1.79 score from hupso.pl for:
escheatable.com



HTML Content


Titleescheatable

Length: 11, Words: 1
Description pusty

Length: 0, Words: 0
Keywords pusty
Robots
Charset UTF-8
Og Meta - Title exist
Og Meta - Description exist
Og Meta - Site name pusty
Tytuł powinien zawierać pomiędzy 10 a 70 znaków (ze spacjami), a mniej niż 12 słów w długości.
Meta opis powinien zawierać pomiędzy 50 a 160 znaków (łącznie ze spacjami), a mniej niż 24 słów w długości.
Kodowanie znaków powinny być określone , UTF-8 jest chyba najlepszy zestaw znaków, aby przejść z powodu UTF-8 jest bardziej międzynarodowy kodowaniem.
Otwarte obiekty wykresu powinny być obecne w stronie internetowej (więcej informacji na temat protokołu OpenGraph: http://ogp.me/)

SEO Content

Words/Characters 3023
Text/HTML 17.86 %
Headings H1 1
H2 13
H3 5
H4 0
H5 0
H6 0
H1
escheatable
H2
monday, september 12, 2016
monday, august 8, 2016
tuesday, july 12, 2016
wednesday, june 29, 2016
monday, may 23, 2016
about me
get escheatable!
total pageviews
unclaimed property resources
blog archive
search this blog
labels
disclaimer
H3
pennsylvania changes ira rules
delware and temple inland settle - questions to remain unanswered
charging money for free informaton on both sides of the world
temple inland scores win in delaware estimation suit - impact to be determined
arizona to take a closer look at contingent fee audits
H4
H5
H6
strong
b
i
em
Bolds strong 0
b 0
i 0
em 0
Zawartość strony internetowej powinno zawierać więcej niż 250 słów, z stopa tekst / kod jest wyższy niż 20%.
Pozycji używać znaczników (h1, h2, h3, ...), aby określić temat sekcji lub ustępów na stronie, ale zwykle, użyj mniej niż 6 dla każdego tagu pozycje zachować swoją stronę zwięzły.
Styl używać silnych i kursywy znaczniki podkreślić swoje słowa kluczowe swojej stronie, ale nie nadużywać (mniej niż 16 silnych tagi i 16 znaczników kursywy)

Statystyki strony

twitter:title pusty
twitter:description pusty
google+ itemprop=name exist
Pliki zewnętrzne 15
Pliki CSS 4
Pliki javascript 11
Plik należy zmniejszyć całkowite odwołanie plików (CSS + JavaScript) do 7-8 maksymalnie.

Linki wewnętrzne i zewnętrzne

Linki 419
Linki wewnętrzne 90
Linki zewnętrzne 329
Linki bez atrybutu Title 364
Linki z atrybutem NOFOLLOW 0
Linki - Użyj atrybutu tytuł dla każdego łącza. Nofollow link jest link, który nie pozwala wyszukiwarkom boty zrealizują są odnośniki no follow. Należy zwracać uwagę na ich użytkowania

Linki wewnętrzne

- //www.blogger.com/rearrange?blogid=873911930895618031&widgettype=profile&widgetid=profile1&action=editwidget§ionid=sidebar-left-1
- //www.blogger.com/rearrange?blogid=873911930895618031&widgettype=subscribe&widgetid=subscribe1&action=editwidget§ionid=sidebar-left-1
- //www.blogger.com/rearrange?blogid=873911930895618031&widgettype=stats&widgetid=stats1&action=editwidget§ionid=sidebar-left-1
- //www.blogger.com/rearrange?blogid=873911930895618031&widgettype=linklist&widgetid=linklist1&action=editwidget§ionid=sidebar-right-1
▼  javascript:void(0)
▼  javascript:void(0)
►  javascript:void(0)
►  javascript:void(0)
►  javascript:void(0)
►  javascript:void(0)
►  javascript:void(0)
►  javascript:void(0)
►  javascript:void(0)
►  javascript:void(0)
►  javascript:void(0)
►  javascript:void(0)
►  javascript:void(0)
►  javascript:void(0)
►  javascript:void(0)
►  javascript:void(0)
►  javascript:void(0)
►  javascript:void(0)
►  javascript:void(0)
►  javascript:void(0)
►  javascript:void(0)
►  javascript:void(0)
►  javascript:void(0)
►  javascript:void(0)
►  javascript:void(0)
►  javascript:void(0)
►  javascript:void(0)
►  javascript:void(0)
►  javascript:void(0)
►  javascript:void(0)
►  javascript:void(0)
►  javascript:void(0)
►  javascript:void(0)
►  javascript:void(0)
►  javascript:void(0)
►  javascript:void(0)
►  javascript:void(0)
►  javascript:void(0)
►  javascript:void(0)
►  javascript:void(0)
►  javascript:void(0)
►  javascript:void(0)
►  javascript:void(0)
►  javascript:void(0)
►  javascript:void(0)
►  javascript:void(0)
►  javascript:void(0)
►  javascript:void(0)
►  javascript:void(0)
►  javascript:void(0)
►  javascript:void(0)
►  javascript:void(0)
►  javascript:void(0)
►  javascript:void(0)
►  javascript:void(0)
►  javascript:void(0)
►  javascript:void(0)
►  javascript:void(0)
►  javascript:void(0)
►  javascript:void(0)
►  javascript:void(0)
►  javascript:void(0)
►  javascript:void(0)
►  javascript:void(0)
►  javascript:void(0)
►  javascript:void(0)
►  javascript:void(0)
►  javascript:void(0)
►  javascript:void(0)
►  javascript:void(0)
►  javascript:void(0)
►  javascript:void(0)
►  javascript:void(0)
►  javascript:void(0)
►  javascript:void(0)
- //www.blogger.com/rearrange?blogid=873911930895618031&widgettype=blogarchive&widgetid=blogarchive1&action=editwidget§ionid=sidebar-right-1
- //www.blogger.com/rearrange?blogid=873911930895618031&widgettype=customsearch&widgetid=customsearch1&action=editwidget§ionid=sidebar-right-1
- //www.blogger.com/rearrange?blogid=873911930895618031&widgettype=label&widgetid=label1&action=editwidget§ionid=footer-1
admin at escheatable dot com mailto:admin@escheatable.com
- //www.blogger.com/rearrange?blogid=873911930895618031&widgettype=text&widgetid=text1&action=editwidget§ionid=footer-1
- //www.blogger.com/rearrange?blogid=873911930895618031&widgettype=attribution&widgetid=attribution1&action=editwidget§ionid=footer-3

