3.94 score from hupso.pl for:
journalismprofessor.com



HTML Content


Titleprof chris daly's blog | thoughts on journalism and history

Length: 64, Words: 10
Description thoughts on journalism and history

Length: 34, Words: 5
Keywords pusty
Robots
Charset UTF-8
Og Meta - Title exist
Og Meta - Description exist
Og Meta - Site name exist
Tytuł powinien zawierać pomiędzy 10 a 70 znaków (ze spacjami), a mniej niż 12 słów w długości.
Meta opis powinien zawierać pomiędzy 50 a 160 znaków (łącznie ze spacjami), a mniej niż 24 słów w długości.
Kodowanie znaków powinny być określone , UTF-8 jest chyba najlepszy zestaw znaków, aby przejść z powodu UTF-8 jest bardziej międzynarodowy kodowaniem.
Otwarte obiekty wykresu powinny być obecne w stronie internetowej (więcej informacji na temat protokołu OpenGraph: http://ogp.me/)

SEO Content

Words/Characters 6386
Text/HTML 39.35 %
Headings H1 2
H2 8
H3 14
H4 0
H5 0
H6 0
H1
prof chris daly's blog
black panthers @ 50:
H2
covering the black panthers
a turning point in america
the ny times’ bias problem
trump epitomizes the “charismatic leader” where power is personal
media earthquake: the end of the roger ailes era at fox news
where do you find the best criticism of journalism?
twiff: clean coal?
journalism jobs: digital now outnumbers print
H3
rate this:
rate this:
rate this:
rate this:
rate this:
rate this:
rate this:
read my book: covering america
follow me on twitter
recent posts
email subscription
facebook like
archives
follow blog via email
H4
H5
H6
strong
black panthers @ 50:
by christopher b. daly
new york times
times
times
covering america: a narrative history of a nation’s journalism
[from covering america]
new york times reporter earl caldwell 
new york times
to learn more:
by christopher b. daly
news
by christopher b. daly
by christopher b. daly
by christopher b. daly
on media criticism
 
for reporting about news:
individual analysts:
academics/theorists
 
left/right:
fact-checking:
by christopher b. daly
nytimes
times
by christopher b. daly
are
b
i
em black panthers @ 50:
by christopher b. daly
new york times
times
times
covering america: a narrative history of a nation’s journalism
[from covering america]
new york times reporter earl caldwell 
new york times
to learn more:
by christopher b. daly
news
by christopher b. daly
by christopher b. daly
by christopher b. daly
on media criticism
 
for reporting about news:
individual analysts:
academics/theorists
 
left/right:
fact-checking:
by christopher b. daly
nytimes
times
by christopher b. daly
are
Bolds strong 28
b 0
i 0
em 28
Zawartość strony internetowej powinno zawierać więcej niż 250 słów, z stopa tekst / kod jest wyższy niż 20%.
Pozycji używać znaczników (h1, h2, h3, ...), aby określić temat sekcji lub ustępów na stronie, ale zwykle, użyj mniej niż 6 dla każdego tagu pozycje zachować swoją stronę zwięzły.
Styl używać silnych i kursywy znaczniki podkreślić swoje słowa kluczowe swojej stronie, ale nie nadużywać (mniej niż 16 silnych tagi i 16 znaczników kursywy)

Statystyki strony

twitter:title pusty
twitter:description pusty
google+ itemprop=name pusty
Pliki zewnętrzne 30
Pliki CSS 4
Pliki javascript 26
Plik należy zmniejszyć całkowite odwołanie plików (CSS + JavaScript) do 7-8 maksymalnie.

Linki wewnętrzne i zewnętrzne

Linki 188
Linki wewnętrzne 3
Linki zewnętrzne 185
Linki bez atrybutu Title 185
Linki z atrybutem NOFOLLOW 0
Linki - Użyj atrybutu tytuł dla każdego łącza. Nofollow link jest link, który nie pozwala wyszukiwarkom boty zrealizują są odnośniki no follow. Należy zwracać uwagę na ich użytkowania

Linki wewnętrzne

Linki zewnętrzne

prof chris daly's blog https://journalismprofessor.com/
home https://journalismprofessor.com/
about https://journalismprofessor.com/about/
- https://journalismprofessor.com/
older posts https://journalismprofessor.com/page/2/
covering the black panthers https://journalismprofessor.com/2016/10/18/3975/
covering america: a narrative history of a nation’s journalism https://www.amazon.com/covering-america-narrative-history-journalism/dp/1558499113/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=utf8&qid=1325343692&sr=1-1
maynard institute http://mije.org/
project http://mije.org/history-maynard-institute
the caldwell journals http://mije.org/historyproject/caldwell_journals
leave a comment https://journalismprofessor.com/2016/10/18/3975/#respond
first amendment https://journalismprofessor.com/category/first-amendment/
journalism https://journalismprofessor.com/category/journalism-2/
new york times https://journalismprofessor.com/category/new-york-times/
uncategorized https://journalismprofessor.com/category/uncategorized/
black panthers https://journalismprofessor.com/tag/black-panthers/
earl caldwell https://journalismprofessor.com/tag/earl-caldwell/
media https://journalismprofessor.com/tag/media/
the ny times’ bias problem https://journalismprofessor.com/2016/09/17/the-ny-times-bias-problem/
leave a comment https://journalismprofessor.com/2016/09/17/the-ny-times-bias-problem/#respond
journalism https://journalismprofessor.com/category/journalism-2/
new york times https://journalismprofessor.com/category/new-york-times/
news https://journalismprofessor.com/category/news/
nytimes https://journalismprofessor.com/category/nytimes/
uncategorized https://journalismprofessor.com/category/uncategorized/
bias https://journalismprofessor.com/tag/bias/
new york times https://journalismprofessor.com/tag/new-york-times/
objectivity https://journalismprofessor.com/tag/objectivity/
trump epitomizes the “charismatic leader” where power is personal https://journalismprofessor.com/2016/07/26/trump-epitomizes-the-charismatic-leader-where-power-is-personal/
1 comment https://journalismprofessor.com/2016/07/26/trump-epitomizes-the-charismatic-leader-where-power-is-personal/#comments
broadcasting https://journalismprofessor.com/category/broadcasting/
donald trump https://journalismprofessor.com/category/donald-trump/
fox news https://journalismprofessor.com/category/fox-news/
history https://journalismprofessor.com/category/history/
journalism https://journalismprofessor.com/category/journalism-2/
journalism history https://journalismprofessor.com/category/journalism-history/
media https://journalismprofessor.com/category/media/
meme https://journalismprofessor.com/category/meme/
politics https://journalismprofessor.com/category/politics/
trump https://journalismprofessor.com/category/trump/
ailes https://journalismprofessor.com/tag/ailes/
charisma https://journalismprofessor.com/tag/charisma/
clinton https://journalismprofessor.com/tag/clinton/
max weber https://journalismprofessor.com/tag/max-weber/
trump https://journalismprofessor.com/tag/trump/
media earthquake: the end of the roger ailes era at fox news https://journalismprofessor.com/2016/07/21/media-earthquake-the-end-of-the-roger-ailes-era-at-fox-news/
leave a comment https://journalismprofessor.com/2016/07/21/media-earthquake-the-end-of-the-roger-ailes-era-at-fox-news/#respond
broadcasting https://journalismprofessor.com/category/broadcasting/
fox news https://journalismprofessor.com/category/fox-news/
journalism https://journalismprofessor.com/category/journalism-2/
journalism history https://journalismprofessor.com/category/journalism-history/
media https://journalismprofessor.com/category/media/
politics https://journalismprofessor.com/category/politics/
uncategorized https://journalismprofessor.com/category/uncategorized/
journalism https://journalismprofessor.com/tag/journalism/
media https://journalismprofessor.com/tag/media/
roger ailes https://journalismprofessor.com/tag/roger-ailes/
where do you find the best criticism of journalism? https://journalismprofessor.com/2016/07/13/where-do-you-find-the-best-criticism-of-journalism/
leave a comment https://journalismprofessor.com/2016/07/13/where-do-you-find-the-best-criticism-of-journalism/#respond
journalism https://journalismprofessor.com/category/journalism-2/
media https://journalismprofessor.com/category/media/
news https://journalismprofessor.com/category/news/
uncategorized https://journalismprofessor.com/category/uncategorized/
criticism https://journalismprofessor.com/tag/criticism/
journalism https://journalismprofessor.com/tag/journalism/
media https://journalismprofessor.com/tag/media/
news https://journalismprofessor.com/tag/news/
twiff: clean coal? https://journalismprofessor.com/2016/07/05/twiff-clean-coal/
story http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/05/science/kemper-coal-mississippi.html?ref=business
leave a comment https://journalismprofessor.com/2016/07/05/twiff-clean-coal/#respond
coal https://journalismprofessor.com/category/coal/
energy https://journalismprofessor.com/category/energy/
environment https://journalismprofessor.com/category/environment-2/
uncategorized https://journalismprofessor.com/category/uncategorized/
coal https://journalismprofessor.com/tag/coal/
energy https://journalismprofessor.com/tag/energy/
journalism jobs: digital now outnumbers print https://journalismprofessor.com/2016/06/09/journalism-jobs-digital-now-outnumbers-print/
study http://www.bls.gov/opub/ted/2016/employment-trends-in-newspaper-publishing-and-other-media-1990-2016.htm
leave a comment https://journalismprofessor.com/2016/06/09/journalism-jobs-digital-now-outnumbers-print/#respond
boston university https://journalismprofessor.com/category/boston-university/
broadcasting https://journalismprofessor.com/category/broadcasting/
digital media https://journalismprofessor.com/category/digital-media/
history https://journalismprofessor.com/category/history/
journalism https://journalismprofessor.com/category/journalism-2/
journalism history https://journalismprofessor.com/category/journalism-history/
media https://journalismprofessor.com/category/media/
news https://journalismprofessor.com/category/news/
npr https://journalismprofessor.com/category/npr/
photography https://journalismprofessor.com/category/photography-2/
photojournalism https://journalismprofessor.com/category/photojournalism-2/
press https://journalismprofessor.com/category/press/
publishing https://journalismprofessor.com/category/publishing/
uncategorized https://journalismprofessor.com/category/uncategorized/
journalism https://journalismprofessor.com/tag/journalism/
journalism history https://journalismprofessor.com/tag/journalism-history/
media https://journalismprofessor.com/tag/media/
older posts https://journalismprofessor.com/page/2/
covering the black panthers https://journalismprofessor.com/2016/10/18/3975/
the ny times’ bias problem https://journalismprofessor.com/2016/09/17/the-ny-times-bias-problem/
trump epitomizes the “charismatic leader” where power is personal https://journalismprofessor.com/2016/07/26/trump-epitomizes-the-charismatic-leader-where-power-is-personal/
media earthquake: the end of the roger ailes era at fox news https://journalismprofessor.com/2016/07/21/media-earthquake-the-end-of-the-roger-ailes-era-at-fox-news/
where do you find the best criticism of journalism? https://journalismprofessor.com/2016/07/13/where-do-you-find-the-best-criticism-of-journalism/
facebook like https://www.facebook.com/chris.daly.125323
facebook like https://www.facebook.com/chris.daly.125323
october 2016 https://journalismprofessor.com/2016/10/
september 2016 https://journalismprofessor.com/2016/09/
july 2016 https://journalismprofessor.com/2016/07/
june 2016 https://journalismprofessor.com/2016/06/
april 2016 https://journalismprofessor.com/2016/04/
february 2016 https://journalismprofessor.com/2016/02/
january 2016 https://journalismprofessor.com/2016/01/
december 2015 https://journalismprofessor.com/2015/12/
november 2015 https://journalismprofessor.com/2015/11/
october 2015 https://journalismprofessor.com/2015/10/
september 2015 https://journalismprofessor.com/2015/09/
august 2015 https://journalismprofessor.com/2015/08/
july 2015 https://journalismprofessor.com/2015/07/
june 2015 https://journalismprofessor.com/2015/06/
may 2015 https://journalismprofessor.com/2015/05/
april 2015 https://journalismprofessor.com/2015/04/
march 2015 https://journalismprofessor.com/2015/03/
february 2015 https://journalismprofessor.com/2015/02/
january 2015 https://journalismprofessor.com/2015/01/
december 2014 https://journalismprofessor.com/2014/12/
november 2014 https://journalismprofessor.com/2014/11/
october 2014 https://journalismprofessor.com/2014/10/
september 2014 https://journalismprofessor.com/2014/09/
august 2014 https://journalismprofessor.com/2014/08/
july 2014 https://journalismprofessor.com/2014/07/
june 2014 https://journalismprofessor.com/2014/06/
may 2014 https://journalismprofessor.com/2014/05/
april 2014 https://journalismprofessor.com/2014/04/
march 2014 https://journalismprofessor.com/2014/03/
february 2014 https://journalismprofessor.com/2014/02/
january 2014 https://journalismprofessor.com/2014/01/
december 2013 https://journalismprofessor.com/2013/12/
november 2013 https://journalismprofessor.com/2013/11/
october 2013 https://journalismprofessor.com/2013/10/
september 2013 https://journalismprofessor.com/2013/09/
august 2013 https://journalismprofessor.com/2013/08/
july 2013 https://journalismprofessor.com/2013/07/
june 2013 https://journalismprofessor.com/2013/06/
may 2013 https://journalismprofessor.com/2013/05/
april 2013 https://journalismprofessor.com/2013/04/
march 2013 https://journalismprofessor.com/2013/03/
february 2013 https://journalismprofessor.com/2013/02/
january 2013 https://journalismprofessor.com/2013/01/
december 2012 https://journalismprofessor.com/2012/12/
november 2012 https://journalismprofessor.com/2012/11/
october 2012 https://journalismprofessor.com/2012/10/
september 2012 https://journalismprofessor.com/2012/09/
august 2012 https://journalismprofessor.com/2012/08/
july 2012 https://journalismprofessor.com/2012/07/
june 2012 https://journalismprofessor.com/2012/06/
may 2012 https://journalismprofessor.com/2012/05/
april 2012 https://journalismprofessor.com/2012/04/
march 2012 https://journalismprofessor.com/2012/03/
february 2012 https://journalismprofessor.com/2012/02/
january 2012 https://journalismprofessor.com/2012/01/
december 2011 https://journalismprofessor.com/2011/12/
november 2011 https://journalismprofessor.com/2011/11/
october 2011 https://journalismprofessor.com/2011/10/
september 2011 https://journalismprofessor.com/2011/09/
august 2011 https://journalismprofessor.com/2011/08/
july 2011 https://journalismprofessor.com/2011/07/
june 2011 https://journalismprofessor.com/2011/06/
may 2011 https://journalismprofessor.com/2011/05/
april 2011 https://journalismprofessor.com/2011/04/
march 2011 https://journalismprofessor.com/2011/03/
february 2011 https://journalismprofessor.com/2011/02/
january 2011 https://journalismprofessor.com/2011/01/
december 2010 https://journalismprofessor.com/2010/12/
november 2010 https://journalismprofessor.com/2010/11/
october 2010 https://journalismprofessor.com/2010/10/
september 2010 https://journalismprofessor.com/2010/09/
july 2010 https://journalismprofessor.com/2010/07/
june 2010 https://journalismprofessor.com/2010/06/
may 2010 https://journalismprofessor.com/2010/05/
april 2010 https://journalismprofessor.com/2010/04/
march 2010 https://journalismprofessor.com/2010/03/
january 2009 https://journalismprofessor.com/2009/01/
prof chris daly's blog https://journalismprofessor.com/
blog at wordpress.com. https://wordpress.com/?ref=footer_blog
prof chris daly's blog https://journalismprofessor.com/
blog at wordpress.com. https://wordpress.com/?ref=footer_blog

