3.51 score from hupso.pl for:
noiseofthecrowd.com



HTML Content


Titlenoise of the crowd noise of the crowd - interesting things about public opinion - interesting things about public opinion

Length: 123, Words: 20
Description interesting things about public opinion

Length: 39, Words: 5
Keywords pusty
Robots noodp
Charset UTF-8
Og Meta - Title exist
Og Meta - Description exist
Og Meta - Site name exist
Tytuł powinien zawierać pomiędzy 10 a 70 znaków (ze spacjami), a mniej niż 12 słów w długości.
Meta opis powinien zawierać pomiędzy 50 a 160 znaków (łącznie ze spacjami), a mniej niż 24 słów w długości.
Kodowanie znaków powinny być określone , UTF-8 jest chyba najlepszy zestaw znaków, aby przejść z powodu UTF-8 jest bardziej międzynarodowy kodowaniem.
Otwarte obiekty wykresu powinny być obecne w stronie internetowej (więcej informacji na temat protokołu OpenGraph: http://ogp.me/)

SEO Content

Words/Characters 3042
Text/HTML 35.09 %
Headings H1 1
H2 17
H3 0
H4 0
H5 0
H6 0
H1
noise of the crowd
H2
why fake news might not be such a problem for uk liberals: polling matters
tory governments age well in the memory. labour governments turn sour.
how past prime ministers are seen: polling matters
corbyn and may’s relative strengths: polling matters
winners and losers from 2016: polling matters
us election polls: what went wrong?
how low can labour’s support go? what past elections & european politics suggest – polling matters
why corbyn now can’t be beaten until he loses a general election: polling matters
politics now favours the lib dems but they’ve still got huge problems: polling matters
hinkley point and grammar schools show may’s electoral priorities – and why she could have a problem with airport expansion
info
categories
most read
archives
polling blogs
pollsters
some others i like
H3
H4
H5
H6
strong
b
i
em
Bolds strong 0
b 0
i 0
em 0
Zawartość strony internetowej powinno zawierać więcej niż 250 słów, z stopa tekst / kod jest wyższy niż 20%.
Pozycji używać znaczników (h1, h2, h3, ...), aby określić temat sekcji lub ustępów na stronie, ale zwykle, użyj mniej niż 6 dla każdego tagu pozycje zachować swoją stronę zwięzły.
Styl używać silnych i kursywy znaczniki podkreślić swoje słowa kluczowe swojej stronie, ale nie nadużywać (mniej niż 16 silnych tagi i 16 znaczników kursywy)

Statystyki strony

twitter:title exist
twitter:description exist
google+ itemprop=name pusty
Pliki zewnętrzne 13
Pliki CSS 3
Pliki javascript 10
Plik należy zmniejszyć całkowite odwołanie plików (CSS + JavaScript) do 7-8 maksymalnie.

Linki wewnętrzne i zewnętrzne

Linki 207
Linki wewnętrzne 0
Linki zewnętrzne 207
Linki bez atrybutu Title 169
Linki z atrybutem NOFOLLOW 0
Linki - Użyj atrybutu tytuł dla każdego łącza. Nofollow link jest link, który nie pozwala wyszukiwarkom boty zrealizują są odnośniki no follow. Należy zwracać uwagę na ich użytkowania

