4.71 score from hupso.pl for:
systematicrelativestrength.com



HTML Content


Titlesystematic relative strength - the official blog of dorsey wright money management systematic relative strength

Length: 111, Words: 15
Description the official blog of dorsey wright money management

Length: 51, Words: 8
Keywords pusty
Robots noodp
Charset UTF-8
Og Meta - Title exist
Og Meta - Description exist
Og Meta - Site name exist
Tytuł powinien zawierać pomiędzy 10 a 70 znaków (ze spacjami), a mniej niż 12 słów w długości.
Meta opis powinien zawierać pomiędzy 50 a 160 znaków (łącznie ze spacjami), a mniej niż 24 słów w długości.
Kodowanie znaków powinny być określone , UTF-8 jest chyba najlepszy zestaw znaków, aby przejść z powodu UTF-8 jest bardziej międzynarodowy kodowaniem.
Otwarte obiekty wykresu powinny być obecne w stronie internetowej (więcej informacji na temat protokołu OpenGraph: http://ogp.me/)

SEO Content

Words/Characters 14007
Text/HTML 47.09 %
Headings H1 1
H2 33
H3 3
H4 0
H5 0
H6 0
H1
systematic relative strength
H2
the ups and downs of sector rotation
no second chances with retirement savings
systematic relative strength portfolios (sma/uma platforms)
alps dorsey wright sector momentum (swin) introduced
q4 manager insights
to constrain or not constrain?
q1 2017 powershares dwa momentum etfs
looking to 2017
top business stories of 2016–pnf edition
momentum demystified
fixed income under the microscope
steve forbes interviews tom dorsey
weekly rs recap
all i want for christmas is… low volatility?
quadfecta highs
some perspective on tactical asset allocation
what winning looks like (probably not what you expect)
the roller coaster ride of oil
relative strength spread
knowing when to stand still
weekly rs recap
recap of november so far
everyone loves a story
how momentum based etfs work in portfolio construction
relative strength spread
asset management
seeking alpha certified
financial blogs
sites
archives
categories
systematic rss feed
meta
H3
political
social security
currency
H4
H5
H6
strong
for more information about this strategy, please e-mail andyh@dorseymm.com or call 626-535-0630.
different portfolios for different objectives
to receive fact sheets for any of the strategies above, please e-mail andy hyer at andyh@dorseymm.com or call 626-535-0630.
pdp: powershares dwa momentum etf
dwas: powershares dwa small cap momentum etf
dwaq: powershares dwa nasdaq momentum etf
piz: powershares dwa developed markets momentum etf
pie: powershares dwa emerging markets momentum etf
new president:
tensions with russia?: 
tax cap increase:
payments increase:
earning limits:
china:
euro:
to the data
study
accessing momentum through managed accounts
where are these strategies available
to find out about availability at your firm and to receive the fact sheets on these strategies, please contact andy hyer at andyh@dorseymm.com or by calling him at 626-535-0630.
in fact, the best-performing funds lagged their indexes in more than one of every three rolling three-year periods.
so, investors in these funds spent roughly a third of the past two decades looking up, not down, at the index (when measured over rolling three-year periods).
upcoming events
please join andy hyer, client portfolio manager at dwa, for an introduction to our family of systematic relative strength portfolios on friday, december 2nd at 2 p.m. et.  these portfolios provide disciplined access to relative strength strategies including u.s. equities, international equities, fixed income, and global macro and are available on uma and sma strategies at a large and growing number of firms.  click here to register for the webinar. the event password is dwadwa.
when it comes to soccer and investing, when choosing what to do, sometimes the best thing is nothing.
b
for more information about this strategy, please e-mail andyh@dorseymm.com or call 626-535-0630.
different portfolios for different objectives
to receive fact sheets for any of the strategies above, please e-mail andy hyer at andyh@dorseymm.com or call 626-535-0630.
pdp: powershares dwa momentum etf
dwas: powershares dwa small cap momentum etf
dwaq: powershares dwa nasdaq momentum etf
piz: powershares dwa developed markets momentum etf
pie: powershares dwa emerging markets momentum etf
new president:
tensions with russia?: 
tax cap increase:
payments increase:
earning limits:
china:
euro:
to the data
study
accessing momentum through managed accounts
where are these strategies available
to find out about availability at your firm and to receive the fact sheets on these strategies, please contact andy hyer at andyh@dorseymm.com or by calling him at 626-535-0630.
in fact, the best-performing funds lagged their indexes in more than one of every three rolling three-year periods.
so, investors in these funds spent roughly a third of the past two decades looking up, not down, at the index (when measured over rolling three-year periods).
upcoming events
please join andy hyer, client portfolio manager at dwa, for an introduction to our family of systematic relative strength portfolios on friday, december 2nd at 2 p.m. et.  these portfolios provide disciplined access to relative strength strategies including u.s. equities, international equities, fixed income, and global macro and are available on uma and sma strategies at a large and growing number of firms.  click here to register for the webinar. the event password is dwadwa.
when it comes to soccer and investing, when choosing what to do, sometimes the best thing is nothing.
i
for more information about this strategy, please e-mail andyh@dorseymm.com or call 626-535-0630.
different portfolios for different objectives
to receive fact sheets for any of the strategies above, please e-mail andy hyer at andyh@dorseymm.com or call 626-535-0630.
pdp: powershares dwa momentum etf
dwas: powershares dwa small cap momentum etf
dwaq: powershares dwa nasdaq momentum etf
piz: powershares dwa developed markets momentum etf
pie: powershares dwa emerging markets momentum etf
new president:
tensions with russia?: 
tax cap increase:
payments increase:
earning limits:
china:
euro:
to the data
study
accessing momentum through managed accounts
where are these strategies available
to find out about availability at your firm and to receive the fact sheets on these strategies, please contact andy hyer at andyh@dorseymm.com or by calling him at 626-535-0630.
in fact, the best-performing funds lagged their indexes in more than one of every three rolling three-year periods.
so, investors in these funds spent roughly a third of the past two decades looking up, not down, at the index (when measured over rolling three-year periods).
upcoming events
please join andy hyer, client portfolio manager at dwa, for an introduction to our family of systematic relative strength portfolios on friday, december 2nd at 2 p.m. et.  these portfolios provide disciplined access to relative strength strategies including u.s. equities, international equities, fixed income, and global macro and are available on uma and sma strategies at a large and growing number of firms.  click here to register for the webinar. the event password is dwadwa.
when it comes to soccer and investing, when choosing what to do, sometimes the best thing is nothing.
em for more information about this strategy, please e-mail andyh@dorseymm.com or call 626-535-0630.
different portfolios for different objectives
to receive fact sheets for any of the strategies above, please e-mail andy hyer at andyh@dorseymm.com or call 626-535-0630.
pdp: powershares dwa momentum etf
dwas: powershares dwa small cap momentum etf
dwaq: powershares dwa nasdaq momentum etf
piz: powershares dwa developed markets momentum etf
pie: powershares dwa emerging markets momentum etf
new president:
tensions with russia?: 
tax cap increase:
payments increase:
earning limits:
china:
euro:
to the data
study
accessing momentum through managed accounts
where are these strategies available
to find out about availability at your firm and to receive the fact sheets on these strategies, please contact andy hyer at andyh@dorseymm.com or by calling him at 626-535-0630.
in fact, the best-performing funds lagged their indexes in more than one of every three rolling three-year periods.
so, investors in these funds spent roughly a third of the past two decades looking up, not down, at the index (when measured over rolling three-year periods).
upcoming events
please join andy hyer, client portfolio manager at dwa, for an introduction to our family of systematic relative strength portfolios on friday, december 2nd at 2 p.m. et.  these portfolios provide disciplined access to relative strength strategies including u.s. equities, international equities, fixed income, and global macro and are available on uma and sma strategies at a large and growing number of firms.  click here to register for the webinar. the event password is dwadwa.
when it comes to soccer and investing, when choosing what to do, sometimes the best thing is nothing.
Bolds strong 25
b 25
i 25
em 25
Zawartość strony internetowej powinno zawierać więcej niż 250 słów, z stopa tekst / kod jest wyższy niż 20%.
Pozycji używać znaczników (h1, h2, h3, ...), aby określić temat sekcji lub ustępów na stronie, ale zwykle, użyj mniej niż 6 dla każdego tagu pozycje zachować swoją stronę zwięzły.
Styl używać silnych i kursywy znaczniki podkreślić swoje słowa kluczowe swojej stronie, ale nie nadużywać (mniej niż 16 silnych tagi i 16 znaczników kursywy)

Statystyki strony

twitter:title exist
twitter:description exist
google+ itemprop=name pusty
Pliki zewnętrzne 25
Pliki CSS 6
Pliki javascript 19
Plik należy zmniejszyć całkowite odwołanie plików (CSS + JavaScript) do 7-8 maksymalnie.

Linki wewnętrzne i zewnętrzne

Linki 320
Linki wewnętrzne 2
Linki zewnętrzne 318
Linki bez atrybutu Title 233
Linki z atrybutem NOFOLLOW 0
Linki - Użyj atrybutu tytuł dla każdego łącza. Nofollow link jest link, który nie pozwala wyszukiwarkom boty zrealizują są odnośniki no follow. Należy zwracać uwagę na ich użytkowania

Linki wewnętrzne

full paper file:///c:/users/andyh.dwmm-pas2.000/downloads/xjfmu27uflzguop5%20(3).pdf
contact mailto:moneymanagement@dorseywright.com

Linki zewnętrzne

systematic relative strength http://systematicrelativestrength.com/
home http://systematicrelativestrength.com/
about us http://systematicrelativestrength.com/about/
the ups and downs of sector rotation http://systematicrelativestrength.com/2017/01/24/ups-downs-sector-rotation/
tweet https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?url=http%3a%2f%2fsystematicrelativestrength.com%2f2017%2f01%2f24%2fups-downs-sector-rotation%2f
the ups and downs of sector rotation https://dpl8ajcy9nn6e.cloudfront.net/x/j/f/xjfmu27uflzguop5.pdf
here https://dpl8ajcy9nn6e.cloudfront.net/x/j/f/xjfmu27uflzguop5.pdf
point & figure relative strength signals http://www.dorseywright.com/sites/default/files/lbmywptwecunfxdw.pdf
- http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/quintile.jpg
- http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/quintile_chart.jpg
- http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/dwawdown.jpg
tweet https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?url=http%3a%2f%2fsystematicrelativestrength.com%2f2017%2f01%2f24%2fups-downs-sector-rotation%2f
leave a comment » http://systematicrelativestrength.com/2017/01/24/ups-downs-sector-rotation/#respond
relative strength research http://systematicrelativestrength.com/category/relative-strength-research/
permalink http://systematicrelativestrength.com/2017/01/24/ups-downs-sector-rotation/
andy hyer http://systematicrelativestrength.com/author/andyhyer/
no second chances with retirement savings http://systematicrelativestrength.com/2017/01/23/no-second-chances-retirement-savings/
tweet https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?url=http%3a%2f%2fsystematicrelativestrength.com%2f2017%2f01%2f23%2fno-second-chances-retirement-savings%2f
- http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/time.jpg
sma and uma platforms http://systematicrelativestrength.com/2017/01/20/systematic-relative-strength-portfolios-smauma-platforms-2/
tweet https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?url=http%3a%2f%2fsystematicrelativestrength.com%2f2017%2f01%2f23%2fno-second-chances-retirement-savings%2f
4 comments http://systematicrelativestrength.com/2017/01/23/no-second-chances-retirement-savings/#comments
tactical asset alloc http://systematicrelativestrength.com/category/tactical-asset-alloc/
permalink http://systematicrelativestrength.com/2017/01/23/no-second-chances-retirement-savings/
andy hyer http://systematicrelativestrength.com/author/andyhyer/
systematic relative strength portfolios (sma/uma platforms) http://systematicrelativestrength.com/2017/01/20/systematic-relative-strength-portfolios-smauma-platforms-2/
tweet https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?url=http%3a%2f%2fsystematicrelativestrength.com%2f2017%2f01%2f20%2fsystematic-relative-strength-portfolios-smauma-platforms-2%2f
- http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/picture1.png
- http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/picture2.png
tweet https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?url=http%3a%2f%2fsystematicrelativestrength.com%2f2017%2f01%2f20%2fsystematic-relative-strength-portfolios-smauma-platforms-2%2f
1 comment http://systematicrelativestrength.com/2017/01/20/systematic-relative-strength-portfolios-smauma-platforms-2/#comments
momentum http://systematicrelativestrength.com/category/momentum-2/
permalink http://systematicrelativestrength.com/2017/01/20/systematic-relative-strength-portfolios-smauma-platforms-2/
andy hyer http://systematicrelativestrength.com/author/andyhyer/
alps dorsey wright sector momentum (swin) introduced http://systematicrelativestrength.com/2017/01/12/alps-dorsey-wright-sector-momentum-swin-introduced/
tweet https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?url=http%3a%2f%2fsystematicrelativestrength.com%2f2017%2f01%2f12%2falps-dorsey-wright-sector-momentum-swin-introduced%2f
yahoo http://finance.yahoo.com/news/alps-adds-momentum-etf-factor-140000064.html?soc_src=social-sh&soc_trk=tw
dst http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=dst
here http://finance.yahoo.com/news/alps-adds-momentum-etf-factor-140000064.html?soc_src=social-sh&soc_trk=tw
tweet https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?url=http%3a%2f%2fsystematicrelativestrength.com%2f2017%2f01%2f12%2falps-dorsey-wright-sector-momentum-swin-introduced%2f
leave a comment » http://systematicrelativestrength.com/2017/01/12/alps-dorsey-wright-sector-momentum-swin-introduced/#respond
media http://systematicrelativestrength.com/category/media/
permalink http://systematicrelativestrength.com/2017/01/12/alps-dorsey-wright-sector-momentum-swin-introduced/
andy hyer http://systematicrelativestrength.com/author/andyhyer/
q4 manager insights http://systematicrelativestrength.com/2017/01/06/q4-manager-insights-2/
tweet https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?url=http%3a%2f%2fsystematicrelativestrength.com%2f2017%2f01%2f06%2fq4-manager-insights-2%2f
tweet https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?url=http%3a%2f%2fsystematicrelativestrength.com%2f2017%2f01%2f06%2fq4-manager-insights-2%2f
leave a comment » http://systematicrelativestrength.com/2017/01/06/q4-manager-insights-2/#respond
from the mm http://systematicrelativestrength.com/category/from-the-mm/
permalink http://systematicrelativestrength.com/2017/01/06/q4-manager-insights-2/
john lewis http://systematicrelativestrength.com/author/johnlewis/
to constrain or not constrain? http://systematicrelativestrength.com/2017/01/04/constrain-not-constrain/
tweet https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?url=http%3a%2f%2fsystematicrelativestrength.com%2f2017%2f01%2f04%2fconstrain-not-constrain%2f
bloomberg wrote https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-01-03/the-2017-bond-strategy-that-goldman-blackrock-and-tcw-all-back
shy away from long term bonds https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-01-03/the-2017-bond-strategy-that-goldman-blackrock-and-tcw-all-back
tweet https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?url=http%3a%2f%2fsystematicrelativestrength.com%2f2017%2f01%2f04%2fconstrain-not-constrain%2f
leave a comment » http://systematicrelativestrength.com/2017/01/04/constrain-not-constrain/#respond
markets http://systematicrelativestrength.com/category/markets/
permalink http://systematicrelativestrength.com/2017/01/04/constrain-not-constrain/
charlie coleman http://systematicrelativestrength.com/author/charlie-coleman/
q1 2017 powershares dwa momentum etfs http://systematicrelativestrength.com/2017/01/03/q1-2017-powershares-dwa-momentum-etfs/
tweet https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?url=http%3a%2f%2fsystematicrelativestrength.com%2f2017%2f01%2f03%2fq1-2017-powershares-dwa-momentum-etfs%2f
- http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/pdp.jpg
- http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/dwas.jpg
- http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/dwaq-1.jpg
- http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/piz.jpg
- http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/pie.jpg
- http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/sector-momentum.jpg
www.powershares.com http://www.invescopowershares.com/
tweet https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?url=http%3a%2f%2fsystematicrelativestrength.com%2f2017%2f01%2f03%2fq1-2017-powershares-dwa-momentum-etfs%2f
leave a comment » http://systematicrelativestrength.com/2017/01/03/q1-2017-powershares-dwa-momentum-etfs/#respond
momentum http://systematicrelativestrength.com/category/momentum-2/
permalink http://systematicrelativestrength.com/2017/01/03/q1-2017-powershares-dwa-momentum-etfs/
andy hyer http://systematicrelativestrength.com/author/andyhyer/
looking to 2017 http://systematicrelativestrength.com/2016/12/30/looking-to-2017/
tweet https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?url=http%3a%2f%2fsystematicrelativestrength.com%2f2016%2f12%2f30%2flooking-to-2017%2f
link https://www.usa.gov/inauguration-2017
2017 social security changes fact sheet https://www.ssa.gov/news/press/factsheets/colafacts2017.pdf
tweet https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?url=http%3a%2f%2fsystematicrelativestrength.com%2f2016%2f12%2f30%2flooking-to-2017%2f
leave a comment » http://systematicrelativestrength.com/2016/12/30/looking-to-2017/#respond
from the mm http://systematicrelativestrength.com/category/from-the-mm/
markets http://systematicrelativestrength.com/category/markets/
wealth management http://systematicrelativestrength.com/category/wealth-management-2/
permalink http://systematicrelativestrength.com/2016/12/30/looking-to-2017/
charlie coleman http://systematicrelativestrength.com/author/charlie-coleman/
top business stories of 2016–pnf edition http://systematicrelativestrength.com/2016/12/29/top-business-stories-2016-pnf-edition/
tweet https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?url=http%3a%2f%2fsystematicrelativestrength.com%2f2016%2f12%2f29%2ftop-business-stories-2016-pnf-edition%2f
the top 10 business stories of 2016 http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/business/2016/12/28/trump-turmoil-top-10-business-stories-2016/95903786/?hootpostid=a991269e52fea5127a91604cfcfbcf10
- http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/xlv.jpg
- http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/xli.jpg
- http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/tnx.jpg
- http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/ewu.jpg
- http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/fxb.jpg
- http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/djia.jpg
- http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/ihe.jpg
- http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/wfc.jpg
- http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/unrate.jpg
- http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/crude.jpg
- http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/dxy.jpg
- http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/eww.jpg
- http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/mchi.jpg
- http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/fb.jpg
tweet https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?url=http%3a%2f%2fsystematicrelativestrength.com%2f2016%2f12%2f29%2ftop-business-stories-2016-pnf-edition%2f
leave a comment » http://systematicrelativestrength.com/2016/12/29/top-business-stories-2016-pnf-edition/#respond
markets http://systematicrelativestrength.com/category/markets/
permalink http://systematicrelativestrength.com/2016/12/29/top-business-stories-2016-pnf-edition/
andy hyer http://systematicrelativestrength.com/author/andyhyer/
momentum demystified http://systematicrelativestrength.com/2016/12/28/momentum-demystified-2/
tweet https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?url=http%3a%2f%2fsystematicrelativestrength.com%2f2016%2f12%2f28%2fmomentum-demystified-2%2f
recent interview http://www.gbta.org/magazine/pages/bottomline_v3i1.aspx
- http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/tom-dorsey-1.jpg
- http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/momentum-model.png
- http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/sma-names.jpg
tweet https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?url=http%3a%2f%2fsystematicrelativestrength.com%2f2016%2f12%2f28%2fmomentum-demystified-2%2f
leave a comment » http://systematicrelativestrength.com/2016/12/28/momentum-demystified-2/#respond
momentum http://systematicrelativestrength.com/category/momentum-2/
relative strength research http://systematicrelativestrength.com/category/relative-strength-research/
permalink http://systematicrelativestrength.com/2016/12/28/momentum-demystified-2/
andy hyer http://systematicrelativestrength.com/author/andyhyer/
fixed income under the microscope http://systematicrelativestrength.com/2016/12/27/fixed-income-microscope/
tweet https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?url=http%3a%2f%2fsystematicrelativestrength.com%2f2016%2f12%2f27%2ffixed-income-microscope%2f
- http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/dali-ranks-2.jpg
- http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/fixed-income-rank-in-dali.jpg
- http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/morningstar-1.jpg
source: morningstar, research affiliates http://beta.morningstar.com/articles/785224/bonds-are-riskier-than-you-think.html
- http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/morningstar-2.jpg
source: morningstar, research affiliates http://beta.morningstar.com/articles/785224/bonds-are-riskier-than-you-think.html
tweet https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?url=http%3a%2f%2fsystematicrelativestrength.com%2f2016%2f12%2f27%2ffixed-income-microscope%2f
leave a comment » http://systematicrelativestrength.com/2016/12/27/fixed-income-microscope/#respond
markets http://systematicrelativestrength.com/category/markets/
permalink http://systematicrelativestrength.com/2016/12/27/fixed-income-microscope/
andy hyer http://systematicrelativestrength.com/author/andyhyer/
steve forbes interviews tom dorsey http://systematicrelativestrength.com/2016/12/27/steve-forbes-interviews-tom-dorsey/
tweet https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?url=http%3a%2f%2fsystematicrelativestrength.com%2f2016%2f12%2f27%2fsteve-forbes-interviews-tom-dorsey%2f
steve forbes interviews tom dorsey, founder, dorsey, wright & associates https://www.riachannel.com/steve-forbes-interviews-tom-dorsey-founder-dorsey-wright-associates/
tweet https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?url=http%3a%2f%2fsystematicrelativestrength.com%2f2016%2f12%2f27%2fsteve-forbes-interviews-tom-dorsey%2f
leave a comment » http://systematicrelativestrength.com/2016/12/27/steve-forbes-interviews-tom-dorsey/#respond
media http://systematicrelativestrength.com/category/media/
permalink http://systematicrelativestrength.com/2016/12/27/steve-forbes-interviews-tom-dorsey/
andy hyer http://systematicrelativestrength.com/author/andyhyer/
weekly rs recap http://systematicrelativestrength.com/2016/12/27/weekly-rs-recap-304/
tweet https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?url=http%3a%2f%2fsystematicrelativestrength.com%2f2016%2f12%2f27%2fweekly-rs-recap-304%2f
- http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/ranks.jpg
tweet https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?url=http%3a%2f%2fsystematicrelativestrength.com%2f2016%2f12%2f27%2fweekly-rs-recap-304%2f
leave a comment » http://systematicrelativestrength.com/2016/12/27/weekly-rs-recap-304/#respond
markets http://systematicrelativestrength.com/category/markets/
permalink http://systematicrelativestrength.com/2016/12/27/weekly-rs-recap-304/
andy hyer http://systematicrelativestrength.com/author/andyhyer/
all i want for christmas is… low volatility? http://systematicrelativestrength.com/2016/12/23/want-christmas-low-volatility/
tweet https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?url=http%3a%2f%2fsystematicrelativestrength.com%2f2016%2f12%2f23%2fwant-christmas-low-volatility%2f
- http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/vix-pric-12.22.2016.png
tweet https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?url=http%3a%2f%2fsystematicrelativestrength.com%2f2016%2f12%2f23%2fwant-christmas-low-volatility%2f
leave a comment » http://systematicrelativestrength.com/2016/12/23/want-christmas-low-volatility/#respond
from the mm http://systematicrelativestrength.com/category/from-the-mm/
markets http://systematicrelativestrength.com/category/markets/
permalink http://systematicrelativestrength.com/2016/12/23/want-christmas-low-volatility/
charlie coleman http://systematicrelativestrength.com/author/charlie-coleman/
quadfecta highs http://systematicrelativestrength.com/2016/12/20/quadfecta-highs/
tweet https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?url=http%3a%2f%2fsystematicrelativestrength.com%2f2016%2f12%2f20%2fquadfecta-highs%2f
- http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/quadfecta-1.jpg
tweet https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?url=http%3a%2f%2fsystematicrelativestrength.com%2f2016%2f12%2f20%2fquadfecta-highs%2f
leave a comment » http://systematicrelativestrength.com/2016/12/20/quadfecta-highs/#respond
markets http://systematicrelativestrength.com/category/markets/
permalink http://systematicrelativestrength.com/2016/12/20/quadfecta-highs/
andy hyer http://systematicrelativestrength.com/author/andyhyer/
some perspective on tactical asset allocation http://systematicrelativestrength.com/2016/12/13/perspective-tactical-asset-allocation/
tweet https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?url=http%3a%2f%2fsystematicrelativestrength.com%2f2016%2f12%2f13%2fperspective-tactical-asset-allocation%2f
- http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/imca.png
- http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/imca2.png
tweet https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?url=http%3a%2f%2fsystematicrelativestrength.com%2f2016%2f12%2f13%2fperspective-tactical-asset-allocation%2f
leave a comment » http://systematicrelativestrength.com/2016/12/13/perspective-tactical-asset-allocation/#respond
tactical asset alloc http://systematicrelativestrength.com/category/tactical-asset-alloc/
permalink http://systematicrelativestrength.com/2016/12/13/perspective-tactical-asset-allocation/
andy hyer http://systematicrelativestrength.com/author/andyhyer/
what winning looks like (probably not what you expect) http://systematicrelativestrength.com/2016/12/06/winning-looks-like-probably-not-expect/
tweet https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?url=http%3a%2f%2fsystematicrelativestrength.com%2f2016%2f12%2f06%2fwinning-looks-like-probably-not-expect%2f
basis pointing http://syouth1.tumblr.com/
- http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/bp1.jpg
here http://syouth1.tumblr.com/
- http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/3-yr-lag.jpg
tweet https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?url=http%3a%2f%2fsystematicrelativestrength.com%2f2016%2f12%2f06%2fwinning-looks-like-probably-not-expect%2f
leave a comment » http://systematicrelativestrength.com/2016/12/06/winning-looks-like-probably-not-expect/#respond
investor behavior http://systematicrelativestrength.com/category/investor-behavior/
markets http://systematicrelativestrength.com/category/markets/
permalink http://systematicrelativestrength.com/2016/12/06/winning-looks-like-probably-not-expect/
andy hyer http://systematicrelativestrength.com/author/andyhyer/
the roller coaster ride of oil http://systematicrelativestrength.com/2016/12/01/roller-coaster-ride-oil/
tweet https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?url=http%3a%2f%2fsystematicrelativestrength.com%2f2016%2f12%2f01%2froller-coaster-ride-oil%2f
- http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/brent-cude-chart-1-year-11.30.2016.png
click here https://dorseywrightspecialevents.webex.com/mw3100/mywebex/default.do?nomenu=true&siteurl=dorseywrightspecialevents&service=6&rnd=0.043676265032964734&main_url=https%3a%2f%2fdorseywrightspecialevents.webex.com%2fec3100%2feventcenter%2fevent%2feventaction.do%3ftheaction%3ddetail%26%26%26emk%3d4832534b000000020edaa0b4396b5e28edc01fa93c713c4b12ad155d65baf143bf38c241e18db39a%26siteurl%3ddorseywrightspecialevents%26confviewid%3d1758348007%26encryptticket%3dsdjtswaaaak29snq8i5dbk_k4j8barf7ttqmhal1v-vfoyklbuchvq2%26
tweet https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?url=http%3a%2f%2fsystematicrelativestrength.com%2f2016%2f12%2f01%2froller-coaster-ride-oil%2f
leave a comment » http://systematicrelativestrength.com/2016/12/01/roller-coaster-ride-oil/#respond
from the mm http://systematicrelativestrength.com/category/from-the-mm/
permalink http://systematicrelativestrength.com/2016/12/01/roller-coaster-ride-oil/
charlie coleman http://systematicrelativestrength.com/author/charlie-coleman/
relative strength spread http://systematicrelativestrength.com/2016/11/29/relative-strength-spread-199/
tweet https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?url=http%3a%2f%2fsystematicrelativestrength.com%2f2016%2f11%2f29%2frelative-strength-spread-199%2f
- http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/spread-1.png
tweet https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?url=http%3a%2f%2fsystematicrelativestrength.com%2f2016%2f11%2f29%2frelative-strength-spread-199%2f
leave a comment » http://systematicrelativestrength.com/2016/11/29/relative-strength-spread-199/#respond
momentum http://systematicrelativestrength.com/category/momentum-2/
permalink http://systematicrelativestrength.com/2016/11/29/relative-strength-spread-199/
andy hyer http://systematicrelativestrength.com/author/andyhyer/
knowing when to stand still http://systematicrelativestrength.com/2016/11/28/knowing-stand-still/
tweet https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?url=http%3a%2f%2fsystematicrelativestrength.com%2f2016%2f11%2f28%2fknowing-stand-still%2f
- http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/intl-perf-1.png
nyt article http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/01/business/01kick.html?pagewanted=all
- http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/01kick_600.jpg
- http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/intl-long-term-perf.png
tweet https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?url=http%3a%2f%2fsystematicrelativestrength.com%2f2016%2f11%2f28%2fknowing-stand-still%2f
leave a comment » http://systematicrelativestrength.com/2016/11/28/knowing-stand-still/#respond
investor behavior http://systematicrelativestrength.com/category/investor-behavior/
momentum http://systematicrelativestrength.com/category/momentum-2/
permalink http://systematicrelativestrength.com/2016/11/28/knowing-stand-still/
andy hyer http://systematicrelativestrength.com/author/andyhyer/
weekly rs recap http://systematicrelativestrength.com/2016/11/28/weekly-rs-recap-303/
tweet https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?url=http%3a%2f%2fsystematicrelativestrength.com%2f2016%2f11%2f28%2fweekly-rs-recap-303%2f
- http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/ranks-2.png
tweet https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?url=http%3a%2f%2fsystematicrelativestrength.com%2f2016%2f11%2f28%2fweekly-rs-recap-303%2f
2 comments http://systematicrelativestrength.com/2016/11/28/weekly-rs-recap-303/#comments
momentum http://systematicrelativestrength.com/category/momentum-2/
permalink http://systematicrelativestrength.com/2016/11/28/weekly-rs-recap-303/
andy hyer http://systematicrelativestrength.com/author/andyhyer/
recap of november so far http://systematicrelativestrength.com/2016/11/25/recap-november-far/
tweet https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?url=http%3a%2f%2fsystematicrelativestrength.com%2f2016%2f11%2f25%2frecap-november-far%2f
tweet https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?url=http%3a%2f%2fsystematicrelativestrength.com%2f2016%2f11%2f25%2frecap-november-far%2f
leave a comment » http://systematicrelativestrength.com/2016/11/25/recap-november-far/#respond
from the mm http://systematicrelativestrength.com/category/from-the-mm/
permalink http://systematicrelativestrength.com/2016/11/25/recap-november-far/
charlie coleman http://systematicrelativestrength.com/author/charlie-coleman/
everyone loves a story http://systematicrelativestrength.com/2016/11/22/everyone-loves-story/
tweet https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?url=http%3a%2f%2fsystematicrelativestrength.com%2f2016%2f11%2f22%2feveryone-loves-story%2f
- http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/smart.png
tweet https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?url=http%3a%2f%2fsystematicrelativestrength.com%2f2016%2f11%2f22%2feveryone-loves-story%2f
1 comment http://systematicrelativestrength.com/2016/11/22/everyone-loves-story/#comments
investor behavior http://systematicrelativestrength.com/category/investor-behavior/
permalink http://systematicrelativestrength.com/2016/11/22/everyone-loves-story/
john lewis http://systematicrelativestrength.com/author/johnlewis/
how momentum based etfs work in portfolio construction http://systematicrelativestrength.com/2016/11/21/momentum-based-etfs-work-portfolio-construction/
tweet https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?url=http%3a%2f%2fsystematicrelativestrength.com%2f2016%2f11%2f21%2fmomentum-based-etfs-work-portfolio-construction%2f
etf trends http://www.etftrends.com/2016/11/how-momentum-based-etfs-work-in-portfolio-construction/
http://www.sec.gov http://www.sec.gov/
tweet https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?url=http%3a%2f%2fsystematicrelativestrength.com%2f2016%2f11%2f21%2fmomentum-based-etfs-work-portfolio-construction%2f
leave a comment » http://systematicrelativestrength.com/2016/11/21/momentum-based-etfs-work-portfolio-construction/#respond
momentum http://systematicrelativestrength.com/category/momentum-2/
permalink http://systematicrelativestrength.com/2016/11/21/momentum-based-etfs-work-portfolio-construction/
andy hyer http://systematicrelativestrength.com/author/andyhyer/
relative strength spread http://systematicrelativestrength.com/2016/11/21/relative-strength-spread-197/
tweet https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?url=http%3a%2f%2fsystematicrelativestrength.com%2f2016%2f11%2f21%2frelative-strength-spread-197%2f
- http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/spread.png
tweet https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?url=http%3a%2f%2fsystematicrelativestrength.com%2f2016%2f11%2f21%2frelative-strength-spread-197%2f
leave a comment » http://systematicrelativestrength.com/2016/11/21/relative-strength-spread-197/#respond
momentum http://systematicrelativestrength.com/category/momentum-2/
permalink http://systematicrelativestrength.com/2016/11/21/relative-strength-spread-197/
andy hyer http://systematicrelativestrength.com/author/andyhyer/
« previous entries http://systematicrelativestrength.com/page/2/
- http://dorseywrightmm.com/information.html
- http://arrowfunds.com/default.aspx?aspxautodetectcookiesupport=1
- http://invescopowershares.com/products/overview.aspx?ticker=pdp
- http://invescopowershares.com/products/overview.aspx?ticker=pie
- http://invescopowershares.com/products/overview.aspx?ticker=piz
- https://www.rydex-sgi-fp.com/
brochure http://dorseywrightmm.com/information.html
mailing list (subscribe) http://dorseywrightmm.com/information.html
- http://seekingalpha.com/author/dorsey-wright-money-management
abnormal returns http://abnormalreturns.com/
clusterstock http://www.businessinsider.com/clusterstock
crossing wall street http://www.crossingwallstreet.com/
css analytics http://cssanalytics.wordpress.com/
dr. ed's blog http://blog.yardeni.com/
global economy and financial markets http://www.globaleconomyfinancialmarkets.blogspot.com/
insider monkey http://www.insidermonkey.com/blog/
market dynamics http://www.clayallen.com/newslett.htm
quantocracy http://quantocracy.com/
seeking alpha http://seekingalpha.com/
street sleuth http://streetsleuth.com/
the big picture http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/
trend following http://www.michaelcovel.com
world beta http://www.mebanefaber.com
dorsey wright http://www.dorseywright.com
dwa money management http://www.dorseywrightmm.com
401k http://systematicrelativestrength.com/category/401k/
from the archives http://systematicrelativestrength.com/category/from-the-archives/
from the mm http://systematicrelativestrength.com/category/from-the-mm/
investor behavior http://systematicrelativestrength.com/category/investor-behavior/
just for fun http://systematicrelativestrength.com/category/just-for-fun/
markets http://systematicrelativestrength.com/category/markets/
media http://systematicrelativestrength.com/category/media/
momentum http://systematicrelativestrength.com/category/momentum-2/
non-partisan op-ed http://systematicrelativestrength.com/category/non-partisan-op-ed/
off-topic http://systematicrelativestrength.com/category/off-topic/
podcasts http://systematicrelativestrength.com/category/podcasts/
portfolio theory http://systematicrelativestrength.com/category/portfolio-theory-2/
relative strength and value http://systematicrelativestrength.com/category/relative-strength-and-value/
relative strength research http://systematicrelativestrength.com/category/relative-strength-research/
retirement/saving http://systematicrelativestrength.com/category/retirementsaving/
sentiment http://systematicrelativestrength.com/category/sentiment/
sri http://systematicrelativestrength.com/category/sri/
tactical asset alloc http://systematicrelativestrength.com/category/tactical-asset-alloc/
thought process http://systematicrelativestrength.com/category/thought-process/
uncategorized http://systematicrelativestrength.com/category/uncategorized/
wealth management http://systematicrelativestrength.com/category/wealth-management-2/
« dec http://systematicrelativestrength.com/2016/12/
3 http://systematicrelativestrength.com/2017/01/03/
4 http://systematicrelativestrength.com/2017/01/04/
6 http://systematicrelativestrength.com/2017/01/06/
12 http://systematicrelativestrength.com/2017/01/12/
20 http://systematicrelativestrength.com/2017/01/20/
23 http://systematicrelativestrength.com/2017/01/23/
24 http://systematicrelativestrength.com/2017/01/24/
- http://feeds2.feedburner.com/systematicrs
rss feed http://feeds2.feedburner.com/systematicrs
log in http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-login.php
entries rss http://systematicrelativestrength.com/feed/
comments rss http://systematicrelativestrength.com/comments/feed/
wordpress.org https://wordpress.org/
vault9 http://www.vault9.net
get a free blog at wordpress.com http://wordpress.com/

