2.81 score from hupso.pl for:
onfiction.ca



HTML Content


Titleonfiction

Length: 9, Words: 1
Description pusty

Length: 0, Words: 0
Keywords pusty
Robots
Charset UTF-8
Og Meta - Title exist
Og Meta - Description exist
Og Meta - Site name pusty
Tytuł powinien zawierać pomiędzy 10 a 70 znaków (ze spacjami), a mniej niż 12 słów w długości.
Meta opis powinien zawierać pomiędzy 50 a 160 znaków (łącznie ze spacjami), a mniej niż 24 słów w długości.
Kodowanie znaków powinny być określone , UTF-8 jest chyba najlepszy zestaw znaków, aby przejść z powodu UTF-8 jest bardziej międzynarodowy kodowaniem.
Otwarte obiekty wykresu powinny być obecne w stronie internetowej (więcej informacji na temat protokołu OpenGraph: http://ogp.me/)

SEO Content

Words/Characters 6946
Text/HTML 28.09 %
Headings H1 1
H2 21
H3 12
H4 0
H5 0
H6 0
H1
onfiction
H2
pages
monday, 7 november 2016
monday, 24 october 2016
monday, 10 october 2016
monday, 3 october 2016
monday, 29 august 2016
monday, 1 august 2016
monday, 11 july 2016
wednesday, 29 june 2016
monday, 20 june 2016
thursday, 9 june 2016
wednesday, 18 may 2016
monday, 25 april 2016
goals of onfiction
subscribe
translate
sections
labels
copyright
followers
books by writers of onfiction
H3
open mind
a single brush with fiction does not improve mental-state inferencing ability
long-term potential or just another bad storyteller?
ibsen and the provisional
literary reading and mentalizing
alternative worlds
books, computers, television, mothers
research bulletin: do "you" feel things more deeply than "i"?
literary reading
research bulletin: movie genre preference influence efficacy of product placement
research bulletin: empathy and fantasy role playing games
stories of the earth: prince reminds us how much care it takes to live with each other
H4
H5
H6
strong
b
i
em
Bolds strong 0
b 0
i 0
em 0
Zawartość strony internetowej powinno zawierać więcej niż 250 słów, z stopa tekst / kod jest wyższy niż 20%.
Pozycji używać znaczników (h1, h2, h3, ...), aby określić temat sekcji lub ustępów na stronie, ale zwykle, użyj mniej niż 6 dla każdego tagu pozycje zachować swoją stronę zwięzły.
Styl używać silnych i kursywy znaczniki podkreślić swoje słowa kluczowe swojej stronie, ale nie nadużywać (mniej niż 16 silnych tagi i 16 znaczników kursywy)

Statystyki strony

twitter:title pusty
twitter:description pusty
google+ itemprop=name exist
Pliki zewnętrzne 26
Pliki CSS 2
Pliki javascript 24
Plik należy zmniejszyć całkowite odwołanie plików (CSS + JavaScript) do 7-8 maksymalnie.

Linki wewnętrzne i zewnętrzne

Linki 251
Linki wewnętrzne 36
Linki zewnętrzne 215
Linki bez atrybutu Title 202
Linki z atrybutem NOFOLLOW 0
Linki - Użyj atrybutu tytuł dla każdego łącza. Nofollow link jest link, który nie pozwala wyszukiwarkom boty zrealizują są odnośniki no follow. Należy zwracać uwagę na ich użytkowania

Linki wewnętrzne

- //www.blogger.com/rearrange?blogid=5455277388900637928&widgettype=pagelist&widgetid=pagelist1&action=editwidget§ionid=crosscol
better you than i: perspectives and  chrome-extension://oemmndcbldboiebfnladdacbdfmadadm/http://ase.tufts.edu/psychology/spacelab/pubs/brunye_jcp.pdf
emotion simulation during narrative comprehension chrome-extension://oemmndcbldboiebfnladdacbdfmadadm/http://ase.tufts.edu/psychology/spacelab/pubs/brunye_jcp.pdf
- //www.blogger.com/rearrange?blogid=5455277388900637928&widgettype=html&widgetid=html5&action=editwidget§ionid=main
- //www.blogger.com/rearrange?blogid=5455277388900637928&widgettype=blogsearch&widgetid=blogsearch1&action=editwidget§ionid=sidebar-right-1
- //www.blogger.com/rearrange?blogid=5455277388900637928&widgettype=text&widgetid=text1&action=editwidget§ionid=sidebar-right-1
- //www.blogger.com/rearrange?blogid=5455277388900637928&widgettype=html&widgetid=html2&action=editwidget§ionid=sidebar-right-1
- //www.blogger.com/rearrange?blogid=5455277388900637928&widgettype=translate&widgetid=translate1&action=editwidget§ionid=sidebar-right-1
- //www.blogger.com/rearrange?blogid=5455277388900637928&widgettype=label&widgetid=label2&action=editwidget§ionid=sidebar-right-1
- //www.blogger.com/rearrange?blogid=5455277388900637928&widgettype=label&widgetid=label1&action=editwidget§ionid=sidebar-right-1
- //www.blogger.com/rearrange?blogid=5455277388900637928&widgettype=text&widgetid=text4&action=editwidget§ionid=sidebar-right-1
- //www.blogger.com/rearrange?blogid=5455277388900637928&widgettype=followers&widgetid=followers1&action=editwidget§ionid=sidebar-right-1
- //www.blogger.com/rearrange?blogid=5455277388900637928&widgettype=image&widgetid=image8&action=editwidget§ionid=sidebar-right-1
- //www.blogger.com/rearrange?blogid=5455277388900637928&widgettype=image&widgetid=image6&action=editwidget§ionid=sidebar-right-1
- //www.blogger.com/rearrange?blogid=5455277388900637928&widgettype=image&widgetid=image5&action=editwidget§ionid=sidebar-right-1
- //www.blogger.com/rearrange?blogid=5455277388900637928&widgettype=image&widgetid=image1&action=editwidget§ionid=sidebar-right-1
- //www.blogger.com/rearrange?blogid=5455277388900637928&widgettype=image&widgetid=image7&action=editwidget§ionid=sidebar-right-1
- //www.blogger.com/rearrange?blogid=5455277388900637928&widgettype=image&widgetid=image2&action=editwidget§ionid=sidebar-right-1
- //www.blogger.com/rearrange?blogid=5455277388900637928&widgettype=image&widgetid=image4&action=editwidget§ionid=sidebar-right-1
- //www.blogger.com/rearrange?blogid=5455277388900637928&widgettype=image&widgetid=image3&action=editwidget§ionid=sidebar-right-1
- //www.blogger.com/rearrange?blogid=5455277388900637928&widgettype=html&widgetid=html1&action=editwidget§ionid=sidebar-right-2-2
- //www.blogger.com/rearrange?blogid=5455277388900637928&widgettype=html&widgetid=html4&action=editwidget§ionid=footer-2-1
- //www.blogger.com/rearrange?blogid=5455277388900637928&widgettype=html&widgetid=html3&action=editwidget§ionid=footer-2-2
- //www.blogger.com/rearrange?blogid=5455277388900637928&widgettype=attribution&widgetid=attribution1&action=editwidget§ionid=footer-3

Linki zewnętrzne

home http://www.onfiction.ca/
about http://www.onfiction.ca/p/about.html
books http://www.onfiction.ca/p/books.html
links http://www.onfiction.ca/p/links.html
open mind http://www.onfiction.ca/2016/11/open-mind.html
- https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-rruthacctke/wcbhuoxlq3i/aaaaaaaaavk/fox5mlvyc4myjga84nj5nlcgeq5fapdyqclcb/s1600/murakami%2bcolorless.jpg
here http://www.onfiction.ca/2016/08/alternative-worlds.html
- https://www.blogger.com/null
keith oatley https://www.blogger.com/profile/16419339550879570935
06:19 http://www.onfiction.ca/2016/11/open-mind.html
no comments: https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogid=5455277388900637928&postid=7009236020423241513
links to this post http://www.onfiction.ca/2016/11/open-mind.html#links
effects of fiction http://www.onfiction.ca/search/label/effects%20of%20fiction
imagination http://www.onfiction.ca/search/label/imagination
novels http://www.onfiction.ca/search/label/novels
reviews http://www.onfiction.ca/search/label/reviews
writers http://www.onfiction.ca/search/label/writers
writing fiction http://www.onfiction.ca/search/label/writing%20fiction
a single brush with fiction does not improve mental-state inferencing ability http://www.onfiction.ca/2016/10/a-single-brush-with-fiction-does-not.html
- https://conversation.which.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/small-book_istock_000003151704small.jpg
- https://www.blogger.com/null
raymond a. mar https://www.blogger.com/profile/07521492403638340957
07:00 http://www.onfiction.ca/2016/10/a-single-brush-with-fiction-does-not.html
no comments: https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogid=5455277388900637928&postid=1948042112729458601
links to this post http://www.onfiction.ca/2016/10/a-single-brush-with-fiction-does-not.html#links
effects of fiction http://www.onfiction.ca/search/label/effects%20of%20fiction
empathy http://www.onfiction.ca/search/label/empathy
research bulletins http://www.onfiction.ca/search/label/research%20bulletins
theory of mind http://www.onfiction.ca/search/label/theory%20of%20mind
long-term potential or just another bad storyteller? http://www.onfiction.ca/2016/10/long-term-potential-or-just-another-bad.html
- https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-9qxktkddd1s/v_zosa5nepi/aaaaaaaabr0/gzsksovk0tuvbekpnhp-_htirwh4olieaclcb/s1600/michelle%2bsecond%2bpost%2bpicture.png
- https://www.blogger.com/null
raymond a. mar https://www.blogger.com/profile/07521492403638340957
07:00 http://www.onfiction.ca/2016/10/long-term-potential-or-just-another-bad.html
no comments: https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogid=5455277388900637928&postid=4354403173925408413
links to this post http://www.onfiction.ca/2016/10/long-term-potential-or-just-another-bad.html#links
dialogue http://www.onfiction.ca/search/label/dialogue
research bulletins http://www.onfiction.ca/search/label/research%20bulletins
ibsen and the provisional http://www.onfiction.ca/2016/10/ibsen-and-provisional.html
- https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-_khlkaae4ay/v_j3tnbklii/aaaaaaaaavm/pop--paziagikvohhpji04cptmdmcyjhqclcb/s1600/ibsen%2bmodernism.jpg
- https://www.blogger.com/null
keith oatley https://www.blogger.com/profile/16419339550879570935
11:24 http://www.onfiction.ca/2016/10/ibsen-and-provisional.html
no comments: https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogid=5455277388900637928&postid=2171654714968666523
links to this post http://www.onfiction.ca/2016/10/ibsen-and-provisional.html#links
literariness http://www.onfiction.ca/search/label/literariness
opinion http://www.onfiction.ca/search/label/opinion
theatre http://www.onfiction.ca/search/label/theatre
writers http://www.onfiction.ca/search/label/writers
literary reading and mentalizing http://www.onfiction.ca/2016/08/literary-reading-and-mentalizing.html
- https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-bjqgqj-zusw/v8qlibxmdqi/aaaaaaaaau4/xnjhus-tkwkfjwhuh96oqjdopxgq0phdwclcb/s1600/tenth%2bof%2bdecember.png
- https://www.blogger.com/null
keith oatley https://www.blogger.com/profile/16419339550879570935
08:13 http://www.onfiction.ca/2016/08/literary-reading-and-mentalizing.html
no comments: https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogid=5455277388900637928&postid=107379017600901212
links to this post http://www.onfiction.ca/2016/08/literary-reading-and-mentalizing.html#links
effects of fiction http://www.onfiction.ca/search/label/effects%20of%20fiction
literariness http://www.onfiction.ca/search/label/literariness
novels http://www.onfiction.ca/search/label/novels
research bulletins http://www.onfiction.ca/search/label/research%20bulletins
theory of mind http://www.onfiction.ca/search/label/theory%20of%20mind
alternative worlds http://www.onfiction.ca/2016/08/alternative-worlds.html
- https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-aopnq7scq4q/v5-hb_l3mki/aaaaaaaaauo/dxou28afbfwr3kqzygt_v2pu6ajyrqdkaclcb/s1600/elephant%2bvanishes.png
- https://www.blogger.com/null
keith oatley https://www.blogger.com/profile/16419339550879570935
15:34 http://www.onfiction.ca/2016/08/alternative-worlds.html
no comments: https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogid=5455277388900637928&postid=3707161827030007683
links to this post http://www.onfiction.ca/2016/08/alternative-worlds.html#links
imagination http://www.onfiction.ca/search/label/imagination
short stories http://www.onfiction.ca/search/label/short%20stories
writers http://www.onfiction.ca/search/label/writers
books, computers, television, mothers http://www.onfiction.ca/2016/07/books-computers-television-mothers.html
- https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-aqmvcsuyecw/v4otfll3tqi/aaaaaaaaaum/d5w6ofj8ejy54qseeje9pwezxzz6kaz6qclcb/s1600/chidren%2breading.jpg
- https://www.blogger.com/null
keith oatley https://www.blogger.com/profile/16419339550879570935
10:45 http://www.onfiction.ca/2016/07/books-computers-television-mothers.html
2 comments: https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogid=5455277388900637928&postid=8474673796640199741
links to this post http://www.onfiction.ca/2016/07/books-computers-television-mothers.html#links
effects of fiction http://www.onfiction.ca/search/label/effects%20of%20fiction
research bulletins http://www.onfiction.ca/search/label/research%20bulletins
television http://www.onfiction.ca/search/label/television
research bulletin: do "you" feel things more deeply than "i"? http://www.onfiction.ca/2016/06/research-bulletin-do-you-feel-things.html
- https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-biasjnoyqmq/v2fop6-c_wi/aaaaaaaaboa/l_hwz93y58gp593nltf1fckyu-w18xioqclcb/s1600/michelle_resaerch%2bbulletin_perspective%2band%2bnarrative_picture.png
tad brunyé https://scholar.google.ca/citations?user=gxtxc6aaaaaj&hl=en
when you and i  https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/when-you-and-i-share-perspectives-pronouns-bruny%c3%a9-ditman/32d626d7f9e963342892440cab10345a3654208f/pdf
share perspectives: pronouns modulate perspective-taking during narrative comprehension https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/when-you-and-i-share-perspectives-pronouns-bruny%c3%a9-ditman/32d626d7f9e963342892440cab10345a3654208f/pdf
- https://www.blogger.com/null
raymond a. mar https://www.blogger.com/profile/07521492403638340957
07:00 http://www.onfiction.ca/2016/06/research-bulletin-do-you-feel-things.html
1 comment: https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogid=5455277388900637928&postid=8014719070116752694
links to this post http://www.onfiction.ca/2016/06/research-bulletin-do-you-feel-things.html#links
discourse http://www.onfiction.ca/search/label/discourse
embodiment http://www.onfiction.ca/search/label/embodiment
emotion http://www.onfiction.ca/search/label/emotion
imagination http://www.onfiction.ca/search/label/imagination
research bulletins http://www.onfiction.ca/search/label/research%20bulletins
simulation http://www.onfiction.ca/search/label/simulation
space http://www.onfiction.ca/search/label/space
literary reading http://www.onfiction.ca/2016/06/literary-reading.html
- https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-w5sgsuzoqpi/v2gay3temzi/aaaaaaaaat0/csbhpdx3_m4lvvdbvojcgai8gy-mr4gjgclcb/s1600/enquist%2bcounterpoint.jpg
- https://www.blogger.com/null
keith oatley https://www.blogger.com/profile/16419339550879570935
10:44 http://www.onfiction.ca/2016/06/literary-reading.html
no comments: https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogid=5455277388900637928&postid=1753745743270178166
links to this post http://www.onfiction.ca/2016/06/literary-reading.html#links
effects of fiction http://www.onfiction.ca/search/label/effects%20of%20fiction
literariness http://www.onfiction.ca/search/label/literariness
research bulletins http://www.onfiction.ca/search/label/research%20bulletins
stylistics http://www.onfiction.ca/search/label/stylistics
research bulletin: movie genre preference influence efficacy of product placement http://www.onfiction.ca/2016/06/research-bulletin-movie-genre.html
- http://u30blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/miracle-whip-gaga.png
- https://www.blogger.com/null
raymond a. mar https://www.blogger.com/profile/07521492403638340957
10:46 http://www.onfiction.ca/2016/06/research-bulletin-movie-genre.html
no comments: https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogid=5455277388900637928&postid=3866984915241035598
links to this post http://www.onfiction.ca/2016/06/research-bulletin-movie-genre.html#links
effects of fiction http://www.onfiction.ca/search/label/effects%20of%20fiction
film http://www.onfiction.ca/search/label/film
research bulletins http://www.onfiction.ca/search/label/research%20bulletins
television http://www.onfiction.ca/search/label/television
research bulletin: empathy and fantasy role playing games http://www.onfiction.ca/2016/05/research-bulletin-empathy-and-fantasy.html
- https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/b5/cc/94/b5cc94b4eba5a854f4c91e427b1419ba.jpg
empathic features and absorption in fantasy role-playing http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00029157.2015.1103696
- https://www.blogger.com/null
raymond a. mar https://www.blogger.com/profile/07521492403638340957
12:15 http://www.onfiction.ca/2016/05/research-bulletin-empathy-and-fantasy.html
no comments: https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogid=5455277388900637928&postid=5164472540465376261
links to this post http://www.onfiction.ca/2016/05/research-bulletin-empathy-and-fantasy.html#links
effects of fiction http://www.onfiction.ca/search/label/effects%20of%20fiction
embodiment http://www.onfiction.ca/search/label/embodiment
emotion http://www.onfiction.ca/search/label/emotion
imagination http://www.onfiction.ca/search/label/imagination
research bulletins http://www.onfiction.ca/search/label/research%20bulletins
theory of mind http://www.onfiction.ca/search/label/theory%20of%20mind
stories of the earth: prince reminds us how much care it takes to live with each other http://www.onfiction.ca/2016/04/stories-of-earth-prince-reminds-us-how.html
- http://blog.thecurrent.org/2016/04/new-prince-mural-in-uptown-a-present-to-minneapolis/
ongoing struggles with dire racial inequalities https://maryturck.com/2016/04/12/minnesota-jim-crow-confirmed-by-met-council-analysis/
watching https://www.facebook.com/gino.vannelli.94/videos/860538120626650/
amazing https://www.facebook.com/205769019459693/videos/10150652875525370/
music https://www.facebook.com/afropunk/videos/10153544857656623/
videos https://www.facebook.com/jukejointpbs/videos/977252512388014/
bookish tributes http://dwarfandgiant.com/tribute-prince/
more http://heavytable.com/whats-in-princes-fridge/
van jones emotional remembrance perhaps has made this most visible for people, opening up the view to prince's humanitarianism https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cmwh-4pa1na
planet earth https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nzpujcm4uls
green for all http://www.greenforall.org/
#yeswecode http://www.yeswecode.org/application
those music videos (such as this one with beyonce) https://youtu.be/oqyajgtjosk
this moment, this move! https://youtu.be/oqyajgtjosk?t=120
- https://www.blogger.com/blogger.g?blogid=5455277388900637928
kirsten valentine cadieux https://www.blogger.com/profile/04781128427942978109
11:17 http://www.onfiction.ca/2016/04/stories-of-earth-prince-reminds-us-how.html
no comments: https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogid=5455277388900637928&postid=6652638483486415444
links to this post http://www.onfiction.ca/2016/04/stories-of-earth-prince-reminds-us-how.html#links
emotion http://www.onfiction.ca/search/label/emotion
empathy http://www.onfiction.ca/search/label/empathy
imagination http://www.onfiction.ca/search/label/imagination
literariness http://www.onfiction.ca/search/label/literariness
memory http://www.onfiction.ca/search/label/memory
stylistics http://www.onfiction.ca/search/label/stylistics
theatre http://www.onfiction.ca/search/label/theatre
older posts http://www.onfiction.ca/search?updated-max=2016-04-25t11:17:00-04:00&max-results=12
home http://www.onfiction.ca/
posts (atom) http://www.onfiction.ca/feeds/posts/default
- http://www.linkwithin.com/
international society for empirical research on literature http://www.psych.ualberta.ca/igel/
literature for life http://www.canadahelps.org/charityprofilepage.aspx?charityid=s75097
- via email http://www.feedburner.com/fb/a/emailverifysubmit?feedid=2087990&loc=en_us
- http://feeds.feedburner.com/onfiction
via rss http://feeds.feedburner.com/onfiction
- http://add.my.yahoo.com/rss?url=http://feeds.feedburner.com/onfiction
- http://fusion.google.com/add?feedurl=http://feeds.feedburner.com/onfiction
research bulletins http://www.onfiction.ca/search/label/research%20bulletins
opinion http://www.onfiction.ca/search/label/opinion
original writing http://www.onfiction.ca/search/label/original%20writing
reviews http://www.onfiction.ca/search/label/reviews
quick hits http://www.onfiction.ca/search/label/quick%20hits
art http://www.onfiction.ca/search/label/art
books on the psychology of fiction http://www.onfiction.ca/search/label/books%20on%20the%20psychology%20of%20fiction
conference http://www.onfiction.ca/search/label/conference
effects of fiction http://www.onfiction.ca/search/label/effects%20of%20fiction
emotion http://www.onfiction.ca/search/label/emotion
empathy http://www.onfiction.ca/search/label/empathy
film http://www.onfiction.ca/search/label/film
imagination http://www.onfiction.ca/search/label/imagination
literariness http://www.onfiction.ca/search/label/literariness
memory http://www.onfiction.ca/search/label/memory
metaphor http://www.onfiction.ca/search/label/metaphor
metonym http://www.onfiction.ca/search/label/metonym
novels http://www.onfiction.ca/search/label/novels
place http://www.onfiction.ca/search/label/place
poetry http://www.onfiction.ca/search/label/poetry
quick hits http://www.onfiction.ca/search/label/quick%20hits
romanticism http://www.onfiction.ca/search/label/romanticism
short stories http://www.onfiction.ca/search/label/short%20stories
simulation http://www.onfiction.ca/search/label/simulation
stylistics http://www.onfiction.ca/search/label/stylistics
television http://www.onfiction.ca/search/label/television
theatre http://www.onfiction.ca/search/label/theatre
theory of mind http://www.onfiction.ca/search/label/theory%20of%20mind
writers http://www.onfiction.ca/search/label/writers
writing fiction http://www.onfiction.ca/search/label/writing%20fiction
- http://www.oup.com/us/catalog/general/subject/psychology/cognitivepsychology/?view=usa&ci=9780199767632
- http://www.amazon.com/such-stuff-dreams-psychology-fiction/dp/0470974575/ref=ntt_at_ep_dpt_2
- http://www.amazon.ca/therefore-choose-keith-oatley/dp/0864926162/ref=sr_1_1?ie=utf8&s=books&qid=1271865188&sr=8-1
- http://www.amazon.ca/understanding-emotions-keith-oatley/dp/1405131039/ref=sr_1_1?ie=utf8&s=books&qid=1260151395&sr=1-1
- http://www.amazon.com/literary-reading-david-s-miall/dp/0820486477/ref=sr_1_1?ie=utf8&qid=1313415483&sr=8-1
- http://www.amazon.ca/emotions-brief-history-keith-oatley/dp/1405113154/ref=sr_1_3?ie=utf8&s=books&qid=1260151905&sr=8-3
- http://www.amazon.ca/best-laid-schemes-psychology-emotions/dp/0521423872/ref=sr_1_7?ie=utf8&s=books&qid=1260152231&sr=1-7
- http://www.amazon.ca/case-emily-v-keith-oatley/dp/1929355300/ref=sr_1_4?ie=utf8&s=books&qid=1260152046&sr=1-4
- http://www.easycounter.com/
unique visitors http://www.easycounter.com/freecounter3.html
- http://www.statcounter.com/
imacon http://www.istockphoto.com/file_closeup.php?id=5357958&platform=blogger
blogger https://www.blogger.com

