3.51 score from hupso.pl for:
gnuband.org



HTML Content


Titleramblings by paolo on web2.0, wikipedia, social networking, trust, reputation, …

Length: 86, Words: 10
Description pusty

Length: 0, Words: 0
Keywords pusty
Robots
Charset UTF-8
Og Meta - Title exist
Og Meta - Description pusty
Og Meta - Site name exist
Tytuł powinien zawierać pomiędzy 10 a 70 znaków (ze spacjami), a mniej niż 12 słów w długości.
Meta opis powinien zawierać pomiędzy 50 a 160 znaków (łącznie ze spacjami), a mniej niż 24 słów w długości.
Kodowanie znaków powinny być określone , UTF-8 jest chyba najlepszy zestaw znaków, aby przejść z powodu UTF-8 jest bardziej międzynarodowy kodowaniem.
Otwarte obiekty wykresu powinny być obecne w stronie internetowej (więcej informacji na temat protokołu OpenGraph: http://ogp.me/)

SEO Content

Words/Characters 3467
Text/HTML 35.06 %
Headings H1 11
H2 1
H3 6
H4 0
H5 0
H6 0
H1
ramblings by paolo on web2.0, wikipedia, social networking, trust, reputation, …
manypedia presented at wikisym
which wikipedia pages are edited mainly by females?
models of economic production, encarta vs wikipedia, and sober economists
mit press book “the reputation society” (containing a chapter by me) is out!
article about manypedia on italian newspaper corriere
my presentation at wikisym: studying (current) history by analyzing wikipedia
wikitrip: animated visualization over time of gender and geo-location of wikipedians who edited a page
wikisym and collective memory building of current events on wikipedia
fbk researcher awarded by google with 50,000 dollars and … emotion ;)
manypedia: comparing linguistic points of view (lpov) of different language wikipedias
H2
H3
post navigation
subscribe to blog via email
recent posts
about paolo
recent bookmarks (del.icio.us)
human calendar
H4
H5
H6
strong
manypedia: comparing language points of view of wikipedia communities
paolo massa
out of more than 4 million pages in the english wikipedia, just one article is edited more by females than males!!!
that article, with 7 male editors and 9 male editors, is cloth menstrual pad
10 years ago you could not have found a single sober economist anywhere on planet earth who would have predicted the wikipedia model
mit press
the reputation society: how online opinions are reshaping the offline worl
judith donath
paul resnick
danielle keats citron
craig newmark
hassan masum, mark tovey, & yi-cheng zhang
chrysanthos dellarocas
randy farmer
john henry clippinger
john whitfield
eric goldman
lior strahilevitz
cliff lampe
alex steffen
marc maxson & mari kuraishi
michael nielsen
victor henning, jason hoyt, and jan reichelt
john willinsky
lucio picci
paolo massa
luca iandoli, josh introne, & mark klein
michael zimmer & anthony hoffman
jamais cascio
madeline ashby & cory doctorow
collective memory building in wikipedia: the case of north african uprisings
not limited to english as first language
56 languages
b
manypedia: comparing language points of view of wikipedia communities
paolo massa
out of more than 4 million pages in the english wikipedia, just one article is edited more by females than males!!!
that article, with 7 male editors and 9 male editors, is cloth menstrual pad
10 years ago you could not have found a single sober economist anywhere on planet earth who would have predicted the wikipedia model
mit press
the reputation society: how online opinions are reshaping the offline worl
judith donath
paul resnick
danielle keats citron
craig newmark
hassan masum, mark tovey, & yi-cheng zhang
chrysanthos dellarocas
randy farmer
john henry clippinger
john whitfield
eric goldman
lior strahilevitz
cliff lampe
alex steffen
marc maxson & mari kuraishi
michael nielsen
victor henning, jason hoyt, and jan reichelt
john willinsky
lucio picci
paolo massa
luca iandoli, josh introne, & mark klein
michael zimmer & anthony hoffman
jamais cascio
madeline ashby & cory doctorow
collective memory building in wikipedia: the case of north african uprisings
not limited to english as first language
56 languages
i
em manypedia: comparing language points of view of wikipedia communities
paolo massa
out of more than 4 million pages in the english wikipedia, just one article is edited more by females than males!!!
that article, with 7 male editors and 9 male editors, is cloth menstrual pad
10 years ago you could not have found a single sober economist anywhere on planet earth who would have predicted the wikipedia model
mit press
the reputation society: how online opinions are reshaping the offline worl
judith donath
paul resnick
danielle keats citron
craig newmark
hassan masum, mark tovey, & yi-cheng zhang
chrysanthos dellarocas
randy farmer
john henry clippinger
john whitfield
eric goldman
lior strahilevitz
cliff lampe
alex steffen
marc maxson & mari kuraishi
michael nielsen
victor henning, jason hoyt, and jan reichelt
john willinsky
lucio picci
paolo massa
luca iandoli, josh introne, & mark klein
michael zimmer & anthony hoffman
jamais cascio
madeline ashby & cory doctorow
collective memory building in wikipedia: the case of north african uprisings
not limited to english as first language
56 languages
Bolds strong 33
b 33
i 0
em 33
Zawartość strony internetowej powinno zawierać więcej niż 250 słów, z stopa tekst / kod jest wyższy niż 20%.
Pozycji używać znaczników (h1, h2, h3, ...), aby określić temat sekcji lub ustępów na stronie, ale zwykle, użyj mniej niż 6 dla każdego tagu pozycje zachować swoją stronę zwięzły.
Styl używać silnych i kursywy znaczniki podkreślić swoje słowa kluczowe swojej stronie, ale nie nadużywać (mniej niż 16 silnych tagi i 16 znaczników kursywy)

Statystyki strony

twitter:title pusty
twitter:description pusty
google+ itemprop=name pusty
Pliki zewnętrzne 21
Pliki CSS 5
Pliki javascript 16
Plik należy zmniejszyć całkowite odwołanie plików (CSS + JavaScript) do 7-8 maksymalnie.

Linki wewnętrzne i zewnętrzne

Linki 172
Linki wewnętrzne 1
Linki zewnętrzne 171
Linki bez atrybutu Title 152
Linki z atrybutem NOFOLLOW 0
Linki - Użyj atrybutu tytuł dla każdego łącza. Nofollow link jest link, który nie pozwala wyszukiwarkom boty zrealizują są odnośniki no follow. Należy zwracać uwagę na ich użytkowania

