3.62 score from hupso.pl for:
shipulski.com



HTML Content


Titleshipulski on design

Length: 19, Words: 3
Description mike shipulski, ph.d., on product development, product design, and engineering, from both a company and national perspective.

Length: 125, Words: 18
Keywords systematic dfma deployment, dfma deployment, dfma, design for manufacturing and assembly, product development, dfm, design for manufacturing, dfa, design for assembly, product design, engineering, design engineering, engineering design, product engineering, axiomatic design triz, three space design theory, shipulski
Robots index,follow,noodp,noydir
Charset UTF-8
Og Meta - Title pusty
Og Meta - Description pusty
Og Meta - Site name pusty
Tytuł powinien zawierać pomiędzy 10 a 70 znaków (ze spacjami), a mniej niż 12 słów w długości.
Meta opis powinien zawierać pomiędzy 50 a 160 znaków (łącznie ze spacjami), a mniej niż 24 słów w długości.
Kodowanie znaków powinny być określone , UTF-8 jest chyba najlepszy zestaw znaków, aby przejść z powodu UTF-8 jest bardziej międzynarodowy kodowaniem.
Otwarte obiekty wykresu powinny być obecne w stronie internetowej (więcej informacji na temat protokołu OpenGraph: http://ogp.me/)

SEO Content

Words/Characters 6278
Text/HTML 36.23 %
Headings H1 1
H2 11
H3 3
H4 0
H5 0
H6 0
H1
shipulski on design
H2
maximize the learning ratio
if you don’t know what to do, you may be on the right track.
responding with kindness
improving what is and creating what isn’t
dismantle the business model.
full circle innovation
transcending our financial accounting systems
imagination
with innovation you’ve got to feel worthy of the work.
diabolically simple prototypes
with innovation, it depends.
H3
there is a name for what you would do. it’s called innovation.
if you do what you did last time and you get less in return, the business model is out of gas.
the mantra – go to the work.
H4
H5
H6
strong
b
i
em
Bolds strong 0
b 0
i 0
em 0
Zawartość strony internetowej powinno zawierać więcej niż 250 słów, z stopa tekst / kod jest wyższy niż 20%.
Pozycji używać znaczników (h1, h2, h3, ...), aby określić temat sekcji lub ustępów na stronie, ale zwykle, użyj mniej niż 6 dla każdego tagu pozycje zachować swoją stronę zwięzły.
Styl używać silnych i kursywy znaczniki podkreślić swoje słowa kluczowe swojej stronie, ale nie nadużywać (mniej niż 16 silnych tagi i 16 znaczników kursywy)

Statystyki strony

twitter:title pusty
twitter:description pusty
google+ itemprop=name pusty
Pliki zewnętrzne 25
Pliki CSS 7
Pliki javascript 18
Plik należy zmniejszyć całkowite odwołanie plików (CSS + JavaScript) do 7-8 maksymalnie.

Linki wewnętrzne i zewnętrzne

Linki 354
Linki wewnętrzne 12
Linki zewnętrzne 342
Linki bez atrybutu Title 296
Linki z atrybutem NOFOLLOW 0
Linki - Użyj atrybutu tytuł dla każdego łącza. Nofollow link jest link, który nie pozwala wyszukiwarkom boty zrealizują są odnośniki no follow. Należy zwracać uwagę na ich użytkowania

Linki wewnętrzne

- //addthis.com/bookmark.php?v=300
- //addthis.com/bookmark.php?v=300
- //addthis.com/bookmark.php?v=300
- //addthis.com/bookmark.php?v=300
- //addthis.com/bookmark.php?v=300
- //addthis.com/bookmark.php?v=300
- //addthis.com/bookmark.php?v=300
- //addthis.com/bookmark.php?v=300
- //addthis.com/bookmark.php?v=300
- //addthis.com/bookmark.php?v=300
- //addthis.com/bookmark.php?v=300
contact us /contact/

