1.99 score from hupso.pl for:
engageonline.wordpress.com



HTML Content


Titleengage | the anti-racist campaign against antisemitism

Length: 54, Words: 6
Description the anti-racist campaign against antisemitism

Length: 45, Words: 5
Keywords pusty
Robots
Charset UTF-8
Og Meta - Title exist
Og Meta - Description exist
Og Meta - Site name exist
Tytuł powinien zawierać pomiędzy 10 a 70 znaków (ze spacjami), a mniej niż 12 słów w długości.
Meta opis powinien zawierać pomiędzy 50 a 160 znaków (łącznie ze spacjami), a mniej niż 24 słów w długości.
Kodowanie znaków powinny być określone , UTF-8 jest chyba najlepszy zestaw znaków, aby przejść z powodu UTF-8 jest bardziej międzynarodowy kodowaniem.
Otwarte obiekty wykresu powinny być obecne w stronie internetowej (więcej informacji na temat protokołu OpenGraph: http://ogp.me/)

SEO Content

Words/Characters 4638
Text/HTML 19.92 %
Headings H1 2
H2 22
H3 14
H4 0
H5 0
H6 0
H1
engage
H2
about engage
sign up
archives
posts by date
categories
admin
“conspiracy”  by marlon solomon showing in manchester, july 23rd to july 28th.
bongani masuku and cosatu found guilty of antisemitic hate speech in the sa equality court
masuku should say sorry to south africa – david hirsh
how racism and conspiracy theory creeps into legitimate discourse – anti-nazis united
a powerful judgement in the battle for truth about anti-semitism – jeff samuels
statement in the masuku case by expert witness david hirsh
the masuku judgement
search
subscribe
recent posts
recent comments
engage on twitter
academic
blogroll
peace and coexistence
top posts
H3
share this:
like this:
share this:
like this:
share this:
like this:
share this:
like this:
share this:
like this:
share this:
like this:
share this:
like this:
H4
H5
H6
strong
follow this link for a piece by david hirsh in the sa press, which outlines the importance of the case.
follow this link for the response from cosatu
follow this link for the full judgment.
follow this link for the expert witness testimony of david hirsh
follow this link for the motion which was passed at ucu congress, refusing to dissociate itself from bongani masuku’s “repugnant” views.
follow this link for david hirsh’s piece in the jewish chronicle about masuku and the ucu.
follow this link for the analysis written by jeff samuels qc of the masuku judgment. 
this piece, by david hirsh
, appeared in the jewish chronicle, 7 july 2017.
this piece, by david hirsh, appeared in the jewish chronicle, 7 july 2017.
follow this link
this piece, by jeff samuels, is from the jewish news website. 
the background
the defence
the judgement
assessment of the significance of the judgement: why is the decision so important?
the source
a
nti-semitic in effect regardless of intention
‘zionist shill’, ‘hasbara agent’
overview
this piece, by jeff samuels, is from the jewish news website. 
b
follow this link for a piece by david hirsh in the sa press, which outlines the importance of the case.
follow this link for the response from cosatu
follow this link for the full judgment.
follow this link for the expert witness testimony of david hirsh
follow this link for the motion which was passed at ucu congress, refusing to dissociate itself from bongani masuku’s “repugnant” views.
follow this link for david hirsh’s piece in the jewish chronicle about masuku and the ucu.
follow this link for the analysis written by jeff samuels qc of the masuku judgment. 
this piece, by david hirsh
, appeared in the jewish chronicle, 7 july 2017.
this piece, by david hirsh, appeared in the jewish chronicle, 7 july 2017.
follow this link
this piece, by jeff samuels, is from the jewish news website. 
the background
the defence
the judgement
assessment of the significance of the judgement: why is the decision so important?
the source
a
nti-semitic in effect regardless of intention
‘zionist shill’, ‘hasbara agent’
overview
this piece, by jeff samuels, is from the jewish news website. 
i
em follow this link for a piece by david hirsh in the sa press, which outlines the importance of the case.
follow this link for the response from cosatu
follow this link for the full judgment.
follow this link for the expert witness testimony of david hirsh
follow this link for the motion which was passed at ucu congress, refusing to dissociate itself from bongani masuku’s “repugnant” views.
follow this link for david hirsh’s piece in the jewish chronicle about masuku and the ucu.
follow this link for the analysis written by jeff samuels qc of the masuku judgment. 
this piece, by david hirsh
, appeared in the jewish chronicle, 7 july 2017.
this piece, by david hirsh, appeared in the jewish chronicle, 7 july 2017.
follow this link
this piece, by jeff samuels, is from the jewish news website. 
the background
the defence
the judgement
assessment of the significance of the judgement: why is the decision so important?
the source
a
nti-semitic in effect regardless of intention
‘zionist shill’, ‘hasbara agent’
overview
this piece, by jeff samuels, is from the jewish news website. 
Bolds strong 22
b 22
i 0
em 22
Zawartość strony internetowej powinno zawierać więcej niż 250 słów, z stopa tekst / kod jest wyższy niż 20%.
Pozycji używać znaczników (h1, h2, h3, ...), aby określić temat sekcji lub ustępów na stronie, ale zwykle, użyj mniej niż 6 dla każdego tagu pozycje zachować swoją stronę zwięzły.
Styl używać silnych i kursywy znaczniki podkreślić swoje słowa kluczowe swojej stronie, ale nie nadużywać (mniej niż 16 silnych tagi i 16 znaczników kursywy)

Statystyki strony

twitter:title pusty
twitter:description pusty
google+ itemprop=name pusty
Pliki zewnętrzne 28
Pliki CSS 6
Pliki javascript 22
Plik należy zmniejszyć całkowite odwołanie plików (CSS + JavaScript) do 7-8 maksymalnie.