Linki wewnętrzne

skip to content #content

Linki zewnętrzne

ramblings by paolo on web2.0, wikipedia, social networking, trust, reputation, … http://www.gnuband.org/
home http://www.gnuband.org/
about http://www.gnuband.org/about/
why gnuband.org http://www.gnuband.org/about/why_gnubandorg/
papers http://www.gnuband.org/papers/
a comparison of trust metrics on advogato social network http://www.gnuband.org/papers/a_comparison_of_trust_metrics_on_advogato_social_network/
a survey of trust use and modeling in current real systems http://www.gnuband.org/papers/a_survey_of_trust_use_and_modeling_in_current_real_systems/
a trust-enhanced recommender system application: moleskiing http://www.gnuband.org/papers/a_trust-enhanced_recommender_system_application_moleskiing/
an empirical analysis on social capital and enterprise 2.0 participation in a research institute http://www.gnuband.org/papers/an_empirical_analysis_on_social_capital_and_enterprise_20_participation_in_a_research_institute/
an on-line evaluation framework for recommender systems http://www.gnuband.org/papers/an_on-line_evaluation_framework_for_recommender_systems/
analyzing collaborative networks emerging in enterprise 2.0: the taolin platform http://www.gnuband.org/papers/analyzing_collaborative_networks_emerging_in_enterprise_20_the_taolin_platform/
collaborative case-based recommendation systems http://www.gnuband.org/papers/collaborative_case-based_recommendation_systems/
collaborative radio community http://www.gnuband.org/papers/collaborative_radio_community/
collective memory building in wikipedia: the case of north african uprisings http://www.gnuband.org/papers/collective_memory_building_in_wikipedia_the_case_of_north_african_uprisings/
compositional cbr via collaborative filtering http://www.gnuband.org/papers/compositional_cbr_via_collaborative_filtering/
data mining, decision support and meta-learning: towards an implicit culture architecture for kdd http://www.gnuband.org/papers/data_mining_decision_support_and_meta-learning_towards_an_implicit_culture_architecture_for_kdd/
gender gap in wikipedia editing: a cross-language comparison http://www.gnuband.org/papers/gender-gap-in-wikipedia-editing-a-cross-language-comparison/
implicit culture for multi-agent interaction support http://www.gnuband.org/papers/implicit_culture_for_multi-agent_interaction_support/
learning contextualised weblog topics http://www.gnuband.org/papers/learning_contextualised_weblog_topics/
manypedia: comparing language points of view of wikipedia communities http://www.gnuband.org/papers/manypedia-comparing-language-points-of-view-of-wikipedia-communities/
moleskiing.it: a trust-aware recommender system for ski mountaineering http://www.gnuband.org/papers/moleskiingit_a_trust-aware_recommender_system_for_ski_mountaineering/
moleskiing: a trust-aware decentralized recommender system http://www.gnuband.org/papers/moleskiing_a_trust-aware_decentralized_recommender_system/
page-rerank: using trusted links to re-rank authority http://www.gnuband.org/papers/page-rerank_using_trusted_links_to_re-rank_authority/
page-rerank: using trusted links to re-rank authority http://www.gnuband.org/papers/page-rerank_using_trusted_links_to_re-rank_authority-2/
reputation-based system: a security analysis http://www.gnuband.org/papers/reputation-based_system_a_security_analysis/
social networks of wikipedia http://www.gnuband.org/papers/social_networks_of_wikipedia/
supporting collaborative networks in organizational settings using an enterprise 2.0 platform http://www.gnuband.org/papers/supporting_collaborative_networks_in_organizational_settings_using_an_enterprise_20_platform/
trust it forward: tyranny of the majority or echo chambers? http://www.gnuband.org/papers/trust_it_forward_tyranny_of_the_majority_or_echo_chambers/
trust-aware bootstrapping of recommender systems http://www.gnuband.org/papers/trust-aware_bootstrapping_of_recommender_systems/
trust-aware collaborative filtering for recommender systems http://www.gnuband.org/papers/trust-aware_collaborative_filtering_for_recommender_systems/
trust-aware recommender systems http://www.gnuband.org/papers/trust-aware_recommender_systems/
trustlet, open research on trust metrics http://www.gnuband.org/papers/trustlet_open_research_on_trust/
using trust in recommender systems: an experimental analysis http://www.gnuband.org/papers/using_trust_in_recommender_systems_an_experimental_analysis/
wikitrip: animated visualization over time of gender and geo-location of wikipedians who edited a page http://www.gnuband.org/papers/wikitrip-animated-visualization-over-time-of-gender-and-geo-location-of-wikipedians-who-edited-a-page/
trust metrics in recommender systems http://www.gnuband.org/papers/trust_metrics_in_recommender_systems/
trust metrics on controversial users: balancing between tyranny of the majority and echo chambers http://www.gnuband.org/papers/trust_metrics_on_controversial_users_balancing_between_tyranny_of_the_majority_and_echo_chambers-2/
trustlet, open research on trust metrics (extended) http://www.gnuband.org/papers/trustlet_open_research_on_trust_metrics_extended/
controversial users demand local trust metrics: an experimental study on epinions.com community http://www.gnuband.org/papers/controversial_users_demand_local_trust_metrics_an_experimental_study_on_epinionscom_community/
reputation is in the eye of the beholder: on subjectivity and objectivity of trust statements http://www.gnuband.org/papers/reputation_is_in_the_eye_of_the_beholder_on_subjectivity_and_objectivity_of_trust_statements/
a multicultural doctorate course on information and communication technologies for development (ict4d) http://www.gnuband.org/papers/a_multicultural_doctorate_course_on_information_and_communication_technologies_for_development_ict4d/
bowling alone and trust decline in social network sites http://www.gnuband.org/papers/bowling_alone_and_trust_decline_in_social_network_sites/
archives http://www.gnuband.org/archives/
contact http://www.gnuband.org/contact/
- http://www.gnuband.org/
manypedia presented at wikisym http://www.gnuband.org/2013/03/18/manypedia-presented-at-wikisym/
leave a reply http://www.gnuband.org/2013/03/18/manypedia-presented-at-wikisym/#respond
manypedia http://www.manypedia.com
manypedia: comparing language points of view of wikipedia communities http://www.slideshare.net/phauly/manypedia-comparing-language-points-of-view-of-wikipedia-communities
paolo massa http://www.slideshare.net/phauly
http://www.manypedia.com http://www.manypedia.com
http://www.gnuband.org/papers/manypedia-comparing-language-points-of-view-of-wikipedia-communities/ http://www.gnuband.org/papers/manypedia-comparing-language-points-of-view-of-wikipedia-communities/
languages http://www.gnuband.org/tag/languages/
manypedia http://www.gnuband.org/tag/manypedia/
pop http://www.gnuband.org/tag/pop/
wikipedia http://www.gnuband.org/tag/wikipedia/
http://www.gnuband.org/2013/03/18/manypedia-presented-at-wikisym/
paolo http://www.gnuband.org/author/paolo/
which wikipedia pages are edited mainly by females? http://www.gnuband.org/2012/09/19/which-wikipedia-pages-are-edited-mainly-by-females/
leave a reply http://www.gnuband.org/2012/09/19/which-wikipedia-pages-are-edited-mainly-by-females/#respond
wikitrip http://sonetlab.fbk.eu/wikitrip/
open source on github https://github.com/volpino/wikipedia-timeline
via gizmodo http://gizmodo.com/5942168/the-wikipedia-gender-divide-visualized
santiago ortiz has used our wikipedia gender api for creating a fantastic visualization http://moebio.com/research/wikipediagender/#tv_programs&films&books&emotions&cities&sports&from_list&popular
cloth menstrual pad http://sonetlab.fbk.eu/wikitrip/#|en|cloth_menstrual_pad
cloth menstrual pad http://sonetlab.fbk.eu/wikitrip/#|en|cloth_menstrual_pad
- http://moebio.com/research/wikipediagender/#tv_programs&films&books&emotions&cities&sports&from_list&popular
api.php http://toolserver.org/%7esonet/api.php
example http://toolserver.org/%7esonet/api.php?article=london&lang=en&editors&max_editors=5
api_gender.php http://toolserver.org/%7esonet/api_gender.php
example http://toolserver.org/%7esonet/api_gender.php?article=london&lang=en
api_geojson.php http://toolserver.org/%7esonet/api_geojson.php
example http://toolserver.org/%7esonet/api_geojson.php?article=london&lang=en
federico “fox” scrinzi http://autistici.org/fox/
http://www.gnuband.org/2012/09/19/which-wikipedia-pages-are-edited-mainly-by-females/
models of economic production, encarta vs wikipedia, and sober economists http://www.gnuband.org/2012/09/05/models-of-economic-production-encarta-vs-wikipedia-and-sober-economists/
leave a reply http://www.gnuband.org/2012/09/05/models-of-economic-production-encarta-vs-wikipedia-and-sober-economists/#respond
the surprising science of motivation http://www.ted.com/talks/lang/en/dan_pink_on_motivation.html
http://www.gnuband.org/2012/09/05/models-of-economic-production-encarta-vs-wikipedia-and-sober-economists/
