5.00 score from hupso.pl for:
timeframesandtaboodata.com



HTML Content


Titletime frames and taboo data blog | the official blog for time frames and taboo data, by c.m. houck.

Length: 98, Words: 19
Description the official blog for time frames and taboo data, by c.m. houck.

Length: 64, Words: 13
Keywords pusty
Robots
Charset UTF-8
Og Meta - Title exist
Og Meta - Description exist
Og Meta - Site name exist
Tytuł powinien zawierać pomiędzy 10 a 70 znaków (ze spacjami), a mniej niż 12 słów w długości.
Meta opis powinien zawierać pomiędzy 50 a 160 znaków (łącznie ze spacjami), a mniej niż 24 słów w długości.
Kodowanie znaków powinny być określone , UTF-8 jest chyba najlepszy zestaw znaków, aby przejść z powodu UTF-8 jest bardziej międzynarodowy kodowaniem.
Otwarte obiekty wykresu powinny być obecne w stronie internetowej (więcej informacji na temat protokołu OpenGraph: http://ogp.me/)

SEO Content

Words/Characters 8260
Text/HTML 55.82 %
Headings H1 1
H2 14
H3 0
H4 0
H5 0
H6 0
H1
time frames and taboo data blog
H2
ezekiel saw a wheel
ambush of spirit
rise of holy agitators (in usa)
making holy myths
uncertainties in sacred texts
corporate style faith systems
examples of scriptural immorality
pages
blogroll
buy the book
social networking
flickr photos
archives
meta
H3
H4
H5
H6
strong
way up in the middle of the air…”
i
a
i
o
b
c
e
f
a
:
:
f
b
way up in the middle of the air…”
i
a
i
o
b
c
e
f
a
:
:
f
i
em way up in the middle of the air…”
i
a
i
o
b
c
e
f
a
:
:
f
Bolds strong 13
b 13
i 0
em 13
Zawartość strony internetowej powinno zawierać więcej niż 250 słów, z stopa tekst / kod jest wyższy niż 20%.
Pozycji używać znaczników (h1, h2, h3, ...), aby określić temat sekcji lub ustępów na stronie, ale zwykle, użyj mniej niż 6 dla każdego tagu pozycje zachować swoją stronę zwięzły.
Styl używać silnych i kursywy znaczniki podkreślić swoje słowa kluczowe swojej stronie, ale nie nadużywać (mniej niż 16 silnych tagi i 16 znaczników kursywy)

Statystyki strony

twitter:title pusty
twitter:description pusty
google+ itemprop=name pusty
Pliki zewnętrzne 26
Pliki CSS 4
Pliki javascript 22
Plik należy zmniejszyć całkowite odwołanie plików (CSS + JavaScript) do 7-8 maksymalnie.

Linki wewnętrzne i zewnętrzne

Linki 188
Linki wewnętrzne 1
Linki zewnętrzne 187
Linki bez atrybutu Title 184
Linki z atrybutem NOFOLLOW 0
Linki - Użyj atrybutu tytuł dla każdego łącza. Nofollow link jest link, który nie pozwala wyszukiwarkom boty zrealizują są odnośniki no follow. Należy zwracać uwagę na ich użytkowania

Linki wewnętrzne

cancel #

Linki zewnętrzne

time frames and taboo data blog https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/
ezekiel saw a wheel https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2017/05/01/ezekiel-saw-a-wheel/
belief https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/belief/
ezekiel the prophet https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/ezekiel-the-prophet/
hebrew scripture https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/hebrew-scripture/
jewish trinity https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/jewish-trinity/
religion https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/religion/
sacred texts https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/sacred-texts/
scriptures https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/scriptures/
leave a comment » https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2017/05/01/ezekiel-saw-a-wheel/#respond
ambush of spirit https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2017/04/01/ambush-of-spirit/
abraham https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/abraham/
belief https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/belief/
bible https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/bible/
creation's democratic flexibility https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/creations-democratic-flexibility/
ethics and morality https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/ethics-and-morality/
faith https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/faith/
random https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/random/
religion https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/religion/
religious hatreds https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/religious-hatreds/
sacred texts https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/sacred-texts/
leave a comment » https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2017/04/01/ambush-of-spirit/#respond
rise of holy agitators (in usa) https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2017/03/02/rise-of-holy-agitators-in-usa-2/
belief https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/belief/
bible https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/bible/
corporate style faiths https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/corporate-style-faiths/
faith https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/faith/
fundamentalism https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/fundamentalism/
government https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/government/
leave a comment » https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2017/03/02/rise-of-holy-agitators-in-usa-2/#respond
making holy myths https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2017/02/27/__trashed/
belief https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/belief/
bible https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/bible/
christianity https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/christianity/
faith https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/faith/
mother nature https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/mother-nature/
pagan gods https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/pagan-gods/
religion https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/religion/
sacred texts https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/sacred-texts/
scriptures https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/scriptures/
leave a comment » https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2017/02/27/__trashed/#respond
uncertainties in sacred texts https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2017/02/18/uncertainties-in-sacred-texts/
bible https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/bible/
dead sea scrolls https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/dead-sea-scrolls/
hebrew scripture https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/hebrew-scripture/
religion https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/religion/
sacred texts https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/sacred-texts/
thoughts https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/thoughts/
leave a comment » https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2017/02/18/uncertainties-in-sacred-texts/#respond
corporate style faith systems https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2017/01/01/corporate-style-faith-systems/
atheist https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/atheist/
belief https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/belief/
ego and belief https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/ego-and-belief/
ethics and morality https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/ethics-and-morality/
monotheism https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/monotheism/
random https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/random/
religion https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/religion/
thoughts https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/thoughts/
leave a comment » https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2017/01/01/corporate-style-faith-systems/#respond
examples of scriptural immorality https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2016/12/01/examples-of-scriptural-immorality/
abraham https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/abraham/
agnostic https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/agnostic/
atheist https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/atheist/
belief https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/belief/
biblical "values" https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/biblical-values/
ethics and morality https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/ethics-and-morality/
religion https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/religion/
scriptures https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/scriptures/
theology https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/theology-2/
leave a comment » https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2016/12/01/examples-of-scriptural-immorality/#respond
« older entries https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/page/2/
about the book https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/about/
wordpress.com http://wordpress.com/
wordpress.org http://wordpress.org/
buy time frames and taboo data at barnesandnoble.com http://search.barnesandnoble.com/time-frames-and-taboo-data/c-m-houck/e/9780595677689/?itm=3
- http://www.iuniverse.com/bookstore/bookdetail.aspx?bookid=sku-000036043
buy time frames and taboo data on amazon.com http://www.amazon.com/time-frames-taboo-data-misdirected/dp/059539986x/ref=sr_1_5?ie=utf8&s=books&qid=1235598055&sr=1-5
facebook profile http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1469708115&ref=name
goodreads http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/4240601.time_frames_and_taboo_data_a_history_of_mankind_s_misdirected_beliefs
goodreads profile http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/2072644
librarything profile http://www.librarything.com/profile/chouck017894
myspace profile http://www.myspace.com/timeframesandtaboodata
shelfari http://www.shelfari.com/books/1996292/time-frames-and-taboo-data-a-history-of-mankind-s-misdirected-be
shelfari profile http://www.shelfari.com/timeframesandtaboodata
twitter https://twitter.com/chouck017894
- https://www.flickr.com/photos/35617818@n02/3298666936/
more photos https://www.flickr.com/photos/35617818@n02/
may 2017 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2017/05/
april 2017 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2017/04/
march 2017 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2017/03/
february 2017 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2017/02/
january 2017 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2017/01/
december 2016 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2016/12/
november 2016 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2016/11/
october 2016 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2016/10/
september 2016 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2016/09/
august 2016 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2016/08/
july 2016 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2016/07/
june 2016 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2016/06/
may 2016 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2016/05/
april 2016 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2016/04/
march 2016 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2016/03/
february 2016 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2016/02/
january 2016 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2016/01/
december 2015 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2015/12/
march 2015 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2015/03/
february 2015 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2015/02/
january 2015 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2015/01/
december 2014 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2014/12/
november 2014 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2014/11/
october 2014 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2014/10/
september 2014 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2014/09/
august 2014 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2014/08/
july 2014 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2014/07/
june 2014 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2014/06/
may 2014 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2014/05/
april 2014 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2014/04/
march 2014 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2014/03/
february 2014 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2014/02/
january 2014 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2014/01/
december 2013 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2013/12/
november 2013 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2013/11/
october 2013 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2013/10/
september 2013 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2013/09/
august 2013 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2013/08/
july 2013 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2013/07/
june 2013 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2013/06/
may 2013 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2013/05/
april 2013 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2013/04/
march 2013 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2013/03/
february 2013 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2013/02/
january 2013 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2013/01/
december 2012 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2012/12/
november 2012 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2012/11/
october 2012 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2012/10/
september 2012 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2012/09/
august 2012 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2012/08/
july 2012 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2012/07/
june 2012 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2012/06/
may 2012 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2012/05/
april 2012 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2012/04/
march 2012 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2012/03/
february 2012 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2012/02/
january 2012 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2012/01/
december 2011 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2011/12/
november 2011 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2011/11/
october 2011 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2011/10/
september 2011 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2011/09/
august 2011 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2011/08/
july 2011 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2011/07/
june 2011 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2011/06/
may 2011 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2011/05/
april 2011 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2011/04/
march 2011 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2011/03/
february 2011 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2011/02/
january 2011 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2011/01/
december 2010 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2010/12/
november 2010 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2010/11/
october 2010 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2010/10/
september 2010 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2010/09/
august 2010 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2010/08/
july 2010 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2010/07/
june 2010 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2010/06/
may 2010 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2010/05/
april 2010 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2010/04/
march 2010 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2010/03/
february 2010 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2010/02/
january 2010 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2010/01/
december 2009 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2009/12/
november 2009 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2009/11/
october 2009 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2009/10/
september 2009 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2009/09/
august 2009 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2009/08/
july 2009 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2009/07/
june 2009 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2009/06/
may 2009 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2009/05/
april 2009 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2009/04/
march 2009 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2009/03/
february 2009 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2009/02/
register https://wordpress.com/start?ref=wplogin
log in https://timeframesandtaboodata.wordpress.com/wp-login.php
entries rss https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/feed/
comments rss https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/comments/feed/
wordpress.com https://wordpress.com/
blog at wordpress.com. https://wordpress.com/?ref=footer_blog
time frames and taboo data blog https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/
blog at wordpress.com. https://wordpress.com/?ref=footer_blog

Zdjęcia

Zdjęcia 4
Zdjęcia bez atrybutu ALT 2
Zdjęcia bez atrybutu TITLE 2
Korzystanie Obraz ALT i TITLE atrybutu dla każdego obrazu.

Zdjęcia bez atrybutu TITLE

https://sb.scorecardresearch.com/p?c1=2&c2=7518284&c3=&c4=&c5=&c6=&c15=&cv=2.0&cj=1
https://pixel.wp.com/b.gif?v=noscript

Zdjęcia bez atrybutu ALT

https://sb.scorecardresearch.com/p?c1=2&c2=7518284&c3=&c4=&c5=&c6=&c15=&cv=2.0&cj=1
https://pixel.wp.com/b.gif?v=noscript

Ranking:


Alexa Traffic
Daily Global Rank Trend
Daily Reach (Percent)









Majestic SEO











Text on page:

time frames and taboo data blog the official blog for time frames and taboo data, by c.m. houck. ezekiel saw a wheel posted in belief, ezekiel the prophet, hebrew scripture, jewish trinity, religion, sacred texts, scriptures on may 1, 2017 by chouck017894 “…way up in the middle of the air…” in the “good book”, famous for its peculiar tales of god’s prejudices and choosing favorite ones from all the variety and diversity in his creation, the character of ezekiel is one of the most bizarre.   he is also regarded as one of the greater hebrew “prophets.”  ezekiel began his “prophetic” career during the later years of another prophet, jeremiah (born c. 650 bce).  ezekiel was the son of buzi, a priest, so ezekiel’s youth was conditioned in a priestly environment, his father being a priest in the timeframe of jehoiakin, 18th king of judah (598-597 bce).  ezekiel therefore tended to be more fanatic than jeremiah in regard to ritual practices of holiness than was jeremiah who stressed moral behavior rather than strict ritual. it was in this timeframe that ezekiel was carried captive to babylonia.  this was around eleven years before jerusalem would be destroyed by zedekiah and the bulk of jews deported to babylonia.  after years of exposure to babylonian culture in which human and mixed animal composites were common motifs (bull with wings, for example), his visions were undoubtedly colored by such images. while captive in babylonia, ezekiel became intimately familiar with the methodical study of astronomy.  this introduced him to how the story of creation had once been explained with use of the revolving images that were imagined to be traced upon the various constellations during their yearly procession.  thus the opening “vision” related by this prophet happened to rely upon babylonian star knowledge (astronomy) to galvanize “the whole house of israel.”  consequently in the first chapter of ezekiel, the prophet declares that a whirlwind out of the north (did he refer to his captivity?)  brought him an awareness (vision) of things to come.  by verse ten he descries the winged creatures he had seen.  ezekiel declares, “as for the likeness of their faces, the four had the face of a man, and the face of a lion on the right side; and the four had the face of an ox on the left side; the four also had the face of and eagle.” wow! what an attention-grabbing array of “visions.”  and to further raise awe of the exiles the prophet declared after long elaboration of the “faces” that they also had wings.  “the four wings of the four living creatures” described by ezekiel are actually coded references taken from the prehistory lessons of creation which used four quarterly divisions of the heavens as study illustrations.  we still reference those quarterly divisions of the heavens today with zodiac symbols of aquarius (man pouring water);  ox (bull), taurus;  lion (leo); and scorpion (eagle was the hebrew symbol for scorpio).  as ezekiel says, “…and they went every one strait forward: whither the spirit was to go, they went; and they turned not when they went” (1-12).  (the stars retain their course.)  by verse 15 he saw a wheel “…upon the earth by the living creatures, with his four faces.”  and their “work” (the established positions of constellations) was as it were a wheel in the middle of a wheel.” (1-16) among ezekiel’s prophecies it is this “wheel within a wheel” vision which is probably most widely known, and this first of his visions is what is concentrated on here.  this is because it was this extreme composite of figures and symbols which openly reveal the connection with ancient astronomy teachings upon which the jewish trinity concept came to be established.  from this the “incommunicable name” of the supreme being was theorized which contains three elements.  that theorized name thus contained 1) yod, which is the letter of the phallus; 2) he, representing the passive or bearing forth principle (considered feminine) within that being; 3) yau, representing the will to create; and 4) the passive he principle was repeated again to signify the creative power as the initiator.  thus the name of the supreme being was theorized to be ya-he-vau-he, or yahweh.  the jewish trinity concept expanded upon ezekiel’s “vision” with the  hebrew letters transliterated as yhwh or jhvh (yahweh or jehovah). in ezekiel’s trinity the “first person”, “yod”, or primal power, was the all-father–the”let there be light” creator.  the second “person” (the “he” part) was regarded to be the enthroned passive principle by which and through which all diverse and varied manifestations become active as creation.  this second “person” was regarded as either androgynous (asexual) or the fertilized virginal source through which all become made manifest.  the third “person”, or “yah“, is the life principle (the will to bring forth), which in genesis 1:2 is referred to as “the spirit upon the face of the waters.”   the “he” or passive bearing forth of this creative power was then repeated again, for it must attend and fulfill the will to create.  interestingly, the christian version of trinity has never allowed this much “feminine” identity with creator power. the events of the ezekiel’s accounts cover approximately twenty-one years.  in truth there was little definable or visionary mystery about ezekiel’s means of communication with heaven.  as noted, each of these four symbolic divisions of the heavens as seen from earth was defined in prehistory lessons which used constellations as illustrations for creation/cosmology and life lessons.  to recount, the “man” of ezekiel’s earliest “vision” came from the opening of the ancient lessons on creation which began with constellation aquarius.  there a naked male figure (his back  toward the viewer) poured water from an urn held on his left shoulder.  the ox,  the second alleged “face” of ezekiel’s vision, represents taurus (the bull); the lion-face refers to constellation leo; and the eagle was the hebrew symbol for constellation scorpius.  each of these four major “face” constellation symbols had two companion constellations of progressive study.  with aquarius, for example, was pisces and aries; lessons with taurus were given with gemini and cancer; with leo were virgo and libra; and with scorpio were sagittarius and capricorn. ezekiel’s prophetic “calling” is said to have begun c. 593 bce, and his prophecies revolved around the concept that the future of the “chosen people” (judaic followers) was to be fulfilled by the babylonian exiles.  his strongest influence upon judaism was his “vision” of a sacred nation which would be raised above all others.  this, in turn, influenced the messianic sermonizing which developed in later centuries.  ezekiel’s prophecies marked the transformation of the prophetic period of jewish people into the priestly period, which was then phased out with rabbis (my master) in the general timeframe of herod (75 bce – 4 bce). leave a comment » ambush of spirit posted in abraham, belief, bible, creation's democratic flexibility, ethics and morality, faith, random, religion, religious hatreds, sacred texts on april 1, 2017 by chouck017894 all scriptural “revealed” texts of man’s contrivance have a considerable amount of hatred ingrained throughout their scores of pages.  early on even god is portrayed as bubbling with a degree of hatred at adam and eve for having been lured by the tempting trees which god had deliberately placed as the focus of his garden.  god chose to interpret the epitome of his creative handiwork as being disrespectful.  so he drove them away from the only home they had ever known after heaping a heavy load of guilt upon them.  the catch 22 to this original sin plot line is thus cunningly established early-on, which allowed the priest class a cautionary choke-hold on all subsequent generations of seekers. all man-concocted faith systems have the tendency to pay tribute to themselves by routinely focusing on the differences and the dissimilar features and characteristics which give life its radiant and diverse range of creation’s representation.  the creative, energetic, sustaining force in which life is expressed is too often imagined in “sacred” accounts to be mainly concerned with the dilemmas of only one narrow selection of human species in one small region on planet earth, and which just happens to represent their particular man-invented faith system.  such a narrow understanding of life’s intended diversity and spirit’s significance in relation to the rest of the universe has resulted in much carefully cultivated hatreds setting the stage for persistent and needless conflicts. reason and knowledge are seriously repressed when ego-serving faith systems labor to impose preconceptions of any kind to hover over people’s interactions with others.  in man-structured faith systems, for example, seekers are indoctrinated and continuously conditioned with claims that it is only through their particular dreamed up rites and rituals that seekers may ever attain the favoritism of that source-power  which is personified as a human-like “god.”  but the universe and nature do not happen to reflect that severely restrictive faith system’s disposition, for the life principle active within that source-power continually formulates and makes manifest a broad diversity and variety of life. promoting the idea of godly hatred toward any manifested life expression by that creative source is the greatest act of blasphemy that can be indulged in by any organized faith system.  an organized, highly structured hierarchical faith system inflicts orderliness, methodology, regulations, systematic posturing, inflexible rules, and narrow interpretations, most of which pretty much fly in the face of universal tolerance for variety and diversity within life experience.   but all these man-contrived faith systems take advantage of the fact that even their life-limiting posturing is tolerated in the democratic flexibility of creation. when the all-embracing creative life principle is imagined to be in man’s image, there is left scant room for any believer to ever attain their intended higher potential.  since all man-concocted faith systems have long histories of indulging in each and every one of the alleged god-hated indulgences, the followers should remember that a spiritually wise man questions every extreme of passion.  after all, the creative life principle installed a brain in humankind with the expectation that humankind would learn and practice rationality for establishing his own relationship with that creative power.  it is alarming therefore that our personal connection to the life principle is so often negatively approached in the many man written “holy” books.  for example, as is in (ot) genesis, exodus, leviticus, deuteronomy, ezra, job, psalms, proverbs, and ecclesiastes hatred is barely disguised.  and hatred is expressed in (nt) matthew, luke, ephesians, romans, titus, 1 john, hebrews and revelations.  and in the quran there are well over one hundred verses of outright murderous hatred is encouraged. godly hatreds are cataloged as in proverbs 6:16; “…six things doth the lord hate: yea, seven are an abomination to him.”  the things that are subsequently listed by the priest-author certainly cannot be assessed as moral or ethical conduct, and so the list of god’s imagined hatreds are actually extreme negative social interaction practices.  thus it is asserted by the authors that the creator turns livid over: 1) a proud look; 2) a lying tongue; 3) hands that shed innocent blood; 4) a heart that deviseth wicked imaginations; 5) a false witness that speaketh lies; and 7) he that soweth discord among brethren.”  (*it was from this list that pope gregory 1, “the great”: [590-604] elaborated upon the “seven deadly sins,” which a lower priest had commented upon years before gregory but who received no credit.)    all this carries a so-what attitude in ecclesiastes 3 where divine insight is pretended by musing that everything has its appointed time, and thus lists “a time time to kill (3), and a time to hate “(8). in the new testament, luke 14:26, even jesus supposedly encourages hatred saying, “if anyone come to me and does not hate his father and mother and wife and children and brothers and sisters, yes, and even his own soul, he cannot be my disciple.”  that is rather disturbing validation that what was recorded in those avowed “revealed” tales is not divine disclosure which was relayed as coming from an omniscient being to a few privileged priest-scribes.  the words that were put into jesus’ mouth by those power obsessed interpreters who had not witnessed the alleged incident is, however, the very principle which is routinely utilized in every cult style exploitation to keep seekers in   subjugation. and in the quran there are, as noted, well over 100 verses which irresponsiblly summon muslims to indulge in violent hatred and outright murder of any diverse way of honoring the life principle.  mohammad’s frequent “message” is the contention that everyone is an enemy of his spiritual tribe.  for example, in the quran 8:65 it is averred, “o prophet, exhort the believers to fight.”  no muslim dares ask why, if allah knows all, sees all and created all, he should have to relay his maintenance directives through a caravan merchant when he, allah, could directly instill in every brain whatever he desired.  the overused excuse is that allah uses a prophet or messenger as a means to test seekers.  this is the same empty “test” that god allegedly imposed upon abraham by god’s alleged instruction to abraham to sacrifice his own son isaac as a test of devotion.  but an omniscient god (all knowing) would have absolutely no reason to “test” anyone. for the most part the three dominant faith systems of western cultures fail to understand that genuine enlightenment value is attained only from the tolerance for diversity and variety which the creator intentionally instilled in all life’s expressions. that failing rests within all man-concocted faith systems which function under the corrupt premise of submit and obey all the faith system’s manipulative, self-serving stipulations.  their self-serving regulations are little more than disguised threats of brute force (by the creator of diversity), not by true spiritual enlightenment, and it is brute force that is promoted and encouraged above the principles of harmony. to the credit of humankind, however, that which is assessed as “spirit” within man is nonetheless sluggishly evolving among the broader masses.  the allegations that the life principle, personified as a human-like god or allah, would hold hatred toward any of the diverse and varied manifestations of life which “he” intentionally created are slowly evaporating under the pursuit of true enlightenment.  unfortunately it is bronze age tribal-style hatreds and cultured distrust of the creator’s intended diversity which still flavor so much of all man-written “holy” texts and continue to negatively pollute “spirit” like malignant cancer cells. leave a comment » rise of holy agitators (in usa) posted in belief, bible, corporate style faiths, faith, fundamentalism, government on march 2, 2017 by chouck017894 in the early 1950’s, television was a new craze.  quick to note the craze some enterprising guys, still clutching their freshly printed bible-mill studies diplomas, sought to serve the lord by preaching their revealed wisdom using that promising medium.  the lord seems to have been well pleased.  later, for example, by may of 1985 the evangelical marketer pat robertson was even featured in a cable magazine called on cable.  filled with boundless self-righteousness and spiritual vanity robertson declared that he sought to remake america into a “biblical based nation.”  his fiery right-wing politics was characterized by him as “conservative, religious, and a biblical point of view.”  he didn’t  mention the authors of those biblical views had written their point of view in the bronze age.  blissfully unconcerned,  robertson latched onto that view and it was so slickly packaged that by 1985 his organization efforts was siphoning in more than $70 million a year from bedazzled followers. the long-standing constitutional ideals and values the nation’s founders placed upon diversity, variety and plurality for the american people were regarded by robertson as being “extreme dangers” to a secular state.  respecting the rights of minorities was being threatened in his lofty opinion of how a “biblical based nation” was to be run.  robertson pontificated that children in  public schools were being taught “a collective philosophy that would lead citizens away from god toward marxism, socialism or a communistic type of ideology.”   oh he was good at scaring the be-jesus out of the gullible.  in his humble opinion, therefore, he found it logical to denounce the department of education as being “unconstitutional”! not shy about telling the nation what god wanted for it, robertson asserted that the united states supreme court had departed from history and the constitution.  he reasoned and worried publicly about the “encroachment” of the judiciary.  they just didn’t seem favorable to his idea of a theocracy.  thus robertson charted course to “engage” in what he termed “advocacy journalism,” and his christian broadcast network news teams began spewing out reams of propagandist mini-documentaries with heavy “conservative” (read theocratic) messages.  