worked hard at presenting himself as the modern age version of a biblical prophet.  for sure the biblical prophets had dared to mix it up with politics–which just happened to always be in regard to a very select bunch of people.  true to form, robertson declared, “god is going to thrust his people (the fundamentalists) into positions they never dreamed they were capable of taking on.”  (george w. bush & company certainly did seem to fill that prediction.)  if the heavy tilt of religiously obsessed persons in governmental positions today is any indication, and if their corruption of true democratic principles is an example of a “biblical based nation,” can we truthfully say that their sly take over of the republican party in 1996 was “fairly benign”? well, today, several decades later, robertson’s christian broadcasting network and regent university pulls in over $400 million a year peddling the same old far-right political propaganda and implications of heaven’s special favoritism.  but his empire is today upstaged by an old rival from the same earlier era which is now marketed as the jerry falwell ministries/liberty counsel/liberty university.  that deceptive use of the word “liberty” in their promotional marketing disguises the fact that the aim of their “liberty” is to sabotage the u.s. constitutional safeguard of church-state separation–the nation’s father’s guarantee of religious freedom (liberty) for everyone.  peddling this anti-democratic baloney the family falwell empire today rakes in over $600 million a year. amazingly there are other claimers of god’s especial favoritism who wage war on every person’s freedom  to worship only as they choose.–all of which rake in multi-millions a year for being staunchly un-american and pro-theocratic.  take the so-called focus on the family that has the gall to endorse right wing political candidates; it is lucrative and nets the dobson family over $92 million a year.  and there’s their family research council (an off-shoot of focus on the family) that holds an annual “value voter summit” which draws in over $14 million against anti-constitutional protections. still another self-declared biblical representative is the american family association that is against about everything that grants american’s civil freedoms. the reverend donald wildman who heads this “association” boldly proclaims that separation of church and state was invented by hitler!  duh!  for that type of heavenly enlightenment his anti-constitutional bias nets over $17 a year. other grandiose named outfits include american center for law and justice/christian advocates serving evangelism.  that imposing mouthful defined the purpose, which is to force–force–fundamentalist beliefs into all public schools.  allied with the pat robertson empire in spirit and money-love, it pulls in over $57 million a year.  justice is again implied with the so-called alliance defending freedom, but the only council for national policy aimed for by them is to allow them to ax the federal law which guards tax-exempt churches from actively intervening in partisan elections.  god, it seems, favors that antidemocratic stance to the tune of over $47 million a year. ahh, but there are even more would-be religious oppressors out there.  it’s all strictly spiritual guidance, of  course.  take the bewildering concerned women for america (affiliated with the concerned women for america legislative action committee) which indulges in heavy prejudices against the creator’s intentional wide-ranged diversities and variety of life.  this anti-feminist lobby was founded by beverly and tim lahaye, who (in 2015) raked in over $14 million for their discriminatory activities.  not content with that, tim lahaye also headed up the council for national policy which presumed to evaluate prospective gop presidential candidates.  this membership-only outfit drew only a little more than $2 million. still another agitator operation is ralph reed’s foundation and freedom coalition whose primary purpose for existence is to attract more fundamentalists to vote.  their holy reward–over $3 million per year. oddly, these material obsessed, self-appointed faith merchants seem to have little appreciation  for what jesus is alleged to have preached about such conduct.  for example, in matthew 6:5 (king james version–among the many other translations): “and when you pray do not be like the hypocrites for they pray standing–so that they may be seen of men. they (in that manner) have their reward.”  and in matthew 7:1-3 “judge not, that ye be judged.  for with what judgment ye judged and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you.” perhaps those faith merchants of fundamentalism should get their greedy noses out of their elaborately constructed feeding troughs and actually follow the teaching they claim to epitomize. leave a comment » making holy myths posted in belief, bible, christianity, faith, mother nature, pagan gods, religion, sacred texts, scriptures on february 27, 2017 by chouck017894 of all the creation myths of ancient peoples, the opening of the book of genesis stands in a class by itself.  unlike all cultures before (our) common era the priests of yahweh in the 9th/8th century bce jerusalem  were busily indulging themselves in setting up the self-serving premise of divine discrimination.   the creator they presented in genesis who walked in his garden and talked to himself is thus depicted as either not omniscient (all-knowing) or as an unfeeling schemer.  for example, where is the wisdom of placing two tempting fruit trees as the focal point of this garden landscape and then forbidding two uncomprehending newly created creatures the freedom to eat of them?  it is weak story-plotting.  but it didn’t much matter to the priest authors, for the underlying purpose of the story was to channel the hebrew people away from belief in numerous gods and goddesses to gradually (and with much difficulty) indoctrinate them with the premise of one human-like being (male of course) who created limited identities without the necessity of energy intercourse. in more ancient time frames the civilizations such as sumer, babylonia, assyria, etc.recognized and respected the interactions and inestimable universal energies and it was these unseen but interrelated and interacting primal creative forces which the ancient cultures personified as a pantiscracy of “gods”.  this was allegorized as a utopian society in which all were equal and each had governing power.  it is an insight which is also the heartbeat of democracy.  the creative energies which interact throughout nature and all through the observable universe do often appear in opposition, hence the “gods” which personified those energy actions were often depicted in pagan cultures as in competition or in a state of lust.  there was never any doubt among these pagan cultures, however, that such  creative energies originated out of a  singular source.. the yahweh priest-authors in the 9th/8th century bce slyly contrived the claim that the amoral all-embracing source-power of creation had singled out only one group of people in the world  (them of course) as the sole recipients of his blessings.  to accomplish this pretext of divine discrimination and purported prejudice the wily priest editors referred  to those same primal and diverse energies which were responsible for all manifested life as having been their historical ancestors by dubbing those primal creative energies as isaelites–the alleged descendants of jacob/israel.  the various gods and goddesses that were recognized by the surrounding cultures and which symbolized for them the same diverse creative primal energies, were then ridiculed as being too lacking and had not been chosen by the power that the priests named yahweh.  but this assault on pagan wisdom necessitated finding a means to explain the diverse energy attributes that had been represented and personified with pagan gods and goddesses. the priest-editors who mined and reworked ancient teachings given with constellation figures, old oral hebrew myths and cabal texts certainly knew that the pagan gods represented forces of creative energy.  they knew as well that those energies, although unseen for the most part, interact throughout the universe and have an effect on all life. the clever scheme of the yahweh priest authors of demoting the the numerous pagan gods and goddesses was to simply give those primal forces a different designation. consequently those diverse creative forces were reassigned from godly status by yahweh’s priests and were hailed as angels in the service of yahweh.  for all extent and purpose, the attributes and special duties of the spurned pagan gods were simply transferred to angels and were envisioned as acting under the direction of a divinely indifferent power-source which they personified as yahweh. other pagan recognition of primal energies were similarly disguised.  in the earliest part of the priest-authored book of genesis (3:20) the character of eve is referred to as “mother of all living,” which suggests the rank of a near-sacred being.  this title that adam allegedly bestowed upon eve happens to be identical to what the ancient sumerians had bestowed upon their love goddess aruru, for she was regarded in their culture as the creatrix of all life.  and strangely also, the authors of genesis never mentioned an account of eve’s death, and the reason for that is no death occurred–we know her today as mother nature. eve’s implied eminence in genesis, even after the alleged fruit picking mistake, reflects the pagan perception that creation of all life can take place only through a process of polar energy interactions.  this is why various neighboring cultures which the priests of yahweh envied–such as sumerian, babylonian, phenician, hittie, ugaritic, etc.–gave homage to goddesses as being equal in divine power as the gods.  but eve, according to the yahweh priest authors, was also demoted and allegedly designed by yahweh to simply serve as adam’s helpmeet (gen 2:18-20).   this was a deliberate capsizing of pagan’s correct understanding that creation of any manifestation occurred only from exchange of opposite but equal polar energies.  the premise presented by the priests of yahweh, however, was that yahweh-jehovah simply muttered things into material existence, and that story feature had no parallel in any other mediterranean or near eastern myths.   the advantage of this story flight of fancy  was that it placed man (especially the political minded priests) in the authoritarian position.  unfortunately, by demoting the feminine (negative) polar aspect which is equally necessary for life production, the genesis myth of creation essentially rejects the scientific polarizing energy principle by which energy manifests as matter.  and western religious understanding has been plagued with confusion, controversy and misunderstanding ever since. leave a comment » uncertainties in sacred texts posted in bible, dead sea scrolls, hebrew scripture, religion, sacred texts, thoughts on february 18, 2017 by chouck017894 for the majority of persons of the western cultures today who have been indoctrinated into the christian faith systems, few are aware that there is yet to be found any original copies of any of the books which are honored as the new testament.  there are age-old copies to be sure, but they are just that, copies.  usually made from copies.  and the hebrew scriptures, so proudly declared to be meticulously accurate reproductions of god-dictated holy word, many uncertainties happen to linger there which necessitates footnotes (as in the new revised standard version).  in fact various passages are integrated where translators were uncertain what the original text really was (as for example, in 1 and 2 samuel).  this presents a tragic predicament for world cultures, because the many uncertainties which continue to hover and cloud all man-written “sacred” texts have been used as models upon which were fashioned each culture’s moral, ethics and spiritual trust.  thus it is actually sacred uncertainties which have served as foundations for the three by-the-book faith systems which routinely reflect their holiness in constant murderous conflicts. basic beliefs, most of which originated in bronze age tribal cultures, were heavily colored by fears and superstitions.  in addition, the words which have been handed down through century after century have been altered–sometimes accidentally, more often deliberately–by countless interpreters and translators who put their own spin on the declared meaning in those words.  predictably the declared meaning said to be god-relayed in those man-written texts was always interpreted from the events of the interpreter’s  particular time frame.  the fundamental philosophy which brought about all the age-old written “holy” works conveniently allowed for such self defensive flexibility and manipulative license.  and it is precisely this philosophical elasticity which stimulates the addictive fascination for what is revered as holy word.  it provides anxious seekers with ego gratification–which is commonly praised and promoted as spiritual fulfillment.  in extreme antiquity the stories were carefully penned to illustrate cosmological and/or life-purpose instruction. regrettably these were often indirectly–or more often than not intentionally–colored by later scribe’s personal likes, dislikes, envy, jealousies and political aims which consequently provoked irrelevant posturing and theatrics rather than radiating any genuine spiritual enlightenment. the faithful who cling unquestioningly to “sacred” texts (hebrew scriptures, new testament of quran, as examples) like to believe that those compositions which have been accepted as revealed and sacred, contain no mistakes, no textural booboos, and no faulty assessments.  but every such textural “holy” work was produced by human hands, and even the most faithful humans fall far short in cosmic awareness to serve as infallible spokesmen for the perfection and broad diversity which is the creative and sustaining power which is the all-enfolding source. the discovery in 1947 of a number of parchment scrolls which contained hebrew and aramaic scriptural texts and liturgical writings of an asectic community which dated from c. 250 bce to about 70 ce are known as the dead sea scrolls.  the intensive research on these scrolls brought to light the startling fact that those texts, which are around a thousand years older than any previously known “old texts” contained a stockpile of significant differences from the hebrew scriptures which are today considered to have always been inviolable.  