5.00 score from hupso.pl for:
timeframesandtaboodata.com



HTML Content


Titletime frames and taboo data blog | the official blog for time frames and taboo data, by c.m. houck.

Length: 98, Words: 19
Description the official blog for time frames and taboo data, by c.m. houck.

Length: 64, Words: 13
Keywords pusty
Robots
Charset UTF-8
Og Meta - Title exist
Og Meta - Description exist
Og Meta - Site name exist
Tytuł powinien zawierać pomiędzy 10 a 70 znaków (ze spacjami), a mniej niż 12 słów w długości.
Meta opis powinien zawierać pomiędzy 50 a 160 znaków (łącznie ze spacjami), a mniej niż 24 słów w długości.
Kodowanie znaków powinny być określone , UTF-8 jest chyba najlepszy zestaw znaków, aby przejść z powodu UTF-8 jest bardziej międzynarodowy kodowaniem.
Otwarte obiekty wykresu powinny być obecne w stronie internetowej (więcej informacji na temat protokołu OpenGraph: http://ogp.me/)

SEO Content

Words/Characters 7106
Text/HTML 51.41 %
Headings H1 1
H2 14
H3 0
H4 0
H5 0
H6 0
H1
time frames and taboo data blog
H2
corporate style faith systems
examples of scriptural immorality
paradox of modern man
faith based fraud in us government
questioning bible style creation
spiritual vanity, the sin of fundamentalism
black holes of religous practices
pages
blogroll
buy the book
social networking
flickr photos
archives
meta
H3
H4
H5
H6
strong
a
:
:
f
m
s
g
;
a
:
b
i
a
:
:
f
m
s
g
;
a
:
em a
:
:
f
m
s
g
;
a
:
Bolds strong 10
b 0
i 10
em 10
Zawartość strony internetowej powinno zawierać więcej niż 250 słów, z stopa tekst / kod jest wyższy niż 20%.
Pozycji używać znaczników (h1, h2, h3, ...), aby określić temat sekcji lub ustępów na stronie, ale zwykle, użyj mniej niż 6 dla każdego tagu pozycje zachować swoją stronę zwięzły.
Styl używać silnych i kursywy znaczniki podkreślić swoje słowa kluczowe swojej stronie, ale nie nadużywać (mniej niż 16 silnych tagi i 16 znaczników kursywy)

Statystyki strony

twitter:title pusty
twitter:description pusty
google+ itemprop=name pusty
Pliki zewnętrzne 26
Pliki CSS 4
Pliki javascript 22
Plik należy zmniejszyć całkowite odwołanie plików (CSS + JavaScript) do 7-8 maksymalnie.

Linki wewnętrzne i zewnętrzne

Linki 196
Linki wewnętrzne 1
Linki zewnętrzne 195
Linki bez atrybutu Title 192
Linki z atrybutem NOFOLLOW 0
Linki - Użyj atrybutu tytuł dla każdego łącza. Nofollow link jest link, który nie pozwala wyszukiwarkom boty zrealizują są odnośniki no follow. Należy zwracać uwagę na ich użytkowania

Linki wewnętrzne

cancel #

Linki zewnętrzne

time frames and taboo data blog https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/
corporate style faith systems https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2017/01/01/corporate-style-faith-systems/
atheist https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/atheist/
belief https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/belief/
ego and belief https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/ego-and-belief/
ethics and morality https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/ethics-and-morality/
monotheism https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/monotheism/
random https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/random/
religion https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/religion/
thoughts https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/thoughts/
leave a comment » https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2017/01/01/corporate-style-faith-systems/#respond
examples of scriptural immorality https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2016/12/01/examples-of-scriptural-immorality/
abraham https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/abraham/
agnostic https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/agnostic/
atheist https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/atheist/
belief https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/belief/
biblical "values" https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/biblical-values/
ethics and morality https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/ethics-and-morality/
religion https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/religion/
scriptures https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/scriptures/
theology https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/theology-2/
leave a comment » https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2016/12/01/examples-of-scriptural-immorality/#respond
paradox of modern man https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2016/11/17/paradox-of-modern-man/
atheist https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/atheist/
belief https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/belief/
enlightenment https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/enlightenment/
faith https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/faith/
life https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/science/life-science/
religion https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/religion/
scriptures https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/scriptures/
thoughts https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/thoughts/
leave a comment » https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2016/11/17/paradox-of-modern-man/#respond
faith based fraud in us government https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2016/11/01/faith-based-fraud-in-us-government/
agnostic https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/agnostic/
atheist https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/atheist/
belief https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/belief/
biblical "values" https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/biblical-values/
christianity https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/christianity/
culture https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/culture/
government https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/government/
politics https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/politics/
random https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/random/
religion https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/religion/
social https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/social/
thoughts https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/thoughts/
leave a comment » https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2016/11/01/faith-based-fraud-in-us-government/#respond
questioning bible style creation https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2016/10/16/questioning-bible-style-creation-2/
agnoticism https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/agnoticism/
atheist https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/atheist/
bible https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/bible/
days of creation https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/days-of-creation/
faith https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/faith/
hebrew scripture https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/hebrew-scripture/
life https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/science/life-science/
prehistory https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/prehistory/
random https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/random/
scriptures https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/scriptures/
theology https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/theology-2/
leave a comment » https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2016/10/16/questioning-bible-style-creation-2/#respond
spiritual vanity, the sin of fundamentalism https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2016/10/01/spiritual-vanity-the-sin-of-fundamentalism/
atheist https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/atheist/
belief https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/belief/
culture https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/culture/
faith https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/faith/
fundamentalism https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/fundamentalism/
humanity https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/humanity/
random https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/random/
religion https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/religion/
theology https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/theology-2/
thoughts https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/thoughts/
leave a comment » https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2016/10/01/spiritual-vanity-the-sin-of-fundamentalism/#respond
black holes of religous practices https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2016/09/17/black-holes-of-religous-practices/
atheist https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/atheist/
belief https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/belief/
biblical "values" https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/biblical-values/
black holes https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/black-holes/
environment https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/environment/
faith https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/faith/
fundamentalism https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/fundamentalism/
religion https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/religion/
thoughts https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/category/thoughts/
leave a comment » https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2016/09/17/black-holes-of-religous-practices/#respond
« older entries https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/page/2/
about the book https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/about/
wordpress.com http://wordpress.com/
wordpress.org http://wordpress.org/
buy time frames and taboo data at barnesandnoble.com http://search.barnesandnoble.com/time-frames-and-taboo-data/c-m-houck/e/9780595677689/?itm=3
- http://www.iuniverse.com/bookstore/bookdetail.aspx?bookid=sku-000036043
buy time frames and taboo data on amazon.com http://www.amazon.com/time-frames-taboo-data-misdirected/dp/059539986x/ref=sr_1_5?ie=utf8&s=books&qid=1235598055&sr=1-5
facebook profile http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1469708115&ref=name
goodreads http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/4240601.time_frames_and_taboo_data_a_history_of_mankind_s_misdirected_beliefs
goodreads profile http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/2072644
librarything profile http://www.librarything.com/profile/chouck017894
myspace profile http://www.myspace.com/timeframesandtaboodata
shelfari http://www.shelfari.com/books/1996292/time-frames-and-taboo-data-a-history-of-mankind-s-misdirected-be
shelfari profile http://www.shelfari.com/timeframesandtaboodata
twitter https://twitter.com/chouck017894
- https://www.flickr.com/photos/35617818@n02/3298666936/
more photos https://www.flickr.com/photos/35617818@n02/
january 2017 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2017/01/
december 2016 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2016/12/
november 2016 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2016/11/
october 2016 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2016/10/
september 2016 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2016/09/
august 2016 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2016/08/
july 2016 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2016/07/
june 2016 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2016/06/
may 2016 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2016/05/
april 2016 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2016/04/
march 2016 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2016/03/
february 2016 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2016/02/
january 2016 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2016/01/
december 2015 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2015/12/
march 2015 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2015/03/
february 2015 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2015/02/
january 2015 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2015/01/
december 2014 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2014/12/
november 2014 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2014/11/
october 2014 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2014/10/
september 2014 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2014/09/
august 2014 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2014/08/
july 2014 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2014/07/
june 2014 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2014/06/
may 2014 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2014/05/
april 2014 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2014/04/
march 2014 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2014/03/
february 2014 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2014/02/
january 2014 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2014/01/
december 2013 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2013/12/
november 2013 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2013/11/
october 2013 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2013/10/
september 2013 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2013/09/
august 2013 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2013/08/
july 2013 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2013/07/
june 2013 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2013/06/
may 2013 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2013/05/
april 2013 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2013/04/
march 2013 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2013/03/
february 2013 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2013/02/
january 2013 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2013/01/
december 2012 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2012/12/
november 2012 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2012/11/
october 2012 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2012/10/
september 2012 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2012/09/
august 2012 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2012/08/
july 2012 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2012/07/
june 2012 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2012/06/
may 2012 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2012/05/
april 2012 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2012/04/
march 2012 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2012/03/
february 2012 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2012/02/
january 2012 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2012/01/
december 2011 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2011/12/
november 2011 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2011/11/
october 2011 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2011/10/
september 2011 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2011/09/
august 2011 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2011/08/
july 2011 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2011/07/
june 2011 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2011/06/
may 2011 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2011/05/
april 2011 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2011/04/
march 2011 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2011/03/
february 2011 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2011/02/
january 2011 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2011/01/
december 2010 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2010/12/
november 2010 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2010/11/
october 2010 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2010/10/
september 2010 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2010/09/
august 2010 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2010/08/
july 2010 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2010/07/
june 2010 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2010/06/
may 2010 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2010/05/
april 2010 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2010/04/
march 2010 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2010/03/
february 2010 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2010/02/
january 2010 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2010/01/
december 2009 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2009/12/
november 2009 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2009/11/
october 2009 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2009/10/
september 2009 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2009/09/
august 2009 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2009/08/
july 2009 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2009/07/
june 2009 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2009/06/
may 2009 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2009/05/
april 2009 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2009/04/
march 2009 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2009/03/
february 2009 https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/2009/02/
register https://wordpress.com/start?ref=wplogin
log in https://timeframesandtaboodata.wordpress.com/wp-login.php
entries rss https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/feed/
comments rss https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/comments/feed/
wordpress.com https://wordpress.com/
create a free website or blog at wordpress.com. https://wordpress.com/?ref=footer_website
time frames and taboo data blog https://timeframesandtaboodata.com/
create a free website or blog at wordpress.com. https://wordpress.com/?ref=footer_website

Zdjęcia

Zdjęcia 4
Zdjęcia bez atrybutu ALT 2
Zdjęcia bez atrybutu TITLE 2
Korzystanie Obraz ALT i TITLE atrybutu dla każdego obrazu.