Linki wewnętrzne i zewnętrzne

Linki 243
Linki wewnętrzne 9
Linki zewnętrzne 234
Linki bez atrybutu Title 212
Linki z atrybutem NOFOLLOW 0
Linki - Użyj atrybutu tytuł dla każdego łącza. Nofollow link jest link, który nie pozwala wyszukiwarkom boty zrealizują są odnośniki no follow. Należy zwracać uwagę na ich użytkowania

Linki wewnętrzne

cancel #
cancel #cancel

Linki zewnętrzne

engage https://engageonline.wordpress.com/
about engage https://engageonline.wordpress.com/about-engage/
anti-boycott arguments https://engageonline.wordpress.com/key-anti-boycott-arguments/
comments policy https://engageonline.wordpress.com/comments-policy/
engage journal https://engageonline.wordpress.com/engage-journal/
links https://engageonline.wordpress.com/links/
that’s funny – steve c https://engageonline.wordpress.com/thats-funny-you-dont-look-antisemitic-steve-cohen/
ucu 06-08 https://engageonline.wordpress.com/some-links-from-the-struggles-against-antisemitism-in-ucu-2006-8/
what they say about us https://engageonline.wordpress.com/what-they-say-about-us/
front page http://www.engageonline.org.uk
about us https://engageonline.wordpress.com/about-engage/
engage on twitter http://twitter.com/engageonline
engage journal https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2015/11/04/engage-journal-2006-2007/
engage up to 2009 http://www.engageonline.org.uk/blog/index2.php
what they say about us https://engageonline.wordpress.com/what-they-say-about-us/
comments policy https://engageonline.wordpress.com/comments-policy/
contact us https://engageonline.wordpress.com/about-engage/contact-engage/
sign up for engage mailings http://www.engageonline.org.uk/blog/article.php?id=1817
archive of engage mailings http://community.icontact.com/p/engageonline/newsletters/no1
« jun https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2017/06/
4 https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2017/07/04/
7 https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2017/07/07/
8 https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2017/07/08/
11 https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2017/07/11/
21 https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2017/07/21/
academics https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/academics/
analogy – apartheid/israel https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/analogy-apartheidisrael/
analogy – holocaust/israel https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/analogy-holocaustisrael/
anti-racism https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/anti-racism/
anti-zionism https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/anti-zionism/
antisemitism https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/antisemitism/
anti-racist antisemitism https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/antisemitism/anti-racist-antisemitism/
antisemitism denial https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/antisemitism/antisemitism-denial/
jewish antisemitism https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/antisemitism/jewish-antisemitism/
open antisemitism https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/antisemitism/open-antisemitism/
street antisemitism https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/antisemitism/street-antisemitism/
art https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/art/
as-a-jew https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/as-a-jew/
book https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/book/
boycott divestment & sanctions https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/boycott-divestment-sanctions/
academic boycott https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/boycott-divestment-sanctions/academic-boycott/
boycott opposition https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/boycott-divestment-sanctions/boycott-opposition/
silent boycott https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/boycott-divestment-sanctions/silent-boycott/
sporting boycott https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/boycott-divestment-sanctions/sporting-boycott/
bridges https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/bridges/
campus activism https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/campus-activism/
cartoons https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/cartoons/
child killing https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/child-killing/
coexistence https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/coexistence/
conflict https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/conflict/
conflict resolution https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/conflict/conflict-resolution/
conspiracy beliefs https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/conspiracy-beliefs/
event https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/event/
free expression https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/free-expression/
gaza https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/gaza/
hamas https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/hamas/
holocaust https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/holocaust/
denial https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/holocaust/denial/
holocaust comparisons https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/holocaust/holocaust-comparisons/
humour https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/humour/
intelligentsia https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/intelligentsia/
iran https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/iran/
israel https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/israel/
jews as proxy israelis https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/jews-as-proxy-israelis/
law https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/law/
letter https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/letter/
media https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/media/
british media https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/media/british-media/
national identity https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/national-identity/
neo-nazi https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/neo-nazi/
palestinians https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/palestinians/
peace activism https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/peace-activism/
religion https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/religion/
suppression https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/suppression/
the left https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/the-left/
swp https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/the-left/swp/
the right https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/the-right/
trade union https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/trade-union/
ucu https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/trade-union/ucu/
uncategorized https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/uncategorized/
united nations https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/united-nations/
register https://wordpress.com/start?ref=wplogin
log in https://engageonline.wordpress.com/wp-login.php
entries rss https://engageonline.wordpress.com/feed/
comments rss https://engageonline.wordpress.com/comments/feed/
wordpress.com https://wordpress.com/
“conspiracy”  by marlon solomon showing in manchester, july 23rd to july 28th. https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2017/07/21/conspiracy-by-marlon-solomon-showing-in-manchester-july-23rd-to-july-28th/
who often writes about antisemitism https://marlonsolomon.wordpress.com
manchester here.  https://www.ticketweb.uk/search?q=conspiracy+theory%3a+a+lizard%27s+tale&org/216863&pl=mff
-
https://engageonline.files.wordpress.com/2017/07/fb_img_1500657649381.jpg
twitter https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2017/07/21/conspiracy-by-marlon-solomon-showing-in-manchester-july-23rd-to-july-28th/?share=twitter
facebook https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2017/07/21/conspiracy-by-marlon-solomon-showing-in-manchester-july-23rd-to-july-28th/?share=facebook
email https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2017/07/21/conspiracy-by-marlon-solomon-showing-in-manchester-july-23rd-to-july-28th/?share=email
reddit https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2017/07/21/conspiracy-by-marlon-solomon-showing-in-manchester-july-23rd-to-july-28th/?share=reddit
uncategorized https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/uncategorized/
1 comment » https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2017/07/21/conspiracy-by-marlon-solomon-showing-in-manchester-july-23rd-to-july-28th/#comments