later, he must have been delighted when the supreme court became composed with five of the nine justices being republican and staunch roman catholics. and it was a later republican dominated supreme court that would step in and tell the nation that our redeeming leader was to be the born again george w. bush.  hallelujah! robertson’s christian broadcast network news teams were headed by a man who was once editor of the washington times, which just happened at that time to be owned by the “reverend” sun myung.  this strange bedfellow happened to be loaded down with questionable north korean connections.  not to fear, for the “born again” population, robertson averred, was seriously under-represented in our national government.  posing as a caring messenger, he declared, “the basic thing people do not understand is that evangelicals in america are not plotting to take away the rights of everyone else.”  (trying to eliminate the department of education would therefore simply be a money saving move.) robertson worked hard at presenting himself as the modern age version of a biblical prophet.  for sure the biblical prophets had dared to mix it up with politics–which just happened to always be in regard to a very select bunch of people.  true to form, robertson declared, “god is going to thrust his people (the fundamentalists) into positions they never dreamed they were capable of taking on.”  (george w. bush & company certainly did seem to fill that prediction.)  if the heavy tilt of religiously obsessed persons in governmental positions today is any indication, and if their corruption of true democratic principles is an example of a “biblical based nation,” can we truthfully say that their sly take over of the republican party in 1996 was “fairly benign”? well, today, several decades later, robertson’s christian broadcasting network and regent university pulls in over $400 million a year peddling the same old far-right political propaganda and implications of heaven’s special favoritism.  but his empire is today upstaged by an old rival from the same earlier era which is now marketed as the jerry falwell ministries/liberty counsel/liberty university.  that deceptive use of the word “liberty” in their promotional marketing disguises the fact that the aim of their “liberty” is to sabotage the u.s. constitutional safeguard of church-state separation–the nation’s father’s guarantee of religious freedom (liberty) for everyone.  peddling this anti-democratic baloney the family falwell empire today rakes in over $600 million a year. amazingly there are other claimers of god’s especial favoritism who wage war on every person’s freedom  to worship only as they choose.–all of which rake in multi-millions a year for being staunchly un-american and pro-theocratic.  take the so-called focus on the family that has the gall to endorse right wing political candidates; it is lucrative and nets the dobson family over $92 million a year.  and there’s their family research council (an off-shoot of focus on the family) that holds an annual “value voter summit” which draws in over $14 million against anti-constitutional protections. still another self-declared biblical representative is the american family association that is against about everything that grants american’s civil freedoms. the reverend donald wildman who heads this “association” boldly proclaims that separation of church and state was invented by hitler!  duh!  for that type of heavenly enlightenment his anti-constitutional bias nets over $17 a year. other grandiose named outfits include american center for law and justice/christian advocates serving evangelism.  that imposing mouthful defined the purpose, which is to force–force–fundamentalist beliefs into all public schools.  allied with the pat robertson empire in spirit and money-love, it pulls in over $57 million a year.  justice is again implied with the so-called alliance defending freedom, but the only council for national policy aimed for by them is to allow them to ax the federal law which guards tax-exempt churches from actively intervening in partisan elections.  god, it seems, favors that antidemocratic stance to the tune of over $47 million a year. ahh, but there are even more would-be religious oppressors out there.  it’s all strictly spiritual guidance, of  course.  take the bewildering concerned women for america (affiliated with the concerned women for america legislative action committee) which indulges in heavy prejudices against the creator’s intentional wide-ranged diversities and variety of life.  this anti-feminist lobby was founded by beverly and tim lahaye, who (in 2015) raked in over $14 million for their discriminatory activities.  not content with that, tim lahaye also headed up the council for national policy which presumed to evaluate prospective gop presidential candidates.  this membership-only outfit drew only a little more than $2 million. still another agitator operation is ralph reed’s foundation and freedom coalition whose primary purpose for existence is to attract more fundamentalists to vote.  their holy reward–over $3 million per year. oddly, these material obsessed, self-appointed faith merchants seem to have little appreciation  for what jesus is alleged to have preached about such conduct.  for example, in matthew 6:5 (king james version–among the many other translations): “and when you pray do not be like the hypocrites for they pray standing–so that they may be seen of men. they (in that manner) have their reward.”  and in matthew 7:1-3 “judge not, that ye be judged.  for with what judgment ye judged and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you.” perhaps those faith merchants of fundamentalism should get their greedy noses out of their elaborately constructed feeding troughs and actually follow the teaching they claim to epitomize. leave a comment » making holy myths posted in belief, bible, christianity, faith, mother nature, pagan gods, religion, sacred texts, scriptures on february 27, 2017 by chouck017894 of all the creation myths of ancient peoples, the opening of the book of genesis stands in a class by itself.  unlike all cultures before (our) common era the priests of yahweh in the 9th/8th century bce jerusalem  were busily indulging themselves in setting up the self-serving premise of divine discrimination.   the creator they presented in genesis who walked in his garden and talked to himself is thus depicted as either not omniscient (all-knowing) or as an unfeeling schemer.  for example, where is the wisdom of placing two tempting fruit trees as the focal point of this garden landscape and then forbidding two uncomprehending newly created creatures the freedom to eat of them?  it is weak story-plotting.  but it didn’t much matter to the priest authors, for the underlying purpose of the story was to channel the hebrew people away from belief in numerous gods and goddesses to gradually (and with much difficulty) indoctrinate them with the premise of one human-like being (male of course) who created limited identities without the necessity of energy intercourse. in more ancient time frames the civilizations such as sumer, babylonia, assyria, etc.recognized and respected the interactions and inestimable universal energies and it was these unseen but interrelated and interacting primal creative forces which the ancient cultures personified as a pantiscracy of “gods”.  this was allegorized as a utopian society in which all were equal and each had governing power.  it is an insight which is also the heartbeat of democracy.  the creative energies which interact throughout nature and all through the observable universe do often appear in opposition, hence the “gods” which personified those energy actions were often depicted in pagan cultures as in competition or in a state of lust.  there was never any doubt among these pagan cultures, however, that such  creative energies originated out of a  singular source.. the yahweh priest-authors in the 9th/8th century bce slyly contrived the claim that the amoral all-embracing source-power of creation had singled out only one group of people in the world  (them of course) as the sole recipients of his blessings.  to accomplish this pretext of divine discrimination and purported prejudice the wily priest editors referred  to those same primal and diverse energies which were responsible for all manifested life as having been their historical ancestors by dubbing those primal creative energies as isaelites–the alleged descendants of jacob/israel.  the various gods and goddesses that were recognized by the surrounding cultures and which symbolized for them the same diverse creative primal energies, were then ridiculed as being too lacking and had not been chosen by the power that the priests named yahweh.  but this assault on pagan wisdom necessitated finding a means to explain the diverse energy attributes that had been represented and personified with pagan gods and goddesses. the priest-editors who mined and reworked ancient teachings given with constellation figures, old oral hebrew myths and cabal texts certainly knew that the pagan gods represented forces of creative energy.  they knew as well that those energies, although unseen for the most part, interact throughout the universe and have an effect on all life. the clever scheme of the yahweh priest authors of demoting the the numerous pagan gods and goddesses was to simply give those primal forces a different designation. consequently those diverse creative forces were reassigned from godly status by yahweh’s priests and were hailed as angels in the service of yahweh.  for all extent and purpose, the attributes and special duties of the spurned pagan gods were simply transferred to angels and were envisioned as acting under the direction of a divinely indifferent power-source which they personified as yahweh. other pagan recognition of primal energies were similarly disguised.  in the earliest part of the priest-authored book of genesis (3:20) the character of eve is referred to as “mother of all living,” which suggests the rank of a near-sacred being.  this title that adam allegedly bestowed upon eve happens to be identical to what the ancient sumerians had bestowed upon their love goddess aruru, for she was regarded in their culture as the creatrix of all life.  and strangely also, the authors of genesis never mentioned an account of eve’s death, and the reason for that is no death occurred–we know her today as mother nature. eve’s implied eminence in genesis, even after the alleged fruit picking mistake, reflects the pagan perception that creation of all life can take place only through a process of polar energy interactions.  this is why various neighboring cultures which the priests of yahweh envied–such as sumerian, babylonian, phenician, hittie, ugaritic, etc.–gave homage to goddesses as being equal in divine power as the gods.  but eve, according to the yahweh priest authors, was also demoted and allegedly designed by yahweh to simply serve as adam’s helpmeet (gen 2:18-20).   this was a deliberate capsizing of pagan’s correct understanding that creation of any manifestation occurred only from exchange of opposite but equal polar energies.  the premise presented by the priests of yahweh, however, was that yahweh-jehovah simply muttered things into material existence, and that story feature had no parallel in any other mediterranean or near eastern myths.   the advantage of this story flight of fancy  was that it placed man (especially the political minded priests) in the authoritarian position.  unfortunately, by demoting the feminine (negative) polar aspect which is equally necessary for life production, the genesis myth of creation essentially rejects the scientific polarizing energy principle by which energy manifests as matter.  and western religious understanding has been plagued with confusion, controversy and misunderstanding ever since. leave a comment » uncertainties in sacred texts posted in bible, dead sea scrolls, hebrew scripture, religion, sacred texts, thoughts on february 18, 2017 by chouck017894 for the majority of persons of the western cultures today who have been indoctrinated into the christian faith systems, few are aware that there is yet to be found any original copies of any of the books which are honored as the new testament.  there are age-old copies to be sure, but they are just that, copies.  usually made from copies.  and the hebrew scriptures, so proudly declared to be meticulously accurate reproductions of god-dictated holy word, many uncertainties happen to linger there which necessitates footnotes (as in the new revised standard version).  in fact various passages are integrated where translators were uncertain what the original text really was (as for example, in 1 and 2 samuel).  this presents a tragic predicament for world cultures, because the many uncertainties which continue to hover and cloud all man-written “sacred” texts have been used as models upon which were fashioned each culture’s moral, ethics and spiritual trust.  thus it is actually sacred uncertainties which have served as foundations for the three by-the-book faith systems which routinely reflect their holiness in constant murderous conflicts. basic beliefs, most of which originated in bronze age tribal cultures, were heavily colored by fears and superstitions.  in addition, the words which have been handed down through century after century have been altered–sometimes accidentally, more often deliberately–by countless interpreters and translators who put their own spin on the declared meaning in those words.  predictably the declared meaning said to be god-relayed in those man-written texts was always interpreted from the events of the interpreter’s  particular time frame.  the fundamental philosophy which brought about all the age-old written “holy” works conveniently allowed for such self defensive flexibility and manipulative license.  and it is precisely this philosophical elasticity which stimulates the addictive fascination for what is revered as holy word.  it provides anxious seekers with ego gratification–which is commonly praised and promoted as spiritual fulfillment.  in extreme antiquity the stories were carefully penned to illustrate cosmological and/or life-purpose instruction. regrettably these were often indirectly–or more often than not intentionally–colored by later scribe’s personal likes, dislikes, envy, jealousies and political aims which consequently provoked irrelevant posturing and theatrics rather than radiating any genuine spiritual enlightenment. the faithful who cling unquestioningly to “sacred” texts (hebrew scriptures, new testament of quran, as examples) like to believe that those compositions which have been accepted as revealed and sacred, contain no mistakes, no textural booboos, and no faulty assessments.  but every such textural “holy” work was produced by human hands, and even the most faithful humans fall far short in cosmic awareness to serve as infallible spokesmen for the perfection and broad diversity which is the creative and sustaining power which is the all-enfolding source. the discovery in 1947 of a number of parchment scrolls which contained hebrew and aramaic scriptural texts and liturgical writings of an asectic community which dated from c. 250 bce to about 70 ce are known as the dead sea scrolls.  the intensive research on these scrolls brought to light the startling fact that those texts, which are around a thousand years older than any previously known “old texts” contained a stockpile of significant differences from the hebrew scriptures which are today considered to have always been inviolable.  time and circumstances since the era of the scrolls’ authorship brought with them alterations that resulted in textural content which became more or less standardized only around 1000 ce.  thus the western world today has become victim to what may be termed sacred shell games. genuine history is routinely forgotten in what has become accepted as holy word.  for example, the ot book  of esther was rewritten from an older version which some scholars have said had been composed by some roman source.  rabbi akiba ben joseph (c.50-132 ce) was one of the most eminent teachers of his timeframe, and he headed the school at jaffa: it was he who rewrote the text known as esther.  and the jewish code known as the mishnah was developed by him partly on the basis of his own teachings.  in the original roman account of the esther tale there was a character named haman (or aman or hamin) who vows to kill all jews.  some scholars say that haman was modeled upon a roman aristocrat named arius piso.  the jewish holiday feast of purim was established ostensibly to celebrate the deliverance of the jews from the alleged massacre by haman.  the rewritten book of esther and the association  of haman with roman aristocracy therefore served as the covert reminder to all jews of the alleged conspiracy of the romans to destroy the jews. once a faith system has compiled its self-serving literary collection and stamped it as “canon” (an ecclesiastical code or laws), that man-written anthology has been advertised and marketed as containing all knowledge which is ever necessary for a believer to attain godly protection, salvation or entrance into paradise.  