Zdjęcia bez atrybutu TITLE

https://sb.scorecardresearch.com/p?c1=2&c2=7518284&c3=&c4=&c5=&c6=&c15=&cv=2.0&cj=1
https://pixel.wp.com/b.gif?v=noscript

Zdjęcia bez atrybutu ALT

https://sb.scorecardresearch.com/p?c1=2&c2=7518284&c3=&c4=&c5=&c6=&c15=&cv=2.0&cj=1
https://pixel.wp.com/b.gif?v=noscript

Ranking:


Alexa Traffic
Daily Global Rank Trend
Daily Reach (Percent)









Majestic SEO











Text on page:

time frames and taboo data blog the official blog for time frames and taboo data, by c.m. houck. corporate style faith systems posted in atheist, belief, ego and belief, ethics and morality, monotheism, random, religion, thoughts on january 1, 2017 by chouck017894 any man-fashioned faith system is basically designed as a power structure: it is not unfaulteringly assembled for the benefit of mass spiritual enlightenment but designed to assert the faith system’s authority.  like any commercial endeavor the service that is offered is gauged by customer demand, and commercial demand is stirred by advertising.  in the faith business the product is basically a manufactured illusion: the merchandise offered is emotional assurance that a higher power looks after them–but that power supposedly functions only if the subscribers submit, obey and partake of all the rites, rituals and ceremonies that the self-appointed authorities have set in place for business use.  consequently those formalized procedures are cleverly fashioned to appeal to the ego of the seekers, not purposefully crafted to empower everyone’s personal connection (called “spirit”) to creation’s source. principles of righteous conduct are comparatively self evident to any balanced mind:  seek understanding, control avarice, value individuality, honor love, demonstrate compassion, respect all life’s diversities, recognize that all things are interrelated, etc.  for the most part the three  networks of corporate styled “faith” systems of today’s western cultures choose to market the principles of “belief” by claiming to possess direct favoritism of a compassionate creator-god.  the general work  ethic of these three sister  faith systems, however, is to force their formalized concepts of god-creator upon everyone else, which results only in constant conflicts.  thus for each of these corporate styled faith systems, their calls to devotion happen to exploit identical  un-righteous principles that happen to resist creation’s intended diversities.  achieving “dominion” over life’s diversity is the subliminal message buried within every man-written “sacred” text, and that faith system obsession is often the excuse for fundamentalists to annihilate whatever they fail to understand.  that strategy is commonly exhibited in attempting to obstruct knowledge, curtail science, stifle natural desires, limit consideration for others, belittle intimate pleasures—in short, restructure everyone to a robotic religionist. what is the architectural foundation for this?  it is  the concept of monotheism, a doctrine that there is only one creator-god, who is characterized as male, of course.  that concept permits erecting a business machine under the assertion that the all-embracing, all-inclusive power which created and sustains everything then unexplainably censored himself to play favorites with segments of the human species.  this is a tactic which is then buttressed by utilizing man’s fear of death which further allows the charlatans to peddle their faith system’s insurance policy which is averred to offer seekers a glorious afterlife in a cloud-lined country club atmosphere–but only if they follow the rules. the three self-serving monotheistic faith systems of western cultures could never survive as controlling powers if the peace and brotherly love to which they give much lip service was faithfully practiced.  instead the self-appointed representatives of heaven incite the egos of seekers with false notions of exclusive access to the all-inclusive creator.  peace and brotherly love happen to make for a limited meal ticket if such tolerance was actually allowed to be demonstrated by followers, for that would allow seekers to truly embark upon achieving personal alignment with universal powers.  such true freedom of spirit would deprive the self-proclaimed god-ambassadors of their public image as individuals who assert to have been heavenly approved for godly service.  each of these three corporate styled faith systems claim to teach love, tolerance and peace, but curiously after nearly three thousand years of these sugary claims the world has not yet witnessed any proof of such divine conduct on their part.  instead, all three of these by-the-book religions  systems have to resort to whitewashing and disguising their bloody histories of violence, practiced prejudices, deceits, contrived theatrical ceremonies, and similar excesses of shameless spiritual pretentiousness.  with these pretentions each of these faith systems have shamelessly taught seekers to hate the intended diversities of life expressions. when some faith system then attains some political clout it inevitably slides into the sensuous “sins” of brutal power management which they legitimatize by quoting cherry-picked verses from their own priest crafted holy books.  for example, does not the hebrew bible attest that god urged the israelites, his “chosen people”, to slaughter the inhabitants of canaan to attain the “promised land”–as reportedly executed by joshua?  and for the promoters of gospel, was not europe brought into gods’s favor by use of torture and fiery destruction of life during the inquisition by self-proclaimed representatives of the prince of peace?  and does not the quran avow that allah (the merciful) sent hordes of angels to slay opponents of mohammad’s possession of mecca?  such is the deceptive propaganda preached by all “holy word” aficionados.  the justification given for such acts of brutal domination is always in the name of a prejudiced holy spirit.  nowhere in such faiths is the truth ever acknowledged that each and every thing is manifested through and from one source, and that each and all things are therefore interrelated and stand equal before that creative power.  there is, of course, no ego manipulation in teaching that, and thus there is little material profit in admitting the truth of impartiality before that creative source. it has been noted elsewhere in these postings that regional conditions shaped and colored the spiritual teachings which were worked into the political governance of tribal styled stability.  thus today, to the jews and muslims, god is still promoted as something like a bellicose tribal leader, and to those “others” who are not of his implied favored people the creative principle supposedly decreed “cut them off.”  for example, psalms 118:10 (among many interpretations) “…all nations surrounded me; in the name of the lord i will surely cut them off…”  in christian faith, which was conceived and nourished in the militant roman empire, god is viewed more as a commander-in-chief, with priests, bishops, ministers, preachers, etc. placed in charge like combat commanders over the lower ranks. how glaringly different are the by-the-book dogmatism practiced in the western culture’s faith systems today when compared to the much belittled way the pagans approached spiritual understanding. pagan understanding was that spiritual things are highly personal and meant to be experienced by each person individually.  the reason why pagans did not actively solicit others to join their particular sect was the belief that the impulse for spiritual enlightenment must originate within the person himself.  it was not viewed as a commercial subject.  the pagans knew that the first place of any person’s spiritual preparation had to arise within one’s own heart.  spiritual preparation, they understood, was not something acquired through exterior pressures.  to the pagan, regardless of which small sect he or she might be drawn to, it was always accepted that those in any superior position were like elder brethren who, just like the postulant, were sharing in a similar search for divine enlightenment. today such spiritual freedom has been placed upon the altars of corporate styled faith systems which reflect more spiritual greed than any dedication to true spiritual enlightenment.  modern day corporate structured faith systems seek only to impose dogmatism which reduces one’s inner spiritual yearning to hostage status that is held for ransom. leave a comment » examples of scriptural immorality posted in abraham, agnostic, atheist, belief, biblical "values", ethics and morality, religion, scriptures, theology on december 1, 2016 by chouck017894 for some two to three thousand years the holy scriptures have been promoted through western cultures as being the ultimate in moral guidance for mankind.  but anyone with genuine respect for moral conduct and ethical behavior toward their fellow man often stagger away in bewilderment after reading a few holy accounts. indeed, the opening chapters of genesis brusquely kick things off with a highly questionable take on common ethics.  the naive couple, adam and eve, the last of the creator’s handiwork, were seemingly fashioned only for fun and games. naked and clueless, they were placed in a deceptively paradisiacal setting–a setting which featured two breathtakingly beautiful fruit bearing trees as its focal point.  ah, but these trees were declared to be off-limits as a food source for the  creator’s not-too-bright last creations.  this is clearly a case of crafty entrapment, not omniscient wisdom.  but god was supposedly outraged when the innocent pair find the trees too alluring, and god declared that death is to be their punishment–just not for adam and eve, but for all matter-life forms!  the first two humans within the walled-in eden had absolutely no experience as to what self-aware life meant, so how could they have possibly comprehended what the sentence of death meant? ethics and compassion (qualities of conscience) soon got another below-the-belt attack in the “revealed” record of adam and eve’s sons cain and abel.  cain had become a farmer and abel was a sheepherder.  for the bounty that god had supposedly allowed them god expected both boys to gather from their hard work and bring him offerings in gratitude.  that seems a tad materialistic for the creator of all things, but what the heck.  abel slit a sheep’s throat and god found that to be extremely pleasing, but cain’s gift, taken from the laboriously tended fields, was scorned by the creator.  cain, of course, smarted at this bald-faced discrimination and in a jealous rage killed his brother.  there were no actual criminal laws established in paradise, nor had there been need for such in a family of four.  so the homicide of abel cannot be termed murder or even  manslaughter.  as punishment the testy omniscient one banished cain from his native land and cain was commanded not to till the ground anymore. apparently cain was expected to starve himself to death.  or perhaps that was the omniscient one’s plan for evolutionary success, for cain became wonderfully successful as a builder of cities after that.how he populated them is never explained.  still we can’t help but wonder–is infinite punishment for “sins” committed by a finite being’s brief life really the caliber of an omniscient creator’s justice? the same slack concept of holy moral/ethical conduct is continued throughout holy word accounts.  aggression is highly praised in divine tales, and war crimes pass as acceptable practice–if carried out for the security of a man-invented faith system.  for example, under moses’ generalship the israelites are glorified for having killed off all the midianite men, their kings and their prophet balaam.  joshua, in turn, reveled in holocaustic violence in which even thousands of noncombatant women, children and aged were slaughtered. deceitful david exterminated men, women and children in various stories, even sawing victims in half or hacking them to pieces. in a number of holy stories characters are admired for indulging in homicide.   the alleged “prophet” elijah, for example, who allegedly killed 450 priest of baal to “justify” jehovah is held to be exemplary.  and there is elisha, elijah’s successor, who called upon god to send two bears to kill children who had dared to mock his bald head.  and there is the woman esther who is praised for scheming the mass murders of persians.  and there is jezebel who trumped up false charges against a father and his two sons so they would be slain. sexual misconduct, as long as it is strictly heterosexual, is routinely sniffed over.  lot and his two daughters, for example, merit no chastising for acts of incest.  the maltreatment of sarah whom her husband abraham loaned out to the king for material benefits is brushed over.  isaac, their son, followed dad’s example and passed his off wife to the king as his sister.  good old david indulged himself in adultery and had the women’s husband set up for assassination at the war front.  dinah, jacob’s daughter, too young to give legal consent, was defiled by her half-brother, prince shechem.  how do these, and many similar holy examples teach seekers how they are to achieve a personal state of grace? strangely, impurity of spirit is a constant counterpoint played upon in holy tales, but the “impurity” is always about not following some man-invented routine of pretentiousness and mannerisms as being the only method to approach the  omniscient one.  the impurity angle of one’s commitment to a man-made faith system is made the major concern in the three western corporate style faith systems.  this springs primarily from the claim that just being born–expelled from a woman’s body–renders a person impure.  it is never explained why, if the creator is omniscient (all-knowing) and supremely merciful, “he” could not have devised a more practical way and less painful manner for multiplying new life.  nonetheless, that little oversight broadly allows for his self-appointed representatives to have steady employment in their self-devised theatrics.  for example, to make up for their original impurity a man-made faith system may insist that  one’s hair must be trimmed in a strict prescribed manner; or other faith systems demand  certain foods must be avoided or prepared in a ritual way; and of course in all systems  certain theatrics (rites, rituals ceremonies, etc) must be performed by those who aver to be god’s selected representatives. such is the enticement and lure of man-written “holy” books.  the emphasis is commonly based upon following some man-devised routine as though it was magically set down in stone and perchance delivered on some mountain top.  that, however, does not reflect the varied and all-inclusive nature of true spirit.  rigidity and inflexibility just happens to be the condition of something that is dead. leave a comment » paradox of modern man posted in atheist, belief, enlightenment, faith, life, religion, scriptures, thoughts on november 17, 2016 by chouck017894 modern man with all his brilliant technological accomplishments inexplicably remains chained to myths and superstitions that still lie hidden beneath what are averred to be holy/spiritual truths.  