3.97 score from hupso.pl for:
oecdinsights.org



HTML Content


Titleoecd insights blog

Length: 18, Words: 3
Description pusty

Length: 0, Words: 0
Keywords pusty
Robots
Charset UTF-8
Og Meta - Title exist
Og Meta - Description pusty
Og Meta - Site name exist
Tytuł powinien zawierać pomiędzy 10 a 70 znaków (ze spacjami), a mniej niż 12 słów w długości.
Meta opis powinien zawierać pomiędzy 50 a 160 znaków (łącznie ze spacjami), a mniej niż 24 słów w długości.
Kodowanie znaków powinny być określone , UTF-8 jest chyba najlepszy zestaw znaków, aby przejść z powodu UTF-8 jest bardziej międzynarodowy kodowaniem.
Otwarte obiekty wykresu powinny być obecne w stronie internetowej (więcej informacji na temat protokołu OpenGraph: http://ogp.me/)

SEO Content

Words/Characters 8126
Text/HTML 39.71 %
Headings H1 1
H2 16
H3 7
H4 0
H5 0
H6 0
H1
H2

the aid community should stop pretending to know the answers and start asking the right questions.
turning groundwater into farmers’ underground insurance against climate change
borders and networks: the forgotten elements of development
should we rely on economic forecasts? the wisdom of the crowds and the consensus forecast
responsible algorithms in business: robots, fake news, spyware, self-driving cars and corporate responsibility
from economic crisis to crisis in economics
what is key for the oecd in 2017? an open economy perspective
oecd social media
search
archives
subscribe via email
just published
oecd insights series
oecd links
rss
H3
share this:
share this:
share this:
share this:
share this:
share this:
share this:
H4
H5
H6
strong
useful links
useful links
useful links
 
 
useful links
useful links
useful links
useful links
b
i
em useful links
useful links
useful links
 
 
useful links
useful links
useful links
useful links
Bolds strong 9
b 0
i 0
em 9
Zawartość strony internetowej powinno zawierać więcej niż 250 słów, z stopa tekst / kod jest wyższy niż 20%.
Pozycji używać znaczników (h1, h2, h3, ...), aby określić temat sekcji lub ustępów na stronie, ale zwykle, użyj mniej niż 6 dla każdego tagu pozycje zachować swoją stronę zwięzły.
Styl używać silnych i kursywy znaczniki podkreślić swoje słowa kluczowe swojej stronie, ale nie nadużywać (mniej niż 16 silnych tagi i 16 znaczników kursywy)

Statystyki strony

twitter:title pusty
twitter:description pusty
google+ itemprop=name pusty
Pliki zewnętrzne 33
Pliki CSS 9
Pliki javascript 24
Plik należy zmniejszyć całkowite odwołanie plików (CSS + JavaScript) do 7-8 maksymalnie.

Linki wewnętrzne i zewnętrzne

Linki 206
Linki wewnętrzne 18
Linki zewnętrzne 188
Linki bez atrybutu Title 174
Linki z atrybutem NOFOLLOW 0
Linki - Użyj atrybutu tytuł dla każdego łącza. Nofollow link jest link, który nie pozwala wyszukiwarkom boty zrealizują są odnośniki no follow. Należy zwracać uwagę na ich użytkowania

Linki wewnętrzne

skip to content #content
more #
more #
more #
more #
[1] #_ftn1
[2] #_ftn2
[3] #_ftn3
[1] #_ftnref1
[2] #_ftnref2
[3] #_ftnref3
more #
more #
more #
- http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/environment/sustainable-development_9789264055742-en
- http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/social-issues-migration-health/international-migration_9789264055780-en
- http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/economics/oecd-insights_19936753
cancel #cancel

Linki zewnętrzne

- http://oecdinsights.org
home http://oecdinsights.org
glossary http://oecdinsights.org/glossary/
about http://oecdinsights.org/about-2/
contact http://oecdinsights.org/contact-us/
disclaimer http://oecdinsights.org/disclaimer/
the aid community should stop pretending to know the answers and start asking the right questions. http://oecdinsights.org/2017/01/20/aid-and-complexity/
complexity http://oecdinsights.org/tag/complexity/
development theory http://oecdinsights.org/tag/development-theory/
- http://www.oecd.org/naec
jorge moreira da silva https://www.oecd.org/dac/jorge-moreira-da-silva-cv.htm
dcd-dac http://www.oecd.org/dac/
the wealth of nations, http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/3300
traditionally https://mitpress.mit.edu/books/elusive-quest-growth
complexity thinking https://global.oup.com/academic/product/aid-on-the-edge-of-chaos-9780199578023?cc=fr&lang=en&
the capabilities http://tannerlectures.utah.edu/_documents/a-to-z/s/sen80.pdf
complex adaptive system http://www.cgdev.org/media/implications-complexity-development-owen-barder
each local context http://www.pooreconomics.com/
it is often unclear http://www.ids.ac.uk/publication/navigating-complexity-in-international-development-facilitating-sustainable-change-at-scale
the oecd and the sustainable development goals http://www.oecd.org/dac/sustainable-development-goals.htm
29/09 morning http://oecdtv.webtv-solution.com/2926/or/naec-workshop-on-complexity-and-policy.html
29/09 afternoon http://oecdtv.webtv-solution.com/2928/or/naec-workshop-on-complexity-and-policy.html
30/09 morning http://oecdtv.webtv-solution.com/2929/or/naec-workshop-on-complexity-and-policy.html
tweet https://twitter.com/share
print http://oecdinsights.org/2017/01/20/aid-and-complexity/
share on tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/share/link/?url=http%3a%2f%2foecdinsights.org%2f2017%2f01%2f20%2faid-and-complexity%2f&name=the%20aid%20community%20should%20stop%20pretending%20to%20know%20the%20answers%20and%20start%20asking%20the%20right%20questions.
email http://oecdinsights.org/2017/01/20/aid-and-complexity/?share=email
pocket https://getpocket.com/save
leave a comment http://oecdinsights.org/2017/01/20/aid-and-complexity/#respond
insights http://oecdinsights.org/category/insights/
new approaches to economic challenges http://oecdinsights.org/category/naec/
turning groundwater into farmers’ underground insurance against climate change http://oecdinsights.org/2017/01/19/groundwater-agriculture-climate-change/
agriculture http://oecdinsights.org/tag/agriculture/
climate change http://oecdinsights.org/tag/climate-change/
water resources http://oecdinsights.org/tag/water-resources/
- http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/agriculture-and-food/drying-wells-rising-stakes_9789264238701-en
oecd trade and agriculture directorate. http://www.oecd.org/tad/sustainable-agriculture/wateruseinagriculture.htm
#gffa https://twitter.com/hashtag/gffa?src=hash
panel discussion on groundwater and agriculture at the global forum for food and agriculture (gffa) 2017 http://www.gffa-berlin.de/en/fachpodium6-2017/
- https://i2.wp.com/oecdinsights.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/groundwater.jpg
here http://www.gffa-berlin.de/en/fachpodium6-2017/
here http://www.oecd.org/tad/sustainable-agriculture/groundwater-use.htm
here http://www.oecd.org/tad/sustainable-agriculture/wateruseinagriculture.htm
here http://www.ifpri.org/topic/water-policy
tweet https://twitter.com/share
print http://oecdinsights.org/2017/01/19/groundwater-agriculture-climate-change/
share on tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/share/link/?url=http%3a%2f%2foecdinsights.org%2f2017%2f01%2f19%2fgroundwater-agriculture-climate-change%2f&name=turning%20groundwater%20into%20farmers%e2%80%99%20underground%20insurance%20against%20climate%20change
email http://oecdinsights.org/2017/01/19/groundwater-agriculture-climate-change/?share=email
pocket https://getpocket.com/save
leave a comment http://oecdinsights.org/2017/01/19/groundwater-agriculture-climate-change/#respond
insights http://oecdinsights.org/category/insights/
borders and networks: the forgotten elements of development http://oecdinsights.org/2017/01/17/borders-and-networks-the-forgotten-elements-of-development/
border regions http://oecdinsights.org/tag/border-regions/
development http://oecdinsights.org/tag/development/
- http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264265875-en
swac http://www.oecd.org/swac/
cross-border co-operation and policy networks in west africa http://www.oecd.org/swac/cross-border-co-operation-and-policy-networks-in-west-africa-9789264265875-en.htm
- https://i1.wp.com/oecdinsights.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/cross-border-cooperation-potential-eng.jpg
african union border programme (aubp) http://aubis.peaceau.org/home
african borderlands research network (aborne) http://www.aborne.org/index.php
association of european border regions (aebr) http://www.aebr.eu/en/index.php
borderless west africa – removing trade barriers in west africa http://www.borderlesswa.com/
cross-border co-operation gateway (mot) http://www.espaces-transfrontaliers.org/en/no_cache/resources/portail-documentaire/
enda-diapol http://www.endadiapol.org/
local cross-border initiative (lobi/uncdf) http://www.uncdf.org/en/local-cross-border-initiative
department of border region studies at the university of southern denmark (sdu) http://www.sdu.dk/en/om_sdu/institutter_centre/i_graenseforskning
african governance and space (afrigos) programme at the centre for african studies, university of edinburgh http://www.cas.ed.ac.uk/research/grants_and_projects/afrigos
tweet https://twitter.com/share
print http://oecdinsights.org/2017/01/17/borders-and-networks-the-forgotten-elements-of-development/
share on tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/share/link/?url=http%3a%2f%2foecdinsights.org%2f2017%2f01%2f17%2fborders-and-networks-the-forgotten-elements-of-development%2f&name=borders%20and%20networks%3a%20the%20forgotten%20elements%20of%20development
email http://oecdinsights.org/2017/01/17/borders-and-networks-the-forgotten-elements-of-development/?share=email
pocket https://getpocket.com/save
leave a comment http://oecdinsights.org/2017/01/17/borders-and-networks-the-forgotten-elements-of-development/#respond
insights http://oecdinsights.org/category/insights/
should we rely on economic forecasts? the wisdom of the crowds and the consensus forecast http://oecdinsights.org/2017/01/16/wisdom-of-crowds-and-consensus-forecast/
complexity http://oecdinsights.org/tag/complexity/
economic forecasting http://oecdinsights.org/tag/economic-forecasting/
- https://twitter.com/focuseconomics
focuseconomics http://www.focus-economics.com/
- https://i1.wp.com/oecdinsights.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/malaysia-forecast.jpg
- https://i2.wp.com/oecdinsights.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/malaysia-2.jpg
oecd forecasting methods and analytical tools http://www.oecd.org/eco/outlook/forecastingmethodsandanalyticaltools.htm
oecd economic outlook, analysis and forecasts http://www.oecd.org/eco/outlook/
combining forecasts: a review and annotated bibliography http://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeeintfor/v_3a5_3ay_3a1989_3ai_3a4_3ap_3a559-583.htm
tweet https://twitter.com/share
print http://oecdinsights.org/2017/01/16/wisdom-of-crowds-and-consensus-forecast/
share on tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/share/link/?url=http%3a%2f%2foecdinsights.org%2f2017%2f01%2f16%2fwisdom-of-crowds-and-consensus-forecast%2f&name=should%20we%20rely%20on%20economic%20forecasts%3f%20the%20wisdom%20of%20the%20crowds%20and%20the%20consensus%20forecast
email http://oecdinsights.org/2017/01/16/wisdom-of-crowds-and-consensus-forecast/?share=email
pocket https://getpocket.com/save
leave a comment http://oecdinsights.org/2017/01/16/wisdom-of-crowds-and-consensus-forecast/#respond
insights http://oecdinsights.org/category/insights/
new approaches to economic challenges http://oecdinsights.org/category/naec/
responsible algorithms in business: robots, fake news, spyware, self-driving cars and corporate responsibility http://oecdinsights.org/2017/01/13/responsible-algorithms-in-business/
algorithms http://oecdinsights.org/tag/algorithms/
digital economy http://oecdinsights.org/tag/digital-economy/
responsible business conduct http://oecdinsights.org/tag/responsible-business-conduct/
- https://i1.wp.com/oecdinsights.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/algorithms.jpg
@nieuwenkamp_csr https://twitter.com/nieuwenkamp_csr
flash crash https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2010_flash_crash#evidence_of_market_manipulation_and_arrest
fake news http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/fact-checking-wont-save-us-from-fake-news/
pizzagate http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/12/10/business/media/pizzagate.html
expert group https://www.hrw.org/news/2016/12/16/un-key-action-killer-robots
campaign https://www.stopkillerrobots.org/
can make decisions https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/aug/22/self-driving-cars-moral-dilemmas
top 9 ethical issues in artificial intelligence https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/10/top-10-ethical-issues-in-artificial-intelligence/
if hollywood has taught us anything, it’s that robots need ethics https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/12/robot-ethics-doing-the-right-thing-as-well-as-not-doing-the-wrong-thing
principles for accountable algorithms https://www.technologyreview.com/s/602933/how-to-hold-algorithms-accountable/
openai https://openai.com/about/
partnership on artificial intelligence to benefit people & society https://www.partnershiponai.org/
oecd guidelines for multinational enterprises http://mneguidelines.oecd.org/guidelines/
submitted a complaint to the uk national contact point (ncp https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/402462/bis-15-93-final_statement_after_examination_of_complaint_privacy_international_and_gamma_international_uk_ltd.pdf
guide http://www.shiftproject.org/publication/european-commission-ict-sector-guide
assessing cyber security export risks https://www.techuk.org/insights/news/item/2816-cyber-export-guidance
how corporations can avoid assisting repressive regimes https://www.eff.org/wp/human-rights-and-technology-sales
principles on freedom of expression and privacy https://globalnetworkinitiative.org/principles/index.php
there’s an algorithm for that. or there soon will be http://oecdinsights.org/2016/05/18/theres-an-algorithm-for-that-or-there-soon-will-be/
tweet https://twitter.com/share
print http://oecdinsights.org/2017/01/13/responsible-algorithms-in-business/
share on tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/share/link/?url=http%3a%2f%2foecdinsights.org%2f2017%2f01%2f13%2fresponsible-algorithms-in-business%2f&name=responsible%20algorithms%20in%20business%3a%20robots%2c%20fake%20news%2c%20spyware%2c%20self-driving%20cars%20and%20corporate%20responsibility
email http://oecdinsights.org/2017/01/13/responsible-algorithms-in-business/?share=email
pocket https://getpocket.com/save
1 comment http://oecdinsights.org/2017/01/13/responsible-algorithms-in-business/#comments
insights http://oecdinsights.org/category/insights/
from economic crisis to crisis in economics http://oecdinsights.org/2017/01/11/from-economic-crisis-to-crisis-in-economics/
complexity http://oecdinsights.org/tag/complexity/
economics http://oecdinsights.org/tag/economics/
- http://www.oecd.org/naec
andy haldane http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/about/pages/people/biographies/haldane.aspx
system of systems https://www.crcpress.com/case-studies-in-system-of-systems-enterprise-systems-and-complex-systems/gorod-white-ireland-gandhi-sauser/p/book/9781466502390
herbert simon in the architecture of complexity http://oecdinsights.org/2016/12/28/a-pragmatic-holist-herbert-simon-economics-and-the-architecture-of-complexity/
http://oecdinsights.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/andy_haldane-naec-oecd.mp4 http://oecdinsights.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/andy_haldane-naec-oecd.mp4
naec roundtable http://oecdtv.oecd.org/3336/or/naec-roundtable.html
the gls shackle biennial memorial lecture http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/publications/pages/speeches/2016/937.aspx
on microscopes and telescopes http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/publications/pages/speeches/2015/812.aspx
29/09 morning http://oecdtv.webtv-solution.com/2926/or/naec-workshop-on-complexity-and-policy.html
29/09 afternoon http://oecdtv.webtv-solution.com/2928/or/naec-workshop-on-complexity-and-policy.html
30/09 morning http://oecdtv.webtv-solution.com/2929/or/naec-workshop-on-complexity-and-policy.html
tweet https://twitter.com/share
print http://oecdinsights.org/2017/01/11/from-economic-crisis-to-crisis-in-economics/
share on tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/share/link/?url=http%3a%2f%2foecdinsights.org%2f2017%2f01%2f11%2ffrom-economic-crisis-to-crisis-in-economics%2f&name=from%20economic%20crisis%20to%20crisis%20in%20economics
email http://oecdinsights.org/2017/01/11/from-economic-crisis-to-crisis-in-economics/?share=email
pocket https://getpocket.com/save
4 comments http://oecdinsights.org/2017/01/11/from-economic-crisis-to-crisis-in-economics/#comments
insights http://oecdinsights.org/category/insights/
new approaches to economic challenges http://oecdinsights.org/category/naec/
what is key for the oecd in 2017? an open economy perspective http://oecdinsights.org/2017/01/10/what-is-key-for-the-oecd-in-2017-an-open-economy-perspective/
digital economy http://oecdinsights.org/tag/digital-economy/
international cooperation http://oecdinsights.org/tag/international-cooperation/
trade http://oecdinsights.org/tag/trade/
-noe van hulst https://www.oecd.org/netherlands/netherlands-ambassador.htm
german council of economic experts https://www.sachverstaendigenrat-wirtschaft.de/index.html?&l=1
structural reforms http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/economics/the-short-term-impact-of-product-market-reforms_5jlv2jm07djl-en
more inclusive http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/economics/the-distributional-impact-of-structural-reforms_5jln041nkpwc-en
mitigate trade-offs http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/economics/enhancing-economic-flexibility_b8558a5b-en
natural http://www.ggdc.net/publications/memorandum/gd162.pdf
rebalance our trade and investment policies http://oecdinsights.org/2016/10/18/from-a-free-trade-regime-to-a-responsible-trade-and-investment-regime/
“trampoline” policies http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fandd/2016/12/obstfeld.htm
financial times https://www.ft.com/content/ef13e61a-ccec-11e6-b8ce-b9c03770f8b1
openness http://www.iccwbo.org/global-influence/g20/reports-and-products/open-markets-index/
oecd global economic outlook, november 2016 http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/economics/oecd-economic-outlook-volume-2016-issue-2_eco_outlook-v2016-2-en
tweet https://twitter.com/share
print http://oecdinsights.org/2017/01/10/what-is-key-for-the-oecd-in-2017-an-open-economy-perspective/
share on tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/share/link/?url=http%3a%2f%2foecdinsights.org%2f2017%2f01%2f10%2fwhat-is-key-for-the-oecd-in-2017-an-open-economy-perspective%2f&name=what%20is%20key%20for%20the%20oecd%20in%202017%3f%20%20an%20open%20economy%20perspective
email http://oecdinsights.org/2017/01/10/what-is-key-for-the-oecd-in-2017-an-open-economy-perspective/?share=email
pocket https://getpocket.com/save
2 comments http://oecdinsights.org/2017/01/10/what-is-key-for-the-oecd-in-2017-an-open-economy-perspective/#comments
insights http://oecdinsights.org/category/insights/
« older entries http://oecdinsights.org/page/2/
- http://www.youtube.com/user/oecden
- http://twitter.com/oecd
- http://www.facebook.com/theoecd
- http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/social-issues-migration-health/income-inequality_9789264246010-en
- http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/human-capital_9789264029095-en
- http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/trade/international-trade_9789264060265-en
- http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/finance-and-investment/from-crisis-to-recovery_9789264077072-en
- http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/economics/oecd-insights_19936753
- http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/economics/economic-globalisation_9789264111905-en
oecd ilibrary http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/
oecd home page http://www.oecd.org
educationtoday http://oecdeducationtoday.blogspot.com/
observatory of public sector innovation (opsi) blog https://www.oecd.org/governance/observatory-public-sector-innovation/blog/#?hf=10&b=0&sl=opsi_blog&s=desc(opsi_date)
progblog http://theblogprogress.blogspot.com/
oecd skills and work https://oecdskillsandwork.wordpress.com/
development matters https://oecd-development-matters.org/
- http://oecdinsights.org/feed/
vigilance theme http://thethemefoundry.com/vigilance/
the theme foundry http://thethemefoundry.com