bongani masuku and cosatu found guilty of antisemitic hate speech in the sa equality court https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2017/07/11/bongani-masuku-and-cosatu-found-guilty-of-antisemitic-hate-speech-in-the-sa-equality-court/
follow this link for a piece by david hirsh in the sa press, which outlines the importance of the case. https://www.businesslive.co.za/bd/opinion/2017-07-11-cosatus-persistent-anti-semitism-defies-constitution/
follow this link for the response from cosatu http://www.cosatu.org.za/show.php?id=12908
follow this link for the full judgment. https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2017/06/29/the-masuku-judgement/
follow this link for the expert witness testimony of david hirsh https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2017/06/30/statement-in-the-masuku-case-by-expert-witness-david-hirsh/
follow this link for the motion which was passed at ucu congress, refusing to dissociate itself from bongani masuku’s “repugnant” views. https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2010/06/01/ucu-congress-backs-antisemitic-speaker/
follow this link for david hirsh’s piece in the jewish chronicle about masuku and the ucu. https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2017/07/08/masuku-should-say-sorry-to-south-africa-david-hirsh/
follow this link for the analysis written by jeff samuels qc of the masuku judgment.  https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2017/07/04/a-powerful-judgement-in-the-battle-for-truth-about-anti-semitism-jeff-samuels/
twitter https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2017/07/11/bongani-masuku-and-cosatu-found-guilty-of-antisemitic-hate-speech-in-the-sa-equality-court/?share=twitter
facebook https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2017/07/11/bongani-masuku-and-cosatu-found-guilty-of-antisemitic-hate-speech-in-the-sa-equality-court/?share=facebook
email https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2017/07/11/bongani-masuku-and-cosatu-found-guilty-of-antisemitic-hate-speech-in-the-sa-equality-court/?share=email
reddit https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2017/07/11/bongani-masuku-and-cosatu-found-guilty-of-antisemitic-hate-speech-in-the-sa-equality-court/?share=reddit
uncategorized https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/uncategorized/
leave a comment » https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2017/07/11/bongani-masuku-and-cosatu-found-guilty-of-antisemitic-hate-speech-in-the-sa-equality-court/#respond
masuku should say sorry to south africa – david hirsh https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2017/07/08/masuku-should-say-sorry-to-south-africa-david-hirsh/
- https://engageonline.files.wordpress.com/2017/07/19665247_10154630378930918_8145114973603143105_n.jpg
follow this link for the full judgment. https://engageonline.files.wordpress.com/2017/06/judgement-sahrc-obo-sajbd-_-mr-masuku-and-cosatu.pdf
follow this link for david hirsh’s expert witness statement. https://engageonline.files.wordpress.com/2017/06/expert-witness-statement-of-david-hirsh-masuku-case.pdf
follow this link for jeff samuels’ commentary.  https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2017/07/04/a-powerful-judgement-in-the-battle-for-truth-about-anti-semitism-jeff-samuels/
twitter https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2017/07/08/masuku-should-say-sorry-to-south-africa-david-hirsh/?share=twitter
facebook https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2017/07/08/masuku-should-say-sorry-to-south-africa-david-hirsh/?share=facebook
email https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2017/07/08/masuku-should-say-sorry-to-south-africa-david-hirsh/?share=email
reddit https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2017/07/08/masuku-should-say-sorry-to-south-africa-david-hirsh/?share=reddit
uncategorized https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/uncategorized/
leave a comment » https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2017/07/08/masuku-should-say-sorry-to-south-africa-david-hirsh/#respond
how racism and conspiracy theory creeps into legitimate discourse – anti-nazis united https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2017/07/07/how-racism-and-conspiracy-theory-creeps-into-legitimate-discourse-anti-nazis-united/
follow this link https://medium.com/@antinazisunited/the-atlantic-the-left-and-the-infection-of-conspiracy-thinking-even-labour-mps-ed3ff6ac31d9
twitter https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2017/07/07/how-racism-and-conspiracy-theory-creeps-into-legitimate-discourse-anti-nazis-united/?share=twitter
facebook https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2017/07/07/how-racism-and-conspiracy-theory-creeps-into-legitimate-discourse-anti-nazis-united/?share=facebook
email https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2017/07/07/how-racism-and-conspiracy-theory-creeps-into-legitimate-discourse-anti-nazis-united/?share=email
reddit https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2017/07/07/how-racism-and-conspiracy-theory-creeps-into-legitimate-discourse-anti-nazis-united/?share=reddit
uncategorized https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/uncategorized/
1 comment » https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2017/07/07/how-racism-and-conspiracy-theory-creeps-into-legitimate-discourse-anti-nazis-united/#comments
a powerful judgement in the battle for truth about anti-semitism – jeff samuels https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2017/07/04/a-powerful-judgement-in-the-battle-for-truth-about-anti-semitism-jeff-samuels/
- https://engageonline.files.wordpress.com/2017/07/jeff-samuels-medium.jpg
this piece, by jeff samuels, is from the jewish news website.  http://blogs.timesofisrael.com/a-powerful-judgement-in-the-battle-for-the-truth-about-anti-semitism/
this piece, by jeff samuels, is from the jewish news website.  http://blogs.timesofisrael.com/a-powerful-judgement-in-the-battle-for-the-truth-about-anti-semitism/
twitter https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2017/07/04/a-powerful-judgement-in-the-battle-for-truth-about-anti-semitism-jeff-samuels/?share=twitter
facebook https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2017/07/04/a-powerful-judgement-in-the-battle-for-truth-about-anti-semitism-jeff-samuels/?share=facebook
email https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2017/07/04/a-powerful-judgement-in-the-battle-for-truth-about-anti-semitism-jeff-samuels/?share=email
reddit https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2017/07/04/a-powerful-judgement-in-the-battle-for-truth-about-anti-semitism-jeff-samuels/?share=reddit
uncategorized https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/uncategorized/
leave a comment » https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2017/07/04/a-powerful-judgement-in-the-battle-for-truth-about-anti-semitism-jeff-samuels/#respond
statement in the masuku case by expert witness david hirsh https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2017/06/30/statement-in-the-masuku-case-by-expert-witness-david-hirsh/
expert witness statement of david hirsh masuku case https://engageonline.files.wordpress.com/2017/06/expert-witness-statement-of-david-hirsh-masuku-case.pdf
twitter https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2017/06/30/statement-in-the-masuku-case-by-expert-witness-david-hirsh/?share=twitter
facebook https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2017/06/30/statement-in-the-masuku-case-by-expert-witness-david-hirsh/?share=facebook
email https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2017/06/30/statement-in-the-masuku-case-by-expert-witness-david-hirsh/?share=email
reddit https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2017/06/30/statement-in-the-masuku-case-by-expert-witness-david-hirsh/?share=reddit
uncategorized https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/uncategorized/
1 comment » https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2017/06/30/statement-in-the-masuku-case-by-expert-witness-david-hirsh/#comments
the masuku judgement https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2017/06/29/the-masuku-judgement/
judgement (sahrc obo sajbd _ mr masuku and cosatu) https://engageonline.files.wordpress.com/2017/06/judgement-sahrc-obo-sajbd-_-mr-masuku-and-cosatu.pdf
twitter https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2017/06/29/the-masuku-judgement/?share=twitter
facebook https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2017/06/29/the-masuku-judgement/?share=facebook
email https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2017/06/29/the-masuku-judgement/?share=email