time and circumstances since the era of the scrolls’ authorship brought with them alterations that resulted in textural content which became more or less standardized only around 1000 ce.  thus the western world today has become victim to what may be termed sacred shell games. genuine history is routinely forgotten in what has become accepted as holy word.  for example, the ot book  of esther was rewritten from an older version which some scholars have said had been composed by some roman source.  rabbi akiba ben joseph (c.50-132 ce) was one of the most eminent teachers of his timeframe, and he headed the school at jaffa: it was he who rewrote the text known as esther.  and the jewish code known as the mishnah was developed by him partly on the basis of his own teachings.  in the original roman account of the esther tale there was a character named haman (or aman or hamin) who vows to kill all jews.  some scholars say that haman was modeled upon a roman aristocrat named arius piso.  the jewish holiday feast of purim was established ostensibly to celebrate the deliverance of the jews from the alleged massacre by haman.  the rewritten book of esther and the association  of haman with roman aristocracy therefore served as the covert reminder to all jews of the alleged conspiracy of the romans to destroy the jews. once a faith system has compiled its self-serving literary collection and stamped it as “canon” (an ecclesiastical code or laws), that man-written anthology has been advertised and marketed as containing all knowledge which is ever necessary for a believer to attain godly protection, salvation or entrance into paradise.  thus have sacred theatrics and man-devised by-the-book directives been set in place as the edifying mechanism over mankind’s social and spiritual evolution (or lack thereof). today, contented that the faith systems which we have been taught as holding divine knowledge and which supposedly extends privileged access into a higher and exclusive domain, we are kept uninformed of how and from what that belief slowly and haphazardly evolved.  every man-contrived faith system has been built upon the awe and wonder that our ancient ancestors had felt for the celestial panorama which was then unmarred by the light and air pollution we humans produce today.  in our self-enveloped bubble of technology we have been manipulated away from the ancient’s awareness and veneration the universal phenomena, and those observations and practices became intentionally modified and disguised.  why?  because the “pagan” sources from which those holy words were “borrowed” had openly respected such things a solstice periods, time of the equinoxes, phases of the moon, constellation grouping of stars, and their associated cycles of nature.  these and other such natural observable facts thus played calculated influences in every man-contrived faith system which dominate cultures and societies today, and those natural wonders are camouflaged and smothered under priest-invented “histories” and theatrical rites. man!  that is almost enough to drive an atheist to attempt a prayer!  lord, rest your hand upon the heads of earnest seekers of enlightenment, and your other hand over the mouths of the braying self-possessed proselytizers. leave a comment » corporate style faith systems posted in atheist, belief, ego and belief, ethics and morality, monotheism, random, religion, thoughts on january 1, 2017 by chouck017894 any man-fashioned faith system is basically designed as a power structure: it is not unfaulteringly assembled for the benefit of mass spiritual enlightenment but designed to assert the faith system’s authority.  like any commercial endeavor the service that is offered is gauged by customer demand, and commercial demand is stirred by advertising.  in the faith business the product is basically a manufactured illusion: the merchandise offered is emotional assurance that a higher power looks after them–but that power supposedly functions only if the subscribers submit, obey and partake of all the rites, rituals and ceremonies that the self-appointed authorities have set in place for business use.  consequently those formalized procedures are cleverly fashioned to appeal to the ego of the seekers, not purposefully crafted to empower everyone’s personal connection (called “spirit”) to creation’s source. principles of righteous conduct are comparatively self evident to any balanced mind:  seek understanding, control avarice, value individuality, honor love, demonstrate compassion, respect all life’s diversities, recognize that all things are interrelated, etc.  for the most part the three  networks of corporate styled “faith” systems of today’s western cultures choose to market the principles of “belief” by claiming to possess direct favoritism of a compassionate creator-god.  the general work  ethic of these three sister  faith systems, however, is to force their formalized concepts of god-creator upon everyone else, which results only in constant conflicts.  thus for each of these corporate styled faith systems, their calls to devotion happen to exploit identical  un-righteous principles that happen to resist creation’s intended diversities.  achieving “dominion” over life’s diversity is the subliminal message buried within every man-written “sacred” text, and that faith system obsession is often the excuse for fundamentalists to annihilate whatever they fail to understand.  that strategy is commonly exhibited in attempting to obstruct knowledge, curtail science, stifle natural desires, limit consideration for others, belittle intimate pleasures—in short, restructure everyone to a robotic religionist. what is the architectural foundation for this?  it is  the concept of monotheism, a doctrine that there is only one creator-god, who is characterized as male, of course.  that concept permits erecting a business machine under the assertion that the all-embracing, all-inclusive power which created and sustains everything then unexplainably censored himself to play favorites with segments of the human species.  this is a tactic which is then buttressed by utilizing man’s fear of death which further allows the charlatans to peddle their faith system’s insurance policy which is averred to offer seekers a glorious afterlife in a cloud-lined country club atmosphere–but only if they follow the rules. the three self-serving monotheistic faith systems of western cultures could never survive as controlling powers if the peace and brotherly love to which they give much lip service was faithfully practiced.  instead the self-appointed representatives of heaven incite the egos of seekers with false notions of exclusive access to the all-inclusive creator.  peace and brotherly love happen to make for a limited meal ticket if such tolerance was actually allowed to be demonstrated by followers, for that would allow seekers to truly embark upon achieving personal alignment with universal powers.  such true freedom of spirit would deprive the self-proclaimed god-ambassadors of their public image as individuals who assert to have been heavenly approved for godly service.  each of these three corporate styled faith systems claim to teach love, tolerance and peace, but curiously after nearly three thousand years of these sugary claims the world has not yet witnessed any proof of such divine conduct on their part.  instead, all three of these by-the-book religions  systems have to resort to whitewashing and disguising their bloody histories of violence, practiced prejudices, deceits, contrived theatrical ceremonies, and similar excesses of shameless spiritual pretentiousness.  with these pretentions each of these faith systems have shamelessly taught seekers to hate the intended diversities of life expressions. when some faith system then attains some political clout it inevitably slides into the sensuous “sins” of brutal power management which they legitimatize by quoting cherry-picked verses from their own priest crafted holy books.  for example, does not the hebrew bible attest that god urged the israelites, his “chosen people”, to slaughter the inhabitants of canaan to attain the “promised land”–as reportedly executed by joshua?  and for the promoters of gospel, was not europe brought into gods’s favor by use of torture and fiery destruction of life during the inquisition by self-proclaimed representatives of the prince of peace?  and does not the quran avow that allah (the merciful) sent hordes of angels to slay opponents of mohammad’s possession of mecca?  such is the deceptive propaganda preached by all “holy word” aficionados.  the justification given for such acts of brutal domination is always in the name of a prejudiced holy spirit.  nowhere in such faiths is the truth ever acknowledged that each and every thing is manifested through and from one source, and that each and all things are therefore interrelated and stand equal before that creative power.  there is, of course, no ego manipulation in teaching that, and thus there is little material profit in admitting the truth of impartiality before that creative source. it has been noted elsewhere in these postings that regional conditions shaped and colored the spiritual teachings which were worked into the political governance of tribal styled stability.  thus today, to the jews and muslims, god is still promoted as something like a bellicose tribal leader, and to those “others” who are not of his implied favored people the creative principle supposedly decreed “cut them off.”  for example, psalms 118:10 (among many interpretations) “…all nations surrounded me; in the name of the lord i will surely cut them off…”  in christian faith, which was conceived and nourished in the militant roman empire, god is viewed more as a commander-in-chief, with priests, bishops, ministers, preachers, etc. placed in charge like combat commanders over the lower ranks. how glaringly different are the by-the-book dogmatism practiced in the western culture’s faith systems today when compared to the much belittled way the pagans approached spiritual understanding. pagan understanding was that spiritual things are highly personal and meant to be experienced by each person individually.  the reason why pagans did not actively solicit others to join their particular sect was the belief that the impulse for spiritual enlightenment must originate within the person himself.  it was not viewed as a commercial subject.  the pagans knew that the first place of any person’s spiritual preparation had to arise within one’s own heart.  spiritual preparation, they understood, was not something acquired through exterior pressures.  to the pagan, regardless of which small sect he or she might be drawn to, it was always accepted that those in any superior position were like elder brethren who, just like the postulant, were sharing in a similar search for divine enlightenment. today such spiritual freedom has been placed upon the altars of corporate styled faith systems which reflect more spiritual greed than any dedication to true spiritual enlightenment.  modern day corporate structured faith systems seek only to impose dogmatism which reduces one’s inner spiritual yearning to hostage status that is held for ransom. leave a comment » examples of scriptural immorality posted in abraham, agnostic, atheist, belief, biblical "values", ethics and morality, religion, scriptures, theology on december 1, 2016 by chouck017894 for some two to three thousand years the holy scriptures have been promoted through western cultures as being the ultimate in moral guidance for mankind.  but anyone with genuine respect for moral conduct and ethical behavior toward their fellow man often stagger away in bewilderment after reading a few holy accounts. indeed, the opening chapters of genesis brusquely kick things off with a highly questionable take on common ethics.  the naive couple, adam and eve, the last of the creator’s handiwork, were seemingly fashioned only for fun and games. naked and clueless, they were placed in a deceptively paradisiacal setting–a setting which featured two breathtakingly beautiful fruit bearing trees as its focal point.  ah, but these trees were declared to be off-limits as a food source for the  creator’s not-too-bright last creations.  this is clearly a case of crafty entrapment, not omniscient wisdom.  but god was supposedly outraged when the innocent pair find the trees too alluring, and god declared that death is to be their punishment–just not for adam and eve, but for all matter-life forms!  the first two humans within the walled-in eden had absolutely no experience as to what self-aware life meant, so how could they have possibly comprehended what the sentence of death meant? ethics and compassion (qualities of conscience) soon got another below-the-belt attack in the “revealed” record of adam and eve’s sons cain and abel.  cain had become a farmer and abel was a sheepherder.  for the bounty that god had supposedly allowed them god expected both boys to gather from their hard work and bring him offerings in gratitude.  that seems a tad materialistic for the creator of all things, but what the heck.  abel slit a sheep’s throat and god found that to be extremely pleasing, but cain’s gift, taken from the laboriously tended fields, was scorned by the creator.  cain, of course, smarted at this bald-faced discrimination and in a jealous rage killed his brother.  there were no actual criminal laws established in paradise, nor had there been need for such in a family of four.  so the homicide of abel cannot be termed murder or even  manslaughter.  as punishment the testy omniscient one banished cain from his native land and cain was commanded not to till the ground anymore. apparently cain was expected to starve himself to death.  or perhaps that was the omniscient one’s plan for evolutionary success, for cain became wonderfully successful as a builder of cities after that.how he populated them is never explained.  still we can’t help but wonder–is infinite punishment for “sins” committed by a finite being’s brief life really the caliber of an omniscient creator’s justice? the same slack concept of holy moral/ethical conduct is continued throughout holy word accounts.  aggression is highly praised in divine tales, and war crimes pass as acceptable practice–if carried out for the security of a man-invented faith system.  for example, under moses’ generalship the israelites are glorified for having killed off all the midianite men, their kings and their prophet balaam.  joshua, in turn, reveled in holocaustic violence in which even thousands of noncombatant women, children and aged were slaughtered. deceitful david exterminated men, women and children in various stories, even sawing victims in half or hacking them to pieces. in a number of holy stories characters are admired for indulging in homicide.   the alleged “prophet” elijah, for example, who allegedly killed 450 priest of baal to “justify” jehovah is held to be exemplary.  