4.74 score from hupso.pl for:
sociologysource.org



HTML Content


Title sociology source

Length: 21, Words: 2
Description the society pages (tsp) is an open-access social science project headquartered in the department of sociology at the university of minnesota

Length: 140, Words: 21
Keywords pusty
Robots
Charset UTF-8
Og Meta - Title exist
Og Meta - Description exist
Og Meta - Site name exist
Tytuł powinien zawierać pomiędzy 10 a 70 znaków (ze spacjami), a mniej niż 12 słów w długości.
Meta opis powinien zawierać pomiędzy 50 a 160 znaków (łącznie ze spacjami), a mniej niż 24 słów w długości.
Kodowanie znaków powinny być określone , UTF-8 jest chyba najlepszy zestaw znaków, aby przejść z powodu UTF-8 jest bardziej międzynarodowy kodowaniem.
Otwarte obiekty wykresu powinny być obecne w stronie internetowej (więcej informacji na temat protokołu OpenGraph: http://ogp.me/)

SEO Content

Words/Characters 3364
Text/HTML 47.43 %
Headings H1 0
H2 10
H3 6
H4 0
H5 0
H6 0
H1
H2
social construction of the body: the nipple
join us at the asa sociology blog meet up!
why don’t we teach students to think sociologically?
we need to teach sociology differently
why you don’t know, what you *know* you know
should common sense be the enemy of sociology?
cj pascoe on teaching developing minds
sociology source joins the society pages
the genie scenario. what would you do?
before you “go off” on that student
H3
how to help students know what they really know
bringing capitalist ideologies into plain sight
student “attacks” & “defending” our selves
how to handle student challenges
about sociology source
topics
H4
H5
H6
strong
this post is written by todd beer and was originally published on his excellent website sociologytoolbox.com
when
where
who
what
b
i
this post is written by todd beer and was originally published on his excellent website sociologytoolbox.com
when
where
who
what
em this post is written by todd beer and was originally published on his excellent website sociologytoolbox.com
when
where
who
what
Bolds strong 5
b 0
i 5
em 5
Zawartość strony internetowej powinno zawierać więcej niż 250 słów, z stopa tekst / kod jest wyższy niż 20%.
Pozycji używać znaczników (h1, h2, h3, ...), aby określić temat sekcji lub ustępów na stronie, ale zwykle, użyj mniej niż 6 dla każdego tagu pozycje zachować swoją stronę zwięzły.
Styl używać silnych i kursywy znaczniki podkreślić swoje słowa kluczowe swojej stronie, ale nie nadużywać (mniej niż 16 silnych tagi i 16 znaczników kursywy)

Statystyki strony

twitter:title pusty
twitter:description pusty
google+ itemprop=name pusty
Pliki zewnętrzne 11
Pliki CSS 4
Pliki javascript 7
Plik należy zmniejszyć całkowite odwołanie plików (CSS + JavaScript) do 7-8 maksymalnie.

Linki wewnętrzne i zewnętrzne

Linki 101
Linki wewnętrzne 15
Linki zewnętrzne 86
Linki bez atrybutu Title 92
Linki z atrybutem NOFOLLOW 0
Linki - Użyj atrybutu tytuł dla każdego łącza. Nofollow link jest link, który nie pozwala wyszukiwarkom boty zrealizują są odnośniki no follow. Należy zwracać uwagę na ich użytkowania

Linki wewnętrzne

/
/search/
nathan /sociologysource/author/nathan
nathan /sociologysource/author/nathan
nathan /sociologysource/author/nathan
[1] #fn:1
nathan /sociologysource/author/nathan
nathan /sociologysource/author/nathan
[1] #fn:1
nathan /sociologysource/author/nathan
nathan /sociologysource/author/nathan
nathan /sociologysource/author/nathan
nathan /sociologysource/author/nathan
nathan /sociologysource/author/nathan
#

