2.14 score from hupso.pl for:
informationdissemination.net



HTML Content


Titleinformation dissemination

Length: 25, Words: 2
Description professional discussions covering topics including foreign policy, maritime strategy, emerging technology, and military affairs.

Length: 128, Words: 14
Keywords pusty
Robots
Charset UTF-8
Og Meta - Title exist
Og Meta - Description exist
Og Meta - Site name pusty
Tytuł powinien zawierać pomiędzy 10 a 70 znaków (ze spacjami), a mniej niż 12 słów w długości.
Meta opis powinien zawierać pomiędzy 50 a 160 znaków (łącznie ze spacjami), a mniej niż 24 słów w długości.
Kodowanie znaków powinny być określone , UTF-8 jest chyba najlepszy zestaw znaków, aby przejść z powodu UTF-8 jest bardziej międzynarodowy kodowaniem.
Otwarte obiekty wykresu powinny być obecne w stronie internetowej (więcej informacji na temat protokołu OpenGraph: http://ogp.me/)

SEO Content

Words/Characters 3550
Text/HTML 21.42 %
Headings H1 0
H2 5
H3 5
H4 0
H5 0
H6 0
H1
H2
friday, january 27, 2017
monday, january 23, 2017
friday, january 20, 2017
contributors
blog archive
H3
question of the week january 23-27, 2017
some thoughts on the mccain white paper
last week's other transition of power
why do an american seapower speaking tour? (segment 1)
hello world. let's try this again.
H4
H5
H6
strong
b
i
em
Bolds strong 0
b 0
i 0
em 0
Zawartość strony internetowej powinno zawierać więcej niż 250 słów, z stopa tekst / kod jest wyższy niż 20%.
Pozycji używać znaczników (h1, h2, h3, ...), aby określić temat sekcji lub ustępów na stronie, ale zwykle, użyj mniej niż 6 dla każdego tagu pozycje zachować swoją stronę zwięzły.
Styl używać silnych i kursywy znaczniki podkreślić swoje słowa kluczowe swojej stronie, ale nie nadużywać (mniej niż 16 silnych tagi i 16 znaczników kursywy)

Statystyki strony

twitter:title pusty
twitter:description pusty
google+ itemprop=name exist
Pliki zewnętrzne 15
Pliki CSS 2
Pliki javascript 13
Plik należy zmniejszyć całkowite odwołanie plików (CSS + JavaScript) do 7-8 maksymalnie.

Linki wewnętrzne i zewnętrzne

Linki 204
Linki wewnętrzne 10
Linki zewnętrzne 194
Linki bez atrybutu Title 157
Linki z atrybutem NOFOLLOW 0
Linki - Użyj atrybutu tytuł dla każdego łącza. Nofollow link jest link, który nie pozwala wyszukiwarkom boty zrealizują są odnośniki no follow. Należy zwracać uwagę na ich użytkowania

Linki wewnętrzne

- //www.blogger.com/rearrange?blogid=7336109314142259809&widgettype=html&widgetid=html4&action=editwidget§ionid=sidebar-right-1
- //www.blogger.com/rearrange?blogid=7336109314142259809&widgettype=blogarchive&widgetid=blogarchive1&action=editwidget§ionid=sidebar-right-1
- //www.blogger.com/rearrange?blogid=7336109314142259809&widgettype=html&widgetid=html2&action=editwidget§ionid=sidebar-right-1
- //www.blogger.com/rearrange?blogid=7336109314142259809&widgettype=html&widgetid=html1&action=editwidget§ionid=sidebar-right-1
- //www.blogger.com/rearrange?blogid=7336109314142259809&widgettype=attribution&widgetid=attribution1&action=editwidget§ionid=footer-3