Zdjęcia

Zdjęcia 15
Zdjęcia bez atrybutu ALT 3
Zdjęcia bez atrybutu TITLE 15
Korzystanie Obraz ALT i TITLE atrybutu dla każdego obrazu.

Zdjęcia bez atrybutu TITLE

https://profdaly.files.wordpress.com/2012/04/cropped-hoes_six-cylinder_press.jpg
https://profdaly.files.wordpress.com/2016/10/12-5-caldwell-and-mlk.jpg?w=500
https://profdaly.files.wordpress.com/2016/09/nyt-print.jpg?w=500
https://profdaly.files.wordpress.com/2016/09/nyt-online.png?w=500
https://umasspress.files.wordpress.com/2016/07/max-weber.jpg?w=145&h=145
https://profdaly.files.wordpress.com/2016/07/os-pictures-donald-trump-rally-in-tampa-20160212.jpg?w=300&h=169
https://profdaly.files.wordpress.com/2016/07/carlson-nydaily-news.jpg?w=102&h=150
https://profdaly.files.wordpress.com/2016/07/megyn-kelly.jpg?w=123&h=150
https://profdaly.files.wordpress.com/2016/07/screen-shot-2016-07-21-at-2-23-42-pm.png?w=500
https://profdaly.files.wordpress.com/2016/07/577fe5a0cf9d4eaf4f490be2834237ef.jpg?w=500
https://profdaly.files.wordpress.com/2016/06/jobs-in-news.jpeg?w=500
https://profdaly.files.wordpress.com/2016/06/screen-shot-2016-06-09-at-11-23-24-am.png?w=500
https://profdaly.files.wordpress.com/2013/06/cropped-stamp-tax-tombstone.gif?w=500&h=129
https://sb.scorecardresearch.com/p?c1=2&c2=7518284&c3=&c4=&c5=&c6=&c15=&cv=2.0&cj=1
https://pixel.wp.com/b.gif?v=noscript

Zdjęcia bez atrybutu ALT

https://profdaly.files.wordpress.com/2012/04/cropped-hoes_six-cylinder_press.jpg
https://sb.scorecardresearch.com/p?c1=2&c2=7518284&c3=&c4=&c5=&c6=&c15=&cv=2.0&cj=1
https://pixel.wp.com/b.gif?v=noscript

Ranking:


Alexa Traffic
Daily Global Rank Trend
Daily Reach (Percent)









Majestic SEO











Text on page:

prof chris daly's blog skip to content homeabout ← older posts october 18, 2016 · 9:26 am covering the black panthers black panthers @ 50: a turning point in america by christopher b. daly recently, the new york times observed the 50th anniversary of the founding of the black panther party, which took place in oakland in october of 1966. in one of those historical twists, it is remarkable to recall that the panthers built their reputation on their response to police harassment of black motorists. panther members “patrolled” the streets of oakland, on the lookout for routine police stops. before those stops could escalate, the panthers would roll up and pull out their own weapons (which were then legal to carry in california). with weapons in full view, they would then “observe” the police while they interacted with black citizens. in its look back at the panthers, the times examines its own coverage of the movement and its leaders. it’s a worthy effort, but i believe the times actually slights one of its own reporters – earl caldwell, a pioneer in the movement by african-american reporters and editors to desegregate the newsrooms of mainstream, white-owned newspapers and magazines. in hopes of giving caldwell his due, i present the following excerpt from my 2012 book covering america: a narrative history of a nation’s journalism. in my view, caldwell did an exemplary job of not only covering the panthers but also in standing up to the fbi, when the bureau tried to pressure caldwell into cooperating. his work is at the heart of the landmark 1972 supreme court ruling known as branzburg, a case that lamentably drew the erroneous conclusion that american journalists have no constitutional right to protect their sources from the government. caldwell had grown up in pennsylvania coal country and made his way into sportswriting, then approached the new york times. [from covering america] . . . the times was famous for having plenty of black elevator operators, but when caldwell started in march 1967, he was just the second black in a newsroom position at the times (following tom johnson). on his first day, caldwell wore a brooks brothers suit and declared that he wanted to write like gay talese. for the first few weeks he did what most newly hired reporters did at the times: cover new york city. on occasion, he served as something like a foreign correspondent, exploring harlem for the times’ white readers and describing the sights, sounds, and folkways of people who lived only a few blocks away. once a times editor asked caldwell for james baldwin’s telephone number, evidently assuming that all black people knew all other black people. soon, though, cities across america began erupting in race riots, and the times tapped the new guy to help out, often teaming him with gene roberts, an experienced white reporter who was the paper’s chief southern-based civil rights correspondent in the late 1960s. in the spring of 1968, caldwell traveled to memphis to cover the strike being waged by the city’s sanitation workers, supported by the reverend martin luther king jr. caldwell was in the lorraine motel on april 4 when a loud shot rang out. new york times reporter earl caldwell (at left) trails rev. martin luther king jr. up stairs in the courtyard of the lorraine motel in memphis, shortly before king’s assassination on april 4, 1968. caldwell was the only reporter in a position to provide an eyewitness account.          (photo: memphis commercial appeal.)  the only journalist present at the scene, caldwell immediately called the times newsroom and began dictating details of the king assassination, which the editors spread across the top of page one. according to caldwell, king had spent most of the day in his room, then emerged around 6 p.m. onto the balcony, wearing a black suit and a white shirt. caldwell’s report continued:                   dr. king, an open-faced genial man, leaned over a green iron railing to chat with an associate. . . . the rev. ralph w. abernathy, perhaps dr. king’s closest friend, was just about to come out of the motel room when the sudden loud noise burst out. dr. king toppled to the concrete second-floor walkway. blood gushed from the right jaw and neck area. his necktie had been ripped off by the blast. king’s murder touched off a fresh round of violence in cities across america, and caldwell returned to the “riot beat” for much of the summer. that fall, caldwell went to san francisco to become a west coast correspondent for the times. through his contacts among the few black reporters in the bay area, he gained access to black power advocate eldridge cleaver, and by the end of 1968, caldwell was the most knowledgeable reporter in the mainstream press about the emerging black panther party, based across the bay in oakland. as it turned out, the panthers were shrewd enough about the media to want coverage in the new york times, and they gave caldwell access, as well as what reporters call “color” (atmospheric details), on-the-record interviews, just about anything he might want. his stories established that the panthers were heavily armed and were talking about violent revolution. caldwell worried about how cleaver and the other panthers would react to his reporting, but he didn’t need to. “the panthers wanted people to know what they were doing. they wanted me to write in the paper about them having guns.” his reporting also attracted the attention of the fbi, which was waging a nationwide campaign of surveillance and intimidation against radical groups both black and white. that attention would develop into one of the landmark supreme court rulings affecting reporters and their ability to protect confidential sources. the legal case began when fbi agents paid a visit to caldwell and told him that they wanted a lot more information about the panthers. caldwell told the agents that everything he knew was right there in the newspaper, including the fact that the panthers were armed and that they were threatening to kill the president. even so, the government wanted more from caldwell. he refused to talk, however, believing that any appearance in secret before a grand jury would make him look like an informant and dry up his sources. the agents were not satisfied, and the bureau turned up the pressure, warning him that he would be forced to testify in court—a step that would not only destroy his relationship with the black panthers but jeopardize his value as a reporter on any other beat as well. facing a possible court appearance, caldwell destroyed most of his panther files, but there was still the matter of his testimony. in february 1970 he was served with a subpoena ordering him to appear before a federal grand jury investigating the black panthers. the subpoena did not name the times, but the newspaper hired a prestigious san francisco law firm to represent caldwell. their advice: cooperate. hearing that, caldwell tapped his network of black journalists, who steered him toward a stanford law professor, anthony amsterdam, a brilliant defense lawyer, who agreed with caldwell’s decision not to testify and offered to represent him pro bono. after he continued to refuse to testify about his news sources, caldwell was found in contempt of court and ordered to jail, but he was allowed to remain free while his case went to the ninth u.s. circuit court of appeals. the higher court sided with caldwell, but then the federal government appealed that ruling. en route to the u.s. supreme court, caldwell’s case was combined with two others and filed under the heading branzburg v. hayes. paul branzburg was a reporter for the louisville courier-journal who had been an eyewitness to a drug crime. (thus he was not, strictly speaking, protecting a confidential source.) paul pappas was a television news photographer working for a tv station in new bedford, mass., who had gone to nearby providence to cover the local black panthers chapter and spent several hours inside their headquarters. like caldwell, branzburg and pappas were both journalists who had been ordered to testify before grand juries; like caldwell, they had refused on professional grounds. in all three cases, the issue was not a classic instance of protecting the identity of a confidential source. it was more a matter of preserving the journalists’ access to sources, which would be destroyed if the people who were being reported on suspected that the reporters had cooperated with law enforcement. all three cases involved a constitutional claim that the first amendment includes not only the right to publish (and withhold) information freely but also the right to gather news freely. recognizing the stakes, news executives threw their institutional weight behind caldwell and the other reporters. supporting briefs were filed by the washington post company, the chicago tribune company, the american newspaper publishers association, the american society of newspaper editors, the american newspaper guild, the radio and television news directors association, the press photographers association, and the aclu—along with affidavits from such respected journalists as anthony lukas, walter cronkite, and marvin kalb. in a decision handed down on june 29, 1972, the supreme court narrowly ruled against the journalists. writing for the 5–4 majority, justice byron white held that the first amendment had to be balanced against the fifth amendment, which guarantees criminal defendants the right to have their cases presented to a grand jury before indictment. in his opinion white invoked the ancient legal doctrine that “the public . . . has a right to every man’s evidence.” the only exceptions, he said, are those instances in which the states have adopted laws specifically granting certain categories of people a legal privilege against having to testify. such a “testimonial privilege” might protect a wife from testifying about her husband, a doctor about a patient, or a priest about a penitent. in such cases, legislatures determined that some other social good was worth the cost of allowing the privileged category of people to avoid the grand jury. but, white said, the court could not take seriously the idea “that it is better to write about crime than to do something about it.” if reporters know things that prosecutors want to find out, they must tell what they know. besides, the justice wrote, if the court created a special privilege for journalists, it would soon have to define who is (and is not) a journalist — a task that raised the specter of government licensing of journalists, which would be far more murky than determining who is a doctor or a priest. “almost any author may quite accurately assert that he is contributing to the flow of information to the public,” white wrote, warning that just about anybody could claim to be a journalist of one variety or another. finally, white observed that the u.s. attorney general had written a set of guidelines governing the issuance of subpoenas to reporters, which the high court thought ought to suffice for the bulk of cases. the majority opinion also included an invitation to legislatures to create a “testimonial privilege” for reporters, and many state legislatures went ahead and passed versions of what are known as “shield laws.” in a brief concurring opinion, justice lewis powell, though voting with the majority, very nearly came down on the other side. he warned prosecutors that “no harassment of newsmen will be tolerated,” and he wrote that if reporters feel they are being abused by overzealous prosecutors seeking the names of confidential sources, then those reporters should go to court and seek a protective order. “the asserted claim to privilege should be judged on its facts by the striking of a proper balance between freedom of the press and the obligation of all citizens to give relevant testimony with respect to criminal conduct,” powell wrote, saying it is up to the courts to handle such claims on a case-by-case basis. nevertheless, his joining with the majority had the effect of denying journalists’ claims to a constitutional privilege. among the dissenters, justice william o. douglas wrote one of the most eloquent statements of press freedom in history. having staked out a position as a first amendment fundamentalist, douglas saw the caldwell and related cases in clear-cut terms. “my belief is that all of the ‘balancing’ was done by those who wrote the bill of rights,” he said, adding that “by casting the first amendment in absolute terms, they repudiated timid, watered-down, emasculated versions of the first amendment. . . .” the key to understanding the first amendment, douglas argued, is to recognize that it exists for the benefit of the american people as a whole. if the people are to govern themselves, they must have reliable, independent sources of information. “effective self-government cannot succeed unless the people are immersed in a steady, robust, unimpeded, and uncensored flow of opinion and reporting which are continuously subjected to critique, rebuttal, and re-examination,” he wrote. in douglas’s view, the free press cases that come before the court are not really about the press per se; they are about the rights of the american people, the ultimate sovereigns of our system. the press, which serves as the agent of its audience, is incidental to the greater purpose of self-government. douglas continued:          the press has a preferred position in our constitutional scheme, not to enable it to make money, not to set newsmen apart as a favored class, but to bring to fulfillment the public’s right to know. . . . there is no higher function performed under our constitutional regime. its performance means that the press is often engaged in projects that bring anxiety and even fear to the bureaucracies, departments, or officials of government. he concluded by warning that the court’s majority opinion would reduce journalists to stenographers, and that without the right to protect confidential sources, “the reporter’s main function in american society will be to pass on to the public the press releases which the various departments of government issue.” the majority, however, did not see it that way. as a result of the court’s 5–4 ruling against the journalists, reporters and their sources have operated in legal jeopardy ever since, at least in federal courts. on the state level, the branzburg ruling had the effect of spurring many legislatures around the country to enact shield laws to protect reporters in state courts, but congress has steadfastly refused to recognize the same right on the federal level. ironically, the branzburg ruling also had another impact: it dried up what was probably the fbi’s greatest source of information about the black panthers—the reporting that anybody could read in the pages of the new york times. of course, by the time caldwell’s case was resolved, the justice department had lost much of its interest in the black panthers. most of caldwell’s contacts were in jail, in exile, or dead. *       *       * to learn more: see earl caldwell’s oral history in wallace terry’s missing pages, as well as caldwell’s book black american witness; also caldwell’s 2006 interview with pbs’s frontline series for the program “news war.” in addition, his own account of his beginnings can be found at the maynard institute’s history project page. also see “the caldwell journals.” as for caldwell, after the supreme court case, he left the times to become a columnist, first at the washington star, then at the new york post. he also served as host of a long- running weekly radio program on wbai radio in new york. in 1977, caldwell co-founded the institute for journalism education, which trains minority journalists. it is now known as the maynard institute for its other co-founder, robert c. maynard. rate this: leave a comment filed under first amendment, journalism, new york times, uncategorized tagged as black panthers, earl caldwell, media september 17, 2016 · 10:35 am the ny times’ bias problem by christopher b. daly today’s front page of the new york times presents a dramatic example of what drives some people crazy about the news media — hidden bias. many people expect the times to exemplify the 20th century ideal of journalistic “objectivity,” a perhaps naive view that news should consist simply of facts. in this view, readers of such facts should draw their own conclusions, and the newspaper as an institution should restrict its opinions to the editorial page. people who hold those views will surely be angry with the times today for its handling of the trump-birther story. here’s a photo of today’s print version of the times’ page 1: the lead story –the one judged by times editors to be the most important of the day — is not a news story at all. it is a “news analysis” that is marbled with blatant opinion and bias. the author, michael barbaro, obviously hates trump, and his piece drips with contempt. yes, the times applied a few fig leaves: the news analysis line above the headline and the setting of the type in a “ragged right” format, rather than the “justified” columns that the paper uses for straight news. but a groggy reader at the breakfast table could be forgiven for expecting a news organization to lead with news, rather than opinion. the times did in fact carry a straight news story about the same event, but it was buried inside. in the online version, things were different, but still exasperating for readers who expect unbiased news. here is the homepage as of this morning: as you can see, the trump analysis piece is re-contextualized and subordinated to classic times-only stories: a tribute to a playwright whose work is essentially unendurable and a staff story from a distant hellhole. the barbaro analysis piece is still there, now positioned in the lefthand column and still given precedence over the related news story. but notice that in the online format, editorials get equal billing with news. what the times calls “the opinion pages” now occupy the upper right quadrant of the homepage — in the spot traditionally reserved in the old print layout for the day’s top news story. so, the reader who scans this page will observe first that the times hates that liar trump and second, that the news team follows the same editorial line. for the record, times editors insist that they are still following the rules of objective news. they insist that the editorial operation is totally separate from the news operation. they insist that their reporters are factual and fair. is it any surprise that some readers disagree? alternatively, times editors might argue that “everybody knows” what trump said, thanks to faster media. therefore, the times should offer readers something of value that they could not find elsewhere. there is some validity to that view, but the times has not fully embraced that self-conception either. [in my personal view, the times faces a crossroads: rein in the opinion, or embrace it. the current approach is awkward at best.] rate this: leave a comment filed under journalism, new york times, news, nytimes, uncategorized tagged as bias, new york times, objectivity july 26, 2016 · 11:46 am trump epitomizes the “charismatic leader” where power is personal by christopher b. daly nothing so aptly captures the phenomenon of donald trump as the social theory laid out more