mit press book “the reputation society” (containing a chapter by me) is out! http://www.gnuband.org/2012/01/24/mit-press-book-the-reputation-society-containing-a-chapter-by-me-is-out/
leave a reply http://www.gnuband.org/2012/01/24/mit-press-book-the-reputation-society-containing-a-chapter-by-me-is-out/#respond
on mit press http://mitpress.mit.edu/catalog/item/default.asp?ttype=2&tid=12750
on amazon http://www.amazon.com/reputation-society-opinions-reshaping-information/dp/0262016648
trust it forward: tyranny of the majority or echo chambers? http://www.gnuband.org/papers/trust_it_forward_tyranny_of_the_majority_or_echo_chambers/
book http://www.gnuband.org/tag/book/
mit press http://www.gnuband.org/tag/mit-press/
reputation http://www.gnuband.org/tag/reputation/
research http://www.gnuband.org/tag/research/
society http://www.gnuband.org/tag/society/
trust http://www.gnuband.org/tag/trust/
http://www.gnuband.org/2012/01/24/mit-press-book-the-reputation-society-containing-a-chapter-by-me-is-out/
paolo http://www.gnuband.org/author/paolo/
article about manypedia on italian newspaper corriere http://www.gnuband.org/2012/01/24/article-about-manypedia-on-italian-newspaper-corriere/
leave a reply http://www.gnuband.org/2012/01/24/article-about-manypedia-on-italian-newspaper-corriere/#respond
manypedia http://www.manypedia.com
wikitrip http://sonetlab.fbk.eu/wikitrip/
corriere.it http://www.corriere.it/scienze_e_tecnologie/12_gennaio_09/manypedia-compara-versioni-curzel_99600478-3aa3-11e1-8a43-34573d1838c1.shtml
- http://www.corriere.it/scienze_e_tecnologie/12_gennaio_09/manypedia-compara-versioni-curzel_99600478-3aa3-11e1-8a43-34573d1838c1.shtml
corriere http://www.gnuband.org/tag/corriere/
manypedia http://www.gnuband.org/tag/manypedia/
wikipedia http://www.gnuband.org/tag/wikipedia/
wikitrip http://www.gnuband.org/tag/wikitrip/
http://www.gnuband.org/2012/01/24/article-about-manypedia-on-italian-newspaper-corriere/
paolo http://www.gnuband.org/author/paolo/
my presentation at wikisym: studying (current) history by analyzing wikipedia http://www.gnuband.org/2011/11/09/my-presentation-at-wikisym-studying-current-history-by-analyzing-wikipedia/
leave a reply http://www.gnuband.org/2011/11/09/my-presentation-at-wikisym-studying-current-history-by-analyzing-wikipedia/#respond
collective memory building in wikipedia http://www.gnuband.org/papers/collective_memory_building_in_wikipedia_the_case_of_north_african_uprisings/
collective memory building in wikipedia: the case of north african uprisings http://www.slideshare.net/phauly/collective-memory-building-in-wikipedia-the-case-of-north-african-uprisings
http://www.gnuband.org/2011/11/09/my-presentation-at-wikisym-studying-current-history-by-analyzing-wikipedia/
wikitrip: animated visualization over time of gender and geo-location of wikipedians who edited a page http://www.gnuband.org/2011/09/30/wikitrip-animated-visualization-over-time-of-gender-and-geo-location-of-wikipedians-who-edited-a-page/
leave a reply http://www.gnuband.org/2011/09/30/wikitrip-animated-visualization-over-time-of-gender-and-geo-location-of-wikipedians-who-edited-a-page/#respond
where in the world are wikipedians who edited the page “peace” http://sonetlab.fbk.eu/wikitrip/#|en|peace
origin of edits for the equivalent page in the arabic wikipedia http://sonetlab.fbk.eu/wikitrip/#|ar|%d8%b3%d9%84%d8%a7%d9%85
“amani” in the swahili wikipedia http://sonetlab.fbk.eu/wikitrip/#|sw|amani
our whitepaper http://www.gnuband.org/papers/wikitrip-animated-visualization-over-time-of-gender-and-geo-location-of-wikipedians-who-edited-a-page/
http://sonetlab.fbk.eu/wikitrip/ http://sonetlab.fbk.eu/wikitrip/
http://www.gnuband.org/2011/09/30/wikitrip-animated-visualization-over-time-of-gender-and-geo-location-of-wikipedians-who-edited-a-page/
wikisym and collective memory building of current events on wikipedia http://www.gnuband.org/2011/09/30/wikisym-and-collective-memory-building-of-current-events-on-wikipedia/
leave a reply http://www.gnuband.org/2011/09/30/wikisym-and-collective-memory-building-of-current-events-on-wikipedia/#respond
collective memory building in wikipedia: the case of north african uprisings http://www.gnuband.org/papers/collective_memory_building_in_wikipedia_the_case_of_north_african_uprisings/
wikisym session titled “wikipedia as a global phenomenon” http://www.wikisym.org/ws2011/program:schedule
brian keegan http://www.brianckeegan.com/
heather ford http://hblog.org/
wikisweeper http://blog.wikimedia.org/2011/09/13/ushahidi-to-track-breaking-news-trends-on-wikipedia/
the image on top http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/27/the_lion_of_egyptian_revolution_%28qasr_al-nil_bridge%29-edit2.jpg
manypedia http://www.gnuband.org/2011/07/04/manypedia_comparing_linguistic_points_of_view_lpov_of_different_language_wikipedias_/
http://www.gnuband.org/2011/09/30/wikisym-and-collective-memory-building-of-current-events-on-wikipedia/
fbk researcher awarded by google with 50,000 dollars and … emotion ;) http://www.gnuband.org/2011/09/30/fbk-researcher-awarded-by-google-with-50000-dollars-and-emotion/
leave a reply http://www.gnuband.org/2011/09/30/fbk-researcher-awarded-by-google-with-50000-dollars-and-emotion/#respond
fondazione bruno kessler (fbk) in trento http://www.fbk.eu/node/1706
http://www.gnuband.org/2011/09/30/fbk-researcher-awarded-by-google-with-50000-dollars-and-emotion/
manypedia: comparing linguistic points of view (lpov) of different language wikipedias http://www.gnuband.org/2011/07/04/manypedia_comparing_linguistic_points_of_view_lpov_of_different_language_wikipedias_/
1 reply http://www.gnuband.org/2011/07/04/manypedia_comparing_linguistic_points_of_view_lpov_of_different_language_wikipedias_/#comments
federico “fox” http://autistici.org/fox/
manypedia http://www.manypedia.com
- http://www.manypedia.com
“gaza war” page from english and arabic wikipedia (both translated into english) http://www.manypedia.com/#|en|gaza_war|ar
from hebrew wikipedia (translated into english) http://www.manypedia.com/#|en|gaza_war|he
compare the controversial articles page on english and chinese wikipedia http://www.manypedia.com/#|en|wikipedia:list_of_controversial_issues|zh
on catalan wikipedia http://www.manypedia.com/#|en|list_of_controversial_articles|ca
manypedia@twitter http://twitter.com/#!/manypedia
manypedia@facebook http://www.facebook.com/pages/manypedia/202808583098332
comparison http://www.gnuband.org/tag/comparison/
cross-cultural http://www.gnuband.org/tag/cross-cultural/
languages http://www.gnuband.org/tag/languages/
manypedia http://www.gnuband.org/tag/manypedia/
translation http://www.gnuband.org/tag/translation/
wikipedia http://www.gnuband.org/tag/wikipedia/
http://www.gnuband.org/2011/07/04/manypedia_comparing_linguistic_points_of_view_lpov_of_different_language_wikipedias_/
paolo http://www.gnuband.org/author/paolo/
older posts http://www.gnuband.org/page/2/
- https://www.facebook.com/paolo.o.massa
- http://www.twitter.com/phauly
- http://www.slideshare.net/phauly
manypedia presented at wikisym http://www.gnuband.org/2013/03/18/manypedia-presented-at-wikisym/
which wikipedia pages are edited mainly by females? http://www.gnuband.org/2012/09/19/which-wikipedia-pages-are-edited-mainly-by-females/
models of economic production, encarta vs wikipedia, and sober economists http://www.gnuband.org/2012/09/05/models-of-economic-production-encarta-vs-wikipedia-and-sober-economists/
mit press book “the reputation society” (containing a chapter by me) is out! http://www.gnuband.org/2012/01/24/mit-press-book-the-reputation-society-containing-a-chapter-by-me-is-out/
article about manypedia on italian newspaper corriere http://www.gnuband.org/2012/01/24/article-about-manypedia-on-italian-newspaper-corriere/
more info about paolo http://www.gnuband.org/about/
why gnuband http://www.gnuband.org/about/why_gnubandorg/
- http://del.icio.us/rss/phauly
recent bookmarks (del.icio.us) https://del.icio.us/phauly
sponsored: 64% off code black drone with hd camera https://shop.icio.us/sales/the-limited-edition-black-hawk-drone-hd-camera?utm_source=del.icio.us&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=the-limited-edition-black-hawk-drone-hd-camera
"comparing linguistic points of view (lpov) of different language wikipedias!" http://www.manypedia.com/
white house visitation social network: wow, that's a transparent government! http://data-gov.tw.rpi.edu/wiki/demo:_white_house_visitation_social_network#overview:_top_100_frequently_visited_people_in_white_house
trustlet - trust metrics wiki http://www.trustlet.org/wiki
the man who looked into facebook's soul http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/facebook_user_data_analysis.php
top 40 free downloadable open source social networking software | vivalogo resources http://www.vivalogo.com/vl-resources/open-source-social-networking-software.htm
50 great examples of data visualization http://ce.sysu.edu.cn/hope/education/showarticle.asp?articleid=4883
- http://www.humancalendar.com
proudly powered by wordpress https://wordpress.org/