Linki zewnętrzne

pennsylvania changes ira rules http://www.escheatable.com/2016/09/pennsylvania-changes-ira-rules.html
$5.68 trillion http://www.pionline.com/article/20130626/online/130629908/ici-us-retirement-assets-hit-record-208-trillion
mike rato https://www.blogger.com/profile/10633679220253274654
10:58 am http://www.escheatable.com/2016/09/pennsylvania-changes-ira-rules.html
no comments: http://www.escheatable.com/2016/09/pennsylvania-changes-ira-rules.html#comment-form
links to this post http://www.escheatable.com/2016/09/pennsylvania-changes-ira-rules.html#links
- https://www.blogger.com/email-post.g?blogid=873911930895618031&postid=1790195016617503891
- https://www.blogger.com/post-edit.g?blogid=873911930895618031&postid=1790195016617503891&from=pencil
https://www.blogger.com/share-post.g?blogid=873911930895618031&postid=1790195016617503891&target=email
https://www.blogger.com/share-post.g?blogid=873911930895618031&postid=1790195016617503891&target=blog
https://www.blogger.com/share-post.g?blogid=873911930895618031&postid=1790195016617503891&target=twitter
https://www.blogger.com/share-post.g?blogid=873911930895618031&postid=1790195016617503891&target=facebook
https://www.blogger.com/share-post.g?blogid=873911930895618031&postid=1790195016617503891&target=pinterest
delware and temple inland settle - questions to remain unanswered http://www.escheatable.com/2016/08/delware-and-temple-inland-settle.html
a delaware federal court issued a decision http://www.escheatable.com/2016/06/temple-inland-scores-win-in-delaware.html
saturday's chicago tribune http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/sns-bc-de--abandoned-property-lawsuit-20160806-story.html
mike rato https://www.blogger.com/profile/10633679220253274654
12:01 pm http://www.escheatable.com/2016/08/delware-and-temple-inland-settle.html
2 comments: http://www.escheatable.com/2016/08/delware-and-temple-inland-settle.html#comment-form
links to this post http://www.escheatable.com/2016/08/delware-and-temple-inland-settle.html#links
- https://www.blogger.com/email-post.g?blogid=873911930895618031&postid=5062768550589622352
- https://www.blogger.com/post-edit.g?blogid=873911930895618031&postid=5062768550589622352&from=pencil
https://www.blogger.com/share-post.g?blogid=873911930895618031&postid=5062768550589622352&target=email
https://www.blogger.com/share-post.g?blogid=873911930895618031&postid=5062768550589622352&target=blog
https://www.blogger.com/share-post.g?blogid=873911930895618031&postid=5062768550589622352&target=twitter
https://www.blogger.com/share-post.g?blogid=873911930895618031&postid=5062768550589622352&target=facebook
https://www.blogger.com/share-post.g?blogid=873911930895618031&postid=5062768550589622352&target=pinterest
charging money for free informaton on both sides of the world http://www.escheatable.com/2016/07/charging-money-for-free-informaton-on.html
sydney morning herald http://www.smh.com.au/money/saving/clever-or-unfair-how-profiteers-are-charging-big-markups-on-public-information-20160705-gpz5ci.html
article http://www.smh.com.au/money/saving/clever-or-unfair-how-profiteers-are-charging-big-markups-on-public-information-20160705-gpz5ci.html
mike rato https://www.blogger.com/profile/10633679220253274654
7:18 am http://www.escheatable.com/2016/07/charging-money-for-free-informaton-on.html
1 comment: http://www.escheatable.com/2016/07/charging-money-for-free-informaton-on.html#comment-form
links to this post http://www.escheatable.com/2016/07/charging-money-for-free-informaton-on.html#links
- https://www.blogger.com/email-post.g?blogid=873911930895618031&postid=1173866172793186718
- https://www.blogger.com/post-edit.g?blogid=873911930895618031&postid=1173866172793186718&from=pencil
https://www.blogger.com/share-post.g?blogid=873911930895618031&postid=1173866172793186718&target=email
https://www.blogger.com/share-post.g?blogid=873911930895618031&postid=1173866172793186718&target=blog
https://www.blogger.com/share-post.g?blogid=873911930895618031&postid=1173866172793186718&target=twitter
https://www.blogger.com/share-post.g?blogid=873911930895618031&postid=1173866172793186718&target=facebook
https://www.blogger.com/share-post.g?blogid=873911930895618031&postid=1173866172793186718&target=pinterest
temple inland scores win in delaware estimation suit - impact to be determined http://www.escheatable.com/2016/06/temple-inland-scores-win-in-delaware.html
filed a lawsuit http://www.escheatable.com/2015/03/court-renders-federal-preemption.html
texas v. new jersey http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/379/674.html
the court denied both those arguments http://www.escheatable.com/2015/03/court-renders-federal-preemption.html
mike rato https://www.blogger.com/profile/10633679220253274654
1:47 pm http://www.escheatable.com/2016/06/temple-inland-scores-win-in-delaware.html
1 comment: http://www.escheatable.com/2016/06/temple-inland-scores-win-in-delaware.html#comment-form
links to this post http://www.escheatable.com/2016/06/temple-inland-scores-win-in-delaware.html#links
- https://www.blogger.com/email-post.g?blogid=873911930895618031&postid=8071611148112327782
- https://www.blogger.com/post-edit.g?blogid=873911930895618031&postid=8071611148112327782&from=pencil
https://www.blogger.com/share-post.g?blogid=873911930895618031&postid=8071611148112327782&target=email
https://www.blogger.com/share-post.g?blogid=873911930895618031&postid=8071611148112327782&target=blog
https://www.blogger.com/share-post.g?blogid=873911930895618031&postid=8071611148112327782&target=twitter
https://www.blogger.com/share-post.g?blogid=873911930895618031&postid=8071611148112327782&target=facebook
https://www.blogger.com/share-post.g?blogid=873911930895618031&postid=8071611148112327782&target=pinterest
arizona to take a closer look at contingent fee audits http://www.escheatable.com/2016/05/arizona-to-take-closer-look-at.html
house bill 2343 into law http://www.azleg.gov//formatdocument.asp?indoc=/legtext/52leg/2r/bills/hb2343o.asp&session_id=115
mike rato https://www.blogger.com/profile/10633679220253274654
9:59 am http://www.escheatable.com/2016/05/arizona-to-take-closer-look-at.html
2 comments: http://www.escheatable.com/2016/05/arizona-to-take-closer-look-at.html#comment-form
links to this post http://www.escheatable.com/2016/05/arizona-to-take-closer-look-at.html#links
- https://www.blogger.com/email-post.g?blogid=873911930895618031&postid=9020974391025917066
- https://www.blogger.com/post-edit.g?blogid=873911930895618031&postid=9020974391025917066&from=pencil
https://www.blogger.com/share-post.g?blogid=873911930895618031&postid=9020974391025917066&target=email
https://www.blogger.com/share-post.g?blogid=873911930895618031&postid=9020974391025917066&target=blog
https://www.blogger.com/share-post.g?blogid=873911930895618031&postid=9020974391025917066&target=twitter
https://www.blogger.com/share-post.g?blogid=873911930895618031&postid=9020974391025917066&target=facebook
https://www.blogger.com/share-post.g?blogid=873911930895618031&postid=9020974391025917066&target=pinterest
arizona http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/arizona
audits http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/audits
older posts http://www.escheatable.com/search?updated-max=2016-05-23t09:59:00-04:00&max-results=5
home http://www.escheatable.com/
posts (atom) http://www.escheatable.com/feeds/posts/default
- https://www.blogger.com/profile/10633679220253274654
mike rato https://www.blogger.com/profile/10633679220253274654
view my complete profile https://www.blogger.com/profile/10633679220253274654
- https://www.netvibes.com/subscribe.php?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.escheatable.com%2ffeeds%2fposts%2fdefault
- https://add.my.yahoo.com/content?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.escheatable.com%2ffeeds%2fposts%2fdefault
- atom http://www.escheatable.com/feeds/posts/default
- https://www.netvibes.com/subscribe.php?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.escheatable.com%2ffeeds%2fcomments%2fdefault
- https://add.my.yahoo.com/content?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.escheatable.com%2ffeeds%2fcomments%2fdefault
- atom http://www.escheatable.com/feeds/comments/default
national association of unclaimed property administrators (links to each state's unclaimed property office) http://www.naupa.org/
unclaimed property professionals organization http://www.uppo.org/
fdic unclaimed funds (deposits & dividends of failed banks) http://www2.fdic.gov/funds/index.asp
u.s. treasury direct - unclaimed savings bonds http://www.treasurydirect.gov/indiv/tools/tools_treasuryhunt.htm
2016 http://www.escheatable.com/search?updated-min=2016-01-01t00:00:00-05:00&updated-max=2017-01-01t00:00:00-05:00&max-results=17
september http://www.escheatable.com/2016_09_01_archive.html
pennsylvania changes ira rules http://www.escheatable.com/2016/09/pennsylvania-changes-ira-rules.html
august http://www.escheatable.com/2016_08_01_archive.html
july http://www.escheatable.com/2016_07_01_archive.html
june http://www.escheatable.com/2016_06_01_archive.html
may http://www.escheatable.com/2016_05_01_archive.html
april http://www.escheatable.com/2016_04_01_archive.html
march http://www.escheatable.com/2016_03_01_archive.html
february http://www.escheatable.com/2016_02_01_archive.html
january http://www.escheatable.com/2016_01_01_archive.html
2015 http://www.escheatable.com/search?updated-min=2015-01-01t00:00:00-05:00&updated-max=2016-01-01t00:00:00-05:00&max-results=17
october http://www.escheatable.com/2015_10_01_archive.html
september http://www.escheatable.com/2015_09_01_archive.html
july http://www.escheatable.com/2015_07_01_archive.html
june http://www.escheatable.com/2015_06_01_archive.html
may http://www.escheatable.com/2015_05_01_archive.html
april http://www.escheatable.com/2015_04_01_archive.html
march http://www.escheatable.com/2015_03_01_archive.html
february http://www.escheatable.com/2015_02_01_archive.html
january http://www.escheatable.com/2015_01_01_archive.html
2014 http://www.escheatable.com/search?updated-min=2014-01-01t00:00:00-05:00&updated-max=2015-01-01t00:00:00-05:00&max-results=24
december http://www.escheatable.com/2014_12_01_archive.html
november http://www.escheatable.com/2014_11_01_archive.html
october http://www.escheatable.com/2014_10_01_archive.html
september http://www.escheatable.com/2014_09_01_archive.html
august http://www.escheatable.com/2014_08_01_archive.html
july http://www.escheatable.com/2014_07_01_archive.html
april http://www.escheatable.com/2014_04_01_archive.html
march http://www.escheatable.com/2014_03_01_archive.html
february http://www.escheatable.com/2014_02_01_archive.html
january http://www.escheatable.com/2014_01_01_archive.html
2013 http://www.escheatable.com/search?updated-min=2013-01-01t00:00:00-05:00&updated-max=2014-01-01t00:00:00-05:00&max-results=39
december http://www.escheatable.com/2013_12_01_archive.html
november http://www.escheatable.com/2013_11_01_archive.html
october http://www.escheatable.com/2013_10_01_archive.html
september http://www.escheatable.com/2013_09_01_archive.html
august http://www.escheatable.com/2013_08_01_archive.html
july http://www.escheatable.com/2013_07_01_archive.html
june http://www.escheatable.com/2013_06_01_archive.html
may http://www.escheatable.com/2013_05_01_archive.html
april http://www.escheatable.com/2013_04_01_archive.html
march http://www.escheatable.com/2013_03_01_archive.html
february http://www.escheatable.com/2013_02_01_archive.html
january http://www.escheatable.com/2013_01_01_archive.html
2012 http://www.escheatable.com/search?updated-min=2012-01-01t00:00:00-05:00&updated-max=2013-01-01t00:00:00-05:00&max-results=50
november http://www.escheatable.com/2012_11_01_archive.html
october http://www.escheatable.com/2012_10_01_archive.html
september http://www.escheatable.com/2012_09_01_archive.html
august http://www.escheatable.com/2012_08_01_archive.html
july http://www.escheatable.com/2012_07_01_archive.html
june http://www.escheatable.com/2012_06_01_archive.html
may http://www.escheatable.com/2012_05_01_archive.html
april http://www.escheatable.com/2012_04_01_archive.html
march http://www.escheatable.com/2012_03_01_archive.html
february http://www.escheatable.com/2012_02_01_archive.html
january http://www.escheatable.com/2012_01_01_archive.html
2011 http://www.escheatable.com/search?updated-min=2011-01-01t00:00:00-05:00&updated-max=2012-01-01t00:00:00-05:00&max-results=50
december http://www.escheatable.com/2011_12_01_archive.html
november http://www.escheatable.com/2011_11_01_archive.html
october http://www.escheatable.com/2011_10_01_archive.html
september http://www.escheatable.com/2011_09_01_archive.html
august http://www.escheatable.com/2011_08_01_archive.html
july http://www.escheatable.com/2011_07_01_archive.html
june http://www.escheatable.com/2011_06_01_archive.html
may http://www.escheatable.com/2011_05_01_archive.html
april http://www.escheatable.com/2011_04_01_archive.html
march http://www.escheatable.com/2011_03_01_archive.html
february http://www.escheatable.com/2011_02_01_archive.html
january http://www.escheatable.com/2011_01_01_archive.html
2010 http://www.escheatable.com/search?updated-min=2010-01-01t00:00:00-05:00&updated-max=2011-01-01t00:00:00-05:00&max-results=50
december http://www.escheatable.com/2010_12_01_archive.html
november http://www.escheatable.com/2010_11_01_archive.html
october http://www.escheatable.com/2010_10_01_archive.html
september http://www.escheatable.com/2010_09_01_archive.html