the sciences that have revolutionized our species’ life patterns have done so despite the fact that the origin of life is even now not totally understood.  we praise ourselves as having entered into the space age and think we are meant to dominate it, yet we have only theories or theological speculations of how our celestial environment came into being.  but not even science, like man’s faith systems, is able to explain why life exists, what role we play in the universal panorama, or how an awareness of “self” interacts with that vast framework that is the universe.  and science also tends to mimic religious contentions that the entire universe is relatively systematic, that creation was a one-shot deal–a big bang or a six day wonder–which the human species alone is capable of dominating through its ability of deductive reasoning. science, however, differs from faith system explanations of man in that their research and studies have culled and continues to cull and analyze the evidence which mankind’s ancestors pioneered.  religious explanations tend to calculate man’s history–for their convenience–as being a scant few thousand years, but the in-depth scientific approach shows that our species with identical capabilities can be traced back for at least a million years. the insistence of faith systems regarding a short term human history is made even more puzzling when modern man is lulled by them into accepting that what is referred to as “primitive” cultures nonetheless raised wondrous construction feats such as the baalbek terrace in lebanon, the great pyramid in egypt, and similar ancient pyramids in south america and the far east.  these are structures that would tax even modern man’s capabilities. mystery, ceremony and magic rites were once the power hold ploys that ancient tribal leaders employed to maintain control over tribal members.  commonly that privileged status was understood to be due to the tribal leader’s claim of being directly counseled by temperamental spirits.  we today recognize that manner of seeking protection as superstition and nonsense.   but just how advanced are faith system practices today that are conducted in great extent in much the same manner?  the heart and soul of any of mankind’s contrive faith systems also adhere to similar features which keeps those systems insulated from scrutiny, for they are practiced in fear of questions which they cannot answer.  when devout seekers begin to ask why?  how? where? when? who? etc., the tribal-styled faith systems react in anxiety and distress.  thus they advise that such questions are not supposed to be asked of pulpit performers who, as an alternative, counsel that true believers are to trust the bronze age priest-authors who were divinely certain that the earth was the center of creation.  the declared “revealed” wisdom offered by the power-seeking priest authors in antiquity simply does not stand as “omniscient” (all-knowing) comprehension against today’s scientific research and exploration. as an example of superstition elevated to “religious” status, it is fully exposed in the jewish ceremony known as kapparot (from semite, akin to hebrew kaph, meaning “palm of hand”).  kapparot is an atonement ritual which is indulged in before the holiday of yom  kippur.  in the ritual (which requires a “donation” of a live chicken to the rabbi for the performance) a rabbi holds the live chicken above the donor’s head (gently of course) and recites a blessing.  the luckless bird is then slaughtered (according to jewish dietary laws).  why this ritual bloodletting of a hapless animal should inspire god to grant the donor reconciliation with god after having transgressed “his” covenants is murky at best.  on the other hand, every faith system has their atonement rites which are equally caked with peculiar stipulations that supposedly satisfies the creator–like jesus died for the sins of the world.  the superstitious prehistory tribal shamans would find such bloodletting to be praiseworthy. so how spiritually advanced is modern man?  the human species, unfortunately, has been well schooled in deluding itself.  and our poor planet is beginning to show the strain and damage that mankind’s belief systems have fostered.  but the holy answer is not necessarily apocalyptic doom.  man’s atonement rests in the release of taught “religious” (belief system) claims of exclusiveness with creation’s multiplicity.  humanity must face the fact that true freedom of spirit (meaning enlightenment) is not the true purpose of any man-concocted faith system.  if those formulated methods of faith indulgence were devoted to actual spiritual attainment and awareness they would seek to enlighten followers, not constrain seekers with made-up rites, rituals, scripted ceremonies and pretended exclusivity with a never-encountered judgmental god.  we might therefore conclude from such acts of pretense that only con-men have such needs for public exhibitionism. leave a comment » faith based fraud in us government posted in agnostic, atheist, belief, biblical "values", christianity, culture, government, politics, random, religion, social, thoughts on november 1, 2016 by chouck017894 special interest handouts by political office holders in the united states have become big-time  “faith” privileges over the last few decades, increasing dramatically after the religious right gained control of the grand old party in 1996.  the fast changing legal status for churches and faith system institutions have not been shy in underhandedly trying to “liberate” religious organizations by granting them more lenient rules than is permitted to their secular counterparts. such deliberate disregard for the democratic principles by religious extremists holding congressional positions, such a separation of church and state, is hardly due to any spiritual morals.  this dangerous and frightening chipping away at long standing principles of democracy has occurred under pressure from extremist religious groups that have muscled their way into the political arena.  the deviously devoted never make it comprehensible as to why an “omniscient/omnipotent” god should or would have to rely upon the use of deceitful persons to achieve “his” intentions.  but the raucous, self-serving religious extremists have effectively infiltrated our congress, the us supreme court , and federal and state courts, all of which have too often casually conceded to the demands that “faith” groups (christian only) should be protected from any government impositions!  (related blogs: rise of holy agitators, september 1, 2016; spiritual vanity, the sin of fundamentalism, october 1, 2016) this has been pushed upon the nations’s widely diverse citizenry by devious religious fanatics who paint themselves with false eminence that reflects neither the principles of true democracy nor any higher spiritual values.  these predatory religious wolves have accomplished this betrayal of democratic principles by camouflaging themselves with traditional sheep’s clothing.  thus disguised they have methodically selected, one by one, various supporting regulations of democratic comportment by inserting into those regulations their faith system’s claims of exclusivity with the creator.  this has purposefully disfigured and betrayed the numerous longstanding laws of equality and spiritual freedom that the “fathers” of the nation intended.  as a consequence so many democratic principles have been mauled to such an extent that the “faith” pretenders may often thumb their noses at requirements leveled upon everyone else.  as an example, their “public” buildings and organizational programs may be only slightly related to their faith system.  that bears the foul odor of theocratic ideology. under these contrived special-interest allowances, unethically obtained, even the day care centers that have religious affiliations were once actually exempted from licensing requirements in a number of states.  in texas, for example, the religious day-care facilities and drug-treatment programs were once exempt from state licensing.  however, protected by their privileged status by the “faithful” serving in state government positions the abuse and disregard for patients in those facilities proved to be greater than in nonreligious facilities.  another example: the health care system operated by the seventh day adventists was actually allowed to bar nurses from joining unions.  and many states permit tax-free churches build or expand their facilities in ways that clearly violate zoning ordinances with which everyone else must comply.  religious-front operations have routinely discriminated in choice of employees, or have expressed their piety in heartless neglect of employee misfortune.  in these faith system front operations even persons that may suddenly be stricken with some physical malady have been unceremoniously dumped, which would never be tolerated in non-religious organizations.  how these self-serving practices follow the teachings attributed to jesus, such as “love one another“, or “do unto others as you would have done unto you” is never explained by them.   special privileges which have been extended by faith aggressive politicians into government to certain (christians only) faith system organizations is not fair or just or moral in a nation that has been built upon dedication to the freedom of choice and the pursuit of happiness.  and practicing bigotry and narrow mindedness as some religiously obsessed do is neither righteous nor spiritual in a creation which is rampant with lavish diversity of life and variety of expression.  a true democratic society can function only within conditions of equality and respect for each individual within the nation.  attempting to inject one particular man-concocted faith system into the politics of a nation which has been dedicated to freedom and liberty for its diverse people can only accomplish catastrophe for all.  enlightenment will never be attained in an indulgence in spiritual avarice. leave a comment » questioning bible style creation posted in agnoticism, atheist, bible, days of creation, faith, hebrew scripture, life, prehistory, random, scriptures, theology on october 16, 2016 by chouck017894 god’s revealed word assures us that god merely had to say “let there be…” this or that and then this and that appeared.  thus, without any recipe or formula or thought-out blueprint all the varied components of whatever he commanded magically appeared.  no trials, no errors, just zap.  although earth seems to be god’s center of focus, not only was earth thus conjured up but all of infinity was set in place in only seven “days.”  however, the authors of “revealed wisdom” never bothered themselves to clarify which of the two  differing creation specifics  (genesis l and/or 2) are to be considered most proper.  and, of course, we are instructed to never ask how god himself came into existence.  this is what some bible fanatics (in the usa) insist must be taught in our schools! in order for all of god’s varied and diverse forms which were thus allegedly brought forth by god talking to himself, some form of regeneration also had to be put in place for the continuation of manifesting such diverse and varied handiwork.  that renewal system of each and everything created by word of mouth required a recipe or formula or blueprint for its continuation.  scientific sleuthing has managed to discover one vital part of that blueprint, and we know that reproduction diagram as dna.  life, whether micro or macro, each follows specific developmental (evolutionary) processes, and even galaxies and the universe itself follow the same constant motions of re-creation. social cultures that preceded the “revealed  word” of god by thousands of years, and therefore not privileged to biblical enlightenment, apparently had to grope about in ignorance of how everything became created.  it was up to the self-appointed priests in jerusalem in the much later 8th century bce to explain the revealed facts of creation.  in that later timeframe the entire population of the world, which has been guesstimated to have been around seventy to one hundred million persons, the creator was apparently interested only in enlightening a tiny percent of those humans in regard to his acts of creation; and those “chosen” ones just happened to live around jerusalem.  oddly, god chose not to bother himself with any specifics, such as what went into his creative process—things like the chemical compounds and such which he utilized for manifesting everything and which continues the re-creation process. again the authors and devotees of those revealed words counsel us not to question god ways. still, we can’t help but wonder.  planet earth is heavy with chemical components, and it is this chemical heaviness which stands as a major argument against biological life having originated on this planet, as “revealed word” implies.  but that fact of our planet’s  chemical makeup, in itself, does not negate the genesis explanation.  however, scores of years of scientific research has projected that earth was formed around four billion five hundred million years ago.  within only a few hundred million years the simple life forms were already in existence on earth–an incredibly short time in creation terms.  to science a few hundred million years after earths‘s formation and simple life forms were already appearing ? it seems a case of too much too soon.  ahh, but all that was just one “day” in the genesis account. if the oldest and simplest life forms were indeed present well over three billion years ago, and these simplest life forms had, as science has shown, molecules of biological origin, some dimension of creation seems to be overlooked.  life on this planet seems to have arisen and developed from some source other than a combination of inert gases and chemicals that were then predominant on the infant planet. some of the most abundant chemical elements of earth’s composition are nickel and chromium.  if biological life originated in such an abundant chemical composition, wouldn’t it seem logical that these more plentiful elements (like nickel and chromium) would figure in the composition of any life forms that developed in that primeval stew (the “dust” in biblical vernacular)–if not prominently, then at least moderately?  but nickel and chromium play practically no role whatsoever in the biochemical structure of the life forms that thrive on this planet.  of course, they are not needed in the genesis account. on the other hand, the element molybdenum, a metallic element of the chromium group is quite rare on this planet, but nonetheless that rare element plays a pivotal role in enzymatic reactions that are vitally necessary to all biological life!  furthermore, if biological life arose on this planet, whether from the “dust” of eden or in a simmering primeval stew, logic suggests that a variety of genetic codes would have resulted.  but that did not happen either.  instead, all life forms on earth developed from a single genetic code–and all life forms on earth share this single genetic composition.  