Linki wewnętrzne

pusty

Linki zewnętrzne

noise of the crowd http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/
why fake news might not be such a problem for uk liberals: polling matters http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/fake-news-might-not-problem-uk-liberals-polling-matters/
politics http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/category/politics/
polling matters http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/category/polling-matters/
be the first to comment http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/fake-news-might-not-problem-uk-liberals-polling-matters/#respond
yougov poll http://d25d2506sfb94s.cloudfront.net/cumulus_uploads/document/g9yhnt6pqu/channel4results_170130_fakenews_w.pdf
tory governments age well in the memory. labour governments turn sour. http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/tory-governments-age-well-memory-labour-governments-turn-sour/
politics http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/category/politics/
be the first to comment http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/tory-governments-age-well-memory-labour-governments-turn-sour/#respond
political betting http://www2.politicalbetting.com/index.php/archives/2017/02/11/tory-governments-age-well-in-the-memory-labour-governments-turn-sour/
satisfaction data https://www.ipsos-mori.com/researchpublications/researcharchive/poll.aspx?oitemid=2438&view=wide
pb / polling matters podcast https://kpedley.podbean.com/
- http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/pb1.png
- http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/pb2.png
how past prime ministers are seen: polling matters http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/past-prime-ministers-seen-polling-matters/
politics http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/category/politics/
polling matters http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/category/polling-matters/
be the first to comment http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/past-prime-ministers-seen-polling-matters/#respond
corbyn and may’s relative strengths: polling matters http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/corbyn-mays-relative-strengths-polling-matters/
politics http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/category/politics/
polling matters http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/category/polling-matters/
be the first to comment http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/corbyn-mays-relative-strengths-polling-matters/#respond
is here http://opinium.co.uk/may-leads-corbyn-range-measures/
winners and losers from 2016: polling matters http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/winners-and-losers-from-2016-polling-matters/
politics http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/category/politics/
polling matters http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/category/polling-matters/
us election polls: what went wrong? http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/us-election-polls-what-went-wrong/
bad polling http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/category/bad-polling/
politics http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/category/politics/
polling matters http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/category/polling-matters/
u.s. http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/category/u-s/
how low can labour’s support go? what past elections & european politics suggest – polling matters http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/how-low-can-labours-support-go-what-past-elections-european-politics-suggest-polling-matters/
historical polls http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/category/historical-polls/
politics http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/category/politics/
polling matters http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/category/polling-matters/
previously compared http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/past-elections-suggest-labours-prospects-are-better-than-most-commentators-think/
- http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/polling-matters-lab-slides.png
- http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/centre-left.png
why corbyn now can’t be beaten until he loses a general election: polling matters http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/why-corbyn-now-cant-be-challenged-until-he-loses-a-general-election-polling-matters/
labour leadership http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/category/labour-leadership/
polling matters http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/category/polling-matters/
u.s. http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/category/u-s/
before http://www.newstatesman.com/politics/staggers/2016/01/think-jeremy-corbyn-untouchable-among-labour-activists-think-again
my view http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/corbyns-chances-of-staying-leader-are-better-than-ever-for-now/
politics now favours the lib dems but they’ve still got huge problems: polling matters http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/politics-now-favours-the-lib-dems-but-theyve-still-got-huge-problems-polling-matters/
politics http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/category/politics/
polling matters http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/category/polling-matters/
u.s. http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/category/u-s/
1 comment http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/politics-now-favours-the-lib-dems-but-theyve-still-got-huge-problems-polling-matters/#comments
put themselves https://d25d2506sfb94s.cloudfront.net/cumulus_uploads/document/jtuxosrbsn/internalresults_160815_leftrightscale_w.pdf
even consider http://d25d2506sfb94s.cloudfront.net/cumulus_uploads/document/5ervwu59hu/internalresults_160905_thirdparty_w.pdf
hinkley point and grammar schools show may’s electoral priorities – and why she could have a problem with airport expansion http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/hinkley-point-and-grammar-schools-show-mays-electoral-priorities-and-why-she-could-have-a-problem-with-airport-expansion/
climate sock http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/category/climate-sock/
politics http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/category/politics/
transport http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/category/transport/
yougov’s poll https://d25d2506sfb94s.cloudfront.net/cumulus_uploads/document/bwmgv6umcm/internalresults_160812_grammarengland.pdf
opinium poll http://opinium.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/opinium_smf_dead_centre_tables_published-1.pdf
67 labour-held seats http://www.britishelectionstudy.com/bes-resources/2015-general-election-results-data-released-by-the-bes/#.v95uk_arliu
populus poll http://www.populus.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/omlet_britain_flymay.pdf
as i found http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/airport-expansion-is-either-the-end-of-carbon-budgets-or-the-end-of-cheap-flights/
« older entries http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/page/2/
entries http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/feed/
comments http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/comments/feed/
about http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/about/
contact http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/contact/
attitudes http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/category/attitudes/
bad polling http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/category/bad-polling/
china http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/category/china/
climate sock http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/category/climate-sock/
climategate http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/category/climategate/
communications http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/category/communications/
criminal justice http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/category/criminal-justice/
demographics http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/category/demographics/
energy sources http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/category/energy-sources/
europe http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/category/europe/
historical polls http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/category/historical-polls/
international http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/category/international/
labour leadership http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/category/labour-leadership/
london http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/category/london/
media http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/category/media/
politics http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/category/politics/
polling matters http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/category/polling-matters/
protests http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/category/protests/
social http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/category/social/
solutions http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/category/solutions/
transport http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/category/transport/
u.s. http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/category/u-s/
uncategorized http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/category/uncategorized/
