3.96 score from hupso.pl for:
principia-scientific.org



HTML Content


Titleprincipia scientific international - a science-based community

Length: 62, Words: 7
Description psi aims to promote best scientific practice in the community; to defend the interests of the members, to educate specialists and non-specialists about new theories and refinements in best practice; to disseminate amongst our members, domestically and internationally, news and views for the betterment of their knowledge and performance.

Length: 338, Words: 49
Keywords pusty
Robots noodp
Charset UTF-8
Og Meta - Title exist
Og Meta - Description exist
Og Meta - Site name exist
Tytuł powinien zawierać pomiędzy 10 a 70 znaków (ze spacjami), a mniej niż 12 słów w długości.
Meta opis powinien zawierać pomiędzy 50 a 160 znaków (łącznie ze spacjami), a mniej niż 24 słów w długości.
Kodowanie znaków powinny być określone , UTF-8 jest chyba najlepszy zestaw znaków, aby przejść z powodu UTF-8 jest bardziej międzynarodowy kodowaniem.
Otwarte obiekty wykresu powinny być obecne w stronie internetowej (więcej informacji na temat protokołu OpenGraph: http://ogp.me/)

SEO Content

Words/Characters 5656
Text/HTML 39.64 %
Headings H1 14
H2 0
H3 6
H4 5
H5 0
H6 0
H1
the science is settled
climate crazies: strange tale of the green house gas gang
greenhouse gas climate theory ‘inadmissible’ and ‘junk science’
trump will likely shutter nasa climate alarm shop
is there a climate change consensus?
‘directed evolution’ and alien life
tackling the peddlers of climate change
lying about the climate – the new normal
3 new papers: global seas rising about 2 inches per century
empirical evidence of man-made global warming?
the real plague affecting science? it isn’t fraud
fossil fuel is “green energy”
extreme cold set to hit us — 75% of the country will be below freezing
climate crazy 2016: hawaii’s ‘foot of snow’
H2
H3
donate today!
latest news
trending climate tweets
get a daily digest of the day’s headlines
or get instant notifications
recent comments
H4 jerry l krause
football coach stopped by atheist from praying with team players keep tradition going - page 47
jerry l krause
jef reynen
jeff greenwell
H5
H6
strong
donald trump
bob walker
robert h. goddard
james hansen
daryl hannah
adam werbach
bill mckibben
julian bond,
al gore
john theon
gavin schmidt
john christy
b
i
donald trump
bob walker
robert h. goddard
james hansen
daryl hannah
adam werbach
bill mckibben
julian bond,
al gore
john theon
gavin schmidt
john christy
em donald trump
bob walker
robert h. goddard
james hansen
daryl hannah
adam werbach
bill mckibben
julian bond,
al gore
john theon
gavin schmidt
john christy
Bolds strong 12
b 0
i 12
em 12
Zawartość strony internetowej powinno zawierać więcej niż 250 słów, z stopa tekst / kod jest wyższy niż 20%.
Pozycji używać znaczników (h1, h2, h3, ...), aby określić temat sekcji lub ustępów na stronie, ale zwykle, użyj mniej niż 6 dla każdego tagu pozycje zachować swoją stronę zwięzły.
Styl używać silnych i kursywy znaczniki podkreślić swoje słowa kluczowe swojej stronie, ale nie nadużywać (mniej niż 16 silnych tagi i 16 znaczników kursywy)

Statystyki strony

twitter:title pusty
twitter:description pusty
google+ itemprop=name pusty
Pliki zewnętrzne 31
Pliki CSS 7
Pliki javascript 24
Plik należy zmniejszyć całkowite odwołanie plików (CSS + JavaScript) do 7-8 maksymalnie.

Linki wewnętrzne i zewnętrzne

Linki 182
Linki wewnętrzne 12
Linki zewnętrzne 170
Linki bez atrybutu Title 154
Linki z atrybutem NOFOLLOW 0
Linki - Użyj atrybutu tytuł dla każdego łącza. Nofollow link jest link, który nie pozwala wyszukiwarkom boty zrealizują są odnośniki no follow. Należy zwracać uwagę na ich użytkowania

Linki wewnętrzne

Linki zewnętrzne

https://twitter.com/psi_intl
http://www.facebook.com/pages/principia-scientific-international/223487287746649
https://uk.linkedin.com/in/john0sullivan
https://plus.google.com/u/0/+johnosullivanpsi
http://feeds.feedburner.com/psintl
privacy policy http://principia-scientific.org/privacy-policy/
latest news http://principia-scientific.org/current-news/
- http://principia-scientific.org
home http://www.principia-scientific.org
latest news http://principia-scientific.org/current-news/
support and advice http://principia-scientific.org/support-advice/
how the prom process works http://principia-scientific.org/how-the-prom-process-works/
the model atmosphere (pdf) http://principia-scientific.org/publications/the_model_atmosphere.pdf
greenhouse effect experiment (pdf) http://principia-scientific.org/publications/experiment_on_greenhouse_effect.pdf
copernicus meets the greenhouse effect (pdf) http://principia-scientific.org/publications/copernicus_meets_the_greenhouse_effect.pdf
observations on backradiation http://principia-scientific.org/publications/new_concise_experiment_on_backradiation.pdf
history of radiation http://principia-scientific.org/publications/history-of-radiation.pdf
greenhouse effect refutation http://principia-scientific.org/publications/psi_miatello_refutation_ghe.pdf
absence of a measurable greenhouse effect http://principia-scientific.org/publications/absence_measureable_greenhouse_effect.pdf
new model of the human cornea http://principia-scientific.org/publications/psi-miatello-new_hall-petch_model_of_human_cornea.pdf
the human cornea’s structure http://principia-scientific.org/publications/psi-miatello-cornea-structural_model.pdf
alternative model to predict global temperatures other than based on co2
by david j. pristash
http://principia-scientific.org/publications/prom/prom-pristash_alternative_theory_to_co2.pdf
is sustainable energy even possible at the global level?
by david j. pristash
http://principia-scientific.org/publications/prom/prom-pristash_sustainable_energy.pdf
finite element model for atmospheric ir-absorption
by joseph reynen
http://principia-scientific.org/publications/prom/prom_reynen_finite_element.pdf
back radiation greenhouse effect of 33 kelvin possible?
by ross mcleod
http://principia-scientific.org/publications/prom/prom-ross-experiment.pdf
why co2 has nothing to do with temperature
by darko butina
http://principia-scientific.org/publications/prom/prom-darko-virtual_vs_reality.pdf
one-way heat flow formulation with planck absorption and re-emission
by joseph reynen
http://principia-scientific.org/publications/prom/prom_reynen_planck_absorption.pdf
the carbon cycle and royal society math
by dr klaus l. e. kaiser
http://principia-scientific.org/publications/prom/prom-kaiser-carbon_cycle_and_rs_math.pdf
diurnal variations of heat evacuation
by joseph reynan
http://principia-scientific.org/publications/prom/prom-reynen_transient.pdf
lessons from a chicken-wire stack on the moon
by jef reynen
http://principia-scientific.org/publications/prom/prom-reynen_vacuum.pdf
clean energy – what is it and what are we paying for? http://principia-scientific.org/images/clean_energy_facts.pdf
the modelling history of climatology http://principia-scientific.org/publications/prom/prom-alker-modelling_history_of_climatology.pdf
co2 surface warming http://principia-scientific.org/publications/prom/prom-reynen-sensitivity_overview.pdf
greenhouse effect theory within the un ipcc
by derek alter
http://principia-scientific.org/publications/prom/ghe-unipcc.pdf
welcome to psi http://principia-scientific.org/principia-scientific-international-psi/
principles of association http://principia-scientific.org/articles-of-association/
psi mission statement http://principia-scientific.org/psi-mission-statement/
policies http://principia-scientific.org/why-is-psi-still-developing-a-science-policy/
why psi is a private assoc. http://principia-scientific.org/why-psi-is-proposed-as-a-cic/
contact us http://principia-scientific.org/contact-us/
- http://principia-scientific.org
the science is settled http://principia-scientific.org/the-science-is-settled/
continue reading http://principia-scientific.org/the-science-is-settled/
1 comment http://principia-scientific.org/the-science-is-settled/#comments
climate crazies: strange tale of the green house gas gang http://principia-scientific.org/climate-crazies-strange-tale-green-house-gas-gang/
continue reading http://principia-scientific.org/climate-crazies-strange-tale-green-house-gas-gang/
no comments http://principia-scientific.org/climate-crazies-strange-tale-green-house-gas-gang/#respond
greenhouse gas climate theory ‘inadmissible’ and ‘junk science’ http://principia-scientific.org/greenhouse-gas-climate-theory-inadmissible-junk-science/
heller’s analysis http://realclimatescience.com/2016/12/climate-scientists-celebrating-115-years-of-debunked-science/
continue reading http://principia-scientific.org/greenhouse-gas-climate-theory-inadmissible-junk-science/
6 comments http://principia-scientific.org/greenhouse-gas-climate-theory-inadmissible-junk-science/#comments
trump will likely shutter nasa climate alarm shop http://principia-scientific.org/trump-will-likely-shutter-nasa-climate-alarm-shop/
- http://i1.wp.com/www.cfact.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/hansen-busted.jpg?ssl=1
- http://i0.wp.com/www.cfact.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/theon.jpg?ssl=1
- http://i1.wp.com/www.cfact.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/schmidy.jpg?ssl=1
continue reading http://principia-scientific.org/trump-will-likely-shutter-nasa-climate-alarm-shop/
3 comments http://principia-scientific.org/trump-will-likely-shutter-nasa-climate-alarm-shop/#comments
is there a climate change consensus? http://principia-scientific.org/climate-change-consensus/
continue reading http://principia-scientific.org/climate-change-consensus/
no comments http://principia-scientific.org/climate-change-consensus/#respond
‘directed evolution’ and alien life http://principia-scientific.org/directed-evolution-alien-life/
hypothetical types of biochemistry https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/hypothetical_types_of_biochemistry
caltech artist’s https://mediaassets.caltech.edu/site_images/265-fa_jk-siliconbasedlife-news-web.jpg
scientists shocked by discovery relating to alien life http://www.morningticker.com/2016/11/scientists-shocked-by-discovery-relating-to-alien-life/
science http://science.sciencemag.org/content/354/6315/1048
continue reading http://principia-scientific.org/directed-evolution-alien-life/
1 comment http://principia-scientific.org/directed-evolution-alien-life/#comments
tackling the peddlers of climate change http://principia-scientific.org/tackling-peddlers-climate-change/
continue reading http://principia-scientific.org/tackling-peddlers-climate-change/
15 comments http://principia-scientific.org/tackling-peddlers-climate-change/#comments
lying about the climate – the new normal http://principia-scientific.org/lying-climate-new-normal/
- http://i0.wp.com/realclimatescience.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/screen-shot-2016-12-02-at-3.30.09-am-down.png
forest fires blaze across southeast: what is feeding the flames? – csmonitor.com http://www.csmonitor.com/environment/2016/1110/forest-fires-blaze-across-southeast-what-is-feeding-the-flames
- http://i1.wp.com/realclimatescience.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/screen-shot-2016-12-02-at-3.34.17-am.png
forest fires in tennessee___3.pdf http://tnrcd.org/documents/envirothon/forest%20fires%20in%20tennessee___3.pdf
- http://i2.wp.com/realclimatescience.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/screen-shot-2016-12-02-at-3.19.01-am.gif
- http://i1.wp.com/realclimatescience.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/screen-shot-2016-12-02-at-3.38.26-am.png
climate at a glance | national centers for environmental information (ncei) https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cag/time-series/us/40/0/pcp/1/10/1895-2016?base_prd=true&firstbaseyear=1901&lastbaseyear=2000&trend=true&trend_base=10&firsttrendyear=1895&lasttrendyear=2016
- http://i2.wp.com/stevengoddard.files.wordpress.com/2015/01/screenhunter_5996-jan-12-09-27.gif?ssl=1
this drought may never break – environment – smh.com.au http://www.smh.com.au/news/environment/this-drought-may-never-break/2008/01/03/1198949986473.html
- http://i2.wp.com/stevengoddard.files.wordpress.com/2015/03/screenhunter_7914-mar-14-08-51.gif?ssl=1
drought may be new norm for uk, says environment secretary | environment | the guardian http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2012/feb/21/drought-new-norm-for-uk
realclimatescience.com http://realclimatescience.com/2016/12/lying-about-the-climate-the-new-normal/
continue reading http://principia-scientific.org/lying-climate-new-normal/
no comments http://principia-scientific.org/lying-climate-new-normal/#respond
3 new papers: global seas rising about 2 inches per century http://principia-scientific.org/3-new-papers-global-seas-rising-2-inches-per-century/
continue reading http://principia-scientific.org/3-new-papers-global-seas-rising-2-inches-per-century/
no comments http://principia-scientific.org/3-new-papers-global-seas-rising-2-inches-per-century/#respond
empirical evidence of man-made global warming? http://principia-scientific.org/empirical-evidence-man-made-global-warming/
continue reading http://principia-scientific.org/empirical-evidence-man-made-global-warming/
1 comment http://principia-scientific.org/empirical-evidence-man-made-global-warming/#comments
the real plague affecting science? it isn’t fraud http://principia-scientific.org/real-plague-affecting-science-isnt-fraud/
science fraud https://www.statnews.com/2016/06/24/science-fraud-second-chance/
continue reading http://principia-scientific.org/real-plague-affecting-science-isnt-fraud/
no comments http://principia-scientific.org/real-plague-affecting-science-isnt-fraud/#respond
fossil fuel is “green energy” http://principia-scientific.org/fossil-fuel-green-energy/
continue reading http://principia-scientific.org/fossil-fuel-green-energy/
no comments http://principia-scientific.org/fossil-fuel-green-energy/#respond
extreme cold set to hit us — 75% of the country will be below freezing http://principia-scientific.org/extreme-cold-set-hit-us-75-country-will-freezing/
continue reading http://principia-scientific.org/extreme-cold-set-hit-us-75-country-will-freezing/
1 comment http://principia-scientific.org/extreme-cold-set-hit-us-75-country-will-freezing/#comments
climate crazy 2016: hawaii’s ‘foot of snow’ http://principia-scientific.org/climate-crazy-2016-hawaiis-foot-snow/
continue reading http://principia-scientific.org/climate-crazy-2016-hawaiis-foot-snow/
no comments http://principia-scientific.org/climate-crazy-2016-hawaiis-foot-snow/#respond
2 http://principia-scientific.org/page/2/
3 http://principia-scientific.org/page/3/
4 http://principia-scientific.org/page/4/
134 http://principia-scientific.org/page/134/
http://principia-scientific.org/page/2/
https://twitter.com/psi_intl
http://www.facebook.com/pages/principia-scientific-international/223487287746649
https://uk.linkedin.com/in/john0sullivan
https://plus.google.com/u/0/+johnosullivanpsi
http://feeds.feedburner.com/psintl
the science is settled http://principia-scientific.org/the-science-is-settled/
lying about the climate – the new normal http://principia-scientific.org/lying-climate-new-normal/
climate crazies: strange tale of the green house gas gang http://principia-scientific.org/climate-crazies-strange-tale-green-house-gas-gang/
3 new papers: global seas rising about 2 inches per century http://principia-scientific.org/3-new-papers-global-seas-rising-2-inches-per-century/
greenhouse gas climate theory ‘inadmissible’ and ‘junk science’ http://principia-scientific.org/greenhouse-gas-climate-theory-inadmissible-junk-science/
empirical evidence of man-made global warming? http://principia-scientific.org/empirical-evidence-man-made-global-warming/
trump will likely shutter nasa climate alarm shop http://principia-scientific.org/trump-will-likely-shutter-nasa-climate-alarm-shop/
the real plague affecting science? it isn’t fraud http://principia-scientific.org/real-plague-affecting-science-isnt-fraud/
is there a climate change consensus? http://principia-scientific.org/climate-change-consensus/
fossil fuel is “green energy” http://principia-scientific.org/fossil-fuel-green-energy/
https://twitter.com/ccdeditor/lists/trending-climate-tweets
fbf http://wordpress.org/extended/plugin/feedburner-form
powered by ®google feedburner http://google.feedburner.com
# http://principia-scientific.org/the-science-is-settled/#comment-15080
football coach stopped by atheist from praying with team players keep tradition going - page 47 http://politicalhotwire.com/current-events/160798-football-coach-stopped-atheist-praying-team-players-keep-tradition-going-47.html#post4928580
# http://principia-scientific.org/nasa-exposed-in-massive-new-climate-data-fraud/#comment-15079
# http://principia-scientific.org/tackling-peddlers-climate-change/#comment-15078
# http://principia-scientific.org/trump-will-likely-shutter-nasa-climate-alarm-shop/#comment-15077
http://principia-scientific.org/publications/prom/prom-reynen-sensitivity_overview.pdf http://principia-scientific.org/publications/prom/prom-reynen-sensitivity_overview.pdf
# http://principia-scientific.org/greenhouse-gas-climate-theory-inadmissible-junk-science/#comment-15076
https://twitter.com/psi_intl
http://www.facebook.com/pages/principia-scientific-international/223487287746649
https://uk.linkedin.com/in/john0sullivan
http://feeds.feedburner.com/psintl
home http://www.principia-scientific.org
latest news http://principia-scientific.org/current-news/
support and advice http://principia-scientific.org/support-advice/
how the prom process works http://principia-scientific.org/how-the-prom-process-works/
the model atmosphere (pdf) http://principia-scientific.org/publications/the_model_atmosphere.pdf
greenhouse effect experiment (pdf) http://principia-scientific.org/publications/experiment_on_greenhouse_effect.pdf
copernicus meets the greenhouse effect (pdf) http://principia-scientific.org/publications/copernicus_meets_the_greenhouse_effect.pdf
observations on backradiation http://principia-scientific.org/publications/new_concise_experiment_on_backradiation.pdf
history of radiation http://principia-scientific.org/publications/history-of-radiation.pdf
greenhouse effect refutation http://principia-scientific.org/publications/psi_miatello_refutation_ghe.pdf
absence of a measurable greenhouse effect http://principia-scientific.org/publications/absence_measureable_greenhouse_effect.pdf
new model of the human cornea http://principia-scientific.org/publications/psi-miatello-new_hall-petch_model_of_human_cornea.pdf
the human cornea’s structure http://principia-scientific.org/publications/psi-miatello-cornea-structural_model.pdf
alternative model to predict global temperatures other than based on co2
by david j. pristash
http://principia-scientific.org/publications/prom/prom-pristash_alternative_theory_to_co2.pdf
is sustainable energy even possible at the global level?
by david j. pristash
http://principia-scientific.org/publications/prom/prom-pristash_sustainable_energy.pdf
finite element model for atmospheric ir-absorption
by joseph reynen
http://principia-scientific.org/publications/prom/prom_reynen_finite_element.pdf
back radiation greenhouse effect of 33 kelvin possible?
by ross mcleod
http://principia-scientific.org/publications/prom/prom-ross-experiment.pdf
why co2 has nothing to do with temperature
by darko butina
http://principia-scientific.org/publications/prom/prom-darko-virtual_vs_reality.pdf
one-way heat flow formulation with planck absorption and re-emission
by joseph reynen
http://principia-scientific.org/publications/prom/prom_reynen_planck_absorption.pdf
the carbon cycle and royal society math
by dr klaus l. e. kaiser
http://principia-scientific.org/publications/prom/prom-kaiser-carbon_cycle_and_rs_math.pdf
diurnal variations of heat evacuation
by joseph reynan
http://principia-scientific.org/publications/prom/prom-reynen_transient.pdf
lessons from a chicken-wire stack on the moon
by jef reynen
http://principia-scientific.org/publications/prom/prom-reynen_vacuum.pdf
clean energy – what is it and what are we paying for? http://principia-scientific.org/images/clean_energy_facts.pdf
the modelling history of climatology http://principia-scientific.org/publications/prom/prom-alker-modelling_history_of_climatology.pdf
co2 surface warming http://principia-scientific.org/publications/prom/prom-reynen-sensitivity_overview.pdf
greenhouse effect theory within the un ipcc
by derek alter
http://principia-scientific.org/publications/prom/ghe-unipcc.pdf
welcome to psi http://principia-scientific.org/principia-scientific-international-psi/
principles of association http://principia-scientific.org/articles-of-association/
psi mission statement http://principia-scientific.org/psi-mission-statement/
policies http://principia-scientific.org/why-is-psi-still-developing-a-science-policy/
why psi is a private assoc. http://principia-scientific.org/why-psi-is-proposed-as-a-cic/
contact us http://principia-scientific.org/contact-us/

