4.83 score from hupso.pl for:
paul-robinson.us



HTML Content


Titlepaul's comments

Length: 15, Words: 2
Description paul's comments

Length: 20, Words: 3
Keywords commentary
Robots
Charset UTF-8
Og Meta - Title pusty
Og Meta - Description pusty
Og Meta - Site name pusty
Tytuł powinien zawierać pomiędzy 10 a 70 znaków (ze spacjami), a mniej niż 12 słów w długości.
Meta opis powinien zawierać pomiędzy 50 a 160 znaków (łącznie ze spacjami), a mniej niż 24 słów w długości.
Kodowanie znaków powinny być określone , UTF-8 jest chyba najlepszy zestaw znaków, aby przejść z powodu UTF-8 jest bardziej międzynarodowy kodowaniem.
Otwarte obiekty wykresu powinny być obecne w stronie internetowej (więcej informacji na temat protokołu OpenGraph: http://ogp.me/)

SEO Content

Words/Characters 3002
Text/HTML 48.30 %
Headings H1 1
H2 5
H3 10
H4 0
H5 0
H6 0
H1
paul's comments
H2
09/29/16
05/01/16
10/22/15
04/21/15
12/09/14
H3
on the fundamental axioms of existience
why i think warren beatty is not the subject of carly simon's "you're so vain"
american express busted over merchant practices
probably not a good idea
about the recent (30+ year old) accusations against bill cosby
paul's comments
search
categories
linkblog
xml feeds
H4
H5
H6
strong
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 32 >>
1
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 32 >>
1
recently
archives
categories
latest comments
b
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 32 >>
1
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 32 >>
1
recently
archives
categories
latest comments
i
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 32 >>
1
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 32 >>
1
recently
archives
categories
latest comments
em
Bolds strong 8
b 8
i 8
em 0
Zawartość strony internetowej powinno zawierać więcej niż 250 słów, z stopa tekst / kod jest wyższy niż 20%.
Pozycji używać znaczników (h1, h2, h3, ...), aby określić temat sekcji lub ustępów na stronie, ale zwykle, użyj mniej niż 6 dla każdego tagu pozycje zachować swoją stronę zwięzły.
Styl używać silnych i kursywy znaczniki podkreślić swoje słowa kluczowe swojej stronie, ale nie nadużywać (mniej niż 16 silnych tagi i 16 znaczników kursywy)

Statystyki strony

twitter:title pusty
twitter:description pusty
google+ itemprop=name pusty
Pliki zewnętrzne 1
Pliki CSS 1
Pliki javascript 0
Plik należy zmniejszyć całkowite odwołanie plików (CSS + JavaScript) do 7-8 maksymalnie.

Linki wewnętrzne i zewnętrzne

Linki 111
Linki wewnętrzne 0
Linki zewnętrzne 111
Linki bez atrybutu Title 80
Linki z atrybutem NOFOLLOW 0
Linki - Użyj atrybutu tytuł dla każdego łącza. Nofollow link jest link, który nie pozwala wyszukiwarkom boty zrealizują są odnośniki no follow. Należy zwracać uwagę na ich użytkowania