Linki zewnętrzne

home http://www.shipulski.com
publications http://www.shipulski.com/publications/
about http://www.shipulski.com/about/
contact http://www.shipulski.com/contact/
http://www.shipulski.com/1639-2/
shipulski on design http://www.shipulski.com/
linkedin http://www.linkedin.com/in/mikeshipulski
twitter http://www.twitter.com/mikeshipulski
facebook http://www.facebook.com/mikeshipulski
maximize the learning ratio http://www.shipulski.com/2017/03/22/maximize-the-learning-ratio/
- http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/half-a-man.jpg
craig sunter https://www.flickr.com/photos/16210667@n02/14203552344/in/photolist-nd7vgw-bx2cvp-dtzhao-9qhztn-h2n1xz-ekqxvx-64cq3w-n6eplx-e5zzms-4aapaf-6hl1ce-4dtpzd-bx7vq3-owim1o-nmuzi5-7f76s6-ehj2m2-xxcvo-4z4uk-5xedey-e2x6sq-5d7fbm-3vhct-4qs9cw-7ivr73-4pabix-e2qyoa-njnsf-5k76pt-8rfzb4-cedq9-5nptnn-ebggzc-4qs96u-nigyt5-5ppvkq-7hyip3-g2web7-6tt6nd-c8ttbo-6aubbt-dui2h6-7e48c8-dui3kn-e2r8ci-e85p2h-e2wng5-axndu-789ndc-e2wmwu
how to http://www.shipulski.com/category/how-to/
learning http://www.shipulski.com/tag/learning/
no comments » http://www.shipulski.com/2017/03/22/maximize-the-learning-ratio/#respond
if you don’t know what to do, you may be on the right track. http://www.shipulski.com/2017/03/15/what-if-you-didnt-know-what-to-do/
- http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/choose-a-favourite.jpg
unknownnet photography https://www.flickr.com/photos/threar/12906716415/in/photolist-kewi8n-at4fzz-dqlwgx-29yaem-5gnhbe-fmekcz-ruymyq-objyb7-5uhb11-jbqca8-6mf9yz-d4yavy-vgjpr-8rsyxc-brbxd4-drtvwu-7kh5hf-hgvvm-63ftse-6fvj1v-7fh6wf-aa6dxu-8mv9aw-2hkspn-4xhxym-9f6ovz-4vuu2x-5uegly-6zedfe-bec73s-pydkfm-6dkcjl-d3ece5-3h5o7h-ryw7tc-4y9xq4-qgrwtj-owttgc-dzjnzb-dugc8b-ccd4ch-6urszb-qicddu-og9a61-jbsysm-nnpxcw-6ziwqj-aiqxbk-qsrvx7-rfk5ea
decisions http://www.shipulski.com/category/decisions/
fear http://www.shipulski.com/category/fear/
innovation http://www.shipulski.com/category/innovation/
top line growth http://www.shipulski.com/category/top-line-growth/
competitiveness http://www.shipulski.com/tag/competitiveness/
fear http://www.shipulski.com/tag/fear/
no comments » http://www.shipulski.com/2017/03/15/what-if-you-didnt-know-what-to-do/#respond
responding with kindness http://www.shipulski.com/2017/03/08/responding-with-kindness/
- http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/bodhisattva.jpg
dean hochman https://www.flickr.com/photos/deanhochman/15189487457/in/photolist-p9f6qm-6eqdgc-ggcgpi-mxqnn5-gari7s-c9kf3a-bwfuoc-nxb1et-9j9fgz-hpbzxm-jqb2hs-avr5uq-nmavzv-9j9ffm-6qqqhc-b1angv-th1mnn-ncektg-avnpkp-avnpyi-56hwru-5aimxp-7s2un2-avr5rc-avr5e1-mc16eb-7pjv8e-rocjtm-3egs6q-q3dnce-phbmfo-nryoyp-9eo5pn-mp9vvv-8kttky-58nn9a-oie3tb-dtmguq-avg6tv-avr5g3-nrjxqu-jygj5v-dvtsdw-dpkwb9-62g3qx-6xjjo7-dmeeni-avnq3g-7gqpde-p2ms9u
fear http://www.shipulski.com/category/fear/
feelings http://www.shipulski.com/category/feelings/
kindness http://www.shipulski.com/tag/kindness/
no comments » http://www.shipulski.com/2017/03/08/responding-with-kindness/#respond
improving what is and creating what isn’t http://www.shipulski.com/2017/03/01/improving-what-is-and-creating-what-isnt/
- http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/justice-lords-superman-vs-bizarro-1.jpg
far less http://www.shipulski.com/2012/05/30/less-with-far-less/
jd hancock https://www.flickr.com/photos/jdhancock/5098218515/in/photolist-8lvgke-5qzqza-follw-vo85-9xuejj-4yyev2-rzgax3-etqc7-etq7pt-4gw3kp-9vuqsa-dumjw3-8pbhf9-5vtb2h-5gehbh-dufgna-dufhge-7wcxns-dumk2g-2rdhe1-mwphtd-76grpn-mjpcbk-8agstx-a3mmm1-8qqdy-ktowtn-agsjry-czfrw5-5fyqlr-jl5f6t-ei7qw1-dxu9sw-5fynvb-6pwycz-besakv-5gy9hu-jbz7td-bl4xnm-jks9h-2vfvhk-4vqia3-9vxbrf-4hrreg-mgaj8-a42yjs-4vmfyv-9nvj8y-4vqssh-n2mupk
clarity http://www.shipulski.com/category/clarity/
complexity http://www.shipulski.com/category/complexity/
constraints http://www.shipulski.com/category/constraints/
seeing things as they are http://www.shipulski.com/category/seeing-things-as-they-are/
uncertainty http://www.shipulski.com/category/uncertainty/
creativity http://www.shipulski.com/tag/creativity/
less-with-far-less http://www.shipulski.com/tag/less-with-far-less/
seven wastes http://www.shipulski.com/tag/seven-wastes/
six sigma http://www.shipulski.com/tag/six-sigma/
no comments » http://www.shipulski.com/2017/03/01/improving-what-is-and-creating-what-isnt/#respond
dismantle the business model. http://www.shipulski.com/2017/02/22/dismantle-business-model/
- http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/gas-stove-burner.jpg
violate the prime directive http://www.shipulski.com/2015/03/25/purposeful-violation-of-the-prime-directive/
steven depolo https://www.flickr.com/photos/stevendepolo/4226949238/in/photolist-7rwdk9-duru2o-67qes6-fdducu-rjeaxg-o54g8r-ih98px-gwmac2-4ejngb-pytq4i-a5sk5c-64qbth-etlaku-hyzmyt-rqmnnw-a5sllt-pxnxm5-pyifaf-f4prwe-qyanxx-a9tzvx-fc6qzw-ncu36d-eejutr-f9hegr-qgs9nj-gwmn7h-bmvq3x-pvke1q-djtuwc-7tw4bb-phphbt-neiriy-o6l4xb-drqelr-shc6yq-cqoyhs-hkuzhk-bxbz3n-gqjgnj-wzl3j-g1edcj-a3pj24-nms6ui-qnobww-qccq7d-i8pw7w-dujttz-ed22h-4ugmrg
constraints http://www.shipulski.com/category/constraints/
culture http://www.shipulski.com/category/culture/
innovation http://www.shipulski.com/category/innovation/
intellectual intertia http://www.shipulski.com/category/intellectual-intertia/
trust http://www.shipulski.com/category/trust/
competitiveness http://www.shipulski.com/tag/competitiveness/
trust-based approach http://www.shipulski.com/tag/trust-based-approach/
no comments » http://www.shipulski.com/2017/02/22/dismantle-business-model/#respond
full circle innovation http://www.shipulski.com/2017/02/15/full-circle-innovation/
- http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/ring-of-fire.jpg
value stream map https://www.amazon.com/learning-see-stream-mapping-eliminate/dp/0966784308
ibe (innovation burst event) http://www.shipulski.com/2014/11/19/dont-boost-innovation-burst-it/
diabolically simple prototype http://innovationexcellence.com/blog/2017/01/24/diabolically-simple-prototypes/
gerry machen https://www.flickr.com/photos/gellscom/9599973717/in/photolist-fcjnje-f5usrl-pkpjm1-hz7qhj-3bmo3y-95ignd-qjuzi9-5owu8f-8clzc4-38mgkl-6lnun5-ooxbeg-5ovzpg-tsmpj-fbvmad-6y6kjg-cvku9k-24yjb5-9yetv3-9jb64o-6yap1q-9j7xye-9ybyxp-6y6mbn-hc4wiw-9yeton-f5qqb-9j7xvp-c4pgrd-bmgmho-fapmfk-feovrh-emqy56-feoptw-fapoh6-gdskxt-zc9jaa-jvivfo-punhh9-9jb5z9-gjybhe-9j7xo8-9yetfl-9ybzjr-9yetrj-9j7xkt-9ybzc2-9j7xtv-3cbfth-f2apgh
fundementals http://www.shipulski.com/category/fundementals/
how to http://www.shipulski.com/category/how-to/
innovation http://www.shipulski.com/category/innovation/
magic http://www.shipulski.com/category/magic/
ibe http://www.shipulski.com/tag/ibe/
problem definition http://www.shipulski.com/tag/problem-definition/
trust-based approach http://www.shipulski.com/tag/trust-based-approach/
no comments » http://www.shipulski.com/2017/02/15/full-circle-innovation/#respond
transcending our financial accounting systems http://www.shipulski.com/2017/02/08/transcending-the-our-financial-accounting-systems/
- http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/abacus.jpg
jeremy tarling https://www.flickr.com/photos/topdrawersausage/271574957/in/photolist-pztlr-bja1eh-bjzx1h-9l8amz-cajxss-ai58c4-9tyasj-eb4btz-7zz5ve-vnubh-htrfo-4xws5r-cbuc2j-69muwf-ad4ht-6x2coz-bjaey2-bhhyg6-bjaf1e-6jc6p4-optnh-optnf-atzmpg-optnp-7v5yfs-8fk1zj-4stox-optnl-q3vqte-vgkd-4zm7vp-an1dz3-fhvfle-sum3n-b6bdar-l4wqz-dvjzfu-5dgbtm-nk44du-6px7rq-bhgnwk-ntyjbj-7viajp-6px7nw-kcrqo-bjzyaf-oxxdrc-nrljxh-6tnwgj-bjzxzv
ceo http://www.shipulski.com/category/ceo/
feelings http://www.shipulski.com/category/feelings/
imagination http://www.shipulski.com/category/imagination/
risk http://www.shipulski.com/category/risk/
uncertainty http://www.shipulski.com/category/uncertainty/
financial accounting http://www.shipulski.com/tag/financial-accounting/
no comments » http://www.shipulski.com/2017/02/08/transcending-the-our-financial-accounting-systems/#respond
imagination http://www.shipulski.com/2017/02/01/imagination/
- http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/imagination.jpg
allegra ricci https://www.flickr.com/photos/allegra_ricci/278540422/in/photolist-qban5-cavzks-evij5b-fhnevp-dpxypq-fm7ftg-etf1xm-ftcj4n-ovhjmt-3kmjn4-7zbixz-ffxzum-ox6zju-6r1qfq-ffogzh-cvdwq-qbqqto-4xynkn-7zevry-99tx3k-e3g8w5-yupymx-efkbd3-7zbijf-kdk7nw-ihbxm3-fggel5-9h7c9m-ae4uwg-dueibi-fmpcqv-9vnz39-ajaymg-e6cjsc-pw27n-pnk6zx-rb4psk-7zbis2-7zevcq-e8w4ze-e8nwxb-dytzjr-eboqgv-famchg-9fsnrx-9wfepf-fubsir-7mhcdd-rrkpw1-7jcs9v
fear http://www.shipulski.com/category/fear/
imagination http://www.shipulski.com/category/imagination/
intellectual intertia http://www.shipulski.com/category/intellectual-intertia/
competitiveness http://www.shipulski.com/tag/competitiveness/
creativity http://www.shipulski.com/tag/creativity/
no comments » http://www.shipulski.com/2017/02/01/imagination/#respond
with innovation you’ve got to feel worthy of the work. http://www.shipulski.com/2017/01/25/with-innovation-youve-got-to-feel-worthy-of-the-work/
- http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/6250327997_b11dc5d828_z.jpg
jonathan kos-read https://www.flickr.com/photos/jonathankosread/6250327997/in/photolist-awjykp-7mhjmg-bgccch-7ahymn-4eqnjs-8ywdie-ogbpd3-6ebuxv-iciruh-9gmtjs-86xahn-6lyxmj-6dsefy-drunaj-7vurzc-oksvms-5edemh-7aqpal-nvkyul-7k35tp-b7g1ec-jjzbcl-5am2et-nkmtgy-qkymcv-875tuz-ahwmr5-9i8q12-8cp1vw-7et6fz-rsbaky-pssqoe-8uyg5j-apkyx5-8xav2q-5zegsu-3tp18-mzeuj-5pbmsx-5lvdb2-4zm68t-78watw-4dqnda-76pfvz-364re6-6fnrpb-87nrc6-8jtqhe-du6btg-8umcsc
fear http://www.shipulski.com/category/fear/
how to http://www.shipulski.com/category/how-to/
innovation http://www.shipulski.com/category/innovation/
trust http://www.shipulski.com/category/trust/
creativity http://www.shipulski.com/tag/creativity/
success http://www.shipulski.com/tag/success/
no comments » http://www.shipulski.com/2017/01/25/with-innovation-youve-got-to-feel-worthy-of-the-work/#respond
diabolically simple prototypes http://www.shipulski.com/2017/01/18/diabolically-simple-prototypes/
- http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/rockem-sockem-robots.jpg
snippets101 https://www.flickr.com/photos/snippets101/2627984511/in/photolist-62yqgw-hl3mjn-4y9wn9-bwrxwp-51e7em-hl2dpj-4nao1-hkzndj-ubyqzb-ef3jx-9mfqkz-7f7eat-6h6nw7-jjvoey-4zxcoq-6b2chp-9kmum3-8tkxx6-51iilj-51ij3q
decisions http://www.shipulski.com/category/decisions/
how to http://www.shipulski.com/category/how-to/
innovation http://www.shipulski.com/category/innovation/
intellectual intertia http://www.shipulski.com/category/intellectual-intertia/
level 5 courage http://www.shipulski.com/category/level-5-courage/
new thinking http://www.shipulski.com/category/new-thinking/
diabolically simple prototypes http://www.shipulski.com/tag/diabolically-simple-prototypes/
problem definition http://www.shipulski.com/tag/problem-definition/
no comments » http://www.shipulski.com/2017/01/18/diabolically-simple-prototypes/#respond
with innovation, it depends. http://www.shipulski.com/2017/01/11/with-innovation-it-depends/
- http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/facing-uncertainty.jpg
sara biljana gaon (off) https://www.flickr.com/photos/sarabiljana/8195659322/in/photolist-dudtz5-omwdw6-nsplyv-p4ueux-6st5h7-dhynxa-b4pzbi-j2sus9-i4j3wz-7z5vkm-djvbsc-8i2ayh-9baonn-9fqqyp-r7krqh-6gnhuh-djupyu-ptgmc6-9skafu-6ff77y-9g7lt5-bqmd8b-6ktcc8-fcefo-8cb1yq-9jbkcn-fh4brj-97tjil-8djqz4-7yqtmd-ckctis-7j5w6b-8h8m3j-dhjt4e-xezqat-7ophat-7w1pnj-dcvtl-ppzmu3-mhbjzx-7xxsra-5ct7tv-9hocvn-4rk3cf-empznt-5yynoy-7rmtce-8dsqqr-5xv6ed-dcddex
innovation http://www.shipulski.com/category/innovation/
problems http://www.shipulski.com/category/problems/
seeing things as they are http://www.shipulski.com/category/seeing-things-as-they-are/