Linki zewnętrzne

- http://www.informationdissemination.net/
question of the week january 23-27, 2017 http://www.informationdissemination.net/2017/01/question-of-week-january-23-27-2017.html
question of the week http://www.informationdissemination.net/search/label/question%20of%20the%20week
galrahn https://www.blogger.com/profile/14681891607184284048
5:00 pm http://www.informationdissemination.net/2017/01/question-of-week-january-23-27-2017.html
no comments: https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogid=7336109314142259809&postid=918786995045132396
links to this post http://www.informationdissemination.net/2017/01/question-of-week-january-23-27-2017.html#links
- https://www.blogger.com/email-post.g?blogid=7336109314142259809&postid=918786995045132396
https://www.blogger.com/share-post.g?blogid=7336109314142259809&postid=918786995045132396&target=email
https://www.blogger.com/share-post.g?blogid=7336109314142259809&postid=918786995045132396&target=blog
https://www.blogger.com/share-post.g?blogid=7336109314142259809&postid=918786995045132396&target=twitter
https://www.blogger.com/share-post.g?blogid=7336109314142259809&postid=918786995045132396&target=facebook
https://www.blogger.com/share-post.g?blogid=7336109314142259809&postid=918786995045132396&target=pinterest
question of the week http://www.informationdissemination.net/search/label/question%20of%20the%20week
some thoughts on the mccain white paper http://www.informationdissemination.net/2017/01/some-thoughts-on-mccain-white-paper.html
bryan clark http://csbaonline.org/about/people/staff/bryan-clark
bryan mcgrath http://www.hudson.org/experts/687-bryan-mc-grath
"restoring american power" http://www.mccain.senate.gov/public/_cache/files/25bff0ec-481e-466a-843f-68ba5619e6d8/restoring-american-power-7.pdf
who waded into the debate last week with a strong, coherent outline http://www.mccain.senate.gov/public/_cache/files/25bff0ec-481e-466a-843f-68ba5619e6d8/restoring-american-power-7.pdf
https://www.blogger.com/null
the conservative wahoo https://www.blogger.com/profile/17818674434286683162
10:00 am http://www.informationdissemination.net/2017/01/some-thoughts-on-mccain-white-paper.html
no comments: https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogid=7336109314142259809&postid=2263252065626992949
links to this post http://www.informationdissemination.net/2017/01/some-thoughts-on-mccain-white-paper.html#links
- https://www.blogger.com/email-post.g?blogid=7336109314142259809&postid=2263252065626992949
https://www.blogger.com/share-post.g?blogid=7336109314142259809&postid=2263252065626992949&target=email
https://www.blogger.com/share-post.g?blogid=7336109314142259809&postid=2263252065626992949&target=blog
https://www.blogger.com/share-post.g?blogid=7336109314142259809&postid=2263252065626992949&target=twitter
https://www.blogger.com/share-post.g?blogid=7336109314142259809&postid=2263252065626992949&target=facebook
https://www.blogger.com/share-post.g?blogid=7336109314142259809&postid=2263252065626992949&target=pinterest
the conservative wahoo https://www.blogger.com/profile/17818674434286683162
last week's other transition of power http://www.informationdissemination.net/2017/01/last-weeks-other-transition-of-power.html
- https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-gir6udrhxl4/wiwilvd39ui/aaaaaaaamwa/opdwg_cpxqwppajvri4itahgov-1-eg6wclcb/s1600/shen%2bjinlong.jpg
radm james shannon http://ipv6.navy.mil/navydata/bios/navybio.asp?bioid=490
picture https://twitter.com/ivaningham/status/603576509631049729
ivan ingham https://au.linkedin.com/in/ivan-ingham-373b4b37
can be found here http://www.mod.gov.cn/topnews/2017-01/20/content_4770549.htm
here http://english.chinamil.com.cn/view/2017-01/20/content_7461058.htm
south china morning post http://www.scmp.com/news/china/article/2061687/navy-man-tipped-command-plas-key-southern-region
article http://www.scmp.com/news/china/article/2061687/navy-man-tipped-command-plas-key-southern-region
the reorganization has taken place http://www.defensenews.com/articles/source-chinese-navy-has-new-commander
andrew erickson http://www.andrewerickson.com/
the world knows very well where vice admiral yuan yubai stands on south china sea issues http://thediplomat.com/2015/09/chinese-admiral-south-china-sea-belongs-to-china/
from september of 2015 http://www.defensenews.com/story/defense/show-daily/dsei/2015/09/14/royal-navy-britain-first-sea-lord-zambellas-south-china-sea-japan-china-dispute-rusi-desi-london/72284844/
galrahn https://www.blogger.com/profile/14681891607184284048
1:00 am http://www.informationdissemination.net/2017/01/last-weeks-other-transition-of-power.html
no comments: https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogid=7336109314142259809&postid=193883830199948968
links to this post http://www.informationdissemination.net/2017/01/last-weeks-other-transition-of-power.html#links
- https://www.blogger.com/email-post.g?blogid=7336109314142259809&postid=193883830199948968
https://www.blogger.com/share-post.g?blogid=7336109314142259809&postid=193883830199948968&target=email
https://www.blogger.com/share-post.g?blogid=7336109314142259809&postid=193883830199948968&target=blog
https://www.blogger.com/share-post.g?blogid=7336109314142259809&postid=193883830199948968&target=twitter
https://www.blogger.com/share-post.g?blogid=7336109314142259809&postid=193883830199948968&target=facebook
https://www.blogger.com/share-post.g?blogid=7336109314142259809&postid=193883830199948968&target=pinterest
china http://www.informationdissemination.net/search/label/china
south china sea http://www.informationdissemination.net/search/label/south%20china%20sea
why do an american seapower speaking tour? (segment 1) http://www.informationdissemination.net/2017/01/why-do-american-seapower-speaking-tour.html
galrahn https://www.blogger.com/profile/14681891607184284048
12:00 am http://www.informationdissemination.net/2017/01/why-do-american-seapower-speaking-tour.html
no comments: https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogid=7336109314142259809&postid=2327390622391557863
links to this post http://www.informationdissemination.net/2017/01/why-do-american-seapower-speaking-tour.html#links
- https://www.blogger.com/email-post.g?blogid=7336109314142259809&postid=2327390622391557863
https://www.blogger.com/share-post.g?blogid=7336109314142259809&postid=2327390622391557863&target=email
https://www.blogger.com/share-post.g?blogid=7336109314142259809&postid=2327390622391557863&target=blog
https://www.blogger.com/share-post.g?blogid=7336109314142259809&postid=2327390622391557863&target=twitter
https://www.blogger.com/share-post.g?blogid=7336109314142259809&postid=2327390622391557863&target=facebook
https://www.blogger.com/share-post.g?blogid=7336109314142259809&postid=2327390622391557863&target=pinterest
bryan mcgrath on seapower http://www.informationdissemination.net/search/label/bryan%20mcgrath%20on%20seapower
hello world. let's try this again. http://www.informationdissemination.net/2017/01/hello-world-lets-try-this-again.html
- https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-otfopc8ruq4/wighkfu521i/aaaaaaaamus/sam0v0jmmykj2u_ta0qrmmipjl3wvikygclcb/s1600/me.jpg
galrahn https://www.blogger.com/profile/14681891607184284048
12:00 am http://www.informationdissemination.net/2017/01/hello-world-lets-try-this-again.html
no comments: https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogid=7336109314142259809&postid=3056969005264632222
links to this post http://www.informationdissemination.net/2017/01/hello-world-lets-try-this-again.html#links
- https://www.blogger.com/email-post.g?blogid=7336109314142259809&postid=3056969005264632222
https://www.blogger.com/share-post.g?blogid=7336109314142259809&postid=3056969005264632222&target=email
https://www.blogger.com/share-post.g?blogid=7336109314142259809&postid=3056969005264632222&target=blog
https://www.blogger.com/share-post.g?blogid=7336109314142259809&postid=3056969005264632222&target=twitter
https://www.blogger.com/share-post.g?blogid=7336109314142259809&postid=3056969005264632222&target=facebook
https://www.blogger.com/share-post.g?blogid=7336109314142259809&postid=3056969005264632222&target=pinterest
writing http://www.informationdissemination.net/search/label/writing
older posts http://www.informationdissemination.net/search?updated-max=2017-01-20t00:00:00-05:00&max-results=5
home http://www.informationdissemination.net/
posts (atom) http://www.informationdissemination.net/feeds/posts/default
january 2017 http://www.informationdissemination.net/2017_01_01_archive.html
march 2016 http://www.informationdissemination.net/2016_03_01_archive.html
february 2016 http://www.informationdissemination.net/2016_02_01_archive.html
january 2016 http://www.informationdissemination.net/2016_01_01_archive.html
december 2015 http://www.informationdissemination.net/2015_12_01_archive.html
november 2015 http://www.informationdissemination.net/2015_11_01_archive.html
october 2015 http://www.informationdissemination.net/2015_10_01_archive.html
september 2015 http://www.informationdissemination.net/2015_09_01_archive.html
august 2015 http://www.informationdissemination.net/2015_08_01_archive.html
july 2015 http://www.informationdissemination.net/2015_07_01_archive.html
june 2015 http://www.informationdissemination.net/2015_06_01_archive.html
may 2015 http://www.informationdissemination.net/2015_05_01_archive.html
april 2015 http://www.informationdissemination.net/2015_04_01_archive.html
march 2015 http://www.informationdissemination.net/2015_03_01_archive.html
february 2015 http://www.informationdissemination.net/2015_02_01_archive.html
january 2015 http://www.informationdissemination.net/2015_01_01_archive.html
december 2014 http://www.informationdissemination.net/2014_12_01_archive.html
november 2014 http://www.informationdissemination.net/2014_11_01_archive.html
october 2014 http://www.informationdissemination.net/2014_10_01_archive.html
september 2014 http://www.informationdissemination.net/2014_09_01_archive.html
august 2014 http://www.informationdissemination.net/2014_08_01_archive.html
july 2014 http://www.informationdissemination.net/2014_07_01_archive.html
june 2014 http://www.informationdissemination.net/2014_06_01_archive.html
may 2014 http://www.informationdissemination.net/2014_05_01_archive.html
april 2014 http://www.informationdissemination.net/2014_04_01_archive.html
march 2014 http://www.informationdissemination.net/2014_03_01_archive.html
february 2014 http://www.informationdissemination.net/2014_02_01_archive.html
january 2014 http://www.informationdissemination.net/2014_01_01_archive.html
december 2013 http://www.informationdissemination.net/2013_12_01_archive.html
november 2013 http://www.informationdissemination.net/2013_11_01_archive.html
october 2013 http://www.informationdissemination.net/2013_10_01_archive.html
september 2013 http://www.informationdissemination.net/2013_09_01_archive.html
august 2013 http://www.informationdissemination.net/2013_08_01_archive.html
july 2013 http://www.informationdissemination.net/2013_07_01_archive.html
june 2013 http://www.informationdissemination.net/2013_06_01_archive.html
may 2013 http://www.informationdissemination.net/2013_05_01_archive.html
april 2013 http://www.informationdissemination.net/2013_04_01_archive.html
march 2013 http://www.informationdissemination.net/2013_03_01_archive.html
february 2013 http://www.informationdissemination.net/2013_02_01_archive.html
january 2013 http://www.informationdissemination.net/2013_01_01_archive.html
december 2012 http://www.informationdissemination.net/2012_12_01_archive.html
november 2012 http://www.informationdissemination.net/2012_11_01_archive.html
october 2012 http://www.informationdissemination.net/2012_10_01_archive.html
september 2012 http://www.informationdissemination.net/2012_09_01_archive.html
august 2012 http://www.informationdissemination.net/2012_08_01_archive.html
july 2012 http://www.informationdissemination.net/2012_07_01_archive.html
june 2012 http://www.informationdissemination.net/2012_06_01_archive.html
may 2012 http://www.informationdissemination.net/2012_05_01_archive.html
april 2012 http://www.informationdissemination.net/2012_04_01_archive.html
march 2012 http://www.informationdissemination.net/2012_03_01_archive.html
february 2012 http://www.informationdissemination.net/2012_02_01_archive.html
january 2012 http://www.informationdissemination.net/2012_01_01_archive.html
december 2011 http://www.informationdissemination.net/2011_12_01_archive.html
november 2011 http://www.informationdissemination.net/2011_11_01_archive.html
october 2011 http://www.informationdissemination.net/2011_10_01_archive.html
september 2011 http://www.informationdissemination.net/2011_09_01_archive.html
august 2011 http://www.informationdissemination.net/2011_08_01_archive.html
july 2011 http://www.informationdissemination.net/2011_07_01_archive.html
june 2011 http://www.informationdissemination.net/2011_06_01_archive.html
may 2011 http://www.informationdissemination.net/2011_05_01_archive.html
april 2011 http://www.informationdissemination.net/2011_04_01_archive.html
march 2011 http://www.informationdissemination.net/2011_03_01_archive.html
february 2011 http://www.informationdissemination.net/2011_02_01_archive.html
january 2011 http://www.informationdissemination.net/2011_01_01_archive.html
december 2010 http://www.informationdissemination.net/2010_12_01_archive.html
november 2010 http://www.informationdissemination.net/2010_11_01_archive.html
october 2010 http://www.informationdissemination.net/2010_10_01_archive.html
september 2010 http://www.informationdissemination.net/2010_09_01_archive.html
august 2010 http://www.informationdissemination.net/2010_08_01_archive.html
july 2010 http://www.informationdissemination.net/2010_07_01_archive.html
june 2010 http://www.informationdissemination.net/2010_06_01_archive.html
may 2010 http://www.informationdissemination.net/2010_05_01_archive.html
april 2010 http://www.informationdissemination.net/2010_04_01_archive.html
march 2010 http://www.informationdissemination.net/2010_03_01_archive.html
february 2010 http://www.informationdissemination.net/2010_02_01_archive.html
january 2010 http://www.informationdissemination.net/2010_01_01_archive.html
december 2009 http://www.informationdissemination.net/2009_12_01_archive.html
november 2009 http://www.informationdissemination.net/2009_11_01_archive.html
october 2009 http://www.informationdissemination.net/2009_10_01_archive.html
september 2009 http://www.informationdissemination.net/2009_09_01_archive.html
august 2009 http://www.informationdissemination.net/2009_08_01_archive.html
july 2009 http://www.informationdissemination.net/2009_07_01_archive.html
june 2009 http://www.informationdissemination.net/2009_06_01_archive.html
may 2009 http://www.informationdissemination.net/2009_05_01_archive.html
april 2009 http://www.informationdissemination.net/2009_04_01_archive.html
march 2009 http://www.informationdissemination.net/2009_03_01_archive.html
february 2009 http://www.informationdissemination.net/2009_02_01_archive.html
january 2009 http://www.informationdissemination.net/2009_01_01_archive.html
december 2008 http://www.informationdissemination.net/2008_12_01_archive.html
november 2008 http://www.informationdissemination.net/2008_11_01_archive.html
october 2008 http://www.informationdissemination.net/2008_10_01_archive.html
september 2008 http://www.informationdissemination.net/2008_09_01_archive.html
august 2008 http://www.informationdissemination.net/2008_08_01_archive.html
july 2008 http://www.informationdissemination.net/2008_07_01_archive.html
june 2008 http://www.informationdissemination.net/2008_06_01_archive.html
may 2008 http://www.informationdissemination.net/2008_05_01_archive.html
april 2008 http://www.informationdissemination.net/2008_04_01_archive.html
march 2008 http://www.informationdissemination.net/2008_03_01_archive.html
february 2008 http://www.informationdissemination.net/2008_02_01_archive.html
january 2008 http://www.informationdissemination.net/2008_01_01_archive.html
december 2007 http://www.informationdissemination.net/2007_12_01_archive.html
november 2007 http://www.informationdissemination.net/2007_11_01_archive.html
october 2007 http://www.informationdissemination.net/2007_10_01_archive.html
september 2007 http://www.informationdissemination.net/2007_09_01_archive.html
august 2007 http://www.informationdissemination.net/2007_08_01_archive.html
july 2007 http://www.informationdissemination.net/2007_07_01_archive.html
june 2007 http://www.informationdissemination.net/2007_06_01_archive.html
get id by email http://www.feedburner.com/fb/a/emailverifysubmit?feedid=1759844&loc=en_us
- http://feeds.feedburner.com/informationdissemination
blogger https://www.blogger.com