Zdjęcia

Zdjęcia 61
Zdjęcia bez atrybutu ALT 44
Zdjęcia bez atrybutu TITLE 61
Korzystanie Obraz ALT i TITLE atrybutu dla każdego obrazu.

Zdjęcia bez atrybutu TITLE

https://resources.blogblog.com/img/icon18_wrench_allbkg.png
https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-rruthacctke/wcbhuoxlq3i/aaaaaaaaavk/fox5mlvyc4myjga84nj5nlcgeq5fapdyqclcb/s200/murakami%2bcolorless.jpg
http://s7.addthis.com/static/btn/v2/lg-share-en.gif
https://conversation.which.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/small-book_istock_000003151704small.jpg
http://s7.addthis.com/static/btn/v2/lg-share-en.gif
https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-9qxktkddd1s/v_zosa5nepi/aaaaaaaabr0/gzsksovk0tuvbekpnhp-_htirwh4olieaclcb/s200/michelle%2bsecond%2bpost%2bpicture.png
http://s7.addthis.com/static/btn/v2/lg-share-en.gif
https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-_khlkaae4ay/v_j3tnbklii/aaaaaaaaavm/pop--paziagikvohhpji04cptmdmcyjhqclcb/s200/ibsen%2bmodernism.jpg
http://s7.addthis.com/static/btn/v2/lg-share-en.gif
https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-bjqgqj-zusw/v8qlibxmdqi/aaaaaaaaau4/xnjhus-tkwkfjwhuh96oqjdopxgq0phdwclcb/s200/tenth%2bof%2bdecember.png
http://s7.addthis.com/static/btn/v2/lg-share-en.gif
https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-aopnq7scq4q/v5-hb_l3mki/aaaaaaaaauo/dxou28afbfwr3kqzygt_v2pu6ajyrqdkaclcb/s200/elephant%2bvanishes.png
http://s7.addthis.com/static/btn/v2/lg-share-en.gif
https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-aqmvcsuyecw/v4otfll3tqi/aaaaaaaaaum/d5w6ofj8ejy54qseeje9pwezxzz6kaz6qclcb/s200/chidren%2breading.jpg
http://s7.addthis.com/static/btn/v2/lg-share-en.gif
https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-biasjnoyqmq/v2fop6-c_wi/aaaaaaaaboa/l_hwz93y58gp593nltf1fckyu-w18xioqclcb/s200/michelle_resaerch%2bbulletin_perspective%2band%2bnarrative_picture.png
http://s7.addthis.com/static/btn/v2/lg-share-en.gif
https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-w5sgsuzoqpi/v2gay3temzi/aaaaaaaaat0/csbhpdx3_m4lvvdbvojcgai8gy-mr4gjgclcb/s200/enquist%2bcounterpoint.jpg
http://s7.addthis.com/static/btn/v2/lg-share-en.gif
http://u30blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/miracle-whip-gaga.png
http://s7.addthis.com/static/btn/v2/lg-share-en.gif
https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/b5/cc/94/b5cc94b4eba5a854f4c91e427b1419ba.jpg
http://s7.addthis.com/static/btn/v2/lg-share-en.gif
http://publicradio2.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/files/2016/04/prince-mural-uptown-minneapolis.jpg
http://s7.addthis.com/static/btn/v2/lg-share-en.gif
http://www.linkwithin.com/pixel.png
https://resources.blogblog.com/img/icon18_wrench_allbkg.png
https://resources.blogblog.com/img/icon18_wrench_allbkg.png
https://resources.blogblog.com/img/icon18_wrench_allbkg.png
http://craphammer.typepad.com/photos/site_images/email_icon_sm.gif
http://www.feedburner.com/fb/images/pub/feed-icon16x16.png
http://us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/my/addtomyyahoo4.gif
http://buttons.googlesyndication.com/fusion/add.gif
https://resources.blogblog.com/img/icon18_wrench_allbkg.png
https://resources.blogblog.com/img/icon18_wrench_allbkg.png
https://resources.blogblog.com/img/icon18_wrench_allbkg.png
https://resources.blogblog.com/img/icon18_wrench_allbkg.png
https://resources.blogblog.com/img/icon18_wrench_allbkg.png
https://resources.blogblog.com/img/icon18_wrench_allbkg.png
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-yo5xpvusrja/t24srmnn72i/aaaaaaaaawu/7jnxilnlrci/s220/passionat%2bmuse%2bcover%2b80kb.jpg
https://resources.blogblog.com/img/icon18_wrench_allbkg.png
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-max4yt_hglm/tkkfqkl9yni/aaaaaaaaatw/qbuojpkdxtw/s220/such%2bstuff%2bas%2bdreams%2bcover.jpg
https://resources.blogblog.com/img/icon18_wrench_allbkg.png
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-1ohzdhdamic/tkmrfrqoqki/aaaaaaaaaua/lgf-zk2th4i/s220/therefore%2bchoose%2bcover.jpg
https://resources.blogblog.com/img/icon18_wrench_allbkg.png
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-3dr-ni4do9i/tkmtnupz-gi/aaaaaaaaauq/vqfp7wfg-no/s220/understanding%2bemos.jpg
https://resources.blogblog.com/img/icon18_wrench_allbkg.png
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-99jl1p-pj6o/tkkg93i-2fi/aaaaaaaaat4/xfkhs-onv8o/s220/miall%2blit%2breading%2bcover.jpg
https://resources.blogblog.com/img/icon18_wrench_allbkg.png
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_5ppmjc9q3j4/sxxkggl4nyi/aaaaaaaaajs/ng5jwu7nslq/s220/emotions.jpg
https://resources.blogblog.com/img/icon18_wrench_allbkg.png
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_5ppmjc9q3j4/sxxmgw9uxti/aaaaaaaaake/qehneuzsx2g/s220/bestlaidschemes.jpg
https://resources.blogblog.com/img/icon18_wrench_allbkg.png
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-egfb6vf0ebu/tkmsmdjxgqi/aaaaaaaaaui/p6g2x_db0ls/s220/case%2bof%2bemily%2bv.jpg
https://resources.blogblog.com/img/icon18_wrench_allbkg.png
http://www.easycounter.com/counter.php?onfictionblog
https://resources.blogblog.com/img/icon18_wrench_allbkg.png
https://resources.blogblog.com/img/icon18_wrench_allbkg.png
http://c.statcounter.com/4039997/0/1d98b952/1/
https://resources.blogblog.com/img/icon18_wrench_allbkg.png
https://resources.blogblog.com/img/icon18_wrench_allbkg.png