the climate debate has gone wrong – this year that can change http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/the-climate-debate-has-gone-wrong-this-year-that-can-change/
how decc is wasting money on its new opinion poll http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/how-decc-is-wasting-money-on-its-new-opinion-poll/
is euroscepticism collapsing, or is it just bad polling? http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/is-euroscepticism-collapsing-or-is-it-just-bad-polling/
don’t just believe what you’re told about polls http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/don%e2%80%99t-just-believe-what-you%e2%80%99re-told-about-polls/
‘belief’ in climate change is the wrong goal http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/%e2%80%98belief%e2%80%99-in-climate-change-is-the-wrong-goal/
climate change: the social attitudes survey is old news, but the lessons are important http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/the-social-attitudes-survey-is-old-news-but-the-lessons-are-important/
the limited impact of climategate http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/the-limited-impact-of-climategate/
fracking has hardly any public support – but opponents have a tough choice http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/fracking-has-hardly-any-public-support-but-opponents-have-a-tough-choice/
opponents of scottish independence shouldn’t be complacent about winning http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/opponents-of-scottish-independence-shouldnt-be-complacent-about-winning/
climate change opinion is now up to pre-climategate levels http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/climate-change-opinion-is-now-up-to-pre-climategate-levels/
february 2017 http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/2017/02/
december 2016 http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/2016/12/
november 2016 http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/2016/11/
october 2016 http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/2016/10/
september 2016 http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/2016/09/
august 2016 http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/2016/08/
july 2016 http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/2016/07/
june 2016 http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/2016/06/
may 2016 http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/2016/05/
april 2016 http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/2016/04/
march 2016 http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/2016/03/
february 2016 http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/2016/02/
january 2016 http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/2016/01/
december 2015 http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/2015/12/
november 2015 http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/2015/11/
october 2015 http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/2015/10/
september 2015 http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/2015/09/
august 2015 http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/2015/08/
july 2015 http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/2015/07/
june 2015 http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/2015/06/
may 2015 http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/2015/05/
april 2015 http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/2015/04/
march 2015 http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/2015/03/
february 2015 http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/2015/02/
january 2015 http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/2015/01/
december 2014 http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/2014/12/
november 2014 http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/2014/11/
october 2014 http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/2014/10/
september 2014 http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/2014/09/
august 2014 http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/2014/08/
may 2014 http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/2014/05/
april 2014 http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/2014/04/
march 2014 http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/2014/03/
february 2014 http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/2014/02/
january 2014 http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/2014/01/
december 2013 http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/2013/12/
november 2013 http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/2013/11/
october 2013 http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/2013/10/
september 2013 http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/2013/09/
august 2013 http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/2013/08/
july 2013 http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/2013/07/
june 2013 http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/2013/06/
may 2013 http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/2013/05/
april 2013 http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/2013/04/
march 2013 http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/2013/03/
february 2013 http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/2013/02/
january 2013 http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/2013/01/
december 2012 http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/2012/12/
november 2012 http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/2012/11/
october 2012 http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/2012/10/
september 2012 http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/2012/09/
august 2012 http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/2012/08/
july 2012 http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/2012/07/
june 2012 http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/2012/06/
may 2012 http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/2012/05/
april 2012 http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/2012/04/
march 2012 http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/2012/03/
february 2012 http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/2012/02/
january 2012 http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/2012/01/
december 2011 http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/2011/12/
november 2011 http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/2011/11/
october 2011 http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/2011/10/
september 2011 http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/2011/09/
august 2011 http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/2011/08/
july 2011 http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/2011/07/
june 2011 http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/2011/06/
may 2011 http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/2011/05/
april 2011 http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/2011/04/
march 2011 http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/2011/03/
february 2011 http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/2011/02/
january 2011 http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/2011/01/
december 2010 http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/2010/12/
november 2010 http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/2010/11/
october 2010 http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/2010/10/
september 2010 http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/2010/09/
august 2010 http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/2010/08/
july 2010 http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/2010/07/
june 2010 http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/2010/06/
may 2010 http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/2010/05/
april 2010 http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/2010/04/
march 2010 http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/2010/03/
february 2010 http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/2010/02/
january 2010 http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/2010/01/
december 2009 http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/2009/12/
november 2009 http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/2009/11/
ballots & bullets http://nottspolitics.org/
fivethirtyeight http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/
lord ashcroft's polls http://www.lordashcroft.com/polling/researcharchive.html
political betting http://www6.politicalbetting.com/
polls and votes http://pollsandvotes.com/pav/
pollytics http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollytics/
straight statistics http://www.straightstatistics.org/tag/polls
the political pulse http://www.politicshome.com/uk/the_political_pulse.html
the poll bludger http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/
uk polling report http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/
comres http://comres.co.uk/default.aspx
icm http://www.icmresearch.com/category/media-centre
ipsos mori http://ipsos-mori.com
populus http://populus.co.uk
survation http://survation.com/surveyarchive/
yougov http://yougov.co.uk/corporate
carbon brief http://www.carbonbrief.org/
climate safety http://climatesafety.org/
duncan's economic blog http://duncanseconomicblog.wordpress.com/
max atkinson's blog http://maxatkinson.blogspot.com/
paul krugman http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/
political climate http://politicalclimate.net/
used to be somebody http://usedtobesomebody.blogspot.com/
wordpress http://wordpress.org/