Zdjęcia

Zdjęcia 156
Zdjęcia bez atrybutu ALT 108
Zdjęcia bez atrybutu TITLE 156
Korzystanie Obraz ALT i TITLE atrybutu dla każdego obrazu.

Zdjęcia bez atrybutu TITLE

http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/quintile.jpg
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/quintile_chart.jpg
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/dwawdown.jpg
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/speech_bubble.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/documents.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/permalink.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/figure_ver1.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/time.jpg
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/speech_bubble.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/documents.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/permalink.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/figure_ver1.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/picture1.png
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/picture2.png
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/speech_bubble.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/documents.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/permalink.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/figure_ver1.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/speech_bubble.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/documents.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/permalink.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/figure_ver1.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/speech_bubble.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/documents.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/permalink.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/figure_ver1.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/speech_bubble.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/documents.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/permalink.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/figure_ver1.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/pdp.jpg
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/dwas.jpg
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/dwaq-1.jpg
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/piz.jpg
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/pie.jpg
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/sector-momentum.jpg
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/speech_bubble.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/documents.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/permalink.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/figure_ver1.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/speech_bubble.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/documents.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/permalink.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/figure_ver1.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/xlv.jpg
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/xli.jpg
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/tnx.jpg
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/ewu.jpg
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/fxb.jpg
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/djia.jpg
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/ihe.jpg
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/wfc.jpg
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/unrate.jpg
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/crude.jpg
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/dxy.jpg
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/eww.jpg
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/mchi.jpg
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/fb.jpg
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/speech_bubble.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/documents.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/permalink.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/figure_ver1.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/tom-dorsey-1.jpg
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/momentum-model.png
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/sma-names.jpg
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/speech_bubble.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/documents.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/permalink.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/figure_ver1.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/dali-ranks-2.jpg
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/fixed-income-rank-in-dali.jpg
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/morningstar-1.jpg
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/morningstar-2.jpg
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/speech_bubble.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/documents.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/permalink.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/figure_ver1.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/speech_bubble.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/documents.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/permalink.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/figure_ver1.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/ranks.jpg
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/speech_bubble.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/documents.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/permalink.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/figure_ver1.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/vix-pric-12.22.2016-300x163.png
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/speech_bubble.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/documents.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/permalink.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/figure_ver1.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/quadfecta-1.jpg
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/speech_bubble.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/documents.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/permalink.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/figure_ver1.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/imca.png
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/imca2.png
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/speech_bubble.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/documents.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/permalink.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/figure_ver1.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/bp1.jpg
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/3-yr-lag.jpg
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/speech_bubble.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/documents.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/permalink.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/figure_ver1.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/brent-cude-chart-1-year-11.30.2016-300x158.png
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/speech_bubble.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/documents.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/permalink.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/figure_ver1.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/spread-1.png
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/speech_bubble.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/documents.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/permalink.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/figure_ver1.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/intl-perf-1.png
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/01kick_600.jpg
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/intl-long-term-perf.png
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/speech_bubble.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/documents.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/permalink.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/figure_ver1.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/ranks-2.png
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/speech_bubble.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/documents.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/permalink.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/figure_ver1.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/speech_bubble.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/documents.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/permalink.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/figure_ver1.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/smart.png
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/speech_bubble.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/documents.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/permalink.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/figure_ver1.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/speech_bubble.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/documents.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/permalink.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/figure_ver1.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/spread.png
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/speech_bubble.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/documents.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/permalink.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/figure_ver1.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/dorseylogo-resized.png
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/arrow-dwa-web-ad-350x300-resized.jpg
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/powershares_dw_pdb_300x250-resized.jpg
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/powershares_dw_pie_300x250-resized.jpg
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/powershares_dw_piz_300x250-resized.jpg
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/rydex-resized.png
http://i563.photobucket.com/albums/ss73/dorseydwa/saadfs.png
http://www.feedburner.com/fb/images/pub/feed-icon16x16.png

Zdjęcia bez atrybutu ALT

http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/speech_bubble.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/documents.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/permalink.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/figure_ver1.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/speech_bubble.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/documents.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/permalink.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/figure_ver1.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/speech_bubble.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/documents.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/permalink.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/figure_ver1.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/speech_bubble.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/documents.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/permalink.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/figure_ver1.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/speech_bubble.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/documents.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/permalink.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/figure_ver1.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/speech_bubble.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/documents.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/permalink.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/figure_ver1.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/speech_bubble.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/documents.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/permalink.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/figure_ver1.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/speech_bubble.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/documents.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/permalink.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/figure_ver1.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/speech_bubble.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/documents.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/permalink.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/figure_ver1.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/speech_bubble.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/documents.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/permalink.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/figure_ver1.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/speech_bubble.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/documents.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/permalink.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/figure_ver1.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/speech_bubble.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/documents.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/permalink.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/figure_ver1.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/speech_bubble.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/documents.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/permalink.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/figure_ver1.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/speech_bubble.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/documents.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/permalink.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/figure_ver1.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/speech_bubble.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/documents.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/permalink.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/figure_ver1.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/speech_bubble.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/documents.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/permalink.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/figure_ver1.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/speech_bubble.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/documents.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/permalink.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/figure_ver1.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/speech_bubble.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/documents.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/permalink.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/figure_ver1.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/speech_bubble.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/documents.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/permalink.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/figure_ver1.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/speech_bubble.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/documents.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/permalink.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/figure_ver1.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/speech_bubble.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/documents.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/permalink.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/figure_ver1.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/speech_bubble.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/documents.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/permalink.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/figure_ver1.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/speech_bubble.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/documents.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/permalink.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/figure_ver1.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/speech_bubble.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/documents.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/permalink.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/figure_ver1.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/speech_bubble.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/documents.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/permalink.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/themes/contempt/images/blog/figure_ver1.gif
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/dorseylogo-resized.png
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/arrow-dwa-web-ad-350x300-resized.jpg
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/powershares_dw_pdb_300x250-resized.jpg
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/powershares_dw_pie_300x250-resized.jpg
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/powershares_dw_piz_300x250-resized.jpg
http://systematicrelativestrength.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/rydex-resized.png
http://i563.photobucket.com/albums/ss73/dorseydwa/saadfs.png
http://www.feedburner.com/fb/images/pub/feed-icon16x16.png

Ranking:


Alexa Traffic
Daily Global Rank Trend
Daily Reach (Percent)









Majestic SEO











Text on page:

systematic relative strength the official blog of dorsey wright money management home about us the ups and downs of sector rotation january 24, 2017 tweet john lewis, cmt, senior portfolio manager at dorsey wright, has just published a powerful new white paper the ups and downs of sector rotation that provides valuable insight into the nature of sector rotation.  click here to access the full white paper, but see below for some excerpts: investors have used sector rotation strategies for many years.  these strategies have become even more popular recently with the rise of exchange traded funds (etfs), which have made getting sector exposure much more efficient.  sector rotation strategies do away with stock picking and seek to capitalize on broad industry trends.  while some sector strategies use valuation or economic data in order to allocate to the different sectors, one of the most popular ways to analyze sectors is using momentum. momentum strategies overweight areas of the market that have performed well in the recent past.  many investors will use a simple moving price window (six or 12 months for example) and rank their potential investments from best to worst over that time period.  this approach is very objective, and doesn’t require an extensive knowledge of each sector in the universe.  in 1999, moskowitz and grinblatt (do industries explain momentum, 1999) showed in an academic paper that there was significant momentum at the industry group level.  even since this anomaly was published many years ago, it continues to deliver outperformance. the outperformance of sector rotation strategies can be quite significant over time.  since momentum is an objective factor, it is easy to backtest using a set of simple rules.  the ken french data library has data on 48 industry groups going back to the 1920’s.  we used this data to look at how well sector rotation strategies have performed over long time horizons, and the risks investors must be aware of to realize the returns. dorsey wright uses a slightly different method to calculate momentum.  we use a point and figure matrix to rank the industries, rather than a moving time window, over time.  if you want to find out more about this ranking methodology you can visit our website, www.dorseywright.com or download our point & figure relative strength signals white paper.  both our methodology and a moving time window methodology seek to buy strong industries and avoid weak ones.  for the purposes of our study, each month, we ranked each of the 48 sectors from best to worst and separated the universe into quintiles.  the sectors were re-ranked each month and the industries were equally weighted within their quintile group.  since we want to own the strongest sectors, we focused on the top quintile when examining the historical returns.  we compared the return of the top quintile of groups against the broad market (the crsp market retun from the ken french data library) as well as the bottom quintile of groups. the returns over time are exceptional if you focus on holding the top groups.  the annualized return of the top quintile is 14.1% versus 7.7% for the bottom quintile, and 9.5% for the market.  the excess returns to come with more risk (measured by standard deviation), but, from a performance perspective, it is worth the extra volatility. the rest of his paper then delves into topics such as the frequency of outperformance over different time frames of such a sector rotation strategy and the types of underperformance that periodically occurs with sector rotation.  to me, one of the most powerful parts of the paper was the following: examining the drawdowns in this fashion allows us to look at the larger periods of underperformance and look at how the strategy performed in the six months, one year, two years, and three years after a period of large underperformance.  the table below shows the trough of underperformance for the large relative drawdowns over the years.  keep in mind that in the table below we are looking at everything relative to the broad market.  so a drawdown of 30% actually means the strategy underperformed the broad market at its worst.  the strategy could actually have delivered positive returns during that time period, they just would have been much worse than the market. once the strategy’s relative performance bottomed out, the next six to 24 months were critical!  over the six months following the relative bottom, the strategy outperformed the market by 10.6% versus 3.8% for all of the days in the sample.  (note: these are average returns, not compounded returns).  the same type of outperformance exists going out two years from the bottom.  by the time you get out three years from the bottom, the strategy was performing in-line with historical averages.  however, it is important to note that the strategy wasn’t underperforming!  the outperformance after a trough in relative performance was long lasting. one of the biggest problems that has plagued investors over the years has been a lack of discipline and patience.  the data shown above makes it clear that it is normal for a sector rotation strategy to underperform from time to time. again, i would encourage you to read the full paper for the full flavor of his testing, but needless to say, we believe that this paper provides a strong argument for a long-term commitment to a sector rotation strategy. test period 12/31/1927-08/31/2016.  the relative strength strategy is not a guarantee.  there may be times where all investments and strategies are unfavorable and depreciate in value.  relative strength is a measure of price momentum based on historical activity.  relative strength is not predictive and there is no assurance that forecasts based on relative strength can be relied upon. tweet leave a comment » | relative strength research | permalink posted by: andy hyer no second chances with retirement savings january 23, 2017 tweet for a financial advisor, providing the right mix of investment strategies to their clients is a critical component of their value proposition.  we all know that each client has unique needs and risk tolerances, but clients can be largely grouped into two major categories, depending on whether they are in the accumulation phase or the distribution phase of their lives.  a recent article by james b. sandidge, jd, in the journal of investment consulting provides some powerful insights: there are no second chances with retirement savings.  when saving for retirement, time provides a safety net against short-term risk.  but retirees cannot count on time, so it’s critical to get the risk allocation right.  figure 3 shows year-by-year account values for a portfolio allocated 70/30 beginning in 2000.  the black line shows that an investor who was accumulating wealth was able to recover from two of the worst stock markets in the past seventy-five years (2000-2002 and 2008-2009) to finish the fourteenth year with 153 percent of the original investment. with time as a safety net, “focus long-term” or “sit tight” have been effective risk-management strategies for those accumulating wealth.  conversely, the bars show that if the same investor employed the same portfolio to distribute wealth with a 5-percent initial withdrawal and a 3-percent annual increases, the account value never recovers from the early market losses and finishes the fourteenth year with only 26 percent of the original investment, a pace of principal erosion that could deplete the account in five more years. accumulating investors only have to worry about how long it would take to recover from losses.  retirees must worry about losses triggering accelerated principal erosion and cash-flow risk, and the lack of a safety net exaggerates the importance of even small adjustments to risk. sandidge, james b. 2016. adaptive distribution theory. journal of investment consulting 17, no. 2: 13–33. this distinction between the distribution phase and the accumulation phase is critical to determining the appropriate types of investment strategies that should be implemented for different clients.  the bottom line is that investors in the distribution phase no longer have time on their side.  risk management is of paramount importance in this phase of their lives. among the 7 strategies that are part of our family of systematic relative strength portfolios, global macro is among those that would be most appropriate for clients who are in the distribution phase of their lives.  in fact, i believe that this strategy is ideally suited to fit the needs of these clients who are want and need a focus on risk management.  see below for information about this strategy. systematic rs global macro strategy frequently asked questions what is the investment objective of the strategy?  the strategy seeks to achieve meaningful risk diversification and investment returns.  the historical correlation of this strategy to every major asset class has been relatively low over time.  our global macro strategy is uniquely positioned from an investment opportunity perspective because it is not limited to a specific market. what asset classes are represented in the strategy?  the strategy is designed to invest in the following asset classes:  domestic equities (long & inverse), international equities (long & inverse), fixed income, real estate, currencies, and commodities.  exposure to each of these areas is achieved through etfs. how are the investments selected?  the strategy holds approximately ten etfs that demonstrate powerful relative strength characteristics.  the strategy is constructed pursuant to dorsey wright’s proprietary basket ranking and rotation methodology. how is this different from strategic asset-allocation?  we do not approach the asset allocation from a strategic standpoint. instead, we implement a tactical approach. our tactical overlay is designed to own the areas of the market exhibiting the greatest relative performance and avoid or use inverse funds for the weakest areas. you can expect the weightings to change over time!  when, for example, domestic equities are performing poorly our tactical process will avoid or use inverse funds in these areas or favor an area with better relative performance, like fixed income.  we make changes to the investment mix as markets and leadership change. the portfolio is designed to be quite responsive to emerging strength. how do all these processes come together?  the investment strategy is 100% systematic. we have designed our processes to remove the portfolio managers’ emotions and biases, which are detrimental to superior long-term performance. how is risk managed in the portfolio?  our investment process is designed to systematically rotate the portfolio into the strongest asset classes and individual alternatives within those asset classes. if an asset class is performing poorly the tactical asset allocation overlay will avoid or use inverse funds in that area and buy an asset class with better relative strength.  there is a stop, based on the relative strength ranking, on each holding. the asset classes used in the portfolio are not typically highly correlated, so that our investment guidelines provide enough latitude to deliver solid returns in a variety of market conditions. will the portfolio ever go to cash?  our investment universe includes etfs that represent the shorter-term sector of the united states treasury market.  so, yes, we can effectively allocate a portion of the account to cash if that is where the best relative strength is found. will you be investing in all of the etfs?  we have a rigorous process to determine what etfs we will evaluate for our portfolios. there are many etfs that are duplicative or not suitable for the investment strategy we are using in this portfolio, and we do not consider these for purchase in the fund. as new etfs come to market we are committed to evaluating their investment merits and the effect they might have on our investment strategy. any new etfs will need to meet the same stringent criteria as existing etfs for consideration in the portfolio. how can investors access the global macro strategy?  there are three different ways that investors can access this strategy.  it is available as a managed account on a large and growing number of sma and uma platforms.  it is also the model used for the arrow dwa tactical fund (dwtfx) and the arrow dwa tactical etf (dwat). for more information about this strategy, please e-mail andyh@dorseymm.com or call 626-535-0630. nothing contained herein should be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any se­curity. this report does not attempt to examine all the facts and circumstances which may be relevant to any company, industry or security mentioned herein. we are not soliciting any action based on this document. it is for the general information of clients of dorsey, wright & associates, llc (“dorsey, wright & associates”). this document does not constitute a personal recommendation or take into account the particular investment objectives, financial situations, or needs of individual clients. before acting on any analysis, advice or recommendation in this document, clients should consider whether the security or strategy in question is suitable for their particular circumstances and, if neces­sary, seek professional advice.  the relative strength strategy is not a guarantee.  there may be times where all investments and strategies are unfavorable and depreciate in value.  relative strength is a measure of price momentum based on historical price activity.  relative strength is not predictive and there is no assurance that forecasts based on relative strength can be relied upon.  dorsey wright is a research provider for the arrow dwa tactical fund and arrow dwa tactical etf. tweet 4 comments | tactical asset alloc | permalink posted by: andy hyer systematic relative strength portfolios (sma/uma platforms) january 20, 2017 tweet our systematic relative strength portfolios are available as managed accounts at a large and growing number of firms. wells fargo advisors (global macro available on the masters/dma platforms) morgan stanley (ims platform) td ameritrade institutional ubs financial services (mac platform) rbc wealth management (map platform) raymond james (outside manager platform) stifel (opportunity platform) kovack securities (growth and global macro approved on the uma platform) charles schwab institutional (marketplace platform) envestnet fidelity institutional adhesion wealth foliodynamix different portfolios for different objectives: descriptions of our seven managed accounts strategies are shown below.  all managed accounts use relative strength as the primary investment selection factor. aggressive:  this mid and large cap u.s. equity strategy seeks to achieve long-term capital appreciation.  it invests in securities that demonstrate powerful relative strength characteristics and requires that the securities maintain strong relative strength in order to remain in the portfolio. core:  this mid and large cap u.s. equity strategy seeks to achieve long-term capital appreciation.  this portfolio invests in securities that demonstrate powerful relative strength characteristics and requires that the securities maintain strong relative strength in order to remain in the portfolio.  this strategy tends to have lower turnover and higher tax efficiency than our aggressive strategy. growth:  this mid and large cap u.s. equity strategy seeks to achieve long-term capital appreciation with some degree of risk mitigation.  this portfolio invests in securities that demonstrate powerful relative strength characteristics and requires that the securities maintain strong relative strength in order to remain in the portfolio.  this portfolio also has an equity exposure overlay that, when activated, allows the account to hold up to 50% cash if necessary. international: this all-cap international equity strategy seeks to achieve long-term capital appreciation through a portfolio of international companies in both developed and emerging markets.  this portfolio invests in those securities with powerful relative strength characteristics and requires that the securities maintain strong relative strength in order to remain in the portfolio.  exposure to international markets is achieved through american depository receipts (adrs). global macro: this global tactical asset allocation strategy seeks to achieve meaningful risk diversification and investment returns.  the strategy invests across multiple asset classes: domestic equities (long & inverse), international equities (long & inverse), fixed income, real estate, currencies, and commodities.  exposure to each of these areas is achieved through exchange-traded funds (etfs). balanced: this strategy includes equities from our core strategy (see above) and high-quality u.s. fixed income in approximately a 60% equity / 40% fixed income mix.  this strategy seeks to provide long-term capital appreciation and income with moderate volatility. tactical fixed income: this strategy seeks to provide current income and strong risk-adjusted fixed income returns.   the strategy invests across multiple sectors of the fixed income market:  u.s. government bonds, investment grade corporate bonds, high yield bonds, treasury inflation protected securities (tips), convertible bonds, and international bonds.  exposure to each of these areas is achieved through exchange-traded funds (etfs). to receive fact sheets for any of the strategies above, please e-mail andy hyer at andyh@dorseymm.com or call 626-535-0630.  past performance is no guarantee of future returns.  an investor should carefully review our brochure and consult with their financial advisor before making any investments. tweet 1 comment | momentum | permalink posted by: andy hyer alps dorsey wright sector momentum (swin) introduced january 12, 2017 tweet we are happy to announce the launch of swin, the alps dorsey wright sector momentum etf.  from yahoo: alps, a subsidiary of dst systems, inc. (dst) providing products and services to the financial services industry, today announced a strategic alliance with dorsey, wright & associates, a nasdaq company (dwa) to launch a new factor exchange-traded fund (etf), which is designed to capture momentum investing at both the sector and stock level. the alps dorsey wright sector momentum etf (nasdaq ticker: swin) leverages dorsey wright’s proprietary point and figure relative strength charting to create a high conviction portfolio of 50 stocks. the fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the dorsey wright us sector momentum index (dwussr), an equally weighted index consisting of 50 large and midcap stocks listed in the us. “we are excited to collaborate with such a prestigious company,” says tom carter, president of alps advisors inc., “the combination of dorsey wright’s research and our focus on product innovation has created a new strategy for enhancing portfolio construction.” historically, momentum strategies tend to perform best when clear leadership is established and sustained for a meaningful period; they often lag during time when there is no clear leadership among sectors. “swin is the first momentum etf to combine both macro (sector) and micro (stock) level screens,” says mike akins, svp & head of etfs for alps, “we believe its unique two-screen construct creates opportunity for outperformance in strong sector momentum cycles, while simultaneously maintaining a diversification cushion to help weather periods where no clear sector leadership is present.” although swin is concentrated on the top performing momentum sectors, it maintains an equal-weighted strategy at the stock level. “at alps we strive to help investors and advisors build better portfolios,” says akins, “alps sector dividend dog etf (sdog), which employs an equal-weight sector and stock strategy with a tilt toward equity income, and swin are complementary strategies that provide diversified exposure to both value and momentum.” continue reading here. tweet leave a comment » | media | permalink posted by: andy hyer q4 manager insights january 6, 2017 tweet the stock market had a solid end to the year and finished up the year strong. u.s. equities, as represented by the s&p 500 total return, were up 3.8% for the quarter and 12.0% for the year. many people had predicted a poor year for u.s. equities so these strong returns caught a lot of investors off guard. the returns for other asset classes were mixed during the fourth quarter, but on a year-to-date basis most of the broad asset class benchmarks finished in positive territory. one standout was small cap u.s. equities. the russell 2000 total return index was up 8.8% in the last three months of the year and 21.3% for the year. bonds lagged equities, but did end the year with positive returns. another big story was commodities, which had seen dreadful returns for the past couple of years. the rally in energy propelled the s&p gsci commodity index to a gain of 11.4% in 2016. the biggest story during the fourth quarter had to be trump winning the election. very few people predicted that outcome, and even fewer predicted what the market’s reaction would be with a trump victory! once again, we learned how difficult it is to mix politics with investing. we have always focused on price and left things like political forecasting to the people that need material for their television appearance. initially, the market had a huge selloff when it became clear trump was going to win. but before the dust even settled the market turned right around and shot higher as confused investors looked on. a trump presidency will no doubt be filled with a lot of uncertainty. however, there are a few themes that have emerged since the election that have affected our portfolios. financials (specifically banks) have rallied on the hopes of looser government regulation. whether or not that is good for americans as a whole is not really for us to decide, but it should make it easier and cheaper for banks to do business going forward and the market recognized that very quickly. we saw our exposure to financials increase after the election as a result of the sector’s relative strength. trump’s plans for improving infrastructure also helped industrials rally in to the end of the year. again, we have seen that strength flow through to our momentum models, and we have large allocations to that sector in most of our strategies. lost in the shuffle of the fourth quarter was the federal reserve raising rates for the first time in a year. the move was largely expected, but that didn’t prevent bonds from having a rough quarter. the positive return from bonds for 2016 was largely earned in the first part of the year. the barclays us aggregate index was down –3.0% for the quarter so the fear of rising rates among investors is real. our tactical fixed income strategy navigated the choppy waters very nicely in 2016. we were able to post nice gains at the beginning of the year by being in long maturity bonds as well as areas that do well in a strong bond market (high yield, emerging markets, corporates). as the probability of a rate hike grew and bonds began to falter we were able to switch the portfolio out of the “risk-on” bonds and into short term u.s. treasuries to preserve those gains. the two major events discussed above caused quite a bit of change in our models. that was really the theme all year. while the market posted impressive gains as a whole, there were a lot of crosscurrents under the surface. all year long, old trends died, and new ones emerged. at the beginning of the year, investors were favoring low volatility stocks and equities with high dividend yields. as the year wore on that leadership began to fall apart and investors began favoring more “risk on” investments like small caps that are more volatile and don’t provide as much current income. gold was also a theme that came and went during the year. there were many themes like that over the course of 2016 and that led to us making a lot of changes in the portfolios throughout the year. trading activity was much higher than normal as our models continued to adapt to emerging themes and get rid of old ones. it was definitely a transition year, but it looks like we are well positioned heading in to the new year. the crosscurrents under the surface will eventually subside. when they do, we should be well positioned to capture the trends in the new leadership. this information is from sources believed to be reliable, but no guarantee is made to its accuracy.  this should not be considered a solicitation to buy or sell any security.  unless otherwise stated, performance numbers are not inclusive of dividends or fees.  investors cannot invest directly in an index.  past performance is not indicative of future results.  potential for profits is accompanied by possibility of loss tweet leave a comment » | from the mm | permalink posted by: john lewis to constrain or not constrain? january 4, 2017 tweet fixed income allocations continue to be a major question in client portfolios. do you continue to hold traditional long term bonds that will price deteriorate as rates rise with the hopes that clients will be able to hold them to maturity, or do you layer in differentiating bond funds that generate returns through multiple asset classes? bloomberg wrote: donald trump’s election has reignited the prospects for inflation and growth both in the u.s. and abroad, which will likely lead to higher interest rates and spell the end of the bond market’s three-decade bull run. and that will favor funds that can go wherever the highest returns are — without constraints on maturity, geography or even credit quality. the buy and hold methodology gives you reliable income flows with the possibility of price deterioration as rates rise. while the multi asset class funds give you more ways to protect your downside and generate upside, which comes with higher volatility and ever-changing sector allocations. it is our belief that the ability to move between sector allocations will be key moving forward into 2017 as the world continues to change. unlike most unconstrained bond funds however that shy away from long term bonds, we believe that long treasuries, at times, are a valuable holding.  our tactical fixed income strategy can hold up to 40% in long term government exposure, along with the ability to hold convertible bonds, short-term treasuries, emerging market debt, tips, high yield and investment grade corporates. if you would like more information on our fixed income strategy please reach out to andyh@dorseymm.com. dorsey, wright & associates, llc, a nasdaq company, is a registered investment advisory firm.  neither the information within this article, nor any opinion expressed shall constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation or an offer to buy any securities, commodities or exchange traded products. this article does not purport to be complete description of the securities or commodities, markets or developments to which reference is made.  past performance, hypothetical or actual, does not guarantee future results. in all securities trading there is a potential for loss as well as profit. it should not be assumed that recommendations made in the future will be profitable or will equal the performance as shown. investors should have long-term financial objectives.  advice from a financial professional is strongly advised. tweet leave a comment » | markets | permalink posted by: charlie coleman q1 2017 powershares dwa momentum etfs january 3, 2017 tweet the powershares dwa momentum indexes are reconstituted on a quarterly basis.  these indexes are designed to evaluate their respective investment universes and build an index of stocks with superior relative strength characteristics.   this quarter’s allocations are shown below. pdp: powershares dwa momentum etf dwas: powershares dwa small cap momentum etf dwaq: powershares dwa nasdaq momentum etf piz: powershares dwa developed markets momentum etf pie: powershares dwa emerging markets momentum etf source: dorsey wright, msci, standard & poor’s, and nasdaq, allocations subject to change we also apply this momentum-indexing methodology on a sector level: see www.powershares.com for more information.   the relative strength strategy is not a guarantee.  there may be times where all investments and strategies are unfavorable and depreciate in value. tweet leave a comment » | momentum | permalink posted by: andy hyer looking to 2017 december 30, 2016 tweet as we close out 2017 the final week of the year the markets have not been as cooperative as investors would have liked.  the markets have pulled back from historic highs and the dow was not able to hit the elusive 20,000 mark. looking forward to 2017 here are several issues that may impact clients and markets. political new president: president elect trump takes the oath of office on friday january 20th in washington, d.c.  the us markets have reacted mostly positive to the trump election based on promises of lower taxes, faster growth and more us based jobs. here is a link if you would like more information on the inauguration. tensions with russia?: obama announced sanctions against russia yesterday afternoon and expelled 35 russian official in response to the allegations of russian cyber-attacks during the election. russia has not yet retaliated but russian foreign minister sergei lavrov “we of course cannot leave these stunts unanswered. reciprocity is the law in diplomacy and international relations.” social security tax cap increase: workers and employers each pay in 6.2% of wages into the social security system until the salary cap of $118,500. in 2017 the tax rate will stay the same but the cap is being raised to $127,200 to adjust for higher wages in the us. payments increase: the cost of living adjustment for 2017 will be a modest 0.3% or about $5 per month. this increase is in line with 2016  which did not see any raise. increases to social security are based on the consumer price index for urban wage earners and clerical workers. earning limits: the earnings limit for people  65 and younger will increase from $15,720 in 2016 to $16,920 in 2017. while those who turn 66 in 2017 the limit increases by $3,000 to $44,880. for a full list of changes, here is the 2017 social security changes fact sheet. currency china: china is trying to reduce the impact of the dollar on the yuan as the yuan trades at an eight year low. they are introducing 11 more countries into its currency basket. euro: the financial times polled 28 economists and over 60% believe that the euro and dollar will hit parity next year for the first time in 14 years. rising interest rates in the us and continued qe in europe are thought to be two of the main factors in the shift. dorsey, wright & associates, llc, a nasdaq company, is a registered investment advisory firm  neither the information within this article, nor any opinion expressed shall constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation or an offer to buy any securities, commodities or exchange traded products. this article does not purport to be complete description of the securities or commodities, markets or developments to which reference is made. past performance, hypothetical or actual, does not guarantee future results. in all securities trading there is a potential for loss as well as profit. it should not be assumed that recommendations made in the future will be profitable or will equal the performance as shown. investors should have long-term financial objectives.  advice from a financial professional is strongly advised. tweet leave a comment » | from the mm, markets, wealth management | permalink posted by: charlie coleman top business stories of 2016–pnf edition december 29, 2016 tweet usa today identified the following as “the top 10 business stories of 2016.”  i’ve added pnf charts for some of the topics mentioned in the article to provide some additional insight. 1. donald trump elected president. new presidents always portend massive changes. but the election of trump, with his promises to upend washington and roll back regulations, could shake business and economic establishments to their foundations. while he has hinted at keeping some popular provisions of obamacare, trump will be politically pressured to repeal much of the health care law that mandated universal coverage. having promised to bring jobs back to rust belt states, trump is likely to renegotiate trade deals and possibly even raise tariffs, a move that could trigger global disputes. the dodd-frank act, enacted after the national financial crisis to lower excessive risk-taking by banks, could be under assault as lobbyists push for easing its restrictions. trump has professed a desire to maintain the current low-interest-rate policy. 2. brexit. in late june, the united kingdom defied polling forecasts and voted to leave the european union, setting off reverberations across the globe. u.s. stocks fell 5% as fears spread of disrupted trade relationships with europe and of other countries that could follow the u.k.’s lead. yet the market recovered within days as investors realized the immediate effects on american businesses were limited. there were even some winners among u.s. banks and tech firms that may have gained from a shift in investment from the u.k. but the economic fallout won’t really be clear until the u.k. renegotiates trade deals with european countries before it leaves the eu in 2019. 3. the dow closes in on 20,000. wall street stumbled into 2016, with stocks suffering their worst-ever first week of trading. but the gloom gave way to bullish optimism, especially after the presidential election when the “trump rally” put the 120-year-old dow jones industrial average on a track for a “dow 20,000” milestone, racking up more than 25 record highs in 2016 so far along the way. the stock rebound occurred despite the federal reserve’s decision to hike short-term interest rates for the first time in 2016  at its december meeting — when the central bank also let investors know it expects three more rate increases in 2017. 4. prescription drug prices bring controversy. the rising cost of prescription drug prices captured headlines, generated rising criticism and sparked investigations. at center stage was turing pharmaceuticals ceo martin shkreli’s decision to impose a more than 5,000% price spike of a drug used to treat a parasitic illness suffered by aids patients. summoned to appear before a congressional committee in february, he went silent, invoking his fifth amendment right to avoid testifying against himself. but he unloaded after the hearing, calling members of congress “imbeciles” in a tweet. turing wasn’t the only drugmaker taking fire. health care providers, patients and others criticized mylan for a series of increases that raised the price for a two-pack of epipens, a potentially life-saving injection for allergy sufferers, to $600, up from about $100 in 2009. by year’s end, mylan had introduced a generic version of the medication for $300 per two-pack. all of these events drew fire from a senate committee report in december that warned “staggering” increases in the cost of some prescription drugs threaten the health of patients and “the economic stability of american households.” 5. wells fargo’s scandal. in september, the san francisco-based bank agreed to a $185 million settlement with federal regulators after an investigation showed wells fargo had secretly opened millions of unauthorized deposit and credit card accounts that weren’t authorized by customers. an estimated 5,300 employees were fired over several years for pressuring customers to accept the largely unwanted accounts, the bank acknowledged in its settlement with the consumer financial protection bureau, the office of the comptroller of the currency and los angeles city and county legal officials. wells fargo ceo john stumpf resigned in october, but investigations of the bank’s conduct continued. 6. unemployment rate falls. the unemployment rate, which hit 10% in 2009, continued its remarkable descent, falling to 4.6% in november from 5% early in the year. many economists believe that rate, the lowest since august 2007, represents full employment and can’t fall much further without generating a run-up in inflation as wages rise. the federal reserve is coming around to that view and so, at a mid-december meeting, unexpectedly forecast three interest rate hikes in 2017, throwing cold water on the post-election market rally. the low jobless rate is already pushing up pay increases as employers compete for fewer available workers. that smaller pool of workers is also tempering average monthly job gains, which have fallen from 229,000 in 2015 to 180,000 this year. 7. oil prices plunge, then rebound. they fell below $27 per barrel in mid-february as a global glut of production fueled a surplus and concerns about economic growth dealt a blow. the commodity’s sharp descent, dropping nearly in half over a four-month stretch, contributed to bankruptcies of dozens of u.s. energy companies and thousands of layoffs. but oil rebounded to more than $50 per barrel after the organization of the petroleum exporting countries and certain non-opec states, including russia, agreed in november to slash production in a bid to bolster prices. 8. the u.s. dollar shines. the greenback hit its highest level vs. the euro in 14 years as global investors began pricing in less fed stimulus and stronger u.s. growth. the dollar surged in value against currencies around the world following the election of trump. it showed particular strength against the chinese yuan, which trump repeatedly targeted in his campaign after accusing the chinese government of currency manipulation to benefit its economy. 9. pressure on free trade. a decades-long movement toward free trade and globalization appeared to stop in its tracks as presidential candidates donald trump and hillary clinton both vowed to withdraw from the trans-pacific partnership, which would have relaxed trade restrictions with asian nations. trump threatened to pull out of the north american free trade agreement if mexico doesn’t renegotiate the deal and to slap mexico and china with tariffs of 35% and 45%, respectively. his aim: to partly reverse the millions of layoffs at u.s. factories as jobs were offshored to china, mexico and other countries. but many economists say those jobs aren’t coming back and tariffs risk retaliation that could ravage u.s. exports and jobs. 10. fake news fears. fake news bubbled up during the political campaign and became a business issue for the place where many people get their news: facebook. a post-election analysis by buzzfeed found that fake stories shared on facebook outperformed real news stories during the final three months of the campaign cycle. the most shared story was a fake report about pope francis’ endorsement of then-republican nominee donald trump. facebook ceo and co-founder mark zuckerberg said it was ”extremely unlikely” that it affected the election outcome, but the company is making changes so users of the social network can more easily flag news that is fake. a pew research center survey, released earlier this month, found that 63% say fake news creates “great confusion” among the public about current events. source of charts is dorsey wright.  charts are as of 12/28/16.  dorsey, wright & associates, a nasdaq company, is a registered investment advisory firm. neither the information nor any opinion expressed shall constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation or an offer to buy any securities, commodities or exchange traded products.  this document does not purport to be complete description of the securities to which reference is made.  there may be times where all investments and strategies are unfavorable and depreciate in value.  technical analysis is not predictive and there is no assurance that forecasts based on charts can be relied upon. each investor should carefully consider the investment objectives, risks, and expenses of the securities discussed above prior to investing.  advice from a financial professional is strongly advised.  dorsey wright currently owns fb in some of its managed accounts.  investors cannot invest directly in an index.  indexes have no fees.  past performance is not indicative of future results.  potential for profits is accompanied by possibility of loss. tweet leave a comment » | markets | permalink posted by: andy hyer momentum demystified december 28, 2016 tweet it has been stated by no less than eugene fama, the 2014 co-recipient of the nobel prize in economics that “the premier anomaly is momentum.” [1]  this idea that past winners tend to be future winners, while past losers tend to be future losers, has been vetted and established through hundreds of academic white papers on the topic. yet, momentum (aka relative strength) continues to be a misunderstood approach to investing.  why is momentum a strong investment factor that gives investors the potential to outperform over time?  how exactly can momentum be exploited? i think tom dorsey explained the concept of momentum best in a recent interview: if i gave you a list of the 100 best golfers worldwide and asked you to pick who you thought would be in the top 10 at the end of the next quarter, who would you pick? my guess is you would pick the current top ten to be in the top three months from now. even if i asked you to pick the ones who would be in the top ten after one year, you would probably pick the current top ten. at the end of the contest some would have fallen out and some would have moved up, but the majority would still be in the top ten. this is outperformance. it relates to newton’s law of motion, which suggests that objects that are in motion tend to stay in motion until an external force acts upon them. so, in my world this means that stocks that have good fundamentals, in a market that in general is supporting higher prices, and the chart pattern clearly shows that demand is in control of the stock, tend to continue to do well. golfers who have good fundamentals, are in good shape, and at the top of their game, tend to continue to do well. buy the winners. [1] fama, e. and k. french, 2008, dissecting anomalies, the journal of finance, 63, pg. 1653-1678. to the data for a simple illustration of the power of momentum, consider the following study completed by nasdaq dorsey wright’s senior portfolio manager, john lewis, cmt, who has done extensive research and published numerous whitepapers on the topic of momentum investing. study out of an investment universe of the largest 1,000 u.s. stocks by market capitalization, we backtested a strategy that selected the top 100 stocks based on trailing 12 month total return.  the portfolio was rebalanced on a monthly basis.  each of the 100 stocks in the portfolio was equal-weighted each month. as shown below, this simple momentum strategy outperformed the russell 1000 total return index by a meaningful margin during this test period covering 12/31/1989 – 9/30/2016. additional data points: annualized return of the momentum model was 13.45% compared to 9.49% for the russell 1000 total return index over this period of time. the momentum model outperformed the russell 1000 total return index in 67 percent of rolling 3 year periods and 70 percent of rolling 5 year periods. there are a variety of ways to construct and implement a momentum strategy and this is by no means meant to be held out the only or the best method.  rather, the purpose of this study is to demonstrate that a very simple momentum model has significant performance potential over time.  the bottom line is that any investor who seeks to employ an active investment strategy that strives to generate performance above that of a passive index over time should give strong consideration to making momentum a key component of their portfolios. source: factset.  hypothetical back-test period: 12/31/1989 – 09/30/2016.  performance information for the momentum model is the result of a strategy back-test on an index that is not available for direct investment.  