reddit https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2017/06/29/the-masuku-judgement/?share=reddit
uncategorized https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/uncategorized/
3 comments » https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2017/06/29/the-masuku-judgement/#comments
« older posts https://engageonline.wordpress.com/page/2/
blog at wordpress.com. https://wordpress.com/?ref=footer_blog
search engage http://www.google.com/coop/cse?cx=001363479571088777852:6_xurirf4uw
rss - posts https://engageonline.wordpress.com/feed/
rss - comments https://engageonline.wordpress.com/comments/feed/
“conspiracy”  by marlon solomon showing in manchester, july 23rd to july 28th. https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2017/07/21/conspiracy-by-marlon-solomon-showing-in-manchester-july-23rd-to-july-28th/
bongani masuku and cosatu found guilty of antisemitic hate speech in the sa equality court https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2017/07/11/bongani-masuku-and-cosatu-found-guilty-of-antisemitic-hate-speech-in-the-sa-equality-court/
masuku should say sorry to south africa – david hirsh https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2017/07/08/masuku-should-say-sorry-to-south-africa-david-hirsh/
how racism and conspiracy theory creeps into legitimate discourse – anti-nazis united https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2017/07/07/how-racism-and-conspiracy-theory-creeps-into-legitimate-discourse-anti-nazis-united/
a powerful judgement in the battle for truth about anti-semitism – jeff samuels https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2017/07/04/a-powerful-judgement-in-the-battle-for-truth-about-anti-semitism-jeff-samuels/
statement in the masuku case by expert witness david hirsh https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2017/06/30/statement-in-the-masuku-case-by-expert-witness-david-hirsh/
the masuku judgement https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2017/06/29/the-masuku-judgement/
documentary film on antisemitism in the labour party and the chakrabarti inquiry https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2017/06/26/documentary-film-on-antisemitism-in-the-labour-party-and-the-chakrabarti-inquiry/
why boycott israeli universities? a response to bricup – a 2007 engage guide https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2017/06/17/why-boycott-israeli-universities-a-response-to-bricup-a-2007-engage-guide/
antisemitic politics knocking on the door of no. 10? – david hirsh https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2017/06/13/antisemitic-politics-knocking-on-the-door-of-no-10-david-hirsh/
academic boycott conference at tcd https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2017/04/13/academic-boycott-conference-at-tcd/#comment-35314
s4r4hbrown http://www.adjb.net/sab/
academic boycott conference at tcd https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2017/04/13/academic-boycott-conference-at-tcd/#comment-35313
academic boycott conference at tcd https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2017/04/13/academic-boycott-conference-at-tcd/#comment-35312
academic boycott conference at tcd https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2017/04/13/academic-boycott-conference-at-tcd/#comment-35311
“conspiracy”  by marlon solomon showing in manchester, july 23rd to july 28th. https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2017/07/21/conspiracy-by-marlon-solomon-showing-in-manchester-july-23rd-to-july-28th/#comment-35305
understanding racists https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2009/07/02/understanding-racists/#comment-35254
anti-nazis united (@antinazisunited) http://twitter.com/antinazisunited
how racism and conspiracy theory creeps into legitimate discourse – anti-nazis united https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2017/07/07/how-racism-and-conspiracy-theory-creeps-into-legitimate-discourse-anti-nazis-united/#comment-35142
the masuku judgement https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2017/06/29/the-masuku-judgement/#comment-35114
josephinebacon http://josephinebacondotcom.wordpress.com
statement in the masuku case by expert witness david hirsh https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2017/06/30/statement-in-the-masuku-case-by-expert-witness-david-hirsh/#comment-35109
the masuku judgement https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2017/06/29/the-masuku-judgement/#comment-35107
engage on twitter http://twitter.com/engageonline
bit.ly/2e9ydk2 http://bit.ly/2e9ydk2
8 months ago http://twitter.com/engageonline/statuses/793474521218949120
bit.ly/2f0msve http://bit.ly/2f0msve
9 months ago http://twitter.com/engageonline/statuses/790590571098234880
bit.ly/2ec6qkl http://bit.ly/2ec6qkl
9 months ago http://twitter.com/engageonline/statuses/790584301557395456
bit.ly/2ebh9hl http://bit.ly/2ebh9hl
9 months ago http://twitter.com/engageonline/statuses/790517323127848960
bit.ly/2em5ghg http://bit.ly/2em5ghg
9 months ago http://twitter.com/engageonline/statuses/788313642617872384
follow @engageonline http://twitter.com/engageonline
brandeis center http://www.brandeiscenter.com/
european institute for the study of contemporary antisemitism http://www.eisca.eu/
european institute for the study of contemporary antisemitism http://www.eisca.eu/
institute for the study of contemporary antisemitism, indiana university http://www.indiana.edu/~iscaweb/index.shtml
journal for the study of antisemitism http://www.jsantisemitism.org/
pears institute for the study of antisemitism http://www.pearsinstitute.bbk.ac.uk/
stephen roth institute for the study of contemporary antisemitism and racism http://www.tau.ac.il/anti-semitism/
the vidal sassoon international center for the study of antisemitism http://sicsa.huji.ac.il/
alliance for workers' liberty http://www.workersliberty.org/
bob from brockley http://brockley.blogspot.com/
european forum on antisemitism http://www.european-forum-on-antisemitism.org
givat haviva http://www.givathaviva.org/
harry's place http://www.hurryupharry.org/
ignoblus http://ignoblus.blogspot.com/
it's complicated http://mideastparalleluniverse.blogspot.com/
meretz uk http://britishmeretz.blogspot.com/
modernityblog http://modernityblog.wordpress.com/
mystical politics http://mystical-politics.blogspot.com/
normblog http://normblog.typepad.com/
obliged to offend http://www.obligedtooffend.com/
peace now uk http://www.peacenowuk.org/
point of no return http://jewishrefugees.blogspot.com/
scholars for peace in the middle east http://www.spme.net/
the community security trust blog http://thecst.org.uk/blog/
trade unions linking israel and palestine http://www.tuliponline.org/
common ground news service http://www.commongroundnews.org
the abraham fund http://www.abrahamfund.org/
"conspiracy"  by marlon solomon showing in manchester, july 23rd to july 28th. https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2017/07/21/conspiracy-by-marlon-solomon-showing-in-manchester-july-23rd-to-july-28th/
academic boycott conference at tcd https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2017/04/13/academic-boycott-conference-at-tcd/
reply to seth j frantzman, ‘hannah arendt, white supremacist’ - robert fine https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2016/06/16/7958/
the livingstone formulation - david hirsh https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2016/04/29/the-livingstone-formulation-david-hirsh-2/
why bds is antisemitic - david hirsh https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2016/06/01/why-bds-is-antisemitic-david-hirsh/
submission to the labour party enquiry on anti-semitism and other forms of racism. by richard gold, member bury south clp https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2016/07/02/submission-to-the-labour-party-enquiry-on-anti-semitism-and-other-forms-of-racism-by-richard-gold-member-bury-south-clp/
opposing the campaign to exclude israelis from the global academic community https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2014/01/21/opposing-the-campaign-to-exclude-israelis-from-the-global-academic-community/
anti-boycott arguments https://engageonline.wordpress.com/key-anti-boycott-arguments/
documentary film on antisemitism in the labour party and the chakrabarti inquiry https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2017/06/26/documentary-film-on-antisemitism-in-the-labour-party-and-the-chakrabarti-inquiry/
resignation from jews for justice for palestinians - david hirsh https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2016/06/01/resignation-from-jews-for-justice-for-palestinians-david-hirsh/
engage https://engageonline.wordpress.com/
blog at wordpress.com. https://wordpress.com/?ref=footer_blog