Zdjęcia

Zdjęcia 14
Zdjęcia bez atrybutu ALT 12
Zdjęcia bez atrybutu TITLE 13
Korzystanie Obraz ALT i TITLE atrybutu dla każdego obrazu.

Zdjęcia bez atrybutu TITLE

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_cys2t5fgjdo/sj7duntciki/aaaaaaaagze/bh5osotlmm0/s750/idlogo2.jpg
https://resources.blogblog.com/img/icon18_email.gif
https://resources.blogblog.com/img/icon18_email.gif
https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-gir6udrhxl4/wiwilvd39ui/aaaaaaaamwa/opdwg_cpxqwppajvri4itahgov-1-eg6wclcb/s640/shen%2bjinlong.jpg
https://resources.blogblog.com/img/icon18_email.gif
https://resources.blogblog.com/img/icon18_email.gif
https://resources.blogblog.com/img/icon18_email.gif
https://resources.blogblog.com/img/icon18_wrench_allbkg.png
https://resources.blogblog.com/img/icon18_wrench_allbkg.png
https://resources.blogblog.com/img/icon18_wrench_allbkg.png
http://feeds.feedburner.com/~fc/informationdissemination?bg=efefef&fg=000000&anim=0
https://resources.blogblog.com/img/icon18_wrench_allbkg.png
https://resources.blogblog.com/img/icon18_wrench_allbkg.png

Zdjęcia bez atrybutu ALT

https://resources.blogblog.com/img/icon18_email.gif
https://resources.blogblog.com/img/icon18_email.gif
https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-gir6udrhxl4/wiwilvd39ui/aaaaaaaamwa/opdwg_cpxqwppajvri4itahgov-1-eg6wclcb/s640/shen%2bjinlong.jpg
https://resources.blogblog.com/img/icon18_email.gif
https://resources.blogblog.com/img/icon18_email.gif
https://resources.blogblog.com/img/icon18_email.gif
https://resources.blogblog.com/img/icon18_wrench_allbkg.png
https://resources.blogblog.com/img/icon18_wrench_allbkg.png
https://resources.blogblog.com/img/icon18_wrench_allbkg.png
http://feeds.feedburner.com/~fc/informationdissemination?bg=efefef&fg=000000&anim=0
https://resources.blogblog.com/img/icon18_wrench_allbkg.png
https://resources.blogblog.com/img/icon18_wrench_allbkg.png

Ranking:


Alexa Traffic
Daily Global Rank Trend
Daily Reach (Percent)









Majestic SEO











Text on page:

friday, january 27, 2017 question of the week january 23-27, 2017 each week information dissemination will present a question of the week for professional consideration and discussion. the question will remain at the top of the blog from monday at 12:00am until friday 5:00pm. please scroll down for new contributions. this weeks question: does a world of great power friction require a different fleet architecture than a uni-polar world? the question asks why, not how. posted by galrahn at 5:00 pm no comments: links to this post email thisblogthis!share to twittershare to facebookshare to pinterest labels: question of the week monday, january 23, 2017 some thoughts on the mccain white paper bryan clark of the center for strategic and budgetary assessments (csba) and i (bryan mcgrath) put together a few thoughts on the recent white paper from senator john mccain (r-az) entitled "restoring american power". ----------------------------- the trump administration began work this week on its promise of an across-the-board enlargement of the u.s. military. the president-elect has thus far described his plan only in the broadest of terms, but those terms portend a sustained period of higher defense spending—something congress has been unwilling to approve since it passed the budget control act (bca) in 2011. chief among those who will shape the future of the american military is senator john mccain (r-az), the chairman of the senate armed services committee, who waded into the debate last week with a strong, coherent outline that not only aims to restore the capacity of a significantly hollowed-out force, but also provides direction for how the force should evolve as it grows. there is a lot in this report, but we will restrict our comments to the larger context of the plan and its impact on american seapower. hope versus strategy senator mccain’s report begins by rightly highlighting the fundamental disconnect in today’s u.s. defense planning between resources and objectives. hoping revanchist regimes in russia and china would not be able to act effectively on their objectives for more than a decade, congress and president obama passed the bca in 2011, reducing military budgets by about 10 percent for the subsequent decade. the bca, in turn, contained the a ticking time-bomb known as sequestration, which implemented another 10 percent cut starting in fiscal year (fy) 2013 if the department was not able to meet bca targets for spending. because fy 2013 was already halfway over, services had to immediately cut their spending, creating maintenance depot backlogs, personnel shortfalls, and training shutdowns from which dod is still recovering. as the impact of the bca’s cuts became clear, dod and congress experienced buyer’s remorse, turning to various budget gimmicks and abuse of the overseas contingency operations (oco) budget to pay for expanding u.s. involvement in regional conflicts, growing compensation costs, and to allow for modest modernization of the force. mccain excoriates both congress and the executive branch for these measures. issuing a clear call to action, his report states “this law (bca) must be repealed outright so we can budget for the true costs of our national defense.” the most significant problem with the bca’s reductions, mccain argues, is they do not allow modernization to address the rapidly improving capability of great powers such as russia and china and regional powers such as iran and north korea. the bca also does not provide the resources for u.s. forces to sustain the operational tempo to conduct daily strikes and raids on terrorists in syria, iraq, yemen, afghanistan, libya and elsewhere. notably, despite the hopes that underpinned the bca, russia’s attacks on ukraine and china’s aggression in the south china sea show, in mccain’s words, “a better defense strategy must acknowledge the reality that we have entered a new era of great power competitions. china and russia aspire to diminish u.s. influence and revise the world order in ways that are contrary to u.s. national interests.” mccain’s focus on great power competition is important in two ways. first, it draws a distinction between the obama administration’s approach and mccain’s more forward-leaning view of great power dynamics. second, it sends a signal to the incoming administration of mccain’s wariness of russia in clear and unambiguous terms. this could ultimately prove to be a contentious issue between congress and the trump administration, which has indicated it may view russia as a partner rather than a competitor or adversary. strategy and fleet architecture mccain argues for a new set of defense strategies to address great powers, regional powers, and transnational terrorists, rather than a single u.s. security strategy. in csba’s upcoming study of alternative navy fleet architectures, we argue the most important of these is a strategy to deter great power aggression, which could potentially have the most catastrophic consequences of these security challenges. with the realignment of american bases since the cold war, u.s. ground and air forces overseas are less numerous and more easily suppressed than when they last faced a great power adversary a quarter century ago. thus, naval forces will assume a more prominent role in conventional deterrence. recognizing both the trump goal of a 350 ship navy and the navy’s own recently released 355-ship force structure assessment (fsa), mccain lays out a plan that over the next five years that: 1) increases the size of the fleet over the final plan of the obama administration by building 59 ships as opposed to the obama administration’s 41, 2) truncates the current littoral combat ship (lcs) program and accelerates the navy’s move to an open-ocean frigate replacement, 3) funds design work on a new class of aircraft carrier, 4) increases navy end-strength, 5) invests significantly in unmanned technologies of all varieties, and 6) provides additional, immediate funding to address fleet readiness and maintenance, and installations and infrastructure. mccain’s plan aligns in large part with our proposed fleet architecture, and would improve the navy’s ability to deter aggression by great powers, counter attacks by regional powers, and help keep terrorists on the run. unlike the current fleet, mccain’s proposal would not focus on efficiently providing presence at the expense of the capability and capacity for combat against a capable adversary. three aspects of mccain’s force structure plan are of particular interest. first is its truncation of the littoral combat ship (lcs) in 2017 with a follow-on frigate proposed for acquisition no later than 2022. it is essential that the navy move as quickly as possible from the lcs to a proper blue-water frigate capable of anti-submarine warfare and local air defense, but it must also continue to increase the size of the fleet and ensure the frigate can be affordable and built in large numbers. mccain proposes an acquisition “bridge” for the two shipyards currently building lcs to continue between 2017 and 2022. this would expand the fleet and enable these shipbuilders to compete for the follow-on frigate, which could lower costs for the frigate and increase the number of shipyards at which it could be built. the second initiative of note is mccain’s proposal to move to a mix of large, nuclear-powered aircraft carriers and smaller, conventionally-powered carriers. as recommended in our fleet architecture study as well, conventional carriers would initially be based on current amphibious assault ships that carry short takeoff and vertical landing aircraft such as the av-8b harrier and f-35b lightning ii. as mccain argues, a smaller carrier would be suited to supporting many of the smaller steady-state operations that require naval air power, such as air strikes in syria. senator mccain is skeptical of the navy’s new ford-class carrier due to its high cost and poor management, but argues the fleet will continue to also need large nuclear-powered carriers to provide a mobile airfield for combat air sorties during larger conflicts in which host nation concerns or enemy actions prevent effectively using land bases. finally, though not mentioned in the narrative, a “patrol ship” of less than 800 tons appears in the mccain plan’s appendix for acquisition starting in 2020. the addition of this small combatant highlights the need for a larger, more distributed, and resilient force, which was also a finding of our fleet architecture study. a patrol vessel of 800 tons such as sweden’s visby-class would be able to defend itself against a salvo of a dozen or more anti-ship missiles and could carry 4 to 8 offensive strike or anti-ship missiles. this will make patrol vessels able to deny or delay enemy aggression while being too costly a target to be worth defeating in large numbers. overall, mccain’s proposal would grow the surface fleet by adding frigates and patrol vessels to the navy’s current requirement of 104 large surface combatants and 52 small surface combatants. we agree a larger surface fleet is essential to conduct offensive strike and anti-ship attacks in a distributed manner that will make them harder to defeat in detail. but we would argue the distributed lethality concept and growing needs for logistics escorts suggest the surface fleet needs to both grow and be rebalanced, with more small surface combatants that can conduct widely distributed offensive operations and fewer large surface combatants that will tend to concentrate the fleet’s firepower. a fleet for the future a navy is a capital investment that takes years to build and lasts for decades thereafter. any plan for a future fleet should be based not on the world of today, but on a set of plausible futures that best represent the world of 15 to 20 years from now. even with an aggressive shipbuilding increase such as envisioned by mccain’s plan, only ¼ of the fleet will change between now and 2030. mccain’s proposal considers the likelihood that the fleet of 2030 will need to deter revisionist great powers as its primary mission, while addressing the growing capability of regional powers and transnational terrorists. it appropriately invests not only in platforms, but across the board in the various enablers and extenders of maritime power, including isr, networking, unmanned vehicles, cyber, and electronic warfare. if the united states fails to make great power competition a priority in long-term force planning, rivals such as russia and china will continue eroding american influence and alliances, with damaging economic and security impacts on the american people. mccain’s plan sets american seapower (as well as the rest of dod) on a solid course for an uncertain future. it remains to be seen the extent to which this thoughtful, strategic approach will be complemented by the other instruments of national power, or the degree to which the incoming administration will welcome it. posted by the conservative wahoo at 10:00 am no comments: links to this post email thisblogthis!share to twittershare to facebookshare to pinterest the conservative wahoo i am a forty-something year-old graduate of the university of virginia. i spent a career on active duty in the us navy, including command of a destroyer. during