back-tested performance is hypothetical and is provided for informational purposes to illustrate the effects of the strategy during a specific period.  the hypothetical returns have been developed and tested by dwa, but have not been verified by any third party and are unaudited.  back-testing performance differs from actual performance because it is achieved through retroactive application of a model investment methodology designed with the benefit of hindsight.  model performance data (both back-tested and live) does not represent the impact of material economic and market factors might have on an investment advisor’s decision making process if the advisor were actually managing client money.  returns include dividends, but do not include fees or transaction costs.  past performance is not indicative of future results.  potential for profits is accompanied by possibility of loss.  the relative strength strategy is not a guarantee.  there may be times where all investments and strategies are unfavorable and depreciate in value.  accessing momentum through managed accounts hopefully, at this point you are starting to wonder how you can put this powerful investment factor to work for your clients.  we have a suggestion: take a look at our family of systematic relative strength portfolios, which are available on a large and growing number of separately managed account (sma) and unified managed account (uma) platforms. first, a little history.  since 1987, dorsey wright & associates has been an advisor to financial professionals on wall street and investment managers worldwide, providing technical research and investment solutions.  in 2002, john lewis joined the portfolio management team at dorsey wright and was instrumental in leading an extensive period of research that led to the introduction of our family of systematic relative strength portfolios.  these portfolios have two major objectives: systematize the investment management process to remove as much of the element of human emotion as possible. focus the investment strategy around the most powerful return factor we could identify: momentum (aka relative strength). this family of accounts now consists of seven different strategies: four of the seven strategies now have 10+ year track records.  there are 3 key reasons to consider making these strategies part of your client’s portfolios: we believe that momentum is the premier investment factor and has the potential to provide meaningful investment performance for your clients. momentum can be relatively uncorrelated to other investment strategies, such as value. dorsey wright, a nasdaq company, is committed to providing financial advisors with the highest level of investment research, tools, and investment solutions in the industry to help you succeed in serving your clients. where are these strategies available these portfolios are available on over 20 different platforms, including on most major wirehouses, regionals, discount brokerages, and turnkey asset management programs (tamps). to find out about availability at your firm and to receive the fact sheets on these strategies, please contact andy hyer at andyh@dorseymm.com or by calling him at 626-535-0630. dorsey, wright & associates, a nasdaq company, is a registered investment advisory firm. neither the information nor any opinion expressed shall constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation or an offer to buy any securities, commodities or exchange traded products.  this document does not purport to be complete description of the investment strategies to which reference is made.  the relative strength strategy is not a guarantee.  there may be times where all investments and strategies are unfavorable and depreciate in value.  relative strength is a measure of price momentum based on historical price activity.  relative strength is not predictive and there is no assurance that forecasts based on relative strength can be relied upon. each investor should carefully consider the investment objectives, risks, and expenses of the strategies discussed above prior to investing.  advice from a financial professional is strongly advised.  tweet leave a comment » | momentum, relative strength research | permalink posted by: andy hyer fixed income under the microscope december 27, 2016 tweet earlier this month we saw a noteworthy shift in dali, which ranks six asset classes by relative strength from strongest to weakest.  fixed income came into 2016 ranked number two in dali and spent much of the first half of the year ranked number one. as of 12/22/16 as shown below, fixed income fell to the fourth rank in the middle of this month after having been ranked three or higher since early 2012. period: 1/3/07 – 12/19/16, based on weekly tally ranking bonds are typically the portion of the allocation that investors worry least about, especially over the past 35 years.  fixed income tends to have lower volatility than most other asset classes and if you just look at the nominal returns of bonds over time, you would probably be reassured.  after all, as shown in the first table below, nominal fixed income returns have been positive in every single decade since the 1870s.  in the tables below, losing performances are shaded in red, those with annualized gains of 0% to 1.9% in yellow, and left unshaded are any gains of 2% or higher. source: morningstar, research affiliates however, real annualized returns show a very different story.  after accounting for inflation, bonds have not always been so stellar. source: morningstar, research affiliates what action should be taken if fixed income were to enter into another extended period where its real returns weren’t so favorable?  that will depend on each client’s circumstances, but dali will be a good way to gauge the overall environment for this very important asset class. the relative strength strategy is not a guarantee.  there may be times where all investments and strategies are unfavorable and depreciate in value.  tweet leave a comment » | markets | permalink posted by: andy hyer steve forbes interviews tom dorsey december 27, 2016 tweet steve forbes interviews tom dorsey, founder, dorsey, wright & associates tweet leave a comment » | media | permalink posted by: andy hyer weekly rs recap december 27, 2016 tweet the table below shows the performance of a universe of mid and large cap u.s. equities, broken down by relative strength decile and quartile and then compared to the universe return.  those at the top of the ranks are those stocks which have the best intermediate-term relative strength.  relative strength strategies buy securities that have strong intermediate-term relative strength and hold them as long as they remain strong. last week’s performance (12/19/16 – 12/23/16) is as follows: this example is presented for illustrative purposes only and does not represent a past or present recommendation.  the relative strength strategy is not a guarantee.  there may be times where all investments and strategies are unfavorable and depreciate in value.  the performance above is based on pure price returns, not inclusive of dividends, fees, or other expenses.  past performance is not indicative of future results.  potential for profits is accompanied by possibility of loss. tweet leave a comment » | markets | permalink posted by: andy hyer all i want for christmas is… low volatility? december 23, 2016 tweet the month of december sees some of the lowest volume trade days of the year. people are on vacation, holiday parties are in full swing and allocations for the next year are being finalized. s&p 500 volatility has also decided it wants to take a step back from the roller coaster of the year. vix futures hit a 16 month low on wednesday to 10.97, a level not seen since august of 2015. the vix had sharp increase in volatility leading up to the election, post-election it has been on a sharp decline following the announcement that trump beat clinton. with the s&p 500 trading almost flat for the week as of market close on december 22nd  and today shaping up to be another non eventful day, all eyes will be looking to the markets next week. in the next week we will see the final tax loss trades of the obama presidency and we may even see the dow jones finally break through 20,000. investors cannot invest directly in an index. indexes have no fees. past performance is not indicative of future results. potential for profits is accompanies by possibility of loss. tweet leave a comment » | from the mm, markets | permalink posted by: charlie coleman quadfecta highs december 20, 2016 tweet how uncommon is it to see the s&p 500, dow jones industrial average, the nasdaq composite, and the russell 2000 indexes all break out to new all-time highs on the same day?  since 1979, there have only been 13 such occurrences, including the most recent occurrence on 11/21/2016.  piper jaffrey’s december issue of the informed investor, included a nice summary the types of market returns we have seen after such “quadfecta” days. following the republican’s ‘trifecta’ sweep during the election, the popular averages posted ‘quadfecta’ highs, representing the rare occurrence when the spx, djia, compq and rut all close at record highs on the same trading day. the recent november ‘quadfecta’ highs was the first time this has occurred since dec. 1999. from our perspective, the major averages simultaneously breaking out to new highs confirms broad participation in the rally and provides further evidence to our secular bull market thesis.  a historical review of other ‘quadfecta’ highs offers compelling results in regards to expected future returns.  although there are a limited number of occurrences since 1979, the major indices have generated meaningfully returns over the ensuing 26-week and 52-week periods. additionally, the percent of positive returns has far outpaced negative returns on a historical basis. the table above highlights various return metrics after quadfecta highs have been reached. as you can see, the spx, djia and compq traded higher 75% of the on a 52-week basis. the rut was higher 67% of the time after the same time period. average returns also look healthy across the board with at the major indices averaging at least 8% returns over the next 52-weeks. when clients ask our thoughts on the markets in 2017, this might be something you consider discussing with them.  strong indications of healthy market breadth have historically tended to be a good sign for future equity returns. price performance only, not inclusive of dividends or transaction costs.  past performance is no guarantee of future returns. tweet leave a comment » | markets | permalink posted by: andy hyer some perspective on tactical asset allocation december 13, 2016 tweet i recently saw a presentation by nadia papagiannis, cfa, of goldman sachs asset management that provided some important insights into the landscape for asset allocation.  consider the table below, which shows  the performance of a number of asset classes (commodities, emerging market debt, u.s. bonds, high yield, u.s. real estate, international real estate, bank loans, hedge funds, emerging market equities, international equities, international small cap, u.s small cap) to the performance of u.s. large cap equities. what stands out about the years 2013-2015?  very few asset classes outperformed u.s. large cap equities during those years.  this goes a long ways towards explaining why most people who have employed some form of asset allocation (anything that diversified away from large cap us equities) have probably been left underwhelmed with their performance during those 3 years. true to the human condition, recency bias has been in full effect in recent years as it applies to tactical allocation with people questioning the category’s merits.  however, i would suggest that clients may benefit from reviewing a table like that shown above to remember that not all years are like 2013-2015 (if they were there wouldn’t be much need to own anything besides u.s. large cap equities). to me, there are 5 key reasons why investors would do well to consider making tactical asset allocation part of the mix: asset classes go through bull and bear markets.  a relative strength-driven tactical asset allocation strategy can seek to overweight those asset classes in favor and underweight those asset classes that are out of favor. many investors can’t handle the volatility associated with a buy and hold approach of investing solely in u.s. large cap equities.  tactical asset allocation has the potential to provide some diversification and help smooth out the ride. after seeing a couple year environment in which tactical asset allocation struggled, now may be a very good time to beef up that exposure or to make new allocation to tactical asset allocation. from a client management standpoint, my experience is that clients love to talk about the tactical portion of their overall asset allocation.  clients like to see how their portfolio is adapting to the current environment.  give them something they want (flexibility).  this is very different than just giving into their emotional investment desires because a relative strength-driven asset allocation strategy objectively respond to market trends. tactical asset allocation can be the glue that keeps a clients’ hands off the more aggressive portions of their allocation that may be fully invested in equities. dorsey wright provides a full suite of tactical asset allocation tools and solutions such as our global macro sma/uma, the arrow dwa tactical and balanced funds, the arrow dwa tactical etf, dali, tactical tilt models, and more.  if you would like to discuss different tools and solutions in this area, please call andy hyer at 626-535-0630 or andyh@dorseymm.com. the relative strength strategy is not a guarantee.  there may be times where all investments and strategies are unfavorable and depreciate in value. indices are unmanaged.  the figures for the index reflect the reinvestment of all income or dividends, as applicable, but do not reflect the deduction of any fees or expenses which would reduce returns.  investors cannot invest directly in indices.  the indices referenced herein have been selected because they are well known, easily recognized by investors, and reflect those indeces that the investment manager believes, in part based on industry practice, provide a suitable benchmark against which to evaluate the investment or broader market described herein.  the exclusion of “failed” or closed hedge funds may mean that each index overstates the performance of hedge funds generally.  starting point selected given longest common index inception.  hfri fof = hfri fund of funds composite index; hfri and related indices are trademarks and service marks of hedge fund research, inc. (“hfr”) which has no affliation with gsam.  information regarding hfr indices was obtained from hfr’s website and other public sources and is provided for comparison purposes only.  hfr does not endorse or approve any of the statements made herein. tweet leave a comment » | tactical asset alloc | permalink posted by: andy hyer what winning looks like (probably not what you expect) december 6, 2016 tweet the blog basis pointing has an excellent write up on the performance profile of winning funds.  i suspect most investors will be very surprised at its findings.  it’s not that winning funds don’t exist–they most definitely do.  rather, it is that the path to long-term outperformance is far lumpier than most investors probably expect. investors tend to have some pretty ingrained misconceptions of what “winning” funds look like. for instance, winning funds lay waste to the index and category peers; they do so over the short- and long-term; they corner really well, deftly avoiding big drawdowns and rocking during rallies; they don’t rattle around much; they succeed like clockwork. they’re tom brady. for those who have gotten to know markets, randomness, and the resultant unpredictability of short and even intermediate-term performance, we know this is nuts. winning funds do not succeed anywhere near linearly. performance is jagged; success and failure arrive abruptly; it often takes years to grind out an advantage; and so forth. this is pure torture for many investors, who bail (and that pattern reveals itself in the form of hideous dollar-weighted returns; if there’s any consistency in markets, it’s that, but i digress). study however, this concept is often too abstract so i thought i’d try to semi-simply illustrate it through an example. here’s what i did (which will win no points for elegance or precision but last time i checked this blog was free): grouped together all diversified u.s. open-end equity mutual funds (i.e., the nine style-box categories; active and index funds; no etfs) limited to unique funds (i.e., oldest shareclass) calculated the twenty year annual excess returns of the unique funds i grouped (excess returns = fund’s total return minus return of benchmark index assigned to the category that fund was assigned to) sorted the funds into deciles by excess returns (top=group with highest excess returns; bottom=group with lowest excess returns) there were around 680 unique funds that had twenty-year excess returns, so we’re talking about 68 per decile grouping. findings here’s the predictable stairstep pattern from the top to bottom decile when sorted by excess return: click here to read all of the different elements of this study, be see below for the one that i found most interesting: as shown below the more-successful funds did indeed lag less often (measured as number of rolling 36-month periods during the twenty year span where the decile grouping had negative average excess returns) than the less-successful funds. but it’s not like they were strangers to underperformance. in fact, the best-performing funds lagged their indexes in more than one of every three rolling three-year periods.so, investors in these funds spent roughly a third of the past two decades looking up, not down, at the index (when measured over rolling three-year periods). my emphasis added.  as shown in the first chart, there are plenty of funds that have outperformed over the past 20 years.  however, any investor who expected consistent outperformance would have been sorely disappointed.  even the best performing funds lagged their benchmark about one third of rolling 3-year periods.  the lessons should be clear.  investors would be well served to do meaningful due diligence on active strategies before putting money to work.  once investors feel confident that they have settled on strategies/management teams that they believe are likely to outperform over time, they would be well served to demonstrate a very high level of patience. there may be times where all investments and strategies are unfavorable and depreciate in value. tweet leave a comment » | investor behavior, markets | permalink posted by: andy hyer the roller coaster ride of oil december 1, 2016 tweet millions of american every year pay a hefty sum of money to be thrilled by some of the world’s fastest rollercoasters. the feeling of being suspended above the world as you climb higher and higher only to have crashing down is an amazing feeling.  if you have not conquered the rational part of your brain that says that it is not logical to put yourself in those metal contraptions i highly recommend a trip to your local amusement park. another option has been to stay long oil over the past year, below is a chart showing roller coaster ride of brent crude futures over the past year. in january we hit the bottom turn of the roller coaster and analysts did not have a consensus on oils next direction. “the price of brent crude fell to $27.67 a barrel at one point, its lowest since 2003, while us crude fell as low as $28.36. many analysts have slashed their 2016 oil price forecasts, with morgan stanley analysts saying that “oil in the $20s is possible”, if china devalues its currency further. economists at the royal bank of scotland say that oil could fall to $16, while standard chartered predicts that prices could hit just $10 a barrel.”1 looking back now it was just a market overreaction. the client calls and excessive worry that the world was slowing down are now just a bad memory. since the bottom in january: oil prices have recovered, china is still growing at a respectable rate and latin america did not fall apart as many people feared. after the opec meeting yesterday we saw oil prices once again climb above $50.00 to close out the day over 8% ahead.  today as of writing this the brent crude markets are up over 3% and gasoline futures are up over 5%. while we do not how the cuts to oil production that have been approved will happen or if the countries involved will follow through, we have a short term relief in the energy market’s low prices. in our aggressive srs mode we rotated two additional energy names into the model in the past month allowing us to capitalize on the energy spike, while at the start of the year we held no energy names going into the january selloff.  that account is a concentrated portfolio (20-25 holdings). two of our energy names were up mid 20% and a third was up 10%. needless to say, we haven’t seen a day like today since hurricane katrina caused all the refiners to have problems.  the long term goal like every other money manager is to outperform our index, while that does not always happen in short time periods, days like yesterday are the reason you invest for longer periods and follow your investment thesis. if you would like more information on our systematic rs aggressive portfolio, please e-mail andyh@dorseymm.com or call 626-535-0630. andy will also be hosting a webinar on friday december 2, 2016 at 2 pm et introducing our family of systematic relative strength portfolios.  upcoming events please join andy hyer, client portfolio manager at dwa, for an introduction to our family of systematic relative strength portfolios on friday, december 2nd at 2 p.m. et.  these portfolios provide disciplined access to relative strength strategies including u.s. equities, international equities, fixed income, and global macro and are available on uma and sma strategies at a large and growing number of firms.  click here to register for the webinar. the event password is dwadwa.   this example is presented for illustrative purposes only and does not represent a past or present recommendation.  the relative strength strategy is not a guarantee.  there may be times where all investments and strategies are unfavorable and depreciate in value.  the performance above is based on pure price returns, not inclusive of dividends, fees, or other expenses.  past performance is not indicative of future results.  potential for profits is accompanied by possibility of loss. 1 west, matthew. “just how low can oil prices go and who is hardest hit?” bbc news. january 18, 2016. accessed december 01, 2016. http://www.bbc.com/news/business-35245133.   tweet leave a comment » | from the mm | permalink posted by: charlie coleman relative strength spread november 29, 2016 tweet the chart below is the spread between the relative strength leaders and relative strength laggards (top quartile of stocks in our ranks divided by the bottom quartile of stocks in our ranks; universe of u.s. mid and large cap stocks).  when the chart is rising, relative strength leaders are performing better than relative strength laggards.    as of 11/28/16: the relative strength strategy is not a guarantee.  there may be times where all investments and strategies are unfavorable and depreciate in value.  past performance is not indicative of future results.  potential for profits is accompanied by possibility of loss. tweet leave a comment » | momentum | permalink posted by: andy hyer knowing when to stand still november 28, 2016 tweet there has been an enormous amount of commentary following the november 8th presidential election about exactly what a trump administration will mean for the financial markets, both domestic and international.  trump’s victory is being called one of the biggest political upsets in modern u.s. history.  i think it is fair to say that the markets were probably expecting a clinton victory, which may account, to some degree, for the wild swings in the performance of many relative strength strategies in the days following the election.  for example, see below for the performance of our systematic rs international model compared to its benchmark, the nasdaq global ex us tr index.  in the immediate aftermath of the election, many of our latin american holdings took it on the chin, perhaps in fears of the perceived protectionists policies that might be associated with a trump administration.  however, you’ll notice that within a couple of days the performance of the model snapped back. *performance of the systematic rs international model is non-inclusive of dividends or transaction costs.  the performance of the nasdaq global ex us index is inclusive of dividends, but does not include transaction costs.  period 11/8/16 – 11/22/16. we received a number of panicked phone calls during the few days following the election when we were experiencing some sharp underperformance.  “is the model responding too slowly?”  “wouldn’t it make sense to get out of all latin american stocks now?”  those were some of the types of questions we were receiving.  our response was that we didn’t know if the underperformance would continue or if we would see those positions snap back, but that we would stick with our relative strength discipline.  positions that deteriorated sufficiently would be removed from the model and replaced with stronger names.  in other words, we were not overriding the model. this does remind me of a nyt article i read a number of years ago on a related topic: the soccer field has turned out to be a popular laboratory among economists, with penalty kicks a particular favorite. awarded after certain kinds of fouls, or sometimes to decide a championship match, a penalty kick pits one player against the goalkeeper. (mano a pie instead of mano a mano, though, since the goalie is allowed to use his hands.) standing just 36 feet away, the kicker sends the ball hurtling at the goal at 60 to 80 m.p.h., giving the goalie just 0.2 to 0.3 second to respond. given the speed, the goalkeeper has to decide what to do even before observing the direction of the kick. stopping a penalty kick is considered one of the most difficult challenges in sports. not surprisingly, 80 percent of all penalty kicks score. for their study, mr. azar, along with michael bar-eli, a sports psychologist; ilana ritov, a psychologist; and two graduate students, scanned the top leagues in the world, collecting data on 311 penalty kicks. then they computed the probability of stopping different kicks (to the left, the right or center) with different actions (jumping left, right, or staying put) to see which one “maximizes his chance of stopping the ball.” according to their calculations, staying in the center gives the goalkeeper the best shot at halting a penalty kick — 33.3 percent, instead of 14.2 percent on the left and 12.6 percent on the right. yet when the group analyzed how the goalkeepers had actually reacted to these penalty kicks, they discovered the goalies remained in the center just 6.3 percent of the time. the reason, mr. azar contends, is rooted in how the players feel after failing to block the ball. source: new york times when it comes to soccer and investing, when choosing what to do, sometimes the best thing is nothing.  overriding models may or may not work out in the short-run.  in the long-run, adherence to disciplined and adaptive models makes all the difference. over the last 10+ years the we have been managing the systematic rs international portfolio, it has certainly had periods of underperformance, but over the last 10 years it has outperformed its benchmark by 6.4 percent annually, net of all fees. as of 10/31/16 to receive the brochure on our systematic rs portfolios (which are available on a large number of sma and uma platforms), please e-mail andyh@dorseymm.com or call 626-535-0630. this example is presented for illustrative purposes only and does not represent a past recommendation.  the relative strength strategy is not a guarantee.  there may be times where all investments and strategies are unfavorable and depreciate in value. the performance shown above is based on monthly performance of the systematic relative strength international model.  net performance shown is total return net of management fees, commissions, and expenses for all dorsey, wright & associates managed accounts, managed for each complete quarter for each objective, regardless of levels of fixed income and cash in each account.  the advisory fees are described in part 2a of the adviser’s form adv.  the starting values on 3/31/2006 are assigned an arbitrary value of 100 and statement portfolios are revalued on a trade date basis on the last day of each quarter.  all returns since inception of actual accounts are compared against the nasdaq global ex us index.  the nasdaq global ex us index total return index is a stock market index that is designed to measure the equity market performance of global markets outside of the united states and is maintained by nasdaq.  a list of all holdings over the past 12 months is available upon request.  the performance information is based on data supplied by the manager or from statistical services, reports, or other sources which the manager believes are reliable.  there are risks inherent in international investments, which may make such investments unsuitable for certain clients. these include, for example, economic, political, currency exchange, rate fluctuations, and limited availability of information on international securities.  past performance does not guarantee future results. in all securities trading, there is a potential for loss as well as profit. it should not be assumed that recommendations made in the future will be profitable or will equal the performance as shown. investors should have long-term financial objectives when working with dorsey, wright & associates. tweet leave a comment » | investor behavior, momentum | permalink posted by: andy hyer weekly rs recap november 28, 2016 tweet the table below shows the performance of a universe of mid and large cap u.s. equities, broken down by relative strength decile and quartile and then compared to the universe return.  those at the top of the ranks are those stocks which have the best intermediate-term relative strength.  relative strength strategies buy securities that have strong intermediate-term relative strength and hold them as long as they remain strong. last week’s performance (11/21/16 – 11/25/16) is as follows: this example is presented for illustrative purposes only and does not represent a past or present recommendation.  the relative strength strategy is not a guarantee.  there may be times where all investments and strategies are unfavorable and depreciate in value.  the performance above is based on pure price returns, not inclusive of dividends, fees, or other expenses.  past performance is not indicative of future results.  potential for profits is accompanied by possibility of loss. tweet 2 comments | momentum | permalink posted by: andy hyer recap of november so far november 25, 2016 tweet as we recover from the great national holiday of turkey, family and football we see the world of securities start to slow down. according to market watch the days before and after thanksgiving make up two of the five slowest trade days for the year. this slow down allows us time to reflect on what we have seen so far in the month of november.  so far this month we have seen: the cubs win the world series for the first time in 108 years donald trump gets elected president of the united states major earthquakes hit fukushima, japan in similar fashion to the 2013 triple disaster vin scully us award the presidential medal of freedom we have also seen global markets increase volatility from fear of a changing trade environment, us equity markets have a surprise rally in the wake of possible corporate tax reform and us interest rates start to climb. looking forward we will continue to have major events as the global markets will need to digest what policies the new president will put into place and what brexit is going to really look like for the eu. we will continue to hit these bumps in the road, but we need to plan for the full journey and not focus on the potholes along the way. people fled from latin american banks over the past couple of weeks resulting in a rough patch for our international accounts. over the past week we followed our game plan of watching the signals and trusting our process. the results have been a strong week of outperformance vs. our benchmark; we continue to be very happy about how this strategy has performed compared to its benchmark over time. the process while it does not have the sizzle of a hot stock picker does have a great story of out performance over full market cycles and exposure to places in the world that an individual investor often does not have the knowledge to invest. when talking to clients, friends and family this holiday season i always like to have a good story. the story this year is about finding value in places others have abandoned out of fear or taking a step back, staying true to a thoughtful investment thesis. if you are interested to learn more about our investment thesis in our international strategy,  andy hyer can be reached at andyh@dorseymm.com or 626 535-0630 charles coleman associate portfolio manager dorsey wright & associates the relative strength strategy is not a guarantee.  there may be times where all investments and strategies are unfavorable and depreciate in value. tweet leave a comment » | from the mm | permalink posted by: charlie coleman everyone loves a story november 22, 2016 tweet there is always a reason not to invest in stocks.  over the years there have been countless reasons that have kept investors out of the market.  the graph below was posted on twitter back in august by @danielcrosby.  i pulled that chart up again last week after the election and reminded myself how many reasons over the years there have been to sit on the sidelines.  the sad truth is everything on the chart had well-reasoned arguments for why investors should have avoided the stock market.  but the market was actually up 100 times more than inflation over the time period in the chart. it is so difficult to avoid getting caught up in the madness because the issues surrounding these problems are real.  the story is always more persuasive than the truth.  try playing a little game the next time you are at a cocktail and the stock market comes up.  there is usually someone around that has a story for a certain stock or how the economy will impact global returns.  everyone standing around listening is captivated because they love the story.  eventually someone will ask you how you go about investing.  my usual response is something like, “well, i just buy a bunch of stocks that are going up and hold them until they stop going up.”  it is amazing how quickly everyone needs to go to the bar for a refill after hearing my “story.” but that is one of the best ways to make money in the market over the long term!  find an edge and exploit that edge as best you can.  keep the process simple so that it is repeatable.  the more moving parts you have the more things you have that can break.  the more you focus on stories rather than a repeatable, proven process the more likely you will be to fall into the trap that plagues most investors. telling a story is great for sales.  you aren’t going to bring in many new accounts with the cocktail party speech i suggested above.  so go ahead a put a little sizzle on the steak in order to sell your process.  but when the rubber meets the road and it is time get down to the business of managing accounts don’t fool yourself.  there is elegance in simplicity.  follow your process and don’t get caught up trying to make everyone think you are a really smart person.  there are always reasons to keep you out of the markets, but history shows that basing your investment decisions on the news story du jour isn’t the way to generate good returns over time. tweet 1 comment | investor behavior | permalink posted by: john lewis how momentum based etfs work in portfolio construction november 21, 2016 tweet etf trends publisher/editor tom lydon spoke with andy hyer, client porfolio manager, dorsey, wright & associates, a nasdaq company, at the schwab impact conference in san diego that ran oct. 24-27, 2016. hyer discussed how its innovative momentum based etfs work in portfolio construction. neither the information nor any opinion expressed shall constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation or an offer to buy any securities, commodities or exchange traded products.  this document and presentation do not purport to be complete descriptions of the securities or commodities, markets or developments to which reference is made.  past performance is not indicative of future results.  potential for profits is accompanied by possibility of loss.    some performance information presented is the result of back-tested performance.  back-tested performance is hypothetical (it does not reflect trading in actual accounts) and is provided for informational purposes to illustrate the effects of the discussed strategy during a specific period.     back-tested performance results have certain limitations.  such results do not represent the impact of material economic and market factors might have on an investment advisor’s decision making process if the advisor were actually managing client money.  back-testing performance also differs from actual performance because it is achieved through retroactive application of a model investment methodology designed with the benefit of hindsight.  dorsey, wright & associates believes the data used in the testing to be from credible, reliable sources, however; dorsey, wright & associates, llc (collectively with its affiliates and parent company, “dwa”) makes no representation or warranties of any kind as to the accuracy of such data.    the relative strength strategy is not a guarantee.  there may be times where all investments and strategies are unfavorable and depreciate in value.  relative strength is a measure of price momentum based on historical price activity.  relative strength is not predictive and there is no assurance that forecasts based on relative strength can be relied upon.   unless otherwise stated, the returns of the strategies do not include dividends for stocks or etfs but do account for distributions in mutual funds.  returns of the strategies do not include any transaction costs. investors should have long-term financial objectives.    the information contained herein has been prepared without regard to any particular investor’s investment objectives, financial situation, and needs.  accordingly, investors should not act on any recommendation (express or implied) or information in this material without obtaining specific advice from their financial advisors and should not rely on information herein as the primary basis for their investment decisions.  information contained herein is based on data obtained from recognized statistical services, issuer reports or communications, or other sources believed to be reliable (“information providers”).  however, such information has not been verified by dwa or the information provider and dwa and the information providers make no representations or warranties or take any responsibility as to the accuracy or completeness of any recommendation or information contained herein.  dwa and the information provider accept no liability to the recipient whatsoever whether in contract, in tort, for negligence, or otherwise for any direct, indirect, consequential, or special loss of any kind arising out of the use of this document or its contents or of the recipient relying on any such recommendation or information (except insofar as any statutory liability cannot be excluded).  any statements nonfactual in nature constitute only current opinions, which are subject to change without notice.    each investor should carefully consider the investment objectives, risks and expenses of any exchange-traded fund (“etf”) prior to investing. the risk of loss in trading commodities and futures can be substantial. the high degree of leverage that is often obtainable in commodity trading can work against you as well as for you. you should therefore carefully consider whether such trading in etfs is suitable for you in light of your financial condition.  before investing in an etf investors should obtain and carefully read the relevant prospectus and documents the issuer has filed with the sec. etf’s may result in the layering of fees as etf’s impose their own advisory and other fees. to obtain more complete information about the product the documents are publicly available for free via edgar on the sec website (http://www.sec.gov). tweet leave a comment » | momentum | permalink posted by: andy hyer relative strength spread november 21, 2016 tweet the chart below is the spread between the relative strength leaders and relative strength laggards (top quartile of stocks in our ranks divided by the bottom quartile of stocks in our ranks; universe of u.s. mid and large cap stocks).  when the chart is rising, relative strength leaders are performing better than relative strength laggards.    as of 11/18/16: the relative strength strategy is not a guarantee.  there may be times where all investments and strategies are unfavorable and depreciate in value.  past performance is not indicative of future results.  potential for profits is accompanied by possibility of loss. tweet leave a comment » | momentum | permalink posted by: andy hyer « previous entries asset management brochure mailing list (subscribe) contact call andy at (626) 535-0630 seeking alpha certified financial blogs abnormal returns clusterstock crossing wall street css analytics dr. ed's blog global economy and financial markets insider monkey market dynamics quantocracy seeking alpha street sleuth the big picture trend following world beta sites dorsey wright dwa money management search archives archives select month january 2017 december 2016 november 2016 october 2016 september 2016 august 2016 july 2016 june 2016 may 2016 april 2016 march 2016 february 2016 january 2016 december 2015 november 2015 october 2015 september 2015 august 2015 july 2015 june 2015 may 2015 april 2015 march 2015 february 2015 january 2015 december 2014 september 2014 august 2014 july 2014 june 2014 may 2014 april 2014 march 2014 february 2014 january 2014 december 2013 november 2013 october 2013 september 2013 august 2013 july 2013 june 2013 may 2013 april 2013 march 2013 february 2013 january 2013 december 2012 november 2012 october 2012 september 2012 august 2012 july 2012 june 2012 may 2012 april 2012 march 2012 february 2012 january 2012 december 2011 november 2011 october 2011 september 2011 august 2011 july 2011 june 2011 may 2011 april 2011 march 2011 february 2011 january 2011 december 2010 november 2010 october 2010 september 2010 august 2010 july 2010 june 2010 may 2010 april 2010 march 2010 february 2010 january 2010 december 2009 november 2009 october 2009 september 2009 august 2009 july 2009 june 2009 may 2009 categories 401k (2) from the archives (70) from the mm (146) investor behavior (623) just for fun (175) markets (2,467) media (66) momentum (530) non-partisan op-ed (44) off-topic (9) podcasts (41) portfolio theory (49) relative strength and value (37) relative strength research (208) retirement/saving (125) sentiment (189) sri (3) tactical asset alloc (461) thought process (874) uncategorized (21) wealth management (12) january 2017 m t w t f s s « dec 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 systematic rss feed rss feed meta log in entries rss comments rss wordpress.org theme: contempt by vault9. get a free blog at wordpress.com