august http://www.escheatable.com/2010_08_01_archive.html
$$$ http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/%24%24%24
5ws http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/5ws
aggregate reporting http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/aggregate%20reporting
airlines http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/airlines
alabama http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/alabama
alaska http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/alaska
amnesty http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/amnesty
appeals http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/appeals
are you ready for some football? http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/are%20you%20ready%20for%20some%20football%3f
arizona http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/arizona
arkansas http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/arkansas
art http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/art
auction hunters http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/auction%20hunters
auctions http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/auctions
audits http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/audits
australia http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/australia
banks http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/banks
baseball http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/baseball
boo http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/boo
breaking news http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/breaking%20news
broker-dealers http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/broker-dealers
california http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/california
canada http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/canada
cases http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/cases
cayman islands http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/cayman%20islands
celebrities http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/celebrities
charities http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/charities
cities http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/cities
claims http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/claims
class action proceeds http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/class%20action%20proceeds
colorado http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/colorado
connecticut http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/connecticut
cookies http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/cookies
counties http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/counties
delaware http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/delaware
deposits http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/deposits
dormancy periods http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/dormancy%20periods
due diligence http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/due%20diligence
dyk? http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/dyk%3f
eastern carribean central bank http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/eastern%20carribean%20central%20bank
elections http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/elections
estimates http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/estimates
events http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/events
exemptions http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/exemptions
fall reporting http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/fall%20reporting
falling pecans http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/falling%20pecans
fdic http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/fdic
federal law http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/federal%20law
federal property http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/federal%20property
finders http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/finders
florida http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/florida
georgia http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/georgia
gift cards http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/gift%20cards
gold teeth http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/gold%20teeth
government unclaimed property http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/government%20unclaimed%20property
grills http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/grills
hawaii http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/hawaii
history http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/history
holder education http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/holder%20education
idaho http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/idaho
illinois http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/illinois
indiana http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/indiana
insurance http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/insurance
interest http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/interest
inverted jenny http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/inverted%20jenny
iowa http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/iowa
irs http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/irs
jamaica http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/jamaica
jurisdiction http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/jurisdiction
kansas http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/kansas
kansas city royals http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/kansas%20city%20royals
kentucky http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/kentucky
kenya http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/kenya
lawsuits http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/lawsuits
life insurance http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/life%20insurance
limitations http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/limitations
loonie http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/loonie
lost + found http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/lost%20%2b%20found
louisiana http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/louisiana
louisina http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/louisina
maine http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/maine
maryland http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/maryland
massachusetts http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/massachusetts
meet your escheator http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/meet%20your%20escheator
merry christmas http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/merry%20christmas
michigan http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/michigan
mickey mouse http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/mickey%20mouse
minerals http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/minerals
mississippi http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/mississippi
missouri http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/missouri
money orders http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/money%20orders
montana http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/montana
moo http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/moo
nast http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/nast
nebraska http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/nebraska
nevada http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/nevada
new hampshire http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/new%20hampshire
new jersey http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/new%20jersey
new laws http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/new%20laws
new mexico http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/new%20mexico
new york http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/new%20york
new zealand http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/new%20zealand
njrma v. nj http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/njrma%20v.%20nj
non-u.s. laws http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/non-u.s.%20laws
non-u.s. unclaimed property http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/non-u.s.%20unclaimed%20property
north carolina http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/north%20carolina
north dakota http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/north%20dakota
notices http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/notices
ohio http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/ohio
oklahoma http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/oklahoma
oregon http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/oregon
owner-unknown property http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/owner-unknown%20property
owner's interest in property http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/owner%27s%20interest%20in%20property
pending legislation http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/pending%20legislation
pennsylvania http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/pennsylvania
pensions http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/pensions
philadelphia http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/philadelphia
physical property http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/physical%20property
preemption http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/preemption
presidents http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/presidents
private escheat http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/private%20escheat
programming note http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/programming%20note
property held by public entities http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/property%20held%20by%20public%20entities
rebates http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/rebates
record retention http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/record%20retention
reporting http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/reporting
reunification efforts http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/reunification%20efforts
rhode island http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/rhode%20island
royalties http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/royalties
safe deposit boxes http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/safe%20deposit%20boxes
sag http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/sag
sardines http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/sardines
scams http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/scams
schoolhouse rock http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/schoolhouse%20rock
securities http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/securities
securities industry http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/securities%20industry
shameless self-promotion http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/shameless%20self-promotion
south carolina http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/south%20carolina
south dakota http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/south%20dakota
spring reporting http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/spring%20reporting
stamps http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/stamps
state revenue http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/state%20revenue
stats http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/stats
tax refunds http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/tax%20refunds
tennessee http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/tennessee
texas http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/texas
tips http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/tips
traveler's checks http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/traveler%27s%20checks
uk http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/uk
unclaimed property 101 http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/unclaimed%20property%20101
unclaimed property crime http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/unclaimed%20property%20crime
uniform act http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/uniform%20act
up 101 http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/up%20101
uppo http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/uppo
utah http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/utah
vdas http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/vdas
vermont http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/vermont
video http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/video
virginia http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/virginia
vriginia http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/vriginia
washington http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/washington
webinars http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/webinars
west virginia http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/west%20virginia
wisconsin http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/wisconsin
wyoming http://www.escheatable.com/search/label/wyoming
blogger https://www.blogger.com