than a century ago by the german social thinker max weber. in weber’s scheme of understanding power, trump epitomizes a type known as the “charismatic leader.” american politicians are sometimes described as charismatic by people who really want to use a word more like “charming.” but leaders like trump are actually pretty rare in american political history. which means, in turn, that trump is likely to present challenges to the journalists trying to cover him. most of the national political press corps has never seen the like. on the one hand, trump is a gift to the news media because he’s exciting; on the other, he does not fit nicely into any conventional category or narrative. according to weber, “charismatic authority” is different from traditional or legal sources of authority. as the great german sociologist argued in “politics as a vocation,” the charismatic leader is followed because of his personal qualities. his success depends on “devotion to the exceptional sanctity, heroism, or exemplary character of an individual person, and of the normative patterns or order revealed or ordained by him.” in essence, a charismatic leader is endowed with special qualities because his followers believe he has those qualities. he is powerful because people think he’s powerful. trump’s authority is entirely personal. it is not connected to a party or a movement or a set of policies. it is all about him. his subliminal message to the convention and the television audience was: i will make you safe. it’s the rough equivalent of saying “i will walk you to school so no one will scare you.” as a businessman, he is the “lord of the tower.” high inside trump tower, he rules over a privately held company. he is not like a ceo of a big publicly traded corporation. the modern corporate executive is a cog in a giant machine – made up of corporate boards, executive committees, finance committees, legal counsel, giant organizational charts, rules, policies, and guidelines. this environment produces ceos who are risk-averse and who know that their time at the top is limited to about four or five years. credit: orlando sentinel none of that pertains to trump. he trusts only those people who work for him in trump tower. any authority they have flows from him directly, in proportion to how close they are to him or how trusted. no one in the trump camp exercises power independently or by virtue of a place in a bureaucracy. it’s all about personal relationships, as in a royal court or a cult. ♦        ♦        ♦       ♦ while trump was rising last week, another career in american conservative politics was ending. roger ailes, the founding chief of fox news, was ousted from his powerful position by his only boss, media mogul rupert murdoch. like trump, ailes was a charismatic leader in the weberian mold. for decades, ailes ruled fox news by fear, bullying, helping favorites, and attempting to exercise the droit de seigneur by “flirting” with the many attractive news readers he hired. trump and ailes also shared a masterful instinct for managing the public’s resentment. even if you never watch fox news, you have probably heard phrases like these: “liberal elites” “the war on christmas” “mainstream media” “radical islamic terrorism” these and similar conservative tropes (or “memes”) are all hobgoblins intended to amplify the fear and loathing felt by some americans. such memes reinforce the fear that something is slipping away and reinforce the loathing of those responsible – smart people, immigrants, jihadis, liberals. ailes toiled for decades inside the conservative meme factory – generating, refining, and broadcasting the idea that america used to be a great country until _______________________  (fill in the blank: secularism, feminism, political correctness, elites, blacks, gays, immigrants) came along and ruined everything. like trump, ailes practiced a politics of restoration. ♦        ♦        ♦       ♦ trump had a successful convention in one sense: he managed the almost impossible task of making a modern convention interesting. for decades, the national conventions have been highly scripted, fully produced pageants made for television. no surprises – and no real politics, either. everything is decided beforehand. as the democratic national convention unfolds in philadelphia, watch for a dramatic contrast from last week’s show in cleveland. hillary clinton is the opposite of a “chaos candidate” like trump. he huddles with a small team of political novices and makes decisions at the last minute. in hillary’s approach to politics, by contrast, professionals are respected, and qualities like steadiness, consistency, and predictably (which trump disdains) are considered virtues. she makes plans and sticks to them.  she limits access. everything is vetted. there is a structure with veteran professionals staff all key positions, from speechwriting to finance to policy. not so with the charismatic candidate trump. he harkens back to political insurgents like huey long or george wallace – not (just) in his bigotry but in his personal approach. trump has no bureaucracy around him. a reporter cannot go seek out trump’s “foreign policy shop” and get briefings on his approach to the mideast. first of all, there is no “shop.” second, even if there were a shop, there is no policy. there will be a policy when trump makes one up, and it will change when he feels like it. he may meet with netanyahu, for example, and if they hit it off personally, then israel is under u.s. protection. if they don’t hit it off, then all bets are off. what are trump’s budget plans? who would make up the cabinet? no one has a clue. reporters are hard pressed to find reliable sources. in covering trump, the media have a further problem: they feel obligated to treat trump with a straight face. their professional code prevents them from writing and saying many things that they know to be true. moreover, the press gets no down time with trump. even when he has retreated to trump tower, he could still feel the urge to tweet out some message or insult or provocation at any time, creating a brand-new controversy and “winning” that news cycle. trump likes to talk about law and order. but in his style, he is the candidate of chaos. fasten your seatbelt. rate this: 1 comment filed under broadcasting, donald trump, fox news, history, journalism, journalism history, media, meme, politics, trump tagged as ailes, charisma, clinton, max weber, trump july 21, 2016 · 2:45 pm media earthquake: the end of the roger ailes era at fox news by christopher b. daly “if you would strike at a prince, you must kill him.”  –niccolo machiavelli the fall of roger ailes is an ephocal event in the history of modern news media. for a man who delivers more than $1 billion in annual profit to his boss and who delivers the top viewer ratings in cable tv news to be fired certainly marks the end of an era. his departure today was brought about by the charges of sexual harrassment filed in court by fox news on-air star gretchen carlson. (before there was megyn kelly, there was gretchen.) megyn kelly credit: dennis van tine ailes was a king-maker who became a powerful prince himself within the kingdom of american conservatism. by assembling a loyal audience for fox news, ailes performed several important services for resurgent conservatism: –fox news attacked the rest of the news media –fox news provided an outlet for conservatives (including climate deniers, conspiracy theorists, and conservative ideologues who could not get on the air otherwise) –fox news hounded the clintons and obama while endorsing and defending george w. bush –fox news cultivated and sustained bill o’reilly (and stood by him when o’reilly had his own problems with a sexual harrasment claim). –fox news, by selling ads for gold bullion, attorneys for the plaintiff’s bar, and many other products, delivered a consistent profit stream to murdoch’s news corp. the back story is well told in the 2014 biography of ailes by the journalist gabriel sherman. the book is titled “the loudest voice in the room” and subtitled “how the brilliant, bombastic roger ailes built fox news and divided a country.” sherman, a national correspondent for new york magazine whose recent daily reporting has driven and shaped the coverage of ailes, lays out the rise of ailes from the day the young tv producer met richard nixon in 1967 and lectured the veteran politician on the power of television. ailes went on to work for nixon, then became an impresario of conservative media. he had a big role in the rise of conservative talk-show champ rush limbaugh, then teamed up with conservative media mogul to found fox news in 1996. fox news is the embodiment of roger ailes. he is responsible for the shrewd and deeply cynical slogans “fair and balanced” and “we report/you decide.” never mind that neither slogan was true. they served the purpose of assembling an audience of american conservatives who consider fox a national message board. ailes harrangued the mainstream media for being liberal, while building the most ideological news operation on the air, all the while denying that he was doing so. what brought him down was his failure to make an alliance with murdoch’s sons, who are the future of news corp. the sons may be less conservative than their father and, as members of a younger generation, they certainly have far less tolerance for the towel-slapping, know-nothing ethos of the fox news morning show. on that show, whose co-hosts regularly humiliated gretchen carlson, who may have more i.q. points than steve doocy and brian kilmeade combined. they harped regularly on her looks, her wardrobe, and her hotness. under ailes, fox news had a history of hiring attractive women and placing them in front of the cameras in ways that displayed their physical attributes. even in an industry like television, which is obsessed with visuals, fox news stood out for its use of news babes. turns out, ailes — who resembles the late sidney greenstreet minus the charm — was “flirting” with them and implying that they should put out for him. in the end, it would appear, the man who ruled by fear was brought down by one brave woman. rate this: leave a comment filed under broadcasting, fox news, journalism, journalism history, media, politics, uncategorized tagged as journalism, media, roger ailes july 13, 2016 · 2:08 pm where do you find the best criticism of journalism? by christopher b. daly dear readers: please help me out. i am preparing a resource for the students i will have this fall in a course on the history of u.s. journalism. i want to help them find good sources of news about the news business as well as thoughtful analysis, vigorous denunciations, and heartfelt appreciations. i have prepared the following (draft) document for class, but i am sure i am overlooking some terrific people or institutions. who’s missing? leave your thoughts in the comments. thanks, prof. daly on media criticism compiled by prof. christopher b. daly we are living in a “golden era” of media criticism. yes, there have been critics of journalism in the past, some of them outstanding. it’s never too late to benefit from reading walter lippmann, for example, or the incomparable a.j. liebling. but for at least a decade, the news media have been subject to closer scrutiny and more commentary than ever before. let’s take advantage. students are encouraged to consume (and participate in!) the current flowering of reporting and analysis. within the general heading of “media criticism,” we are concerned in jo357 with the study of journalism (as distinct from analyses of fiction, feature films, and other media). seek out the best sources of information and the most intelligent, penetrating analyses you can find. here are some recommendations:  for reporting about news: –cnn reliable sources (brian stelter) –pbs mediashift –npr “on the media” –nieman journalism lab –columbia journalism review –maynard institute –poynter institute –romenesko.com individual analysts: jim rutenberg, media columnist for new york times. liz spayd, public editor, new york times. gabriel sherman, new york magazine jack shafer, politico margaret sullivan, washington post ken doctor, newsonomics david folkenflik, npr richard prince, the root. academics/theorists prof. jay rosen prof. jeff jarvis   left/right: media matters accuracy in media fact-checking: politifact.com rate this: leave a comment filed under journalism, media, news, uncategorized tagged as criticism, journalism, media, news july 5, 2016 · 12:36 pm twiff: clean coal? (photo by lewis hine) by christopher b. daly this week in fossil fuels brings a front-page story in the nytimes reporting on a fiasco in mississippi to spin straw into gold: a giant “clean coal” project that failed. if anyone still thinks coal can be used cleanly, here’s a tip: pick up a lump of coal sometime. carry it around. try sharing it with others. put it under your pillow. go into a small room with the windows closed and burn it. you will be sick of it in less time than it takes to read that times story. the world cannot stop mining and burning coal fast enough. just stop. there are other ways. rate this: leave a comment filed under coal, energy, environment, uncategorized tagged as coal, energy june 9, 2016 · 11:50 am journalism jobs: digital now outnumbers print by christopher b. daly two important trend lines have recently crossed, probably forever. the number of jobs in the u.s. newspaper sector has now dipped below the number of jobs in the digital media. newspapers are not dead, but they are no longer the center of gravity for the news business. thus ends a dominance that began in the 17th century and reached a peak in the 20th century before cratering in the 21st century. that is one of the major findings in a new study from the u.s. bureau of labor statistics, documenting what many have long noticed: american newspapers are no longer the driving wheel of american journalism. the past belonged to the printing press, but the future belongs to the web. here’s the big picture: here are some highlights: –the purple line that starts so far above the others in 1990 represents all employment in the newspaper industry. it’s worth noting that the bls counts everyone who works at a newspaper, not just the newsroom crew. so, this is just a rough approximation of the employment situation of journalists — reporters, photographers, videographers, podcasters, editors, producers, and others who are directly involved in gathering and disseminating news. that is a much harder number to track. –newspaper employment took a hit in the early 1990s, then sort of plateaued, took a steeper hit when the “tech bubble” burst in 2001 (taking with it a lot of full-page ads), and then really dove in the great recession of 2008-9. since then, the downward trend has slowed a bit, but the trend from 2009 to 2016 gives no reason to think that newspapers are coming back. –the bls also provides a helpful monthly chart of the data used to draw all those lines. here are some salient details i found in the data tables. –looking deeper into the numbers, it is heartening to see that the overall numbers of jobs in all these industries combined has not dropped very much, having fallen about 3 percent over 26 years. the biggest proportional hit seems to have occurred in “books” — which i take to mean the publishing industry as a whole. while a small number of journalists make a living by writing non-fiction books, it is probably a very small group that depends primarily on their book royalties. –the big gainer is “internet publishing and broadcasting.” it’s hard to imagine how 28,800 people made a living putting stuff online in 1990 (which was before the web became ubiquitous), but there is no mistaking that web-based activities have been on a surge. –the other big gainer in the last quarter century has been “motion picture and video production.” it is unclear from the bls definitions of its categories what fraction of all those folks could be considered journalists. probably a lot of them work in hollywood or other venues where they produce content that is fictional or promotional. still, it is a rough indicator of where the growth is. one question that these data raise is this: what will journalists of the future need to know and do? about a decade ago, my colleagues and i began a deep re-think of our curriculum to bring it out of the days of print newspapers, glossy magazines, film-based photography, and broadcast television. we eliminated our separate, medium-based “concentrations” and decided that all our students should be educated as digital journalists. we tore out our darkrooms, converted to all-digital photography, and decided that all our students need to be competent in “visual journalism.” we ramped up our instruction in shooting and editing video. we converted our student radio station to digital and embraced podcasting. we decided that essentially all our coursework should be multimedia. like other journalism programs in u.s. universities, we found that it was not easy, but it was a matter of survival. as a specialist in the history of journalism, i spend a lot of time thinking about the centuries when the newspaper ruled the field. the newspaper had a good long run, but it is clearer every year that newspapers not only documented history, they are history. rate this: leave a comment filed under boston university, broadcasting, digital media, history, journalism, journalism history, media, news, npr, photography, photojournalism, press, publishing, uncategorized tagged as journalism, journalism history, media ← older posts read my book: covering america available at amazon. http://amzn.to/1qq1sze search for "covering america" or christopher b. daly follow me on twittermy tweets search for: recent posts covering the black panthers the ny times’ bias problem trump epitomizes the “charismatic leader” where power is personal media earthquake: the end of the roger ailes era at fox news where do you find the best criticism of journalism? email subscription enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. join 873 other followers facebook like facebook like archives october 2016 september 2016 july 2016 june 2016 april 2016 february 2016 january 2016 december 2015 november 2015 october 2015 september 2015 august 2015 july 2015 june 2015 may 2015 april 2015 march 2015 february 2015 january 2015 december 2014 november 2014 october 2014 september 2014 august 2014 july 2014 june 2014 may 2014 april 2014 march 2014 february 2014 january 2014 december 2013 november 2013 october 2013 september 2013 august 2013 july 2013 june 2013 may 2013 april 2013 march 2013 february 2013 january 2013 december 2012 november 2012 october 2012 september 2012 august 2012 july 2012 june 2012 may 2012 april 2012 march 2012 february 2012 january 2012 december 2011 november 2011 october 2011 september 2011 august 2011 july 2011 june 2011 may 2011 april 2011 march 2011 february 2011 january 2011 december 2010 november 2010 october 2010 september 2010 july 2010 june 2010 may 2010 april 2010 march 2010 january 2009 follow blog via email enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. join 873 other followers prof chris daly's blog · thoughts on journalism and history blog at wordpress.com. prof chris daly's blog blog at wordpress.com. post to cancel