Here you find all texts from your page as Google (googlebot) and others search engines seen it.

Words density analysis:

Numbers of all words: 14261

One word

Two words phrases

Three words phrases

the - 7.26% (1035)
and - 2.55% (364)
for - 2.29% (327)
per - 1.49% (213)
all - 1.23% (176)
rate - 1.23% (175)
invest - 1.2% (171)
form - 1.12% (160)
that - 1.11% (158)
are - 1.04% (149)
not - 0.84% (120)
perform - 0.77% (110)
act - 0.74% (106)
his - 0.74% (106)
mark - 0.71% (101)
our - 0.69% (99)
here - 0.69% (98)
relative - 0.65% (92)
have - 0.65% (92)
market - 0.62% (88)
strength - 0.6% (86)
performance - 0.59% (84)
investment - 0.58% (83)
out - 0.58% (83)
this - 0.58% (83)
year - 0.57% (81)
sec - 0.57% (81)
with - 0.55% (78)
turn - 0.53% (76)
strategy - 0.52% (74)
low - 0.51% (73)
over - 0.5% (71)
return - 0.49% (70)
any - 0.48% (69)
time - 0.47% (67)
you - 0.46% (66)
able - 0.46% (66)
ran - 0.43% (62)
how - 0.43% (62)
end - 0.43% (61)
momentum - 0.41% (59)
investor - 0.41% (58)
from - 0.41% (58)
portfolio - 0.39% (56)
ten - 0.39% (55)
can - 0.38% (54)
there - 0.37% (53)
dec - 0.36% (52)
2016 - 0.36% (52)
set - 0.36% (51)
returns - 0.36% (51)
tweet - 0.36% (51)
strategies - 0.35% (50)
one - 0.35% (50)
win - 0.34% (48)
but - 0.33% (47)
fun - 0.32% (46)
has - 0.32% (46)
dorsey - 0.32% (46)
fund - 0.32% (45)
was - 0.31% (44)
investors - 0.3% (43)
asset - 0.3% (43)
will - 0.29% (42)
long - 0.29% (42)
right - 0.29% (42)
see - 0.29% (41)
 the - 0.28% (40)
high - 0.27% (39)
sector - 0.27% (38)
term - 0.27% (38)
count - 0.27% (38)
may - 0.27% (38)
cap - 0.27% (38)
own - 0.26% (37)
markets - 0.26% (37)
its - 0.26% (37)
etf - 0.26% (37)
stock - 0.26% (37)
index - 0.26% (37)
wright - 0.25% (35)
come - 0.25% (35)
which - 0.25% (35)
on. - 0.24% (34)
top - 0.24% (34)
alloc - 0.24% (34)
andy - 0.24% (34)
ever - 0.23% (33)
past - 0.23% (33)
funds - 0.23% (33)
post - 0.22% (32)
u.s - 0.22% (32)
more - 0.22% (32)
information - 0.22% (32)
would - 0.22% (32)
use - 0.22% (32)
day - 0.22% (31)
u.s. - 0.22% (31)
their - 0.22% (31)
client - 0.21% (30)
price - 0.21% (30)
some - 0.21% (30)
los - 0.21% (30)
elect - 0.2% (29)
period - 0.2% (29)
like - 0.2% (29)
value - 0.2% (29)
been - 0.2% (29)
were - 0.2% (29)
strong - 0.2% (28)
show - 0.2% (28)
december - 0.2% (28)
sit - 0.2% (28)
years - 0.2% (28)
posted - 0.2% (28)
tactical - 0.2% (28)
allocation - 0.2% (28)
account - 0.2% (28)
securities - 0.19% (27)
off - 0.19% (27)
large - 0.19% (27)
comment - 0.19% (27)
even - 0.19% (27)
month - 0.19% (27)
income - 0.18% (26)
provide - 0.18% (26)
they - 0.18% (26)
link - 0.18% (26)
trade - 0.18% (26)
based - 0.18% (26)
dow - 0.18% (26)
future - 0.18% (26)
financial - 0.18% (26)
dwa - 0.18% (26)
new - 0.18% (26)
mode - 0.18% (26)
 i - 0.18% (26)
favor - 0.18% (25)
permalink - 0.18% (25)
old - 0.18% (25)
after - 0.18% (25)
by: - 0.18% (25)
should - 0.18% (25)
hyer - 0.18% (25)
where - 0.18% (25)
these - 0.17% (24)
well - 0.17% (24)
present - 0.17% (24)
risk - 0.17% (24)
other - 0.17% (24)
leave - 0.17% (24)
trump - 0.17% (24)
very - 0.17% (24)
when - 0.17% (24)
each - 0.17% (24)
does - 0.17% (24)
result - 0.16% (23)
gain - 0.16% (23)
part - 0.16% (23)
investments - 0.16% (23)
about - 0.16% (23)
times - 0.16% (23)
equities - 0.16% (23)
change - 0.16% (23)
national - 0.16% (23)
into - 0.16% (23)
way - 0.16% (23)
global - 0.16% (23)
back - 0.16% (23)
vin - 0.15% (22)
2017 - 0.15% (22)
class - 0.15% (22)
model - 0.15% (22)
bond - 0.15% (22)
led - 0.15% (22)
tom - 0.15% (22)
stocks - 0.15% (22)
system - 0.15% (21)
international - 0.15% (21)
january - 0.15% (21)
those - 0.15% (21)
election - 0.15% (21)
guarantee - 0.15% (21)
table - 0.15% (21)
below - 0.15% (21)
rough - 0.15% (21)
fit - 0.15% (21)
test - 0.14% (20)
outperform - 0.14% (20)
sign - 0.14% (20)
rank - 0.14% (20)
clients - 0.14% (20)
under - 0.14% (20)
fixed - 0.14% (20)
most - 0.14% (20)
november - 0.14% (20)
portfolios - 0.14% (20)
power - 0.13% (19)
etfs - 0.13% (19)
potential - 0.13% (19)
full - 0.13% (19)
loss - 0.13% (19)
follow - 0.13% (19)
than - 0.13% (19)
fact - 0.13% (19)
call - 0.13% (19)
value. - 0.13% (18)
advisor - 0.13% (18)
bonds - 0.13% (18)
log - 0.13% (18)
hold - 0.13% (18)
systematic - 0.13% (18)
week - 0.13% (18)
look - 0.13% (18)
associate - 0.13% (18)
down - 0.12% (17)
results - 0.12% (17)
now - 0.12% (17)
nasdaq - 0.12% (17)
two - 0.12% (17)
what - 0.12% (17)
different - 0.12% (17)
just - 0.12% (17)
unfavorable - 0.12% (17)
story - 0.12% (17)
who - 0.12% (17)
real - 0.12% (17)
since - 0.12% (17)
many - 0.12% (17)
during - 0.12% (17)
depreciate - 0.12% (17)
gains - 0.11% (16)
above - 0.11% (16)
chart - 0.11% (16)
objective - 0.11% (16)
continue - 0.11% (16)
2015 - 0.11% (16)
main - 0.11% (16)
through - 0.11% (16)
seek - 0.11% (16)
management - 0.11% (16)
hit - 0.11% (15)
again - 0.11% (15)
2013 - 0.11% (15)
had - 0.11% (15)
sell - 0.11% (15)
classes - 0.11% (15)
line - 0.11% (15)
year. - 0.11% (15)
buy - 0.11% (15)
dust - 0.11% (15)
best - 0.11% (15)
 a - 0.11% (15)
consider - 0.11% (15)
guarantee. - 0.11% (15)
your - 0.11% (15)
process - 0.11% (15)
associates - 0.11% (15)
bottom - 0.1% (14)
lead - 0.1% (14)
long-term - 0.1% (14)
 in - 0.1% (14)
shown - 0.1% (14)
group - 0.1% (14)
get - 0.1% (14)
fees - 0.1% (14)
accounts - 0.1% (14)
increase - 0.1% (14)
sma - 0.1% (14)
ways - 0.1% (14)
data - 0.1% (14)
search - 0.1% (14)
dorsey, - 0.1% (14)
actual - 0.09% (13)
such - 0.09% (13)
tend - 0.09% (13)
number - 0.09% (13)
higher - 0.09% (13)
percent - 0.09% (13)
world - 0.09% (13)
read - 0.09% (13)
believe - 0.09% (13)
three - 0.09% (13)
2012 - 0.09% (13)
manager - 0.09% (13)
represent - 0.09% (13)
roll - 0.09% (13)
work - 0.09% (13)
only - 0.09% (13)
offer - 0.09% (13)
commodities - 0.09% (13)
need - 0.09% (13)
recommend - 0.09% (13)
them - 0.09% (13)
research - 0.09% (13)
make - 0.09% (13)
while - 0.09% (13)
results. - 0.09% (13)
mean - 0.09% (13)
rotation - 0.08% (12)
achieve - 0.08% (12)
rest - 0.08% (12)
me, - 0.08% (12)
thing - 0.08% (12)
also - 0.08% (12)
periods - 0.08% (12)
oil - 0.08% (12)
investing - 0.08% (12)
recommendation - 0.08% (12)
historic - 0.08% (12)
first - 0.08% (12)
following - 0.08% (12)
performed - 0.08% (12)
returns. - 0.08% (12)
dividend - 0.08% (12)
mid - 0.08% (12)
less - 0.08% (12)
2010 - 0.08% (12)
available - 0.08% (12)
point - 0.08% (12)
lag - 0.08% (12)
2011 - 0.08% (12)
bank - 0.08% (12)
major - 0.08% (12)
managed - 0.08% (12)
exchange - 0.08% (11)
made - 0.08% (11)
2016. - 0.08% (11)
exposure - 0.08% (11)
equity - 0.08% (11)
august - 0.08% (11)
far - 0.08% (11)
traded - 0.08% (11)
possibility - 0.08% (11)
let - 0.08% (11)
current - 0.08% (11)
try - 0.08% (11)
event - 0.08% (11)
quarter - 0.08% (11)
product - 0.08% (11)
president - 0.08% (11)
underperform - 0.08% (11)
say - 0.08% (11)
universe - 0.08% (11)
area - 0.08% (11)
trading - 0.08% (11)
did - 0.08% (11)
rates - 0.08% (11)
every - 0.08% (11)
2014 - 0.08% (11)
factor - 0.08% (11)
company - 0.08% (11)
objectives - 0.08% (11)
historical - 0.08% (11)
source - 0.08% (11)
used - 0.08% (11)
excess - 0.08% (11)
eight - 0.08% (11)
2009 - 0.08% (11)
short - 0.07% (10)
could - 0.07% (10)
method - 0.07% (10)
value.  - 0.07% (10)
much - 0.07% (10)
people - 0.07% (10)
designed - 0.07% (10)
before - 0.07% (10)
100 - 0.07% (10)
once - 0.07% (10)
action - 0.07% (10)
highs - 0.07% (10)
against - 0.07% (10)
volatility - 0.07% (10)
fall - 0.07% (10)
media - 0.07% (10)
however - 0.07% (10)
indicative - 0.07% (10)
dividends - 0.07% (10)
outperformance - 0.07% (10)
seeks - 0.07% (10)
know - 0.07% (10)
macro - 0.07% (10)
road - 0.07% (10)
leaders - 0.07% (10)
ability - 0.07% (10)
stand - 0.07% (10)
kick - 0.07% (10)
employ - 0.07% (10)
profits - 0.07% (10)
days - 0.07% (10)
powerful - 0.07% (10)
nor - 0.07% (10)
prices - 0.07% (10)
- 0.07% (10)
level - 0.07% (10)
america - 0.07% (10)
paper - 0.07% (10)
uma - 0.06% (9)
limit - 0.06% (9)
expect - 0.06% (9)
years. - 0.06% (9)
february - 0.06% (9)
june - 0.06% (9)
care - 0.06% (9)
firm - 0.06% (9)
focus - 0.06% (9)
september - 0.06% (9)
purpose - 0.06% (9)
forecast - 0.06% (9)
include - 0.06% (9)
rid - 0.06% (9)
 there - 0.06% (9)
keep - 0.06% (9)
direct - 0.06% (9)
going - 0.06% (9)
back-test - 0.06% (9)
performing - 0.06% (9)
reason - 0.06% (9)
average - 0.06% (9)
edge - 0.06% (9)
next - 0.06% (9)
total - 0.06% (9)
news - 0.06% (9)
last - 0.06% (9)
loss. - 0.06% (9)
good - 0.06% (9)
expenses - 0.06% (9)
accompanied - 0.06% (9)
time. - 0.06% (9)
goal - 0.06% (9)
complete - 0.06% (9)
herein - 0.06% (9)
economic - 0.06% (9)
company, - 0.06% (9)
put - 0.06% (9)
document - 0.06% (9)
guarantee.  - 0.06% (9)
example - 0.06% (9)
fully - 0.06% (9)
both - 0.06% (9)
american - 0.06% (9)
rising - 0.06% (8)
however, - 0.06% (8)
please - 0.06% (8)
around - 0.06% (8)
results.  - 0.06% (8)
give - 0.06% (8)
business - 0.06% (8)
move - 0.06% (8)
seen - 0.06% (8)
making - 0.06% (8)
basis - 0.06% (8)
associates, - 0.06% (8)
alps - 0.06% (8)
maintain - 0.06% (8)
equities, - 0.06% (8)
four - 0.06% (8)
constitute - 0.06% (8)
powershares - 0.06% (8)
interest - 0.06% (8)
swin - 0.06% (8)
emerging - 0.06% (8)
andyh@dorseymm.com - 0.06% (8)
equal - 0.06% (8)
late - 0.06% (8)
capital - 0.06% (8)
cost - 0.06% (8)
always - 0.06% (8)
ups - 0.06% (8)
october - 0.06% (8)
take - 0.06% (8)
measure - 0.06% (8)
benchmark - 0.06% (8)
clear - 0.06% (8)
july - 0.06% (8)
bar - 0.06% (8)
broad - 0.06% (8)
methodology - 0.06% (8)
shows - 0.06% (8)
months - 0.06% (8)
avoid - 0.06% (8)
underperformance - 0.06% (8)
535-0630 - 0.06% (8)
money - 0.06% (8)
purposes - 0.06% (8)
sum - 0.06% (8)
areas - 0.06% (8)
recent - 0.06% (8)
net - 0.06% (8)
sectors - 0.06% (8)
family - 0.06% (8)
same - 0.06% (8)
626 - 0.06% (8)
job - 0.05% (7)
among - 0.05% (7)
penalty - 0.05% (7)
march - 0.05% (7)
russia - 0.05% (7)
cannot - 0.05% (7)
small - 0.05% (7)
effect - 0.05% (7)
inclusive - 0.05% (7)
tested - 0.05% (7)
forecasts - 0.05% (7)
april - 0.05% (7)
allocations - 0.05% (7)
mix - 0.05% (7)
industry - 0.05% (7)
presented - 0.05% (7)
latin - 0.05% (7)
remain - 0.05% (7)
article - 0.05% (7)
advice - 0.05% (7)
wealth - 0.05% (7)
phase - 0.05% (7)
ranks - 0.05% (7)
security - 0.05% (7)
too - 0.05% (7)
san - 0.05% (7)
bonds, - 0.05% (7)
outperformed - 0.05% (7)
annual - 0.05% (7)
key - 0.05% (7)
solicitation - 0.05% (7)
 this - 0.05% (7)
 past - 0.05% (7)
study - 0.05% (7)
view - 0.05% (7)
upon - 0.05% (7)
because - 0.05% (7)
indices - 0.05% (7)
energy - 0.05% (7)
ask - 0.05% (7)
winning - 0.05% (7)
performance. - 0.05% (7)
want - 0.05% (7)
investing. - 0.05% (7)
owns - 0.05% (7)
rally - 0.05% (7)
market. - 0.05% (7)
discuss - 0.05% (7)
compared - 0.05% (7)
inverse - 0.05% (7)
fear - 0.05% (7)
found - 0.05% (7)
quintile - 0.05% (7)
euro - 0.05% (7)
increases - 0.05% (7)
platform) - 0.05% (7)
meaningful - 0.05% (7)
positive - 0.05% (7)
free - 0.05% (7)
hfr - 0.05% (7)
pick - 0.05% (7)
certain - 0.05% (7)
ones - 0.05% (7)
looking - 0.05% (7)
hypothetical - 0.04% (6)
motion - 0.04% (6)
issue - 0.04% (6)
tax - 0.04% (6)
rolling - 0.04% (6)
actually - 0.04% (6)
place - 0.04% (6)
topic - 0.04% (6)
story. - 0.04% (6)
really - 0.04% (6)
characteristics - 0.04% (6)
decile - 0.04% (6)
invests - 0.04% (6)
enter - 0.04% (6)
fake - 0.04% (6)
opinion - 0.04% (6)
description - 0.04% (6)
reference - 0.04% (6)
within - 0.04% (6)
quartile - 0.04% (6)
simple - 0.04% (6)
holding - 0.04% (6)
distribution - 0.04% (6)
then - 0.04% (6)
growth - 0.04% (6)
products - 0.04% (6)
theme - 0.04% (6)
big - 0.04% (6)
dividends, - 0.04% (6)
obtain - 0.04% (6)
carefully - 0.04% (6)
generate - 0.04% (6)
few - 0.04% (6)
often - 0.04% (6)
find - 0.04% (6)
trend - 0.04% (6)
unique - 0.04% (6)
models - 0.04% (6)
pie - 0.04% (6)
left - 0.04% (6)
political - 0.04% (6)
markets, - 0.04% (6)
start - 0.04% (6)
advisory - 0.04% (6)
probably - 0.04% (6)
construct - 0.04% (6)
stop - 0.04% (6)
achieved - 0.04% (6)
ubs - 0.04% (6)
rise - 0.04% (6)
close - 0.04% (6)
list - 0.04% (6)
order - 0.04% (6)
changes - 0.04% (6)
leadership - 0.04% (6)
downs - 0.04% (6)
john - 0.04% (6)
roller - 0.04% (6)
early - 0.04% (6)
service - 0.04% (6)
recover - 0.04% (6)
stay - 0.04% (6)
states - 0.04% (6)
provides - 0.04% (6)
impact - 0.04% (6)
portfolios. - 0.04% (6)
quadfecta - 0.04% (6)
access - 0.04% (6)
arrow - 0.04% (6)
flat - 0.04% (6)
select - 0.04% (6)
clients. - 0.04% (6)
countries - 0.04% (6)
indexes - 0.04% (6)
626-535-0630 - 0.04% (6)
20, - 0.04% (6)
provider - 0.04% (6)
thought - 0.04% (6)
blog - 0.04% (6)
currency - 0.04% (6)
decision - 0.04% (6)
professional - 0.04% (6)
elected - 0.04% (6)
china - 0.04% (6)
demonstrate - 0.04% (6)
coleman - 0.04% (6)
insight - 0.04% (5)
suitable - 0.04% (5)
economists - 0.04% (5)
activity - 0.04% (5)
cash - 0.04% (5)
s&p - 0.04% (5)
500 - 0.04% (5)
 we - 0.04% (5)
went - 0.04% (5)
ken - 0.04% (5)
slow - 0.04% (5)
social - 0.04% (5)
jour - 0.04% (5)
below, - 0.04% (5)
ranked - 0.04% (5)
sources - 0.04% (5)
returns, - 0.04% (5)
meet - 0.04% (5)
non - 0.04% (5)
help - 0.04% (5)
type - 0.04% (5)
portfolio. - 0.04% (5)
services - 0.04% (5)
 it - 0.04% (5)
growing - 0.04% (5)
might - 0.04% (5)
russell - 0.04% (5)
don’t - 0.04% (5)
costs. - 0.04% (5)
great - 0.04% (5)
being - 0.04% (5)
limited - 0.04% (5)
better - 0.04% (5)
performance, - 0.04% (5)
index. - 0.04% (5)
deal - 0.04% (5)
fees. - 0.04% (5)
reflect - 0.04% (5)
stories - 0.04% (5)
neither - 0.04% (5)
strength. - 0.04% (5)
health - 0.04% (5)
events - 0.04% (5)
risks - 0.04% (5)
active - 0.04% (5)
jobs - 0.04% (5)
white - 0.04% (5)
commodities, - 0.04% (5)
figure - 0.04% (5)
trends - 0.04% (5)
public - 0.04% (5)
dollar - 0.04% (5)
 for - 0.04% (5)
six - 0.04% (5)
banks - 0.04% (5)
specific - 0.04% (5)
fed - 0.04% (5)
year, - 0.04% (5)
discussed - 0.04% (5)
head - 0.04% (5)
kicks - 0.04% (5)
needs - 0.04% (5)
final - 0.04% (5)
27, - 0.04% (5)
center - 0.04% (5)
whether - 0.04% (5)
reasons - 0.04% (5)
worst - 0.04% (5)
yield - 0.04% (5)
source: - 0.04% (5)
inflation - 0.04% (5)
report - 0.04% (5)
approach - 0.04% (5)
et.  - 0.04% (5)
coaster - 0.04% (5)
626-535-0630. - 0.04% (5)
register - 0.04% (5)
weighted - 0.04% (5)
particular - 0.04% (5)
relied - 0.04% (5)
saving - 0.04% (5)
intermediate-term - 0.04% (5)
advisors - 0.04% (5)
made. - 0.04% (5)
charlie - 0.04% (5)
a guarantee.  - 0.04% (5)
purport - 0.04% (5)
products. - 0.04% (5)
expressed - 0.04% (5)
moving - 0.04% (5)
securities, - 0.04% (5)
shall - 0.04% (5)
question - 0.04% (5)
objectives, - 0.04% (5)
aggressive - 0.04% (5)
appreciation - 0.04% (5)
upon. - 0.04% (5)
drug - 0.04% (5)
short- - 0.04% (5)
lewis - 0.04% (5)
predictive - 0.04% (5)
likely - 0.04% (5)
back-tested - 0.04% (5)
strategy. - 0.04% (5)
donald - 0.04% (5)
spread - 0.04% (5)
popular - 0.04% (5)
lowest - 0.04% (5)
today - 0.04% (5)
“the - 0.04% (5)
without - 0.04% (5)
reliable - 0.04% (5)
fell - 0.04% (5)
assurance - 0.04% (5)
require - 0.04% (5)
transaction - 0.04% (5)
track - 0.03% (4)
bull - 0.03% (4)
industries - 0.03% (4)
europe - 0.03% (4)
testing - 0.03% (4)
momentum. - 0.03% (4)
using - 0.03% (4)
layer - 0.03% (4)
thesis - 0.03% (4)
basis. - 0.03% (4)
strongly - 0.03% (4)
regard - 0.03% (4)
behavior - 0.03% (4)
low. - 0.03% (4)
constrain - 0.03% (4)
yet - 0.03% (4)
ranking - 0.03% (4)
additional - 0.03% (4)
charts - 0.03% (4)
advised. - 0.03% (4)
act, - 0.03% (4)
registered - 0.03% (4)
workers - 0.03% (4)
benefit - 0.03% (4)
came - 0.03% (4)
until - 0.03% (4)
pay - 0.03% (4)
including - 0.03% (4)
multi - 0.03% (4)
protect - 0.03% (4)
firms - 0.03% (4)
street - 0.03% (4)
groups - 0.03% (4)
period. - 0.03% (4)
directly - 0.03% (4)
raise - 0.03% (4)
adjust - 0.03% (4)
winners - 0.03% (4)
barrel - 0.03% (4)
rss - 0.03% (4)
million - 0.03% (4)
wage - 0.03% (4)
20,000 - 0.03% (4)
everyone - 0.03% (4)
away - 0.03% (4)
presidential - 0.03% (4)
continued - 0.03% (4)
along - 0.03% (4)
began - 0.03% (4)
adapt - 0.03% (4)
sharp - 0.03% (4)
highest - 0.03% (4)
rather - 0.03% (4)
2000 - 0.03% (4)
reserve - 0.03% (4)
says - 0.03% (4)
announce - 0.03% (4)
managing - 0.03% (4)
third - 0.03% (4)
activity. - 0.03% (4)
contained - 0.03% (4)
provided - 0.03% (4)
create - 0.03% (4)
 relative - 0.03% (4)
laggards - 0.03% (4)
“we - 0.03% (4)
e-mail - 0.03% (4)
retirement - 0.03% (4)
worry - 0.03% (4)
futures - 0.03% (4)
between - 0.03% (4)
discipline - 0.03% (4)
it’s - 0.03% (4)
 however, - 0.03% (4)
periods. - 0.03% (4)
break - 0.03% (4)
occurrence - 0.03% (4)
selected - 0.03% (4)
portion - 0.03% (4)
etfs) - 0.03% (4)
providing - 0.03% (4)
ball - 0.03% (4)
finish - 0.03% (4)
right. - 0.03% (4)
wells - 0.03% (4)
fargo - 0.03% (4)
seven - 0.03% (4)
pure - 0.03% (4)
feel - 0.03% (4)
environment - 0.03% (4)
crude - 0.03% (4)
requires - 0.03% (4)
lower - 0.03% (4)
decade - 0.03% (4)
dali - 0.03% (4)
herein. - 0.03% (4)
names - 0.03% (4)
across - 0.03% (4)
exchange-traded - 0.03% (4)
llc - 0.03% (4)
federal - 0.03% (4)
solutions - 0.03% (4)
government - 0.03% (4)
largely - 0.03% (4)
corporate - 0.03% (4)
receive - 0.03% (4)
critical - 0.03% (4)
so, - 0.03% (4)
decide - 0.03% (4)
goalkeeper - 0.03% (4)
material - 0.03% (4)
another - 0.03% (4)
returns.  - 0.03% (4)
fees, - 0.03% (4)
 to - 0.03% (4)
couple - 0.03% (4)
types - 0.03% (4)
presentation - 0.03% (4)
why - 0.03% (4)
perspective - 0.03% (4)
date - 0.03% (4)
hedge - 0.03% (4)
expected - 0.03% (4)
domestic - 0.03% (4)
(long - 0.03% (4)
inverse), - 0.03% (4)
investing.  - 0.03% (4)
income, - 0.03% (4)
annualized - 0.03% (4)
suggest - 0.03% (4)
wright’s - 0.03% (4)
forward - 0.03% (4)
estate, - 0.03% (4)
saw - 0.03% (4)
recommendation. - 0.03% (4)
illustrative - 0.03% (4)
fourth - 0.03% (4)
united - 0.03% (4)
lot - 0.03% (4)
right, - 0.03% (4)
related - 0.03% (4)
rut - 0.03% (4)
diversification - 0.03% (4)
equities. - 0.03% (4)
drawdown - 0.03% (4)
poor - 0.03% (4)
(to - 0.03% (4)
love - 0.02% (3)
29, - 0.02% (3)
talk - 0.02% (3)
website - 0.02% (3)
thesis. - 0.02% (3)
true - 0.02% (3)
jones - 0.02% (3)
renegotiate - 0.02% (3)
industrial - 0.02% (3)
giving - 0.02% (3)
measured - 0.02% (3)
balanced - 0.02% (3)
archives - 0.02% (3)
value.  the - 0.02% (3)
recommendation.  - 0.02% (3)
averages - 0.02% (3)
ride - 0.02% (3)
respond - 0.02% (3)
feed - 0.02% (3)
click - 0.02% (3)
fees, or other - 0.02% (3)
returns) - 0.02% (3)
marks - 0.02% (3)
near - 0.02% (3)
52-week - 0.02% (3)
something - 0.02% (3)
bring - 0.02% (3)
shift - 0.02% (3)
wall - 0.02% (3)
success - 0.02% (3)
tech - 0.02% (3)
here’s - 0.02% (3)
step - 0.02% (3)
effects - 0.02% (3)
hfri - 0.02% (3)
assigned - 0.02% (3)
category - 0.02% (3)
expenses.  - 0.02% (3)
categories - 0.02% (3)
twenty - 0.02% (3)
allocation. - 0.02% (3)
election, - 0.02% (3)
fears - 0.02% (3)
funds. - 0.02% (3)
approve - 0.02% (3)
u.k. - 0.02% (3)
obama - 0.02% (3)
holiday - 0.02% (3)
patients - 0.02% (3)
record - 0.02% (3)
production - 0.02% (3)
concept - 0.02% (3)
according - 0.02% (3)
currencies - 0.02% (3)
economy - 0.02% (3)
tools - 0.02% (3)
chance - 0.02% (3)
staying - 0.02% (3)
still - 0.02% (3)
think - 0.02% (3)
stopping - 0.02% (3)
acts - 0.02% (3)
goalie - 0.02% (3)
pattern - 0.02% (3)
history - 0.02% (3)
mano - 0.02% (3)
monthly - 0.02% (3)
campaign - 0.02% (3)
statement - 0.02% (3)
post-election - 0.02% (3)
possible - 0.02% (3)
hot - 0.02% (3)
analysis - 0.02% (3)
finding - 0.02% (3)
10. - 0.02% (3)
game - 0.02% (3)
facebook - 0.02% (3)
plan - 0.02% (3)
tariffs - 0.02% (3)
stated - 0.02% (3)
products.  - 0.02% (3)
prior - 0.02% (3)
mexico - 0.02% (3)
believes - 0.02% (3)
pull - 0.02% (3)
 investors - 0.02% (3)
clinton - 0.02% (3)
28, - 0.02% (3)
1000 - 0.02% (3)
coming - 0.02% (3)
rebound - 0.02% (3)
weekly - 0.02% (3)
investigation - 0.02% (3)
emotion - 0.02% (3)
fire - 0.02% (3)
taking - 0.02% (3)
appear - 0.02% (3)
succeed - 0.02% (3)
him - 0.02% (3)
affiliates - 0.02% (3)
starting - 0.02% (3)
analysts - 0.02% (3)
brent - 0.02% (3)
prescription - 0.02% (3)
climb - 0.02% (3)
recap - 0.02% (3)
return. - 0.02% (3)
 those - 0.02% (3)
meeting - 0.02% (3)
little - 0.02% (3)
millions - 0.02% (3)
further - 0.02% (3)
rely - 0.02% (3)
instead - 0.02% (3)
construction - 0.02% (3)
employment - 0.02% (3)
kind - 0.02% (3)
accuracy - 0.02% (3)
objectives.  - 0.02% (3)
nyt - 0.02% (3)
holdings - 0.02% (3)
city - 0.02% (3)
victory - 0.02% (3)
providers - 0.02% (3)
recipient - 0.02% (3)
(top - 0.02% (3)
special - 0.02% (3)
illustrate - 0.02% (3)
light - 0.02% (3)
ceo - 0.02% (3)
‘quadfecta’ - 0.02% (3)
treasuries - 0.02% (3)
 dorsey - 0.02% (3)
commodity - 0.02% (3)
themes - 0.02% (3)
lack - 0.02% (3)
difficult - 0.02% (3)
market’s - 0.02% (3)
makes - 0.02% (3)
normal - 0.02% (3)
again, - 0.02% (3)
election. - 0.02% (3)
lagged - 0.02% (3)
biggest - 0.02% (3)
caught - 0.02% (3)
predicted - 0.02% (3)
strong. - 0.02% (3)
insights - 0.02% (3)
second - 0.02% (3)
diversified - 0.02% (3)
toward - 0.02% (3)
equal-weight - 0.02% (3)
problems - 0.02% (3)
note - 0.02% (3)
lives. - 0.02% (3)
underperformance. - 0.02% (3)
- 0.02% (3)
study, - 0.02% (3)
otherwise - 0.02% (3)
strongest - 0.02% (3)
standard - 0.02% (3)
on” - 0.02% (3)
drawdowns - 0.02% (3)
allows - 0.02% (3)
bit - 0.02% (3)
important - 0.02% (3)
mind - 0.02% (3)
hike - 0.02% (3)
maturity - 0.02% (3)
nice - 0.02% (3)
means - 0.02% (3)
having - 0.02% (3)
flow - 0.02% (3)
trump’s - 0.02% (3)
recognized - 0.02% (3)
grouped - 0.02% (3)
james - 0.02% (3)
gives - 0.02% (3)
general - 0.02% (3)
asked - 0.02% (3)
positioned - 0.02% (3)
opportunity - 0.02% (3)
institutional - 0.02% (3)
platforms) - 0.02% (3)
comments - 0.02% (3)
factors - 0.02% (3)
activity.  - 0.02% (3)
strategic - 0.02% (3)
portfolios, - 0.02% (3)
circumstances - 0.02% (3)
strategy? - 0.02% (3)
implement - 0.02% (3)
overlay - 0.02% (3)
portfolio, - 0.02% (3)
evaluate - 0.02% (3)
market.  - 0.02% (3)
example, - 0.02% (3)
remove - 0.02% (3)
tends - 0.02% (3)
degree - 0.02% (3)
journal - 0.02% (3)
accumulating - 0.02% (3)
 when - 0.02% (3)
safety - 0.02% (3)
short-term - 0.02% (3)
capture - 0.02% (3)
inc. - 0.02% (3)
time, - 0.02% (3)
values - 0.02% (3)
beginning - 0.02% (3)
consult - 0.02% (3)
companies - 0.02% (3)
brochure - 0.02% (3)
review - 0.02% (3)
 an - 0.02% (3)
losses - 0.02% (3)
core - 0.02% (3)
five - 0.02% (3)
multiple - 0.02% (3)
developed - 0.02% (3)
17, - 0.02% (3)
weak - 0.02% (3)
individual - 0.02% (3)
firm. - 0.02% (3)
sectors, - 0.02% (3)
profit. - 0.02% (3)
wages - 0.02% (3)
published - 0.02% (3)