Zdjęcia

Zdjęcia 14
Zdjęcia bez atrybutu ALT 5
Zdjęcia bez atrybutu TITLE 11
Korzystanie Obraz ALT i TITLE atrybutu dla każdego obrazu.

Zdjęcia bez atrybutu TITLE

http://www.gnuband.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/gnuband_banner_960.png
https://i2.wp.com/img.gawkerassets.com/img/17yrrdc7fzwo4png/xlarge.png?w=625
https://i0.wp.com/www.gnuband.org/images/the_reputation_society.jpg?w=200
https://i0.wp.com/www.gnuband.org/images/corriere_paolo_massa_manypedia.png?w=99%25
https://i1.wp.com/sonetlab.fbk.eu/wikitrip/images/1.png?w=300
https://i2.wp.com/upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/27/the_lion_of_egyptian_revolution_%28qasr_al-nil_bridge%29-edit2.jpg?w=300
https://i2.wp.com/www.fbk.eu/sites/www.fbk.eu/files/images/comunicati/2011/carlostrapparavafbk.jpg?w=100
https://i0.wp.com/www.gnuband.org/tmp/manypedia_logo2.jpg?w=625
http://www.gnuband.org/images/paolo/paolo_massa_00006.png
http://www.gnuband.org/wp-includes/images/rss.png
http://api.humancalendar.com/2x2/215/60/ms.jpg

Zdjęcia bez atrybutu ALT

https://i1.wp.com/sonetlab.fbk.eu/wikitrip/images/1.png?w=300
https://i2.wp.com/upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/27/the_lion_of_egyptian_revolution_%28qasr_al-nil_bridge%29-edit2.jpg?w=300
https://i2.wp.com/www.fbk.eu/sites/www.fbk.eu/files/images/comunicati/2011/carlostrapparavafbk.jpg?w=100
https://i0.wp.com/www.gnuband.org/tmp/manypedia_logo2.jpg?w=625
http://api.humancalendar.com/2x2/215/60/ms.jpg

Ranking:


Alexa Traffic
Daily Global Rank Trend
Daily Reach (Percent)