and there is elisha, elijah’s successor, who called upon god to send two bears to kill children who had dared to mock his bald head.  and there is the woman esther who is praised for scheming the mass murders of persians.  and there is jezebel who trumped up false charges against a father and his two sons so they would be slain. sexual misconduct, as long as it is strictly heterosexual, is routinely sniffed over.  lot and his two daughters, for example, merit no chastising for acts of incest.  the maltreatment of sarah whom her husband abraham loaned out to the king for material benefits is brushed over.  isaac, their son, followed dad’s example and passed his off wife to the king as his sister.  good old david indulged himself in adultery and had the women’s husband set up for assassination at the war front.  dinah, jacob’s daughter, too young to give legal consent, was defiled by her half-brother, prince shechem.  how do these, and many similar holy examples teach seekers how they are to achieve a personal state of grace? strangely, impurity of spirit is a constant counterpoint played upon in holy tales, but the “impurity” is always about not following some man-invented routine of pretentiousness and mannerisms as being the only method to approach the  omniscient one.  the impurity angle of one’s commitment to a man-made faith system is made the major concern in the three western corporate style faith systems.  this springs primarily from the claim that just being born–expelled from a woman’s body–renders a person impure.  it is never explained why, if the creator is omniscient (all-knowing) and supremely merciful, “he” could not have devised a more practical way and less painful manner for multiplying new life.  nonetheless, that little oversight broadly allows for his self-appointed representatives to have steady employment in their self-devised theatrics.  for example, to make up for their original impurity a man-made faith system may insist that  one’s hair must be trimmed in a strict prescribed manner; or other faith systems demand  certain foods must be avoided or prepared in a ritual way; and of course in all systems  certain theatrics (rites, rituals ceremonies, etc) must be performed by those who aver to be god’s selected representatives. such is the enticement and lure of man-written “holy” books.  the emphasis is commonly based upon following some man-devised routine as though it was magically set down in stone and perchance delivered on some mountain top.  that, however, does not reflect the varied and all-inclusive nature of true spirit.  rigidity and inflexibility just happens to be the condition of something that is dead. leave a comment » paradox of modern man posted in atheist, belief, enlightenment, faith, life, religion, scriptures, thoughts on november 17, 2016 by chouck017894 modern man with all his brilliant technological accomplishments inexplicably remains chained to myths and superstitions that still lie hidden beneath what are averred to be holy/spiritual truths.  the sciences that have revolutionized our species’ life patterns have done so despite the fact that the origin of life is even now not totally understood.  we praise ourselves as having entered into the space age and think we are meant to dominate it, yet we have only theories or theological speculations of how our celestial environment came into being.  but not even science, like man’s faith systems, is able to explain why life exists, what role we play in the universal panorama, or how an awareness of “self” interacts with that vast framework that is the universe.  and science also tends to mimic religious contentions that the entire universe is relatively systematic, that creation was a one-shot deal–a big bang or a six day wonder–which the human species alone is capable of dominating through its ability of deductive reasoning. science, however, differs from faith system explanations of man in that their research and studies have culled and continues to cull and analyze the evidence which mankind’s ancestors pioneered.  religious explanations tend to calculate man’s history–for their convenience–as being a scant few thousand years, but the in-depth scientific approach shows that our species with identical capabilities can be traced back for at least a million years. the insistence of faith systems regarding a short term human history is made even more puzzling when modern man is lulled by them into accepting that what is referred to as “primitive” cultures nonetheless raised wondrous construction feats such as the baalbek terrace in lebanon, the great pyramid in egypt, and similar ancient pyramids in south america and the far east.  these are structures that would tax even modern man’s capabilities. mystery, ceremony and magic rites were once the power hold ploys that ancient tribal leaders employed to maintain control over tribal members.  commonly that privileged status was understood to be due to the tribal leader’s claim of being directly counseled by temperamental spirits.  we today recognize that manner of seeking protection as superstition and nonsense.   but just how advanced are faith system practices today that are conducted in great extent in much the same manner?  the heart and soul of any of mankind’s contrive faith systems also adhere to similar features which keeps those systems insulated from scrutiny, for they are practiced in fear of questions which they cannot answer.  when devout seekers begin to ask why?  how? where? when? who? etc., the tribal-styled faith systems react in anxiety and distress.  thus they advise that such questions are not supposed to be asked of pulpit performers who, as an alternative, counsel that true believers are to trust the bronze age priest-authors who were divinely certain that the earth was the center of creation.  the declared “revealed” wisdom offered by the power-seeking priest authors in antiquity simply does not stand as “omniscient” (all-knowing) comprehension against today’s scientific research and exploration. as an example of superstition elevated to “religious” status, it is fully exposed in the jewish ceremony known as kapparot (from semite, akin to hebrew kaph, meaning “palm of hand”).  kapparot is an atonement ritual which is indulged in before the holiday of yom  kippur.  in the ritual (which requires a “donation” of a live chicken to the rabbi for the performance) a rabbi holds the live chicken above the donor’s head (gently of course) and recites a blessing.  the luckless bird is then slaughtered (according to jewish dietary laws).  why this ritual bloodletting of a hapless animal should inspire god to grant the donor reconciliation with god after having transgressed “his” covenants is murky at best.  on the other hand, every faith system has their atonement rites which are equally caked with peculiar stipulations that supposedly satisfies the creator–like jesus died for the sins of the world.  the superstitious prehistory tribal shamans would find such bloodletting to be praiseworthy. so how spiritually advanced is modern man?  the human species, unfortunately, has been well schooled in deluding itself.  and our poor planet is beginning to show the strain and damage that mankind’s belief systems have fostered.  but the holy answer is not necessarily apocalyptic doom.  man’s atonement rests in the release of taught “religious” (belief system) claims of exclusiveness with creation’s multiplicity.  humanity must face the fact that true freedom of spirit (meaning enlightenment) is not the true purpose of any man-concocted faith system.  if those formulated methods of faith indulgence were devoted to actual spiritual attainment and awareness they would seek to enlighten followers, not constrain seekers with made-up rites, rituals, scripted ceremonies and pretended exclusivity with a never-encountered judgmental god.  we might therefore conclude from such acts of pretense that only con-men have such needs for public exhibitionism. leave a comment » faith based fraud in us government posted in agnostic, atheist, belief, biblical "values", christianity, culture, government, politics, random, religion, social, thoughts on november 1, 2016 by chouck017894 special interest handouts by political office holders in the united states have become big-time  “faith” privileges over the last few decades, increasing dramatically after the religious right gained control of the grand old party in 1996.  the fast changing legal status for churches and faith system institutions have not been shy in underhandedly trying to “liberate” religious organizations by granting them more lenient rules than is permitted to their secular counterparts. such deliberate disregard for the democratic principles by religious extremists holding congressional positions, such a separation of church and state, is hardly due to any spiritual morals.  this dangerous and frightening chipping away at long standing principles of democracy has occurred under pressure from extremist religious groups that have muscled their way into the political arena.  the deviously devoted never make it comprehensible as to why an “omniscient/omnipotent” god should or would have to rely upon the use of deceitful persons to achieve “his” intentions.  but the raucous, self-serving religious extremists have effectively infiltrated our congress, the us supreme court , and federal and state courts, all of which have too often casually conceded to the demands that “faith” groups (christian only) should be protected from any government impositions!  (related blogs: rise of holy agitators, september 1, 2016; spiritual vanity, the sin of fundamentalism, october 1, 2016) this has been pushed upon the nations’s widely diverse citizenry by devious religious fanatics who paint themselves with false eminence that reflects neither the principles of true democracy nor any higher spiritual values.  these predatory religious wolves have accomplished this betrayal of democratic principles by camouflaging themselves with traditional sheep’s clothing.  thus disguised they have methodically selected, one by one, various supporting regulations of democratic comportment by inserting into those regulations their faith system’s claims of exclusivity with the creator.  this has purposefully disfigured and betrayed the numerous longstanding laws of equality and spiritual freedom that the “fathers” of the nation intended.  as a consequence so many democratic principles have been mauled to such an extent that the “faith” pretenders may often thumb their noses at requirements leveled upon everyone else.  as an example, their “public” buildings and organizational programs may be only slightly related to their faith system.  that bears the foul odor of theocratic ideology. under these contrived special-interest allowances, unethically obtained, even the day care centers that have religious affiliations were once actually exempted from licensing requirements in a number of states.  in texas, for example, the religious day-care facilities and drug-treatment programs were once exempt from state licensing.  however, protected by their privileged status by the “faithful” serving in state government positions the abuse and disregard for patients in those facilities proved to be greater than in nonreligious facilities.  another example: the health care system operated by the seventh day adventists was actually allowed to bar nurses from joining unions.  and many states permit tax-free churches build or expand their facilities in ways that clearly violate zoning ordinances with which everyone else must comply.  religious-front operations have routinely discriminated in choice of employees, or have expressed their piety in heartless neglect of employee misfortune.  in these faith system front operations even persons that may suddenly be stricken with some physical malady have been unceremoniously dumped, which would never be tolerated in non-religious organizations.  how these self-serving practices follow the teachings attributed to jesus, such as “love one another“, or “do unto others as you would have done unto you” is never explained by them.   special privileges which have been extended by faith aggressive politicians into government to certain (christians only) faith system organizations is not fair or just or moral in a nation that has been built upon dedication to the freedom of choice and the pursuit of happiness.  and practicing bigotry and narrow mindedness as some religiously obsessed do is neither righteous nor spiritual in a creation which is rampant with lavish diversity of life and variety of expression.  a true democratic society can function only within conditions of equality and respect for each individual within the nation.  attempting to inject one particular man-concocted faith system into the politics of a nation which has been dedicated to freedom and liberty for its diverse people can only accomplish catastrophe for all.  enlightenment will never be attained in an indulgence in spiritual avarice. leave a comment » « older entries search for: pages about the book blogroll wordpress.com wordpress.org buy the book buy time frames and taboo data at barnesandnoble.com buy time frames and taboo data on amazon.com social networking facebook profile goodreads goodreads profile librarything profile myspace profile shelfari shelfari profile twitter flickr photos more photos archives march 2017 february 2017 january 2017 december 2016 november 2016 october 2016 september 2016 august 2016 july 2016 june 2016 may 2016 april 2016 march 2016 february 2016 january 2016 december 2015 march 2015 february 2015 january 2015 december 2014 november 2014 october 2014 september 2014 august 2014 july 2014 june 2014 may 2014 april 2014 march 2014 february 2014 january 2014 december 2013 november 2013 october 2013 september 2013 august 2013 july 2013 june 2013 may 2013 april 2013 march 2013 february 2013 january 2013 december 2012 november 2012 october 2012 september 2012 august 2012 july 2012 june 2012 may 2012 april 2012 march 2012 february 2012 january 2012 december 2011 november 2011 october 2011 september 2011 august 2011 july 2011 june 2011 may 2011 april 2011 march 2011 february 2011 january 2011 december 2010 november 2010 october 2010 september 2010 august 2010 july 2010 june 2010 may 2010 april 2010 march 2010 february 2010 january 2010 december 2009 november 2009 october 2009 september 2009 august 2009 july 2009 june 2009 may 2009 april 2009 march 2009 february 2009 meta register log in entries rss comments rss wordpress.com blog at wordpress.com. time frames and taboo data blog create a free website or blog at wordpress.com. post to cancel


Here you find all texts from your page as Google (googlebot) and others search engines seen it.