Here you find all texts from your page as Google (googlebot) and others search engines seen it.

Words density analysis:

Numbers of all words: 6418

One word

Two words phrases

Three words phrases

the - 9.13% (586)
and - 2.31% (148)
our - 1.84% (118)
her - 1.82% (117)
new - 1.75% (112)
for - 1.42% (91)
news - 1.36% (87)
that - 1.32% (85)
his - 1.18% (76)
pro - 1% (64)
out - 0.92% (59)
all - 0.84% (54)
per - 0.83% (53)
time - 0.79% (51)
well - 0.78% (50)
are - 0.69% (44)
was - 0.69% (44)
caldwell - 0.67% (43)
times - 0.67% (43)
not - 0.64% (41)
with - 0.64% (41)
report - 0.58% (37)
trump - 0.58% (37)
who - 0.56% (36)
era - 0.56% (36)
media - 0.56% (36)
over - 0.55% (35)
but - 0.51% (33)
end - 0.5% (32)
they - 0.48% (31)
about - 0.48% (31)
here - 0.47% (30)
can - 0.47% (30)
– - 0.45% (29)
journalism - 0.45% (29)
story - 0.44% (28)
one - 0.41% (26)
reporter - 0.41% (26)
other - 0.39% (25)
america - 0.39% (25)
black - 0.37% (24)
man - 0.37% (24)
court - 0.36% (23)
journalist - 0.36% (23)
panther - 0.36% (23)
king - 0.36% (23)
ailes - 0.34% (22)
like - 0.34% (22)
any - 0.34% (22)
ever - 0.33% (21)
paper - 0.33% (21)
fox - 0.33% (21)
you - 0.33% (21)
from - 0.33% (21)
have - 0.31% (20)
had - 0.31% (20)
people - 0.31% (20)
.” - 0.31% (20)
press - 0.3% (19)
him - 0.3% (19)
panthers - 0.3% (19)
now - 0.3% (19)
own - 0.3% (19)
journalists - 0.28% (18)
history - 0.28% (18)
newspaper - 0.28% (18)
reporters - 0.28% (18)
which - 0.28% (18)
top - 0.28% (18)
rate - 0.26% (17)
some - 0.26% (17)
their - 0.26% (17)
right - 0.26% (17)
american - 0.26% (17)
this - 0.26% (17)
there - 0.25% (16)
york - 0.25% (16)
cover - 0.23% (15)
under - 0.23% (15)
case - 0.23% (15)
use - 0.23% (15)
its - 0.23% (15)
hit - 0.23% (15)
2016 - 0.23% (15)
may - 0.22% (14)
has - 0.22% (14)
sources - 0.22% (14)
just - 0.22% (14)
what - 0.22% (14)
know - 0.22% (14)
page - 0.22% (14)
prof - 0.22% (14)
were - 0.22% (14)
then - 0.22% (14)
would - 0.22% (14)
read - 0.22% (14)
daly - 0.2% (13)
2014 - 0.2% (13)
than - 0.2% (13)
stop - 0.2% (13)
old - 0.2% (13)
will - 0.2% (13)
editor - 0.2% (13)
chris - 0.2% (13)
2012 - 0.2% (13)
view - 0.19% (12)
first - 0.19% (12)
before - 0.19% (12)
2015 - 0.19% (12)
line - 0.19% (12)
most - 0.19% (12)
follow - 0.19% (12)
2013 - 0.19% (12)
2011 - 0.19% (12)
how - 0.17% (11)
when - 0.17% (11)
— - 0.17% (11)
more - 0.17% (11)
july - 0.17% (11)
journalism, - 0.17% (11)
very - 0.17% (11)
those - 0.17% (11)
only - 0.17% (11)
see - 0.17% (11)
work - 0.16% (10)
white - 0.16% (10)
news, - 0.16% (10)
try - 0.16% (10)
day - 0.16% (10)
conservative - 0.16% (10)
want - 0.16% (10)
power - 0.16% (10)
war - 0.16% (10)
into - 0.16% (10)
make - 0.16% (10)
lead - 0.16% (10)
leave - 0.16% (10)
photo - 0.16% (10)
did - 0.16% (10)
opinion - 0.16% (10)
long - 0.16% (10)
filed - 0.16% (10)
also - 0.16% (10)
govern - 0.16% (10)
should - 0.14% (9)
room - 0.14% (9)
april - 0.14% (9)
charismatic - 0.14% (9)
2010 - 0.14% (9)
book - 0.14% (9)
october - 0.14% (9)
protect - 0.14% (9)
christopher - 0.14% (9)
found - 0.14% (9)
them - 0.14% (9)
comment - 0.14% (9)
fact - 0.14% (9)
reader - 0.14% (9)
even - 0.14% (9)
post - 0.14% (9)
june - 0.14% (9)
could - 0.14% (9)
reporting - 0.12% (8)
still - 0.12% (8)
♦ - 0.12% (8)
she - 0.12% (8)
caldwell’s - 0.12% (8)
law - 0.12% (8)
been - 0.12% (8)
personal - 0.12% (8)
off - 0.12% (8)
every - 0.12% (8)
september - 0.12% (8)
leader - 0.12% (8)
government - 0.12% (8)
number - 0.12% (8)
ought - 0.12% (8)
“the - 0.12% (8)
this: - 0.12% (8)
find - 0.12% (8)
u.s. - 0.12% (8)
amendment - 0.12% (8)
present - 0.12% (8)
covering - 0.12% (8)
web - 0.12% (8)
way - 0.12% (8)
blog - 0.12% (8)
late - 0.12% (8)
coal - 0.12% (8)
march - 0.11% (7)
where - 0.11% (7)
january - 0.11% (7)
served - 0.11% (7)
used - 0.11% (7)
media, - 0.11% (7)
readers - 0.11% (7)
history, - 0.11% (7)
television - 0.11% (7)
february - 0.11% (7)
editors - 0.11% (7)
caldwell, - 0.11% (7)
privilege - 0.11% (7)
tagged - 0.11% (7)
legal - 0.11% (7)
story. - 0.11% (7)
casting - 0.11% (7)
major - 0.11% (7)
wrote - 0.11% (7)
many - 0.11% (7)
position - 0.11% (7)
public - 0.11% (7)
cases - 0.11% (7)
big - 0.11% (7)
politics - 0.11% (7)
roger - 0.11% (7)
down - 0.11% (7)
rough - 0.11% (7)
while - 0.11% (7)
criticism - 0.09% (6)
branzburg - 0.09% (6)
information - 0.09% (6)
look - 0.09% (6)
air - 0.09% (6)
century - 0.09% (6)
bias - 0.09% (6)
rest - 0.09% (6)
came - 0.09% (6)
uncategorized - 0.09% (6)
take - 0.09% (6)
earl - 0.09% (6)
too - 0.09% (6)
view, - 0.09% (6)
free - 0.09% (6)
newspapers - 0.09% (6)
broadcast - 0.09% (6)
author - 0.09% (6)
though - 0.09% (6)
such - 0.09% (6)
ruling - 0.09% (6)
majority - 0.09% (6)
email - 0.09% (6)
testify - 0.09% (6)
main - 0.09% (6)
bureau - 0.09% (6)
claim - 0.09% (6)
high - 0.09% (6)
it’s - 0.09% (6)
analysis - 0.09% (6)
think - 0.09% (6)
round - 0.09% (6)
november - 0.09% (6)
december - 0.09% (6)
order - 0.09% (6)
convention - 0.09% (6)
him. - 0.09% (6)
call - 0.09% (6)
times, - 0.09% (6)
digital - 0.09% (6)
 ♦ - 0.09% (6)
trump, - 0.08% (5)
fear - 0.08% (5)
van - 0.08% (5)
based - 0.08% (5)
approach - 0.08% (5)
student - 0.08% (5)
others - 0.08% (5)
–fox - 0.08% (5)
supreme - 0.08% (5)
job - 0.08% (5)
political - 0.08% (5)
douglas - 0.08% (5)
fit - 0.08% (5)
national - 0.08% (5)
wanted - 0.08% (5)
last - 0.08% (5)
less - 0.08% (5)
having - 0.08% (5)
times. - 0.08% (5)
justice - 0.08% (5)
writing - 0.08% (5)
posts - 0.08% (5)
never - 0.08% (5)
state - 0.08% (5)
publish - 0.08% (5)
constitutional - 0.08% (5)
august - 0.08% (5)
great - 0.08% (5)
broadcasting - 0.08% (5)
stream - 0.08% (5)
probably - 0.08% (5)
 the - 0.08% (5)
began - 0.08% (5)
help - 0.08% (5)
produce - 0.08% (5)
hard - 0.08% (5)
gene - 0.08% (5)
grand - 0.08% (5)
fast - 0.08% (5)
decade - 0.08% (5)
get - 0.08% (5)
institute - 0.08% (5)
news. - 0.08% (5)
week - 0.08% (5)
your - 0.08% (5)
against - 0.08% (5)
print - 0.08% (5)
media. - 0.08% (5)
–the - 0.08% (5)
confidential - 0.08% (5)
recent - 0.06% (4)
trump. - 0.06% (4)
qualities - 0.06% (4)
powerful - 0.06% (4)
thought - 0.06% (4)
authority - 0.06% (4)
legislatures - 0.06% (4)
magazine - 0.06% (4)
set - 0.06% (4)
cog - 0.06% (4)
rise - 0.06% (4)
flow - 0.06% (4)
idea - 0.06% (4)
version - 0.06% (4)
audience - 0.06% (4)
policy - 0.06% (4)
country - 0.06% (4)
editorial - 0.06% (4)
ailes, - 0.06% (4)
today - 0.06% (4)
made - 0.06% (4)
full - 0.06% (4)
following - 0.06% (4)
problem - 0.06% (4)
back - 0.06% (4)
decided - 0.06% (4)
journalism. - 0.06% (4)
real - 0.06% (4)
fall - 0.06% (4)
standing - 0.06% (4)
politics, - 0.06% (4)
maynard - 0.06% (4)
talk - 0.06% (4)
star - 0.06% (4)
bring - 0.06% (4)
meme - 0.06% (4)
left - 0.06% (4)
agent - 0.06% (4)
team - 0.06% (4)
front - 0.06% (4)
urge - 0.06% (4)
bill - 0.06% (4)
these - 0.06% (4)
observe - 0.06% (4)
enter - 0.06% (4)
show - 0.06% (4)
column - 0.06% (4)
give - 0.06% (4)
small - 0.06% (4)
seek - 0.06% (4)
feel - 0.06% (4)
because - 0.06% (4)
it. - 0.06% (4)
“charismatic - 0.06% (4)
known - 0.06% (4)
second - 0.06% (4)
lines - 0.06% (4)
put - 0.06% (4)
access - 0.06% (4)
mainstream - 0.06% (4)
best - 0.06% (4)
(and - 0.06% (4)
close - 0.06% (4)
students - 0.06% (4)
being - 0.06% (4)
sure - 0.06% (4)
professional - 0.06% (4)
journalists, - 0.06% (4)
jobs - 0.06% (4)
correspondent - 0.06% (4)
prof. - 0.06% (4)
few - 0.06% (4)
san - 0.06% (4)
something - 0.06% (4)
times’ - 0.06% (4)
federal - 0.06% (4)
appear - 0.06% (4)
matter - 0.06% (4)
refuse - 0.06% (4)
once - 0.06% (4)
sources, - 0.06% (4)
fbi - 0.06% (4)
jury - 0.06% (4)
across - 0.06% (4)
race - 0.06% (4)
everything - 0.06% (4)
out, - 0.06% (4)
lot - 0.06% (4)
radio - 0.06% (4)
inside - 0.06% (4)
went - 0.06% (4)