that time, i kept my political views largely to myself. those days are over. last week's other transition of power radm james shannon usn meets commander south sea fleet radm shen jinlong pla-n in hmas perth at imdex asia, singapore. (picture courtesy of ivan ingham, commanding officer of hmas perth. last week the largest navy in asia undertook a transition of power at the top for the first time in over a decade. the official announcement can be found here, but the english version was reported here. the people's liberation army navy has appointed a new commander — 60-year-old lieutenant admiral shen jinlong. in a news release distributed by the pla navy on friday, shen spoke in a video conference with officers and sailors of the 25th escort fleet in the gulf of aden in his new capacity as pla navy commander. that means he has replaced admiral wu shengli, 71, to take charge of the largest navy in asia. although the navy did not disclose when the transition took place, observers believe it was this week. a point of interest that will be noted by most pla navy experts is that shen jinlong had been the commander of the pla navy south sea fleet since december 2014. as we have seen over the last many years, virtually all commanders of the south sea fleet eventually rise to one of the top offices in the pla navy. these military moves within the pla navy come as china has discussed reorganizing that command into a more "joint" organization. the south china morning post covered the possibility of shen jinlong becoming the new pla navy commander last week, prior to it happening, and has additional information on the reorganization that is proposed, and may in fact already be underway. the pla is set to break with a long-standing tradition if a proposal to appoint a naval officer to head its strategic southern command is adopted, four independent sources said. the proposed reshuffle at the helm of the southern theatre command, which is responsible for the south china sea and the pla south sea fleet, also underscores the rising importance of the navy in the chinese military and the decline of its army-centric doctrine under an overhaul begun by president xi jinping last year. the article goes on to note other changes, but in discussing shen jinlong later in the article, this stood out as worth noting. if shen secures the top navy job, it will surprise many pla watchers at home and abroad. shen would have beaten a number of rivals, including vice admiral qiu yangpeng, the chief of staff for the navy, and vice admiral wang hai, the navy’s deputy commander. wang is tipped to be the new commander of the south sea fleet and deputy commander of the southern theatre command, according to the sources. shen would be the least experienced naval boss for decades. there are several news reports that the reorganization has taken place, the most interesting new development being that vice admiral yuan yubai has taken command of the new southern theater command. while i look forward to the analysis of these events from pla navy experts like andrew erickson, i see three important takeaways from the early news reporting. first, shen jinlong is as much a scholar as he is a sailor. shen jinlong was president of naval academy of commanding from 2011-2014, prior to taking command of the south sea fleet. prior to that he was president of dalian naval academy from 2010-2011. in other words shen jinlong spent five years as an admiral immersed in the two academic establishments most noted for advancing the strategic and academic acumen of pla navy officers. would it be a feature or a bug if the us navy cno had spent five years as a flag officer commanding either annapolis and the naval war college. what about both? is it a feature or a bug that the new commander of the largest navy in asia spent five years in command of the equivalent of both? i can't speak to the us navy admirals who take command at annapolis, but in my opinion based on my own observations, us navy admirals who spend time in command at the naval war college change while they are there, and almost always come out the other side with an increased strategic and academic acumen not easily rivaled by their peers. second, reorganizing the southern theater command structure to be under the leadership of a naval officer represents a commitment towards true joint operations that china has been discussing for well over a decade. the southern theater command incorporates marine forces (sea, land, and air), the air force units in the region, and the rocket forces under the command a naval officer for virtually all military forces with domain responsibilities over the south china sea region. the significance of this change cannot be understated. this change ultimately discards pla military tradition that has been in place for over seven decades where strategic rocket forces commanded by army officers have controlled the command structure for a region. the southern theater command structure represents the official beginning of a command structure that includes naval officers, and the first instance of this inclusion takes place in china's most important strategic theater. finally, news that the southern theater command will be led by vice admiral yuan yubai simply cannot be ignored. the world knows very well where vice admiral yuan yubai stands on south china sea issues, because he certainly hasn't mince words and his promotion signals his previous comments on the subject almost certainly contributed to his promotion. from september of 2015: the south china sea, yuan said, “is a sea for all the nations around, and a sea of peace. “the south china sea, as the name indicates, is a sea area that belongs to china. and the sea from the han dynasty a long time ago where the chinese people have been working and producing from the sea.” while i suspect we will all learn more as the chinese experts weigh in more facts and opinions on events taking place in the pla navy, my initial impression from changes in the pla navy last week is that the force took meaningful steps towards more strategic and academic acumen at the top of the pla navy, took serious organizational steps towards a joint forces approach for the south china sea theater of operations, and among all the candidates that could be chosen to lead the chinese military forces into this new joint forces era in the south china sea - the pla navy ultimately picked one of the most well known vocal hard liners in their ranks for the position. posted by galrahn at 1:00 am no comments: links to this post email thisblogthis!share to twittershare to facebookshare to pinterest labels: china, south china sea why do an american seapower speaking tour? (segment 1) posted by galrahn at 12:00 am no comments: links to this post email thisblogthis!share to twittershare to facebookshare to pinterest labels: bryan mcgrath on seapower friday, january 20, 2017 hello world. let's try this again. raymond pritchett (galrahn) it would be both foolish and self indulging to explain in any detail why i have been away for most of the last five years. it would be challenging to discuss publicly the reasons why i closed the blog for most of last year. to keep it short and sweet... i have a career, and occasionally i am very good at it. sometimes there are rewards, and sometimes there are restrictions, but i accept both as consequences of successfully navigating the rough seas found in ones professional journey. it is in this time i find myself emerging again into a stable situation where my activities on this little corner of the internet no longer represent a point of interest to those i associate with professionally. i am excited about the opportunity to reengage the discussions and build a new community online, even if it is on this old platform that has survived nearly a decade. as i emerge from my late 30s into my 40s, it is possible i am not the same person you remember. but some things never change. with more information comes changes in my opinions. basically, i wouldn't assume anything. as a reminder, i would like to reiterate the rules of information dissemination. i will not tolerate personal attacks against other people participating in this community. be respectful to one another. this is a professoinal forum, and my expectations is that all contributors will respect the professionals who leverage this forum for information, knowledge, and idea generation. do your homework if you intend to respectfully debate another community member, because the person you are debating almost certainly will have done their homework. update your disqus profile and use the forum to network with other professionals. the authors are not always right. we are here to learn as well. there are no stupid questions, but there are stupid ways to ask a question. respect the distinction. if you have a short attention span, or read nonsense on the internet and believe it, this is probably not the right community for you. conspiracy theories are not welcome here, but well thought out and sourced theories are. have fun. welcome back to those who have long been part of this community. we welcome new professionals here as well. posted by galrahn at 12:00 am no comments: links to this post email thisblogthis!share to twittershare to facebookshare to pinterest labels: writing older posts home subscribe to: posts (atom) contributors blog archive january 2017 (5) march 2016 (1) february 2016 (3) january 2016 (6) december 2015 (8) november 2015 (6) october 2015 (5) september 2015 (14) august 2015 (5) july 2015 (12) june 2015 (18) may 2015 (7) april 2015 (16) march 2015 (19) february 2015 (18) january 2015 (21) december 2014 (25) november 2014 (23) october 2014 (32) september 2014 (10) august 2014 (10) july 2014 (12) june 2014 (8) may 2014 (15) april 2014 (18) march 2014 (26) february 2014 (21) january 2014 (17) december 2013 (19) november 2013 (24) october 2013 (24) september 2013 (26) august 2013 (11) july 2013 (17) june 2013 (22) may 2013 (18) april 2013 (16) march 2013 (27) february 2013 (20) january 2013 (37) december 2012 (13) november 2012 (11) october 2012 (8) september 2012 (28) august 2012 (31) july 2012 (36) june 2012 (28) may 2012 (28) april 2012 (45) march 2012 (42) february 2012 (19) january 2012 (22) december 2011 (21) november 2011 (42) october 2011 (47) september 2011 (51) august 2011 (56) july 2011 (59) june 2011 (59) may 2011 (76) april 2011 (69) march 2011 (113) february 2011 (78) january 2011 (62) december 2010 (87) november 2010 (72) october 2010 (52) september 2010 (58) august 2010 (50) july 2010 (32) june 2010 (51) may 2010 (43) april 2010 (27) march 2010 (27) february 2010 (59) january 2010 (86) december 2009 (79) november 2009 (47) october 2009 (69) september 2009 (100) august 2009 (97) july 2009 (67) june 2009 (95) may 2009 (62) april 2009 (121) march 2009 (87) february 2009 (100) january 2009 (98) december 2008 (90) november 2008 (90) october 2008 (115) september 2008 (70) august 2008 (103) july 2008 (93) june 2008 (83) may 2008 (98) april 2008 (88) march 2008 (78) february 2008 (93) january 2008 (99) december 2007 (65) november 2007 (67) october 2007 (64) september 2007 (67) august 2007 (67) july 2007 (50) june 2007 (28) get id by email awesome inc. template. powered by blogger.