uncertainty http://www.shipulski.com/category/uncertainty/
fear http://www.shipulski.com/tag/fear/
ibe http://www.shipulski.com/tag/ibe/
problem definition http://www.shipulski.com/tag/problem-definition/
problems http://www.shipulski.com/tag/problems/
understanding physics http://www.shipulski.com/tag/understanding-physics/
no comments » http://www.shipulski.com/2017/01/11/with-innovation-it-depends/#respond
« older entries http://www.shipulski.com/page/2/
feedburner http://feedburner.google.com
a/b data http://www.shipulski.com/category/ab-data/
allocating cost http://www.shipulski.com/category/allocating-cost/
assembly time reduction http://www.shipulski.com/category/assembly-time-reduction/
assumptions http://www.shipulski.com/category/assumptions/
authentic http://www.shipulski.com/category/authentic/
axiomatic design http://www.shipulski.com/category/axiomatic-design/
bottom line growth http://www.shipulski.com/category/bottom-line-growth/
ceo http://www.shipulski.com/category/ceo/
clarity http://www.shipulski.com/category/clarity/
complexity http://www.shipulski.com/category/complexity/
constraints http://www.shipulski.com/category/constraints/
cost savings http://www.shipulski.com/category/cost-savings/
culture http://www.shipulski.com/category/culture/
decisions http://www.shipulski.com/category/decisions/
design engineers http://www.shipulski.com/category/design-engineers/
dfa http://www.shipulski.com/category/dfa/
dfma http://www.shipulski.com/category/dfma/
downstream savings http://www.shipulski.com/category/downstream-savings/
engineering leaders http://www.shipulski.com/category/engineering-leaders/
fear http://www.shipulski.com/category/fear/
feelings http://www.shipulski.com/category/feelings/
floor space http://www.shipulski.com/category/floor-space/
fundementals http://www.shipulski.com/category/fundementals/
green http://www.shipulski.com/category/green/
how to http://www.shipulski.com/category/how-to/
imagination http://www.shipulski.com/category/imagination/
independence http://www.shipulski.com/category/independence/
innovation http://www.shipulski.com/category/innovation/
intellectual intertia http://www.shipulski.com/category/intellectual-intertia/
lean http://www.shipulski.com/category/lean/
level 5 courage http://www.shipulski.com/category/level-5-courage/
magic http://www.shipulski.com/category/magic/
manufacturing competitiveness http://www.shipulski.com/category/manufacturing-competitiveness/
meaning http://www.shipulski.com/category/meaning/
most popular posts http://www.shipulski.com/category/most-popular-posts/
motivation http://www.shipulski.com/category/motivation/
negativity http://www.shipulski.com/category/negativity/
new normal http://www.shipulski.com/category/new-normal/
new thinking http://www.shipulski.com/category/new-thinking/
one page thinking http://www.shipulski.com/category/one-page-thinking/
part count reduction http://www.shipulski.com/category/part-count-reduction/
positivity http://www.shipulski.com/category/positivity/
problems http://www.shipulski.com/category/problems/
product development http://www.shipulski.com/category/product-development/
product robustness http://www.shipulski.com/category/product-robustness/
recession http://www.shipulski.com/category/recession/
risk http://www.shipulski.com/category/risk/
robust economy http://www.shipulski.com/category/robust-economy/
seeing things as they are http://www.shipulski.com/category/seeing-things-as-they-are/
seven wastes http://www.shipulski.com/category/seven-wastes/
six sigma http://www.shipulski.com/category/six-sigma/
design for six sigma http://www.shipulski.com/category/six-sigma/design-for-six-sigma/
technology http://www.shipulski.com/category/technology/
the future http://www.shipulski.com/category/the-future/
top line growth http://www.shipulski.com/category/top-line-growth/
triz http://www.shipulski.com/category/triz/
trust http://www.shipulski.com/category/trust/
uncategorized http://www.shipulski.com/category/uncategorized/
uncertainty http://www.shipulski.com/category/uncertainty/
voc http://www.shipulski.com/category/voc/
warranty cost http://www.shipulski.com/category/warranty-cost/
year in review http://www.shipulski.com/category/year-in-review/
march 2017 http://www.shipulski.com/2017/03/
february 2017 http://www.shipulski.com/2017/02/
january 2017 http://www.shipulski.com/2017/01/
december 2016 http://www.shipulski.com/2016/12/
november 2016 http://www.shipulski.com/2016/11/
october 2016 http://www.shipulski.com/2016/10/
september 2016 http://www.shipulski.com/2016/09/
august 2016 http://www.shipulski.com/2016/08/
july 2016 http://www.shipulski.com/2016/07/
june 2016 http://www.shipulski.com/2016/06/
may 2016 http://www.shipulski.com/2016/05/
april 2016 http://www.shipulski.com/2016/04/
march 2016 http://www.shipulski.com/2016/03/
february 2016 http://www.shipulski.com/2016/02/
january 2016 http://www.shipulski.com/2016/01/
december 2015 http://www.shipulski.com/2015/12/
november 2015 http://www.shipulski.com/2015/11/
october 2015 http://www.shipulski.com/2015/10/
september 2015 http://www.shipulski.com/2015/09/
august 2015 http://www.shipulski.com/2015/08/
july 2015 http://www.shipulski.com/2015/07/
june 2015 http://www.shipulski.com/2015/06/
may 2015 http://www.shipulski.com/2015/05/
april 2015 http://www.shipulski.com/2015/04/
march 2015 http://www.shipulski.com/2015/03/
february 2015 http://www.shipulski.com/2015/02/
january 2015 http://www.shipulski.com/2015/01/
december 2014 http://www.shipulski.com/2014/12/
november 2014 http://www.shipulski.com/2014/11/
october 2014 http://www.shipulski.com/2014/10/
september 2014 http://www.shipulski.com/2014/09/
august 2014 http://www.shipulski.com/2014/08/
july 2014 http://www.shipulski.com/2014/07/
june 2014 http://www.shipulski.com/2014/06/
may 2014 http://www.shipulski.com/2014/05/
april 2014 http://www.shipulski.com/2014/04/
march 2014 http://www.shipulski.com/2014/03/
february 2014 http://www.shipulski.com/2014/02/
january 2014 http://www.shipulski.com/2014/01/
december 2013 http://www.shipulski.com/2013/12/
november 2013 http://www.shipulski.com/2013/11/
october 2013 http://www.shipulski.com/2013/10/
september 2013 http://www.shipulski.com/2013/09/
august 2013 http://www.shipulski.com/2013/08/
july 2013 http://www.shipulski.com/2013/07/
june 2013 http://www.shipulski.com/2013/06/
may 2013 http://www.shipulski.com/2013/05/
april 2013 http://www.shipulski.com/2013/04/
march 2013 http://www.shipulski.com/2013/03/
february 2013 http://www.shipulski.com/2013/02/
january 2013 http://www.shipulski.com/2013/01/
december 2012 http://www.shipulski.com/2012/12/
november 2012 http://www.shipulski.com/2012/11/
october 2012 http://www.shipulski.com/2012/10/
september 2012 http://www.shipulski.com/2012/09/
august 2012 http://www.shipulski.com/2012/08/
july 2012 http://www.shipulski.com/2012/07/
june 2012 http://www.shipulski.com/2012/06/
may 2012 http://www.shipulski.com/2012/05/
april 2012 http://www.shipulski.com/2012/04/
march 2012 http://www.shipulski.com/2012/03/
february 2012 http://www.shipulski.com/2012/02/
january 2012 http://www.shipulski.com/2012/01/
december 2011 http://www.shipulski.com/2011/12/
november 2011 http://www.shipulski.com/2011/11/
october 2011 http://www.shipulski.com/2011/10/
september 2011 http://www.shipulski.com/2011/09/
august 2011 http://www.shipulski.com/2011/08/
july 2011 http://www.shipulski.com/2011/07/
june 2011 http://www.shipulski.com/2011/06/
may 2011 http://www.shipulski.com/2011/05/
april 2011 http://www.shipulski.com/2011/04/
march 2011 http://www.shipulski.com/2011/03/
february 2011 http://www.shipulski.com/2011/02/
january 2011 http://www.shipulski.com/2011/01/
december 2010 http://www.shipulski.com/2010/12/
november 2010 http://www.shipulski.com/2010/11/
october 2010 http://www.shipulski.com/2010/10/
september 2010 http://www.shipulski.com/2010/09/
august 2010 http://www.shipulski.com/2010/08/
july 2010 http://www.shipulski.com/2010/07/
june 2010 http://www.shipulski.com/2010/06/
may 2010 http://www.shipulski.com/2010/05/
april 2010 http://www.shipulski.com/2010/04/
march 2010 http://www.shipulski.com/2010/03/
february 2010 http://www.shipulski.com/2010/02/
january 2010 http://www.shipulski.com/2010/01/
december 2009 http://www.shipulski.com/2009/12/
november 2009 http://www.shipulski.com/2009/11/
october 2009 http://www.shipulski.com/2009/10/
september 2009 http://www.shipulski.com/2009/09/
june 2009 http://www.shipulski.com/2009/06/
november 2008 http://www.shipulski.com/2008/11/
september 2008 http://www.shipulski.com/2008/09/
august 2008 http://www.shipulski.com/2008/08/
may 2008 http://www.shipulski.com/2008/05/
march 2008 http://www.shipulski.com/2008/03/
september 2007 http://www.shipulski.com/2007/09/
august 2007 http://www.shipulski.com/2007/08/
march 2007 http://www.shipulski.com/2007/03/
november 2006 http://www.shipulski.com/2006/11/
july 2006 http://www.shipulski.com/2006/07/
june 2006 http://www.shipulski.com/2006/06/
april 2006 http://www.shipulski.com/2006/04/
competitiveness http://www.shipulski.com/tag/competitiveness/
cost http://www.shipulski.com/tag/cost/
cost reduction http://www.shipulski.com/tag/cost-reduction/
cost savings http://www.shipulski.com/tag/cost-savings/
creativity http://www.shipulski.com/tag/creativity/
design alternatives http://www.shipulski.com/tag/design-alternatives/
design for assembly http://www.shipulski.com/tag/design-for-assembly/
design spaces http://www.shipulski.com/tag/design-spaces/
dfa http://www.shipulski.com/tag/dfa/
dfma culture http://www.shipulski.com/tag/dfma-culture/
downstream savings http://www.shipulski.com/tag/downstream-savings/
engage design; product design; cost savings http://www.shipulski.com/tag/engage-design-product-design-cost-savings/
engineering capability http://www.shipulski.com/tag/engineering-capability/
engineering mindset http://www.shipulski.com/tag/engineering-mindset/
fear http://www.shipulski.com/tag/fear/
fix manufacturing http://www.shipulski.com/tag/fix-manufacturing/
floor space http://www.shipulski.com/tag/floor-space/
functional domain http://www.shipulski.com/tag/functional-domain/
ibe http://www.shipulski.com/tag/ibe/
independence http://www.shipulski.com/tag/independence/
lean http://www.shipulski.com/tag/lean/
less-with-far-less http://www.shipulski.com/tag/less-with-far-less/
lessons learned http://www.shipulski.com/tag/lessons-learned/
manufacturing competitveness http://www.shipulski.com/tag/manufacturing-competitveness/
no-to-yes http://www.shipulski.com/tag/no-to-yes/
part count http://www.shipulski.com/tag/part-count/
patents http://www.shipulski.com/tag/patents/
physical domain http://www.shipulski.com/tag/physical-domain/
piano teacher http://www.shipulski.com/tag/piano-teacher/
problem definition http://www.shipulski.com/tag/problem-definition/
problems http://www.shipulski.com/tag/problems/
product design http://www.shipulski.com/tag/product-design/
product development engine http://www.shipulski.com/tag/product-development-engine/
profit per square foot http://www.shipulski.com/tag/profit-per-square-foot/
role of engineering http://www.shipulski.com/tag/role-of-engineering/
seven wastes http://www.shipulski.com/tag/seven-wastes/
six sigma http://www.shipulski.com/tag/six-sigma/
start http://www.shipulski.com/tag/start/
success http://www.shipulski.com/tag/success/
survey results http://www.shipulski.com/tag/survey-results/
time http://www.shipulski.com/tag/time/
trust-based approach http://www.shipulski.com/tag/trust-based-approach/
understanding physics http://www.shipulski.com/tag/understanding-physics/
vacation http://www.shipulski.com/tag/vacation/
words http://www.shipulski.com/tag/words/
http://www.shipulski.com/feed/
chase brook software http://www.chasebrook.com/
wordpress http://www.wordpress.org/