to those who idolize the biblical tales this genetic singularity can be easily brushed aside as proof of god’s verbal commands as related in genesis. long before the authors of sacred writ were around, some ancient sumerian cuneiform texts provided more authoritative information in regard to the puzzle of life’s appearance on primal earth.  according to the deciphered texts, life on this planet developed billions of years ago from an outer space source; from a huge planet that made at least two passes through our developing solar system.  the sumerians did not confuse that rogue celestial object with any comet, asteroid or other space object, and that roving planet was defined with the name marduk.  the sumerians also referred to this planet, which was obviously not affiliated with our solar system, as “the planet of crossing.”  this information later became reworked by the succeeding babylonians, and was the basis for personification of the babylonian god marduk. this god is known in the bible as merodach (jeremiah 50:1-2), who was credited by the babylonians with bringing the chemistry of life to planet earth.  could that possibly be the inspiration for the god that the post-sumerian story tellers in 8th century bce jerusalem referred to in genesis as commanding the activation of all life? oddly, in recent modern science a theory has been advanced that is remarkably similar to the ancient sumerian account.  a minority of scientists, risking reputation and government financial support, dared to offer the theory that life on this planet may have been seeded from minuscule organisms given off by some free-wheeling planet that once brushed close to the primordial earth.  perhaps that planetary lovemaking is what took place over the biblical six “days” of creation?  or was god simply playing a solo game of billiards those “days”? s leave a comment » spiritual vanity, the sin of fundamentalism posted in atheist, belief, culture, faith, fundamentalism, humanity, random, religion, theology, thoughts on october 1, 2016 by chouck017894 it must be a terrible burden for fundamentalists of any faith system to confront all the diversity and variety and multiplicity in this life—a lavishness which typifies the radiance that is creation.  the “conservative” outlook of hard-nosed fundamentalists obliges them to advise the creator that “he” made a vulgar blunder by having indulged in such a prolific assortment of potentials. one characteristic of a religious fundamentalist is that they seem to always wax with hatred toward a hell of a lot of life’s manifestations.  however, it is that astonishing diversity, variety and multiplicity that assures the awesome radiance that we refer to as creation.  another characteristic of the “fundies” is their unending attempts to impose their manufactured belief system upon anyone they can.  this vanity of spirit is indulged in despite the fact that genuine spiritual enlightenment always proves itself as authentic by an enfolding sense of inner serenity and compassion that is experienced.  such an inner warmth is rendered impossible when cultivated hatreds for all the intentional differences that sustain creation are encouraged.  and yet, like any other man-contrived faith system, the fundies claim that it is only through their hard-line approach alone that anyone can attain the creator’s favoritism. reason and knowledge are seriously constrained when any faith system representative labors to advance  preconceptions of any sort to hover over seekers interactions with others.  in tightly structured faith systems, for example, seekers are routinely indoctrinated and continuously conditioned with claims that it is only through their particular man-made faith system that anyone can ever attain the favoritism of the creative principle which they like to personify as “god.”  but, curiously, the universe and nature do not happen to reflect that narrowly restrictive disposition toward the diversity and multiplicity of life which the creative principle formulated, made manifest and steadfastly maintains. the creative and unifying force which is commonly personified as “god” is too often imagined in scriptural texts to be mainly concerned with the dilemma of only one certain representation of human species in one small region on planet earth.  ignored in such “holy” tales is the fact that those characters just happened to be from the author’s locale and also happened to be subscribed to his faith system.  that narrow understanding of life and spiritual significance in relation to the rest of the world population has resulted only in a setup for persistent and unnecessary conflicts. such old locally focused writings which are honored as “revealed word” leave us with fundamental questions.  such as: when a person feels they must indulge in devilish scheming to impose their faith upon others can that really be assessed as one’s “higher calling?”   why would an omniscient (all-knowing), omnipotent (all-powerful) creator find this to be the only way of making “his” intentions known among men?   in a universe that has been created with such lavish diversity and multiplicity, we are left to wonder over the where, when or why did the creator of that diversity and multiplicity suddenly judge himself/herself/itself to have been too liberal and/or too excessive?  and if that hypothetical self reevaluation was the case, what caused him/her/it to decide upon picking and choosing favorites out of that multiplicity and give only to those “chosen ones ones” or “saved one” the all-clear for them to indulge in what amounts to spiritual brutality?  would it not have been easier and wiser for him/her/it to have simply have resorted to the alleged original method of creation and simply just say, “let there be no more variety and diversity in creation?”  certainly that would have erased all the virulent spiritual egotism which all man-made faith systems demonstrate. regimentation and/or strictly controlled adherence to man-invented rites, rituals, ceremonies, taboos, cultivated hatreds and contriving to exert authority over others is not the means into genuine spiritual enlightenment. that means, bluntly, that no man-contrived faith system can sincerely promise or officially grant a stamped passport into what they may fantasize to be a heavily regimented and snooty heaven.  all that the  “fundies” of any faith system can conceivably offer seekers is only a lottery ticket for an all-expense paid future flight into what is actually another dimension of creative energy.  (energy does not cease; it simply transforms.)  few faith system seekers, it seems, ever notice the tiny print at the bottom of their frail proffered ticket stub where it is grudgingly admitted that the voyage and destination are the same for each and every matter-life form, and that no purchase or contribution is necessary to gain that award. leave a comment » black holes of religous practices posted in atheist, belief, biblical "values", black holes, environment, faith, fundamentalism, religion, thoughts on september 17, 2016 by chouck017894 around 2007 theoretical physicists discovered that gravitational waves were connected to black holes, those massive deep throat, light-swallowing areas which are scattered throughout the universe.  the “holes,” the theory goes, are the result of cores of massive stars that have imploded and collapsed in upon themselves.  the immense gravity at the core of these space objects, the theory suggests, siphon into them all the existing energy-as-matter that happens to be unlucky enough to have lolled around the former massive star.  strangely, that hole of collapsing energy and the vast gravitational field which results may present a relatively calm appearance to the region that we see surrounding it.  indeed, any random fluctuations against the gravitational core may be barely registered from our perspective.  and it is this deceptive tranquil appearance that can be compared to man-invented religions. consider: in a very real sense human contrived faith systems can be said to imitate the same process that is theorized in astrophysics as black hole activity.  the core around which human consciousness may become ill-fatedly propelled is but the canonized speculations which have collapsed in upon themselves to become active as the identity crushing whirl of religious fundamentalism.  the gravitational pull of these imploding belief cores upon human consciousness then becomes so relentless and so crushingly magnetic that the mass, spin and other essentials necessary for life-sustaining rationalism are obliterated.  muslim jihads of today are a prime example.  any random fluctuations of rationality that might survive in the fringe of spiritual implosion then become barely perceptible. the greatest error in all man-made organized religions is the allegiance given by them to an interpretation of warring opposites.  building spiritual understanding by using that as its foundation guarantees only the life experiences of physical, emotional and spiritual un-fulfillment and senseless conflicts.  the reason for this is that by adoring one polar energy point of creation’s generative force while berating the other necessary polar aspect as evil is to practice spiritual schizophrenia.  the whole imagined god/devil, heaven/hell, chosen/rejected, saved/lost, etc. is rendered meaningless simply because neither interactive pole can possibly create without the other generative pole to project effects.  all of man’s by-the-book faith systems exploit the emotions of love/hate but fail to realize that these are not true opposites, for those emotions arise from the same energy center but are projected differently much like light passing through a prism.  the only thing truly opposite to either love or hate would be indifference.  by personifying the generative polar fields within the creative source as two individual human-like beings, as faith systems habitually do, the practice that is thus erroneously sanctified is the denial of one absolute source. the concept that is promoted by theological musings is that a rivalry exists within the primordial conditions of source, with one generative polar aspect personified as “god” and the other necessary polar aspect personified as the “devil” or “satan.”  to do so is to misunderstand creation’s singularity.  by this alleged “revealed” wisdom the scheming human authors declared these interactive dual components of creation’s power were separate, incompatible and not connected in creative purpose.  by such counseling man-invented faith systems then led the masses not into enlightenment but deeper into the illusion of creation’s energies as matter–the very condition the faith systems rail against.  when this was accepted by human imagination to be holy truth, these symbols then became adopted for use in satanism, magic, witchcraft and similar rebellious rites by those who instinctively distrusted the tyranny of man-invented faith systems.  but their attempt to seek higher power by reversing religious rites and rituals inadvertently implied the credibility of those symbols, rites and tenets that the faith systems honored. man-made faith systems have, through their doctrines of either/or, lost sight of how creation creates and thus carelessly muddied the purpose of life to benefit their corporate style faith system.  their claims of monotheism thus rest precariously upon a theology of dualism.  in these faith systems everything is portrayed and defined as good or evil,  light or dark, saved or lost, angelic or devil-like.  but creation does not create anything as some purposeless lump with no flexibility; all energy-forms are necessarily a blend of both polar charges. as contrary as this may seem, this makes for unity through contrast, for there can be no light without dark, no up without down, no front without back, for example.  each energy illusion (matter form) is but a transitory aspect of creation’s unity.  this means that the source out of which all creation expresses itself cannot be some good only “god” that is rhapsodized in man-fashioned faith systems, for darkness or negative events which they term evil cannot have issued from a different source.  therefore to pray to this amoral (meaning neither moral or immoral) turbulent seat of creation as some benevolent deity-being is but a practice of frustration, for creation’s turbulent potentiality is not the evolutionary pinnacle of wisdom. oddly, these same self-serving faith systems tell us not to be deceived by material appearances, yet they are all busy gathering unto themselves as much material baggage and power advantages as possible.  and inexplicably the feminine gender (through which life becomes manifest) is evaluated by male dominated faith systems as not being worthy to represent their imagined macho god.  how do these men then account for the feminine aspects that are submerged with their own physical being?  science has revealed that each person carries within their physical being the hormones of the opposite sex.  therefore no man can ever be 100% male, and no woman can be 100% female.  and since this is true how can these man-contrived faith systems teach that “god abhors” same gender attraction? with man-contrived faith systems devoted mainly to pretense and theatrics as guidance, the lure of human adherents to the faith amounts to little more than that faith system’s fiscal assets.  in this manner the “sheep” are kept benumbed and focused on materiality.  feeling righteous with such holy guidance is it any wonder that the devotees feel no sin in mercilessly plundering and despoiling planet earth for their material pleasures?  the faithful fail to see that they drift in the currents around a black hole. leave a comment » « older entries search for: pages about the book blogroll wordpress.com wordpress.org buy the book buy time frames and taboo data at barnesandnoble.com buy time frames and taboo data on amazon.com social networking facebook profile goodreads goodreads profile librarything profile myspace profile shelfari shelfari profile twitter flickr photos more photos archives january 2017 december 2016 november 2016 october 2016 september 2016 august 2016 july 2016 june 2016 may 2016 april 2016 march 2016 february 2016 january 2016 december 2015 march 2015 february 2015 january 2015 december 2014 november 2014 october 2014 september 2014 august 2014 july 2014 june 2014 may 2014 april 2014 march 2014 february 2014 january 2014 december 2013 november 2013 october 2013 september 2013 august 2013 july 2013 june 2013 may 2013 april 2013 march 2013 february 2013 january 2013 december 2012 november 2012 october 2012 september 2012 august 2012 july 2012 june 2012 may 2012 april 2012 march 2012 february 2012 january 2012 december 2011 november 2011 october 2011 september 2011 august 2011 july 2011 june 2011 may 2011 april 2011 march 2011 february 2011 january 2011 december 2010 november 2010 october 2010 september 2010 august 2010 july 2010 june 2010 may 2010 april 2010 march 2010 february 2010 january 2010 december 2009 november 2009 october 2009 september 2009 august 2009 july 2009 june 2009 may 2009 april 2009 march 2009 february 2009 meta register log in entries rss comments rss wordpress.com create a free website or blog at wordpress.com. time frames and taboo data blog create a free website or blog at wordpress.com. post to cancel