Linki zewnętrzne

- https://thesocietypages.org/sociologysource
https://thesocietypages.org/sociologysource/feed/
https://thesocietypages.org/sociologysource/search/
social construction of the body: the nipple https://thesocietypages.org/sociologysource/2015/08/31/social-construction-of-the-body-the-nipple/
originally published http://sociologytoolbox.com/social-construction-of-the-body/
sociologytoolbox.com http://sociologytoolbox.com/social-construction-of-the-body/
killing us softly 4 http://www.mediaed.org/cgi-bin/commerce.cgi?preadd=action&key=241
super bowl halftime shows http://www.rollingstone.com/culture/news/nipple-ripples-10-years-of-fallout-from-janet-jacksons-halftime-show-20140130
- http://www.rollingstone.com/culture/news/nipple-ripples–10-years-of-fallout-from-janet-jacksons-halftime-show–20140130)
more... https://thesocietypages.org/sociologysource/2015/08/31/social-construction-of-the-body-the-nipple/
join us at the asa sociology blog meet up! https://thesocietypages.org/sociologysource/2015/08/05/join-us-at-the-asa-sociology-blog-meet-up/
- https://thesocietypages.org/sociologysource/files/2015/08/highres_147421062.jpeg
sociological images https://thesocietypages.org/socimages/
the sociological cinema http://www.thesociologicalcinema.com
the society pages https://thesocietypages.org
sociology toolbox http://sociologytoolbox.com
sociology in focus http://www.sociologyinfocus.com
sociology source https://thesocietypages.org/sociologysource/
why don’t we teach students to think sociologically? https://thesocietypages.org/sociologysource/2015/02/02/why-dont-we-teach-students-to-think-sociologically/
think like a sociologist http://books.wwnorton.com/books/detail.aspx?id=17168
more... https://thesocietypages.org/sociologysource/2015/02/02/why-dont-we-teach-students-to-think-sociologically/
we need to teach sociology differently https://thesocietypages.org/sociologysource/2015/01/21/we-need-to-teach-sociology-differently/
more... https://thesocietypages.org/sociologysource/2015/01/21/we-need-to-teach-sociology-differently/
why you don’t know, what you *know* you know https://thesocietypages.org/sociologysource/2014/11/19/why-you-dont-know-what-you-know-you-know/
more... https://thesocietypages.org/sociologysource/2014/11/19/why-you-dont-know-what-you-know-you-know/
should common sense be the enemy of sociology? https://thesocietypages.org/sociologysource/2014/11/03/335/
- https://thesocietypages.org/sociologysource/files/2014/11/common_sense.jpg
more... https://thesocietypages.org/sociologysource/2014/11/03/335/
cj pascoe on teaching developing minds https://thesocietypages.org/sociologysource/2014/10/20/cj-pascoe-on-teaching-developing-minds/
ambrose et al 2010:160 http://www.amazon.com/how-learning-works-research-based-principles/dp/0470484101
dude you’re a fag http://www.amazon.com/dude-youre-fag-masculinity-sexuality/dp/0520271483
sociology source joins the society pages https://thesocietypages.org/sociologysource/2014/10/20/sociology-source-joins-the-society-pages/
doug hartman https://thesocietypages.org/doug-hartmann/
chris uggen https://thesocietypages.org/people/chris-uggen/
letta page https://thesocietypages.org/people/letta-page/
jon smjada https://thesocietypages.org/people/jonsmajda/
the genie scenario. what would you do? https://thesocietypages.org/sociologysource/2014/10/13/the-genie-scenario-what-would-you-do/
want to assign this to your students? send them this link to an essay version of this complete with four assignable questions. http://www.sociologyinfocus.com/2014/10/13/if-you-could-quit-your-job-would-you/
oedipus http://www.ancientgreece.com/s/greekmyths/oedipus/
cronus http://www.greekmythology.com/titans/cronus/cronus.html
before you “go off” on that student https://thesocietypages.org/sociologysource/2014/10/06/before-you-go-off-on-that-student/
[1] http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/sociologysourcecom/~3/dpgpfexix5s/before-you-go-off-on-that-student.html#fn:1
goffman, erving. 2013. encounters: two studies in the sociology of interaction eastford, ct: martino fine books http://www.amazon.com/encounters-two-studies-sociology-interaction/dp/1614274401
 ↩ http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/sociologysourcecom/~3/dpgpfexix5s/before-you-go-off-on-that-student.html#fnref:1
2 https://thesocietypages.org/sociologysource/page/2
3 https://thesocietypages.org/sociologysource/page/3
4 https://thesocietypages.org/sociologysource/page/4
5 https://thesocietypages.org/sociologysource/page/5
6 https://thesocietypages.org/sociologysource/page/6
7 https://thesocietypages.org/sociologysource/page/7
8 https://thesocietypages.org/sociologysource/page/8
9 https://thesocietypages.org/sociologysource/page/9
20 https://thesocietypages.org/sociologysource/page/20
https://thesocietypages.org/sociologysource/page/2
class discussion https://thesocietypages.org/sociologysource/category/class-discussion/
class/inequality https://thesocietypages.org/sociologysource/category/classinequality/
deling w/ large classes https://thesocietypages.org/sociologysource/category/deling-w-large-classes/
deviance/crime https://thesocietypages.org/sociologysource/category/deviancecrime/
economy https://thesocietypages.org/sociologysource/category/economy/
email https://thesocietypages.org/sociologysource/category/email/
environmental soc https://thesocietypages.org/sociologysource/category/environmental-soc/
events & announcements https://thesocietypages.org/sociologysource/category/events/
gender https://thesocietypages.org/sociologysource/category/gender/
grading https://thesocietypages.org/sociologysource/category/grading/
in class activities https://thesocietypages.org/sociologysource/category/in-class-activities/
listen https://thesocietypages.org/sociologysource/category/listen/
music for class https://thesocietypages.org/sociologysource/category/music-for-class/
my thoughts https://thesocietypages.org/sociologysource/category/my-thoughts/
podcast https://thesocietypages.org/sociologysource/category/podcast/
race/ethnicity https://thesocietypages.org/sociologysource/category/raceethnicity/
read https://thesocietypages.org/sociologysource/category/read/
research methods https://thesocietypages.org/sociologysource/category/research-methods/
resources for teachers https://thesocietypages.org/sociologysource/category/resources-for-teachers/
sexuality https://thesocietypages.org/sociologysource/category/sexuality/
student relationships https://thesocietypages.org/sociologysource/category/student-relationships/
study skills https://thesocietypages.org/sociologysource/category/study-skills/
teaching philosophy https://thesocietypages.org/sociologysource/category/teaching-philosophy/
technology https://thesocietypages.org/sociologysource/category/technology/
theory https://thesocietypages.org/sociologysource/category/theory/
time savers https://thesocietypages.org/sociologysource/category/time-savers/
videos for class https://thesocietypages.org/sociologysource/category/videos-for-class/
what is sociology? https://thesocietypages.org/sociologysource/category/what-is-sociology/
login https://thesocietypages.org/sociologysource/wp-login.php
https://thesocietypages.org/sociologysource/feed/
https://thesocietypages.org/sociologysource/search/
cc attribution non-commercial share alike http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/us/

Zdjęcia

Zdjęcia 6
Zdjęcia bez atrybutu ALT 2
Zdjęcia bez atrybutu TITLE 6
Korzystanie Obraz ALT i TITLE atrybutu dla każdego obrazu.

Zdjęcia bez atrybutu TITLE

/static/syndicates/logos/sociologysource.png
https://thesocietypages.org/sociologysource/files/2015/08/screen-shot-2015-05-12-at-12.52.08-pm-500x295.png
https://thesocietypages.org/sociologysource/files/2015/08/highres_147421062.jpeg
https://thesocietypages.org/sociologysource/files/2014/11/common_sense.jpg
https://thesocietypages.org/sociologysource/files/2014/10/483302_thumbnail-1000-500x564.jpg
http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/sociologysourcecom/~4/dpgpfexix5s

Zdjęcia bez atrybutu ALT

/static/syndicates/logos/sociologysource.png
http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/sociologysourcecom/~4/dpgpfexix5s

Ranking:


Alexa Traffic
Daily Global Rank Trend
Daily Reach (Percent)