provide - 0.06% (4)
around - 0.06% (4)
tom - 0.06% (4)
come - 0.06% (4)
journalists. - 0.06% (4)
ruled - 0.06% (4)
newsroom - 0.06% (4)
iron - 0.06% (4)
much - 0.06% (4)
man, - 0.06% (4)
and, - 0.06% (4)
said, - 0.06% (4)
told - 0.05% (3)
coverage - 0.05% (3)
consist - 0.05% (3)
so, - 0.05% (3)
institution - 0.05% (3)
is. - 0.05% (3)
here’s - 0.05% (3)
piece - 0.05% (3)
numbers - 0.05% (3)
panthers. - 0.05% (3)
important - 0.05% (3)
agents - 0.05% (3)
“i - 0.05% (3)
mean - 0.05% (3)
refused - 0.05% (3)
expect - 0.05% (3)
giant - 0.05% (3)
broadcasting, - 0.05% (3)
represent - 0.05% (3)
details - 0.05% (3)
clean - 0.05% (3)
project - 0.05% (3)
daly's - 0.05% (3)
subpoena - 0.05% (3)
well. - 0.05% (3)
trend - 0.05% (3)
executive - 0.05% (3)
destroy - 0.05% (3)
laws - 0.05% (3)
king’s - 0.05% (3)
movement - 0.05% (3)
modern - 0.05% (3)
reliable - 0.05% (3)
example - 0.05% (3)
sources. - 0.05% (3)
straight - 0.05% (3)
dr. - 0.05% (3)
ends - 0.05% (3)
television. - 0.05% (3)
out. - 0.05% (3)
oakland - 0.05% (3)
rein - 0.05% (3)
embrace - 0.05% (3)
turned - 0.05% (3)
publishing - 0.05% (3)
bls - 0.05% (3)
employment - 0.05% (3)
argue - 0.05% (3)
epitomizes - 0.05% (3)
decades - 0.05% (3)
loud - 0.05% (3)
ago - 0.05% (3)
motel - 0.05% (3)
took - 0.05% (3)
word - 0.05% (3)
1990 - 0.05% (3)
followers - 0.05% (3)
memphis - 0.05% (3)
carry - 0.05% (3)
message - 0.05% (3)
candidate - 0.05% (3)
video - 0.05% (3)
(which - 0.05% (3)
online - 0.05% (3)
join - 0.05% (3)
whose - 0.05% (3)
makes - 0.05% (3)
rights - 0.05% (3)
clinton - 0.05% (3)
might - 0.05% (3)
police - 0.05% (3)
need - 0.05% (3)
day’s - 0.05% (3)
party - 0.05% (3)
insist - 0.05% (3)
rules - 0.05% (3)
trump’s - 0.05% (3)
operation - 0.05% (3)
program - 0.05% (3)
warning - 0.05% (3)
ads - 0.05% (3)
prince - 0.05% (3)
photographer - 0.05% (3)
living - 0.05% (3)
history. - 0.05% (3)
special - 0.05% (3)
photography, - 0.05% (3)
wrote, - 0.05% (3)
became - 0.05% (3)
far - 0.05% (3)
tine - 0.05% (3)
combined - 0.05% (3)
cannot - 0.05% (3)
really - 0.05% (3)
heart - 0.05% (3)
year - 0.05% (3)
must - 0.05% (3)
effect - 0.05% (3)
ways - 0.05% (3)
prosecutors - 0.05% (3)
business - 0.05% (3)
brief - 0.05% (3)
government. - 0.05% (3)
washington - 0.05% (3)
write - 0.05% (3)
course - 0.05% (3)
reporters, - 0.05% (3)
data - 0.05% (3)
document - 0.05% (3)
courts - 0.05% (3)
gold - 0.05% (3)
facts - 0.05% (3)
balance - 0.05% (3)
association, - 0.05% (3)
industry - 0.05% (3)
respect - 0.05% (3)
saying - 0.05% (3)
press, - 0.05% (3)
two - 0.05% (3)
things - 0.05% (3)
worth - 0.05% (3)
brought - 0.05% (3)
event - 0.05% (3)
doctor - 0.05% (3)
continued - 0.05% (3)
amendment, - 0.05% (3)
same - 0.05% (3)
another - 0.05% (3)
social - 0.05% (3)
ken - 0.05% (3)
certain - 0.05% (3)
way. - 0.05% (3)
good - 0.05% (3)
deep - 0.05% (3)
future - 0.05% (3)
hired - 0.05% (3)
decision - 0.05% (3)
consider - 0.05% (3)
majority, - 0.05% (3)
lab - 0.05% (3)
gretchen - 0.05% (3)
department - 0.05% (3)
npr - 0.05% (3)
pages - 0.05% (3)
         - 0.05% (3)
sons - 0.03% (2)
past - 0.03% (2)
charm - 0.03% (2)
peak - 0.03% (2)
responsible - 0.03% (2)
loathing - 0.03% (2)
felt - 0.03% (2)
reinforce - 0.03% (2)
virtue - 0.03% (2)
group - 0.03% (2)
royal - 0.03% (2)
away - 0.03% (2)
gainer - 0.03% (2)
chart - 0.03% (2)
young - 0.03% (2)
exercise - 0.03% (2)
slogan - 0.03% (2)
politician - 0.03% (2)
morning - 0.03% (2)
directly - 0.03% (2)
early - 0.03% (2)
sherman, - 0.03% (2)
1967 - 0.03% (2)
since - 0.03% (2)
mogul - 0.03% (2)
decades, - 0.03% (2)
2009 - 0.03% (2)
  ♦ - 0.03% (2)
“flirting” - 0.03% (2)
nixon - 0.03% (2)
attractive - 0.03% (2)
watch - 0.03% (2)
doing - 0.03% (2)
brian - 0.03% (2)
richard - 0.03% (2)
media” - 0.03% (2)
involved - 0.03% (2)
regularly - 0.03% (2)
lines. - 0.03% (2)
end, - 0.03% (2)
earthquake: - 0.03% (2)
titled - 0.03% (2)
boss - 0.03% (2)
kelly - 0.03% (2)
energy - 0.03% (2)
coal, - 0.03% (2)
all, - 0.03% (2)
analyses - 0.03% (2)
megyn - 0.03% (2)
example, - 0.03% (2)
receive - 0.03% (2)
mining - 0.03% (2)
columnist - 0.03% (2)
sexual - 0.03% (2)
certainly - 0.03% (2)
treat - 0.03% (2)
true. - 0.03% (2)
george - 0.03% (2)
raise - 0.03% (2)
takes - 0.03% (2)
liz - 0.03% (2)
profit - 0.03% (2)
delivers - 0.03% (2)
search - 0.03% (2)
address - 0.03% (2)
burn - 0.03% (2)
nytimes - 0.03% (2)
(photo - 0.03% (2)
tweet - 0.03% (2)
him.” - 0.03% (2)
prince, - 0.03% (2)
bureaucracy - 0.03% (2)
within - 0.03% (2)
thus - 0.03% (2)
stood - 0.03% (2)
gabriel - 0.03% (2)
journalism? - 0.03% (2)
longer - 0.03% (2)
along - 0.03% (2)
almost - 0.03% (2)
corp. - 0.03% (2)
quarter - 0.03% (2)
murdoch’s - 0.03% (2)
contrast - 0.03% (2)
picture - 0.03% (2)
criticism, - 0.03% (2)
facebook - 0.03% (2)
recently - 0.03% (2)
thoughts - 0.03% (2)
assembling - 0.03% (2)
hillary - 0.03% (2)
o’reilly - 0.03% (2)
conservatives - 0.03% (2)
professionals - 0.03% (2)
873 - 0.03% (2)
considered - 0.03% (2)
email. - 0.03% (2)
notifications - 0.03% (2)
plans - 0.03% (2)
subject - 0.03% (2)
study - 0.03% (2)
veteran - 0.03% (2)
policy. - 0.03% (2)
converted - 0.03% (2)
camp - 0.03% (2)
related - 0.03% (2)
proportion - 0.03% (2)
value - 0.03% (2)
higher - 0.03% (2)
jail, - 0.03% (2)
ordered - 0.03% (2)
contempt - 0.03% (2)
after - 0.03% (2)
brilliant - 0.03% (2)
anthony - 0.03% (2)
name - 0.03% (2)
destroyed - 0.03% (2)
possible - 0.03% (2)
beat - 0.03% (2)
relationship - 0.03% (2)
paul - 0.03% (2)
appearance - 0.03% (2)
however, - 0.03% (2)
caldwell. - 0.03% (2)
kill - 0.03% (2)
including - 0.03% (2)
newspaper, - 0.03% (2)
both - 0.03% (2)
radical - 0.03% (2)
attention - 0.03% (2)
cleaver - 0.03% (2)
armed - 0.03% (2)
heading - 0.03% (2)
protecting - 0.03% (2)
enough - 0.03% (2)
society - 0.03% (2)
priest - 0.03% (2)
privilege” - 0.03% (2)
“testimonial - 0.03% (2)
categories - 0.03% (2)
criminal - 0.03% (2)
balanced - 0.03% (2)
5–4 - 0.03% (2)
walter - 0.03% (2)
respected - 0.03% (2)
photographers - 0.03% (2)
editors, - 0.03% (2)
company, - 0.03% (2)
pappas - 0.03% (2)
gather - 0.03% (2)
freely - 0.03% (2)
journalists’ - 0.03% (2)
source. - 0.03% (2)
instance - 0.03% (2)
classic - 0.03% (2)
issue - 0.03% (2)
cases, - 0.03% (2)
three - 0.03% (2)
several - 0.03% (2)
station - 0.03% (2)
stories - 0.03% (2)
shrewd - 0.03% (2)
crime - 0.03% (2)
weapons - 0.03% (2)
gay - 0.03% (2)
conclusion - 0.03% (2)
1972 - 0.03% (2)
landmark - 0.03% (2)
pressure - 0.03% (2)
fbi, - 0.03% (2)
exemplary - 0.03% (2)
narrative - 0.03% (2)
actually - 0.03% (2)
believe - 0.03% (2)
panthers, - 0.03% (2)
roll - 0.03% (2)
knew - 0.03% (2)
members - 0.03% (2)
harassment - 0.03% (2)
built - 0.03% (2)
place - 0.03% (2)
party, - 0.03% (2)
founding - 0.03% (2)
observed - 0.03% (2)
point - 0.03% (2)
older - 0.03% (2)
← - 0.03% (2)
content - 0.03% (2)
foreign - 0.03% (2)
cities - 0.03% (2)
bay - 0.03% (2)
spent - 0.03% (2)
among - 0.03% (2)
contacts - 0.03% (2)
become - 0.03% (2)
francisco - 0.03% (2)
neck - 0.03% (2)
burst - 0.03% (2)
perhaps - 0.03% (2)
green - 0.03% (2)
king, - 0.03% (2)
continued: - 0.03% (2)
suit - 0.03% (2)
according - 0.03% (2)
tapped - 0.03% (2)
eyewitness - 0.03% (2)
assassination - 0.03% (2)
luther - 0.03% (2)
rev. - 0.03% (2)
rang - 0.03% (2)
lorraine - 0.03% (2)
jr. - 0.03% (2)
martin - 0.03% (2)
strike - 0.03% (2)
1968, - 0.03% (2)
chief - 0.03% (2)
often - 0.03% (2)
category - 0.03% (2)
tell - 0.03% (2)
tower. - 0.03% (2)
staff - 0.03% (2)
either. - 0.03% (2)
embraced - 0.03% (2)
fully - 0.03% (2)
offer - 0.03% (2)
thanks - 0.03% (2)
surprise - 0.03% (2)
separate - 0.03% (2)
second, - 0.03% (2)
notice - 0.03% (2)
given - 0.03% (2)
barbaro - 0.03% (2)
essentially - 0.03% (2)
objectivity - 0.03% (2)
tribute - 0.03% (2)
