3.39 score from hupso.pl for:
repmanblog.com



HTML Content


Titlerep man | one pr man's take on the importance of a good reputation in a world gone mad.

Length: 93, Words: 19
Description pusty

Length: 0, Words: 0
Keywords pusty
Robots
Charset UTF-8
Og Meta - Title exist
Og Meta - Description exist
Og Meta - Site name exist
Tytuł powinien zawierać pomiędzy 10 a 70 znaków (ze spacjami), a mniej niż 12 słów w długości.
Meta opis powinien zawierać pomiędzy 50 a 160 znaków (łącznie ze spacjami), a mniej niż 24 słów w długości.
Kodowanie znaków powinny być określone , UTF-8 jest chyba najlepszy zestaw znaków, aby przejść z powodu UTF-8 jest bardziej międzynarodowy kodowaniem.
Otwarte obiekty wykresu powinny być obecne w stronie internetowej (więcej informacji na temat protokołu OpenGraph: http://ogp.me/)

SEO Content

Words/Characters 5907
Text/HTML 33.87 %
Headings H1 11
H2 1
H3 19
H4 0
H5 0
H6 0
H1
rep man
what’s a poor millennial to do?
not this boomer. not no how. not no way.
“do you swear to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth?”
want fries with that?… we’re out of scruples.
a ray of hope in the morning
making the english language mediocre again
people and culture in 2017: what matters most?
fake news comes to advertising
don’t come around here no more
is hate entering mainstream advertising?
H2
one pr man's take on the importance of a good reputation in a world gone mad.
H3
main menu
post navigation
share this:
share this:
share this:
share this:
share this:
share this:
share this:
share this:
share this:
share this:
about
blogger of the year finalist
repman comedy
subscribe to rep man
blogroll
archives
conflicts policy
H4
H5
H6
strong
and a tip of rep’s critical thinking cap to cat cody for suggesting this post.
today’s guest column was penned by sara whitman, our culture czar

it comes from the top.
but it belongs to the people.
and a tip o’ repman’s cap to chris cody for suggesting this post.
and  a tip of repman’s racing helmet to ann barlow for suggesting this post.
b
and a tip of rep’s critical thinking cap to cat cody for suggesting this post.
today’s guest column was penned by sara whitman, our culture czar

it comes from the top.
but it belongs to the people.
and a tip o’ repman’s cap to chris cody for suggesting this post.
and  a tip of repman’s racing helmet to ann barlow for suggesting this post.
i
em and a tip of rep’s critical thinking cap to cat cody for suggesting this post.
today’s guest column was penned by sara whitman, our culture czar

it comes from the top.
but it belongs to the people.
and a tip o’ repman’s cap to chris cody for suggesting this post.
and  a tip of repman’s racing helmet to ann barlow for suggesting this post.
Bolds strong 7
b 7
i 0
em 7
Zawartość strony internetowej powinno zawierać więcej niż 250 słów, z stopa tekst / kod jest wyższy niż 20%.
Pozycji używać znaczników (h1, h2, h3, ...), aby określić temat sekcji lub ustępów na stronie, ale zwykle, użyj mniej niż 6 dla każdego tagu pozycje zachować swoją stronę zwięzły.
Styl używać silnych i kursywy znaczniki podkreślić swoje słowa kluczowe swojej stronie, ale nie nadużywać (mniej niż 16 silnych tagi i 16 znaczników kursywy)

Statystyki strony

twitter:title pusty
twitter:description pusty
google+ itemprop=name pusty
Pliki zewnętrzne 32
Pliki CSS 7
Pliki javascript 25
Plik należy zmniejszyć całkowite odwołanie plików (CSS + JavaScript) do 7-8 maksymalnie.

Linki wewnętrzne i zewnętrzne

Linki 309
Linki wewnętrzne 4
Linki zewnętrzne 305
Linki bez atrybutu Title 213
Linki z atrybutem NOFOLLOW 0
Linki - Użyj atrybutu tytuł dla każdego łącza. Nofollow link jest link, który nie pozwala wyszukiwarkom boty zrealizują są odnośniki no follow. Należy zwracać uwagę na ich użytkowania

Linki wewnętrzne

skip to primary content #content
skip to secondary content #secondary
#admired-top
cancel #cancel