Majestic SEO











Text on page:

ramblings by paolo on web2.0, wikipedia, social networking, trust, reputation, … menu skip to content homeabout why gnuband.org papers a comparison of trust metrics on advogato social network a survey of trust use and modeling in current real systems a trust-enhanced recommender system application: moleskiing an empirical analysis on social capital and enterprise 2.0 participation in a research institute an on-line evaluation framework for recommender systems analyzing collaborative networks emerging in enterprise 2.0: the taolin platform collaborative case-based recommendation systems collaborative radio community collective memory building in wikipedia: the case of north african uprisings compositional cbr via collaborative filtering data mining, decision support and meta-learning: towards an implicit culture architecture for kdd gender gap in wikipedia editing: a cross-language comparison implicit culture for multi-agent interaction support learning contextualised weblog topics manypedia: comparing language points of view of wikipedia communities moleskiing.it: a trust-aware recommender system for ski mountaineering moleskiing: a trust-aware decentralized recommender system page-rerank: using trusted links to re-rank authority page-rerank: using trusted links to re-rank authority reputation-based system: a security analysis social networks of wikipedia supporting collaborative networks in organizational settings using an enterprise 2.0 platform trust it forward: tyranny of the majority or echo chambers? trust-aware bootstrapping of recommender systems trust-aware collaborative filtering for recommender systems trust-aware recommender systems trustlet, open research on trust metrics using trust in recommender systems: an experimental analysis wikitrip: animated visualization over time of gender and geo-location of wikipedians who edited a page trust metrics in recommender systems trust metrics on controversial users: balancing between tyranny of the majority and echo chambers trustlet, open research on trust metrics (extended) controversial users demand local trust metrics: an experimental study on epinions.com community reputation is in the eye of the beholder: on subjectivity and objectivity of trust statements a multicultural doctorate course on information and communication technologies for development (ict4d) bowling alone and trust decline in social network sites archives contact manypedia presented at wikisym leave a reply i uploaded on slideshare the presentation i gave time ago at wikisym 2012. it is embedded below. there is a comparison of points of view across different wikis (such as ecured.cu, the cuban government official wiki, and conservapedia, anarchopedia, veganpedia, …) and a comparisons of the same page across different language wikipedias thanks to manypedia (such as “list of controversial issues” in english, chinese and catalan wikipedia, “human rights in the united states” in english and chinese, “osama bin laden” in english and arabic, “vietnam war” in english and vietnamese, “northern cyprus” in turkish, greek and english wikipedia, “underwear” in english and arabic) manypedia: comparing language points of view of wikipedia communities from paolo massa manypedia is online at http://www.manypedia.com. the paper is at http://www.gnuband.org/papers/manypedia-comparing-language-points-of-view-of-wikipedia-communities/. if you like manypedia and the paper, please cite it. thanks! this post was tagged languages, manypedia, pop, wikipedia on 18 march 2013 by paolo. which wikipedia pages are edited mainly by females? leave a reply some time ago we developed wikitrip, a web tool which shows the world location of editors of a chosen wikipedia page and also the gender of editors, i.e. how many edits were made by males and females. we released wikitrip as open source on github and we also deployed 3 live apis: api.php (various stats about a specific wikipedia page), api_gender.php (returns timestamp and gender for any edit to a specific wikipedia page by a registered user that specified his/her gender), api_geojson.php (returns a geojson for anonymous edits on a specific wikipedia page). if you want to use the apis in your mashups, we’ll be delighted, more details about the apis can be found at the end of this blog post. in fact, today i discovered via gizmodo that santiago ortiz has used our wikipedia gender api for creating a fantastic visualization of wikipedia pages based on how many female and male contributors each of the articles has. using the cool visualization you can for example “discover” that currently, out of more than 4 million pages in the english wikipedia, just one article is edited more by females than males!!! that article, with 7 male editors and 9 male editors, is cloth menstrual pad. note that the api we released is based on data from wikipedia and that only users who specified their gender in wikipedia are counted in (these users are a minority, around 10%). note also that in our wikitrip visualization we show a plot with number of edits from gendered users while santiago show the number of different users. for example in wikitrip you see that the page cloth menstrual pad has 62 edits from females and 15 edits from males but the different users who edited the page are 7 male and 9 female. now i give you some more info about the apis released with wikitrip so that you can use them as well in your mashups if you wish so. api.php get various stats about a page options: article: page title lang: desidered language (default: en) family: wiki family (default: wikipedia) year_count: show edit count per month (default: false) editors: show unique editors for the page (default: false) max_editors: maximum number of editors displayed (only if “editors” option is set) anons: show anonymous unique editors (default: false) top_ten: show top 10% of editors (default: false) top_fifty: top 50 editors (default: false) example api_gender.php get timestamp and gender for any edit by a registered user that specified his gender on a specific page (might be quite slow) options: article: page title lang: desidered language (default: en) family: wiki family (default: wikipedia) example api_geojson.php get a geojson for anonymous edits on a specific page options: article: page title lang: desidered language (default: en) family: wiki family (default: wikipedia) example p.s.: the coder of all wikitrip awesomeness is the amazing federico “fox” scrinzi! this post was created on 19 september 2012. models of economic production, encarta vs wikipedia, and sober economists leave a reply an excerpt from dan pink’s ted talk “the surprising science of motivation” the mid-1990s, microsoft started an encyclopedia called encarta. they had deployed all the right incentives, all the right incentives. they paid professionals to write and edit thousands of articles. well-compensated managers oversaw the whole thing to make sure it came in on budget and on time. a few years later another encyclopedia got started. different model, right? do it for fun. no one gets paid a cent, or a euro or a yen. do it because you like to do it. now if you had, just 10 years ago, if you had gone to an economist, anywhere, and said, “hey, i’ve got these two different models for creating an encyclopedia. if they went head to head, who would win?” 10 years ago you could not have found a single sober economist anywhere on planet earth who would have predicted the wikipedia model. this post was created on 5 september 2012. mit press book “the reputation society” (containing a chapter by me) is out! leave a reply the mit press i contributed to with a chapter is out! it is titled “the reputation society: how online opinions are reshaping the offline world” and edited by hassan masum and mark tovey. it is available on mit press and on amazon. the chapter i wrote is titled trust it forward: tyranny of the majority or echo chambers? and on it i ramble about objectivity/subjectivity, minorities/majorities, etc. if reputation systems weight all perspectives similarly, they may devolve into simple majority rule. but if they give each user reputation scores that take only other similar users’ opinions into account, they run the risk of becoming “echo chambers” in which like-minded people reinforce each others’ views without being open to outside perspectives. massa discusses design choices and trust metrics that may help balance these two extremes and the broader implication for our future societies. the book received endorsements by people i really admire. “as our societies expand from local villages to global networks, our ways of assessing and sharing reputation—the foundation of trust and community—must also evolve, but how? the thoughtful and thought-provoking essays in the reputation society bring a wide range of perspectives to this question, including the design of technological solutions, applications in philanthropy, science and governance, and warnings about the loss of privacy and autonomy. it is a fascinating collection of readings not only for scholars, but for anyone interested in the dynamics of the reviews and recommendations that shape our decisions—or in the future of how we will judge and be judged.” —judith donath, fellow, berkman center for internet and society, harvard university “today is tomorrow’s yesterday. these provocative essays, by some of the leading thinkers in the domain of reputation systems, illuminate how reputations regulate actions across time and social distance and point to the opportunities and obstacles that reputation systems present for commerce and democracy.” —paul resnick, professor, university of michigan school of information “the reputation society enriches the discussion of reputation by bringing together technologists, philosophers, legal scholars, and industry leaders to sort through the promise and perils we face today. it covers the practical, for those interested in the nuts and bolts of the challenges we face today, and the theoretical, for those looking to engage in broader discussions of the ethical and moral concerns. in short, a terrific and enlightening read!” —danielle keats citron, professor of law, university of maryland school of law the list of my co-authors is also very delightful. trust, reputation systems, and the immune system of democracy / craig newmark — building the reputation society / hassan masum, mark tovey, & yi-cheng zhang — designing reputation systems for the social web / chrysanthos dellarocas — web reputation systems and the real world / randy farmer — an inquiry into effective reputation and rating systems / john henry clippinger — the biology of reputation / john whitfield — regulating reputation / eric goldman — less regulation, more reputation / lior strahilevitz — the role of reputation systems in managing online communities / cliff lampe — attention philanthropy : giving reputation a boost / alex steffen — making use of reputation systems in philanthropy / marc maxson & mari kuraishi — the measurement and mismeasurement of science / michael nielsen — usage-based reputation metrics in science / victor henning, jason hoyt, and jan reichelt — open access and academic reputation / john willinsky — reputation-based governance and making states “legible” to their citizens / lucio picci — trust it forward : tyranny of the majority or echo chambers? / paolo massa — rating in large-scale argumentation systems / luca iandoli, josh introne, & mark klein — privacy, context, and oversharing : reputational challenges in a web 2.0 world / michael zimmer & anthony hoffman — the future of reputation networks / jamais cascio — “i hope you know this is going on your permanent record” / madeline ashby & cory doctorow. the cover of the book reads as follows. in making decisions, we often seek advice. online, we check amazon recommendations, ebay vendors’ histories, tripadvisor ratings, and even our elected representatives’ voting records. these online reputation systems serve as filters for information overload. in this book, experts discuss the benefits and risks of such online tools. the contributors offer expert perspectives that range from philanthropy and open access to science and law, addressing reputation systems in theory and practice. properly designed reputation systems, they argue, have the potential to create a “reputation society,” reshaping society for the better by promoting accountability through the mediated judgments of billions of people. effective design can also steer systems away from the pitfalls of online opinion sharing by motivating truth-telling, protecting personal privacy, and discouraging digital vigilantism. this post was tagged book, mit press, reputation, research, society, trust on 24 january 2012 by paolo. article about manypedia on italian newspaper corriere leave a reply i’ve been interviewed by the italian newspaper corriere della sera about manypedia (and wikitrip). if you know italian, you can read the resulting article titled “every wikipedia represents its own culture: even the concept of controversiality is controversial” at corriere.it. the journalist liked to stress the fact both manypedia and wikitrip are open source, which is a good thing i think. this post was tagged corriere, manypedia, wikipedia, wikitrip on 24 january 2012 by paolo. my presentation at wikisym: studying (current) history by analyzing wikipedia leave a reply wikisym was a great conference! below you can find my presentation about the paper on collective memory building in wikipedia. during the presentation, i provided evidence and possible research lines in order to argue how it is becoming possible to study history (of current events) by analyzing what it is written about these events by thousands of editors on wikipedia. collective memory building in wikipedia: the case of north african uprisings this post was created on 9 november 2011. wikitrip: animated visualization over time of gender and geo-location of wikipedians who edited a page leave a reply wikitrip allows to have a trip in the process of creation of any wikipedia page from any language edition of wikipedia. wikitrip is an interactive web tool empowering its users by providing an insightful visualization of two kinds of information about the wikipedians who edited the selected page: their location in the world and their gender. if you want to investigate, for example, where in the world are wikipedians who edited the page “peace”, wikitrip is the right tool. and you can check also the origin of edits for the equivalent page in the arabic wikipedia or “amani” in the swahili wikipedia. moreover, if you have ever wondered if a specific page was edited more by male or female wikipedians, wikitrip allows to explore this information as well. how many edits are performed by males and females respectively on wikipedia on average? what is the page most edited by females? on wikirip you can explore your own ideas about these questions and more. visualization of both information is available over time so that you can appreciate the evolution of the page over years, from its creation up to the present. more information about wikitrip at our whitepaper but the best way to enjoy wikitrip is at http://sonetlab.fbk.eu/wikitrip/. we would love to hear the wikipedia pages you found more interesting as they are visualized by wikitrip and of course we wait for your feedback! this post was created on 30 september 2011. wikisym and collective memory building of current events on wikipedia leave a reply in few hours i’ll start the long journey towards mountain view, california, for the wikisym conference where i’m going to speak about wikirevolutions presenting the paper “collective memory building in wikipedia: the case of north african uprisings“. in the paper, we highlight the intense edit activity by wikipedians on articles related to protests and uprisings in north african countries such as tunisia, egypt, libya, syria, yemen focusing mainly on the egyptian revolution. we cast the phenomenon as a process of collective memory building in which thousands of wikipedia editors were involved as the traumatic events unfolded. we explore and suggest possible directions for quantitative research on collective memory formation of traumatic and controversial events in wikipedia. i’m in a wikisym session titled “wikipedia as a global phenomenon” in which i will have the pleasure to speak after brian keegan that is addressing the same topic of how on wikipedia it is possible to analyze how editors cover recent events in real time; the paper is “dynamics, practices, and structures in wikipedia’s coverage of the t?hoku catastrophes” (joint work with d. gergle, n. contractor). probably at wikisym there will be also people from ushahidi, such as heather ford, which recently announced wikisweeper, a joint project with the wikimedia foundation to track breaking news trends on wikipedia so i think we will have wonderful exchanges of points of views and possibly future collaborations. i’m really looking forward for what looks like a fabolous conference! credit: the image on top is creative commons by-sa. p.s.: at wikisym i’m also going to demo our web tool on comparing points of view of different language communities of wikipedia, i.e. manypedia. this post was created on 30 september 2011. fbk researcher awarded by google with 50,000 dollars and … emotion ;) leave a reply one of my colleague at fondazione bruno kessler (fbk) in trento, carlo strapparava, was awarded with $50,000 by google as an incentive to continue his research, especially with the participation of young researchers. carlo proposed algorithms for distinguishing some of the nuances and emotions expressed in written language. dealing with the emotional, persuasive, or other aspects of creative language content in the texts – strapparava explains- is commonly considered to be off limits for any computational ability. actually, these features are a key part of communicating, and it is important that research in the field of natural language processing deal with it. the usefulness of automatic recognition of these aspects is nowadays even greater, given the enormous daily production of texts on the web. through these technologies, it will also be possible to predict the emotional or persuasive content of a text. congrats carlo! this post was created on 30 september 2011. manypedia: comparing linguistic points of view (lpov) of different language wikipedias 1 reply as part of our investigation of the social side of wikipedia in sonet, federico “fox” and i created manypedia, a web mashup which i really like ;) on manypedia, you compare linguistic points of view (lpov) of different language wikipedias. for example (but this is just one of the many possible comparisons), are you wondering if the community of editors in the english, arabic and hebrew wikipedias are crystallizing different histories of the gaza war? now you can check “gaza war” page from english and arabic wikipedia (both translated into english) or from hebrew wikipedia (translated into english). manypedia, by using the google translate api, automatically translates the compared page in a language you don’t know into the language you know. and this is not limited to english as first language. for example you can search a page in the italian wikipedia (or in 56 languages wikipedias) and compare it with the same page from the french wikipedia but translated into italian. in this way you can check the differences of the page from another language wikipedia even if you don’t know that language, sweet! well, the gaza war is just one of the topics which might have very different lpovs on difference language wikipedias but there are many more. as a starting point, you can check the wikipedia page “list of controversial issues” which lists many controversial articles grouped around 15 main categories. actually it is interesting to compare the controversial articles page on english and chinese wikipedia (the english wikipedia is slightly more centered around topics important for us/western culture and in particular the chinese wikipedia page reports pages such as “anti-japanese war”, “nanjing massacre”, “taiwan”, “human rights in china”, “falun gong”, “tiananmen incident”, “mao zedong”, “list of sites blocked by china”) or on catalan wikipedia (in which controversiality arises around what is a country, catalan countries and valencia). on top header of manypedia there are some featured comparisons handpicked by us (and a random one is loaded on the main page) but actually you can search in real time for any page that appears in any language wikipedia. currently we support 56 languages so that for example, you can search for a page in the arabic wikipedia and compare it with the same page in hebrew wikipedia but translated into arabic. or from italian compared with french, or from tagalog compared with catalan, or from hindi compared with irish, or from turkish compared with yiddish, or from persian compared with swahili … well, you’ve got the idea ;) of course if you have any suggestion or feedback, we would love to hear it in order to make manypedia better and more useful. you can contact us via twitter (manypedia@twitter) or via facebook (manypedia@facebook). this post was tagged comparison, cross-cultural, languages, manypedia, translation, wikipedia on 4 july 2011 by paolo. post navigation ← older posts subscribe to blog via email email address recent posts manypedia presented at wikisym which wikipedia pages are edited mainly by females? models of economic production, encarta vs wikipedia, and sober economists mit press book “the reputation society” (containing a chapter by me) is out! article about manypedia on italian newspaper corriere about paolo i'm paolo massa and this is my blog. not enough for you? then get some more info about paolo or about why gnuband. recent bookmarks (del.icio.us)sponsored: 64% off code black drone with hd camera"comparing linguistic points of view (lpov) of different language wikipedias!"white house visitation social network: wow, that's a transparent government!trustlet - trust metrics wikithe man who looked into facebook's soultop 40 free downloadable open source social networking software | vivalogo resources50 great examples of data visualizationhuman calendar proudly powered by wordpress