Zdjęcia

Zdjęcia 26
Zdjęcia bez atrybutu ALT 13
Zdjęcia bez atrybutu TITLE 26
Korzystanie Obraz ALT i TITLE atrybutu dla każdego obrazu.

Zdjęcia bez atrybutu TITLE

http://oecdinsights.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/oecd-insights-logo21.png
https://i1.wp.com/oecdinsights.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/naec.jpg?resize=200%2c244
https://i1.wp.com/oecdinsights.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/drying-wells.jpg?resize=172%2c231
https://i2.wp.com/oecdinsights.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/groundwater.jpg?resize=595%2c317
https://i0.wp.com/oecdinsights.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/cross-border-cooperation.jpg?resize=163%2c220
https://i1.wp.com/oecdinsights.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/cross-border-cooperation-potential-eng.jpg?resize=595%2c411
https://i1.wp.com/oecdinsights.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/focus-economics-300x300.png?resize=166%2c166
https://i1.wp.com/oecdinsights.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/malaysia-forecast.jpg?resize=500%2c598
https://i2.wp.com/oecdinsights.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/malaysia-2.jpg?resize=500%2c598
https://i1.wp.com/oecdinsights.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/algorithms.jpg?resize=240%2c160
https://i1.wp.com/oecdinsights.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/naec.jpg?resize=200%2c244
https://i0.wp.com/oecdinsights.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/symbol_10cm.jpg?resize=175%2c113
http://augbeck.files.wordpress.com/2010/10/youtube_logo1.png
http://augbeck.files.wordpress.com/2010/10/twitter_logo_jpg.gif
http://oecdinsights.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/facebook-icon.png
http://oecdinsights.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/income-inequality_9789264246010-en.jpg
http://augbeck.files.wordpress.com/2009/12/hum-cap.jpg
http://augbeck.files.wordpress.com/2009/12/sd2.jpg
http://augbeck.files.wordpress.com/2009/12/trade.jpg
http://augbeck.files.wordpress.com/2009/12/migration.jpg
http://augbeck.files.wordpress.com/2010/01/fisheries-e1263895317762.jpg
http://augbeck.files.wordpress.com/2012/08/crisis-recovery1.jpg
http://oecdinsights.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/aid-to-development-e1367248291221.jpg
http://oecdinsights.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/globalisation-insights-cover-e1434550941493.jpg
http://oecdinsights.org/wp-content/plugins/jetpack/images/rss/red-medium.png
http://oecdinsights.org/wp-content/plugins/jetpack/modules/sharedaddy/images/loading.gif

Zdjęcia bez atrybutu ALT

http://oecdinsights.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/oecd-insights-logo21.png
https://i1.wp.com/oecdinsights.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/naec.jpg?resize=200%2c244
https://i1.wp.com/oecdinsights.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/drying-wells.jpg?resize=172%2c231
https://i2.wp.com/oecdinsights.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/groundwater.jpg?resize=595%2c317
https://i0.wp.com/oecdinsights.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/cross-border-cooperation.jpg?resize=163%2c220
https://i1.wp.com/oecdinsights.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/cross-border-cooperation-potential-eng.jpg?resize=595%2c411
https://i1.wp.com/oecdinsights.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/focus-economics-300x300.png?resize=166%2c166
https://i1.wp.com/oecdinsights.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/malaysia-forecast.jpg?resize=500%2c598
https://i2.wp.com/oecdinsights.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/malaysia-2.jpg?resize=500%2c598
https://i1.wp.com/oecdinsights.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/algorithms.jpg?resize=240%2c160
https://i1.wp.com/oecdinsights.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/naec.jpg?resize=200%2c244
https://i0.wp.com/oecdinsights.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/symbol_10cm.jpg?resize=175%2c113
http://oecdinsights.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/income-inequality_9789264246010-en.jpg

Ranking:


Alexa Traffic
Daily Global Rank Trend
Daily Reach (Percent)









Majestic SEO











Text on page:

skip to content home glossary about contact disclaimer the aid community should stop pretending to know the answers and start asking the right questions. 20 january 2017 tags: complexity, development theory by guest author frans lammersen and jorge moreira da silva (director) oecd development co-operation directorate – dcd-dac in the wealth of nations, adam smith wrote that: “little else is requisite to carry a state to the highest degree of opulence from the lowest barbarism but peace, easy taxes, and a tolerable administration of justice: all the rest being brought about by natural course of things.” others were less optimistic. they argued that nations are rich or poor because of differences in religion, culture, endowments, and/or geography. modern economic development theories originate from thinking about how to reconstruct europe in the aftermath of world war ii. the european recovery program – or the marshall plan – was based on the notion that economic growth can be stifled by local institutions and social attitudes, especially if these influence the domestic savings and investments rate. according to this linear growth model, a correctly-designed massive injection of capital coupled with public sector intervention to address market failures would ultimately lead to industrialisation and economic development. many other economic development theories have since followed, but none have been able to explain convincingly why some countries experience rapid economic growth and others not. the development community has continued its quest for the missing ingredient to ignite economic growth. candidates have included capital, technology, policies, institutions, better politics, and market integration. every time we think we have identified what’s missing, we find that it is actually not something which can be provided from outside, but turns out to be an endogenous characteristic of the system itself. traditionally, development assistance has been rooted in a type of engineering, mass production, conveyor belt mentality, with agencies promoting “silver bullet” solutions for such complex problems as eradicating malaria, reducing vulnerability, improving resilience, strengthening connectivity etc. unfortunately, piecemeal or one step at a time development programmes often failed to deliver. increasingly, complexity thinking – a way of understanding how elements of systems interact and change over time – has found its way into the development discourse. after all, what could be more complex than promoting development, sustainability, human rights, peace, and governance? we should think of the economy and society as being composed of a rich set of interactions between large numbers of adaptive agents, all of which are coevolving. based on this approach development is not just an increase in outputs, but the emergence of an interlinked system of economic, financial, legal, social and political institutions, firms, products and technologies. together these elements and their interaction provide citizens with the capabilities to live happy, healthy and fulfilling lives. once we look at development as the outcome of a complex adaptive system instead of the sum of what happens to the people and firms, we will get better insights into how we can help accelerate and shape development. we would be more effective if we assess development challenges through this prism of complex adaptive systems. this could yield important insights about how best to prioritise, design and deliver holistic development programmes for achieving the multiple goals of inclusiveness, sustainability and economic growth that underpin the 2030 sustainable development agenda. there is increasing support in aid agencies for the idea that solutions to complex problems must evolve, through trial and error – and that successful programmes are likely to be different for each local context, with its particular history, natural resources and webs of social relations. the key for anyone engaged in the aid business is to put their own preconceived ideas aside and first observe, map, and listen carefully to identify the areas where change for the better is already happening and then try to encourage and nurture that change further. complexity matters particularly when the knowledge and capacities required for tackling problems are spread across actors without strong, formalised institutional links. inherent to many complex problems are divergent interests, conflicting goals or competing narratives. moreover, it is often unclear how to achieve a given objective in a specific context, or change processes that involve significant, unpredictable forces. at the same time, it is important to emphasise that the counsel of complexity should not be taken as a counsel of despair for development. there has been immense social and economic progress, and development assistance has found to be helpful overall. development co-operation has contributed to achieving economic objectives by helping developing countries connect their firms to international markets; to achieving social objectives by making globalisation pro-poor and reducing inequalities; and to environmental objectives by adapting to climate change while exploiting comparative advantages. not all development challenges are inherently complex though. for those that are, complexity should not be used as an excuse for fatalism and inertia. instead we should strive to promote innovation, experimentation and renewal. we should build partnerships to learn about the past, allowing us to shape approaches that are more likely to work and that are owned by the people we are trying to help. they will tell us what is working and what is not. together we should build a narrative for change involving many different voices and perspectives. we should also be modest and realise that it might better to start small and learn and adapt as we go along in iterative processes of dialogue. we should keep looking for change, scanning widely for new factors emerging in the wider world; listen to a wide range of opinions to be better able to anticipate and adapt and seize opportunities. embracing complexity where it matters will allow us to contribute more effectively to the 2030 sustainable development agenda. useful links the oecd and the sustainable development goals the oecd organised a workshop on complexity and policy, 29-30 september 2016, at oecd hq, paris, along with the european commission and inet. watch the webcast: 29/09 morning; 29/09 afternoon; 30/09 morning share this:tweetprintmoreshare on tumblremailpocket leave a comment from → insights, new approaches to economic challenges turning groundwater into farmers’ underground insurance against climate change 19 january 2017 tags: agriculture, climate change, water resources by guest author robert akam and guillaume gruère, oecd trade and agriculture directorate. follow the global forum for food and agriculture (gffa) at #gffa despite the recent drought in california, farms have continued to supply water-intensive crops such as fruits and nuts to consumers both in the us and around the world. doing so has not always been easy for farmers – or for the environment. agricultural producers turned to groundwater to irrigate their crops, a change made so intensively that in some parts of the state the ground started sinking because the water table had fallen so much. the south-western united states is not an isolated case. the green fields of india’s punjab state hide a similar problem. groundwater supplies around 60% of india’s water needs for agriculture but the country suffers from depletion and pollution of this water resource in approximately 60% of its states. in punjab, india’s breadbasket, demand for water already outstrips supply by 38%. these countries are only examples of a growing global policy challenge. the disruption that climate change poses to water supplies in many parts of the world only increases the importance of correctly managing this resource. getting groundwater policy right could ensure that farmers have supplies of water to last them through dry periods. the oecd and the international food policy research institute (ifpri) have organised a panel discussion on groundwater and agriculture at the global forum for food and agriculture (gffa) 2017 on friday 20 january in berlin. the speakers will discuss how this vital resource for agriculture around the world can be properly managed to ensure that policy decisions taken today will protection future food production. the outcomes of the discussion will feed into the following day’s gffa meeting of agriculture ministers where the topic of water and agriculture will be discussed. groundwater supplies need to be properly managed because this resource has the potential to provide a reliable, on-demand source of water to irrigate crops, and has become central to agricultural production in a range of countries. groundwater accounts for over 40% of global irrigation on almost 40% of irrigated land and has become indispensable for agriculture production in many countries. it accounts for half of south asia’s irrigation and supports two-thirds of grain crops produced in china. oecd countries alone extract an estimated 123.5 km3 of groundwater each year to irrigate semi-arid areas. this heavy use of groundwater has become unsustainable in many regions. high rates of extraction may boost production today but doing so also causes problems such as land subsidence, salinisation, and other forms of land and water quality degradation. these knock-on effects may be putting global food security at risk. already a number of oecd regions are facing challenges in pumping water out of the ground. a quarter of surveyed irrigating regions in the oecd that use groundwater are seeing a major reduction in well yields as well as significant increases in pumping costs (see figure 1). importantly, there are efforts that policy makers can implement that can ensure that groundwater can continue to feed billions of people around the world. “you can’t manage what you can’t measure” has become a mantra for groundwater campaigners in california. the same approach must be applied in countries around the world. greater information needs to be collected about stocks and flows over time – data without which it becomes almost impossible to implement effective management. and where groundwater stresses are identified, governments must put in places measures that not only reduce water demand, but also take into account how surface and groundwater interact. these measures would go some way to preventing collapses in water supply for agriculture. excess groundwater demand in punjab could be curbed by providing information on best practice to farmers and by realigning economic incentives away from electricity and crop subsidies and instead encouraging sustainable irrigation systems. a locally-focused package of regulatory, economic and collective-action approaches should be introduced in areas of intensive groundwater usage. this package should support a well-defined groundwater entitlement system, incentive efficient resource use and, importantly, involve the local users. in california, the state government introduced the 2014 sustainable groundwater management act, under which local agencies are being formed that will develop regionally-specific and long-term water management programmes with defined sustainability objectives. groundwater has the potential to act as a natural insurance mechanism for farmers, so that they are not reliant on surface water to continue to produce in times of drought. this resource would support them in an increasingly volatile climate and allow us to keep producing the food demanded by a growing global population. useful links more information on the gffa panel discussion can be found here together with a list of the speakers. the oecd’s review of groundwater policies in agriculture, which includes 16 country profiles, can be found here an overview of the oecd’s work on water use in agriculture can be found here. ifpri’s work on water policy can be found here. share this:tweetprintmoreshare on tumblremailpocket leave a comment from → insights borders and networks: the forgotten elements of development 17 january 2017 tags: border regions, development by guest author download the report laurent bossard, director, oecd sahel and west africa club (swac) secretariat the latest swac/oecd publication cross-border co-operation and policy networks in west africa addresses the crucial but often overlooked issue of cross-border co-operation, employing an analytical approach sparsely used in the development field and in west africa in particular – social network analysis. these two unique features of the publication make for enriching reading. more than 46% of west africa’s agglomerations and over half of the west african urban population are located within 100 km of a border. in fact no place in benin, the gambia, guinea bissau or togo is more than 100 km from a border, and these border areas cover two-thirds of guinea, senegal and sierra leone, and more than half of burkina faso and ghana, as well as being home to the vast majority of the mauritanian and niger populations. these figures show us the importance that we should place on border and cross-border dynamics, particularly in relation to the development of agro-pastoral and food security, health-related education, the management and preservation of the environment, and of course, security issues. the only things that stop at borders are national policies. the rest passes through: goods, information, people; but also crises and instabilities. people living close to borders, their networks, villages and towns are the foundations of powerful, transnational processes of de facto regional integration, whilst de jure integration continues to struggle with implementation challenges. the idea of reconciling “bottom-up” integration with “top-down” integration through cross-border co-operation policies is slowly progressing. cross-border co-operation, promoted at the turn of the century by former malian president alpha oumar konaré, now benefits from programmes led by the african union commission, ecowas and uemoa, whilst a number of international initiatives are also underway. however, this approach remains marginal in the public policies of west african countries and in the portfolios of development co-operation institutions, due largely to the persistence of legal and financial constraints. it is true that these initiatives are taking place in a context marked by an upsurge in transnational terrorism, which, as in mali, nigeria and the lake chad basin, encourages the international community and african countries to attach increasing importance to the security of borders. more than ever, border control is a crucial issue for the stability of states and the prosperity of west africans. as underscored by the international organization for migration’s (iom) recent report on the management of mali’s borders, a new balance must be found “between control and free movement so that border areas can fully facilitate integration and peace”. but for this to happen, the co-operation potential of border regions and the functioning of public policy networks that enable the collaboration of cross-border actors must be known. there are many publications that describe cross-border dynamics. however, few studies have attempted to systematically map the regions that are most favourable to cross-border co-operation, or to visualise the structure of co-operation networks. the analysis of cross-border policy networks presented in this publication is a welcome development for all actors involved in cross-border co-operation in west africa. it highlights, for the first time, how cross-border governance networks are organised, how information circulates between partners of different natures, and who are the most central actors, thus facilitating an understanding of these largely informal dynamics. beyond the academic field, social network analysis is also an empowering tool for local communities and non-governmental organisations, as well as an operational tool for international organisations and governments. social network analysis is also pertinent for understanding the functioning of cross-border co-operation networks as it illustrates the complexity of both the relationships that exist between actors and their geographical locations, particularly when networks operate across borders. furthermore, by providing information at a more detailed and geographically local level, the analysis is more relevant for local actors and the conditions they operate within, enabling local characteristics to be accounted for within national and international strategies. future african public policies must utilise this approach to better match local realities. at the same time, public policies need to better integrate border areas where there is significant potential for development and regional integration. useful links african union border programme (aubp) african borderlands research network (aborne) association of european border regions (aebr) borderless west africa – removing trade barriers in west africa cross-border co-operation gateway (mot) enda-diapol local cross-border initiative (lobi/uncdf) department of border region studies at the university of southern denmark (sdu) african governance and space (afrigos) programme at the centre for african studies, university of edinburgh share this:tweetprintmoreshare on tumblremailpocket leave a comment from → insights should we rely on economic forecasts? the wisdom of the crowds and the consensus forecast 16 january 2017 tags: complexity, economic forecasting by guest author brian dowd, focuseconomics laurence j. peter, a canadian educator and author, is often referenced as saying, “an economist is an expert who will know tomorrow why the things he predicted yesterday didn’t happen today.” economics and especially economic forecasting are often given a bad rap. many people think of forecasting as akin to licking a finger and testing the wind. however, there is a science to it. forecasting is essentially attempting to predict the future and predicting the future behavior of anything, much less something as complex and enormous as an entire economy, is not an easy task, to say the least. accurate forecasts, therefore, are often in short supply. there are a few reasons for this; the first being that economies are in perpetual motion and therefore extrapolating behaviors and relationships from past economic cycles into the next one is, as one might imagine, tremendously complicated. the second reason, and perhaps the most surprising, has to do with the vast amount of raw economic data available. in an ideal world, economic forecasts would consider all of the information available. in the real world, however, that is nearly impossible, as information is scattered in myriad news articles, press releases, government communications, along with the aforementioned mountain of raw data. although some might consider having all of that information an advantage, nothing could be further from the truth. the thousands of economic indicators and data available tend to produce a vast amount of statistical noise, making the establishment of meaningful relations of causation between variables a serious challenge. and, of course, we cannot forget the uncertainty that is inherent with forecasting, something that forecasters must take into account and which creates even more noise to deal with. the question then becomes, is there a way to cancel out all of that noise to get a more accurate forecast? this is where the wisdom of the crowds comes in. is there wisdom in the crowds? to illustrate how the wisdom of the crowds works, it’s best to tell the story of sir francis galton, a victorian polymath, who was the first to note the wisdom of the crowds at a livestock fair he visited in 1906. in one event, fairgoers were given the opportunity to guess the weight of an ox. the person with the closest guess to the actual weight would win a prize. galton hypothesized that not one person would get the answer right, but that everyone would get it right. bear with me. over 750 participants made their guesses and unsurprisingly no one guessed the weight perfectly. however, when galton calculated the mean average of all of the guesses, incredibly, it turned out to be the exact weight of the ox: 1,198 pounds. tapping economic analysts’ wisdom with consensus forecasts the basic idea of the wisdom of the crowds is that the average of the answers of a group of individuals is often more accurate than the answer of any one individual expert. this was evident in the story of galton’s experiment at the fair. for the wisdom of the crowds to be more accurate, it depends on the number of participants and the diversity of the expertise of each individual participant. the more participants involved and the more diverse the participants are, the lower the margin of error. so what does the wisdom of the crowds have to do with economic forecasting? remember all of that noise that makes economic forecasting so difficult and as a result affects the accuracy of forecasts? the theory is that idiosyncratic noise is associated with any one individual answer and by taking the average of multiple answers, the noise tends to cancel itself out, presenting a far more accurate picture of the situation. sometimes also referred to as simply combining forecasts, the consensus forecast borrows from the same idea of galton’s wisdom of the crowds – a consensus forecast is essentially the average of forecasts from various sources. averaging multiple forecasts cancels out the statistical noise to yield a more accurate forecast. but don’t take my word for it. over the last few decades there has been a great deal of empirical research that has shown consensus forecasts to increase forecast accuracy, including those cited below. with that said, it is possible for an individual forecast to beat the consensus, however, it is unlikely that the same forecaster will consistently do so one forecast period after another. moreover, those individual forecasts that do happen to beat the consensus in one period are impossible to pick out ahead of time since they vary significantly from period to period. taking a look at a practical example may serve to clear things up a bit further. a practical example of a consensus forecast in the graph above, the consensus forecast for malaysia’s 2015 gdp taken in january 2015 was 5.1%. all the other points, marked in grey, along the same axis represent the individual forecasts from 25 prominent sources taken at the same time. in march 2016, the actual reading came out at 5.0%. a few forecasts were closer to the end result, however, as mentioned previously, some individual forecasts are going to beat the consensus from time to time, but it won’t happen consistently and it would be impossible to know which forecasts those will be until after the fact. the second graph uses the same example as before; 25 different economic analysts forecasted malaysia’s 2015 gdp in january of 2015. by march 2016, the maximum forecast turned out to be 16% above the actual reading with the minimum 10% below the actual reading. the consensus was only 1.9% above the actual reading. by taking the average of all forecasts, the upside and downside errors of the different forecasts mostly cancelled each other out. as a result, the consensus forecast was much closer to the actual reading than the majority of the individual forecasts. consistency and reducing the margin of error are key the point to keep in mind is that whether they are consensus forecasts or individual forecasts or any other kind of forecast, predicting the future is seldom going to be perfect. in the malaysia gdp example, the consensus wasn’t spot on, but it did certainly reduce the margin of error. it is important to note that there is almost always going to be some error, but reducing that error is the key, and more often than not, it will result in a more accurate forecast. the consensus not only reduces the margin of error, but it also provides some consistency and reliability. as was mentioned previously, an individual forecaster can beat the consensus, however, it is impossible to know which of hundreds of forecasts will be the most accurate ahead of time. as is evident in our previous example, the forecasts from individual analysts can vary significantly from one to another, whereas the consensus will consistently provide accurate forecasts. forecasting isn’t perfect, but does it need to be? forecasting is a science, but it isn’t an exact science. they may not be perfect, but forecasts are still very important to businesses and governments, as they shed light on the unforeseen future, helping them to make vital decisions on strategy, plans and budgets. so, should you trust forecasts? that is a tough question to answer. yes, forecasting is complicating and, yes, forecasts are notoriously inaccurate and there are few ways to consistently improve forecast accuracy. the point is, however, that forecasts don’t necessarily need to be perfect to be useful. they just need to be as accurate as possible. one such way to do so is leveraging the wisdom of a crowd of analysts to produce a consensus forecast. as french mathematician, physicist and philosopher henri poincaré put it, “it is far better to foresee even without certainty than not to foresee at all.” the consensus forecast is a more accurate way to “foresee.” useful links oecd forecasting methods and analytical tools oecd economic outlook, analysis and forecasts academic research on consensus forecasts “consider what we have learned about the combination of forecasts over the past twenty years. (…) the results have been virtually unanimous: combining multiple forecasts leads to increased forecast accuracy. this has been the result whether the forecasts are judgmental or statistical, econometric or extrapolation. furthermore, in many cases one can make dramatic performance improvements by simply averaging the forecasts.”