Linki zewnętrzne

rep man http://www.repmanblog.com/
home http://www.repmanblog.com/
about http://www.repmanblog.com/about
older posts http://www.repmanblog.com/page/2
what’s a poor millennial to do? http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2017/05/whats-a-poor-millennial-to-do.html
http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2017/05/whats-a-poor-millennial-to-do.html
steve cody http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/author/steve-cody
alarming intelligence from the advertising agency, hill holiday http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2017/05/do-you-swear-to-tell-the-truth-the-whole-truth-and-nothing-but-the-truth.html
troubling new research from research now https://www.agilitypr.com/pr-news/public-relations/fake-news-half-millennials-struggle-news-literacy/
https://www.buzzfeed.com/janelytvynenko/fake-news-quiz-may15?utm_term=.mqlmq12x0#.tf04j5q0j https://www.buzzfeed.com/janelytvynenko/fake-news-quiz-may15?utm_term=.mqlmq12x0#.tf04j5q0j
www.ipr.org http://www.ipr.org
www.awps.org http://www.awps.org
www.prcouncil.net http://www.prcouncil.net
www.caprsa.com http://www.caprsa.com
google http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2017/05/whats-a-poor-millennial-to-do.html?share=google-plus-1
print http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2017/05/whats-a-poor-millennial-to-do.html
facebook http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2017/05/whats-a-poor-millennial-to-do.html?share=facebook
email http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2017/05/whats-a-poor-millennial-to-do.html?share=email
twitter http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2017/05/whats-a-poor-millennial-to-do.html?share=twitter
linkedin http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2017/05/whats-a-poor-millennial-to-do.html?share=linkedin
uncategorized http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/category/uncategorized
8 replies http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2017/05/whats-a-poor-millennial-to-do.html#comments
not this boomer. not no how. not no way. http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2017/05/not-this-boomer-not-no-how-not-no-way.html
http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2017/05/not-this-boomer-not-no-how-not-no-way.html
steve cody http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/author/steve-cody
eyes drift. marketers stick to tv https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/14/business/media/advertisers-streaming-video-broadcast-tv.html
google http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2017/05/not-this-boomer-not-no-how-not-no-way.html?share=google-plus-1
print http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2017/05/not-this-boomer-not-no-how-not-no-way.html
facebook http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2017/05/not-this-boomer-not-no-how-not-no-way.html?share=facebook
email http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2017/05/not-this-boomer-not-no-how-not-no-way.html?share=email
twitter http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2017/05/not-this-boomer-not-no-how-not-no-way.html?share=twitter
linkedin http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2017/05/not-this-boomer-not-no-how-not-no-way.html?share=linkedin
uncategorized http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/category/uncategorized
5 replies http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2017/05/not-this-boomer-not-no-how-not-no-way.html#comments
“do you swear to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth?” http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2017/05/do-you-swear-to-tell-the-truth-the-whole-truth-and-nothing-but-the-truth.html
http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2017/05/do-you-swear-to-tell-the-truth-the-whole-truth-and-nothing-but-the-truth.html
steve cody http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/author/steve-cody
the arthur w. page society http://www.awpagesociety.com/
google http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2017/05/do-you-swear-to-tell-the-truth-the-whole-truth-and-nothing-but-the-truth.html?share=google-plus-1
print http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2017/05/do-you-swear-to-tell-the-truth-the-whole-truth-and-nothing-but-the-truth.html
facebook http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2017/05/do-you-swear-to-tell-the-truth-the-whole-truth-and-nothing-but-the-truth.html?share=facebook
email http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2017/05/do-you-swear-to-tell-the-truth-the-whole-truth-and-nothing-but-the-truth.html?share=email
twitter http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2017/05/do-you-swear-to-tell-the-truth-the-whole-truth-and-nothing-but-the-truth.html?share=twitter
linkedin http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2017/05/do-you-swear-to-tell-the-truth-the-whole-truth-and-nothing-but-the-truth.html?share=linkedin
uncategorized http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/category/uncategorized
4 replies http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2017/05/do-you-swear-to-tell-the-truth-the-whole-truth-and-nothing-but-the-truth.html#comments
want fries with that?… we’re out of scruples. http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2017/05/want-fries-with-that-were-out-of-scruples.html
http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2017/05/want-fries-with-that-were-out-of-scruples.html
steve cody http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/author/steve-cody
- http://www.repmanblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/carl-junior.jpg
food instead of boobs http://adage.com/article/cmo-strategy/food-boobs-carl-s-jr-hardees/308464/
global coffee campaign http://www.adweek.com/creativity/new-love-affair-brewing-over-cup-nescaf-12757/
how the baby back rib burger was born https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nbpqxwgaoo8
google http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2017/05/want-fries-with-that-were-out-of-scruples.html?share=google-plus-1
print http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2017/05/want-fries-with-that-were-out-of-scruples.html
facebook http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2017/05/want-fries-with-that-were-out-of-scruples.html?share=facebook
email http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2017/05/want-fries-with-that-were-out-of-scruples.html?share=email
twitter http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2017/05/want-fries-with-that-were-out-of-scruples.html?share=twitter
linkedin http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2017/05/want-fries-with-that-were-out-of-scruples.html?share=linkedin
uncategorized http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/category/uncategorized
leave a reply http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2017/05/want-fries-with-that-were-out-of-scruples.html#respond
a ray of hope in the morning http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2017/05/a-ray-of-hope-in-the-morning.html
http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2017/05/a-ray-of-hope-in-the-morning.html
steve cody http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/author/steve-cody
- http://www.repmanblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/cbs_this_morning_logo.png
kicking some serious butt http://www.adweek.com/tv-video/cbs-successfully-reinvigorated-its-morning-show-by-going-back-to-the-basics-and-covering-news/
google http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2017/05/a-ray-of-hope-in-the-morning.html?share=google-plus-1
print http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2017/05/a-ray-of-hope-in-the-morning.html
facebook http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2017/05/a-ray-of-hope-in-the-morning.html?share=facebook
email http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2017/05/a-ray-of-hope-in-the-morning.html?share=email
twitter http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2017/05/a-ray-of-hope-in-the-morning.html?share=twitter
linkedin http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2017/05/a-ray-of-hope-in-the-morning.html?share=linkedin
uncategorized http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/category/uncategorized
4 replies http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2017/05/a-ray-of-hope-in-the-morning.html#comments
making the english language mediocre again http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2017/05/making-the-english-language-mediocre-again.html
http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2017/05/making-the-english-language-mediocre-again.html
steve cody http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/author/steve-cody
researchers at carnegie mellon university https://www.cmu.edu/news/stories/archives/2016/march/speechifying.html
trump’s mangling madness, says times columnist charles m. blow https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/01/opinion/donald-trump-degradation-of-the-language.html?_r=0
google http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2017/05/making-the-english-language-mediocre-again.html?share=google-plus-1
print http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2017/05/making-the-english-language-mediocre-again.html
facebook http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2017/05/making-the-english-language-mediocre-again.html?share=facebook
email http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2017/05/making-the-english-language-mediocre-again.html?share=email
twitter http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2017/05/making-the-english-language-mediocre-again.html?share=twitter
linkedin http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2017/05/making-the-english-language-mediocre-again.html?share=linkedin
uncategorized http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/category/uncategorized
1 reply http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2017/05/making-the-english-language-mediocre-again.html#comments
people and culture in 2017: what matters most? http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2017/04/people-and-culture-in-2017-what-matters-most.html
http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2017/04/people-and-culture-in-2017-what-matters-most.html
steve cody http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/author/steve-cody
pomello https://blog.pomello.com/people-management-in-2017-survey-results-and-analysis/
a report http://try.pomello.com/people-management-2017/
google http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2017/04/people-and-culture-in-2017-what-matters-most.html?share=google-plus-1
print http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2017/04/people-and-culture-in-2017-what-matters-most.html
facebook http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2017/04/people-and-culture-in-2017-what-matters-most.html?share=facebook
email http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2017/04/people-and-culture-in-2017-what-matters-most.html?share=email
twitter http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2017/04/people-and-culture-in-2017-what-matters-most.html?share=twitter
linkedin http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2017/04/people-and-culture-in-2017-what-matters-most.html?share=linkedin
uncategorized http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/category/uncategorized
leave a reply http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2017/04/people-and-culture-in-2017-what-matters-most.html#respond
fake news comes to advertising http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2017/04/fake-news-comes-to-advertising.html
http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2017/04/fake-news-comes-to-advertising.html
steve cody http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/author/steve-cody
check out the spot http://www.bizjournals.com/chicago/news/2017/02/27/the-eyes-have-it-in-allergans-new-ad-campaign-from.html
google http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2017/04/fake-news-comes-to-advertising.html?share=google-plus-1
print http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2017/04/fake-news-comes-to-advertising.html
facebook http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2017/04/fake-news-comes-to-advertising.html?share=facebook
email http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2017/04/fake-news-comes-to-advertising.html?share=email
twitter http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2017/04/fake-news-comes-to-advertising.html?share=twitter
linkedin http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2017/04/fake-news-comes-to-advertising.html?share=linkedin
uncategorized http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/category/uncategorized
don’t come around here no more http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2017/04/dont-come-around-here-no-more.html
http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2017/04/dont-come-around-here-no-more.html
steve cody http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/author/steve-cody
4.3 million fewer people are expected to visit the u.s. this year https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/capitalbusiness/after-trumps-travel-ban-tourism-outfits-say-that-brand-usa-has-taken-a-hit/2017/04/14/d0eebf4e-158e-11e7-833c-503e1f6394c9_story.html?utm_term=.1e53cfbcb3ee
the trump slump http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-travel-slump-2017-story.html
google http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2017/04/dont-come-around-here-no-more.html?share=google-plus-1
print http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2017/04/dont-come-around-here-no-more.html
facebook http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2017/04/dont-come-around-here-no-more.html?share=facebook
email http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2017/04/dont-come-around-here-no-more.html?share=email
twitter http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2017/04/dont-come-around-here-no-more.html?share=twitter
linkedin http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2017/04/dont-come-around-here-no-more.html?share=linkedin
uncategorized http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/category/uncategorized
is hate entering mainstream advertising? http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2017/04/is-hate-entering-mainstream-advertising.html
http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2017/04/is-hate-entering-mainstream-advertising.html
steve cody http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/author/steve-cody
google http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2017/04/is-hate-entering-mainstream-advertising.html?share=google-plus-1
print http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2017/04/is-hate-entering-mainstream-advertising.html
facebook http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2017/04/is-hate-entering-mainstream-advertising.html?share=facebook
email http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2017/04/is-hate-entering-mainstream-advertising.html?share=email
twitter http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2017/04/is-hate-entering-mainstream-advertising.html?share=twitter
linkedin http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2017/04/is-hate-entering-mainstream-advertising.html?share=linkedin
uncategorized http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/category/uncategorized
2 http://www.repmanblog.com/page/2
3 http://www.repmanblog.com/page/3
4 http://www.repmanblog.com/page/4
next › http://www.repmanblog.com/page/2
last » http://www.repmanblog.com/page/237
- http://www.repmanblog.com/about
more about steve http://www.repmanblog.com/about
- http://www.prnewsonline.com/featured/2012/10/01/2012-digital-pr-awards-blogger/
- http://www.repmancomedy.com/
feedblitz http://www.feedblitz.com
- http://feeds.feedburner.com/repmanblog
- http://my.msn.com/addtomymsn.armx?id=rss&ut=http://feeds.feedburner.com/repman&tt=centraldirectory&ru=http://rss.msn.com'
- http://add.my.yahoo.com/rss?url=http://feeds.feedburner.com/repman
- http://fusion.google.com/add?feedurl=http://feeds.feedburner.com/repmanblog
the innovation mill http://theinnovationmill.com
priscope http://www.priscope.com
about you blog http://www.aboutyoublog.com
intake http://intakeinsidedge.net
pepperdigital http://www.pepperdigitalblog.com
f.a.d.s. the fight against destructive spin http://spinsucks.com
reputationxchange http://reputationxchange.com
media nation http://www.dankennedy.com
holmes report blog http://blog.holmesreport.com/index.php/author/pholmes/
pr squared http://www.pr-squared.com
jim carroll http://www.jimcarroll.com/blog/#
my three cents http://makovskyblog.blogspot.com/
propr http://propr.ca
may 2017 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2017/05
april 2017 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2017/04
march 2017 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2017/03
february 2017 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2017/02
january 2017 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2017/01
december 2016 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2016/12
november 2016 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2016/11
october 2016 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2016/10
september 2016 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2016/09
august 2016 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2016/08
july 2016 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2016/07
june 2016 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2016/06
may 2016 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2016/05
april 2016 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2016/04
march 2016 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2016/03
february 2016 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2016/02
january 2016 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2016/01
december 2015 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2015/12
november 2015 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2015/11
october 2015 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2015/10
september 2015 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2015/09
august 2015 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2015/08
july 2015 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2015/07
june 2015 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2015/06
may 2015 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2015/05
april 2015 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2015/04
march 2015 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2015/03
february 2015 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2015/02
january 2015 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2015/01
december 2014 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2014/12
november 2014 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2014/11
october 2014 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2014/10
september 2014 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2014/09
august 2014 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2014/08
july 2014 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2014/07
june 2014 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2014/06
may 2014 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2014/05
april 2014 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2014/04
march 2014 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2014/03
february 2014 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2014/02
january 2014 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2014/01
december 2013 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2013/12
november 2013 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2013/11
october 2013 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2013/10
september 2013 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2013/09
august 2013 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2013/08
july 2013 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2013/07
june 2013 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2013/06
may 2013 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2013/05
april 2013 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2013/04
march 2013 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2013/03
february 2013 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2013/02
january 2013 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2013/01
december 2012 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2012/12
november 2012 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2012/11
october 2012 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2012/10
september 2012 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2012/09
august 2012 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2012/08
july 2012 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2012/07
june 2012 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2012/06
may 2012 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2012/05
april 2012 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2012/04
march 2012 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2012/03
february 2012 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2012/02
january 2012 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2012/01
december 2011 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2011/12
november 2011 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2011/11
october 2011 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2011/10
september 2011 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2011/09
august 2011 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2011/08
july 2011 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2011/07
june 2011 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2011/06
may 2011 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2011/05
april 2011 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2011/04
march 2011 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2011/03
february 2011 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2011/02
january 2011 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2011/01
december 2010 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2010/12
november 2010 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2010/11
october 2010 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2010/10
september 2010 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2010/09
august 2010 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2010/08
july 2010 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2010/07
june 2010 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2010/06
may 2010 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2010/05
april 2010 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2010/04
march 2010 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2010/03
february 2010 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2010/02
january 2010 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2010/01
december 2009 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2009/12
november 2009 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2009/11
october 2009 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2009/10
september 2009 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2009/09
august 2009 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2009/08
july 2009 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2009/07
june 2009 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2009/06
may 2009 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2009/05
april 2009 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2009/04
march 2009 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2009/03
february 2009 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2009/02
january 2009 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2009/01
december 2008 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2008/12
november 2008 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2008/11
october 2008 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2008/10
september 2008 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2008/09
august 2008 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2008/08
july 2008 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2008/07
june 2008 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2008/06
may 2008 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2008/05
april 2008 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2008/04
march 2008 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2008/03
february 2008 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2008/02
january 2008 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2008/01
december 2007 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2007/12
november 2007 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2007/11
october 2007 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2007/10
september 2007 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2007/09
august 2007 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2007/08
july 2007 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2007/07
june 2007 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2007/06
may 2007 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2007/05
april 2007 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2007/04
march 2007 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2007/03
february 2007 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2007/02
january 2007 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2007/01
december 2006 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2006/12
november 2006 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2006/11
october 2006 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2006/10
september 2006 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2006/09
august 2006 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2006/08
july 2006 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2006/07
june 2006 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2006/06
may 2006 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2006/05
april 2006 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2006/04
march 2006 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2006/03
february 2006 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2006/02
january 2006 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2006/01
december 2005 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2005/12
november 2005 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2005/11
october 2005 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2005/10
september 2005 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2005/09
august 2005 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2005/08
july 2005 http://www.repmanblog.com/repman/2005/07
rep man http://www.repmanblog.com/
admired theme http://wp-ultra.com/

Zdjęcia

Zdjęcia 17
Zdjęcia bez atrybutu ALT 14
Zdjęcia bez atrybutu TITLE 17
Korzystanie Obraz ALT i TITLE atrybutu dla każdego obrazu.