Here you find all texts from your page as Google (googlebot) and others search engines seen it.

Words density analysis:

Numbers of all words: 3483

One word

Two words phrases

Three words phrases

the - 5.54% (193)
wiki - 3.3% (115)
and - 3.27% (114)
wikipedia - 2.18% (76)
for - 1.69% (59)
ted - 1.26% (44)
man - 1.23% (43)
page - 1.23% (43)
edit - 1.23% (43)
any - 1.21% (42)
you - 1.21% (42)
reputation - 1.03% (36)
are - 0.95% (33)
end - 0.92% (32)
many - 0.89% (31)
per - 0.86% (30)
trust - 0.86% (30)
over - 0.8% (28)
language - 0.78% (27)
system - 0.78% (27)
his - 0.75% (26)
our - 0.75% (26)
- 0.72% (25)
out - 0.72% (25)
manypedia - 0.72% (25)
systems - 0.63% (22)
that - 0.63% (22)
from - 0.6% (21)
use - 0.6% (21)
trip - 0.6% (21)
can - 0.57% (20)
with - 0.57% (20)
war - 0.57% (20)
about - 0.55% (19)
all - 0.55% (19)
male - 0.55% (19)
wikitrip - 0.55% (19)
this - 0.55% (19)
how - 0.49% (17)
api - 0.46% (16)
editors - 0.46% (16)
english - 0.4% (14)
gender - 0.4% (14)
one - 0.4% (14)
more - 0.4% (14)
post - 0.4% (14)
search - 0.37% (13)
two - 0.37% (13)
its - 0.37% (13)
was - 0.37% (13)
article - 0.37% (13)
but - 0.37% (13)
view - 0.37% (13)
paper - 0.34% (12)
which - 0.34% (12)
user - 0.34% (12)
different - 0.34% (12)
wikis - 0.34% (12)
work - 0.34% (12)
males - 0.32% (11)
edited - 0.32% (11)
point - 0.32% (11)
top - 0.32% (11)
present - 0.32% (11)
(default: - 0.32% (11)
time - 0.32% (11)
web - 0.29% (10)
even - 0.29% (10)
network - 0.29% (10)
wikisym - 0.29% (10)
reply - 0.29% (10)
also - 0.29% (10)
compare - 0.29% (10)
controversial - 0.29% (10)
research - 0.29% (10)
social - 0.29% (10)
who - 0.29% (10)
society - 0.29% (10)
book - 0.29% (10)
these - 0.29% (10)
info - 0.29% (10)
example - 0.29% (10)
female - 0.29% (10)
paolo - 0.29% (10)
points - 0.26% (9)
recommender - 0.26% (9)
now - 0.26% (9)
metrics - 0.26% (9)
into - 0.26% (9)
leave - 0.26% (9)
users - 0.26% (9)
have - 0.26% (9)
wikipedia, - 0.23% (8)
count - 0.23% (8)
open - 0.23% (8)
visualization - 0.23% (8)
create - 0.23% (8)
they - 0.23% (8)
edits - 0.23% (8)
not - 0.23% (8)
formation - 0.23% (8)
show - 0.2% (7)
females - 0.2% (7)
online - 0.2% (7)
wikipedias - 0.2% (7)
italian - 0.2% (7)
get - 0.2% (7)
arabic - 0.2% (7)
mit - 0.2% (7)
press - 0.2% (7)
title - 0.2% (7)
some - 0.2% (7)
created - 0.2% (7)
building - 0.2% (7)
collective - 0.2% (7)
comparison - 0.2% (7)
information - 0.2% (7)
using - 0.2% (7)
memory - 0.2% (7)
real - 0.2% (7)
comparing - 0.17% (6)
manypedia, - 0.17% (6)
off - 0.17% (6)
pages - 0.17% (6)
translate - 0.17% (6)
compared - 0.17% (6)
specific - 0.17% (6)
current - 0.17% (6)
wikipedia. - 0.17% (6)
world - 0.17% (6)
based - 0.17% (6)
events - 0.17% (6)
cover - 0.17% (6)
collaborative - 0.17% (6)
wikipedians - 0.17% (6)
possible - 0.17% (6)
side - 0.17% (6)
like - 0.17% (6)
such - 0.17% (6)
right - 0.17% (6)
ago - 0.17% (6)
family - 0.17% (6)
main - 0.17% (6)
list - 0.17% (6)
will - 0.17% (6)
mark - 0.14% (5)
know - 0.14% (5)
face - 0.14% (5)
has - 0.14% (5)
networks - 0.14% (5)
articles - 0.14% (5)
ski - 0.14% (5)
found - 0.14% (5)
your - 0.14% (5)
only - 0.14% (5)
trust-aware - 0.14% (5)
communities - 0.14% (5)
2.0 - 0.14% (5)
majority - 0.14% (5)
echo - 0.14% (5)
september - 0.14% (5)
other - 0.14% (5)
“the - 0.14% (5)
false) - 0.14% (5)
science - 0.14% (5)
massa - 0.14% (5)
chambers - 0.14% (5)
2011 - 0.14% (5)
corriere - 0.14% (5)
part - 0.14% (5)
design - 0.14% (5)
well - 0.14% (5)
2012 - 0.14% (5)
via - 0.14% (5)
tool - 0.14% (5)
north - 0.14% (5)
check - 0.14% (5)
option - 0.11% (4)
community - 0.11% (4)
economist - 0.11% (4)
emotion - 0.11% (4)
than - 0.11% (4)
african - 0.11% (4)
case - 0.11% (4)
news - 0.11% (4)
just - 0.11% (4)
support - 0.11% (4)
sure - 0.11% (4)
culture - 0.11% (4)
years - 0.11% (4)
would - 0.11% (4)
their - 0.11% (4)
around - 0.11% (4)
recent - 0.11% (4)
topic - 0.11% (4)
philanthropy - 0.11% (4)
uprisings - 0.11% (4)
apis - 0.11% (4)
tagged - 0.11% (4)
way - 0.11% (4)
location - 0.11% (4)
people - 0.11% (4)
chinese - 0.11% (4)
chapter - 0.11% (4)
paolo. - 0.11% (4)
future - 0.11% (4)
perspectives - 0.11% (4)
catalan - 0.11% (4)
it. - 0.11% (4)
there - 0.11% (4)
discuss - 0.11% (4)
presentation - 0.11% (4)
2011. - 0.11% (4)
where - 0.11% (4)
source - 0.11% (4)
read - 0.11% (4)
translated - 0.11% (4)
what - 0.11% (4)
today - 0.11% (4)
blog - 0.11% (4)
titled - 0.11% (4)
tyranny - 0.11% (4)
i’m - 0.11% (4)
forward - 0.11% (4)
geojson - 0.11% (4)
start - 0.11% (4)
- 0.11% (4)
languages - 0.11% (4)
same - 0.11% (4)
analyzing - 0.09% (3)
sober - 0.09% (3)
law - 0.09% (3)
encarta - 0.09% (3)
sharing - 0.09% (3)
fbk - 0.09% (3)
privacy - 0.09% (3)
encyclopedia - 0.09% (3)
demo - 0.09% (3)
through - 0.09% (3)
explore - 0.09% (3)
wikipedia: - 0.09% (3)
had - 0.09% (3)
thousands - 0.09% (3)
think - 0.09% (3)
really - 0.09% (3)
views - 0.09% (3)
evolution - 0.09% (3)
got - 0.09% (3)
university - 0.09% (3)
systems, - 0.09% (3)
head - 0.09% (3)
conference - 0.09% (3)
out! - 0.09% (3)
recommendation - 0.09% (3)
society, - 0.09% (3)
pad - 0.09% (3)
very - 0.09% (3)
page) - 0.09% (3)
(lpov) - 0.09% (3)
mashup - 0.09% (3)
content - 0.09% (3)
hebrew - 0.09% (3)
gaza - 0.09% (3)
anonymous - 0.09% (3)
specified - 0.09% (3)
own - 0.09% (3)
chambers? - 0.09% (3)
released - 0.09% (3)
going - 0.09% (3)
were - 0.09% (3)
actually - 0.09% (3)
study - 0.09% (3)
jan - 0.09% (3)
analysis - 0.09% (3)
females? - 0.09% (3)
mainly - 0.09% (3)
course - 0.09% (3)
newspaper - 0.09% (3)
facebook - 0.09% (3)
2012. - 0.09% (3)
war” - 0.09% (3)
address - 0.09% (3)
gnuband. - 0.09% (3)
“list - 0.09% (3)
moleskiing - 0.09% (3)
across - 0.09% (3)
comparisons - 0.09% (3)
models - 0.09% (3)
linguistic - 0.09% (3)
gender. - 0.09% (3)
options: - 0.09% (3)
google - 0.09% (3)
opinion - 0.09% (3)
carlo - 0.09% (3)
incentive - 0.09% (3)
enterprise - 0.09% (3)
great - 0.09% (3)
data - 0.09% (3)
wikipedia) - 0.09% (3)
decision - 0.09% (3)
family: - 0.09% (3)
en) - 0.09% (3)
desidered - 0.09% (3)
lang: - 0.09% (3)
rating - 0.09% (3)
article: - 0.09% (3)
john - 0.09% (3)
eric - 0.09% (3)
each - 0.09% (3)
topics - 0.09% (3)
both - 0.09% (3)
process - 0.09% (3)
number - 0.09% (3)
manypedia: - 0.09% (3)
give - 0.09% (3)
production - 0.09% (3)
making - 0.09% (3)
allows - 0.06% (2)
order - 0.06% (2)
conference! - 0.06% (2)
written - 0.06% (2)
history - 0.06% (2)
controversiality - 0.06% (2)
below - 0.06% (2)
della - 0.06% (2)
(and - 0.06% (2)
argue - 0.06% (2)
fact - 0.06% (2)
(such - 0.06% (2)
creation - 0.06% (2)
might - 0.06% (2)
automatic - 0.06% (2)
predict - 0.06% (2)
emotional - 0.06% (2)
persuasive - 0.06% (2)
histories - 0.06% (2)
english) - 0.06% (2)
don’t - 0.06% (2)
french - 0.06% (2)
well, - 0.06% (2)
reputation, - 0.06% (2)
difference - 0.06% (2)
field - 0.06% (2)
(the - 0.06% (2)
loaded - 0.06% (2)
currently - 0.06% (2)
turkish - 0.06% (2)
idea - 0.06% (2)
twitter - 0.06% (2)
older - 0.06% (2)
posts - 0.06% (2)
email - 0.06% (2)
code - 0.06% (2)
trust, - 0.06% (2)
deal - 0.06% (2)
important - 0.06% (2)
example, - 0.06% (2)
traumatic - 0.06% (2)
papers - 0.06% (2)
swahili - 0.06% (2)
ever - 0.06% (2)
more. - 0.06% (2)
love - 0.06% (2)
hear - 0.06% (2)
interesting - 0.06% (2)
mountain - 0.06% (2)
speak - 0.06% (2)
countries - 0.06% (2)
phenomenon - 0.06% (2)
suggest - 0.06% (2)
strapparava - 0.06% (2)
gnuband.org - 0.06% (2)
why - 0.06% (2)
joint - 0.06% (2)
creative - 0.06% (2)
manypedia. - 0.06% (2)
researcher - 0.06% (2)
awarded - 0.06% (2)
50,000 - 0.06% (2)