Linki wewnętrzne

pusty

Linki zewnętrzne

all http://www.paul-robinson.us/index.php?blog=1
paul http://www.paul-robinson.us/index.php
notices http://www.paul-robinson.us/index.php?blog=3
politics http://www.paul-robinson.us/index.php?blog=5
stories http://www.paul-robinson.us/index.php?blog=6
computers http://www.paul-robinson.us/index.php?blog=7
cartoons http://www.paul-robinson.us/index.php?blog=8
misc http://www.paul-robinson.us/index.php?blog=9
paul's comments http://www.paul-robinson.us/index.php
home http://www.paul-robinson.us/index.php
contact http://www.paul-robinson.us/index.php?disp=msgform&recipient_id=1&redirect_to=http%3a%2f%2fwww.paul-robinson.us%2findex.php%3fblog%3d2
log in http://www.paul-robinson.us/htsrv/login.php?redirect_to=%2findex.php%3fblog%3d2
2 http://www.paul-robinson.us/index.php?blog=2&paged=2
3 http://www.paul-robinson.us/index.php?blog=2&paged=3
4 http://www.paul-robinson.us/index.php?blog=2&paged=4
5 http://www.paul-robinson.us/index.php?blog=2&paged=5
6 http://www.paul-robinson.us/index.php?blog=2&paged=6
7 http://www.paul-robinson.us/index.php?blog=2&paged=7
8 http://www.paul-robinson.us/index.php?blog=2&paged=8
9 http://www.paul-robinson.us/index.php?blog=2&paged=9
10 http://www.paul-robinson.us/index.php?blog=2&paged=10
11 http://www.paul-robinson.us/index.php?blog=2&paged=11
... http://www.paul-robinson.us/index.php?blog=2&paged=21
32 http://www.paul-robinson.us/index.php?blog=2&paged=32
>> http://www.paul-robinson.us/index.php?blog=2&paged=2
- http://www.paul-robinson.us/index.php/2016/09/29/axioms
paul robinson http://www.paul-robinson.us/index.php?disp=user&user_id=3
announcements [a] http://www.paul-robinson.us/index.php/cat1/
on the fundamental axioms of existience http://www.paul-robinson.us/index.php/2016/09/29/axioms
-permalink http://www.paul-robinson.us/index.php/2016/09/29/axioms
- http://www.paul-robinson.us/index.php/2016/05/01/why-i-think-warren-beatty-is-not-the-subject-of-carly-simon-s-you-re-so-vain
paul robinson http://www.paul-robinson.us/index.php?disp=user&user_id=3
announcements [a] http://www.paul-robinson.us/index.php/cat1/
why i think warren beatty is not the subject of carly simon's "you're so vain" http://www.paul-robinson.us/index.php/2016/05/01/why-i-think-warren-beatty-is-not-the-subject-of-carly-simon-s-you-re-so-vain
-permalink http://www.paul-robinson.us/index.php/2016/05/01/why-i-think-warren-beatty-is-not-the-subject-of-carly-simon-s-you-re-so-vain
- http://www.paul-robinson.us/index.php/2015/10/22/amex-merchant
paul robinson http://www.paul-robinson.us/index.php?disp=user&user_id=3
announcements [a] http://www.paul-robinson.us/index.php/cat1/
american express busted over merchant practices http://www.paul-robinson.us/index.php/2015/10/22/amex-merchant
http://www.justice.gov/atr/case/document/order-entering-permanent-injunction-american-express-defendants http://www.justice.gov/atr/case/document/order-entering-permanent-injunction-american-express-defendants
https://www209.americanexpress.com/merchant/sevices/en_us/doj https://www209.americanexpress.com/merchant/sevices/en_us/doj
https://www209.americanexpress.com/merchant/sen/ices/en_us/doj https://www209.americanexpress.com/merchant/sen/ices/en_us/doj
-permalink http://www.paul-robinson.us/index.php/2015/10/22/amex-merchant
- http://www.paul-robinson.us/index.php/2015/04/21/probably-not-a-good-idea
paul robinson http://www.paul-robinson.us/index.php?disp=user&user_id=3
announcements [a] http://www.paul-robinson.us/index.php/cat1/
probably not a good idea http://www.paul-robinson.us/index.php/2015/04/21/probably-not-a-good-idea
-permalink http://www.paul-robinson.us/index.php/2015/04/21/probably-not-a-good-idea
- http://www.paul-robinson.us/index.php/2014/12/09/cosby
paul robinson http://www.paul-robinson.us/index.php?disp=user&user_id=3
announcements [a] http://www.paul-robinson.us/index.php/cat1/
news http://www.paul-robinson.us/index.php/cat2/
about the recent (30+ year old) accusations against bill cosby http://www.paul-robinson.us/index.php/2014/12/09/cosby
-permalink http://www.paul-robinson.us/index.php/2014/12/09/cosby
2 http://www.paul-robinson.us/index.php?blog=2&paged=2
3 http://www.paul-robinson.us/index.php?blog=2&paged=3
4 http://www.paul-robinson.us/index.php?blog=2&paged=4
5 http://www.paul-robinson.us/index.php?blog=2&paged=5
6 http://www.paul-robinson.us/index.php?blog=2&paged=6
7 http://www.paul-robinson.us/index.php?blog=2&paged=7
8 http://www.paul-robinson.us/index.php?blog=2&paged=8
9 http://www.paul-robinson.us/index.php?blog=2&paged=9
10 http://www.paul-robinson.us/index.php?blog=2&paged=10
11 http://www.paul-robinson.us/index.php?blog=2&paged=11
... http://www.paul-robinson.us/index.php?blog=2&paged=21
32 http://www.paul-robinson.us/index.php?blog=2&paged=32
>> http://www.paul-robinson.us/index.php?blog=2&paged=2
december 2016 http://www.paul-robinson.us/index.php/2016/12/
<< http://www.paul-robinson.us/index.php/2015/12/
< http://www.paul-robinson.us/index.php/2016/11/
> http://www.paul-robinson.us/index.php/2017/01/
>> http://www.paul-robinson.us/index.php/2017/12/
paul's comments http://www.paul-robinson.us/index.php
http://honeypot.nfshost.com/breakfrontatmospher.php
recently http://www.paul-robinson.us/index.php
archives http://www.paul-robinson.us/index.php?disp=arcdir
categories http://www.paul-robinson.us/index.php?disp=catdir
latest comments http://www.paul-robinson.us/index.php?disp=comments
all http://www.paul-robinson.us/index.php
announcements [a] http://www.paul-robinson.us/index.php/cat1/
audio http://www.paul-robinson.us/index.php/audio/
background http://www.paul-robinson.us/index.php/cat3/
news http://www.paul-robinson.us/index.php/cat2/
video http://www.paul-robinson.us/index.php/video/
down under: use an ipod, go to jail? http://www.paul-robinson.us/index.php/2006/11/21/down_under_use_an_ipod_go_to_jail?blog=3
proposition 8 http://www.paul-robinson.us/index.php/2008/11/01/proposition_8?blog=3
golf pro suing florida company over wikipedia article http://www.paul-robinson.us/index.php/2007/03/01/golf_pro_suing_florida_company_over_wiki?blog=3
better treatment of programmers by management: an argument from a business perspective http://www.paul-robinson.us/index.php/2006/11/24/better_treatment_of_programmers_by_manag?blog=3
google supports atty fees on copyright owner suit loss http://www.paul-robinson.us/index.php/2006/08/12/google_supports_atty_fees_on_copyright_o?blog=3
coin-op crapola http://www.paul-robinson.us/index.php/2006/07/11/coin_op_crapola?blog=3
copyright registrar reports extension 'big mistake' http://www.paul-robinson.us/index.php/2006/02/21/copyright_registrar_reports_extension_bi?blog=3
star wars movie downloads slowing down internet http://www.paul-robinson.us/index.php/2005/05/20/star_wars_movie_downloads_slowing_down_i?blog=3
fcc's broadcast flag struck down http://www.paul-robinson.us/index.php/2005/05/16/fcc_s_broadcast_flag_struck_down?blog=3
bush unaware of own administration's proposal http://www.paul-robinson.us/index.php/2005/04/15/bush_unaware_of_own_administration_s_pro?blog=3
robert heinlein does it again! http://www.paul-robinson.us/index.php/2004/08/28/robert_heinlein_does_it_again?blog=3
the three creators of linux: torvalds, stallman and gates http://www.paul-robinson.us/index.php/2004/08/09/the_three_creators_of_linux_torvalds_sta?blog=3
ibm to build new top 20 supercomputer http://www.paul-robinson.us/index.php/2004/08/04/ibm_to_build_new_top_20_supercomputer?blog=3
35 years ago today: "one small step for [a] man..." http://www.paul-robinson.us/index.php/2004/07/20/35_years_ago_today_one_small_step_for_a_?blog=3
mexico's attorney general gets microchip implant http://www.paul-robinson.us/index.php/2004/07/13/mexico_s_attorney_general_gets_microchip?blog=3
worst features of programming languages? http://www.paul-robinson.us/index.php/2004/07/09/worst_features_of_programming_languages?blog=3
fcc rules only it can regulate wireless spectrum http://www.paul-robinson.us/index.php/2004/06/28/fcc_rules_only_it_can_regulate_wireless_?blog=3
posts http://www.paul-robinson.us/index.php?tempskin=_rss2
posts http://www.paul-robinson.us/index.php?tempskin=_atom
what is rss? http://webreference.fr/2006/08/30/rss_atom_xml
- http://b2evolution.net/
contact http://www.paul-robinson.us/index.php?disp=msgform&recipient_id=1&redirect_to=http%3a%2f%2fwww.paul-robinson.us%2findex.php%3fblog%3d2
blog template http://skinfaktory.com/
francois http://fplanque.com/
blog tool http://b2evolution.net/
dedicated servers http://b2evolution.net/web-hosting/dedicated-servers.php
authors http://b2evolution.net/dev/authors.html

Zdjęcia

Zdjęcia 17
Zdjęcia bez atrybutu ALT 1
Zdjęcia bez atrybutu TITLE 16
Korzystanie Obraz ALT i TITLE atrybutu dla każdego obrazu.