Zdjęcia bez atrybutu TITLE

http://www.repmanblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/wgfnews-300x162.jpg
http://www.repmanblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/5f7d7faa-cb93-43c2-801b-3a0932f6c35b-2060x1236-300x180.jpeg
http://www.repmanblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/data-the-fake-economy-2017.png
http://www.repmanblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/carl-junior-300x192.jpg
http://www.repmanblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/cbs_this_morning_logo-300x179.png
http://www.repmanblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/0907rich-master675-1.jpg
http://www.repmanblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/people-management-control-or-anatomy.jpg
http://www.repmanblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/amelia-earhart-2.jpg
http://www.repmanblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/welcome-go_away-1024x768.jpg
http://www.repmanblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/stevecody_336x336_11462.jpg
http://www.repmanblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/site_aside_blogger-of-the-year.jpg
http://www.repmanblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/site_aside_repmancomedy.gif
http://www.feedburner.com/fb/images/pub/flchklt.gif
http://sc.msn.com/c/rss/rss_mymsn.gif
http://us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/my/addtomyyahoo4.gif
http://buttons.googlesyndication.com/fusion/add.gif
http://www.repmanblog.com/wp-content/plugins/jetpack/modules/sharedaddy/images/loading.gif

Zdjęcia bez atrybutu ALT

http://www.repmanblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/wgfnews-300x162.jpg
http://www.repmanblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/5f7d7faa-cb93-43c2-801b-3a0932f6c35b-2060x1236-300x180.jpeg
http://www.repmanblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/data-the-fake-economy-2017.png
http://www.repmanblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/carl-junior-300x192.jpg
http://www.repmanblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/cbs_this_morning_logo-300x179.png
http://www.repmanblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/0907rich-master675-1.jpg
http://www.repmanblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/people-management-control-or-anatomy.jpg
http://www.repmanblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/amelia-earhart-2.jpg
http://www.repmanblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/welcome-go_away-1024x768.jpg
http://www.repmanblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/stevecody_336x336_11462.jpg
http://www.repmanblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/site_aside_blogger-of-the-year.jpg
http://www.feedburner.com/fb/images/pub/flchklt.gif
http://sc.msn.com/c/rss/rss_mymsn.gif
http://us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/my/addtomyyahoo4.gif

Ranking:


Alexa Traffic
Daily Global Rank Trend
Daily Reach (Percent)









Majestic SEO











Text on page:

rep man one pr man's take on the importance of a good reputation in a world gone mad. main menu skip to primary content skip to secondary content homeabout search post navigation ← older posts may 22 what’s a poor millennial to do? posted on may 22, 2017 by steve cody last week i shared some rather alarming intelligence from the advertising agency, hill holiday, warning brands of all stripes about the severe implications of being caught creating or sharing fake news. the hh research said consumers will drop brands that share fake news faster than trump dumped former fbi director james comey a week or so ago. troubling new research from research now has only fanned the flames. it shows that millennials, in particular, struggle when it comes to determining what’s real and what isn’t. considering so many millennials are being asked to disseminate news on both the client and agency sides of our august industry, that’s akin to pouring gasoline on fire (i.e. if millennial communicators can’t tell what’s true and what isn’t, what’s to prevent them from unknowingly sharing fake news on their company’s/client’s social channels and damaging, if not destroying, long-standing relationships between the brand and its constituents?). it turns out the 1,100 millennials surveyed struggle to determine what’s real and what isn’t. that’s because they aren’t being taught the critical thinking skills that were part and parcel of every college curriculum prior to their arrival on campuses a decade or so back. in fact, 44 percent of the millennials surveyed by research now received an “f” when the company evaluated their critical thinking skills and the ability to identify fake news. and, only 36 percent of millennials surveyed said they were well-trained in critical thinking. indeed, a shocking 37 percent readily admitted to having already shared fake news on their social channels. holy mega disaster in the making, batman! critical thinking, you see, is paramount in determining if what one reads is true or false. and, according to the world economic forum, next to complex problem-solving, critical thinking will be the second most important skill a college graduate will need to possess in 2020. so, what’s a poor millennial to do? in my mind, the answer is elementary, my dear watson. do what every trained journalist is required to do before filing a story of any type: verify the news from a trusted second source. so, if like most millennials, you rely solely on social media news for information and entertainment, admit to routinely sharing that online content (55 percent) or have already accidentally shared fake news (36 percent), just do the right thing. double check the “news” with articles in the wall street journal, the new york times, a trusted industry trade publication or another source whose integrity for accuracy is impeccable. if it doesn’t pass the sniff test, hit delete. having said that, ferreting out fake news is a challenge for communicators of all ages. see how well you fare in this test of recent events: https://www.buzzfeed.com/janelytvynenko/fake-news-quiz-may15?utm_term=.mqlmq12x0#.tf04j5q0j i won’t tell you my score. if i did, i’d probably be interviewing for a job at edelman as we speak. sadly, this is no laughing matter. in fact, it’s an issue that should concern our industry’s top trade groups ranging from the institute for public relations (www.ipr.org) and the arthur w. page society (www.awps.org) to the pr council (www.prcouncil.net) and prsa’s counselors academy (www.caprsa.com.) pr professionals pride ourselves on being the ethical and moral compass of the organization. how can we continue to say that if young practitioners no longer possess built-in bs detectors? last, but not least, this should be a clarion call to the pr, journalism, communications and marketing academics who are (or, as the study suggests, aren’t) teaching students to develop critical thinking abilities. that’s where the crux of the problem begins and that’s where it should be immediately addressed. by the time we hire millennials, their sloppy news-checking habits have already been formed. and, unless we insist they check and re-check facts before passing them along, you’ll see more and more organizations take a huge hit for spreading fake news (and firing the agencies who enabled it to happen). and a tip of rep’s critical thinking cap to cat cody for suggesting this post. share this:googleprintfacebookemailtwitterlinkedin posted in uncategorized | 8 replies may 16 not this boomer. not no how. not no way. posted on may 16, 2017 by steve cody yesterday’s new york times article, headlined “eyes drift. marketers stick to tv” had this boomer/blogger executing a classic double take. in sum, the article says that, even though tv ratings are collapsing, media stocks are failing and core cutting is accelerating, major advertisers are continuing to pour billions and billions of dollars into, get this, broadcast television. in fact, major marketers just plunked down a cool $9 billion dollars to sponsor shows on abc, cbs, abc and fox. this, despite the fact that tv’s number one show, ‘the big bang theory,’ has a median viewing age of 55. so, why do smart cmo’s, whose average mayfly-like lifespan is shorter than any other member of the c-suite, continue to dump mega dollars into a medium a pivotal research analyst described as “…archaic as water flowing through pipes”? there are several reasons: – network sales directors correctly point out that they, and they alone, provide premium content that is professionally produced, vetted and won’t be an issue for your brand to be associated with (a biggie considering the flak facebook in particular has received after allowing live videos of murders and suicides to appear right alongside digital ads). – while digital may be the darling of the day, it still trails traditional advertising spending by a whopping 11 percent. so much for the mindset that all things must be digital right now. while i can understand why advertisers prefer tv to digital, especially when it comes to reaching boomers, i must tell you i despise commercials. i don’t watch a single “live” major network program; i opt opt instead to dvr my favorite cable programs, and view them when i can. and, when i can, i immediately fast forward every, single commercial. so, for now, there remains a colossal number of boomers (and their younger brethren, the so often overlooked gen xers), who still watch the mediocre mix of recycled: –  ‘csi: benton harbor’ spin-offs –  oh-so-predictable ‘bull’ courtroom dramas –  moronic sitcoms and reality shows. i can tell these network advertisers one thing for sure: their days are numbered. while “the base” may still enjoy “dancing with the has-beens and never were”, their millennial and generation z kids aren’t going anywhere near tv sets. and, discerning boomers and gen xers will continue to dvr their favorite shows and blow past commercials faster than the white house disavowed trump’s sharing top state secrets with visiting russian diplomats. network tv is reaping the rewards of the final days of the horse-and-buggy era. while they can still count on money pouring into their coffers in the short term, the handwriting is on the wall (or on the i8. take your pick). digital is coming. and, guys like me are leaving. the sooner boomer bloggers like me die off (or descend into senility), the sooner networks will have to face facts: the big bang theory, and the advertisers who support it, will disappear. it’ll be a big bang of advertising. and, it’s coming soon to a theatre near you. hello digital. bye-bye broadcast. share this:googleprintfacebookemailtwitterlinkedin posted in uncategorized | 5 replies may 15 “do you swear to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth?” posted on may 15, 2017 by steve cody last week’s shenanigans in the west wing reinforced what’s been happening across all pillars of society for the past few years: the rise of fake news and the demise of truth. there are lots of fingers to be pointed at lots of ersatz sources on both the left and right wings of our highly polarized society, but i’ve yet to see an analysis of the potential impact of false news on corporate america. hill holliday just filled that gap by surveying 540 americans aged 18-61. as you see from the infographic below, americans have had it with fakery. and, woe betide the organization that is caught creating, or forwarding, fake news. when asked if a brand they loved presented fake content: –              59 percent of respondents said they’d stop shopping with that brand. –              36 percent would stop following the brand on social media. –              30 percent would delete the brand’s app. holy dire consequences, batman! and holy opportunity for the chief communications officer (cco) and her pr partners! the arthur w. page society in particular, and our profession in general, has long advocated on behalf of the role of the cco and, positioned the “title” as being the conscience of an organization. clearly, the cco’s role has never been more important. cover-up unethical practices, share false, negative information about a competitor or boast that your product, service or company is something that it’s not, and the fallout won’t be temporary. massive amounts of stakeholders will cut you off. permanently. your sales, stock price and reputation will experience a nuclear winter. and guess who many ceos will blame? the cco and her agency. these are the times that try men’s (and women’s) souls, but it’s also the time for ccos and their agency partners to rise to the occasion. if you see something that seems fishy, say something. push back. verify and re-verify. refuse to lie or spread fake news. if you’re on the agency side, resign the account post haste. i don’t know about you, but i can’t think of a single client that can afford a 59 percent decline in sales. and, i don’t know of a single agency that could survive the fallout of having aided and abetted a client organization in spreading fake news. share this:googleprintfacebookemailtwitterlinkedin posted in uncategorized | 4 replies may 10 want fries with that?… we’re out of scruples. posted on may 10, 2017 by steve cody today’s guest blog was written by matt lester, peppercomm’s creative director.  for quite some time the carl’s jr. burger chain had been the king of sexist, soft-porn marketing. so, i suppose they can be commended for emphasizing food instead of boobs in their latest campaign. going back to their roots of solid, innovative, good food with a sense of humor was a smart step in the right direction, albeit forced by consumer data more than from the heart. through a well-produced pairing of a seemingly honorable, can-do carl sr. and entitled slacker carl jr., they set up a classic sitcom conflict by leveraging the generational differences between a baby-boomer dad and his millennial son. i was actually looking forward to what’s next in the series. let’s not heap too much praise on one, admittedly well done film. having been part of a global coffee campaign that ran nearly two dozen episodes in the states alone, i know a thing or two about serial commercials. the question of what’s next is exactly what should be on the minds of every one of your viewers at the end of each film. diligently establish full characters and they’ll practically write the scripts for you. carl sr. was introduced as the classic, righteous, all-american hero arriving just in the nick of time to save the company from certainly failure. a man who stands tall for his principles, does the right thing for himself, his family and the public at large. well, that’s who i thought he was until i saw the latest installment explaining how the baby back rib burger was born. here’s yet another example of our new world order where the less scruples you have, the more you’re celebrated at the highest levels of society. where the old definition of the classic hero fighting for fairness and what’s right is turned into a joke. in this film, the two carls team up to blatantly steal a, “million-dollar idea” from a hard-working short order cook and then cowardly run away. to add insult to injury, it’s not enough to take advantage of the guy and leave him with nothing, he’s made to look the fool and humiliated in the closing scene. most cmo’s and cco’s know that the importance of what a company stands for is at an all-time high and rising. carl’s jr. had a perfect opportunity to establish a new purpose, one about a belief in honest, good food at a good value. instead, their agency stole that chance from them by portraying their founder as being just as lazy, irresponsible and selfish as his spoiled kid. ray kroc is reported to have once said, “if i see my competition drowning, i’ll stick a hose in their mouth.” sadly, i guess that’s carl’s jr.’s new mission, their new purpose. dare i say, it almost makes me miss the boobs. share this:googleprintfacebookemailtwitterlinkedin posted in uncategorized | leave a reply may 09 a ray of hope in the morning posted on may 9, 2017 by steve cody i was pleasantly surprised to read that my favorite morning news show, cbs this morning is kicking some serious butt. i’ve been attracted to the morning show ever since cbs completely changed the format in 2011 and added the distinguished charlie rose as their anchor. rose is flanked by longtime washington insider, norah o’donnell, and oprah’s bff, gayle king, who also happens to be a formidable interviewer. what makes cbs this morning different, and far better, than it’s network rivals is its intense focus on news (at least for the first half hour). so, while gma is reporting on kelly’s new co-host and the today show cast is busy making each other laugh, rose & co. are taking care of business. the program begins with a snapshot of the lead news stories of the day called, “your world in 90 seconds.” if i have time for nothing else, i know i can count on that first minute-and-a-half to bring me up-to-speed. typically, i watch 15 minutes or so of cbs this morning. then i check my feeds from the skimm, bbc america, the new york times, the wall street journal, advertising age and adweek. with that kind of download, i’m locked and loaded with the information i need to counsel clients, suggest new ideas for my firm and be prepared to discuss just about any topic of the day at a new business meeting. according to adweek, i’m not the only one who’s discovered this gem in a sea of superficiality in the morning. check these facts: rose & co. are delivering the biggest viewership for cbs morning shows in 30 years. it’s the only one of the three major network morning shows to grow viewership in the past five years. it’s the only morning show to have gained viewers with both the coveted 25-54 age demographic and with women. abc and nbc plummeted by an average of 25 percent with the same cohorts. cbs this morning is an oasis in the desert. its remarkable success gives me hope there’s a growing number of americans who prefer smart, hard news to start their days (as opposed to the pablum served up by nbc and abc or the polarizing content found on fox and msnbc). one final point: cbs this morning has also attracted 10 new, blue chip advertisers this year. as cbs-tv president of sales, jo ann ross summarized: “every category is now interested. they know they are getting an educated and intelligent audience.” here’s hoping the powers-that-be at cbs continue to double down and invest in a traditional medium that’s keeping pace with anything digital has to offer. ### share this:googleprintfacebookemailtwitterlinkedin posted in uncategorized | 4 replies may 01 making the english language mediocre again posted on may 1, 2017 by steve cody name the only president in american history whose words and grammar were worse than those of donald j. trump? according to researchers at carnegie mellon university, that dubious distinction belongs to 43, otherwise known as george w. bush. carnegie mellon researchers say that presidential candidates “…routinely use words and phrases of students in grades 6-8.” not the donald. cmu academics say trump’s vocabulary lags behind even those lowly standards. but, there’s a method to trump’s mangling madness, says times columnist charles m. blow, who described trump’s tweets as “…a jumble of incomplete thoughts stitched together with arrogance and ignorance.” his words. not mine. trump’s short, and rambling, tweets emphasize certainty and determination, built upon layer and layer, like (ironically) bricks in a wall,” wrote nyt ceo, mark thompson. “it’s a style that students of rhetoric call parataxis (note to self: call primary care doctor to see if i’ve been inoculated against this disease). thompson says parataxis is “….an age-old style used by generals and dictators alike who have used it to distinguish themselves from the caviling civilians they mean to sweep away.” yikes, i don’t know if i’m more perplexed by the phrase sweep away or the adjective caviling (note: i must admit to having had to research the latter, which means whimpering or whining). i’ll have to work that gem of a word into my next cocktail reception discussion with my fellow, long-suffering jets fans (“c’mon, guys. let’s admit it. we’re just a bunch of caviling cry babies.”). that’ll be right after i invoke the late spiro t. agnew’s description of the media as, “nattering nabobs of negativity.” what is it with republicans and their contempt of mainstream media? regardless of the gibberish and double talk, trump’s base eats up his tweets, even if they’re: – inaccurate (“a u.s. fleet is now steaming towards north korea”) – contradictory (“i’m killing nafta”) only to be followed the very next day by (“just had great talks with leaders of canada and mexico. lots of room to negotiate nafta”). – or, flat out absurd (” my cabinet has probably the highest iq of any cabinet in history”). it’s one thing to mangle the english language. it’s quite another to use one’s barely understandable tweets to bewilder friends and foes alike. that’s like playing russian roulette with the fragile stability of an unstable world. what worries me most from a grammatical and spelling standpoint is the impact trumpprose will have on our nation’s young people (who are already severely challenged when it comes to writing clear, concise, active sentences). mix in eight more years of trump’s trashing of the language with another near decade of recent college graduates using text abbreviations in their client and management memos, and you’ve got all the ingredients necessary to return the proper use of the english language to a mix of prehistoric, cave man grunts and indecipherable slang. it’s a real problem that i believe our nation’s colleges and universities have taken a pass on. i know my son, who is completing his ph. d. while simultaneously teaching freshman history students, is absolutely appalled by the abysmal quality of the papers turned in by his students. and, it’s only going to get worse with our nation’s commander-in-chief setting the example. it makes one pine for the days when w. used to mangle his speeches with such memorable phrases as, “fool me once, shame on — shame on you. fool me — you can’t get fooled again.” where’s it all headed? thoughts welcomed. share this:googleprintfacebookemailtwitterlinkedin posted in uncategorized | 1 reply apr 26 people and culture in 2017: what matters most? posted on april 26, 2017 by steve cody there’s no secret to running a successful business: you attract and retain good people who, in turn, attract and retain good clients. ah, but to suggest accomplishing the above is easy is akin to saying donald trump is introverted.  