Here you find all texts from your page as Google (googlebot) and others search engines seen it.

Words density analysis:

Numbers of all words: 3746

One word

Two words phrases

Three words phrases

the - 7.58% (284)
and - 3.6% (135)
for - 2.03% (76)
his - 1.23% (46)
pla - 1.12% (42)
this - 1.04% (39)
navy - 0.96% (36)
are - 0.93% (35)
out - 0.91% (34)
that - 0.91% (34)
all - 0.88% (33)
command - 0.85% (32)
power - 0.8% (30)
not - 0.75% (28)
sea - 0.75% (28)
fleet - 0.72% (27)
south - 0.64% (24)
but - 0.64% (24)
mccain - 0.64% (24)
will - 0.59% (22)
can - 0.53% (20)
china - 0.53% (20)
here - 0.51% (19)
new - 0.51% (19)
force - 0.51% (19)
han - 0.48% (18)
our - 0.45% (17)
era - 0.45% (17)
2011 - 0.43% (16)
would - 0.43% (16)
with - 0.43% (16)
large - 0.43% (16)
over - 0.4% (15)
rest - 0.4% (15)
ship - 0.4% (15)
long - 0.37% (14)
from - 0.37% (14)
2013 - 0.37% (14)
january - 0.37% (14)
2014 - 0.37% (14)
mccain’s - 0.35% (13)
has - 0.35% (13)
2015 - 0.35% (13)
post - 0.35% (13)
shen - 0.35% (13)
2010 - 0.35% (13)
year - 0.35% (13)
most - 0.35% (13)
have - 0.32% (12)
plan - 0.32% (12)
war - 0.32% (12)
more - 0.32% (12)
2009 - 0.32% (12)
week - 0.32% (12)
air - 0.32% (12)
2008 - 0.32% (12)
2012 - 0.32% (12)
last - 0.29% (11)
act - 0.29% (11)
naval - 0.29% (11)
which - 0.29% (11)
great - 0.29% (11)
get - 0.27% (10)
september - 0.27% (10)
admiral - 0.27% (10)
december - 0.27% (10)
other - 0.27% (10)
may - 0.27% (10)
forces - 0.27% (10)
able - 0.27% (10)
commander - 0.27% (10)
interest - 0.27% (10)
bca - 0.24% (9)
march - 0.24% (9)
february - 0.24% (9)
time - 0.24% (9)
combat - 0.24% (9)
july - 0.24% (9)
november - 0.24% (9)
june - 0.24% (9)
its - 0.24% (9)
august - 0.24% (9)
officer - 0.24% (9)
october - 0.24% (9)
blog - 0.24% (9)
nation - 0.24% (9)
powers - 0.21% (8)
there - 0.21% (8)
take - 0.21% (8)
april - 0.21% (8)
change - 0.21% (8)
side - 0.21% (8)
under - 0.21% (8)
strategic - 0.21% (8)
u.s. - 0.21% (8)
question - 0.21% (8)
american - 0.21% (8)
southern - 0.21% (8)
well - 0.21% (8)
jinlong - 0.21% (8)
military - 0.21% (8)
years - 0.21% (8)
russia - 0.19% (7)
some - 0.19% (7)
been - 0.19% (7)
2007 - 0.19% (7)
vice - 0.19% (7)
was - 0.19% (7)
than - 0.19% (7)
theater - 0.19% (7)
such - 0.19% (7)
comments - 0.19% (7)
even - 0.19% (7)
work - 0.19% (7)
both - 0.19% (7)
2017 - 0.19% (7)
structure - 0.19% (7)
frigate - 0.19% (7)
now - 0.19% (7)
come - 0.19% (7)
place - 0.19% (7)
led - 0.19% (7)
surface - 0.19% (7)
administration - 0.19% (7)
you - 0.19% (7)
carrier - 0.19% (7)
one - 0.19% (7)
world - 0.19% (7)
professional - 0.16% (6)
argue - 0.16% (6)
these - 0.16% (6)
own - 0.16% (6)
architecture - 0.16% (6)
part - 0.16% (6)
increase - 0.16% (6)
defense - 0.16% (6)
who - 0.16% (6)
ways - 0.16% (6)
navy’s - 0.16% (6)
too - 0.16% (6)
also - 0.16% (6)
grow - 0.16% (6)
small - 0.16% (6)
report - 0.16% (6)
though - 0.16% (6)
could - 0.16% (6)
discuss - 0.16% (6)
email - 0.16% (6)
build - 0.16% (6)
any - 0.16% (6)
budget - 0.16% (6)
national - 0.13% (5)
five - 0.13% (5)
current - 0.13% (5)
two - 0.13% (5)
first - 0.13% (5)
pinterest - 0.13% (5)
clear - 0.13% (5)
old - 0.13% (5)
distributed - 0.13% (5)
comments: - 0.13% (5)
use - 0.13% (5)
while - 0.13% (5)
into - 0.13% (5)
future - 0.13% (5)
community - 0.13% (5)
links - 0.13% (5)
thisblogthis!share - 0.13% (5)
twittershare - 0.13% (5)
congress - 0.13% (5)
those - 0.13% (5)
combatant - 0.13% (5)
facebookshare - 0.13% (5)
strategy - 0.13% (5)
between - 0.13% (5)
present - 0.13% (5)
operations - 0.13% (5)
galrahn - 0.13% (5)
their - 0.13% (5)
posted - 0.13% (5)
president - 0.13% (5)
proposal - 0.13% (5)
need - 0.13% (5)
top - 0.13% (5)
again - 0.13% (5)
information - 0.13% (5)
regional - 0.13% (5)
where - 0.13% (5)
cost - 0.13% (5)
short - 0.11% (4)
deter - 0.11% (4)
asia - 0.11% (4)
seapower - 0.11% (4)
lcs - 0.11% (4)
carriers - 0.11% (4)
note - 0.11% (4)
number - 0.11% (4)
patrol - 0.11% (4)
continue - 0.11% (4)
strike - 0.11% (4)
combatants - 0.11% (4)
tend - 0.11% (4)
navy, - 0.11% (4)
spent - 0.11% (4)
welcome - 0.11% (4)
ability - 0.11% (4)
proposed - 0.11% (4)
represent - 0.11% (4)
move - 0.11% (4)
powered - 0.11% (4)
joint - 0.11% (4)
high - 0.11% (4)
respect - 0.11% (4)
spend - 0.11% (4)
cut - 0.11% (4)
why - 0.11% (4)
decade. - 0.11% (4)
self - 0.11% (4)
obama - 0.11% (4)
late - 0.11% (4)
larger - 0.11% (4)
person - 0.11% (4)
read - 0.11% (4)
like - 0.11% (4)
right - 0.11% (4)
thought - 0.11% (4)
only - 0.11% (4)
(18) - 0.11% (4)
senator - 0.11% (4)
(28) - 0.11% (4)
labels: - 0.11% (4)
friday - 0.11% (4)
(67) - 0.11% (4)
academic - 0.11% (4)
people - 0.11% (4)
point - 0.11% (4)
home - 0.11% (4)
address - 0.11% (4)
prior - 0.11% (4)
important - 0.11% (4)
sources - 0.11% (4)
chinese - 0.11% (4)
aggression - 0.11% (4)
officers - 0.11% (4)
news - 0.11% (4)
attacks - 0.11% (4)
took - 0.11% (4)
terrorists - 0.11% (4)
yuan - 0.11% (4)
argues - 0.11% (4)
set - 0.11% (4)
provide - 0.11% (4)
powers, - 0.11% (4)
(21) - 0.08% (3)
2016 - 0.08% (3)
offensive - 0.08% (3)
anti-ship - 0.08% (3)
vessel - 0.08% (3)
largest - 0.08% (3)
(8) - 0.08% (3)
(59) - 0.08% (3)
(19) - 0.08% (3)
land - 0.08% (3)
addition - 0.08% (3)
(27) - 0.08% (3)
commanding - 0.08% (3)
yubai - 0.08% (3)
experts - 0.08% (3)
(5) - 0.08% (3)
certainly - 0.08% (3)
see - 0.08% (3)
words - 0.08% (3)
acumen - 0.08% (3)
opinion - 0.08% (3)
including - 0.08% (3)
almost - 0.08% (3)
towards - 0.08% (3)
sea, - 0.08% (3)
make - 0.08% (3)
army - 0.08% (3)
changes - 0.08% (3)
12:00 - 0.08% (3)
decades - 0.08% (3)
seas - 0.08% (3)
professionals - 0.08% (3)
forum - 0.08% (3)
transition - 0.08% (3)
here, - 0.08% (3)
friday, - 0.08% (3)
power, - 0.08% (3)
ultimately - 0.08% (3)
they - 0.08% (3)
capability - 0.08% (3)
conduct - 0.08% (3)
competition - 0.08% (3)
approach - 0.08% (3)
view - 0.08% (3)
prove - 0.08% (3)
costs - 0.08% (3)
security - 0.08% (3)
study - 0.08% (3)
adversary - 0.08% (3)
conventional - 0.08% (3)
final - 0.08% (3)
building - 0.08% (3)
significant - 0.08% (3)
growing - 0.08% (3)
aircraft - 0.08% (3)
since - 0.08% (3)
require - 0.08% (3)
bryan - 0.08% (3)
put - 0.08% (3)
trump - 0.08% (3)
far - 0.08% (3)
terms - 0.08% (3)
capacity - 0.08% (3)
dod - 0.08% (3)
how - 0.08% (3)
impact - 0.08% (3)
about - 0.08% (3)
another - 0.08% (3)
because - 0.08% (3)
had - 0.08% (3)
class - 0.08% (3)
must - 0.08% (3)
second - 0.08% (3)
many - 0.08% (3)
against - 0.08% (3)