Here you find all texts from your page as Google (googlebot) and others search engines seen it.

Words density analysis:

Numbers of all words: 7025

One word

Two words phrases

Three words phrases

the - 7.99% (561)
and - 3.25% (228)
that - 2.12% (149)
for - 1.84% (129)
man - 1.34% (94)
all - 1.28% (90)
her - 1.17% (82)
men - 1.17% (82)
faith - 1.11% (78)
system - 1.01% (71)
are - 0.97% (68)
not - 0.91% (64)
his - 0.87% (61)
one - 0.85% (60)
with - 0.75% (53)
which - 0.67% (47)
have - 0.61% (43)
life - 0.61% (43)
their - 0.6% (42)
led - 0.6% (42)
god - 0.58% (41)
ever - 0.58% (41)
 the - 0.57% (40)
ritual - 0.57% (40)
this - 0.56% (39)
spirit - 0.56% (39)
 a - 0.53% (37)
systems - 0.51% (36)
but - 0.51% (36)
was - 0.5% (35)
our - 0.5% (35)
any - 0.48% (34)
creation - 0.46% (32)
only - 0.46% (32)
see - 0.44% (31)
spiritual - 0.44% (31)
sin - 0.44% (31)
form - 0.43% (30)
such - 0.43% (30)
self - 0.43% (30)
other - 0.4% (28)
can - 0.4% (28)
out - 0.4% (28)
from - 0.37% (26)
these - 0.37% (26)
how - 0.37% (26)
plan - 0.34% (24)
over - 0.33% (23)
they - 0.33% (23)
log - 0.33% (23)
some - 0.31% (22)
were - 0.3% (21)
has - 0.3% (21)
thing - 0.28% (20)
religious - 0.28% (20)
planet - 0.28% (20)
each - 0.28% (20)
2016 - 0.28% (20)
been - 0.28% (20)
light - 0.27% (19)
who - 0.27% (19)
them - 0.27% (19)
those - 0.27% (19)
person - 0.27% (19)
day - 0.27% (19)
seek - 0.26% (18)
less - 0.26% (18)
into - 0.26% (18)
off - 0.26% (18)
lie - 0.26% (18)
there - 0.24% (17)
creator - 0.24% (17)
may - 0.24% (17)
holy - 0.24% (17)
what - 0.24% (17)
upon - 0.24% (17)
under - 0.24% (17)
human - 0.23% (16)
example - 0.23% (16)
she - 0.23% (16)
age - 0.23% (16)
nation - 0.23% (16)
its - 0.23% (16)
would - 0.23% (16)
 and - 0.23% (16)
fun - 0.23% (16)
very - 0.23% (16)
 in - 0.21% (15)
once - 0.21% (15)
earth - 0.21% (15)
power - 0.21% (15)
even - 0.2% (14)
just - 0.2% (14)
way - 0.2% (14)
every - 0.2% (14)
like - 0.2% (14)
word - 0.19% (13)
too - 0.19% (13)
belief - 0.19% (13)
then - 0.19% (13)
enlighten - 0.19% (13)
sent - 0.19% (13)
through - 0.19% (13)
king - 0.19% (13)
2011 - 0.17% (12)
2012 - 0.17% (12)
2013 - 0.17% (12)
seekers - 0.17% (12)
claim - 0.17% (12)
forms - 0.17% (12)
stand - 0.17% (12)
nor - 0.17% (12)
now - 0.17% (12)
being - 0.17% (12)
more - 0.17% (12)
made - 0.17% (12)
2010 - 0.17% (12)
had - 0.17% (12)
2014 - 0.17% (12)
principle - 0.16% (11)
post - 0.16% (11)
use - 0.16% (11)
2009 - 0.16% (11)
when - 0.16% (11)
two - 0.16% (11)
years - 0.16% (11)
thus - 0.16% (11)
source - 0.16% (11)
moral - 0.16% (11)
rites - 0.16% (11)
war - 0.16% (11)
practice - 0.16% (11)
 but - 0.16% (11)
him - 0.16% (11)
enlightenment - 0.16% (11)
revealed - 0.16% (11)
october - 0.14% (10)
fundamental - 0.14% (10)
old - 0.14% (10)
science - 0.14% (10)
never - 0.14% (10)
logic - 0.14% (10)
creative - 0.14% (10)
free - 0.14% (10)
know - 0.14% (10)
part - 0.14% (10)
seem - 0.14% (10)
true - 0.14% (10)
style - 0.14% (10)
within - 0.14% (10)
happen - 0.14% (10)
position - 0.13% (9)
january - 0.13% (9)
december - 0.13% (9)
logical - 0.13% (9)
create - 0.13% (9)
own - 0.13% (9)
example, - 0.13% (9)
september - 0.13% (9)
present - 0.13% (9)
omniscient - 0.13% (9)
tend - 0.13% (9)
creation’s - 0.13% (9)
follow - 0.13% (9)
must - 0.13% (9)
november - 0.13% (9)
three - 0.13% (9)
pass - 0.13% (9)
 this - 0.13% (9)
work - 0.13% (9)
today - 0.11% (8)
chemical - 0.11% (8)
around - 0.11% (8)
why - 0.11% (8)
 how - 0.11% (8)
comment - 0.11% (8)
leave - 0.11% (8)
state - 0.11% (8)
rest - 0.11% (8)
indulge - 0.11% (8)
book - 0.11% (8)
energy - 0.11% (8)
contrive - 0.11% (8)
march - 0.11% (8)
same - 0.11% (8)
february - 0.11% (8)
gain - 0.11% (8)
cain - 0.11% (8)
fact - 0.11% (8)
hole - 0.11% (8)
though - 0.11% (8)
time - 0.11% (8)
diversity - 0.11% (8)
after - 0.11% (8)
set - 0.11% (8)
offer - 0.11% (8)
corporate - 0.11% (8)
allow - 0.11% (8)
principles - 0.11% (8)
himself - 0.11% (8)
place - 0.11% (8)
love - 0.11% (8)
others - 0.1% (7)
course - 0.1% (7)
modern - 0.1% (7)
one’s - 0.1% (7)
does - 0.1% (7)
belief, - 0.1% (7)
biblical - 0.1% (7)
atheist, - 0.1% (7)
standing - 0.1% (7)
april - 0.1% (7)
much - 0.1% (7)
favor - 0.1% (7)
posted - 0.1% (7)
represent - 0.1% (7)
man’s - 0.1% (7)
origin - 0.1% (7)
june - 0.1% (7)
july - 0.1% (7)
august - 0.1% (7)
tribal - 0.1% (7)
multiplicity - 0.1% (7)
 that - 0.1% (7)
mass - 0.1% (7)
material - 0.1% (7)
however, - 0.1% (7)
right - 0.1% (7)
either - 0.1% (7)
become - 0.1% (7)
dual - 0.1% (7)
ways - 0.1% (7)
blog - 0.1% (7)
genesis - 0.1% (7)
evil - 0.1% (7)
contrived - 0.1% (7)
“revealed - 0.1% (7)
similar - 0.1% (7)
point - 0.1% (7)
chouck017894 - 0.1% (7)
seems - 0.09% (6)
universe - 0.09% (6)
random - 0.09% (6)
explain - 0.09% (6)
rely - 0.09% (6)
came - 0.09% (6)
conduct - 0.09% (6)
polar - 0.09% (6)
species - 0.09% (6)
tended - 0.09% (6)
account - 0.09% (6)
themselves - 0.09% (6)
actual - 0.09% (6)
manner - 0.09% (6)
wonder - 0.09% (6)
styled - 0.09% (6)
question - 0.09% (6)
again - 0.09% (6)
man-made - 0.09% (6)
 for - 0.09% (6)
concept - 0.09% (6)
few - 0.09% (6)
religion, - 0.09% (6)
things - 0.09% (6)
manifest - 0.09% (6)
core - 0.09% (6)
system. - 0.09% (6)
play - 0.09% (6)
pagan - 0.09% (6)
man-invented - 0.09% (6)
condition - 0.09% (6)
regard - 0.09% (6)
certain - 0.09% (6)
priest - 0.09% (6)
acts - 0.09% (6)
give - 0.09% (6)
simply - 0.09% (6)
authors - 0.09% (6)
necessary - 0.09% (6)
structure - 0.09% (6)
attain - 0.09% (6)
supposed - 0.09% (6)
government - 0.09% (6)
teach - 0.09% (6)
freedom - 0.09% (6)
itself - 0.09% (6)
taboo - 0.09% (6)
purpose - 0.09% (6)
make - 0.07% (5)
fully - 0.07% (5)
individual - 0.07% (5)
western - 0.07% (5)
biological - 0.07% (5)
ceremonies - 0.07% (5)
search - 0.07% (5)
than - 0.07% (5)
wisdom - 0.07% (5)
variety - 0.07% (5)
rituals - 0.07% (5)
routine - 0.07% (5)
hate - 0.07% (5)
status - 0.07% (5)
creation. - 0.07% (5)
supposedly - 0.07% (5)
cultures - 0.07% (5)
bar - 0.07% (5)
against - 0.07% (5)
thousand - 0.07% (5)
everyone - 0.07% (5)
aspect - 0.07% (5)
till - 0.07% (5)
data - 0.07% (5)
front - 0.07% (5)
sons - 0.07% (5)
systems, - 0.07% (5)
another - 0.07% (5)
chose - 0.07% (5)
thoughts - 0.07% (5)
serving - 0.07% (5)
often - 0.07% (5)
 thus - 0.07% (5)
claims - 0.07% (5)
element - 0.07% (5)
having - 0.07% (5)
result - 0.07% (5)
related - 0.07% (5)
alleged - 0.07% (5)
frames - 0.07% (5)
black - 0.07% (5)
where - 0.07% (5)
common - 0.07% (5)
good - 0.07% (5)
control - 0.07% (5)
everything - 0.07% (5)
space - 0.07% (5)
without - 0.07% (5)
“god - 0.07% (5)
faith, - 0.07% (5)
value - 0.07% (5)
democratic - 0.07% (5)
understanding - 0.07% (5)
representative - 0.07% (5)
always - 0.07% (5)
ego - 0.07% (5)
therefore - 0.07% (5)
god’s - 0.07% (5)
also - 0.07% (5)
little - 0.07% (5)
term - 0.07% (5)
profile - 0.07% (5)
bible - 0.07% (5)
million - 0.07% (5)
fundamentalism - 0.07% (5)
sumerian - 0.07% (5)
story - 0.07% (5)
else - 0.06% (4)
refer - 0.06% (4)
simple - 0.06% (4)
developed - 0.06% (4)
sense - 0.06% (4)
 however, - 0.06% (4)
chromium - 0.06% (4)
able - 0.06% (4)
cannot - 0.06% (4)
facilities - 0.06% (4)
 such - 0.06% (4)
process - 0.06% (4)
far - 0.06% (4)
ancient - 0.06% (4)
history - 0.06% (4)
build - 0.06% (4)
great - 0.06% (4)
fundamentalist - 0.06% (4)
god. - 0.06% (4)
offered - 0.06% (4)
ones - 0.06% (4)
real - 0.06% (4)
righteous - 0.06% (4)
theory - 0.06% (4)
became - 0.06% (4)
active - 0.06% (4)
lot - 0.06% (4)
source. - 0.06% (4)
aged - 0.06% (4)
system’s - 0.06% (4)
care - 0.06% (4)
rise - 0.06% (4)
diverse - 0.06% (4)
sort - 0.06% (4)
impurity - 0.06% (4)
appearance - 0.06% (4)
demand - 0.06% (4)
personal - 0.06% (4)
life’s - 0.06% (4)
method - 0.06% (4)
indulged - 0.06% (4)
approach - 0.06% (4)
counsel - 0.06% (4)
strict - 0.06% (4)
center - 0.06% (4)
writ - 0.06% (4)
planet, - 0.06% (4)
self-appointed - 0.06% (4)
varied - 0.06% (4)
“faith” - 0.06% (4)
genetic - 0.06% (4)
meaning - 0.06% (4)
praise - 0.06% (4)
gravitational - 0.06% (4)
etc. - 0.06% (4)
holes - 0.06% (4)
live - 0.06% (4)
tales - 0.06% (4)
kill - 0.06% (4)
magic - 0.06% (4)
advance - 0.06% (4)
print - 0.06% (4)
man-contrived - 0.06% (4)
akin - 0.06% (4)
rites, - 0.06% (4)
hold - 0.06% (4)
fashioned - 0.06% (4)
neither - 0.06% (4)
earth. - 0.06% (4)
scientific - 0.06% (4)
long - 0.06% (4)
composition - 0.06% (4)
scriptures - 0.06% (4)
peace - 0.06% (4)
truth - 0.06% (4)
 it - 0.06% (4)
word” - 0.06% (4)
theology - 0.06% (4)
attempt - 0.06% (4)
commonly - 0.06% (4)
anyone - 0.06% (4)
 no - 0.06% (4)
ethics - 0.06% (4)
slaughter - 0.06% (4)
representatives - 0.06% (4)
random, - 0.06% (4)
heaven - 0.06% (4)
2015 - 0.06% (4)
political - 0.06% (4)
reflect - 0.06% (4)
equal - 0.06% (4)
creator’s - 0.06% (4)