Zdjęcia bez atrybutu ALT

https://resources.blogblog.com/img/icon18_wrench_allbkg.png
https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-rruthacctke/wcbhuoxlq3i/aaaaaaaaavk/fox5mlvyc4myjga84nj5nlcgeq5fapdyqclcb/s200/murakami%2bcolorless.jpg
https://conversation.which.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/small-book_istock_000003151704small.jpg
https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-9qxktkddd1s/v_zosa5nepi/aaaaaaaabr0/gzsksovk0tuvbekpnhp-_htirwh4olieaclcb/s200/michelle%2bsecond%2bpost%2bpicture.png
https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-_khlkaae4ay/v_j3tnbklii/aaaaaaaaavm/pop--paziagikvohhpji04cptmdmcyjhqclcb/s200/ibsen%2bmodernism.jpg
https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-bjqgqj-zusw/v8qlibxmdqi/aaaaaaaaau4/xnjhus-tkwkfjwhuh96oqjdopxgq0phdwclcb/s200/tenth%2bof%2bdecember.png
https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-aopnq7scq4q/v5-hb_l3mki/aaaaaaaaauo/dxou28afbfwr3kqzygt_v2pu6ajyrqdkaclcb/s200/elephant%2bvanishes.png
https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-aqmvcsuyecw/v4otfll3tqi/aaaaaaaaaum/d5w6ofj8ejy54qseeje9pwezxzz6kaz6qclcb/s200/chidren%2breading.jpg
https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-biasjnoyqmq/v2fop6-c_wi/aaaaaaaaboa/l_hwz93y58gp593nltf1fckyu-w18xioqclcb/s200/michelle_resaerch%2bbulletin_perspective%2band%2bnarrative_picture.png
https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-w5sgsuzoqpi/v2gay3temzi/aaaaaaaaat0/csbhpdx3_m4lvvdbvojcgai8gy-mr4gjgclcb/s200/enquist%2bcounterpoint.jpg
http://u30blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/miracle-whip-gaga.png
https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/b5/cc/94/b5cc94b4eba5a854f4c91e427b1419ba.jpg
http://publicradio2.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/files/2016/04/prince-mural-uptown-minneapolis.jpg
https://resources.blogblog.com/img/icon18_wrench_allbkg.png
https://resources.blogblog.com/img/icon18_wrench_allbkg.png
https://resources.blogblog.com/img/icon18_wrench_allbkg.png
http://craphammer.typepad.com/photos/site_images/email_icon_sm.gif
http://www.feedburner.com/fb/images/pub/feed-icon16x16.png
http://us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/my/addtomyyahoo4.gif
https://resources.blogblog.com/img/icon18_wrench_allbkg.png
https://resources.blogblog.com/img/icon18_wrench_allbkg.png
https://resources.blogblog.com/img/icon18_wrench_allbkg.png
https://resources.blogblog.com/img/icon18_wrench_allbkg.png
https://resources.blogblog.com/img/icon18_wrench_allbkg.png
https://resources.blogblog.com/img/icon18_wrench_allbkg.png
https://resources.blogblog.com/img/icon18_wrench_allbkg.png
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-max4yt_hglm/tkkfqkl9yni/aaaaaaaaatw/qbuojpkdxtw/s220/such%2bstuff%2bas%2bdreams%2bcover.jpg
https://resources.blogblog.com/img/icon18_wrench_allbkg.png
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-1ohzdhdamic/tkmrfrqoqki/aaaaaaaaaua/lgf-zk2th4i/s220/therefore%2bchoose%2bcover.jpg
https://resources.blogblog.com/img/icon18_wrench_allbkg.png
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-3dr-ni4do9i/tkmtnupz-gi/aaaaaaaaauq/vqfp7wfg-no/s220/understanding%2bemos.jpg
https://resources.blogblog.com/img/icon18_wrench_allbkg.png
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-99jl1p-pj6o/tkkg93i-2fi/aaaaaaaaat4/xfkhs-onv8o/s220/miall%2blit%2breading%2bcover.jpg
https://resources.blogblog.com/img/icon18_wrench_allbkg.png
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_5ppmjc9q3j4/sxxkggl4nyi/aaaaaaaaajs/ng5jwu7nslq/s220/emotions.jpg
https://resources.blogblog.com/img/icon18_wrench_allbkg.png
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_5ppmjc9q3j4/sxxmgw9uxti/aaaaaaaaake/qehneuzsx2g/s220/bestlaidschemes.jpg
https://resources.blogblog.com/img/icon18_wrench_allbkg.png
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-egfb6vf0ebu/tkmsmdjxgqi/aaaaaaaaaui/p6g2x_db0ls/s220/case%2bof%2bemily%2bv.jpg
https://resources.blogblog.com/img/icon18_wrench_allbkg.png
https://resources.blogblog.com/img/icon18_wrench_allbkg.png
https://resources.blogblog.com/img/icon18_wrench_allbkg.png
https://resources.blogblog.com/img/icon18_wrench_allbkg.png
https://resources.blogblog.com/img/icon18_wrench_allbkg.png

Ranking:


Alexa Traffic
Daily Global Rank Trend
Daily Reach (Percent)









Majestic SEO











Text on page:

onfiction' itemprop='name' /> onfiction pages home about books links monday, 7 november 2016 open mind the story of haruki murakami's novel colorless tsukuru tasaki and his years of pilgrimage is that of a quest. in late adolescence, tsukuru had been one of a group of five young people who were very close. they were not just friends, they thought and acted almost as one. then, in his second year at university, his four friends cut him off, and told him not to get in touch with any of them again ... ever. it seemed as if he had done something, but he did not know what it was. for months he was extremely depressed. he wanted to commit suicide. the novel is a pilgrimage in which tsukuru journeys through his life, and tries to find out what the meaning of all this had been. in his twenties tsukuru meets haida, a young man of about the same age as himself, and they become close. haida is a graduate student who says that his idea in life is "to think deeply about things. contemplate ideas in a pure, free sort of way ... kind of like constructing a vacuum" (p. 48). i think what haida is talking about here is a kind of reflection, a kind of contemplation, a kind of mindfulness, in which in the "vacuum" one lets thoughts just come into one's mind. i think this is the mode in which murakami may write his books. it is the mode in which i write mine. it's the mode one enters when one takes up a literary novel or short story, and lets it in. one puts aside one's mundane concerns and goals, and opens one's mind to whatever may occur. whereas in the east, a kind of meditation has grown up in which one concentrates on one particular thing, perhaps one's breathing, and allows other thoughts that enter the mind just to drift out of it without paying attention to them, this kind of mode is an opposite. it is a welcoming of all the thoughts that come into the mind, an allowing of them to move around in there, to make associations with other thoughts, with memories, with ideas. it's on these kinds of associations, when they are meaningful to us, that we may concentrate, whether we are writing or reading. we have featured murakami's short stories before in onfiction (click here). in some of these he starts by depicting what seems to be an ordinary world. then, one finds that growing out of it, or growing alongside it, is an extra-ordinary world, something like a dream world. this idea is developed further in colorless tsukuru tasaki. just as, in a midsummer-night's dream, shakespeare was able to present us with a dream world, in order to see our day-to-day world more clearly, so too is murakami. the dream-world is something like the unconscious. it's composed of inward meanings. moving between the two—the ordinary world and a dream world—is part of this novel. by means of such movements tsukuro, and we, are able to think about ourselves, and each other, and our relationships with others, in new and clarifying ways. in life, or as one makes one's own pilgrimage through this book, in the vacuum that one may create in the mind, thoughts and memories can connect with each other and, by means of associations between and among them, we can change from the sometimes colourless, to the more colourful. that is to say that among our thoughts, memories, and reflections, we can choose what is important for us, and understand it more deeply. murakami, h. (2014). colorless tsukuru tasaki and his years of pilgrimage (p. garbriel, trans.). toronto: anchor canada. shakespeare, w. (1600). a midsummer night's dream. oxford: oxford university press (1995). posted by keith oatley at 06:19 no comments: links to this post labels: effects of fiction, imagination, novels, reviews, writers, writing fiction monday, 24 october 2016 a single brush with fiction does not improve mental-state inferencing ability a paper published in 2013 entitled reading literary fiction improves theory of mind by david kidd and emanuele castano may not have as simple a story behind it as its title would seem to imply. the results of the paper, which were widely reported in mainstream media, showed that reading a short piece of literary fiction immediately alters the reader’s ability to infer the mental states of others, or theory-of-mind ability. however, a recent paper attempting to replicate the findings of kidd and castano failed to find any such effect of reading literary fiction. the replication attempt, does reading a single passage of literary fiction really improve theory of mind? an attempt at replication (2016) by maria panero and her colleagues, is a combined analysis of three separate studies that each sought to replicate kidd and castano’s findings. all three studies asked one group of participants to read literary fiction and compared performance on a subsequent mental-state inference task to that for those who read other things (popular fiction, non-fiction) or nothing at all. all of the replication attempts used the same texts as in the original kidd and castano study. the studies reported by panero and colleagues found no significant difference in mental-state inferencing ability after reading literary fiction compared to other kinds of texts or nothing at all. however, what they did find was a consistent replication of a correlation between lifelong exposure to fiction and performance on the theory-of-mind task, reported previously by others (e.g., mar et al., 2006). in light of these results, panero and colleagues advise against jumping to the conclusion that a brief exposure to literary fiction results in immediate gains in mental-state inferencing ability. posted by krithika sukumar * for a copy of the original article, please contact r. mar (see profile for e-mail). kidd, d. c., & castano, e. (2013). reading literary fiction improves theory of mind. science, 342, 377-380. mar, r. a., oatley, k., hirsh, j., dela paz, j., & peterson, j. b. (2006). bookworms versus nerds: exposure to fiction versus non-fiction, divergent associations with social ability, and the simulation of fictional social worlds. journal of research in personality, 40, 694–712. panero, m. e., weisberg, d. s., black, j., goldstein, t. r., barnes, j. l., brownell, h., & winner, e. (2016, september 19). does reading a single passage of literary fiction really improve theory of mind? an attempt at replication. journal of personality and social psychology. advance online publication. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000064 posted by raymond a. mar at 07:00 no comments: links to this post labels: effects of fiction, empathy, research bulletins, theory of mind monday, 10 october 2016 long-term potential or just another bad storyteller? could the best pick up line be, “i have to tell you what happened to my friend last weekend”? according to findings by donahue and green (2016), this very well may be the case as it seems that being a great storyteller can have impactful consequences on one’s relationships. donahue and green (2016) conducted three studies in which they examined the effect of storytelling ability on perceptions of an individual’s attractiveness, examining both short-term and long-term romantic relationships. in the first study, undergraduate students were given a picture of someone of the opposite gender and a biographical sketch. the sketch included neutral background information as well as the person’s story telling ability: good, moderate, poor, or no information. participants then rated the individual’s physical attractiveness and attractiveness in terms of a casual date, long-term partner, or friend. they found that boasting good storytelling abilities made men more attractive to women, but only in terms of a long-term partner. in other words, men who are skilled in storytelling appear to have an advantage in attracting long-term partners. one limitation of the first study was that participants were simply told of the quality of the storyteller rather than experiencing the story being told. in the second study, with a new set of participants, half of the individuals read an effectively-told story and the other half read an ineffectively told account. also, the degree to which participants felt transported or engaged by the story was measured. the results of this study were consistent with the first: women rated skilled male storytellers as more attractive than poor storytellers, with respect to a long-term relationship. for the other measures (e.g. physical attractiveness, casual date, and friend), the quality of the storyteller did not impact women’s ratings of attractiveness. in terms of men’s attraction to women, a female’s storytelling ability was irrelevant to men for all measures of attractiveness. in addition, attractiveness was not influenced by engagement with the story. in the final study, the researchers investigated whether storytelling ability might reflect perception of increased status. participants rated the degree to which the target individual exhibited characteristics such as popularity, good leadership, and admiration. these results revealed that perceived status was a substantial mediator between storytelling ability and attractiveness of a long-term mate. in other words, effective storytelling led to perceptions of higher status because this very skill is interpreted to reflect a person’s ability to gain resources. someone who is a good storyteller may be more capable of influencing others or gaining prestigious positions. so, from an evolutionary perspective, higher status could indicate greater means and thus a better chance of survival, which would be attractive to another potential mate. so the next time you find yourself on the lookout for that special someone, be mindful that entertaining her with a great story could mean long-term potential in her eyes. posted by michelle vinitsky reference donahue, j. k., green, m. c. (2016). a good story: men’s storytelling ability reflects their attractiveness and perceived status. personal relationships, 23, 199-213. posted by raymond a. mar at 07:00 no comments: links to this post labels: dialogue, research bulletins monday, 3 october 2016 ibsen and the provisional in henrik ibsen and the birth of modernism, toril moi proposes that ibsen was the most important playwright since shakespeare, and that his work was critical to the coming of modernism in the west. last month, i was pleased to give a talk at the centre for ibsen studies at the university of oslo. i wanted to explore with the people there a theme of søren kierkegaard's concluding unscientific postscript and the seeming opposite, ibsen's plays about science. on the theme of science, ibsen had written ghosts, about the discovery of syphilis in a family. following the shock provoked by that play, in 1882 he wrote an enemy of the people, about the discovery by dr stockmann that, in the town baths which were central to the economy of the town where he lived, the water was contaminated. dr stockmann thinks at first that his discovery will benefit the town. but the town's mayor, his brother, thinks otherwise, and the local people come to think of dr stockmann as their enemy. a huge concern of ibsen's time was the spate of five cholera epidemics that swept through europe in the nineteenth century, killing hundreds of thousands of people. in the 1850s, cholera was discovered to be spread by contaminated water, but it took years for the discovery to be accepted. it was, however, this discovery that enabled the inference that infectious diseases are spread by germs. cholera and its implications caused great public consternation, and were discussed in newspapers much as aids was discussed in the 1980s, and cancer is discussed today. a source for an enemy of the people came from a friendship with the poet, alfred meissner, which ibsen had formed in the 1870s when he was living in munich. h.g. kohler recounts how meissner told ibsen that his father, dr eduard meissner, had worked in teplitz, in bohemia. in the middle of the summer of 1832, he had diagnosed a case of cholera. the mayor of the town tried to get him to change his diagnosis, but he refused. a mob besieged his house, smashed his windows, and demanded that he leave the town. in a two-faced way, the town's mayor professed friendship with dr meissner, but endorsed the crowd's demands, so dr meissner and his family were forced to leave the town. this conflict is replayed in an enemy of the people, with dr stockmann's diagnosis of contaminated water in the town's public baths. he becomes increasingly assertive, and is rejected by everyone in the town except his wife and children. the climax comes at the end when dr stockmann proclaims: "the strongest man in the world is the man who stands most alone." science is based on evidence and is provisional. at the same time one can meet scientists who believe they are absolutely right, who confront every attempt to ask questions, or to offer suggestions, with vehemence. søren kierkegaard proposes the idea of indirect communication in a passage of some eight pages in part two of concluding unscientific postscript. his idea is that indirect communication is a mode in which a person communicates with someone else not to persuade, not to try to get the other person to think as the person wants, not to coerce, but to enable the other to think and feel what she or she wants to think and feel. kierkegaard links it to inwardness, which is fundamental to modernism in literature. one implication of the idea of indirect communication is that as audience members and readers of artistic fiction we are not instructed, not persuaded what to think and feel. instead, we are invited to think and feel for ourselves in the circumstances of a play, short story, novel, or film. and rather than being unscientific, as kierkegaard may seem to imply from the title of his book, the idea is also at the centre of science because although a scientist offers evidence, and suggests inferences from it, science is provisional. the scientist does not stand alone. changes of interpretation can be suggested by other people when new evidence is discovered, when new inferences are offered. ibsen, h. (1882). ghosts, and a public enemy. (usual translataion an enemy of the people) in p. watts (trans.), ibsen, ghosts and other plays (pp. 101-219). harmondsworth: penguin. kierkegaard, s. (1846). concluding unscientific postscript (d. f. swenson & w. lowrie, trans.). princeton, nj: princeton university press (currrenl work published 1968). kohler, h. g. (1990). henrik ibsen's an enemy of the people and eduard meissner's expulsion from teplitz. british medical journal, 300, 1123-1126. moi, t. (2006). henrik ibsen and the birth of modernism: art, theater, philosophy. new york: oxford university press. posted by keith oatley at 11:24 no comments: links to this post labels: literariness, opinion, theatre, writers monday, 29 august 2016 literary reading and mentalizing since the publication from our research group that the reading of fiction as compared with non-fiction is associated with better empathy and understanding of others (mar et al., 2006) people have done experimental tests on this issue. among these, kidd and castano (2013) made a hit with their finding that reading literary fiction, as compared with reading popular fiction, prompted better empathy and theory-of-mind. in a recent report from the university of l’aquila, in italy, maria pino and monica mazzi have taken some important further steps. whereas previous experimental tests have used short stories and essays, pino and mazzi had 214 people read a whole book. the books were all about the same length, and participants were assigned to read one of two books of literary fiction, one of two of nonfiction, or one of two of science fiction. also, whereas previous experimental studies on the issue have tended to use just one outcome measure, pino and mazzi used several. one set of measures was of what the authors call “mentalizing.” they included a self-report test of empathy, a test of theory-of-mind in which participants were asked to say why people in the book they read did certain things, two tests in which participants were asked to infer from photographs what people were feeling, and an emotion attribution test in which participants were asked to infer from very short stories what people were feeling. a second set of measures was of what the authors call “sharing.” these included scales that asked how participants were affected in emotional situations, how they behaved in certain social circumstances, and how emotional they felt in reaction to pictures and situations. the results were that as compared with particpants who read a book of nonfiction or science fiction, those who read a book of literary fiction showed improved mentalizing, but they showed no change in sharing. pino and mazzi conclude that their results suggest that reading literary fiction may be helpful to people who have difficulties in understanding the minds of others. kidd, d. c., & castano, e. (2013). reading literary fiction improves theory of mind. science, 342, 377-380. mar, r. a., oatley, k., hirsh, j., dela paz, j., & peterson, j. b. (2006). bookworms versus nerds: exposure to fiction versus non-fiction, divergent associations with social ability, and the simulation of fictional social worlds. journal of research in personality, 40, 694-712. pino, m. c., & mazza, m. (2016). the use of "literary fiction" to promote mentalizing ability. plos one, 11(8). doi: org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160254 image: cover of george saunders’s tenth of december, one of the books of literary fiction read by participants in this study. posted by keith oatley at 08:13 no comments: links to this post labels: effects of fiction, literariness, novels, research bulletins, theory of mind monday, 1 august 2016 alternative worlds haruki murakami is acclaimed as one the most interesting present-day writers of short stories and novels. he is japanese, but influenced by western writers such as flaubert and kafka. "the elephant vanishes," title story of a collection of short stories, is set in a small town in a suburb of tokyo. the town used to have a zoo, but it closed. only an elderly elephant remains, living in its own elephant house and looked after by its 63-year-old keeper, noboru watanabe. the outside part of the elephant house is solidly built cage, surrounded by a strong fence, ten feet high made of iron bars anchored in concrete. in addition the elephant has a steel cuff, a shackle, round its right hind leg, attached to a 30-foot-long chain. between the evening of 17th may and the next day, the elephant is found to have vanished, along with its keeper. murakami is good at depicting the everyday world, and he is engaging to read. this story includes the political controversy in the town about whether to keep the elephant when the zoo closed and, when it vanishes, he depicts newspaper stories of a recognizable kind about the disappearance. the narrator is interested in the elephant and keeps a scrap-book of the published newspaper articles. as readers we are on the edge of the ordinary: a small suburban community with a lone african elephant. but why the iron-bar fence and the steel shackle? we barely notice when the almost ordinary becomes strange, the barely plausible becomes impossible. the elephant did not escape. it is no-where to be found, despite extensive searches. and no large elephant footprints are seen on the muddy grounds around the elephant house. the steel shackle that used to be round the elephant's leg is still intact. it is still locked, and there are only two keys, both still in place, one locked up in the police station and one locked up at the fire station. then the narrator meets a young woman, as part of his work life. the two get on well together. they like each other. and something seems to be developing between them. they go out for a meal. the narrator cannot help talking to the woman about his preoccupation: the vanished elephant. the evening before it disappeared, after opening hours, he tells her, he was on a cliff overlooking the elephant house, observing the affection between the elephant and its keeper, which was not expressed during the day when the public would visit, and he noticed that the size difference between them started to get less. the elephant seemed to be shrinking. did the elephant get so small that it could slip out of its cuff and squeeze through the bars of its cage, and the bars of the fence, and go off with its keeper, of whom it seemed so fond? the young woman avoids seeing the protagonist again. as it seems to me, murakami is doing what the surrealists were trying to do, in depicting how the unconscious seeps into consciousness, and sometimes even pervades day-to-day life, though he does it better. his ordinary world and the alternative world interpenetrate in ways that enable each to throw light on the other, and enable us to think about our minds and ourselves in new ways. and, far more interesting than the surrealists' mere depictions, with murakami there is always the relational. how does our individuality, with its peculiarities and unconscious aspects, affect our lives with others, and how do our relationships affect our sense of self? murakami, h. (1994). the elephant vanishes: stories (a. birnbaum & j. rubin, trans.). new york: vintage. posted by keith oatley at 15:34 no comments: links to this post labels: imagination, short stories, writers monday, 11 july 2016 books, computers, television, mothers engagement in fiction starts with stories being read to young children, and with parents and other adults interacting with children in relation to books that have pictures and text. by middle childhood, reading is taught at school, while at home