thus have sacred theatrics and man-devised by-the-book directives been set in place as the edifying mechanism over mankind’s social and spiritual evolution (or lack thereof). today, contented that the faith systems which we have been taught as holding divine knowledge and which supposedly extends privileged access into a higher and exclusive domain, we are kept uninformed of how and from what that belief slowly and haphazardly evolved.  every man-contrived faith system has been built upon the awe and wonder that our ancient ancestors had felt for the celestial panorama which was then unmarred by the light and air pollution we humans produce today.  in our self-enveloped bubble of technology we have been manipulated away from the ancient’s awareness and veneration the universal phenomena, and those observations and practices became intentionally modified and disguised.  why?  because the “pagan” sources from which those holy words were “borrowed” had openly respected such things a solstice periods, time of the equinoxes, phases of the moon, constellation grouping of stars, and their associated cycles of nature.  these and other such natural observable facts thus played calculated influences in every man-contrived faith system which dominate cultures and societies today, and those natural wonders are camouflaged and smothered under priest-invented “histories” and theatrical rites. man!  that is almost enough to drive an atheist to attempt a prayer!  lord, rest your hand upon the heads of earnest seekers of enlightenment, and your other hand over the mouths of the braying self-possessed proselytizers. leave a comment » corporate style faith systems posted in atheist, belief, ego and belief, ethics and morality, monotheism, random, religion, thoughts on january 1, 2017 by chouck017894 any man-fashioned faith system is basically designed as a power structure: it is not unfaulteringly assembled for the benefit of mass spiritual enlightenment but designed to assert the faith system’s authority.  like any commercial endeavor the service that is offered is gauged by customer demand, and commercial demand is stirred by advertising.  in the faith business the product is basically a manufactured illusion: the merchandise offered is emotional assurance that a higher power looks after them–but that power supposedly functions only if the subscribers submit, obey and partake of all the rites, rituals and ceremonies that the self-appointed authorities have set in place for business use.  consequently those formalized procedures are cleverly fashioned to appeal to the ego of the seekers, not purposefully crafted to empower everyone’s personal connection (called “spirit”) to creation’s source. principles of righteous conduct are comparatively self evident to any balanced mind:  seek understanding, control avarice, value individuality, honor love, demonstrate compassion, respect all life’s diversities, recognize that all things are interrelated, etc.  for the most part the three  networks of corporate styled “faith” systems of today’s western cultures choose to market the principles of “belief” by claiming to possess direct favoritism of a compassionate creator-god.  the general work  ethic of these three sister  faith systems, however, is to force their formalized concepts of god-creator upon everyone else, which results only in constant conflicts.  thus for each of these corporate styled faith systems, their calls to devotion happen to exploit identical  un-righteous principles that happen to resist creation’s intended diversities.  achieving “dominion” over life’s diversity is the subliminal message buried within every man-written “sacred” text, and that faith system obsession is often the excuse for fundamentalists to annihilate whatever they fail to understand.  that strategy is commonly exhibited in attempting to obstruct knowledge, curtail science, stifle natural desires, limit consideration for others, belittle intimate pleasures—in short, restructure everyone to a robotic religionist. what is the architectural foundation for this?  it is  the concept of monotheism, a doctrine that there is only one creator-god, who is characterized as male, of course.  that concept permits erecting a business machine under the assertion that the all-embracing, all-inclusive power which created and sustains everything then unexplainably censored himself to play favorites with segments of the human species.  this is a tactic which is then buttressed by utilizing man’s fear of death which further allows the charlatans to peddle their faith system’s insurance policy which is averred to offer seekers a glorious afterlife in a cloud-lined country club atmosphere–but only if they follow the rules. the three self-serving monotheistic faith systems of western cultures could never survive as controlling powers if the peace and brotherly love to which they give much lip service was faithfully practiced.  instead the self-appointed representatives of heaven incite the egos of seekers with false notions of exclusive access to the all-inclusive creator.  peace and brotherly love happen to make for a limited meal ticket if such tolerance was actually allowed to be demonstrated by followers, for that would allow seekers to truly embark upon achieving personal alignment with universal powers.  such true freedom of spirit would deprive the self-proclaimed god-ambassadors of their public image as individuals who assert to have been heavenly approved for godly service.  each of these three corporate styled faith systems claim to teach love, tolerance and peace, but curiously after nearly three thousand years of these sugary claims the world has not yet witnessed any proof of such divine conduct on their part.  instead, all three of these by-the-book religions  systems have to resort to whitewashing and disguising their bloody histories of violence, practiced prejudices, deceits, contrived theatrical ceremonies, and similar excesses of shameless spiritual pretentiousness.  with these pretentions each of these faith systems have shamelessly taught seekers to hate the intended diversities of life expressions. when some faith system then attains some political clout it inevitably slides into the sensuous “sins” of brutal power management which they legitimatize by quoting cherry-picked verses from their own priest crafted holy books.  for example, does not the hebrew bible attest that god urged the israelites, his “chosen people”, to slaughter the inhabitants of canaan to attain the “promised land”–as reportedly executed by joshua?  and for the promoters of gospel, was not europe brought into gods’s favor by use of torture and fiery destruction of life during the inquisition by self-proclaimed representatives of the prince of peace?  and does not the quran avow that allah (the merciful) sent hordes of angels to slay opponents of mohammad’s possession of mecca?  such is the deceptive propaganda preached by all “holy word” aficionados.  the justification given for such acts of brutal domination is always in the name of a prejudiced holy spirit.  nowhere in such faiths is the truth ever acknowledged that each and every thing is manifested through and from one source, and that each and all things are therefore interrelated and stand equal before that creative power.  there is, of course, no ego manipulation in teaching that, and thus there is little material profit in admitting the truth of impartiality before that creative source. it has been noted elsewhere in these postings that regional conditions shaped and colored the spiritual teachings which were worked into the political governance of tribal styled stability.  thus today, to the jews and muslims, god is still promoted as something like a bellicose tribal leader, and to those “others” who are not of his implied favored people the creative principle supposedly decreed “cut them off.”  for example, psalms 118:10 (among many interpretations) “…all nations surrounded me; in the name of the lord i will surely cut them off…”  in christian faith, which was conceived and nourished in the militant roman empire, god is viewed more as a commander-in-chief, with priests, bishops, ministers, preachers, etc. placed in charge like combat commanders over the lower ranks. how glaringly different are the by-the-book dogmatism practiced in the western culture’s faith systems today when compared to the much belittled way the pagans approached spiritual understanding. pagan understanding was that spiritual things are highly personal and meant to be experienced by each person individually.  the reason why pagans did not actively solicit others to join their particular sect was the belief that the impulse for spiritual enlightenment must originate within the person himself.  it was not viewed as a commercial subject.  the pagans knew that the first place of any person’s spiritual preparation had to arise within one’s own heart.  spiritual preparation, they understood, was not something acquired through exterior pressures.  to the pagan, regardless of which small sect he or she might be drawn to, it was always accepted that those in any superior position were like elder brethren who, just like the postulant, were sharing in a similar search for divine enlightenment. today such spiritual freedom has been placed upon the altars of corporate styled faith systems which reflect more spiritual greed than any dedication to true spiritual enlightenment.  modern day corporate structured faith systems seek only to impose dogmatism which reduces one’s inner spiritual yearning to hostage status that is held for ransom. leave a comment » examples of scriptural immorality posted in abraham, agnostic, atheist, belief, biblical "values", ethics and morality, religion, scriptures, theology on december 1, 2016 by chouck017894 for some two to three thousand years the holy scriptures have been promoted through western cultures as being the ultimate in moral guidance for mankind.  but anyone with genuine respect for moral conduct and ethical behavior toward their fellow man often stagger away in bewilderment after reading a few holy accounts. indeed, the opening chapters of genesis brusquely kick things off with a highly questionable take on common ethics.  the naive couple, adam and eve, the last of the creator’s handiwork, were seemingly fashioned only for fun and games. naked and clueless, they were placed in a deceptively paradisiacal setting–a setting which featured two breathtakingly beautiful fruit bearing trees as its focal point.  ah, but these trees were declared to be off-limits as a food source for the  creator’s not-too-bright last creations.  this is clearly a case of crafty entrapment, not omniscient wisdom.  but god was supposedly outraged when the innocent pair find the trees too alluring, and god declared that death is to be their punishment–just not for adam and eve, but for all matter-life forms!  the first two humans within the walled-in eden had absolutely no experience as to what self-aware life meant, so how could they have possibly comprehended what the sentence of death meant? ethics and compassion (qualities of conscience) soon got another below-the-belt attack in the “revealed” record of adam and eve’s sons cain and abel.  cain had become a farmer and abel was a sheepherder.  for the bounty that god had supposedly allowed them god expected both boys to gather from their hard work and bring him offerings in gratitude.  that seems a tad materialistic for the creator of all things, but what the heck.  abel slit a sheep’s throat and god found that to be extremely pleasing, but cain’s gift, taken from the laboriously tended fields, was scorned by the creator.  cain, of course, smarted at this bald-faced discrimination and in a jealous rage killed his brother.  there were no actual criminal laws established in paradise, nor had there been need for such in a family of four.  so the homicide of abel cannot be termed murder or even  manslaughter.  as punishment the testy omniscient one banished cain from his native land and cain was commanded not to till the ground anymore. apparently cain was expected to starve himself to death.  or perhaps that was the omniscient one’s plan for evolutionary success, for cain became wonderfully successful as a builder of cities after that.how he populated them is never explained.  still we can’t help but wonder–is infinite punishment for “sins” committed by a finite being’s brief life really the caliber of an omniscient creator’s justice? the same slack concept of holy moral/ethical conduct is continued throughout holy word accounts.  aggression is highly praised in divine tales, and war crimes pass as acceptable practice–if carried out for the security of a man-invented faith system.  for example, under moses’ generalship the israelites are glorified for having killed off all the midianite men, their kings and their prophet balaam.  joshua, in turn, reveled in holocaustic violence in which even thousands of noncombatant women, children and aged were slaughtered. deceitful david exterminated men, women and children in various stories, even sawing victims in half or hacking them to pieces. in a number of holy stories characters are admired for indulging in homicide.   the alleged “prophet” elijah, for example, who allegedly killed 450 priest of baal to “justify” jehovah is held to be exemplary.  and there is elisha, elijah’s successor, who called upon god to send two bears to kill children who had dared to mock his bald head.  and there is the woman esther who is praised for scheming the mass murders of persians.  and there is jezebel who trumped up false charges against a father and his two sons so they would be slain. sexual misconduct, as long as it is strictly heterosexual, is routinely sniffed over.  lot and his two daughters, for example, merit no chastising for acts of incest.  the maltreatment of sarah whom her husband abraham loaned out to the king for material benefits is brushed over.  isaac, their son, followed dad’s example and passed his off wife to the king as his sister.  good old david indulged himself in adultery and had the women’s husband set up for assassination at the war front.  dinah, jacob’s daughter, too young to give legal consent, was defiled by her half-brother, prince shechem.  how do these, and many similar holy examples teach seekers how they are to achieve a personal state of grace? strangely, impurity of spirit is a constant counterpoint played upon in holy tales, but the “impurity” is always about not following some man-invented routine of pretentiousness and mannerisms as being the only method to approach the  omniscient one.  the impurity angle of one’s commitment to a man-made faith system is made the major concern in the three western corporate style faith systems.  this springs primarily from the claim that just being born–expelled from a woman’s body–renders a person impure.  it is never explained why, if the creator is omniscient (all-knowing) and supremely merciful, “he” could not have devised a more practical way and less painful manner for multiplying new life.  nonetheless, that little oversight broadly allows for his self-appointed representatives to have steady employment in their self-devised theatrics.  for example, to make up for their original impurity a man-made faith system may insist that  one’s hair must be trimmed in a strict prescribed manner; or other faith systems demand  certain foods must be avoided or prepared in a ritual way; and of course in all systems  certain theatrics (rites, rituals ceremonies, etc) must be performed by those who aver to be god’s selected representatives. such is the enticement and lure of man-written “holy” books.  the emphasis is commonly based upon following some man-devised routine as though it was magically set down in stone and perchance delivered on some mountain top.  that, however, does not reflect the varied and all-inclusive nature of true spirit.  rigidity and inflexibility just happens to be the condition of something that is dead. leave a comment » « older entries search for: pages about the book blogroll wordpress.com wordpress.org buy the book buy time frames and taboo data at barnesandnoble.com buy time frames and taboo data on amazon.com social networking facebook profile goodreads goodreads profile librarything profile myspace profile shelfari shelfari profile twitter flickr photos more photos archives may 2017 april 2017 march 2017 february 2017 january 2017 december 2016 november 2016 october 2016 september 2016 august 2016 july 2016 june 2016 may 2016 april 2016 march 2016 february 2016 january 2016 december 2015 march 2015 february 2015 january 2015 december 2014 november 2014 october 2014 september 2014 august 2014 july 2014 june 2014 may 2014 april 2014 march 2014 february 2014 january 2014 december 2013 november 2013 october 2013 september 2013 august 2013 july 2013 june 2013 may 2013 april 2013 march 2013 february 2013 january 2013 december 2012 november 2012 october 2012 september 2012 august 2012 july 2012 june 2012 may 2012 april 2012 march 2012 february 2012 january 2012 december 2011 november 2011 october 2011 september 2011 august 2011 july 2011 june 2011 may 2011 april 2011 march 2011 february 2011 january 2011 december 2010 november 2010 october 2010 september 2010 august 2010 july 2010 june 2010 may 2010 april 2010 march 2010 february 2010 january 2010 december 2009 november 2009 october 2009 september 2009 august 2009 july 2009 june 2009 may 2009 april 2009 march 2009 february 2009 meta register log in entries rss comments rss wordpress.com blog at wordpress.com. time frames and taboo data blog blog at wordpress.com. post to cancel