Zdjęcia

Zdjęcia 4
Zdjęcia bez atrybutu ALT 2
Zdjęcia bez atrybutu TITLE 4
Korzystanie Obraz ALT i TITLE atrybutu dla każdego obrazu.

Zdjęcia bez atrybutu TITLE

http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/pb1-1024x796.png
http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/pb2.png
http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/polling-matters-lab-slides.png
http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/centre-left.png

Zdjęcia bez atrybutu ALT

http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/pb1-1024x796.png
http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/pb2.png

Ranking:


Alexa Traffic
Daily Global Rank Trend
Daily Reach (Percent)









Majestic SEO











Text on page:

noise of the crowd interesting things about public opinion search for: why fake news might not be such a problem for uk liberals: polling matters posted in politics, polling matters on february 16th, 2017 by leo – be the first to comment on this week’s polling matters, keiran and i were joined by harry carr, who run’s sky’s polling. we talked about an interesting yougov poll on ‘fake news’, which suggested that people in the uk are relatively unlikely to believe made-up stories about immigrants and benefit scroungers. we also discussed the new polling matters/opinium poll on immigration, which found public opinion to be more nuanced than it might seem. tory governments age well in the memory. labour governments turn sour. posted in politics on february 12th, 2017 by leo – be the first to comment this article originally appeared on political betting no recent prime minister was popular as they approached the end of their time in power. each of the last five had net satisfaction scores – the proportion satisfied minus the proportion dissatisfied – of well below minus 20 points during their final month, according to mori’s satisfaction data. thatcher was the most unpopular, with 71% dissatisfied with the job she was doing. the least unpopular was gordon brown, who still had the support of 35% before the 2010 election. if it seems surprising that the scotsman was less reviled than the others, that’s because of what’s happened after his defeat. in the time since each prime minister left office, the collective memory of their effectiveness has been transformed. this week’s opinium poll for the pb / polling matters podcast found that thatcher has gone from being the least popular recent prime minister, when she left office, to the most popular now. over the same time, blair and brown have gone from the prime ministers with the joint-highest satisfaction scores (along with major) as they were leaving downing street, to being seen as the ones that did the worst job. with cameron moving up the ranking, the picture is clear – tory governments are remembered increasingly well over time, while labour governments become less popular. the reason for this is labour voters. while current tory voters have views that you’d expect – overwhelmingly believing tory prime ministers did a good job and thinking the opposite of labour ones – labour voters are more reluctant to support their party’s leaders. only one in three thinks blair did a good job (he’s more popular among lib dems) while even fewer think the same of gordon brown. this ambivalence does labour no good. tory voters can draw on several examples of what they consider successful prime ministers from their side. if even the currently diminished ranks of labour voters don’t believe that past labour governments were worthwhile, it’s hard to see who will resist the accusation that labour administrations spend too much for too little benefit. there are many reasons that labour supporters might come up with to justify their doubts about blair and brown’s governments. but tory voters have forgotten their previous reservations about the woman who left office as the least popular prime minister in recent history. if labour is to become an election-winning machine again, it will need to do the same for its own past leaders. how past prime ministers are seen: polling matters posted in politics, polling matters on february 8th, 2017 by leo – be the first to comment this week’s episode discussed the latest opinium/polling matters data, which looked at how past prime ministers are seen. we also talked about the chances of a possible labour leadership challenge and whether there’ll be a vote of no confidence in the speaker. the first part of the show covered german politics, where the spd’s new leader has given the party a rapid boost in the polls. corbyn and may’s relative strengths: polling matters posted in politics, polling matters on february 1st, 2017 by leo – be the first to comment polling matters is running weekly polls with opinium. this week we talked about new data showing that corbyn trails may on a series of characteristics that people might want in a leader – strength, caring about people like me, and capable as/of being prime minister. the opinium data is here. the first half of the show discusses northern ireland in the context of its forthcoming election and the complications of brexit. winners and losers from 2016: polling matters posted in politics, polling matters on december 17th, 2016 by leo – comments off on winners and losers from 2016: polling matters in the last episode of the year, keiran, rob and i talked about a listeners’ poll of 2016’s winners and losers, and the defining moments of the year: us election polls: what went wrong? posted in bad polling, politics, polling matters, u.s. on november 9th, 2016 by leo – comments off on us election polls: what went wrong? keiran and i recorded a polling matters podcast at 5am on election morning, responding to the results and debating what went wrong with the polls. you can listen here: how low can labour’s support go? what past elections & european politics suggest – polling matters posted in historical polls, politics, polling matters on october 27th, 2016 by leo – comments off on how low can labour’s support go? what past elections & european politics suggest – polling matters on polling matters this week i talked about what might happen to labour’s support over the rest of the parliament. regular readers of this site might remember that i’ve previously compared how oppositions have stood in the polls 18 months after elections with how they then did at the subsequent election (using mark pack’s brilliant collection of historical polling data). for this week’s episode i updated this analysis with the 2015 election (which was an outlier, as labour underperformed how they’d be expected to do – largely because of the polling miss). the analysis suggests that, between this point in a parliament and the subsequent election, polling leads typically roughly halve. this happens regardless of whether it’s the government or the opposition that’s leading in the polls at this point. i found this surprising and it seemed like it can’t be right. i had thought that this was typically a low point for governments, and that they usually recover support by the time an election comes. but the evidence doesn’t really seem to bear that out – and it appears the opposition did gain ground ahead of the 2001 and 2005 elections. obviously this is a crude model. it doesn’t take into account many things. but for what it’s worth it suggests that labour – currently about 12pts down – is on course for a 6pt election defeat, which is less than i’d expected. but here’s another view on the question of labour’s polling floor. if we look at other centre-left european parties that, like labour, were scoring between 35-45% in the late ’90s and early ’00s, we don’t see much evidence that labour is currently at the lowest point it can get. all of those parties have scored lower than labour in national parliamentary elections. most of the others have gone below 25%. clearly different electoral systems – and national politics – are an enormous factor. what happens in one country isn’t inevitably replicated in another. but this alone suggests that labour has no assurance it can call on the support of 30% of the public at a general election. other major centre-left parties have found that the ground can indeed fall away beneath them. i talked about this, along with ukip and theresa may’s in-tray, with keiran and asa bennett of the telegraph. audio: video: why corbyn now can’t be beaten until he loses a general election: polling matters posted in labour leadership, polling matters, u.s. on september 30th, 2016 by leo – comments off on why corbyn now can’t be beaten until he loses a general election: polling matters on polling matters this week i argued that the labour leadership challenge has made corbyn far stronger than he was before: his overall victory wasn’t much bigger than last time, 62% compared with just under 60%. but there was a significant increase in his win among the members, from about 50% to close to 60%. this was partly about people who voted for burnham last year, but is mostly about a change in the membership. smith won nearly two-thirds of people who had joined labour before the last general election, while corbyn is utterly dominant among more recent members. the party membership has changed and is much more pro-corbyn – although this had little to do with the leadership challenge. but the membership challenge itself will also make things even harder for those who want rid of corbyn, for two reasons: 1. he won 70% of registered supporters, who paid £25 to vote. it has to be expected that momentum will try to register those people as full party members, which will mean the membership will become even more sympathetic to corbyn. 