Words density analysis:

Numbers of all words: 7371

One word

Two words phrases

Three words phrases

the - 8.19% (604)
and - 3.5% (258)
for - 1.75% (129)
that - 1.63% (120)
all - 1.41% (104)
man - 1.25% (92)
her - 1.09% (80)
eve - 1.07% (79)
which - 1.02% (75)
eat - 0.95% (70)
his - 0.8% (59)
faith - 0.8% (59)
was - 0.8% (59)
are - 0.79% (58)
not - 0.68% (50)
with - 0.64% (47)
system - 0.64% (47)
their - 0.64% (47)
have - 0.62% (46)
one - 0.62% (46)
ever - 0.62% (46)
god - 0.61% (45)
per - 0.61% (45)
 the - 0.56% (41)
our - 0.56% (41)
 a - 0.49% (36)
out - 0.47% (35)
spirit - 0.47% (35)
were - 0.46% (34)
ritual - 0.46% (34)
from - 0.45% (33)
over - 0.45% (33)
but - 0.42% (31)
been - 0.42% (31)
era - 0.42% (31)
any - 0.41% (30)
who - 0.38% (28)
self - 0.38% (28)
spiritual - 0.37% (27)
they - 0.35% (26)
other - 0.35% (26)
only - 0.35% (26)
age - 0.35% (26)
such - 0.35% (26)
sin - 0.35% (26)
nation - 0.35% (26)
lie - 0.34% (25)
day - 0.34% (25)
this - 0.34% (25)
there - 0.33% (24)
can - 0.31% (23)
holy - 0.31% (23)
tim - 0.31% (23)
systems - 0.31% (23)
those - 0.31% (23)
each - 0.3% (22)
religious - 0.3% (22)
how - 0.28% (21)
under - 0.28% (21)
these - 0.28% (21)
life - 0.28% (21)
has - 0.27% (20)
example - 0.27% (20)
pagan - 0.27% (20)
had - 0.26% (19)
them - 0.26% (19)
priest - 0.26% (19)
old - 0.26% (19)
what - 0.26% (19)
very - 0.24% (18)
person - 0.24% (18)
 in - 0.24% (18)
culture - 0.24% (18)
today - 0.24% (18)
part - 0.23% (17)
 and - 0.23% (17)
being - 0.23% (17)
power - 0.23% (17)
text - 0.23% (17)
upon - 0.23% (17)
way - 0.23% (17)
into - 0.23% (17)
log - 0.23% (17)
stand - 0.23% (17)
2016 - 0.23% (17)
she - 0.22% (16)
light - 0.22% (16)
some - 0.22% (16)
just - 0.22% (16)
thing - 0.22% (16)
every - 0.22% (16)
sent - 0.22% (16)
now - 0.22% (16)
aim - 0.22% (16)
once - 0.2% (15)
seek - 0.2% (15)
belief - 0.2% (15)
even - 0.2% (15)
year - 0.2% (15)
less - 0.2% (15)
more - 0.2% (15)
book - 0.19% (14)
cultures - 0.19% (14)
may - 0.19% (14)
creator - 0.19% (14)
off - 0.19% (14)
time - 0.19% (14)
 for - 0.19% (14)
free - 0.19% (14)
work - 0.19% (14)
word - 0.19% (14)
would - 0.18% (13)
king - 0.18% (13)
two - 0.18% (13)
state - 0.18% (13)
example, - 0.18% (13)
able - 0.18% (13)
own - 0.18% (13)
robertson - 0.18% (13)
like - 0.18% (13)
war - 0.18% (13)
know - 0.18% (13)
claim - 0.18% (13)
 this - 0.16% (12)
yahweh - 0.16% (12)
2012 - 0.16% (12)
2011 - 0.16% (12)
2014 - 0.16% (12)
sly - 0.16% (12)
2010 - 0.16% (12)
creation - 0.16% (12)
2013 - 0.16% (12)
million - 0.16% (12)
freedom - 0.16% (12)
right - 0.16% (12)
its - 0.16% (12)
february - 0.15% (11)
principle - 0.15% (11)
enlighten - 0.15% (11)
sacred - 0.15% (11)
never - 0.15% (11)
certain - 0.15% (11)
new - 0.15% (11)
fun - 0.15% (11)
oral - 0.15% (11)
thus - 0.15% (11)
2009 - 0.15% (11)
nor - 0.15% (11)
post - 0.15% (11)
creative - 0.15% (11)
gods - 0.15% (11)
people - 0.14% (10)
hand - 0.14% (10)
seekers - 0.14% (10)
biblical - 0.14% (10)
human - 0.14% (10)
true - 0.14% (10)
take - 0.14% (10)
course - 0.14% (10)
standing - 0.14% (10)
march - 0.14% (10)
america - 0.14% (10)
declared - 0.14% (10)
moral - 0.14% (10)
texts - 0.14% (10)
enlightenment - 0.14% (10)
source - 0.14% (10)
 but - 0.14% (10)
tend - 0.14% (10)
christian - 0.14% (10)
through - 0.14% (10)
public - 0.12% (9)
use - 0.12% (9)
wing - 0.12% (9)
after - 0.12% (9)
allow - 0.12% (9)
happen - 0.12% (9)
style - 0.12% (9)
november - 0.12% (9)
december - 0.12% (9)
position - 0.12% (9)
him - 0.12% (9)
point - 0.12% (9)
teach - 0.12% (9)
authors - 0.12% (9)
written - 0.12% (9)
january - 0.12% (9)
three - 0.12% (9)
ce. - 0.12% (9)
place - 0.12% (9)
energies - 0.12% (9)
alleged - 0.12% (9)
follow - 0.12% (9)
ancient - 0.12% (9)
omniscient - 0.12% (9)
story - 0.12% (9)
hebrew - 0.12% (9)
divine - 0.12% (9)
principles - 0.12% (9)
often - 0.12% (9)
too - 0.11% (8)
october - 0.11% (8)
sea - 0.11% (8)
september - 0.11% (8)
fully - 0.11% (8)
rites - 0.11% (8)
origin - 0.11% (8)
equal - 0.11% (8)
political - 0.11% (8)
purpose - 0.11% (8)
comment - 0.11% (8)
 that - 0.11% (8)
why - 0.11% (8)
tribal - 0.11% (8)
favor - 0.11% (8)
fundamental - 0.11% (8)
cain - 0.11% (8)
western - 0.11% (8)
democratic - 0.11% (8)
 thus - 0.11% (8)
government - 0.11% (8)
understand - 0.11% (8)
than - 0.11% (8)
again - 0.11% (8)
sure - 0.11% (8)
when - 0.11% (8)
corporate - 0.11% (8)
about - 0.11% (8)
found - 0.11% (8)
set - 0.09% (7)
many - 0.09% (7)
modern - 0.09% (7)
things - 0.09% (7)
2017 - 0.09% (7)
head - 0.09% (7)
chouck017894 - 0.09% (7)
serving - 0.09% (7)
supposed - 0.09% (7)
everyone - 0.09% (7)
love - 0.09% (7)
till - 0.09% (7)
you - 0.09% (7)
seem - 0.09% (7)
leave - 0.09% (7)
conduct - 0.09% (7)
scriptures - 0.09% (7)
force - 0.09% (7)
roman - 0.09% (7)
priests - 0.09% (7)
then - 0.09% (7)
must - 0.09% (7)
 it - 0.09% (7)
energy - 0.09% (7)
genesis - 0.09% (7)
actual - 0.09% (7)
june - 0.09% (7)
august - 0.09% (7)
posted - 0.09% (7)
special - 0.09% (7)
did - 0.09% (7)
ways - 0.09% (7)
family - 0.09% (7)
belief, - 0.09% (7)
july - 0.09% (7)
regard - 0.09% (7)
fact - 0.09% (7)
april - 0.09% (7)
blog - 0.09% (7)
came - 0.08% (6)
tended - 0.08% (6)
still - 0.08% (6)
well - 0.08% (6)
also - 0.08% (6)
diverse - 0.08% (6)
sons - 0.08% (6)
science - 0.08% (6)
aman - 0.08% (6)
made - 0.08% (6)
search - 0.08% (6)
hold - 0.08% (6)
pass - 0.08% (6)
little - 0.08% (6)
similar - 0.08% (6)
common - 0.08% (6)
status - 0.08% (6)
teaching - 0.08% (6)
within - 0.08% (6)
religion, - 0.08% (6)
liberty - 0.08% (6)
routine - 0.08% (6)
styled - 0.08% (6)
explain - 0.08% (6)
though - 0.08% (6)
supposedly - 0.08% (6)
respect - 0.08% (6)
man’s - 0.08% (6)
aware - 0.08% (6)
one’s - 0.08% (6)
value - 0.08% (6)
manner - 0.08% (6)
goddess - 0.08% (6)
most - 0.08% (6)
simply - 0.08% (6)
always - 0.08% (6)
interact - 0.08% (6)
understanding - 0.08% (6)
primal - 0.08% (6)
year. - 0.08% (6)
himself - 0.08% (6)
myth - 0.08% (6)
name - 0.08% (6)
however, - 0.08% (6)
away - 0.08% (6)
view - 0.08% (6)
church - 0.08% (6)
frames - 0.08% (6)
ego - 0.08% (6)
positions - 0.08% (6)
far - 0.08% (6)
contrive - 0.08% (6)
same - 0.08% (6)
death - 0.08% (6)
law - 0.08% (6)
kill - 0.07% (5)
called - 0.07% (5)
2015 - 0.07% (5)
organization - 0.07% (5)
court - 0.07% (5)
bible - 0.07% (5)
placed - 0.07% (5)
reflect - 0.07% (5)
myths - 0.07% (5)
profile - 0.07% (5)
history - 0.07% (5)
where - 0.07% (5)
actually - 0.07% (5)
acts - 0.07% (5)
uncertain - 0.07% (5)
haman - 0.07% (5)
based - 0.07% (5)
self-serving - 0.07% (5)
much - 0.07% (5)
offer - 0.07% (5)
supreme - 0.07% (5)
world - 0.07% (5)
ethics - 0.07% (5)
attain - 0.07% (5)
presented - 0.07% (5)
man-written - 0.07% (5)
various - 0.07% (5)
network - 0.07% (5)
later - 0.07% (5)
contrived - 0.07% (5)
goddesses - 0.07% (5)
jews - 0.07% (5)
aims - 0.07% (5)
wisdom - 0.07% (5)
term - 0.07% (5)
praise - 0.07% (5)
character - 0.07% (5)
source. - 0.07% (5)
adam - 0.07% (5)
else - 0.07% (5)
another - 0.07% (5)
women - 0.07% (5)
species - 0.07% (5)
representative - 0.07% (5)
constitutional - 0.07% (5)
lead - 0.07% (5)
years - 0.07% (5)