Zdjęcia bez atrybutu TITLE

http://www.paul-robinson.us/rsc/icons/minipost.gif
http://www.paul-robinson.us/rsc/flags/h10px/us.gif
http://www.paul-robinson.us/rsc/icons/minipost.gif
http://www.paul-robinson.us/rsc/icons/minipost.gif
http://www.paul-robinson.us/rsc/flags/h10px/us.gif
http://www.paul-robinson.us/rsc/icons/minipost.gif
http://www.paul-robinson.us/rsc/icons/minipost.gif
http://www.paul-robinson.us/rsc/flags/h10px/us.gif
http://www.paul-robinson.us/rsc/icons/minipost.gif
http://www.paul-robinson.us/rsc/icons/minipost.gif
http://www.paul-robinson.us/rsc/flags/h10px/us.gif
http://www.paul-robinson.us/rsc/icons/minipost.gif
http://www.paul-robinson.us/rsc/icons/minipost.gif
http://www.paul-robinson.us/rsc/flags/h10px/us.gif
http://www.paul-robinson.us/rsc/icons/minipost.gif
http://www.paul-robinson.us/rsc/icons/feed-icon-16x16.gif

Zdjęcia bez atrybutu ALT

http://www.paul-robinson.us/rsc/icons/feed-icon-16x16.gif

Ranking:


Alexa Traffic
Daily Global Rank Trend
Daily Reach (Percent)









Majestic SEO











Text on page:

allpaulnoticespoliticsstoriescomputerscartoonsmisc paul's commentspaul's general comments homecontactlog in pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 32 >> 09/29/16 11:33:22 pm, by paul robinson, 505 words categories: announcements [a] on the fundamental axioms of existience there is some consideration among skeptics as to what we should "believe," even to the point of not using "belief," as a concept. first, it is axiomatic that i exist. for the simple reason that if i did not exist, this conversation could not exist. in your case, substitute you for "i" and thus you exist and can join the conversation. any person who makes the ridiculous claim that they do not exist, must, by their own statement, shut up, propose no further theories, and die. you can't make a claim by using the other side's concepts. once you open your mouth to say anything, you concede you exist and that language exists. it is entirely possible you are arguing with nothing at all, but you are arguing. now, second, it is axiomatic that the world around me exists. because if it didn't, again, this conversation could not take place. even if this world was simply a figment of my imagination, that thing supplying me with the sensations would exist in my brain as a separate "process" the way a web browser and a word processor run on a computer in separate processes. the following two items are new, i didn't accept them until a couple of years ago when i made the connections. third, i reject the idea that my own consciousness could be simulating the world around me, because it would require that i, at the time i was instantiated, had the capacity to completely imagine the entire world around me lacking any sense data or other information necessary to imagine these things. for this to be possible, i, as an entity, having no sense inputs and no knowledge of anything, be able to create an entire construct of a world around me, despite the fact i have no information about anything to do so. thus i reject this hypothesis as not possible. fourth, for that reason i accept the world around me, and concede that, while my senses are not perfect and sometimes do give me false information, they are mostly accurate and the data given is sufficiently adequate as to be accepted as valid until other evidence proves otherwise. i must also accept the world around me because i have no choice. absent evidence that the world is not real, if i fail to act in compliance with its mandates, i will die. i cannot step in front of any moving conveyance and not expect to be struck and most likely injured, possibly killed. i cannot fail to eat, drink or breathe, or i would also die. so, in summary, i exist, i exist in a world of other people, and this world is, for all intents and purposes, generally a valid representation of what it appears to be and that it is real and substantial. these are the things i accept as proven axiomatically, and while potentially they may not be comlpetely provable, i accept that they must, of necessity, be taken as proven for the reasons i have given. permalink 05/01/16 07:02:02 pm, by paul robinson, 136 words categories: announcements [a] why i think warren beatty is not the subject of carly simon's "you're so vain" ever since carly simon released the song "you're so vain" there has been controversy over the relatively uncaring man she sings about. essentially every man with whom, she had a relationship or her ex-husband james taylor, has been considered as a possible subject for the song. i believe i can eliminate warren beatty. one of the lines in the song tells how her paramour "flew your learjet to nova scotia, to see the total eclipse of the sun." however, the federal aviation administration has its database of pilots on line and open to the public for inspection. i looked up john travolta, who claims to be a pilot, and he's in there. however, warren beatty is not on that list. this leads me to the conclusion that he is not the person named in the song. permalink 10/22/15 03:52:26 pm, by paul robinson, 752 words categories: announcements [a] american express busted over merchant practices i got this in the mail today as my company has a merchant account with american express: american express services company, inc. world financial center 200 vesey street new york’ ny 10285-4908 october 7, 2015 dear business owner or manager, we value your business as an american express merchant and want to ensure that you are aware of important modifications to your card acceptance contract resulting from recent developments in a federal court case. the modifications were effective as of july 20, 2015, and only apply to your locations in the united states and united states territories and possessions. the changes relate to the treatment of american express cards. a federal court has ruled that american express violated the law by prohibiting merchants from influencing the payment form that their customers use. as a result of that ruling, you may now favor any credit card brand that you wish, by, for example, communicating to customers which credit card brand you would prefer that they use, telling customers which credit card brands are the most or least expensive for you, or offering discounts or incentives to customers to use the credit card brand you prefer. consistent with the federal court's ruling, you may not, however, disparage or mischaracterize the american express brand or impose a surcharge (as opposed to a discount) on customers who use an american express credit card. to influence the credit card that a customer uses, you may employ any of the practices listed in section iila of the court's order,including: * offering a discount or rebate, including an immediate discount or rebate at the point of sale; * offering a free or discounted product; * offering a free or discounted or enhanced sen/ice; * offering an incentive, encouragement, or benefit; * expressing a preference for a particular brand or type of card; * promoting a particular brand or type of card through posted information, through the size, prominence, or sequencing of payment choices, or through other communications to a customer; * communicating to a customer the reasonably estimated or actual costs incurred by you when a customer uses a particular card, or the relative costs of using different brands or types of cards; or * engaging in any other practices substantially equivalent to these. to review all applicable terms and conditions, please refer to the court's order, a copy of which may be found at: http://www.justice.gov/atr/case/document/order-entering-permanent-injunction-american-express-defendants . the court's order also allows american express to maintain merchant rules providing that you cannot make untrue statements about your cost of accepting american express cards or the relative cost of accepting american express cards as compared to other credit and charge cards. similarly, if you choose to compare your cost of accepting american express cards to your cost of accepting other credit or charge cards, you must exclude the costs of accepting debit cards from your calculation. if you choose to attempt to influence a customer's choice of credit or charge card, you must reasonably indicate that you accept american express cards by posting signage, either at the point of sale (including online or on mobile sen/ices) or at the store entry, or by communicating orally that you accept the american express card prior to the request for authorization of the transaction. for example, you may satisfy this requirement by displaying a sticker at the point of sale or at the store entrance indicating all brands you accept that includes the american express logo. accordingly, american express has made modifications to its u.s. merchant regulations, the u.s. merchant reference guide, and the u.s. merchant operating guide to reflect the federal court's ruling. please read the revised documents relevant to your card acceptance contract carefully, as they explain in detail the new policies and procedures governing your treatment of american express cards.you can find these -revised documents and a full copy of the federal court's ruling at https://www209.americanexpress.com/merchant/sevices/en_us/doj to the extent your card acceptance contract, or other agreement that governs your acceptance of american express cards, contains provisions that are inconsistent with the federal court's ruling, american express will not enforce those provisions. american express is presently appealing the federal court's ruling. if the federal court's ruling is reversed or modified as a result of the appeal, american express resen/es all rights to cancel or revise these modifications. we will apprise you of any such updates in the future. if you have questions or would like more information about these modifications, please visit https://www209.americanexpress.com/merchant/sen/ices/en_us/doj