- clemen robert t. (1989) “combining forecasts: a review and annotated bibliography” international journal of forecasting 5: 559-560 “a key reason for using forecast combinations […] is that individual forecasts may be differently affected by non-stationaries such as structural breaks caused by institutional change, technological developments or large macroeconomic shocks. […] since it is typically difficult to detect structural breaks in ‘real terms’, it is plausible that on average, across periods with varying degrees of stability, combinations of forecasts from models with different degrees of adaptability may outperform forecasts from individual models.” aiolfi m. and timmermann a. (2004) “structural breaks and the performance of forecast combinations” share this:tweetprintmoreshare on tumblremailpocket leave a comment from → insights, new approaches to economic challenges responsible algorithms in business: robots, fake news, spyware, self-driving cars and corporate responsibility 13 january 2017 tags: algorithms, digital economy, responsible business conduct by guest author roel nieuwenkamp, chair of the oecd working party on responsible business conduct (@nieuwenkamp_csr) why is the topic of robots frequently being raised at recent conferences on responsible business conduct? for example, october last year the polish deputy prime minister noted the connection between robotisation and corporate responsibility during the opening of the conference in warsaw celebrating the 40 years anniversary of the oecd guidelines for responsible business. the potential negative impacts of robots or automated systems have proved cause for concern. in may 2010 there was a trillion dollar stock market crash, a ‘flash crash’, attributed to algorithm trading or in other words: robot investors. and let’s not forget the mathematical models that contributed to the financial crisis of 2007 and 2008. recent events surrounding fake news, with pizzagate as the most extreme example, are also contributing to these concerns. what is the common denominator of these automated systems? algorithms! these rule-based processes for solving mathematical problems are being applied to more and more areas of our daily lives. likely, we are only at the beginning of the era of algorithms and their widespread application is raising many ethical questions for society and businesses in particular. for example “killer robots”, weapons systems that select and attack targets without meaningful human control raise questions about dehumanisation of killing and who is responsible? in december the united nations decided to set up an expert group, in order to look into this issue following a campaign ‘stop killer robots’ by human rights watch and other ngos. while self-driving cars will never be at risk of driving while intoxicated they can make decisions that might pose moral dilemmas for humans. online face recognition technology raises concerns around privacy. these are just a few examples. the pervasiveness of the use of algorithms may result in many unintended consequences. in her book ‘weapons of math destruction’ cathy o’neil describes how algorithms in combination with big data increase inequality and threaten democracy. she provides examples of the financial crisis and the housing market, but also of a college student who does not get a minimum wage job in a grocery store due to answers provided on a personality test, people whose credit card spending limits are lowered because they shopped at certain stores, etc. she also discussed predictive policing models such as those that predict recidivism and algorithms that send police to patrol areas on the basis of crime data, which can have a racist effect because of harmful or self-fulfilling prophecy feedback loops. scholars and practitioners in this field are beginning to consider the ethical implications of application of algorithms. julia bossmann of the foresight institute described her top 9 ethical issues in artificial intelligence. prof susan leigh anderson of the university of connecticut stated: “if hollywood has taught us anything, it’s that robots need ethics.” cathy o’neil proposes a ‘hippocratic oath’ for data scientists. recently a group of scholars developed principles for accountable algorithms. in the private sector elon musk, spacex ceo and other business leaders have founded openai, an r&d company created to address ethical issues related to artificial intelligence. amazon, facebook, deepmind, ibm and microsoft founded a new organisation called the partnership on artificial intelligence to benefit people & society. the partnership seeks to facilitate a dialogue on the nature, purpose of artificial intelligence and its impacts on people and society at large. it is encouraging that certain industry efforts are being undertaken in this area. additionally one thing should be clear for businesses that create and use these technologies: when things go wrong, using algorithms as a scapegoat won’t do the trick. what guidance on these issues can be found in the most important instrument on business ethics, the oecd guidelines for multinational enterprises (mne), a multilateral agreement of 46 states on corporate responsibility. cases brought to national contact points, the globally active complaints mechanism of the guidelines, provide a good illustration of what the guidelines recommend with respect to these issues. for example, in february of 2013 a consortium of ngos led by privacy international (pi) submitted a complaint to the uk national contact point (ncp) alleging that gamma international had supplied a spyware product – finfisher – to agencies of the bahrain government which then used it to target pro-democracy activists. the ncp concluded that gamma had not acted consistently with the provisions of the oecd guidelines requiring enterprises to do appropriate due diligence, to undertake a policy commitment to respect human rights and to remediate human rights impacts. furthermore the company’s approach did not meet with the oecd guidelines’ standards to respect human rights and the engagement of the company with the ncp process was unsatisfactory, particularly in view of the serious nature of the issues. the ncp recommended that the company engage in human rights due diligence. what is human rights due diligence and what does it mean for companies developing algorithms? under the guidelines due diligence is a process that should be carried out by corporations as part of a broader range of actions to respect human rights. the right to privacy, freedom of speech, freedom from torture and arbitrary detention are examples of the many potential human rights that could be impacted. due diligence is the process of identifying, preventing and mitigating actual and potential adverse human rights impacts, and accounting for how these impacts are addressed. if there is a risk of severe human rights impacts a heightened form of due diligence is recommended. for example, significant caution should be taken with regard to the sale and distribution of surveillance technology when the buyer is a government with a poor track record of human rights. due diligence should be applied not only to a company’s activities but across its business relationships. in the context of a company producing algorithms therefore it is not sufficient that they behave responsibly in the context of their own operations but due diligence should also be applied to ensure buyers of the technology are not using it irresponsibly. in instances where this is the case, the company that created and sold the technology is expected to use its leverage in the value chain to prevent or mitigate the impact. a number of valuable tools to respect human rights and implement the ’know your client’ principle have been developed in the context of ict business operations. for example, the european commission has developed a useful guide for companies on respecting human rights in the ict sector. techuk, an industry association of ict companies in the uk, in partnership with the uk government has published a guide on how to design and implement appropriate due diligence processes for assessing cyber security export risks. additionally the electronic frontier foundation has developed a guide on how corporations can avoid assisting repressive regimes and the global network initiative has developed principles on freedom of expression and privacy. beyond the human rights related recommendations, the oecd guidelines make other relevant recommendations for companies developing algorithms. for example the environment chapter recommends environmental, health and safety impact assessments.[1] the consumer chapter advises companies to provide accurate, verifiable and clear information to consumers.[2] in addition companies should respect consumer privacy and take reasonable measures to ensure the security of personal data that they collect, store process or disseminate.[3] businesses that create algorithms should do their due diligence on potential human rights impacts. companies should also carry out due diligence on labour, environmental and health and safety impacts. they should provide accurate verifiable and clear information about their algorithms and take measures to protect personal data. collaborative industry efforts on responsible algorithms are highly needed to shape these expectations in concrete terms. responsible algorithms will not only generate profit, but protect the rights of individuals worldwide while doing so. useful links there’s an algorithm for that. or there soon will be marina bradbury on insights [1] oecd guidelines for multinational enterprises, chapter vi.3 [2] oecd guidelines for multinational enterprises, chapter viii.2 [3] oecd guidelines for multinational enterprises, chapter viii.6 share this:tweetprintmoreshare on tumblremailpocket 1 comment from → insights from economic crisis to crisis in economics 11 january 2017 tags: complexity, economics by guest author andy haldane, chief economist and executive director, monetary analysis & statistics, ​bank of england it would be easy to become very depressed at the state of economics in the current environment. many experts, including economics experts, are simply being ignored. but the economic challenges facing us could not be greater: slowing growth, slowing productivity, the retreat of trade, the retreat of globalisation, high and rising levels of inequality. these are deep and diverse problems facing our societies and we will need deep and diverse frameworks to help understand them and to set policy in response to them. in the pre-crisis environment when things were relatively stable and stationary, our existing frameworks in macroeconomics did a pretty good job of making sense of things. but the world these days is characterised by features such as discontinuities, tipping points, multiple equilibria, and radical uncertainty. so if we are to make economics interesting and the response to the challenges adequate, we need new frameworks that can capture the complexities of modern societies. we are seeing increased interest in using complexity theory to make sense of the dynamics of economic and financial systems. for example, epidemiological models have been used to understand and calibrate regulatory capital standards for the largest, most interconnected banks, the so-called “super-spreaders”. less attention has been placed on using complexity theory to understand the overall architecture of public policy – how the various pieces of the policy jigsaw fit together as a whole in relation to modern economic and financial systems. these systems can be characterised as a complex, adaptive “system of systems”, a nested set of sub-systems, each one itself a complex web. the architecture of a complex system of systems means that policies with varying degrees of magnification are necessary to understand and to moderate fluctuations. it also means that taking account of interactions between these layers is important when gauging risk. although there is no generally-accepted definition of complexity, that proposed by herbert simon in the architecture of complexity – “one made up of a large number of parts that interact in a non-simple way” – captures well its everyday essence. the whole behaves very differently than the sum of its parts. the properties of complex systems typically give rise to irregular, and often highly non-normal, statistical distributions for these systems over time. this manifests itself as much fatter tails than a normal distribution would suggest. in other words, system-wide interactions and feedbacks generate a much higher probability of catastrophic events than gaussian distributions would imply. for evolutionary reasons of survival of the fittest, simon posited that “decomposable” networks were more resilient and hence more likely to proliferate. by decomposable networks, he meant organisational structures which could be partitioned such that the resilience of the system as a whole was not reliant on any one sub-element. this may be a reasonable long-run description of some real-world complex systems, but less suitable as a description of the evolution of socio-economic systems. the efficiency of many of today’s networks relies on their hyper-connectivity. there are, in the language of economics, significantly increasing returns to scale and scope in a network industry. think of the benefits of global supply chains and global interbank networks for trade and financial risk-sharing. this provides a powerful secular incentive for non-decomposable socio-economic systems. moreover, if these hyper-connected networks do face systemic threat, they are often able to adapt in ways which avoid extinction. for example, the risk of social, economic or financial disorder will typically lead to an adaptation of policies to prevent systemic collapse. these adaptive policy responses may preserve otherwise-fragile socio-economic topologies. they may even further encourage the growth of connectivity and complexity of these networks. policies to support “super-spreader” banks in a crisis for instance may encourage them to become larger and more complex. the combination of network economies and policy responses to failure means socio-economic systems may be less darwinian, and hence decomposable, than natural and biological systems. andy haldane addresses oecd new approaches to economic challenges (naec) roundtable http://oecdinsights.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/andy_haldane-naec-oecd.mp4 what public policy implications follow from this complex system of systems perspective? first, it underscores the importance of accurate data and timely mapping of each layer in the system. this is especially important when these layers are themselves complex. granular data is needed to capture the interactions within and between these complex sub-systems. second, modelling of each of these layers, and their interaction with other layers, is likely to be important, both for understanding system risks and dynamics and for calibrating potential policy responses to them. third, in controlling these risks, something akin to the tinbergen rule is likely to apply: there is likely to be a need for at least as many policy instruments as there are complex sub-components of a system of systems if risk is to be monitored and managed effectively. put differently, an under-identified complex system of systems is likely to result in a loss of control, both system-wide and for each of the layers. in the meantime, there is a crisis in economics. for some, it is a threat. for others it is an opportunity to make a great leap forward, as keynes did in the 1930s. but seizing this opportunity requires first a re-examination of the contours of economics and an exploration of some new pathways. second, it is important to look at economic systems through a cross-disciplinary lens. drawing on insights from a range of disciplines, natural as well as social sciences, can provide a different perspective on individual behaviour and system-wide dynamics. the naec initiative does so, and the oecd’s willingness to consider a complexity approach puts the organisation at the forefront of bringing economic analysis policy-making into the 21st century. useful links this article draws on contributions to the oecd naec roundtable on 14 december 2016; the gls shackle biennial memorial lecture on 10 november 2016; and “on microscopes and telescopes”, at the lorentz centre, leiden, workshop on socio-economic complexity on 27 march 2015. the oecd organised a workshop on complexity and policy, 29-30 september, oecd hq, paris, along with the european commission and inet. watch the webcast: 29/09 morning; 29/09 afternoon; 30/09 morning share this:tweetprintmoreshare on tumblremailpocket 4 comments from → insights, new approaches to economic challenges what is key for the oecd in 2017? an open economy perspective 10 january 2017 tags: digital economy, international cooperation, trade by guest author noe van hulst, ambassador of the netherlands to the oecd as we start a year that ian bremmer (president eurasia group) has coined as entering ‘the geopolitical recession’, it is worth asking what the oecd focus could be in 2017. i see two key issues worth highlighting in this context. first: escaping the low-growth trap. escape games are popular nowadays, but this one is of eminent importance to all of us. in the latest economic outlook (november 2016) the oecd has aptly demonstrated how we got stuck at 3% per year for the last five years. how can we get out of this low-growth trap? now that extraordinary accommodative monetary policy has reached its limits, the oecd recommends a more balanced policy set with a much stronger role for collective fiscal action and for more inclusive structural and trade policies. although the economic outlook makes a passionate case for a more expansionary fiscal stance in many countries, the reality is that this is unlikely to happen. partly because some countries are cautious in the light of a heavy public debt burden. partly because they are already growing at or above potential growth, as we heard from prof. christoph schmidt (chairman of the german council of economic experts) a week after the publication of the economic outlook. the reason that potential growth is so low has, of course, everything to do with the productivity slowdown that was – very appropriately – the main topic of the oecd ministerial council meeting in june 2016. against this background, i think we will find more common oecd ground in 2017 if we focus strongly on boosting smarter structural policies as the main avenue to get out of the low-growth trap. let me mention just two concrete examples. the first one is harvesting the great potential of the digital economy, both a priority of the german g20 presidency and a promising new horizontal project within the oecd. the second example is inclusive structural reforms, particularly in product markets potentially delivering short-term benefits in terms of output, investment and employment. making reforms more inclusive is also about exploiting benefits of complementarities between product and labour market reforms, synergies (growth & equity objectives) and designing policy packages to help vulnerable groups or mitigate trade-offs.the launch of the 2017 oecd going for growth publication is an excellent opportunity to highlight this key point. reinvigorating good-old competition policy will also reinforce stronger and faster diffusion of new (digital) technologies from frontier to laggard firms and hence boost average productivity. let’s not forget that structural policies are a traditional oecd strength, an area where the oecd holds a strong comparative advantage and rightly enjoys high international credibility. what about inclusive trade policies? well, that is my second key issue to focus on in 2017. global trade growth has been very weak relative to historic norms for five years. the general consensus is that the relationship between trade and gdp growth is undergoing a fundamental shift. in the ‘good old days’ we enjoyed trade growth at a rate of twice global gdp growth and now trade barely makes global output growth. according to oecd analysis this also contributes to the productivity slowdown. so what exactly is going on with trade? is low trade growth somehow intertwined with the general global growth malaise? to what extent is this due to global value chains contracting, as reflected in oecd analysis? is the current slowdown in global trade only natural and should not be a major concern? in any case, it is clear that the rise of trade restrictions in g20 countries, still continuing in stunning contradiction to countless g20 communiqués, surely are not helpful. deeper oecd analysis is required to pin down more precisely how the different factors contribute to the trade slowdown. and how trade impacts labour markets and economic growth in different regions within countries. deeper analysis, however, is not enough. we definitely need to ask ourselves some tough questions about where the public backlash against trade and globalisation is coming from and what went wrong. and even more importantly, what we can and should do better. one area is the need to rebalance our trade and investment policies, towards a more fair, sustainable and inclusive system. making the oecd guidelines for multinational enterprises the centerpiece of trade and investment policies would be a concrete step. another area is more effective complementary domestic policies to help people deal faster and more successfully with trade-related job losses if and when they occur. ideally, this entails not only effective ‘safety net’ policies but also so-called “trampoline” policies offering a tangible springboard to new jobs. in any case, it is obvious that trade and trade policies are politically more under fire now than i can remember – and i am not young. as martin wolf wrote in the financial times “the era of globalisation under a us-led order is drawing to a close…the question is whether protectionism and conflict will define the next phase”. for very open economies like the netherlands it is of critical importance how this ‘next phase’ will shape up in 2017 and beyond. at this juncture, the dutch economy is growing at a solid 2% per year (in 2016 and 2017) with unemployment coming down rapidly to 5%, but the downside risks are all related to where the global economy is heading. many other oecd member countries have a similarly high exposure to shifts in the global economy. according to open market index data from the international chamber of commerce (icc), more than two-thirds of oecd countries have an above average openness, as measured by observed openness to trade, trade policy, foreign direct investment openness and infrastructure for trade. the oecd has a crucial role to play, in cooperation with other international organisations, in clearly demonstrating the adverse impact of rising protectionism, in monitoring what’s happening in trade and stimulating policy dialogue on better alternatives that help global growth. in this light it is very fitting that the oecd ministerial meeting in june 2017 will focus on the theme of making globalization work for all. let’s try to come up with concrete policy improvements that can help us preserve a well-functioning open global economy. useful links oecd global economic outlook, november 2016 share this:tweetprintmoreshare on tumblremailpocket 2 comments from → insights « older entries oecd social media search archives archives select month january 2017 (9) december 2016 (12) november 2016 (21) october 2016 (22) september 2016 (22) august 2016 (8) july 2016 (12) june 2016 (21) may 2016 (17) april 2016 (24) march 2016 (15) february 2016 (15) january 2016 (18) december 2015 (12) november 2015 (16) october 2015 (18) september 2015 (15) august 2015 (8) july 2015 (15) june 2015 (23) may 2015 (23) april 2015 (15) march 2015 (17) february 2015 (11) january 2015 (10) december 2014 (14) november 2014 (17) october 2014 (17) september 2014 (14) august 2014 (5) july 2014 (12) june 2014 (18) may 2014 (10) april 2014 (5) march 2014 (7) february 2014 (10) january 2014 (7) december 2013 (7) november 2013 (11) october 2013 (11) september 2013 (10) august 2013 (10) july 2013 (10) june 2013 (12) may 2013 (9) april 2013 (7) march 2013 (11) february 2013 (8) january 2013 (9) december 2012 (5) november 2012 (8) october 2012 (7) september 2012 (7) august 2012 (7) july 2012 (8) june 2012 (10) may 2012 (11) april 2012 (9) march 2012 (14) february 2012 (5) january 2012 (4) december 2011 (3) november 2011 (8) october 2011 (10) september 2011 (11) august 2011 (8) july 2011 (8) june 2011 (12) may 2011 (30) april 2011 (11) march 2011 (20) february 2011 (11) january 2011 (9) december 2010 (11) november 2010 (16) october 2010 (18) september 2010 (17) august 2010 (9) july 2010 (15) june 2010 (18) may 2010 (32) april 2010 (15) march 2010 (16) february 2010 (16) january 2010 (18) december 2009 (13) november 2009 (2) october 2009 (1) subscribe via email enter your address to get notifications of new posts. join 2,144 other subscribers email address just published oecd insights series oecd links oecd ilibrary oecd home page educationtoday observatory of public sector innovation (opsi) blog progblog oecd skills and work development matters rss copyright 2017 vigilance theme by the theme foundry send to email address your name your email address cancel post was not sent - check your email addresses! email check failed, please try again sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.