it’s in competition with the watching of television and with being on the computer for various reasons. with four colleagues, johanna rosenqvist, who is at the university of helsinki, analyzed data from 381 typically developing north american children, who were between the ages of five and twelve, who had taken part in a study of neurocognitive development (see the report by korkman et al. 2013). assessments were analyzed for each child in five domains: attention and executive functioning, language, memory and learning, social perception, and visuospatial processing. a parent of the child (or in 5.5% of cases another adult such as a grandparent) gave information on how many hours a day the child watched television, how many hours a week the child was on a computer, and how many hours a week the child spent reading at home. the amount of television that children watched had a significant and negative relationship with children’s scores in all five domains of functioning that had been analyzed: the more hours of television watching, the worse was children's neurocognitive processing. in contrast, the amount of computer use was significantly and positively associated with scores in the domains of language, memory and learning, and social perception. the amount of reading children did was significantly and positively associated with scores the domains of attention and executive functioning and visuospatial processing. the researchers say that when maternal education was lower than average, reading was also positively related to memory and learning. overall, maternal education, rather that the media with which children spent their time, was the strongest positive predictor of all neurocognitive variables. the researchers suggest that limiting the amount of time that children spend watching television might be a good idea but this may not get to the root of the issue. it seems likely that mothers who are more educated have the effects they do by encouraging their children to read. korkman, m., lahti-nuuttila, p., laasonen, m., kemp, s. l. and holdnack, j. (2013). neurocognitive development in 5- to 16-year-old north american children: a cross-sectional study. child neuropsychology, 19, 516-539. rosenqvist, j., lahti-nuuttila, p., holdnack, j., kemp, s. l., and laasonen, m. (2016). relationship of tv watching, computer use, and reading to children's neurocognitive functions. journal of applied developmental psychology, 46, 11-21. image: wikimedia commons, school in laos - reading time. author: bigbrothermouse, who gives permission for reproduction of this image. posted by keith oatley at 10:45 2 comments: links to this post labels: effects of fiction, research bulletins, television wednesday, 29 june 2016 research bulletin: do "you" feel things more deeply than "i"? you enter the room, spot the glances of your peers and know, that you are about to overcome your greatest weaknesses. what does this line mean to you? did you feel present? empowered? fearful? some sort of emotional reaction would seem likely given the gravity of these words. but, intriguingly, it might not be the most obvious words in this sentence that drive your emotional reaction. reading something like “overcome” or “greatest weaknesses” can certainly prompt strong feelings but this might be particularly the case thanks to the personal pronoun “you.” based on fascinating research by tad brunyé and colleagues, it seems that reading something in the second person (using “you” as the pronoun) can elicit stronger reactions compared to reading an identical text using the first-person (i.e. “i”) (brunyé et al., 2011). when we read a story, we don’t simply come to understand the information contained within the piece. reading a story also involves imagining the events described and implied. in effect, we build a model in our minds of what’s going on in the story, known as a “situation model.” situation models represent a wide range of information from the story, including how things look, smell, and feel, along with the emotions and actions of characters. it is these models that prompt us to embody the narrative, or feel as if we are a part of them, and all of this can be enhanced by the pronouns used. it has been shown that using the second-person (i.e. “you”) is more effective at having readers see things from a character’s perspective; compared to the first-person (i.e., “i”) or third-person (i.e., “he”). in a recent study, it was suggested that readers develop more in-depth situation models when they put themselves in the shoes of the characters in the story (brunyé et al., 2011). this theory was tested by observing how readers represent events that either use “you” or “i” when describing the protagonist. in the experiment, each of the 48 native english-speaking undergraduates from tufts university were told to read 8 passages, 4 of which used “you” as a pronoun and 4 of which used “i” as a pronoun. how well people understood each passage was measured by having people respond as quickly as possible to some yes-or-no comprehension questions. importantly, arriving at the correct answer required participants to make some inferences regarding what was represented by the text, rather than simply remembering the text itself. in addition, before and after each passage read, emotions were measured. what the researchers found was that when “you” appeared in the passages, readers answered the comprehension questions more accurately and more quickly, compared to when they read the passages using “i.” this result was true only for information about the space described in the story (e.g. was the desk at the corner of the room?). reading passages that employed “you” as the pronoun also resulted in greater shifts in emotion as a result of reading the passage, relative to the “i” passages. in other words, using the second-person (i.e., “you”) led readers to experience more profound emotions. it appears that stories that use the second-person may produce more emotional experiences in readers. but, why is this? the researchers suggest that reading about “you” can prompt readers to place themselves in the shoes of the characters they read, therefore thinking of themselves as being in the situation described and as a result, feel these emotions more profoundly. these findings might be useful for writers looking for a leg up in producing an emotional reaction in readers. helping readers to feel a part of the story and see things from a character’s perspective, such as using “you” instead of “i,” will certainly help! posted by michelle vinitsky references brunyé, t. t., ditman, t., mahoney, c. r., augustyn, j. s., & taylor, h. a. (2009). when you and i share perspectives: pronouns modulate perspective-taking during narrative comprehension. psychological science, 20, 27-32. brunyé, t. t., ditman, t., mahoney, c. r., taylor, h. a. (2011). better you than i: perspectives and emotion simulation during narrative comprehension. journal of cognitive psychology, 23, 659-666. posted by raymond a. mar at 07:00 1 comment: links to this post labels: discourse, embodiment, emotion, imagination, research bulletins, simulation, space monday, 20 june 2016 literary reading what distinguishes novels and short stories that are literary from those that are not? the issue has come into focus in the psychology of fiction with david kidd and emanuele castano’s (2013) finding that reading stories that were literary was more likely to prompt an improvement of empathy and theory-of-mind than reading stories that achieved high popularity on amazon. in his book on literariness, david miall (2006) proposed that one factor is that literary writers use styles such as foregrounding, which attract attention and prompt reflection. in s/z roland barthes (1975) distinguished writerly reading from readerly reading. in writerly reading a person takes on a role like that of a writer, in creating the story that he or she experiences. in contrast, he says, readerly reading is a “kind of idleness” (p. 4). another possibility is that literary works enable people to think and reflect on characters. this view was put by frank hakemulder (2000) in the moral laboratory. he said that: "the complexity of literary characters helps readers to have more sophisticated ideas about others’ emotions and motives than stereotyped characters in popular fiction” (p. 15). although it has often been thought that literature has a function to instruct, with shelley’s (1819) idea that “poets are the unacknowledged legislators of the world” being an example, this may not be right. it is possible that the central quality of the literary is that it enables readers to feel and think for themselves (djikic & oatley, 2014). emy koopman (2016) compared three different versions of a chapter from anna enquist’s literary novel, counterpoint, about loss of a child. the original version contained a high level of semantic, phonetic, and grammatical foregrounding. in a second version, foregrounding that depended on imagery was removed: a version without imagery. in a third version all foregrounding was removed: a version without foregrounding. people assigned to read the original version scored higher on self-reported empathy than those who read the version without foregrounding. koopman also found that people who read the original text experienced more ambivalent emotions such as “a sad beauty” or a “grey joy,” than those who read the version without foregrounding. might this have indicated that as well as having their own feelings of empathy for others, readers of the original story were feeling for themselves in a writerly way? readers of the original version were not however found to be more reflective than those who read other versions. what might be done, one may wonder, to see how literary stories may invite us not just to feel empathetically and ambivalently, but also to think reflectively, for ourselves? barthes, r. (1975). s / z (r. miller, trans.). london: cape. djikic, m., & oatley, k. (2014). the art in fiction: from indirect communication to changes of the self. psychology of aesthetics, creativity, and the arts, 8, 498-505. hakemulder, f. (2000). the moral laboratory: experiments examining the effects of reading literature on social perception and moral self-concept. amsterdam: benjamins. kidd, d. c., & castano, e. (2013). reading literary fiction improves theory of mind. science, 342, 377-380. koopman, e. m. e. (2016). effects of "literariness" on emotions and on empathy and reflection after reading. psychology of aesthetics, creativity, and the arts, 10, 82-98. miall, d. s. (2006). literary reading: empirical and theoretical studies. new york: peter lang. shelley, p. b. (1819). a defence of poetry. in c. norman (ed.), poets on poetry (pp. 180-211). new york: free press. posted by keith oatley at 10:44 no comments: links to this post labels: effects of fiction, literariness, research bulletins, stylistics thursday, 9 june 2016 research bulletin: movie genre preference influence efficacy of product placement when lady gaga and beyoncé released a music video for their single, telephone, the blatant and numerous product placements for brands such as virgin mobile and hewlett-packard incited backlash. these product placements, in which products are strategically placed or embedded within a medium for marketing purposes, has become increasingly prevalent (russell & belch, 2005; wiles & danielova, 2009). this increase may be unsurprising, as the strategy can be successful. but how does product placement work? product placement may be more effective when branded objects don’t appear centrally, but in the background of movies or tv shows. these products then become implicitly associated (unconsciously and gradually) with the emotional aspects of the viewer’s experience. this is known as evaluative conditioning, which can result in more positive implicit attitudes toward new stimuli (cacioppo, marshall-goodell, tassinary, & petty, 1992). with these ideas in mind, christopher redker (ferris state university), bryan gibson, and ian zimmerman (central michigan university) conducted a study on background product placement to see if different variables affect implicit brand attitudes. participants were first asked about their brand preferences towards coke and pepsi along with their attitudes towards the sci-fi genre. those who had neutral attitudes towards coke and pepsi then watched a segment of a sci-fi movie. the experimental group watched a segment of the movie that included background product placement for coke, with the brand appearing on a billboard in the background. the control group watched a segment of the movie that did not include any product placement for coke. after the movie segment, participants were asked more questions about their brand attitudes. explicit attitudes toward the four brands were measured using a 7-point likert scale, disguised as a pilot study irrelevant to the first half of the study. implicit brand attitudes were measured using implicit association tests, in which coke and pepsi were paired with negative, positive, or self attributes. viewers who liked sci-fi had more positive implicit brand attitudes after watching the clip, compared to those who had other movie genre preferences. in addition, those who disliked sci-fi shifted their implicit brand attitudes to be more negative. explicit brand attitudes, in contrast, were shown to be unaffected by product placement. this study illustrates how implicit brand attitudes are affected by background product placement in a movie as a function of genre and genre preferences. posted by jennifer ip * for a copy of the original article, please contact r. mar (see profile for e-mail). cacioppo, j. t., marshall-goodell, b. s., tassinary, l. g., & petty, r. e. (1992). rudimentary determinants of attitudes: classical conditioning is more effective when prior knowledge about the attitude stimulus is low than high. journal of experimental social psychology, 28, 207–233. redker, c., gibson, b., & zimmerman, i. (2013). liking of movie genre alters the effectiveness of background product placements. basic and applied social psychology, 35, 249–255. russell, c. a., & belch, m. (2005). a managerial investigation into the product placement industry. journal of advertising research, 45, 73–92. wiles, m. a., & danielova, a. (2009). the worth of product placement in successful films: an event study analysis. journal of marketing, 73, 44–63. posted by raymond a. mar at 10:46 no comments: links to this post labels: effects of fiction, film, research bulletins, television wednesday, 18 may 2016 research bulletin: empathy and fantasy role playing games negative stereotypes about “gamers”, those who play all kinds of games (e.g., videogames, boardgames, etc.), are everywhere. indeed, those who “game” are often thought of as lazy, nerdy, or even out of touch with reality. yet while we often clump gamers together as one big group, the act of gaming can actually encompass countless different types of activities appealing to a wide variety of different people. one particularly interesting type of gaming is the fantasy role-playing game (rpg), in which players create their own fictional characters as well as develop the fictional worlds where those characters exist. playing a fantasy rpg, then, is a little bit like doing improv in drama class: players create characters (deciding upon the characters’ qualities, attitudes and beliefs) and play “make believe” with others embodying their own characters. and just as drama classes have their benefits (schellenberg, 2004), research is beginning to show that there may be some positive aspects to playing fantasy rpgs, which so far seem to have flown under the radar. specifically, because this type of gaming requires players to take another’s perspective, it has been suggested that people who play fantasy rpgs may have a higher capacity for empathy: the ability to share in someone else’s thoughts, feelings, and perspective on the world (davis, 1994; wondra & ellsworth, 2015). recently, a study was conducted that examined this very possibility (rivers, wickramasekera ii, pekala & rivers, 2016). researchers measured levels of four distinct types of empathy in a group of self-proclaimed fantasy rpg-players, as well as how “absorbed” (i.e., “lost in the story”) they tended to feel while playing. when the authors compared these levels to the general population, they found that fantasy rpg-players scored significantly higher than average on every facet of empathy. in addition, the more absorbed a player reported being, the higher their self-reported empathy and vice versa. intriguingly, the authors note that this association between engagement with stories and engagement with people is found not only in the “gamer” population, but also in the general public. so, gamers tend to be more empathic the more they become immersed in the game, and the same is observed among those who have a tendency to become highly immersed in other types of fictional stories. these results are correlational, of course, and so it is not clear whether the act of playing fantasy rpgs improves empathy, whether more empathic people gravitate toward these types of games, or some other factor plays a role. of course, the stigma behind gaming remains, but it’s time to pay attention to its advantages. although many of us are quick to dismiss gamers as out of touch, we may in fact be the ones missing out on a crucial skill of human connection. posted by shaina list. davis, m. h. (1994). empathy: a social psychological approach. boulder, co: westview press. rivers, a., wickramasekera ii, i. e., pekala, r. j., & rivers, j. a. (2016). empathic features and absorption in fantasy role-playing. american journal of clinical hypnosis, 58, 286- 294. schellenberg, e. g. (2004). music lessons enhance iq. psychological science, 15, 511–514. wondra, j., & ellsworth, p. (2015). an appraisal theory of empathy and other emotional experiences. psychological review, 122, 411–428. posted by raymond a. mar at 12:15 no comments: links to this post labels: effects of fiction, embodiment, emotion, imagination, research bulletins, theory of mind monday, 25 april 2016 stories of the earth: prince reminds us how much care it takes to live with each other the week of earth day was intense in minneapolis this year. earth day eve, already a time of pensive introspection given the reminder of climate change this year has been (the pile of street snow that usually would not be melted at the end of my driveway for another month has been gone for over two months already!) and ongoing struggles with dire racial inequalities, also brought the news of prince's death. as my hometown's most notable hero, prince has inspired not only the overnight purplization of the city (everyone i encountered on earth day was wearing purple, and murals like the one pictured went up immediately), but also an earth day sung in and out with all night mourning dance parties. i will remain brief and encourage readers to go back to watching amazing prince music videos and sharing their stories with friends, but will also share a quick reflection of my own. listening to and watching the outpouring of remembrance and appreciation amongst all my friends (most of whom grew up here, in the inspiring and liberating purple shadow -- and who are giving bookish tributes, #princerevelry, and more), a significant part of what i am hearing echoed is the caring work that makes it possible to live with each other. van jones emotional remembrance perhaps has made this most visible for people, opening up the view to prince's humanitarianism, if they hadn't been paying attention to visible work such as planet earth or his more subtle involvement building and funding green for all and #yeswecode. watching those music videos (such as this one with beyonce) in this light reveals ways of listening and responding that seem important to learn from (this moment, this move!) -- they make prince so sexy and so loved partly because they show graceful and creative ways of acting on paying attention and caring. caring enough to continue living here seems like one important way to practice our celebration of earth and its communities, and trying to pay attention, then figuring out what to do about what we've noticed, like prince, seems a good tribute. posted by kirsten valentine cadieux at 11:17 no comments: links to this post labels: emotion, empathy, imagination, literariness, memory, stylistics, theatre older posts home subscribe to: posts (atom) goals of onfiction onfiction has the aim of developing the psychology of fiction. using theoretical and empirical perspectives, we endeavour to understand how fiction is created, and how readers and audience members engage in it. researchers please consider joining the international society for empirical research on literature (igel, acronym for the name of this society in german) and contributing to the society's journal, scientific study of literature. please consider donating to literature for life. subscribe via email via rss translate sections research bulletins (202) opinion (58) original writing (55) reviews (48) quick hits (26) labels art books on the psychology of fiction conference effects of fiction emotion empathy film imagination literariness memory metaphor metonym novels place poetry quick hits romanticism short stories simulation stylistics television theatre theory of mind writers writing fiction copyright copyright is held by the individual authors of posts and comments. you may republish material published here if you cite the author and the source. followers books by writers of onfiction unique visitors simple template. template images by imacon. powered by blogger.