Zdjęcia

Zdjęcia 28
Zdjęcia bez atrybutu ALT 0
Zdjęcia bez atrybutu TITLE 28
Korzystanie Obraz ALT i TITLE atrybutu dla każdego obrazu.

Zdjęcia bez atrybutu TITLE

http://principia-scientific.org/images/stories/psi-logo.png
http://principia-scientific.org/images/stories/psi-logo.png
http://i1.wp.com/principia-scientific.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/settled-science.jpg?resize=704%2c484
http://i2.wp.com/principia-scientific.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/trio.jpg?resize=727%2c320
http://i0.wp.com/principia-scientific.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/heller.jpg?resize=800%2c278
http://i2.wp.com/principia-scientific.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/scam.jpg?resize=764%2c419
http://i2.wp.com/www.cfact.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/hansen-busted-300x169.jpg?resize=300%2c169&ssl=1
http://i0.wp.com/www.cfact.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/theon-300x225.jpg?resize=300%2c225&ssl=1
http://i1.wp.com/www.cfact.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/schmidy-300x163.jpg?resize=300%2c163&ssl=1
http://i1.wp.com/principia-scientific.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/thumbs.jpg?resize=715%2c339
http://i0.wp.com/principia-scientific.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/life.jpg?resize=800%2c388
http://i1.wp.com/principia-scientific.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/fraud.jpg?resize=587%2c387
http://i0.wp.com/realclimatescience.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/screen-shot-2016-12-02-at-3.30.09-am-down.png?resize=500%2c266
http://i1.wp.com/realclimatescience.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/screen-shot-2016-12-02-at-3.34.17-am.png?resize=677%2c545
http://i2.wp.com/realclimatescience.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/screen-shot-2016-12-02-at-3.19.01-am.gif?resize=730%2c555
http://i1.wp.com/realclimatescience.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/screen-shot-2016-12-02-at-3.38.26-am.png?resize=886%2c488
http://i2.wp.com/stevengoddard.files.wordpress.com/2015/01/screenhunter_5996-jan-12-09-27.gif?resize=574%2c304&ssl=1
http://i2.wp.com/stevengoddard.files.wordpress.com/2015/03/screenhunter_7914-mar-14-08-51.gif?resize=549%2c433&ssl=1
http://i1.wp.com/principia-scientific.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/sea.jpg?resize=800%2c544
http://i2.wp.com/principia-scientific.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/change.jpg?resize=689%2c501
http://i2.wp.com/principia-scientific.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/maggots.jpg?resize=800%2c361
http://i2.wp.com/principia-scientific.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/co2.jpg?resize=739%2c413
http://i2.wp.com/principia-scientific.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/snow.jpg?resize=624%2c371
https://feedburner.google.com/fb/images/pub/feed-icon16x16.png
http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/c5b68b189928c760186238842160a7f5?s=35&r=g
http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/c5b68b189928c760186238842160a7f5?s=35&r=g
http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/cb734981410c48e6421fc678455b9d7c?s=35&r=g
http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/88928e9077b73e111da1b286fa723997?s=35&r=g

Zdjęcia bez atrybutu ALT

empty

Ranking:


Alexa Traffic
Daily Global Rank Trend
Daily Reach (Percent)









Majestic SEO











Text on page:

privacy policysitemaplatest news homelatest newssupportsupport and advicehow the prom process workspublicationsthe model atmosphere (pdf)greenhouse effect experiment (pdf)copernicus meets the greenhouse effect (pdf)observations on backradiationhistory of radiationgreenhouse effect refutationabsence of a measurable greenhouse effectnew model of the human corneathe human cornea’s structurepromalternative model to predict global temperatures other than based on co2by david j. pristashis sustainable energy even possible at the global level?by david j. pristashfinite element model for atmospheric ir-absorptionby joseph reynenback radiation greenhouse effect of 33 kelvin possible?by ross mcleodwhy co2 has nothing to do with temperatureby darko butinaone-way heat flow formulation with planck absorption and re-emissionby joseph reynenthe carbon cycle and royal society mathby dr klaus l. e. kaiserdiurnal variations of heat evacuationby joseph reynanlessons from a chicken-wire stack on the moonby jef reynenclean energy – what is it and what are we paying for?the modelling history of climatologyco2 surface warming greenhouse effect theory within the un ipccby derek alteraboutwelcome to psiprinciples of associationpsi mission statementpolicieswhy psi is a private assoc.contact us the science is settled published on december 9, 2016written by anthony bright-paul the warmists are very fond of saying ‘the science is settled’ and in point of fact they are largely right. between the warmists and the skeptics there is a great deal of agreement on the science. the disagreements mostly come over the use or abuse of the english language. just as one small example, many of the warmists are unable apparently to distinguish between ‘causation’ and ‘correlation’. that is a matter of linguistics and not of science per se. continue reading 1 comment climate crazies: strange tale of the green house gas gang published on december 7, 2016written by joseph a olsen pe the green house gas gang began in 1896 when svante arrhenius of sweden discovered heat storage increases with increased carbon dioxide levels. this father of the gang was a child prodigy, nobel committee member, nobel laureate and founding member of the eugenics movement. in 1900 he became involved in the creation of the nobel prize, in 1901 he was a member of the nobel committee and in 1903 he helped give himself a nobel prize for chemistry. he served on the nobel committee until 1927 where he exerted enormous influence on the selection of all prize winners. in 1922 he helped father the state institute for racial biology, which was to have been a nobel institute. the principles for this had been in discussion by the literati for decades and were incorporated in the us progressive movement of the 1900’s and fully implemented by the nazi eugenics programs. continue reading no comments greenhouse gas climate theory ‘inadmissible’ and ‘junk science’ published on december 6, 2016written by john o'sullivan global warming science in full meltdown. influential climate analyst tony heller exposes key errors made 115 years ago by the “grandfather” of greenhouse gas theory. the findings, say heller, make the climate theory of swedish chemist svante arrhenius “inadmissible” and “junk science.” heller’s analysis could have huge implications. us president-elect, donald trump, given a populist mandate to dismantle the “hoax” of man-made global warming, is set to target the environmental protection agency’s (epa) for its wasteful multi-billion dollar climate change boondoggle. leading trump’s epa transition team is myron ebell, the director of energy and environment at the competitive enterprise institute (cei). ebell and heller are long-time friends championing skepticism of establishment climate alarm. continue reading 6 comments trump will likely shutter nasa climate alarm shop published on december 5, 2016written by professor larry bell president-elect donald trump’s senior space policy advisor, bob walker, recently observed to the guardian newspaper that nasa has been reduced to “a logistics agency concentrating on space station resupply and politically correct environmental monitoring.” instead, “we see nasa in an exploration role, in deep space research.” he added, “mr. trump’s decisions will be based upon solid science, not politicized science.” we should definitely expect a major budgetary realignment of nasa’s annual earth science directorate funding which has increased 50% to a current $2 billion under the obama administration, compared with $2.8 billion for space exploration. a great place to start serious slashing will be with the ideologically corrupted nasa goddard institute for space studies (giss). the giss, which inappropriately bears the distinguished name of father of modern rocketry robert h. goddard, should definitely not be confused with nasa’s goddard space flight center in greenbelt, maryland, a major national scientific and engineering center. instead, this small enclave of temperature data modelers located in a midtown manhattan office building relies primarily upon sparse surface data (not the far more reliable satellite measurements available since 1979) that is mostly supplied by others. check the issuing source the next time you hear media reports claiming that “nasa says that blah, blah year, month, day is hottest in record.” if mentioned at all, you should not be surprised to see that it came from the giss. up until three years ago, the organization’s much-chronicled “top climate scientist” director was james hansen, a politically protected civil service employee-cum-anti-fossil energy activist who was arrested four times for noncompliance with police orders during public demonstrations. on february 13, 2013, he was handcuffed in front of the white house alongside actress daryl hannah, sierra club founder adam werbach, 350.org founder bill mckibben, former naacp president julian bond, and a few dozen others protesting to block the keystone xl pipeline. hansen first gained national media attention as star witness at then-sen. al gore’s 1988 committee on science, technology, and space hearings where he famously testified that he was 99% certain that temperatures had increased under human-caused greenhouse influence. in 2009, hansen’s former supervisor john theon wrote to the minority office at the environment and public works committee that he had “embarrassed nasa” with his alarming claims which were not supported by scientific evidence. as theon noted, “nasa scientist james hansen has created worldwide frenzy with his dire climate warning, his call for those who dissent against manmade global warming fear, and his claims that he was allegedly muzzled by the bush administration despite doing 1,400 on-the-job media interviews!” he added that “climate models are useless” because they “do not realistically simulate the climate system because there are many sub-grid scale processes that the models either replicate poorly or completely omit.” theon continued, observing, “furthermore, some scientists have manipulated the observed data to justify their model results. in doing so, they neither explain what they have modified in the observations, nor explain how they did it.” true to form, in january 2015 the giss, now headed by climate alarm blogger gavin schmidt, rolled out a report that 2014 was the hottest year ever measured. that claim was presumably based upon available records dating back to 1880 . . . nearly a century before accurate global satellite records existed. schmidt has since admitted that the likelihood that 2014 was the warmest year since 1880 is just 38%. yet when asked by the daily mailwhether he regretted that his press release hadn’t mentioned this, they reported that he gave no response. according to satellite measurements, 2014 (a major el niño year) was actually the third-warmest in 36 years since satellite measurements have been recorded. john christy, a professor of atmospheric science and director of the earth system science center at the university of alabama in huntsville, argues that any recorded temperature changes since 2001 are “statistically insignificant.” it is tragic to see the agency that applied solid science to put humans the moon become publicly identified with and misrepresented by a junk science-premised climate alarm propaganda machine. nevertheless, in a recent interview posted in the independent, a british online newspaper, nasa giss director schmidt “warned” president-elect donald trump that government scientists are “not going to stand” for any interference with their work. asked if he would resign if the trump administration adopted an extreme form of “climate change denial,” schmidt replied that this was “an interesting question,” but one which would not cause him to quit “in or of itself.” perhaps we might hope that the trump administration will solve schmidt’s decision quandary by eliminating the giss altogether. while no one i know denies that natural climate changes, it’s high time for a political climate change that gets nasa back to doing reliable science we can once again trust. continue reading 3 comments is there a climate change consensus? published on december 4, 2016written by dr charles anderson is there any level on which a climate consensus can be said to exist?  only at the most obvious level, which is that everyone agrees that the climate changes.  the realists know that the climate has always changed, drastically over millions of years of alternating ice ages and warm periods and within a narrower range over the warm last 12,000 years, with such periods as the minoan warm period, the roman warming, the medieval warm period, and the present warm period. the catastrophic man-made global warming alarmists claim that the climate was very stable prior to the industrial age, which just happens to have had its start at the end of the little ice age according to the climate realists.  but, since man became powerful and plentiful with the industrial age, the alarmists say that climate change now occurs mostly due to man. continue reading no comments ‘directed evolution’ and alien life published on december 4, 2016written by dr klaus l e kaiser all life forms (on earth) rely on carbon (chemical symbol “c”) for their existence and functioning. from miniscule bacteria to giant sequoia trees, from worms to whales, no life on earth including humans would exist without “carbon” in various combinations with other elements, most notably hydrogen, oxygen, nitrogen, and phosphorus. recent news speculate about hypothetical types of biochemistry and extraterrestrial life forms using a “silicon” based system, possibly akin to the caltech artist’s rendering of such an envisioned life form shown nearby: it may be difficult to figure out what’s front or back on that but it’s a lovely alien creature, isn’t it? another headline says “scientists shocked by discovery relating to alien life” and “the search for alien life may have been altered forever by an amazing new conclusion by researchers.” researchers say in a new paper published in the journal science that silicon can be made to bond naturally with carbon, which could open the door for many possibilities, not just with regards to alien life but also for human engineering. they term that process “directed evolution.” is the idea of “evolutionary tinkering” based on the claim that “silicon can form long chains of molecules, making it a potential building block for life” realistic or based on false assumptions? in order to evaluate that, one needs to look at the actual chemistry which i will try to explain in brief continue reading 1 comment tackling the peddlers of climate change published on december 3, 2016written by anthony bright-paul how often have we heard that ‘climatechange’ is the greatest threat to mankind! how often have we heard that global warming will lead to an unprecedented rise in sea levels! –  when what is the truth? there is absolutely no truth whatsoever in these assertions, made by a coven of corrupt scientists, who have held the whole world in thrall. not only is the globe not warming, but we find that the books have been cooked on a truly massive scale. so massive in fact, that even intelligent members of parliament with some scientific knowledge have been fooled.  the world at large has been fooled, as witness the bizarre antics at cop22. did you think that that was a climate conference? think again! it was about nothing but money, and who could screw the most out of the supposedly rich nations. continue reading 15 comments lying about the climate – the new normal published on december 7, 2016written by tony heller christian science monitor is up to their usual ambulance chasing climate lies – now blaming fires in the southeast on global warming. could this be the new normal for the south? forest fires blaze across southeast: what is feeding the flames? – csmonitor.com as always, this is based on no facts or science. forest fires have been declining in tennessee since the 1970s. forest fires in tennessee___3.pdf in fact, there is a good correlation with declining sea ice. the less ice, the fewer fires. tennessee has been getting wetter as the fires have decreased. climate at a glance | national centers for environmental information (ncei) every time there is a drought, government experts declare it to be the new normal.  this drought may never break – environment – smh.com.au drought may be new norm for uk, says environment secretary | environment | the guardian there isn’t one bit of truth in the christian science monitor thesis. but that is the new normal. read more at realclimatescience.com continue reading no comments 3 new papers: global seas rising about 2 inches per century published on december 7, 2016written by kenneth richard according to the most highly-cited estimate of recent (1992 – 2011) polar ice sheet melt rates, the land ice on greenland and antarctica has been contributing to sea level rise at a rate of 0.59 mm/year in the modern era, which means the equivalent of 5.9 centimeters (2.3 inches) per century of sea level rise might eventually accrue if the polar ice sheets continue melting at current rates for the next 10 decades. continue reading no comments empirical evidence of man-made global warming? published on december 5, 2016written by anthony bright-paul there is no empirical evidence of man-made global warming whatsoever. there never has been and there never will be. oh yes! there is a theory and plenty of scientists have an ‘opinion’ on the matter. but opinion is not science. a great number of apparatchiks also ‘believe’ that the globe is getting hotter and hotter and indeed only today i read in the bbc science section that we are near to reaching that famous tipping point. but belief is not science either. of course the globe warms every day and cools every night. the weather likewise changes every day and the seasons are rotating all the time. the temperature is different in different places all over the globe – watch the meteo on euronews or watch cnn or the bbc. they all show magnificently the different and ever-changing temperatures throughout the world. that is empirical. those temperatures are taken by thermometers at some 5ft above the ground. continue reading 1 comment the real plague affecting science? it isn’t fraud published on december 5, 2016written by ivan oransky & adam marcus if a burst pipe in your house is flooding your basement, you’re probably going to be more worried about that than the couple termites you previously spotted. but multiply those termites times a thousand and suddenly the bigger threat to your house might be, well, the little things. the same holds true for science. science fraud draws urgent attention whenever it comes to light, the equivalent of a busted pipe emergency. but it turns out, most scientists think it’s a far lesser threat to their field than the small, but legion, instances of under-reporting of negative findings and scientists’ use of shoddy methodology. and — although it may be surprising coming from two people who run a blog that often focuses on scientific misconduct — we agree. continue reading no comments fossil fuel is “green energy” published on december 4, 2016written by carl brehmer we have today one of the most astonishing examples of a regression in scientific education.  it used to be common knowledge and taught in schools at all levels that carbon dioxide (co2) is a vital, airborne plant food, but it is currently being condemned as being a “pollutant” because many people have come to believe, due to a massive disinformation campaign, that higher levels of this plant food would be harmful to the biosphere.  so pervasive, so effective is this ongoing disinformation campaign that it is now considered by many to be a moral imperative for humanity to abandon the use of its primary source of energy—burning hydrocarbons—because doing so produces co2. let me say that again.  so pervasive, so effective has been the campaign that has demonized co2—the gas that feeds the biosphere—that it is now generally accepted that humanity has a moral obligation to limit its production of it, even if doing so would cause a profound regression in global economic development!  