Majestic SEO











Text on page:

about tsp features editor’s desk roundtables changing lenses clippings office hours discoveries teaching tsp there’s research on that council on contemporary families scholars strategy network contexts a backstage sociologist cyborgology dispatches from a dean economic sociology education & society families as they really are feminist reflections girl w/ pen give methods a chance graphic sociology new books in sociology public criminology sexuality & society sociological eye sociological images sociology improv sociology lens sociology source sociology toolbox the color line thickculture --> social construction of the body: the nipple nathan on august 31, 2015 this post is written by todd beer and was originally published on his excellent website sociologytoolbox.com examples of the social construction of the body are prevalent in the media’s objectification of the female body in particular. see the famous documentary killing us softly 4 for numerous patterns in the media. the biological body has purposes driven by genetics and “human nature”, but the meanings we as a society apply to the body are not fixed, “natural”, or static. they are socially constructed. the nipple is a great example. biologically, both men and women have nipples, albeit with slightly different levels of functionality. however, socially the symbolic meaning of men’s and women’s nipples is dramatically different in most societies. women’s nipples are sexualized, objectified, censored, and stop super bowl halftime shows. men’s nipples get to be on display… when we’re running, doing yard work, in yoga class, in primetime television, and in advertising. more... join us at the asa sociology blog meet up! nathan on august 5, 2015 take a break from asa and join us for the 4th annual sociology blog meet up. come chat with the authors of sociological images, the sociological cinema, the society pages, sociology toolbox, sociology in focus, sociology source, and more. this is a casual event that is open to everyone (even non-sociologists)- come alone or bring your friends. here are the details: when: saturday 8/22 at 4pm where: burger bar (1150 s michigan ave – 2.5 blocks from hilton) who: everyone’s welcome. bloggers, readers, anyone. what: a meet up for sociology bloggers, sociology tweeters, and the people who read them. come meet the sociologists you only engage with online. see old friends, make new friends, have a drink, and take a break from asa. hope to see you soon! why don’t we teach students to think sociologically? nathan on february 2, 2015 textbooks often promise to teach your students how to “think like a sociologist,” but what do they actually do? most simply relay sociological theories and research findings to your students. that is, they tell your students what sociologists think, but not how sociologists think. but come to think of it, the very same thing could be said for how i often teach sociology and how it was taught to me. most of my undergraduate sociology education could be roughly described as my teacher saying to the class, “watch me as i sociologically analyze this aspect of society.” then once the teacher reached their conclusion they would step back and say, “see? did you see how i came to that conclusion?” if the whole class was still lost the professor would pick another similar topic and sociologically analyze it. and again s/he would ask, “do you get it now?” in the absence of direct instruction, sociological thinking is taught through repetition, trial and error, and inferred meaning[1]. “but there is no one way to think sociologically!” i imagine many of you are shouting in your mind. when discussing thinking like a sociologist with colleagues i am often told that there really isn’t a sociology to speak of, but rather many different sociologies tenuously connected under an umbrella term. this is a cop out. especially for a discipline that prides itself in seeing commonalities within absurdly complex systems. more... we need to teach sociology differently nathan on january 21, 2015 i think we need to teach sociology differently, especially intro courses and especially large sections of intro. my plan is to spend 2015 identifying the areas for improvement and then using empirical research to inform the creation of solutions. this is the first of what will be a year long series documenting my attempt to reimagine intro to sociology and remake myself as a teacher. i said i think we need to teach sociology differently above, but i know for certain that i need to teach it differently. my soc 101 class will be my laboratory for this project because i know that my class and the way i teach it are perfect examples of what’s wrong with the large format intro to sociology class. i’m not trying to be self-effacing or modest, but honest. i’m also not trying to make anyone else feel bad for how they teach their classes. i teach between 200–400 students in a single intro class which limits what i can do, but i think many of us (first and foremost myself) over estimate what’s not possible in a large class. for instance, i fundamentally reject the idea that having a large section automatically requires the class to be lecture based and void of any written assignments. and i am not going to be a martyr for sociology. i’m not going to spend every hour of the day grading or tending to my classes. the idea that you either forego written assignments in large sections or sacrifice all your free time grading is a false dichotomy. what i’m suggesting is, we should accept the very real constraints on ourselves and our classes and then innovate within them. more... why you don’t know, what you *know* you know nathan on november 19, 2014 sociology exams have a way of blindsiding students. “i was just certain i had aced the test until i saw online that i failed it.” i have heard statements like this after every exam that i have ever given. maybe my approach to teaching and assessing student learning is to blame, but i’m guessing that many of you reading this have experienced the same thing. so what gives? the problem seems to lie in our student’s ability to assess their knowledge. students’ have unwarranted confidence in their mastery of course content. they feel they know things that they in fact don’t[1]. research out of the ucla learning and forgetting lab suggest the problem may lie in how our students are studying. i’ll let robert bjork explain. i hear bjork saying, that when students try to judge their understanding of course material by looking at their notes and course texts, those judgments “will be very flawed.” this works in a way similar to the hindsight bias, once you know the answer it’s easy to presume you would have been able to do so without the help of your notes. so the best thing for students to do is to try and externalize their ideas so that they can assess them. students who study with their peers, quizzing one another, will have a better understanding of what they know and what they don’t. how to help students know what they really know the first question we should ask a struggling student is, “if i had watched you while you were studying for the test, what would i have seen you doing?” when students say that they, “reviewed their notes, reread chapters, etc.,” we have to encourage them to externalize their studying process. more... should common sense be the enemy of sociology? nathan on november 3, 2014 how do you discuss common sense in your classes? during my first few years of teaching i used to assassinate common sense as the enemy of sociology. but i no longer do. studies of cognition have shown that it is near impossible to learn new ideas until we are able to connect them to things we already understand (bransford and johnson 1972; resnick 1983). this suggests that our intro level students are almost certain to connect the things you are teaching them to their already established common sense beliefs. hostility to common sense then, threatens the very foundation your students will use to learn sociology (mathisen 1989). furthermore, interpretive theories and concepts like weber’s verstehen cannot be understood without considering how common sense is used to make meaning. when we honor our students’ common sense understanding of the world, we show them respect and acknowledge where they are in the learning process. today i treat my students’ common sense as their baseline for understanding. i start from what they already know and then move toward an empirical understanding of the world. if they are going to start with common sense anyways, why not join them? more... cj pascoe on teaching developing minds nathan on october 20, 2014 “students with a well-developed sense of self feel less threatened by new ideas involving beliefs that conflict with their own” (ambrose et al 2010:160) teaching “traditional aged” college students about sex & gender can be tricky. many of them are still discovering who they are. even the most basic ideas about sex & gender can seem radical/threatening when the concepts are first introduced to students. last fall i sat down with dr. cj pascoe from the university of oregon to discuss her groundbreaking work dude you’re a fag and her award winning teaching. given her area of expertise, i was dying to have her weigh in on how she overcame this pedagogical challenge. *note: this clip is excerpted from a much longer interview. more clips to come soon. * sociology source joins the society pages nathan on october 20, 2014 sociology source has found a new home as part of the society