for more details. thank you for accepting american express cards. we appreciate and value your business. (signature) anré williams president, global merchant services permalink 04/21/15 01:18:27 pm, by paul robinson, 160 words categories: announcements [a] probably not a good idea i happened to catch a streaming video of a 1975 tv movie "the last survivors," where a cruise ship sinks due to a sudden typhoon, there are 18 people ending up in a lifeboat which can technically only support 8 people. the second purser is appointed in charge of the lifeboat by the captain who is dying, and the acting captain has to force emergency conditions, such as making passengers in the boat switch places with those in the water on two hour shifts, ration food and water, and in some cases jettison passengers who are either overloading the boat during a storm, or denying food to a passenger that he believes is not going to make it. he even has to shoot one of the crew who is pushing people off the boat to save himself. attached to the end of the movie was a retro commercial probably from when the movie was broadcast. it was a commercial for a cruise line. permalink 12/09/14 12:51:52 am, by paul robinson, 898 words categories: announcements [a], news about the recent (30+ year old) accusations against bill cosby i'm not trying to enter "blame the victim" mode here, but why didn't anyone say something about these allegations against bill cosby before? why does it take 30 years or more to finally bring up events that (may have) happened that far back, and might even have had major details lost or forgotten? i'm thinking of the william kennedy smith trial, and the evidence and summations made it sound like basically, he was probably lousy in bed, treated her like shit or just a piece of ass, and she decides to 'retroactively" claim rape. now, again, i'm not saying this is the case here. it is entirely possible cosby did do all of the really bad things that it is claimed he did. it is possible some are true and some are exaggerated or fabricated, and it is possible all of them are created out of whole cloth. but the problem that remains what that anyone who could have said something - and if true, potentially prevented other incidents - did nothing and remained silent. for decades. now, i can understand some wannabe actress afraid to say something immediately, possibly fearing she might be blacklisted (as happened to cliff robertson in 1978 after he publicly accused columbia studio head david begelman of stealing from him, an accusation later shown to be true, and robertson wasn't the only person used by begelman to embezzle from columbia pictures). but, after a few years, you would think someone would have said something. perhaps, back in the 1970s and earlier women weren't taken that seriously over domestic (boyfriend-girlfriend and husband-wife) assault and acquaintance rape, but the same is not true during the 1980s, and especially coming into the 1990s and 2000s. let's look back to 1984 and 1985, were societal mores so inadequately protective of women that accusations of abuse and sexual assault, even against a famous and well-loved actor and comedian like cosby would be ignored or treated cavalierly by the police? while i might be wrong, i do not think so. there is a concept in law called "laches" which in layman's terms means, "you snooze, you lose," in which if you wait too long to sue over an incident the courts dismiss your claim as untimely. this helps prevent the courts with being clogged with old, stale cases where evidence which might allow the defendant to raise a defense could be lost, destroyed, or memories faded. this is expressed in statutes of limitations requirements where, in most states a criminal case for anything less than murder must be filed within 3 to 7 years, and civil cases asking for money or other damages generally must be filed within about the same period of time. which brings us to noted (self admitted) feminist attorney gloria allred, who is representing at least one of cosby's female accusers, realizes that as it stands cosby could never be prosecuted nor sued for anything even if he did do what he is accused of (the statute of limitations on prosecuting such crimes in california is 3 years, and for a civil suit for damages it's 3 years after the incident or 3 years after the person turns 18 if they were under 18 at the time of the incident, whichever is later), came out to say that cosby should waive the statute of limitations and allow a trial on the merits to take place. the simple question i have is "why?" who on earth would choose to go on trial over something - whether or not they are liable for it - when they are essentially immune from process? what exactly does allowing a suit against him to go forward buy cosby except grief and potential financial loss? i mean, the guy isn't doing any tv or movie projects, does not have, as far as i know, any endorsement deals or advertising campaign, isn't doing stand-up, and is, for all intents and purposes retired or semi-retired. he's probably a multimillionaire, so it doesn't matter what some women say about him - even if it's true - because no amount of public opinion is going to affect his probably extremely comfortable lifestyle. allred shows no possible reason cosby should want to waive the statute of limitations and essentially the only argument she can come up with is it allows her client potentially to get money out of him through a judgment if the accusation were proven true, and thus allred would get the typical 30% cut of the money, so to some extent her comments are essentially self-serving. allred here is clearly acting the part of a zealous attorney who has failed to realize you have nothing to offer and nothing to threaten. in legal circles, this is exemplified by the saying, "during a trial, if the law is on your side, pound on (emphasize the importance of) the law; if the facts are on your side, pound on the facts; if neither is on your side, pound on the table." it is one thing for a young person with their career ahead of them who has a cloud overhanging them to want to see such matters resolved and gotten out of the way so they can be able to make a living, but it would represent rank insanity for someone like cosby to consider this, especially if he was committing the things he has been accused of. and if he wasn't, there's probably not much upside to raise a response over this. permalink 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 32 >> december 2016 sun mon tue wed thu fri sat << < > >> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 paul's commentswelcome to my blog! this is where i store my thoughts so that i can come back to them at some point in the future. this allows me a place like a journal to keep what i'm thinking about. but anyone else is welcome to visit; i make this place public so that other people can hear what i'm thinking. this is where i make comments on any subject i find of interest. my political comments are in the politics section, and technical items are in the computers section. note, if you want to make a comment, e-mail it to me at paul@paul-robinson.us. i am sorry that i had to disable comments, but after i had deleted the 300th worthless piece of spam comment on this blog and receiving exactly zero valid comments, i decided to stop allowing spammers to excrement all over me and my blog. if you have *anything* at all to say, send it to me in e-mail; if it is even the slightest bit relevant - even if i don't agree with it, i will post it. (as soon as i find a way to stop spammers from posting junk i'll allow direct comments.) note that if you are a visitor and post a comment, it defaults to "draft" meaning i have to approve it before it is visible, so if you're posting spam, don't bother, nobody will see it. recentlyarchivescategorieslatest commentssearchall wordssome wordentire phrasecategoriesallannouncements [a]audiobackgroundnewsvideolinkblogon the webdown under: use an ipod, go to jail?in real lifeproposition 8golf pro suing florida company over wikipedia articleannouncements [b]better treatment of programmers by management: an argument from a business perspectivegoogle supports atty fees on copyright owner suit losscoin-op crapolacopyright registrar reports extension 'big mistake'star wars movie downloads slowing down internet fcc's broadcast flag struck downbush unaware of own administration's proposalrobert heinlein does it again!the three creators of linux: torvalds, stallman and gatesibm to build new top 20 supercomputer35 years ago today: "one small step for [a] man..."mexico's attorney general gets microchip implantworst features of programming languages?fcc rules only it can regulate wireless spectrum xml feedsrss 2.0: postsatom: postswhat is rss? ©2016 by admin • contact • blog template by francois • blog tool • dedicated servers • authors