today’s guest column was penned by sara whitman, our culture czar and head of human resources who believe success, and a successful culture, are the result of two key factors.“management is doing things right; leadership is doing the right things,” peter drucker. these wise words rang in my ears as i found myself asking, “what are those right things?” enter pomello, a provider of culture analytics solutions. the company published a report last month on the key people management and company culture priorities in 2017. the core hypothesis in the report is that companies reach a tipping point when they hit about 1000 employees. at that point, pomello says that companies start to shift people management priorities towards employee engagement, learning & development and leadership. but i’m not so sure that the scale of the company dictates that focus. working at an agency with 100+ employees, those priorities feel right for us as well.  and it has me thinking, is it less about scale and more about maturity of the business? could it be how well developed a focus senior management has on culture and people management in general? i spoke with pomello co-founder and coo, catherine spence about my thoughts. “it’s possible. maturity of a business is much harder to measure. for most companies, there is a fast-growth period that shifts priorities quickly. we definitely see companies struggle to keep their culture strong as they scale.” the pomello report states that only 14% of larger companies report having a very strong culture, compared to smaller companies where more than a third report having a strong culture. so how can companies maintain culture through change? i believe it comes down to two things: it comes from the top. whatever the culture stands for, if the leaders at the top do not demonstrate those principles and values, the culture will morph and won’t hold steady through change. leaders need to believe in the culture, demonstrate it in their actions every day and make sure that any process, system and approach reinforces that culture as the company grows or embarks on any other type of change. but it belongs to the people. if the leaders set the tone for the culture, employees set the tempo. departments, teams and individuals across the company need to be feel empowered to express the culture in ways that are meaningful – and not dictated – to them. giving employees the freedom to express opinions, to introduce new ideas and to run with them will ignite the culture and allow it to blaze throughout the organization. as i look ahead to the rest of this year, doing the right things to maintain those two factors is exactly where we’ll focus in 2017, and we encourage you to do the same. lead on. share this:googleprintfacebookemailtwitterlinkedin posted in uncategorized | leave a reply apr 24 fake news comes to advertising posted on april 24, 2017 by steve cody what did grace kelly and amelia earhart have in common? aside from being superstars during their lifetimes, a new ad from allergan would suggest that, along with a bevy of other high-profile role models featured in a new tv spot, the aviatrix and princess of monaco suffered from, get this, dry eyes. don’t believe me? check out the spot. now, i consider myself quite the historian, and i’ve never, ever read about amelia struggles with dry eyes as she vainly sought to find a place to land her lost aircraft on homeland island. nor do i remember the cause cited for princess grace’s death in an automobile accident as being linked to dry eyes. in fact, i’ll bet there’s no documentation whatsoever to prove these two rolemodels suffered from what, the heartbreak of dry eyes? the discomfort? the redness and itchiness? or, is red eyes merely an inconvenience? i’m not sure. i’m not trying to minimize whatever discomfort the condition might cause, but allergen, the ad’s sponsor (whose logo is seen oh-so-briefly at the very end of the spot) wants you to believe the opposite. in fact, by bombarding us with snapshots of scores upon scores of women, we’re led to believe that: all of these ladies do/did battle with dry eyes. allergan can help. now, the latter may be true, but the former qualifies as fake news in my book. and, unless allergan can provide documented proof to the contrary, i’m calling them out. allergen can then do one of three things: issue a clarification and apology prove me wrong ignore my blog. instead, it can own the fake news and hire the queen of misinformation, the seldom seen white house strategist kellyanne conway. after all, it was ms. conway who coined the now infamous expression “alternative facts” when she was confronted by reporters the morning after her boss’s inauguration with the actual number of people who turned out to watch the reality star be sworn in. we already have breitbart, the dearly departed bill o’reilly and scads and scads of far left- and right-wing sources to provide fake news and lies. now, thanks to allergan, we have to start questioning the veracity of tv commercials as well. well done, allergan. well done. it’s almost enough to make me wipe away a tear but, like madame bovary, joan of arc and cleopatra, i, too, suffer from dry eyes and simply can’t conjure up a tear. or a lie, for that matter. share this:googleprintfacebookemailtwitterlinkedin posted in uncategorized apr 19 don’t come around here no more posted on april 19, 2017 by steve cody imagine you work in the travel & tourism business. now, imagine you’re the senior executive leading a major u.s. city’s tourism efforts. now, consider these sobering facts: – some 4.3 million fewer people are expected to visit the u.s. this year . – the overall travel & tourism industry is expected to lose $7.4 billion in revenue in 2017. – next year will be even worse: there will 6.3 million fewer tourists and $10.8 billion in lost revenues. miami will be the hardest hit destination spot, followed closely by san francisco and new york (serves them right for once being, or continuing to be, sanctuary cities). anyway, these dire facts and projections are the direct result of what the new york times has dubbed, “the trump slump.” it seems our 45th president’s vitriolic, whacko and completely unsubstantiated claims are sending a very clear, if unsettling, message to the rest of the world: find other countries to kick back and relax while on vacation. arne sorensen, chief executive of marriott international, the world’s biggest hotel company, says it isn’t just tourists who are steering clear of the land of the free and the home of the brave: “…companies and conferences were also choosing to host events in other countries due to uncertainty over restrictions on entry to the u. s.” nice. now, factor in yesterday’s hate crime in fresno, the charleston church shootings and the deranged, random gunman who chose to document his assassination of a complete stranger on facebook, and you’re facing a serious image and reputation challenge if you happen to be in charge of any large u.s. city’s tourism and business conference operations. things have gotten so dicey that even those fun-loving canadians i always seem to bump into at the jersey shore over the fourth of july weekend are staying put in the great white north. can anyone imagine a summer in cape may without bumping into roving bands of québécois who’ve just driven 1,000 miles to frolic in our syringe-strewn seas? want some more anti-globalization fat to chew on? the number of flights from china and iraq have dropped 40 percent since january 20th (the donald’s inauguration date lest you forget), and demand from ireland and new zealand are down 35 percent. ah, but try to guess the one country where departing flights to the u.s. have surged 60 percent this year? if you said the land of lenin, tolstoy and vlad “the bear” putin, you’d be correct. while all of this news is sad and sobering (and has untold ripple effects on the cottage industries that support hotels, convention halls and disney-type theme parks), consider the implications on jobs. yes, jobs. the one issue that propelled trump to his incredible victory. while i wasn’t able to unearth specific numbers or predictions, the trump factor is singlehandedly idling hundreds, if not tens of thousands, of americans who count on long-term employment in travel & tourism to earn their livelihood. methinks the president couldn’t care less since i understand trump-branded properties are faring quite well. so, if eric and donald, jr., aren’t being impacted, what’s the big deal? and, speaking of deals, how about that monopolistic move by ivanka with communist china? that should reset a lot of jobs. in china. what is crystal clear is that trump will only accelerate his isolationist, america-first tweeting and pontificating. in his endless efforts to flex america’s muscle, he’s dramatically weakened one of the key sectors of our economy. but, hey, i’ll bet all the statistics i’ve read and cited would be dismissed by white house press secretary sean spicer as mere “…left-wing, fake news from the opposition party.” leaving spicey and getting back to the profound marketing challenge facing the travel & tourism industry today, i suggest they consider one of these three campaign strategies: 1.) admit fault, but position fear and hatred as an unexpected value add to a foreign national’s otherwise mundane vacation: “you’ve always wanted to see the grand canyon. now, we can detain you and provide a few extra weeks to explore all of its natural beauty. but, remember to pack your handcuffs. it’s a byo destination.” 2.) play-up the historical significance of a vacation to the u.s. during trump’s reign. “you missed mussolini and were too young to experience stalin’s gulags, so why not watch, firsthand, as a democracy becomes a dictatorship. talk about a story you can tell the grand kids!” 3.) throw up your hands and tell it like it is. borrow a line from a tom petty classic and run ads headlined, “don’t come around here no more. or, at least not until 2039.'” thoughts (and campaign themes) welcomed. and a tip o’ repman’s cap to chris cody for suggesting this post. share this:googleprintfacebookemailtwitterlinkedin posted in uncategorized apr 18 is hate entering mainstream advertising? posted on april 18, 2017 by steve cody if there’s one thing those of you who are left or right of center (or stuck in the middle with me,) can agree upon, it’s this:  the one unifying thread americans seem to share nowadays is hate. like you, i’ve unfriended countless, longtime bffs on social channels, have seen a rift occur in my own family and, frankly, have tried to avoid talking politics at all costs. but, having just viewed this new tv spot from lexus, i wonder if marketers are picking up on the undercurrent of hate and subliminally adding it to their pitch? check it out (below) and pay close attention to the driver’s reaction after he swerves to avoid hitting a businessman carrying a stack of papers. the car’s sensors prevented the driver from hitting the pedestrian, but the latter is left behind to pick-up all of the paperwork the car’s velocity scattered. meanwhile, the lexus driver plows ahead with a definite smirk on his face that one could read as: – i’m so happy my lexus sensors prevented me from hitting that dope, or – stupid bastard. serves him right that he’s left to try and scoop up his valuable paperwork. wouldn’t the average driver stop, pull over and help the guy collect his belongings? i certainly would. but, not this particular lexus driver, who’s probably thinking, “f the pedestrian’s problems. i avoided an accident and have people to see, places to go and things to do.” so, what’s your take? did you react the way i did? and, based upon the ever escalating vitriol in our country, will other marketers find ways to subtly insert hate in their messaging? i have to believe half of the viewers shouted, “right on!” when the driver smiled and plowed ahead while the other half felt terrible for the businessman. comments welcomed from fans of o’reilly, maddow and everyone else in-between. and  a tip of repman’s racing helmet to ann barlow for suggesting this post. share this:googleprintfacebookemailtwitterlinkedin posted in uncategorized page 1 of 2371234next ›last » about i'm a climber, comedian and dog lover. but not necessarily in that order. i also happen to be co-founder and ceo of peppercomm, a strategic communications firm headquartered in nyc, and with offices in san francisco, boulder and london. more about steve blogger of the year finalist repman comedy subscribe to rep man enter your email powered by feedblitz --> blogrollthe innovation millpriscopeabout you blogintakepepperdigitalf.a.d.s. the fight against destructive spinreputationxchangemedia nationholmes report blogpr squaredjim carrollmy three centsproprarchives may 2017 april 2017 march 2017 february 2017 january 2017 december 2016 november 2016 october 2016 september 2016 august 2016 july 2016 june 2016 may 2016 april 2016 march 2016 february 2016 january 2016 december 2015 november 2015 october 2015 september 2015 august 2015 july 2015 june 2015 may 2015 april 2015 march 2015 february 2015 january 2015 december 2014 november 2014 october 2014 september 2014 august 2014 july 2014 june 2014 may 2014 april 2014 march 2014 february 2014 january 2014 december 2013 november 2013 october 2013 september 2013 august 2013 july 2013 june 2013 may 2013 april 2013 march 2013 february 2013 january 2013 december 2012 november 2012 october 2012 september 2012 august 2012 july 2012 june 2012 may 2012 april 2012 march 2012 february 2012 january 2012 december 2011 november 2011 october 2011 september 2011 august 2011 july 2011 june 2011 may 2011 april 2011 march 2011 february 2011 january 2011 december 2010 november 2010 october 2010 september 2010 august 2010 july 2010 june 2010 may 2010 april 2010 march 2010 february 2010 january 2010 december 2009 november 2009 october 2009 september 2009 august 2009 july 2009 june 2009 may 2009 april 2009 march 2009 february 2009 january 2009 december 2008 november 2008 october 2008 september 2008 august 2008 july 2008 june 2008 may 2008 april 2008 march 2008 february 2008 january 2008 december 2007 november 2007 october 2007 september 2007 august 2007 july 2007 june 2007 may 2007 april 2007 march 2007 february 2007 january 2007 december 2006 november 2006 october 2006 september 2006 august 2006 july 2006 june 2006 may 2006 april 2006 march 2006 february 2006 january 2006 december 2005 november 2005 october 2005 september 2005 august 2005 july 2005 conflicts policy everything on this blog is my personal opinion and does not necessarily represent the views of peppercomm or its clients. some posts may contain references to businesses or people the peppercomm or its clients work with or have worked with, and in such cases i make an effort to point out such connections in the posts. i also may choose not to write about subjects or events that may relate to or affect peppercomm clients. © 2017 rep man admired theme send to email address your name your email address cancel post was not sent - check your email addresses! email check failed, please try again sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.