pages. the site is going to stay pretty much the same. it will still be focused on ideas & resources for teaching sociology. however, i’m hoping to bring more voices on to the site. so if you have a great idea or resource for teaching sociology, send me an email (nathan [at] sociologysource [dot] org). a huge thanks goes to doug hartman, chris uggen, letta page, and especially jon smjada at tsp for making this all happen. it’s an honor to join all of the other wonderful blogs on the society pages. the genie scenario. what would you do? nathan on october 13, 2014 ideology is a lot like implicit bias. a smart person knows they have it, but they often struggle to see or describe it. one of the only ways to draw ideology into the light is to present it to students in unfamiliar ways. with this in mind i created the “genie scenario”. want to assign this to your students? send them this link to an essay version of this complete with four assignable questions. walking along the beach one bright morning you trip over a hidden piece of driftwood. on all fours, a bright metallic spark of light escapes from the sand below searing your eyes. like a blinded archeologist you clench your eyelids together while sweeping away the warm sticky yellow grains until your hand settles on something hot and smooth. “are you done rubbing my lamp or should i come back later?” you whip your head around. a lumpy blue cloud with arms and a smiling face stands above you. “my god you’re… you’re a…” “i’m a genie, yes. now how about you stand up and let’s talk about what i can do for you.” “do i get three wishes?” “nope. not that kind of genie. get up. brush yourself off and get ready to listen carefully.” rising to your feet you subtly grab a a piece of you hip and pinch down hard. you don’t wake up. this is happening. “as the saying goes kid, time is money.” genie says arms folded. he starts in while you brush yourself clean. “i have been to the future and i know how you will live your life and how it will come to an end- well for our purposes here, the more important point is that i know *when* it will end.” “wait, how i die?” genie raises his hand. “can’t give you that. plus, knowing your fate only imprisons the rest of your life; just ask oedipus and cronus. what i offer you is the opposite of that. i want to give you… freedom.” “i am prepared to give you all of the money you will earn over the rest of your life. take this offer and you’ll never have to sell another hour of your life to your employer. i will return ten more times over the remainder of your life each time with 1/10 of the money you are set to earn over the remainder of your career.” “accept my offer and you are free to do anything you like with your time on earth. keep working if you like. volunteer, travel, paint, or binge watch netflix, it’s up to you. you would finally be truly free to do what you want. however in return, every time you see me, before i give you your money, i’m going to painlessly remove one of your fingers.” “so, do we have a deal?” bringing capitalist ideologies into plain sight i follow the “genie scenario” with a quick think/pair/share. that is, i ask my students to write down whether or not they’d take the offer and why. then they talk to their classmates briefly before we talk as a whole group. i have asked nearly 2,000 students to consider this offer and almost all of them have said they’d turn it down. the most common theme running through all the reasons they have given me for saying no can roughly be summarized as, “i need my fingers to live a quality life and once they’re gone they can’t be replaced.” i ask my students to raise their hands if their reason for saying no fit’s with this summary and almost the entire room lifts up their arm. then i ask them, “but couldn’t we say the exact same thing for your time? and many of you sell that for almost nothing.” the genie scenario makes it easier for students to see one of their ideologies (i.e. selling my labor is normal if not moral). from here it’s much easier for students to understand marx’s economic determinism and false consciousness, gramsci’s hegemony, and the frankfurt school’s critical theory. after the genie scenario, weber’s protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism helps students see how culture and the economy are both created by ideology and both also play a role in creating ideology. before you “go off” on that student nathan on october 6, 2014 when a student is angry pull them closer to you. embrace their critique and thank them for it. show them that you really hear what they are saying and ask them to keep talking. if right now you think i’m crazy, that’s okay. this is a counterintuitive approach and that’s what makes it both disarming and pedagogically rich. to understand why this approach works, first we have to examine how teachers commonly frame a student’s vehement challenge. student “attacks” & “defending” our selves when a student challenges you, how do you respond? or let’s take a step back, what are the adjectives you use inside your head when thinking about a student assertively challenging you or the ideas and research you are presenting them? it’s not uncommon for teachers (myself included) to frame a student’s challenge as “an attack” or frame their posture as “willful ignorance.” we might tell our colleagues afterwards that we had to “defend ourselves” from students who were “not willing to learn” or “blinded by their [insert perceived culprit].” the crucial self-reflexive question that we should ask ourselves is, what are we defending and how does that affect our teaching?[1] most of the time we are protecting our identities as teachers. we have spent years in graduate school and in our careers developing our identity as a competent teacher and content expert. but every teacher, no matter how developed their teacher identity, has a voice in their head that questions their competency and wonders if their identity is built upon a foundation of self-deception. you might be tempted to think that this is an issue for only new teachers or sub-par teachers. to the contrary, the more reinforced our identity as a teacher is, the more egregious a student’s challenge can feel. that is, our internal monologue can tell us, “i am a full professor who’s won teaching awards and has published on this topic for decades. who is this student to think they can pull my card!” the point i’m making here is that it is perilous to conceptualize a student as your adversary. but if this conceptualization still rings true for you, then my suggestion is you employ an aikido like approach to your students. in aikido, you are trained to redirect the energy of your attacker. in this case, you take a student’s powerful energy and redirect it toward your learning goals. how to handle student challenges imagine a student has come up to you after class with a red face and explains all the ways that you, your class, and sociology in general have “got it all wrong” in a tone of voice teetering on the edge of incivility. how would this interaction go if you said something like this: “thank you for sharing this with me. i know that it’s not easy to challenge a professor or what’s written in a textbook. we are always talking about how important it is to think critically about things, so i absolutely appreciate the fact that you are thinking critically about our class. i hear you saying… , is that right?” this is a classic deescalation technique. you are showing the student that you are hearing them, you are affirming their point of view, and most importantly you are role modeling civility and inviting them to join you. this is a powerful, mature, and authoritative response that projects confidence and compassion. from here, encourage your students to continue talking. often their outrage is based upon a misunderstanding of the course material, an error in logic, or the fact that they have privileged their anecdotal experiences above the empirical evidence you showed them. ask questions that will direct the conversation to these mistakes. you will often find that the student’s own inner teacher will emerge and teach the students to better understand the material, acknowledge their logic errors, and accept that their anecdotal evidence and the empirical evidence can both be accurate. there are numerous examples in society of how we adjust our expectations and tact when working with novices. for instance, when we deal with children, or a “new hire” at work, or the server at the restaurant who is “in training” (goffman 1961/2013). i’m not suggesting that we “coddle entitled students”, rather i’m suggesting that we reframe student challenges as a passionate request for help. references: goffman, erving. 2013. encounters: two studies in the sociology of interaction eastford, ct: martino fine books note that i am not talking about abusive student-teacher interactions. if a student crosses that line, my approach may not be appropriate.  ↩ « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 … 20 » about sociology source resources & ideas for teaching sociology from nathan palmer. topics class discussion class/inequality deling w/ large classes deviance/crime economy email environmental soc events & announcements gender grading in class activities listen music for class my thoughts podcast race/ethnicity read research methods resources for teachers sexuality student relationships study skills teaching philosophy technology theory time savers videos for class what is sociology? login cc attribution non-commercial share alike