they say that they have “science” on their side but do they?  let’s review what science “knows” and what it doesn’t. continue reading no comments extreme cold set to hit us — 75% of the country will be below freezing published on december 3, 2016written by michael bastach winter is coming. or at least that’s what weather forecasters are predicting for the second week of december. dr. ryan maue, meteorologist with weatherbell analytics, posted a weather forecast showing “extreme cold” building in alaska that’s going to swing southeast in the coming days and bring freezing weather to the lower 48 states. while the cold won’t necessarily be record-breaking, it will surely bring some record lows and maybe even some snow. maue said “that over 75% of the usa will be below freezing for overnight lows on december 8th” based on forecasts. continue reading 1 comment climate crazy 2016: hawaii’s ‘foot of snow’ published on december 3, 2016written by bart jansen [december 2 2016] forget the swimsuits for hawaii and pack raincoats and winter parkas. the national weather service just issued a winter-storm warning until 6 p.m. saturday local time, with heavy, flooding rainfall across the chain of pacific islands and up to 30 inches of snow on the peaks of the big island. drifting snow, freezing fog and gusting wind are forecast for the summits of mauna kea and mauna loa volcanoes above 11,000 feet. visibility could be less than a quarter-mile, making driving and hiking dangerous. continue reading no comments 1234...134 --> search for: -->follow us: donate today! currently, joining psi is free. when you make a donation of the suggested amount of $25 (any amount will help, though!) you will help to sponsor sound, alarmist-free scientific work. latest news the science is settled december 9, 2016 lying about the climate – the new normal december 7, 2016 climate crazies: strange tale of the green house gas gang december 7, 2016 3 new papers: global seas rising about 2 inches per century december 7, 2016 greenhouse gas climate theory ‘inadmissible’ and ‘junk science’ december 6, 2016 empirical evidence of man-made global warming? december 5, 2016 trump will likely shutter nasa climate alarm shop december 5, 2016 the real plague affecting science? it isn’t fraud december 5, 2016 is there a climate change consensus? december 4, 2016 fossil fuel is “green energy” december 4, 2016 trending climate tweets get a daily digest of the day’s headlines every evening, you'll get an email showing you the day's headlines posted here at psi. email goes out between 5 and 7 g.s.t. fbf ▪ powered by ®google feedburner or get instant notifications get instant notifications of new posts by email email address recent comments jerry l krause december 9, 2016 | # hi anthony, “unlike o2 and n2, the greenhouse gases are di-polar in structure, which allows them to absorb and radiate. this means that unlike oxygen and nitrogen, they absorb infrared and so warm up. that includes water vapour, carbon dioxide and methane. all molecules above absolute zero absorb infrared and likewise radiate away, thus cooling. as far as i knows nobody on either side disputes any of this science.” when you stated—as far as i knows nobody on either side disputes any of this science.¬—as far as i know you are absolutely accurate. that is except for me, a chemist. in comments to your article—http://principia-scientific.org/tackling-peddlers-climate-change/—i have just responded to a comment by jim mcginn by quoting extensively from linus pauling’s 1964 chemistry textbook—college chemistry 3rd ed. in his preface to this textbook pauling began: “during the last decade the science of chemistry has continued to change. descriptive chemistry, the tabulation of the observed physical and chemical properties of substances, is still an important part of chemistry; with each passing decade, however, it becomes possible to correlate these facts in terms of theory in a more and more satisfactory manner.” “the theories of greatest value in modern chemistry are the theories of atomic and molecular structure, quantum theory (quantum mechanics), and statistical mechanics. i believe that the concepts involved in these theories can be learned by the beginning student of chemistry sufficiently well for him to apply them in correlating and understanding the facts of descriptive chemistry. moreover, the fundamental experiments upon which these theories are based can be understood by the beginning student. the theories in their detailed mathematical treatment can then be studied later.” thus, by this textbook pauling successfully moved chemists into 20th century physical science. which, it seems professors of physics did not do. richard feynman, at caltech where pauling was also a professor, tried but it had to be concluded that the experiment, which produced the three volumes of the feynman lectures on physics, failed. for feynman, a physicist, could not delay the study of the detailed mathematical treatment to be studied later. this, even if he knew most all the bright students of his physics class at caltech were totally unprepared to understand (do) this detailed mathematical treatment. for all students (chemistry, biology, etc. majors) entering caltech at that time had to take his introductory physics course. and it seems to have been a fact that even many physics majors were unprepared to understand this detailed mathematical treatment associated with quantum mechanics and statistical mechanics. it seems that physicists have never been terribly interested in the atomic and molecular structure of matter. that clearly was and is the province of chemists. so it seems nobody on either side of the controversy involving the greenhouse effect of those trace atmospheric gases which are capable of absorbing longwave ir radiation, have considered, if they have even read, what could be read in volume i of the feynman lectures, pp 42-8 to pp 42-10. however, only a short excerpt should be necessary to alert one what needs to be considered about einstein’s laws of radiation. “thus einstein assumed that there are three kinds of processes: an absorption proportion to the intensity of light, an emission proportional to the intensity of light, called induced emission or sometimes stimulated emission, and a spontaneous emission independent of light.” have a good day, jerry football coach stopped by atheist from praying with team players keep tradition going - page 47 december 9, 2016 | # […] theory of evolution. you make a red herring fallacy, where you bring up irrelevant information. nasa exposed in ?massive? new climate data fraud – principia scientific international nasa exposed in ?massive? new climate data fraud – principia scientific […] jerry l krause december 9, 2016 | # hi jim, thank you for trying to clarify to rosco what i had written. however, you now state: “the exact mechanism of h2o’s huge heat capacity is, currently, a complete mystery to science. (before the end of the year i will be releasing a paper that completely resolves this mystery.)” i doubt that anything you consider might be a mystery to a chemist for they have studied matter and the changes it undergoes for millennia. and water was and is a common, abundant, pure, compound that exists as gas, liquid, and solid in the environment. so chemists from the beginning did not ignore water. now, i almost made a blunder by writing that ancient people who lived in the tropics maybe could not have observed that solid water (ice) floated on liquid water (water) but then i remember that i have read that thunderstorms are common to the tropics and that sometimes hail falls during a thunderstorm. and, of course, anyone, anywhere, probably observed water to disappear as it evaporated to its invisible vapor and has observed clouds form in an invisible atmosphere. and that ice floated on water. so to validate my doubt that there is a mystery, i will review excerpts of what linus pauling wrote in his 1966 textbook college chemistry 3rd ed. “water is a clear, transparent liquid, colorless in thin layers. thick layers of water have a bluish-green color. the physical properties of water are used to define many physical constants and units. the freezing point of water (saturated with air at 1 atm pressure) is taken as 0oc, and the boiling point of water at 1 atm is taken as 100oc. the unit of volume in the metric system is chosen so that 1 ml of water at 3.98 oc (the temperature of its maximum density) weighs 1.00000 gram. a similar relation holds in the english system: 1 cu ft of water weighs approximately 1000 ounces. the unit of energy, the calorie, is defined in relation to water. the amount of heat required to raise the temperature of 1 g of liquid water by 1 oc , at any temperature. most substances diminish in volume, and hence increase in density, with decrease in temperature. water has the very unusual property of having a temperature at which its density is a maximum. this temperature 3.98 oc. with further cooling below this temperature the volume of a sample of water increases somewhat. a related phenomenon is the increase in volume which water undergoes on freezing. the unusual properties of water mentioned … are due to the power of its molecules to attract one another especially strongly. this power is associated with a structural feature called the hydrogen bond.” to help the student understand the power associated with this hydrogen bond pauling needed to first review the attraction between molecules of ordinary matter. “all molecules exert a real attraction upon one another. this attraction, the electronic van der waals attraction, is the result of the mutual interaction of the electrons and nuclei of the molecules; it has its origin in the electrostatic attraction of the nuclei of one molecule to the electrons of another, which is largely, but not completely compensated by the repulsion of electrons by electrons and nuclei by nuclei.” “the hydrogen ion is a bare nucleus, with charge +1. if hydrogen fluoride, hf, had an extreme ionic structure, it could be represented as in a of figure 16-8, the positive charge of the hydrogen ion could then strongly attract a negative ion, such as a fluoride ion, forming an [f-h+ f-]- or hf2- ion as shown in b. [in this comment it is not possible in this comment to show any figures, but hopefully one is able to imagine from the text what is illustrated.] this does indeed occur, and the stable ion hf2-, called the hydrogen difluoride ion, exists in considerable concentration in acidic fluoride solutions, and in salts such as khf2, potassium hydrogen difluoride. the bond holding this complex ion together, called the hydrogen bond, is weaker than ordinary ionic or covalent bonds, but stronger than ordinary van der waals forces of intermolecular attraction. because of the electrostatic origin of the hydrogen bond, only the most electronegative atoms—fluorine, oxygen, and nitrogen—form these bonds. usually an unshared electron pair of the attracted atom approaches closely to the attracting hydrogen ion. water is an especially suitable substance for hydrogen bond formation, because each molecule has two attached hydrogen atoms and two unshared electron pairs, and hence can form four hydrogen bonds. the tetrahedral arrangement of the shared and unshared electron pairs these four bonds to extend in the four tetrahedral directions in space, and leads to the characteristic crystal structure of ice. (figure 16-10) this structure, in which each molecule is surrounded by only four immediate neighbors, is a very open structure, and accordingly ice is a substance with abnormally low density. when ice melts, this tetrahedral structure is partially destroyed, and the water molecules are packed more closely together, causing water to have a greater density than ice. many of the hydrogen bonds remain, however, and aggregates of molecules with the open tetrahedral structure persist in water at the freezing point. with increase of temperature some of these aggregates break up, causing a further increase in density of the liquid; only at 4 oc does the normal expansion due to increase in molecular agitation overcome this effect, and cause water to begin to show the usual decrease in density with increasing temperature.” what can be seen in figure 16-10 is that 8 water molecules naturally arrange themselves to form a unit cage inside of which another water molecule would easily fit. except this ninth water molecule would have no incentive to fill this space for the fact it could not form a hydrogen bond with the surrounding molecules of the cage. better, energetically, for it to hydrogen bond with two other water molecules in forming, or completing, another 8 water molecule cage as the ice ‘cube’ forms as energy is removed from the water molecule system. pauling referred to the ‘molecular agitation’ which overcomes the hydrogen bonding as the ice melts. to understand the importance of this ‘concept’ it seems productive to consider that which richard feynman considered to be the most important single statement of scientific knowledge. “all things are made of atoms—little particles that move around in perpetual motion, attracting each other when they are a little distance apart, but repelling upon being squeezed into one another.” jim, to this point i admit that pauling seems to overlook the consequence of one property of water to which you have directed attention—water’s great heat capacity, or specific heat. pauling in writing—the unit of energy, the calorie, is defined in relation to water. the amount of heat required to raise the temperature of 1 g of liquid water by 1 oc , at any temperature.—does not note that the value of the calorie is even unusual. and he does not seem to consider how it is that the energy defined by a calorie does not change as the temperature of the water increases from 0 oc to 100 oc. and i do not know, but i suspect, this might be the mystery to which you refer. i argee this ‘constant’ value of the calorie, as defined by the observation of the energy needed to increase 1 gm of water one degree celsius, needs explanation. for given pauling’s description of the ice melting, one might conclude that everything is over once the temperature of water increases from 0 oc to 3.98 oc and the water becomes like every liquid in which hydrogen bonding is not a factor like the hydrocarbon octane. but only if one does carefully read: “when ice melts, this tetrahedral structure is partially destroyed, and the water molecules are packed more closely together, causing water to have a greater density than ice. many of the hydrogen bonds remain, however, and aggregates of molecules with the open tetrahedral structure persist in water at the freezing point. with increase of temperature some of these aggregates break up.” the energy required to break up the ice cages of 1 gm of ice at 0 oc to form 1 gm of water at 0 oc is the latent heat of melting—80 calories. but, “many of the hydrogen bonds remain.” and, “with increase of temperature some of these aggregates break up.” hence, based upon the observation that the same amount of energy is required to increase the temperature of 1 gm water one degree celsius forces the conclusion that the same portion of hydrogen bonds in these aggregates are broken for each degree increase from 0 to 100 oc. for even at 100 oc, 540 calories (latent heat of vaporization) are required to break the attraction (hydrogen bonds) holding 1 gm of water molecules together at this temperature. jim, as i began, i do not know what your mystery is. i only know this is what i know about the compound—water. have a good day, jerry jef reynen december 9, 2016 | # concerning giss, i recently updated a prom paper discussing the so-called hanssen relation. http://principia-scientific.org/publications/prom/prom-reynen-sensitivity_overview.pdf all the hoax of surface warming due to co2 started with this suspicious relation from giss. jeff greenwell december 9, 2016 | # rosco, i can tell you with certainty, heller has not been expressing sarcasm. i have very in-depth discussions with him that eventually turned very heated and very ugly. the nastiness of those conversations most certainly originated from heller with some of these being private email discussions. all one needs to do is post a comment on his site directly refuting the ghe (giving some details) and wham! .. you should see what i mean. i am very much doubting that this latest post from him is a sign of a change of heart for him, which makes me more curious as to why he would post it. heller is also a spencer worshiper and believes that virginia can make warm objects warmer from cold objects. he has adamantly defended spencer on this topic in the past. i respect the good works that heller does (and he does do good work) concerning historical records, but he knows nothing about physics. portions copyright © principia scientific international principia scientific international (psi) is a not-for-profit community interest association. homelatest newssupportsupport and advicehow the prom process workspublicationsthe model atmosphere (pdf)greenhouse effect experiment (pdf)copernicus meets the greenhouse effect (pdf)observations on backradiationhistory of radiationgreenhouse effect refutationabsence of a measurable greenhouse effectnew model of the human corneathe human cornea’s structurepromalternative model to predict global temperatures other than based on co2by david j. pristashis sustainable energy even possible at the global level?by david j. pristashfinite element model for atmospheric ir-absorptionby joseph reynenback radiation greenhouse effect of 33 kelvin possible?by ross mcleodwhy co2 has nothing to do with temperatureby darko butinaone-way heat flow formulation with planck absorption and re-emissionby joseph reynenthe carbon cycle and royal society mathby dr klaus l. e. kaiserdiurnal variations of heat evacuationby joseph reynanlessons from a chicken-wire stack on the moonby jef reynenclean energy – what is it and what are we paying for?the modelling history of climatologyco2 surface warming greenhouse effect theory within the un ipccby derek alteraboutwelcome to psiprinciples of associationpsi mission statementpolicieswhy psi is a private assoc.contact us