ben - 0.07% (5)
thousand - 0.07% (5)
american - 0.07% (5)
taboo - 0.07% (5)
against - 0.07% (5)
therefore - 0.07% (5)
scrolls - 0.07% (5)
serve - 0.07% (5)
wonder - 0.07% (5)
data - 0.07% (5)
rest - 0.07% (5)
personal - 0.07% (5)
aged - 0.07% (5)
esther - 0.07% (5)
direct - 0.07% (5)
nature - 0.07% (5)
market - 0.07% (5)
air - 0.07% (5)
related - 0.07% (5)
give - 0.07% (5)
known - 0.07% (5)
etc. - 0.07% (5)
stories - 0.07% (5)
atheist - 0.07% (5)
material - 0.07% (5)
broad - 0.07% (5)
mankind’s - 0.05% (4)
 there - 0.05% (4)
accomplish - 0.05% (4)
group - 0.05% (4)
atheist, - 0.05% (4)
heaven - 0.05% (4)
persons - 0.05% (4)
universe - 0.05% (4)
social - 0.05% (4)
make - 0.05% (4)
claims - 0.05% (4)
practiced - 0.05% (4)
scriptures, - 0.05% (4)
original - 0.05% (4)
assert - 0.05% (4)
having - 0.05% (4)
today, - 0.05% (4)
copies - 0.05% (4)
limit - 0.05% (4)
teachings - 0.05% (4)
“faith” - 0.05% (4)
concept - 0.05% (4)
service - 0.05% (4)
recognize - 0.05% (4)
play - 0.05% (4)
control - 0.05% (4)
states - 0.05% (4)
fear - 0.05% (4)
righteous - 0.05% (4)
few - 0.05% (4)
good - 0.05% (4)
ceremonies - 0.05% (4)
systems, - 0.05% (4)
thoughts - 0.05% (4)
taught - 0.05% (4)
demand - 0.05% (4)
peace - 0.05% (4)
create - 0.05% (4)
logical - 0.05% (4)
uncertainties - 0.05% (4)
representatives - 0.05% (4)
account - 0.05% (4)
“a - 0.05% (4)
reason - 0.05% (4)
prejudice - 0.05% (4)
pat - 0.05% (4)
does - 0.05% (4)
lord - 0.05% (4)
older - 0.05% (4)
creator’s - 0.05% (4)
diversities - 0.05% (4)
life. - 0.05% (4)
content - 0.05% (4)
that, - 0.05% (4)
 we - 0.05% (4)
aver - 0.05% (4)
meaning - 0.05% (4)
raised - 0.05% (4)
devised - 0.05% (4)
self-appointed - 0.05% (4)
nation. - 0.05% (4)
concern - 0.05% (4)
jesus - 0.05% (4)
become - 0.05% (4)
 of - 0.05% (4)
slaughter - 0.05% (4)
action - 0.05% (4)
brought - 0.05% (4)
 how - 0.05% (4)
theatrics - 0.05% (4)
facilities - 0.05% (4)
 to - 0.05% (4)
care - 0.05% (4)
version - 0.05% (4)
faith, - 0.05% (4)
research - 0.05% (4)
diversity - 0.05% (4)
commonly - 0.05% (4)
live - 0.05% (4)
allowed - 0.05% (4)
invented - 0.05% (4)
akin - 0.05% (4)
named - 0.05% (4)
early - 0.05% (4)
values - 0.05% (4)
heart - 0.05% (4)
individual - 0.05% (4)
superstition - 0.05% (4)
basic - 0.05% (4)
wordpress.com - 0.05% (4)
impurity - 0.05% (4)
feature - 0.05% (4)
contain - 0.05% (4)
long - 0.05% (4)
fashioned - 0.05% (4)
awareness - 0.05% (4)
became - 0.05% (4)
trees - 0.05% (4)
knowledge - 0.05% (4)
others - 0.05% (4)
meant - 0.05% (4)
lower - 0.05% (4)
century - 0.05% (4)
children - 0.05% (4)
nations - 0.05% (4)
politics - 0.05% (4)
truth - 0.05% (4)
universal - 0.05% (4)
“holy - 0.05% (4)
forces - 0.05% (4)
personified - 0.05% (4)
abel - 0.05% (4)
last - 0.05% (4)
school - 0.05% (4)
faithful - 0.05% (4)
plan - 0.05% (4)
mother - 0.05% (4)
should - 0.05% (4)
routinely - 0.05% (4)
jewish - 0.05% (4)
by-the-book - 0.05% (4)
leader - 0.05% (4)
tell - 0.05% (4)
laws - 0.05% (4)
empire - 0.05% (4)
polar - 0.05% (4)
prophet - 0.05% (4)
before - 0.05% (4)
ce) - 0.04% (3)
humans - 0.04% (3)
ancestors - 0.04% (3)
exclusive - 0.04% (3)
 every - 0.04% (3)
number - 0.04% (3)
evolution - 0.04% (3)
tale - 0.04% (3)
privileged - 0.04% (3)
short - 0.04% (3)
lack - 0.04% (3)
higher - 0.04% (3)
council - 0.04% (3)
practices - 0.04% (3)
explained - 0.04% (3)
understood - 0.04% (3)
note - 0.04% (3)
tax - 0.04% (3)
great - 0.04% (3)
big - 0.04% (3)
condition - 0.04% (3)
strict - 0.04% (3)
approach - 0.04% (3)
counsel - 0.04% (3)
method - 0.04% (3)
father - 0.04% (3)
men, - 0.04% (3)
system. - 0.04% (3)
land - 0.04% (3)
punishment - 0.04% (3)
 as - 0.04% (3)
protection - 0.04% (3)
atonement - 0.04% (3)
seems - 0.04% (3)
bar - 0.04% (3)
rise - 0.04% (3)
(in - 0.04% (3)
buy - 0.04% (3)
bible, - 0.04% (3)
“do - 0.04% (3)
front - 0.04% (3)
build - 0.04% (3)
exempt - 0.04% (3)
rabbi - 0.04% (3)
disguised - 0.04% (3)
extremist - 0.04% (3)
democracy - 0.04% (3)
organizations - 0.04% (3)
face - 0.04% (3)
sins - 0.04% (3)
grant - 0.04% (3)
murder - 0.04% (3)
killed - 0.04% (3)
 these - 0.04% (3)
business - 0.04% (3)
intended - 0.04% (3)
possess - 0.04% (3)
love, - 0.04% (3)
creation’s - 0.04% (3)
rituals - 0.04% (3)
rites, - 0.04% (3)
product - 0.04% (3)
offered - 0.04% (3)
course. - 0.04% (3)
commercial - 0.04% (3)
system’s - 0.04% (3)
mass - 0.04% (3)
bronze - 0.04% (3)
attempt - 0.04% (3)
dominate - 0.04% (3)
natural - 0.04% (3)
science, - 0.04% (3)
all-inclusive - 0.04% (3)
got - 0.04% (3)
particular - 0.04% (3)
compassion - 0.04% (3)
find - 0.04% (3)
ethical - 0.04% (3)
examples - 0.04% (3)
“biblical - 0.04% (3)
originate - 0.04% (3)
sect - 0.04% (3)
highly - 0.04% (3)
averred - 0.04% (3)
cut - 0.04% (3)
something - 0.04% (3)
 he - 0.04% (3)
didn’t - 0.04% (3)
 such - 0.04% (3)
creator. - 0.04% (3)
false - 0.04% (3)
could - 0.04% (3)
textural - 0.04% (3)
pagans - 0.04% (3)
accepted - 0.04% (3)
separation - 0.04% (3)
throughout - 0.04% (3)
churches - 0.04% (3)
actions - 0.04% (3)
among - 0.04% (3)
cultures, - 0.04% (3)
aimed - 0.04% (3)
policy - 0.04% (3)
discrimination - 0.04% (3)
implied - 0.04% (3)
referred - 0.04% (3)
center - 0.04% (3)
yahweh. - 0.04% (3)
represented - 0.04% (3)
it, - 0.04% (3)
knew - 0.04% (3)
interrelated - 0.04% (3)
eve’s - 0.04% (3)
deliberate - 0.04% (3)
designed - 0.04% (3)
eve, - 0.04% (3)
hard - 0.04% (3)
worked - 0.04% (3)
(an - 0.04% (3)
identical - 0.04% (3)
different - 0.04% (3)
allegedly - 0.04% (3)
association - 0.04% (3)
angels - 0.04% (3)
extent - 0.04% (3)
godly - 0.04% (3)
consequently - 0.04% (3)
 they - 0.04% (3)
concerned - 0.04% (3)
near - 0.04% (3)
either - 0.04% (3)
editor - 0.04% (3)
headed - 0.04% (3)
texts, - 0.04% (3)
born - 0.04% (3)
seen - 0.04% (3)
bce - 0.04% (3)
themselves - 0.04% (3)
setting - 0.04% (3)
premise - 0.04% (3)
believe - 0.04% (3)
republican - 0.04% (3)
happened - 0.04% (3)
pray - 0.04% (3)
strange - 0.04% (3)
down - 0.04% (3)
intentional - 0.04% (3)
foundation - 0.04% (3)
course) - 0.04% (3)
termed - 0.04% (3)
agitator - 0.04% (3)
broadcast - 0.04% (3)
operation - 0.04% (3)
numerous - 0.04% (3)
national - 0.04% (3)
(all-knowing) - 0.04% (3)
heavy - 0.04% (3)
matter - 0.04% (3)
created - 0.04% (3)
fundamentalists - 0.04% (3)
fruit - 0.04% (3)
tempting - 0.04% (3)
occurred - 0.04% (3)
fundamentalism - 0.04% (3)
deceptive - 0.04% (3)
continue - 0.04% (3)
yet - 0.04% (3)
select - 0.04% (3)
extreme - 0.04% (3)
promoted - 0.04% (3)
praised - 0.04% (3)
variety - 0.04% (3)
books - 0.04% (3)
genuine - 0.04% (3)
colored - 0.04% (3)
words - 0.04% (3)
later, - 0.04% (3)
(the - 0.04% (3)
fill - 0.04% (3)
favoritism - 0.04% (3)
“holy” - 0.04% (3)
dead - 0.04% (3)
rake - 0.04% (3)
“sacred” - 0.04% (3)
enlightenment. - 0.04% (3)
obsessed - 0.04% (3)
scientific - 0.04% (3)
constant - 0.04% (3)
“god - 0.04% (3)
studies - 0.03% (2)
explanations - 0.03% (2)
insist - 0.03% (2)
 religious - 0.03% (2)
 their - 0.03% (2)
religiously - 0.03% (2)
 certain - 0.03% (2)
 if - 0.03% (2)
existence - 0.03% (2)
outfit - 0.03% (2)
propaganda - 0.03% (2)
cull - 0.03% (2)
god’s - 0.03% (2)