Zdjęcia

Zdjęcia 67
Zdjęcia bez atrybutu ALT 55
Zdjęcia bez atrybutu TITLE 66
Korzystanie Obraz ALT i TITLE atrybutu dla każdego obrazu.

Zdjęcia bez atrybutu TITLE

http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/themes/shipulskicom3/images/postdateicon.png
http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/half-a-man.jpg
//cache.addthis.com/cachefly/static/btn/v2/lg-share-en.gif
http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/themes/shipulskicom3/images/postcategoryicon.png
http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/themes/shipulskicom3/images/posttagicon.png
http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/themes/shipulskicom3/images/postcommentsicon.png
http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/themes/shipulskicom3/images/postdateicon.png
http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/choose-a-favourite.jpg
//cache.addthis.com/cachefly/static/btn/v2/lg-share-en.gif
http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/themes/shipulskicom3/images/postcategoryicon.png
http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/themes/shipulskicom3/images/posttagicon.png
http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/themes/shipulskicom3/images/postcommentsicon.png
http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/themes/shipulskicom3/images/postdateicon.png
http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/bodhisattva.jpg
//cache.addthis.com/cachefly/static/btn/v2/lg-share-en.gif
http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/themes/shipulskicom3/images/postcategoryicon.png
http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/themes/shipulskicom3/images/posttagicon.png
http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/themes/shipulskicom3/images/postcommentsicon.png
http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/themes/shipulskicom3/images/postdateicon.png
http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/justice-lords-superman-vs-bizarro-1.jpg
//cache.addthis.com/cachefly/static/btn/v2/lg-share-en.gif
http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/themes/shipulskicom3/images/postcategoryicon.png
http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/themes/shipulskicom3/images/posttagicon.png
http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/themes/shipulskicom3/images/postcommentsicon.png
http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/themes/shipulskicom3/images/postdateicon.png
http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/gas-stove-burner.jpg
//cache.addthis.com/cachefly/static/btn/v2/lg-share-en.gif
http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/themes/shipulskicom3/images/postcategoryicon.png
http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/themes/shipulskicom3/images/posttagicon.png
http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/themes/shipulskicom3/images/postcommentsicon.png
http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/themes/shipulskicom3/images/postdateicon.png
http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/ring-of-fire.jpg
//cache.addthis.com/cachefly/static/btn/v2/lg-share-en.gif
http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/themes/shipulskicom3/images/postcategoryicon.png
http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/themes/shipulskicom3/images/posttagicon.png
http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/themes/shipulskicom3/images/postcommentsicon.png
http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/themes/shipulskicom3/images/postdateicon.png
http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/abacus.jpg
//cache.addthis.com/cachefly/static/btn/v2/lg-share-en.gif
http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/themes/shipulskicom3/images/postcategoryicon.png
http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/themes/shipulskicom3/images/posttagicon.png
http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/themes/shipulskicom3/images/postcommentsicon.png
http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/themes/shipulskicom3/images/postdateicon.png
http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/imagination.jpg
//cache.addthis.com/cachefly/static/btn/v2/lg-share-en.gif
http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/themes/shipulskicom3/images/postcategoryicon.png
http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/themes/shipulskicom3/images/posttagicon.png
http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/themes/shipulskicom3/images/postcommentsicon.png
http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/themes/shipulskicom3/images/postdateicon.png
http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/6250327997_b11dc5d828_z.jpg
//cache.addthis.com/cachefly/static/btn/v2/lg-share-en.gif
http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/themes/shipulskicom3/images/postcategoryicon.png
http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/themes/shipulskicom3/images/posttagicon.png
http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/themes/shipulskicom3/images/postcommentsicon.png
http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/themes/shipulskicom3/images/postdateicon.png
http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/rockem-sockem-robots.jpg
//cache.addthis.com/cachefly/static/btn/v2/lg-share-en.gif
http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/themes/shipulskicom3/images/postcategoryicon.png
http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/themes/shipulskicom3/images/posttagicon.png
http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/themes/shipulskicom3/images/postcommentsicon.png
http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/themes/shipulskicom3/images/postdateicon.png
http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/facing-uncertainty.jpg
//cache.addthis.com/cachefly/static/btn/v2/lg-share-en.gif
http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/themes/shipulskicom3/images/postcategoryicon.png
http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/themes/shipulskicom3/images/posttagicon.png
http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/themes/shipulskicom3/images/postcommentsicon.png

Zdjęcia bez atrybutu ALT

http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/themes/shipulskicom3/images/postdateicon.png
http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/half-a-man.jpg
http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/themes/shipulskicom3/images/postcategoryicon.png
http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/themes/shipulskicom3/images/posttagicon.png
http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/themes/shipulskicom3/images/postcommentsicon.png
http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/themes/shipulskicom3/images/postdateicon.png
http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/choose-a-favourite.jpg
http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/themes/shipulskicom3/images/postcategoryicon.png
http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/themes/shipulskicom3/images/posttagicon.png
http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/themes/shipulskicom3/images/postcommentsicon.png
http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/themes/shipulskicom3/images/postdateicon.png
http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/bodhisattva.jpg
http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/themes/shipulskicom3/images/postcategoryicon.png
http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/themes/shipulskicom3/images/posttagicon.png
http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/themes/shipulskicom3/images/postcommentsicon.png
http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/themes/shipulskicom3/images/postdateicon.png
http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/justice-lords-superman-vs-bizarro-1.jpg
http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/themes/shipulskicom3/images/postcategoryicon.png
http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/themes/shipulskicom3/images/posttagicon.png
http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/themes/shipulskicom3/images/postcommentsicon.png
http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/themes/shipulskicom3/images/postdateicon.png
http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/gas-stove-burner.jpg
http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/themes/shipulskicom3/images/postcategoryicon.png
http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/themes/shipulskicom3/images/posttagicon.png
http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/themes/shipulskicom3/images/postcommentsicon.png
http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/themes/shipulskicom3/images/postdateicon.png
http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/ring-of-fire.jpg
http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/themes/shipulskicom3/images/postcategoryicon.png
http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/themes/shipulskicom3/images/posttagicon.png
http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/themes/shipulskicom3/images/postcommentsicon.png
http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/themes/shipulskicom3/images/postdateicon.png
http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/abacus.jpg
http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/themes/shipulskicom3/images/postcategoryicon.png
http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/themes/shipulskicom3/images/posttagicon.png
http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/themes/shipulskicom3/images/postcommentsicon.png
http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/themes/shipulskicom3/images/postdateicon.png
http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/imagination.jpg
http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/themes/shipulskicom3/images/postcategoryicon.png
http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/themes/shipulskicom3/images/posttagicon.png
http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/themes/shipulskicom3/images/postcommentsicon.png
http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/themes/shipulskicom3/images/postdateicon.png
http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/6250327997_b11dc5d828_z.jpg
http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/themes/shipulskicom3/images/postcategoryicon.png
http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/themes/shipulskicom3/images/posttagicon.png
http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/themes/shipulskicom3/images/postcommentsicon.png
http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/themes/shipulskicom3/images/postdateicon.png
http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/rockem-sockem-robots.jpg
http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/themes/shipulskicom3/images/postcategoryicon.png
http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/themes/shipulskicom3/images/posttagicon.png
http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/themes/shipulskicom3/images/postcommentsicon.png
http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/themes/shipulskicom3/images/postdateicon.png
http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/facing-uncertainty.jpg
http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/themes/shipulskicom3/images/postcategoryicon.png
http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/themes/shipulskicom3/images/posttagicon.png
http://www.shipulski.com/wp-content/themes/shipulskicom3/images/postcommentsicon.png

Ranking:


Alexa Traffic
Daily Global Rank Trend
Daily Reach (Percent)









Majestic SEO











Text on page:

homepublications about contact – shipulski on design innovation, product development, design connect with mike: linkedin twitter facebook maximize the learning ratio march 22nd, 2017 as creatures of habit, we like to do what we did last time. outcomes match expectations and things go as planned – no surprises, no delays, no problems. but as creatures swimming in an evolutionary soup, doing what we did last time leads to extinction. customers’ expectations multiply and competitors mutate into a higher performing organism and eat us. there are two competing functions – do what we did last time to minimize energy and try new things to harden ourselves for the ever more competitive future. you can’t reinvent yourself at every turn or your brain will run out of glucose and you’ll pass out. and you can’t always lounge on the couch or you’ll get out of shape and become a slow-moving snack for the new t-rex on the block.  if the endpoints lead to our demise, the solution must be something like the middle way. if you can get away with it, do what you did last time – minimum energy living is a good gig if you can get it. with little investment and lots of return, there’s enough for everyone.  plenty to eat and some left over to put in stores for the winter. but plenty to eat and plenty of time to goof off may make for lazy (but happy) tribe members who may be of little use when it’s time to defend the business model against hostile species. live frugally to develop a surplus and spend some of it trying new things. improved fitness is the best way to navigate the landscape, even the landscape still beyond the horizon.  more than physical fitness, improved mental fitness is the dominant trait that leads to survival. but doing new work is energy intensive and must be done skillfully. the primary reason we try new things is to learn. in that way, the new things we try are a means to an end – improved mental fitness. but because doing new is expensive from an energy perspective, the learning ratio (new learning divided by the energy to learn) must be high. first, be clear about what you want to learn because learning the wrong thing costs more energy than resting on the couch. second, maximize the learning of your experiments. if you run an experiment where you are 100% sure of the outcome, your learning is zero. you already knew how it would go, so there was no need to run the experiment. the least costly experiment is the one you didn’t have to run, so don’t run experiments when you know how they’ll turn out.  if you run an experiment where you are 0% sure of the outcome, your learning is zero. these experiments are like buying a lottery ticket – you learn the number you chose didn’t win, but you learned nothing about how to choose next week’s number.  you’re down a dollar, but no smarter. the learning ratio is maximized when energy is minimized (the simplest experiment is run) and probability the experimental results match your hypothesis (expectation) is 50%.  in that way, half of the experiments confirm your hypothesis and the other half tell you why your hypothesis was off track. we can argue about the energy balance between leveraging best practices and creating new recipes. but, when you want to learn, there can be no argument – maximize the learning ratio. image credit – craig sunter posted in how to | tags: learning | no comments » if you don’t know what to do, you may be on the right track. march 15th, 2017 what would you do if: you had to push through your fear of being judged? you had to break some rules to get an idea off the ground? you had a concept that would displace your most successful product? your colleague tried to scuttle your best idea? you knew it was time to stop judging yourself negatively? your colleague asked you to help with a hair-brained idea? you were asked to facilitate a session to create new concepts, but no one could explain what would happen after the concepts were created? you weren’t afraid your prototype would be a success? you thought you knew what the customer wanted, but didn’t have the data to prove it? you were asked to create patentable concepts you knew would never be commercialized? your prototype threatened the status quo? you were asked to facilitate a session to create new concepts and told how to do it? you were told “no.” you saw a young employee struggling with a new concept? you were blocking yourself from starting the right work? you thought your idea had merit, but you needed help testing it in the market? you were asked to follow a standard process but you knew there wasn’t one? you were asked to come up with new concepts though there were five excellent concepts gathering dust? you were told there was no market for your new-to-world prototype? you had to bolster your self-confidence to believe wholeheartedly in your idea? there is a name for what you would do. it’s called innovation. image credit – unknownnet photography posted in decisions, fear, innovation, top line growth | tags: competitiveness, fear | no comments » responding with kindness march 8th, 2017 if some talks to you in an angry way, what do you do? well, if it’s a family member you take it personally and respond with equal and opposite anger. if it’s someone at work, you take it personally but use a bit more restraint.  and in both cases, the root of all the trouble is taking their anger personally. there can be no argument if the second doesn’t accept the radiated negativity of the first. in that way, arguments are like tennis – it takes two to play a match worth watching.  but in the heat of the moment, and even in the residual heat after the moment, it’s tremendously difficult remember their anger is about them. the natural tendency is to focus on the injustice of the other’s anger. they’re out of line, they’re wrong, they shouldn’t yell like that. but pouring your energy into that bucket won’t end the arguments. you can’t control their behavior, you can only control your response to their behavior. the only way to end the arguments is to look inside and figure out why you take their anger personally. if their anger threatens you, you’ll take it personally and respond in-kind.  and what is threatened is your image of yourself.  if you don’t think highly of yourself, you call your caliber into question and respond with anger to prop up and protect your self-image.  but, if you don’t think their rage applies, you won’t be threatened and you’ll respond effectively. and you’ll be able to help them be more effective. when you respond to anger with kindness, people notice.  it may take them a while to understand there is no hidden agenda and your kindness truly kindness, but when they do, they change and your relationship changes.  trust and mutual respect blossom and the future has no limit. it’s not easy to respond to anger with kindness. but in the end, it’s worth it. image credit – dean hochman posted in fear, feelings | tags: kindness | no comments » improving what is and creating what isn’t march 1st, 2017 there are two domains – what is and what isn’t. we’re most comfortable in what is and we don’t know much about what isn’t. neither domain is best and you can’t have one without the other. sometimes it’s best to swim in what is and other times it’s better to splash around in what isn’t.  though we want them, there are no hard and fast rules when to swim and when to splash. improvement lives in the domain of what is. if you’re running a six sigma project, a lean project or a continuous improvement program you’re knee deep in what is. measure, analyze, improve, and control what is. walk out to the production floor, count the machines, people and defects, measure the cycle time and eliminate the wasteful activities. define the current state and continually (and incrementally) improve what is. clear, unambiguous, measurable, analytical, rational. the close cousins creativity and innovation live in the domain of what isn’t. they don’t see what is, they only see gaps, gulfs and gullies. they are drawn to the black hole of what’s missing. they define things in terms of difference.  they care about the negative, not the image. they live in the bizarro world where strength is weakness and far less is better than less. unclear, ambiguous, intuitive, irrational. what is – productivity, utilization, standard work. what isn’t – imagination, unstructured time, daydreaming. predictable – what is. unknowable – what isn’t. in the world of what is, it’s best to hire for experience.  what worked last time will work this time. the knowledge of the past is all powerful.  in the world of what isn’t, it’s best to hire young people that know more than you do. they know the latest technology you’ve never heard of and they know its limitations. improving what is pays the bills while creating what isn’t fumbles to find the future. but when what is runs out of gas, what isn’t rides to the rescue and refuels. neither domain is better, and neither can survive without the other. the magic question – what’s the best way to allocate resources between the domains? the unsatisfying answer – it depends. and the sextant to navigate the dependencies – good judgement. image credit – jd hancock posted in clarity, complexity, constraints, seeing things as they are, uncertainty | tags: creativity, less-with-far-less, seven wastes, six sigma | no comments » dismantle the business model. february 22nd, 2017 when companies want to innovate, there are three things they can change – products, services and business models. products are usually the first, second and third priorities, services, though they have a tighter connection with customer and are more lasting and powerful, sadly, are fourth priority.  and business models are the superset and the most powerful of all, yet, as a source of innovation, are largely off limits. it’s easy to improve products. measure goodness using a standard test protocol, figure out what drives performance and improve it. create the hard data, quantify the incremental performance and sell the difference.  a straightforward method to sell more – if you liked the last one, you’re going to like this one. but this is fleeting. just as you are reverse engineering the competitors’ products, they’re doing it to you. any incremental difference will be swallowed up by their next product. the half-life of your advantage is measured in months. it’s easy for companies to run innovation projects to improve product performance because it’s easy to quantify the improvement and because we think customers are transactional. truth is, customers are emotional, not rational. people don’t buy performance, they buy the story they create for themselves. innovating on services is more difficult because, unlike a product, it’s not a physical thing. you can’t touch it, smell it or taste it.  some say you can measure a service, but you can’t. you can measure its footprints in the sand, but you can’t measure it directly. all the click data in the world won’t get you there because clicks, as measured, don’t capture intent – an unintentional click on the wrong image counts the same a premeditated click on the right one. sure, you can count clicks, but if you can’t count the why’s, you don’t have causation. and, sure, you can measure customer satisfaction with an online survey, but the closest you can get is correlation and that’s not good enough.  it’s causation or bust.  you’ve got to figure out why they like your services. (hint – it’s the people who interface directly with your customers and the latitude you give them to advocate on the customers’ behalf.) where services are difficult to innovate, the business model is almost impossible. no one is quite sure what the business model actually is an in-the-trenches-way, but they know it’s been responsible for the success of the company, and they don’t want to change it. ultimately, if you want to innovate on the business model, you’ve got to know what it is, but before you spend the time and energy to define it, it’s best to figure out if it needs changing.  the question – what does it look like when the business model is out of gas? if you do what you did last time and you get less in return, the business model is out of gas. successful models are limiting. just like with the prime directive, where captain kirk could do anything he wanted as long as he didn’t interfere with the internal development of alien civilizations, do anything you want with the business model as long as you don’t change it. and that’s why you need external help to formally define the business model and experiment with it. the resource should understand your business first hand, yet be outside the chain of command so they can say the sacrilegious things that violate the prime directive without being fired.  for good candidates, look to trusted customers and suppliers. to define the business model, use a simple block diagram (one page) where blocks are labelled with simple nouns and arrows are labelled with simple verbs. start with a single block on the right of the page labelled “customer” and draw a single arrow pointing to the block and label it.  continue until you’ve defined the business model.  (note – maximum number of blocks is 12.)  you’ll be surprised with the difficulty of the process. after there’s consensus on the business model, the next step is to figure out how the environment changed around it and to identify and test the preferred evolutionary paths. but that’s for another time. image credit – steven depolo posted in constraints, culture, innovation, intellectual intertia, trust | tags: competitiveness, trust-based approach | no comments » full circle innovation february 15th, 2017 it’s not enough to sell things to customers, because selling things is transactional and, over time, transactional selling deteriorates into selling on price. and selling on price is a race to the bottom. sales must move from transactional to relational, where people in the sales organization become trusted advisers and then something altogether deeper. at this deeper level of development, the sales people know the business as well as the customer, know where the customer wants to go and provide unique perspective and thoughtful insight.  that’s quite a thing for sales, but it’s not enough.  sales must become the conduit that brings the entire company closer to the customer and their their work. when the customer is trying to figure out what’s next, sales brings in a team of marketing, r&d and manufacturing to triangulate on the future.  the objective is to develop deep understanding of the customer’s world.  the understanding must go deeper than the what’s.  the learning must scrape bottom and get right down to the bedrock why’s. to get to bedrock, marketing leads learning sessions with the customer.  and it all starts by understanding the work.  what does the customer do? why is it done that way? what are the most important processes? how did they evolve? why do they flow the way they do? these aren’t high-level questions, they are low-level, specific questions, done in front of the actual work. the mantra – go to the work. when the learning sessions are done well, marketing includes experts in manufacturing and r&d.  manufacturing brings their expertise in understanding process and r&d brings their expertise in products and technologies.  and to understand the work the deepest way, the tool of choice is the value stream map (vsm). cross-organization teams are formed (customer, sales, marketing, manufacturing, and r&d) and are sent out to create value steam maps of the most important processes.  (each team is supported by a vsm expert.)  once the maps are made, all the teams come back together to review the them and identify the fundamental constraints and how to overcome them.  the solutions are not limited to new product offerings, rather the solutions could be training, process changes, policy changes, organizational changes or business model changes. not all the problems are solved in the moment.  after the low hanging fruit is picked, the real work begins.  after returning home, marketing and r&d work together to formulate emergent needs and create new ways to meet them.  the tool of choice is the ibe (innovation burst event). to prepare for the ibe, marketing and r&d formalize emergent needs and create design challenges to focus the ibe teams.  solving the design challenges breaks the conflicts creates novel solutions that meet the unmet needs.  in this way, the ibe is a pull process – customer needs create the pull for a solution. the ibe is a one or two-day event where teams solve the design challenges by building conceptual prototypes (thinking prototypes).  then, they vote on the most interesting concepts and create a build plan (who, what, when).  the objective of the build plan is to create a diabolically simple prototype (dsp), a functional prototype that demonstrates the new functionality. what makes it diabolical is quick build time.  at the end of the ibe is a report out of the build plan to the leader who can allocate the resources to execute it. in a closed-loop way, once the dsp is built, sales arranges another visit to the customer to demonstrate the new solution.  and because the prototype designed to fulfill the validated customer need, by definition, the prototype will be valuable to the customer. this full circle process has several novel elements, but the magic is in the framework that brings everyone together.  with the process, two companies can work together effectively to achieve shared business objectives.  and, because the process brings together multiple functions and their unique perspectives, the solutions are well-thought-out and grounded in the diversity of the collective. image credit – gerry machen posted in fundementals, how to, innovation, magic | tags: ibe, problem definition, trust-based approach | no comments » transcending our financial accounting systems february 8th, 2017 in business and in life, one of the biggest choices is what to do next.  sounds simple, but it’s not. the decision has many facets and drives many questions, for example:  does it fit with core competence? does it fit with the brand? how many will we sell? what will the market look like after it’s launched? do we have what it takes to pull it off? these questions then explode into a series of complex financial analyses like – return on investment, return on capital, return on net assets (and all its flavors) and all sorts of yet-to-be created return on this’s and that’s.  this return business is all about the golden ratio – how much will we make relative to how much it costs.  all the calculations, regardless of their name, are variations on this theme. and all suffer the same fundamental flaw – they are based on an artificial system of financial accounting. to me, especially when working in new territory, we must transcend the self-made biases and limitations of gaap and ask the bedrock question – is it worth it? in the house of cards of our financial accounting, worth equals dollars. nothing more, nothing less.  and this simplistic, formulaic characterization has devastating consequence.  worth is broader than profit, it’s nuanced, it’s philosophical, it’s about people, it’s about planet. yet we let our accounting systems lead us around by the nose as if people don’t matter, like the planet doesn’t matter, like what we stand for doesn’t matter. simply put, worth is not dollars. the single-most troubling artifact of our accounting systems is its unnatural bias toward immediacy.  how much will we make next year? how about next quarter? what will we spend next month? if we push out the expense by a month how much will we save? what will it do to this quarter’s stock price? it’s like the work has no validity unless the return on investment isn’t measured in days, weeks or months. it seems the only work that makes it through the financial analysis gauntlet is work that costs nothing and returns almost nothing. under the thumb of financial accounting, projects are small in scope, smaller in resource demands and predictable in time.  this is a recipe for minimalist improvement and incrementalism. what about the people doing the work? why aren’t we concerned they can’t pay their mortgages? why do we think it’s okay to demand they work weekends? why don’t we hold their insurance co-pays at reasonable levels? why do we think it’s okay to slash our investment in their development? what about their self-worth? just because we can’t measure it in a financial sense, don’t we think it’s a liability to foster disenchantment and disengagement? if we considered our people an asset in a financial accounting sense, wouldn’t we invest in them to protect their output? why do we preventive maintenance on our machines but not our people? when doing innovative work, our financial accounting systems fail us. these systems were designed in an era when it was best to increase the maturity of immature systems.  but now that our systems are mature, and our objective is to obsolete them, our ancient financial accounting systems hinder more than help. the domains of reinvention and disruption are dominated by judgement, not rigid accounting rules.  innovation is the domain of incomplete data and uncertain outcomes and not the domain of debits and credits. profit is important, but profit is a result.  financial accounting doesn’t create profit, people create profit. and the currency of people are thoughts, feelings and judgement. with innovation, it’s better to create the conditions so people believe in the project and are fully engaged in their work. with creativity, it’s better to have empowered people who will move mountains to do what must be done. with work that’s new, it’s better to trust people and empower them to use their best judgement. image credit – jeremy tarling posted in ceo, feelings, imagination, risk, uncertainty | tags: financial accounting | no comments » imagination february 1st, 2017 if you can’t imagine it, it can’t be done. but if it can’t be done, how can you imagine it? no one is buying a product like the one you imagined. there’s no market. no one can buy an imaginative product that doesn’t yet exist. there may be a market. imagine things are good, just as they are. imagine an upstart competitor will obsolete your best product. let’s fix what is. let’s imagine what isn’t, and build it. don’t waste time imagining radical new concepts. there’s no way to get there. use your imagination to create an unobtainable concept, then build a bridge to get there. imagine the future profits of our great recipe. let’s replicate it. imagine our recipe has a half-life. let’s disrupt it. to be competitive, we’ve got to use our imagination to reduce the cost of our products. to be competitive, we’ve got to use our imagination to obsolete our best work. put together a specification, a detailed gannt chart and make it happen on time. imagine what could be, and make a prototype. let’s shore up our weaknesses and live to fight another day. let’s imagine our strength as a weakness and invent the future. we are the best in the industry. imagine how tough it is to be our competitor. imagine there’s a hungry start-up who will do whatever it takes to get the business. we’ve got to protect our market share. imagine what we could create if we weren’t constrained by our success. imagine how productive we will be when we standardize the work. imagine how much fun we will have when we reinvent the industry. ask the customer what they want, built it and launch it. imagine what could be, build a prototype, show the customer, listen and refine. let’s follow the script. imagine the profits. let’s burn the script and imagine a new one. image credit — allegra ricci posted in fear, imagination, intellectual intertia | tags: competitiveness, creativity | no comments » with innovation you’ve got to feel worthy of the work. january 25th, 2017 when doing work that’s new, sometimes it seems the whole world is working against you. and, most of the time, it is.  the outside world is impossible to control, so the only way to deal with external resistance is to pretend you don’t hear it. shut your ears, put your head down and pull with all your might. define your dream and live it. and don’t look back.  but what about internal resistance? where external resistance cannot be controlled and must be ignored, internal resistance, resistance created by you, can be actively managed.  the best way to deal with internal resistance is to prevent its manufacture, but very few can do that. the second best way is to acknowledge resistance is self-made and acknowledge it will always be part of the innovation equation.  then, understand the traps that cause us to create self-inflicted resistance and learn how to work through them. the first trap prevents starting.  at the initial stage of a project, two unstated questions power the resistance – what if it doesn’t work? and what if it does work?  if it doesn’t work, the fear is you’ll be judged as incompetent or crazy. the only thing to battle this fear is self-worth. if you feel worthy of the work, you’ll push through the resistance and start.  if it does work, the fear is you won’t know how to navigate success. again, if you think you’re worthy of the work (the work that comes with success), you and your self-esteem will power through the resistance and start. underpinning both questions is a fundamental of new work that is misunderstood – new work is different than standard work.  where standard work follows a well-worn walking path, new work slashes through an uncharted jungle where there are no maps and no gps. with standard work, all the questions have been answered, the scope is well established and the sequence of events and timeline are dialed in.   with standard work, everything is known up front. with new work, it’s the opposite. never mind the answers, the questions are unknown. the scope is uncertain and the sequence of events is yet to be defined. and the timeline cannot be estimated. but with so much standard work and so little new work, companies expect people to that do the highly creative work to have all the answers up front. and to break through the self-generated resistance, people doing new work must let go of self-imposed expectations that they must have all the answers before starting.  with innovation, the only thing that can be known is how to figure out what’s next. here’s a generic project plan for new work – do the first thing and then, based on the results, figure out what to do next, and repeat. to break through the trap that prevents starting, don’t hold yourself accountable to know everything at the start. instead, be accountable for figuring out what’s next. the second trap prevents progress. and, like the first trap, resistance-based paralysis sets in because we expect ourselves to have an etched-in-stone project plan and expect we’ll have all the answers up front.  and again, there’s no way to have the right answers when the first bit of work must be done to determine the right questions. if you think you’re worthy of the work, you’ll be able to push through the resistance with the figure out what’s next approach. when in the middle of an innovation project, hold yourself accountable to figuring out what to do next. nothing more, nothing less. when the standard work police demand a sequence of events and a timeline, don’t buckle. tell them you will finish the current task then define the next one and you won’t stop until you’re done.  and if they persist, tell them to create their own project plan and do the innovation work themselves. with innovation, it depends. with innovation, hold onto your self-worth. with innovation, figure out what’s next. image credit — jonathan kos-read posted in fear, how to, innovation, trust | tags: creativity, success | no comments » diabolically simple prototypes january 18th, 2017 ideas are all talk and no action.  ideas are untested concepts that have yet to rise to the level of practicality.  you can’t sell an idea and you can’t barter with them. ideas aren’t worth much. a prototype is a physical manifestation of an idea. where ideas are ethereal, prototypes are practical. where ideas are fuzzy and subject to interpretation, prototypes are a sledge hammer right between the eyes.  there is no arguing with a prototype. it does what it does and that’s the end of that. you don’t have to like what a prototype stands for, but you can’t dismiss it. where ideas aren’t worth a damn, prototypes are wholly worth every ounce of effort to create them. if camp a says it will work and camp b says it won’t, a prototype will settle the disagreement pretty quickly.  it will work or it won’t.  and if it works, the idea behind it is valid.  and if it doesn’t, the idea may be valid, but a workable solution is yet-to-be discovered.  either way, a prototype brings clarity. prototypes are not elegant.  prototypes are ugly. the best ones do one thing – demonstrate the novel idea that underpins them. the good ones are simple, and the best ones are diabolically simple. it is difficult to make diabolically simple prototypes (dsps), but it’s a skill that can be learned.  and it’s worth learning because dsps come to life in record time. the approach with dsps is to take the time up front to distill the concept down to its essence and then its all-hands-on-deck until it’s up and running in the lab. but the real power of the dsp is that it drives rapid learning.  when a new idea comes, it’s only a partially formed.  the process of trying to make a dsp demands the holes are filled and blurry parts are brought into focus.  the dsp process demands a half-baked idea matures into fully-baked physical embodiment.  and it’s full-body learning.  your hands learn, your eyes learn and your torso learns. if you find yourself in a disagreement of ideas, stop talking and start making a prototype. if the dsp works, the disagreement is over. diabolically simple prototypes end arguments. but, more importantly, they radically increase the pace of learning. image credit – snippets101 posted in decisions, how to, innovation, intellectual intertia, level 5 courage, new thinking | tags: diabolically simple prototypes, problem definition | no comments » with innovation, it depends. january 11th, 2017 by definition, when the work is new there is uncertainty.  and uncertainty can be stressful. but, instead of getting yourself all bound up, accept it.  more than that, relish in it.  wear it as a badge of honor.  not everyone gets the chance to work on something new – only the best do.  and, because you’ve been asked to do work with a strong tenor of uncertainty, someone thinks you’re the best. but uncertainty is an unknown quantity, and our systems have been designed to reject it, not swim in it.  when companies want to get serious they drive toward a culture of accountability and the new work gets the back seat.  accountability is mis-mapped to predictability, successful results and on time delivery.  accountability, as we’ve mapped it, is the mortal enemy of new work.  when you’re working on a project with a strong element of uncertainty, the only certainty is the task you have in front of you.  there’s no certainty on how the task will turn out, rather, there’s only the simple certainty of the task. with work with low uncertainty there are three year plans, launch timelines and predictable sales figures. task one is well-defined and there’s a linear flow of standard work right behind it – task two through twenty-two are dialed in. but when working with uncertainty, the task at hand is all there is.  you don’t know the next task.  when someone asks what’s next the only thing you can say is “it depends.”  and that’s difficult in a culture of traditional accountability. an “it depends” gannt chart is an oxymoron, but with uncertainty step two is defined by step one.  if a, then b.  but if the wheels fall off, i’m not sure what we’ll do next.  the only thing worse than an “it depends” gantt chart is an “i’m not sure” gannt chart.  but with uncertainty, you can be sure you won’t be sure.  with uncertainty, traditional project planning goes out the window, and “it depends” project planning is the only way. with uncertainty, traditional project planning is replaced by a clear distillation of the problem that must be solved.  instead of a set of well-defined tasks, ask for a block diagram that defines the problem that must be solved.  and when there’s clarity and agreement on the problem that must be solved, the supporting tasks can be well-defined.  step one – make a prototype like this and test it like that. step two – it depends on how step one turns out.  if it goes like this then we’ll do that.  if it does that, we’ll do the other.  and if it does neither, we’re not sure what we’ll do.  you don’t have to like it, but that’s the way it is. with uncertainty, the project plan isn’t the most important thing.  what’s most important is relentless effort to define the system as it is.  here’s what the system is doing, here’s how we’d like it to behave and, based on our mechanism-based theory, here’s the prototype we’re going to build and here’s how we’re going to test it.  what are we going to do next?  it depends. what’s next? it depends. what resources do you need? it depends. when will you be done? it depends. innovation is, by definition, work that is new.  and, innovation, by definition, is uncertain.  and that’s why with innovation, it depends.  and that’s why innovation is difficult. and that’s why you’ve got to choose wisely when you choose the people that do your innovation work. image credit – sara biljana gaon (off) posted in innovation, problems, seeing things as they are, uncertainty | tags: fear, ibe, problem definition, problems, understanding physics | no comments » « older entries mike shipulski subscribe via email enter your email address:delivered by feedburner categories a/b data allocating cost assembly time reduction assumptions authentic axiomatic design bottom line growth ceo clarity complexity constraints cost savings culture decisions design engineers dfa dfma downstream savings engineering leaders fear feelings floor space fundementals green how to imagination independence innovation intellectual intertia lean level 5 courage magic manufacturing competitiveness meaning most popular posts motivation negativity new normal new thinking one page thinking part count reduction positivity problems product development product robustness recession risk robust economy seeing things as they are seven wastes six sigma design for six sigma technology the future top line growth triz trust uncategorized uncertainty voc warranty cost year in review archives march 2017 february 2017 january 2017 december 2016 november 2016 october 2016 september 2016 august 2016 july 2016 june 2016 may 2016 april 2016 march 2016 february 2016 january 2016 december 2015 november 2015 october 2015 september 2015 august 2015 july 2015 june 2015 may 2015 april 2015 march 2015 february 2015 january 2015 december 2014 november 2014 october 2014 september 2014 august 2014 july 2014 june 2014 may 2014 april 2014 march 2014 february 2014 january 2014 december 2013 november 2013 october 2013 september 2013 august 2013 july 2013 june 2013 may 2013 april 2013 march 2013 february 2013 january 2013 december 2012 november 2012 october 2012 september 2012 august 2012 july 2012 june 2012 may 2012 april 2012 march 2012 february 2012 january 2012 december 2011 november 2011 october 2011 september 2011 august 2011 july 2011 june 2011 may 2011 april 2011 march 2011 february 2011 january 2011 december 2010 november 2010 october 2010 september 2010 august 2010 july 2010 june 2010 may 2010 april 2010 march 2010 february 2010 january 2010 december 2009 november 2009 october 2009 september 2009 june 2009 november 2008 september 2008 august 2008 may 2008 march 2008 september 2007 august 2007 march 2007 november 2006 july 2006 june 2006 april 2006 tags competitiveness cost cost reduction cost savings creativity design alternatives design for assembly design spaces dfa dfma culture downstream savings engage design; product design; cost savings engineering capability engineering mindset fear fix manufacturing floor space functional domain ibe independence lean less-with-far-less lessons learned manufacturing competitveness no-to-yes part count patents physical domain piano teacher problem definition problems product design product development engine profit per square foot role of engineering seven wastes six sigma start success survey results time trust-based approach understanding physics vacation words contact us | copyright © 2013 mike shipulski. all rights reserved. | design by chase brook software | powered by wordpress  