Here you find all texts from your page as Google (googlebot) and others search engines seen it.

Words density analysis:

Numbers of all words: 3282

One word

Two words phrases

Three words phrases

the - 6.86% (225)
you - 3.44% (113)
and - 2.89% (95)
our - 2.35% (77)
soc - 2.19% (72)
student - 1.68% (55)
that - 1.55% (51)
for - 1.46% (48)
all - 1.34% (44)
each - 1.28% (42)
are - 1.28% (42)
her - 1.22% (40)
teach - 1.19% (39)
sociology - 1.16% (38)
your - 1.1% (36)
his - 1.1% (36)
this - 1.04% (34)
how - 1.01% (33)
students - 1.01% (33)
their - 0.91% (30)
they - 0.88% (29)
ave - 0.85% (28)
not - 0.82% (27)
with - 0.76% (25)
what - 0.76% (25)
have - 0.76% (25)
class - 0.73% (24)
now - 0.67% (22)
ten - 0.67% (22)
them - 0.64% (21)
one - 0.58% (19)
know - 0.58% (19)
think - 0.55% (18)
out - 0.52% (17)
men - 0.52% (17)
will - 0.49% (16)
but - 0.49% (16)
teacher - 0.46% (15)
logic - 0.43% (14)
see - 0.4% (13)
more - 0.4% (13)
under - 0.4% (13)
when - 0.4% (13)
teaching - 0.4% (13)
common - 0.4% (13)
can - 0.4% (13)
from - 0.37% (12)
i’m - 0.37% (12)
stand - 0.37% (12)
thing - 0.37% (12)
say - 0.37% (12)
nathan - 0.37% (12)
most - 0.37% (12)
like - 0.34% (11)
here - 0.34% (11)
about - 0.34% (11)
time - 0.34% (11)
any - 0.34% (11)
ever - 0.34% (11)
very - 0.3% (10)
way - 0.3% (10)
source - 0.3% (10)
understand - 0.3% (10)
sociological - 0.3% (10)
who - 0.3% (10)
sense - 0.3% (10)
off - 0.3% (10)
self - 0.3% (10)
idea - 0.3% (10)
ask - 0.3% (10)
come - 0.27% (9)
read - 0.27% (9)
earn - 0.27% (9)
give - 0.27% (9)
society - 0.27% (9)
genie - 0.27% (9)
work - 0.24% (8)
then - 0.24% (8)
would - 0.24% (8)
over - 0.24% (8)
challenge - 0.24% (8)
“i - 0.24% (8)
learn - 0.21% (7)
once - 0.21% (7)
ideas - 0.21% (7)
sociologist - 0.21% (7)
different - 0.21% (7)
pen - 0.21% (7)
it’s - 0.21% (7)
saying - 0.21% (7)
get - 0.21% (7)
new - 0.21% (7)
is, - 0.21% (7)
exam - 0.21% (7)
own - 0.21% (7)
take - 0.21% (7)
talk - 0.21% (7)
intro - 0.21% (7)
suggest - 0.18% (6)
2014 - 0.18% (6)
many - 0.18% (6)
use - 0.18% (6)
student’s - 0.18% (6)
first - 0.18% (6)
every - 0.18% (6)
large - 0.18% (6)
lie - 0.18% (6)
show - 0.18% (6)
life - 0.18% (6)
understanding - 0.18% (6)
more. - 0.18% (6)
line - 0.18% (6)
join - 0.18% (6)
teachers - 0.18% (6)
often - 0.18% (6)
nipple - 0.18% (6)
research - 0.18% (6)
red - 0.18% (6)
make - 0.18% (6)
… - 0.18% (6)
you. - 0.15% (5)
approach - 0.15% (5)
has - 0.15% (5)
going - 0.15% (5)
more... - 0.15% (5)
she - 0.15% (5)
blog - 0.15% (5)
classes - 0.15% (5)
2015 - 0.15% (5)
real - 0.15% (5)
should - 0.15% (5)
scenario - 0.15% (5)
question - 0.15% (5)
ways - 0.15% (5)
was - 0.15% (5)
body - 0.15% (5)
course - 0.15% (5)
need - 0.15% (5)
study - 0.15% (5)
only - 0.15% (5)
note - 0.15% (5)
why - 0.15% (5)
both - 0.15% (5)
let - 0.15% (5)
don’t - 0.15% (5)
offer - 0.15% (5)
hear - 0.15% (5)
sex - 0.15% (5)
students. - 0.12% (4)
even - 0.12% (4)
october - 0.12% (4)
selves - 0.12% (4)
frame - 0.12% (4)
feel - 0.12% (4)
down - 0.12% (4)
social - 0.12% (4)
identity - 0.12% (4)
free - 0.12% (4)
written - 0.12% (4)
almost - 0.12% (4)
discuss - 0.12% (4)
after - 0.12% (4)
edge - 0.12% (4)
talking - 0.12% (4)
learning - 0.12% (4)
really - 0.12% (4)
things - 0.12% (4)
help - 0.12% (4)
able - 0.12% (4)
try - 0.12% (4)
dying - 0.12% (4)
right - 0.12% (4)
meaning - 0.12% (4)
still - 0.12% (4)
especially - 0.12% (4)
ideology - 0.12% (4)
meet - 0.12% (4)
there - 0.12% (4)
direct - 0.12% (4)
it. - 0.12% (4)
assign - 0.12% (4)
hand - 0.12% (4)
up. - 0.12% (4)
differently - 0.12% (4)
back - 0.12% (4)
them. - 0.12% (4)
sociologists - 0.12% (4)
sociologically - 0.12% (4)
money - 0.12% (4)
me. - 0.12% (4)
said - 0.12% (4)
same - 0.12% (4)
other - 0.12% (4)
thinking - 0.12% (4)
ready - 0.12% (4)
empirical - 0.12% (4)
long - 0.12% (4)
nipples - 0.12% (4)
pages - 0.12% (4)
site - 0.12% (4)
men’s - 0.12% (4)
resource - 0.12% (4)
while - 0.09% (3)
point - 0.09% (3)
found - 0.09% (3)