Zdjęcia

Zdjęcia 34
Zdjęcia bez atrybutu ALT 33
Zdjęcia bez atrybutu TITLE 34
Korzystanie Obraz ALT i TITLE atrybutu dla każdego obrazu.

Zdjęcia bez atrybutu TITLE

https://resources.blogblog.com/img/icon18_email.gif
https://resources.blogblog.com/img/icon18_edit_allbkg.gif
https://resources.blogblog.com/img/icon18_email.gif
https://resources.blogblog.com/img/icon18_edit_allbkg.gif
https://resources.blogblog.com/img/icon18_email.gif
https://resources.blogblog.com/img/icon18_edit_allbkg.gif
https://resources.blogblog.com/img/icon18_email.gif
https://resources.blogblog.com/img/icon18_edit_allbkg.gif
https://resources.blogblog.com/img/icon18_email.gif
https://resources.blogblog.com/img/icon18_edit_allbkg.gif
//3.bp.blogspot.com/_mbon6jt9ehy/th6jzdwpymi/aaaaaaaaabu/jkwfiyp9d8k/s220-s80/blog.bmp
https://resources.blogblog.com/img/icon18_wrench_allbkg.png
https://img2.blogblog.com/img/widgets/arrow_dropdown.gif
https://img1.blogblog.com/img/icon_feed12.png
https://img1.blogblog.com/img/widgets/subscribe-netvibes.png
https://img1.blogblog.com/img/widgets/subscribe-yahoo.png
https://img1.blogblog.com/img/icon_feed12.png
https://img2.blogblog.com/img/widgets/arrow_dropdown.gif
https://img1.blogblog.com/img/icon_feed12.png
https://img2.blogblog.com/img/widgets/arrow_dropdown.gif
https://img1.blogblog.com/img/icon_feed12.png
https://img1.blogblog.com/img/widgets/subscribe-netvibes.png
https://img1.blogblog.com/img/widgets/subscribe-yahoo.png
https://img1.blogblog.com/img/icon_feed12.png
https://img2.blogblog.com/img/widgets/arrow_dropdown.gif
https://img1.blogblog.com/img/icon_feed12.png
https://resources.blogblog.com/img/icon18_wrench_allbkg.png
https://resources.blogblog.com/img/icon18_wrench_allbkg.png
https://resources.blogblog.com/img/icon18_wrench_allbkg.png
https://resources.blogblog.com/img/icon18_wrench_allbkg.png
https://resources.blogblog.com/img/icon18_wrench_allbkg.png
https://resources.blogblog.com/img/icon18_wrench_allbkg.png
https://resources.blogblog.com/img/icon18_wrench_allbkg.png
https://resources.blogblog.com/img/icon18_wrench_allbkg.png

Zdjęcia bez atrybutu ALT

https://resources.blogblog.com/img/icon18_email.gif
https://resources.blogblog.com/img/icon18_edit_allbkg.gif
https://resources.blogblog.com/img/icon18_email.gif
https://resources.blogblog.com/img/icon18_edit_allbkg.gif
https://resources.blogblog.com/img/icon18_email.gif
https://resources.blogblog.com/img/icon18_edit_allbkg.gif
https://resources.blogblog.com/img/icon18_email.gif
https://resources.blogblog.com/img/icon18_edit_allbkg.gif
https://resources.blogblog.com/img/icon18_email.gif
https://resources.blogblog.com/img/icon18_edit_allbkg.gif
https://resources.blogblog.com/img/icon18_wrench_allbkg.png
https://img2.blogblog.com/img/widgets/arrow_dropdown.gif
https://img1.blogblog.com/img/icon_feed12.png
https://img1.blogblog.com/img/widgets/subscribe-netvibes.png
https://img1.blogblog.com/img/widgets/subscribe-yahoo.png
https://img1.blogblog.com/img/icon_feed12.png
https://img2.blogblog.com/img/widgets/arrow_dropdown.gif
https://img1.blogblog.com/img/icon_feed12.png
https://img2.blogblog.com/img/widgets/arrow_dropdown.gif
https://img1.blogblog.com/img/icon_feed12.png
https://img1.blogblog.com/img/widgets/subscribe-netvibes.png
https://img1.blogblog.com/img/widgets/subscribe-yahoo.png
https://img1.blogblog.com/img/icon_feed12.png
https://img2.blogblog.com/img/widgets/arrow_dropdown.gif
https://img1.blogblog.com/img/icon_feed12.png
https://resources.blogblog.com/img/icon18_wrench_allbkg.png
https://resources.blogblog.com/img/icon18_wrench_allbkg.png
https://resources.blogblog.com/img/icon18_wrench_allbkg.png
https://resources.blogblog.com/img/icon18_wrench_allbkg.png
https://resources.blogblog.com/img/icon18_wrench_allbkg.png
https://resources.blogblog.com/img/icon18_wrench_allbkg.png
https://resources.blogblog.com/img/icon18_wrench_allbkg.png
https://resources.blogblog.com/img/icon18_wrench_allbkg.png

Ranking:


Alexa Traffic
Daily Global Rank Trend
Daily Reach (Percent)









Majestic SEO











Text on page:

escheatable the unclaimed property law blog -- news, analysis, and commentary monday, september 12, 2016 pennsylvania changes ira rules according to the investment company institute, americans have $5.68 trillion in individual retirement accounts (iras). in a traditional ira account, a person can make tax deductible contributions to an account that can grow over the years with no tax impact until distribution. importantly, individuals must wait until age 59.5 to make withdrawals without a tax penalty (and individuals generally must begin taking distributions at age 70.5). in other words, an ira is a prototypical long term investment. depending upon the individual's age when he or she opens the plan, decades can go by before the money is touched, in fact, to avoid tax penalties, it is likely. the unclaimed property laws account for the fact that long dormancy is expected. pursuant to the 1995 uniform unclaimed property act, the dormancy period for iras and similar accounts does not begin to run until (1) the attempted distribution of assets or (2) the date that distribution must begin under the tax laws. this position is sensible - the whole purpose of these accounts is to put the money away until retirement. pennsylvania, however, has recently amended its unclaimed property laws for iras. under the new law (house bill 1605) the dormancy period begins to run when two account statements are returned to the custodian as undeliverable. in other words, if a person moves, but forgets to tell his or her ira custodian within the period of two account statements, the ira account is on its way to being turned over to the commonwealth. it is unclear if there are any positive impacts from this change, but there certainly could be negative impacts. under the former law, if a person moved without notifying his/her broker, their funds would not be escheated until the mandatory distribution date (therefore there is no adverse tax consequence). now, if the same move happens, and the property is escheated, the account owner may suffer tax implications as a result of the "distribution" of his or her property to the commonwealth. moreover, it wouldn't seem that delivering the property to the commonwealth does not make it any more likely that it will be returned to the owner. if an individual remembers that he or she had a forgotten ira account, he/she is more likely to remember (and contact) the broker rather than to contact the commonwealth. accordingly, other than simply bringing more money into pennsylvania's treasury, the reasons for this change are not clear. posted by mike rato at 10:58 am no comments: links to this post email thisblogthis!share to twittershare to facebookshare to pinterest monday, august 8, 2016 delware and temple inland settle - questions to remain unanswered in late june, 2016 a delaware federal court issued a decision ruling that delaware's unclaimed property audit and estimation practices "shock[ed] the conscience" of the court and likely violated the due process rights of temple inland (a delaware company being subjected to an unclaimed property audit on delaware's behalf by a private auditing firm). while the court's holding was big news in the unclaimed property industry and signaled potentially seismic changes in the way unclaimed property audits are conducted, the real work was left to be done: the court expressly left open the issue of how delaware's violations were to be remedied. even with this important step left to be taken, the holder community was understandably excited that -- finally -- there would be some answers concerning (a) the interplay between estimation and availability of records; (b) the proper methods for calculating and sourcing historical unclaimed property liabilities; and (c) the retroactivity of delaware's estimation authority. well, it seems that we will have to wait a little longer. according to a an associated press story in saturday's chicago tribune, the parties in the temple inland case reached a settlement resolving the matter in full. according to a joint-motion to dismiss the case filed by the parties on friday, delaware and temple inland have "entered into a voluntary settlement agreement that fully and finally resolves all claims, including all claims that were asserted, or that could have been asserted, in the case and therefore the matters in dispute between plaintiff and defendants have been resolved." accordingly, while the temple inland case showed that courts are willing ask the hard questions about delaware's unclaimed property audit practices, it ultimately left those questions unanswered. posted by mike rato at 12:01 pm 2 comments: links to this post email thisblogthis!share to twittershare to facebookshare to pinterest tuesday, july 12, 2016 charging money for free informaton on both sides of the world the sydney morning herald (australia) recently posted an article outlining how various companies in australia seek to make money by repackaging otherwise public information at increased prices. according to the article, profit-minded aussies are charging for public information relating to unclaimed property, ancestry records, government reports -- sometimes at a significant profit. the experience here in the u.s. is no different, particularly with regard to unclaimed property. agreements with so-called "finder firms" are allowed in many states, pursuant to which the finder agrees to assist a claimant with obtaining his or her money from the state in exchange for a percentage fee. of course, states generally charge no fees for searching, claiming and receiving unclaimed property that they hold for the benefit of the rightful owner. accordingly, finder firms (might) provide you with expertise or time (i.e., the they will deal with the the claim process so you don't have to). they are not, however, providing you with access to the money; the underlying funds belong to the owner and is (or shortly will be) claimable directly from the state without the involvement of a finder firm. everyone is free to spend their time and money how they wish, and everyone has their own individual balance of what is worth doing and what is worth paying someone else to do. just know what you are paying for. in the case of unclaimed funds and finder firms, it is (maybe) time and expertise, not access, that you are buying. posted by mike rato at 7:18 am 1 comment: links to this post email thisblogthis!share to twittershare to facebookshare to pinterest wednesday, june 29, 2016 temple inland scores win in delaware estimation suit - impact to be determined in 2014, temple inland filed a lawsuit against the state of delaware, challenging the results and methodology of an unclaimed property audit performed by that state. as part of a 2008 audit, the state of delaware assessed temple inland unclaimed property liabilities for a 22 year time period, allegedly because of temple inland's failure to maintain records (notwithstanding the fact that no delaware law requires a holder to keep such records). after availing itself of the state's administrative appeal process, temple inland filed a lawsuit in federal challenged the state's use of estimation in the audit context, arguing that the technique (1) was preempted by the supreme court's texas v. new jersey decision; (2) violated temple inland's rights under the due process clause of the constitution; (3) represented an unconstitutional "taking" of temple inland's property; and (4) violated the ex post facto clause of the constitution. initially, both parties moved for a quick knockout -- temple inland sought a preliminary determination that the use of estimates was completely prohibited by the u.s. supreme court's decision in texas v. new jersey, while delaware asked the court to dismiss the suit in its entirety. in march 2013, the court denied both those arguments, allowing the case to continue. later both parties moved for summary judgment (a ruling providing that there is no need for a trial because one party is right as a matter of law) on the remaining claims that estimation was barred by the due process clause, represented an unconstitutional taking of temple inland's property, or violated the ex post facto clause. the court ruled on those motions yesterday. the court rules against delaware on due process claim, leaves remedy open the court began its substantive opinion with a section titled "delaware's dependence on unclaimed property revenue." while none of the following facts will be particularly startling to unclaimed property professionals, seeing them acknowledged by a federal judge is notable. in particular, the court recognized: unclaimed property represents delaware's third largest revenue source; in 2007, delaware transferred over $350 in unclaimed property to the general fund, but only returned $20 million to owners; and it is estimated that 90% of the property collected by delaware is owner-unknown property (meaning it will likely never be paid out to its rightful owner). against this backdrop, the court evaluated whether delaware's use of estimation was consistent with its obligation to provide temple inland with due process of law. as the court noted, the key protection of the due process clause is to prevent "arbitrary" government action. under the relevant caselaw, the court recognized, action by a government agency like the delaware department of finance is deemed to be arbitrary when it "shocks the conscience" of the court. while noting that no clear precedent existed for the court to determine whether any of delaware's individual actions met this threshhold, the court concluded that "in combination, defendants' executive actions shock the conscience." in particular, the court singled out the following actions for criticism: the fact that delaware attempted to avoid the three or six year statute of limitations (which does not apply where no report has been filed) by not requiring negative reports and by not (apparently) keeping copies of reports filed by holders; that delaware never gave the holder notice that it must keep records of unclaimed property compliance (delaware has no unclaimed property records retention statute) then tried to capitalize on the lack of such records to justify its estimation practices; delaware's attempt to impose the estimation statute retroactively; the mechanics of the estimation process itself. in particular, the he court intimated that delaware may not properly take custody of estimated sums where the underlying liabilities upon which those estimates are based relate to amounts owed in other states. specifically, the court explained that “[i]f the property in base years shows an address in another state, then the characteristic of that property has to be extrapolated into the reach back years;” and the potential for double liability if other states estimate the same period. while the court ruled that this conduct amounted to a violation of temple inland's due process rights, it did not decide the appropriate remedy. instead, it deferred to delaware for suggestions, explaining that "[i]t is defendants who are best able to know which remedy will be the most palatable in its anticipated efforts to normalize the enforcement of its unclaimed property laws. thus, the court will defer its decision on the subject of an appropriate remedy until another day." the court defers the takings clause claim the court made no final decision on the "taking" claim. pursuant to the fifth amendment (made applicable to the states by the fourteenth amendment) a state may not take private property for public use without just compensation. temple inland argued that, by demanding estimated property in the context of an unclaimed property audit, the state was impermissibly taking temple inland's property for public use. the court rejected the absolute nature of this argument. while the court recognized that an inaccurately performed estimate could result in the taking of a holder's property, the court held "reasonable" estimation, in and of itself, did not represent an unconstitutional taking of a holder's property. noting that the parties had not yet presented evidence on whether the estimation at issue was "reasonable," the court deferred a decision on this issue. the court rejects the ex post facto challenge the court found in favor of delaware on the ex post facto cause claim. the constitution's ex post facto clause (art. i, sec. 10) prevents states from retroactively punishing an act that was not prohibited at the time of the act. as the court recognized, however, violations of the ex post facto clause have generally only been found in connection with criminal statutes, or civil statutes that operate as criminal punishments. because the court found that the estimation provisions of delaware's unclaimed property law were civil, not criminal, in nature it rejected this claim. the temple inland decision is no doubt a big win for the unclaimed property holder community that, for years, has been complaining about delaware's overly aggressive and at times seemingly arbitrary estimation practices. that said, the court has expressly left open the issue of how delaware's violation is to be remedied. until the court's ruling is given some practical effect, it is unclear just how much of a game changer this ruling will be. posted by mike rato at 1:47 pm 1 comment: links to this post email thisblogthis!share to twittershare to facebookshare to pinterest monday, may 23, 2016 arizona to take a closer look at contingent fee audits a few days ago, the governor of arizona signed house bill 2343 into law. the legislation makes some welcome and well-meaning changes to the way that unclaimed property audits (including, specifically, contingent fee audits) are conducted. for example, the legislation provides that all holders will receive a "notice of rights" (1) making clear that the department of revenue makes all final decisions "that any unclaimed property is reportable;" (2) setting forth appeals procedures; (3) notifying holders where they can file complaints regarding auditor conduct; and (4) contact information for designated employees. in addition to these changes, the new legislation also signals that arizona is taking a fresh look at the use of contingent fee audits, and whether there are any practical alternatives. the law requires the department of revenue to issue a request for information by the beginning of next year to "explore the feasibility of contracting for audits . . . that are not directly or indirectly contingent on the auditor recovering unclaimed property." this is obviously an important issue to the holder community. because the audit firm's payment at the end of an unclaimed property audit is generally calculated as a percentage of reportable property "identified" by the auditor, it is in the auditor's financial interest to take aggressive and novel positions intended to increase the amount due. that is not to suggest that all audit firms do so, but the incentive alone is enough to cause many in the holder community to question the fairness of impartiality of these audits. hopefully, this is a first step in arizona to formulating an audit process designed to locate unclaimed property actually due to the state, no more and no less. posted by mike rato at 9:59 am 2 comments: links to this post email thisblogthis!share to twittershare to facebookshare to pinterest labels: arizona, audits older posts home subscribe to: posts (atom) about me mike rato michael rato is an attorney in the new york metropolitan area whose practice focuses on advising corporations and financial institutions on unclaimed property law compliance. http://www.linkedin.com/in/michaelrato view my complete profile get escheatable! posts atom posts all comments atom all comments total pageviews unclaimed property resources national association of unclaimed property administrators (links to each state's unclaimed property office) unclaimed property professionals organization fdic unclaimed funds (deposits & dividends of failed banks) u.s. treasury direct - unclaimed savings bonds blog archive ▼  2016 (17) ▼  september (1) pennsylvania changes ira rules ►  august (1) ►  july (1) ►  june (1) ►  may (5) ►  april (1) ►  march (3) ►  february (2) ►  january (2) ►  2015 (17) ►  october (1) ►  september (1) ►  july (2) ►  june (2) ►  may (1) ►  april (1) ►  march (2) ►  february (3) ►  january (4) ►  2014 (24) ►  december (4) ►  november (3) ►  october (2) ►  september (2) ►  august (1) ►  july (1) ►  april (3) ►  march (3) ►  february (2) ►  january (3) ►  2013 (39) ►  december (2) ►  november (1) ►  october (3) ►  september (1) ►  august (3) ►  july (5) ►  june (4) ►  may (4) ►  april (5) ►  march (2) ►  february (3) ►  january (6) ►  2012 (65) ►  november (6) ►  october (4) ►  september (6) ►  august (5) ►  july (5) ►  june (4) ►  may (3) ►  april (11) ►  march (6) ►  february (6) ►  january (9) ►  2011 (135) ►  december (6) ►  november (10) ►  october (11) ►  september (12) ►  august (5) ►  july (11) ►  june (11) ►  may (12) ►  april (13) ►  march (16) ►  february (16) ►  january (12) ►  2010 (70) ►  december (11) ►  november (18) ►  october (15) ►  september (21) ►  august (5) search this blog loading... labels $$$ 5ws aggregate reporting airlines alabama alaska amnesty appeals are you ready for some football? arizona arkansas art auction hunters auctions audits australia banks baseball boo breaking news broker-dealers california canada cases cayman islands celebrities charities cities claims class action proceeds colorado connecticut cookies counties delaware deposits dormancy periods due diligence dyk? eastern carribean central bank elections estimates events exemptions fall reporting falling pecans fdic federal law federal property finders florida georgia gift cards gold teeth government unclaimed property grills hawaii history holder education idaho illinois indiana insurance interest inverted jenny iowa irs jamaica jurisdiction kansas kansas city royals kentucky kenya lawsuits life insurance limitations loonie lost + found louisiana louisina maine maryland massachusetts meet your escheator merry christmas michigan mickey mouse minerals mississippi missouri money orders montana moo nast nebraska nevada new hampshire new jersey new laws new mexico new york new zealand njrma v. nj non-u.s. laws non-u.s. unclaimed property north carolina north dakota notices ohio oklahoma oregon owner-unknown property owner's interest in property pending legislation pennsylvania pensions philadelphia physical property preemption presidents private escheat programming note property held by public entities rebates record retention reporting reunification efforts rhode island royalties safe deposit boxes sag sardines scams schoolhouse rock securities securities industry shameless self-promotion south carolina south dakota spring reporting stamps state revenue stats tax refunds tennessee texas tips traveler's checks uk unclaimed property 101 unclaimed property crime uniform act up 101 uppo utah vdas vermont video virginia vriginia washington webinars west virginia wisconsin wyoming disclaimer thank you for visiting escheatable, the escheat, unclaimed property reporting, and abandoned property law blog. the material presented on this blog is for informational purposes only and is not offered as legal advice on any matter. no reader should act, or refrain from acting, based solely on any information on this web site. please do not send confidential or sensitive information; doing so will not impose an attorney-client relationship. attorney advertising contact us at admin at escheatable dot com copyright 2011 mike rato. simple template. powered by blogger.