homepage - 0.03% (2)
organization - 0.03% (2)
table - 0.03% (2)
rather - 0.03% (2)
format, - 0.03% (2)
type - 0.03% (2)
above - 0.03% (2)
yes, - 0.03% (2)
hates - 0.03% (2)
views - 0.03% (2)
current - 0.03% (2)
leader” - 0.03% (2)
draw - 0.03% (2)
depends - 0.03% (2)
credit: - 0.03% (2)
years. - 0.03% (2)
environment - 0.03% (2)
finance - 0.03% (2)
committees, - 0.03% (2)
corporate - 0.03% (2)
ceo - 0.03% (2)
held - 0.03% (2)
tower, - 0.03% (2)
walk - 0.03% (2)
individual - 0.03% (2)
success - 0.03% (2)
nothing - 0.03% (2)
qualities. - 0.03% (2)
argued - 0.03% (2)
traditional - 0.03% (2)
different - 0.03% (2)
weber, - 0.03% (2)
he’s - 0.03% (2)
leaders - 0.03% (2)
scheme - 0.03% (2)
max - 0.03% (2)
german - 0.03% (2)
donald - 0.03% (2)
hold - 0.03% (2)
20th - 0.03% (2)
know. - 0.03% (2)
order. - 0.03% (2)
benefit - 0.03% (2)
recognize - 0.03% (2)
understanding - 0.03% (2)
key - 0.03% (2)
denying - 0.03% (2)
claims - 0.03% (2)
powell - 0.03% (2)
testimony - 0.03% (2)
citizens - 0.03% (2)
freedom - 0.03% (2)
judged - 0.03% (2)
newsmen - 0.03% (2)
independent - 0.03% (2)
side. - 0.03% (2)
lewis - 0.03% (2)
opinion, - 0.03% (2)
versions - 0.03% (2)
create - 0.03% (2)
guidelines - 0.03% (2)
general - 0.03% (2)
attorney - 0.03% (2)
assert - 0.03% (2)
task - 0.03% (2)
soon - 0.03% (2)
whole. - 0.03% (2)
self-government - 0.03% (2)
bias. - 0.03% (2)
*       - 0.03% (2)
dramatic - 0.03% (2)
presents - 0.03% (2)
today’s - 0.03% (2)
robert - 0.03% (2)
host - 0.03% (2)
page. - 0.03% (2)
account - 0.03% (2)
“news - 0.03% (2)
interview - 0.03% (2)
missing - 0.03% (2)
wallace - 0.03% (2)
interest - 0.03% (2)
people, - 0.03% (2)
anybody - 0.03% (2)
least - 0.03% (2)
operated - 0.03% (2)
departments - 0.03% (2)
pass - 0.03% (2)
court’s - 0.03% (2)
means - 0.03% (2)
performed - 0.03% (2)
function - 0.03% (2)
public’s - 0.03% (2)
class, - 0.03% (2)
purpose - 0.03% (2)
wordpress.com. - 0.03% (2)
in the - 0.64% (41)
of the - 0.62% (40)
at the - 0.59% (38)
that the - 0.37% (24)
the new - 0.36% (23)
to the - 0.34% (22)
the time - 0.34% (22)
the times - 0.33% (21)
fox news - 0.31% (20)
new york - 0.25% (16)
the news - 0.25% (16)
out the - 0.23% (15)
for the - 0.23% (15)
and the - 0.2% (13)
on the - 0.2% (13)
black panther - 0.17% (11)
about the - 0.17% (11)
by the - 0.16% (10)
as the - 0.14% (9)
with the - 0.14% (9)
b. daly - 0.14% (9)
black panthers - 0.14% (9)
the panthers - 0.14% (9)
christopher b. - 0.14% (9)
but the - 0.12% (8)
filed under - 0.12% (8)
the press - 0.12% (8)
rate this: - 0.11% (7)
the court - 0.11% (7)
roger ailes - 0.11% (7)
tagged as - 0.11% (7)
he was - 0.11% (7)
the black - 0.11% (7)
right to - 0.11% (7)
comment filed - 0.11% (7)
here is - 0.11% (7)
of new - 0.11% (7)
2016 · - 0.11% (7)
by christopher - 0.11% (7)
first amendment - 0.11% (7)
a comment - 0.09% (6)
fox news, - 0.09% (6)
charismatic leader - 0.09% (6)
uncategorized tagged - 0.09% (6)
this: leave - 0.09% (6)
leave a - 0.09% (6)
from the - 0.09% (6)
the right - 0.09% (6)
in his - 0.09% (6)
that they - 0.09% (6)
if the - 0.09% (6)
they are - 0.09% (6)
there is - 0.09% (6)
the other - 0.09% (6)
the first - 0.09% (6)
one of - 0.09% (6)
with a - 0.08% (5)
the most - 0.08% (5)
people who - 0.08% (5)
the end - 0.08% (5)
–fox news - 0.08% (5)
of news - 0.08% (5)
the american - 0.08% (5)
news media - 0.08% (5)
the newspaper - 0.08% (5)
history of - 0.08% (5)
of journalism - 0.08% (5)
the day - 0.08% (5)
supreme court - 0.08% (5)
the journalists - 0.06% (4)
sources of - 0.06% (4)
most of - 0.06% (4)
grand jury - 0.06% (4)
is the - 0.06% (4)
will be - 0.06% (4)
like trump - 0.06% (4)
people a - 0.06% (4)
known as - 0.06% (4)
journalism, journalism - 0.06% (4)
is personal - 0.06% (4)
the u.s. - 0.06% (4)
to testify - 0.06% (4)
in america - 0.06% (4)
that news - 0.06% (4)
it was - 0.06% (4)
news story - 0.06% (4)
is not - 0.06% (4)
to protect - 0.06% (4)
not only - 0.06% (4)
journalism history, - 0.06% (4)
that he - 0.06% (4)
of information - 0.06% (4)
are some - 0.06% (4)
that all - 0.06% (4)
out for - 0.06% (4)
when the - 0.06% (4)
like a - 0.06% (4)
are no - 0.06% (4)
caldwell was - 0.06% (4)
   ♦ - 0.06% (4)
here are - 0.06% (4)
york times. - 0.06% (4)
used to - 0.06% (4)
as well - 0.06% (4)
the majority - 0.06% (4)
of its - 0.06% (4)
has no - 0.06% (4)
that is - 0.06% (4)
of his - 0.06% (4)
york times, - 0.06% (4)
have been - 0.06% (4)
before the - 0.05% (3)
the same - 0.05% (3)
maynard institute - 0.05% (3)
the ny - 0.05% (3)
times to - 0.05% (3)
for its - 0.05% (3)
in american - 0.05% (3)
well as - 0.05% (3)
prof chris - 0.05% (3)
daly's blog - 0.05% (3)
and broadcast - 0.05% (3)
the number - 0.05% (3)
of jobs - 0.05% (3)
newspapers are - 0.05% (3)
the bls - 0.05% (3)
the web - 0.05% (3)
need to - 0.05% (3)
decided that - 0.05% (3)
number of - 0.05% (3)
all our - 0.05% (3)
but it - 0.05% (3)
lot of - 0.05% (3)
history, media, - 0.05% (3)
the best - 0.05% (3)
chris daly's - 0.05% (3)
jobs in - 0.05% (3)
a small - 0.05% (3)
the paper - 0.05% (3)
want to - 0.05% (3)
the trump - 0.05% (3)
over the - 0.05% (3)
what the - 0.05% (3)
insist that - 0.05% (3)
trump epitomizes - 0.05% (3)
the “charismatic - 0.05% (3)
the great - 0.05% (3)
journalism, media, - 0.05% (3)
no one - 0.05% (3)
for decades - 0.05% (3)
at any - 0.05% (3)
of ailes - 0.05% (3)
who are - 0.05% (3)
the future - 0.05% (3)
i will - 0.05% (3)
.” the - 0.05% (3)
times editors - 0.05% (3)
was the - 0.05% (3)
would be - 0.05% (3)
the top - 0.05% (3)
covering the - 0.05% (3)
who had - 0.05% (3)
of government - 0.05% (3)
the bureau - 0.05% (3)
had been - 0.05% (3)
the only - 0.05% (3)
against the - 0.05% (3)
a reporter - 0.05% (3)
there was - 0.05% (3)
reporters and - 0.05% (3)
matter of - 0.05% (3)
the people - 0.05% (3)
american newspaper - 0.05% (3)
to write - 0.05% (3)
not to - 0.05% (3)
of black - 0.05% (3)
of people - 0.05% (3)
the media - 0.05% (3)
should be - 0.05% (3)
on april - 0.03% (2)
story in - 0.03% (2)
find the - 0.03% (2)
best criticism - 0.03% (2)
of journalism? - 0.03% (2)
the king - 0.03% (2)
news business - 0.03% (2)
april 4 - 0.03% (2)
reliable sources - 0.03% (2)
of them - 0.03% (2)
1968, caldwell - 0.03% (2)
media, news, - 0.03% (2)
we are - 0.03% (2)
under journalism, - 0.03% (2)
and other - 0.03% (2)
cover the - 0.03% (2)
as journalism, - 0.03% (2)
the lorraine - 0.03% (2)
lorraine motel - 0.03% (2)
you can - 0.03% (2)
do you - 0.03% (2)
had the - 0.03% (2)
by fear - 0.03% (2)
media earthquake: - 0.03% (2)
within the - 0.03% (2)
ailes was - 0.03% (2)
megyn kelly - 0.03% (2)
who delivers - 0.03% (2)
era at - 0.03% (2)
of 1968, - 0.03% (2)
panther party, - 0.03% (2)
his own - 0.03% (2)
the bay - 0.03% (2)
history, journalism, - 0.03% (2)
under broadcasting, - 0.03% (2)
armed and - 0.03% (2)
to talk - 0.03% (2)
panthers would - 0.03% (2)
correspondent for - 0.03% (2)
news corp. - 0.03% (2)
the man - 0.03% (2)
of roger - 0.03% (2)
was just - 0.03% (2)
much of - 0.03% (2)
news operation - 0.03% (2)
mainstream media - 0.03% (2)
purpose of - 0.03% (2)
served the - 0.03% (2)
media mogul - 0.03% (2)
well told - 0.03% (2)
rise of - 0.03% (2)
of conservative - 0.03% (2)
the rise - 0.03% (2)
york magazine - 0.03% (2)
for new - 0.03% (2)
become a - 0.03% (2)
corp. the - 0.03% (2)
he did - 0.03% (2)
coal, energy - 0.03% (2)
this blog - 0.03% (2)
their own - 0.03% (2)
harassment of - 0.03% (2)
older posts - 0.03% (2)
of those - 0.03% (2)
epitomizes the - 0.03% (2)
“charismatic leader” - 0.03% (2)
where power - 0.03% (2)
in one - 0.03% (2)
where do - 0.03% (2)
you find - 0.03% (2)
in oakland - 0.03% (2)
criticism of - 0.03% (2)
your email - 0.03% (2)
address to - 0.03% (2)
and receive - 0.03% (2)