2. as i’ve argued before, around a quarter of people who voted corbyn last year were shakeable in their faith. they would prefer a leader who could win an election to one who they agree with about everything. the size of his victory among members suggests to me that he’s won many if not most of those people (my view in may was, they needed corbyn to be given longer before they were persuaded he had to go). having made the decision to vote for corbyn this time, they’re now pyschologically committed to him and it’s going to be harder to shake their support in future than it would have been if there hadn’t been a challenge. this and discussion of how labour can win the public, and the us election, on podcast and video: politics now favours the lib dems but they’ve still got huge problems: polling matters posted in politics, polling matters, u.s. on september 22nd, 2016 by leo – 1 comment on this week’s polling matters i argued that the shape of politics at the moment is a great opportunity for the lib dems. they’re the party that, by miles, is seen as politically closest to most voters: on a 7-point left-right scale, 70% of people who have an opinion put themselves in the middle 3 positions 78% put the lib dems in those positions the tories are the next-most placed in those positions, and still only 40% put them there. this may be beginning to show: the lib dems have been winning local council by-elections in the last few months, when every other major party has had a net loss. but their voting intent score is still as bad as it was a year ago and only 22% say they’d even consider voting lib dem. the party has to resolve this contradiction, somehow persuading far more voters that they’re in the same place. i see two huge barriers to resolving this: 1. hardly anyone outside politics hears about the lib dems any more. it’s much easier to get people’s attention as a small party if you make radical protest noises: iraq, tuition fees. it’s much harder to do that if the space you want to occupy is, essentially, blairite. they’ve tried this with the eu, and farron has made his appeal to ’97 labour voters explicit, but this doesn’t seem to have made much difference yet. it’s much more difficult to come up with dramatic announcements that will allow people to understand what you stand for if you want to present yourself as responsible modernisers. 2. they may not have the members and mps for this. i don’t claim to be an expert on the membership of the party, but after 13 years of positioning itself as a left-liberal alternative to new labour, i’m not sure how much appetitie there is for a reversal. that said, 5 years in coalition may have shaken up the membership on that front. but even if farron wanted to become the new clegg (and his instincts are clearly to the left of blair’s) i’m not sure how much people in the party yearn to be a boring party of the centre. i talked about this and the us election with keiran and matt shaddick from ladbrokes. podcast and video below. hinkley point and grammar schools show may’s electoral priorities – and why she could have a problem with airport expansion posted in climate sock, politics, transport on september 18th, 2016 by leo – comments off on hinkley point and grammar schools show may’s electoral priorities – and why she could have a problem with airport expansion approval of hinkley point and plans for more secondary moderns might seem unrelated – but they have a shared politics and point towards a decision in favour of expanding either heathrow or gatwick. hinkley and selective education are both unpopular with the left and with most experts. increasing the number of secondary moderns is so evidently bad for most children that even corbyn could take may apart on it. and although the debate about hinkley point’s merits is more disputed, in both cases the government will face a long battle to achieve what it’s promised. but the political appeal for theresa may is clear. her message is that this is a government that will act decisively to promote jobs and skills. grammar schools and hinkley convey this effectively to one of may’s key target audiences. in yougov’s poll from before the secondary moderns announcement, the only groups of which a majority supported new grammars were 2015 tory voters and ukip voters, and the over 65s. the polls on hinkley are less useful but this recent opinium poll found that the same three groups are the strongest supporters of new nuclear power stations. this seems a clear sign that may’s top target in any early election wouldn’t be people who voted for miliband last year and are now put off by corbyn. she’d go for those who voted for farage. this makes electoral sense. there are 67 labour-held seats where the combined 2015 tory and ukip vote was more than the labour share. flipping those to tory would give a blair-style landslide. (this is pre-boundary changes) when it comes to airport expansion, public opinion is divided, but support seems to be strongest among the same groups who support hinkley and grammar schools. this 2015 populus poll found the over 65s to be the only age group in which a majority supports expansion. if the government is prepared to force more schools to become secondary moderns – in the face of all evidence about their benefit – the fact that london airport expansion is supported by the same people makes it seem likely that the government will go ahead. but there’s one problem that could transform the calculation. support for grammar schools is evenly spread across the country. support for london airport expansion isn’t. while 52% of londoners supported expansion in that populus poll, among people in many other parts of the country, support is only 35-39%. this won’t be a problem for the government so long as the decision is seen to only affect london and the south east. many people outside those areas are indifferent – they see it as a question for london that doesn’t affect them. but, as i found in my paper for the campaign for better transport last month, building a new runway in london means airports in the rest of the country will be restricted in size. ticket prices would go up for all flights across the country. this is hardly mentioned in the debate. as long as it isn’t, london airport expansion will seem to most people to be a london issue – and it will make political sense for may’s government to use it to appeal to the same people who like grammar schools and nuclear power. but of those 67 target seats, only nine are in london and the south east. if it were widely realised that london airport expansion would restrict growth in the rest of the country, the plans may be a lot less politically appealing than they seem. « older entries subscribe: entries | comments info about contact categories attitudes bad polling china climate sock climategate communications criminal justice demographics energy sources europe historical polls international labour leadership london media politics polling matters protests social solutions transport u.s. uncategorized most read the climate debate has gone wrong – this year that can change how decc is wasting money on its new opinion poll is euroscepticism collapsing, or is it just bad polling? don’t just believe what you’re told about polls ‘belief’ in climate change is the wrong goal climate change: the social attitudes survey is old news, but the lessons are important the limited impact of climategate fracking has hardly any public support – but opponents have a tough choice opponents of scottish independence shouldn’t be complacent about winning climate change opinion is now up to pre-climategate levels archives february 2017 december 2016 november 2016 october 2016 september 2016 august 2016 july 2016 june 2016 may 2016 april 2016 march 2016 february 2016 january 2016 december 2015 november 2015 october 2015 september 2015 august 2015 july 2015 june 2015 may 2015 april 2015 march 2015 february 2015 january 2015 december 2014 november 2014 october 2014 september 2014 august 2014 may 2014 april 2014 march 2014 february 2014 january 2014 december 2013 november 2013 october 2013 september 2013 august 2013 july 2013 june 2013 may 2013 april 2013 march 2013 february 2013 january 2013 december 2012 november 2012 october 2012 september 2012 august 2012 july 2012 june 2012 may 2012 april 2012 march 2012 february 2012 january 2012 december 2011 november 2011 october 2011 september 2011 august 2011 july 2011 june 2011 may 2011 april 2011 march 2011 february 2011 january 2011 december 2010 november 2010 october 2010 september 2010 august 2010 july 2010 june 2010 may 2010 april 2010 march 2010 february 2010 january 2010 december 2009 november 2009 polling blogs ballots & bullets fivethirtyeight lord ashcroft's polls political betting polls and votes pollytics straight statistics the political pulse the poll bludger uk polling report pollsters comres icm ipsos mori populus survation yougov some others i like carbon brief climate safety duncan's economic blog max atkinson's blog paul krugman political climate used to be somebody © leo barasi 2017. all rights reserved. powered by wordpress.