Here you find all texts from your page as Google (googlebot) and others search engines seen it.

Words density analysis:

Numbers of all words: 7018

One word

Two words phrases

Three words phrases

the - 7.51% (527)
and - 3.15% (221)
her - 1.4% (98)
that - 1.27% (89)
read - 1.21% (85)
his - 1.1% (77)
men - 1.03% (72)
with - 0.95% (67)
for - 0.88% (62)
one - 0.87% (61)
fiction - 0.87% (61)
our - 0.77% (54)
art - 0.76% (53)
this - 0.74% (52)
act - 0.73% (51)
are - 0.71% (50)
other - 0.66% (46)
was - 0.61% (43)
out - 0.6% (42)
age - 0.6% (42)
not - 0.57% (40)
story - 0.54% (38)
all - 0.54% (38)
man - 0.54% (38)
reading - 0.54% (38)
post - 0.5% (35)
were - 0.5% (35)
more - 0.47% (33)
part - 0.46% (32)
how - 0.46% (32)
who - 0.46% (32)
you - 0.43% (30)
mind - 0.41% (29)
literary - 0.41% (29)
ten - 0.41% (29)
see - 0.4% (28)
use - 0.4% (28)
own - 0.38% (27)
which - 0.38% (27)
but - 0.38% (27)
can - 0.37% (26)
research - 0.37% (26)
people - 0.37% (26)
day - 0.37% (26)
they - 0.36% (25)
may - 0.36% (25)
what - 0.34% (24)
2016 - 0.33% (23)
about - 0.33% (23)
play - 0.33% (23)
emotion - 0.33% (23)
have - 0.3% (21)
when - 0.3% (21)
end - 0.3% (21)
effect - 0.3% (21)
some - 0.3% (21)
child - 0.3% (21)
from - 0.28% (20)
book - 0.28% (20)
round - 0.28% (20)
feel - 0.27% (19)
its - 0.27% (19)
elephant - 0.27% (19)
stories - 0.27% (19)
tell - 0.26% (18)
here - 0.26% (18)
world - 0.26% (18)
mar - 0.26% (18)
empathy - 0.26% (18)
person - 0.26% (18)
readers - 0.24% (17)
come - 0.24% (17)
posted - 0.24% (17)
think - 0.24% (17)
she - 0.24% (17)
theory - 0.24% (17)
seem - 0.24% (17)
their - 0.24% (17)
place - 0.24% (17)
study - 0.24% (17)
like - 0.23% (16)
very - 0.23% (16)
ability - 0.23% (16)
these - 0.23% (16)
product - 0.23% (16)
mental - 0.23% (16)
had - 0.23% (16)
than - 0.23% (16)
write - 0.21% (15)
over - 0.21% (15)
fiction, - 0.21% (15)
participants - 0.21% (15)
mode - 0.21% (15)
attract - 0.21% (15)
though - 0.2% (14)
them - 0.2% (14)
new - 0.2% (14)
those - 0.2% (14)
attitude - 0.2% (14)
town - 0.2% (14)
links - 0.2% (14)
children - 0.19% (13)
labels - 0.19% (13)
ibsen - 0.19% (13)
able - 0.19% (13)
has - 0.19% (13)
result - 0.19% (13)
attitudes - 0.19% (13)
placement - 0.19% (13)
day, - 0.19% (13)
game - 0.19% (13)
attractive - 0.17% (12)
others - 0.17% (12)
social - 0.17% (12)
journal - 0.17% (12)
relation - 0.17% (12)
labels: - 0.17% (12)
science - 0.17% (12)
short - 0.17% (12)
also - 0.17% (12)
brand - 0.17% (12)
idea - 0.17% (12)
compared - 0.16% (11)
novel - 0.16% (11)
high - 0.16% (11)
way - 0.16% (11)
comments: - 0.16% (11)
characters - 0.16% (11)
psychology - 0.16% (11)
infer - 0.16% (11)
van - 0.16% (11)
al. - 0.16% (11)
passage - 0.16% (11)
found - 0.16% (11)
such - 0.16% (11)
each - 0.16% (11)
improv - 0.16% (11)
kind - 0.16% (11)
version - 0.16% (11)
find - 0.16% (11)
effects - 0.16% (11)
reflect - 0.16% (11)
self - 0.16% (11)
get - 0.14% (10)
thought - 0.14% (10)
test - 0.14% (10)
two - 0.14% (10)
murakami - 0.14% (10)
under - 0.14% (10)
between - 0.14% (10)
good - 0.14% (10)
used - 0.14% (10)
ages - 0.14% (10)
prince - 0.14% (10)
improve - 0.14% (10)
university - 0.14% (10)
led - 0.14% (10)
ask - 0.14% (10)
time - 0.14% (10)
oatley - 0.14% (10)
(2016) - 0.13% (9)
bulletins - 0.13% (9)
movie - 0.13% (9)
“you” - 0.13% (9)
been - 0.13% (9)
castano - 0.13% (9)
kidd - 0.13% (9)
using - 0.13% (9)
most - 0.13% (9)
2013 - 0.13% (9)
back - 0.13% (9)
monday, - 0.13% (9)
books - 0.13% (9)
television - 0.13% (9)
writers - 0.13% (9)
telling - 0.13% (9)
develop - 0.13% (9)
perspective - 0.13% (9)
friend - 0.13% (9)
emotional - 0.13% (9)
attractiveness - 0.13% (9)
j., - 0.13% (9)
did - 0.13% (9)
report - 0.13% (9)
original - 0.13% (9)
fantasy - 0.13% (9)
“i - 0.11% (8)
put - 0.11% (8)
implicit - 0.11% (8)
storytelling - 0.11% (8)
first - 0.11% (8)
being - 0.11% (8)
cover - 0.11% (8)
then - 0.11% (8)
does - 0.11% (8)
show - 0.11% (8)
long-term - 0.11% (8)
work - 0.11% (8)
low - 0.11% (8)
type - 0.11% (8)
watching - 0.11% (8)
suggest - 0.11% (8)
emy - 0.11% (8)
results - 0.11% (8)
positive - 0.11% (8)
relationship - 0.11% (8)
view - 0.11% (8)
mean - 0.11% (8)
onfiction - 0.11% (8)
year - 0.11% (8)
become - 0.11% (8)
seems - 0.11% (8)
second - 0.11% (8)
attention - 0.11% (8)
just - 0.11% (8)
public - 0.1% (7)
asked - 0.1% (7)
2006) - 0.1% (7)
stand - 0.1% (7)
try - 0.1% (7)
life - 0.1% (7)
where - 0.1% (7)
thoughts - 0.1% (7)
enemy - 0.1% (7)
studies - 0.1% (7)
effective - 0.1% (7)
association - 0.1% (7)
any - 0.1% (7)
things - 0.1% (7)
might - 0.1% (7)
researchers - 0.1% (7)
playing - 0.1% (7)
appear - 0.1% (7)
after - 0.1% (7)
background - 0.1% (7)
storyteller - 0.1% (7)
great - 0.1% (7)
well - 0.1% (7)
bulletins, - 0.1% (7)
(2013) - 0.1% (7)
earth - 0.1% (7)
foregrounding - 0.1% (7)
even - 0.1% (7)
author - 0.1% (7)
media - 0.1% (7)
4). - 0.1% (7)
affect - 0.1% (7)
literariness - 0.1% (7)
press - 0.1% (7)
group - 0.1% (7)
pronoun - 0.1% (7)
emotions - 0.1% (7)
told - 0.1% (7)
late - 0.1% (7)
text - 0.1% (7)
only - 0.09% (6)
engage - 0.09% (6)
prompt - 0.09% (6)
make - 0.09% (6)
experience - 0.09% (6)
take - 0.09% (6)
information - 0.09% (6)
(i.e. - 0.09% (6)
situation - 0.09% (6)
measured - 0.09% (6)
ordinary - 0.09% (6)
posts - 0.09% (6)
another - 0.09% (6)
something - 0.09% (6)
l., - 0.09% (6)
e., - 0.09% (6)
dream - 0.09% (6)
2016). - 0.09% (6)
tsukuru - 0.09% (6)
higher - 0.09% (6)
perception - 0.09% (6)
literature - 0.09% (6)
feeling - 0.09% (6)
imagination - 0.09% (6)
know - 0.09% (6)
call - 0.09% (6)
finding - 0.09% (6)
right - 0.09% (6)
friends - 0.09% (6)
keep - 0.09% (6)
function - 0.09% (6)
genre - 0.09% (6)
enable - 0.09% (6)
player - 0.09% (6)
cognitive - 0.09% (6)
every - 0.09% (6)
meissner - 0.09% (6)
toward - 0.09% (6)
state - 0.09% (6)
ways - 0.09% (6)
there - 0.09% (6)
include - 0.09% (6)
reference - 0.09% (6)
2013). - 0.09% (6)
gain - 0.09% (6)
individual - 0.09% (6)
science, - 0.09% (6)
keith - 0.09% (6)
present - 0.09% (6)
change - 0.09% (6)
significant - 0.09% (6)
attempt - 0.09% (6)
paper - 0.09% (6)
quick - 0.09% (6)
important - 0.09% (6)
say - 0.09% (6)
reported - 0.09% (6)
help - 0.07% (5)
her, - 0.07% (5)
associations - 0.07% (5)
types - 0.07% (5)
authors - 0.07% (5)
theory-of-mind - 0.07% (5)
reaction - 0.07% (5)
whether - 0.07% (5)
addition - 0.07% (5)
would - 0.07% (5)
dire - 0.07% (5)
pay - 0.07% (5)
players - 0.07% (5)
colleagues - 0.07% (5)
personal - 0.07% (5)
house - 0.07% (5)
someone - 0.07% (5)
strong - 0.07% (5)
among - 0.07% (5)
replication - 0.07% (5)
pino - 0.07% (5)
inference - 0.07% (5)
(2016). - 0.07% (5)
relationships - 0.07% (5)
mind. - 0.07% (5)
coke - 0.07% (5)
one's - 0.07% (5)
better - 0.07% (5)
give - 0.07% (5)
into - 0.07% (5)
discovery - 0.07% (5)
stockmann - 0.07% (5)
status - 0.07% (5)
popular - 0.07% (5)
imagination, - 0.07% (5)
scientific - 0.07% (5)
without - 0.07% (5)
kierkegaard - 0.07% (5)
imply - 0.07% (5)
same - 0.07% (5)
reflection - 0.07% (5)
games - 0.07% (5)
literariness, - 0.07% (5)
experimental - 0.07% (5)
move - 0.07% (5)
story, - 0.07% (5)
off - 0.07% (5)
watched - 0.07% (5)
memory - 0.07% (5)
raymond - 0.07% (5)
novels - 0.07% (5)
a., - 0.07% (5)
hours - 0.07% (5)
please - 0.07% (5)
t., - 0.07% (5)
neurocognitive - 0.07% (5)
fictional - 0.07% (5)
passages - 0.07% (5)
simulation - 0.07% (5)
brunyé - 0.07% (5)
psychology, - 0.07% (5)
words - 0.07% (5)
improves - 0.07% (5)
model - 0.07% (5)
five - 0.07% (5)
(2013). - 0.07% (5)
understand - 0.07% (5)
2006). - 0.07% (5)
role - 0.07% (5)
themselves - 0.07% (5)
c., - 0.07% (5)
young - 0.07% (5)
computer - 0.07% (5)
“i” - 0.07% (5)
home - 0.07% (5)
(2006) - 0.07% (5)
communication - 0.06% (4)
segment - 0.06% (4)
indirect - 0.06% (4)
mental-state - 0.06% (4)
ideas - 0.06% (4)
create - 0.06% (4)
music - 0.06% (4)
video - 0.06% (4)
preference - 0.06% (4)
sci-fi - 0.06% (4)
panero - 0.06% (4)
comes - 0.06% (4)
possible - 0.06% (4)
single - 0.06% (4)
unscientific - 0.06% (4)
modernism - 0.06% (4)
open - 0.06% (4)
three - 0.06% (4)
central - 0.06% (4)
will - 0.06% (4)
live - 0.06% (4)
town's - 0.06% (4)
cholera - 0.06% (4)
comprehension - 0.06% (4)
questions - 0.06% (4)
night - 0.06% (4)
(p. - 0.06% (4)
ourselves - 0.06% (4)
use, - 0.06% (4)
published - 0.06% (4)
him - 0.06% (4)
week - 0.06% (4)
minds - 0.06% (4)
one, - 0.06% (4)
many - 0.06% (4)
pilgrimage - 0.06% (4)
own. - 0.06% (4)
foregrounding. - 0.06% (4)
news - 0.06% (4)
trans.). - 0.06% (4)
four - 0.06% (4)
along - 0.06% (4)
different - 0.06% (4)
fence - 0.06% (4)
leg - 0.06% (4)
one. - 0.06% (4)
unconscious - 0.06% (4)
certain - 0.06% (4)
film - 0.06% (4)
your - 0.06% (4)
tests - 0.06% (4)
references - 0.06% (4)
york: - 0.06% (4)
mentalizing - 0.06% (4)
non-fiction - 0.06% (4)
associated - 0.06% (4)
findings - 0.06% (4)
title - 0.06% (4)
month - 0.06% (4)
amount - 0.06% (4)
recent - 0.06% (4)
through - 0.06% (4)
psychological - 0.06% (4)
mazzi - 0.06% (4)
issue - 0.06% (4)
domains - 0.06% (4)
however - 0.06% (4)
negative - 0.06% (4)
worlds - 0.06% (4)
(i.e., - 0.06% (4)
enter - 0.06% (4)
rivers, - 0.06% (4)
set - 0.06% (4)
picture - 0.06% (4)
(2006). - 0.06% (4)
skill - 0.06% (4)
writing - 0.06% (4)
versus - 0.06% (4)
because - 0.06% (4)
study, - 0.06% (4)
rather - 0.06% (4)
learn - 0.06% (4)
gamers - 0.06% (4)
measures - 0.06% (4)
addition, - 0.06% (4)
empathy, - 0.06% (4)
exposure - 0.06% (4)
women - 0.06% (4)
copy - 0.06% (4)
so, - 0.06% (4)
could - 0.06% (4)
worth - 0.06% (4)
green - 0.06% (4)
made - 0.06% (4)
others, - 0.06% (4)
aim - 0.06% (4)
tend - 0.06% (4)
in. - 0.06% (4)
it, - 0.06% (4)
gaming - 0.06% (4)
engagement - 0.06% (4)
study. - 0.06% (4)
case - 0.06% (4)
(e.g. - 0.06% (4)
oatley, - 0.06% (4)
included - 0.06% (4)
al., - 0.06% (4)
moral - 0.04% (3)
2014). - 0.04% (3)
notice - 0.04% (3)
shackle - 0.04% (3)
still - 0.04% (3)
locked - 0.04% (3)
then, - 0.04% (3)
conducted - 0.04% (3)
15). - 0.04% (3)
often - 0.04% (3)
developing - 0.04% (3)
during - 0.04% (3)
woman - 0.04% (3)
depicting - 0.04% (3)
caring - 0.04% (3)
lone - 0.04% (3)
keeper, - 0.04% (3)
why - 0.04% (3)
done - 0.04% (3)
seemed - 0.04% (3)
affected - 0.04% (3)
rated - 0.04% (3)
and, - 0.04% (3)
again - 0.04% (3)
kinds - 0.04% (3)
interesting - 0.04% (3)
touch - 0.04% (3)
small - 0.04% (3)
takes - 0.04% (3)
given - 0.04% (3)
edge - 0.04% (3)
reading. - 0.04% (3)
level - 0.04% (3)
bars - 0.04% (3)
cut - 0.04% (3)
hind - 0.04% (3)
showed - 0.04% (3)
before - 0.04% (3)
games, - 0.04% (3)
rpgs - 0.04% (3)
koopman - 0.04% (3)
newspaper - 0.04% (3)
narrator - 0.04% (3)
steel - 0.04% (3)
world, - 0.04% (3)
me, - 0.04% (3)
2011). - 0.04% (3)
likely - 0.04% (3)
m., - 0.04% (3)
acting - 0.04% (3)
june - 0.04% (3)
bulletin: - 0.04% (3)
experiences - 0.04% (3)
feelings - 0.04% (3)
inferencing - 0.04% (3)
colorless - 0.04% (3)
remain - 0.04% (3)
template - 0.04% (3)
oxford - 0.04% (3)
shakespeare - 0.04% (3)
described - 0.04% (3)
sharing - 0.04% (3)
k., - 0.04% (3)
models - 0.04% (3)
represent - 0.04% (3)
wide - 0.04% (3)
october - 0.04% (3)
377-380. - 0.04% (3)
characters. - 0.04% (3)
native - 0.04% (3)
342, - 0.04% (3)
second-person - 0.04% (3)
castano, - 0.04% (3)
having - 0.04% (3)
kidd, - 0.04% (3)
tasaki - 0.04% (3)
share - 0.04% (3)
donahue - 0.04% (3)
personality - 0.04% (3)
writerly - 0.04% (3)
while - 0.04% (3)
self-report - 0.04% (3)
line - 0.04% (3)
analyzed - 0.04% (3)
american - 0.04% (3)
light - 0.04% (3)
potential - 0.04% (3)
development - 0.04% (3)
david - 0.04% (3)
course, - 0.04% (3)
immediate - 0.04% (3)
07:00 - 0.04% (3)
emotion, - 0.04% (3)
narrative - 0.04% (3)
processing. - 0.04% (3)
parent - 0.04% (3)
19). - 0.04% (3)
r., - 0.04% (3)
s., - 0.04% (3)
years - 0.04% (3)
scores - 0.04% (3)
empathic - 0.04% (3)
functioning - 0.04% (3)
perspectives - 0.04% (3)
theatre - 0.04% (3)
contrast, - 0.04% (3)
significantly - 0.04% (3)
positively - 0.04% (3)
ability. - 0.04% (3)
opposite - 0.04% (3)
however, - 0.04% (3)
evidence - 0.04% (3)
living - 0.04% (3)
aspects - 0.04% (3)
summer - 0.04% (3)
mayor - 0.04% (3)
2009). - 0.04% (3)
becomes - 0.04% (3)
terms - 0.04% (3)
"the - 0.04% (3)
placements - 0.04% (3)
means - 0.04% (3)
meet - 0.04% (3)
society - 0.04% (3)
offer - 0.04% (3)
men’s - 0.04% (3)
deeply - 0.04% (3)
says - 0.04% (3)
memories - 0.04% (3)
graduate - 0.04% (3)
influence - 0.04% (3)
haida - 0.04% (3)
stylistics - 0.04% (3)
poetry - 0.04% (3)
meissner, - 0.04% (3)
source - 0.04% (3)
event - 0.04% (3)
perspective, - 0.04% (3)
it's - 0.04% (3)
provisional - 0.04% (3)
henrik - 0.04% (3)
pepsi - 0.04% (3)
whereas - 0.04% (3)
particular - 0.04% (3)
towards - 0.04% (3)
talk - 0.04% (3)
preferences - 0.04% (3)
concluding - 0.04% (3)
postscript - 0.04% (3)
other, - 0.04% (3)
ibsen's - 0.04% (3)
plays - 0.04% (3)
people, - 0.04% (3)
colleagues, - 0.04% (3)
water - 0.04% (3)
thing, - 0.04% (3)
vacuum - 0.04% (3)
town. - 0.04% (3)
g., - 0.04% (3)
contaminated - 0.04% (3)
discussed - 0.04% (3)
fiction. - 0.04% (3)
(see - 0.04% (3)
peter - 0.04% (3)
suggested - 0.04% (3)
thoughts, - 0.04% (3)
too - 0.04% (3)
previous - 0.04% (3)
words, - 0.04% (3)
mind, - 0.04% (3)
hit - 0.04% (3)
simply - 0.04% (3)
quality - 0.04% (3)
them, - 0.04% (3)
meaning - 0.04% (3)
half - 0.04% (3)
august - 0.04% (3)
press. - 0.04% (3)
ghosts - 0.04% (3)
life, - 0.04% (3)
empirical - 0.04% (3)
fact - 0.04% (3)
scientist - 0.04% (3)
although - 0.04% (3)
inferences - 0.04% (3)
paying - 0.04% (3)
explicit - 0.03% (2)
gibson, - 0.03% (2)
space - 0.03% (2)
schellenberg, - 0.03% (2)
videos - 0.03% (2)
profound - 0.03% (2)
levels - 0.03% (2)
purple - 0.03% (2)
readers. - 0.03% (2)
ian - 0.03% (2)
looking - 0.03% (2)
scored - 0.03% (2)
bit - 0.03% (2)
instead - 0.03% (2)
playing. - 0.03% (2)
pekala - 0.03% (2)
cape. - 0.03% (2)
brunyé, - 0.03% (2)
ii, - 0.03% (2)
wickramasekera - 0.03% (2)
ditman, - 0.03% (2)
mahoney, - 0.03% (2)
taylor, - 0.03% (2)
(2009). - 0.03% (2)
absorbed - 0.03% (2)
third - 0.03% (2)
davis, - 0.03% (2)
zimmerman - 0.03% (2)
university) - 0.03% (2)
shoes - 0.03% (2)
quickly - 0.03% (2)
remembrance - 0.03% (2)
invite - 0.03% (2)
role-playing - 0.03% (2)
reflective - 0.03% (2)
passages, - 0.03% (2)
liked - 0.03% (2)