Here you find all texts from your page as Google (googlebot) and others search engines seen it.

Words density analysis:

Numbers of all words: 5709

One word

Two words phrases

Three words phrases

the - 7.83% (447)
ion - 2.66% (152)
and - 2.28% (130)
that - 1.65% (94)
for - 1.45% (83)
per - 1.12% (64)
his - 1.05% (60)
all - 0.88% (50)
with - 0.84% (48)
water - 0.82% (47)
not - 0.79% (45)
use - 0.79% (45)
are - 0.77% (44)
this - 0.75% (43)
man - 0.72% (41)
climate - 0.7% (40)
science - 0.65% (37)
der - 0.61% (35)
have - 0.6% (34)
december - 0.56% (32)
2016 - 0.54% (31)
one - 0.53% (30)
ice - 0.49% (28)
warm - 0.49% (28)
red - 0.49% (28)
but - 0.47% (27)
temperature - 0.47% (27)
which - 0.47% (27)
green - 0.47% (27)
here - 0.46% (26)
you - 0.44% (25)
now - 0.44% (25)
ever - 0.42% (24)
new - 0.42% (24)
form - 0.42% (24)
house - 0.42% (24)
hydrogen - 0.4% (23)
out - 0.4% (23)
what - 0.4% (23)
has - 0.39% (22)
any - 0.39% (22)
molecule - 0.37% (21)
bond - 0.37% (21)
was - 0.35% (20)
comment - 0.35% (20)
— - 0.35% (20)
read - 0.35% (20)
chemist - 0.33% (19)
from - 0.32% (18)
how - 0.32% (18)
side - 0.32% (18)
greenhouse - 0.32% (18)
change - 0.32% (18)
over - 0.3% (17)
try - 0.3% (17)
very - 0.3% (17)
increase - 0.3% (17)
global - 0.3% (17)
continue - 0.3% (17)
effect - 0.28% (16)
been - 0.28% (16)
get - 0.28% (16)
energy - 0.28% (16)
under - 0.28% (16)
able - 0.26% (15)
they - 0.26% (15)
there - 0.26% (15)
see - 0.26% (15)
most - 0.26% (15)
published - 0.26% (15)
will - 0.26% (15)
thin - 0.26% (15)
know - 0.25% (14)
other - 0.25% (14)
warming - 0.25% (14)
nasa - 0.25% (14)
reading - 0.25% (14)
age - 0.25% (14)
model - 0.25% (14)
molecules - 0.25% (14)
2016written - 0.25% (14)
even - 0.23% (13)
call - 0.23% (13)
some - 0.23% (13)
its - 0.23% (13)
chemistry - 0.23% (13)
heat - 0.23% (13)
structure - 0.23% (13)
scientific - 0.23% (13)
can - 0.23% (13)
atm - 0.23% (13)
– - 0.23% (13)
time - 0.21% (12)
day - 0.21% (12)
about - 0.21% (12)
sea - 0.21% (12)
nor - 0.21% (12)
attract - 0.21% (12)
comments - 0.21% (12)
ion, - 0.21% (12)
low - 0.19% (11)
year - 0.19% (11)
could - 0.19% (11)
based - 0.19% (11)
made - 0.19% (11)
than - 0.19% (11)
dire - 0.19% (11)
these - 0.19% (11)
science. - 0.19% (11)
rate - 0.19% (11)
ion. - 0.19% (11)
come - 0.18% (10)
fact - 0.18% (10)
many - 0.18% (10)
gas - 0.18% (10)
more - 0.18% (10)
human - 0.18% (10)
cause - 0.18% (10)
carbon - 0.18% (10)
co2 - 0.18% (10)
level - 0.18% (10)
pauling - 0.18% (10)
ed. - 0.18% (10)
theory - 0.18% (10)
electron - 0.16% (9)
does - 0.16% (9)
space - 0.16% (9)
alarm - 0.16% (9)
bonds - 0.16% (9)
trump - 0.16% (9)
like - 0.16% (9)
environment - 0.16% (9)
psi - 0.16% (9)
had - 0.16% (9)
real - 0.16% (9)
when - 0.16% (9)
only - 0.16% (9)
say - 0.16% (9)
norm - 0.16% (9)
heller - 0.16% (9)
end - 0.16% (9)
life - 0.16% (9)
scientist - 0.16% (9)
giss - 0.14% (8)
every - 0.14% (8)
less - 0.14% (8)
would - 0.14% (8)
once - 0.14% (8)
news - 0.14% (8)
consider - 0.14% (8)
radiation - 0.14% (8)
record - 0.14% (8)
great - 0.14% (8)
mission - 0.14% (8)
reynen - 0.14% (8)
freezing - 0.14% (8)
melt - 0.14% (8)
density - 0.14% (8)
back - 0.12% (7)
joseph - 0.12% (7)
paper - 0.12% (7)
van - 0.12% (7)
them - 0.12% (7)
their - 0.12% (7)
scientists - 0.12% (7)
relation - 0.12% (7)
may - 0.12% (7)
liquid - 0.12% (7)
another - 0.12% (7)
attraction - 0.12% (7)
break - 0.12% (7)
served - 0.12% (7)
who - 0.12% (7)
national - 0.12% (7)
post - 0.12% (7)
since - 0.12% (7)
prom - 0.12% (7)
show - 0.12% (7)
just - 0.12% (7)
nobel - 0.12% (7)
normal - 0.12% (7)
upon - 0.12% (7)
state - 0.12% (7)
point - 0.12% (7)
seem - 0.12% (7)
let - 0.12% (7)
calorie - 0.12% (7)
observed - 0.11% (6)
because - 0.11% (6)
system - 0.11% (6)
unit - 0.11% (6)
might - 0.11% (6)
recent - 0.11% (6)
claim - 0.11% (6)
oc. - 0.11% (6)
tell - 0.11% (6)
public - 0.11% (6)
either - 0.11% (6)
aggregates - 0.11% (6)
possible - 0.11% (6)
tetrahedral - 0.11% (6)
atom - 0.11% (6)
him - 0.11% (6)
mystery - 0.11% (6)
each - 0.11% (6)
exist - 0.11% (6)
never - 0.11% (6)
emission - 0.11% (6)
principia - 0.11% (6)
seems - 0.11% (6)
weather - 0.11% (6)
volume - 0.11% (6)
fires - 0.11% (6)
physics - 0.11% (6)
usual - 0.11% (6)
those - 0.09% (5)
move - 0.09% (5)
term - 0.09% (5)
doing - 0.09% (5)
your - 0.09% (5)
search - 0.09% (5)
rise - 0.09% (5)
four - 0.09% (5)
100 - 0.09% (5)
observation - 0.09% (5)
fraud - 0.09% (5)
help - 0.09% (5)
massive - 0.09% (5)
together - 0.09% (5)
hear - 0.09% (5)
good - 0.09% (5)
land - 0.09% (5)
far - 0.09% (5)
why - 0.09% (5)
amount - 0.09% (5)
alien - 0.09% (5)
latest - 0.09% (5)
schmidt - 0.09% (5)
called - 0.09% (5)
water. - 0.09% (5)
define - 0.09% (5)
air - 0.09% (5)
going - 0.09% (5)
understand - 0.09% (5)
required - 0.09% (5)
feynman - 0.09% (5)
changes - 0.09% (5)
temperature. - 0.09% (5)
century - 0.09% (5)
email - 0.09% (5)
power - 0.09% (5)
student - 0.09% (5)
molecular - 0.09% (5)
range - 0.09% (5)
theories - 0.09% (5)
however, - 0.09% (5)
part - 0.09% (5)
fluoride - 0.09% (5)
text - 0.09% (5)
due - 0.09% (5)
structure, - 0.09% (5)
data - 0.09% (5)
figure - 0.09% (5)
director - 0.09% (5)
make - 0.09% (5)
were - 0.09% (5)
current - 0.09% (5)
temperatures - 0.09% (5)
committee - 0.09% (5)
set - 0.09% (5)
absorption - 0.09% (5)
matter - 0.09% (5)
major - 0.09% (5)
where - 0.09% (5)
man-made - 0.09% (5)
should - 0.09% (5)
years - 0.09% (5)
process - 0.09% (5)
member - 0.09% (5)
full - 0.09% (5)
did - 0.07% (4)
akin - 0.07% (4)
decade - 0.07% (4)
physical - 0.07% (4)
history - 0.07% (4)
using - 0.07% (4)
believe - 0.07% (4)
bright - 0.07% (4)
professor - 0.07% (4)
bell - 0.07% (4)
report - 0.07% (4)
inches - 0.07% (4)
jef - 0.07% (4)
then - 0.07% (4)
caltech - 0.07% (4)
treatment - 0.07% (4)
textbook - 0.07% (4)
detailed - 0.07% (4)
mathematical - 0.07% (4)
two - 0.07% (4)
evidence - 0.07% (4)
surface - 0.07% (4)
snow - 0.07% (4)
used - 0.07% (4)
levels - 0.07% (4)
comes - 0.07% (4)
being - 0.07% (4)
again - 0.07% (4)
considered - 0.07% (4)
between - 0.07% (4)
cold - 0.07% (4)
such - 0.07% (4)
forecast - 0.07% (4)
extreme - 0.07% (4)
jim - 0.07% (4)
anthony - 0.07% (4)
little - 0.07% (4)
fully - 0.07% (4)
jerry - 0.07% (4)
absorb - 0.07% (4)
junk - 0.07% (4)
epa - 0.07% (4)
mechanics - 0.07% (4)
knows - 0.07% (4)
according - 0.07% (4)
empirical - 0.07% (4)
take - 0.07% (4)
“a - 0.07% (4)
isn’t - 0.07% (4)
institute - 0.07% (4)
open - 0.07% (4)
bill - 0.07% (4)
also - 0.07% (4)
atmospheric - 0.07% (4)
cage - 0.07% (4)
begin - 0.07% (4)
electrons - 0.07% (4)
nuclei - 0.07% (4)
times - 0.07% (4)
experiment - 0.07% (4)
earth - 0.07% (4)
long - 0.07% (4)
david - 0.07% (4)
father - 0.07% (4)
media - 0.07% (4)
monitor - 0.07% (4)
needs - 0.07% (4)
rich - 0.07% (4)
substance - 0.07% (4)
president - 0.07% (4)
ross - 0.07% (4)
shared - 0.07% (4)
ice. - 0.07% (4)
world - 0.07% (4)
administration - 0.07% (4)
solid - 0.07% (4)
“the - 0.07% (4)
information - 0.07% (4)
gang - 0.07% (4)
works - 0.07% (4)
increases - 0.07% (4)
satellite - 0.07% (4)
complete - 0.07% (4)
star - 0.07% (4)
defined - 0.07% (4)
nothing - 0.07% (4)
hansen - 0.07% (4)
globe - 0.07% (4)
portion - 0.07% (4)
it. - 0.07% (4)
center - 0.07% (4)
above - 0.05% (3)
light, - 0.05% (3)
taken - 0.05% (3)
find - 0.05% (3)
small - 0.05% (3)
same - 0.05% (3)
knowledge - 0.05% (3)
different - 0.05% (3)
mostly - 0.05% (3)
pipe - 0.05% (3)
matter. - 0.05% (3)
large - 0.05% (3)
facts - 0.05% (3)
seas - 0.05% (3)
began - 0.05% (3)
rising - 0.05% (3)
drought - 0.05% (3)
increased - 0.05% (3)
tennessee - 0.05% (3)
richard - 0.05% (3)
polar - 0.05% (3)
se. - 0.05% (3)
think - 0.05% (3)
forest - 0.05% (3)
melting - 0.05% (3)
southeast - 0.05% (3)
dioxide - 0.05% (3)
today - 0.05% (3)
near - 0.05% (3)
point. - 0.05% (3)
course - 0.05% (3)
negative - 0.05% (3)
within - 0.05% (3)
coming - 0.05% (3)
… - 0.05% (3)
jim, - 0.05% (3)
is, - 0.05% (3)
doubt - 0.05% (3)
now, - 0.05% (3)
and, - 0.05% (3)
vapor - 0.05% (3)
layers - 0.05% (3)
3.98 - 0.05% (3)
calorie, - 0.05% (3)
hence - 0.05% (3)
decrease - 0.05% (3)
unusual - 0.05% (3)
further - 0.05% (3)
ordinary - 0.05% (3)
klaus - 0.05% (3)
element - 0.05% (3)
origin - 0.05% (3)
predict - 0.05% (3)
together, - 0.05% (3)
unshared - 0.05% (3)
pair - 0.05% (3)
closely - 0.05% (3)
atoms - 0.05% (3)
causing - 0.05% (3)
statement - 0.05% (3)
directed - 0.05% (3)
degree - 0.05% (3)
atmosphere - 0.05% (3)
sign - 0.05% (3)
international - 0.05% (3)
associated - 0.05% (3)
people - 0.05% (3)
private - 0.05% (3)
fossil - 0.05% (3)
common - 0.05% (3)
currently - 0.05% (3)
campaign - 0.05% (3)
review - 0.05% (3)
below - 0.05% (3)
warmists - 0.05% (3)
winter - 0.05% (3)
bring - 0.05% (3)
bright-paul - 0.05% (3)
lows - 0.05% (3)
usa - 0.05% (3)
loa - 0.05% (3)
settled - 0.05% (3)
goes - 0.05% (3)
chemists - 0.05% (3)
oxygen - 0.05% (3)
up. - 0.05% (3)
lead - 0.05% (3)
absolute - 0.05% (3)
thus - 0.05% (3)
nobody - 0.05% (3)
me, - 0.05% (3)
properties - 0.05% (3)
value - 0.05% (3)
quantum - 0.05% (3)
statistical - 0.05% (3)
beginning - 0.05% (3)
well - 0.05% (3)
studied - 0.05% (3)
truth - 0.05% (3)
interest - 0.05% (3)
threat - 0.05% (3)
science.” - 0.05% (3)
put - 0.05% (3)
moon - 0.05% (3)
become - 0.05% (3)
trump’s - 0.05% (3)
posted - 0.05% (3)
environmental - 0.05% (3)
warming, - 0.05% (3)
donald - 0.05% (3)
natural - 0.05% (3)
2014 - 0.05% (3)
it’s - 0.05% (3)
high - 0.05% (3)
political - 0.05% (3)
consensus - 0.05% (3)
john - 0.05% (3)
present - 0.05% (3)
kaiser - 0.05% (3)
forms - 0.05% (3)
press - 0.05% (3)
president-elect - 0.05% (3)
principles - 0.05% (3)
mentioned - 0.05% (3)
building - 0.05% (3)
modern - 0.05% (3)
measurements - 0.05% (3)
giss, - 0.05% (3)
goddard - 0.05% (3)
start - 0.05% (3)
says - 0.05% (3)
billion - 0.05% (3)
came - 0.05% (3)
explain - 0.05% (3)
three - 0.05% (3)
during - 0.05% (3)
adam - 0.05% (3)
bond, - 0.05% (3)
attention - 0.05% (3)
certain - 0.05% (3)
theon - 0.05% (3)
agency - 0.05% (3)
completely - 0.05% (3)
discussion - 0.05% (3)
records - 0.05% (3)
often - 0.05% (3)
until - 0.05% (3)
prize - 0.05% (3)
silicon - 0.05% (3)
headline - 0.05% (3)
give - 0.05% (3)
few - 0.04% (2)
others - 0.04% (2)
mcleodwhy - 0.04% (2)
block - 0.04% (2)
substances - 0.04% (2)
first - 0.04% (2)
raise - 0.04% (2)