reason - 0.06% (4)
christian - 0.06% (4)
nations - 0.06% (4)
many - 0.06% (4)
formula - 0.06% (4)
still - 0.06% (4)
meant - 0.06% (4)
wordpress.com - 0.06% (4)
did - 0.06% (4)
 to - 0.06% (4)
male - 0.06% (4)
self-serving - 0.06% (4)
created - 0.06% (4)
course, - 0.06% (4)
days - 0.06% (4)
 there - 0.06% (4)
could - 0.06% (4)
before - 0.06% (4)
actually - 0.06% (4)
death - 0.06% (4)
practiced - 0.06% (4)
generative - 0.06% (4)
compassion - 0.06% (4)
higher - 0.06% (4)
experience - 0.06% (4)
yet - 0.06% (4)
divine - 0.06% (4)
world - 0.06% (4)
physical - 0.06% (4)
abel - 0.06% (4)
hard - 0.06% (4)
opposite - 0.06% (4)
both - 0.06% (4)
hundred - 0.06% (4)
declared - 0.06% (4)
oddly, - 0.04% (3)
teaching - 0.04% (3)
nickel - 0.04% (3)
strain - 0.04% (3)
show - 0.04% (3)
allowed - 0.04% (3)
devoted - 0.04% (3)
special - 0.04% (3)
formation - 0.04% (3)
least - 0.04% (3)
feel - 0.04% (3)
sins - 0.04% (3)
cut - 0.04% (3)
vanity - 0.04% (3)
specific - 0.04% (3)
short - 0.04% (3)
components - 0.04% (3)
faithful - 0.04% (3)
hatred - 0.04% (3)
people - 0.04% (3)
face - 0.04% (3)
public - 0.04% (3)
blueprint - 0.04% (3)
something - 0.04% (3)
promoted - 0.04% (3)
persons - 0.04% (3)
service - 0.04% (3)
 each - 0.04% (3)
social - 0.04% (3)
extremist - 0.04% (3)
role - 0.04% (3)
big - 0.04% (3)
buy - 0.04% (3)
referred - 0.04% (3)
conditions - 0.04% (3)
fundamentalism, - 0.04% (3)
motions - 0.04% (3)
research - 0.04% (3)
mankind’s - 0.04% (3)
church - 0.04% (3)
nonetheless - 0.04% (3)
states - 0.04% (3)
grant - 0.04% (3)
should - 0.04% (3)
ask - 0.04% (3)
“chosen - 0.04% (3)
texts - 0.04% (3)
 instead - 0.04% (3)
and/or - 0.04% (3)
hebrew - 0.04% (3)
commercial - 0.04% (3)
by-the-book - 0.04% (3)
adhere - 0.04% (3)
false - 0.04% (3)
creator. - 0.04% (3)
brutal - 0.04% (3)
ticket - 0.04% (3)
religions - 0.04% (3)
atonement - 0.04% (3)
diversities - 0.04% (3)
known - 0.04% (3)
taught - 0.04% (3)
questions - 0.04% (3)
deceptive - 0.04% (3)
raised - 0.04% (3)
privileged - 0.04% (3)
seven - 0.04% (3)
ceremonies, - 0.04% (3)
 of - 0.04% (3)
babylonian - 0.04% (3)
name - 0.04% (3)
account. - 0.04% (3)
given - 0.04% (3)
“holy - 0.04% (3)
object - 0.04% (3)
understood - 0.04% (3)
heart - 0.04% (3)
indeed - 0.04% (3)
organizations - 0.04% (3)
group - 0.04% (3)
“his” - 0.04% (3)
superstition - 0.04% (3)
interest - 0.04% (3)
inner - 0.04% (3)
practices - 0.04% (3)
ago - 0.04% (3)
advanced - 0.04% (3)
killed - 0.04% (3)
billion - 0.04% (3)
illusion - 0.04% (3)
trees - 0.04% (3)
unto - 0.04% (3)
women - 0.04% (3)
cores - 0.04% (3)
last - 0.04% (3)
stories - 0.04% (3)
massive - 0.04% (3)
you - 0.04% (3)
adam - 0.04% (3)
holes, - 0.04% (3)
take - 0.04% (3)
benefit - 0.04% (3)
children - 0.04% (3)
narrow - 0.04% (3)
woman - 0.04% (3)
scheming - 0.04% (3)
toward - 0.04% (3)
ethical - 0.04% (3)
genuine - 0.04% (3)
means - 0.04% (3)
routinely - 0.04% (3)
fundamentalists - 0.04% (3)
guidance - 0.04% (3)
lavish - 0.04% (3)
placed - 0.04% (3)
intended - 0.04% (3)
business - 0.04% (3)
science, - 0.04% (3)
“revealed” - 0.04% (3)
force - 0.04% (3)
need - 0.04% (3)
rage - 0.04% (3)
found - 0.04% (3)
constant - 0.04% (3)
 as - 0.04% (3)
punishment - 0.04% (3)
tiny - 0.04% (3)
apparently - 0.04% (3)
prime - 0.04% (3)
conflicts. - 0.04% (3)
evolutionary - 0.04% (3)
men, - 0.04% (3)
got - 0.04% (3)
happened - 0.04% (3)
possibly - 0.04% (3)
project - 0.04% (3)
positions - 0.04% (3)
find - 0.04% (3)
favoritism - 0.04% (3)
it. - 0.04% (3)
case - 0.04% (3)
 by - 0.04% (3)
field - 0.04% (3)
“do - 0.04% (3)
brushed - 0.04% (3)
fail - 0.04% (3)
scriptures, - 0.04% (3)
highly - 0.04% (3)
originate - 0.04% (3)
 certain - 0.04% (3)
theatrics - 0.04% (3)
aver - 0.04% (3)
particular - 0.04% (3)
imagined - 0.04% (3)
“god” - 0.04% (3)
personified - 0.04% (3)
respect - 0.04% (3)
later - 0.04% (3)
pagans - 0.04% (3)
all-inclusive - 0.04% (3)
knowledge - 0.04% (3)
life, - 0.04% (3)
demonstrate - 0.04% (3)
fundies - 0.04% (3)
jerusalem - 0.04% (3)
sustain - 0.04% (3)
laws - 0.04% (3)
different - 0.04% (3)
lower - 0.04% (3)
 we - 0.04% (3)
charge - 0.04% (3)
insist - 0.04% (3)
honor - 0.04% (3)
region - 0.04% (3)
might - 0.04% (3)
assert - 0.04% (3)
saved - 0.04% (3)
enlightenment. - 0.04% (3)
arise - 0.04% (3)
monotheism - 0.04% (3)
about - 0.04% (3)
explained - 0.04% (3)
(all-knowing) - 0.04% (3)
devised - 0.04% (3)
accomplish - 0.04% (3)
impose - 0.04% (3)
lost - 0.04% (3)
"values", - 0.04% (3)
new - 0.04% (3)
most - 0.04% (3)
limit - 0.04% (3)
four - 0.03% (2)
planet. - 0.03% (2)
simplest - 0.03% (2)
formed - 0.03% (2)
priests - 0.03% (2)
population - 0.03% (2)
devotees - 0.03% (2)
product - 0.03% (2)
projected - 0.03% (2)
already - 0.03% (2)
bce - 0.03% (2)
re-creation - 0.03% (2)
existence - 0.03% (2)
bother - 0.03% (2)
 life - 0.03% (2)
originated - 0.03% (2)
century - 0.03% (2)
dimension - 0.03% (2)
8th - 0.03% (2)
universal - 0.03% (2)
abundant - 0.03% (2)
interactive - 0.03% (2)
evil, - 0.03% (2)
sight - 0.03% (2)
symbols - 0.03% (2)
rail - 0.03% (2)
exists - 0.03% (2)
absolute - 0.03% (2)
fields - 0.03% (2)
emotions - 0.03% (2)
pole - 0.03% (2)
2017 - 0.03% (2)
lost, - 0.03% (2)
using - 0.03% (2)
interpretation - 0.03% (2)
error - 0.03% (2)
 any - 0.03% (2)
example. - 0.03% (2)
becomes - 0.03% (2)
crushing - 0.03% (2)
consciousness - 0.03% (2)
barely - 0.03% (2)
dark, - 0.03% (2)
unity - 0.03% (2)
man-fashioned - 0.03% (2)
morality, - 0.03% (2)
wordpress.com. - 0.03% (2)
website - 0.03% (2)
rss - 0.03% (2)
register - 0.03% (2)
meta - 0.03% (2)
official - 0.03% (2)
photos - 0.03% (2)
shelfari - 0.03% (2)
goodreads - 0.03% (2)
entries - 0.03% (2)
 therefore - 0.03% (2)
older - 0.03% (2)
since - 0.03% (2)
100% - 0.03% (2)
monotheism, - 0.03% (2)
worthy - 0.03% (2)
gender - 0.03% (2)
feminine - 0.03% (2)
tell - 0.03% (2)
turbulent - 0.03% (2)
(meaning - 0.03% (2)
fluctuations - 0.03% (2)
basically - 0.03% (2)
elements - 0.03% (2)
sumerians - 0.03% (2)
radiance - 0.03% (2)
game - 0.03% (2)
creation? - 0.03% (2)
“days” - 0.03% (2)
primordial - 0.03% (2)
babylonians - 0.03% (2)
system, - 0.03% (2)
marduk. - 0.03% (2)
defined - 0.03% (2)
solar - 0.03% (2)
hell - 0.03% (2)
information - 0.03% (2)
sacred - 0.03% (2)
singularity - 0.03% (2)
single - 0.03% (2)
suggests - 0.03% (2)
rare - 0.03% (2)
“dust” - 0.03% (2)
stew - 0.03% (2)
primeval - 0.03% (2)
figure - 0.03% (2)
characteristic - 0.03% (2)
“fundies” - 0.03% (2)
designed - 0.03% (2)
him/her/it - 0.03% (2)
former - 0.03% (2)
collapsed - 0.03% (2)
deep - 0.03% (2)
connected - 0.03% (2)
 all - 0.03% (2)
promise - 0.03% (2)
manufactured - 0.03% (2)
authority - 0.03% (2)
amounts - 0.03% (2)
among - 0.03% (2)
rendered - 0.03% (2)
intentions - 0.03% (2)
making - 0.03% (2)
omnipotent - 0.03% (2)
honored - 0.03% (2)
focused - 0.03% (2)
resulted - 0.03% (2)
mainly - 0.03% (2)
personify - 0.03% (2)
hatreds - 0.03% (2)
cultivated - 0.03% (2)
whether - 0.03% (2)
tax - 0.03% (2)
vital - 0.03% (2)
homicide - 0.03% (2)
throughout - 0.03% (2)
sister - 0.03% (2)
really - 0.03% (2)
finite - 0.03% (2)
help - 0.03% (2)
can’t - 0.03% (2)
perhaps - 0.03% (2)
 or - 0.03% (2)
commanded - 0.03% (2)
land - 0.03% (2)
native - 0.03% (2)
murder - 0.03% (2)
throat - 0.03% (2)
praised - 0.03% (2)
sheep’s - 0.03% (2)
results - 0.03% (2)
bring - 0.03% (2)
gather - 0.03% (2)
expected - 0.03% (2)
 cain - 0.03% (2)
soon - 0.03% (2)
eden - 0.03% (2)
humans - 0.03% (2)
matter-life - 0.03% (2)
wisdom. - 0.03% (2)
exploit - 0.03% (2)
clearly - 0.03% (2)
general - 0.03% (2)
tales, - 0.03% (2)
food - 0.03% (2)
called - 0.03% (2)
achieve - 0.03% (2)
legal - 0.03% (2)
today’s - 0.03% (2)
abraham - 0.03% (2)
husband - 0.03% (2)
over. - 0.03% (2)
strictly - 0.03% (2)
sexual - 0.03% (2)
father - 0.03% (2)
charges - 0.03% (2)
bald - 0.03% (2)
dared - 0.03% (2)
bears - 0.03% (2)
held - 0.03% (2)
direct - 0.03% (2)
baal - 0.03% (2)
allegedly - 0.03% (2)
characters - 0.03% (2)
number - 0.03% (2)
half - 0.03% (2)
various - 0.03% (2)
david - 0.03% (2)
deceitful - 0.03% (2)
thousands - 0.03% (2)
violence - 0.03% (2)
prophet - 0.03% (2)
israelites - 0.03% (2)
possess - 0.03% (2)
identical - 0.03% (2)
setting - 0.03% (2)
following - 0.03% (2)
brought - 0.03% (2)
implied - 0.03% (2)
averred - 0.03% (2)
worked - 0.03% (2)
teachings - 0.03% (2)
that, - 0.03% (2)
survive - 0.03% (2)
interrelated - 0.03% (2)
source, - 0.03% (2)
powers - 0.03% (2)
brotherly - 0.03% (2)
spirit. - 0.03% (2)
(the - 0.03% (2)
prince - 0.03% (2)
books. - 0.03% (2)
further - 0.03% (2)
exclusive - 0.03% (2)
“sins” - 0.03% (2)
tolerance - 0.03% (2)
 with - 0.03% (2)
shameless - 0.03% (2)
resort - 0.03% (2)
 instead, - 0.03% (2)
proof - 0.03% (2)
curiously - 0.03% (2)
followers, - 0.03% (2)
self-proclaimed - 0.03% (2)