based - 0.08% (3)
acquisition - 0.08% (3)
smaller - 0.08% (3)
restrict - 0.05% (2)
find - 0.05% (2)
myself - 0.05% (2)
resources - 0.05% (2)
internet - 0.05% (2)
planning - 0.05% (2)
hope - 0.05% (2)
platform - 0.05% (2)
nuclear-powered - 0.05% (2)
respectful - 0.05% (2)
should - 0.05% (2)
community. - 0.05% (2)
sometimes - 0.05% (2)
contributors - 0.05% (2)
provides - 0.05% (2)
force, - 0.05% (2)
your - 0.05% (2)
homework - 0.05% (2)
significantly - 0.05% (2)
network - 0.05% (2)
tons - 0.05% (2)
well. - 0.05% (2)
effectively - 0.05% (2)
objectives - 0.05% (2)
ask - 0.05% (2)
expand - 0.05% (2)
bca’s - 0.05% (2)
missiles - 0.05% (2)
maintenance - 0.05% (2)
very - 0.05% (2)
numbers. - 0.05% (2)
promotion - 0.05% (2)
already - 0.05% (2)
shipyards - 0.05% (2)
meet - 0.05% (2)
starting - 0.05% (2)
ago - 0.05% (2)
working - 0.05% (2)
away - 0.05% (2)
learn - 0.05% (2)
opinions - 0.05% (2)
initial - 0.05% (2)
known - 0.05% (2)
steps - 0.05% (2)
lead - 0.05% (2)
hard - 0.05% (2)
bca, - 0.05% (2)
percent - 0.05% (2)
mcgrath - 0.05% (2)
enable - 0.05% (2)
detail - 0.05% (2)
stupid - 0.05% (2)
theories - 0.05% (2)
debate - 0.05% (2)
(62) - 0.05% (2)
(22) - 0.05% (2)
paper - 0.05% (2)
white - 0.05% (2)
thoughts - 0.05% (2)
(42) - 0.05% (2)
5:00 - 0.05% (2)
(47) - 0.05% (2)
(51) - 0.05% (2)
conflicts - 0.05% (2)
(69) - 0.05% (2)
(78) - 0.05% (2)
does - 0.05% (2)
(24) - 0.05% (2)
(87) - 0.05% (2)
(50) - 0.05% (2)
down - 0.05% (2)
(100) - 0.05% (2)
monday - 0.05% (2)
(98) - 0.05% (2)
remain - 0.05% (2)
(90) - 0.05% (2)
(93) - 0.05% (2)
dissemination - 0.05% (2)
27, - 0.05% (2)
(11) - 0.05% (2)
(17) - 0.05% (2)
services - 0.05% (2)
800 - 0.05% (2)
region. - 0.05% (2)
among - 0.05% (2)
are. - 0.05% (2)
back - 0.05% (2)
posts - 0.05% (2)
chief - 0.05% (2)
2011. - 0.05% (2)
(bca) - 0.05% (2)
control - 0.05% (2)
(6) - 0.05% (2)
passed - 0.05% (2)
carry - 0.05% (2)
(26) - 0.05% (2)
finally, - 0.05% (2)
thus - 0.05% (2)
(12) - 0.05% (2)
(r-az) - 0.05% (2)
john - 0.05% (2)
recent - 0.05% (2)
(16) - 0.05% (2)
few - 0.05% (2)
enemy - 0.05% (2)
(32) - 0.05% (2)
(10) - 0.05% (2)
cannot - 0.05% (2)
keep - 0.05% (2)
rocket - 0.05% (2)
adversary. - 0.05% (2)
easily - 0.05% (2)
less - 0.05% (2)
bases - 0.05% (2)
consequences - 0.05% (2)
three - 0.05% (2)
official - 0.05% (2)
found - 0.05% (2)
follow-on - 0.05% (2)
here. - 0.05% (2)
transnational - 0.05% (2)
- 0.05% (2)
rather - 0.05% (2)
hmas - 0.05% (2)
release - 0.05% (2)
issue - 0.05% (2)
escort - 0.05% (2)
commander. - 0.05% (2)
later - 0.05% (2)
did - 0.05% (2)
incoming - 0.05% (2)
place, - 0.05% (2)
believe - 0.05% (2)
signal - 0.05% (2)
second, - 0.05% (2)
perth - 0.05% (2)
when - 0.05% (2)
worth - 0.05% (2)
takes - 0.05% (2)
unmanned - 0.05% (2)
invests - 0.05% (2)
fleet, - 0.05% (2)
2030 - 0.05% (2)
across - 0.05% (2)
board - 0.05% (2)
rivals - 0.05% (2)
(lcs) - 0.05% (2)
littoral - 0.05% (2)
ships - 0.05% (2)
seen - 0.05% (2)
capable - 0.05% (2)
defeat - 0.05% (2)
it. - 0.05% (2)
conservative - 0.05% (2)
wahoo - 0.05% (2)
year-old - 0.05% (2)
size - 0.05% (2)
career - 0.05% (2)
increases - 0.05% (2)
assessment - 0.05% (2)
kept - 0.05% (2)
needs - 0.05% (2)
radm - 0.05% (2)
assume - 0.05% (2)
noted - 0.05% (2)
target - 0.05% (2)
immediate - 0.05% (2)
call - 0.05% (2)
possible - 0.05% (2)
warfare - 0.05% (2)
early - 0.05% (2)
academy - 0.05% (2)
taking - 0.05% (2)
true - 0.05% (2)
during - 0.05% (2)
states - 0.05% (2)
feature - 0.05% (2)
bug - 0.05% (2)
annapolis - 0.05% (2)
both? - 0.05% (2)
forward - 0.05% (2)
speak - 0.05% (2)
admirals - 0.05% (2)
modernization - 0.05% (2)
allow - 0.05% (2)
college - 0.05% (2)
built - 0.05% (2)
always - 0.05% (2)
overseas - 0.05% (2)
represents - 0.05% (2)
various - 0.05% (2)
experienced - 0.05% (2)
events - 0.05% (2)
argues, - 0.05% (2)
virtually - 0.05% (2)
focus - 0.05% (2)
rise - 0.05% (2)
administration’s - 0.05% (2)
distinction - 0.05% (2)
reorganizing - 0.05% (2)
first, - 0.05% (2)
additional - 0.05% (2)
reorganization - 0.05% (2)
fact - 0.05% (2)
tradition - 0.05% (2)
appoint - 0.05% (2)
2022. - 0.05% (2)
theatre - 0.05% (2)
vessels - 0.05% (2)
command, - 0.05% (2)
influence - 0.05% (2)
strikes - 0.05% (2)
year. - 0.05% (2)
article - 0.05% (2)
discussing - 0.05% (2)
being - 0.05% (2)
sustain - 0.05% (2)
wang - 0.05% (2)
deputy - 0.05% (2)
taken - 0.05% (2)
essential - 0.05% (2)
marine - 0.05% (2)
of the - 1.09% (41)
in the - 0.48% (18)
the south - 0.45% (17)
pla navy - 0.35% (13)
for the - 0.32% (12)
at the - 0.32% (12)
great power - 0.29% (11)
the pla - 0.29% (11)
south china - 0.27% (10)
and the - 0.27% (10)
the navy - 0.27% (10)
china sea - 0.24% (9)
on the - 0.24% (9)
shen jinlong - 0.21% (8)
the fleet - 0.19% (7)
such as - 0.19% (7)
a fleet - 0.19% (7)
fleet architecture - 0.16% (6)
sea fleet - 0.16% (6)
the navy’s - 0.16% (6)
that the - 0.16% (6)
south sea - 0.16% (6)
the southern - 0.16% (6)
to this - 0.16% (6)
vice admiral - 0.13% (5)
southern theater - 0.13% (5)
to twittershare - 0.13% (5)
to pinterest - 0.13% (5)
to facebookshare - 0.13% (5)
with a - 0.13% (5)
email thisblogthis!share - 0.13% (5)
this post - 0.13% (5)
links to - 0.13% (5)
no comments: - 0.13% (5)
posted by - 0.13% (5)
the most - 0.13% (5)
there are - 0.13% (5)
facebookshare to - 0.13% (5)
theater command - 0.13% (5)
thisblogthis!share to - 0.13% (5)
would be - 0.13% (5)
post email - 0.13% (5)
comments: links - 0.13% (5)
the top - 0.13% (5)
last week - 0.13% (5)
twittershare to - 0.13% (5)
as the - 0.13% (5)
five years - 0.13% (5)
able to - 0.11% (4)
of this - 0.11% (4)
pinterest labels: - 0.11% (4)
mccain’s proposal - 0.11% (4)
command of - 0.11% (4)
us navy - 0.11% (4)
from the - 0.11% (4)
by galrahn - 0.11% (4)
of great - 0.11% (4)
galrahn at - 0.11% (4)
by the - 0.11% (4)
over the - 0.11% (4)
navy in - 0.11% (4)
command structure - 0.11% (4)
commander of - 0.11% (4)
and china - 0.11% (4)
surface combatants - 0.11% (4)
the world - 0.11% (4)
the new - 0.11% (4)
the chinese - 0.11% (4)
naval officer - 0.11% (4)
that will - 0.08% (3)
at 12:00 - 0.08% (3)
surface fleet - 0.08% (3)
2012 (28) - 0.08% (3)
mccain’s plan - 0.08% (3)
not on - 0.08% (3)
but we - 0.08% (3)
time i - 0.08% (3)
spent five - 0.08% (3)
the us - 0.08% (3)
admiral yuan - 0.08% (3)
prior to - 0.08% (3)
of these - 0.08% (3)
yuan yubai - 0.08% (3)
a naval - 0.08% (3)
command a - 0.08% (3)
the command - 0.08% (3)
is that - 0.08% (3)
largest navy - 0.08% (3)