Here you find all texts from your page as Google (googlebot) and others search engines seen it.

Words density analysis:

Numbers of all words: 5850

One word

Two words phrases

Three words phrases

the - 6.62% (387)
and - 3.71% (217)
that - 1.15% (67)
for - 1.06% (62)
his - 1.03% (60)
are - 0.96% (56)
you - 0.94% (55)
all - 0.92% (54)
our - 0.89% (52)
new - 0.84% (49)
her - 0.84% (49)
with - 0.67% (39)
this - 0.65% (38)
can - 0.65% (38)
age - 0.63% (37)
out - 0.62% (36)
one - 0.62% (36)
not - 0.58% (34)
may - 0.56% (33)
man - 0.55% (32)
what - 0.53% (31)
who - 0.51% (30)
post - 0.51% (30)
rep - 0.51% (30)
cat - 0.5% (29)
news - 0.5% (29)
their - 0.46% (27)
lie - 0.46% (27)
from - 0.46% (27)
now - 0.43% (25)
red - 0.43% (25)
arc - 0.43% (25)
any - 0.43% (25)
king - 0.43% (25)
here - 0.39% (23)
thing - 0.39% (23)
have - 0.39% (23)
but - 0.36% (21)
ran - 0.36% (21)
ever - 0.36% (21)
apr - 0.36% (21)
gen - 0.36% (21)
posted - 0.34% (20)
2017 - 0.34% (20)
fake - 0.34% (20)
right - 0.32% (19)
see - 0.32% (19)
how - 0.31% (18)
they - 0.31% (18)
- 0.31% (18)
day - 0.31% (18)
about - 0.31% (18)
share - 0.29% (17)
culture - 0.29% (17)
it’s - 0.29% (17)
will - 0.29% (17)
trump - 0.29% (17)
and, - 0.27% (16)
april - 0.27% (16)
has - 0.27% (16)
fact - 0.27% (16)
email - 0.27% (16)
time - 0.26% (15)
read - 0.26% (15)
work - 0.26% (15)
come - 0.26% (15)
on. - 0.24% (14)
hose - 0.24% (14)
other - 0.24% (14)
your - 0.24% (14)
face - 0.24% (14)
percent - 0.24% (14)
use - 0.24% (14)
two - 0.24% (14)
long - 0.22% (13)
way - 0.22% (13)
was - 0.22% (13)
sea - 0.22% (13)
able - 0.22% (13)
january - 0.22% (13)
more - 0.22% (13)
even - 0.22% (13)
july - 0.22% (13)
2011 - 0.22% (13)
try - 0.22% (13)
august - 0.22% (13)
morning - 0.22% (13)
september - 0.21% (12)
october - 0.21% (12)
november - 0.21% (12)
facebook - 0.21% (12)
2015 - 0.21% (12)
led - 0.21% (12)
2016 - 0.21% (12)
part - 0.21% (12)
february - 0.21% (12)
very - 0.21% (12)
what’s - 0.21% (12)
hit - 0.21% (12)
cody - 0.21% (12)
2014 - 0.21% (12)
march - 0.21% (12)
december - 0.21% (12)
eric - 0.21% (12)
2009 - 0.21% (12)
2012 - 0.21% (12)
2008 - 0.21% (12)
2007 - 0.21% (12)
2006 - 0.21% (12)
them - 0.21% (12)
2013 - 0.21% (12)
2010 - 0.21% (12)
millennial - 0.21% (12)
steve - 0.19% (11)
just - 0.19% (11)
view - 0.19% (11)
wing - 0.19% (11)
cco - 0.19% (11)
people - 0.19% (11)
like - 0.19% (11)
this: - 0.19% (11)
o’ - 0.19% (11)
think - 0.19% (11)
say - 0.19% (11)
linked - 0.19% (11)
when - 0.19% (11)
end - 0.19% (11)
company - 0.19% (11)
june - 0.19% (11)
well - 0.19% (11)
show - 0.19% (11)
while - 0.19% (11)
uncategorized - 0.17% (10)
being - 0.17% (10)
this:googleprintfacebookemailtwitterlinkedin - 0.17% (10)
check - 0.17% (10)
client - 0.17% (10)
there - 0.17% (10)
year - 0.17% (10)
only - 0.17% (10)
media - 0.17% (10)
know - 0.17% (10)
gem - 0.17% (10)
business - 0.17% (10)
blog - 0.17% (10)
cbs - 0.17% (10)
add - 0.15% (9)
these - 0.15% (9)
things - 0.15% (9)
mark - 0.15% (9)
take - 0.15% (9)
i’m - 0.15% (9)
call - 0.15% (9)
tell - 0.15% (9)
over - 0.15% (9)
brand - 0.15% (9)
lead - 0.15% (9)
own - 0.15% (9)
thinking - 0.15% (9)
report - 0.15% (9)
than - 0.15% (9)
some - 0.15% (9)
count - 0.15% (9)
search - 0.15% (9)
where - 0.15% (9)
bet - 0.14% (8)
research - 0.14% (8)
into - 0.14% (8)
suggest - 0.14% (8)
top - 0.14% (8)
trump’s - 0.14% (8)
agency - 0.14% (8)
here’s - 0.14% (8)
get - 0.14% (8)
so, - 0.14% (8)
that’s - 0.14% (8)
less - 0.14% (8)
were - 0.14% (8)
every - 0.14% (8)
most - 0.14% (8)
off - 0.14% (8)
those - 0.14% (8)
been - 0.14% (8)
set - 0.14% (8)
companies - 0.14% (8)
digital - 0.14% (8)
eyes - 0.14% (8)
head - 0.14% (8)
ann - 0.14% (8)
believe - 0.14% (8)
having - 0.14% (8)
now, - 0.14% (8)
millennials - 0.12% (7)
week - 0.12% (7)
times - 0.12% (7)
american - 0.12% (7)
point - 0.12% (7)
carl - 0.12% (7)
boomer - 0.12% (7)
don’t - 0.12% (7)
network - 0.12% (7)
nor - 0.12% (7)
number - 0.12% (7)
big - 0.12% (7)
world - 0.12% (7)
dire - 0.12% (7)
land - 0.12% (7)
next - 0.12% (7)
critical - 0.12% (7)
akin - 0.12% (7)
hate - 0.12% (7)
its - 0.12% (7)
comes - 0.12% (7)
said - 0.1% (6)
though - 0.1% (6)
bill - 0.1% (6)
put - 0.1% (6)
star - 0.1% (6)
2005 - 0.1% (6)
had - 0.1% (6)
but, - 0.1% (6)
did - 0.1% (6)
also - 0.1% (6)
king, - 0.1% (6)
driver - 0.1% (6)
good - 0.1% (6)
advertising - 0.1% (6)
tourism - 0.1% (6)
each - 0.1% (6)
dry - 0.1% (6)
make - 0.1% (6)
found - 0.1% (6)
facts - 0.1% (6)
i’ve - 0.1% (6)
clear - 0.1% (6)
main - 0.1% (6)
content - 0.1% (6)
line - 0.1% (6)
shows - 0.1% (6)
management - 0.1% (6)
left - 0.1% (6)
old - 0.1% (6)
leaders - 0.1% (6)
would - 0.1% (6)
consider - 0.1% (6)
u.s. - 0.1% (6)
organization - 0.1% (6)
back - 0.1% (6)
admit - 0.1% (6)
again - 0.09% (5)
president - 0.09% (5)
after - 0.09% (5)
watch - 0.09% (5)
last - 0.09% (5)
there’s - 0.09% (5)
allergan - 0.09% (5)
jr. - 0.09% (5)
single - 0.09% (5)
industry - 0.09% (5)
york - 0.09% (5)
spot - 0.09% (5)
cut - 0.09% (5)
word - 0.09% (5)
late - 0.09% (5)
ads - 0.09% (5)
or, - 0.09% (5)
americans - 0.09% (5)
ears - 0.09% (5)
near - 0.09% (5)
employee - 0.09% (5)
–  - 0.09% (5)
sure - 0.09% (5)
days - 0.09% (5)
donald - 0.09% (5)
enter - 0.09% (5)
story - 0.09% (5)
provide - 0.09% (5)
source - 0.09% (5)
she - 0.09% (5)
advertisers - 0.09% (5)
major - 0.09% (5)
core - 0.09% (5)
says - 0.09% (5)
social - 0.09% (5)
rib - 0.09% (5)
seem - 0.09% (5)
billion - 0.09% (5)
down - 0.09% (5)
rose - 0.09% (5)
format - 0.09% (5)
classic - 0.09% (5)
(and - 0.09% (5)
news. - 0.09% (5)
high - 0.09% (5)
students - 0.09% (5)
direct - 0.09% (5)
run - 0.09% (5)
peppercomm - 0.09% (5)
san - 0.09% (5)
clients - 0.09% (5)
happen - 0.09% (5)
society - 0.09% (5)
thought - 0.09% (5)
half - 0.09% (5)
fact, - 0.09% (5)
viewers - 0.09% (5)
real - 0.09% (5)
should - 0.09% (5)
already - 0.09% (5)
through - 0.09% (5)
prior - 0.09% (5)
away - 0.07% (4)
mean - 0.07% (4)
rely - 0.07% (4)
success - 0.07% (4)
one, - 0.07% (4)
miss - 0.07% (4)
information - 0.07% (4)
guy - 0.07% (4)
i’ll - 0.07% (4)
three - 0.07% (4)
once - 0.07% (4)
struggle - 0.07% (4)
fool - 0.07% (4)
look - 0.07% (4)
address - 0.07% (4)
him - 0.07% (4)
grow - 0.07% (4)
sent - 0.07% (4)
role - 0.07% (4)
upon - 0.07% (4)
lexus - 0.07% (4)
focus - 0.07% (4)
far - 0.07% (4)
quite - 0.07% (4)
matt - 0.07% (4)
words - 0.07% (4)
could - 0.07% (4)
first - 0.07% (4)
need - 0.07% (4)
you’re - 0.07% (4)
few - 0.07% (4)
today - 0.07% (4)
thoughts - 0.07% (4)
want - 0.07% (4)
can’t - 0.07% (4)
college - 0.07% (4)
tweets - 0.07% (4)
posts - 0.07% (4)
second - 0.07% (4)
aren’t - 0.07% (4)
campaign - 0.07% (4)
hard - 0.07% (4)
die - 0.07% (4)
live - 0.07% (4)
lot - 0.07% (4)
challenge - 0.07% (4)
particular - 0.07% (4)
test - 0.07% (4)
sales - 0.07% (4)
won’t - 0.07% (4)
press - 0.07% (4)
years - 0.07% (4)
ways - 0.07% (4)
employees - 0.07% (4)
fast - 0.07% (4)
instead - 0.07% (4)
whose - 0.07% (4)
pass - 0.07% (4)
rest - 0.07% (4)
job - 0.07% (4)
issue - 0.07% (4)
isn’t - 0.07% (4)
complete - 0.07% (4)
replies - 0.07% (4)
cap - 0.07% (4)
tip - 0.07% (4)
problem - 0.07% (4)
sharing - 0.07% (4)
way. - 0.07% (4)
young - 0.07% (4)
reputation - 0.07% (4)
abc - 0.07% (4)
public - 0.07% (4)
suffer - 0.07% (4)
travel - 0.07% (4)
continue - 0.07% (4)
marketers - 0.07% (4)
another - 0.07% (4)
still - 0.07% (4)
double - 0.07% (4)
rang - 0.07% (4)
(or - 0.07% (4)
culture, - 0.07% (4)
talk - 0.07% (4)
factor - 0.07% (4)
attract - 0.07% (4)
white - 0.07% (4)
commercials - 0.07% (4)
wall - 0.07% (4)
short - 0.07% (4)
priorities - 0.07% (4)
truth - 0.07% (4)
pomello - 0.07% (4)
language - 0.07% (4)
vacation - 0.05% (3)
clients. - 0.05% (3)
lest - 0.05% (3)
large - 0.05% (3)
seen - 0.05% (3)
imagine - 0.05% (3)
“you - 0.05% (3)
least - 0.05% (3)
million - 0.05% (3)
latter - 0.05% (3)
china - 0.05% (3)
well. - 0.05% (3)
cast - 0.05% (3)
base - 0.05% (3)
document - 0.05% (3)
got - 0.05% (3)
such - 0.05% (3)
home - 0.05% (3)
events - 0.05% (3)
s.” - 0.05% (3)
nation’s - 0.05% (3)
makes - 0.05% (3)
effort - 0.05% (3)
lose - 0.05% (3)
since - 0.05% (3)
making - 0.05% (3)
reply - 0.05% (3)
arne - 0.05% (3)
secret - 0.05% (3)
expected - 0.05% (3)
accident - 0.05% (3)
ross - 0.05% (3)
ahead - 0.05% (3)
blogger - 0.05% (3)
value - 0.05% (3)
kelly - 0.05% (3)
start - 0.05% (3)
along - 0.05% (3)
wise - 0.05% (3)
ceo - 0.05% (3)
english - 0.05% (3)
“f - 0.05% (3)
type - 0.05% (3)
worse - 0.05% (3)