french - 0.02% (3)
significant - 0.02% (3)
shown. - 0.02% (3)
reach - 0.02% (3)
allocate - 0.02% (3)
wright, - 0.02% (3)
level. - 0.02% (3)
profitable - 0.02% (3)
deliver - 0.02% (3)
yesterday - 0.02% (3)
russian - 0.02% (3)
recommendations - 0.02% (3)
developments - 0.02% (3)
assumed - 0.02% (3)
response - 0.02% (3)
showed - 0.02% (3)
momentum, - 0.02% (3)
explain - 0.02% (3)
continues - 0.02% (3)
window - 0.02% (3)
markets. - 0.02% (3)
official - 0.02% (3)
quite - 0.02% (3)
extensive - 0.02% (3)
 since - 0.02% (3)
friday - 0.02% (3)
knowledge - 0.02% (3)
yuan - 0.02% (3)
comes - 0.02% (3)
law - 0.02% (3)
mutual - 0.01% (2)
elegance - 0.01% (2)
well, - 0.01% (2)
together - 0.01% (2)
principal - 0.01% (2)
points - 0.01% (2)
entries - 0.01% (2)
pace - 0.01% (2)
erosion - 0.01% (2)
initial - 0.01% (2)
returns; - 0.01% (2)
(which - 0.01% (2)
(i.e., - 0.01% (2)
calculate - 0.01% (2)
employed - 0.01% (2)
work. - 0.01% (2)
leverage - 0.01% (2)
trip - 0.01% (2)
risk. - 0.01% (2)
yourself - 0.01% (2)
amazing - 0.01% (2)
doesn’t - 0.01% (2)
retirees - 0.01% (2)
feeling - 0.01% (2)
documents - 0.01% (2)
behavior, - 0.01% (2)
sec. - 0.01% (2)
served - 0.01% (2)
effective - 0.01% (2)
etf’s - 0.01% (2)
decades - 0.01% (2)
three-year - 0.01% (2)
grouping - 0.01% (2)
fourteenth - 0.01% (2)
findings - 0.01% (2)
via - 0.01% (2)
talking - 0.01% (2)
original - 0.01% (2)
sorted - 0.01% (2)
investment. - 0.01% (2)
objective, - 0.01% (2)
appropriate - 0.01% (2)
importance - 0.01% (2)
bias - 0.01% (2)
approximately - 0.01% (2)
 click - 0.01% (2)
rotation. - 0.01% (2)
nature - 0.01% (2)
proprietary - 0.01% (2)
basket - 0.01% (2)
valuable - 0.01% (2)
associated - 0.01% (2)
strength-driven - 0.01% (2)
anything - 0.01% (2)
wouldn’t - 0.01% (2)
2013-2015 - 0.01% (2)
senior - 0.01% (2)
equities) - 0.01% (2)
recently - 0.01% (2)
theory - 0.01% (2)
weakest - 0.01% (2)
cmt, - 0.01% (2)
lewis, - 0.01% (2)
funds, - 0.01% (2)
poorly - 0.01% (2)
change. - 0.01% (2)
processes - 0.01% (2)
meta - 0.01% (2)
superior - 0.01% (2)
tended - 0.01% (2)
historically - 0.01% (2)
rotate - 0.01% (2)
 these - 0.01% (2)
hands - 0.01% (2)
seeking - 0.01% (2)
composite - 0.01% (2)
adaptive - 0.01% (2)
alpha - 0.01% (2)
overweight - 0.01% (2)
$16, - 0.01% (2)
statements - 0.01% (2)
longer - 0.01% (2)
endorse - 0.01% (2)
 hfr - 0.01% (2)
analyze - 0.01% (2)
obtained - 0.01% (2)
fact, - 0.01% (2)
questions - 0.01% (2)
strategy?  - 0.01% (2)
relatively - 0.01% (2)
holds - 0.01% (2)
common - 0.01% (2)
given - 0.01% (2)
time.  - 0.01% (2)
described - 0.01% (2)
trends. - 0.01% (2)
investors, - 0.01% (2)
capitalize - 0.01% (2)
represented - 0.01% (2)
classes: - 0.01% (2)
getting - 0.01% (2)
currencies, - 0.01% (2)
commodities.  - 0.01% (2)
suite - 0.01% (2)
point, - 0.01% (2)
accumulation - 0.01% (2)
$10 - 0.01% (2)
azar - 0.01% (2)
worth - 0.01% (2)
services, - 0.01% (2)
statistical - 0.01% (2)
outside - 0.01% (2)
quickly - 0.01% (2)
inception - 0.01% (2)
volatility. - 0.01% (2)
topics - 0.01% (2)
parts - 0.01% (2)
realize - 0.01% (2)
fashion - 0.01% (2)
ball. - 0.01% (2)
hearing - 0.01% (2)
usual - 0.01% (2)
must - 0.01% (2)
exploit - 0.01% (2)
trough - 0.01% (2)
library - 0.01% (2)
trap - 0.01% (2)
left, - 0.01% (2)
everything - 0.01% (2)
psychologist; - 0.01% (2)
sports - 0.01% (2)
ahead - 0.01% (2)
mr. - 0.01% (2)
direction - 0.01% (2)
perspective, - 0.01% (2)
(measured - 0.01% (2)
0.3 - 0.01% (2)
cycles - 0.01% (2)
 if - 0.01% (2)
signals - 0.01% (2)
truth - 0.01% (2)
cocktail - 0.01% (2)
someone - 0.01% (2)
ones. - 0.01% (2)
reached - 0.01% (2)
 andy - 0.01% (2)
uses - 0.01% (2)
learn - 0.01% (2)
month, - 0.01% (2)
places - 0.01% (2)
equally - 0.01% (2)
watch - 0.01% (2)
sizzle - 0.01% (2)
process. - 0.01% (2)
story.  - 0.01% (2)
weeks - 0.01% (2)
focused - 0.01% (2)
road, - 0.01% (2)
brexit - 0.01% (2)
examining - 0.01% (2)
surprise - 0.01% (2)
changing - 0.01% (2)
award - 0.01% (2)
groups. - 0.01% (2)
versus - 0.01% (2)
out, - 0.01% (2)
backtest - 0.01% (2)
calls - 0.01% (2)
savings - 0.01% (2)
stocks).  - 0.01% (2)
ranks; - 0.01% (2)
divided - 0.01% (2)
needless - 0.01% (2)
say, - 0.01% (2)
argument - 0.01% (2)
18, - 0.01% (2)
bbc - 0.01% (2)
academic - 0.01% (2)
chances - 0.01% (2)
issuer - 0.01% (2)
disciplined - 0.01% (2)
reports - 0.01% (2)
rising, - 0.01% (2)
2nd - 0.01% (2)
hyer, - 0.01% (2)
webinar - 0.01% (2)
23, - 0.01% (2)
component - 0.01% (2)
graph - 0.01% (2)
liability - 0.01% (2)
happen - 0.01% (2)
sandidge, - 0.01% (2)
opec - 0.01% (2)
direct, - 0.01% (2)
consulting - 0.01% (2)
 even - 0.01% (2)
anomaly - 0.01% (2)
 over - 0.01% (2)
patience. - 0.01% (2)
standing - 0.01% (2)
decisions - 0.01% (2)
bottom, - 0.01% (2)
3.8% - 0.01% (2)
outperformance. - 0.01% (2)
21, - 0.01% (2)
player - 0.01% (2)
wasn’t - 0.01% (2)
sometimes - 0.01% (2)
construction. - 0.01% (2)
soccer - 0.01% (2)
ago - 0.01% (2)
remind - 0.01% (2)
laggards.    - 0.01% (2)
healthy - 0.01% (2)
overriding - 0.01% (2)
back, - 0.01% (2)
snap - 0.01% (2)
representation - 0.01% (2)
positions - 0.01% (2)
notice - 0.01% (2)
policies - 0.01% (2)
warranties - 0.01% (2)
history. - 0.01% (2)
administration - 0.01% (2)
amount - 0.01% (2)
value.  past - 0.01% (2)
model. - 0.01% (2)
mm, - 0.01% (2)
djia - 0.01% (2)
fallen - 0.01% (2)
2017, - 0.01% (2)
water - 0.01% (2)
believed - 0.01% (2)
rally. - 0.01% (2)
do, - 0.01% (2)
eventually - 0.01% (2)
surface - 0.01% (2)
unless - 0.01% (2)
looks - 0.01% (2)
$27 - 0.01% (2)
definitely - 0.01% (2)
course - 0.01% (2)
gold - 0.01% (2)
nearly - 0.01% (2)
considered - 0.01% (2)
stated, - 0.01% (2)
$50 - 0.01% (2)
unemployment - 0.01% (2)
customers - 0.01% (2)
accept - 0.01% (2)
accounts, - 0.01% (2)
protection - 0.01% (2)
credit - 0.01% (2)
investigations - 0.01% (2)
rate, - 0.01% (2)
can’t - 0.01% (2)
10% - 0.01% (2)
descent, - 0.01% (2)
run. - 0.01% (2)
maturity, - 0.01% (2)
deteriorate - 0.01% (2)
index.  - 0.01% (2)
half - 0.01% (2)
income. - 0.01% (2)
weren’t - 0.01% (2)
hopes - 0.01% (2)
aren’t - 0.01% (2)
quarter. - 0.01% (2)
didn’t - 0.01% (2)
models, - 0.01% (2)
shared - 0.01% (2)
whole - 0.01% (2)
easily - 0.01% (2)
layoffs - 0.01% (2)
earlier - 0.01% (2)
financials - 0.01% (2)
affected - 0.01% (2)
wright. - 0.01% (2)
emerged - 0.01% (2)
risks, - 0.01% (2)
earned - 0.01% (2)
real. - 0.01% (2)
slash - 0.01% (2)
trump. - 0.01% (2)
prices. - 0.01% (2)
vs. - 0.01% (2)
“risk - 0.01% (2)
apart - 0.01% (2)
stronger - 0.01% (2)
favoring - 0.01% (2)
chinese - 0.01% (2)
yield, - 0.01% (2)
crosscurrents - 0.01% (2)
pressure - 0.01% (2)
caused - 0.01% (2)
probability - 0.01% (2)
withdraw - 0.01% (2)
restrictions - 0.01% (2)
authorized - 0.01% (2)
deposit - 0.01% (2)
shot - 0.01% (2)
european - 0.01% (2)
trigger - 0.01% (2)
employers - 0.01% (2)
excessive - 0.01% (2)
push - 0.01% (2)
desire - 0.01% (2)
increase: - 0.01% (2)
recovered - 0.01% (2)
deals - 0.01% (2)
immediate - 0.01% (2)
jobs. - 0.01% (2)
promises - 0.01% (2)
reacted - 0.01% (2)
office - 0.01% (2)
takes - 0.01% (2)
raised - 0.01% (2)
adjustment - 0.01% (2)
issues - 0.01% (2)
washington - 0.01% (2)
introducing - 0.01% (2)
usa - 0.01% (2)
added - 0.01% (2)
pnf - 0.01% (2)
trades - 0.01% (2)
reduce - 0.01% (2)
trying - 0.01% (2)
month. - 0.01% (2)
2017. - 0.01% (2)
earning - 0.01% (2)
workers. - 0.01% (2)
consumer - 0.01% (2)
rust - 0.01% (2)
states, - 0.01% (2)
20,000. - 0.01% (2)
gave - 0.01% (2)
rise. - 0.01% (2)
series - 0.01% (2)
calling - 0.01% (2)
congress - 0.01% (2)
turing - 0.01% (2)
andyh@dorseymm.com. - 0.01% (2)
others - 0.01% (2)
mylan - 0.01% (2)
two-pack - 0.01% (2)
llc, - 0.01% (2)
debt, - 0.01% (2)
threaten - 0.01% (2)
treasuries, - 0.01% (2)
agreed - 0.01% (2)
unlike - 0.01% (2)
settlement - 0.01% (2)
committee - 0.01% (2)
spike - 0.01% (2)
several - 0.01% (2)
objectives.  advice - 0.01% (2)
especially - 0.01% (2)
pulled - 0.01% (2)
subject - 0.01% (2)
below. - 0.01% (2)
characteristics. - 0.01% (2)
respective - 0.01% (2)
way. - 0.01% (2)
impose - 0.01% (2)
occurred - 0.01% (2)
 at - 0.01% (2)
actual, - 0.01% (2)
article, - 0.01% (2)
 neither - 0.01% (2)
generated - 0.01% (2)
presidency - 0.01% (2)
turned - 0.01% (2)
negative - 0.01% (2)
morningstar, - 0.01% (2)
that, - 0.01% (2)
least - 0.01% (2)
nominal - 0.01% (2)
 after - 0.01% (2)
shaded - 0.01% (2)
red, - 0.01% (2)
portfolio.  - 0.01% (2)
 fixed - 0.01% (2)
appreciation.  - 0.01% (2)
depend - 0.01% (2)
overall - 0.01% (2)
primary - 0.01% (2)
steve - 0.01% (2)
forbes - 0.01% (2)
spent - 0.01% (2)
dali, - 0.01% (2)
descriptions - 0.01% (2)
client’s - 0.01% (2)
human - 0.01% (2)
sheets - 0.01% (2)
convertible - 0.01% (2)
grade - 0.01% (2)
10+ - 0.01% (2)
40% - 0.01% (2)
strategies, - 0.01% (2)
made.  - 0.01% (2)
research, - 0.01% (2)
60% - 0.01% (2)
serving - 0.01% (2)
availability - 0.01% (2)
contact - 0.01% (2)
(etfs). - 0.01% (2)
interviews - 0.01% (2)
broken - 0.01% (2)
introduction - 0.01% (2)
compq - 0.01% (2)
day, - 0.01% (2)
merits - 0.01% (2)
committed - 0.01% (2)
1979, - 0.01% (2)
treasury - 0.01% (2)
spx, - 0.01% (2)
includes - 0.01% (2)
platforms. - 0.01% (2)
variety - 0.01% (2)
solid - 0.01% (2)
highly - 0.01% (2)
occurrences - 0.01% (2)
typically - 0.01% (2)
holding. - 0.01% (2)
consideration - 0.01% (2)
strategy, - 0.01% (2)
objectives: - 0.01% (2)
morgan - 0.01% (2)
schwab - 0.01% (2)
charles - 0.01% (2)
approved - 0.01% (2)
week’s - 0.01% (2)
follows: - 0.01% (2)
stanley - 0.01% (2)
firms. - 0.01% (2)
vix - 0.01% (2)
etf. - 0.01% (2)
mentioned - 0.01% (2)
relevant - 0.01% (2)
swing - 0.01% (2)
facts - 0.01% (2)
nothing - 0.01% (2)
element - 0.01% (2)
leading - 0.01% (2)
settled - 0.01% (2)
them. - 0.01% (2)
worldwide - 0.01% (2)
ten. - 0.01% (2)
moved - 0.01% (2)
up, - 0.01% (2)
finished - 0.01% (2)
momentum.” - 0.01% (2)
fundamentals, - 0.01% (2)
quarter, - 0.01% (2)
well. - 0.01% (2)
tilt - 0.01% (2)
manager, - 0.01% (2)
done - 0.01% (2)
dog - 0.01% (2)
build - 0.01% (2)
golfers - 0.01% (2)
exactly - 0.01% (2)
equal-weighted - 0.01% (2)
fewer - 0.01% (2)
accounts. - 0.01% (2)
became - 0.01% (2)
selloff - 0.01% (2)
things - 0.01% (2)
reaction - 0.01% (2)
fama, - 0.01% (2)
premier - 0.01% (2)
outcome, - 0.01% (2)
[1]  - 0.01% (2)
idea - 0.01% (2)
losers - 0.01% (2)
papers - 0.01% (2)
(aka - 0.01% (2)
strength) - 0.01% (2)
strive - 0.01% (2)
side. - 0.01% (2)
team - 0.01% (2)
alps, - 0.01% (2)
differs - 0.01% (2)
dst - 0.01% (2)
retroactive - 0.01% (2)
application - 0.01% (2)
hindsight.  - 0.01% (2)
advisor’s - 0.01% (2)
money.  - 0.01% (2)
party - 0.01% (2)
launch - 0.01% (2)
happy - 0.01% (2)
introduced - 0.01% (2)
loss.  - 0.01% (2)
managers - 0.01% (2)
technical - 0.01% (2)
back-testing - 0.01% (2)
verified - 0.01% (2)
concentrated - 0.01% (2)
akins, - 0.01% (2)
9/30/2016. - 0.01% (2)
although - 0.01% (2)
simultaneously - 0.01% (2)
held - 0.01% (2)
rather, - 0.01% (2)
creates - 0.01% (2)
micro - 0.01% (2)
dwa, - 0.01% (2)
established - 0.01% (2)
period: - 0.01% (2)
us. - 0.01% (2)
stocks. - 0.01% (2)
swin) - 0.01% (2)
informational - 0.01% (2)
announced - 0.01% (2)
12/31/1989 - 0.01% (2)
of the - 0.82% (117)
relative strength - 0.58% (83)
in the - 0.51% (73)
  the - 0.32% (46)
to the - 0.29% (42)
or the - 0.29% (41)
for the - 0.26% (37)
is not - 0.25% (35)
at the - 0.22% (32)
on the - 0.22% (31)
permalink posted - 0.18% (25)
posted by: - 0.18% (25)
the year - 0.18% (25)
| permalink - 0.18% (25)
andy hyer - 0.17% (24)
based on - 0.15% (22)
and the - 0.15% (22)
a comment - 0.15% (21)
leave a - 0.15% (21)
may be - 0.15% (21)
asset class - 0.15% (21)
dorsey wright - 0.15% (21)
comment » - 0.15% (21)
tweet leave - 0.15% (21)
fixed income - 0.14% (20)
does not - 0.14% (20)
strategy is - 0.14% (20)
over the - 0.14% (20)
the market - 0.14% (20)
the relative - 0.13% (19)
the top - 0.13% (19)
strategies are - 0.13% (18)
from the - 0.13% (18)
asset alloc - 0.13% (18)
2016 tweet - 0.13% (18)
by: andy - 0.13% (18)
the performance - 0.13% (18)
that i - 0.13% (18)
are unfavorable - 0.12% (17)
and strategies - 0.12% (17)
be times - 0.12% (17)
and depreciate - 0.12% (17)
all investments - 0.12% (17)
where all - 0.12% (17)
in value. - 0.12% (17)
depreciate in - 0.12% (17)
unfavorable and - 0.12% (17)
investments and - 0.12% (17)
times where - 0.12% (17)
there may - 0.12% (17)
the strategy - 0.11% (16)
as the - 0.11% (16)
the portfolio - 0.11% (16)
performance is - 0.11% (16)
strength strategy - 0.11% (15)
past performance - 0.11% (15)
asset allocation - 0.11% (15)
asset classes - 0.11% (15)
wright & - 0.11% (15)
& associates - 0.11% (15)
here is - 0.11% (15)
with the - 0.1% (14)
that the - 0.1% (14)
from a - 0.09% (13)
potential for - 0.09% (13)
dorsey, wright - 0.09% (13)
performance of - 0.09% (13)
there is - 0.09% (13)
future results. - 0.09% (13)
we have - 0.09% (13)
the investment - 0.09% (13)
the election - 0.09% (13)
tactical asset - 0.09% (13)
have a - 0.08% (12)
large cap - 0.08% (12)
of future - 0.08% (12)
have been - 0.08% (12)
offer to - 0.08% (12)
an offer - 0.08% (12)
over time - 0.08% (12)
is the - 0.08% (11)
the past - 0.08% (11)
will be - 0.08% (11)
of loss - 0.08% (11)
possibility of - 0.08% (11)
can be - 0.08% (11)
sector rotation - 0.08% (11)
there are - 0.08% (11)
has been - 0.07% (10)
this strategy - 0.07% (10)
not indicative - 0.07% (10)
for profits - 0.07% (10)
the bottom - 0.07% (10)
by possibility - 0.07% (10)
a guarantee. - 0.07% (10)
the first - 0.07% (10)
do not - 0.07% (10)
with a - 0.07% (10)
tweet the - 0.07% (10)
the year. - 0.07% (10)
indicative of - 0.07% (10)
profits is - 0.07% (10)
number of - 0.07% (10)
seeks to - 0.07% (10)
in value.  - 0.07% (10)
the information - 0.06% (9)
strength is - 0.06% (9)
is accompanied - 0.06% (9)
global macro - 0.06% (9)
when the - 0.06% (9)
systematic relative - 0.06% (9)
guarantee.  there - 0.06% (9)
managed account - 0.06% (9)
the world - 0.06% (9)
out of - 0.06% (9)
total return - 0.06% (9)
during the - 0.06% (9)
the best - 0.06% (9)
that have - 0.06% (9)
momentum etf - 0.06% (9)
of loss. - 0.06% (9)
if you - 0.06% (9)
the securities - 0.06% (9)
accompanied by - 0.06% (9)
strategy seeks - 0.06% (8)
of their - 0.06% (8)
to buy - 0.06% (8)
the goal - 0.06% (8)
into the - 0.06% (8)
not be - 0.06% (8)
the same - 0.06% (8)
on that - 0.06% (8)
end to - 0.06% (8)
of our - 0.06% (8)
results.  potential - 0.06% (8)
after the - 0.06% (8)
excess returns - 0.06% (8)
a nasdaq - 0.06% (8)
& associates, - 0.06% (8)
future results.  - 0.06% (8)
in this - 0.06% (8)
as shown - 0.06% (8)
in strong - 0.05% (7)
a tactical - 0.05% (7)
we are - 0.05% (7)
that are - 0.05% (7)
the chart - 0.05% (7)
and large - 0.05% (7)
out the - 0.05% (7)
nasdaq company - 0.05% (7)
| momentum - 0.05% (7)
you would - 0.05% (7)
mid and - 0.05% (7)
our investment - 0.05% (7)
tend to - 0.05% (7)
 past performance - 0.05% (7)
continue to - 0.05% (7)
investors should - 0.05% (7)
systematic rs - 0.05% (7)
would be - 0.05% (7)
markets | - 0.05% (7)
of dividends - 0.05% (7)
designed to - 0.05% (7)
in our - 0.05% (7)
to invest - 0.05% (7)
penalty kick - 0.05% (7)
if the - 0.05% (7)
that is - 0.05% (7)
inclusive of - 0.05% (7)
exposure to - 0.05% (7)
one of - 0.05% (7)
the table - 0.05% (7)
momentum | - 0.05% (7)
following the - 0.05% (7)
percent of - 0.05% (7)
powershares dwa - 0.05% (7)
 there may - 0.05% (7)
but the - 0.05% (7)
to have - 0.05% (7)
to sell - 0.05% (7)
2017 tweet - 0.05% (7)
this document - 0.05% (7)
are in - 0.05% (7)
strength portfolios - 0.05% (7)
nasdaq company, - 0.04% (6)
should not - 0.04% (6)
as well - 0.04% (6)
family of - 0.04% (6)
the most - 0.04% (6)
investors can - 0.04% (6)
exchange traded - 0.04% (6)
believe that - 0.04% (6)
constitute a - 0.04% (6)
a solicitation - 0.04% (6)
investment objective - 0.04% (6)
well as - 0.04% (6)
is made - 0.04% (6)
the next - 0.04% (6)
to achieve - 0.04% (6)
how the - 0.04% (6)
and investment - 0.04% (6)
were a - 0.04% (6)
would have - 0.04% (6)
in order - 0.04% (6)
is designed - 0.04% (6)
order to - 0.04% (6)
momentum based - 0.04% (6)
consider the - 0.04% (6)
not represent - 0.04% (6)
is based - 0.04% (6)
after a - 0.04% (6)
of stocks - 0.04% (6)
been a - 0.04% (6)
managed accounts - 0.04% (6)
or exchange - 0.04% (6)
the mm - 0.04% (6)
buy any - 0.04% (6)
sell or - 0.04% (6)
arrow dwa - 0.04% (6)
cap u.s. - 0.04% (6)
the stock - 0.04% (6)
loss. tweet - 0.04% (6)
dwa tactical - 0.04% (6)
strength characteristics - 0.04% (6)
emerging market - 0.04% (6)
table below - 0.04% (6)
the model - 0.04% (6)
the markets - 0.04% (6)
the more - 0.04% (6)
over time. - 0.04% (6)
guarantee.  there - 0.04% (6)
is achieved - 0.04% (6)
purposes only - 0.04% (5)
and expenses - 0.04% (5)
and does - 0.04% (5)
portfolio manager - 0.04% (5)
of any - 0.04% (5)
not a guarantee.  - 0.04% (5)
of this - 0.04% (5)
transaction costs. - 0.04% (5)
this portfolio - 0.04% (5)
some of - 0.04% (5)
powerful relative - 0.04% (5)
a large - 0.04% (5)
stocks in - 0.04% (5)
charlie coleman - 0.04% (5)
available on - 0.04% (5)
relied upon. - 0.04% (5)
that forecasts - 0.04% (5)
| markets - 0.04% (5)
strength in - 0.04% (5)
securities that - 0.04% (5)
no assurance - 0.04% (5)
the russell - 0.04% (5)
predictive and - 0.04% (5)
stock market - 0.04% (5)
investment objectives, - 0.04% (5)
long-term capital - 0.04% (5)
capital appreciation - 0.04% (5)
return index - 0.04% (5)
sector momentum - 0.04% (5)
of these - 0.04% (5)
advice from - 0.04% (5)
solicitation or - 0.04% (5)
which reference - 0.04% (5)
is made. - 0.04% (5)
the years - 0.04% (5)
should have - 0.04% (5)
a financial - 0.04% (5)
by: charlie - 0.04% (5)
an index - 0.04% (5)
commodities or - 0.04% (5)
small cap - 0.04% (5)
any securities, - 0.04% (5)
the on - 0.04% (5)
should be - 0.04% (5)
the nasdaq - 0.04% (5)
purport to - 0.04% (5)
a guarantee.  there - 0.04% (5)
have the - 0.04% (5)
compared to - 0.04% (5)
universe of - 0.04% (5)
in 2016 - 0.04% (5)
shall constitute - 0.04% (5)
opinion expressed - 0.04% (5)
nor any - 0.04% (5)
are available - 0.04% (5)
part of - 0.04% (5)
of systematic - 0.04% (5)
our family - 0.04% (5)
john lewis - 0.04% (5)
be complete - 0.04% (5)
traded products. - 0.04% (5)
such a - 0.04% (5)
not inclusive - 0.04% (5)
andyh@dorseymm.com or - 0.04% (5)
oil price - 0.04% (5)
neither the - 0.04% (5)
by the - 0.04% (5)
any investor - 0.04% (5)
shown below - 0.04% (5)
interest rate - 0.04% (5)
first time - 0.04% (5)
momentum model - 0.04% (5)
we were - 0.04% (5)
time i - 0.04% (5)
more than - 0.04% (5)
the eu - 0.04% (5)
donald trump - 0.04% (5)
securities, commodities - 0.04% (5)
| from - 0.04% (5)
financial professional - 0.04% (5)
long term - 0.04% (5)
of all - 0.04% (5)
and hold - 0.04% (5)
reference is - 0.04% (5)
year periods - 0.04% (5)
company, is - 0.04% (5)
to which - 0.04% (5)
not purport - 0.04% (5)
any opinion - 0.04% (5)
expressed shall - 0.04% (5)
constitute an - 0.04% (5)
this is - 0.04% (5)
complete description - 0.04% (5)
each of - 0.04% (5)
you can - 0.04% (5)
that in - 0.04% (5)
and there - 0.04% (5)
are no - 0.04% (5)
not predictive - 0.04% (5)
assurance that - 0.04% (5)
forecasts based - 0.04% (5)
the portfolio. - 0.04% (5)
look at - 0.04% (5)
the return - 0.04% (5)
investment strategy - 0.04% (5)
of price - 0.04% (5)
be relied - 0.04% (5)
able to - 0.04% (5)
focus on - 0.04% (5)
large and - 0.04% (5)
these are - 0.04% (5)
more information - 0.04% (5)
ways to - 0.04% (5)
of investment - 0.04% (5)
the arrow - 0.04% (5)
have seen - 0.03% (4)
s&p 500 - 0.03% (4)
do well - 0.03% (4)
cap equities - 0.03% (4)
u.s. large - 0.03% (4)
real estate, - 0.03% (4)
international equities - 0.03% (4)
should carefully - 0.03% (4)
it should - 0.03% (4)
the large - 0.03% (4)
a trump - 0.03% (4)
cannot invest - 0.03% (4)
returns over - 0.03% (4)
a potential - 0.03% (4)
the end - 0.03% (4)
(long & - 0.03% (4)
the major - 0.03% (4)
directly in - 0.03% (4)
investment advisory - 0.03% (4)
the broad - 0.03% (4)
of rolling - 0.03% (4)
exchange-traded fund - 0.03% (4)
all the - 0.03% (4)
latin america - 0.03% (4)
since the - 0.03% (4)
dorsey wright’s - 0.03% (4)
which have - 0.03% (4)
roller coaster - 0.03% (4)
return of - 0.03% (4)
of u.s. - 0.03% (4)
the distribution - 0.03% (4)
u.s. equities, - 0.03% (4)
funds i - 0.03% (4)
returns of - 0.03% (4)
strongly advised. - 0.03% (4)
professional is - 0.03% (4)
like to - 0.03% (4)
demonstrate powerful - 0.03% (4)
a relative - 0.03% (4)
year. the - 0.03% (4)
long-term financial - 0.03% (4)
these areas - 0.03% (4)
& inverse), - 0.03% (4)
that it - 0.03% (4)
types of - 0.03% (4)
not include - 0.03% (4)
to its - 0.03% (4)
these strategies - 0.03% (4)
the account - 0.03% (4)
or call - 0.03% (4)
investors cannot - 0.03% (4)
invest directly - 0.03% (4)
a registered - 0.03% (4)
which are - 0.03% (4)
investment strategies - 0.03% (4)
against the - 0.03% (4)
distribution phase - 0.03% (4)
the strategies - 0.03% (4)
but do - 0.03% (4)
out to - 0.03% (4)
to hold - 0.03% (4)
funds that - 0.03% (4)
information on - 0.03% (4)
interest rates - 0.03% (4)
that could - 0.03% (4)
performance above - 0.03% (4)
the returns - 0.03% (4)
is that - 0.03% (4)
a very - 0.03% (4)
to provide - 0.03% (4)
two of - 0.03% (4)
see the - 0.03% (4)
presented for - 0.03% (4)
our tactical - 0.03% (4)
equities (long - 0.03% (4)
a sector - 0.03% (4)
associates, a - 0.03% (4)
of dividends, - 0.03% (4)
it has - 0.03% (4)
a strong - 0.03% (4)
description of - 0.03% (4)
represent a - 0.03% (4)
only and - 0.03% (4)
illustrative purposes - 0.03% (4)
example is - 0.03% (4)
end of - 0.03% (4)
hold them - 0.03% (4)
lot of - 0.03% (4)
this article - 0.03% (4)
intermediate-term relative - 0.03% (4)
 relative strength - 0.03% (4)
relative strength. - 0.03% (4)
the universe - 0.03% (4)
top ten - 0.03% (4)
have not - 0.03% (4)
 in the - 0.03% (4)
this month - 0.03% (4)
wells fargo - 0.03% (4)
oil prices - 0.03% (4)
would like - 0.03% (4)
strong relative - 0.03% (4)
we will - 0.03% (4)
in all - 0.03% (4)
equity strategy - 0.03% (4)
a measure - 0.03% (4)
achieve long-term - 0.03% (4)
that demonstrate - 0.03% (4)
of out - 0.03% (4)
the united - 0.03% (4)
and requires - 0.03% (4)
securities maintain - 0.03% (4)
on our - 0.03% (4)
and we - 0.03% (4)
remain in - 0.03% (4)
on historical - 0.03% (4)
need to - 0.03% (4)
all of - 0.03% (4)
so far - 0.03% (4)
or other - 0.03% (4)
social security - 0.03% (4)
the last - 0.03% (4)
is strongly - 0.03% (4)
the following - 0.03% (4)
the time - 0.03% (4)
and growing - 0.03% (4)
characteristics and - 0.03% (4)