language. - 0.06% (2)
aspects - 0.06% (2)
texts - 0.06% (2)
january - 0.06% (2)
risk - 0.06% (2)
research, - 0.06% (2)
note - 0.06% (2)
forward: - 0.06% (2)
reputation-based - 0.06% (2)
santiago - 0.06% (2)
authority - 0.06% (2)
re-rank - 0.06% (2)
creating - 0.06% (2)
links - 0.06% (2)
trusted - 0.06% (2)
contributors - 0.06% (2)
page-rerank: - 0.06% (2)
cloth - 0.06% (2)
menstrual - 0.06% (2)
see - 0.06% (2)
api_geojson.php - 0.06% (2)
learning - 0.06% (2)
mashups - 0.06% (2)
implicit - 0.06% (2)
various - 0.06% (2)
towards - 0.06% (2)
filtering - 0.06% (2)
editors: - 0.06% (2)
unique - 0.06% (2)
10% - 0.06% (2)
p.s.: - 0.06% (2)
federico - 0.06% (2)
“fox” - 0.06% (2)
economic - 0.06% (2)
want - 0.06% (2)
registered - 0.06% (2)
economists - 0.06% (2)
subjectivity - 0.06% (2)
thanks - 0.06% (2)
issues” - 0.06% (2)
english, - 0.06% (2)
“human - 0.06% (2)
rights - 0.06% (2)
presented - 0.06% (2)
paper, - 0.06% (2)
contact - 0.06% (2)
sites - 0.06% (2)
technologies - 0.06% (2)
languages, - 0.06% (2)
objectivity - 0.06% (2)
local - 0.06% (2)
trustlet, - 0.06% (2)
editors, - 0.06% (2)
i.e. - 0.06% (2)
geo-location - 0.06% (2)
made - 0.06% (2)
animated - 0.06% (2)
wikitrip: - 0.06% (2)
deployed - 0.06% (2)
api.php - 0.06% (2)
stats - 0.06% (2)
experimental - 0.06% (2)
api_gender.php - 0.06% (2)
(returns - 0.06% (2)
timestamp - 0.06% (2)
production, - 0.06% (2)
dan - 0.06% (2)
better - 0.06% (2)
democracy - 0.06% (2)
dynamics - 0.06% (2)
recommendations - 0.06% (2)
judge - 0.06% (2)
center - 0.06% (2)
participation - 0.06% (2)
school - 0.06% (2)
discussion - 0.06% (2)
those - 0.06% (2)
challenges - 0.06% (2)
looking - 0.06% (2)
professor - 0.06% (2)
law, - 0.06% (2)
effective - 0.06% (2)
scholars, - 0.06% (2)
marc - 0.06% (2)
measurement - 0.06% (2)
michael - 0.06% (2)
access - 0.06% (2)
governance - 0.06% (2)
states - 0.06% (2)
privacy, - 0.06% (2)
hope - 0.06% (2)
amazon - 0.06% (2)
elected - 0.06% (2)
book, - 0.06% (2)
expert - 0.06% (2)
addressing - 0.06% (2)
interested - 0.06% (2)
range - 0.06% (2)
started - 0.06% (2)
opinions - 0.06% (2)
paid - 0.06% (2)
thing - 0.06% (2)
make - 0.06% (2)
came - 0.06% (2)
few - 0.06% (2)
another - 0.06% (2)
i’ve - 0.06% (2)
anywhere - 0.06% (2)
platform - 0.06% (2)
society” - 0.06% (2)
(containing - 0.06% (2)
me) - 0.06% (2)
reshaping - 0.06% (2)
bring - 0.06% (2)
hassan - 0.06% (2)
masum - 0.06% (2)
available - 0.06% (2)
may - 0.06% (2)
similar - 0.06% (2)
run - 0.06% (2)
government - 0.06% (2)
becoming - 0.06% (2)
broader - 0.06% (2)
societies - 0.06% (2)
global - 0.06% (2)
foundation - 0.06% (2)
essays - 0.06% (2)
networking - 0.06% (2)
of the - 0.6% (21)
in the - 0.57% (20)
a page - 0.46% (16)
you can - 0.4% (14)
reputation systems - 0.32% (11)
wikipedia page - 0.32% (11)
this post - 0.29% (10)
post was - 0.29% (10)
if you - 0.29% (10)
of wikipedia - 0.29% (10)
leave a - 0.26% (9)
a reply - 0.26% (9)
recommender system - 0.26% (9)
points of - 0.23% (8)
trust metrics - 0.23% (8)
in wikipedia - 0.23% (8)
of view - 0.23% (8)
collective memory - 0.2% (7)
reputation society - 0.2% (7)
about the - 0.2% (7)
the page - 0.2% (7)
a specific - 0.17% (6)
memory building - 0.17% (6)
recommender systems - 0.17% (6)
at wikisym - 0.17% (6)
was created - 0.17% (6)
or from - 0.17% (6)
created on - 0.17% (6)
of reputation - 0.17% (6)
the paper - 0.17% (6)
and the - 0.17% (6)
social network - 0.17% (6)
for example - 0.17% (6)
english and - 0.17% (6)
the reputation - 0.17% (6)
of editors - 0.17% (6)
on wikipedia - 0.14% (5)
(default: false) - 0.14% (5)
page in - 0.14% (5)
different language - 0.14% (5)
building in - 0.14% (5)
who edited - 0.14% (5)
such as - 0.14% (5)
for any - 0.14% (5)
mit press - 0.14% (5)
language wikipedias - 0.14% (5)
in english - 0.14% (5)
of different - 0.14% (5)
with the - 0.14% (5)
this is - 0.11% (4)
the wikipedia - 0.11% (4)
reputation / - 0.11% (4)
by paolo. - 0.11% (4)
— the - 0.11% (4)
wikipedia pages - 0.11% (4)
“the reputation - 0.11% (4)
any edit - 0.11% (4)
the api - 0.11% (4)
list of - 0.11% (4)
by females - 0.11% (4)
north african - 0.11% (4)
tyranny of - 0.11% (4)
to the - 0.11% (4)
page from - 0.11% (4)
the majority - 0.11% (4)
was tagged - 0.11% (4)
systems a - 0.11% (4)
in which - 0.11% (4)
translated into - 0.11% (4)
systems trust - 0.11% (4)
of trust - 0.11% (4)
so that - 0.11% (4)
can check - 0.11% (4)
the same - 0.11% (4)
options: article: - 0.09% (3)
can search - 0.09% (3)
same page - 0.09% (3)
editors (default: - 0.09% (3)
english wikipedia - 0.09% (3)
specific page - 0.09% (3)
search in - 0.09% (3)
is out! - 0.09% (3)
arabic wikipedia - 0.09% (3)
hebrew wikipedia - 0.09% (3)
sober economist - 0.09% (3)
by females? - 0.09% (3)
language (default: - 0.09% (3)
and on - 0.09% (3)
linguistic points - 0.09% (3)
page title - 0.09% (3)
lang: desidered - 0.09% (3)
is the - 0.09% (3)
(default: wikipedia) - 0.09% (3)
wiki family - 0.09% (3)
en) family: - 0.09% (3)
to english - 0.09% (3)
wikitrip is - 0.09% (3)
and arabic - 0.09% (3)
thousands of - 0.09% (3)
case of - 0.09% (3)
web tool - 0.09% (3)
the world - 0.09% (3)
wikipedia: the - 0.09% (3)
by male - 0.09% (3)
visualization of - 0.09% (3)
possible to - 0.09% (3)
september 2011. - 0.09% (3)
about manypedia - 0.09% (3)
newspaper corriere - 0.09% (3)
italian newspaper - 0.09% (3)
systems in - 0.09% (3)
one of - 0.09% (3)
on the - 0.09% (3)
you know - 0.09% (3)
echo chambers? - 0.09% (3)
majority or - 0.09% (3)
: tyranny - 0.09% (3)
it forward - 0.09% (3)
30 september - 0.09% (3)
view (lpov) - 0.09% (3)
/ john - 0.09% (3)
family (default: - 0.09% (3)
which i - 0.09% (3)
(lpov) of - 0.09% (3)
a chapter - 0.09% (3)
family: wiki - 0.09% (3)
manypedia: comparing - 0.09% (3)
of north - 0.09% (3)
but the - 0.09% (3)
african uprisings - 0.09% (3)
or echo - 0.09% (3)
how many - 0.09% (3)
number of - 0.09% (3)
males and - 0.09% (3)
in wikipedia: - 0.09% (3)
over time - 0.09% (3)
just one - 0.09% (3)
specific wikipedia - 0.09% (3)
a comparison - 0.09% (3)
at the - 0.09% (3)
the apis - 0.09% (3)
the case - 0.09% (3)
edits from - 0.09% (3)
reply i - 0.09% (3)
title lang: - 0.09% (3)
desidered language - 0.09% (3)
wikipedia on - 0.09% (3)
article: page - 0.09% (3)
paolo massa - 0.09% (3)
enterprise 2.0 - 0.09% (3)
“list of - 0.09% (3)
(default: en) - 0.09% (3)
by google - 0.06% (2)
animated visualization - 0.06% (2)
an experimental - 0.06% (2)
part of - 0.06% (2)
research in - 0.06% (2)
on top - 0.06% (2)
and females - 0.06% (2)
by males - 0.06% (2)
it. the - 0.06% (2)
on trust - 0.06% (2)
open research - 0.06% (2)
comparing linguistic - 0.06% (2)
edited by - 0.06% (2)
love to - 0.06% (2)
will have - 0.06% (2)
of wikipedians - 0.06% (2)
metrics on - 0.06% (2)
current events - 0.06% (2)
we would - 0.06% (2)
in recommender - 0.06% (2)
to speak - 0.06% (2)
controversial users - 0.06% (2)
manypedia presented - 0.06% (2)
in real - 0.06% (2)
is available - 0.06% (2)
and geo-location - 0.06% (2)
of gender - 0.06% (2)
as the - 0.06% (2)
events in - 0.06% (2)
have the - 0.06% (2)
of how - 0.06% (2)
trust-aware recommender - 0.06% (2)
re-rank authority - 0.06% (2)
it forward: - 0.06% (2)
edited mainly - 0.06% (2)
any language - 0.06% (2)
and compare - 0.06% (2)
it with - 0.06% (2)
you have - 0.06% (2)
and more - 0.06% (2)
languages, manypedia, - 0.06% (2)
which wikipedia - 0.06% (2)
pages are - 0.06% (2)
book “the - 0.06% (2)
implicit culture - 0.06% (2)
reputation society” - 0.06% (2)
(containing a - 0.06% (2)
chapter by - 0.06% (2)
me) is - 0.06% (2)