Here you find all texts from your page as Google (googlebot) and others search engines seen it.

Words density analysis:

Numbers of all words: 8034

One word

Two words phrases

Three words phrases

the - 7.28% (585)
and - 3.39% (272)
for - 2.71% (218)
are - 1.21% (97)
that - 1.17% (94)
her - 1.07% (86)
forecast - 0.9% (72)
per - 0.87% (70)
act - 0.85% (68)
all - 0.77% (62)
era - 0.75% (60)
economic - 0.72% (58)
oecd - 0.71% (57)
can - 0.68% (55)
more - 0.66% (53)
with - 0.65% (52)
this - 0.61% (49)
not - 0.59% (47)
out - 0.57% (46)
system - 0.54% (43)
here - 0.52% (42)
but - 0.52% (42)
our - 0.51% (41)
develop - 0.5% (40)
water - 0.47% (38)
complex - 0.47% (38)
order - 0.46% (37)
rate - 0.46% (37)
able - 0.45% (36)
work - 0.45% (36)
forecasts - 0.45% (36)
use - 0.44% (35)
border - 0.42% (34)
from - 0.41% (33)
one - 0.41% (33)
how - 0.41% (33)
any - 0.41% (33)
has - 0.4% (32)
these - 0.39% (31)
development - 0.39% (31)
over - 0.36% (29)
part - 0.35% (28)
policy - 0.35% (28)
two - 0.35% (28)
trade - 0.35% (28)
low - 0.32% (26)
global - 0.32% (26)
national - 0.31% (25)
will - 0.31% (25)
should - 0.31% (25)
ground - 0.31% (25)
right - 0.3% (24)
there - 0.3% (24)
systems - 0.3% (24)
form - 0.29% (23)
growth - 0.29% (23)
network - 0.27% (22)
what - 0.27% (22)
end - 0.27% (22)
its - 0.26% (21)
consensus - 0.26% (21)
2016 - 0.26% (21)
other - 0.26% (21)
under - 0.26% (21)
may - 0.25% (20)
policies - 0.25% (20)
groundwater - 0.25% (20)
example - 0.25% (20)
have - 0.25% (20)
also - 0.24% (19)
human - 0.24% (19)
- 0.24% (19)
get - 0.24% (19)
2017 - 0.24% (19)
algorithm - 0.24% (19)
january - 0.22% (18)
some - 0.22% (18)
time - 0.22% (18)
complexity - 0.22% (18)
they - 0.22% (18)
rights - 0.21% (17)
algorithms - 0.21% (17)
on, - 0.21% (17)
africa - 0.21% (17)
many - 0.21% (17)
new - 0.21% (17)
2015 - 0.21% (17)
public - 0.2% (16)
ict - 0.2% (16)
individual - 0.2% (16)
own - 0.2% (16)
thing - 0.2% (16)
accurate - 0.19% (15)
way - 0.19% (15)
countries - 0.19% (15)
share - 0.19% (15)
networks - 0.19% (15)
need - 0.19% (15)
than - 0.19% (15)
win - 0.19% (15)
guide - 0.19% (15)
pin - 0.17% (14)
akin - 0.17% (14)
email - 0.17% (14)
due - 0.17% (14)
international - 0.17% (14)
business - 0.17% (14)
was - 0.17% (14)
them - 0.17% (14)
cross-border - 0.17% (14)
impact - 0.16% (13)
agriculture - 0.16% (13)
product - 0.16% (13)
found - 0.16% (13)
which - 0.16% (13)
approach - 0.16% (13)
come - 0.16% (13)
led - 0.16% (13)
co-operation - 0.16% (13)
insights - 0.16% (13)
potential - 0.16% (13)
their - 0.16% (13)
2014 - 0.16% (13)
2010 - 0.16% (13)
would - 0.16% (13)
2013 - 0.16% (13)
take - 0.15% (12)
data - 0.15% (12)
important - 0.15% (12)
provide - 0.15% (12)
change - 0.15% (12)
guidelines - 0.15% (12)
different - 0.15% (12)
very - 0.15% (12)
make - 0.15% (12)
west - 0.15% (12)
area - 0.15% (12)
analysis - 0.15% (12)
about - 0.15% (12)
region - 0.15% (12)
forecasting - 0.15% (12)
2012 - 0.15% (12)
2011 - 0.15% (12)
now - 0.15% (12)
world - 0.15% (12)
look - 0.14% (11)
issue - 0.14% (11)
been - 0.14% (11)
rise - 0.14% (11)
adapt - 0.14% (11)
november - 0.14% (11)
ian - 0.14% (11)
help - 0.14% (11)
social - 0.14% (11)
wisdom - 0.14% (11)
local - 0.14% (11)
only - 0.14% (11)
where - 0.14% (11)
risk - 0.14% (11)
most - 0.14% (11)
ever, - 0.14% (11)
information - 0.14% (11)
like - 0.14% (11)
high - 0.14% (11)
economics - 0.14% (11)
source - 0.14% (11)
even - 0.14% (11)
diligence - 0.14% (11)
better - 0.12% (10)
top - 0.12% (10)
action - 0.12% (10)
put - 0.12% (10)
crowd - 0.12% (10)
challenges - 0.12% (10)
down - 0.12% (10)
cause - 0.12% (10)
into - 0.12% (10)
people - 0.12% (10)
however, - 0.12% (10)
address - 0.12% (10)
likely - 0.12% (10)
try - 0.12% (10)
december - 0.12% (10)
state - 0.12% (10)
economy - 0.12% (10)
african - 0.12% (10)
between - 0.12% (10)
you - 0.12% (10)
march - 0.12% (10)
often - 0.12% (10)
error - 0.11% (9)
key - 0.11% (9)
each - 0.11% (9)
open - 0.11% (9)
crowds - 0.11% (9)
process - 0.11% (9)
being - 0.11% (9)
when - 0.11% (9)
manage - 0.11% (9)
example, - 0.11% (9)
fit - 0.11% (9)
well - 0.11% (9)
see - 0.11% (9)
impacts - 0.11% (9)
october - 0.11% (9)
enter - 0.11% (9)
useful - 0.11% (9)
who - 0.11% (9)
financial - 0.11% (9)
(11) - 0.11% (9)
market - 0.11% (9)
september - 0.11% (9)
could - 0.11% (9)
government - 0.11% (9)
mean - 0.11% (9)
links - 0.11% (9)
year - 0.11% (9)
interact - 0.11% (9)
june - 0.11% (9)
result - 0.1% (8)
large - 0.1% (8)
actors - 0.1% (8)
far - 0.1% (8)
wide - 0.1% (8)
robot - 0.1% (8)
connect - 0.1% (8)
environment - 0.1% (8)
happen - 0.1% (8)
same - 0.1% (8)
regions - 0.1% (8)
(8) - 0.1% (8)
such - 0.1% (8)
author - 0.1% (8)
become - 0.1% (8)
average - 0.1% (8)
areas - 0.1% (8)
relation - 0.1% (8)
particular - 0.1% (8)
program - 0.1% (8)
resource - 0.1% (8)
first - 0.1% (8)
quest - 0.1% (8)
account - 0.1% (8)
understand - 0.1% (8)
(10) - 0.1% (8)
answer - 0.1% (8)
february - 0.1% (8)
effect - 0.1% (8)
responsible - 0.1% (8)
systems. - 0.1% (8)
actual - 0.1% (8)
land - 0.09% (7)
table - 0.09% (7)
companies - 0.09% (7)
- 0.09% (7)
case - 0.09% (7)
comment - 0.09% (7)
structural - 0.09% (7)
this:tweetprintmoreshare - 0.09% (7)
tumblremailpocket - 0.09% (7)
point - 0.09% (7)
increase - 0.09% (7)
making - 0.09% (7)
question - 0.09% (7)
july - 0.09% (7)
april - 0.09% (7)
integration - 0.09% (7)
turn - 0.09% (7)
think - 0.09% (7)
(7) - 0.09% (7)
context - 0.09% (7)
respect - 0.09% (7)
recommend - 0.09% (7)
issues - 0.09% (7)
noise - 0.09% (7)
things - 0.09% (7)
because - 0.09% (7)
company - 0.09% (7)
programme - 0.09% (7)
less - 0.09% (7)
expert - 0.09% (7)
guest - 0.09% (7)
tags: - 0.09% (7)
further - 0.09% (7)
predict - 0.09% (7)
know - 0.09% (7)
real - 0.09% (7)
problems - 0.09% (7)
(15) - 0.09% (7)
august - 0.09% (7)
possible - 0.09% (7)
significant - 0.09% (7)
crisis - 0.09% (7)
must - 0.09% (7)
idea - 0.09% (7)
clear - 0.09% (7)
live - 0.09% (7)
sustainable - 0.09% (7)
reason - 0.09% (7)
after - 0.09% (7)
food - 0.09% (7)
relations - 0.07% (6)
security - 0.07% (6)
much - 0.07% (6)
around - 0.07% (6)
number - 0.07% (6)
dynamics - 0.07% (6)
combination - 0.07% (6)
discuss - 0.07% (6)
reading - 0.07% (6)
layer - 0.07% (6)
van - 0.07% (6)
graph - 0.07% (6)
light - 0.07% (6)
your - 0.07% (6)
future - 0.07% (6)
let - 0.07% (6)
going - 0.07% (6)
fact - 0.07% (6)
inclusive - 0.07% (6)
period - 0.07% (6)
few - 0.07% (6)
borders - 0.07% (6)
publication - 0.07% (6)
within - 0.07% (6)
importance - 0.07% (6)
did - 0.07% (6)
focus - 0.07% (6)
taken - 0.07% (6)
certain - 0.07% (6)
second - 0.07% (6)
sum - 0.07% (6)
through - 0.07% (6)
robots - 0.07% (6)
enterprises - 0.07% (6)
tell - 0.07% (6)
approaches - 0.07% (6)
she - 0.07% (6)
just - 0.07% (6)
used - 0.07% (6)
war - 0.07% (6)
pose - 0.07% (6)
europe - 0.07% (6)
(18) - 0.07% (6)
once - 0.07% (6)
nations - 0.07% (6)
organisation - 0.07% (6)
using - 0.07% (6)
(12) - 0.07% (6)
objective - 0.07% (6)
interaction - 0.07% (6)
sent - 0.07% (6)
rest - 0.07% (6)
(9) - 0.07% (6)
natural - 0.07% (6)
math - 0.07% (6)
were - 0.07% (6)
direct - 0.07% (6)
effective - 0.07% (6)
search - 0.06% (5)
face - 0.06% (5)
protect - 0.06% (5)
consistently - 0.06% (5)
multiple - 0.06% (5)
investment - 0.06% (5)
produce - 0.06% (5)
serve - 0.06% (5)
management - 0.06% (5)
increasing - 0.06% (5)
support - 0.06% (5)
gdp - 0.06% (5)
crop - 0.06% (5)
impossible - 0.06% (5)
particularly - 0.06% (5)
continue - 0.06% (5)
implement - 0.06% (5)
processes - 0.06% (5)
time, - 0.06% (5)
technology - 0.06% (5)
recent - 0.06% (5)
great - 0.06% (5)
layers - 0.06% (5)
partners - 0.06% (5)
cancel - 0.06% (5)
deal - 0.06% (5)
developed - 0.06% (5)
create - 0.06% (5)
deep - 0.06% (5)
initiative - 0.06% (5)
european - 0.06% (5)
course - 0.06% (5)
related - 0.06% (5)
response - 0.06% (5)
consider - 0.06% (5)
benefit - 0.06% (5)
raw - 0.06% (5)
multinational - 0.06% (5)
guess - 0.06% (5)
adaptive - 0.06% (5)
(17) - 0.06% (5)
set - 0.06% (5)
place - 0.06% (5)
programmes - 0.06% (5)
close - 0.06% (5)
objectives - 0.06% (5)
margin - 0.06% (5)
group - 0.06% (5)
person - 0.06% (5)
privacy - 0.06% (5)
socio-economic - 0.06% (5)
taking - 0.06% (5)
control - 0.06% (5)
good - 0.06% (5)
galton - 0.06% (5)
does - 0.06% (5)
is, - 0.06% (5)
production - 0.06% (5)
models - 0.06% (5)
strong - 0.06% (5)
examples - 0.06% (5)
today - 0.06% (5)
farmers - 0.06% (5)
those - 0.06% (5)
ask - 0.06% (5)
gffa - 0.06% (5)
follow - 0.06% (5)
along - 0.06% (5)
contribute - 0.06% (5)
above - 0.06% (5)
climate - 0.06% (5)
old - 0.06% (5)
outlook - 0.06% (5)
both - 0.06% (5)
ensure - 0.06% (5)
ways - 0.06% (5)
demand - 0.06% (5)
supply - 0.06% (5)
actions - 0.06% (5)
stance - 0.06% (5)
perfect - 0.06% (5)
chapter - 0.06% (5)
free - 0.05% (4)
participants - 0.05% (4)
slowdown - 0.05% (4)
lead - 0.05% (4)
me. - 0.05% (4)
sector - 0.05% (4)
(5) - 0.05% (4)
forms - 0.05% (4)
growing - 0.05% (4)
productivity - 0.05% (4)
every - 0.05% (4)
institutions - 0.05% (4)
benefits - 0.05% (4)
29/09 - 0.05% (4)
prevent - 0.05% (4)
something - 0.05% (4)
(16) - 0.05% (4)
facto - 0.05% (4)
last - 0.05% (4)
commission - 0.05% (4)
reducing - 0.05% (4)
relationship - 0.05% (4)
research - 0.05% (4)
job - 0.05% (4)
morning - 0.05% (4)
weight - 0.05% (4)
start - 0.05% (4)
degree - 0.05% (4)
partnership - 0.05% (4)
theory - 0.05% (4)
tend - 0.05% (4)
complexity, - 0.05% (4)
science - 0.05% (4)
again - 0.05% (4)
answers - 0.05% (4)
easy - 0.05% (4)
stop - 0.05% (4)
economy, - 0.05% (4)
press - 0.05% (4)
intelligence - 0.05% (4)
aid - 0.05% (4)
crops - 0.05% (4)
past - 0.05% (4)
distribution - 0.05% (4)
statistical - 0.05% (4)
supplies - 0.05% (4)
comes - 0.05% (4)
artificial - 0.05% (4)
opportunity - 0.05% (4)
fair - 0.05% (4)
itself - 0.05% (4)
decomposable - 0.05% (4)
states - 0.05% (4)
rising - 0.05% (4)
tool - 0.05% (4)
foresee - 0.05% (4)
leave - 0.05% (4)
had - 0.05% (4)
prof - 0.05% (4)
parts - 0.05% (4)
give - 0.05% (4)
mention - 0.05% (4)
irrigate - 0.05% (4)
accuracy - 0.05% (4)
agencies - 0.05% (4)
understanding - 0.05% (4)
then - 0.05% (4)
list - 0.05% (4)
might - 0.05% (4)
design - 0.05% (4)
minister - 0.05% (4)
and, - 0.05% (4)
are, - 0.05% (4)
consumer - 0.05% (4)
questions - 0.05% (4)
ethical - 0.05% (4)
meet - 0.05% (4)
already - 0.05% (4)
sources - 0.05% (4)
measures - 0.05% (4)
encourage - 0.05% (4)
perspective - 0.05% (4)
while - 0.05% (4)
spread - 0.05% (4)
applied - 0.05% (4)
across - 0.05% (4)
without - 0.05% (4)
industry - 0.05% (4)
analysts - 0.05% (4)
view - 0.05% (4)
years - 0.05% (4)
globalisation - 0.05% (4)
major - 0.05% (4)
involve - 0.05% (4)
firms - 0.05% (4)
health - 0.05% (4)
vary - 0.05% (4)
naec - 0.05% (4)
shape - 0.05% (4)
society - 0.05% (4)
together - 0.05% (4)
beat - 0.05% (4)
field - 0.05% (4)
range - 0.05% (4)
organised - 0.05% (4)
businesses - 0.05% (4)
interactions - 0.05% (4)
concrete - 0.05% (4)
risks - 0.05% (4)
digital - 0.05% (4)
feed - 0.05% (4)
ncp - 0.05% (4)
andy - 0.04% (3)
time. - 0.04% (3)
differently - 0.04% (3)
days - 0.04% (3)