the largest - 0.08% (3)
the force - 0.08% (3)
american seapower - 0.08% (3)
and academic - 0.08% (3)
new commander - 0.08% (3)
a decade. - 0.08% (3)
in asia - 0.08% (3)
patrol vessel - 0.08% (3)
2007 (67) - 0.08% (3)
has been - 0.08% (3)
in large - 0.08% (3)
power competition - 0.08% (3)
the trump - 0.08% (3)
not be - 0.08% (3)
congress and - 0.08% (3)
in this - 0.08% (3)
the week - 0.08% (3)
mccain argues - 0.08% (3)
fleet and - 0.08% (3)
to address - 0.08% (3)
question of - 0.08% (3)
to deter - 0.08% (3)
the obama - 0.08% (3)
if the - 0.08% (3)
russia and - 0.08% (3)
his promotion - 0.05% (2)
china sea, - 0.05% (2)
a region. - 0.05% (2)
senator john - 0.05% (2)
cannot be - 0.05% (2)
the american - 0.05% (2)
most important - 0.05% (2)
place in - 0.05% (2)
the first - 0.05% (2)
for combat - 0.05% (2)
we will - 0.05% (2)
admirals who - 0.05% (2)
starting in - 0.05% (2)
the naval - 0.05% (2)
feature or - 0.05% (2)
navy admirals - 0.05% (2)
command at - 0.05% (2)
the bca, - 0.05% (2)
in command - 0.05% (2)
this change - 0.05% (2)
10 percent - 0.05% (2)
naval war - 0.05% (2)
out the - 0.05% (2)
passed the - 0.05% (2)
under the - 0.05% (2)
rocket forces - 0.05% (2)
air force - 0.05% (2)
joint forces - 0.05% (2)
only in - 0.05% (2)
2015 (18) - 0.05% (2)
if you - 0.05% (2)
as well. - 0.05% (2)
are not - 0.05% (2)
to those - 0.05% (2)
2015 (5) - 0.05% (2)
(12) june - 0.05% (2)
2014 (10) - 0.05% (2)
this community. - 0.05% (2)
2013 (24) - 0.05% (2)
(27) february - 0.05% (2)
2011 (59) - 0.05% (2)
2010 (27) - 0.05% (2)
2009 (100) - 0.05% (2)
2008 (90) - 0.05% (2)
2008 (93) - 0.05% (2)
respect the - 0.05% (2)
not the - 0.05% (2)
steps towards - 0.05% (2)
i have - 0.05% (2)
pla navy, - 0.05% (2)
military forces - 0.05% (2)
john mccain - 0.05% (2)
white paper - 0.05% (2)
12:00 am - 0.05% (2)
it would - 0.05% (2)
for most - 0.05% (2)
build a - 0.05% (2)
thoughts on - 0.05% (2)
most of - 0.05% (2)
sometimes there - 0.05% (2)
present a - 0.05% (2)
into a - 0.05% (2)
the internet - 0.05% (2)
point of - 0.05% (2)
a feature - 0.05% (2)
with the - 0.05% (2)
years as - 0.05% (2)
follow-on frigate - 0.05% (2)
to which - 0.05% (2)
increase the - 0.05% (2)
the conservative - 0.05% (2)
continue to - 0.05% (2)
lcs to - 0.05% (2)
is essential - 0.05% (2)
27, 2017 - 0.05% (2)
the frigate - 0.05% (2)
focus on - 0.05% (2)
would not - 0.05% (2)
a career - 0.05% (2)
great powers, - 0.05% (2)
transition of - 0.05% (2)
ship (lcs) - 0.05% (2)
size of - 0.05% (2)
with an - 0.05% (2)
the current - 0.05% (2)
offensive strike - 0.05% (2)
a target - 0.05% (2)
the surface - 0.05% (2)
large surface - 0.05% (2)
a larger - 0.05% (2)
fleet will - 0.05% (2)
to conduct - 0.05% (2)
will make - 0.05% (2)
can be - 0.05% (2)
based on - 0.05% (2)
and be - 0.05% (2)
the two - 0.05% (2)
tend to - 0.05% (2)
large numbers. - 0.05% (2)
for decades - 0.05% (2)
be based - 0.05% (2)
littoral combat - 0.05% (2)
the official - 0.05% (2)
his report - 0.05% (2)
we have - 0.05% (2)
the article - 0.05% (2)
but in - 0.05% (2)
shen would - 0.05% (2)
china and - 0.05% (2)
theatre command, - 0.05% (2)
be the - 0.05% (2)
has taken - 0.05% (2)
obama administration’s - 0.05% (2)
as russia - 0.05% (2)
powers such - 0.05% (2)
mccain argues, - 0.05% (2)
president of - 0.05% (2)
naval academy - 0.05% (2)
be able - 0.05% (2)
of our - 0.05% (2)
last year. - 0.05% (2)
southern theatre - 0.05% (2)
here, but - 0.05% (2)
a point - 0.05% (2)
the size - 0.05% (2)
force structure - 0.05% (2)
his new - 0.05% (2)
a more - 0.05% (2)
consequences of - 0.05% (2)
powers, and - 0.05% (2)
of interest - 0.05% (2)
the incoming - 0.05% (2)
the last - 0.05% (2)
virtually all - 0.05% (2)
rather than - 0.05% (2)
to one - 0.05% (2)
russia as - 0.05% (2)
the reorganization - 0.05% (2)
proposal to - 0.05% (2)
friday, january - 0.05% (2)
south china sea - 0.24% (9)
the south china - 0.21% (8)
south sea fleet - 0.16% (6)
southern theater command - 0.13% (5)
post email thisblogthis!share - 0.13% (5)
to twittershare to - 0.13% (5)
facebookshare to pinterest - 0.13% (5)
of the south - 0.13% (5)
links to this - 0.13% (5)
comments: links to - 0.13% (5)
this post email - 0.13% (5)
thisblogthis!share to twittershare - 0.13% (5)
to facebookshare to - 0.13% (5)
twittershare to facebookshare - 0.13% (5)
email thisblogthis!share to - 0.13% (5)
to this post - 0.13% (5)
no comments: links - 0.13% (5)
by galrahn at - 0.11% (4)
in the pla - 0.11% (4)
to pinterest labels: - 0.11% (4)
commander of the - 0.11% (4)
the southern theater - 0.11% (4)
posted by galrahn - 0.11% (4)
am no comments: - 0.11% (4)
question of the - 0.08% (3)
vice admiral yuan - 0.08% (3)
command of the - 0.08% (3)
spent five years - 0.08% (3)
and academic acumen - 0.08% (3)
strategic and academic - 0.08% (3)
admiral yuan yubai - 0.08% (3)
the top of - 0.08% (3)
the south sea - 0.08% (3)
the largest navy - 0.08% (3)
russia and china - 0.08% (3)
at the top - 0.08% (3)
largest navy in - 0.08% (3)
great power competition - 0.08% (3)
top of the - 0.05% (2)
littoral combat ship - 0.05% (2)
the size of - 0.05% (2)
south china sea, - 0.05% (2)
rather than a - 0.05% (2)
the pla navy, - 0.05% (2)
12:00 am no - 0.05% (2)
the incoming administration - 0.05% (2)
the fleet and - 0.05% (2)
such as russia - 0.05% (2)
john mccain (r-az) - 0.05% (2)
thoughts on the - 0.05% (2)
sometimes there are - 0.05% (2)
a region. the - 0.05% (2)
navy admirals who - 0.05% (2)
move to a - 0.05% (2)
a decade. the - 0.05% (2)
new commander of - 0.05% (2)
feature or a - 0.05% (2)
mccain’s proposal would - 0.05% (2)
surface combatants that - 0.05% (2)
pla navy experts - 0.05% (2)
the world of - 0.05% (2)
the southern theatre - 0.05% (2)
the conservative wahoo - 0.05% (2)
the new commander - 0.05% (2)
for the south - 0.05% (2)
southern theatre command, - 0.05% (2)
transition of power - 0.05% (2)
point of interest - 0.05% (2)

Here you can find chart of all your popular one, two and three word phrases. Google and others search engines means your page is about words you use frequently.

Copyright © 2015-2016 hupso.pl. All rights reserved. FB | +G | Twitter

Hupso.pl jest serwisem internetowym, w którym jednym kliknieciem możesz szybko i łatwo sprawdź stronę www pod kątem SEO. Oferujemy darmowe pozycjonowanie stron internetowych oraz wycena domen i stron internetowych. Prowadzimy ranking polskich stron internetowych oraz ranking stron alexa.