error - 0.09% (3)
studying - 0.09% (3)
evidence - 0.09% (3)
however - 0.09% (3)
two - 0.09% (3)
hip - 0.09% (3)
watch - 0.09% (3)
sell - 0.09% (3)
before - 0.09% (3)
you’re - 0.09% (3)
given - 0.09% (3)
important - 0.09% (3)
rest - 0.09% (3)
clip - 0.09% (3)
thank - 0.09% (3)
you, - 0.09% (3)
interaction - 0.09% (3)
already - 0.09% (3)
start - 0.09% (3)
voice - 0.09% (3)
resources - 0.09% (3)
plain - 0.09% (3)
gender - 0.09% (3)
light - 0.09% (3)
questions - 0.09% (3)
mind - 0.09% (3)
much - 0.09% (3)
turn - 0.09% (3)
challenges - 0.09% (3)
connect - 0.09% (3)
us, - 0.09% (3)
want - 0.09% (3)
won - 0.09% (3)
used - 0.09% (3)
sat - 0.09% (3)
critical - 0.09% (3)
head - 0.09% (3)
above - 0.09% (3)
fact - 0.09% (3)
notes - 0.09% (3)
topic - 0.09% (3)
accept - 0.09% (3)
suggesting - 0.09% (3)
grading - 0.09% (3)
day - 0.09% (3)
hour - 0.09% (3)
sociology. - 0.09% (3)
section - 0.09% (3)
class. - 0.09% (3)
what’s - 0.09% (3)
certain - 0.09% (3)
myself - 0.09% (3)
year - 0.09% (3)
imagine - 0.09% (3)
another - 0.09% (3)
just - 0.09% (3)
could - 0.09% (3)
it, - 0.09% (3)
tell - 0.09% (3)
old - 0.09% (3)
bring - 0.09% (3)
break - 0.09% (3)
asa - 0.09% (3)
class, - 0.09% (3)
women - 0.09% (3)
examples - 0.09% (3)
toolbox - 0.09% (3)
eye - 0.09% (3)
books - 0.09% (3)
ourselves - 0.09% (3)
professor - 0.09% (3)
material - 0.09% (3)
until - 0.09% (3)
tsp - 0.09% (3)
students’ - 0.09% (3)
had - 0.09% (3)
assess - 0.09% (3)
lab - 0.09% (3)
may - 0.09% (3)
test - 0.09% (3)
quality - 0.06% (2)
can’t - 0.06% (2)
raise - 0.06% (2)
reason - 0.06% (2)
them, - 0.06% (2)
work, - 0.06% (2)
makes - 0.06% (2)
near - 0.06% (2)
easier - 0.06% (2)
labor - 0.06% (2)
doing - 0.06% (2)
culture - 0.06% (2)
economy - 0.06% (2)
play - 0.06% (2)
role - 0.06% (2)
“go - 0.06% (2)
pull - 0.06% (2)
women’s - 0.06% (2)
fingers - 0.06% (2)
consider - 0.06% (2)
as, - 0.06% (2)
everyone - 0.06% (2)
friends, - 0.06% (2)
bloggers, - 0.06% (2)
return - 0.06% (2)
– - 0.06% (2)
remainder - 0.06% (2)
set - 0.06% (2)
keep - 0.06% (2)
working - 0.06% (2)
event - 0.06% (2)
running - 0.06% (2)
me, - 0.06% (2)
externalize - 0.06% (2)
ideologies - 0.06% (2)
sight - 0.06% (2)
scenario” - 0.06% (2)
they’d - 0.06% (2)
however, - 0.06% (2)
without - 0.06% (2)
talking. - 0.06% (2)
great - 0.06% (2)
that’s - 0.06% (2)
anecdotal - 0.06% (2)
powerful - 0.06% (2)
easy - 0.06% (2)
lens - 0.06% (2)
improv - 0.06% (2)
images - 0.06% (2)
critically - 0.06% (2)
civility - 0.06% (2)
material, - 0.06% (2)
sexuality - 0.06% (2)
redirect - 0.06% (2)
find - 0.06% (2)
works - 0.06% (2)
methods - 0.06% (2)
deal - 0.06% (2)
education - 0.06% (2)
economic - 0.06% (2)
families - 0.06% (2)
deling - 0.06% (2)
theory - 0.06% (2)
energy - 0.06% (2)
aikido - 0.06% (2)
bjork - 0.06% (2)
graduate - 0.06% (2)
theories - 0.06% (2)
socially - 0.06% (2)
purposes - 0.06% (2)
biological - 0.06% (2)
numerous - 0.06% (2)
might - 0.06% (2)
“defend - 0.06% (2)
defending - 0.06% (2)
teachers. - 0.06% (2)
school - 0.06% (2)
employ - 0.06% (2)
been - 0.06% (2)
content - 0.06% (2)
developed - 0.06% (2)
published - 0.06% (2)
post - 0.06% (2)
upon - 0.06% (2)
august - 0.06% (2)
full - 0.06% (2)
construction - 0.06% (2)
do? - 0.06% (2)
here, - 0.06% (2)
that. - 0.06% (2)
also - 0.06% (2)
are. - 0.06% (2)
seem - 0.06% (2)
instance, - 0.06% (2)
possible - 0.06% (2)
do, - 0.06% (2)
classes. - 0.06% (2)
anyone - 0.06% (2)
award - 0.06% (2)
area - 0.06% (2)
enemy - 0.06% (2)
trying - 0.06% (2)
pedagogical - 0.06% (2)
challenge. - 0.06% (2)
wrong - 0.06% (2)
process. - 0.06% (2)
project - 0.06% (2)
online - 0.06% (2)
encourage - 0.06% (2)
part - 0.06% (2)
based - 0.06% (2)
beliefs - 0.06% (2)
thing. - 0.06% (2)
acknowledge - 0.06% (2)
studies - 0.06% (2)
longer - 0.06% (2)
level - 0.06% (2)
foundation - 0.06% (2)
false - 0.06% (2)
concepts - 0.06% (2)
weber’s - 0.06% (2)
honor - 0.06% (2)
assignments - 0.06% (2)
where - 0.06% (2)
less - 0.06% (2)
years - 0.06% (2)