Zdjęcia

Zdjęcia 6
Zdjęcia bez atrybutu ALT 5
Zdjęcia bez atrybutu TITLE 6
Korzystanie Obraz ALT i TITLE atrybutu dla każdego obrazu.

Zdjęcia bez atrybutu TITLE

https://engageonline.files.wordpress.com/2017/07/fb_img_1500657649381.jpg?w=780
https://engageonline.files.wordpress.com/2017/07/19665247_10154630378930918_8145114973603143105_n.jpg?w=411&h=226
https://engageonline.files.wordpress.com/2017/07/jeff-samuels-medium.jpg?w=155&h=155
https://engageonline.files.wordpress.com/2010/09/scouring_powder.gif
https://s2.wp.com/wp-content/mu-plugins/post-flair/sharing/images/loading.gif
https://pixel.wp.com/b.gif?v=noscript

Zdjęcia bez atrybutu ALT

https://engageonline.files.wordpress.com/2017/07/fb_img_1500657649381.jpg?w=780
https://engageonline.files.wordpress.com/2017/07/19665247_10154630378930918_8145114973603143105_n.jpg?w=411&h=226
https://engageonline.files.wordpress.com/2017/07/jeff-samuels-medium.jpg?w=155&h=155
https://engageonline.files.wordpress.com/2010/09/scouring_powder.gif
https://pixel.wp.com/b.gif?v=noscript

Ranking:


Alexa Traffic
Daily Global Rank Trend
Daily Reach (Percent)









Majestic SEO











Text on page:

engage about engage anti-boycott arguments comments policy engage journal links that’s funny – steve c ucu 06-08 what they say about us about engage front page about us engage on twitter engage journal engage up to 2009 what they say about us comments policy contact us sign up sign up for engage mailings archive of engage mailings archives archives select month july 2017 (5) june 2017 (5) may 2017 (1) april 2017 (2) march 2017 (1) february 2017 (1) january 2017 (1) december 2016 (4) november 2016 (2) october 2016 (3) september 2016 (3) august 2016 (1) july 2016 (11) june 2016 (8) may 2016 (6) april 2016 (3) march 2016 (4) february 2016 (2) january 2016 (2) december 2015 (1) november 2015 (56) october 2015 (3) september 2015 (6) august 2015 (4) july 2015 (1) june 2015 (1) may 2015 (1) april 2015 (4) march 2015 (7) february 2015 (2) january 2015 (3) december 2014 (2) november 2014 (3) september 2014 (1) august 2014 (3) july 2014 (3) june 2014 (1) may 2014 (1) april 2014 (2) march 2014 (4) february 2014 (8) january 2014 (8) december 2013 (7) november 2013 (1) october 2013 (6) september 2013 (1) august 2013 (1) july 2013 (10) june 2013 (3) may 2013 (8) april 2013 (9) march 2013 (6) february 2013 (5) january 2013 (4) december 2012 (3) october 2012 (2) september 2012 (1) august 2012 (3) july 2012 (3) june 2012 (2) may 2012 (5) april 2012 (6) march 2012 (3) february 2012 (1) january 2012 (2) december 2011 (1) november 2011 (12) october 2011 (5) september 2011 (18) august 2011 (12) july 2011 (42) june 2011 (48) may 2011 (30) april 2011 (17) march 2011 (15) february 2011 (9) january 2011 (9) december 2010 (12) november 2010 (17) october 2010 (28) september 2010 (20) august 2010 (9) july 2010 (16) june 2010 (21) may 2010 (15) april 2010 (22) march 2010 (9) february 2010 (15) january 2010 (15) december 2009 (28) november 2009 (34) october 2009 (15) september 2009 (14) august 2009 (10) july 2009 (16) june 2009 (24) may 2009 (45) april 2009 (36) march 2009 (71) february 2009 (52) january 2009 (86) december 2008 (17) november 2008 (4) september 2008 (1) august 2008 (1) may 2008 (2) april 2008 (1) february 2008 (2) january 2008 (1) may 2007 (2) november 2006 (1) september 2006 (3) august 2006 (2) may 2006 (1) march 2006 (1) november 2005 (1) october 2005 (3) september 2005 (5) july 2005 (1) may 2005 (1) posts by date july 2017 m t w t f s s « jun 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 categories academics (150) analogy – apartheid/israel (37) analogy – holocaust/israel (36) anti-racism (45) anti-zionism (139) antisemitism (315) anti-racist antisemitism (61) antisemitism denial (34) jewish antisemitism (17) open antisemitism (40) street antisemitism (19) art (21) as-a-jew (37) book (6) boycott divestment & sanctions (202) academic boycott (97) boycott opposition (44) silent boycott (1) sporting boycott (2) bridges (1) campus activism (38) cartoons (5) child killing (8) coexistence (24) conflict (37) conflict resolution (20) conspiracy beliefs (34) event (22) free expression (36) gaza (27) hamas (18) holocaust (57) denial (21) holocaust comparisons (16) humour (1) intelligentsia (13) iran (21) israel (70) jews as proxy israelis (25) law (10) letter (13) media (42) british media (29) national identity (14) neo-nazi (8) palestinians (33) peace activism (23) religion (3) suppression (17) the left (91) swp (12) the right (30) trade union (100) ucu (74) uncategorized (541) united nations (12) admin register log in entries rss comments rss wordpress.com “conspiracy”  by marlon solomon showing in manchester, july 23rd to july 28th. july 21, 2017 — richard gold many of you will know marlon as a blogger who often writes about antisemitism. “marlon’s a jew. this didn’t bother him until he realised that some people he knew didn’t believe the holocaust happened. a darkly comic tale of one man’s journey through the conspiracy underworld. marlon examines why conspiracy theories are more popular than ever and how fake news gives rise to ancient slander. a comic tale which is no laughing matter.” you can purchase tickets for his show in manchester here. share this:twitterfacebookemailredditlike this:like loading... posted in uncategorized. 1 comment » bongani masuku and cosatu found guilty of antisemitic hate speech in the sa equality court july 11, 2017 — david hirsh on 29 june judgment was handed down in johannesburg’s equality court, unequivocally upholding a south african human rights commission ruling that cosatu international relations spokesman bongani masuku had been guilty of anti-semitic hate speech. in 2009, he threatened at wits university to mobilise cosatu members on campus to make life there “hell” for people he called “zionists”. he threatened violence, “with immediate effect” against families in sa whose children had moved to israel and served in its army. he threatened concrete harm against people who lived in orange grove, known as a jewish neighbourhood, who did not agree with him about israeli politics. on a website, masuku wrote about the overwhelming majority of living jews, those who in one way or another identify with israel, as though they were supporters of racism and fascism. to drive his point home about those jews, including those who live in sa, he wrote hitler was their friend. masuku said those jews he defines as “zionists” should be forced out of sa. he threatened to make the people in sa, whom he defined in this way, drink “bitter medicine”. follow this link for a piece by david hirsh in the sa press, which outlines the importance of the case. masuku and cosatu persistently mis-represent what they did as “criticism of israel” and as “solidarity with the palestinians”: “this was not just a trial against cosatu and its international secretary, bongani masuku,” said cosatu, “but effectively a trial against workers rights to offer solidarity, freedom of expression and the struggle for justice and dignity for all.” follow this link for the response from cosatu in its response cosatu divides jews into good jews and bad jews, jews who are with the struggle and jews who are against the struggle.  the representative institutions of the jewish community are defined as being pro-aprtheid, pro-imperialist, dishonest, zionist and racist.  on the other hand, cosatu says that “the proud record of heroic jews in our ranks, who selflessly fought against apartheid, such as joe slovo, the former chief of staff of the anc military wing, umkhonto wesizwe (mk), dennis goldberg rivonia trialist with former president nelson mandela, and many other great stalwarts of our revolution, will forever inspire our struggle for full equality, freedom and justice for all.” this dishonest characterization of south african jews portrays most ordinary jews who identify, in one way or another, with israel as being racist and pro-apartheid while it portrays antizionist jews as the only good antiracist jews. in the trial before the equality court, cosatu relied upon the expert testimony of an antizionist jew, steven friedman.  the judge was clear in his judgment that “as a jew” does not constitute expertise.  he wrote that friedman’s evidence was “trite” and “partisan”.  he wrote: “although the evidence shows that friedman has immense interest in these matters, these have not been the focus of his academic career”. follow this link for the full judgment. follow this link for the expert witness testimony of david hirsh, which explains the issues in the case and which goes through the complex relationships between hostility to israel, antisemitism and jewish identity. we in britain first knew of bongani masuku in 2009 when the university and college union (ucu) invited cosatu to send a delegate to a behind-closed-doors conference on boycotting israel. a year later, ucu had time to think carefully about what mr masuku had said, and to understand the significance of the human rights commissions finding of antisemitism.  