Here you find all texts from your page as Google (googlebot) and others search engines seen it.

Words density analysis:

Numbers of all words: 8185

One word

Two words phrases

Three words phrases

the - 8.55% (700)
and - 3.51% (287)
for - 1.73% (142)
all - 1.61% (132)
that - 1.54% (126)
man - 1.19% (97)
which - 1.15% (94)
her - 1.15% (94)
eat - 1.14% (93)
eve - 1.09% (89)
his - 1.08% (88)
was - 1% (82)
ten - 0.81% (66)
are - 0.75% (61)
with - 0.72% (59)
god - 0.66% (54)
ever - 0.64% (52)
son - 0.64% (52)
our - 0.64% (52)
faith - 0.61% (50)
not - 0.6% (49)
act - 0.59% (48)
one - 0.57% (47)
their - 0.55% (45)
 the - 0.54% (44)
per - 0.51% (42)
system - 0.5% (41)
out - 0.5% (41)
this - 0.45% (37)
were - 0.45% (37)
over - 0.43% (35)
from - 0.42% (34)
age - 0.42% (34)
era - 0.4% (33)
life - 0.4% (33)
spirit - 0.4% (33)
any - 0.39% (32)
have - 0.38% (31)
there - 0.38% (31)
but - 0.37% (30)
tim - 0.37% (30)
had - 0.37% (30)
who - 0.34% (28)
- 0.34% (28)
ritual - 0.33% (27)
other - 0.33% (27)
they - 0.33% (27)
self - 0.32% (26)
sin - 0.32% (26)
priest - 0.31% (25)
been - 0.31% (25)
can - 0.31% (25)
systems - 0.29% (24)
upon - 0.29% (24)
each - 0.29% (24)
very - 0.28% (23)
person - 0.28% (23)
power - 0.28% (23)
those - 0.27% (22)
holy - 0.27% (22)
only - 0.27% (22)
ezekiel - 0.27% (22)
sent - 0.26% (21)
text - 0.26% (21)
spiritual - 0.26% (21)
example - 0.26% (21)
what - 0.26% (21)
nation - 0.26% (21)
every - 0.24% (20)
 an - 0.24% (20)
time - 0.24% (20)
under - 0.24% (20)
being - 0.24% (20)
pagan - 0.24% (20)
culture - 0.23% (19)
creative - 0.23% (19)
now - 0.23% (19)
such - 0.23% (19)
year - 0.23% (19)
these - 0.23% (19)
 in - 0.23% (19)
thing - 0.23% (19)
once - 0.22% (18)
day - 0.22% (18)
creator - 0.22% (18)
principle - 0.22% (18)
part - 0.22% (18)
know - 0.21% (17)
them - 0.21% (17)
creation - 0.21% (17)
verse - 0.21% (17)
has - 0.21% (17)
she - 0.21% (17)
own - 0.21% (17)
way - 0.21% (17)
less - 0.21% (17)
 this - 0.2% (16)
old - 0.2% (16)
vision - 0.2% (16)
war - 0.2% (16)
even - 0.2% (16)
log - 0.2% (16)
book - 0.2% (16)
stand - 0.2% (16)
 and - 0.2% (16)
 for - 0.2% (16)
today - 0.2% (16)
seek - 0.18% (15)
prophet - 0.18% (15)
light - 0.18% (15)
thus - 0.18% (15)
like - 0.18% (15)
work - 0.18% (15)
just - 0.18% (15)
use - 0.18% (15)
word - 0.18% (15)
sacred - 0.18% (15)
more - 0.18% (15)
example, - 0.18% (15)
through - 0.17% (14)
face - 0.17% (14)
some - 0.17% (14)
lion - 0.17% (14)
two - 0.17% (14)
hatred - 0.17% (14)
hebrew - 0.17% (14)
alleged - 0.17% (14)
source - 0.17% (14)
how - 0.17% (14)
may - 0.17% (14)
cultures - 0.17% (14)
aim - 0.17% (14)
texts - 0.17% (14)
yahweh - 0.17% (14)
belief - 0.16% (13)
human - 0.16% (13)
seekers - 0.16% (13)
robertson - 0.16% (13)
wing - 0.16% (13)
represent - 0.16% (13)
post - 0.16% (13)
2016 - 0.16% (13)
would - 0.15% (12)
happen - 0.15% (12)
king - 0.15% (12)
2011 - 0.15% (12)
tell - 0.15% (12)
oral - 0.15% (12)
2014 - 0.15% (12)
2012 - 0.15% (12)
into - 0.15% (12)
people - 0.15% (12)
him - 0.15% (12)
right - 0.15% (12)
take - 0.15% (12)
off - 0.15% (12)
new - 0.15% (12)
2013 - 0.15% (12)
2010 - 0.15% (12)
written - 0.13% (11)
2017 - 0.13% (11)
its - 0.13% (11)
february - 0.13% (11)
sly - 0.13% (11)
2009 - 0.13% (11)
three - 0.13% (11)
moral - 0.13% (11)
after - 0.13% (11)
million - 0.13% (11)
pass - 0.13% (11)
gods - 0.13% (11)
claim - 0.13% (11)
understand - 0.12% (10)
favor - 0.12% (10)
enlightenment - 0.12% (10)
place - 0.12% (10)
constellation - 0.12% (10)
within - 0.12% (10)
four - 0.12% (10)
than - 0.12% (10)
things - 0.12% (10)
till - 0.12% (10)
march - 0.12% (10)
course - 0.12% (10)
ezekiel’s - 0.12% (10)
diversity - 0.12% (10)
most - 0.12% (10)
divine - 0.12% (10)
declared - 0.12% (10)
point - 0.12% (10)
fun - 0.12% (10)
style - 0.12% (10)
force - 0.12% (10)
again - 0.11% (9)
 thus - 0.11% (9)
teach - 0.11% (9)
biblical - 0.11% (9)
about - 0.11% (9)
america - 0.11% (9)
omniscient - 0.11% (9)
follow - 0.11% (9)
shed - 0.11% (9)
 but - 0.11% (9)
set - 0.11% (9)
april - 0.11% (9)
manifest - 0.11% (9)
sons - 0.11% (9)
story - 0.11% (9)
western - 0.11% (9)
when - 0.11% (9)
genesis - 0.11% (9)
december - 0.11% (9)
sure - 0.11% (9)
often - 0.11% (9)
ancient - 0.11% (9)
list - 0.11% (9)
comment - 0.11% (9)
ego - 0.11% (9)
january - 0.11% (9)
energies - 0.11% (9)
allow - 0.11% (9)
still - 0.11% (9)
name - 0.11% (9)
ce. - 0.11% (9)
 that - 0.11% (9)
years - 0.1% (8)
much - 0.1% (8)
did - 0.1% (8)
then - 0.1% (8)
hand - 0.1% (8)
christian - 0.1% (8)
freedom - 0.1% (8)
nor - 0.1% (8)
position - 0.1% (8)
corporate - 0.1% (8)
came - 0.1% (8)
concept - 0.1% (8)
cain - 0.1% (8)
practice - 0.1% (8)
 it - 0.1% (8)
tended - 0.1% (8)
little - 0.1% (8)
heaven - 0.1% (8)
regard - 0.1% (8)
diverse - 0.1% (8)
roman - 0.1% (8)
authors - 0.1% (8)
bce - 0.1% (8)
found - 0.1% (8)
(the - 0.1% (8)
leave - 0.09% (7)
come - 0.09% (7)
urn - 0.09% (7)
energy - 0.09% (7)
interact - 0.09% (7)
 to - 0.09% (7)
conduct - 0.09% (7)
hate - 0.09% (7)
public - 0.09% (7)
november - 0.09% (7)
october - 0.09% (7)
september - 0.09% (7)
august - 0.09% (7)
seem - 0.09% (7)
broad - 0.09% (7)
family - 0.09% (7)
view - 0.09% (7)
well - 0.09% (7)
july - 0.09% (7)
june - 0.09% (7)
scriptures - 0.09% (7)
belief, - 0.09% (7)
posted - 0.09% (7)
chouck017894 - 0.09% (7)
fundamental - 0.09% (7)
later - 0.09% (7)
also - 0.09% (7)
character - 0.09% (7)
routine - 0.09% (7)
understanding - 0.09% (7)
refer - 0.09% (7)
give - 0.09% (7)
primal - 0.09% (7)
priests - 0.09% (7)
interpret - 0.09% (7)
never - 0.09% (7)
symbol - 0.09% (7)
true - 0.09% (7)
serving - 0.09% (7)
aged - 0.09% (7)
placed - 0.07% (6)
known - 0.07% (6)
attain - 0.07% (6)
rites - 0.07% (6)
death - 0.07% (6)
away - 0.07% (6)
kind - 0.07% (6)
adam - 0.07% (6)
stories - 0.07% (6)
many - 0.07% (6)
contain - 0.07% (6)
love - 0.07% (6)
nature - 0.07% (6)
sea - 0.07% (6)
too - 0.07% (6)
ethics - 0.07% (6)
goddess - 0.07% (6)
rest - 0.07% (6)
personified - 0.07% (6)
religious - 0.07% (6)
personal - 0.07% (6)
fact - 0.07% (6)
account - 0.07% (6)
others - 0.07% (6)
you - 0.07% (6)
supreme - 0.07% (6)
common - 0.07% (6)
purpose - 0.07% (6)
teaching - 0.07% (6)
“holy - 0.07% (6)
political - 0.07% (6)
state - 0.07% (6)
same - 0.07% (6)
bible - 0.07% (6)
reveal - 0.07% (6)
visions - 0.07% (6)
knowledge - 0.07% (6)
man-written - 0.07% (6)
actual - 0.07% (6)
early - 0.07% (6)
action - 0.07% (6)
year. - 0.07% (6)
one’s - 0.07% (6)
extreme - 0.07% (6)
among - 0.07% (6)
jews - 0.07% (6)
must - 0.07% (6)
respect - 0.07% (6)
wheel - 0.07% (6)
religion, - 0.07% (6)
direct - 0.07% (6)
supposedly - 0.07% (6)
kill - 0.07% (6)
lower - 0.07% (6)
frames - 0.07% (6)
blog - 0.07% (6)
“a - 0.07% (6)
himself - 0.07% (6)
jewish - 0.07% (6)
therefore - 0.07% (6)
always - 0.07% (6)
 ezekiel - 0.07% (6)
everyone - 0.07% (6)
variety - 0.07% (6)
however, - 0.07% (6)
called - 0.06% (5)
representative - 0.06% (5)
uncertain - 0.06% (5)
fill - 0.06% (5)
serve - 0.06% (5)
good - 0.06% (5)
simply - 0.06% (5)
constitutional - 0.06% (5)
godly - 0.06% (5)
reflect - 0.06% (5)
life. - 0.06% (5)
brought - 0.06% (5)
toward - 0.06% (5)
american - 0.06% (5)
network - 0.06% (5)
principles - 0.06% (5)
indulge - 0.06% (5)
goddesses - 0.06% (5)
lord - 0.06% (5)
murder - 0.06% (5)
why - 0.06% (5)
allah - 0.06% (5)
 no - 0.06% (5)
is, - 0.06% (5)
equal - 0.06% (5)
prejudice - 0.06% (5)
where - 0.06% (5)
appointed - 0.06% (5)
contrived - 0.06% (5)
children - 0.06% (5)
mother - 0.06% (5)
quran - 0.06% (5)
created - 0.06% (5)
aware - 0.06% (5)
intentional - 0.06% (5)
original - 0.06% (5)
women - 0.06% (5)
note - 0.06% (5)
creator’s - 0.06% (5)
myth - 0.06% (5)
explain - 0.06% (5)
abraham - 0.06% (5)
presented - 0.06% (5)
“holy” - 0.06% (5)
value - 0.06% (5)
self-serving - 0.06% (5)
material - 0.06% (5)
invented - 0.06% (5)
tale - 0.06% (5)
2015 - 0.06% (5)
similar - 0.06% (5)
line - 0.06% (5)
star - 0.06% (5)
made - 0.06% (5)
profile - 0.06% (5)
father - 0.06% (5)
ce) - 0.06% (5)
became - 0.06% (5)
regarded - 0.06% (5)
first - 0.06% (5)
range - 0.06% (5)
routinely - 0.06% (5)
“the - 0.06% (5)
esther - 0.06% (5)
 of - 0.06% (5)
aman - 0.06% (5)
arius - 0.06% (5)
assert - 0.06% (5)
limit - 0.06% (5)
before - 0.06% (5)
various - 0.06% (5)
market - 0.06% (5)
concern - 0.06% (5)
styled - 0.06% (5)
 there - 0.06% (5)
democratic - 0.06% (5)
version - 0.06% (5)
trees - 0.06% (5)
strict - 0.06% (5)
allowed - 0.06% (5)
seen - 0.06% (5)
air - 0.06% (5)
god’s - 0.06% (5)
become - 0.06% (5)
taboo - 0.06% (5)
established - 0.06% (5)
data - 0.06% (5)
source. - 0.06% (5)
rage - 0.06% (5)
reason - 0.06% (5)
lessons - 0.06% (5)
far - 0.06% (5)
labor - 0.06% (5)
actually - 0.06% (5)
hatreds - 0.06% (5)
intended - 0.06% (5)
raise - 0.06% (5)
scrolls - 0.06% (5)
trinity - 0.06% (5)
offer - 0.05% (4)
happened - 0.05% (4)
truth - 0.05% (4)
accounts - 0.05% (4)
power. - 0.05% (4)
based - 0.05% (4)
representatives - 0.05% (4)
peace - 0.05% (4)
named - 0.05% (4)
course. - 0.05% (4)
words - 0.05% (4)
forces - 0.05% (4)
law - 0.05% (4)
actions - 0.05% (4)
does - 0.05% (4)
etc. - 0.05% (4)
imagined - 0.05% (4)
 he - 0.05% (4)
abel - 0.05% (4)
“vision” - 0.05% (4)
used - 0.05% (4)
opening - 0.05% (4)
constellations - 0.05% (4)
systems, - 0.05% (4)
related - 0.05% (4)
hold - 0.05% (4)
“he” - 0.05% (4)
yahweh. - 0.05% (4)
allegedly - 0.05% (4)
premise - 0.05% (4)
that, - 0.05% (4)
connection - 0.05% (4)
will - 0.05% (4)
wisdom - 0.05% (4)
genuine - 0.05% (4)
against - 0.05% (4)
impurity - 0.05% (4)
self-appointed - 0.05% (4)
teachings - 0.05% (4)
passive - 0.05% (4)
disguised - 0.05% (4)
content - 0.05% (4)
creatures - 0.05% (4)
century - 0.05% (4)
make - 0.05% (4)
went - 0.05% (4)
rely - 0.05% (4)
intentionally - 0.05% (4)
image - 0.05% (4)
could - 0.05% (4)
active - 0.05% (4)
myths - 0.05% (4)
search - 0.05% (4)
positions - 0.05% (4)
diversities - 0.05% (4)
promoted - 0.05% (4)
enlightenment. - 0.05% (4)
empire - 0.05% (4)
“sacred” - 0.05% (4)
thousand - 0.05% (4)
flexibility - 0.05% (4)
copies - 0.05% (4)
concerned - 0.05% (4)
universal - 0.05% (4)
tolerance - 0.05% (4)
books - 0.05% (4)