certainly - 0.03% (2)
selected - 0.03% (2)
photos - 0.03% (2)
shelfari - 0.03% (2)
lahaye - 0.03% (2)
 enlightenment - 0.03% (2)
ability - 0.03% (2)
falwell - 0.03% (2)
entries - 0.03% (2)
prejudices - 0.03% (2)
tends - 0.03% (2)
marketed - 0.03% (2)
bush - 0.03% (2)
caring - 0.03% (2)
superstitions - 0.03% (2)
goodreads - 0.03% (2)
space - 0.03% (2)
sought - 0.03% (2)
done - 0.03% (2)
alone - 0.03% (2)
so-called - 0.03% (2)
peddling - 0.03% (2)
half - 0.03% (2)
sexual - 0.03% (2)
judgment - 0.03% (2)
woman - 0.03% (2)
bald - 0.03% (2)
bears - 0.03% (2)
held - 0.03% (2)
jehovah - 0.03% (2)
baal - 0.03% (2)
david - 0.03% (2)
over. - 0.03% (2)
deceitful - 0.03% (2)
wordpress.com. - 0.03% (2)
judged - 0.03% (2)
violence - 0.03% (2)
measure - 0.03% (2)
perhaps - 0.03% (2)
party - 0.03% (2)
israelites - 0.03% (2)
rss - 0.03% (2)
husband - 0.03% (2)
 not - 0.03% (2)
agitators - 0.03% (2)
questionable - 0.03% (2)
pulls - 0.03% (2)
university - 0.03% (2)
merchants - 0.03% (2)
major - 0.03% (2)
craze - 0.03% (2)
one. - 0.03% (2)
 omniscient - 0.03% (2)
preached - 0.03% (2)
1996 - 0.03% (2)
pretentiousness - 0.03% (2)
sun - 0.03% (2)
following - 0.03% (2)
matthew - 0.03% (2)
achieve - 0.03% (2)
legal - 0.03% (2)
indulged - 0.03% (2)
decades - 0.03% (2)
abraham - 0.03% (2)
man-made - 0.03% (2)
stance - 0.03% (2)
calculate - 0.03% (2)
answer - 0.03% (2)
privileges - 0.03% (2)
interest - 0.03% (2)
god. - 0.03% (2)
exclusivity - 0.03% (2)
$14 - 0.03% (2)
devoted - 0.03% (2)
indulgence - 0.03% (2)
man-concocted - 0.03% (2)
strain - 0.03% (2)
trying - 0.03% (2)
show - 0.03% (2)
unfortunately, - 0.03% (2)
everything - 0.03% (2)
 on - 0.03% (2)
licensing - 0.03% (2)
“his” - 0.03% (2)
person’s - 0.03% (2)
dared - 0.03% (2)
proved - 0.03% (2)
grand - 0.03% (2)
holds - 0.03% (2)
civil - 0.03% (2)
protected - 0.03% (2)
devious - 0.03% (2)
regulations - 0.03% (2)
equality - 0.03% (2)
focus - 0.03% (2)
requirements - 0.03% (2)
nets - 0.03% (2)
fundamentalism, - 0.03% (2)
else. - 0.03% (2)
only) - 0.03% (2)
rules - 0.03% (2)
(christian - 0.03% (2)
rely - 0.03% (2)
groups - 0.03% (2)
programs - 0.03% (2)
pressure - 0.03% (2)
 take - 0.03% (2)
ideology. - 0.03% (2)
extremists - 0.03% (2)
disregard - 0.03% (2)
donor - 0.03% (2)
bloodletting - 0.03% (2)
capabilities - 0.03% (2)
function - 0.03% (2)
unto - 0.03% (2)
fair - 0.03% (2)
“liberty” - 0.03% (2)
seeking - 0.03% (2)
directly - 0.03% (2)
due - 0.03% (2)
declared, - 0.03% (2)
federal - 0.03% (2)
taking - 0.03% (2)
capable - 0.03% (2)
magic - 0.03% (2)
ceremony - 0.03% (2)
actively - 0.03% (2)
on.” - 0.03% (2)
pyramid - 0.03% (2)
neither - 0.03% (2)
tune - 0.03% (2)
nonetheless - 0.03% (2)
strictly - 0.03% (2)
advanced - 0.03% (2)
plotting - 0.03% (2)
 why - 0.03% (2)
anti-constitutional - 0.03% (2)
slaughtered - 0.03% (2)
reverend - 0.03% (2)
heads - 0.03% (2)
chicken - 0.03% (2)
especial - 0.03% (2)
money - 0.03% (2)
man-invented - 0.03% (2)
heavenly - 0.03% (2)
operations - 0.03% (2)
questions - 0.03% (2)
“religious” - 0.03% (2)
choice - 0.03% (2)
employee - 0.03% (2)
trust - 0.03% (2)
purpose, - 0.03% (2)
beliefs - 0.03% (2)
why? - 0.03% (2)
ask - 0.03% (2)
begin - 0.03% (2)
 kapparot - 0.03% (2)
experience - 0.03% (2)
noses - 0.03% (2)
morality, - 0.03% (2)
strangely - 0.03% (2)
type - 0.03% (2)
nature. - 0.03% (2)
eminence - 0.03% (2)
benefit - 0.03% (2)
basically - 0.03% (2)
toward - 0.03% (2)
random, - 0.03% (2)
monotheism, - 0.03% (2)
reflects - 0.03% (2)
bestowed - 0.03% (2)
enlightenment, - 0.03% (2)
your - 0.03% (2)
according - 0.03% (2)
(gen - 0.03% (2)
theatrical - 0.03% (2)
played - 0.03% (2)
intentionally - 0.03% (2)
minded - 0.03% (2)
produce - 0.03% (2)
equally - 0.03% (2)
happens - 0.03% (2)
being. - 0.03% (2)
celestial - 0.03% (2)
demonstrate - 0.03% (2)
message - 0.03% (2)
effect - 0.03% (2)
sister - 0.03% (2)
general - 0.03% (2)
clever - 0.03% (2)
scheme - 0.03% (2)
demoting - 0.03% (2)
choose - 0.03% (2)
today’s - 0.03% (2)
life’s - 0.03% (2)
acting - 0.03% (2)
rank - 0.03% (2)
honor - 0.03% (2)
shy - 0.03% (2)
divinely - 0.03% (2)
disguised. - 0.03% (2)
education - 0.03% (2)
department - 0.03% (2)
connection - 0.03% (2)
crafted - 0.03% (2)
purposefully - 0.03% (2)
formalized - 0.03% (2)
panorama - 0.03% (2)
necessary - 0.03% (2)
constellation - 0.03% (2)
regarded - 0.03% (2)
rights - 0.03% (2)
scholars - 0.03% (2)
rewritten - 0.03% (2)
games. - 0.03% (2)
victim - 0.03% (2)
handed - 0.03% (2)
secular - 0.03% (2)
said - 0.03% (2)
since - 0.03% (2)
works - 0.03% (2)
opinion - 0.03% (2)
around - 0.03% (2)
flexibility - 0.03% (2)
word. - 0.03% (2)
scriptural - 0.03% (2)
contained - 0.03% (2)
antiquity - 0.03% (2)
likes, - 0.03% (2)
fall - 0.03% (2)
testament - 0.03% (2)
nation’s - 0.03% (2)
conflicts. - 0.03% (2)
say - 0.03% (2)
built - 0.03% (2)
man-devised - 0.03% (2)
man-contrived - 0.03% (2)
philosophy - 0.03% (2)
access - 0.03% (2)
age-old - 0.03% (2)
holding - 0.03% (2)
copies. - 0.03% (2)
schools - 0.03% (2)
(as - 0.03% (2)
standard - 0.03% (2)
translators - 0.03% (2)
really - 0.03% (2)
nation” - 0.03% (2)
believer - 0.03% (2)
because - 0.03% (2)
 robertson - 0.03% (2)
cloud - 0.03% (2)
established - 0.03% (2)
holiday - 0.03% (2)
jews. - 0.03% (2)
culture’s - 0.03% (2)
(or - 0.03% (2)
served - 0.03% (2)
attempting - 0.03% (2)
given - 0.03% (2)
tales, - 0.03% (2)
agnostic, - 0.03% (2)
evangelical - 0.03% (2)
accounts. - 0.03% (2)
fellow - 0.03% (2)
garden - 0.03% (2)
guidance - 0.03% (2)
composed - 0.03% (2)
featured - 0.03% (2)
cable - 0.03% (2)
"values", - 0.03% (2)
depicted - 0.03% (2)
1985 - 0.03% (2)
vanity - 0.03% (2)
dedication - 0.03% (2)
greed - 0.03% (2)
who, - 0.03% (2)
might - 0.03% (2)
preparation - 0.03% (2)
first - 0.03% (2)
focal - 0.03% (2)
join - 0.03% (2)
authors, - 0.03% (2)
nine - 0.03% (2)
food - 0.03% (2)
news - 0.03% (2)
opening - 0.03% (2)
finite - 0.03% (2)
help - 0.03% (2)
robertson’s - 0.03% (2)
native - 0.03% (2)
christianity, - 0.03% (2)
george - 0.03% (2)
cannot - 0.03% (2)
homicide - 0.03% (2)
 so - 0.03% (2)
need - 0.03% (2)
itself. - 0.03% (2)
 later, - 0.03% (2)
staunch - 0.03% (2)
rage - 0.03% (2)
jealous - 0.03% (2)
9th/8th - 0.03% (2)
sheep’s - 0.03% (2)
expected - 0.03% (2)
 cain - 0.03% (2)
indulging - 0.03% (2)
“revealed” - 0.03% (2)
clearly - 0.03% (2)
teams - 0.03% (2)
fiery - 0.03% (2)
belittle - 0.03% (2)
all-embracing - 0.03% (2)
observable - 0.03% (2)
histories - 0.03% (2)
“gods” - 0.03% (2)
 each - 0.03% (2)
self-proclaimed - 0.03% (2)
achieving - 0.03% (2)
followers, - 0.03% (2)
tolerance - 0.03% (2)
originated - 0.03% (2)
priest-authors - 0.03% (2)
 instead - 0.03% (2)
shameless - 0.03% (2)
brotherly - 0.03% (2)
editors - 0.03% (2)
powers - 0.03% (2)
manifested - 0.03% (2)
recognized - 0.03% (2)
allows - 0.03% (2)
energies, - 0.03% (2)
chosen - 0.03% (2)
united - 0.03% (2)
attributes - 0.03% (2)
ceremonies, - 0.03% (2)
hate - 0.03% (2)
dogmatism - 0.03% (2)
faiths - 0.03% (2)
combat - 0.03% (2)
charge - 0.03% (2)
viewed - 0.03% (2)
indoctrinate - 0.03% (2)
will - 0.03% (2)
conditions - 0.03% (2)
course, - 0.03% (2)
is, - 0.03% (2)