move - 0.06% (2)
toward - 0.06% (2)
them? - 0.06% (2)
pascoe - 0.06% (2)
developing - 0.06% (2)
aced - 0.06% (2)
20, - 0.06% (2)
sociology? - 0.06% (2)
pages. - 0.06% (2)
spend - 0.06% (2)
better - 0.06% (2)
conclusion - 0.06% (2)
arms - 0.06% (2)
face - 0.06% (2)
“will - 0.06% (2)
whole - 0.06% (2)
yes. - 0.06% (2)
came - 0.06% (2)
step - 0.06% (2)
let’s - 0.06% (2)
brush - 0.06% (2)
something - 0.06% (2)
yourself - 0.06% (2)
analyze - 0.06% (2)
roughly - 0.06% (2)
listen - 0.06% (2)
taught - 0.06% (2)
live - 0.06% (2)
well - 0.06% (2)
november - 0.06% (2)
confidence - 0.06% (2)
hot - 0.06% (2)
similar - 0.06% (2)
sections - 0.06% (2)
into - 0.06% (2)
send - 0.06% (2)
email - 0.06% (2)
goes - 0.06% (2)
making - 0.06% (2)
within - 0.06% (2)
rather - 0.06% (2)
colleagues - 0.06% (2)
describe - 0.06% (2)
problem - 0.06% (2)
“but - 0.06% (2)
blinded - 0.06% (2)
present - 0.06% (2)
through - 0.06% (2)
created - 0.06% (2)
“genie - 0.06% (2)
“do - 0.06% (2)
were - 0.06% (2)
four - 0.06% (2)
bright - 0.06% (2)
piece - 0.06% (2)
share - 0.06% (2)
of the - 0.55% (18)
at the - 0.46% (15)
that i - 0.37% (12)
of you - 0.37% (12)
you are - 0.34% (11)
to the - 0.3% (10)
a student - 0.3% (10)
and the - 0.3% (10)
nathan on - 0.3% (10)
students to - 0.27% (9)
in the - 0.27% (9)
common sense - 0.27% (9)
this is - 0.24% (8)
of your - 0.24% (8)
your students - 0.21% (7)
have a - 0.18% (6)
to think - 0.18% (6)
to teach - 0.18% (6)
what they - 0.15% (5)
understanding of - 0.15% (5)
to your - 0.15% (5)
i have - 0.15% (5)
i know - 0.15% (5)
genie scenario - 0.15% (5)
them to - 0.15% (5)
many of - 0.15% (5)
they are - 0.15% (5)
sociology source - 0.15% (5)
what i - 0.15% (5)
going to - 0.15% (5)
your life - 0.15% (5)
that you - 0.15% (5)
or the - 0.15% (5)
the society - 0.12% (4)
offer and - 0.12% (4)
that they - 0.12% (4)
society pages - 0.12% (4)
teach sociology - 0.12% (4)
that we - 0.12% (4)
need to - 0.12% (4)
we have - 0.12% (4)
a student’s - 0.12% (4)
one of - 0.12% (4)
with a - 0.12% (4)
that is - 0.12% (4)
and in - 0.12% (4)
with the - 0.12% (4)
as the - 0.12% (4)
take a - 0.12% (4)
we should - 0.09% (3)
the idea - 0.09% (3)
the genie - 0.09% (3)
it will - 0.09% (3)
if you - 0.09% (3)
when we - 0.09% (3)
for students - 0.09% (3)
and then - 0.09% (3)
my students - 0.09% (3)
for teaching - 0.09% (3)
have to - 0.09% (3)
the more - 0.09% (3)
over the - 0.09% (3)
they have - 0.09% (3)
you will - 0.09% (3)
how do - 0.09% (3)
the rest - 0.09% (3)
to learn - 0.09% (3)
is that - 0.09% (3)
i’m not - 0.09% (3)
on that - 0.09% (3)
how to - 0.09% (3)
of what - 0.09% (3)
to see - 0.09% (3)
and how - 0.09% (3)
meet up - 0.09% (3)
sociology blog - 0.09% (3)
they can - 0.09% (3)
we need - 0.09% (3)
we are - 0.09% (3)
but the - 0.09% (3)
sociology differently - 0.09% (3)
student challenges - 0.09% (3)
do you - 0.09% (3)
i think - 0.09% (3)
will be - 0.09% (3)
fact that - 0.06% (2)
how it - 0.06% (2)
published on - 0.06% (2)
is the - 0.06% (2)
for instance, - 0.06% (2)
who is - 0.06% (2)
better understand - 0.06% (2)
teach the - 0.06% (2)
student as - 0.06% (2)
approach to - 0.06% (2)
your students. - 0.06% (2)
empirical evidence - 0.06% (2)
life and - 0.06% (2)
the fact - 0.06% (2)
can do - 0.06% (2)
critically about - 0.06% (2)
is, the - 0.06% (2)
now how - 0.06% (2)
from the - 0.06% (2)
this to - 0.06% (2)
the “genie - 0.06% (2)
pages. the - 0.06% (2)
with this - 0.06% (2)
to join - 0.06% (2)
when a - 0.06% (2)
identity as - 0.06% (2)
want to - 0.06% (2)
ask my - 0.06% (2)
from here - 0.06% (2)
easier for - 0.06% (2)
your head - 0.06% (2)
makes it - 0.06% (2)
about a - 0.06% (2)
thing for - 0.06% (2)
and almost - 0.06% (2)
for teachers - 0.06% (2)
if their - 0.06% (2)
students who - 0.06% (2)
what are - 0.06% (2)
saying no - 0.06% (2)
all the - 0.06% (2)
the most - 0.06% (2)
you see - 0.06% (2)
to give - 0.06% (2)
to you. - 0.06% (2)
your time - 0.06% (2)
and you - 0.06% (2)
earn over - 0.06% (2)