truly - 0.03% (2)
achieving - 0.03% (2)
allows - 0.03% (2)
will - 0.03% (2)
eve, - 0.03% (2)
who, - 0.03% (2)
man-written - 0.03% (2)
indeed, - 0.03% (2)
accounts. - 0.03% (2)
away - 0.03% (2)
whatever - 0.03% (2)
attempting - 0.03% (2)
agnostic, - 0.03% (2)
scriptural - 0.03% (2)
examples - 0.03% (2)
belittle - 0.03% (2)
foundation - 0.03% (2)
structured - 0.03% (2)
dedication - 0.03% (2)
doctrine - 0.03% (2)
viewed - 0.03% (2)
accepted - 0.03% (2)
male, - 0.03% (2)
small - 0.03% (2)
preparation - 0.03% (2)
first - 0.03% (2)
sect - 0.03% (2)
join - 0.03% (2)
experienced - 0.03% (2)
favorites - 0.03% (2)
compared - 0.03% (2)
dogmatism - 0.03% (2)
fear - 0.03% (2)
combat - 0.03% (2)
strangely, - 0.03% (2)
pretentiousness - 0.03% (2)
discover - 0.03% (2)
constrain - 0.03% (2)
groups - 0.03% (2)
pressure - 0.03% (2)
democracy - 0.03% (2)
extremists - 0.03% (2)
disregard - 0.03% (2)
rules - 0.03% (2)
churches - 0.03% (2)
fast - 0.03% (2)
privileges - 0.03% (2)
culture, - 0.03% (2)
pretense - 0.03% (2)
exclusivity - 0.03% (2)
rituals, - 0.03% (2)
indulgence - 0.03% (2)
court - 0.03% (2)
formulated - 0.03% (2)
 if - 0.03% (2)
man-concocted - 0.03% (2)
necessarily - 0.03% (2)
answer - 0.03% (2)
well - 0.03% (2)
prehistory - 0.03% (2)
died - 0.03% (2)
jesus - 0.03% (2)
hand, - 0.03% (2)
 on - 0.03% (2)
donor - 0.03% (2)
bloodletting - 0.03% (2)
supreme - 0.03% (2)
(christian - 0.03% (2)
head - 0.03% (2)
employee - 0.03% (2)
manifesting - 0.03% (2)
put - 0.03% (2)
emotional - 0.03% (2)
recipe - 0.03% (2)
appeared. - 0.03% (2)
“let - 0.03% (2)
say - 0.03% (2)
assures - 0.03% (2)
 enlightenment - 0.03% (2)
politics - 0.03% (2)
nation. - 0.03% (2)
function - 0.03% (2)
suddenly - 0.03% (2)
choice - 0.03% (2)
only) - 0.03% (2)
operations - 0.03% (2)
 another - 0.03% (2)
proved - 0.03% (2)
exempt - 0.03% (2)
licensing - 0.03% (2)
programs - 0.03% (2)
requirements - 0.03% (2)
equality - 0.03% (2)
regulations - 0.03% (2)
fanatics - 0.03% (2)
devious - 0.03% (2)
vanity, - 0.03% (2)
protected - 0.03% (2)
slaughtered - 0.03% (2)
rabbi - 0.03% (2)
 omniscient - 0.03% (2)
enlightenment, - 0.03% (2)
vast - 0.03% (2)
awareness - 0.03% (2)
environment - 0.03% (2)
celestial - 0.03% (2)
speculations - 0.03% (2)
theological - 0.03% (2)
it, - 0.03% (2)
dominate - 0.03% (2)
despite - 0.03% (2)
done - 0.03% (2)
love, - 0.03% (2)
inexplicably - 0.03% (2)
17, - 0.03% (2)
happens - 0.03% (2)
entire - 0.03% (2)
nature - 0.03% (2)
down - 0.03% (2)
magically - 0.03% (2)
based - 0.03% (2)
“holy” - 0.03% (2)
lure - 0.03% (2)
selected - 0.03% (2)
recognize - 0.03% (2)
original - 0.03% (2)
practical - 0.03% (2)
systems. - 0.03% (2)
concern - 0.03% (2)
major - 0.03% (2)
universe. - 0.03% (2)
relatively - 0.03% (2)
chicken - 0.03% (2)
seekers, - 0.03% (2)
 kapparot - 0.03% (2)
jewish - 0.03% (2)
“religious” - 0.03% (2)
formalized - 0.03% (2)
trust - 0.03% (2)
advise - 0.03% (2)
react - 0.03% (2)
begin - 0.03% (2)
 when - 0.03% (2)
extent - 0.03% (2)
seeking - 0.03% (2)
due - 0.03% (2)
maintain - 0.03% (2)
purposefully - 0.03% (2)
six - 0.03% (2)
ceremony - 0.03% (2)
 these - 0.03% (2)
pyramid - 0.03% (2)
back - 0.03% (2)
crafted - 0.03% (2)
capabilities - 0.03% (2)
years, - 0.03% (2)
 religious - 0.03% (2)
cull - 0.03% (2)
continues - 0.03% (2)
explanations - 0.03% (2)
ability - 0.03% (2)
alone - 0.03% (2)
“he” - 0.03% (2)
faith system - 0.84% (59)
in the - 0.54% (38)
faith systems - 0.44% (31)
to the - 0.43% (30)
of the - 0.4% (28)
at the - 0.4% (28)
that the - 0.31% (22)
for the - 0.27% (19)
that a - 0.24% (17)
and the - 0.2% (14)
is the - 0.19% (13)
of creation - 0.17% (12)
by the - 0.16% (11)
such a - 0.16% (11)
that is - 0.16% (11)
the creator - 0.14% (10)
of life - 0.14% (10)
has been - 0.13% (9)
life forms - 0.13% (9)
have been - 0.13% (9)
as the - 0.13% (9)
this planet - 0.11% (8)
for example, - 0.11% (8)
of these - 0.11% (8)
to have - 0.1% (7)
on this - 0.1% (7)
all the - 0.1% (7)
by chouck017894 - 0.1% (7)
of course - 0.1% (7)
leave a - 0.1% (7)
comment » - 0.1% (7)
does not - 0.1% (7)
posted in - 0.1% (7)
from the - 0.1% (7)
a comment - 0.1% (7)
into the - 0.1% (7)
corporate style - 0.09% (6)
the faith - 0.09% (6)
the same - 0.09% (6)
is not - 0.09% (6)
can be - 0.09% (6)
of any - 0.09% (6)
from a - 0.09% (6)
2016 by - 0.09% (6)
there is - 0.09% (6)
atheist, belief, - 0.09% (6)
of man - 0.09% (6)
not the - 0.07% (5)
the other - 0.07% (5)
man-made faith - 0.07% (5)
with a - 0.07% (5)
must be - 0.07% (5)
the creative - 0.07% (5)
not to - 0.07% (5)
acts of - 0.07% (5)
was the - 0.07% (5)
1, 2016 - 0.07% (5)
of spirit - 0.07% (5)
with the - 0.07% (5)
modern man - 0.07% (5)
upon the - 0.07% (5)
in that - 0.07% (5)
and taboo - 0.07% (5)
faith system. - 0.07% (5)
time frames - 0.07% (5)
thoughts on - 0.07% (5)
black hole - 0.07% (5)
faith systems, - 0.07% (5)
spiritual enlightenment - 0.07% (5)
if the - 0.07% (5)
which they - 0.07% (5)
and that - 0.07% (5)
this is - 0.07% (5)
and multiplicity - 0.07% (5)
of creation’s - 0.06% (4)
are the - 0.06% (4)
it was - 0.06% (4)
they are - 0.06% (4)
of god - 0.06% (4)
this planet, - 0.06% (4)
happen to - 0.06% (4)
styled faith - 0.06% (4)
had to - 0.06% (4)
the universe - 0.06% (4)
rites, rituals - 0.06% (4)
them to - 0.06% (4)
for all - 0.06% (4)
over the - 0.06% (4)
of course, - 0.06% (4)
that have - 0.06% (4)
revealed word - 0.06% (4)
would have - 0.06% (4)
such as - 0.06% (4)
principles of - 0.06% (4)
hundred million - 0.06% (4)
to those - 0.06% (4)
 for example, - 0.06% (4)
in such - 0.06% (4)
in atheist, - 0.06% (4)
and no - 0.06% (4)
all life - 0.06% (4)
systems have - 0.06% (4)
biological life - 0.06% (4)
man-contrived faith - 0.06% (4)
 in the - 0.06% (4)
is only - 0.06% (4)
as some - 0.06% (4)
the fact - 0.06% (4)
diversity and - 0.06% (4)
be the - 0.06% (4)
is that - 0.06% (4)
their faith - 0.06% (4)
which is - 0.06% (4)
million years - 0.06% (4)
faith system’s - 0.06% (4)
human species - 0.06% (4)
of which - 0.04% (3)
 but the - 0.04% (3)
personified as - 0.04% (3)
create a - 0.04% (3)
those who - 0.04% (3)
a person - 0.04% (3)
not have - 0.04% (3)
freedom of - 0.04% (3)
at least - 0.04% (3)
style faith - 0.04% (3)
are not - 0.04% (3)
for their - 0.04% (3)
ever be - 0.04% (3)
by them - 0.04% (3)
random, religion, - 0.04% (3)
is but - 0.04% (3)
age and - 0.04% (3)
upon a - 0.04% (3)
claims of - 0.04% (3)
the theory - 0.04% (3)
polar aspect - 0.04% (3)
the genesis - 0.04% (3)
which are - 0.04% (3)
and spiritual - 0.04% (3)
in creation - 0.04% (3)
science a - 0.04% (3)
creative principle - 0.04% (3)
through their - 0.04% (3)
that are - 0.04% (3)
happened to - 0.04% (3)
belief system - 0.04% (3)
on earth - 0.04% (3)
to impose - 0.04% (3)
years ago - 0.04% (3)
referred to - 0.04% (3)
life on - 0.04% (3)
forms were - 0.04% (3)
what is - 0.04% (3)
the nation - 0.04% (3)
that we - 0.04% (3)
such an - 0.04% (3)
were once - 0.04% (3)
follow the - 0.04% (3)
which have - 0.04% (3)
or that - 0.04% (3)
seems to - 0.04% (3)
we are - 0.04% (3)
to his - 0.04% (3)
any faith - 0.04% (3)
of that - 0.04% (3)
belief, biblical - 0.04% (3)
of how - 0.04% (3)
black holes - 0.04% (3)
only in - 0.04% (3)
and every - 0.04% (3)
nickel and - 0.04% (3)
democratic principles - 0.04% (3)
the only - 0.04% (3)
adam and - 0.04% (3)
man-invented faith - 0.04% (3)
western cultures - 0.04% (3)
for each - 0.04% (3)
is never - 0.04% (3)
fail to - 0.04% (3)
and in - 0.04% (3)
of all - 0.04% (3)
that god - 0.04% (3)
what the - 0.04% (3)
to what - 0.04% (3)
 this is - 0.04% (3)
the self-appointed - 0.04% (3)
as being - 0.04% (3)
the three - 0.04% (3)
ethics and - 0.04% (3)
biblical "values", - 0.04% (3)
have to - 0.04% (3)
and similar - 0.04% (3)
did not - 0.04% (3)
each of - 0.04% (3)
these faith - 0.04% (3)
god is - 0.04% (3)
attain the - 0.04% (3)
was not - 0.04% (3)
the name - 0.04% (3)
and all - 0.04% (3)
corporate styled - 0.04% (3)
the human - 0.04% (3)
in place - 0.04% (3)
 and there - 0.04% (3)
of holy - 0.04% (3)
are to - 0.04% (3)
things are - 0.04% (3)
faith, fundamentalism, - 0.03% (2)
the diversity - 0.03% (2)
seekers to - 0.03% (2)
true freedom - 0.03% (2)
necessary polar - 0.03% (2)
proof of - 0.03% (2)
allowed to - 0.03% (2)
the feminine - 0.03% (2)
physical being - 0.03% (2)
sin of - 0.03% (2)
the primordial - 0.03% (2)
and variety - 0.03% (2)
was actually - 0.03% (2)
in this - 0.03% (2)
in genesis - 0.03% (2)
creation.  the - 0.03% (2)
characteristic of - 0.03% (2)
that they - 0.03% (2)
radiance that - 0.03% (2)
do these - 0.03% (2)
is basically - 0.03% (2)
to make - 0.03% (2)
of exclusive - 0.03% (2)
seekers with - 0.03% (2)
and compassion - 0.03% (2)
representatives of - 0.03% (2)
that it - 0.03% (2)
 instead, all - 0.03% (2)
 the sumerians - 0.03% (2)