limited - 0.03% (2)
respected - 0.03% (2)
spirit. - 0.03% (2)
“sins” - 0.03% (2)
interactions - 0.03% (2)
unseen - 0.03% (2)
characterized - 0.03% (2)
quran - 0.03% (2)
prince - 0.03% (2)
idea - 0.03% (2)
society - 0.03% (2)
power. - 0.03% (2)
books. - 0.03% (2)
brutal - 0.03% (2)
code - 0.03% (2)
of the - 0.56% (41)
faith system - 0.53% (39)
in the - 0.46% (34)
at the - 0.34% (25)
for the - 0.33% (24)
to the - 0.3% (22)
that the - 0.27% (20)
as the - 0.27% (20)
faith systems - 0.24% (18)
and the - 0.23% (17)
have been - 0.19% (14)
is the - 0.18% (13)
by the - 0.18% (13)
which is - 0.15% (11)
from the - 0.12% (9)
has been - 0.12% (9)
as being - 0.11% (8)
such a - 0.11% (8)
a year - 0.11% (8)
the creator - 0.11% (8)
million a - 0.09% (7)
 in the - 0.09% (7)
the nation - 0.09% (7)
of course - 0.09% (7)
that a - 0.09% (7)
which the - 0.09% (7)
comment » - 0.09% (7)
leave a - 0.09% (7)
by chouck017894 - 0.09% (7)
with the - 0.09% (7)
a comment - 0.09% (7)
posted in - 0.09% (7)
there is - 0.09% (7)
the priest - 0.09% (7)
it was - 0.09% (7)
 for example, - 0.09% (7)
holy word - 0.08% (6)
into the - 0.08% (6)
of these - 0.08% (6)
and god - 0.08% (6)
time frames - 0.08% (6)
if the - 0.08% (6)
upon the - 0.08% (6)
to have - 0.08% (6)
of all - 0.08% (6)
 and the - 0.08% (6)
corporate style - 0.08% (6)
a year. - 0.07% (5)
pagan gods - 0.07% (5)
the alleged - 0.07% (5)
and taboo - 0.07% (5)
the same - 0.07% (5)
which have - 0.07% (5)
of life - 0.07% (5)
in over - 0.07% (5)
was the - 0.07% (5)
the pagan - 0.07% (5)
taboo data - 0.07% (5)
modern man - 0.07% (5)
frames and - 0.07% (5)
and in - 0.07% (5)
of which - 0.05% (4)
 it is - 0.05% (4)
and it - 0.05% (4)
from a - 0.05% (4)
western cultures - 0.05% (4)
faith systems, - 0.05% (4)
such as - 0.05% (4)
is not - 0.05% (4)
atheist, belief, - 0.05% (4)
and goddesses - 0.05% (4)
which are - 0.05% (4)
was to - 0.05% (4)
which we - 0.05% (4)
happen to - 0.05% (4)
ethics and - 0.05% (4)
thoughts on - 0.05% (4)
only a - 0.05% (4)
the three - 0.05% (4)
1, 2016 - 0.05% (4)
democratic principles - 0.05% (4)
of his - 0.05% (4)
the hebrew - 0.05% (4)
known as - 0.05% (4)
of yahweh - 0.05% (4)
the priests - 0.05% (4)
all the - 0.05% (4)
and spiritual - 0.05% (4)
2017 by - 0.05% (4)
 and there - 0.05% (4)
does not - 0.05% (4)
what the - 0.05% (4)
is never - 0.05% (4)
principles of - 0.05% (4)
of holy - 0.05% (4)
and all - 0.05% (4)
in their - 0.05% (4)
fact that - 0.05% (4)
of genesis - 0.05% (4)
priest authors - 0.05% (4)
that would - 0.05% (4)
the most - 0.05% (4)
that those - 0.05% (4)
supreme court - 0.05% (4)
which they - 0.05% (4)
of any - 0.05% (4)
styled faith - 0.05% (4)
the book - 0.05% (4)
under the - 0.04% (3)
the declared - 0.04% (3)
faith system. - 0.04% (3)
in those - 0.04% (3)
for that - 0.04% (3)
systems which - 0.04% (3)
number of - 0.04% (3)
after the - 0.04% (3)
example, the - 0.04% (3)
were once - 0.04% (3)
that creation - 0.04% (3)
priests of - 0.04% (3)
yahweh priest - 0.04% (3)
and that - 0.04% (3)
the political - 0.04% (3)
of creation - 0.04% (3)
for such - 0.04% (3)
adam and - 0.04% (3)
seekers with - 0.04% (3)
  the - 0.04% (3)
god to - 0.04% (3)
the human - 0.04% (3)
their faith - 0.04% (3)
of spirit - 0.04% (3)
have to - 0.04% (3)
each of - 0.04% (3)
systems have - 0.04% (3)
and their - 0.04% (3)
things are - 0.04% (3)
not the - 0.04% (3)
was not - 0.04% (3)
use of - 0.04% (3)
to what - 0.04% (3)
the creative - 0.04% (3)
god is - 0.04% (3)
was that - 0.04% (3)
 this is - 0.04% (3)
corporate styled - 0.04% (3)
are to - 0.04% (3)
of true - 0.04% (3)
the jewish - 0.04% (3)
and state - 0.04% (3)
a number - 0.04% (3)
the western - 0.04% (3)
that have - 0.04% (3)
with a - 0.04% (3)
freedom of - 0.04% (3)
system has - 0.04% (3)
they are - 0.04% (3)
rites, rituals - 0.04% (3)
we have - 0.04% (3)
in that - 0.04% (3)
of man - 0.04% (3)
over the - 0.04% (3)
human species - 0.04% (3)
the fact - 0.04% (3)
faith system’s - 0.04% (3)
must be - 0.04% (3)
to all - 0.04% (3)
is commonly - 0.04% (3)
the power - 0.04% (3)
christian broadcast - 0.04% (3)
away from - 0.04% (3)
point of - 0.04% (3)
book of - 0.04% (3)
in his - 0.04% (3)
of how - 0.04% (3)
follow the - 0.04% (3)
may be - 0.04% (3)
in what - 0.04% (3)
and his - 0.04% (3)
for their - 0.04% (3)
a “biblical - 0.04% (3)
that our - 0.04% (3)
be the - 0.04% (3)
by them - 0.04% (3)
the family - 0.04% (3)
are not - 0.04% (3)
on every - 0.04% (3)
there are - 0.04% (3)
of their - 0.04% (3)
an example - 0.04% (3)
of course) - 0.04% (3)
out of - 0.04% (3)
“biblical based - 0.04% (3)
the world - 0.04% (3)
which were - 0.04% (3)
the lord - 0.04% (3)
the yahweh - 0.04% (3)
placed in - 0.03% (2)
trees as - 0.03% (2)
just happened - 0.03% (2)
and eve, - 0.03% (2)
at that - 0.03% (2)
man who - 0.03% (2)
they have - 0.03% (2)
and abel - 0.03% (2)
that god - 0.03% (2)
news teams - 0.03% (2)
three thousand - 0.03% (2)
the creator. - 0.03% (2)
broadcast network - 0.03% (2)
cain was - 0.03% (2)
robertson’s christian - 0.03% (2)
concept of - 0.03% (2)
george w. - 0.03% (2)
the israelites - 0.03% (2)
born again - 0.03% (2)
them to - 0.03% (2)
of equality - 0.03% (2)
nation that - 0.03% (2)
when the - 0.03% (2)
or moral - 0.03% (2)
network news - 0.03% (2)
who is - 0.03% (2)
is routinely - 0.03% (2)
his two - 0.03% (2)
happened to - 0.03% (2)
dedication to - 0.03% (2)
biblical "values", - 0.03% (2)
cut them - 0.03% (2)
data blog - 0.03% (2)
such acts - 0.03% (2)
rise of - 0.03% (2)
of brutal - 0.03% (2)
always in - 0.03% (2)
the name - 0.03% (2)
buy time - 0.03% (2)
holy agitators - 0.03% (2)
the truth - 0.03% (2)
true democratic - 0.03% (2)
that creative - 0.03% (2)
before that - 0.03% (2)
capable of - 0.03% (2)
they were - 0.03% (2)
always be - 0.03% (2)
do not - 0.03% (2)
are the - 0.03% (2)
practiced in - 0.03% (2)
way the - 0.03% (2)
dared to - 0.03% (2)
meant to - 0.03% (2)
the rights - 0.03% (2)
a nation - 0.03% (2)
and respect - 0.03% (2)
or she - 0.03% (2)
in any - 0.03% (2)
like the - 0.03% (2)
search for - 0.03% (2)
spiritual freedom - 0.03% (2)
of corporate - 0.03% (2)
had the - 0.03% (2)
everyone else. - 0.03% (2)
equality and - 0.03% (2)
even the - 0.03% (2)
the bronze - 0.03% (2)
example of - 0.03% (2)
placed upon - 0.03% (2)
live chicken - 0.03% (2)
the donor - 0.03% (2)
more than - 0.03% (2)
the holy - 0.03% (2)
of view - 0.03% (2)
man-concocted faith - 0.03% (2)
the authors - 0.03% (2)
random, religion, - 0.03% (2)
the religious - 0.03% (2)
religious organizations - 0.03% (2)
a biblical - 0.03% (2)
rights of - 0.03% (2)
to any - 0.03% (2)
pat robertson - 0.03% (2)
of democracy - 0.03% (2)
by him - 0.03% (2)
would have - 0.03% (2)
to achieve - 0.03% (2)
 but the - 0.03% (2)
religious extremists - 0.03% (2)
to their - 0.03% (2)
with false - 0.03% (2)
the principles - 0.03% (2)
declared that - 0.03% (2)
of democratic - 0.03% (2)
principles by - 0.03% (2)
that true - 0.03% (2)
that manner - 0.03% (2)
is always - 0.03% (2)
averred to - 0.03% (2)
following some - 0.03% (2)
man-made faith - 0.03% (2)
system is - 0.03% (2)
never be - 0.03% (2)