Here you find all texts from your page as Google (googlebot) and others search engines seen it.

Words density analysis:

Numbers of all words: 3004

One word

Two words phrases

Three words phrases

the - 7.39% (222)
and - 2.16% (65)
poll - 2.1% (63)
his - 1.73% (52)
that - 1.53% (46)
for - 1.46% (44)
this - 1.4% (42)
polling - 1.26% (38)
- 1.13% (34)
her - 1.03% (31)
labour - 1.03% (31)
matt - 0.97% (29)
out - 0.97% (29)
matters - 0.93% (28)
election - 0.83% (25)
are - 0.8% (24)
all - 0.8% (24)
about - 0.77% (23)
over - 0.77% (23)
but - 0.73% (22)
with - 0.73% (22)
may - 0.73% (22)
2016 - 0.7% (21)
support - 0.7% (21)
see - 0.67% (20)
vote - 0.67% (20)
they - 0.67% (20)
one - 0.6% (18)
how - 0.6% (18)
politics - 0.6% (18)
part - 0.6% (18)
people - 0.6% (18)
have - 0.57% (17)
who - 0.53% (16)
2015 - 0.53% (16)
was - 0.5% (15)
can - 0.47% (14)
government - 0.47% (14)
polls - 0.47% (14)
corbyn - 0.47% (14)
more - 0.43% (13)
will - 0.43% (13)
2010 - 0.43% (13)
what - 0.43% (13)
february - 0.4% (12)
tory - 0.4% (12)
has - 0.4% (12)
2013 - 0.4% (12)
2012 - 0.4% (12)
2011 - 0.4% (12)
new - 0.4% (12)
most - 0.37% (11)
climate - 0.37% (11)
voters - 0.37% (11)
london - 0.37% (11)
their - 0.37% (11)
party - 0.37% (11)
comment - 0.37% (11)
seem - 0.37% (11)
members - 0.37% (11)
you - 0.37% (11)
leo - 0.37% (11)
point - 0.37% (11)
minister - 0.33% (10)
2014 - 0.33% (10)
win - 0.33% (10)
posted - 0.33% (10)
there - 0.33% (10)
september - 0.33% (10)
lib - 0.33% (10)
those - 0.33% (10)
year - 0.33% (10)
leader - 0.33% (10)
much - 0.33% (10)
prime - 0.33% (10)
left - 0.3% (9)
off - 0.3% (9)
expansion - 0.3% (9)
november - 0.3% (9)
december - 0.3% (9)
week - 0.3% (9)
any - 0.3% (9)
come - 0.3% (9)
low - 0.3% (9)
other - 0.3% (9)
had - 0.3% (9)
last - 0.3% (9)
politics, - 0.3% (9)
act - 0.3% (9)
were - 0.3% (9)
than - 0.3% (9)
popular - 0.3% (9)
october - 0.27% (8)
even - 0.27% (8)
it’s - 0.27% (8)
from - 0.27% (8)
only - 0.27% (8)
which - 0.27% (8)
political - 0.27% (8)
same - 0.27% (8)
hinkley - 0.27% (8)
airport - 0.27% (8)
january - 0.23% (7)
hard - 0.23% (7)
time - 0.23% (7)
august - 0.23% (7)
change - 0.23% (7)
grammar - 0.23% (7)
rob - 0.23% (7)
own - 0.23% (7)
governments - 0.23% (7)
found - 0.23% (7)
talked - 0.23% (7)
april - 0.23% (7)
may’s - 0.23% (7)
try - 0.23% (7)
march - 0.23% (7)
like - 0.23% (7)
suggest - 0.23% (7)
clear - 0.23% (7)
less - 0.23% (7)
now - 0.23% (7)
schools - 0.23% (7)
rest - 0.23% (7)
not - 0.23% (7)
might - 0.23% (7)
first - 0.2% (6)
while - 0.2% (6)
she - 0.2% (6)
june - 0.2% (6)
show - 0.2% (6)
blair - 0.2% (6)
past - 0.2% (6)
would - 0.2% (6)
country - 0.2% (6)
opinium - 0.2% (6)
july - 0.2% (6)
2017 - 0.2% (6)
opinion - 0.2% (6)
long - 0.2% (6)
among - 0.2% (6)
problem - 0.2% (6)
public - 0.2% (6)
elections - 0.2% (6)
membership - 0.2% (6)
dems - 0.2% (6)
before - 0.2% (6)
its - 0.2% (6)
comments - 0.2% (6)
become - 0.17% (5)
leadership - 0.17% (5)
challenge - 0.17% (5)
job - 0.17% (5)
why - 0.17% (5)
early - 0.17% (5)
data - 0.17% (5)
want - 0.17% (5)
me, - 0.17% (5)
could - 0.17% (5)
recent - 0.17% (5)
keiran - 0.17% (5)
ministers - 0.17% (5)
made - 0.17% (5)
fact - 0.17% (5)
far - 0.17% (5)
did - 0.17% (5)
just - 0.17% (5)
use - 0.17% (5)
seen - 0.17% (5)
does - 0.17% (5)
week’s - 0.17% (5)
wrong - 0.17% (5)
bad - 0.17% (5)
major - 0.17% (5)
many - 0.17% (5)
put - 0.17% (5)
make - 0.17% (5)
electoral - 0.13% (4)
suggests - 0.13% (4)
happen - 0.13% (4)
matters, - 0.13% (4)
u.s. - 0.13% (4)
labour’s - 0.13% (4)
voted - 0.13% (4)
general - 0.13% (4)
still - 0.13% (4)
group - 0.13% (4)
don’t - 0.13% (4)
been - 0.13% (4)
power - 0.13% (4)
time, - 0.13% (4)
brown - 0.13% (4)
doesn’t - 0.13% (4)
current - 0.13% (4)
expect - 0.13% (4)
secondary - 0.13% (4)
appeal - 0.13% (4)
europe - 0.13% (4)
gone - 0.13% (4)
podcast - 0.13% (4)
moderns - 0.13% (4)
won - 0.13% (4)
them - 0.13% (4)
positions - 0.13% (4)
age - 0.13% (4)
score - 0.13% (4)
supported - 0.1% (3)
isn’t - 0.1% (3)
parties - 0.1% (3)
late - 0.1% (3)
target - 0.1% (3)
some - 0.1% (3)
groups - 0.1% (3)
transport - 0.1% (3)
debate - 0.1% (3)
others - 0.1% (3)
it. - 0.1% (3)
national - 0.1% (3)
two - 0.1% (3)
ukip - 0.1% (3)
winning - 0.1% (3)
argued - 0.1% (3)
decision - 0.1% (3)
shake - 0.1% (3)
moment - 0.1% (3)
that, - 0.1% (3)
election, - 0.1% (3)
old - 0.1% (3)
give - 0.1% (3)
read - 0.1% (3)
climategate - 0.1% (3)
hardly - 0.1% (3)
video - 0.1% (3)
harder - 0.1% (3)
populus - 0.1% (3)
loses - 0.1% (3)
they’re - 0.1% (3)
blog - 0.1% (3)
seems - 0.1% (3)
satisfied - 0.1% (3)
currently - 0.1% (3)
too - 0.1% (3)
net - 0.1% (3)
after - 0.1% (3)
losers - 0.1% (3)
also - 0.1% (3)
supporters - 0.1% (3)
went - 0.1% (3)
historical - 0.1% (3)
european - 0.1% (3)
satisfaction - 0.1% (3)
least - 0.1% (3)
episode - 0.1% (3)
office - 0.1% (3)
unpopular - 0.1% (3)
winners - 0.1% (3)
end - 0.1% (3)
being - 0.1% (3)
well - 0.1% (3)
good - 0.1% (3)
reason - 0.1% (3)
below - 0.1% (3)
things - 0.1% (3)
think - 0.1% (3)
news - 0.1% (3)
yougov - 0.1% (3)
believe - 0.1% (3)
evidence - 0.1% (3)
can’t - 0.1% (3)
opposition - 0.1% (3)
benefit - 0.1% (3)
when - 0.1% (3)
parliament - 0.1% (3)
expected - 0.1% (3)
strongest - 0.07% (2)
majority - 0.07% (2)
thatcher - 0.07% (2)
gordon - 0.07% (2)
elections. - 0.07% (2)
because - 0.07% (2)
election. - 0.07% (2)
face - 0.07% (2)