Here you find all texts from your page as Google (googlebot) and others search engines seen it.

Words density analysis:

Numbers of all words: 3040

One word

Two words phrases

Three words phrases

the - 6.32% (192)
and - 2.63% (80)
you - 2.01% (61)
all - 1.55% (47)
that - 1.38% (42)
for - 1.35% (41)
can - 1.32% (40)
her - 1.25% (38)
pro - 1.15% (35)
not - 1.15% (35)
are - 0.89% (27)
express - 0.89% (27)
card - 0.86% (26)
american - 0.82% (25)
any - 0.72% (22)
act - 0.72% (22)
his - 0.69% (21)
thing - 0.69% (21)
this - 0.66% (20)
your - 0.63% (19)
accept - 0.63% (19)
some - 0.56% (17)
use - 0.56% (17)
with - 0.49% (15)
other - 0.46% (14)
here - 0.46% (14)
out - 0.46% (14)
court - 0.43% (13)
have - 0.43% (13)
over - 0.43% (13)
comment - 0.43% (13)
one - 0.43% (13)
who - 0.43% (13)
cards - 0.39% (12)
has - 0.39% (12)
exist - 0.39% (12)
even - 0.39% (12)
world - 0.36% (11)
man - 0.36% (11)
sat - 0.36% (11)
paul - 0.36% (11)
merchant - 0.36% (11)
would - 0.36% (11)
they - 0.33% (10)
customer - 0.33% (10)
own - 0.33% (10)
comments - 0.33% (10)
cosby - 0.33% (10)
about - 0.3% (9)
from - 0.3% (9)
what - 0.3% (9)
brand - 0.3% (9)
federal - 0.3% (9)
which - 0.3% (9)
was - 0.3% (9)
court's - 0.3% (9)
year - 0.3% (9)
credit - 0.3% (9)
years - 0.26% (8)
but - 0.26% (8)
did - 0.26% (8)
possible - 0.26% (8)
end - 0.26% (8)
case - 0.26% (8)
make - 0.26% (8)
ever - 0.26% (8)
able - 0.26% (8)
word - 0.26% (8)
post - 0.26% (8)
allow - 0.26% (8)
say - 0.26% (8)
must - 0.23% (7)
true - 0.23% (7)
off - 0.23% (7)
these - 0.23% (7)
may - 0.23% (7)
will - 0.23% (7)
cost - 0.23% (7)
announcements - 0.23% (7)
[a] - 0.23% (7)
like - 0.23% (7)
mon - 0.23% (7)
ruling - 0.23% (7)
discount - 0.2% (6)
could - 0.2% (6)
reason - 0.2% (6)
accepting - 0.2% (6)
anything - 0.2% (6)
point - 0.2% (6)
think - 0.2% (6)
now - 0.2% (6)
real - 0.2% (6)
there - 0.2% (6)
words - 0.2% (6)
claim - 0.2% (6)
blog - 0.2% (6)
once - 0.2% (6)
how - 0.2% (6)
probably - 0.2% (6)
offer - 0.2% (6)
take - 0.2% (6)
new - 0.2% (6)
around - 0.2% (6)
form - 0.2% (6)
she - 0.16% (5)
only - 0.16% (5)
refer - 0.16% (5)
people - 0.16% (5)
where - 0.16% (5)
customers - 0.16% (5)
offering - 0.16% (5)
boat - 0.16% (5)
were - 0.16% (5)
does - 0.16% (5)
permalink - 0.16% (5)
charge - 0.16% (5)
something - 0.16% (5)
i'm - 0.16% (5)
after - 0.16% (5)
movie - 0.16% (5)
back - 0.16% (5)
had - 0.16% (5)
them - 0.16% (5)
entire - 0.16% (5)
him - 0.16% (5)
information - 0.16% (5)
person - 0.16% (5)
categories: - 0.16% (5)
robinson, - 0.16% (5)
• - 0.16% (5)
time - 0.16% (5)
come - 0.16% (5)
place - 0.16% (5)
part - 0.13% (4)
down - 0.13% (4)
atty - 0.13% (4)
thu - 0.13% (4)
trial - 0.13% (4)
more - 0.13% (4)
because - 0.13% (4)
law - 0.13% (4)
potential - 0.13% (4)
want - 0.13% (4)
accusation - 0.13% (4)
ration - 0.13% (4)
line - 0.13% (4)
computer - 0.13% (4)
essentially - 0.13% (4)
when - 0.13% (4)
spam - 0.13% (4)
allred - 0.13% (4)
public - 0.13% (4)
such - 0.13% (4)
cards. - 0.13% (4)
pm, - 0.13% (4)
its - 0.13% (4)
used - 0.13% (4)
evidence - 0.13% (4)
general - 0.13% (4)
things - 0.13% (4)
nothing - 0.13% (4)
might - 0.13% (4)
business - 0.13% (4)
why - 0.13% (4)
most - 0.13% (4)
incident - 0.13% (4)
copy - 0.13% (4)
limitations - 0.13% (4)
acceptance - 0.13% (4)
against - 0.13% (4)
order - 0.13% (4)
song - 0.13% (4)
now, - 0.13% (4)
statute - 0.13% (4)
through - 0.13% (4)
choice - 0.1% (3)
posting - 0.1% (3)
either - 0.1% (3)
accused - 0.1% (3)
you're - 0.1% (3)
fri - 0.1% (3)
choose - 0.1% (3)
bit - 0.1% (3)
note - 0.1% (3)
top - 0.1% (3)
allows - 0.1% (3)
admin - 0.1% (3)
please - 0.1% (3)
relative - 0.1% (3)
costs - 0.1% (3)
sale - 0.1% (3)
happened - 0.1% (3)
consider - 0.1% (3)
suit - 0.1% (3)
true, - 0.1% (3)
years, - 0.1% (3)
particular - 0.1% (3)
thinking - 0.1% (3)
women - 0.1% (3)
concept - 0.1% (3)
"you - 0.1% (3)
too - 0.1% (3)
anyone - 0.1% (3)
enter - 0.1% (3)
less - 0.1% (3)
money - 0.1% (3)
attorney - 0.1% (3)
under - 0.1% (3)
represent - 0.1% (3)
it. - 0.1% (3)
passenger - 0.1% (3)
during - 0.1% (3)
cases - 0.1% (3)
get - 0.1% (3)
cut - 0.1% (3)
visit - 0.1% (3)
side, - 0.1% (3)
pound - 0.1% (3)
revise - 0.1% (3)
detail - 0.1% (3)
u.s. - 0.1% (3)
modifications - 0.1% (3)
store - 0.1% (3)
type - 0.1% (3)
paul's - 0.1% (3)
way - 0.1% (3)
mail - 0.1% (3)
contract - 0.1% (3)
while - 0.1% (3)
die. - 0.1% (3)
is, - 0.1% (3)
been - 0.1% (3)
fact - 0.1% (3)
proven - 0.1% (3)
data - 0.1% (3)
potentially - 0.1% (3)
sense - 0.1% (3)
company - 0.1% (3)
got - 0.1% (3)
recent - 0.1% (3)
warren - 0.1% (3)
beatty - 0.1% (3)
practices - 0.1% (3)
require - 0.1% (3)
subject - 0.1% (3)
valid - 0.1% (3)
two - 0.1% (3)
me, - 0.1% (3)
didn't - 0.1% (3)
however, - 0.1% (3)
see - 0.1% (3)
believe - 0.1% (3)
their - 0.1% (3)
made - 0.1% (3)
(as - 0.1% (3)
ruling, - 0.1% (3)
brands - 0.1% (3)
communicating - 0.1% (3)
axiomatic - 0.1% (3)
also - 0.1% (3)
including - 0.1% (3)
fail - 0.1% (3)
states - 0.1% (3)
section - 0.1% (3)
conversation - 0.1% (3)
thus - 0.1% (3)
result - 0.1% (3)
using - 0.1% (3)
should - 0.1% (3)
... - 0.1% (3)
cannot - 0.1% (3)
exist, - 0.1% (3)
give - 0.1% (3)
treatment - 0.1% (3)
prefer - 0.1% (3)
sue - 0.07% (2)