information provider - 0.03% (4)
contained herein - 0.03% (4)
investor behavior - 0.03% (4)
strength laggards - 0.03% (4)
and other - 0.03% (4)
suitable for - 0.03% (4)
growing number - 0.03% (4)
associates, llc - 0.03% (4)
to investing. - 0.03% (4)
carefully consider - 0.03% (4)
to change - 0.03% (4)
for their - 0.03% (4)
us and - 0.03% (4)
a guarantee.  - 0.03% (4)
of sector - 0.03% (4)
advisory firm - 0.03% (4)
have on - 0.03% (4)
registered investment - 0.03% (4)
price momentum - 0.03% (4)
measure of - 0.03% (4)
we believe - 0.03% (4)
the result - 0.03% (4)
our systematic - 0.03% (4)
invests in - 0.03% (4)
have long-term - 0.03% (4)
a momentum - 0.03% (4)
strength can - 0.03% (4)
global ex - 0.03% (4)
strength leaders - 0.03% (4)
our ranks - 0.03% (4)
quartile of - 0.03% (4)
on relative - 0.03% (4)
returns, not - 0.03% (4)
please e-mail - 0.03% (4)
relative performance - 0.03% (4)
below for - 0.03% (4)
investor should - 0.03% (4)
time in - 0.03% (4)
financial advisor - 0.03% (4)
a past - 0.03% (4)
for illustrative - 0.03% (4)
is presented - 0.03% (4)
this example - 0.03% (4)
call 626-535-0630. - 0.03% (4)
markets have - 0.03% (4)
rotation strategies - 0.03% (4)
penalty kicks - 0.03% (4)
the full - 0.03% (4)
requires that - 0.03% (4)
to remain - 0.03% (4)
the current - 0.03% (4)
the goalkeeper - 0.03% (4)
there were - 0.03% (4)
maintain strong - 0.03% (4)
the euro - 0.02% (3)
test period - 0.02% (3)
an index. - 0.02% (3)
guarantee future - 0.02% (3)
information nor - 0.02% (3)
the market. - 0.02% (3)
results. in - 0.02% (3)
all securities - 0.02% (3)
dow jones - 0.02% (3)
at its - 0.02% (3)
1000 total - 0.02% (3)
or developments - 0.02% (3)
expenses of - 0.02% (3)
prescription drug - 0.02% (3)
than the - 0.02% (3)
the momentum - 0.02% (3)
the federal - 0.02% (3)
commodities, markets - 0.02% (3)
russell 1000 - 0.02% (3)
to investing.  - 0.02% (3)
index over - 0.02% (3)
rolling 3 - 0.02% (3)
top 10 - 0.02% (3)
securities or - 0.02% (3)
outperformed the - 0.02% (3)
cost of - 0.02% (3)
such as - 0.02% (3)
free trade - 0.02% (3)
12 month - 0.02% (3)
three months - 0.02% (3)
traded products.  - 0.02% (3)
is momentum - 0.02% (3)
investment factor - 0.02% (3)
the u.k. - 0.02% (3)
potential to - 0.02% (3)
as shown. - 0.02% (3)
until the - 0.02% (3)
week of - 0.02% (3)
rotation strategy - 0.02% (3)
of momentum - 0.02% (3)
the days - 0.02% (3)
each investor - 0.02% (3)
will equal - 0.02% (3)
profitable or - 0.02% (3)
the future - 0.02% (3)
advisory firm. - 0.02% (3)
was the - 0.02% (3)
millions of - 0.02% (3)
who have - 0.02% (3)
shows that - 0.02% (3)
loss as - 0.02% (3)
of outperformance - 0.02% (3)
fake news - 0.02% (3)
profit. it - 0.02% (3)
best in - 0.02% (3)
be assumed - 0.02% (3)
much of - 0.02% (3)
the final - 0.02% (3)
that recommendations - 0.02% (3)
list of - 0.02% (3)
made in - 0.02% (3)
shows the - 0.02% (3)
fees, or other expenses.  - 0.02% (3)
year periods. - 0.02% (3)
pure price - 0.02% (3)
the right - 0.02% (3)
the ball - 0.02% (3)
the goalie - 0.02% (3)
to decide - 0.02% (3)
that we - 0.02% (3)
latin american - 0.02% (3)
international model - 0.02% (3)
to say - 0.02% (3)
what a - 0.02% (3)
below is - 0.02% (3)
expenses.  past - 0.02% (3)
dividends, fees, or other - 0.02% (3)
above is - 0.02% (3)
years the - 0.02% (3)
value.  the performance - 0.02% (3)
recommendation.  the - 0.02% (3)
or present - 0.02% (3)
traded funds - 0.02% (3)
strategies do - 0.02% (3)
equities, international - 0.02% (3)
to outperform - 0.02% (3)
energy names - 0.02% (3)
did not - 0.02% (3)
brent crude - 0.02% (3)
of your - 0.02% (3)
| investor - 0.02% (3)
a penalty - 0.02% (3)
the systematic - 0.02% (3)
click here - 0.02% (3)
you have - 0.02% (3)
about the - 0.02% (3)
the high - 0.02% (3)
objectives, risks - 0.02% (3)
recommendation or - 0.02% (3)
information contained - 0.02% (3)
financial objectives.  - 0.02% (3)
activity.  relative - 0.02% (3)
historical price - 0.02% (3)
  back-tested - 0.02% (3)
a specific - 0.02% (3)
products.  this - 0.02% (3)
way to - 0.02% (3)
the long - 0.02% (3)
rs international - 0.02% (3)
the bar - 0.02% (3)
because the - 0.02% (3)
there have - 0.02% (3)
last week - 0.02% (3)
a story - 0.02% (3)
dorsey wright, - 0.02% (3)
the story - 0.02% (3)
not have - 0.02% (3)
time. the - 0.02% (3)
going to - 0.02% (3)
new president - 0.02% (3)
rally in - 0.02% (3)
global markets - 0.02% (3)
value. tweet - 0.02% (3)
unique funds - 0.02% (3)
performance information - 0.02% (3)
the potential - 0.02% (3)
past or - 0.02% (3)
as long - 0.02% (3)
strength and - 0.02% (3)
top of - 0.02% (3)
by relative - 0.02% (3)
below shows - 0.02% (3)
tom dorsey - 0.02% (3)
december 27, - 0.02% (3)
prior to - 0.02% (3)
on over - 0.02% (3)
these portfolios - 0.02% (3)
your clients. - 0.02% (3)
as much - 0.02% (3)
in value.  the - 0.02% (3)
two major - 0.02% (3)
to own - 0.02% (3)
research and - 0.02% (3)
wall street - 0.02% (3)
at this - 0.02% (3)
top quintile - 0.02% (3)
the advisor - 0.02% (3)
might have - 0.02% (3)
broad market - 0.02% (3)
because it - 0.02% (3)
is provided - 0.02% (3)
result of - 0.02% (3)
present recommendation.  - 0.02% (3)
on pure - 0.02% (3)
they do - 0.02% (3)
seek to - 0.02% (3)
most investors - 0.02% (3)
any of - 0.02% (3)
hedge funds - 0.02% (3)
they are - 0.02% (3)
to market - 0.02% (3)
allocation strategy - 0.02% (3)
to see - 0.02% (3)
that clients - 0.02% (3)
asset allocation. - 0.02% (3)
to make - 0.02% (3)
continues to - 0.02% (3)
many investors - 0.02% (3)
investors would - 0.02% (3)
price returns, - 0.02% (3)
a number - 0.02% (3)
asset management - 0.02% (3)
or transaction - 0.02% (3)
a good - 0.02% (3)
positive returns - 0.02% (3)
future returns. - 0.02% (3)
to our - 0.02% (3)
‘quadfecta’ highs - 0.02% (3)
the election, - 0.02% (3)
of market - 0.02% (3)
the types - 0.02% (3)
on december - 0.02% (3)
the roller - 0.02% (3)
of dorsey - 0.02% (3)
is very - 0.02% (3)
wright sector - 0.02% (3)
 this mid - 0.02% (3)
use inverse - 0.02% (3)
ability to - 0.02% (3)
u.s. equity - 0.02% (3)
alps dorsey - 0.02% (3)
as profit. - 0.02% (3)
under the - 0.02% (3)
the effect - 0.02% (3)
avoid or - 0.02% (3)
for loss - 0.02% (3)
strength research - 0.02% (3)
emerging markets - 0.02% (3)
to 2017 - 0.02% (3)
securities trading - 0.02% (3)
price activity.  - 0.02% (3)
value.  relative - 0.02% (3)
or use - 0.02% (3)
2017 the - 0.02% (3)
journal of - 0.02% (3)
not been - 0.02% (3)
are performing - 0.02% (3)
the sector - 0.02% (3)
discussed above - 0.02% (3)
of change - 0.02% (3)
shown. investors - 0.02% (3)
diversification and - 0.02% (3)
performance as - 0.02% (3)
equal the - 0.02% (3)
their lives. - 0.02% (3)
phase of - 0.02% (3)
or will - 0.02% (3)
domestic equities - 0.02% (3)
dwa momentum - 0.02% (3)
wealth management - 0.02% (3)
be profitable - 0.02% (3)
future will - 0.02% (3)
with high - 0.02% (3)
like more - 0.02% (3)
e-mail andyh@dorseymm.com - 0.02% (3)
recommendations made - 0.02% (3)
all year - 0.02% (3)
assumed that - 0.02% (3)
year with - 0.02% (3)
it was - 0.02% (3)
inverse funds - 0.02% (3)
but it - 0.02% (3)
income strategy - 0.02% (3)
portfolios are - 0.02% (3)
not guarantee - 0.02% (3)
or even - 0.02% (3)
macro strategy - 0.02% (3)
fourth quarter - 0.02% (3)
the financial - 0.02% (3)
investment universe - 0.02% (3)
 the relative - 0.02% (3)
markets or - 0.02% (3)
to receive - 0.02% (3)
etfs that - 0.02% (3)
or commodities, - 0.02% (3)
and that - 0.02% (3)
strategies that - 0.02% (3)
those asset - 0.02% (3)
or not - 0.02% (3)
recover from - 0.02% (3)
funds in - 0.02% (3)
the risk - 0.02% (3)
for example, - 0.02% (3)
that investors - 0.02% (3)
between the - 0.02% (3)
time to - 0.02% (3)
that an - 0.02% (3)
investor who - 0.02% (3)
tactical etf - 0.02% (3)
portion of - 0.02% (3)
that provide - 0.02% (3)
the impact - 0.02% (3)
in securities - 0.02% (3)
of 2016 - 0.02% (3)
the dow - 0.02% (3)
about this - 0.02% (3)
hit the - 0.02% (3)
portfolio invests - 0.02% (3)
on friday - 0.02% (3)
so the - 0.02% (3)
but that - 0.02% (3)
the fund - 0.02% (3)
federal reserve - 0.02% (3)
safety net - 0.02% (3)
developments to - 0.02% (3)
in those - 0.02% (3)
no guarantee - 0.02% (3)
for information - 0.02% (3)
that will - 0.02% (3)
at andyh@dorseymm.com - 0.02% (3)
which may - 0.02% (3)
and stock - 0.01% (2)
morgan stanley - 0.01% (2)
say that - 0.01% (2)
fall apart - 0.01% (2)
up over - 0.01% (2)
just a - 0.01% (2)
are up - 0.01% (2)
strategy to - 0.01% (2)
the start - 0.01% (2)
bonds, high - 0.01% (2)
with their - 0.01% (2)
to emerging - 0.01% (2)
strategies have - 0.01% (2)
how is - 0.01% (2)
for any - 0.01% (2)
for many - 0.01% (2)
fact sheets - 0.01% (2)
strength spread - 0.01% (2)
comment | - 0.01% (2)
grade corporate - 0.01% (2)
the spread - 0.01% (2)
leaders and - 0.01% (2)
laggards (top - 0.01% (2)
across multiple - 0.01% (2)
strategy invests - 0.01% (2)
divided by - 0.01% (2)
tweet 1 - 0.01% (2)
better relative - 0.01% (2)
momentum investing - 0.01% (2)
with dorsey, - 0.01% (2)
needless to - 0.01% (2)
say, we - 0.01% (2)
to capture - 0.01% (2)
the reason - 0.01% (2)
periods and - 0.01% (2)
follow your - 0.01% (2)
investment thesis. - 0.01% (2)
financial services - 0.01% (2)
favor an - 0.01% (2)
the different - 0.01% (2)
2, 2016 - 0.01% (2)
strength portfolios. - 0.01% (2)
hyer, client - 0.01% (2)
to capitalize - 0.01% (2)
and are - 0.01% (2)
will avoid - 0.01% (2)
in these - 0.01% (2)
areas of - 0.01% (2)
well served - 0.01% (2)
crude fell - 0.01% (2)
evaluate the - 0.01% (2)
solutions in - 0.01% (2)
at 626-535-0630 - 0.01% (2)
the industry - 0.01% (2)
reflect the - 0.01% (2)
 investors cannot - 0.01% (2)
the asset - 0.01% (2)
investment manager - 0.01% (2)
no clear - 0.01% (2)
as our - 0.01% (2)
that each - 0.01% (2)
of hedge - 0.01% (2)
indices are - 0.01% (2)
a strategic - 0.01% (2)
an extensive - 0.01% (2)
alloc | - 0.01% (2)
investors will - 0.01% (2)
income, and - 0.01% (2)
tools and - 0.01% (2)
clear leadership - 0.01% (2)
associated with - 0.01% (2)
to tactical - 0.01% (2)
to me, - 0.01% (2)
income, real - 0.01% (2)
russell 2000 - 0.01% (2)
to consider - 0.01% (2)
estate, currencies, - 0.01% (2)
year. many - 0.01% (2)
has the - 0.01% (2)
many years - 0.01% (2)
provide some - 0.01% (2)
the quarter - 0.01% (2)
were up - 0.01% (2)
and commodities.  - 0.01% (2)
market had - 0.01% (2)
portfolio is - 0.01% (2)
media | - 0.01% (2)
wright’s proprietary - 0.01% (2)
be very - 0.01% (2)
the short- - 0.01% (2)
fell to - 0.01% (2)
that they - 0.01% (2)
a simple - 0.01% (2)
rolling three-year - 0.01% (2)
third of - 0.01% (2)
performing funds - 0.01% (2)
the us. - 0.01% (2)
u.s. mid - 0.01% (2)
money to - 0.01% (2)
to demonstrate - 0.01% (2)
they were - 0.01% (2)
equally weighted - 0.01% (2)
momentum index - 0.01% (2)
coaster ride - 0.01% (2)
been to - 0.01% (2)
portfolio of - 0.01% (2)
ride of - 0.01% (2)
and figure - 0.01% (2)
lagged their - 0.01% (2)
decile grouping - 0.01% (2)
those who - 0.01% (2)
twenty year - 0.01% (2)
and even - 0.01% (2)
funds do - 0.01% (2)
out an - 0.01% (2)
what i - 0.01% (2)
simple momentum - 0.01% (2)
mutual funds - 0.01% (2)
funds (i.e., - 0.01% (2)
a meaningful - 0.01% (2)
where the - 0.01% (2)
leadership is - 0.01% (2)
time period. - 0.01% (2)
excess returns) - 0.01% (2)
momentum strategies - 0.01% (2)
the one - 0.01% (2)
to worst - 0.01% (2)
from best - 0.01% (2)
the twenty - 0.01% (2)
our ranks; - 0.01% (2)
account to - 0.01% (2)
cap stocks).  - 0.01% (2)
 dorsey wright - 0.01% (2)
their investment - 0.01% (2)
period.   - 0.01% (2)
| tactical - 0.01% (2)
no representation - 0.01% (2)
or warranties - 0.01% (2)
lewis, cmt, - 0.01% (2)
tactical fund - 0.01% (2)
will need - 0.01% (2)
come to - 0.01% (2)
upon.   - 0.01% (2)
include dividends - 0.01% (2)
etfs for - 0.01% (2)
any recommendation - 0.01% (2)
financial advisors - 0.01% (2)
on data - 0.01% (2)
obtained from - 0.01% (2)
strategy during - 0.01% (2)
of loss.  - 0.01% (2)
believed to - 0.01% (2)
story is - 0.01% (2)
is always - 0.01% (2)
senior portfolio - 0.01% (2)
going up - 0.01% (2)
for different - 0.01% (2)
market over - 0.01% (2)
new etfs - 0.01% (2)
than a - 0.01% (2)
the road - 0.01% (2)
andy hyer, - 0.01% (2)
caught up - 0.01% (2)
trying to - 0.01% (2)
investment decisions - 0.01% (2)
available as - 0.01% (2)
1 comment - 0.01% (2)
etfs work - 0.01% (2)
in portfolio - 0.01% (2)
21, 2016 - 0.01% (2)
other sources - 0.01% (2)
be reliable - 0.01% (2)
to avoid - 0.01% (2)
is rising, - 0.01% (2)
and relative - 0.01% (2)
is also - 0.01% (2)
(top quartile - 0.01% (2)
ranks divided - 0.01% (2)
bottom quartile - 0.01% (2)
ranks; universe - 0.01% (2)
stocks).  when - 0.01% (2)
leaders are - 0.01% (2)
chart below - 0.01% (2)
performing better - 0.01% (2)
than relative - 0.01% (2)
strength laggards.    - 0.01% (2)
value.  past performance - 0.01% (2)
call andy - 0.01% (2)
financial markets - 0.01% (2)
money management - 0.01% (2)
2017 december - 0.01% (2)
spread between - 0.01% (2)
spread november - 0.01% (2)
dwa and - 0.01% (2)
 there are - 0.01% (2)
the accuracy - 0.01% (2)
the global - 0.01% (2)
is suitable - 0.01% (2)
the recipient - 0.01% (2)
and downs - 0.01% (2)
consider whether - 0.01% (2)
  each - 0.01% (2)
or take - 0.01% (2)
and uma - 0.01% (2)
the ups - 0.01% (2)
is available - 0.01% (2)
of sma - 0.01% (2)
is often - 0.01% (2)
trading in - 0.01% (2)
to any - 0.01% (2)
you in - 0.01% (2)
investing in - 0.01% (2)
are shown - 0.01% (2)
our portfolios. - 0.01% (2)
chart is - 0.01% (2)
an asset - 0.01% (2)
we would - 0.01% (2)
of years - 0.01% (2)
cash if - 0.01% (2)
hold up - 0.01% (2)
during those - 0.01% (2)
has an - 0.01% (2)
 click here - 0.01% (2)
performing poorly - 0.01% (2)
invests across - 0.01% (2)
along with - 0.01% (2)
probability of - 0.01% (2)
the tactical - 0.01% (2)
of stopping - 0.01% (2)
according to - 0.01% (2)
the center - 0.01% (2)
instead of - 0.01% (2)
a portfolio - 0.01% (2)
days following - 0.01% (2)
the ball. - 0.01% (2)
presidential election - 0.01% (2)
rising, relative - 0.01% (2)
income and - 0.01% (2)
better than - 0.01% (2)
laggards.    as - 0.01% (2)
in value.  past - 0.01% (2)
november 28, - 0.01% (2)
been an - 0.01% (2)
trump administration - 0.01% (2)
dividends, but - 0.01% (2)
is being - 0.01% (2)
funds (etfs). - 0.01% (2)
strategies in - 0.01% (2)
through exchange-traded - 0.01% (2)
multiple asset - 0.01% (2)
index.  in - 0.01% (2)
might be - 0.01% (2)
a couple - 0.01% (2)
mr. azar - 0.01% (2)
when it - 0.01% (2)
why investors - 0.01% (2)
variety of - 0.01% (2)
the presidential - 0.01% (2)
looking forward - 0.01% (2)
so that - 0.01% (2)
to deliver - 0.01% (2)
a rough - 0.01% (2)
our international - 0.01% (2)
our process. - 0.01% (2)
it does - 0.01% (2)
start to - 0.01% (2)
performance over - 0.01% (2)
this year - 0.01% (2)
ups and - 0.01% (2)
capital appreciation.  - 0.01% (2)
to cash - 0.01% (2)
years there - 0.01% (2)
manager at - 0.01% (2)
the primary - 0.01% (2)
president of - 0.01% (2)
tweet as - 0.01% (2)
degree of - 0.01% (2)
index is - 0.01% (2)
our aggressive - 0.01% (2)
have lower - 0.01% (2)
performance shown - 0.01% (2)
net of - 0.01% (2)
for each - 0.01% (2)
day of - 0.01% (2)
us index - 0.01% (2)
sector rotation. - 0.01% (2)
downs of - 0.01% (2)
equity market - 0.01% (2)
tends to - 0.01% (2)
a list - 0.01% (2)
12 months - 0.01% (2)
information is - 0.01% (2)
the portfolio.  - 0.01% (2)
the manager - 0.01% (2)
investor behavior, - 0.01% (2)
true to - 0.01% (2)
most of - 0.01% (2)
index was - 0.01% (2)
top ten. - 0.01% (2)
momentum be - 0.01% (2)
to get - 0.01% (2)
a recent - 0.01% (2)
the 100 - 0.01% (2)
asked you - 0.01% (2)
to pick - 0.01% (2)
who would - 0.01% (2)
some would - 0.01% (2)
count on - 0.01% (2)
have fallen - 0.01% (2)
to stay - 0.01% (2)
in motion - 0.01% (2)
stocks that - 0.01% (2)
have good - 0.01% (2)
a market - 0.01% (2)
the fourteenth - 0.01% (2)
outperform over - 0.01% (2)
(aka relative - 0.01% (2)
for those - 0.01% (2)
above prior - 0.01% (2)
found that - 0.01% (2)
james b. - 0.01% (2)
objectives.  advice from - 0.01% (2)
earlier this - 0.01% (2)
among the - 0.01% (2)
risks, and - 0.01% (2)
second chances - 0.01% (2)
one year, - 0.01% (2)
papers on - 0.01% (2)
with retirement - 0.01% (2)
no fees. - 0.01% (2)
periods of - 0.01% (2)
actual, does - 0.01% (2)
most powerful - 0.01% (2)
hypothetical or - 0.01% (2)
provides a - 0.01% (2)
of such - 0.01% (2)
to continue - 0.01% (2)
good fundamentals, - 0.01% (2)
which would - 0.01% (2)
for informational - 0.01% (2)
to generate - 0.01% (2)
investment consulting - 0.01% (2)
component of - 0.01% (2)
bottom quintile - 0.01% (2)
the highest - 0.01% (2)
a strategy - 0.01% (2)
that can - 0.01% (2)
purposes to - 0.01% (2)
bottom line - 0.01% (2)
illustrate the - 0.01% (2)
effects of - 0.01% (2)
during a - 0.01% (2)
returns have - 0.01% (2)
verified by - 0.01% (2)
back-testing performance - 0.01% (2)
differs from - 0.01% (2)
as rates - 0.01% (2)
worry about - 0.01% (2)
the power - 0.01% (2)
the original - 0.01% (2)
john lewis, - 0.01% (2)
strategy that - 0.01% (2)
article, nor - 0.01% (2)
within this - 0.01% (2)
his paper - 0.01% (2)
strategy outperformed - 0.01% (2)
come with - 0.01% (2)
principal erosion - 0.01% (2)
this study - 0.01% (2)
associates, llc, - 0.01% (2)
investment grade - 0.01% (2)
market debt, - 0.01% (2)
strategy can - 0.01% (2)
a variety - 0.01% (2)
away from - 0.01% (2)
strategy and - 0.01% (2)
the ability - 0.01% (2)
mexico and - 0.01% (2)
the chinese - 0.01% (2)
through retroactive - 0.01% (2)
cap of - 0.01% (2)
the yuan - 0.01% (2)
years from - 0.01% (2)
in 2017. - 0.01% (2)
not see - 0.01% (2)
the cost - 0.01% (2)
financial objectives.  advice - 0.01% (2)
wages in - 0.01% (2)
has not - 0.01% (2)
its currency - 0.01% (2)
advised. tweet - 0.01% (2)
3.8% for - 0.01% (2)
the mm, - 0.01% (2)
business stories - 0.01% (2)
29, 2016 - 0.01% (2)
and more - 0.01% (2)
for some - 0.01% (2)
time you - 0.01% (2)
next year - 0.01% (2)
the health - 0.01% (2)
bottom, the - 0.01% (2)
products. this - 0.01% (2)
article does - 0.01% (2)
that has - 0.01% (2)
i would - 0.01% (2)
to read - 0.01% (2)
to say, - 0.01% (2)
strategy was - 0.01% (2)
performance, hypothetical - 0.01% (2)
that this - 0.01% (2)
or actual, - 0.01% (2)
this article, - 0.01% (2)
information within - 0.01% (2)
 neither the - 0.01% (2)
trading there - 0.01% (2)
three years - 0.01% (2)
llc, a - 0.01% (2)
get out - 0.01% (2)
election of - 0.01% (2)
to bring - 0.01% (2)
3, 2017 - 0.01% (2)
shown below. - 0.01% (2)
subject to - 0.01% (2)
of american - 0.01% (2)
settlement with - 0.01% (2)
markets momentum - 0.01% (2)
the bank - 0.01% (2)
the lowest - 0.01% (2)
since august - 0.01% (2)
that time - 0.01% (2)
the only - 0.01% (2)
strategies to - 0.01% (2)
each client - 0.01% (2)
per barrel - 0.01% (2)
to evaluate - 0.01% (2)
in november - 0.01% (2)
the accumulation - 0.01% (2)
years as - 0.01% (2)
the dollar - 0.01% (2)
price for - 0.01% (2)
drug prices - 0.01% (2)
likely to - 0.01% (2)
close out - 0.01% (2)
as investors - 0.01% (2)
leave the - 0.01% (2)
u.s. stocks - 0.01% (2)
of other - 0.01% (2)
the immediate - 0.01% (2)
shift in - 0.01% (2)
be clear - 0.01% (2)
trade deals - 0.01% (2)
retirement savings - 0.01% (2)
six months - 0.01% (2)
industrial average - 0.01% (2)
no second - 0.01% (2)
the way. - 0.01% (2)
decision to - 0.01% (2)
rates for - 0.01% (2)
chances with - 0.01% (2)
increases in - 0.01% (2)
actual performance - 0.01% (2)
application of - 0.01% (2)
the outperformance - 0.01% (2)
rate hike - 0.01% (2)
remain strong. - 0.01% (2)
last week’s - 0.01% (2)
follows: this - 0.01% (2)
the historical - 0.01% (2)
major events - 0.01% (2)
short term - 0.01% (2)
the strategy?  - 0.01% (2)
 if you - 0.01% (2)
while the - 0.01% (2)
the probability - 0.01% (2)
a moving - 0.01% (2)
bond market - 0.01% (2)
well in - 0.01% (2)
that do - 0.01% (2)
in long - 0.01% (2)
the month - 0.01% (2)
as they - 0.01% (2)
investment returns.  - 0.01% (2)
in full - 0.01% (2)
investors began - 0.01% (2)
more about - 0.01% (2)
broken down - 0.01% (2)
and don’t - 0.01% (2)
strength decile - 0.01% (2)
and quartile - 0.01% (2)
and then - 0.01% (2)
find out - 0.01% (2)
return.  those - 0.01% (2)
crosscurrents under - 0.01% (2)
to fall - 0.01% (2)
the ranks - 0.01% (2)
are those - 0.01% (2)
stocks which - 0.01% (2)
want to - 0.01% (2)
best intermediate-term - 0.01% (2)
strategies buy - 0.01% (2)
have strong - 0.01% (2)
trade days - 0.01% (2)
a step - 0.01% (2)
hyer weekly - 0.01% (2)
data library - 0.01% (2)
spx, djia - 0.01% (2)
performed over - 0.01% (2)
average returns - 0.01% (2)
and left - 0.01% (2)
in 2017, - 0.01% (2)
again, we - 0.01% (2)
the rally - 0.01% (2)
past couple - 0.01% (2)
basis. the - 0.01% (2)
of asset - 0.01% (2)
ken french - 0.01% (2)
story was - 0.01% (2)
international equities, - 0.01% (2)
months of - 0.01% (2)
cap equities. - 0.01% (2)
out about - 0.01% (2)
quadfecta highs - 0.01% (2)
a historical - 0.01% (2)
back from - 0.01% (2)
returns we - 0.01% (2)
beginning of - 0.01% (2)
were able - 0.01% (2)
week we - 0.01% (2)
indexes have - 0.01% (2)
fear of - 0.01% (2)
rather than - 0.01% (2)
highs on - 0.01% (2)
lack of - 0.01% (2)
inverse), fixed - 0.01% (2)
point and - 0.01% (2)
record highs - 0.01% (2)
sector in - 0.01% (2)
from our - 0.01% (2)
to that - 0.01% (2)
models, and - 0.01% (2)
since 1979, - 0.01% (2)
a whole - 0.01% (2)
rs recap - 0.01% (2)
interviews tom - 0.01% (2)
a model - 0.01% (2)
focused on - 0.01% (2)
how you - 0.01% (2)
to work - 0.01% (2)
for your - 0.01% (2)
at our - 0.01% (2)
examining the - 0.01% (2)
to financial - 0.01% (2)
strength portfolios, - 0.01% (2)
who are - 0.01% (2)
by: john - 0.01% (2)
the strongest - 0.01% (2)
that led - 0.01% (2)
needs of - 0.01% (2)
the industries - 0.01% (2)
to remove - 0.01% (2)
unless otherwise - 0.01% (2)
around the - 0.01% (2)
line is - 0.01% (2)
of groups - 0.01% (2)
reasons to - 0.01% (2)
market factors - 0.01% (2)
investment methodology - 0.01% (2)
designed with - 0.01% (2)
the benefit - 0.01% (2)
of hindsight.  - 0.01% (2)
which will - 0.01% (2)
of material - 0.01% (2)
economic and - 0.01% (2)
the u.s. - 0.01% (2)
do you - 0.01% (2)
investment advisor’s - 0.01% (2)
decision making - 0.01% (2)
process if - 0.01% (2)
were actually - 0.01% (2)
managing client - 0.01% (2)
rates rise - 0.01% (2)
accumulation phase - 0.01% (2)
fees or - 0.01% (2)
10+ year - 0.01% (2)
consider making - 0.01% (2)
steve forbes - 0.01% (2)