biology, - 0.04% (2)
actual - 0.04% (2)
witness - 0.04% (2)
energy, - 0.04% (2)
darko - 0.04% (2)
weighs - 0.04% (2)
maximum - 0.04% (2)
look - 0.04% (2)
butinaone-way - 0.04% (2)
flow - 0.04% (2)
temperatureby - 0.04% (2)
possible?by - 0.04% (2)
property - 0.04% (2)
front - 0.04% (2)
waals - 0.04% (2)
pristashfinite - 0.04% (2)
13, - 0.04% (2)
attraction, - 0.04% (2)
another. - 0.04% (2)
exert - 0.04% (2)
“all - 0.04% (2)
founder - 0.04% (2)
planck - 0.04% (2)
needed - 0.04% (2)
ir-absorptionby - 0.04% (2)
especially - 0.04% (2)
reynenback - 0.04% (2)
kelvin - 0.04% (2)
helped - 0.04% (2)
cooling - 0.04% (2)
former - 0.04% (2)
formulation - 0.04% (2)
lying - 0.04% (2)
nasa’s - 0.04% (2)
sometimes - 0.04% (2)
society - 0.04% (2)
?massive? - 0.04% (2)
exposed - 0.04% (2)
mathby - 0.04% (2)
evolution. - 0.04% (2)
[…] - 0.04% (2)
day, - 0.04% (2)
independent - 0.04% (2)
politically - 0.04% (2)
models - 0.04% (2)
kaiserdiurnal - 0.04% (2)
intensity - 0.04% (2)
proportion - 0.04% (2)
einstein - 0.04% (2)
excerpt - 0.04% (2)
variations - 0.04% (2)
evacuationby - 0.04% (2)
scale - 0.04% (2)
instead, - 0.04% (2)
rosco - 0.04% (2)
wrote - 0.04% (2)
science, - 0.04% (2)
college - 0.04% (2)
claims - 0.04% (2)
invisible - 0.04% (2)
definitely - 0.04% (2)
re-emissionby - 0.04% (2)
floated - 0.04% (2)
tropics - 0.04% (2)
writing - 0.04% (2)
reynenthe - 0.04% (2)
capacity - 0.04% (2)
liquid, - 0.04% (2)
exists - 0.04% (2)
compound - 0.04% (2)
undergoes - 0.04% (2)
cycle - 0.04% (2)
exploration - 0.04% (2)
royal - 0.04% (2)
added - 0.04% (2)
“climate - 0.04% (2)
result - 0.04% (2)
service - 0.04% (2)
fact, - 0.04% (2)
(pdf)observations - 0.04% (2)
hydrocarbon - 0.04% (2)
factor - 0.04% (2)
(pdf)greenhouse - 0.04% (2)
conclude - 0.04% (2)
whatsoever - 0.04% (2)
source - 0.04% (2)
(pdf)copernicus - 0.04% (2)
meets - 0.04% (2)
note - 0.04% (2)
latent - 0.04% (2)
next - 0.04% (2)
admit - 0.04% (2)
backradiationhistory - 0.04% (2)
things - 0.04% (2)
1900 - 0.04% (2)
bonding - 0.04% (2)
corrupt - 0.04% (2)
arrange - 0.04% (2)
up.” - 0.04% (2)
but, - 0.04% (2)
place - 0.04% (2)
advicehow - 0.04% (2)
objects - 0.04% (2)
spencer - 0.04% (2)
became - 0.04% (2)
newssupportsupport - 0.04% (2)
absolutely - 0.04% (2)
much - 0.04% (2)
ghe - 0.04% (2)
site - 0.04% (2)
discussions - 0.04% (2)
celsius - 0.04% (2)
reliable - 0.04% (2)
hoax - 0.04% (2)
concerning - 0.04% (2)
workspublicationsthe - 0.04% (2)
is. - 0.04% (2)
greatest - 0.04% (2)
calories - 0.04% (2)
oc, - 0.04% (2)
available - 0.04% (2)
16-10 - 0.04% (2)
overcome - 0.04% (2)
majors - 0.04% (2)
forming - 0.04% (2)
forces - 0.04% (2)
peddlers - 0.04% (2)
holding - 0.04% (2)
difluoride - 0.04% (2)
giss. - 0.04% (2)
tackling - 0.04% (2)
co2by - 0.04% (2)
hf2- - 0.04% (2)
james - 0.04% (2)
all, - 0.04% (2)
pristashis - 0.04% (2)
strongly - 0.04% (2)
represented - 0.04% (2)
ionic - 0.04% (2)
charge - 0.04% (2)
sustainable - 0.04% (2)
level?by - 0.04% (2)
electrostatic - 0.04% (2)
bonds. - 0.04% (2)
structurepromalternative - 0.04% (2)
agitation - 0.04% (2)
melts, - 0.04% (2)
persist - 0.04% (2)
radiationgreenhouse - 0.04% (2)
remain, - 0.04% (2)
greater - 0.04% (2)
“nasa - 0.04% (2)
packed - 0.04% (2)
destroyed, - 0.04% (2)
partially - 0.04% (2)
refutationabsence - 0.04% (2)
cornea’s - 0.04% (2)
measurable - 0.04% (2)
pairs - 0.04% (2)
heard - 0.04% (2)
effectnew - 0.04% (2)
blah - 0.04% (2)
eugenics - 0.04% (2)
corneathe - 0.04% (2)
attracting - 0.04% (2)
hottest - 0.04% (2)
processes - 0.04% (2)
unprepared - 0.04% (2)
order - 0.04% (2)
“green - 0.04% (2)
consensus? - 0.04% (2)
key - 0.04% (2)
plant - 0.04% (2)
life” - 0.04% (2)
said - 0.04% (2)
tony - 0.04% (2)
regression - 0.04% (2)
energy” - 0.04% (2)
fuel - 0.04% (2)
food - 0.04% (2)
 the - 0.04% (2)
blog - 0.04% (2)
realists - 0.04% (2)
office - 0.04% (2)
always - 0.04% (2)
findings - 0.04% (2)
ages - 0.04% (2)
svante - 0.04% (2)
disinformation - 0.04% (2)
pervasive, - 0.04% (2)
holds - 0.04% (2)
largely - 0.04% (2)
conclusion - 0.04% (2)
showing - 0.04% (2)
hope - 0.04% (2)
that’s - 0.04% (2)
solve - 0.04% (2)
decision - 0.04% (2)
while - 0.04% (2)
75% - 0.04% (2)
hit - 0.04% (2)
effective - 0.04% (2)
getting - 0.04% (2)
influence - 0.04% (2)
arrhenius - 0.04% (2)
agreement - 0.04% (2)
humanity - 0.04% (2)
moral - 0.04% (2)
normal. - 0.04% (2)
ago - 0.04% (2)
periods - 0.04% (2)
science’ - 0.04% (2)
huge - 0.04% (2)
papers: - 0.04% (2)
decades - 0.04% (2)
indeed - 0.04% (2)
hotter - 0.04% (2)
opinion - 0.04% (2)
warming? - 0.04% (2)
tale - 0.04% (2)
rely - 0.04% (2)
rates - 0.04% (2)
eventually - 0.04% (2)
movement - 0.04% (2)
equivalent - 0.04% (2)
means - 0.04% (2)
oxygen, - 0.04% (2)
crazies: - 0.04% (2)
strange - 0.04% (2)
sheet - 0.04% (2)
nitrogen, - 0.04% (2)
homelatest - 0.04% (2)
bbc - 0.04% (2)
famous - 0.04% (2)
termites - 0.04% (2)
plague - 0.04% (2)
probably - 0.04% (2)
flooding - 0.04% (2)
last - 0.04% (2)
period, - 0.04% (2)
ivan - 0.04% (2)
english - 0.04% (2)
science? - 0.04% (2)
affecting - 0.04% (2)
relating - 0.04% (2)
‘inadmissible’ - 0.04% (2)
alarmists - 0.04% (2)
stable - 0.04% (2)
distinguish - 0.04% (2)
meteo - 0.04% (2)
watch - 0.04% (2)
industrial - 0.04% (2)
likewise - 0.04% (2)
age, - 0.04% (2)
‘junk - 0.04% (2)
“in - 0.04% (2)
maybe - 0.04% (2)
reynanlessons - 0.04% (2)
modelling - 0.04% (2)
shutter - 0.04% (2)
involved - 0.04% (2)
reynenclean - 0.04% (2)
atomic - 0.04% (2)
likely - 0.04% (2)
paying - 0.04% (2)
becomes - 0.04% (2)
for?the - 0.04% (2)
1880 - 0.04% (2)
shop - 0.04% (2)
important - 0.04% (2)
ebell - 0.04% (2)
chemical - 0.04% (2)
before - 0.04% (2)
chemistry, - 0.04% (2)
descriptive - 0.04% (2)
continued - 0.04% (2)
accurate - 0.04% (2)
mechanics. - 0.04% (2)
“silicon - 0.04% (2)
warmest - 0.04% (2)
moonby - 0.04% (2)
shown - 0.04% (2)
students - 0.04% (2)
christian - 0.04% (2)
later. - 0.04% (2)
lectures - 0.04% (2)
chicken-wire - 0.04% (2)
feynman, - 0.04% (2)
stack - 0.04% (2)
into - 0.04% (2)
making - 0.04% (2)
newspaper - 0.04% (2)
moved - 0.04% (2)
guardian - 0.04% (2)
realistic - 0.04% (2)
recently - 0.04% (2)
policy - 0.04% (2)
it.” - 0.04% (2)
true - 0.04% (2)
climatologyco2 - 0.04% (2)
asked - 0.04% (2)
maue - 0.04% (2)
currently, - 0.04% (2)
instant - 0.04% (2)
psiprinciples - 0.04% (2)
associationpsi - 0.04% (2)
headlines - 0.04% (2)
statementpolicieswhy - 0.04% (2)
assoc.contact - 0.04% (2)
government - 0.04% (2)
work. - 0.04% (2)
--> - 0.04% (2)
interview - 0.04% (2)
correlation - 0.04% (2)
mauna - 0.04% (2)
big - 0.04% (2)
given - 0.04% (2)
chain - 0.04% (2)
warning - 0.04% (2)
hawaii - 0.04% (2)
researchers - 0.04% (2)
notifications - 0.04% (2)
krause - 0.04% (2)
3rd - 0.04% (2)
radiate - 0.04% (2)
pauling’s - 0.04% (2)
linus - 0.04% (2)
daily - 0.04% (2)
except - 0.04% (2)
disputes - 0.04% (2)
this, - 0.04% (2)
team - 0.04% (2)
recorded - 0.04% (2)
naturally - 0.04% (2)
gases - 0.04% (2)
humans - 0.04% (2)
ipccby - 0.04% (2)
across - 0.04% (2)
infrared - 0.04% (2)
chemistry. - 0.04% (2)
unlike - 0.04% (2)
declining - 0.04% (2)
derek - 0.04% (2)
alteraboutwelcome - 0.04% (2)
engineering - 0.04% (2)
of the - 0.89% (51)
at the - 0.51% (29)
in the - 0.42% (24)
to the - 0.32% (18)
that the - 0.3% (17)
on december - 0.26% (15)
hydrogen bond - 0.26% (15)
published on - 0.25% (14)
continue reading - 0.25% (14)
2016written by - 0.25% (14)
of water - 0.23% (13)
greenhouse effect - 0.23% (13)
and the - 0.21% (12)
is the - 0.21% (12)
on the - 0.19% (11)
the hydrogen - 0.18% (10)
by the - 0.18% (10)
as the - 0.18% (10)
climate change - 0.16% (9)
what i - 0.16% (9)
global warming - 0.16% (9)
water molecule - 0.16% (9)
the climate - 0.14% (8)
there is - 0.14% (8)
reading no - 0.12% (7)
for the - 0.12% (7)
the temperature - 0.12% (7)
have been - 0.12% (7)
no comments - 0.12% (7)
9, 2016 - 0.12% (7)
by joseph - 0.12% (7)
the un - 0.12% (7)
december 9, - 0.12% (7)
house gas - 0.12% (7)
the green - 0.12% (7)
with the - 0.11% (6)
temperature of - 0.11% (6)
have a - 0.11% (6)
7, 2016 - 0.11% (6)
december 5, - 0.11% (6)
has been - 0.11% (6)
will be - 0.11% (6)
december 7, - 0.11% (6)
the most - 0.11% (6)
hydrogen bonds - 0.11% (6)
5, 2016 - 0.11% (6)
a climate - 0.11% (6)
based on - 0.11% (6)
a great - 0.09% (5)
the us - 0.09% (5)
reading 1 - 0.09% (5)
2016 | - 0.09% (5)
man-made global - 0.09% (5)
and he - 0.09% (5)
water to - 0.09% (5)
the new - 0.09% (5)
new normal - 0.09% (5)
the water - 0.09% (5)
can be - 0.09% (5)
december 4, - 0.09% (5)
due to - 0.09% (5)
to have - 0.09% (5)
of energy - 0.09% (5)
the warm - 0.09% (5)
there a - 0.09% (5)
climate alarm - 0.09% (5)
4, 2016 - 0.09% (5)
that he - 0.09% (5)
that is - 0.09% (5)
required to - 0.09% (5)
the science - 0.09% (5)
water molecules - 0.09% (5)
water at - 0.09% (5)
what is - 0.09% (5)
it seems - 0.09% (5)
increase in - 0.07% (4)
tetrahedral structure - 0.07% (4)
and in - 0.07% (4)
of man-made - 0.07% (4)
of heat - 0.07% (4)
these aggregates - 0.07% (4)
some of - 0.07% (4)
of temperature - 0.07% (4)
of this - 0.07% (4)
mathematical treatment - 0.07% (4)
latest news - 0.07% (4)
david j. - 0.07% (4)
of its - 0.07% (4)
detailed mathematical - 0.07% (4)
from the - 0.07% (4)
of these - 0.07% (4)
alien life - 0.07% (4)
use of - 0.07% (4)
on that - 0.07% (4)
the ice - 0.07% (4)
the greenhouse - 0.07% (4)
but it - 0.07% (4)
the globe - 0.07% (4)
principia scientific - 0.07% (4)
he was - 0.07% (4)
they have - 0.07% (4)
many of - 0.07% (4)
history of - 0.07% (4)
is not - 0.07% (4)
at any - 0.07% (4)
amount of - 0.07% (4)
the human - 0.07% (4)
gas gang - 0.05% (3)
this temperature - 0.05% (3)
say that - 0.05% (3)
temperature some - 0.05% (3)
might be - 0.05% (3)
is there - 0.05% (3)
4, 2016written - 0.05% (3)
liquid water - 0.05% (3)
could be - 0.05% (3)
i have - 0.05% (3)
to understand - 0.05% (3)
a good - 0.05% (3)
the calorie, - 0.05% (3)
if the - 0.05% (3)
going to - 0.05% (3)
the energy - 0.05% (3)
the moon - 0.05% (3)
increase of - 0.05% (3)
satellite measurements - 0.05% (3)
could not - 0.05% (3)
the warmists - 0.05% (3)
science is - 0.05% (3)
is settled - 0.05% (3)
that even - 0.05% (3)
psi is - 0.05% (3)
come to - 0.05% (3)
in volume - 0.05% (3)
on either - 0.05% (3)
by anthony - 0.05% (3)
3, 2016written - 0.05% (3)
i will - 0.05% (3)