it's - 0.07% (2)
idea - 0.07% (2)
question - 0.07% (2)
exactly - 0.07% (2)
allowing - 0.07% (2)
reject - 0.07% (2)
waive - 0.07% (2)
nor - 0.07% (2)
same - 0.07% (2)
create - 0.07% (2)
information, - 0.07% (2)
courts - 0.07% (2)
prevent - 0.07% (2)
given - 0.07% (2)
so. - 0.07% (2)
raise - 0.07% (2)
than - 0.07% (2)
especially - 0.07% (2)
filed - 0.07% (2)
within - 0.07% (2)
civil - 0.07% (2)
look - 0.07% (2)
damages - 0.07% (2)
imagine - 0.07% (2)
defendant - 0.07% (2)
discounted - 0.07% (2)
isn't - 0.07% (2)
up, - 0.07% (2)
welcome - 0.07% (2)
find - 0.07% (2)
politics - 0.07% (2)
technical - 0.07% (2)
computers - 0.07% (2)
comment, - 0.07% (2)
e-mail - 0.07% (2)
comments, - 0.07% (2)
stop - 0.07% (2)
anything, - 0.07% (2)
spammers - 0.07% (2)
must, - 0.07% (2)
don't - 0.07% (2)
agree - 0.07% (2)
before - 0.07% (2)
simple - 0.07% (2)
exist. - 0.07% (2)
copyright - 0.07% (2)
broadcast - 0.07% (2)
open - 0.07% (2)
concede - 0.07% (2)
doing - 0.07% (2)
realize - 0.07% (2)
purposes - 0.07% (2)
retired - 0.07% (2)
matter - 0.07% (2)
ago - 0.07% (2)
until - 0.07% (2)
argument - 0.07% (2)
items - 0.07% (2)
web - 0.07% (2)
separate - 0.07% (2)
language - 0.07% (2)
place. - 0.07% (2)
again, - 0.07% (2)
facts - 0.07% (2)
gotten - 0.07% (2)
arguing - 0.07% (2)
entirely - 0.07% (2)
2016 - 0.07% (2)
sun - 0.07% (2)
exists. - 0.07% (2)
assault - 0.07% (2)
said - 0.07% (2)
adequate - 0.07% (2)
2015 - 0.07% (2)
relevant - 0.07% (2)
aware - 0.07% (2)
full - 0.07% (2)
value - 0.07% (2)
extent - 0.07% (2)
provisions - 0.07% (2)
those - 0.07% (2)
owner - 0.07% (2)
future. - 0.07% (2)
revised - 0.07% (2)
200 - 0.07% (2)
financial - 0.07% (2)
services - 0.07% (2)
today - 0.07% (2)
video - 0.07% (2)
cruise - 0.07% (2)
ship - 0.07% (2)
lifeboat - 0.07% (2)
support - 0.07% (2)
documents - 0.07% (2)
ruling. - 0.07% (2)
captain - 0.07% (2)
consistent - 0.07% (2)
rebate - 0.07% (2)
immediate - 0.07% (2)
reasonably - 0.07% (2)
uses - 0.07% (2)
card, - 0.07% (2)
terms - 0.07% (2)
conditions, - 0.07% (2)
listed - 0.07% (2)
order, - 0.07% (2)
least - 0.07% (2)
guide - 0.07% (2)
rules - 0.07% (2)
example, - 0.07% (2)
compare - 0.07% (2)
cards, - 0.07% (2)
payment - 0.07% (2)
united - 0.07% (2)
requirement - 0.07% (2)
modifications - 0.07% (2)
reference - 0.07% (2)
second - 0.07% (2)
acting - 0.07% (2)
someone - 0.07% (2)
intents - 0.07% (2)
william - 0.07% (2)
trial, - 0.07% (2)
treated - 0.07% (2)
just - 0.07% (2)
piece - 0.07% (2)
saying - 0.07% (2)
generally - 0.07% (2)
here. - 0.07% (2)
free - 0.07% (2)
details - 0.07% (2)
possibly - 0.07% (2)
robertson - 0.07% (2)
struck - 0.07% (2)
step - 0.07% (2)
columbia - 0.07% (2)
head - 0.07% (2)
begelman - 0.07% (2)
later - 0.07% (2)
wasn't - 0.07% (2)
lost - 0.07% (2)
far - 0.07% (2)
force - 0.07% (2)
commercial - 0.07% (2)
passengers - 0.07% (2)
he's - 0.07% (2)
water - 0.07% (2)
administration - 0.07% (2)
food - 0.07% (2)
going - 0.07% (2)
song. - 0.07% (2)
about. - 0.07% (2)
retro - 0.07% (2)
am, - 0.07% (2)
bring - 0.07% (2)
news - 0.07% (2)
simon - 0.07% (2)
accusations - 0.07% (2)
vain" - 0.07% (2)
bill - 0.07% (2)
"you're - 0.07% (2)
carly - 0.07% (2)
here, - 0.07% (2)
taken - 0.07% (2)
contact - 0.07% (2)
american express - 0.72% (22)
of the - 0.56% (17)
at the - 0.43% (13)
in the - 0.43% (13)
to the - 0.36% (11)
that i - 0.3% (9)
if you - 0.26% (8)
federal court - 0.26% (8)
express cards - 0.26% (8)
the federal - 0.23% (7)
world around - 0.2% (6)
that the - 0.2% (6)
federal court's - 0.2% (6)
is not - 0.2% (6)
court's ruling - 0.2% (6)
credit card - 0.2% (6)
around me - 0.2% (6)
announcements [a] - 0.2% (6)
of accepting - 0.16% (5)
i have - 0.16% (5)
on the - 0.16% (5)
the world - 0.16% (5)
if the - 0.16% (5)
a customer - 0.16% (5)
that you - 0.16% (5)
by paul - 0.16% (5)
this is - 0.16% (5)
words categories: - 0.16% (5)
categories: announcements - 0.16% (5)
paul robinson, - 0.16% (5)
the song - 0.13% (4)
* offering - 0.13% (4)
offering a - 0.13% (4)
and the - 0.13% (4)
about the - 0.13% (4)
even if - 0.13% (4)
want to - 0.13% (4)
pm, by - 0.13% (4)
point of - 0.13% (4)
card brand - 0.13% (4)
by the - 0.13% (4)
of limitations - 0.13% (4)
you are - 0.13% (4)
with the - 0.13% (4)
to your - 0.13% (4)
to say - 0.13% (4)
the point - 0.13% (4)
accept the - 0.13% (4)
accepting american - 0.13% (4)
cost of - 0.13% (4)
you may - 0.13% (4)
use an - 0.1% (3)
the american - 0.1% (3)
choose to - 0.1% (3)
your cost - 0.1% (3)
3 years - 0.1% (3)
u.s. merchant - 0.1% (3)
who is - 0.1% (3)
to make - 0.1% (3)
the boat - 0.1% (3)
and some - 0.1% (3)
treatment of - 0.1% (3)
card acceptance - 0.1% (3)
you accept - 0.1% (3)
statute of - 0.1% (3)
of sale - 0.1% (3)
express cards. - 0.1% (3)
the court's - 0.1% (3)
the relative - 0.1% (3)
brand or - 0.1% (3)
a particular - 0.1% (3)
or type - 0.1% (3)
court's order - 0.1% (3)
the statute - 0.1% (3)
of american - 0.1% (3)
you have - 0.1% (3)
and that - 0.1% (3)
make a - 0.1% (3)
or other - 0.1% (3)
out of - 0.1% (3)
have no - 0.1% (3)
i accept - 0.1% (3)
they are - 0.1% (3)
because i - 0.1% (3)
side, pound - 0.1% (3)
on your - 0.1% (3)
pound on - 0.1% (3)
your side, - 0.1% (3)
the law - 0.1% (3)
for the - 0.1% (3)