nature - 0.04% (3)
years. - 0.04% (3)
combining - 0.04% (3)
degrees - 0.04% (3)
combinations - 0.04% (3)
called - 0.04% (3)
diverse - 0.04% (3)
mentioned - 0.04% (3)
shed - 0.04% (3)
word - 0.04% (3)
news - 0.04% (3)
forecast. - 0.04% (3)
available - 0.04% (3)
case, - 0.04% (3)
let’s - 0.04% (3)
although - 0.04% (3)
stock - 0.04% (3)
safety - 0.04% (3)
makes - 0.04% (3)
enterprises, - 0.04% (3)
certainty - 0.04% (3)
frameworks - 0.04% (3)
story - 0.04% (3)
conduct - 0.04% (3)
forecaster - 0.04% (3)
driving - 0.04% (3)
provides - 0.04% (3)
significantly - 0.04% (3)
addition - 0.04% (3)
improve - 0.04% (3)
engage - 0.04% (3)
appropriate - 0.04% (3)
personal - 0.04% (3)
raise - 0.04% (3)
note - 0.04% (3)
malaysia - 0.04% (3)
chain - 0.04% (3)
simply - 0.04% (3)
forget - 0.04% (3)
impacts. - 0.04% (3)
whether - 0.04% (3)
responsibility - 0.04% (3)
store - 0.04% (3)
furthermore - 0.04% (3)
principle - 0.04% (3)
exact - 0.04% (3)
typically - 0.04% (3)
forecasts. - 0.04% (3)
freedom - 0.04% (3)
points, - 0.04% (3)
breaks - 0.04% (3)
corporate - 0.04% (3)
previous - 0.04% (3)
works, - 0.04% (3)
relationships - 0.04% (3)
next - 0.04% (3)
insights, - 0.04% (3)
doing - 0.04% (3)
world. - 0.04% (3)
markets - 0.04% (3)
terms - 0.04% (3)
reforms - 0.04% (3)
labour - 0.04% (3)
highlight - 0.04% (3)
against - 0.04% (3)
technologies - 0.04% (3)
advantage - 0.04% (3)
turned - 0.04% (3)
watch - 0.04% (3)
general - 0.04% (3)
2016, - 0.04% (3)
policy, - 0.04% (3)
workshop - 0.04% (3)
allow - 0.04% (3)
algorithms. - 0.04% (3)
change, - 0.04% (3)
keep - 0.04% (3)
g20 - 0.04% (3)
made - 0.04% (3)
learn - 0.04% (3)
almost - 0.04% (3)
efforts - 0.04% (3)
importantly, - 0.04% (3)
low-growth - 0.04% (3)
facing - 0.04% (3)
quality - 0.04% (3)
boost - 0.04% (3)
two-thirds - 0.04% (3)
south - 0.04% (3)
half - 0.04% (3)
irrigation - 0.04% (3)
india’s - 0.04% (3)
countries. - 0.04% (3)
topic - 0.04% (3)
therefore - 0.04% (3)
protection - 0.04% (3)
decisions - 0.04% (3)
managed - 0.04% (3)
discussion - 0.04% (3)
main - 0.04% (3)
punjab - 0.04% (3)
output - 0.04% (3)
environmental - 0.04% (3)
reduce - 0.04% (3)
based - 0.04% (3)
growth. - 0.04% (3)
why - 0.04% (3)
since - 0.04% (3)
development. - 0.04% (3)
capital - 0.04% (3)
according - 0.04% (3)
rate. - 0.04% (3)
2009 - 0.04% (3)
especially - 0.04% (3)
ii. - 0.04% (3)
institutions, - 0.04% (3)
modern - 0.04% (3)
culture, - 0.04% (3)
poor - 0.04% (3)
rich - 0.04% (3)
others - 0.04% (3)
blog - 0.04% (3)
post - 0.04% (3)
community - 0.04% (3)
contact - 0.04% (3)
(14) - 0.04% (3)
identified - 0.04% (3)
developing - 0.04% (3)
all. - 0.04% (3)
another - 0.04% (3)
given - 0.04% (3)
moreover, - 0.04% (3)
inherent - 0.04% (3)
define - 0.04% (3)
matters - 0.04% (3)
member - 0.04% (3)
openness - 0.04% (3)
theme - 0.04% (3)
sustainability - 0.04% (3)
connectivity - 0.04% (3)
goals - 0.04% (3)
achieving - 0.04% (3)
deliver - 0.04% (3)
best - 0.04% (3)
yield - 0.04% (3)
assess - 0.04% (3)
instead - 0.04% (3)
political - 0.04% (3)
elements - 0.04% (3)
governments - 0.04% (3)
meeting - 0.04% (3)
dialogue - 0.04% (3)
haldane - 0.04% (3)
crucial - 0.04% (3)
co-operation, - 0.04% (3)
home - 0.04% (3)
reading. - 0.04% (3)
scope - 0.04% (3)
population - 0.04% (3)
system-wide - 0.04% (3)
beyond - 0.04% (3)
vast - 0.04% (3)
governance - 0.04% (3)
hence - 0.04% (3)
course, - 0.04% (3)
university - 0.04% (3)
structure - 0.04% (3)
map - 0.04% (3)
issues. - 0.04% (3)
studies - 0.04% (3)
dynamics. - 0.04% (3)
describe - 0.04% (3)
functioning - 0.04% (3)
regional - 0.04% (3)
fully - 0.04% (3)
balance - 0.04% (3)
responses - 0.04% (3)
addresses - 0.04% (3)
organisations - 0.04% (3)
means - 0.04% (3)
package - 0.04% (3)
times - 0.04% (3)
economies - 0.04% (3)
forecasts, - 0.04% (3)
incentive - 0.04% (3)
oecd’s - 0.04% (3)
interest - 0.04% (3)
intensive - 0.04% (3)
architecture - 0.04% (3)
capture - 0.04% (3)
rap. - 0.04% (3)
whole - 0.04% (3)
rely - 0.04% (3)
forecasts? - 0.04% (3)
loss - 0.04% (3)
conflict - 0.02% (2)
company’s - 0.02% (2)
coming - 0.02% (2)
media - 0.02% (2)
went - 0.02% (2)
them. - 0.02% (2)
cooperation - 0.02% (2)
check - 0.02% (2)
systems, - 0.02% (2)
economy. - 0.02% (2)
standards - 0.02% (2)
meant - 0.02% (2)
growth, - 0.02% (2)
sense - 0.02% (2)
innovation - 0.02% (2)
resilience - 0.02% (2)
protectionism - 0.02% (2)
description - 0.02% (2)
things. - 0.02% (2)
instrument - 0.02% (2)
characterised - 0.02% (2)
(22) - 0.02% (2)
simon - 0.02% (2)
ngos - 0.02% (2)
distributions - 0.02% (2)
tails - 0.02% (2)
(23) - 0.02% (2)
complaint - 0.02% (2)
gamma - 0.02% (2)
spyware - 0.02% (2)
overall - 0.02% (2)
subscribe - 0.02% (2)
undertake - 0.02% (2)
(21) - 0.02% (2)
target - 0.02% (2)
normal - 0.02% (2)
acted - 0.02% (2)
so-called - 0.02% (2)
archives - 0.02% (2)
regulatory - 0.02% (2)
trade, - 0.02% (2)
retreat - 0.02% (2)
societies - 0.02% (2)
evolution - 0.02% (2)
comments - 0.02% (2)
recommended - 0.02% (2)
published - 0.02% (2)
mitigate - 0.02% (2)
german - 0.02% (2)
partly - 0.02% (2)
countries, - 0.02% (2)
layers, - 0.02% (2)
highly - 0.02% (2)
fiscal - 0.02% (2)
collective - 0.02% (2)
rule - 0.02% (2)
uk, - 0.02% (2)
role - 0.02% (2)
least - 0.02% (2)
stronger - 0.02% (2)
five - 0.02% (2)
drawing - 0.02% (2)
ministerial - 0.02% (2)
article - 0.02% (2)
“on - 0.02% (2)
worth - 0.02% (2)
verifiable - 0.02% (2)
2017. - 0.02% (2)
2016; - 0.02% (2)
trap. - 0.02% (2)
recommends - 0.02% (2)
frontier - 0.02% (2)
got - 0.02% (2)
puts - 0.02% (2)
recommendations - 0.02% (2)
avoid - 0.02% (2)
foundation - 0.02% (2)
reasonable - 0.02% (2)
council - 0.02% (2)
needed - 0.02% (2)
deeper - 0.02% (2)
monetary - 0.02% (2)
traditional - 0.02% (2)
banks - 0.02% (2)
[3] - 0.02% (2)
relative - 0.02% (2)
preserve - 0.02% (2)
corporations - 0.02% (2)
current - 0.02% (2)
[2] - 0.02% (2)
netherlands - 0.02% (2)
systemic - 0.02% (2)
slowing - 0.02% (2)
powerful - 0.02% (2)
slowdown. - 0.02% (2)
chains - 0.02% (2)
rights. - 0.02% (2)
instance - 0.02% (2)
second, - 0.02% (2)
responsibly - 0.02% (2)
value - 0.02% (2)
generate - 0.02% (2)
system. - 0.02% (2)
oecd. - 0.02% (2)
operations - 0.02% (2)
reforms, - 0.02% (2)
behave - 0.02% (2)
complex. - 0.02% (2)
buyer - 0.02% (2)
roundtable - 0.02% (2)
failure - 0.02% (2)
[1] - 0.02% (2)
adverse - 0.02% (2)
faster - 0.02% (2)
experts, - 0.02% (2)
content - 0.02% (2)
additionally - 0.02% (2)
poses - 0.02% (2)
40% - 0.02% (2)
accounts - 0.02% (2)
central - 0.02% (2)
day’s - 0.02% (2)
following - 0.02% (2)
properly - 0.02% (2)
vital - 0.02% (2)
speakers - 0.02% (2)
panel - 0.02% (2)
institute - 0.02% (2)
dry - 0.02% (2)
correctly - 0.02% (2)
increases - 0.02% (2)
challenge. - 0.02% (2)
heavy - 0.02% (2)
country - 0.02% (2)
needs - 0.02% (2)
60% - 0.02% (2)
similar - 0.02% (2)
united - 0.02% (2)
crops, - 0.02% (2)
agricultural - 0.02% (2)
environment. - 0.02% (2)
always - 0.02% (2)
consumers - 0.02% (2)
california, - 0.02% (2)
drought - 0.02% (2)
(gffa) - 0.02% (2)
forum - 0.02% (2)
extract - 0.02% (2)
rates - 0.02% (2)
agriculture, - 0.02% (2)
producing - 0.02% (2)
show - 0.02% (2)
niger - 0.02% (2)
majority - 0.02% (2)
cover - 0.02% (2)
guinea - 0.02% (2)
100 - 0.02% (2)
features - 0.02% (2)
analytical - 0.02% (2)
latest - 0.02% (2)
director, - 0.02% (2)
report - 0.02% (2)
here. - 0.02% (2)
review - 0.02% (2)
increasingly - 0.02% (2)
risk. - 0.02% (2)
reliant - 0.02% (2)
mechanism - 0.02% (2)
defined - 0.02% (2)
introduced - 0.02% (2)
encouraging - 0.02% (2)
providing - 0.02% (2)
preventing - 0.02% (2)
surface - 0.02% (2)
becomes - 0.02% (2)
greater - 0.02% (2)
can’t - 0.02% (2)
figure - 0.02% (2)
seeing - 0.02% (2)
pumping - 0.02% (2)
robert - 0.02% (2)
insurance - 0.02% (2)
borders, - 0.02% (2)
integration. - 0.02% (2)
firms, - 0.02% (2)
failed - 0.02% (2)
step - 0.02% (2)
etc. - 0.02% (2)
solutions - 0.02% (2)
promoting - 0.02% (2)
mass - 0.02% (2)
assistance - 0.02% (2)
characteristic - 0.02% (2)
turns - 0.02% (2)
provided - 0.02% (2)
find - 0.02% (2)
what’s - 0.02% (2)
policies, - 0.02% (2)
lives. - 0.02% (2)
missing - 0.02% (2)
continued - 0.02% (2)
not. - 0.02% (2)
rapid - 0.02% (2)
domestic - 0.02% (2)
plan - 0.02% (2)
thinking - 0.02% (2)
theories - 0.02% (2)
brought - 0.02% (2)
peace, - 0.02% (2)
carry - 0.02% (2)
wrote - 0.02% (2)
directorate - 0.02% (2)
asking - 0.02% (2)
fulfilling - 0.02% (2)
outcome - 0.02% (2)
30/09 - 0.02% (2)
helping - 0.02% (2)
afternoon; - 0.02% (2)
morning; - 0.02% (2)
webcast: - 0.02% (2)
inet. - 0.02% (2)
paris, - 0.02% (2)
hq, - 0.02% (2)
29-30 - 0.02% (2)
effectively - 0.02% (2)
narrative - 0.02% (2)
working - 0.02% (2)
build - 0.02% (2)
promote - 0.02% (2)
comparative - 0.02% (2)
exploiting - 0.02% (2)
contributed - 0.02% (2)
2030 - 0.02% (2)
helpful - 0.02% (2)
counsel - 0.02% (2)
specific - 0.02% (2)
institutional - 0.02% (2)
required - 0.02% (2)
further. - 0.02% (2)
happening - 0.02% (2)
identify - 0.02% (2)
listen - 0.02% (2)
resources - 0.02% (2)
context, - 0.02% (2)
successful - 0.02% (2)
trial - 0.02% (2)
agenda. - 0.02% (2)
policies. - 0.02% (2)
networks, - 0.02% (2)
created - 0.02% (2)
accuracy. - 0.02% (2)
fake - 0.02% (2)
varying - 0.02% (2)
periods - 0.02% (2)
macroeconomic - 0.02% (2)
[…] - 0.02% (2)
“a - 0.02% (2)
improvements - 0.02% (2)
performance - 0.02% (2)
cases - 0.02% (2)
increased - 0.02% (2)
outlook, - 0.02% (2)
tools - 0.02% (2)
it, - 0.02% (2)
yes, - 0.02% (2)
self-driving - 0.02% (2)
tough - 0.02% (2)
so, - 0.02% (2)
still - 0.02% (2)
perfect, - 0.02% (2)
isn’t - 0.02% (2)
error, - 0.02% (2)
mind - 0.02% (2)
consistency - 0.02% (2)
downside - 0.02% (2)
below - 0.02% (2)
minimum - 0.02% (2)
2015. - 0.02% (2)
uses - 0.02% (2)
won’t - 0.02% (2)
news, - 0.02% (2)
cars - 0.02% (2)
result, - 0.02% (2)
cathy - 0.02% (2)
founded - 0.02% (2)
principles - 0.02% (2)
intelligence. - 0.02% (2)
factors - 0.02% (2)
implications - 0.02% (2)
scholars - 0.02% (2)
feedback - 0.02% (2)
send - 0.02% (2)
discussed - 0.02% (2)
limits - 0.02% (2)
test, - 0.02% (2)
inequality - 0.02% (2)
o’neil - 0.02% (2)
book - 0.02% (2)
chair - 0.02% (2)
examples. - 0.02% (2)
privacy. - 0.02% (2)
concerns - 0.02% (2)
killer - 0.02% (2)
campaign - 0.02% (2)
select - 0.02% (2)
weapons - 0.02% (2)
application - 0.02% (2)
beginning - 0.02% (2)
common - 0.02% (2)
events - 0.02% (2)
mathematical - 0.02% (2)
automated - 0.02% (2)
conference - 0.02% (2)
previously, - 0.02% (2)
closer - 0.02% (2)
transnational - 0.02% (2)
exist - 0.02% (2)
anything, - 0.02% (2)
behavior - 0.02% (2)
predicting - 0.02% (2)
essentially - 0.02% (2)
it. - 0.02% (2)
economist - 0.02% (2)
centre - 0.02% (2)
space - 0.02% (2)
association - 0.02% (2)
relevant - 0.02% (2)
furthermore, - 0.02% (2)
operate - 0.02% (2)
geographical - 0.02% (2)
organisations, - 0.02% (2)
short - 0.02% (2)
academic - 0.02% (2)
involved - 0.02% (2)
networks. - 0.02% (2)
facilitate - 0.02% (2)
stability - 0.02% (2)
borders. - 0.02% (2)
marked - 0.02% (2)
legal - 0.02% (2)
largely - 0.02% (2)
initiatives - 0.02% (2)
union - 0.02% (2)
president - 0.02% (2)