the money - 0.06% (2)
the remainder - 0.06% (2)
in our - 0.06% (2)
our identity - 0.06% (2)
in their - 0.06% (2)
upon a - 0.06% (2)
rest of - 0.06% (2)
ask them - 0.06% (2)
a teacher - 0.06% (2)
money you - 0.06% (2)
resources for - 0.06% (2)
enemy of - 0.06% (2)
the site - 0.06% (2)
know that - 0.06% (2)
a sociology - 0.06% (2)
2015 i - 0.06% (2)
think we - 0.06% (2)
and especially - 0.06% (2)
large sections - 0.06% (2)
the first - 0.06% (2)
to sociology - 0.06% (2)
teach it - 0.06% (2)
my class - 0.06% (2)
see how - 0.06% (2)
examples of - 0.06% (2)
intro to - 0.06% (2)
trying to - 0.06% (2)
not trying - 0.06% (2)
to make - 0.06% (2)
i teach - 0.06% (2)
students in - 0.06% (2)
a large - 0.06% (2)
a sociologist - 0.06% (2)
sociologically analyze - 0.06% (2)
hour of - 0.06% (2)
join us - 0.06% (2)
sociological images - 0.06% (2)
sociology toolbox - 0.06% (2)
construction of - 0.06% (2)
the nipple - 0.06% (2)
social construction - 0.06% (2)
body are - 0.06% (2)
a great - 0.06% (2)
and women - 0.06% (2)
blog meet - 0.06% (2)
for how - 0.06% (2)
on august - 0.06% (2)
break from - 0.06% (2)
for the - 0.06% (2)
sociology in - 0.06% (2)
are the - 0.06% (2)
for sociology - 0.06% (2)
theories and - 0.06% (2)
come to - 0.06% (2)
not going - 0.06% (2)
written assignments - 0.06% (2)
society pages. - 0.06% (2)
cj pascoe - 0.06% (2)
in your - 0.06% (2)
new ideas - 0.06% (2)
to connect - 0.06% (2)
to their - 0.06% (2)
used to - 0.06% (2)
students’ common - 0.06% (2)
show them - 0.06% (2)
sense as - 0.06% (2)
on teaching - 0.06% (2)
& society - 0.06% (2)
october 20, - 0.06% (2)
of self - 0.06% (2)
about sex - 0.06% (2)
& gender - 0.06% (2)
of them - 0.06% (2)
gender can - 0.06% (2)
you’re a - 0.06% (2)
2014 sociology - 0.06% (2)
3, 2014 - 0.06% (2)
what would - 0.06% (2)
our classes - 0.06% (2)
i hear - 0.06% (2)
what you - 0.06% (2)
on november - 0.06% (2)
my approach - 0.06% (2)
the same - 0.06% (2)
the problem - 0.06% (2)
lie in - 0.06% (2)
of course - 0.06% (2)
students are - 0.06% (2)
their notes - 0.06% (2)
should ask - 0.06% (2)
similar to - 0.06% (2)
you know - 0.06% (2)
you would - 0.06% (2)
have been - 0.06% (2)
able to - 0.06% (2)
externalize their - 0.06% (2)
with their - 0.06% (2)
know and - 0.06% (2)
i’m suggesting - 0.06% (2)
this is a - 0.18% (6)
of your life - 0.12% (4)
need to teach - 0.12% (4)
nathan on october - 0.12% (4)
all of the - 0.09% (3)
many of you - 0.09% (3)
we need to - 0.09% (3)
to teach sociology - 0.09% (3)
for students to - 0.09% (3)
earn over the - 0.06% (2)
over the remainder - 0.06% (2)
free to do - 0.06% (2)
the “genie scenario” - 0.06% (2)
ask my students - 0.06% (2)
social construction of - 0.06% (2)
we have to - 0.06% (2)
to give you - 0.06% (2)
identity as a - 0.06% (2)
as a teacher - 0.06% (2)
a student as - 0.06% (2)
to your students. - 0.06% (2)
the empirical evidence - 0.06% (2)
when a student - 0.06% (2)
the society pages. - 0.06% (2)
rest of your - 0.06% (2)
the idea that - 0.06% (2)
nathan on august - 0.06% (2)
a break from - 0.06% (2)
take a break - 0.06% (2)
intro to sociology - 0.06% (2)
think we need - 0.06% (2)
not trying to - 0.06% (2)
not going to - 0.06% (2)
is that i - 0.06% (2)
nathan on november - 0.06% (2)
that it is - 0.06% (2)
common sense as - 0.06% (2)
& gender can - 0.06% (2)
on october 20, - 0.06% (2)
society pages. the - 0.06% (2)
of the body - 0.06% (2)
suggesting that we - 0.06% (2)

Here you can find chart of all your popular one, two and three word phrases. Google and others search engines means your page is about words you use frequently.

Copyright © 2015-2016 hupso.pl. All rights reserved. FB | +G | Twitter

Hupso.pl jest serwisem internetowym, w którym jednym kliknieciem możesz szybko i łatwo sprawdź stronę www pod kątem SEO. Oferujemy darmowe pozycjonowanie stron internetowych oraz wycena domen i stron internetowych. Prowadzimy ranking polskich stron internetowych oraz ranking stron alexa.