around me, - 0.1% (3)
he was - 0.1% (3)
has been - 0.1% (3)
acceptance contract - 0.1% (3)
on that - 0.1% (3)
i'm thinking - 0.1% (3)
warren beatty - 0.1% (3)
one of - 0.1% (3)
not the - 0.1% (3)
your card - 0.1% (3)
other people - 0.07% (2)
is possible - 0.07% (2)
welcome to - 0.07% (2)
i make - 0.07% (2)
what i'm - 0.07% (2)
at some - 0.07% (2)
i find - 0.07% (2)
said something - 0.07% (2)
that it - 0.07% (2)
items are - 0.07% (2)
a comment, - 0.07% (2)
so that - 0.07% (2)
to stop - 0.07% (2)
all of - 0.07% (2)
at all - 0.07% (2)
did do - 0.07% (2)
- even - 0.07% (2)
i will - 0.07% (2)
is entirely - 0.07% (2)
that if - 0.07% (2)
true, and - 0.07% (2)
cosby should - 0.07% (2)
is where - 0.07% (2)
something - - 0.07% (2)
after the - 0.07% (2)
nothing to - 0.07% (2)
comments are - 0.07% (2)
limitations and - 0.07% (2)
filed within - 0.07% (2)
must be - 0.07% (2)
raise a - 0.07% (2)
can come - 0.07% (2)
a concept - 0.07% (2)
going to - 0.07% (2)
and if - 0.07% (2)
isn't doing - 0.07% (2)
able to - 0.07% (2)
there is - 0.07% (2)
do not - 0.07% (2)
might be - 0.07% (2)
back to - 0.07% (2)
the same - 0.07% (2)
waive the - 0.07% (2)
the only - 0.07% (2)
and purposes - 0.07% (2)
11 ... - 0.07% (2)
or more - 0.07% (2)
imagine the - 0.07% (2)
value your - 0.07% (2)
"you're so - 0.07% (2)
beatty is - 0.07% (2)
as proven - 0.07% (2)
accept that - 0.07% (2)
may not - 0.07% (2)
are the - 0.07% (2)
all intents - 0.07% (2)
is, for - 0.07% (2)
this world - 0.07% (2)
i cannot - 0.07% (2)
information about - 0.07% (2)
a world - 0.07% (2)
be able - 0.07% (2)
the time - 0.07% (2)
united states - 0.07% (2)
not exist, - 0.07% (2)
is axiomatic - 0.07% (2)
the simple - 0.07% (2)
did not - 0.07% (2)
conversation could - 0.07% (2)
you for - 0.07% (2)
exist and - 0.07% (2)
you exist - 0.07% (2)
it would - 0.07% (2)
entirely possible - 0.07% (2)
exist in - 0.07% (2)
the way - 0.07% (2)
years ago - 0.07% (2)
i reject - 0.07% (2)
could be - 0.07% (2)
an american - 0.07% (2)
a federal - 0.07% (2)
against bill - 0.07% (2)
result of - 0.07% (2)
or charge - 0.07% (2)
credit or - 0.07% (2)
you must - 0.07% (2)
for example, - 0.07% (2)
the store - 0.07% (2)
court's ruling. - 0.07% (2)
the future. - 0.07% (2)
you choose - 0.07% (2)
probably not - 0.07% (2)
happened to - 0.07% (2)
has to - 0.07% (2)
that he - 0.07% (2)
movie was - 0.07% (2)
the movie - 0.07% (2)
other credit - 0.07% (2)
copy of - 0.07% (2)
a result - 0.07% (2)
a discount - 0.07% (2)
ruling, you - 0.07% (2)
to customers - 0.07% (2)
which credit - 0.07% (2)
you would - 0.07% (2)
brand you - 0.07% (2)
the credit - 0.07% (2)
or rebate - 0.07% (2)
costs of - 0.07% (2)
free or - 0.07% (2)
a free - 0.07% (2)
or discounted - 0.07% (2)
particular brand - 0.07% (2)
type of - 0.07% (2)
customer uses - 0.07% (2)
• blog - 0.07% (2)
federal court's ruling - 0.2% (6)
the federal court's - 0.2% (6)
world around me - 0.2% (6)
by paul robinson, - 0.16% (5)
categories: announcements [a] - 0.16% (5)
words categories: announcements - 0.16% (5)
the point of - 0.13% (4)
* offering a - 0.13% (4)
the world around - 0.13% (4)
pm, by paul - 0.13% (4)
of american express - 0.1% (3)
at the point - 0.1% (3)
the american express - 0.1% (3)
the court's order - 0.1% (3)
of accepting american - 0.1% (3)
point of sale - 0.1% (3)
american express cards. - 0.1% (3)
your cost of - 0.1% (3)
your card acceptance - 0.1% (3)
your side, pound - 0.1% (3)
the statute of - 0.1% (3)
side, pound on - 0.1% (3)
statute of limitations - 0.1% (3)
is on your - 0.07% (2)
what i'm thinking - 0.07% (2)
or at the - 0.07% (2)
is where i - 0.07% (2)
be able to - 0.07% (2)
the u.s. merchant - 0.07% (2)
be filed within - 0.07% (2)
it is possible - 0.07% (2)
intents and purposes - 0.07% (2)
federal court's ruling, - 0.07% (2)
at the time - 0.07% (2)
against bill cosby - 0.07% (2)
all of the - 0.07% (2)
that it is - 0.07% (2)
3 years after - 0.07% (2)
11 ... 32 - 0.07% (2)
a particular brand - 0.07% (2)
if you choose - 0.07% (2)
one of the - 0.07% (2)
it is axiomatic - 0.07% (2)
you exist and - 0.07% (2)
is entirely possible - 0.07% (2)
you are arguing - 0.07% (2)
this conversation could - 0.07% (2)
accept the world - 0.07% (2)
i have no - 0.07% (2)
that the world - 0.07% (2)
is, for all - 0.07% (2)
is not the - 0.07% (2)
warren beatty is - 0.07% (2)
you choose to - 0.07% (2)
a federal court - 0.07% (2)
a result of - 0.07% (2)
customers which credit - 0.07% (2)
card brand you - 0.07% (2)
ruling, you may - 0.07% (2)
discount or rebate - 0.07% (2)
offering a free - 0.07% (2)
free or discounted - 0.07% (2)
or type of - 0.07% (2)
the relative cost - 0.07% (2)
even if i - 0.07% (2)

Here you can find chart of all your popular one, two and three word phrases. Google and others search engines means your page is about words you use frequently.

Copyright © 2015-2016 hupso.pl. All rights reserved. FB | +G | Twitter

Hupso.pl jest serwisem internetowym, w którym jednym kliknieciem możesz szybko i łatwo sprawdź stronę www pod kątem SEO. Oferujemy darmowe pozycjonowanie stron internetowych oraz wycena domen i stron internetowych. Prowadzimy ranking polskich stron internetowych oraz ranking stron alexa.