Here you find all texts from your page as Google (googlebot) and others search engines seen it.

Words density analysis:

Numbers of all words: 6238

One word

Two words phrases

Three words phrases

the - 8.34% (520)
and - 3.66% (228)
you - 3.01% (188)
our - 1.43% (89)
what - 1.36% (85)
are - 1.17% (73)
work - 1.12% (70)
with - 1.01% (63)
all - 0.88% (55)
that - 0.87% (54)
out - 0.83% (52)
your - 0.82% (51)
but - 0.79% (49)
eat - 0.75% (47)
- 0.72% (45)
can - 0.72% (45)
new - 0.71% (44)
for - 0.67% (42)
one - 0.67% (42)
they - 0.64% (40)
it’s - 0.64% (40)
thing - 0.61% (38)
end - 0.56% (35)
per - 0.56% (35)
not - 0.55% (34)
there - 0.51% (32)
when - 0.51% (32)
time - 0.51% (32)
how - 0.48% (30)
innovation - 0.48% (30)
learn - 0.46% (29)
prototype - 0.45% (28)
way - 0.42% (26)
customer - 0.4% (25)
count - 0.4% (25)
like - 0.38% (24)
will - 0.38% (24)
get - 0.37% (23)
stand - 0.37% (23)
create - 0.37% (23)
now - 0.37% (23)
product - 0.37% (23)
don’t - 0.35% (22)
know - 0.35% (22)
their - 0.35% (22)
it. - 0.35% (22)
use - 0.35% (22)
sure - 0.34% (21)
business - 0.34% (21)
ask - 0.34% (21)
have - 0.32% (20)
best - 0.32% (20)
people - 0.32% (20)
next - 0.32% (20)
them - 0.32% (20)
certainty - 0.3% (19)
idea - 0.3% (19)
uncertain - 0.3% (19)
design - 0.29% (18)
does - 0.29% (18)
imagine - 0.29% (18)
worth - 0.27% (17)
learning - 0.27% (17)
once - 0.27% (17)
were - 0.26% (16)
even - 0.26% (16)
must - 0.26% (16)
innovation, - 0.26% (16)
model - 0.26% (16)
able - 0.26% (16)
can’t - 0.26% (16)
why - 0.26% (16)
uncertainty - 0.26% (16)
let - 0.24% (15)
where - 0.24% (15)
image - 0.24% (15)
project - 0.24% (15)
here’s - 0.24% (15)
define - 0.24% (15)
ever - 0.24% (15)
this - 0.24% (15)
concept - 0.22% (14)
only - 0.22% (14)
may - 0.22% (14)
about - 0.22% (14)
plan - 0.22% (14)
more - 0.22% (14)
march - 0.22% (14)
2017 - 0.22% (14)
turn - 0.22% (14)
under - 0.22% (14)
cause - 0.22% (14)
fit - 0.22% (14)
things - 0.22% (14)
resistance - 0.22% (14)
less - 0.21% (13)
question - 0.21% (13)
that’s - 0.21% (13)
isn’t - 0.21% (13)
problem - 0.21% (13)
because - 0.21% (13)
start - 0.21% (13)
simple - 0.21% (13)
most - 0.21% (13)
some - 0.21% (13)
think - 0.21% (13)
2013 - 0.21% (13)
depends - 0.21% (13)
prove - 0.21% (13)
come - 0.21% (13)
its - 0.19% (12)
financial - 0.19% (12)
work. - 0.19% (12)
process - 0.19% (12)
fear - 0.19% (12)
accounting - 0.19% (12)
improve - 0.19% (12)
credit - 0.19% (12)
tags - 0.19% (12)
2010 - 0.19% (12)
system - 0.19% (12)
cost - 0.19% (12)
market - 0.19% (12)
february - 0.19% (12)
2016 - 0.19% (12)
want - 0.19% (12)
2014 - 0.19% (12)
2012 - 0.19% (12)
ibe - 0.19% (12)
mental - 0.19% (12)
2015 - 0.19% (12)
2011 - 0.19% (12)
own - 0.19% (12)
prototypes - 0.18% (11)
measure - 0.18% (11)
what’s - 0.18% (11)
than - 0.18% (11)
posted - 0.18% (11)
right - 0.18% (11)
did - 0.18% (11)
then - 0.18% (11)
standard - 0.18% (11)
domain - 0.18% (11)
tags: - 0.18% (11)
experiment - 0.18% (11)
figure - 0.18% (11)
january - 0.18% (11)
it, - 0.18% (11)
was - 0.18% (11)
fun - 0.18% (11)
run - 0.18% (11)
comments - 0.18% (11)
line - 0.16% (10)
return - 0.16% (10)
make - 0.16% (10)
change - 0.16% (10)
work, - 0.16% (10)
understand - 0.16% (10)
through - 0.16% (10)
there’s - 0.16% (10)
low - 0.16% (10)
task - 0.16% (10)
trust - 0.16% (10)
is. - 0.16% (10)
two - 0.16% (10)
need - 0.16% (10)
and, - 0.16% (10)
done - 0.16% (10)
november - 0.16% (10)
event - 0.16% (10)
september - 0.16% (10)
success - 0.16% (10)
energy - 0.16% (10)
you’ll - 0.14% (9)
concepts - 0.14% (9)
august - 0.14% (9)
take - 0.14% (9)
power - 0.14% (9)
anger - 0.14% (9)
who - 0.14% (9)
sales - 0.14% (9)
depends. - 0.14% (9)
build - 0.14% (9)
way, - 0.14% (9)
yourself - 0.14% (9)
well - 0.14% (9)
very - 0.14% (9)
doing - 0.14% (9)
call - 0.14% (9)
dsp - 0.14% (9)
questions - 0.14% (9)
other - 0.14% (9)
june - 0.14% (9)
sell - 0.14% (9)
you’re - 0.14% (9)
systems - 0.14% (9)
much - 0.13% (8)
though - 0.13% (8)
definition - 0.13% (8)
imagination - 0.13% (8)
profit - 0.13% (8)
me, - 0.13% (8)
block - 0.13% (8)
based - 0.13% (8)
doesn’t - 0.13% (8)
one. - 0.13% (8)
any - 0.13% (8)
first - 0.13% (8)
yet - 0.13% (8)
won’t - 0.13% (8)
world - 0.13% (8)
let’s - 0.13% (8)
december - 0.13% (8)
ratio - 0.13% (8)
october - 0.13% (8)
last - 0.13% (8)
would - 0.13% (8)
july - 0.13% (8)
develop - 0.13% (8)
april - 0.13% (8)
competitive - 0.13% (8)
live - 0.13% (8)
off - 0.13% (8)
solution - 0.13% (8)
try - 0.13% (8)
lead - 0.11% (7)
time. - 0.11% (7)
difficult - 0.11% (7)
them. - 0.11% (7)
has - 0.11% (7)
asked - 0.11% (7)
customers - 0.11% (7)
diabolical - 0.11% (7)
test - 0.11% (7)
into - 0.11% (7)
see - 0.11% (7)
answer - 0.11% (7)
nothing - 0.11% (7)
uncertainty, - 0.11% (7)
you’ve - 0.11% (7)
set - 0.11% (7)
good - 0.11% (7)
together - 0.11% (7)
future - 0.11% (7)
brings - 0.11% (7)
ideas - 0.11% (7)
tell - 0.11% (7)
got - 0.11% (7)
expect - 0.11% (7)
manufacturing - 0.11% (7)
engine - 0.11% (7)
team - 0.11% (7)
level - 0.11% (7)
every - 0.11% (7)
respond - 0.11% (7)
understanding - 0.1% (6)
development - 0.1% (6)
kindness - 0.1% (6)
full - 0.1% (6)
better - 0.1% (6)
down - 0.1% (6)
next. - 0.1% (6)
defined - 0.1% (6)
problems - 0.1% (6)
step - 0.1% (6)
argument - 0.1% (6)
map - 0.1% (6)
source - 0.1% (6)
products - 0.1% (6)
important - 0.1% (6)
half - 0.1% (6)
could - 0.1% (6)
definition, - 0.1% (6)
marketing - 0.1% (6)
r&d - 0.1% (6)
after - 0.1% (6)
events - 0.1% (6)
deep - 0.1% (6)
feel - 0.1% (6)
diabolically - 0.1% (6)
creativity - 0.1% (6)
front - 0.1% (6)
it.  - 0.1% (6)
sigma - 0.08% (5)
six - 0.08% (5)
prevent - 0.08% (5)
2009 - 0.08% (5)
solve - 0.08% (5)
answers - 0.08% (5)
part - 0.08% (5)
physical - 0.08% (5)
approach - 0.08% (5)
we’ll - 0.08% (5)
put - 0.08% (5)
over - 0.08% (5)
resource - 0.08% (5)
needs - 0.08% (5)
known - 0.08% (5)
either - 0.08% (5)
click - 0.08% (5)
changes - 0.08% (5)
say - 0.08% (5)
buy - 0.08% (5)
just - 0.08% (5)
services - 0.08% (5)
companies - 0.08% (5)
knew - 0.08% (5)
trap - 0.08% (5)
culture - 0.08% (5)
engineering - 0.08% (5)
is, - 0.08% (5)
chart - 0.08% (5)
demand - 0.08% (5)
thought - 0.08% (5)
be, - 0.08% (5)
isn’t. - 0.08% (5)
savings - 0.08% (5)
2008 - 0.08% (5)
competitiveness - 0.08% (5)
invest - 0.08% (5)
data - 0.08% (5)
top - 0.08% (5)
fear, - 0.08% (5)
help - 0.08% (5)
had - 0.08% (5)
that. - 0.08% (5)
control - 0.08% (5)
second - 0.08% (5)
look - 0.08% (5)
waste - 0.08% (5)
personally - 0.08% (5)
aren’t - 0.06% (4)
intertia - 0.06% (4)
sequence - 0.06% (4)
timeline - 0.06% (4)
improvement - 0.06% (4)
worthy - 0.06% (4)
working - 0.06% (4)
life - 0.06% (4)
clear - 0.06% (4)
going - 0.06% (4)
incremental - 0.06% (4)
pace - 0.06% (4)
performance - 0.06% (4)
thinking - 0.06% (4)
teams - 0.06% (4)
arguments - 0.06% (4)
work? - 0.06% (4)
month - 0.06% (4)
we’ve - 0.06% (4)
competitor - 0.06% (4)
label - 0.06% (4)
maximize - 0.06% (4)
it? - 0.06% (4)
era - 0.06% (4)
selling - 0.06% (4)
transactional - 0.06% (4)
do. - 0.06% (4)
fitness - 0.06% (4)
session - 0.06% (4)
internal - 0.06% (4)
hold - 0.06% (4)
been - 0.06% (4)
recipe - 0.06% (4)
enough - 0.06% (4)
bit - 0.06% (4)
 the - 0.06% (4)
objective - 0.06% (4)
invent - 0.06% (4)
agreement - 0.06% (4)
comes - 0.06% (4)
investment - 0.06% (4)
but, - 0.06% (4)
push - 0.06% (4)
experiments - 0.06% (4)
accountability - 0.06% (4)
solved - 0.06% (4)
these - 0.06% (4)
feelings - 0.06% (4)
hole - 0.06% (4)
intellectual - 0.06% (4)
future. - 0.06% (4)
didn’t - 0.06% (4)
close - 0.06% (4)
pull - 0.06% (4)
we’re - 0.06% (4)
neither - 0.06% (4)
hand - 0.06% (4)
results - 0.06% (4)
“it - 0.06% (4)
swim - 0.06% (4)
drive - 0.06% (4)
easy - 0.06% (4)
starting - 0.06% (4)
constraints - 0.06% (4)
break - 0.06% (4)
solutions - 0.06% (4)
net - 0.06% (4)
2006 - 0.06% (4)
magic - 0.06% (4)
clarity - 0.06% (4)
stream - 0.05% (3)
engage - 0.05% (3)
gannt - 0.05% (3)
then, - 0.05% (3)
to, - 0.05% (3)
fundamental - 0.05% (3)
plenty - 0.05% (3)
deeper - 0.05% (3)
created - 0.05% (3)
become - 0.05% (3)
organization - 0.05% (3)
maps - 0.05% (3)
price - 0.05% (3)
everyone - 0.05% (3)
front. - 0.05% (3)
designed - 0.05% (3)
demonstrate - 0.05% (3)
out. - 0.05% (3)
obsolete - 0.05% (3)
trust-based - 0.05% (3)
fully - 0.05% (3)
reinvent - 0.05% (3)
done. - 0.05% (3)
shipulski - 0.05% (3)
hear - 0.05% (3)
customer, - 0.05% (3)
little - 0.05% (3)
choice - 0.05% (3)
prototype. - 0.05% (3)
questions, - 0.05% (3)
complex - 0.05% (3)
expectations - 0.05% (3)
launch - 0.05% (3)
start. - 0.05% (3)
match - 0.05% (3)
2007 - 0.05% (3)
many - 0.05% (3)
is.  - 0.05% (3)
real - 0.05% (3)
bedrock - 0.05% (3)
bottom - 0.05% (3)
ways - 0.05% (3)
leads - 0.05% (3)
something - 0.05% (3)
back - 0.05% (3)
demands - 0.05% (3)
ibe, - 0.05% (3)
us. - 0.05% (3)
pay - 0.05% (3)
challenges - 0.05% (3)
novel - 0.05% (3)
functional - 0.05% (3)
in. - 0.05% (3)
prevents - 0.05% (3)
scope - 0.05% (3)
perspective - 0.05% (3)
hard - 0.05% (3)
another - 0.05% (3)
well-defined - 0.05% (3)
without - 0.05% (3)
other. - 0.05% (3)
times - 0.05% (3)
one.  - 0.05% (3)
around - 0.05% (3)
depends” - 0.05% (3)
traditional - 0.05% (3)
project, - 0.05% (3)
lean - 0.05% (3)
until - 0.05% (3)
asks - 0.05% (3)
year - 0.05% (3)
creating - 0.05% (3)
rational. - 0.05% (3)
choose - 0.05% (3)
learned - 0.05% (3)
weakness - 0.05% (3)
far - 0.05% (3)
number - 0.05% (3)
less. - 0.05% (3)
imagination, - 0.05% (3)
time, - 0.05% (3)
predictable - 0.05% (3)
knowledge - 0.05% (3)
unknown - 0.05% (3)
between - 0.05% (3)
domains - 0.05% (3)
judgement. - 0.05% (3)
reduction - 0.05% (3)
follow - 0.05% (3)
floor - 0.05% (3)
told - 0.05% (3)
threatened - 0.05% (3)
never - 0.05% (3)
decisions - 0.05% (3)
growth - 0.05% (3)
competitiveness, - 0.05% (3)
8th, - 0.05% (3)
do? - 0.05% (3)
member - 0.05% (3)
someone - 0.05% (3)
planning - 0.05% (3)
space - 0.05% (3)
mike - 0.05% (3)
takes - 0.05% (3)
focus - 0.05% (3)
they’re - 0.05% (3)
stop - 0.05% (3)
idea? - 0.05% (3)
successful - 0.05% (3)
rules - 0.05% (3)
protect - 0.05% (3)
rage - 0.05% (3)
wastes - 0.05% (3)
resources - 0.05% (3)
hypothesis - 0.05% (3)
still - 0.05% (3)
sure, - 0.05% (3)
spend - 0.05% (3)
 when - 0.05% (3)
learning. - 0.05% (3)
trying - 0.05% (3)
thing. - 0.05% (3)
dsps - 0.05% (3)
improved - 0.05% (3)
ones - 0.05% (3)
from - 0.05% (3)
you. - 0.05% (3)
navigate - 0.05% (3)
external - 0.05% (3)
talk - 0.05% (3)
disagreement - 0.05% (3)
rise - 0.05% (3)
seeing - 0.05% (3)
innovate - 0.05% (3)
model, - 0.05% (3)
difference - 0.05% (3)
measured - 0.05% (3)
wrong - 0.05% (3)
models - 0.05% (3)
page - 0.05% (3)
creativity, - 0.05% (3)
seven - 0.05% (3)
single - 0.05% (3)
labelled - 0.05% (3)
costs - 0.05% (3)
instead - 0.05% (3)
powerful - 0.05% (3)
drives - 0.05% (3)
accountable - 0.05% (3)
script - 0.03% (2)
email - 0.03% (2)
independence - 0.03% (2)
effort - 0.03% (2)
built - 0.03% (2)
radical - 0.03% (2)
less-with-far-less - 0.03% (2)
physics - 0.03% (2)
success. - 0.03% (2)
there. - 0.03% (2)
industry. - 0.03% (2)
dfma - 0.03% (2)
dfa - 0.03% (2)
assembly - 0.03% (2)
fundementals - 0.03% (2)
defined. - 0.03% (2)
sets - 0.03% (2)
survey - 0.03% (2)
profits - 0.03% (2)
competitive, - 0.03% (2)
disrupt - 0.03% (2)
ceo - 0.03% (2)
complexity - 0.03% (2)
downstream - 0.03% (2)
figuring - 0.03% (2)
foot - 0.03% (2)
mind - 0.03% (2)
burn - 0.03% (2)
gets - 0.03% (2)
- 0.03% (2)
task. - 0.03% (2)
cannot - 0.03% (2)
voc - 0.03% (2)
hands - 0.03% (2)
eyes - 0.03% (2)
again, - 0.03% (2)