michael yudkin, a world renowned scientist, took a motion to ucu congress from the oxford branch. the motion said: ‘congress dissociates itself from masuku’s repugnant views.’  ucu congress explicitly refused to dissociate itself in that way from mr masuku’s antisemitism. follow this link for the motion which was passed at ucu congress, refusing to dissociate itself from bongani masuku’s “repugnant” views. follow this link for david hirsh’s piece in the jewish chronicle about masuku and the ucu. follow this link for the analysis written by jeff samuels qc of the masuku judgment.  share this:twitterfacebookemailredditlike this:like loading... posted in uncategorized. leave a comment » masuku should say sorry to south africa – david hirsh july 8, 2017 — david hirsh this piece, by david hirsh, appeared in the jewish chronicle, 7 july 2017. we in britain first knew of bongani masuku in 2009 when the university and college union (ucu) invited cosatu, the confederation of south african trade unions, to send a delegate to a behind-closed-doors conference on boycotting israel. we learned that mr masuku, cosatu’s delegate, had been conducting a campaign of antisemitic intimidation in south africa. that year, at wits university in johannesburg, he had threatened to mobilize cosatu members on campus to make life ‘hell’ for people there who he designated as ‘zionists’. he threatened violence, ‘with immediate effect,’ against families in south africa whose children had moved to israel and served in its army.  he threatened harm against people who lived in orange grove, known as a jewish neighbourhood, who disagreed with him about israeli politics. on a blog, mr masuku wrote that zionists were supporters of racism and fascism; and to drive his point home he wrote that hitler was their friend. he said that zionists should be forced to leave south africa.  he threatened to make zionists drink ‘bitter medicine’. we reported these concerns to ucu officials in britain but we were told that they did not respond to gossip on websites. the south african jewish board of deputies took mr masuku to the south african human rights commission (sahrc), arguing that he was guilty of antisemitic hate speech.  the sahrc is a constitutional body of the new antiracist south african state. it looked at the evidence and found mr masuku guilty; it ordered him to apologize to the jewish community. mr masuku ignored the finding and refused to apologize.  the palestine solidarity movement, the boycott divestment sanctions campaign and cosatu stood by him.  they said that these allegations of antisemitism were a dishonest and disgraceful ruse by the south african jews to silence criticism of israel. even after the human rights commission had found mr masuku guilty of antisemitism, the ucu in britain still hosted him and paid for his trip. a year later, ucu had time to think carefully about what mr masuku had said, and to understand the significance of the hrc’s finding of antisemitism.  michael yudkin, a world renowned scientist, took a motion to ucu congress from the oxford branch. the motion said: ‘congress dissociates itself from masuku’s repugnant views.’  ucu congress explicitly refused to dissociate itself in that way from mr masuku’s antisemitism. with bongani masuku still scornful of the hrc’s finding, the hrc, together with the south african jewish board of deputies, took the masuku case to the equality court in johannesburg, asking for the finding to be legally enforced. the case was heard in february this year.  i was asked to appear as an expert witness for the hrc and to explain to the court why what masuku had said and written was antisemitic. cosatu put up a formidable defence. bongani masuku had been making criticisms of israel, it said, and he had been campaigning in solidarity with the palestinians.  cosatu produced a jewish antizionist as an expert witness, who claimed that nothing masuku had said could be interpreted as being antisemitic, since it only targeted zionists, not jews.  i explained to the court something of the complexities of jewish identity and history. i told the court that it is wrong to ask what zionism really is; the relevant question is what bongani masuku means by ‘zionism’ as he strives to force the identity upon his enemies, and by which he designates them as racists, fascists and friends of hitler. it seems inexplicable that the palestine solidarity movement, the boycotters and the university and college union stood by bongani masuku to the bitter end, in the face of such evidence.  but to admit that hostility to israel is sometimes antisemitic would fatally disrupt their strategy of complete denial and counter-accusation of zionist conspiracy to smear and to silence. the constitution of the rainbow nation aims to maintain respectful co-existence between different communities in south africa.  in this spirit, mr masuku is ordered to apologize to the jewish community. i think it would have been more powerful if the court had ordered him to apologize not to the jews, but to the constitution and to the state itself.  antisemitism is not only a harm to jews, it is a harm to the whole community. this piece, by david hirsh, appeared in the jewish chronicle, 7 july 2017. follow this link for the full judgment. follow this link for david hirsh’s expert witness statement. follow this link for jeff samuels’ commentary.  share this:twitterfacebookemailredditlike this:like loading... posted in uncategorized. leave a comment » how racism and conspiracy theory creeps into legitimate discourse – anti-nazis united july 7, 2017 — david hirsh blogger ‘anti-nazis united’ has followed some connections online and shows us why people need to be extremely careful about what sources they rely on and with whom they end up in conversation.  follow this link to ‘the atlantic, the left and the infection of conspiracy thinking, even close-by labour mps.’ share this:twitterfacebookemailredditlike this:like loading... posted in uncategorized. 1 comment » a powerful judgement in the battle for truth about anti-semitism – jeff samuels july 4, 2017 — david hirsh jeff samuels this piece, by jeff samuels, is from the jewish news website.  how often when you encounter thinly veiled or indeed naked anti-semitism are you met with the riposte: “it is not anti-semitic to be anti-zionist; it is legitimate criticism of israel; you are only raising the false charge to stifle debate/criticism of israel or to smear the left”, and so ad nauseam?  well, a significant development occurred this week which may have a considerable bearing on the debate around these issues but has been met by near total obliviousness by friend and foe alike. the reason for the near silence in the press and on social media alike is unclear but maybe because it all occurred thousands of miles away from israel, the uk and the us.  on 29th june mr. justice moshidi, a high court judge, sitting in the south african equality court delivered his judgement in what has been referred to as the bongani masuku case. perhaps because it runs to 56 pages of largely legalistic discourse around the relevant legislation it has not made the impact it might otherwise have done. as someone with a lifetime in the law behind him coupled with a comparably durable study of anti-semitism i have been asked to assess the significance of the judgement in an (hopefully) accessible fashion. the background bongani masuku is the international relations secretary of cosatu ( the sa equivalent of the tuc). in early 2009 at a number of meetings organised by the palestine solidarity campaign he made a number of statements to which the south african board of deputies took exception on behalf of the jewish community. “as we struggle to liberate palestine from the racists, fascists and zionists who belong to the era of their friend hitler, we must not apologise. every zionist must be made to drink the bitter medicine they are feeding our brethren and sisters in palestine. we must target them, expose them and do all that is