surprising - 0.07% (2)
that’s - 0.07% (2)
increasing - 0.07% (2)
both - 0.07% (2)
favour - 0.07% (2)
month, - 0.07% (2)
plans - 0.07% (2)
office, - 0.07% (2)
memory - 0.07% (2)
priorities - 0.07% (2)
ones - 0.07% (2)
nuclear - 0.07% (2)
proportion - 0.07% (2)
sign - 0.07% (2)
opponents - 0.07% (2)
attitudes - 0.07% (2)
sock - 0.07% (2)
five - 0.07% (2)
social - 0.07% (2)
each - 0.07% (2)
power. - 0.07% (2)
betting - 0.07% (2)
lot - 0.07% (2)
seem. - 0.07% (2)
joined - 0.07% (2)
fake - 0.07% (2)
2009 - 0.07% (2)
mori - 0.07% (2)
interesting - 0.07% (2)
entries - 0.07% (2)
restrict - 0.07% (2)
makes - 0.07% (2)
transform - 0.07% (2)
seats - 0.07% (2)
comes - 0.07% (2)
dissatisfied - 0.07% (2)
65s - 0.07% (2)
minus - 0.07% (2)
three - 0.07% (2)
across - 0.07% (2)
sense - 0.07% (2)
country. - 0.07% (2)
country, - 0.07% (2)
affect - 0.07% (2)
south - 0.07% (2)
east. - 0.07% (2)
outside - 0.07% (2)
scores - 0.07% (2)
leaders. - 0.07% (2)
want to - 0.07% (2)
clearly - 0.07% (2)
compared - 0.07% (2)
beaten - 0.07% (2)
until - 0.07% (2)
remember - 0.07% (2)
election: - 0.07% (2)
site - 0.07% (2)
victory - 0.07% (2)
go? - 0.07% (2)
video: - 0.07% (2)
listen - 0.07% (2)
members, - 0.07% (2)
close - 0.07% (2)
60%. - 0.07% (2)
wrong? - 0.07% (2)
polls: - 0.07% (2)
year, - 0.07% (2)
i’ve - 0.07% (2)
theresa - 0.07% (2)
challenge. - 0.07% (2)
labour, - 0.07% (2)
worth - 0.07% (2)
down - 0.07% (2)
here’s - 0.07% (2)
question - 0.07% (2)
ahead - 0.07% (2)
centre-left - 0.07% (2)
ground - 0.07% (2)
gain - 0.07% (2)
months - 0.07% (2)
happens - 0.07% (2)
typically - 0.07% (2)
they’d - 0.07% (2)
analysis - 0.07% (2)
subsequent - 0.07% (2)
them. - 0.07% (2)
along - 0.07% (2)
although - 0.07% (2)
but the - 0.07% (2)
sure - 0.07% (2)
consider - 0.07% (2)
politically - 0.07% (2)
reasons - 0.07% (2)
tories - 0.07% (2)
little - 0.07% (2)
every - 0.07% (2)
voting - 0.07% (2)
protest - 0.07% (2)
that the - 0.07% (2)
take - 0.07% (2)
is, - 0.07% (2)
farron - 0.07% (2)
stand - 0.07% (2)
expert - 0.07% (2)
years - 0.07% (2)
i’m - 0.07% (2)
previous - 0.07% (2)
huge - 0.07% (2)
2016: - 0.07% (2)
given - 0.07% (2)
here. - 0.07% (2)
70% - 0.07% (2)
relative - 0.07% (2)
register - 0.07% (2)
mean - 0.07% (2)
corbyn. - 0.07% (2)
polls. - 0.07% (2)
where - 0.07% (2)
got - 0.07% (2)
size - 0.07% (2)
whether - 0.07% (2)
he’s - 0.07% (2)
discussed - 0.07% (2)
8th, - 0.07% (2)
need - 0.07% (2)
they’ve - 0.07% (2)
noise - 0.07% (2)
polling matters - 0.93% (28)
in the - 0.7% (21)
of the - 0.6% (18)
at the - 0.33% (10)
leo – - 0.33% (10)
prime minister - 0.33% (10)
posted in - 0.33% (10)
by leo - 0.33% (10)
and the - 0.3% (9)
this week - 0.27% (8)
the same - 0.27% (8)
matters on - 0.23% (7)
talked about - 0.23% (7)
politics, polling - 0.23% (7)
but the - 0.23% (7)
with the - 0.23% (7)
matters posted - 0.23% (7)
airport expansion - 0.23% (7)
the poll - 0.23% (7)
the party - 0.2% (6)
2016 by - 0.2% (6)
grammar schools - 0.2% (6)
as the - 0.2% (6)
that the - 0.2% (6)
in politics - 0.2% (6)
or the - 0.2% (6)
people who - 0.2% (6)
lib dems - 0.2% (6)
the first - 0.2% (6)
the members - 0.2% (6)
have a - 0.17% (5)
the lib - 0.17% (5)
this is - 0.17% (5)
be the - 0.17% (5)
that labour - 0.17% (5)
off on - 0.17% (5)
– and - 0.17% (5)
the polls - 0.17% (5)
comments off - 0.17% (5)
the government - 0.17% (5)
– comments - 0.17% (5)
this week’s - 0.17% (5)
prime ministers - 0.17% (5)
in politics, - 0.17% (5)
the country - 0.17% (5)
for the - 0.17% (5)
i talked - 0.13% (4)
the membership - 0.13% (4)
secondary moderns - 0.13% (4)
on that - 0.13% (4)
first to - 0.13% (4)
– be - 0.13% (4)
left of - 0.13% (4)
2017 by - 0.13% (4)
to the - 0.13% (4)
on february - 0.13% (4)
polling matters, - 0.13% (4)
keiran and - 0.13% (4)
london airport - 0.13% (4)
to comment - 0.13% (4)
labour leadership - 0.13% (4)
the last - 0.13% (4)
and it - 0.13% (4)
about the - 0.13% (4)
a problem - 0.13% (4)
who voted - 0.13% (4)
hinkley point - 0.13% (4)
labour voters - 0.13% (4)
u.s. on - 0.1% (3)
a general - 0.1% (3)
the least - 0.1% (3)
seem to - 0.1% (3)
can’t be - 0.1% (3)
– the - 0.1% (3)
labour’s support - 0.1% (3)
of those - 0.1% (3)
it can - 0.1% (3)
rest of - 0.1% (3)
climate change - 0.1% (3)
on the - 0.1% (3)
suggests that - 0.1% (3)
at this - 0.1% (3)
people in - 0.1% (3)
the rest - 0.1% (3)
on september - 0.1% (3)
what went - 0.1% (3)
public opinion - 0.1% (3)
for this - 0.1% (3)
of labour - 0.1% (3)
left office - 0.1% (3)
if the - 0.1% (3)
to become - 0.1% (3)
leadership challenge - 0.1% (3)
put the - 0.1% (3)
found that - 0.1% (3)
and grammar - 0.1% (3)
an election - 0.1% (3)
opinium poll - 0.1% (3)
matters, u.s. - 0.1% (3)
voted for - 0.1% (3)
winners and - 0.1% (3)
how much - 0.07% (2)
the decision - 0.07% (2)
harder to - 0.07% (2)
have been - 0.07% (2)
the us - 0.07% (2)
podcast and - 0.07% (2)
people to - 0.07% (2)
you want to - 0.07% (2)
opinion is - 0.07% (2)
matters i - 0.07% (2)
to most - 0.07% (2)
not sure - 0.07% (2)
put them - 0.07% (2)
if you - 0.07% (2)
may be - 0.07% (2)
in those - 0.07% (2)
south east. - 0.07% (2)
– but - 0.07% (2)
will be - 0.07% (2)
nuclear power - 0.07% (2)
for those - 0.07% (2)
and ukip - 0.07% (2)
hinkley and - 0.07% (2)
populus poll - 0.07% (2)
are in - 0.07% (2)
schools and - 0.07% (2)
appeal to - 0.07% (2)
over 65s - 0.07% (2)
of people - 0.07% (2)
the only - 0.07% (2)