resistance, - 0.03% (2)
self-worth. - 0.03% (2)
element - 0.03% (2)
distill - 0.03% (2)
 and - 0.03% (2)
judged - 0.03% (2)
acknowledge - 0.03% (2)
mapped - 0.03% (2)
up, - 0.03% (2)
that, - 0.03% (2)
starting. - 0.03% (2)
strong - 0.03% (2)
dream - 0.03% (2)
i’m - 0.03% (2)
problems, - 0.03% (2)
says - 0.03% (2)
next? - 0.03% (2)
turns - 0.03% (2)
camp - 0.03% (2)
design; - 0.03% (2)
tasks - 0.03% (2)
everything - 0.03% (2)
courage - 0.03% (2)
dialed - 0.03% (2)
deal - 0.03% (2)
solved.  - 0.03% (2)
risk - 0.03% (2)
whole - 0.03% (2)
robust - 0.03% (2)
works, - 0.03% (2)
goes - 0.03% (2)
impossible - 0.03% (2)
skill - 0.03% (2)
behind - 0.03% (2)
half-life - 0.03% (2)
fix - 0.03% (2)
arguments. - 0.03% (2)
splash - 0.03% (2)
sometimes - 0.03% (2)
1st, - 0.03% (2)
improving - 0.03% (2)
while - 0.03% (2)
kindness, - 0.03% (2)
highly - 0.03% (2)
you, - 0.03% (2)
line, - 0.03% (2)
running - 0.03% (2)
natural - 0.03% (2)
moment, - 0.03% (2)
heat - 0.03% (2)
negativity - 0.03% (2)
accept - 0.03% (2)
personally. - 0.03% (2)
both - 0.03% (2)
anger. - 0.03% (2)
them, - 0.03% (2)
walk - 0.03% (2)
equal - 0.03% (2)
technology - 0.03% (2)
three - 0.03% (2)
innovate, - 0.03% (2)
model. - 0.03% (2)
are, - 0.03% (2)
constraints, - 0.03% (2)
allocate - 0.03% (2)
find - 0.03% (2)
pays - 0.03% (2)
isn’t, - 0.03% (2)
current - 0.03% (2)
hire - 0.03% (2)
ambiguous, - 0.03% (2)
strength - 0.03% (2)
image. - 0.03% (2)
difference. - 0.03% (2)
clear, - 0.03% (2)
(and - 0.03% (2)
state - 0.03% (2)
opposite - 0.03% (2)
well, - 0.03% (2)
products. - 0.03% (2)
minimize - 0.03% (2)
against - 0.03% (2)
return, - 0.03% (2)
way. - 0.03% (2)
middle - 0.03% (2)
couch - 0.03% (2)
always - 0.03% (2)
brain - 0.03% (2)
ourselves - 0.03% (2)
functions - 0.03% (2)
reason - 0.03% (2)
competitors - 0.03% (2)
customers’ - 0.03% (2)
evolutionary - 0.03% (2)
outcomes - 0.03% (2)
creatures - 0.03% (2)
22nd, - 0.03% (2)
connect - 0.03% (2)
development, - 0.03% (2)
landscape - 0.03% (2)
first, - 0.03% (2)
decisions, - 0.03% (2)
being - 0.03% (2)
name - 0.03% (2)
believe - 0.03% (2)
one? - 0.03% (2)
young - 0.03% (2)
weren’t - 0.03% (2)
happen - 0.03% (2)
facilitate - 0.03% (2)
colleague - 0.03% (2)
15th, - 0.03% (2)
resting - 0.03% (2)
do, - 0.03% (2)
learn, - 0.03% (2)
track. - 0.03% (2)
(the - 0.03% (2)
buying - 0.03% (2)
out.  - 0.03% (2)
zero. - 0.03% (2)
outcome, - 0.03% (2)
products, - 0.03% (2)
quantify - 0.03% (2)
are. - 0.03% (2)
makes - 0.03% (2)
yet-to-be - 0.03% (2)
simple, - 0.03% (2)
next.  - 0.03% (2)
effectively - 0.03% (2)
customer. - 0.03% (2)
leader - 0.03% (2)
 at - 0.03% (2)
quick - 0.03% (2)
solution. - 0.03% (2)
self-made - 0.03% (2)
emergent - 0.03% (2)
meet - 0.03% (2)
hanging - 0.03% (2)
changes. - 0.03% (2)
changes, - 0.03% (2)
rather - 0.03% (2)
them.  - 0.03% (2)
review - 0.03% (2)
transcend - 0.03% (2)
limitations - 0.03% (2)
formed - 0.03% (2)
okay - 0.03% (2)
market. - 0.03% (2)
empower - 0.03% (2)
new, - 0.03% (2)
increase - 0.03% (2)
machines - 0.03% (2)
asset - 0.03% (2)
sense, - 0.03% (2)
slash - 0.03% (2)
small - 0.03% (2)
accounting, - 0.03% (2)
seems - 0.03% (2)
toward - 0.03% (2)
bias - 0.03% (2)
planet - 0.03% (2)
matter, - 0.03% (2)
profit, - 0.03% (2)
more, - 0.03% (2)
dollars. - 0.03% (2)
vsm - 0.03% (2)
value - 0.03% (2)
one, - 0.03% (2)
causation - 0.03% (2)
long - 0.03% (2)
wanted - 0.03% (2)
anything - 0.03% (2)
prime - 0.03% (2)
before - 0.03% (2)
quite - 0.03% (2)
almost - 0.03% (2)
directly - 0.03% (2)
enough.  - 0.03% (2)
outside - 0.03% (2)
same - 0.03% (2)
intent - 0.03% (2)
clicks, - 0.03% (2)
themselves. - 0.03% (2)
projects - 0.03% (2)
months. - 0.03% (2)
contact - 0.03% (2)
product. - 0.03% (2)
should - 0.03% (2)
directive - 0.03% (2)
tool - 0.03% (2)
company - 0.03% (2)
expertise - 0.03% (2)
actual - 0.03% (2)
specific - 0.03% (2)
flow - 0.03% (2)
work.  - 0.03% (2)
sessions - 0.03% (2)
marketing, - 0.03% (2)
next, - 0.03% (2)
sales, - 0.03% (2)
trusted - 0.03% (2)
unique - 0.03% (2)
move - 0.03% (2)
circle - 0.03% (2)
intertia, - 0.03% (2)
identify - 0.03% (2)
arrow - 0.03% (2)
draw - 0.03% (2)
blocks - 0.03% (2)
diagram - 0.03% (2)
powered - 0.03% (2)
of the - 0.45% (28)
what is - 0.43% (27)
in the - 0.37% (23)
and the - 0.37% (23)
you can - 0.35% (22)
if you - 0.27% (17)
business model - 0.24% (15)
on the - 0.24% (15)
the business - 0.22% (14)
to the - 0.21% (13)
the customer - 0.21% (13)
and you - 0.21% (13)
you do - 0.21% (13)
it depends - 0.21% (13)
the work - 0.19% (12)
you can’t - 0.19% (12)
how to - 0.19% (12)
what isn’t - 0.18% (11)
no comments - 0.18% (11)
is the - 0.18% (11)
posted in - 0.18% (11)
image credit - 0.18% (11)
comments » - 0.18% (11)
| tags: - 0.18% (11)
new work - 0.16% (10)
must be - 0.16% (10)
figure out - 0.16% (10)
to create - 0.16% (10)
all the - 0.16% (10)
out what - 0.16% (10)
with the - 0.14% (9)
a prototype - 0.14% (9)
with a - 0.14% (9)
it depends. - 0.14% (9)
credit – - 0.14% (9)
you were - 0.14% (9)
financial accounting - 0.14% (9)
you don’t - 0.14% (9)
the only - 0.14% (9)
it does - 0.14% (9)
standard work - 0.13% (8)
work that - 0.13% (8)
can be - 0.13% (8)
the best - 0.13% (8)
at the - 0.13% (8)
when the - 0.13% (8)
and that’s - 0.13% (8)
with innovation - 0.13% (8)
what we - 0.11% (7)
through the - 0.11% (7)
got to - 0.11% (7)
the learning - 0.11% (7)
what’s next - 0.11% (7)
project plan - 0.11% (7)
with innovation, - 0.11% (7)
out of - 0.11% (7)
they are - 0.11% (7)
way to - 0.11% (7)
there are - 0.1% (6)
is and - 0.1% (6)
to get - 0.1% (6)
– what - 0.1% (6)
what is. - 0.1% (6)
the future - 0.1% (6)
asked to - 0.1% (6)
want to - 0.1% (6)
the right - 0.1% (6)
the ibe - 0.1% (6)
and in - 0.1% (6)
ideas are - 0.1% (6)
but you - 0.1% (6)
do what - 0.1% (6)
for the - 0.1% (6)
the domain - 0.1% (6)
about the - 0.1% (6)
if the - 0.1% (6)
be done - 0.1% (6)
last time - 0.1% (6)
the first - 0.1% (6)
accounting systems - 0.08% (5)
end the - 0.08% (5)
able to - 0.08% (5)
and r&d - 0.08% (5)
best to - 0.08% (5)
it’s a - 0.08% (5)
simple prototype - 0.08% (5)
what isn’t. - 0.08% (5)
how much - 0.08% (5)
there is - 0.08% (5)
six sigma - 0.08% (5)
do the - 0.08% (5)
like the - 0.08% (5)
the new - 0.08% (5)
out what’s - 0.08% (5)
define the - 0.08% (5)
to figure - 0.08% (5)
the most - 0.08% (5)
prototypes are - 0.08% (5)
did last - 0.08% (5)
why do - 0.08% (5)
and your - 0.08% (5)
the other - 0.08% (5)
with uncertainty, - 0.08% (5)
return on - 0.08% (5)
were asked - 0.08% (5)
you won’t - 0.06% (4)
worthy of - 0.06% (4)
better to - 0.06% (4)
in what - 0.06% (4)
intellectual intertia - 0.06% (4)
more than - 0.06% (4)
most important - 0.06% (4)
time to - 0.06% (4)
new things - 0.06% (4)
the work. - 0.06% (4)
no one - 0.06% (4)
after the - 0.06% (4)
and to - 0.06% (4)
you’ll be - 0.06% (4)
it’s best - 0.06% (4)
going to - 0.06% (4)
it’s better - 0.06% (4)
the resistance - 0.06% (4)
the answers - 0.06% (4)
the time - 0.06% (4)
up front - 0.06% (4)
best way - 0.06% (4)
the dsp - 0.06% (4)
you knew - 0.06% (4)
problem definition - 0.06% (4)
you had - 0.06% (4)
to have - 0.06% (4)
as they - 0.06% (4)
what you - 0.06% (4)
domain of - 0.06% (4)
them to - 0.06% (4)
the problem - 0.06% (4)
the task - 0.06% (4)
imagine what - 0.06% (4)
what the - 0.06% (4)
– it - 0.06% (4)
but the - 0.06% (4)
of our - 0.06% (4)
by definition, - 0.06% (4)
new concepts - 0.06% (4)
the end - 0.06% (4)
simple prototypes - 0.06% (4)
we’ll do - 0.06% (4)
what to - 0.06% (4)
only thing - 0.06% (4)
may be - 0.06% (4)
that’s why - 0.06% (4)
their anger - 0.06% (4)
to learn - 0.06% (4)
we think - 0.06% (4)
you want - 0.06% (4)
innovation, it - 0.06% (4)
there’s no - 0.06% (4)
are no - 0.06% (4)
how the - 0.06% (4)
learning ratio - 0.06% (4)
why you - 0.06% (4)
you’ve got - 0.06% (4)
time and - 0.05% (3)
imagine the - 0.05% (3)
imagine how - 0.05% (3)
based on - 0.05% (3)
much will - 0.05% (3)
the second - 0.05% (3)
and all - 0.05% (3)
is all - 0.05% (3)
get the - 0.05% (3)
the people - 0.05% (3)
the future. - 0.05% (3)
to innovate - 0.05% (3)
to define - 0.05% (3)
model is - 0.05% (3)
of events - 0.05% (3)
build a - 0.05% (3)
sure what - 0.05% (3)
a prototype. - 0.05% (3)
what it - 0.05% (3)
do next. - 0.05% (3)
business model, - 0.05% (3)
the next - 0.05% (3)
here’s a - 0.05% (3)
by the - 0.05% (3)
what’s next. - 0.05% (3)
create a - 0.05% (3)
fear is - 0.05% (3)
only way - 0.05% (3)
think it’s - 0.05% (3)
design challenges - 0.05% (3)
resistance is - 0.05% (3)
ibe is - 0.05% (3)
build plan - 0.05% (3)
and are - 0.05% (3)
to navigate - 0.05% (3)
internal resistance - 0.05% (3)
what about - 0.05% (3)
it. and - 0.05% (3)
the prototype - 0.05% (3)
will be - 0.05% (3)
to, innovation, - 0.05% (3)
so the - 0.05% (3)
trust-based approach - 0.05% (3)
and then - 0.05% (3)
what will - 0.05% (3)
know the - 0.05% (3)
have all - 0.05% (3)
but it’s - 0.05% (3)
brings the - 0.05% (3)
work to - 0.05% (3)
it, it - 0.05% (3)
our financial - 0.05% (3)
but with - 0.05% (3)
sequence of - 0.05% (3)
is uncertain - 0.05% (3)
and it - 0.05% (3)
8th, 2017 - 0.05% (3)
innovation is - 0.05% (3)
up front. - 0.05% (3)
understand the - 0.05% (3)
resistance and - 0.05% (3)
and so - 0.05% (3)
gannt chart - 0.05% (3)
don’t have - 0.05% (3)
do you - 0.05% (3)
and what - 0.05% (3)
your hypothesis - 0.05% (3)
it is. - 0.05% (3)
a project - 0.05% (3)
but when - 0.05% (3)
have to - 0.05% (3)
you are - 0.05% (3)
maximize the - 0.05% (3)
take it - 0.05% (3)
that do - 0.05% (3)
and start - 0.05% (3)
make a - 0.05% (3)
things as - 0.05% (3)
project planning - 0.05% (3)
they know - 0.05% (3)
that way, - 0.05% (3)
don’t know - 0.05% (3)
them. the - 0.05% (3)
uncertainty | - 0.05% (3)
step one - 0.05% (3)
create new - 0.05% (3)
there was - 0.05% (3)
problem that - 0.05% (3)
that must - 0.05% (3)
tags: competitiveness, - 0.05% (3)
with kindness - 0.05% (3)
uncertainty, the - 0.05% (3)
to you - 0.05% (3)
to break - 0.05% (3)
what do - 0.05% (3)
you take - 0.05% (3)
it personally - 0.05% (3)
and respond - 0.05% (3)
like this - 0.05% (3)
but if - 0.05% (3)
one is - 0.05% (3)
an idea - 0.05% (3)
the other. - 0.05% (3)
will work - 0.05% (3)
work is - 0.05% (3)
seven wastes - 0.05% (3)
they can - 0.05% (3)
line growth - 0.05% (3)
can get - 0.05% (3)
it will - 0.05% (3)
are the - 0.05% (3)
easy to - 0.05% (3)
cost savings - 0.05% (3)
to sell - 0.05% (3)
to like - 0.05% (3)
it’s easy - 0.05% (3)
to run - 0.05% (3)
and you’ll - 0.05% (3)
imagination to - 0.05% (3)
where ideas - 0.05% (3)
because we - 0.05% (3)
we did - 0.05% (3)
can measure - 0.05% (3)
measure it - 0.05% (3)
the world - 0.05% (3)
seeing things - 0.05% (3)
doing new - 0.05% (3)
question – - 0.05% (3)
dfa dfma - 0.03% (2)
floor space - 0.03% (2)
and make - 0.03% (2)
trap prevents - 0.03% (2)
2008 september - 0.03% (2)
2009 november - 0.03% (2)
imagine our - 0.03% (2)
the fear - 0.03% (2)
could be, - 0.03% (2)
a project, - 0.03% (2)
on how - 0.03% (2)
the system - 0.03% (2)
the way - 0.03% (2)
credit — - 0.03% (2)
ibe, problem - 0.03% (2)
sometimes it - 0.03% (2)
seems the - 0.03% (2)
understanding physics - 0.03% (2)
they are, - 0.03% (2)
savings engineering - 0.03% (2)
5 courage - 0.03% (2)
part count - 0.03% (2)
to deal - 0.03% (2)
problems product - 0.03% (2)
the script - 0.03% (2)
that’s new, - 0.03% (2)
all your - 0.03% (2)
are we - 0.03% (2)
we’re going - 0.03% (2)
and live - 0.03% (2)
here’s how - 0.03% (2)
deal with - 0.03% (2)
on our - 0.03% (2)
design for - 0.03% (2)