dead - 0.05% (4)
uncertainties - 0.05% (4)
ben - 0.05% (4)
feature - 0.05% (4)
“god - 0.05% (4)
another - 0.05% (4)
nine - 0.05% (4)
followers - 0.05% (4)
should - 0.05% (4)
devised - 0.05% (4)
tales - 0.05% (4)
highly - 0.05% (4)
setting - 0.05% (4)
system’s - 0.05% (4)
believe - 0.05% (4)
theatrics - 0.05% (4)
tribal - 0.05% (4)
basic - 0.05% (4)
aims - 0.05% (4)
favoritism - 0.05% (4)
universe - 0.05% (4)
born - 0.05% (4)
particular - 0.05% (4)
texts, - 0.05% (4)
(as - 0.05% (4)
 such - 0.05% (4)
fashioned - 0.05% (4)
by-the-book - 0.05% (4)
life’s - 0.05% (4)
heavy - 0.05% (4)
polar - 0.05% (4)
around - 0.05% (4)
though - 0.05% (4)
mass - 0.05% (4)
today, - 0.05% (4)
condition - 0.05% (4)
say - 0.05% (4)
service - 0.05% (4)
consequently - 0.05% (4)
aver - 0.05% (4)
special - 0.05% (4)
colored - 0.05% (4)
world - 0.05% (4)
jesus - 0.05% (4)
manner - 0.05% (4)
babylonian - 0.05% (4)
raised - 0.05% (4)
lists - 0.05% (4)
long - 0.05% (4)
negative - 0.05% (4)
bible, - 0.05% (4)
social - 0.05% (4)
man’s - 0.05% (4)
focus - 0.05% (4)
chose - 0.05% (4)
timeframe - 0.05% (4)
haman - 0.05% (4)
history - 0.05% (4)
throughout - 0.05% (4)
wordpress.com - 0.05% (4)
wonder - 0.05% (4)
faith, - 0.05% (4)
church - 0.04% (3)
land - 0.04% (3)
approach - 0.04% (3)
worked - 0.04% (3)
select - 0.04% (3)
national - 0.04% (3)
deceptive - 0.04% (3)
one. - 0.04% (3)
punishment - 0.04% (3)
 or - 0.04% (3)
presenting - 0.04% (3)
sexual - 0.04% (3)
council - 0.04% (3)
later, - 0.04% (3)
(an - 0.04% (3)
bush - 0.04% (3)
method - 0.04% (3)
men, - 0.04% (3)
buy - 0.04% (3)
rake - 0.04% (3)
association - 0.04% (3)
jehovah - 0.04% (3)
fruit - 0.04% (3)
angels - 0.04% (3)
different - 0.04% (3)
knew - 0.04% (3)
disguised. - 0.04% (3)
 every - 0.04% (3)
eve, - 0.04% (3)
eve’s - 0.04% (3)
lack - 0.04% (3)
represented - 0.04% (3)
natural - 0.04% (3)
demand - 0.04% (3)
business - 0.04% (3)
product - 0.04% (3)
discrimination - 0.04% (3)
commercial - 0.04% (3)
chosen - 0.04% (3)
atheist - 0.04% (3)
designed - 0.04% (3)
down - 0.04% (3)
accepted - 0.04% (3)
textural - 0.04% (3)
humans - 0.04% (3)
testament - 0.04% (3)
faithful - 0.04% (3)
commonly - 0.04% (3)
praised - 0.04% (3)
constant - 0.04% (3)
scriptures, - 0.04% (3)
older - 0.04% (3)
school - 0.04% (3)
code - 0.04% (3)
deliberate - 0.04% (3)
manifestation - 0.04% (3)
near - 0.04% (3)
since - 0.04% (3)
feminine - 0.04% (3)
ceremonies - 0.04% (3)
righteous - 0.04% (3)
meant - 0.04% (3)
sect - 0.04% (3)
fundamentalists - 0.04% (3)
pagans - 0.04% (3)
cut - 0.04% (3)
matthew - 0.04% (3)
noted - 0.04% (3)
something - 0.04% (3)
originate - 0.04% (3)
foundation - 0.04% (3)
aimed - 0.04% (3)
policy - 0.04% (3)
implied - 0.04% (3)
compassion - 0.04% (3)
experience - 0.04% (3)
examples - 0.04% (3)
last - 0.04% (3)
pray - 0.04% (3)
acts - 0.04% (3)
interrelated - 0.04% (3)
sister - 0.04% (3)
message - 0.04% (3)
possess - 0.04% (3)
cultures, - 0.04% (3)
honor - 0.04% (3)
love, - 0.04% (3)
recognize - 0.04% (3)
indoctrinate - 0.04% (3)
all-inclusive - 0.04% (3)
garden - 0.04% (3)
practiced - 0.04% (3)
slaughter - 0.04% (3)
matter - 0.04% (3)
averred - 0.04% (3)
play - 0.04% (3)
fear - 0.04% (3)
killed - 0.04% (3)
“spirit” - 0.04% (3)
divisions - 0.04% (3)
heavens - 0.04% (3)
obsessed - 0.04% (3)
second - 0.04% (3)
mouth - 0.04% (3)
figure - 0.04% (3)
expression - 0.04% (3)
said - 0.04% (3)
structured - 0.04% (3)
 their - 0.04% (3)
aquarius - 0.04% (3)
 as - 0.04% (3)
symbols - 0.04% (3)
man-contrived - 0.04% (3)
prophetic - 0.04% (3)
water - 0.04% (3)
lying - 0.04% (3)
 his - 0.04% (3)
source-power - 0.04% (3)
human-like - 0.04% (3)
idea - 0.04% (3)
using - 0.04% (3)
few - 0.04% (3)
rituals - 0.04% (3)
left - 0.04% (3)
priest-author - 0.04% (3)
government - 0.04% (3)
manifested - 0.04% (3)
continue - 0.04% (3)
bronze - 0.04% (3)
living - 0.04% (3)
influence - 0.04% (3)
(in - 0.04% (3)
wings - 0.04% (3)
scorpio - 0.04% (3)
posturing - 0.04% (3)
merchant - 0.04% (3)
 each - 0.04% (3)
relay - 0.04% (3)
major - 0.04% (3)
he, - 0.04% (3)
contained - 0.04% (3)
humankind - 0.04% (3)
books. - 0.04% (3)
eagle - 0.04% (3)
bearing - 0.04% (3)
forth - 0.04% (3)
held - 0.04% (3)
verses - 0.04% (3)
“o - 0.04% (3)
taurus - 0.04% (3)
muslim - 0.04% (3)
theorized - 0.04% (3)
astronomy - 0.04% (3)
earth - 0.04% (3)
knowing) - 0.04% (3)
(all - 0.04% (3)
creator. - 0.04% (3)
all-embracing - 0.04% (3)
leo - 0.04% (3)
fail - 0.04% (3)
prophecies - 0.04% (3)
believer - 0.04% (3)
given - 0.04% (3)
all, - 0.04% (3)
indulging - 0.04% (3)
histories - 0.04% (3)
higher - 0.04% (3)
because - 0.04% (3)
 god - 0.04% (3)
“person” - 0.04% (3)
tribute - 0.04% (3)
court - 0.04% (3)
false - 0.04% (3)
termed - 0.04% (3)
rather - 0.04% (3)
broadcast - 0.04% (3)
fulfill - 0.04% (3)
scriptural - 0.04% (3)
narrow - 0.04% (3)
 so - 0.04% (3)
morality, - 0.04% (3)
seems - 0.04% (3)
witness - 0.04% (3)
creation’s - 0.04% (3)
“revealed” - 0.04% (3)
man-concocted - 0.04% (3)
bce). - 0.04% (3)
cover - 0.04% (3)
jeremiah - 0.04% (3)
during - 0.04% (3)
plot - 0.04% (3)
began - 0.04% (3)
republican - 0.04% (3)
headed - 0.04% (3)
having - 0.04% (3)
heart - 0.04% (3)
tempting - 0.04% (3)
editor - 0.04% (3)
practices - 0.04% (3)
lead - 0.04% (3)
referred - 0.04% (3)
awareness - 0.04% (3)
anyone - 0.04% (3)
cable - 0.04% (3)
strange - 0.04% (3)
conflicts. - 0.04% (3)
“biblical - 0.04% (3)
impose - 0.04% (3)
means - 0.04% (3)
claims - 0.04% (3)
varied - 0.04% (3)
certainly - 0.04% (3)
saw - 0.04% (3)
interactions - 0.04% (3)
cannot - 0.04% (3)
prejudices - 0.04% (3)
stage - 0.04% (3)
explained - 0.04% (3)
everything - 0.04% (3)
prophet, - 0.04% (3)
taught - 0.04% (3)
study - 0.04% (3)
period - 0.04% (3)
general - 0.04% (3)
didn’t - 0.04% (3)
ethical - 0.04% (3)
male - 0.04% (3)
system. - 0.04% (3)
man-invented - 0.04% (3)
happens - 0.04% (3)
noted, - 0.02% (2)
powers - 0.02% (2)
allows - 0.02% (2)
naked - 0.02% (2)
intimate - 0.02% (2)
belittle - 0.02% (2)
earliest - 0.02% (2)
illustrations - 0.02% (2)
defined - 0.02% (2)
exploit - 0.02% (2)
devotion - 0.02% (2)
people” - 0.02% (2)
abraham, - 0.02% (2)
produce - 0.02% (2)
ancestors - 0.02% (2)
played - 0.02% (2)
dominate - 0.02% (2)
attempt - 0.02% (2)
theatrical - 0.02% (2)
random, - 0.02% (2)
exclusive - 0.02% (2)
romans - 0.02% (2)
deliberately - 0.02% (2)
jews. - 0.02% (2)
destroy - 0.02% (2)
man-devised - 0.02% (2)
access - 0.02% (2)
evolution - 0.02% (2)
your - 0.02% (2)
atheist, - 0.02% (2)
crafted - 0.02% (2)
formalized - 0.02% (2)
“chosen - 0.02% (2)
control - 0.02% (2)
demonstrate - 0.02% (2)
choose - 0.02% (2)
 with - 0.02% (2)
rites, - 0.02% (2)
offered - 0.02% (2)
basically - 0.02% (2)
developed - 0.02% (2)
monotheism, - 0.02% (2)
benefit - 0.02% (2)
turn, - 0.02% (2)
above - 0.02% (2)
others. - 0.02% (2)
“face” - 0.02% (2)
repeated - 0.02% (2)
bald - 0.02% (2)
woman - 0.02% (2)
half - 0.02% (2)
david - 0.02% (2)
 by - 0.02% (2)
north - 0.02% (2)
over. - 0.02% (2)
chapter - 0.02% (2)
pretentiousness - 0.02% (2)
following - 0.02% (2)
declares - 0.02% (2)
husband - 0.02% (2)
violence - 0.02% (2)
“as - 0.02% (2)
awe - 0.02% (2)
further - 0.02% (2)
exiles - 0.02% (2)
homicide - 0.02% (2)
need - 0.02% (2)
plan - 0.02% (2)
help - 0.02% (2)
israelites - 0.02% (2)
side; - 0.02% (2)
tales, - 0.02% (2)
finite - 0.02% (2)
 consequently - 0.02% (2)
images - 0.02% (2)
behavior - 0.02% (2)
holiness - 0.02% (2)
photos - 0.02% (2)
shelfari - 0.02% (2)
goodreads - 0.02% (2)
priestly - 0.02% (2)
conditioned - 0.02% (2)
rss - 0.02% (2)
wordpress.com. - 0.02% (2)
scripture, - 0.02% (2)
middle - 0.02% (2)
favorite - 0.02% (2)
carried - 0.02% (2)
captive - 0.02% (2)
(bull - 0.02% (2)
 certain - 0.02% (2)
babylonia, - 0.02% (2)
man-made - 0.02% (2)
 omniscient - 0.02% (2)
 after - 0.02% (2)
lure - 0.02% (2)
pages - 0.02% (2)
entries - 0.02% (2)
babylonia. - 0.02% (2)
jerusalem - 0.02% (2)
laws - 0.02% (2)
taken - 0.02% (2)
spirit. - 0.02% (2)
faiths - 0.02% (2)
person”, - 0.02% (2)
mohammad’s - 0.02% (2)
avow - 0.02% (2)
course, - 0.02% (2)
psalms - 0.02% (2)
charge - 0.02% (2)
combat - 0.02% (2)
viewed - 0.02% (2)
representing - 0.02% (2)
nations - 0.02% (2)
prince - 0.02% (2)
manifestations - 0.02% (2)
self-proclaimed - 0.02% (2)
bring - 0.02% (2)
achieving - 0.02% (2)
events - 0.02% (2)
 instead - 0.02% (2)
either - 0.02% (2)
ceremonies, - 0.02% (2)
brutal - 0.02% (2)
“sins” - 0.02% (2)
shameless - 0.02% (2)
creation. - 0.02% (2)
dogmatism - 0.02% (2)
letter - 0.02% (2)
got - 0.02% (2)
record - 0.02% (2)
 we - 0.02% (2)
reference - 0.02% (2)
find - 0.02% (2)
 cain - 0.02% (2)
quarterly - 0.02% (2)
prehistory - 0.02% (2)
jealous - 0.02% (2)
slit - 0.02% (2)
expected - 0.02% (2)
food - 0.02% (2)
accounts. - 0.02% (2)
composite - 0.02% (2)
brethren - 0.02% (2)
figures - 0.02% (2)
preparation - 0.02% (2)
openly - 0.02% (2)
greed - 0.02% (2)
here. - 0.02% (2)
fellow - 0.02% (2)
guidance - 0.02% (2)
 (the - 0.02% (2)
stars - 0.02% (2)
brotherly - 0.02% (2)
seriously - 0.02% (2)
 unfortunately - 0.02% (2)
slowly - 0.02% (2)
cancer - 0.02% (2)
beliefs - 0.02% (2)
purpose, - 0.02% (2)
actively - 0.02% (2)
stance - 0.02% (2)
credit - 0.02% (2)
encouraged - 0.02% (2)
nonetheless - 0.02% (2)
evolving - 0.02% (2)
strictly - 0.02% (2)
rise - 0.02% (2)
anti-constitutional - 0.02% (2)
 later, - 0.02% (2)
civil - 0.02% (2)
1985 - 0.02% (2)
$14 - 0.02% (2)
evangelical - 0.02% (2)
reverend - 0.02% (2)
heads - 0.02% (2)
heavenly - 0.02% (2)
craze - 0.02% (2)
sought - 0.02% (2)
separation - 0.02% (2)
enlightenment, - 0.02% (2)
brute - 0.02% (2)
get - 0.02% (2)
isaac - 0.02% (2)
fundamentalism - 0.02% (2)
perhaps - 0.02% (2)
measure - 0.02% (2)
instruction - 0.02% (2)
“test” - 0.02% (2)
instill - 0.02% (2)
directly - 0.02% (2)
whatever - 0.02% (2)
excuse - 0.02% (2)
messenger - 0.02% (2)
judged - 0.02% (2)
absolutely - 0.02% (2)
agitator - 0.02% (2)
obey - 0.02% (2)
outfit - 0.02% (2)
lahaye - 0.02% (2)
regulations - 0.02% (2)
existence - 0.02% (2)
corrupt - 0.02% (2)
preached - 0.02% (2)
merchants - 0.02% (2)
expressions. - 0.02% (2)
function - 0.02% (2)
pat - 0.02% (2)