needs to - 0.05% (3)
and what - 0.05% (3)
doing so - 0.05% (3)
called the - 0.05% (3)
aggregates break - 0.05% (3)
may be - 0.05% (3)
hydrogen ion - 0.05% (3)
5, 2016written - 0.05% (3)
anthony bright-paul - 0.05% (3)
mystery to - 0.05% (3)
forest fires - 0.05% (3)
does not - 0.05% (3)
december 3, - 0.05% (3)
according to - 0.05% (3)
not be - 0.05% (3)
green house - 0.05% (3)
unit of - 0.05% (3)
at this - 0.05% (3)
of chemistry - 0.05% (3)
climate theory - 0.05% (3)
all the - 0.05% (3)
dr klaus - 0.05% (3)
the same - 0.05% (3)
surface warming - 0.05% (3)
the unit - 0.05% (3)
far as - 0.05% (3)
per century - 0.05% (3)
sea level - 0.05% (3)
empirical evidence - 0.05% (3)
evidence of - 0.05% (3)
either side - 0.05% (3)
associated with - 0.05% (3)
7, 2016written - 0.05% (3)
nobody on - 0.05% (3)
threat to - 0.05% (3)
nobel committee - 0.05% (3)
scientific international - 0.05% (3)
carbon dioxide - 0.05% (3)
the freezing - 0.05% (3)
properties of - 0.05% (3)
the theories - 0.05% (3)
the real - 0.05% (3)
effect of - 0.05% (3)
to form - 0.05% (3)
the environment - 0.05% (3)
unshared electron - 0.05% (3)
that it - 0.05% (3)
over the - 0.05% (3)
water increases - 0.05% (3)
the beginning - 0.05% (3)
a major - 0.05% (3)
about the - 0.05% (3)
based upon - 0.05% (3)
freezing point - 0.05% (3)
closely to - 0.05% (3)
in these - 0.05% (3)
point of - 0.05% (3)
?massive? new - 0.04% (2)
climate data - 0.04% (2)
than ordinary - 0.04% (2)
structure is - 0.04% (2)
ice melts, - 0.04% (2)
fraud – - 0.04% (2)
this tetrahedral - 0.04% (2)
electron pairs - 0.04% (2)
water is - 0.04% (2)
exposed in - 0.04% (2)
hydrogen bond, - 0.04% (2)
of one - 0.04% (2)
l krause - 0.04% (2)
defined in - 0.04% (2)
one another. - 0.04% (2)
the attraction - 0.04% (2)
energy, the - 0.04% (2)
needed to - 0.04% (2)
calorie, is - 0.04% (2)
molecules to - 0.04% (2)
the power - 0.04% (2)
the electrons - 0.04% (2)
relation to - 0.04% (2)
water. the - 0.04% (2)
heat required - 0.04% (2)
to raise - 0.04% (2)
property of - 0.04% (2)
and hence - 0.04% (2)
is taken - 0.04% (2)
taken as - 0.04% (2)
in this - 0.04% (2)
was and - 0.04% (2)
this comment - 0.04% (2)
ion as - 0.04% (2)
end of - 0.04% (2)
fluoride ion, - 0.04% (2)
doubt that - 0.04% (2)
a chemist - 0.04% (2)
floated on - 0.04% (2)
chemistry 3rd - 0.04% (2)
ion is - 0.04% (2)
decrease in - 0.04% (2)
the tropics - 0.04% (2)
the electrostatic - 0.04% (2)
and nuclei - 0.04% (2)
and that - 0.04% (2)
linus pauling - 0.04% (2)
van der - 0.04% (2)
newssupportsupport and - 0.04% (2)
partially destroyed, - 0.04% (2)
j. pristashfinite - 0.04% (2)
butinaone-way heat - 0.04% (2)
temperatureby darko - 0.04% (2)
do with - 0.04% (2)
nothing to - 0.04% (2)
co2 has - 0.04% (2)
ross mcleodwhy - 0.04% (2)
kelvin possible?by - 0.04% (2)
reynenback radiation - 0.04% (2)
ir-absorptionby joseph - 0.04% (2)
for atmospheric - 0.04% (2)
element model - 0.04% (2)
level?by david - 0.04% (2)
with planck - 0.04% (2)
the global - 0.04% (2)
possible at - 0.04% (2)
energy even - 0.04% (2)
pristashis sustainable - 0.04% (2)
on co2by - 0.04% (2)
than based - 0.04% (2)
temperatures other - 0.04% (2)
predict global - 0.04% (2)
model to - 0.04% (2)
cornea’s structurepromalternative - 0.04% (2)
corneathe human - 0.04% (2)
flow formulation - 0.04% (2)
absorption and - 0.04% (2)
greenhouse effectnew - 0.04% (2)
reynenclean energy - 0.04% (2)
statementpolicieswhy psi - 0.04% (2)
associationpsi mission - 0.04% (2)
psiprinciples of - 0.04% (2)
alteraboutwelcome to - 0.04% (2)
ipccby derek - 0.04% (2)
theory within - 0.04% (2)
of climatologyco2 - 0.04% (2)
modelling history - 0.04% (2)
paying for?the - 0.04% (2)
are we - 0.04% (2)
– what - 0.04% (2)
moonby jef - 0.04% (2)
re-emissionby joseph - 0.04% (2)
chicken-wire stack - 0.04% (2)
from a - 0.04% (2)
joseph reynanlessons - 0.04% (2)
heat evacuationby - 0.04% (2)
variations of - 0.04% (2)
e. kaiserdiurnal - 0.04% (2)
klaus l. - 0.04% (2)
mathby dr - 0.04% (2)
royal society - 0.04% (2)
cycle and - 0.04% (2)
reynenthe carbon - 0.04% (2)
model of - 0.04% (2)
a measurable - 0.04% (2)
are packed - 0.04% (2)
molecular agitation - 0.04% (2)
to which - 0.04% (2)
to 100 - 0.04% (2)
make a - 0.04% (2)
which you - 0.04% (2)
to this - 0.04% (2)
understand the - 0.04% (2)
energy is - 0.04% (2)
8 water - 0.04% (2)
other water - 0.04% (2)
form a - 0.04% (2)
to show - 0.04% (2)
only at - 0.04% (2)
water one - 0.04% (2)
point. with - 0.04% (2)
persist in - 0.04% (2)
the open - 0.04% (2)
molecules with - 0.04% (2)
aggregates of - 0.04% (2)
however, and - 0.04% (2)
bonds remain, - 0.04% (2)
than ice. - 0.04% (2)
greater density - 0.04% (2)
together, causing - 0.04% (2)
more closely - 0.04% (2)
value of - 0.04% (2)
in which - 0.04% (2)
refutationabsence of - 0.04% (2)
he does - 0.04% (2)
radiationgreenhouse effect - 0.04% (2)
backradiationhistory of - 0.04% (2)
(pdf)observations on - 0.04% (2)
meets the - 0.04% (2)
experiment (pdf)copernicus - 0.04% (2)
(pdf)greenhouse effect - 0.04% (2)
model atmosphere - 0.04% (2)
process workspublicationsthe - 0.04% (2)
the prom - 0.04% (2)
and advicehow - 0.04% (2)
homelatest newssupportsupport - 0.04% (2)
he would - 0.04% (2)
hydrogen bonding - 0.04% (2)
a comment - 0.04% (2)
one needs - 0.04% (2)
with this - 0.04% (2)
good day, - 0.04% (2)
do not - 0.04% (2)
100 oc. - 0.04% (2)
degree celsius - 0.04% (2)
break up.” - 0.04% (2)
heat of - 0.04% (2)
ice at - 0.04% (2)
to break - 0.04% (2)
increases from - 0.04% (2)
will likely - 0.04% (2)
theory of - 0.04% (2)
crazies: strange - 0.04% (2)
theory ‘inadmissible’ - 0.04% (2)
gas climate - 0.04% (2)
a nobel - 0.04% (2)
he helped - 0.04% (2)
where he - 0.04% (2)
nobel prize - 0.04% (2)
involved in - 0.04% (2)
father of - 0.04% (2)
svante arrhenius - 0.04% (2)
tale of - 0.04% (2)
comment climate - 0.04% (2)
tony heller - 0.04% (2)
the english - 0.04% (2)
they are - 0.04% (2)
assoc.contact us - 0.04% (2)
a private - 0.04% (2)
mission statementpolicieswhy - 0.04% (2)
of associationpsi - 0.04% (2)
to psiprinciples - 0.04% (2)
derek alteraboutwelcome - 0.04% (2)
un ipccby - 0.04% (2)
within the - 0.04% (2)
effect theory - 0.04% (2)
and ‘junk - 0.04% (2)
set to - 0.04% (2)
climatologyco2 surface - 0.04% (2)
was the - 0.04% (2)
life forms - 0.04% (2)
the end - 0.04% (2)
the industrial - 0.04% (2)
warm period, - 0.04% (2)
which is - 0.04% (2)
on which - 0.04% (2)
a political - 0.04% (2)
him to - 0.04% (2)
that this - 0.04% (2)
president-elect donald - 0.04% (2)
that any - 0.04% (2)
that 2014 - 0.04% (2)
trump will - 0.04% (2)
back to - 0.04% (2)
2014 was - 0.04% (2)
the observed - 0.04% (2)
to see - 0.04% (2)
the next - 0.04% (2)
the giss, - 0.04% (2)
for space - 0.04% (2)
should definitely - 0.04% (2)
alarm shop - 0.04% (2)
nasa climate - 0.04% (2)
likely shutter - 0.04% (2)
warming greenhouse - 0.04% (2)
for?the modelling - 0.04% (2)
to alien - 0.04% (2)
human cornea’s - 0.04% (2)
pristashfinite element - 0.04% (2)
global level?by - 0.04% (2)
even possible - 0.04% (2)
sustainable energy - 0.04% (2)
j. pristashis - 0.04% (2)
co2by david - 0.04% (2)
other than - 0.04% (2)
global temperatures - 0.04% (2)
to predict - 0.04% (2)
structurepromalternative model - 0.04% (2)
human corneathe - 0.04% (2)
atmospheric ir-absorptionby - 0.04% (2)
effectnew model - 0.04% (2)
measurable greenhouse - 0.04% (2)
effect refutationabsence - 0.04% (2)
of radiationgreenhouse - 0.04% (2)
on backradiationhistory - 0.04% (2)
effect (pdf)observations - 0.04% (2)
(pdf)copernicus meets - 0.04% (2)
effect experiment - 0.04% (2)
atmosphere (pdf)greenhouse - 0.04% (2)
workspublicationsthe model - 0.04% (2)
prom process - 0.04% (2)
model for - 0.04% (2)
joseph reynenback - 0.04% (2)
we paying - 0.04% (2)
and royal - 0.04% (2)
what are - 0.04% (2)
it and - 0.04% (2)
energy – - 0.04% (2)
jef reynenclean - 0.04% (2)
the moonby - 0.04% (2)
stack on - 0.04% (2)
a chicken-wire - 0.04% (2)
reynanlessons from - 0.04% (2)
evacuationby joseph - 0.04% (2)
kaiserdiurnal variations - 0.04% (2)
society mathby - 0.04% (2)
carbon cycle - 0.04% (2)
radiation greenhouse - 0.04% (2)
joseph reynenthe - 0.04% (2)
and re-emissionby - 0.04% (2)
planck absorption - 0.04% (2)
formulation with - 0.04% (2)
heat flow - 0.04% (2)
darko butinaone-way - 0.04% (2)
with temperatureby - 0.04% (2)
has nothing - 0.04% (2)
mcleodwhy co2 - 0.04% (2)
possible?by ross - 0.04% (2)
33 kelvin - 0.04% (2)
on earth - 0.04% (2)
can form - 0.04% (2)
day, jerry - 0.04% (2)
instant notifications - 0.04% (2)
to your - 0.04% (2)
disputes any - 0.04% (2)
i knows - 0.04% (2)
infrared and - 0.04% (2)
all molecules - 0.04% (2)
and so - 0.04% (2)
absorb infrared - 0.04% (2)
krause december - 0.04% (2)
jerry l - 0.04% (2)
get instant - 0.04% (2)
is “green - 0.04% (2)
in his - 0.04% (2)
fossil fuel - 0.04% (2)
isn’t fraud - 0.04% (2)
science? it - 0.04% (2)
plague affecting - 0.04% (2)
shutter nasa - 0.04% (2)
advicehow the - 0.04% (2)
6, 2016 - 0.04% (2)
2 inches - 0.04% (2)
rising about - 0.04% (2)
global seas - 0.04% (2)
new papers: - 0.04% (2)
3rd ed. - 0.04% (2)
this textbook - 0.04% (2)
climate crazies: - 0.04% (2)
even if - 0.04% (2)
intensity of - 0.04% (2)
that there - 0.04% (2)
the feynman - 0.04% (2)
of those - 0.04% (2)
side of - 0.04% (2)
and is - 0.04% (2)
structure of - 0.04% (2)
unprepared to - 0.04% (2)
a fact - 0.04% (2)
seems to - 0.04% (2)
at that - 0.04% (2)
feynman, a - 0.04% (2)
theories of - 0.04% (2)
feynman lectures - 0.04% (2)
had to - 0.04% (2)
also a - 0.04% (2)
did not - 0.04% (2)
textbook pauling - 0.04% (2)
be studied - 0.04% (2)
these theories - 0.04% (2)
for him - 0.04% (2)
beginning student - 0.04% (2)
statistical mechanics. - 0.04% (2)
and molecular - 0.04% (2)
strange tale - 0.04% (2)
climate – - 0.04% (2)
often have - 0.04% (2)
or science. - 0.04% (2)
level rise - 0.04% (2)
equivalent of - 0.04% (2)
polar ice - 0.04% (2)
inches per - 0.04% (2)
about 2 - 0.04% (2)
seas rising - 0.04% (2)
papers: global - 0.04% (2)
science monitor - 0.04% (2)
drought may - 0.04% (2)
fires have - 0.04% (2)
this is - 0.04% (2)
there never - 0.04% (2)
fires in - 0.04% (2)
christian science - 0.04% (2)
– the - 0.04% (2)
lying about - 0.04% (2)
scientific knowledge - 0.04% (2)
with some - 0.04% (2)
in fact, - 0.04% (2)