century - 0.02% (2)
whilst - 0.02% (2)
say - 0.02% (2)
reasons - 0.02% (2)
malaysia’s - 0.02% (2)
experiment - 0.02% (2)
bit - 0.02% (2)
practical - 0.02% (2)
ahead - 0.02% (2)
unlikely - 0.02% (2)
consensus, - 0.02% (2)
including - 0.02% (2)
don’t - 0.02% (2)
averaging - 0.02% (2)
various - 0.02% (2)
difficult - 0.02% (2)
remember - 0.02% (2)
error. - 0.02% (2)
lower - 0.02% (2)
accurate, - 0.02% (2)
galton’s - 0.02% (2)
amount - 0.02% (2)
evident - 0.02% (2)
individuals - 0.02% (2)
guesses - 0.02% (2)
it’s - 0.02% (2)
illustrate - 0.02% (2)
in. - 0.02% (2)
uncertainty - 0.02% (2)
cannot - 0.02% (2)
serious - 0.02% (2)
meaningful - 0.02% (2)
data. - 0.02% (2)
world, - 0.02% (2)
ideal - 0.02% (2)
available. - 0.02% (2)
posts - 0.02% (2)
of the - 0.85% (68)
in the - 0.45% (36)
at the - 0.4% (32)
to the - 0.34% (27)
the oecd - 0.32% (26)
and the - 0.31% (25)
human rights - 0.2% (16)
and in - 0.17% (14)
the consensus - 0.16% (13)
that the - 0.16% (13)
with the - 0.16% (13)
consensus forecast - 0.15% (12)
on the - 0.14% (11)
for the - 0.14% (11)
due diligence - 0.14% (11)
can be - 0.12% (10)
west africa - 0.12% (10)
oecd guidelines - 0.11% (9)
as the - 0.11% (9)
wisdom of - 0.11% (9)
the crowds - 0.11% (9)
is the - 0.11% (9)
trade and - 0.1% (8)
a more - 0.1% (8)
the same - 0.1% (8)
for example - 0.1% (8)
the wisdom - 0.1% (8)
likely to - 0.1% (8)
january 2017 - 0.1% (8)
cross-border co-operation - 0.1% (8)
individual forecast - 0.1% (8)
there is - 0.1% (8)
this:tweetprintmoreshare on - 0.09% (7)
we should - 0.09% (7)
need to - 0.09% (7)
of economic - 0.09% (7)
more accurate - 0.09% (7)
all of - 0.09% (7)
useful links - 0.09% (7)
by guest - 0.09% (7)
from → - 0.09% (7)
on tumblremailpocket - 0.09% (7)
2017 tags: - 0.09% (7)
→ insights - 0.09% (7)
share this:tweetprintmoreshare - 0.09% (7)
guest author - 0.09% (7)
individual forecasts - 0.07% (6)
guidelines for - 0.07% (6)
for example, - 0.07% (6)
the actual - 0.07% (6)
the global - 0.07% (6)
where the - 0.07% (6)
of systems - 0.07% (6)
could be - 0.07% (6)
the world - 0.07% (6)
be found - 0.07% (6)
has been - 0.07% (6)
system of - 0.07% (6)
is that - 0.07% (6)
provide a - 0.07% (6)
is not - 0.07% (6)
in many - 0.07% (6)
there are - 0.07% (6)
number of - 0.06% (5)
economic challenges - 0.06% (5)
multinational enterprises - 0.06% (5)
in this - 0.06% (5)
actual reading - 0.06% (5)
and agriculture - 0.06% (5)
this is - 0.06% (5)
average of - 0.06% (5)
not be - 0.06% (5)
with a - 0.06% (5)
that in - 0.06% (5)
more than - 0.06% (5)
forecasts from - 0.06% (5)
what is - 0.06% (5)
such as - 0.06% (5)
and to - 0.06% (5)
should be - 0.06% (5)
complex system - 0.06% (5)
and more - 0.06% (5)
comment from - 0.06% (5)
able to - 0.06% (5)
but the - 0.06% (5)
and for - 0.06% (5)
a complex - 0.06% (5)
not only - 0.06% (5)
in 2017 - 0.06% (5)
for multinational - 0.06% (5)
the most - 0.06% (5)
economic growth - 0.06% (5)
approaches to - 0.05% (4)
as well - 0.05% (4)
is also - 0.05% (4)
and policy - 0.05% (4)
of cross-border - 0.05% (4)
consensus forecasts - 0.05% (4)
leave a - 0.05% (4)
the international - 0.05% (4)
analysis is - 0.05% (4)
a comment - 0.05% (4)
found here - 0.05% (4)
water to - 0.05% (4)
out the - 0.05% (4)
impossible to - 0.05% (4)
for agriculture - 0.05% (4)
we are - 0.05% (4)
has become - 0.05% (4)
and financial - 0.05% (4)
well as - 0.05% (4)
around the - 0.05% (4)
way to - 0.05% (4)
in west - 0.05% (4)
how the - 0.05% (4)
the average - 0.05% (4)
is likely - 0.05% (4)
border region - 0.05% (4)
the margin - 0.05% (4)
from the - 0.05% (4)
they are - 0.05% (4)
and other - 0.05% (4)
email address - 0.05% (4)
tumblremailpocket leave - 0.05% (4)
and their - 0.05% (4)
and economic - 0.05% (4)
to help - 0.05% (4)
margin of - 0.05% (4)
important to - 0.05% (4)
example, the - 0.05% (4)
but it - 0.05% (4)
when the - 0.05% (4)
is important - 0.05% (4)
the first - 0.05% (4)
to make - 0.05% (4)
that is - 0.05% (4)
forecasting is - 0.05% (4)
the company - 0.05% (4)
climate change - 0.05% (4)
may be - 0.05% (4)
new approaches - 0.05% (4)
to economic - 0.05% (4)
to respect - 0.05% (4)
into the - 0.05% (4)
responsible business - 0.05% (4)
the development - 0.05% (4)
have been - 0.05% (4)
of these - 0.05% (4)
the european - 0.05% (4)
artificial intelligence - 0.05% (4)
have a - 0.05% (4)
are not - 0.05% (4)
rights impacts - 0.05% (4)
but also - 0.05% (4)
by the - 0.05% (4)
forecasts are - 0.05% (4)
range of - 0.05% (4)
respect human - 0.05% (4)
would be - 0.05% (4)
of global - 0.05% (4)
beat the - 0.05% (4)
that are - 0.05% (4)
the public - 0.05% (4)
will be - 0.05% (4)
business conduct - 0.04% (3)
the uk - 0.04% (3)
social network - 0.04% (3)
the ncp - 0.04% (3)
to prevent - 0.04% (3)
public policies - 0.04% (3)
corporate responsibility - 0.04% (3)
on responsible - 0.04% (3)
network analysis - 0.04% (3)
to know - 0.04% (3)
is more - 0.04% (3)
the environment - 0.04% (3)
going to - 0.04% (3)
idea of - 0.04% (3)
has developed - 0.04% (3)
the potential - 0.04% (3)
examples of - 0.04% (3)
not forget - 0.04% (3)
are the - 0.04% (3)
→ insights, - 0.04% (3)
rights and - 0.04% (3)
the financial - 0.04% (3)
for companies - 0.04% (3)
are being - 0.04% (3)
of algorithms - 0.04% (3)
must be - 0.04% (3)
to beat - 0.04% (3)
public policy - 0.04% (3)
border regions - 0.04% (3)
that create - 0.04% (3)
policy networks - 0.04% (3)
enterprises, chapter - 0.04% (3)
structural breaks - 0.04% (3)
the context - 0.04% (3)
than the - 0.04% (3)
the future - 0.04% (3)
any other - 0.04% (3)
is often - 0.04% (3)
to produce - 0.04% (3)
of course, - 0.04% (3)
a group - 0.04% (3)
responsible algorithms - 0.04% (3)
noise to - 0.04% (3)
of that - 0.04% (3)
that they - 0.04% (3)
context of - 0.04% (3)
get the - 0.04% (3)
tags: complexity, - 0.04% (3)
any one - 0.04% (3)
provide accurate - 0.04% (3)
and it - 0.04% (3)
the guidelines - 0.04% (3)
the second - 0.04% (3)
view of - 0.04% (3)
university of - 0.04% (3)
and what - 0.04% (3)
of public - 0.04% (3)
what we - 0.04% (3)
forecasts, the - 0.04% (3)
result in - 0.04% (3)
do with - 0.04% (3)
the right - 0.04% (3)
the forecasts - 0.04% (3)
diligence is - 0.04% (3)
to understand - 0.04% (3)
risk of - 0.04% (3)
a consensus - 0.04% (3)
of west - 0.04% (3)
to get - 0.04% (3)
we will - 0.04% (3)
of water - 0.04% (3)
to ensure - 0.04% (3)
topic of - 0.04% (3)
sustainable development - 0.04% (3)
this resource - 0.04% (3)
links oecd - 0.04% (3)
(8) july - 0.04% (3)
how to - 0.04% (3)
this approach - 0.04% (3)
the oecd’s - 0.04% (3)
two-thirds of - 0.04% (3)
of groundwater - 0.04% (3)
a number - 0.04% (3)
2015 (15) - 0.04% (3)
think of - 0.04% (3)
problems are - 0.04% (3)
the economic - 0.04% (3)
be applied - 0.04% (3)
about the - 0.04% (3)
opportunity to - 0.04% (3)
trade growth - 0.04% (3)
digital economy, - 0.04% (3)
one is - 0.04% (3)
insights, new - 0.04% (3)
out of - 0.04% (3)
should also - 0.04% (3)
objectives by - 0.04% (3)
or change - 0.04% (3)
the world. - 0.04% (3)
and investment - 0.04% (3)
doing so - 0.04% (3)
development co-operation - 0.04% (3)
of trade - 0.04% (3)
should not - 0.04% (3)
of complexity - 0.04% (3)
be more - 0.04% (3)
european commission - 0.04% (3)
2012 (7) - 0.04% (3)
2013 (11) - 0.04% (3)
cross-border co-operation, - 0.04% (3)
2011 (11) - 0.04% (3)
half of - 0.04% (3)
2010 (16) - 0.04% (3)
economic development - 0.04% (3)
policies to - 0.04% (3)
socio-economic systems - 0.04% (3)
2010 (18) - 0.04% (3)
2011 (8) - 0.04% (3)
2013 (10) - 0.04% (3)
from a - 0.04% (3)
and hence - 0.04% (3)
policy responses - 0.04% (3)
particularly in - 0.04% (3)
these layers - 0.04% (3)
out to - 0.04% (3)
complex problems - 0.04% (3)
the relationship - 0.02% (2)
area is - 0.02% (2)
these issues - 0.02% (2)
era of - 0.02% (2)
of ict - 0.02% (2)
do the - 0.02% (2)
when things - 0.02% (2)
their own - 0.02% (2)
the technology - 0.02% (2)
comparative advantage - 0.02% (2)
2010 (15) - 0.02% (2)
industry efforts - 0.02% (2)
people and - 0.02% (2)
should do - 0.02% (2)
key issue - 0.02% (2)
dialogue on - 0.02% (2)
value chain - 0.02% (2)
case, it - 0.02% (2)
in any - 0.02% (2)
is low - 0.02% (2)
or mitigate - 0.02% (2)
growth is - 0.02% (2)
public sector - 0.02% (2)
of new - 0.02% (2)
2014 (17) - 0.02% (2)
at this - 0.02% (2)
the next - 0.02% (2)
2016 (21) - 0.02% (2)
appropriate due - 0.02% (2)
2014 (14) - 0.02% (2)
(15) march - 0.02% (2)
2015 (23) - 0.02% (2)
(18) may - 0.02% (2)
2014 (10) - 0.02% (2)
(18) september - 0.02% (2)
2016 (15) - 0.02% (2)
2014 (7) - 0.02% (2)
rights impacts. - 0.02% (2)
june 2016 - 0.02% (2)
2016 (12) - 0.02% (2)
developed a - 0.02% (2)
companies developing - 0.02% (2)
(12) november - 0.02% (2)
2012 (8) - 0.02% (2)
with other - 0.02% (2)
diligence should - 0.02% (2)
(11) january - 0.02% (2)
2013 (9) - 0.02% (2)
economy is - 0.02% (2)
national contact - 0.02% (2)
oecd countries - 0.02% (2)
(12) may - 0.02% (2)
december 2016 - 0.02% (2)
focus on - 0.02% (2)
potential human - 0.02% (2)
freedom of - 0.02% (2)
what the - 0.02% (2)
the theme - 0.02% (2)
human rights. - 0.02% (2)
2016 (22) - 0.02% (2)
systems. the - 0.02% (2)
policies are - 0.02% (2)
understand the - 0.02% (2)
itself a - 0.02% (2)
modern economic - 0.02% (2)
capture the - 0.02% (2)
each of - 0.02% (2)
for understanding - 0.02% (2)
to them. - 0.02% (2)
akin to - 0.02% (2)
a great - 0.02% (2)
theory to - 0.02% (2)
the architecture - 0.02% (2)
using complexity - 0.02% (2)
at economic - 0.02% (2)
on insights - 0.02% (2)
complexity theory - 0.02% (2)
are seeing - 0.02% (2)
sense of - 0.02% (2)
consider a - 0.02% (2)
comments from - 0.02% (2)
is key - 0.02% (2)
andy haldane - 0.02% (2)
natural and - 0.02% (2)
response to - 0.02% (2)
they may - 0.02% (2)
and global - 0.02% (2)
of some - 0.02% (2)
for trade - 0.02% (2)
reliant on - 0.02% (2)
was not - 0.02% (2)
a whole - 0.02% (2)
he meant - 0.02% (2)
these systems - 0.02% (2)
complex systems - 0.02% (2)
responses to - 0.02% (2)
encourage the - 0.02% (2)
large number - 0.02% (2)
complexity of - 0.02% (2)
important when - 0.02% (2)
between these - 0.02% (2)
of interactions - 0.02% (2)
a crisis - 0.02% (2)
means that - 0.02% (2)
them to - 0.02% (2)
of making - 0.02% (2)
oecd in - 0.02% (2)
a guide - 0.02% (2)
ground in - 0.02% (2)
the productivity - 0.02% (2)
health and - 0.02% (2)
on potential - 0.02% (2)
personal data - 0.02% (2)
measures to - 0.02% (2)
oecd ministerial - 0.02% (2)
companies should - 0.02% (2)
in june - 0.02% (2)
clear information - 0.02% (2)
algorithms and - 0.02% (2)
structural policies - 0.02% (2)
verifiable and - 0.02% (2)
and safety - 0.02% (2)
description of - 0.02% (2)
the low-growth - 0.02% (2)
publication is - 0.02% (2)
guide on - 0.02% (2)
and implement - 0.02% (2)
on how - 0.02% (2)
potential growth - 0.02% (2)
after the - 0.02% (2)
policy in - 0.02% (2)
economics in - 0.02% (2)
and diverse - 0.02% (2)
deep and - 0.02% (2)
the netherlands - 0.02% (2)
these are - 0.02% (2)
the retreat - 0.02% (2)
the current - 0.02% (2)
low-growth trap. - 0.02% (2)