history - 0.05% (3)
scale - 0.05% (3)
welcomed - 0.05% (3)
express - 0.05% (3)
position - 0.05% (3)
eyes. - 0.05% (3)
hitting - 0.05% (3)
theme - 0.05% (3)
phrase - 0.05% (3)
ray - 0.05% (3)
cause - 0.05% (3)
sad - 0.05% (3)
care - 0.05% (3)
program - 0.05% (3)
strong - 0.05% (3)
jobs. - 0.05% (3)
avoid - 0.05% (3)
repman - 0.05% (3)
nbc - 0.05% (3)
used - 0.05% (3)
caviling - 0.05% (3)
doing - 0.05% (3)
find - 0.05% (3)
key - 0.05% (3)
co. - 0.05% (3)
he’s - 0.05% (3)
past - 0.05% (3)
going - 0.05% (3)
never - 0.05% (3)
house - 0.05% (3)
state - 0.05% (3)
facts: - 0.05% (3)
final - 0.05% (3)
“the - 0.05% (3)
mix - 0.05% (3)
must - 0.05% (3)
much - 0.05% (3)
understand - 0.05% (3)
favorite - 0.05% (3)
founder - 0.05% (3)
forward - 0.05% (3)
soon - 0.05% (3)
you. - 0.05% (3)
shared - 0.05% (3)
chief - 0.05% (3)
profession - 0.05% (3)
something - 0.05% (3)
spread - 0.05% (3)
guess - 0.05% (3)
stop - 0.05% (3)
–              - 0.05% (3)
rise - 0.05% (3)
nothing - 0.05% (3)
lots - 0.05% (3)
sources - 0.05% (3)
false - 0.05% (3)
impact - 0.05% (3)
day, - 0.05% (3)
member - 0.05% (3)
verify - 0.05% (3)
skill - 0.05% (3)
according - 0.05% (3)
millennials, - 0.05% (3)
director - 0.05% (3)
that, - 0.05% (3)
times, - 0.05% (3)
thinking, - 0.05% (3)
holy - 0.05% (3)
true - 0.05% (3)
both - 0.05% (3)
prevent - 0.05% (3)
channels - 0.05% (3)
surveyed - 0.05% (3)
between - 0.05% (3)
probably - 0.05% (3)
page - 0.05% (3)
this, - 0.05% (3)
dollars - 0.05% (3)
bang - 0.05% (3)
why - 0.05% (3)
average - 0.05% (3)
smart - 0.05% (3)
pour - 0.05% (3)
article - 0.05% (3)
communications - 0.05% (3)
organization. - 0.05% (3)
marketing - 0.05% (3)
develop - 0.05% (3)
post. - 0.05% (3)
suggesting - 0.05% (3)
we’re - 0.05% (3)
boomers - 0.05% (3)
son. - 0.05% (3)
stands - 0.05% (3)
food - 0.05% (3)
team - 0.05% (3)
does - 0.05% (3)
turned - 0.05% (3)
order - 0.05% (3)
too - 0.05% (3)
done - 0.05% (3)
then - 0.05% (3)
tall - 0.05% (3)
leave - 0.05% (3)
carl’s - 0.05% (3)
sure. - 0.03% (2)
unless - 0.03% (2)
host - 0.03% (2)
immediately - 0.03% (2)
longtime - 0.03% (2)
begins - 0.03% (2)
free - 0.03% (2)
hire - 0.03% (2)
spreading - 0.03% (2)
discomfort - 0.03% (2)
countries - 0.03% (2)
francisco - 0.03% (2)
kick - 0.03% (2)
family - 0.03% (2)
creating - 0.03% (2)
hotel - 0.03% (2)
teaching - 0.03% (2)
academics - 0.03% (2)
completely - 0.03% (2)
prove - 0.03% (2)
council - 0.03% (2)
on? - 0.03% (2)
flights - 0.03% (2)
relations - 0.03% (2)
arthur - 0.03% (2)
bump - 0.03% (2)
ethical - 0.03% (2)
baby - 0.03% (2)
facing - 0.03% (2)
until - 0.03% (2)
example - 0.03% (2)
exactly - 0.03% (2)
always - 0.03% (2)
conference - 0.03% (2)
yesterday’s - 0.03% (2)
tourists - 0.03% (2)
left- - 0.03% (2)
scads - 0.03% (2)
o’reilly - 0.03% (2)
caught - 0.03% (2)
tear - 0.03% (2)
hero - 0.03% (2)
broadcast - 0.03% (2)
sponsor - 0.03% (2)
show, - 0.03% (2)
in. - 0.03% (2)
ms. - 0.03% (2)
all, - 0.03% (2)
median - 0.03% (2)
conway - 0.03% (2)
inauguration - 0.03% (2)
write - 0.03% (2)
actual - 0.03% (2)
viewing - 0.03% (2)
around - 0.03% (2)
visit - 0.03% (2)
minds - 0.03% (2)
fewer - 0.03% (2)
stick - 0.03% (2)
revenue - 0.03% (2)
allergen - 0.03% (2)
headlined - 0.03% (2)
continuing - 0.03% (2)
sobering - 0.03% (2)
billions - 0.03% (2)
certainly - 0.03% (2)
importance - 0.03% (2)
establish - 0.03% (2)
scores - 0.03% (2)
city’s - 0.03% (2)
executive - 0.03% (2)
destination - 0.03% (2)
matter. - 0.03% (2)
powered - 0.03% (2)
see, - 0.03% (2)
important - 0.03% (2)
fight - 0.03% (2)
hope - 0.03% (2)
admitted - 0.03% (2)
mega - 0.03% (2)
batman! - 0.03% (2)
poor - 0.03% (2)
necessarily - 0.03% (2)
dear - 0.03% (2)
help - 0.03% (2)
serves - 0.03% (2)
react - 0.03% (2)
possess - 0.03% (2)
else - 0.03% (2)
graduate - 0.03% (2)
vitriol - 0.03% (2)
ability - 0.03% (2)
received - 0.03% (2)
communicators - 0.03% (2)
opinion - 0.03% (2)
cmo’s - 0.03% (2)
pouring - 0.03% (2)
many - 0.03% (2)
asked - 0.03% (2)
instead, - 0.03% (2)
send - 0.03% (2)
considering - 0.03% (2)
almost - 0.03% (2)
skills - 0.03% (2)
decade - 0.03% (2)
back. - 0.03% (2)
determining - 0.03% (2)
away. - 0.03% (2)
isn’t. - 0.03% (2)
enough - 0.03% (2)
definite - 0.03% (2)
trained - 0.03% (2)
mere - 0.03% (2)
scruples - 0.03% (2)
hey, - 0.03% (2)
leaving - 0.03% (2)
trade - 0.03% (2)
journal, - 0.03% (2)
grand - 0.03% (2)
highest - 0.03% (2)
efforts - 0.03% (2)
former - 0.03% (2)
implications - 0.03% (2)
country - 0.03% (2)
drop - 0.03% (2)
sadly, - 0.03% (2)
recent - 0.03% (2)
faster - 0.03% (2)
earn - 0.03% (2)
tens - 0.03% (2)
street - 0.03% (2)
missed - 0.03% (2)
businessman - 0.03% (2)
particular, - 0.03% (2)
close - 0.03% (2)
car’s - 0.03% (2)
sensors - 0.03% (2)
paperwork - 0.03% (2)
before - 0.03% (2)
prevented - 0.03% (2)
trusted - 0.03% (2)
rift - 0.03% (2)
tom - 0.03% (2)
thing. - 0.03% (2)
attracted - 0.03% (2)
percent) - 0.03% (2)
routinely - 0.03% (2)
serious - 0.03% (2)
repman’s - 0.03% (2)
date - 0.03% (2)
medium - 0.03% (2)
nafta”) - 0.03% (2)
north - 0.03% (2)
towards - 0.03% (2)
followed - 0.03% (2)
same - 0.03% (2)
room - 0.03% (2)
yet - 0.03% (2)
great - 0.03% (2)
sr. - 0.03% (2)
consumer - 0.03% (2)
delete - 0.03% (2)
opportunity - 0.03% (2)
latest - 0.03% (2)
fans - 0.03% (2)
cry - 0.03% (2)
mainstream - 0.03% (2)
as, - 0.03% (2)
forced - 0.03% (2)
jr., - 0.03% (2)
cabinet - 0.03% (2)
biggest - 0.03% (2)
proper - 0.03% (2)
viewership - 0.03% (2)
coming - 0.03% (2)
papers - 0.03% (2)
- 0.03% (2)
shame - 0.03% (2)
support - 0.03% (2)
you’ve - 0.03% (2)
“do - 0.03% (2)
conflict - 0.03% (2)
sitcom - 0.03% (2)
mangle - 0.03% (2)
(who - 0.03% (2)
writing - 0.03% (2)
years. - 0.03% (2)
across - 0.03% (2)
clear, - 0.03% (2)
boobs - 0.03% (2)
sweep - 0.03% (2)
older - 0.03% (2)
otherwise - 0.03% (2)
belongs - 0.03% (2)
phrases - 0.03% (2)
lags - 0.03% (2)
charles - 0.03% (2)
burger - 0.03% (2)
behind - 0.03% (2)
mellon - 0.03% (2)
carnegie - 0.03% (2)
getting - 0.03% (2)
name - 0.03% (2)
today’s - 0.03% (2)
you, - 0.03% (2)
seems - 0.03% (2)
researchers - 0.03% (2)
men’s - 0.03% (2)
partners - 0.03% (2)
experience - 0.03% (2)
“…a - 0.03% (2)
thompson - 0.03% (2)
against - 0.03% (2)
(note - 0.03% (2)
dictators - 0.03% (2)
alike - 0.03% (2)
fox - 0.03% (2)
cco’s - 0.03% (2)
distinguish - 0.03% (2)
parataxis - 0.03% (2)
style - 0.03% (2)
built - 0.03% (2)
certainty - 0.03% (2)
stock - 0.03% (2)
sales, - 0.03% (2)
layer - 0.03% (2)
“it’s - 0.03% (2)
fallout - 0.03% (2)
nyt - 0.03% (2)
welcomed. - 0.03% (2)
primary - 0.03% (2)
prefer - 0.03% (2)
factors - 0.03% (2)
commercials. - 0.03% (2)
grace - 0.03% (2)
do? - 0.03% (2)
snapshot - 0.03% (2)
during - 0.03% (2)
amelia - 0.03% (2)
opt - 0.03% (2)
allow - 0.03% (2)
film. - 0.03% (2)
change. - 0.03% (2)
hold - 0.03% (2)
morning. - 0.03% (2)
cable - 0.03% (2)
introduce - 0.03% (2)
dvr - 0.03% (2)
global - 0.03% (2)
states - 0.03% (2)
models - 0.03% (2)
lost - 0.03% (2)
severe - 0.03% (2)
place - 0.03% (2)
described - 0.03% (2)
remember - 0.03% (2)
dump - 0.03% (2)
cited - 0.03% (2)
guest - 0.03% (2)
alone, - 0.03% (2)
brands - 0.03% (2)
suffered - 0.03% (2)
princess - 0.03% (2)
spot, - 0.03% (2)
percent. - 0.03% (2)
traditional - 0.03% (2)
appear - 0.03% (2)
business. - 0.03% (2)
me? - 0.03% (2)
principles - 0.03% (2)
demonstrate - 0.03% (2)
leadership - 0.03% (2)
who’s - 0.03% (2)
result - 0.03% (2)
discuss - 0.03% (2)
blow - 0.03% (2)
firm - 0.03% (2)
myself - 0.03% (2)
xers - 0.03% (2)
russian - 0.03% (2)
let’s - 0.03% (2)
successful - 0.03% (2)
theory, - 0.03% (2)
skip - 0.03% (2)
sooner - 0.03% (2)
retain - 0.03% (2)
column - 0.03% (2)
ah, - 0.03% (2)
guys - 0.03% (2)
kids - 0.03% (2)
generation - 0.03% (2)
co-founder - 0.03% (2)
senior - 0.03% (2)
maturity - 0.03% (2)
keep - 0.03% (2)
hill - 0.03% (2)
whatever - 0.03% (2)
things: - 0.03% (2)
maintain - 0.03% (2)
feel - 0.03% (2)
working - 0.03% (2)
reach - 0.03% (2)
ideas - 0.03% (2)
2017. - 0.03% (2)
shift - 0.03% (2)
reality - 0.03% (2)
mediocre - 0.03% (2)
counsel - 0.03% (2)
question - 0.03% (2)
of the - 0.58% (34)
in the - 0.41% (24)
to the - 0.34% (20)
fake news - 0.29% (17)
and the - 0.27% (16)
on the - 0.19% (11)
steve cody - 0.17% (10)
in uncategorized - 0.17% (10)
2017 by - 0.17% (10)
posted on - 0.17% (10)
this:googleprintfacebookemailtwitterlinkedin posted - 0.17% (10)
by steve - 0.17% (10)
share this:googleprintfacebookemailtwitterlinkedin - 0.17% (10)
posted in - 0.17% (10)
at the - 0.15% (9)