research - 0.02% (2)
composed - 0.02% (2)
teams - 0.02% (2)
mix - 0.02% (2)
dared - 0.02% (2)
prophets - 0.02% (2)
news - 0.02% (2)
taking - 0.02% (2)
it, - 0.02% (2)
education - 0.02% (2)
persons - 0.02% (2)
 they - 0.02% (2)
on.” - 0.02% (2)
modern - 0.02% (2)
staunch - 0.02% (2)
caring - 0.02% (2)
declared, - 0.02% (2)
sun - 0.02% (2)
 not - 0.02% (2)
questionable - 0.02% (2)
plotting - 0.02% (2)
robertson’s - 0.02% (2)
leader - 0.02% (2)
hard - 0.02% (2)
george - 0.02% (2)
money - 0.02% (2)
department - 0.02% (2)
logical - 0.02% (2)
politics - 0.02% (2)
fiery - 0.02% (2)
characterized - 0.02% (2)
 robertson - 0.02% (2)
“liberty” - 0.02% (2)
especial - 0.02% (2)
person’s - 0.02% (2)
nets - 0.02% (2)
featured - 0.02% (2)
so-called - 0.02% (2)
 take - 0.02% (2)
values - 0.02% (2)
nation’s - 0.02% (2)
peddling - 0.02% (2)
philosophy - 0.02% (2)
pulls - 0.02% (2)
university - 0.02% (2)
type - 0.02% (2)
propaganda - 0.02% (2)
schools - 0.02% (2)
falwell - 0.02% (2)
marketed - 0.02% (2)
rights - 0.02% (2)
opinion - 0.02% (2)
allah, - 0.02% (2)
9th/8th - 0.02% (2)
really - 0.02% (2)
presents - 0.02% (2)
indulged - 0.02% (2)
translators - 0.02% (2)
standard - 0.02% (2)
cloud - 0.02% (2)
culture’s - 0.02% (2)
works - 0.02% (2)
manipulative - 0.02% (2)
dreamed - 0.02% (2)
meaning - 0.02% (2)
served - 0.02% (2)
organized - 0.02% (2)
copies. - 0.02% (2)
occurred - 0.02% (2)
negatively - 0.02% (2)
approached - 0.02% (2)
genesis, - 0.02% (2)
ecclesiastes - 0.02% (2)
brain - 0.02% (2)
necessary - 0.02% (2)
age-old - 0.02% (2)
advantage - 0.02% (2)
yet - 0.02% (2)
thoughts - 0.02% (2)
word. - 0.02% (2)
indoctrinated - 0.02% (2)
victim - 0.02% (2)
games. - 0.02% (2)
themselves - 0.02% (2)
differences - 0.02% (2)
considered - 0.02% (2)
seekers. - 0.02% (2)
rewritten - 0.02% (2)
load - 0.02% (2)
handiwork - 0.02% (2)
class - 0.02% (2)
subsequent - 0.02% (2)
scholars - 0.02% (2)
sustaining - 0.02% (2)
expressed - 0.02% (2)
resulted - 0.02% (2)
relation - 0.02% (2)
carefully - 0.02% (2)
likes, - 0.02% (2)
hover - 0.02% (2)
region - 0.02% (2)
fall - 0.02% (2)
number - 0.02% (2)
species - 0.02% (2)
short - 0.02% (2)
small - 0.02% (2)
process - 0.02% (2)
outright - 0.02% (2)
put - 0.02% (2)
privileged - 0.02% (2)
unseen - 0.02% (2)
respected - 0.02% (2)
interpreters - 0.02% (2)
observable - 0.02% (2)
“gods” - 0.02% (2)
originated - 0.02% (2)
group - 0.02% (2)
wife - 0.02% (2)
doubt - 0.02% (2)
relayed - 0.02% (2)
limited - 0.02% (2)
course) - 0.02% (2)
why, - 0.02% (2)
focal - 0.02% (2)
(all-knowing) - 0.02% (2)
depicted - 0.02% (2)
directives - 0.02% (2)
authors, - 0.02% (2)
averred, - 0.02% (2)
witnessed - 0.02% (2)
100 - 0.02% (2)
muslims - 0.02% (2)
numerous - 0.02% (2)
luke - 0.02% (2)
insight - 0.02% (2)
bestowed - 0.02% (2)
identical - 0.02% (2)
rank - 0.02% (2)
conduct, - 0.02% (2)
acting - 0.02% (2)
assessed - 0.02% (2)
strangely - 0.02% (2)
nature. - 0.02% (2)
murderous - 0.02% (2)
proverbs - 0.02% (2)
seven - 0.02% (2)
asserted - 0.02% (2)
proud - 0.02% (2)
gregory - 0.02% (2)
attributes - 0.02% (2)
energies, - 0.02% (2)
recognized - 0.02% (2)
editors - 0.02% (2)
innocent - 0.02% (2)
clever - 0.02% (2)
status - 0.02% (2)
hands - 0.02% (2)
demoting - 0.02% (2)
scheme - 0.02% (2)
(or - 0.02% (2)
of the - 0.78% (64)
in the - 0.51% (42)
faith system - 0.45% (37)
as the - 0.33% (27)
or the - 0.31% (25)
at the - 0.29% (24)
and the - 0.27% (22)
for the - 0.27% (22)
faith systems - 0.26% (21)
on the - 0.24% (20)
that the - 0.23% (19)
to the - 0.22% (18)
is the - 0.21% (17)
which is - 0.18% (15)
for example, - 0.18% (15)
from the - 0.16% (13)
by the - 0.16% (13)
was the - 0.15% (12)
have been - 0.13% (11)
it was - 0.13% (11)
with the - 0.12% (10)
the creator - 0.12% (10)
the priest - 0.12% (10)
 for example, - 0.11% (9)
upon the - 0.11% (9)
that a - 0.11% (9)
which a - 0.11% (9)
as being - 0.1% (8)
and eve - 0.1% (8)
a year - 0.1% (8)
there is - 0.1% (8)
of these - 0.1% (8)
that is - 0.1% (8)
the alleged - 0.09% (7)
posted in - 0.09% (7)
all the - 0.09% (7)
by chouck017894 - 0.09% (7)
which the - 0.09% (7)
to have - 0.09% (7)
of his - 0.09% (7)
and in - 0.09% (7)
leave a - 0.09% (7)
of all - 0.09% (7)
a comment - 0.09% (7)
 and the - 0.09% (7)
comment » - 0.09% (7)
life principle - 0.09% (7)
million a - 0.09% (7)
if the - 0.07% (6)
of creation - 0.07% (6)
time frames - 0.07% (6)
the hebrew - 0.07% (6)
in their - 0.07% (6)
corporate style - 0.07% (6)
the most - 0.07% (6)
holy word - 0.07% (6)
from a - 0.07% (6)
of course - 0.07% (6)
was to - 0.07% (6)
of life - 0.07% (6)
and god - 0.07% (6)
2017 by - 0.07% (6)
the face - 0.07% (6)
face of - 0.07% (6)
the creative - 0.07% (6)
pagan gods - 0.06% (5)
the pagan - 0.06% (5)
 in the - 0.06% (5)
 it is - 0.06% (5)
there are - 0.06% (5)
western cultures - 0.06% (5)
ethics and - 0.06% (5)
the three - 0.06% (5)
a year. - 0.06% (5)
and it - 0.06% (5)
sacred texts - 0.06% (5)
the life - 0.06% (5)
 this is - 0.06% (5)
each of - 0.06% (5)
happen to - 0.06% (5)
had the - 0.06% (5)
of any - 0.06% (5)
the four - 0.06% (5)
frames and - 0.06% (5)
has been - 0.06% (5)
and taboo - 0.06% (5)
taboo data - 0.06% (5)
the same - 0.06% (5)
a wheel - 0.06% (5)
in over - 0.06% (5)
god is - 0.05% (4)
the lord - 0.05% (4)
systems which - 0.05% (4)
in every - 0.05% (4)
written “holy” - 0.05% (4)
that creative - 0.05% (4)
his own - 0.05% (4)
the nation - 0.05% (4)
the opening - 0.05% (4)
systems have - 0.05% (4)
personified as - 0.05% (4)
of which - 0.05% (4)
faith systems, - 0.05% (4)
when the - 0.05% (4)
the priests - 0.05% (4)
in what - 0.05% (4)
away from - 0.05% (4)
and his - 0.05% (4)
faith system’s - 0.05% (4)
of yahweh - 0.05% (4)
and goddesses - 0.05% (4)
and that - 0.05% (4)
does not - 0.05% (4)
which was - 0.05% (4)
use of - 0.05% (4)
the prophet - 0.05% (4)
which all - 0.05% (4)
be the - 0.05% (4)
the jewish - 0.05% (4)
into the - 0.05% (4)
creative power - 0.05% (4)
the quran - 0.05% (4)
which we - 0.05% (4)
adam and - 0.05% (4)
and all - 0.05% (4)
that those - 0.05% (4)
the ancient - 0.05% (4)
of their - 0.05% (4)
what the - 0.05% (4)
of genesis - 0.05% (4)
under the - 0.05% (4)
in his - 0.05% (4)
out of - 0.05% (4)
  the - 0.05% (4)
one of - 0.05% (4)
 and there - 0.05% (4)
a “biblical - 0.04% (3)
which they - 0.04% (3)
belief, bible, - 0.04% (3)
and spiritual - 0.04% (3)
was not - 0.04% (3)
point of - 0.04% (3)
bronze age - 0.04% (3)
of holy - 0.04% (3)
more than - 0.04% (3)
and their - 0.04% (3)
and variety - 0.04% (3)
must be - 0.04% (3)
in all - 0.04% (3)
through a - 0.04% (3)
is never - 0.04% (3)
that god - 0.04% (3)
the creator’s - 0.04% (3)
styled faith - 0.04% (3)
only one - 0.04% (3)
of true - 0.04% (3)
among the - 0.04% (3)
to what - 0.04% (3)
was that - 0.04% (3)
supreme court - 0.04% (3)
which are - 0.04% (3)
sacred texts, - 0.04% (3)
had no - 0.04% (3)
the new - 0.04% (3)
book of - 0.04% (3)
which have - 0.04% (3)
example, in - 0.04% (3)
is routinely - 0.04% (3)
this was - 0.04% (3)
the yahweh - 0.04% (3)
which were - 0.04% (3)
priest authors - 0.04% (3)
for that - 0.04% (3)
priests of - 0.04% (3)
premise of - 0.04% (3)
yahweh priest - 0.04% (3)
the many - 0.04% (3)
only a - 0.04% (3)
that all - 0.04% (3)
that would - 0.04% (3)
that our - 0.04% (3)
things are - 0.04% (3)
christian broadcast - 0.04% (3)
corporate styled - 0.04% (3)
most part - 0.04% (3)
and morality, - 0.04% (3)
man-contrived faith - 0.04% (3)
is commonly - 0.04% (3)
the family - 0.04% (3)
for such - 0.04% (3)
known as - 0.04% (3)
the western - 0.04% (3)
to all - 0.04% (3)
upon a - 0.04% (3)
principles of - 0.04% (3)
“biblical based - 0.04% (3)
and with - 0.04% (3)
the right - 0.04% (3)
jewish trinity - 0.04% (3)
the supreme - 0.04% (3)
fact that - 0.04% (3)
all man-concocted - 0.04% (3)
a priest - 0.04% (3)
hatred is - 0.04% (3)
from an - 0.04% (3)
during the - 0.04% (3)
faith system. - 0.04% (3)
man-concocted faith - 0.04% (3)
would be - 0.04% (3)
the only - 0.04% (3)
do not - 0.04% (3)
diversity and - 0.04% (3)
the universe - 0.04% (3)
colored by - 0.04% (3)
the will - 0.04% (3)
that were - 0.04% (3)
he principle - 0.04% (3)
happened to - 0.04% (3)
attain the - 0.04% (3)
 thus the - 0.04% (3)
of spirit - 0.04% (3)
the name - 0.04% (3)
what is - 0.04% (3)
each and - 0.04% (3)
the authors - 0.04% (3)
religion, sacred - 0.04% (3)
the heavens - 0.04% (3)
for it - 0.04% (3)
time to - 0.04% (3)
1, 2017 - 0.04% (3)
of this - 0.04% (3)
was then - 0.04% (3)
divisions of - 0.04% (3)
was regarded - 0.04% (3)
in genesis - 0.04% (3)
cannot be - 0.04% (3)
happens to - 0.04% (3)
they went - 0.04% (3)
which just - 0.04% (3)
in those - 0.04% (3)
marketed as - 0.02% (2)
necessary for - 0.02% (2)
of esther - 0.02% (2)
being was - 0.02% (2)
account of - 0.02% (2)
within that - 0.02% (2)
rites, rituals - 0.02% (2)
the passive - 0.02% (2)
in place - 0.02% (2)
and they - 0.02% (2)
we have - 0.02% (2)
is basically - 0.02% (2)
the middle - 0.02% (2)
he who - 0.02% (2)
over the - 0.02% (2)
atheist, belief, - 0.02% (2)
upon which - 0.02% (2)
trinity concept - 0.02% (2)
 that is - 0.02% (2)
to attain - 0.02% (2)
set in - 0.02% (2)
offered is - 0.02% (2)
a higher - 0.02% (2)
is not - 0.02% (2)
every one - 0.02% (2)
diversity which - 0.02% (2)
served as - 0.02% (2)
principle by - 0.02% (2)
 thus it - 0.02% (2)
“sacred” texts - 0.02% (2)
second “person” - 0.02% (2)
in constant - 0.02% (2)
their own - 0.02% (2)
the words - 0.02% (2)
age tribal - 0.02% (2)
to hover - 0.02% (2)
because the - 0.02% (2)
as either - 0.02% (2)
any of - 0.02% (2)
the christian - 0.02% (2)
and varied - 0.02% (2)
hebrew scriptures, - 0.02% (2)
through which - 0.02% (2)
many uncertainties - 0.02% (2)
declared to - 0.02% (2)
the declared - 0.02% (2)
declared meaning - 0.02% (2)
supreme being - 0.02% (2)
a number - 0.02% (2)
personal connection - 0.02% (2)
than any - 0.02% (2)
has become - 0.02% (2)
holy word. - 0.02% (2)
accepted as - 0.02% (2)
be termed - 0.02% (2)
and even - 0.02% (2)
more often - 0.02% (2)
the events - 0.02% (2)
was always - 0.02% (2)
said to - 0.02% (2)
for what - 0.02% (2)
as holy - 0.02% (2)