Here you find all texts from your page as Google (googlebot) and others search engines seen it.

Words density analysis:

Numbers of all words: 3131

One word

Two words phrases

Three words phrases

the - 7.38% (231)
►  - 2.33% (73)
and - 2.11% (66)
are - 2.11% (66)
proper - 2.01% (63)
property - 1.95% (61)
claim - 1.82% (57)
law - 1.72% (54)
for - 1.72% (54)
that - 1.53% (48)
act - 1.41% (44)
unclaimed - 1.37% (43)
his - 1.18% (37)
court - 1.15% (36)
not - 1.09% (34)
delaware - 1.02% (32)
this - 0.99% (31)
com - 0.96% (30)
her - 0.96% (30)
all - 0.93% (29)
use - 0.83% (26)
its - 0.8% (25)
audit - 0.8% (25)
state - 0.67% (21)
art - 0.67% (21)
post - 0.67% (21)
with - 0.61% (19)
inland - 0.61% (19)
temple - 0.61% (19)
one - 0.54% (17)
(1) - 0.51% (16)
part - 0.51% (16)
hold - 0.48% (15)
end - 0.45% (14)
able - 0.45% (14)
estimation - 0.45% (14)
new - 0.45% (14)
out - 0.42% (13)
(2) - 0.42% (13)
older - 0.42% (13)
delaware's - 0.42% (13)
will - 0.38% (12)
(3) - 0.38% (12)
here - 0.38% (12)
holder - 0.38% (12)
own - 0.38% (12)
blog - 0.35% (11)
report - 0.35% (11)
process - 0.35% (11)
over - 0.35% (11)
any - 0.35% (11)
fact - 0.35% (11)
was - 0.35% (11)
but - 0.35% (11)
account - 0.35% (11)
late - 0.32% (10)
may - 0.32% (10)
how - 0.32% (10)
due - 0.32% (10)
ira - 0.32% (10)
rato - 0.32% (10)
even - 0.29% (9)
escheat - 0.29% (9)
audits - 0.29% (9)
laws - 0.29% (9)
taking - 0.29% (9)
owner - 0.29% (9)
change - 0.29% (9)
money - 0.29% (9)
case - 0.26% (8)
september - 0.26% (8)
right - 0.26% (8)
other - 0.26% (8)
can - 0.26% (8)
decision - 0.26% (8)
estimate - 0.26% (8)
there - 0.26% (8)
record - 0.26% (8)
(4) - 0.26% (8)
clause - 0.26% (8)
you - 0.26% (8)
interest - 0.26% (8)
under - 0.26% (8)
tax - 0.26% (8)
age - 0.22% (7)
file - 0.22% (7)
until - 0.22% (7)
while - 0.22% (7)
august - 0.22% (7)
issue - 0.22% (7)
june - 0.22% (7)
march - 0.22% (7)
2016 - 0.22% (7)
mike - 0.22% (7)
july - 0.22% (7)
information - 0.22% (7)
individual - 0.22% (7)
has - 0.22% (7)
have - 0.22% (7)
records - 0.22% (7)
according - 0.22% (7)
time - 0.22% (7)
year - 0.22% (7)
(5) - 0.22% (7)
links - 0.19% (6)
inland's - 0.19% (6)
were - 0.19% (6)
some - 0.19% (6)
finder - 0.19% (6)
facto - 0.19% (6)
action - 0.19% (6)
like - 0.19% (6)
cause - 0.19% (6)
arizona - 0.19% (6)
april - 0.19% (6)
february - 0.19% (6)
january - 0.19% (6)
october - 0.19% (6)
(6) - 0.19% (6)
boo - 0.19% (6)
posted - 0.19% (6)
states - 0.19% (6)
period - 0.19% (6)
make - 0.19% (6)
distribution - 0.19% (6)
been - 0.16% (5)
fee - 0.16% (5)
they - 0.16% (5)
funds - 0.16% (5)
know - 0.16% (5)
win - 0.16% (5)
suit - 0.16% (5)
general - 0.16% (5)
move - 0.16% (5)
revenue - 0.16% (5)
take - 0.16% (5)
begin - 0.16% (5)
statute - 0.16% (5)
from - 0.16% (5)
left - 0.16% (5)
met - 0.16% (5)
clear - 0.16% (5)
parties - 0.16% (5)
federal - 0.16% (5)
u.s. - 0.16% (5)
(11) - 0.16% (5)
more - 0.16% (5)
email - 0.16% (5)
november - 0.16% (5)
thisblogthis!share - 0.16% (5)
twittershare - 0.16% (5)
facebookshare - 0.16% (5)
pinterest - 0.16% (5)
likely - 0.16% (5)
reporting - 0.16% (5)
comments - 0.16% (5)
practice - 0.16% (5)
filed - 0.16% (5)
public - 0.16% (5)
changes - 0.16% (5)
pennsylvania - 0.16% (5)
those - 0.13% (4)
both - 0.13% (4)
because - 0.13% (4)
contact - 0.13% (4)
dormancy - 0.13% (4)
government - 0.13% (4)
just - 0.13% (4)
firms - 0.13% (4)
term - 0.13% (4)
which - 0.13% (4)
escheatable - 0.13% (4)
defer - 0.13% (4)
whether - 0.13% (4)
must - 0.13% (4)
december - 0.13% (4)
direct - 0.13% (4)
posts - 0.13% (4)
question - 0.13% (4)
years - 0.13% (4)
impact - 0.13% (4)
auditor - 0.13% (4)
legislation - 0.13% (4)
contingent - 0.13% (4)
without - 0.13% (4)
long - 0.13% (4)
found - 0.13% (4)
presented - 0.13% (4)
represent - 0.13% (4)
recognized - 0.13% (4)
final - 0.13% (4)
violation - 0.13% (4)
conduct - 0.13% (4)
generally - 0.13% (4)
base - 0.13% (4)
ask - 0.13% (4)
remedy - 0.13% (4)
claims - 0.13% (4)
community - 0.13% (4)
way - 0.13% (4)
court's - 0.13% (4)
matter - 0.13% (4)
commonwealth - 0.13% (4)
turned - 0.13% (4)
ruling - 0.13% (4)
practices - 0.13% (4)
into - 0.13% (4)
violated - 0.13% (4)
rights - 0.13% (4)
open - 0.13% (4)
news - 0.1% (3)
arbitrary - 0.1% (3)
where - 0.1% (3)
shock - 0.1% (3)
notice - 0.1% (3)
actions - 0.1% (3)
attempt - 0.1% (3)
owed - 0.1% (3)
commonwealth. - 0.1% (3)
department - 0.1% (3)
estimated - 0.1% (3)
only - 0.1% (3)
particular, - 0.1% (3)
when - 0.1% (3)
she - 0.1% (3)
estimates - 0.1% (3)
important - 0.1% (3)
unconstitutional - 0.1% (3)
pursuant - 0.1% (3)
jersey - 0.1% (3)
texas - 0.1% (3)
act, - 0.1% (3)
appeal - 0.1% (3)
could - 0.1% (3)
claim. - 0.1% (3)
private - 0.1% (3)
each - 0.1% (3)
admin - 0.1% (3)
deposit - 0.1% (3)
monday, - 0.1% (3)
kansas - 0.1% (3)
bank - 0.1% (3)
accordingly, - 0.1% (3)
broker - 0.1% (3)
(12) - 0.1% (3)
rules - 0.1% (3)
accounts - 0.1% (3)
person - 0.1% (3)
comments: - 0.1% (3)
atom - 0.1% (3)
who - 0.1% (3)
seem - 0.1% (3)
attorney - 0.1% (3)
result - 0.1% (3)
settle - 0.1% (3)
questions - 0.1% (3)
amount - 0.1% (3)
holders - 0.1% (3)
house - 0.1% (3)
would - 0.1% (3)
their - 0.1% (3)
criminal - 0.1% (3)
moved - 0.1% (3)
itself - 0.1% (3)
state's - 0.1% (3)
than - 0.1% (3)
press - 0.1% (3)
defendants - 0.1% (3)
australia - 0.1% (3)
returned - 0.1% (3)
reports - 0.1% (3)
lawsuit - 0.1% (3)
against - 0.1% (3)
property. - 0.1% (3)
property, - 0.1% (3)
however, - 0.1% (3)
about - 0.1% (3)
what - 0.1% (3)
directly - 0.1% (3)
liabilities - 0.1% (3)
does - 0.1% (3)
keep - 0.1% (3)
these - 0.1% (3)
iras - 0.1% (3)
provide - 0.1% (3)
recently - 0.06% (2)
york - 0.06% (2)
settlement - 0.06% (2)
michael - 0.06% (2)
such - 0.06% (2)
view - 0.06% (2)
complete - 0.06% (2)
get - 0.06% (2)
bill - 0.06% (2)
professionals - 0.06% (2)
fdic - 0.06% (2)
treasury - 0.06% (2)
dismiss - 0.06% (2)
particularly - 0.06% (2)
reportable - 0.06% (2)
regard - 0.06% (2)
makes - 0.06% (2)
times - 0.06% (2)
practical - 0.06% (2)
look - 0.06% (2)
percentage - 0.06% (2)
put - 0.06% (2)
signed - 0.06% (2)
escheated - 0.06% (2)
appeals - 0.06% (2)
suggest - 0.06% (2)
individuals - 0.06% (2)
same - 0.06% (2)
unanswered - 0.06% (2)
financial - 0.06% (2)
remain - 0.06% (2)
increase - 0.06% (2)
many - 0.06% (2)
▼  - 0.06% (2)
company - 0.06% (2)
(17) - 0.06% (2)
12, - 0.06% (2)
insurance - 0.06% (2)
irs - 0.06% (2)
statements - 0.06% (2)
non-u.s. - 0.06% (2)
north - 0.06% (2)
carolina - 0.06% (2)
dakota - 0.06% (2)
pending - 0.06% (2)
note - 0.06% (2)
events - 0.06% (2)
island - 0.06% (2)
therefore - 0.06% (2)
securities - 0.06% (2)
south - 0.06% (2)
101 - 0.06% (2)
virginia - 0.06% (2)
web - 0.06% (2)
including - 0.06% (2)
fall - 0.06% (2)
deposits - 0.06% (2)
account, - 0.06% (2)
agreement - 0.06% (2)
article - 0.06% (2)
retirement - 0.06% (2)
statutes - 0.06% (2)
investment - 0.06% (2)
2014 - 0.06% (2)
owner. - 0.06% (2)
had - 0.06% (2)
2013 - 0.06% (2)
remember - 0.06% (2)
fully - 0.06% (2)
2011 - 0.06% (2)
free - 0.06% (2)
(16) - 0.06% (2)
search - 0.06% (2)
labels - 0.06% (2)
charging - 0.06% (2)
two - 0.06% (2)
auction - 0.06% (2)
banks - 0.06% (2)
aggressive - 0.06% (2)
notifying - 0.06% (2)
civil - 0.06% (2)
words, - 0.06% (2)
never - 0.06% (2)
violations - 0.06% (2)
unclear - 0.06% (2)
law. - 0.06% (2)
key - 0.06% (2)
prevent - 0.06% (2)
recognized, - 0.06% (2)
impacts - 0.06% (2)
doing - 0.06% (2)
paying - 0.06% (2)
worth - 0.06% (2)
noting - 0.06% (2)
determine - 0.06% (2)
custodian - 0.06% (2)
expressly - 0.06% (2)
everyone - 0.06% (2)
industry - 0.06% (2)
limitations - 0.06% (2)
owner-unknown - 0.06% (2)
between - 0.06% (2)
underlying - 0.06% (2)
run - 0.06% (2)
requires - 0.06% (2)
step - 0.06% (2)
supreme - 0.06% (2)
being - 0.06% (2)
uniform - 0.06% (2)
represented - 0.06% (2)
audit, - 0.06% (2)
"taking" - 0.06% (2)
avoid - 0.06% (2)
comment: - 0.06% (2)
performed - 0.06% (2)
prohibited - 0.06% (2)
upon - 0.06% (2)
ruled - 0.06% (2)
finally - 0.06% (2)
following - 0.06% (2)
attempted - 0.06% (2)
remedied. - 0.06% (2)
be) - 0.06% (2)
compliance - 0.06% (2)
story - 0.06% (2)
nature - 0.06% (2)
subject - 0.06% (2)
made - 0.06% (2)
law, - 0.06% (2)
amendment - 0.06% (2)
that, - 0.06% (2)
context - 0.06% (2)
use. - 0.06% (2)
rejected - 0.06% (2)
holder's - 0.06% (2)
efforts - 0.06% (2)