the babylonian - 0.03% (2)
the “dust” - 0.03% (2)
the most - 0.03% (2)
abundant chemical - 0.03% (2)
or blog - 0.03% (2)
that these - 0.03% (2)
free website - 0.03% (2)
of brutal - 0.03% (2)
primeval stew - 0.03% (2)
such acts - 0.03% (2)
use of - 0.03% (2)
data blog - 0.03% (2)
to see - 0.03% (2)
from their - 0.03% (2)
intended diversities - 0.03% (2)
man can - 0.03% (2)
developed from - 0.03% (2)
with such - 0.03% (2)
forms on - 0.03% (2)
the biblical - 0.03% (2)
be 100% - 0.03% (2)
and morality, - 0.03% (2)
before the - 0.03% (2)
regard to - 0.03% (2)
of life’s - 0.03% (2)
religion, thoughts - 0.03% (2)
from an - 0.03% (2)
planet that - 0.03% (2)
and brotherly - 0.03% (2)
enlightenment but - 0.03% (2)
out of - 0.03% (2)
anyone can - 0.03% (2)
of today - 0.03% (2)
that faith - 0.03% (2)
that happen - 0.03% (2)
cores of - 0.03% (2)
collapsed in - 0.03% (2)
rites and - 0.03% (2)
the core - 0.03% (2)
upon everyone - 0.03% (2)
any random - 0.03% (2)
the gravitational - 0.03% (2)
compared to - 0.03% (2)
these three - 0.03% (2)
in upon - 0.03% (2)
then become - 0.03% (2)
dimension of - 0.03% (2)
all man-made - 0.03% (2)
as its - 0.03% (2)
only the - 0.03% (2)
favoritism of - 0.03% (2)
other necessary - 0.03% (2)
 for the - 0.03% (2)
generative polar - 0.03% (2)
as faith - 0.03% (2)
led the - 0.03% (2)
of one - 0.03% (2)
the concept - 0.03% (2)
conditions of - 0.03% (2)
for fundamentalists - 0.03% (2)
and thus - 0.03% (2)
only if - 0.03% (2)
planet earth. - 0.03% (2)
aspect personified - 0.03% (2)
only through - 0.03% (2)
their particular - 0.03% (2)
seekers a - 0.03% (2)
not happen - 0.03% (2)
toward the - 0.03% (2)
to offer - 0.03% (2)
fear of - 0.03% (2)
offered is - 0.03% (2)
as “god” - 0.03% (2)
of human - 0.03% (2)
higher power - 0.03% (2)
system.  that - 0.03% (2)
 it is - 0.03% (2)
is then - 0.03% (2)
the truth - 0.03% (2)
“revealed word” - 0.03% (2)
impose their - 0.03% (2)
“his” intentions - 0.03% (2)
creator of - 0.03% (2)
only one - 0.03% (2)
amounts to - 0.03% (2)
the alleged - 0.03% (2)
that all - 0.03% (2)
which all - 0.03% (2)
spiritual enlightenment. - 0.03% (2)
offer seekers - 0.03% (2)
than a - 0.03% (2)
cut them - 0.03% (2)
that each - 0.03% (2)
that was - 0.03% (2)
concept of - 0.03% (2)
that true - 0.03% (2)
earth was - 0.03% (2)
of creation. - 0.03% (2)
“revealed” wisdom - 0.03% (2)
scientific research - 0.03% (2)
is indulged - 0.03% (2)
live chicken - 0.03% (2)
the donor - 0.03% (2)
other hand, - 0.03% (2)
the holy - 0.03% (2)
help but - 0.03% (2)
man-concocted faith - 0.03% (2)
we can’t - 0.03% (2)
cain was - 0.03% (2)
the tribal - 0.03% (2)
the religious - 0.03% (2)
religious organizations - 0.03% (2)
cannot be - 0.03% (2)
for such - 0.03% (2)
to any - 0.03% (2)
the political - 0.03% (2)
the creator. - 0.03% (2)
and god - 0.03% (2)
to achieve - 0.03% (2)
religious extremists - 0.03% (2)
and state - 0.03% (2)
vanity, the - 0.03% (2)
october 1, - 0.03% (2)
with false - 0.03% (2)
holy word - 0.03% (2)
due to - 0.03% (2)
of true - 0.03% (2)
and his - 0.03% (2)
following some - 0.03% (2)
faith systems. - 0.03% (2)
is always - 0.03% (2)
omniscient (all-knowing) - 0.03% (2)
 how do - 0.03% (2)
had the - 0.03% (2)
a man-made - 0.03% (2)
his two - 0.03% (2)
would be - 0.03% (2)
in all - 0.03% (2)
by those - 0.03% (2)
lure of - 0.03% (2)
the varied - 0.03% (2)
happens to - 0.03% (2)
who is - 0.03% (2)
privileged status - 0.03% (2)
a number - 0.03% (2)
the great - 0.03% (2)
the israelites - 0.03% (2)
and their - 0.03% (2)
is made - 0.03% (2)
thousands of - 0.03% (2)
our species - 0.03% (2)
god to - 0.03% (2)
on november - 0.03% (2)
the entire - 0.03% (2)
came into - 0.03% (2)
dared to - 0.03% (2)
have done - 0.03% (2)
averred to - 0.03% (2)
17, 2016 - 0.03% (2)
the principles - 0.03% (2)
of democratic - 0.03% (2)
simplest life - 0.03% (2)
practiced in - 0.03% (2)
varied and - 0.03% (2)
which were - 0.03% (2)
only to - 0.03% (2)
structured faith - 0.03% (2)
dedication to - 0.03% (2)
of corporate - 0.03% (2)
spiritual freedom - 0.03% (2)
search for - 0.03% (2)
8th century - 0.03% (2)
like the - 0.03% (2)
that those - 0.03% (2)
in regard - 0.03% (2)
 the reason - 0.03% (2)
meant to - 0.03% (2)
with any - 0.03% (2)
scriptures, theology - 0.03% (2)
system is - 0.03% (2)
genesis account. - 0.03% (2)
all that - 0.03% (2)
seems a - 0.03% (2)
few hundred - 0.03% (2)
that creative - 0.03% (2)
before that - 0.03% (2)
simple life - 0.03% (2)
us not - 0.03% (2)
which was - 0.03% (2)
 but that - 0.03% (2)
as “revealed - 0.03% (2)
is this - 0.03% (2)
and it - 0.03% (2)
can’t help - 0.03% (2)
of god’s - 0.03% (2)
l and/or - 0.03% (2)
principles by - 0.03% (2)
life and - 0.03% (2)
and abel - 0.03% (2)
equality and - 0.03% (2)
they have - 0.03% (2)
to their - 0.03% (2)
number of - 0.03% (2)
example, the - 0.03% (2)
and eve, - 0.03% (2)
case of - 0.03% (2)
actually allowed - 0.03% (2)
of employee - 0.03% (2)
never be - 0.03% (2)
placed in - 0.03% (2)
the creator’s - 0.03% (2)
or moral - 0.03% (2)
variety of - 0.03% (2)
themselves to - 0.03% (2)
components of - 0.03% (2)
authors of - 0.03% (2)
in only - 0.03% (2)
but all - 0.03% (2)
center of - 0.03% (2)
be god’s - 0.03% (2)
three thousand - 0.03% (2)
or formula - 0.03% (2)
of equality - 0.03% (2)
years the - 0.03% (2)
“let there - 0.03% (2)
theology on - 0.03% (2)
for its - 0.03% (2)
which has - 0.03% (2)
a nation - 0.03% (2)
at wordpress.com. - 0.03% (2)
leave a comment - 0.1% (7)
on this planet - 0.1% (7)
a comment » - 0.1% (7)
2016 by chouck017894 - 0.09% (6)
time frames and - 0.07% (5)
man-made faith system - 0.07% (5)
frames and taboo - 0.07% (5)
the fact that - 0.06% (4)
posted in atheist, - 0.06% (4)
in atheist, belief, - 0.06% (4)
corporate style faith - 0.04% (3)
to be the - 0.04% (3)
life on this - 0.04% (3)
life forms were - 0.04% (3)
on this planet, - 0.04% (3)
any faith system - 0.04% (3)
atheist, belief, biblical - 0.04% (3)
contrived faith systems - 0.04% (3)
the human species - 0.04% (3)
belief, biblical "values", - 0.04% (3)
 and there is - 0.04% (3)
hundred million years - 0.04% (3)
simplest life forms - 0.03% (2)
variety and multiplicity - 0.03% (2)
the other hand, - 0.03% (2)
the diversity and - 0.03% (2)
if biological life - 0.03% (2)
spiritual vanity, the - 0.03% (2)
the authors of - 0.03% (2)
life forms on - 0.03% (2)
all life forms - 0.03% (2)
life forms that - 0.03% (2)
that anyone can - 0.03% (2)
it is only - 0.03% (2)
man-made faith systems - 0.03% (2)
create a free - 0.03% (2)
blog at wordpress.com. - 0.03% (2)
free website or - 0.03% (2)
man-contrived faith systems - 0.03% (2)
 how do these - 0.03% (2)
us not to - 0.03% (2)
faith systems, for - 0.03% (2)
of life to - 0.03% (2)
to be holy - 0.03% (2)
to impose their - 0.03% (2)
the faith systems - 0.03% (2)
aspect personified as - 0.03% (2)
is that a - 0.03% (2)
other necessary polar - 0.03% (2)
collapsed in upon - 0.03% (2)
17, 2016 by - 0.03% (2)
faith system can - 0.03% (2)
“let there be - 0.03% (2)
the genesis account. - 0.03% (2)
which has been - 0.03% (2)
few hundred million - 0.03% (2)
before that creative - 0.03% (2)
as being the - 0.03% (2)
three thousand years - 0.03% (2)
scriptures, theology on - 0.03% (2)
agnostic, atheist, belief, - 0.03% (2)
of corporate styled - 0.03% (2)
in the name - 0.03% (2)
into the political - 0.03% (2)
all things are - 0.03% (2)
we can’t help - 0.03% (2)
such acts of - 0.03% (2)
does not the - 0.03% (2)
these faith systems - 0.03% (2)
true freedom of - 0.03% (2)
was actually allowed - 0.03% (2)
and brotherly love - 0.03% (2)
set in place - 0.03% (2)
adam and eve, - 0.03% (2)
in a number - 0.03% (2)
simple life forms - 0.03% (2)
actually allowed to - 0.03% (2)
a few hundred - 0.03% (2)
as “revealed word” - 0.03% (2)
taboo data blog - 0.03% (2)
8th century bce - 0.03% (2)
or formula or - 0.03% (2)
that has been - 0.03% (2)
 in these faith - 0.03% (2)
their faith system’s - 0.03% (2)
and his two - 0.03% (2)
the principles of - 0.03% (2)
vanity, the sin - 0.03% (2)
as an example - 0.03% (2)
despite the fact - 0.03% (2)
such is the - 0.03% (2)
by those who - 0.03% (2)
a man-made faith - 0.03% (2)
to the king - 0.03% (2)
website or blog - 0.03% (2)

Here you can find chart of all your popular one, two and three word phrases. Google and others search engines means your page is about words you use frequently.

Copyright © 2015-2016 hupso.pl. All rights reserved. FB | +G | Twitter

Hupso.pl jest serwisem internetowym, w którym jednym kliknieciem możesz szybko i łatwo sprawdź stronę www pod kątem SEO. Oferujemy darmowe pozycjonowanie stron internetowych oraz wycena domen i stron internetowych. Prowadzimy ranking polskich stron internetowych oraz ranking stron alexa.