coverage of - 0.03% (2)
notifications of - 0.03% (2)
new posts - 0.03% (2)
by email. - 0.03% (2)
join 873 - 0.03% (2)
other followers - 0.03% (2)
facebook like - 0.03% (2)
blog and - 0.03% (2)
receive notifications - 0.03% (2)
the founding - 0.03% (2)
posts by - 0.03% (2)
email. join - 0.03% (2)
873 other - 0.03% (2)
← older - 0.03% (2)
at wordpress.com. - 0.03% (2)
its own - 0.03% (2)
our students - 0.03% (2)
to help - 0.03% (2)
found in - 0.03% (2)
across america - 0.03% (2)
black people - 0.03% (2)
tower, he - 0.03% (2)
longer the - 0.03% (2)
the 20th - 0.03% (2)
no longer - 0.03% (2)
the past - 0.03% (2)
on his - 0.03% (2)
in 1990 - 0.03% (2)
just the - 0.03% (2)
a rough - 0.03% (2)
took a - 0.03% (2)
that newspapers - 0.03% (2)
the data - 0.03% (2)
has not - 0.03% (2)
and decided - 0.03% (2)
all those - 0.03% (2)
the movement - 0.03% (2)
earl caldwell, - 0.03% (2)
a decade - 0.03% (2)
panthers but - 0.03% (2)
where the - 0.03% (2)
also in - 0.03% (2)
the last - 0.03% (2)
to have - 0.03% (2)
but there - 0.03% (2)
a case - 0.03% (2)
on their - 0.03% (2)
probably a - 0.03% (2)
a living - 0.03% (2)
which i - 0.03% (2)
feel the - 0.03% (2)
for example, - 0.03% (2)
to trump - 0.03% (2)
“testimonial privilege” - 0.03% (2)
any author - 0.03% (2)
the supreme - 0.03% (2)
he left - 0.03% (2)
to become - 0.03% (2)
the washington - 0.03% (2)
in new - 0.03% (2)
institute for - 0.03% (2)
who is - 0.03% (2)
it would - 0.03% (2)
the justice - 0.03% (2)
what they - 0.03% (2)
journalism, new - 0.03% (2)
to find - 0.03% (2)
things that - 0.03% (2)
times’ bias - 0.03% (2)
flow of - 0.03% (2)
a dramatic - 0.03% (2)
down on - 0.03% (2)
association, the - 0.03% (2)
20th century - 0.03% (2)
company, the - 0.03% (2)
the editorial - 0.03% (2)
washington post - 0.03% (2)
opinion and - 0.03% (2)
and his - 0.03% (2)
yes, the - 0.03% (2)
above the - 0.03% (2)
rather than - 0.03% (2)
confidential source. - 0.03% (2)
could be - 0.03% (2)
black panthers. - 0.03% (2)
anybody could - 0.03% (2)
all three - 0.03% (2)
to bring - 0.03% (2)
a constitutional - 0.03% (2)
the caldwell - 0.03% (2)
all of - 0.03% (2)
he said, - 0.03% (2)
amendment in - 0.03% (2)
first amendment, - 0.03% (2)
a whole. - 0.03% (2)
he wrote - 0.03% (2)
people are - 0.03% (2)
what are - 0.03% (2)
versions of - 0.03% (2)
and many - 0.03% (2)
our constitutional - 0.03% (2)
class, but - 0.03% (2)
the public’s - 0.03% (2)
warning that - 0.03% (2)
the high - 0.03% (2)
the court’s - 0.03% (2)
majority opinion - 0.03% (2)
confidential sources, - 0.03% (2)
set of - 0.03% (2)
the majority, - 0.03% (2)
their sources - 0.03% (2)
at least - 0.03% (2)
the state - 0.03% (2)
branzburg ruling - 0.03% (2)
to recognize - 0.03% (2)
a journalist - 0.03% (2)
the federal - 0.03% (2)
the branzburg - 0.03% (2)
straight news - 0.03% (2)
the homepage - 0.03% (2)
but he - 0.03% (2)
the landmark - 0.03% (2)
they wanted - 0.03% (2)
american conservative - 0.03% (2)
trump, ailes - 0.03% (2)
him that - 0.03% (2)
for decades, - 0.03% (2)
to caldwell - 0.03% (2)
“flirting” with - 0.03% (2)
even if - 0.03% (2)
the fear - 0.03% (2)
reinforce the - 0.03% (2)
inside the - 0.03% (2)
and broadcasting - 0.03% (2)
the idea - 0.03% (2)
that america - 0.03% (2)
his reporting - 0.03% (2)
and that - 0.03% (2)
everything is - 0.03% (2)
they were - 0.03% (2)
approach to - 0.03% (2)
but in - 0.03% (2)
his personal - 0.03% (2)
people to - 0.03% (2)
and it - 0.03% (2)
when he - 0.03% (2)
effect of - 0.03% (2)
it off - 0.03% (2)
hit it - 0.03% (2)
would make - 0.03% (2)
media have - 0.03% (2)
a straight - 0.03% (2)
place in - 0.03% (2)
are to - 0.03% (2)
a confidential - 0.03% (2)
still the - 0.03% (2)
analysis piece - 0.03% (2)
work is - 0.03% (2)
piece is - 0.03% (2)
went to - 0.03% (2)
they insist - 0.03% (2)
that their - 0.03% (2)
reporters are - 0.03% (2)
the current - 0.03% (2)
to represent - 0.03% (2)
san francisco - 0.03% (2)
leader” where - 0.03% (2)
power is - 0.03% (2)
donald trump - 0.03% (2)
more than - 0.03% (2)
the national - 0.03% (2)
work for - 0.03% (2)
trump is - 0.03% (2)
up the - 0.03% (2)
sources. the - 0.03% (2)
the charismatic - 0.03% (2)
leader is - 0.03% (2)
a charismatic - 0.03% (2)
he has - 0.03% (2)
before a - 0.03% (2)
trump tower, - 0.03% (2)
he rules - 0.03% (2)
over a - 0.03% (2)
refused to - 0.03% (2)
and who - 0.03% (2)
so, the - 0.03% (2)
blog at - 0.03% (2)
new york times - 0.17% (11)
christopher b. daly - 0.14% (9)
comment filed under - 0.11% (7)
by christopher b. - 0.11% (7)
rate this: leave - 0.09% (6)
a comment filed - 0.09% (6)
leave a comment - 0.09% (6)
the black panthers - 0.09% (6)
♦     - 0.09% (6)
the new york - 0.09% (6)
this: leave a - 0.09% (6)
uncategorized tagged as - 0.09% (6)
the first amendment - 0.08% (5)
new york times, - 0.06% (4)
journalism, journalism history, - 0.06% (4)
there is no - 0.06% (4)
new york times. - 0.06% (4)
the right to - 0.06% (4)
the news media - 0.06% (4)
 ♦     - 0.06% (4)
   ♦   - 0.06% (4)
     ♦ - 0.06% (4)
the end of - 0.06% (4)
of jobs in - 0.05% (3)
of the new - 0.05% (3)
the history of - 0.05% (3)
chris daly's blog - 0.05% (3)
journalism history, media, - 0.05% (3)
prof chris daly's - 0.05% (3)
the times to - 0.05% (3)
the panthers were - 0.05% (3)
that the panthers - 0.05% (3)
one of the - 0.05% (3)
on to the - 0.05% (3)
cities across america - 0.03% (2)
black panther party, - 0.03% (2)
tagged as journalism, - 0.03% (2)
where do you - 0.03% (2)
find the best - 0.03% (2)
criticism of journalism? - 0.03% (2)
enter your email - 0.03% (2)
new york magazine - 0.03% (2)
the lorraine motel - 0.03% (2)
number of jobs - 0.03% (2)
the 20th century - 0.03% (2)
no longer the - 0.03% (2)
that all our - 0.03% (2)
supreme court ruling - 0.03% (2)
email. join 873 - 0.03% (2)
covering the black - 0.03% (2)
to protect confidential - 0.03% (2)
trump epitomizes the - 0.03% (2)
“charismatic leader” where - 0.03% (2)
power is personal - 0.03% (2)
media earthquake: the - 0.03% (2)
end of the - 0.03% (2)
roger ailes era - 0.03% (2)
at fox news - 0.03% (2)
your email address - 0.03% (2)
this blog and - 0.03% (2)
receive notifications of - 0.03% (2)
new posts by - 0.03% (2)
times’ bias problem - 0.03% (2)
news corp. the - 0.03% (2)
at the new - 0.03% (2)
where power is - 0.03% (2)
known as the - 0.03% (2)
reporters and their - 0.03% (2)
journalism, new york - 0.03% (2)
times, uncategorized tagged - 0.03% (2)
the ny times’ - 0.03% (2)
the people are - 0.03% (2)
a “testimonial privilege” - 0.03% (2)
about the news - 0.03% (2)
but it was - 0.03% (2)
in the online - 0.03% (2)
they insist that - 0.03% (2)
the supreme court - 0.03% (2)
filed under journalism, - 0.03% (2)
the “charismatic leader” - 0.03% (2)
most of the - 0.03% (2)
on the air - 0.03% (2)
if the people - 0.03% (2)
a matter of - 0.03% (2)
a confidential source. - 0.03% (2)
a charismatic leader - 0.03% (2)
“flirting” with the - 0.03% (2)
who had been - 0.03% (2)
to cover the - 0.03% (2)
      ♦ - 0.03% (2)
but in his - 0.03% (2)
history, journalism, journalism - 0.03% (2)
the roger ailes - 0.03% (2)
era at fox - 0.03% (2)
in the history - 0.03% (2)
ailes was a - 0.03% (2)
blog at wordpress.com. - 0.03% (2)

Here you can find chart of all your popular one, two and three word phrases. Google and others search engines means your page is about words you use frequently.

Copyright © 2015-2016 hupso.pl. All rights reserved. FB | +G | Twitter

Hupso.pl jest serwisem internetowym, w którym jednym kliknieciem możesz szybko i łatwo sprawdź stronę www pod kątem SEO. Oferujemy darmowe pozycjonowanie stron internetowych oraz wycena domen i stron internetowych. Prowadzimy ranking polskich stron internetowych oraz ranking stron alexa.