oecd has - 0.02% (2)
to become - 0.02% (2)
the german - 0.02% (2)
it would - 0.02% (2)
per year - 0.02% (2)
get out - 0.02% (2)
crisis in - 0.02% (2)
of this - 0.02% (2)
inclusive structural - 0.02% (2)
and trade - 0.02% (2)
needed to - 0.02% (2)
partly because - 0.02% (2)
the partnership - 0.02% (2)
the aid - 0.02% (2)
group of - 0.02% (2)
not an - 0.02% (2)
groundwater supplies - 0.02% (2)
water and - 0.02% (2)
that policy - 0.02% (2)
properly managed - 0.02% (2)
a panel - 0.02% (2)
importance of - 0.02% (2)
growing global - 0.02% (2)
countries are - 0.02% (2)
of its - 0.02% (2)
60% of - 0.02% (2)
a similar - 0.02% (2)
crops, a - 0.02% (2)
has the - 0.02% (2)
the us - 0.02% (2)
to consumers - 0.02% (2)
in california, - 0.02% (2)
agriculture (gffa) - 0.02% (2)
food and - 0.02% (2)
forum for - 0.02% (2)
morning share - 0.02% (2)
afternoon; 30/09 - 0.02% (2)
morning; 29/09 - 0.02% (2)
webcast: 29/09 - 0.02% (2)
watch the - 0.02% (2)
and inet. - 0.02% (2)
be properly - 0.02% (2)
potential to - 0.02% (2)
oecd hq, - 0.02% (2)
so that - 0.02% (2)
the latest - 0.02% (2)
of development - 0.02% (2)
found here. - 0.02% (2)
water policy - 0.02% (2)
work on - 0.02% (2)
on water - 0.02% (2)
panel discussion - 0.02% (2)
information on - 0.02% (2)
to keep - 0.02% (2)
continue to - 0.02% (2)
not reliant - 0.02% (2)
act as - 0.02% (2)
and has - 0.02% (2)
water management - 0.02% (2)
providing information - 0.02% (2)
in punjab - 0.02% (2)
into account - 0.02% (2)
in countries - 0.02% (2)
you can’t - 0.02% (2)
in pumping - 0.02% (2)
of oecd - 0.02% (2)
of south - 0.02% (2)
40% of - 0.02% (2)
a range - 0.02% (2)
production in - 0.02% (2)
paris, along - 0.02% (2)
29-30 september - 0.02% (2)
100 km - 0.02% (2)
that it - 0.02% (2)
adaptive system - 0.02% (2)
based on - 0.02% (2)
interactions between - 0.02% (2)
set of - 0.02% (2)
as being - 0.02% (2)
and society - 0.02% (2)
has found - 0.02% (2)
time – - 0.02% (2)
development programmes - 0.02% (2)
assistance has - 0.02% (2)
which can - 0.02% (2)
think we - 0.02% (2)
of what - 0.02% (2)
growth and - 0.02% (2)
many other - 0.02% (2)
lead to - 0.02% (2)
to address - 0.02% (2)
to this - 0.02% (2)
if these - 0.02% (2)
– or - 0.02% (2)
about how - 0.02% (2)
because of - 0.02% (2)
the rest - 0.02% (2)
20 january - 0.02% (2)
the answers - 0.02% (2)
the sum - 0.02% (2)
the people - 0.02% (2)
and policy, - 0.02% (2)
counsel of - 0.02% (2)
on complexity - 0.02% (2)
a workshop - 0.02% (2)
oecd organised - 0.02% (2)
development agenda. - 0.02% (2)
2030 sustainable - 0.02% (2)
allow us - 0.02% (2)
and that - 0.02% (2)
more likely - 0.02% (2)
complexity should - 0.02% (2)
and reducing - 0.02% (2)
to achieving - 0.02% (2)
development assistance - 0.02% (2)
be taken - 0.02% (2)
how we - 0.02% (2)
same time, - 0.02% (2)
areas where - 0.02% (2)
key for - 0.02% (2)
of social - 0.02% (2)
for each - 0.02% (2)
be different - 0.02% (2)
– and - 0.02% (2)
the 2030 - 0.02% (2)
best to - 0.02% (2)
complex adaptive - 0.02% (2)
development challenges - 0.02% (2)
can help - 0.02% (2)
in particular - 0.02% (2)
place in - 0.02% (2)
artificial intelligence. - 0.02% (2)
know which - 0.02% (2)
be the - 0.02% (2)
it also - 0.02% (2)
error, but - 0.02% (2)
to note - 0.02% (2)
forecasts or - 0.02% (2)
consistency and - 0.02% (2)
closer to - 0.02% (2)
the different - 0.02% (2)
taking the - 0.02% (2)
actual reading. - 0.02% (2)
above the - 0.02% (2)
mentioned previously, - 0.02% (2)
vary significantly - 0.02% (2)
march 2016, - 0.02% (2)
in january - 0.02% (2)
malaysia’s 2015 - 0.02% (2)
practical example - 0.02% (2)
significantly from - 0.02% (2)
ahead of - 0.02% (2)
will consistently - 0.02% (2)
is unlikely - 0.02% (2)
however, it - 0.02% (2)
the consensus, - 0.02% (2)
for an - 0.02% (2)
to increase - 0.02% (2)
from individual - 0.02% (2)
perfect, but - 0.02% (2)
the last - 0.02% (2)
contributed to - 0.02% (2)
to consider - 0.02% (2)
those that - 0.02% (2)
at certain - 0.02% (2)
examples. the - 0.02% (2)
at risk - 0.02% (2)
to look - 0.02% (2)
to set - 0.02% (2)
the era - 0.02% (2)
are only - 0.02% (2)
applied to - 0.02% (2)
to these - 0.02% (2)
of robots - 0.02% (2)
does it - 0.02% (2)
the topic - 0.02% (2)
fake news, - 0.02% (2)
algorithms in - 0.02% (2)
varying degrees - 0.02% (2)
whether the - 0.02% (2)
the result - 0.02% (2)
multiple forecasts - 0.02% (2)
the past - 0.02% (2)
combination of - 0.02% (2)
to foresee - 0.02% (2)
than not - 0.02% (2)
better to - 0.02% (2)
there has - 0.02% (2)
accurate forecast. - 0.02% (2)
the vast - 0.02% (2)
co-operation in - 0.02% (2)
of forecasting - 0.02% (2)
economics and - 0.02% (2)
complexity, economic - 0.02% (2)
forecasts? the - 0.02% (2)
the university - 0.02% (2)
for development - 0.02% (2)
to better - 0.02% (2)
particularly when - 0.02% (2)
for local - 0.02% (2)
beyond the - 0.02% (2)
and who - 0.02% (2)
for all - 0.02% (2)
predicting the - 0.02% (2)
the analysis - 0.02% (2)
functioning of - 0.02% (2)
potential of - 0.02% (2)
for this - 0.02% (2)
security of - 0.02% (2)
african countries - 0.02% (2)
are also - 0.02% (2)
african union - 0.02% (2)
issues. the - 0.02% (2)
and of - 0.02% (2)
relation to - 0.02% (2)
majority of - 0.02% (2)
is essentially - 0.02% (2)
are in - 0.02% (2)
statistical noise - 0.02% (2)
the weight - 0.02% (2)
forecast is - 0.02% (2)
by taking - 0.02% (2)
one individual - 0.02% (2)
so what - 0.02% (2)
of error. - 0.02% (2)
the more - 0.02% (2)
of galton’s - 0.02% (2)
evident in - 0.02% (2)
of individuals - 0.02% (2)
weight of - 0.02% (2)
turned out - 0.02% (2)
the mean - 0.02% (2)
in one - 0.02% (2)
vast amount - 0.02% (2)
the story - 0.02% (2)
to cancel - 0.02% (2)
is there - 0.02% (2)
the question - 0.02% (2)
even more - 0.02% (2)
take into - 0.02% (2)
forget the - 0.02% (2)
making the - 0.02% (2)
amount of - 0.02% (2)
however, that - 0.02% (2)
available. in - 0.02% (2)
of raw - 0.02% (2)
been a - 0.02% (2)
of the crowds - 0.1% (8)
the wisdom of - 0.1% (8)
wisdom of the - 0.1% (8)
by guest author - 0.09% (7)
share this:tweetprintmoreshare on - 0.09% (7)
this:tweetprintmoreshare on tumblremailpocket - 0.09% (7)
from → insights - 0.09% (7)
the oecd guidelines - 0.07% (6)
oecd guidelines for - 0.07% (6)
of the oecd - 0.06% (5)
the consensus forecast - 0.06% (5)
comment from → - 0.06% (5)
system of systems - 0.06% (5)
can be found - 0.06% (5)
need to be - 0.06% (5)
for multinational enterprises - 0.06% (5)
guidelines for multinational - 0.06% (5)
a comment from - 0.05% (4)
is likely to - 0.05% (4)
new approaches to - 0.05% (4)
on tumblremailpocket leave - 0.05% (4)
there is a - 0.05% (4)
as well as - 0.05% (4)
human rights impacts - 0.05% (4)
the average of - 0.05% (4)
leave a comment - 0.05% (4)
a more accurate - 0.05% (4)
the margin of - 0.05% (4)
to respect human - 0.05% (4)
at the same - 0.05% (4)
beat the consensus - 0.05% (4)
tumblremailpocket leave a - 0.05% (4)
to economic challenges - 0.05% (4)
for multinational enterprises, - 0.04% (3)
should not be - 0.04% (3)
out to be - 0.04% (3)
the european commission - 0.04% (3)
in the context - 0.04% (3)
to do with - 0.04% (3)
a consensus forecast - 0.04% (3)
due diligence is - 0.04% (3)
to beat the - 0.04% (3)
multinational enterprises, chapter - 0.04% (3)
along with the - 0.04% (3)
2017 tags: complexity, - 0.04% (3)
human rights and - 0.04% (3)
it is important - 0.04% (3)
likely to be - 0.04% (3)
complex system of - 0.04% (3)
going to be - 0.04% (3)
is important to - 0.04% (3)
insights, new approaches - 0.04% (3)
around the world. - 0.04% (3)
the university of - 0.02% (2)
businesses that create - 0.02% (2)
due diligence should - 0.02% (2)
in any case, - 0.02% (2)
potential human rights - 0.02% (2)
the productivity slowdown - 0.02% (2)
case, it is - 0.02% (2)
and investment policies - 0.02% (2)
and economic growth - 0.02% (2)
rights due diligence - 0.02% (2)
has developed a - 0.02% (2)
result in a - 0.02% (2)
the economic outlook - 0.02% (2)
it would be - 0.02% (2)
policy responses to - 0.02% (2)
for example, the - 0.02% (2)
more likely to - 0.02% (2)
and financial systems. - 0.02% (2)
using complexity theory - 0.02% (2)
to the oecd - 0.02% (2)
oecd hq, paris, - 0.02% (2)
the financial crisis - 0.02% (2)
complexity theory to - 0.02% (2)
response to the - 0.02% (2)
european commission and - 0.02% (2)
a guide on - 0.02% (2)
inet. watch the - 0.02% (2)
webcast: 29/09 morning; - 0.02% (2)
29/09 afternoon; 30/09 - 0.02% (2)
morning share this:tweetprintmoreshare - 0.02% (2)
comments from → - 0.02% (2)
the oecd has - 0.02% (2)
get out of - 0.02% (2)
a range of - 0.02% (2)
verifiable and clear - 0.02% (2)
and clear information - 0.02% (2)
economic and financial - 0.02% (2)
economic development theories - 0.02% (2)
let’s not forget - 0.02% (2)
hq, paris, along - 0.02% (2)
forum for food - 0.02% (2)
oecd and the - 0.02% (2)
of water to - 0.02% (2)
a growing global - 0.02% (2)
food and agriculture - 0.02% (2)
global forum for - 0.02% (2)
afternoon; 30/09 morning - 0.02% (2)
29/09 morning; 29/09 - 0.02% (2)
watch the webcast: - 0.02% (2)
commission and inet. - 0.02% (2)
with the european - 0.02% (2)
policy, 29-30 september - 0.02% (2)
be properly managed - 0.02% (2)
on complexity and - 0.02% (2)
organised a workshop - 0.02% (2)
the oecd and - 0.02% (2)
2030 sustainable development - 0.02% (2)
we should build - 0.02% (2)
there has been - 0.02% (2)
complexity should not - 0.02% (2)
the same time, - 0.02% (2)
sustainable development agenda. - 0.02% (2)
the sum of - 0.02% (2)
and their interaction - 0.02% (2)
think of the - 0.02% (2)
and agriculture (gffa) - 0.02% (2)
has the potential - 0.02% (2)
on responsible business - 0.02% (2)
average of all - 0.02% (2)
forecasts from individual - 0.02% (2)
the combination of - 0.02% (2)
closer to the - 0.02% (2)
above the actual - 0.02% (2)
to know which - 0.02% (2)
march 2016, the - 0.02% (2)
development assistance has - 0.02% (2)
the consensus, however, - 0.02% (2)
taking the average - 0.02% (2)
any one individual - 0.02% (2)
of that noise - 0.02% (2)
is that the - 0.02% (2)
vast amount of - 0.02% (2)
to provide a - 0.02% (2)
to produce a - 0.02% (2)
is a science - 0.02% (2)
tags: complexity, economic - 0.02% (2)
of border region - 0.02% (2)
of cross-border co-operation - 0.02% (2)
network analysis is - 0.02% (2)
analysis is also - 0.02% (2)
publication is a - 0.02% (2)
the security of - 0.02% (2)
of west african - 0.02% (2)
in relation to - 0.02% (2)
work on water - 0.02% (2)
your email address - 0.02% (2)

Here you can find chart of all your popular one, two and three word phrases. Google and others search engines means your page is about words you use frequently.

Copyright © 2015-2016 hupso.pl. All rights reserved. FB | +G | Twitter

Hupso.pl jest serwisem internetowym, w którym jednym kliknieciem możesz szybko i łatwo sprawdź stronę www pod kątem SEO. Oferujemy darmowe pozycjonowanie stron internetowych oraz wycena domen i stron internetowych. Prowadzimy ranking polskich stron internetowych oraz ranking stron alexa.