preferences. - 0.03% (2)
big - 0.03% (2)
“a - 0.03% (2)
enhance - 0.03% (2)
average - 0.03% (2)
respond - 0.03% (2)
attitudes. - 0.03% (2)
general - 0.03% (2)
cacioppo, - 0.03% (2)
ambivalent - 0.03% (2)
rpg-players - 0.03% (2)
answer - 0.03% (2)
read, - 0.03% (2)
appeared - 0.03% (2)
(1819) - 0.03% (2)
empathy: - 0.03% (2)
population, - 0.03% (2)
goals - 0.03% (2)
self-reported - 0.03% (2)
redker - 0.03% (2)
variables - 0.03% (2)
1992). - 0.03% (2)
(2000) - 0.03% (2)
readerly - 0.03% (2)
aesthetics, - 0.03% (2)
ones - 0.03% (2)
factor - 0.03% (2)
creativity, - 0.03% (2)
qualities, - 0.03% (2)
cite - 0.03% (2)
listening - 0.03% (2)
via - 0.03% (2)
copyright - 0.03% (2)
went - 0.03% (2)
barthes - 0.03% (2)
(1975) - 0.03% (2)
arts, - 0.03% (2)
already - 0.03% (2)
products - 0.03% (2)
subscribe - 0.03% (2)
city - 0.03% (2)
wondra - 0.03% (2)
prince's - 0.03% (2)
versions - 0.03% (2)
experiences. - 0.03% (2)
says, - 0.03% (2)
opinion - 0.03% (2)
to: - 0.03% (2)
possibility - 0.03% (2)
anna - 0.03% (2)
successful - 0.03% (2)
hakemulder - 0.03% (2)
brands - 0.03% (2)
drama - 0.03% (2)
comprehension. - 0.03% (2)
name - 0.03% (2)
petty, - 0.03% (2)
tassinary, - 0.03% (2)
marshall-goodell, - 0.03% (2)
removed: - 0.03% (2)
conditioning - 0.03% (2)
imagery - 0.03% (2)
poets - 0.03% (2)
here, - 0.03% (2)
reviews - 0.03% (2)
2015). - 0.03% (2)
ellsworth, - 0.03% (2)
self. - 0.03% (2)
together - 0.03% (2)
immersed - 0.03% (2)
marketing - 0.03% (2)
knowledge - 0.03% (2)
embodiment, - 0.03% (2)
human - 0.03% (2)
theoretical - 0.03% (2)
increase - 0.03% (2)
hits - 0.03% (2)
clear - 0.03% (2)
visible - 0.03% (2)
popularity - 0.03% (2)
danielova, - 0.03% (2)
wiles - 0.03% (2)
belch, - 0.03% (2)
miall - 0.03% (2)
consider - 0.03% (2)
strongest - 0.03% (2)
character’s - 0.03% (2)
relationships. - 0.03% (2)
casual - 0.03% (2)
physical - 0.03% (2)
person’s - 0.03% (2)
neutral - 0.03% (2)
sketch - 0.03% (2)
undergraduate - 0.03% (2)
romantic - 0.03% (2)
both - 0.03% (2)
examining - 0.03% (2)
attractiveness, - 0.03% (2)
individual’s - 0.03% (2)
perceptions - 0.03% (2)
examined - 0.03% (2)
last - 0.03% (2)
women, - 0.03% (2)
40, - 0.03% (2)
personality, - 0.03% (2)
worlds. - 0.03% (2)
ability, - 0.03% (2)
divergent - 0.03% (2)
non-fiction, - 0.03% (2)
nerds: - 0.03% (2)
bookworms - 0.03% (2)
peterson, - 0.03% (2)
paz, - 0.03% (2)
dela - 0.03% (2)
hirsh, - 0.03% (2)
mar, - 0.03% (2)
date, - 0.03% (2)
skilled - 0.03% (2)
profile - 0.03% (2)
greater - 0.03% (2)
søren - 0.03% (2)
theme - 0.03% (2)
centre - 0.03% (2)
coming - 0.03% (2)
since - 0.03% (2)
proposes - 0.03% (2)
moi - 0.03% (2)
birth - 0.03% (2)
23, - 0.03% (2)
vinitsky - 0.03% (2)
michelle - 0.03% (2)
mindful - 0.03% (2)
next - 0.03% (2)
indicate - 0.03% (2)
advantage - 0.03% (2)
mate. - 0.03% (2)
perceived - 0.03% (2)
status. - 0.03% (2)
influenced - 0.03% (2)
irrelevant - 0.03% (2)
attractiveness. - 0.03% (2)
impact - 0.03% (2)
poor - 0.03% (2)
storytellers - 0.03% (2)
male - 0.03% (2)
measured. - 0.03% (2)
felt - 0.03% (2)
degree - 0.03% (2)
also, - 0.03% (2)
e-mail). - 0.03% (2)
contact - 0.03% (2)
play, - 0.03% (2)
lets - 0.03% (2)
makes - 0.03% (2)
ways. - 0.03% (2)
inward - 0.03% (2)
day-to-day - 0.03% (2)
as, - 0.03% (2)
further - 0.03% (2)
growing - 0.03% (2)
world. - 0.03% (2)
starts - 0.03% (2)
us, - 0.03% (2)
memories, - 0.03% (2)
around - 0.03% (2)
perhaps - 0.03% (2)
talking - 0.03% (2)
connect - 0.03% (2)
vacuum" - 0.03% (2)
sort - 0.03% (2)
free - 0.03% (2)
student - 0.03% (2)
meets - 0.03% (2)
wanted - 0.03% (2)
months - 0.03% (2)
... - 0.03% (2)
almost - 0.03% (2)
friends, - 0.03% (2)
close. - 0.03% (2)
murakami's - 0.03% (2)
haruki - 0.03% (2)
book, - 0.03% (2)
sometimes - 0.03% (2)
article, - 0.03% (2)
maria - 0.03% (2)
gains - 0.03% (2)
brief - 0.03% (2)
(e.g., - 0.03% (2)
correlation - 0.03% (2)
consistent - 0.03% (2)
difference - 0.03% (2)
texts - 0.03% (2)
all. - 0.03% (2)
nothing - 0.03% (2)
task - 0.03% (2)
performance - 0.03% (2)
castano’s - 0.03% (2)
analysis - 0.03% (2)
mind? - 0.03% (2)
murakami, - 0.03% (2)
really - 0.03% (2)
replicate - 0.03% (2)
alters - 0.03% (2)
immediately - 0.03% (2)
piece - 0.03% (2)
behind - 0.03% (2)
simple - 0.03% (2)
emanuele - 0.03% (2)
novels, - 0.03% (2)
night's - 0.03% (2)
midsummer - 0.03% (2)
shakespeare, - 0.03% (2)
anchor - 0.03% (2)
(2014). - 0.03% (2)
ghosts, - 0.03% (2)
1882 - 0.03% (2)
“you”) - 0.03% (2)
children, - 0.03% (2)
maternal - 0.03% (2)
children's - 0.03% (2)
watching, - 0.03% (2)
spent - 0.03% (2)
adult - 0.03% (2)
visuospatial - 0.03% (2)
learning, - 0.03% (2)
language, - 0.03% (2)
executive - 0.03% (2)
korkman - 0.03% (2)
north - 0.03% (2)
rosenqvist, - 0.03% (2)
it’s - 0.03% (2)
mothers - 0.03% (2)
lower - 0.03% (2)
television, - 0.03% (2)
(1994). - 0.03% (2)
far - 0.03% (2)
trying - 0.03% (2)
surrealists - 0.03% (2)
doing - 0.03% (2)
protagonist - 0.03% (2)
whom - 0.03% (2)
cuff - 0.03% (2)
noticed - 0.03% (2)
observing - 0.03% (2)
opening - 0.03% (2)
vanished - 0.03% (2)
education - 0.03% (2)
lahti-nuuttila, - 0.03% (2)
life. - 0.03% (2)
(brunyé - 0.03% (2)
shown - 0.03% (2)
used. - 0.03% (2)
pronouns - 0.03% (2)
embody - 0.03% (2)
actions - 0.03% (2)
range - 0.03% (2)
known - 0.03% (2)
going - 0.03% (2)
build - 0.03% (2)
events - 0.03% (2)
within - 0.03% (2)
contained - 0.03% (2)
don’t - 0.03% (2)
“i”) - 0.03% (2)
p., - 0.03% (2)
first-person - 0.03% (2)
particularly - 0.03% (2)
certainly - 0.03% (2)
drive - 0.03% (2)
intriguingly, - 0.03% (2)
but, - 0.03% (2)
greatest - 0.03% (2)
overcome - 0.03% (2)
wednesday, - 0.03% (2)
school - 0.03% (2)
applied - 0.03% (2)
holdnack, - 0.03% (2)
kemp, - 0.03% (2)
laasonen, - 0.03% (2)
other. - 0.03% (2)
station - 0.03% (2)
baths - 0.03% (2)
leave - 0.03% (2)
implication - 0.03% (2)
literature. - 0.03% (2)
feel. - 0.03% (2)
wants - 0.03% (2)
else - 0.03% (2)
believe - 0.03% (2)
provisional. - 0.03% (2)
based - 0.03% (2)
pages - 0.03% (2)
everyone - 0.03% (2)
increasingly - 0.03% (2)
diagnosis - 0.03% (2)
family - 0.03% (2)
house, - 0.03% (2)
members - 0.03% (2)
mob - 0.03% (2)
middle - 0.03% (2)
eduard - 0.03% (2)
kohler - 0.03% (2)
friendship - 0.03% (2)
much - 0.03% (2)
spread - 0.03% (2)
discovered - 0.03% (2)
people. - 0.03% (2)
concern - 0.03% (2)
enemy. - 0.03% (2)
benefit - 0.03% (2)
thinks - 0.03% (2)
audience - 0.03% (2)
circumstances - 0.03% (2)
barely - 0.03% (2)
image: - 0.03% (2)
elephant. - 0.03% (2)
vanishes, - 0.03% (2)
closed - 0.03% (2)
zoo - 0.03% (2)
read. - 0.03% (2)
evening - 0.03% (2)
iron - 0.03% (2)
fence, - 0.03% (2)
cage, - 0.03% (2)
remains, - 0.03% (2)
suburb - 0.03% (2)
stories, - 0.03% (2)
alternative - 0.03% (2)
sharing. - 0.03% (2)
novel, - 0.03% (2)
nonfiction - 0.03% (2)
pictures - 0.03% (2)
tended - 0.03% (2)
assigned - 0.03% (2)
taken - 0.03% (2)
issue. - 0.03% (2)
understanding - 0.03% (2)
publication - 0.03% (2)
journal, - 0.03% (2)
princeton - 0.03% (2)
(pp. - 0.03% (2)
ibsen, - 0.03% (2)
changes - 0.03% (2)
alone. - 0.03% (2)
powered - 0.03% (2)
of the - 0.71% (50)
in the - 0.63% (44)
and the - 0.31% (22)
at the - 0.31% (22)
posted by - 0.24% (17)
literary fiction - 0.24% (17)
of fiction - 0.21% (15)
to the - 0.21% (15)
the elephant - 0.2% (14)
on the - 0.2% (14)
product placement - 0.19% (13)
the story - 0.19% (13)
in which - 0.19% (13)
this post - 0.17% (12)
links to - 0.17% (12)
to this - 0.17% (12)
post labels: - 0.17% (12)
the town - 0.17% (12)
to think - 0.16% (11)
comments: links - 0.16% (11)
those who - 0.16% (11)
with the - 0.16% (11)
of mind - 0.16% (11)
as the - 0.16% (11)
theory of - 0.16% (11)
effects of - 0.14% (10)
no comments: - 0.14% (10)
about the - 0.13% (9)
reading a - 0.13% (9)
research bulletins - 0.13% (9)
such as - 0.13% (9)
journal of - 0.13% (9)
short stories - 0.11% (8)
participants were - 0.11% (8)
the original - 0.11% (8)
reading literary - 0.11% (8)
is the - 0.1% (7)
empathy and - 0.1% (7)
of literary - 0.1% (7)
labels: effects - 0.1% (7)
kind of - 0.1% (7)
of fiction, - 0.1% (7)
when the - 0.1% (7)
brand attitudes - 0.1% (7)
who read - 0.1% (7)
research bulletins, - 0.1% (7)
to read - 0.1% (7)
keith oatley - 0.09% (6)
part of - 0.09% (6)
may be - 0.09% (6)
kidd and - 0.09% (6)
with a - 0.09% (6)
is that - 0.09% (6)
and so - 0.09% (6)
by keith - 0.09% (6)
for the - 0.09% (6)
that the - 0.09% (6)
what the - 0.09% (6)
one of - 0.09% (6)
between the - 0.09% (6)
that reading - 0.09% (6)
readers to - 0.09% (6)
the people - 0.09% (6)
oatley at - 0.09% (6)
read a - 0.09% (6)
the second - 0.07% (5)
of this - 0.07% (5)
compared to - 0.07% (5)
in addition - 0.07% (5)
out for - 0.07% (5)
and how - 0.07% (5)
have a - 0.07% (5)
think and - 0.07% (5)
read the - 0.07% (5)
to have - 0.07% (5)
attitudes to - 0.07% (5)
implicit brand - 0.07% (5)
enemy of - 0.07% (5)
raymond a. - 0.07% (5)
mar at - 0.07% (5)
dr stockmann - 0.07% (5)
an enemy - 0.07% (5)
a. mar - 0.07% (5)
by raymond - 0.07% (5)
the researchers - 0.07% (5)
storytelling ability - 0.07% (5)
the other - 0.07% (5)
et al. - 0.07% (5)
be more - 0.07% (5)
psychology of - 0.07% (5)
out of - 0.07% (5)
we are - 0.07% (5)
the author - 0.07% (5)
from the - 0.06% (4)
of reading - 0.06% (4)
background product - 0.06% (4)
by the - 0.06% (4)
which participants - 0.06% (4)
to get - 0.06% (4)
fiction improves - 0.06% (4)
the authors - 0.06% (4)
attitudes toward - 0.06% (4)
of what - 0.06% (4)
not to - 0.06% (4)
were asked - 0.06% (4)
using the - 0.06% (4)
has been - 0.06% (4)
exposure to - 0.06% (4)
in other - 0.06% (4)
stories that - 0.06% (4)
pino and - 0.06% (4)
of mode - 0.06% (4)
as one - 0.06% (4)
was the - 0.06% (4)
and castano - 0.06% (4)
indirect communication - 0.06% (4)
did not - 0.06% (4)
ordinary world - 0.06% (4)
as well - 0.06% (4)
new york: - 0.06% (4)
improves theory - 0.06% (4)
in addition, - 0.06% (4)
the more - 0.06% (4)
which i - 0.06% (4)
attention and - 0.06% (4)
the child - 0.06% (4)
people who - 0.06% (4)
version without - 0.06% (4)
earth day - 0.06% (4)
the amount - 0.06% (4)
amount of - 0.06% (4)
well as - 0.06% (4)
of them - 0.06% (4)
et al., - 0.06% (4)
types of - 0.06% (4)
the effect - 0.06% (4)
might be - 0.06% (4)
a good - 0.06% (4)
to feel - 0.06% (4)
it seems - 0.06% (4)
with other - 0.06% (4)
the second-person - 0.04% (3)
the psychology - 0.04% (3)
the person - 0.04% (3)
at 07:00 - 0.04% (3)
mode in - 0.04% (3)
his idea - 0.04% (3)
a person - 0.04% (3)
but it - 0.04% (3)
readers of - 0.04% (3)
the town. - 0.04% (3)
paying attention - 0.04% (3)
when they - 0.04% (3)
ibsen and - 0.04% (3)
and reflect - 0.04% (3)
the most - 0.04% (3)
come into - 0.04% (3)
seem to - 0.04% (3)
idea is - 0.04% (3)
the mode - 0.04% (3)
the university - 0.04% (3)
concluding unscientific - 0.04% (3)
this is - 0.04% (3)
unscientific postscript - 0.04% (3)
the idea - 0.04% (3)
but also - 0.04% (3)
the discovery - 0.04% (3)
the town's - 0.04% (3)
feel a - 0.04% (3)
what i - 0.04% (3)
two of - 0.04% (3)
ability a - 0.04% (3)
attention to - 0.04% (3)
the narrator - 0.04% (3)
emotional reaction - 0.04% (3)
2016 research - 0.04% (3)
associations with - 0.04% (3)
read by - 0.04% (3)
murakami is - 0.04% (3)
stories and - 0.04% (3)
of five - 0.04% (3)
with its - 0.04% (3)
had been - 0.04% (3)
of all - 0.04% (3)
seems to - 0.04% (3)
something like - 0.04% (3)
the individual - 0.04% (3)
and its - 0.04% (3)
domains of - 0.04% (3)
in contrast, - 0.04% (3)
and his - 0.04% (3)
many hours - 0.04% (3)
hours a - 0.04% (3)
how do - 0.04% (3)
how many - 0.04% (3)
of television - 0.04% (3)
be the - 0.04% (3)
a story - 0.04% (3)
of science - 0.04% (3)
of two - 0.04% (3)
and other - 0.04% (3)
henrik ibsen - 0.04% (3)
in his - 0.04% (3)
he was - 0.04% (3)
literary reading - 0.04% (3)
as compared - 0.04% (3)
themselves in - 0.04% (3)
compared with - 0.04% (3)
a recent - 0.04% (3)
tsukuru tasaki - 0.04% (3)
more effective - 0.04% (3)
342, 377-380. - 0.04% (3)
and mazzi - 0.04% (3)
asked to - 0.04% (3)
the book - 0.04% (3)
they read - 0.04% (3)
can be - 0.04% (3)
emotions and - 0.04% (3)
suggest that - 0.04% (3)
d. c., - 0.04% (3)
& castano, - 0.04% (3)
e. (2013). - 0.04% (3)
mind. science, - 0.04% (3)
without foregrounding. - 0.04% (3)
university of - 0.04% (3)
this very - 0.04% (3)
kidd, d. - 0.04% (3)
to infer - 0.04% (3)
to find - 0.04% (3)
with others - 0.04% (3)
science, 342, - 0.04% (3)
mind monday, - 0.04% (3)
passage of - 0.04% (3)
of mind. - 0.04% (3)
set of - 0.04% (3)
(2013). reading - 0.04% (3)
rather than - 0.04% (3)
castano, e. - 0.04% (3)
quality of - 0.04% (3)
than those - 0.04% (3)
product placements - 0.04% (3)
to fiction - 0.04% (3)
panero and - 0.04% (3)
music video - 0.04% (3)
group of - 0.04% (3)
of these - 0.04% (3)
who are - 0.04% (3)
in terms - 0.04% (3)
in new - 0.04% (3)
social perception - 0.04% (3)
and on - 0.04% (3)
found that - 0.04% (3)
is more - 0.04% (3)
genre preference - 0.04% (3)
terms of - 0.04% (3)
bulletins, theory - 0.04% (3)
placement in - 0.04% (3)
colorless tsukuru - 0.04% (3)
october 2016 - 0.04% (3)
ability to - 0.04% (3)
a single - 0.04% (3)
other words, - 0.04% (3)
a long-term - 0.04% (3)
their own - 0.04% (3)
who had - 0.04% (3)
these results - 0.04% (3)
were feeling - 0.04% (3)
may not - 0.04% (3)
it has - 0.04% (3)
the results - 0.04% (3)
with each - 0.04% (3)
engagement with - 0.04% (3)
a segment - 0.04% (3)
were measured - 0.04% (3)
fantasy rpgs - 0.04% (3)
a study - 0.04% (3)
coke and - 0.04% (3)
to see - 0.04% (3)
kinds of - 0.04% (3)
of fictional - 0.04% (3)
a dream - 0.04% (3)
mental-state inferencing - 0.04% (3)
this study - 0.04% (3)
of gaming - 0.04% (3)
oatley, k. - 0.04% (3)
and pepsi - 0.04% (3)
effective when - 0.03% (2)
holdnack, j. - 0.03% (2)
m. (2016). - 0.03% (2)
television wednesday, - 0.03% (2)
self-reported empathy - 0.03% (2)
affected by - 0.03% (2)
also in - 0.03% (2)
reading something - 0.03% (2)
the first-person - 0.03% (2)
(brunyé et - 0.03% (2)
al., 2011). - 0.03% (2)
the story, - 0.03% (2)
genre preferences. - 0.03% (2)
watching the - 0.03% (2)
known as - 0.03% (2)
a wide - 0.03% (2)
the general - 0.03% (2)
kemp, s. - 0.03% (2)
of games - 0.03% (2)
lahti-nuuttila, p., - 0.03% (2)
the domains - 0.03% (2)