a person - 0.03% (2)
omniscient (all-knowing) - 0.03% (2)
a man-made - 0.03% (2)
the united - 0.03% (2)
department of - 0.03% (2)
happens to - 0.03% (2)
say that - 0.03% (2)
on november - 0.03% (2)
myths and - 0.03% (2)
have done - 0.03% (2)
the tribal - 0.03% (2)
of employee - 0.03% (2)
type of - 0.03% (2)
as having - 0.03% (2)
actually allowed - 0.03% (2)
able to - 0.03% (2)
from god - 0.03% (2)
to serve - 0.03% (2)
our species - 0.03% (2)
is made - 0.03% (2)
even more - 0.03% (2)
is referred - 0.03% (2)
may of - 0.03% (2)
privileged status - 0.03% (2)
due to - 0.03% (2)
belief, bible, - 0.03% (2)
and similar - 0.03% (2)
in 1996 - 0.03% (2)
“sacred” texts - 0.03% (2)
in constant - 0.03% (2)
in genesis - 0.03% (2)
not omniscient - 0.03% (2)
served as - 0.03% (2)
focal point - 0.03% (2)
of this - 0.03% (2)
because the - 0.03% (2)
of divine - 0.03% (2)
example, in - 0.03% (2)
the freedom - 0.03% (2)
many uncertainties - 0.03% (2)
declared to - 0.03% (2)
hebrew scriptures, - 0.03% (2)
purpose of - 0.03% (2)
their own - 0.03% (2)
declared meaning - 0.03% (2)
any of - 0.03% (2)
more often - 0.03% (2)
history is - 0.03% (2)
be termed - 0.03% (2)
has become - 0.03% (2)
and with - 0.03% (2)
than any - 0.03% (2)
claim to - 0.03% (2)
promoted as - 0.03% (2)
9th/8th century - 0.03% (2)
religion, sacred - 0.03% (2)
on february - 0.03% (2)
as holy - 0.03% (2)
for what - 0.03% (2)
the opening - 0.03% (2)
was always - 0.03% (2)
the new - 0.03% (2)
premise of - 0.03% (2)
holy word. - 0.03% (2)
consequently those - 0.03% (2)
an account - 0.03% (2)
century bce - 0.03% (2)
bestowed upon - 0.03% (2)
referred to - 0.03% (2)
the claim - 0.03% (2)
discrimination and - 0.03% (2)
those primal - 0.03% (2)
the 9th/8th - 0.03% (2)
all life. - 0.03% (2)
primal creative - 0.03% (2)
cultures and - 0.03% (2)
diverse creative - 0.03% (2)
knew that - 0.03% (2)
not been - 0.03% (2)
the reason - 0.03% (2)
that such - 0.03% (2)
in more - 0.03% (2)
demoting the - 0.03% (2)
chouck017894 for - 0.03% (2)
interrelated and - 0.03% (2)
creative forces - 0.03% (2)
sacred texts, - 0.03% (2)
dead sea - 0.03% (2)
personified as - 0.03% (2)
energies which - 0.03% (2)
pagan cultures - 0.03% (2)
any other - 0.03% (2)
had no - 0.03% (2)
interact throughout - 0.03% (2)
creation of - 0.03% (2)
this was - 0.03% (2)
were often - 0.03% (2)
accepted as - 0.03% (2)
the ot - 0.03% (2)
from their - 0.03% (2)
upon everyone - 0.03% (2)
fear of - 0.03% (2)
is then - 0.03% (2)
power which - 0.03% (2)
only one - 0.03% (2)
that has - 0.03% (2)
for each - 0.03% (2)
these three - 0.03% (2)
policy which - 0.03% (2)
over $14 - 0.03% (2)
separation of - 0.03% (2)
most part - 0.03% (2)
 for the - 0.03% (2)
church and - 0.03% (2)
that all - 0.03% (2)
focus on - 0.03% (2)
only if - 0.03% (2)
pulls in - 0.03% (2)
seekers to - 0.03% (2)
an old - 0.03% (2)
intended diversities - 0.03% (2)
these faith - 0.03% (2)
of religious - 0.03% (2)
had been - 0.03% (2)
true freedom - 0.03% (2)
allowed to - 0.03% (2)
and brotherly - 0.03% (2)
was actually - 0.03% (2)
to make - 0.03% (2)
of exclusive - 0.03% (2)
representatives of - 0.03% (2)
the self-appointed - 0.03% (2)
the so-called - 0.03% (2)
in place - 0.03% (2)
is again - 0.03% (2)
some scholars - 0.03% (2)
once a - 0.03% (2)
up the - 0.03% (2)
set in - 0.03% (2)
to attain - 0.03% (2)
necessary for - 0.03% (2)
marketed as - 0.03% (2)
faith merchants - 0.03% (2)
seem to - 0.03% (2)
a higher - 0.03% (2)
in matthew - 0.03% (2)
of esther - 0.03% (2)
the many - 0.03% (2)
upon a - 0.03% (2)
account of - 0.03% (2)
for they - 0.03% (2)
tim lahaye - 0.03% (2)
built upon - 0.03% (2)
the only - 0.03% (2)
for america - 0.03% (2)
offered is - 0.03% (2)
council for - 0.03% (2)
national policy - 0.03% (2)
is basically - 0.03% (2)
and morality, - 0.03% (2)
concerned women - 0.03% (2)
women for - 0.03% (2)
which was - 0.03% (2)
other hand - 0.03% (2)
the creator’s - 0.03% (2)
man-contrived faith - 0.03% (2)
in every - 0.03% (2)
the universal - 0.03% (2)
variety of - 0.03% (2)
$14 million - 0.03% (2)
at wordpress.com. - 0.03% (2)
leave a comment - 0.09% (7)
a comment » - 0.09% (7)
million a year - 0.08% (6)
time frames and - 0.07% (5)
and taboo data - 0.07% (5)
frames and taboo - 0.07% (5)
million a year. - 0.05% (4)
2017 by chouck017894 - 0.05% (4)
 and there is - 0.04% (3)
to be the - 0.04% (3)
a number of - 0.04% (3)
2016 by chouck017894 - 0.04% (3)
the human species - 0.04% (3)
priests of yahweh - 0.04% (3)
corporate style faith - 0.04% (3)
the priests of - 0.04% (3)
faith systems which - 0.04% (3)
the fact that - 0.04% (3)
which have been - 0.04% (3)
a “biblical based - 0.04% (3)
and it was - 0.04% (3)
of corporate styled - 0.03% (2)
three thousand years - 0.03% (2)
knew that the - 0.03% (2)
as being the - 0.03% (2)
in the name - 0.03% (2)
adam and eve, - 0.03% (2)
in a number - 0.03% (2)
into the political - 0.03% (2)
and his two - 0.03% (2)
agnostic, atheist, belief, - 0.03% (2)
in atheist, belief, - 0.03% (2)
to the king - 0.03% (2)
of church and - 0.03% (2)
buy time frames - 0.03% (2)
and variety of - 0.03% (2)
actually allowed to - 0.03% (2)
their faith system’s - 0.03% (2)
the principles of - 0.03% (2)
all of which - 0.03% (2)
atheist, belief, biblical - 0.03% (2)
man-made faith system - 0.03% (2)
as an example - 0.03% (2)
the bronze age - 0.03% (2)
of any of - 0.03% (2)
all things are - 0.03% (2)
such is the - 0.03% (2)
a man-made faith - 0.03% (2)
before that creative - 0.03% (2)
set in place - 0.03% (2)
such acts of - 0.03% (2)
council for national - 0.03% (2)
9th/8th century bce - 0.03% (2)
in the 9th/8th - 0.03% (2)
religion, sacred texts, - 0.03% (2)
in belief, bible, - 0.03% (2)
follow the teaching - 0.03% (2)
women for america - 0.03% (2)
separation of church - 0.03% (2)
pagan gods and - 0.03% (2)
over $14 million - 0.03% (2)
broadcast network news - 0.03% (2)
was to be - 0.03% (2)
network news teams - 0.03% (2)
to have been - 0.03% (2)
posted in belief, - 0.03% (2)
rise of holy - 0.03% (2)
for the most - 0.03% (2)
book of genesis - 0.03% (2)
does not the - 0.03% (2)
we have been - 0.03% (2)
true freedom of - 0.03% (2)
was actually allowed - 0.03% (2)
and brotherly love - 0.03% (2)
is to force - 0.03% (2)
taboo data blog - 0.03% (2)
of all the - 0.03% (2)
known as the - 0.03% (2)
referred to as - 0.03% (2)
the declared meaning - 0.03% (2)
declared to be - 0.03% (2)
that there is - 0.03% (2)
by chouck017894 for - 0.03% (2)
that creation of - 0.03% (2)
an account of - 0.03% (2)
the authors of - 0.03% (2)
blog at wordpress.com. - 0.03% (2)

Here you can find chart of all your popular one, two and three word phrases. Google and others search engines means your page is about words you use frequently.

Copyright © 2015-2016 hupso.pl. All rights reserved. FB | +G | Twitter

Hupso.pl jest serwisem internetowym, w którym jednym kliknieciem możesz szybko i łatwo sprawdź stronę www pod kątem SEO. Oferujemy darmowe pozycjonowanie stron internetowych oraz wycena domen i stron internetowych. Prowadzimy ranking polskich stron internetowych oraz ranking stron alexa.