held - 0.06% (2)
rightful - 0.06% (2)
conscience" - 0.06% (2)
challenge - 0.06% (2)
purpose - 0.06% (2)
10) - 0.06% (2)
retroactively - 0.06% (2)
wait - 0.06% (2)
position - 0.06% (2)
(and - 0.06% (2)
retention - 0.06% (2)
another - 0.06% (2)
then - 0.06% (2)
access - 0.06% (2)
impose - 0.06% (2)
big - 0.06% (2)
based - 0.06% (2)
providing - 0.06% (2)
asserted, - 0.06% (2)
date - 0.06% (2)
state, - 0.06% (2)
expertise - 0.06% (2)
reach - 0.06% (2)
back - 0.06% (2)
potential - 0.06% (2)
deal - 0.06% (2)
negative - 0.06% (2)
laws. - 0.06% (2)
did - 0.06% (2)
appropriate - 0.06% (2)
deferred - 0.06% (2)
specifically, - 0.06% (2)
unclaimed property - 1.28% (40)
he court - 1.02% (32)
the court - 0.99% (31)
temple inland - 0.61% (19)
to the - 0.57% (18)
of the - 0.51% (16)
in the - 0.42% (13)
(1) ►  - 0.38% (12)
(2) ►  - 0.32% (10)
(3) ►  - 0.32% (10)
the state - 0.29% (9)
on the - 0.26% (8)
property audit - 0.26% (8)
property law - 0.22% (7)
due process - 0.22% (7)
that the - 0.22% (7)
by the - 0.22% (7)
mike rato - 0.22% (7)
use of - 0.22% (7)
(4) ►  - 0.19% (6)
(6) ►  - 0.19% (6)
ex post - 0.19% (6)
post facto - 0.19% (6)
the ex - 0.19% (6)
►  july - 0.19% (6)
►  september - 0.19% (6)
►  february - 0.19% (6)
of delaware - 0.19% (6)
(5) ►  - 0.19% (6)
►  march - 0.19% (6)
►  april - 0.19% (6)
►  january - 0.19% (6)
►  august - 0.19% (6)
►  october - 0.19% (6)
temple inland's - 0.19% (6)
under the - 0.16% (5)
►  june - 0.16% (5)
(11) ►  - 0.16% (5)
the proper - 0.16% (5)
of temple - 0.16% (5)
the audit - 0.16% (5)
post email - 0.16% (5)
twittershare to - 0.16% (5)
►  may - 0.16% (5)
►  november - 0.16% (5)
posted by - 0.16% (5)
facebookshare to - 0.16% (5)
to this - 0.16% (5)
thisblogthis!share to - 0.16% (5)
the property - 0.13% (4)
an unclaimed - 0.13% (4)
the commonwealth - 0.13% (4)
while the - 0.13% (4)
the case - 0.13% (4)
for the - 0.13% (4)
that delaware - 0.13% (4)
the estimation - 0.13% (4)
holder community - 0.13% (4)
the holder - 0.13% (4)
the unclaimed - 0.13% (4)
the due - 0.13% (4)
act that - 0.13% (4)
facto clause - 0.13% (4)
court recognized - 0.13% (4)
►  december - 0.13% (4)
of delaware's - 0.1% (3)
is not - 0.1% (3)
september (1) - 0.1% (3)
contingent fee - 0.1% (3)
the temple - 0.1% (3)
new jersey - 0.1% (3)
decision on - 0.1% (3)
audits a - 0.1% (3)
an unconstitutional - 0.1% (3)
. that - 0.1% (3)
this is - 0.1% (3)
particular, the - 0.1% (3)
august (5) - 0.1% (3)
are not - 0.1% (3)
and the - 0.1% (3)
violated the - 0.1% (3)
for public - 0.1% (3)
in particular, - 0.1% (3)
department of - 0.1% (3)
inland's property - 0.1% (3)
taking of - 0.1% (3)
on this - 0.1% (3)
the parties - 0.1% (3)
the fact - 0.1% (3)
does not - 0.1% (3)
property to - 0.1% (3)
a person - 0.1% (3)
the commonwealth. - 0.1% (3)
his or - 0.1% (3)
open the - 0.1% (3)
the new - 0.1% (3)
to unclaimed - 0.1% (3)
comments: links - 0.1% (3)
dormancy period - 0.1% (3)
or her - 0.1% (3)
property laws - 0.1% (3)
delaware's unclaimed - 0.1% (3)
of unclaimed - 0.1% (3)
property is - 0.06% (2)
the way - 0.06% (2)
unclaimed funds - 0.06% (2)
property professionals - 0.06% (2)
all comments - 0.06% (2)
that all - 0.06% (2)
new york - 0.06% (2)
an attorney - 0.06% (2)
to cause - 0.06% (2)
law requires - 0.06% (2)
pinterest monday, - 0.06% (2)
but the - 0.06% (2)
the department - 0.06% (2)
ira account, - 0.06% (2)
of revenue - 0.06% (2)
august (1) - 0.06% (2)
because the - 0.06% (2)
more likely - 0.06% (2)
for information - 0.06% (2)
the state's - 0.06% (2)
not be - 0.06% (2)
it will - 0.06% (2)
march (3) - 0.06% (2)
on any - 0.06% (2)
this blog - 0.06% (2)
interest in - 0.06% (2)
(16) ►  - 0.06% (2)
changes ira - 0.06% (2)
to make - 0.06% (2)
must begin - 0.06% (2)
other words, - 0.06% (2)
june (4) - 0.06% (2)
for iras - 0.06% (2)
if the - 0.06% (2)
july (1) - 0.06% (2)
to run - 0.06% (2)
the dormancy - 0.06% (2)
february (3) - 0.06% (2)
account statements - 0.06% (2)
there are - 0.06% (2)
february (2) - 0.06% (2)
and temple - 0.06% (2)
april (1) - 0.06% (2)
house bill - 0.06% (2)
a decision - 0.06% (2)
2016 a - 0.06% (2)
court to - 0.06% (2)
have been - 0.06% (2)
conscience" of - 0.06% (2)
about delaware's - 0.06% (2)
court recognized, - 0.06% (2)
estimation was - 0.06% (2)
owner-unknown property - 0.06% (2)
public information - 0.06% (2)
the following - 0.06% (2)
the u.s. - 0.06% (2)
the the - 0.06% (2)
suit in - 0.06% (2)
law blog - 0.06% (2)
out the - 0.06% (2)
parties moved - 0.06% (2)
you with - 0.06% (2)
the underlying - 0.06% (2)
is worth - 0.06% (2)
what is - 0.06% (2)
clause of - 0.06% (2)
comment: links - 0.06% (2)
filed a - 0.06% (2)
texas v. - 0.06% (2)
supreme court's - 0.06% (2)
property liabilities - 0.06% (2)
all claims - 0.06% (2)
dismiss the - 0.06% (2)
look at - 0.06% (2)
left to - 0.06% (2)
to take - 0.06% (2)
that no - 0.06% (2)
the conscience" - 0.06% (2)
process rights - 0.06% (2)
the court's - 0.06% (2)
property audits - 0.06% (2)
delaware on - 0.06% (2)
found in - 0.06% (2)
a holder's - 0.06% (2)
the taking - 0.06% (2)
that an - 0.06% (2)
use. the - 0.06% (2)
has been - 0.06% (2)
expressly left - 0.06% (2)
issue of - 0.06% (2)
of its - 0.06% (2)
in its - 0.06% (2)
able to - 0.06% (2)
the same - 0.06% (2)
how delaware's - 0.06% (2)
owed in - 0.06% (2)
that we - 0.06% (2)
that it - 0.06% (2)
filed by - 0.06% (2)
the use - 0.06% (2)
unclaimed property law - 0.19% (6)
ex post facto - 0.19% (6)
by mike rato - 0.16% (5)
thisblogthis!share to twittershare - 0.16% (5)
to this post - 0.16% (5)
email thisblogthis!share to - 0.16% (5)
twittershare to facebookshare - 0.16% (5)
of temple inland - 0.16% (5)
the ex post - 0.16% (5)
to facebookshare to - 0.16% (5)
this post email - 0.16% (5)
mike rato at - 0.16% (5)
posted by mike - 0.16% (5)
links to this - 0.16% (5)
post email thisblogthis!share - 0.16% (5)
to twittershare to - 0.16% (5)
facebookshare to pinterest - 0.16% (5)
the court recognized - 0.13% (4)
the due process - 0.13% (4)
an unclaimed property - 0.13% (4)
the unclaimed property - 0.13% (4)
delaware's unclaimed property - 0.1% (3)
►  august (5) - 0.1% (3)
due process clause - 0.1% (3)
comments: links to - 0.1% (3)
the holder community - 0.1% (3)
unclaimed property laws - 0.1% (3)
the fact that - 0.1% (3)
he or she - 0.06% (2)
taking of a - 0.06% (2)
the court found - 0.06% (2)
the court recognized, - 0.06% (2)
it is unclear - 0.06% (2)
expressly left open - 0.06% (2)
the issue of - 0.06% (2)
how delaware's violation - 0.06% (2)
to the commonwealth. - 0.06% (2)
the dormancy period - 0.06% (2)
temple inland case - 0.06% (2)
decision on the - 0.06% (2)
changes ira rules - 0.06% (2)
►  august (1) - 0.06% (2)
►  july (1) - 0.06% (2)
►  april (1) - 0.06% (2)
►  march (3) - 0.06% (2)
►  february (2) - 0.06% (2)
►  september (1) - 0.06% (2)
►  march (2) - 0.06% (2)
►  february (3) - 0.06% (2)
►  july (5) - 0.06% (2)
►  june (4) - 0.06% (2)
department of revenue - 0.06% (2)
its unclaimed property - 0.06% (2)
to dismiss the - 0.06% (2)
in the audit - 0.06% (2)
according to a - 0.06% (2)
2 comments: links - 0.06% (2)
to be remedied. - 0.06% (2)
issue of how - 0.06% (2)
left open the - 0.06% (2)
to the owner - 0.06% (2)
comment: links to - 0.06% (2)
inland filed a - 0.06% (2)
state of delaware - 0.06% (2)
unclaimed property liabilities - 0.06% (2)
use of estimation - 0.06% (2)
texas v. new - 0.06% (2)
the court ruled - 0.06% (2)
pennsylvania changes ira - 0.06% (2)
due process rights - 0.06% (2)
both parties moved - 0.06% (2)
the use of - 0.06% (2)
the court to - 0.06% (2)
the conscience" of - 0.06% (2)
unconstitutional taking of - 0.06% (2)
and temple inland - 0.06% (2)
particular, the court - 0.06% (2)
as the court - 0.06% (2)
conscience" of the - 0.06% (2)
property law blog - 0.06% (2)

Here you can find chart of all your popular one, two and three word phrases. Google and others search engines means your page is about words you use frequently.

Copyright © 2015-2016 hupso.pl. All rights reserved. FB | +G | Twitter

Hupso.pl jest serwisem internetowym, w którym jednym kliknieciem możesz szybko i łatwo sprawdź stronę www pod kątem SEO. Oferujemy darmowe pozycjonowanie stron internetowych oraz wycena domen i stron internetowych. Prowadzimy ranking polskich stron internetowych oraz ranking stron alexa.