probably be - 0.01% (2)
allocation that - 0.01% (2)
time window - 0.01% (2)
figure relative - 0.01% (2)
than most - 0.01% (2)
other asset - 0.01% (2)
classes and - 0.01% (2)
over time, - 0.01% (2)
shown in - 0.01% (2)
ranked number - 0.01% (2)
table below, - 0.01% (2)
income returns - 0.01% (2)
of changes - 0.01% (2)
source: morningstar, - 0.01% (2)
research affiliates - 0.01% (2)
very different - 0.01% (2)
led to - 0.01% (2)
forbes interviews - 0.01% (2)
meaningful risk - 0.01% (2)
in dali - 0.01% (2)
best to - 0.01% (2)
investment solutions - 0.01% (2)
momentum is - 0.01% (2)
the premier - 0.01% (2)
strategy?  the - 0.01% (2)
performance for - 0.01% (2)
sources believed - 0.01% (2)
committed to - 0.01% (2)
level of - 0.01% (2)
well positioned - 0.01% (2)
 fixed income - 0.01% (2)
looks like - 0.01% (2)
the fact - 0.01% (2)
is made.  - 0.01% (2)
and avoid - 0.01% (2)
investing.  advice - 0.01% (2)
research | - 0.01% (2)
our models - 0.01% (2)
month we - 0.01% (2)
january 2017 - 0.01% (2)
permalink posted by: - 0.18% (25)
| permalink posted - 0.18% (25)
a comment » - 0.15% (21)
leave a comment - 0.15% (21)
comment » | - 0.15% (21)
tweet leave a - 0.15% (21)
by: andy hyer - 0.13% (18)
posted by: andy - 0.13% (18)
the relative strength - 0.13% (18)
may be times - 0.12% (17)
where all investments - 0.12% (17)
and strategies are - 0.12% (17)
unfavorable and depreciate - 0.12% (17)
be times where - 0.12% (17)
all investments and - 0.12% (17)
strategies are unfavorable - 0.12% (17)
times where all - 0.12% (17)
and depreciate in - 0.12% (17)
there may be - 0.12% (17)
investments and strategies - 0.12% (17)
are unfavorable and - 0.12% (17)
depreciate in value. - 0.12% (17)
strength strategy is - 0.11% (15)
relative strength strategy - 0.11% (15)
wright & associates - 0.11% (15)
strategy is not - 0.11% (15)
dorsey, wright & - 0.09% (13)
tactical asset alloc - 0.09% (13)
past performance is - 0.08% (12)
performance is no - 0.08% (12)
an offer to - 0.08% (12)
tactical asset allocation - 0.07% (10)
performance is not - 0.07% (10)
of future results. - 0.07% (10)
by possibility of - 0.07% (10)
not indicative of - 0.07% (10)
for profits is - 0.07% (10)
potential for profits - 0.07% (10)
is not indicative - 0.07% (10)
of the year - 0.07% (10)
possibility of loss - 0.07% (10)
depreciate in value.  - 0.07% (10)
indicative of future - 0.07% (10)
profits is accompanied - 0.06% (9)
accompanied by possibility - 0.06% (9)
the performance of - 0.06% (9)
guarantee.  there may - 0.06% (9)
relative strength is - 0.06% (9)
possibility of loss. - 0.06% (9)
is accompanied by - 0.06% (9)
in the portfolio - 0.06% (9)
systematic relative strength - 0.06% (9)
future results.  potential - 0.06% (8)
2016 tweet the - 0.06% (8)
wright & associates, - 0.06% (8)
of future results.  - 0.06% (8)
results.  potential for - 0.06% (8)
strategy seeks to - 0.06% (8)
inclusive of dividends - 0.05% (7)
markets | permalink - 0.05% (7)
and large cap - 0.05% (7)
over the past - 0.05% (7)
momentum | permalink - 0.05% (7)
mid and large - 0.05% (7)
relative strength characteristics - 0.04% (6)
is designed to - 0.04% (6)
to buy any - 0.04% (6)
a nasdaq company, - 0.04% (6)
seeks to achieve - 0.04% (6)
offer to sell - 0.04% (6)
is achieved through - 0.04% (6)
to sell or - 0.04% (6)
is based on - 0.04% (6)
a guarantee.  there - 0.04% (6)
of loss. tweet - 0.04% (6)
arrow dwa tactical - 0.04% (6)
one of the - 0.04% (6)
offer to buy - 0.04% (6)
| momentum | - 0.04% (6)
in order to - 0.04% (6)
as well as - 0.04% (6)
guarantee.  there may - 0.04% (6)
from the mm - 0.04% (6)
sell or a - 0.04% (5)
total return index - 0.04% (5)
a solicitation or - 0.04% (5)
can be relied - 0.04% (5)
be complete description - 0.04% (5)
| markets | - 0.04% (5)
opinion expressed shall - 0.04% (5)
relative strength in - 0.04% (5)
expressed shall constitute - 0.04% (5)
forecasts based on - 0.04% (5)
of the securities - 0.04% (5)
constitute an offer - 0.04% (5)
any securities, commodities - 0.04% (5)
in the portfolio. - 0.04% (5)
and there is - 0.04% (5)
our family of - 0.04% (5)
of systematic relative - 0.04% (5)
does not represent - 0.04% (5)
there is a - 0.04% (5)
to which reference - 0.04% (5)
to be complete - 0.04% (5)
no assurance that - 0.04% (5)
which reference is - 0.04% (5)
solicitation or an - 0.04% (5)
commodities or exchange - 0.04% (5)
buy any securities, - 0.04% (5)
long-term capital appreciation - 0.04% (5)
or exchange traded - 0.04% (5)
is no assurance - 0.04% (5)
is not predictive - 0.04% (5)
nasdaq company, is - 0.04% (5)
that forecasts based - 0.04% (5)
the table below - 0.04% (5)
predictive and there - 0.04% (5)
investors should have - 0.04% (5)
 past performance is - 0.04% (5)
the arrow dwa - 0.04% (5)
the first time - 0.04% (5)
| from the - 0.04% (5)
loss. tweet leave - 0.04% (5)
family of systematic - 0.04% (5)
is not a guarantee.  - 0.04% (5)
any opinion expressed - 0.04% (5)
» | from - 0.04% (5)
a guarantee.  there may - 0.04% (5)
shall constitute an - 0.04% (5)
or a solicitation - 0.04% (5)
or an offer - 0.04% (5)
securities, commodities or - 0.04% (5)
not inclusive of - 0.04% (5)
be relied upon. - 0.04% (5)
nor any opinion - 0.04% (5)
neither the information - 0.04% (5)
» | markets - 0.04% (5)
not a guarantee.  there - 0.04% (5)
by: charlie coleman - 0.04% (5)
not purport to - 0.04% (5)
exchange traded products. - 0.04% (5)
we have a - 0.04% (5)
» | momentum - 0.04% (5)
you would like - 0.03% (4)
the nasdaq global - 0.03% (4)
purposes only and - 0.03% (4)
global ex us - 0.03% (4)
a registered investment - 0.03% (4)
all of the - 0.03% (4)
inclusive of dividends, - 0.03% (4)
first time in - 0.03% (4)
the end of - 0.03% (4)
is strongly advised. - 0.03% (4)
presented for illustrative - 0.03% (4)
this example is - 0.03% (4)
or call 626-535-0630. - 0.03% (4)
be in the - 0.03% (4)
a financial professional - 0.03% (4)
is a measure - 0.03% (4)
of price momentum - 0.03% (4)
investors cannot invest - 0.03% (4)
end of the - 0.03% (4)
should not be - 0.03% (4)
cannot invest directly - 0.03% (4)
performance of the - 0.03% (4)
based on historical - 0.03% (4)
associates, a nasdaq - 0.03% (4)
stocks in our - 0.03% (4)
description of the - 0.03% (4)
and does not - 0.03% (4)
of the strategies - 0.03% (4)
not represent a - 0.03% (4)
intermediate-term relative strength - 0.03% (4)
only and does - 0.03% (4)
for illustrative purposes - 0.03% (4)
example is presented - 0.03% (4)
relative strength strategies - 0.03% (4)
turn of the - 0.03% (4)
of sector rotation - 0.03% (4)
that demonstrate powerful - 0.03% (4)
is presented for - 0.03% (4)
illustrative purposes only - 0.03% (4)
represent a past - 0.03% (4)
is a registered - 0.03% (4)
(long & inverse), - 0.03% (4)
some of the - 0.03% (4)
quartile of stocks - 0.03% (4)
of the year. - 0.03% (4)
in our ranks - 0.03% (4)
over the years - 0.03% (4)
the distribution phase - 0.03% (4)
sector rotation strategies - 0.03% (4)
we have seen - 0.03% (4)
there are a - 0.03% (4)
invest directly in - 0.03% (4)
u.s. large cap - 0.03% (4)
for the first - 0.03% (4)
large and growing - 0.03% (4)
should have long-term - 0.03% (4)
relative strength leaders - 0.03% (4)
order to remain - 0.03% (4)
not a guarantee.  - 0.03% (4)
equities (long & - 0.03% (4)
a measure of - 0.03% (4)
remain in the - 0.03% (4)
strong relative strength - 0.03% (4)
the securities maintain - 0.03% (4)
and requires that - 0.03% (4)
price momentum based - 0.03% (4)
relative strength can - 0.03% (4)
large cap equities - 0.03% (4)
securities maintain strong - 0.03% (4)
does not purport - 0.03% (4)
requires that the - 0.03% (4)
strength characteristics and - 0.03% (4)
demonstrate powerful relative - 0.03% (4)
achieve long-term capital - 0.03% (4)
relative strength laggards - 0.03% (4)
growing number of - 0.03% (4)
a large and - 0.03% (4)
have long-term financial - 0.03% (4)
on relative strength - 0.03% (4)
strength is not - 0.03% (4)
financial professional is - 0.03% (4)
of stocks in - 0.03% (4)
products.  this document - 0.02% (3)
should carefully consider - 0.02% (3)
the investment objectives, - 0.02% (3)
in an index. - 0.02% (3)
below shows the - 0.02% (3)
investment advisory firm. - 0.02% (3)
at the top - 0.02% (3)
as shown. investors - 0.02% (3)
in value.  the performance - 0.02% (3)
carefully consider the - 0.02% (3)
and expenses of - 0.02% (3)
december 27, 2016 - 0.02% (3)
expenses.  past performance - 0.02% (3)
table below shows - 0.02% (3)
of dividends, fees, or other - 0.02% (3)
returns, not inclusive - 0.02% (3)
on pure price - 0.02% (3)
above is based - 0.02% (3)
recommendation.  the relative - 0.02% (3)
activity.  relative strength - 0.02% (3)
past or present - 0.02% (3)
top of the - 0.02% (3)
our systematic rs - 0.02% (3)
or present recommendation.  - 0.02% (3)
value.  the performance above - 0.02% (3)
pure price returns, - 0.02% (3)
dividends, fees, or other expenses.  - 0.02% (3)
the roller coaster - 0.02% (3)
or transaction costs. - 0.02% (3)
performance of a - 0.02% (3)
each investor should - 0.02% (3)
on historical price - 0.02% (3)
equal the performance - 0.02% (3)
the russell 1000 - 0.02% (3)
profitable or will - 0.02% (3)
future will be - 0.02% (3)
made in the - 0.02% (3)
assumed that recommendations - 0.02% (3)
as profit. it - 0.02% (3)
loss as well - 0.02% (3)
a potential for - 0.02% (3)
in all securities - 0.02% (3)
guarantee future results. - 0.02% (3)
 the relative strength - 0.02% (3)
the momentum model - 0.02% (3)
the top quintile - 0.02% (3)
of rolling 3 - 0.02% (3)
is provided for - 0.02% (3)
please e-mail andyh@dorseymm.com - 0.02% (3)
on a large - 0.02% (3)
systematic rs international - 0.02% (3)
a penalty kick - 0.02% (3)
a number of - 0.02% (3)
of the most - 0.02% (3)
a sector rotation - 0.02% (3)
the broad market - 0.02% (3)
the impact of - 0.02% (3)
will be profitable - 0.02% (3)
asset allocation strategy - 0.02% (3)
information nor any - 0.02% (3)
of these areas - 0.02% (3)
exposure to each - 0.02% (3)
traded products.  this - 0.02% (3)
dorsey wright sector - 0.02% (3)
wright sector momentum - 0.02% (3)
the stock market - 0.02% (3)
the s&p 500 - 0.02% (3)
because it is - 0.02% (3)
markets or developments - 0.02% (3)
u.s. equity strategy - 0.02% (3)
fixed income strategy - 0.02% (3)
global macro strategy - 0.02% (3)
of the united - 0.02% (3)
for the year. - 0.02% (3)
directly in an - 0.02% (3)
we believe that - 0.02% (3)
fees, or other expenses.  past - 0.02% (3)
securities or commodities, - 0.02% (3)
areas is achieved - 0.02% (3)
based on pure - 0.02% (3)
e-mail andyh@dorseymm.com or - 0.02% (3)
this portfolio invests - 0.02% (3)
in securities that - 0.02% (3)
cap u.s. equity - 0.02% (3)
might have on - 0.02% (3)
price activity.  relative - 0.02% (3)
value.  relative strength - 0.02% (3)
this document does - 0.02% (3)
relative strength research - 0.02% (3)
returns of the - 0.02% (3)
each of these - 0.02% (3)
do not include - 0.02% (3)
long-term financial objectives.  - 0.02% (3)
to each of - 0.02% (3)
these areas is - 0.02% (3)
and is provided - 0.02% (3)
the investment strategy - 0.02% (3)
or use inverse - 0.02% (3)
we do not - 0.02% (3)
price returns, not - 0.02% (3)
in the first - 0.02% (3)
performance above is - 0.02% (3)
has been a - 0.02% (3)
and hold them - 0.02% (3)
more information on - 0.02% (3)
that it is - 0.02% (3)
shown. investors should - 0.02% (3)
the performance as - 0.02% (3)
or will equal - 0.02% (3)
in the future - 0.02% (3)
that recommendations made - 0.02% (3)
not be assumed - 0.02% (3)
phase of their - 0.02% (3)
profit. it should - 0.02% (3)
sector rotation strategy - 0.02% (3)
all securities trading - 0.02% (3)
future results. in - 0.02% (3)
potential for loss - 0.02% (3)
present recommendation.  the - 0.02% (3)
relative strength and - 0.02% (3)
or commodities, markets - 0.02% (3)
of their lives. - 0.02% (3)
depreciate in value.  the - 0.02% (3)
does not guarantee - 0.02% (3)
or developments to - 0.02% (3)
in value. tweet - 0.02% (3)
a past or - 0.02% (3)
strength spread november - 0.01% (2)
strength leaders are - 0.01% (2)
as to the - 0.01% (2)
strategies do not - 0.01% (2)
is rising, relative - 0.01% (2)
of hedge fund - 0.01% (2)
as the primary - 0.01% (2)
tools and solutions - 0.01% (2)
relative strength laggards.    - 0.01% (2)
performing better than - 0.01% (2)
value.  past performance is - 0.01% (2)
strength leaders and - 0.01% (2)
between the relative - 0.01% (2)
of any kind - 0.01% (2)
model investment methodology - 0.01% (2)
is the spread - 0.01% (2)
the chart below - 0.01% (2)
benefit of hindsight.  - 0.01% (2)
designed with the - 0.01% (2)
when the chart - 0.01% (2)
or other sources - 0.01% (2)
based on data - 0.01% (2)
or of the - 0.01% (2)
the twenty year - 0.01% (2)
divided by the - 0.01% (2)
click here to - 0.01% (2)
well served to - 0.01% (2)
strength laggards (top - 0.01% (2)
bottom quartile of - 0.01% (2)
leaders and relative - 0.01% (2)
the spread between - 0.01% (2)
chart below is - 0.01% (2)
is suitable for - 0.01% (2)
ranks; universe of - 0.01% (2)
large cap stocks).  - 0.01% (2)
recommendation or information - 0.01% (2)
and the information - 0.01% (2)
would be well - 0.01% (2)
believed to be - 0.01% (2)
winning funds do - 0.01% (2)
of brent crude - 0.01% (2)
are up over - 0.01% (2)
to say, we - 0.01% (2)
investment thesis. if - 0.01% (2)
u.s. mid and - 0.01% (2)
asset alloc | - 0.01% (2)
(top quartile of - 0.01% (2)
strength.  relative strength - 0.01% (2)
application of a - 0.01% (2)
is as follows: - 0.01% (2)
to receive the - 0.01% (2)
andy hyer, client - 0.01% (2)
work in portfolio - 0.01% (2)
momentum based etfs - 0.01% (2)
1 comment | - 0.01% (2)
you focus on - 0.01% (2)
the years there - 0.01% (2)
does not have - 0.01% (2)
not have the - 0.01% (2)
along the way. - 0.01% (2)
will continue to - 0.01% (2)
ups and downs - 0.01% (2)
weekly rs recap - 0.01% (2)
tweet the table - 0.01% (2)
universe of mid - 0.01% (2)
in the center - 0.01% (2)
last week’s performance - 0.01% (2)
they remain strong. - 0.01% (2)
as long as - 0.01% (2)
that have strong - 0.01% (2)
u.s. equities, broken - 0.01% (2)
down by relative - 0.01% (2)
strength decile and - 0.01% (2)
quartile and then - 0.01% (2)
compared to the - 0.01% (2)
universe return.  those - 0.01% (2)
of the ranks - 0.01% (2)
are those stocks - 0.01% (2)
strategies buy securities - 0.01% (2)
which have the - 0.01% (2)
over the last - 0.01% (2)
percent on the - 0.01% (2)
achieved through retroactive - 0.01% (2)
a specific period. - 0.01% (2)
from actual performance - 0.01% (2)
were actually managing - 0.01% (2)
if the advisor - 0.01% (2)
decision making process - 0.01% (2)
ranks divided by - 0.01% (2)
the bottom quartile - 0.01% (2)
an investment advisor’s - 0.01% (2)
and market factors - 0.01% (2)
our ranks; universe - 0.01% (2)
of material economic - 0.01% (2)
represent the impact - 0.01% (2)
of u.s. mid - 0.01% (2)
stocks).  when the - 0.01% (2)
chart is rising, - 0.01% (2)
effects of the - 0.01% (2)
days following the - 0.01% (2)
strength strategies in - 0.01% (2)
is the result - 0.01% (2)
 the performance of - 0.01% (2)
the systematic rs - 0.01% (2)
back-tested performance is - 0.01% (2)
compared to its - 0.01% (2)
rs international model - 0.01% (2)
a trump administration - 0.01% (2)
are performing better - 0.01% (2)
november 28, 2016 - 0.01% (2)
for informational purposes - 0.01% (2)
to illustrate the - 0.01% (2)
best intermediate-term relative - 0.01% (2)
laggards.    as of - 0.01% (2)
than relative strength - 0.01% (2)
in value.  past performance - 0.01% (2)
of investment strategies - 0.01% (2)
equities, international equities, - 0.01% (2)
the russell 2000 - 0.01% (2)
were able to - 0.01% (2)
for the quarter - 0.01% (2)
part of the - 0.01% (2)
rates for the - 0.01% (2)
in to the - 0.01% (2)
with a trump - 0.01% (2)
past couple of - 0.01% (2)
the year and - 0.01% (2)
three months of - 0.01% (2)
during the fourth - 0.01% (2)
the probability of - 0.01% (2)
| media | - 0.01% (2)
dorsey wright us - 0.01% (2)
the alps dorsey - 0.01% (2)
tweet 1 comment - 0.01% (2)
guarantee of future - 0.01% (2)
at andyh@dorseymm.com or - 0.01% (2)
any of the - 0.01% (2)
through exchange-traded funds - 0.01% (2)
the strategy invests - 0.01% (2)
seeks to provide - 0.01% (2)
at the beginning - 0.01% (2)
we were able - 0.01% (2)
and commodities.  exposure - 0.01% (2)
hypothetical or actual, - 0.01% (2)
based on the - 0.01% (2)
the markets have - 0.01% (2)
tweet as we - 0.01% (2)
the strategy was - 0.01% (2)
markets momentum etf - 0.01% (2)
dwa momentum etf - 0.01% (2)
relative strength characteristics. - 0.01% (2)
needless to say, - 0.01% (2)
strongly advised. tweet - 0.01% (2)
objectives.  advice from a - 0.01% (2)
this article does - 0.01% (2)
that led to - 0.01% (2)
this article, nor - 0.01% (2)
the information within - 0.01% (2)
associates, llc, a - 0.01% (2)
our tactical fixed - 0.01% (2)
buy and hold - 0.01% (2)
long term bonds - 0.01% (2)
continue to be - 0.01% (2)
4, 2017 tweet - 0.01% (2)
by: john lewis - 0.01% (2)
unless otherwise stated, - 0.01% (2)
achieved through exchange-traded - 0.01% (2)
real estate, currencies, - 0.01% (2)
29, 2016 tweet - 0.01% (2)
believe that this - 0.01% (2)
currencies, and commodities.  - 0.01% (2)
income, real estate, - 0.01% (2)
& inverse), fixed - 0.01% (2)
international equities (long - 0.01% (2)
to invest in - 0.01% (2)
our global macro - 0.01% (2)
diversification and investment - 0.01% (2)
achieve meaningful risk - 0.01% (2)
the strategy?  the - 0.01% (2)
information about this - 0.01% (2)
relative strength portfolios, - 0.01% (2)
dorsey wright’s proprietary - 0.01% (2)
investors in the - 0.01% (2)
line is that - 0.01% (2)
journal of investment - 0.01% (2)
to recover from - 0.01% (2)
fourteenth year with - 0.01% (2)
of the original - 0.01% (2)
the fourteenth year - 0.01% (2)
second chances with - 0.01% (2)
the accumulation phase - 0.01% (2)
they are in - 0.01% (2)
the strategy is - 0.01% (2)
with retirement savings - 0.01% (2)
inverse), fixed income, - 0.01% (2)
long-term capital appreciation.  - 0.01% (2)
& inverse), international - 0.01% (2)
domestic equities (long - 0.01% (2)
strategy invests across - 0.01% (2)
investment returns.  the - 0.01% (2)
risk diversification and - 0.01% (2)
to achieve meaningful - 0.01% (2)
hold up to - 0.01% (2)
the account to - 0.01% (2)
to have lower - 0.01% (2)
in the portfolio.  - 0.01% (2)
and global macro - 0.01% (2)
an asset class - 0.01% (2)
portfolios are available - 0.01% (2)
alloc | permalink - 0.01% (2)
| tactical asset - 0.01% (2)
dwa tactical fund - 0.01% (2)
for the arrow - 0.01% (2)
number of sma - 0.01% (2)
suitable for the - 0.01% (2)
a variety of - 0.01% (2)
no second chances - 0.01% (2)
with better relative - 0.01% (2)
business stories of - 0.01% (2)
the following as - 0.01% (2)
no guarantee of - 0.01% (2)
shown in the - 0.01% (2)
broken down by - 0.01% (2)
cap u.s. equities, - 0.01% (2)
a universe of - 0.01% (2)
a moving time - 0.01% (2)
hyer weekly rs - 0.01% (2)
media | permalink - 0.01% (2)
to find out - 0.01% (2)
forbes interviews tom - 0.01% (2)
morningstar, research affiliates - 0.01% (2)
other asset classes - 0.01% (2)
and quartile and - 0.01% (2)
research | permalink - 0.01% (2)
investment objectives, risks, - 0.01% (2)
moving time window - 0.01% (2)
to own the - 0.01% (2)
ken french data - 0.01% (2)
annualized return of - 0.01% (2)
investment strategies to - 0.01% (2)
for your clients. - 0.01% (2)
potential to provide - 0.01% (2)
the most powerful - 0.01% (2)
relative strength decile - 0.01% (2)
then compared to - 0.01% (2)
at dorsey wright - 0.01% (2)
strong. last week’s - 0.01% (2)
be a good - 0.01% (2)
the spx, djia - 0.01% (2)
returns over the - 0.01% (2)
the major indices - 0.01% (2)
highs on the - 0.01% (2)
on the same - 0.01% (2)
from best to - 0.01% (2)
look at how - 0.01% (2)
the month of - 0.01% (2)
follows: this example - 0.01% (2)
as they remain - 0.01% (2)
the universe return. - 0.01% (2)
them as long - 0.01% (2)
strength and hold - 0.01% (2)
strong intermediate-term relative - 0.01% (2)
securities that have - 0.01% (2)
strength strategies buy - 0.01% (2)
relative strength.  relative - 0.01% (2)
the best intermediate-term - 0.01% (2)
stocks which have - 0.01% (2)
ranks are those - 0.01% (2)
 those at the - 0.01% (2)
of our family - 0.01% (2)
dorsey wright & - 0.01% (2)
the election of - 0.01% (2)
to outperform over - 0.01% (2)
to do well. - 0.01% (2)
tend to continue - 0.01% (2)
of dorsey wright - 0.01% (2)
to continue to - 0.01% (2)
you would probably - 0.01% (2)
the top ten - 0.01% (2)
would be in - 0.01% (2)
you to pick - 0.01% (2)
pick the current - 0.01% (2)
of the 100 - 0.01% (2)
momentum (aka relative - 0.01% (2)
on the topic - 0.01% (2)
to be future - 0.01% (2)
years from the - 0.01% (2)
investing.  advice from - 0.01% (2)
above prior to - 0.01% (2)
risks, and expenses - 0.01% (2)
upon. each investor - 0.01% (2)
the year. many - 0.01% (2)
the cost of - 0.01% (2)
prescription drug prices - 0.01% (2)
dow jones industrial - 0.01% (2)
john lewis, cmt, - 0.01% (2)
any investor who - 0.01% (2)
available on a - 0.01% (2)
with the benefit - 0.01% (2)
periods of underperformance - 0.01% (2)
strategy outperformed the - 0.01% (2)
dividends, but do - 0.01% (2)
actually managing client - 0.01% (2)
the advisor were - 0.01% (2)
making process if - 0.01% (2)
investment advisor’s decision - 0.01% (2)
component of their - 0.01% (2)
market factors might - 0.01% (2)
material economic and - 0.01% (2)
investment methodology designed - 0.01% (2)
the result of - 0.01% (2)
of a model - 0.01% (2)
through retroactive application - 0.01% (2)
it is achieved - 0.01% (2)
actual performance because - 0.01% (2)
have not been - 0.01% (2)
returns have been - 0.01% (2)
during a specific - 0.01% (2)
of the strategy - 0.01% (2)
illustrate the effects - 0.01% (2)
informational purposes to - 0.01% (2)
have on an - 0.01% (2)

Here you can find chart of all your popular one, two and three word phrases. Google and others search engines means your page is about words you use frequently.

Copyright © 2015-2016 hupso.pl. All rights reserved. FB | +G | Twitter

Hupso.pl jest serwisem internetowym, w którym jednym kliknieciem możesz szybko i łatwo sprawdź stronę www pod kątem SEO. Oferujemy darmowe pozycjonowanie stron internetowych oraz wycena domen i stron internetowych. Prowadzimy ranking polskich stron internetowych oraz ranking stron alexa.