on italian - 0.06% (2)
about paolo - 0.06% (2)
about why - 0.06% (2)
on social - 0.06% (2)
real time - 0.06% (2)
catalan wikipedia - 0.06% (2)
to re-rank - 0.06% (2)
56 languages - 0.06% (2)
is just - 0.06% (2)
trusted links - 0.06% (2)
the gaza - 0.06% (2)
page-rerank: using - 0.06% (2)
language you - 0.06% (2)
don’t know - 0.06% (2)
links to - 0.06% (2)
using trusted - 0.06% (2)
compare it - 0.06% (2)
chinese wikipedia - 0.06% (2)
a trust-aware - 0.06% (2)
but translated - 0.06% (2)
in this - 0.06% (2)
language points - 0.06% (2)
there are - 0.06% (2)
check the - 0.06% (2)
and chinese - 0.06% (2)
and in - 0.06% (2)
many edits - 0.06% (2)
“human rights - 0.06% (2)
the arabic - 0.06% (2)
these two - 0.06% (2)
that the - 0.06% (2)
press book - 0.06% (2)
society” (containing - 0.06% (2)
show a - 0.06% (2)
by me) - 0.06% (2)
their gender - 0.06% (2)
we released - 0.06% (2)
chapter i - 0.06% (2)
male editors - 0.06% (2)
menstrual pad - 0.06% (2)
future of - 0.06% (2)
some of - 0.06% (2)
edited more - 0.06% (2)
school of - 0.06% (2)
we face - 0.06% (2)
for those - 0.06% (2)
english wikipedia, - 0.06% (2)
trust, reputation - 0.06% (2)
who would - 0.06% (2)
10 years - 0.06% (2)
using the - 0.06% (2)
some more - 0.06% (2)
registered user - 0.06% (2)
that specified - 0.06% (2)
page options: - 0.06% (2)
about a - 0.06% (2)
various stats - 0.06% (2)
your mashups - 0.06% (2)
that you - 0.06% (2)
info about - 0.06% (2)
male and - 0.06% (2)
to make - 0.06% (2)
different users - 0.06% (2)
september 2012. - 0.06% (2)
models of - 0.06% (2)
economic production, - 0.06% (2)
encarta vs - 0.06% (2)
wikipedia, and - 0.06% (2)
sober economists - 0.06% (2)
all the - 0.06% (2)
the social - 0.06% (2)
creating a - 0.06% (2)
of points - 0.06% (2)
mainly by - 0.06% (2)
24 january - 0.06% (2)
2012 by - 0.06% (2)
by analyzing - 0.06% (2)
wikipedia leave - 0.06% (2)
on collective - 0.06% (2)
in wikipedia. - 0.06% (2)
in order - 0.06% (2)
also the - 0.06% (2)
are edited - 0.06% (2)
stats about - 0.06% (2)
paper is - 0.06% (2)
allows to - 0.06% (2)
have a - 0.06% (2)
controversial issues” - 0.06% (2)
information about - 0.06% (2)
(such as - 0.06% (2)
for example, - 0.06% (2)
across different - 0.06% (2)
manypedia and - 0.06% (2)
the italian - 0.06% (2)
in your - 0.06% (2)
user that - 0.06% (2)
reputation a - 0.06% (2)
in philanthropy - 0.06% (2)
science / - 0.06% (2)
you want - 0.06% (2)
anonymous edits - 0.06% (2)
geojson for - 0.06% (2)
systems / - 0.06% (2)
/ michael - 0.06% (2)
a registered - 0.06% (2)
timestamp and - 0.06% (2)
the book - 0.06% (2)
open access - 0.06% (2)
from the - 0.06% (2)
online opinion - 0.06% (2)
january 2012 - 0.06% (2)
gender for - 0.06% (2)
article about - 0.06% (2)
manypedia on - 0.06% (2)
comparison of - 0.06% (2)
this post was - 0.29% (10)
leave a reply - 0.26% (9)
points of view - 0.23% (8)
post was created - 0.17% (6)
collective memory building - 0.17% (6)
was created on - 0.17% (6)
memory building in - 0.14% (5)
recommender systems trust - 0.11% (4)
in english and - 0.11% (4)
you can check - 0.11% (4)
of the majority - 0.11% (4)
different language wikipedias - 0.11% (4)
post was tagged - 0.11% (4)
wikipedians who edited - 0.11% (4)
tyranny of the - 0.11% (4)
view (lpov) of - 0.09% (3)
of reputation systems - 0.09% (3)
wiki family (default: - 0.09% (3)
the same page - 0.09% (3)
(default: en) family: - 0.09% (3)
lang: desidered language - 0.09% (3)
article: page title - 0.09% (3)
family: wiki family - 0.09% (3)
language (default: en) - 0.09% (3)
title lang: desidered - 0.09% (3)
options: article: page - 0.09% (3)
editors (default: false) - 0.09% (3)
or echo chambers? - 0.09% (3)
building in wikipedia: - 0.09% (3)
reputation systems in - 0.09% (3)
italian newspaper corriere - 0.09% (3)
linguistic points of - 0.09% (3)
the case of - 0.09% (3)
en) family: wiki - 0.09% (3)
north african uprisings - 0.09% (3)
who edited the - 0.09% (3)
page in the - 0.09% (3)
a specific page - 0.09% (3)
30 september 2011. - 0.09% (3)
in wikipedia: the - 0.09% (3)
case of north - 0.09% (3)
you can search - 0.09% (3)
created on 30 - 0.09% (3)
on 30 september - 0.09% (3)
family (default: wikipedia) - 0.09% (3)
(lpov) of different - 0.09% (3)
desidered language (default: - 0.09% (3)
wikipedia: the case - 0.09% (3)
the majority or - 0.09% (3)
a specific wikipedia - 0.09% (3)
a reply i - 0.09% (3)
of north african - 0.09% (3)
page title lang: - 0.09% (3)
presented at wikisym - 0.06% (2)
would love to - 0.06% (2)
manypedia on italian - 0.06% (2)
trusted links to - 0.06% (2)
forward: tyranny of - 0.06% (2)
about why gnuband. - 0.06% (2)
research on trust - 0.06% (2)
wikitrip: animated visualization - 0.06% (2)
over time of - 0.06% (2)
of the page - 0.06% (2)
page-rerank: using trusted - 0.06% (2)
that you can - 0.06% (2)
by males and - 0.06% (2)
gender and geo-location - 0.06% (2)
if you have - 0.06% (2)
of wikipedians who - 0.06% (2)
edited the page - 0.06% (2)
in the world - 0.06% (2)
links to re-rank - 0.06% (2)
trust-aware recommender system - 0.06% (2)
in order to - 0.06% (2)
can check the - 0.06% (2)
we would love - 0.06% (2)
with the same - 0.06% (2)
and compare it - 0.06% (2)
the arabic wikipedia - 0.06% (2)
“list of controversial - 0.06% (2)
the wikipedia page - 0.06% (2)
just one of - 0.06% (2)
wikipedia but translated - 0.06% (2)
one of the - 0.06% (2)
which wikipedia pages - 0.06% (2)
compare it with - 0.06% (2)
a page in - 0.06% (2)
language points of - 0.06% (2)
and this is - 0.06% (2)
are edited mainly - 0.06% (2)
view of wikipedia - 0.06% (2)
translated into english) - 0.06% (2)
and geo-location of - 0.06% (2)
edited a page - 0.06% (2)
geojson for anonymous - 0.06% (2)
and sober economists - 0.06% (2)
encarta vs wikipedia, - 0.06% (2)
of economic production, - 0.06% (2)
a registered user - 0.06% (2)
a geojson for - 0.06% (2)
anonymous edits on - 0.06% (2)
for creating a - 0.06% (2)
edits on a - 0.06% (2)
(default: wikipedia) example - 0.06% (2)
all the right - 0.06% (2)
in the english - 0.06% (2)
some more info - 0.06% (2)
about the apis - 0.06% (2)
so that you - 0.06% (2)
that specified his - 0.06% (2)
and gender for - 0.06% (2)
stats about a - 0.06% (2)
page options: article: - 0.06% (2)
for any edit - 0.06% (2)
timestamp and gender - 0.06% (2)
time of gender - 0.06% (2)
manypedia: comparing language - 0.06% (2)
animated visualization over - 0.06% (2)
a comparison of - 0.06% (2)
of controversial issues” - 0.06% (2)
“human rights in - 0.06% (2)
on collective memory - 0.06% (2)
wikipedia leave a - 0.06% (2)
2012 by paolo. - 0.06% (2)
on 24 january - 0.06% (2)
about manypedia on - 0.06% (2)
mit press book - 0.06% (2)
24 january 2012 - 0.06% (2)
of wikipedia communities - 0.06% (2)
wikipedia pages are - 0.06% (2)
edited mainly by - 0.06% (2)
reputation / john - 0.06% (2)
interested in the - 0.06% (2)
by me) is - 0.06% (2)
(containing a chapter - 0.06% (2)
“the reputation society” - 0.06% (2)
for recommender systems - 0.06% (2)

Here you can find chart of all your popular one, two and three word phrases. Google and others search engines means your page is about words you use frequently.

Copyright © 2015-2016 hupso.pl. All rights reserved. FB | +G | Twitter

Hupso.pl jest serwisem internetowym, w którym jednym kliknieciem możesz szybko i łatwo sprawdź stronę www pod kątem SEO. Oferujemy darmowe pozycjonowanie stron internetowych oraz wycena domen i stron internetowych. Prowadzimy ranking polskich stron internetowych oraz ranking stron alexa.