when we - 0.03% (2)
like it - 0.03% (2)
to work - 0.03% (2)
planning is - 0.03% (2)
there’s a - 0.03% (2)
uncertainty, traditional - 0.03% (2)
be able - 0.03% (2)
break through - 0.03% (2)
work must - 0.03% (2)
difficult to - 0.03% (2)
thing and - 0.03% (2)
the trap - 0.03% (2)
hold yourself - 0.03% (2)
accountable to - 0.03% (2)
ones are - 0.03% (2)
are not - 0.03% (2)
way, a - 0.03% (2)
answers up - 0.03% (2)
you think - 0.03% (2)
you’re worthy - 0.03% (2)
work, you’ll - 0.03% (2)
prototype will - 0.03% (2)
the concept - 0.03% (2)
the middle - 0.03% (2)
figuring out - 0.03% (2)
says it - 0.03% (2)
nothing less. - 0.03% (2)
work and - 0.03% (2)
effort to - 0.03% (2)
plan and - 0.03% (2)
innovation work - 0.03% (2)
ideas aren’t - 0.03% (2)
trust | - 0.03% (2)
like what - 0.03% (2)
a physical - 0.03% (2)
aren’t worth - 0.03% (2)
tags: creativity, - 0.03% (2)
time. the - 0.03% (2)
demands a - 0.03% (2)
i’m not - 0.03% (2)
scope is - 0.03% (2)
the work, - 0.03% (2)
chart is - 0.03% (2)
an “it - 0.03% (2)
thing you - 0.03% (2)
work, the - 0.03% (2)
know how - 0.03% (2)
think you’re - 0.03% (2)
behind it - 0.03% (2)
that is - 0.03% (2)
work with - 0.03% (2)
with standard - 0.03% (2)
the questions - 0.03% (2)
have been - 0.03% (2)
in front - 0.03% (2)
certainty is - 0.03% (2)
intellectual intertia, - 0.03% (2)
events and - 0.03% (2)
culture of - 0.03% (2)
dialed in. - 0.03% (2)
when companies - 0.03% (2)
the scope - 0.03% (2)
designed to - 0.03% (2)
our systems - 0.03% (2)
of uncertainty, - 0.03% (2)
yet to - 0.03% (2)
only the - 0.03% (2)
in it.  - 0.03% (2)
to that - 0.03% (2)
is new - 0.03% (2)
level 5 - 0.03% (2)
works, the - 0.03% (2)
their expertise - 0.03% (2)
use our - 0.03% (2)
to understand - 0.03% (2)
the current - 0.03% (2)
count the - 0.03% (2)
and when - 0.03% (2)
to splash - 0.03% (2)
to swim - 0.03% (2)
without the - 0.03% (2)
domain is - 0.03% (2)
it’s worth - 0.03% (2)
has no - 0.03% (2)
to anger - 0.03% (2)
not the - 0.03% (2)
won’t be - 0.03% (2)
don’t think - 0.03% (2)
up and - 0.03% (2)
personally and - 0.03% (2)
anger personally. - 0.03% (2)
the moment, - 0.03% (2)
but in - 0.03% (2)
no argument - 0.03% (2)
of all - 0.03% (2)
they don’t - 0.03% (2)
live in - 0.03% (2)
top line - 0.03% (2)
companies want - 0.03% (2)
improvement and - 0.03% (2)
quantify the - 0.03% (2)
to improve - 0.03% (2)
just as - 0.03% (2)
performance and - 0.03% (2)
business models - 0.03% (2)
customer and - 0.03% (2)
and business - 0.03% (2)
to innovate, - 0.03% (2)
2017 when - 0.03% (2)
weakness and - 0.03% (2)
business model. - 0.03% (2)
are, uncertainty - 0.03% (2)
the magic - 0.03% (2)
improving what - 0.03% (2)
what isn’t, - 0.03% (2)
to hire - 0.03% (2)
what is, - 0.03% (2)
world of - 0.03% (2)
is better - 0.03% (2)
2017 if - 0.03% (2)
in decisions, - 0.03% (2)
click on - 0.03% (2)
navigate the - 0.03% (2)
experiment where - 0.03% (2)
run an - 0.03% (2)
the wrong - 0.03% (2)
about what - 0.03% (2)
the energy - 0.03% (2)
we try - 0.03% (2)
and must - 0.03% (2)
improved mental - 0.03% (2)
the landscape - 0.03% (2)
fitness is - 0.03% (2)
learning is - 0.03% (2)
eat and - 0.03% (2)
plenty to - 0.03% (2)
to eat - 0.03% (2)
the couch - 0.03% (2)
or your - 0.03% (2)
– do - 0.03% (2)
are two - 0.03% (2)
leads to - 0.03% (2)
as creatures - 0.03% (2)
outcome, your - 0.03% (2)
was no - 0.03% (2)
no market - 0.03% (2)
to help - 0.03% (2)
were told - 0.03% (2)
with new - 0.03% (2)
a session - 0.03% (2)
to facilitate - 0.03% (2)
have the - 0.03% (2)
you thought - 0.03% (2)
your prototype - 0.03% (2)
session to - 0.03% (2)
facilitate a - 0.03% (2)
it was - 0.03% (2)
experiment is - 0.03% (2)
your colleague - 0.03% (2)
to push - 0.03% (2)
there can - 0.03% (2)
and creating - 0.03% (2)
down a - 0.03% (2)
to choose - 0.03% (2)
you learn - 0.03% (2)
0% sure - 0.03% (2)
the one - 0.03% (2)
customers are - 0.03% (2)
the same - 0.03% (2)
competitive, we’ve - 0.03% (2)
problem definition, - 0.03% (2)
our accounting - 0.03% (2)
it’s about - 0.03% (2)
worth is - 0.03% (2)
nothing more, - 0.03% (2)
we make - 0.03% (2)
takes to - 0.03% (2)
look like - 0.03% (2)
the market - 0.03% (2)
it fit - 0.03% (2)
the customer. - 0.03% (2)
measured in - 0.03% (2)
because the - 0.03% (2)
dsp is - 0.03% (2)
makes it - 0.03% (2)
plan is - 0.03% (2)
the build - 0.03% (2)
concepts and - 0.03% (2)
the design - 0.03% (2)
needs and - 0.03% (2)
work together - 0.03% (2)
matter, like - 0.03% (2)
it seems - 0.03% (2)
solutions are - 0.03% (2)
people who - 0.03% (2)
it. imagine - 0.03% (2)
get there. - 0.03% (2)
no way - 0.03% (2)
your best - 0.03% (2)
one you - 0.03% (2)
a product - 0.03% (2)
can’t be - 0.03% (2)
1st, 2017 - 0.03% (2)
work that’s - 0.03% (2)
in their - 0.03% (2)
financial accounting, - 0.03% (2)
the project - 0.03% (2)
profit is - 0.03% (2)
increase the - 0.03% (2)
when doing - 0.03% (2)
to protect - 0.03% (2)
our people - 0.03% (2)
okay to - 0.03% (2)
don’t we - 0.03% (2)
it’s okay - 0.03% (2)
the real - 0.03% (2)
them.  the - 0.03% (2)
sure, you - 0.03% (2)
can say - 0.03% (2)
it and - 0.03% (2)
out how - 0.03% (2)
the block - 0.03% (2)
a single - 0.03% (2)
labelled with - 0.03% (2)
with simple - 0.03% (2)
are labelled - 0.03% (2)
block diagram - 0.03% (2)
prime directive - 0.03% (2)
long as - 0.03% (2)
but that’s - 0.03% (2)
as long - 0.03% (2)
do anything - 0.03% (2)
is out - 0.03% (2)
return, the - 0.03% (2)
what does - 0.03% (2)
energy to - 0.03% (2)
to know - 0.03% (2)
change it. - 0.03% (2)
with an - 0.03% (2)
and test - 0.03% (2)
innovation, intellectual - 0.03% (2)
together to - 0.03% (2)
to develop - 0.03% (2)
once the - 0.03% (2)
of choice - 0.03% (2)
the tool - 0.03% (2)
work the - 0.03% (2)
22nd, 2017 - 0.03% (2)
learning sessions - 0.03% (2)
front of - 0.03% (2)
the bedrock - 0.03% (2)
down to - 0.03% (2)
objective is - 0.03% (2)
approach | - 0.03% (2)
trying to - 0.03% (2)
their work. - 0.03% (2)
and their - 0.03% (2)
the customer, - 0.03% (2)
level of - 0.03% (2)
the sales - 0.03% (2)
sales must - 0.03% (2)
on price - 0.03% (2)
things to - 0.03% (2)
not enough - 0.03% (2)
wastes six - 0.03% (2)
the business model - 0.19% (12)
| no comments - 0.18% (11)
no comments » - 0.18% (11)
image credit – - 0.14% (9)
you were asked - 0.08% (5)
to figure out - 0.08% (5)
were asked to - 0.08% (5)
did last time - 0.08% (5)
out what’s next - 0.08% (5)
figure out what’s - 0.06% (4)
with innovation, it - 0.06% (4)
the learning ratio - 0.06% (4)
the domain of - 0.06% (4)
it’s best to - 0.06% (4)
in what is - 0.06% (4)
worthy of the - 0.06% (4)
you’ve got to - 0.06% (4)
what to do - 0.06% (4)
and that’s why - 0.06% (4)
of the work - 0.06% (4)
the business model, - 0.05% (3)
we’ve got to - 0.05% (3)
we think it’s - 0.05% (3)
our imagination to - 0.05% (3)
take it personally - 0.05% (3)
much will we - 0.05% (3)
must be done - 0.05% (3)
financial accounting systems - 0.05% (3)
to the customer - 0.05% (3)
and you can’t - 0.05% (3)
the most important - 0.05% (3)
on the right - 0.05% (3)
best way to - 0.05% (3)
if it doesn’t - 0.05% (3)
all the answers - 0.05% (3)
through the resistance - 0.05% (3)
things as they - 0.05% (3)
have all the - 0.05% (3)
sequence of events - 0.05% (3)
you can measure - 0.05% (3)
– what is - 0.05% (3)
| tags: competitiveness, - 0.05% (3)
how to, innovation, - 0.05% (3)
we did last - 0.05% (3)
what we did - 0.05% (3)
seeing things as - 0.05% (3)
uncertainty | tags: - 0.05% (3)
the best way - 0.05% (3)
you don’t have - 0.05% (3)
in that way, - 0.05% (3)
that must be - 0.05% (3)
problem that must - 0.05% (3)
you want to - 0.05% (3)
why do we - 0.05% (3)
if you don’t - 0.05% (3)
and if it - 0.05% (3)
companies want to - 0.03% (2)
image credit — - 0.03% (2)
with uncertainty, the - 0.03% (2)
the first trap - 0.03% (2)
we’re going to - 0.03% (2)
resistance is to - 0.03% (2)
only way to - 0.03% (2)
you think you’re - 0.03% (2)
feel worthy of - 0.03% (2)
» with innovation - 0.03% (2)
use our imagination - 0.03% (2)
of the work, - 0.03% (2)
as they are, - 0.03% (2)
it will work - 0.03% (2)
have to like - 0.03% (2)
to be competitive, - 0.03% (2)
wastes six sigma - 0.03% (2)
the end of - 0.03% (2)
got to use - 0.03% (2)
hold yourself accountable - 0.03% (2)
be competitive, we’ve - 0.03% (2)
work, the fear - 0.03% (2)
the resistance and - 0.03% (2)
project plan and - 0.03% (2)
what we’ll do - 0.03% (2)
out what to - 0.03% (2)
you don’t know - 0.03% (2)
a culture of - 0.03% (2)
chart is an - 0.03% (2)
break through the - 0.03% (2)
the answers up - 0.03% (2)
are dialed in. - 0.03% (2)
i’m not sure - 0.03% (2)
the sequence of - 0.03% (2)
the scope is - 0.03% (2)
posted in decisions, - 0.03% (2)
an “it depends” - 0.03% (2)
with standard work, - 0.03% (2)
ideas aren’t worth - 0.03% (2)
new work is - 0.03% (2)
to get there. - 0.03% (2)
that can be - 0.03% (2)
the best ones - 0.03% (2)
think you’re worthy - 0.03% (2)
fear is you - 0.03% (2)
uncertainty, traditional project - 0.03% (2)
choice is the - 0.03% (2)
there’s no way - 0.03% (2)
0% sure of - 0.03% (2)
can be no - 0.03% (2)
personally and respond - 0.03% (2)
you take it - 0.03% (2)
top line growth - 0.03% (2)
you were told - 0.03% (2)
create new concepts - 0.03% (2)
a session to - 0.03% (2)
asked to facilitate - 0.03% (2)
session to create - 0.03% (2)
to facilitate a - 0.03% (2)
to push through - 0.03% (2)
be no argument - 0.03% (2)
learning is zero. - 0.03% (2)
the outcome, your - 0.03% (2)
where you are - 0.03% (2)
and what is - 0.03% (2)
doing new work - 0.03% (2)
try new things - 0.03% (2)
on the couch - 0.03% (2)
what you did - 0.03% (2)
to eat and - 0.03% (2)
to navigate the - 0.03% (2)
improved mental fitness - 0.03% (2)
and must be - 0.03% (2)
run an experiment - 0.03% (2)
want to learn - 0.03% (2)
you run an - 0.03% (2)
experiment where you - 0.03% (2)
of the outcome, - 0.03% (2)
your learning is - 0.03% (2)
there was no - 0.03% (2)
their anger personally. - 0.03% (2)
be able to - 0.03% (2)
in a financial - 0.03% (2)
of choice is - 0.03% (2)
selling on price - 0.03% (2)
in front of - 0.03% (2)
work. when the - 0.03% (2)
brings their expertise - 0.03% (2)
the tool of - 0.03% (2)
to do what - 0.03% (2)
needs and create - 0.03% (2)
trust-based approach | - 0.03% (2)
the design challenges - 0.03% (2)
of the build - 0.03% (2)
the build plan - 0.03% (2)
it fit with - 0.03% (2)
return on investment - 0.03% (2)
what about the - 0.03% (2)
it’s not enough - 0.03% (2)
are labelled with - 0.03% (2)
respond to anger - 0.03% (2)
when companies want - 0.03% (2)
world of what - 0.03% (2)
the world of - 0.03% (2)
best to hire - 0.03% (2)
judgement. image credit - 0.03% (2)
are, uncertainty | - 0.03% (2)
the business model. - 0.03% (2)
to improve product - 0.03% (2)
that’s why you - 0.03% (2)
can’t measure it - 0.03% (2)
sure, you can - 0.03% (2)
figure out why - 0.03% (2)
no one is - 0.03% (2)
is out of - 0.03% (2)
do what you - 0.03% (2)
seven wastes six - 0.03% (2)

Here you can find chart of all your popular one, two and three word phrases. Google and others search engines means your page is about words you use frequently.

Copyright © 2015-2016 hupso.pl. All rights reserved. FB | +G | Twitter

Hupso.pl jest serwisem internetowym, w którym jednym kliknieciem możesz szybko i łatwo sprawdź stronę www pod kątem SEO. Oferujemy darmowe pozycjonowanie stron internetowych oraz wycena domen i stron internetowych. Prowadzimy ranking polskich stron internetowych oraz ranking stron alexa.