promoted as - 0.02% (2)
was theorized - 0.02% (2)
seekers with - 0.02% (2)
some scholars - 0.02% (2)
seekers a - 0.02% (2)
man-invented faith - 0.02% (2)
timeframe of - 0.02% (2)
concept of - 0.02% (2)
bce).  ezekiel - 0.02% (2)
the israelites - 0.02% (2)
children and - 0.02% (2)
god to - 0.02% (2)
as one - 0.02% (2)
them to - 0.02% (2)
cain was - 0.02% (2)
in regard - 0.02% (2)
and eve, - 0.02% (2)
 this was - 0.02% (2)
trees as - 0.02% (2)
absolutely no - 0.02% (2)
to babylonia. - 0.02% (2)
rather than - 0.02% (2)
ezekiel was - 0.02% (2)
and abel - 0.02% (2)
who had - 0.02% (2)
character of - 0.02% (2)
man-written “holy” - 0.02% (2)
texts, scriptures - 0.02% (2)
a man-made - 0.02% (2)
omniscient (all-knowing) - 0.02% (2)
about the - 0.02% (2)
blog at - 0.02% (2)
at wordpress.com. - 0.02% (2)
data blog - 0.02% (2)
hebrew scripture, - 0.02% (2)
a person - 0.02% (2)
middle of - 0.02% (2)
and diversity - 0.02% (2)
his two - 0.02% (2)
who is - 0.02% (2)
are to - 0.02% (2)
is always - 0.02% (2)
system is - 0.02% (2)
man-made faith - 0.02% (2)
following some - 0.02% (2)
placed in - 0.02% (2)
years before - 0.02% (2)
representatives of - 0.02% (2)
the self-appointed - 0.02% (2)
also had - 0.02% (2)
and brotherly - 0.02% (2)
to make - 0.02% (2)
seekers to - 0.02% (2)
not the - 0.02% (2)
from their - 0.02% (2)
intended diversities - 0.02% (2)
only if - 0.02% (2)
chouck017894 for - 0.02% (2)
these three - 0.02% (2)
which used - 0.02% (2)
 for the - 0.02% (2)
fail to - 0.02% (2)
prehistory lessons - 0.02% (2)
is averred - 0.02% (2)
policy which - 0.02% (2)
power which - 0.02% (2)
four had - 0.02% (2)
imagined to - 0.02% (2)
like the - 0.02% (2)
in any - 0.02% (2)
or she - 0.02% (2)
search for - 0.02% (2)
of corporate - 0.02% (2)
three thousand - 0.02% (2)
structured faith - 0.02% (2)
his visions - 0.02% (2)
way the - 0.02% (2)
are the - 0.02% (2)
the truth - 0.02% (2)
always in - 0.02% (2)
of brutal - 0.02% (2)
before that - 0.02% (2)
creation had - 0.02% (2)
cut them - 0.02% (2)
how the - 0.02% (2)
and to - 0.02% (2)
hebrew symbol - 0.02% (2)
events of - 0.02% (2)
favoritism of - 0.02% (2)
that source-power - 0.02% (2)
a human-like - 0.02% (2)
network news - 0.02% (2)
born again - 0.02% (2)
george w. - 0.02% (2)
news teams - 0.02% (2)
broadcast network - 0.02% (2)
robertson’s christian - 0.02% (2)
idea of - 0.02% (2)
to his - 0.02% (2)
rights of - 0.02% (2)
hatred toward - 0.02% (2)
life expression - 0.02% (2)
placed upon - 0.02% (2)
of how - 0.02% (2)
from god - 0.02% (2)
variety of - 0.02% (2)
department of - 0.02% (2)
type of - 0.02% (2)
man who - 0.02% (2)
just happened - 0.02% (2)
 such a - 0.02% (2)
intended diversity - 0.02% (2)
of religious - 0.02% (2)
resulted in - 0.02% (2)
on every - 0.02% (2)
the so-called - 0.02% (2)
pulls in - 0.02% (2)
over $14 - 0.02% (2)
focus on - 0.02% (2)
that it - 0.02% (2)
an old - 0.02% (2)
the rights - 0.02% (2)
are not - 0.02% (2)
at that - 0.02% (2)
dared to - 0.02% (2)
always be - 0.02% (2)
is only - 0.02% (2)
say that - 0.02% (2)
they were - 0.02% (2)
creative source - 0.02% (2)
of view - 0.02% (2)
from this - 0.02% (2)
all life’s - 0.02% (2)
me and - 0.02% (2)
his father - 0.02% (2)
of god’s - 0.02% (2)
true spiritual - 0.02% (2)
and so - 0.02% (2)
brute force - 0.02% (2)
enlightenment, and - 0.02% (2)
only from - 0.02% (2)
to understand - 0.02% (2)
have to - 0.02% (2)
why, if - 0.02% (2)
by those - 0.02% (2)
and children - 0.02% (2)
is that - 0.02% (2)
of western - 0.02% (2)
part the - 0.02% (2)
an omniscient - 0.02% (2)
the principles - 0.02% (2)
assessed as - 0.02% (2)
pat robertson - 0.02% (2)
creative life - 0.02% (2)
using that - 0.02% (2)
principle is - 0.02% (2)
the all-embracing - 0.02% (2)
declared that - 0.02% (2)
most of - 0.02% (2)
a biblical - 0.02% (2)
by him - 0.02% (2)
to serve - 0.02% (2)
histories of - 0.02% (2)
varied manifestations - 0.02% (2)
diverse and - 0.02% (2)
toward any - 0.02% (2)
quran there - 0.02% (2)
books.  for - 0.02% (2)
indulging in - 0.02% (2)
all man-written - 0.02% (2)
power.  it - 0.02% (2)
is again - 0.02% (2)
council for - 0.02% (2)
knew that - 0.02% (2)
given with - 0.02% (2)
had been - 0.02% (2)
means to - 0.02% (2)
“chosen people” - 0.02% (2)
throughout the - 0.02% (2)
of ezekiel’s - 0.02% (2)
all life. - 0.02% (2)
universe and - 0.02% (2)
diverse creative - 0.02% (2)
cultures and - 0.02% (2)
the 9th/8th - 0.02% (2)
random, religion, - 0.02% (2)
pagan cultures - 0.02% (2)
century bce - 0.02% (2)
the claim - 0.02% (2)
primal creative - 0.02% (2)
discrimination and - 0.02% (2)
the world - 0.02% (2)
those primal - 0.02% (2)
consequently those - 0.02% (2)
any other - 0.02% (2)
bearing forth - 0.02% (2)
creation of - 0.02% (2)
had not - 0.02% (2)
the political - 0.02% (2)
demoting the - 0.02% (2)
thoughts on - 0.02% (2)
the “he” - 0.02% (2)
dead sea - 0.02% (2)
only through - 0.02% (2)
that creation - 0.02% (2)
bestowed upon - 0.02% (2)
 there a - 0.02% (2)
 the second - 0.02% (2)
creation which - 0.02% (2)
an account - 0.02% (2)
after the - 0.02% (2)
opening of - 0.02% (2)
the reason - 0.02% (2)
were often - 0.02% (2)
interact throughout - 0.02% (2)
human species - 0.02% (2)
in matthew - 0.02% (2)
seem to - 0.02% (2)
faith merchants - 0.02% (2)
that they - 0.02% (2)
may be - 0.02% (2)
claim to - 0.02% (2)
follow the - 0.02% (2)
 and in - 0.02% (2)
little more - 0.02% (2)
in one - 0.02% (2)
for america - 0.02% (2)
concerned women - 0.02% (2)
national policy - 0.02% (2)
women for - 0.02% (2)
$14 million - 0.02% (2)
up the - 0.02% (2)
tim lahaye - 0.02% (2)
for their - 0.02% (2)
on february - 0.02% (2)
is expressed - 0.02% (2)
of hatred - 0.02% (2)
in more - 0.02% (2)
of course) - 0.02% (2)
at adam - 0.02% (2)
interrelated and - 0.02% (2)
creative forces - 0.02% (2)
energies which - 0.02% (2)
 the creative - 0.02% (2)
is also - 0.02% (2)
for having - 0.02% (2)
the story - 0.02% (2)
is thus - 0.02% (2)
allowed the - 0.02% (2)
and diverse - 0.02% (2)
9th/8th century - 0.02% (2)
of divine - 0.02% (2)
his creative - 0.02% (2)
focal point - 0.02% (2)
not omniscient - 0.02% (2)
referred to - 0.02% (2)
leave a comment - 0.09% (7)
a comment » - 0.09% (7)
2017 by chouck017894 - 0.07% (6)
the face of - 0.07% (6)
the life principle - 0.06% (5)
each of these - 0.06% (5)
and taboo data - 0.06% (5)
time frames and - 0.06% (5)
million a year. - 0.05% (4)
faith systems which - 0.05% (4)
which is the - 0.05% (4)
to be the - 0.05% (4)
gods and goddesses - 0.05% (4)
one of the - 0.05% (4)
faith systems have - 0.04% (3)
man-concocted faith systems - 0.04% (3)
man-contrived faith system - 0.04% (3)
1, 2017 by - 0.04% (3)
religion, sacred texts, - 0.04% (3)
priests of yahweh - 0.04% (3)
was to be - 0.04% (3)
a “biblical based - 0.04% (3)
this was a - 0.04% (3)
for example, in - 0.04% (3)
the yahweh priest - 0.04% (3)
in the quran - 0.04% (3)
ethics and morality, - 0.04% (3)
the name of - 0.04% (3)
the will to - 0.04% (3)
 and there is - 0.04% (3)
out of the - 0.04% (3)
of the heavens - 0.04% (3)
had the face - 0.04% (3)
to the king - 0.02% (2)
faith system is - 0.02% (2)
had dared to - 0.02% (2)
is never explained - 0.02% (2)
that creation of - 0.02% (2)
a number of - 0.02% (2)
man-made faith system - 0.02% (2)
to the priest - 0.02% (2)
the 9th/8th century - 0.02% (2)
book of genesis - 0.02% (2)
opening of the - 0.02% (2)
power.  it is - 0.02% (2)
buy time frames - 0.02% (2)
just happens to - 0.02% (2)
of divine discrimination - 0.02% (2)
in the 9th/8th - 0.02% (2)
man-invented faith system. - 0.02% (2)
 thus it is - 0.02% (2)
faith systems of - 0.02% (2)
of all the - 0.02% (2)
and brotherly love - 0.02% (2)
corporate styled faith - 0.02% (2)
which was then - 0.02% (2)
only if the - 0.02% (2)
style faith systems - 0.02% (2)
every man-contrived faith - 0.02% (2)
we have been - 0.02% (2)
of the alleged - 0.02% (2)
the creator of - 0.02% (2)
which have been - 0.02% (2)
bronze age tribal - 0.02% (2)
the declared meaning - 0.02% (2)
the events of - 0.02% (2)
known as the - 0.02% (2)
the hebrew scriptures - 0.02% (2)
in the name - 0.02% (2)
part the three - 0.02% (2)
christian broadcast network - 0.02% (2)
of the supreme - 0.02% (2)
being was theorized - 0.02% (2)
supreme being was - 0.02% (2)
the jewish trinity - 0.02% (2)
saw a wheel - 0.02% (2)
and varied manifestations - 0.02% (2)
through which all - 0.02% (2)
the hebrew symbol - 0.02% (2)
the heavens as - 0.02% (2)
of these four - 0.02% (2)
is referred to - 0.02% (2)
hebrew symbol for - 0.02% (2)
taken from the - 0.02% (2)
variety and diversity - 0.02% (2)
the middle of - 0.02% (2)
sacred texts, scriptures - 0.02% (2)
taboo data blog - 0.02% (2)
the character of - 0.02% (2)
of the most - 0.02% (2)
the four had - 0.02% (2)
imagined to be - 0.02% (2)
in regard to - 0.02% (2)
as one of - 0.02% (2)
 each of these - 0.02% (2)
as a human-like - 0.02% (2)
robertson’s christian broadcast - 0.02% (2)
network news teams - 0.02% (2)
point of view - 0.02% (2)
the authors of - 0.02% (2)
in belief, bible, - 0.02% (2)
focus on the - 0.02% (2)
pulls in over - 0.02% (2)
council for national - 0.02% (2)
in over $14 - 0.02% (2)
concerned women for - 0.02% (2)
for national policy - 0.02% (2)
of the creator’s - 0.02% (2)
the principles of - 0.02% (2)
each and every - 0.02% (2)
creative life principle - 0.02% (2)
hatred toward any - 0.02% (2)
and variety of - 0.02% (2)
life principle is - 0.02% (2)
in the new - 0.02% (2)
the faith system’s - 0.02% (2)
diversity and variety - 0.02% (2)
systems of western - 0.02% (2)
most part the - 0.02% (2)
little more than - 0.02% (2)

Here you can find chart of all your popular one, two and three word phrases. Google and others search engines means your page is about words you use frequently.

Copyright © 2015-2016 hupso.pl. All rights reserved. FB | +G | Twitter

Hupso.pl jest serwisem internetowym, w którym jednym kliknieciem możesz szybko i łatwo sprawdź stronę www pod kątem SEO. Oferujemy darmowe pozycjonowanie stron internetowych oraz wycena domen i stron internetowych. Prowadzimy ranking polskich stron internetowych oraz ranking stron alexa.