from the - 0.15% (9)
or the - 0.15% (9)
with a - 0.14% (8)
uncategorized | - 0.12% (7)
for the - 0.12% (7)
critical thinking - 0.12% (7)
the culture - 0.1% (6)
dry eyes - 0.1% (6)
on may - 0.1% (6)
the company - 0.1% (6)
with the - 0.1% (6)
new york - 0.09% (5)
in their - 0.09% (5)
cbs this - 0.09% (5)
as the - 0.09% (5)
one of - 0.09% (5)
the right - 0.09% (5)
right thing - 0.09% (5)
if you - 0.09% (5)
this morning - 0.09% (5)
about a - 0.09% (5)
from a - 0.09% (5)
in fact, - 0.09% (5)
it comes - 0.09% (5)
fake news. - 0.09% (5)
and in - 0.09% (5)
comes to - 0.07% (4)
who are - 0.07% (4)
if the - 0.07% (4)
and what - 0.07% (4)
the morning - 0.07% (4)
all of - 0.07% (4)
travel & - 0.07% (4)
number of - 0.07% (4)
to their - 0.07% (4)
replies may - 0.07% (4)
i don’t - 0.07% (4)
to believe - 0.07% (4)
& tourism - 0.07% (4)
morning show - 0.07% (4)
news on - 0.07% (4)
out the - 0.07% (4)
to see - 0.07% (4)
have to - 0.07% (4)
on april - 0.07% (4)
the only - 0.07% (4)
the day - 0.07% (4)
need to - 0.07% (4)
having a - 0.07% (4)
i’m not - 0.07% (4)
white house - 0.05% (3)
lots of - 0.05% (3)
count on - 0.05% (3)
the brand - 0.05% (3)
and, i - 0.05% (3)
the organization - 0.05% (3)
and her - 0.05% (3)
on social - 0.05% (3)
big bang - 0.05% (3)
both the - 0.05% (3)
the one - 0.05% (3)
but the - 0.05% (3)
and it - 0.05% (3)
people management - 0.05% (3)
the u.s. - 0.05% (3)
the latter - 0.05% (3)
email address - 0.05% (3)
post. share - 0.05% (3)
suggesting this - 0.05% (3)
when the - 0.05% (3)
english language - 0.05% (3)
our nation’s - 0.05% (3)
cody i - 0.05% (3)
carl’s jr. - 0.05% (3)
rep man - 0.05% (3)
i know - 0.05% (3)
the english - 0.05% (3)
by the - 0.05% (3)
one thing - 0.05% (3)
and their - 0.05% (3)
just a - 0.05% (3)
don’t know - 0.05% (3)
that the - 0.05% (3)
for suggesting - 0.05% (3)
this post. - 0.05% (3)
age of - 0.05% (3)
into a - 0.05% (3)
the time - 0.05% (3)
where the - 0.05% (3)
when it - 0.05% (3)
percent of - 0.05% (3)
36 percent - 0.05% (3)
of any - 0.05% (3)
and they - 0.05% (3)
will be - 0.05% (3)
a single - 0.05% (3)
suffered from - 0.03% (2)
on both - 0.03% (2)
what isn’t. - 0.03% (2)
with dry - 0.03% (2)
now, i - 0.03% (2)
you to - 0.03% (2)
the rest - 0.03% (2)
of this - 0.03% (2)
things to - 0.03% (2)
now, the - 0.03% (2)
new tv - 0.03% (2)
real and - 0.03% (2)
don’t come - 0.03% (2)
as well. - 0.03% (2)
around here - 0.03% (2)
no more - 0.03% (2)
imagine you - 0.03% (2)
to start - 0.03% (2)
and scads - 0.03% (2)
and, unless - 0.03% (2)
allergan can - 0.03% (2)
thing for - 0.03% (2)
watch the - 0.03% (2)
culture and - 0.03% (2)
and to - 0.03% (2)
of every - 0.03% (2)
can tell - 0.03% (2)
and more - 0.03% (2)
struggle to - 0.03% (2)
aren’t being - 0.03% (2)
says that - 0.03% (2)
that companies - 0.03% (2)
attract and - 0.03% (2)
retain good - 0.03% (2)
is doing - 0.03% (2)
doing the - 0.03% (2)
report having - 0.03% (2)
the leaders - 0.03% (2)
akin to - 0.03% (2)
set the - 0.03% (2)
culture in - 0.03% (2)
new ideas - 0.03% (2)
belongs to - 0.03% (2)
but it - 0.03% (2)
what’s real - 0.03% (2)
and won’t - 0.03% (2)
on their - 0.03% (2)
sure that - 0.03% (2)
the travel - 0.03% (2)
research now - 0.03% (2)
at all - 0.03% (2)
to avoid - 0.03% (2)
after he - 0.03% (2)
millennial to - 0.03% (2)
from hitting - 0.03% (2)
uncategorized apr - 0.03% (2)
cody last - 0.03% (2)
all the - 0.03% (2)
back to - 0.03% (2)
of these - 0.03% (2)
the grand - 0.03% (2)
a poor - 0.03% (2)
posts may - 0.03% (2)
peppercomm or - 0.03% (2)
its clients - 0.03% (2)
a good - 0.03% (2)
importance of - 0.03% (2)
not necessarily - 0.03% (2)
more about - 0.03% (2)
skip to - 0.03% (2)
but not - 0.03% (2)
i also - 0.03% (2)
happen to - 0.03% (2)
i’ll bet - 0.03% (2)
the key - 0.03% (2)
san francisco - 0.03% (2)
and new - 0.03% (2)
continuing to - 0.03% (2)
result of - 0.03% (2)
in 2017. - 0.03% (2)
tourism industry - 0.03% (2)
u.s. city’s - 0.03% (2)
million fewer - 0.03% (2)
expected to - 0.03% (2)
faster than - 0.03% (2)
other countries - 0.03% (2)
the land - 0.03% (2)
consider the - 0.03% (2)
if not - 0.03% (2)
americans who - 0.03% (2)
that should - 0.03% (2)
caught creating - 0.03% (2)
in our - 0.03% (2)
and reputation - 0.03% (2)
city’s tourism - 0.03% (2)
even those - 0.03% (2)
seem to - 0.03% (2)
a successful - 0.03% (2)
reply apr - 0.03% (2)
is exactly - 0.03% (2)
what’s next - 0.03% (2)
the minds - 0.03% (2)
cap to - 0.03% (2)
take a - 0.03% (2)
to dvr - 0.03% (2)
a classic - 0.03% (2)
good food - 0.03% (2)
may 16 - 0.03% (2)
more than - 0.03% (2)
carl sr. - 0.03% (2)
end of - 0.03% (2)
my favorite - 0.03% (2)
hose in - 0.03% (2)
| leave - 0.03% (2)
a reply - 0.03% (2)
9, 2017 - 0.03% (2)
to say - 0.03% (2)
what a - 0.03% (2)
that’s where - 0.03% (2)
he was - 0.03% (2)
the guy - 0.03% (2)
and, it’s - 0.03% (2)
not this - 0.03% (2)
not no - 0.03% (2)
point out - 0.03% (2)
may be - 0.03% (2)
i must - 0.03% (2)
being the - 0.03% (2)
tell you - 0.03% (2)
percent would - 0.03% (2)
that is - 0.03% (2)
an issue - 0.03% (2)
won’t be - 0.03% (2)
and right - 0.03% (2)
it with - 0.03% (2)
something that - 0.03% (2)
cco and - 0.03% (2)
spreading fake - 0.03% (2)
out of - 0.03% (2)
king of - 0.03% (2)
they can - 0.03% (2)
to pour - 0.03% (2)
get this, - 0.03% (2)
time for - 0.03% (2)
their agency - 0.03% (2)
abc and - 0.03% (2)
down a - 0.03% (2)
how can - 0.03% (2)
the organization. - 0.03% (2)
social media - 0.03% (2)
to research - 0.03% (2)
mix of - 0.03% (2)
a story - 0.03% (2)
up his - 0.03% (2)
admit to - 0.03% (2)
or have - 0.03% (2)
words and - 0.03% (2)
those of - 0.03% (2)
carnegie mellon - 0.03% (2)
do the - 0.03% (2)
the very - 0.03% (2)
so, what’s - 0.03% (2)
i believe - 0.03% (2)
turned in - 0.03% (2)
shame on - 0.03% (2)
of society - 0.03% (2)
shared fake - 0.03% (2)
client and - 0.03% (2)
to mangle - 0.03% (2)
have on - 0.03% (2)
college graduate - 0.03% (2)
gen xers - 0.03% (2)
wall street - 0.03% (2)
is now - 0.03% (2)
on that - 0.03% (2)
age and - 0.03% (2)
in this - 0.03% (2)
how well - 0.03% (2)
know i - 0.03% (2)
issue that - 0.03% (2)
w. page - 0.03% (2)
the arthur - 0.03% (2)
rose & - 0.03% (2)
co. are - 0.03% (2)
of all - 0.03% (2)
morning shows - 0.03% (2)
the same - 0.03% (2)
there’s a - 0.03% (2)
of americans - 0.03% (2)
times, a - 0.03% (2)
and with - 0.03% (2)
news is - 0.03% (2)
years. it’s - 0.03% (2)
major network - 0.03% (2)
the past - 0.03% (2)
it’s the - 0.03% (2)
will have - 0.03% (2)
this:googleprintfacebookemailtwitterlinkedin posted in - 0.17% (10)
share this:googleprintfacebookemailtwitterlinkedin posted - 0.17% (10)
posted in uncategorized - 0.17% (10)
2017 by steve - 0.17% (10)
by steve cody - 0.17% (10)
in uncategorized | - 0.12% (7)
posted on may - 0.1% (6)
cbs this morning - 0.09% (5)
the right thing - 0.07% (4)
travel & tourism - 0.07% (4)
it comes to - 0.05% (3)
when it comes - 0.05% (3)
of the day - 0.05% (3)
to the pr - 0.05% (3)
the english language - 0.05% (3)
post. share this:googleprintfacebookemailtwitterlinkedin - 0.05% (3)
this post. share - 0.05% (3)
for suggesting this - 0.05% (3)
if the leaders - 0.03% (2)
and retain good - 0.03% (2)
attract and retain - 0.03% (2)
cody for suggesting - 0.03% (2)
doing the right - 0.03% (2)
come around here - 0.03% (2)
peppercomm or its - 0.03% (2)
your email address - 0.03% (2)
the rest of - 0.03% (2)
leave a reply - 0.03% (2)
to the u.s. - 0.03% (2)
the land of - 0.03% (2)
| leave a - 0.03% (2)
a poor millennial - 0.03% (2)
new york times, - 0.03% (2)
the arthur w. - 0.03% (2)
will be the - 0.03% (2)
shared fake news - 0.03% (2)
real and what - 0.03% (2)
news on their - 0.03% (2)
the big bang - 0.03% (2)
steve cody last - 0.03% (2)
the wall street - 0.03% (2)
the only one - 0.03% (2)
it’s the only - 0.03% (2)
& co. are - 0.03% (2)
poor millennial to - 0.03% (2)
arthur w. page - 0.03% (2)
| 4 replies - 0.03% (2)
uncategorized | 4 - 0.03% (2)

Here you can find chart of all your popular one, two and three word phrases. Google and others search engines means your page is about words you use frequently.

Copyright © 2015-2016 hupso.pl. All rights reserved. FB | +G | Twitter

Hupso.pl jest serwisem internetowym, w którym jednym kliknieciem możesz szybko i łatwo sprawdź stronę www pod kątem SEO. Oferujemy darmowe pozycjonowanie stron internetowych oraz wycena domen i stron internetowych. Prowadzimy ranking polskich stron internetowych oraz ranking stron alexa.