that london - 0.07% (2)
by the - 0.07% (2)
same people - 0.07% (2)
support for - 0.07% (2)
in london - 0.07% (2)
the country. - 0.07% (2)
long as - 0.07% (2)
are the - 0.07% (2)
london and - 0.07% (2)
schools show - 0.07% (2)
problem with - 0.07% (2)
may’s electoral - 0.07% (2)
hardly any - 0.07% (2)
in climate - 0.07% (2)
historical polls - 0.07% (2)
priorities – - 0.07% (2)
and why - 0.07% (2)
she could - 0.07% (2)
climate sock - 0.07% (2)
is seen - 0.07% (2)
on hinkley - 0.07% (2)
might seem - 0.07% (2)
but they - 0.07% (2)
government will - 0.07% (2)
the political - 0.07% (2)
theresa may - 0.07% (2)
the south - 0.07% (2)
a majority - 0.07% (2)
2015 tory - 0.07% (2)
a leader - 0.07% (2)
fake news - 0.07% (2)
those people - 0.07% (2)
comment this - 0.07% (2)
there are - 0.07% (2)
come up - 0.07% (2)
blair and - 0.07% (2)
least popular - 0.07% (2)
labour is - 0.07% (2)
it will - 0.07% (2)
how past - 0.07% (2)
discussed the - 0.07% (2)
good job - 0.07% (2)
past prime - 0.07% (2)
ministers are - 0.07% (2)
the polls. - 0.07% (2)
that people - 0.07% (2)
losers from - 0.07% (2)
2016: polling - 0.07% (2)
election polls: - 0.07% (2)
how low - 0.07% (2)
of what - 0.07% (2)
voters have - 0.07% (2)
support go? - 0.07% (2)
satisfaction scores - 0.07% (2)
on this - 0.07% (2)
week’s polling - 0.07% (2)
the new - 0.07% (2)
poll on - 0.07% (2)
than it - 0.07% (2)
tory governments - 0.07% (2)
recent prime - 0.07% (2)
of their - 0.07% (2)
the most - 0.07% (2)
up the - 0.07% (2)
support of - 0.07% (2)
has gone - 0.07% (2)
left office, - 0.07% (2)
and brown - 0.07% (2)
have gone - 0.07% (2)
from the - 0.07% (2)
as they - 0.07% (2)
seen as - 0.07% (2)
can labour’s - 0.07% (2)
what past - 0.07% (2)
be expected - 0.07% (2)
matters this - 0.07% (2)
election: polling - 0.07% (2)
why corbyn - 0.07% (2)
now can’t - 0.07% (2)
be beaten - 0.07% (2)
until he - 0.07% (2)
loses a - 0.07% (2)
general election: - 0.07% (2)
on polling - 0.07% (2)
the labour - 0.07% (2)
beaten until - 0.07% (2)
has made - 0.07% (2)
he was - 0.07% (2)
but there - 0.07% (2)
among the - 0.07% (2)
this was - 0.07% (2)
much more - 0.07% (2)
those who - 0.07% (2)
70% of - 0.07% (2)
he loses - 0.07% (2)
corbyn now - 0.07% (2)
elections & - 0.07% (2)
over the - 0.07% (2)
european politics - 0.07% (2)
suggest – - 0.07% (2)
low can - 0.07% (2)
go? what - 0.07% (2)
past elections - 0.07% (2)
& european - 0.07% (2)
politics suggest - 0.07% (2)
– polling - 0.07% (2)
the subsequent - 0.07% (2)
along with - 0.07% (2)
this point - 0.07% (2)
that this - 0.07% (2)
the time - 0.07% (2)
the opposition - 0.07% (2)
what it’s - 0.07% (2)
parties have - 0.07% (2)
the others - 0.07% (2)
the public - 0.07% (2)
the late - 0.07% (2)
by leo – - 0.33% (10)
polling matters posted - 0.23% (7)
polling matters on - 0.23% (7)
matters posted in - 0.23% (7)
politics, polling matters - 0.23% (7)
2016 by leo - 0.2% (6)
leo – comments - 0.17% (5)
posted in politics, - 0.17% (5)
in politics, polling - 0.17% (5)
comments off on - 0.17% (5)
– comments off - 0.17% (5)
– be the - 0.13% (4)
first to comment - 0.13% (4)
be the first - 0.13% (4)
london airport expansion - 0.13% (4)
2017 by leo - 0.13% (4)
polling matters, u.s. - 0.1% (3)
hinkley point and - 0.1% (3)
the rest of - 0.1% (3)
he loses a - 0.07% (2)
general election: polling - 0.07% (2)
be beaten until - 0.07% (2)
corbyn now can’t - 0.07% (2)
polling matters i - 0.07% (2)
u.s. on september - 0.07% (2)
election: polling matters - 0.07% (2)
loses a general - 0.07% (2)
a problem for - 0.07% (2)
point and grammar - 0.07% (2)
sure how much - 0.07% (2)
i’m not sure - 0.07% (2)
the us election - 0.07% (2)
now can’t be - 0.07% (2)
schools show may’s - 0.07% (2)
electoral priorities – - 0.07% (2)
and why she - 0.07% (2)
could have a - 0.07% (2)
problem with airport - 0.07% (2)
the government will - 0.07% (2)
the over 65s - 0.07% (2)
the same people - 0.07% (2)
london and the - 0.07% (2)
across the country. - 0.07% (2)
beaten until he - 0.07% (2)
what past elections - 0.07% (2)
with keiran and - 0.07% (2)
of the show - 0.07% (2)
on this week’s - 0.07% (2)
people in the - 0.07% (2)
to comment this - 0.07% (2)
the support of - 0.07% (2)
blair and brown - 0.07% (2)
did a good - 0.07% (2)
come up with - 0.07% (2)
the least popular - 0.07% (2)
past prime ministers - 0.07% (2)
how past prime - 0.07% (2)
labour leadership challenge - 0.07% (2)
losers from 2016: - 0.07% (2)
suggests that labour - 0.07% (2)
and losers from - 0.07% (2)
2016: polling matters - 0.07% (2)
in the last - 0.07% (2)
polls: what went - 0.07% (2)
polling matters podcast - 0.07% (2)
how low can - 0.07% (2)
labour’s support go? - 0.07% (2)
& european politics - 0.07% (2)
suggest – polling - 0.07% (2)
matters on polling - 0.07% (2)
matters this week - 0.07% (2)
this is a - 0.07% (2)
grammar schools and - 0.07% (2)

Here you can find chart of all your popular one, two and three word phrases. Google and others search engines means your page is about words you use frequently.

Copyright © 2015-2016 hupso.pl. All rights reserved. FB | +G | Twitter

Hupso.pl jest serwisem internetowym, w którym jednym kliknieciem możesz szybko i łatwo sprawdź stronę www pod kątem SEO. Oferujemy darmowe pozycjonowanie stron internetowych oraz wycena domen i stron internetowych. Prowadzimy ranking polskich stron internetowych oraz ranking stron alexa.