language, memory - 0.03% (2)
and learning, - 0.03% (2)
and visuospatial - 0.03% (2)
that people - 0.03% (2)
a week - 0.03% (2)
& ellsworth, - 0.03% (2)
that children - 0.03% (2)
a significant - 0.03% (2)
five domains - 0.03% (2)
significantly and - 0.03% (2)
positively associated - 0.03% (2)
with scores - 0.03% (2)
and social - 0.03% (2)
type of - 0.03% (2)
and executive - 0.03% (2)
to read. - 0.03% (2)
please consider - 0.03% (2)
the effects - 0.03% (2)
only in - 0.03% (2)
than average - 0.03% (2)
of movie - 0.03% (2)
this may - 0.03% (2)
they found - 0.03% (2)
quick hits - 0.03% (2)
wickramasekera ii, - 0.03% (2)
who play - 0.03% (2)
measured using - 0.03% (2)
of touch - 0.03% (2)
act of - 0.03% (2)
the strongest - 0.03% (2)
visuospatial processing. - 0.03% (2)
a part - 0.03% (2)
& petty, - 0.03% (2)
movie that - 0.03% (2)
t., ditman, - 0.03% (2)
narrative comprehension. - 0.03% (2)
of aesthetics, - 0.03% (2)
a. (2009). - 0.03% (2)
taylor, h. - 0.03% (2)
c. r., - 0.03% (2)
t., mahoney, - 0.03% (2)
brunyé, t. - 0.03% (2)
psychological science, - 0.03% (2)
creativity, and - 0.03% (2)
possible to - 0.03% (2)
described and - 0.03% (2)
in readers. - 0.03% (2)
& rivers, - 0.03% (2)
emotional experiences - 0.03% (2)
use the - 0.03% (2)
art in - 0.03% (2)
during narrative - 0.03% (2)
more profound - 0.03% (2)
not only - 0.03% (2)
the version - 0.03% (2)
a version - 0.03% (2)
was removed: - 0.03% (2)
a high - 0.03% (2)
to live - 0.03% (2)
& oatley, - 0.03% (2)
or she - 0.03% (2)
reading stories - 0.03% (2)
embodiment, emotion, - 0.03% (2)
for themselves - 0.03% (2)
the one - 0.03% (2)
found to - 0.03% (2)
read other - 0.03% (2)
that are - 0.03% (2)
stories of - 0.03% (2)
2016 literary - 0.03% (2)
the arts, - 0.03% (2)
live with - 0.03% (2)
and all - 0.03% (2)
of onfiction - 0.03% (2)
the shoes - 0.03% (2)
& danielova, - 0.03% (2)
but in - 0.03% (2)
the background - 0.03% (2)
more positive - 0.03% (2)
a character’s - 0.03% (2)
to pay - 0.03% (2)
things from - 0.03% (2)
characters in - 0.03% (2)
fiction is - 0.03% (2)
more empathic - 0.03% (2)
their brand - 0.03% (2)
second-person (i.e. - 0.03% (2)
attitudes towards - 0.03% (2)
towards coke - 0.03% (2)
group watched - 0.03% (2)
they become - 0.03% (2)
seems like - 0.03% (2)
in emotion - 0.03% (2)
which used - 0.03% (2)
fiction, literariness, - 0.03% (2)
9 june - 0.03% (2)
the view - 0.03% (2)
of product - 0.03% (2)
the text - 0.03% (2)
was measured - 0.03% (2)
each passage - 0.03% (2)
these product - 0.03% (2)
& belch, - 0.03% (2)
of which - 0.03% (2)
how readers - 0.03% (2)
pay attention - 0.03% (2)
plays a - 0.03% (2)
the act - 0.03% (2)
immersed in - 0.03% (2)
ways of - 0.03% (2)
imagination, research - 0.03% (2)
story of - 0.03% (2)
who is - 0.03% (2)
divergent associations - 0.03% (2)
of mind? - 0.03% (2)
improve theory - 0.03% (2)
fiction really - 0.03% (2)
single passage - 0.03% (2)
personality, 40, - 0.03% (2)
research in - 0.03% (2)
social worlds. - 0.03% (2)
the simulation - 0.03% (2)
ability, and - 0.03% (2)
with social - 0.03% (2)
versus non-fiction, - 0.03% (2)
07:00 no - 0.03% (2)
nerds: exposure - 0.03% (2)
bookworms versus - 0.03% (2)
b. (2006). - 0.03% (2)
peterson, j. - 0.03% (2)
dela paz, - 0.03% (2)
hirsh, j., - 0.03% (2)
oatley, k., - 0.03% (2)
r. a., - 0.03% (2)
377-380. mar, - 0.03% (2)
for e-mail). - 0.03% (2)
(see profile - 0.03% (2)
an attempt - 0.03% (2)
and green - 0.03% (2)
please contact - 0.03% (2)
results of - 0.03% (2)
because this - 0.03% (2)
higher status - 0.03% (2)
led to - 0.03% (2)
perceived status - 0.03% (2)
to which - 0.03% (2)
the degree - 0.03% (2)
influenced by - 0.03% (2)
was not - 0.03% (2)
for all - 0.03% (2)
attractiveness. in - 0.03% (2)
as more - 0.03% (2)
degree to - 0.03% (2)
the case - 0.03% (2)
story and - 0.03% (2)
the storyteller - 0.03% (2)
was that - 0.03% (2)
first study - 0.03% (2)
to women, - 0.03% (2)
more attractive - 0.03% (2)
attractiveness and - 0.03% (2)
rated the - 0.03% (2)
perceptions of - 0.03% (2)
being a - 0.03% (2)
seems that - 0.03% (2)
r. mar - 0.03% (2)
original article, - 0.03% (2)
attractive to - 0.03% (2)
haida is - 0.03% (2)
in some - 0.03% (2)
we may - 0.03% (2)
they are - 0.03% (2)
the mind, - 0.03% (2)
enter the - 0.03% (2)
thoughts that - 0.03% (2)
on one - 0.03% (2)
literary novel - 0.03% (2)
i think - 0.03% (2)
sort of - 0.03% (2)
in life - 0.03% (2)
a young - 0.03% (2)
by means - 0.03% (2)
but he - 0.03% (2)
he had - 0.03% (2)
it seemed - 0.03% (2)
any of - 0.03% (2)
touch with - 0.03% (2)
get in - 0.03% (2)
not just - 0.03% (2)
who were - 0.03% (2)
a group - 0.03% (2)
that of - 0.03% (2)
years of - 0.03% (2)
like the - 0.03% (2)
other, and - 0.03% (2)
a copy - 0.03% (2)
would seem - 0.03% (2)
in mental-state - 0.03% (2)
nothing at - 0.03% (2)
fiction and - 0.03% (2)
participants to - 0.03% (2)
three studies - 0.03% (2)
attempt at - 0.03% (2)
mind? an - 0.03% (2)
really improve - 0.03% (2)
does reading - 0.03% (2)
effect of - 0.03% (2)
alters the - 0.03% (2)
emanuele castano - 0.03% (2)
our relationships - 0.03% (2)
writing fiction - 0.03% (2)
oxford university - 0.03% (2)
of pilgrimage - 0.03% (2)
his years - 0.03% (2)
tasaki and - 0.03% (2)
and understand - 0.03% (2)
say that - 0.03% (2)
we can - 0.03% (2)
of associations - 0.03% (2)
that one - 0.03% (2)
with others, - 0.03% (2)
from an - 0.03% (2)
the next - 0.03% (2)
and with - 0.03% (2)
versus nerds: - 0.03% (2)
a small - 0.03% (2)
of short - 0.03% (2)
books of - 0.03% (2)
in personality, - 0.03% (2)
of research - 0.03% (2)
worlds. journal - 0.03% (2)
fictional social - 0.03% (2)
simulation of - 0.03% (2)
social ability, - 0.03% (2)
non-fiction, divergent - 0.03% (2)
fiction versus - 0.03% (2)
(2006). bookworms - 0.03% (2)
is found - 0.03% (2)
& peterson, - 0.03% (2)
paz, j., - 0.03% (2)
j., dela - 0.03% (2)
k., hirsh, - 0.03% (2)
a., oatley, - 0.03% (2)
mar, r. - 0.03% (2)
minds of - 0.03% (2)
who have - 0.03% (2)
of nonfiction - 0.03% (2)
a book - 0.03% (2)
measures was - 0.03% (2)
used to - 0.03% (2)
are on - 0.03% (2)
what people - 0.03% (2)
the unconscious - 0.03% (2)
at home - 0.03% (2)
reading is - 0.03% (2)
pictures and - 0.03% (2)
with children - 0.03% (2)
with stories - 0.03% (2)
h. (1994). - 0.03% (2)
affect our - 0.03% (2)
how does - 0.03% (2)
about our - 0.03% (2)
that enable - 0.03% (2)
world and - 0.03% (2)
trying to - 0.03% (2)
the steel - 0.03% (2)
of whom - 0.03% (2)
its keeper, - 0.03% (2)
and go - 0.03% (2)
bars of - 0.03% (2)
that it - 0.03% (2)
between them - 0.03% (2)
was on - 0.03% (2)
the evening - 0.03% (2)
each other. - 0.03% (2)
the two - 0.03% (2)
one locked - 0.03% (2)
a second - 0.03% (2)
authors call - 0.03% (2)
great story - 0.03% (2)
come to - 0.03% (2)
world is - 0.03% (2)
and is - 0.03% (2)
the people, - 0.03% (2)
with dr - 0.03% (2)
town's mayor - 0.03% (2)
leave the - 0.03% (2)
that he - 0.03% (2)
ibsen had - 0.03% (2)
for an - 0.03% (2)
discussed in - 0.03% (2)
spread by - 0.03% (2)
but the - 0.03% (2)
based on - 0.03% (2)
his discovery - 0.03% (2)
which were - 0.03% (2)
theme of - 0.03% (2)
the centre - 0.03% (2)
modernism in - 0.03% (2)
coming of - 0.03% (2)
his work - 0.03% (2)
the birth - 0.03% (2)
vinitsky reference - 0.03% (2)
by michelle - 0.03% (2)
long-term potential - 0.03% (2)
science is - 0.03% (2)
is provisional. - 0.03% (2)
was of - 0.03% (2)
when new - 0.03% (2)
of measures - 0.03% (2)
tended to - 0.03% (2)
the books - 0.03% (2)
whereas previous - 0.03% (2)
better empathy - 0.03% (2)
finding that - 0.03% (2)
with their - 0.03% (2)
experimental tests - 0.03% (2)
august 2016 - 0.03% (2)
press. posted - 0.03% (2)
birth of - 0.03% (2)
by other - 0.03% (2)
of indirect - 0.03% (2)
changes of - 0.03% (2)
does not - 0.03% (2)
of his - 0.03% (2)
ourselves in - 0.03% (2)
what to - 0.03% (2)
idea of - 0.03% (2)
and feel. - 0.03% (2)
someone else - 0.03% (2)
a mode - 0.03% (2)
communication is - 0.03% (2)
of some - 0.03% (2)
writers of - 0.03% (2)
links to this - 0.17% (12)
this post labels: - 0.17% (12)
to this post - 0.17% (12)
comments: links to - 0.16% (11)
no comments: links - 0.14% (10)
theory of mind - 0.14% (10)
reading literary fiction - 0.11% (8)
effects of fiction, - 0.1% (7)
post labels: effects - 0.1% (7)
by keith oatley - 0.09% (6)
keith oatley at - 0.09% (6)
posted by keith - 0.09% (6)
of literary fiction - 0.09% (6)
by raymond a. - 0.07% (5)
a. mar at - 0.07% (5)
those who read - 0.07% (5)
an enemy of - 0.07% (5)
to think and - 0.07% (5)
enemy of the - 0.07% (5)
posted by raymond - 0.07% (5)
fiction improves theory - 0.06% (4)
participants were asked - 0.06% (4)
of the original - 0.06% (4)
think and feel - 0.06% (4)
as well as - 0.06% (4)
kidd and castano - 0.06% (4)
the amount of - 0.06% (4)
literary fiction improves - 0.06% (4)
a kind of - 0.06% (4)
improves theory of - 0.06% (4)
how many hours - 0.04% (3)
research bulletins, theory - 0.04% (3)
of mind monday, - 0.04% (3)
watched a segment - 0.04% (3)
in terms of - 0.04% (3)
in other words, - 0.04% (3)
ibsen and the - 0.04% (3)
the university of - 0.04% (3)
a segment of - 0.04% (3)
mind. science, 342, - 0.04% (3)
castano, e. (2013). - 0.04% (3)
one of two - 0.04% (3)
as compared with - 0.04% (3)
to be more - 0.04% (3)
version without foregrounding. - 0.04% (3)
who read the - 0.04% (3)
the original version - 0.04% (3)
the psychology of - 0.04% (3)
bulletins, theory of - 0.04% (3)
mar at 07:00 - 0.04% (3)
part of the - 0.04% (3)
of the story - 0.04% (3)
2016 research bulletin: - 0.04% (3)
colorless tsukuru tasaki - 0.04% (3)
which participants were - 0.04% (3)
psychology of fiction - 0.04% (3)
kidd, d. c., - 0.04% (3)
out of it - 0.04% (3)
of mind. science, - 0.04% (3)
(2013). reading literary - 0.04% (3)
& castano, e. - 0.04% (3)
with each other - 0.04% (3)
shoes of the - 0.03% (2)
themselves in the - 0.03% (2)
his years of - 0.03% (2)
a version without - 0.03% (2)
oxford university press - 0.03% (2)
is that literary - 0.03% (2)
reading stories that - 0.03% (2)
literary fiction really - 0.03% (2)
et al., 2011). - 0.03% (2)
kidd and emanuele - 0.03% (2)
inferencing ability a - 0.03% (2)
is more effective - 0.03% (2)
see things from - 0.03% (2)
emotion, imagination, research - 0.03% (2)
of which used - 0.03% (2)
and emanuele castano - 0.03% (2)
does reading a - 0.03% (2)
ditman, t., mahoney, - 0.03% (2)
tsukuru tasaki and - 0.03% (2)
mahoney, c. r., - 0.03% (2)
t., ditman, t., - 0.03% (2)
from a character’s - 0.03% (2)
single passage of - 0.03% (2)
the shoes of - 0.03% (2)
suggest that reading - 0.03% (2)
using the second-person - 0.03% (2)
as a result - 0.03% (2)
brunyé, t. t., - 0.03% (2)
read the original - 0.03% (2)
that people who - 0.03% (2)
that of a - 0.03% (2)
paying attention to - 0.03% (2)
live with each - 0.03% (2)
playing fantasy rpgs - 0.03% (2)
the act of - 0.03% (2)
type of gaming - 0.03% (2)
out of touch - 0.03% (2)
mar (see profile - 0.03% (2)
please contact r. - 0.03% (2)
the original article, - 0.03% (2)
a copy of - 0.03% (2)
were measured using - 0.03% (2)
the movie that - 0.03% (2)
product placement for - 0.03% (2)
of the movie - 0.03% (2)
a group of - 0.03% (2)
kemp, s. l. - 0.03% (2)
is the mode - 0.03% (2)
the version without - 0.03% (2)
readers of the - 0.03% (2)
by means of - 0.03% (2)
of aesthetics, creativity, - 0.03% (2)
and the arts, - 0.03% (2)
the mode in - 0.03% (2)
here is a - 0.03% (2)
towards coke and - 0.03% (2)
psychology of aesthetics, - 0.03% (2)
creativity, and the - 0.03% (2)
june 2016 research - 0.03% (2)
of product placement - 0.03% (2)
more positive implicit - 0.03% (2)
about their brand - 0.03% (2)
research bulletins, television - 0.03% (2)
research in personality, - 0.03% (2)
this may not - 0.03% (2)
by michelle vinitsky - 0.03% (2)
k., hirsh, j., - 0.03% (2)
dela paz, j., - 0.03% (2)
the idea of - 0.03% (2)
think and feel. - 0.03% (2)
& peterson, j. - 0.03% (2)
indirect communication is - 0.03% (2)
of indirect communication - 0.03% (2)
at the end - 0.03% (2)
leave the town. - 0.03% (2)
of the town - 0.03% (2)
b. (2006). bookworms - 0.03% (2)
versus nerds: exposure - 0.03% (2)
to fiction versus - 0.03% (2)
of attractiveness. in - 0.03% (2)
press. posted by - 0.03% (2)
the quality of - 0.03% (2)
degree to which - 0.03% (2)
of the storyteller - 0.03% (2)
the first study - 0.03% (2)
non-fiction, divergent associations - 0.03% (2)
with social ability, - 0.03% (2)
they found that - 0.03% (2)
terms of a - 0.03% (2)
and the simulation - 0.03% (2)
and green (2016) - 0.03% (2)
it seems that - 0.03% (2)
donahue and green - 0.03% (2)
of fictional social - 0.03% (2)
worlds. journal of - 0.03% (2)
and the birth - 0.03% (2)
2016 literary reading - 0.03% (2)
attention and executive - 0.03% (2)
for a copy - 0.03% (2)
07:00 no comments: - 0.03% (2)
associated with scores - 0.03% (2)
significantly and positively - 0.03% (2)
improve theory of - 0.03% (2)
a week the - 0.03% (2)
mind? an attempt - 0.03% (2)
memory and learning, - 0.03% (2)
who read other - 0.03% (2)
in mental-state inferencing - 0.03% (2)
nothing at all. - 0.03% (2)
think about our - 0.03% (2)
as it seems - 0.03% (2)
the elephant and - 0.03% (2)
one locked up - 0.03% (2)
of short stories - 0.03% (2)
better empathy and - 0.03% (2)
mind monday, 1 - 0.03% (2)
article, please contact - 0.03% (2)
r. mar (see - 0.03% (2)
profile for e-mail). - 0.03% (2)
read a book - 0.03% (2)
a book of - 0.03% (2)
asked to infer - 0.03% (2)
and his years - 0.03% (2)
342, 377-380. mar, - 0.03% (2)
what the authors - 0.03% (2)
measures was of - 0.03% (2)
r. a., oatley, - 0.03% (2)
in a recent - 0.03% (2)
that reading literary - 0.03% (2)
the domains of - 0.03% (2)

Here you can find chart of all your popular one, two and three word phrases. Google and others search engines means your page is about words you use frequently.

Copyright © 2015-2016 hupso.pl. All rights reserved. FB | +G | Twitter

Hupso.pl jest serwisem internetowym, w którym jednym kliknieciem możesz szybko i łatwo sprawdź stronę www pod kątem SEO. Oferujemy darmowe pozycjonowanie stron internetowych oraz wycena domen i stron internetowych. Prowadzimy ranking polskich stron internetowych oraz ranking stron alexa.