heard that - 0.04% (2)
have we - 0.04% (2)
how often - 0.04% (2)
we heard - 0.04% (2)
global warming? - 0.04% (2)
scientists have - 0.04% (2)
will help - 0.04% (2)
fuel is - 0.04% (2)
you make - 0.04% (2)
below freezing - 0.04% (2)
75% of - 0.04% (2)
pervasive, so - 0.04% (2)
a moral - 0.04% (2)
campaign that - 0.04% (2)
so effective - 0.04% (2)
so pervasive, - 0.04% (2)
plant food - 0.04% (2)
used to - 0.04% (2)
“green energy” - 0.04% (2)
people who - 0.04% (2)
hotter and - 0.04% (2)
it’s a - 0.04% (2)
the equivalent - 0.04% (2)
your house - 0.04% (2)
than the - 0.04% (2)
it isn’t - 0.04% (2)
affecting science? - 0.04% (2)
real plague - 0.04% (2)
day and - 0.04% (2)
of course - 0.04% (2)
the bbc - 0.04% (2)
read in - 0.04% (2)
private assoc.contact - 0.04% (2)
published on december - 0.25% (14)
continue reading no - 0.12% (7)
reading no comments - 0.12% (7)
december 9, 2016 - 0.12% (7)
there is a - 0.11% (6)
the temperature of - 0.11% (6)
december 5, 2016 - 0.11% (6)
december 7, 2016 - 0.11% (6)
continue reading 1 - 0.09% (5)
the new normal - 0.09% (5)
of the hydrogen - 0.09% (5)
of man-made global - 0.07% (4)
some of these - 0.07% (4)
detailed mathematical treatment - 0.07% (4)
reading 1 comment - 0.07% (4)
that the climate - 0.05% (3)
on december 4, - 0.05% (3)
december 4, 2016written - 0.05% (3)
with increase of - 0.05% (3)
these aggregates break - 0.05% (3)
temperature some of - 0.05% (3)
on december 5, - 0.05% (3)
2016written by anthony - 0.05% (3)
have been a - 0.05% (3)
on december 7, - 0.05% (3)
the green house - 0.05% (3)
principia scientific international - 0.05% (3)
on december 3, - 0.05% (3)
of water at - 0.05% (3)
the hydrogen bonds - 0.05% (3)
of temperature some - 0.05% (3)
temperature of 1 - 0.05% (3)
called the hydrogen - 0.05% (3)
nobody on either - 0.05% (3)
on either side - 0.05% (3)
as far as - 0.05% (3)
house gas gang - 0.05% (3)
of these aggregates - 0.05% (3)
december 7, 2016written - 0.05% (3)
december 3, 2016written - 0.05% (3)
3, 2016written by - 0.05% (3)
evidence of man-made - 0.05% (3)
5, 2016written by - 0.05% (3)
science is settled - 0.05% (3)
empirical evidence of - 0.05% (3)
gm of water - 0.05% (3)
by dr klaus - 0.05% (3)
the greenhouse effect - 0.05% (3)
backradiationhistory of radiationgreenhouse - 0.04% (2)
hydrogen bond with - 0.04% (2)
open tetrahedral structure - 0.04% (2)
persist in water - 0.04% (2)
we paying for?the - 0.04% (2)
at the freezing - 0.04% (2)
point. with increase - 0.04% (2)
and what are - 0.04% (2)
what is it - 0.04% (2)
reynenclean energy – - 0.04% (2)
the moonby jef - 0.04% (2)
water molecule would - 0.04% (2)
chicken-wire stack on - 0.04% (2)
and aggregates of - 0.04% (2)
as the ice - 0.04% (2)
reynanlessons from a - 0.04% (2)
heat evacuationby joseph - 0.04% (2)
kaiserdiurnal variations of - 0.04% (2)
to which you - 0.04% (2)
klaus l. e. - 0.04% (2)
unit of energy, - 0.04% (2)
the calorie, is - 0.04% (2)
defined in relation - 0.04% (2)
to water. the - 0.04% (2)
amount of heat - 0.04% (2)
molecules with the - 0.04% (2)
bonds remain, however, - 0.04% (2)
society mathby dr - 0.04% (2)
ipccby derek alteraboutwelcome - 0.04% (2)
water. the amount - 0.04% (2)
of heat required - 0.04% (2)
to raise the - 0.04% (2)
associationpsi mission statementpolicieswhy - 0.04% (2)
to psiprinciples of - 0.04% (2)
g of liquid - 0.04% (2)
water by 1 - 0.04% (2)
of water increases - 0.04% (2)
van der waals - 0.04% (2)
electrons and nuclei - 0.04% (2)
ice melts, this - 0.04% (2)
modelling history of - 0.04% (2)
tetrahedral structure is - 0.04% (2)
partially destroyed, and - 0.04% (2)
the water molecules - 0.04% (2)
are packed more - 0.04% (2)
closely together, causing - 0.04% (2)
water to have - 0.04% (2)
within the un - 0.04% (2)
a greater density - 0.04% (2)
than ice. many - 0.04% (2)
greenhouse effect theory - 0.04% (2)
climatologyco2 surface warming - 0.04% (2)
required to raise - 0.04% (2)
liquid water by - 0.04% (2)
effect (pdf)observations on - 0.04% (2)
a good day, - 0.04% (2)
the freezing point. - 0.04% (2)
david j. pristashfinite - 0.04% (2)
the global level?by - 0.04% (2)
even possible at - 0.04% (2)
pristashis sustainable energy - 0.04% (2)
required to break - 0.04% (2)
co2by david j. - 0.04% (2)
that the same - 0.04% (2)
water one degree - 0.04% (2)
than based on - 0.04% (2)
global temperatures other - 0.04% (2)
in water at - 0.04% (2)
model to predict - 0.04% (2)
human cornea’s structurepromalternative - 0.04% (2)
the human corneathe - 0.04% (2)
effectnew model of - 0.04% (2)
and advicehow the - 0.04% (2)
a measurable greenhouse - 0.04% (2)
effect refutationabsence of - 0.04% (2)
prom process workspublicationsthe - 0.04% (2)
model atmosphere (pdf)greenhouse - 0.04% (2)
effect experiment (pdf)copernicus - 0.04% (2)
meets the greenhouse - 0.04% (2)
element model for - 0.04% (2)
atmospheric ir-absorptionby joseph - 0.04% (2)
water increases from - 0.04% (2)
together, causing water - 0.04% (2)
cycle and royal - 0.04% (2)
joseph reynenthe carbon - 0.04% (2)
absorption and re-emissionby - 0.04% (2)
formulation with planck - 0.04% (2)
melts, this tetrahedral - 0.04% (2)
structure is partially - 0.04% (2)
destroyed, and the - 0.04% (2)
water molecules are - 0.04% (2)
butinaone-way heat flow - 0.04% (2)
packed more closely - 0.04% (2)
with temperatureby darko - 0.04% (2)
nothing to do - 0.04% (2)
tetrahedral structure persist - 0.04% (2)
to have a - 0.04% (2)
greater density than - 0.04% (2)
ice. many of - 0.04% (2)
mcleodwhy co2 has - 0.04% (2)
kelvin possible?by ross - 0.04% (2)
effect of 33 - 0.04% (2)
remain, however, and - 0.04% (2)
aggregates of molecules - 0.04% (2)
in relation to - 0.04% (2)
reynenback radiation greenhouse - 0.04% (2)
with the open - 0.04% (2)
homelatest newssupportsupport and - 0.04% (2)
of the feynman - 0.04% (2)
calorie, is defined - 0.04% (2)
surface warming greenhouse - 0.04% (2)
mathby dr klaus - 0.04% (2)
l. e. kaiserdiurnal - 0.04% (2)
variations of heat - 0.04% (2)
evacuationby joseph reynanlessons - 0.04% (2)
from a chicken-wire - 0.04% (2)
stack on the - 0.04% (2)
moonby jef reynenclean - 0.04% (2)
energy – what - 0.04% (2)
is it and - 0.04% (2)
what are we - 0.04% (2)
paying for?the modelling - 0.04% (2)
history of climatologyco2 - 0.04% (2)
effect theory within - 0.04% (2)
reynenthe carbon cycle - 0.04% (2)
the un ipccby - 0.04% (2)
derek alteraboutwelcome to - 0.04% (2)
psiprinciples of associationpsi - 0.04% (2)
mission statementpolicieswhy psi - 0.04% (2)
is a private - 0.04% (2)
anthony bright-paul the - 0.04% (2)
strange tale of - 0.04% (2)
of the nobel - 0.04% (2)
member of the - 0.04% (2)
gas climate theory - 0.04% (2)
‘inadmissible’ and ‘junk - 0.04% (2)
trump will likely - 0.04% (2)
and royal society - 0.04% (2)
and re-emissionby joseph - 0.04% (2)
that 2014 was - 0.04% (2)
based on co2by - 0.04% (2)
process workspublicationsthe model - 0.04% (2)
atmosphere (pdf)greenhouse effect - 0.04% (2)
experiment (pdf)copernicus meets - 0.04% (2)
(pdf)observations on backradiationhistory - 0.04% (2)
of radiationgreenhouse effect - 0.04% (2)
refutationabsence of a - 0.04% (2)
measurable greenhouse effectnew - 0.04% (2)
model of the - 0.04% (2)
human corneathe human - 0.04% (2)
cornea’s structurepromalternative model - 0.04% (2)
to predict global - 0.04% (2)
temperatures other than - 0.04% (2)
david j. pristashis - 0.04% (2)
with planck absorption - 0.04% (2)
sustainable energy even - 0.04% (2)
possible at the - 0.04% (2)
global level?by david - 0.04% (2)
j. pristashfinite element - 0.04% (2)
model for atmospheric - 0.04% (2)
ir-absorptionby joseph reynenback - 0.04% (2)
radiation greenhouse effect - 0.04% (2)
of 33 kelvin - 0.04% (2)
possible?by ross mcleodwhy - 0.04% (2)
co2 has nothing - 0.04% (2)
to do with - 0.04% (2)
temperatureby darko butinaone-way - 0.04% (2)
heat flow formulation - 0.04% (2)
shutter nasa climate - 0.04% (2)
president-elect donald trump - 0.04% (2)
of energy, the - 0.04% (2)
by the beginning - 0.04% (2)
likely shutter nasa - 0.04% (2)
climate alarm shop - 0.04% (2)
the real plague - 0.04% (2)
affecting science? it - 0.04% (2)
get instant notifications - 0.04% (2)
jerry l krause - 0.04% (2)
absorb infrared and - 0.04% (2)
i knows nobody - 0.04% (2)
disputes any of - 0.04% (2)
as i knows - 0.04% (2)
side disputes any - 0.04% (2)
this textbook pauling - 0.04% (2)
advicehow the prom - 0.04% (2)
crazies: strange tale - 0.04% (2)
unprepared to understand - 0.04% (2)
this detailed mathematical - 0.04% (2)
was and is - 0.04% (2)
intensity of light, - 0.04% (2)
to the intensity - 0.04% (2)
good day, jerry - 0.04% (2)
in ?massive? new - 0.04% (2)
climate data fraud - 0.04% (2)
– principia scientific - 0.04% (2)
krause december 9, - 0.04% (2)
chemistry 3rd ed. - 0.04% (2)
point of water - 0.04% (2)
is taken as - 0.04% (2)
of the green - 0.04% (2)
climate – the - 0.04% (2)
there a climate - 0.04% (2)
global seas rising - 0.04% (2)
2016written by dr - 0.04% (2)
end of the - 0.04% (2)
according to the - 0.04% (2)
to alien life - 0.04% (2)
one needs to - 0.04% (2)
have we heard - 0.04% (2)
often have we - 0.04% (2)
about the climate - 0.04% (2)
– the new - 0.04% (2)
christian science monitor - 0.04% (2)
to be the - 0.04% (2)
3 new papers: - 0.04% (2)
about 2 inches - 0.04% (2)
lying about the - 0.04% (2)
polar ice sheet - 0.04% (2)
man-made global warming? - 0.04% (2)
every day and - 0.04% (2)
plague affecting science? - 0.04% (2)
it isn’t fraud - 0.04% (2)
the equivalent of - 0.04% (2)
fuel is “green - 0.04% (2)
pervasive, so effective - 0.04% (2)
it is now - 0.04% (2)
so pervasive, so - 0.04% (2)
be below freezing - 0.04% (2)
75% of the - 0.04% (2)
you make a - 0.04% (2)
private assoc.contact us - 0.04% (2)

Here you can find chart of all your popular one, two and three word phrases. Google and others search engines means your page is about words you use frequently.

Copyright © 2015-2016 hupso.pl. All rights reserved. FB | +G | Twitter

Hupso.pl jest serwisem internetowym, w którym jednym kliknieciem możesz szybko i łatwo sprawdź stronę www pod kątem SEO. Oferujemy darmowe pozycjonowanie stron internetowych oraz wycena domen i stron internetowych. Prowadzimy ranking polskich stron internetowych oraz ranking stron alexa.