needed to subject them to perpetual suffering until they withdraw from the land of others and stop their savage attacks on human dignity. every palestinian who suffers is a direct attack on all of us. cosatu is a tripartite alliance the ruling anc party. a vote for the anc is a vote for bongani” (10.2.2009) “cosatu has got members here even on this campus. we can make sure that for that side it will be hell”  “the following things are going to apply : any south african family, i want to repeat it so it is clear for anyone, any south african family who sends his son or daughter to be part of the idf must not blame us when something happens to them with immediate effect” (5.3.2009 psc rally at wits university) “cosatu is with you, we will do everything to make sure whether it is at wits, whether it is at orange grove, anyone who does not support equality and dignity, who does not support the rights of other people must face the consequences even if it means that we will do something that may necessarily cause what is regarded as harm” unlike the uk, south africa has a unique and dedicated system for dealing with issues of this kind. following the collapse of apartheid a new constitution was enacted of which section 9 established a human rights commission. it was to this body that complaint was made, the essence of which was that masuku’s utterances contravened section 10 (1) of what is commonly known as the equality act 2000.  that section was introduced to protect individuals and communities in the new south africa from what is described as (and defined) “hate speech”. it also provides for remedies in the event that such is proven. in due course the hrc did indeed uphold the complaint and requested that masuku apologise. he categorically refused. the palestine solidarity campaign, who had organised the rally at which some of the ‘impugned statements’ had been made denounced the decision of the hrc as a “pack of lies” and went on to accuse the jewish community of “constant, frivolous and false accusations of anti-semitism” (sound familiar?!). regrettably the hrc has no powers of enforcement of its decisions. for that the issue has to go before the equality court, effectively a dedicated subdivision of the high court of south africa, again established post apartheid. the human rights commission and the south african jewish board of deputies brought the case to court. the trial hearing itself took place earlier this year with inter alia david hirsh being called as an expert witness. on a side note (but one not without significance) some years ago, and in full knowledge of the statements made by masuku, the university and college union together with bricup (an organisation comprising a number of prominent left wingers) invited masuku to the uk to deliver a number of lectures. efforts to have the invitation cancelled were rejected and dismissed as racist. the annual conference of ucu stood by masuku and declined to condemn his statements.  the defence masuku contended his remarks were not hate speech. he was referring to zionists not jews, he said; a distinction which in this context the judge was later to describe as having “no merit at all”. his comments were intended only as criticism of zionism and israel and were either true or fair comment and thus protected free speech. (the right to free speech is protected under south african legislation but is limited by section 10 as outlined above). i feel sure that masuku’s defence is one that the reader will have encountered with a frequency bordering on tedium.  the judgement the judgement surveys the legislation involved and the relevant case law which may be impenetrable to many. for the purpose of this article i summarise the main points which i consider to be of significance: the judge ruled that the ‘impugned statements’ were “offensive and targeted at the jewish community”. note that this judgement was arrived at despite masuku hardly even jews. references by masuku to “wits” (a campus with a significant jewish population) and “orange grove” (a predominantly jewish area) also constituted hate speech again despite the word jews not being mentioned. the defence that the comments were true and/or fair comment had “no merit at all” and that masuku’s stated intentions behind the remarks were “wholly irrelevant” and that these comments were “unequivocally a reference to jews”. the judge went on to conclude that what was done by masuku was “to instill detestation, enmity, ill will and malevolence towards jews in south africa. it is distinct advocacy of hatred – nothing else”. powerful stuff! and finally for good measure… “the bottom line… objectively assessed… must readily be understood to be concerning jews” and that the argument advanced on behalf of masuku “that the statements have nothing to do with jewish people… is without credence”. (for the sake of completeness i add that the judge has ordered within 30 days masuku to issue a full and unequivocal apology for the remarks made that the judge clearly found to constitute hate speech. a failure to comply with the order is treated in the same way that any breach of a court order might be with the ultimate sanction for disobedience being imprisonment).  assessment of the significance of the judgement: why is the decision so important? a.                the source – to my mind, in the near constant struggle and debate around anti-semitism, this decision is of considerable significance. why? the battleground is substantially on the left of the political spectrum. too often it is (falsely) said that allegations of anti-semitism are made in order to smear the left and that the makers of the allegations are tories, blairites, right wing media etc. this source cannot be so readily dismissed in that fashion. this is not a white, male, public school, oxbridge educated, high court judge whose credibility and motives would doubtless be attacked and undermined if the case had been heard in the royal courts of justice on the strand. on the contrary, this was the equality court enshrined in the constitution of the new post apartheid south africa as a source of remedy available to those to those affected by racist or sexist discrimination. who on the left in the uk (or elsewhere) could sensibly seek to undermine the bona fides and impeccable credentials of this court, this judge and this legislation? b.                anti-semitic in effect regardless of intention: this judgement clearly establishes that in the judgement of a court it is not necessary to refer specifically to jews to be guilty of anti-semitic hate speech. references to ‘zionists’ or jewish areas may suffice. it is the context together with an objective assessment of the words used that matters. it follows axiomatically that the stated intention of the maker of the statement is wholly irrelevant. whether it is anti-semitic is an objective assessment based on the words used, the context in which they are used and their cumulative effect. c.                ‘zionist shill’, ‘hasbara agent’: often the reader will have encountered such denunciations. an interesting side issue in the judgement concerned the question of expert evidence. the judge received evidence from david hirsh called by the sajbod and a dr. friedman called by the respondent masuku. it is pertinent to observe that the judge accepted hirsh as an expert and that the court was assisted by his evidence and how it was given. in marked contradistinction his anti-zionist/anti israel ‘opponent’ was referred to in less complimentary terms with the judge questioning his credentials and observing that he “showed that he is partisan which on its own offends the approach and principles to expert testimony”. in other words, the anti-zionist ‘expert’ was deemed not an expert at all and endeavoured solely to say to say what the side calling him wanted him to say. this is very much worth bearing in mind when this allegation surfaces as inevitably it will. overview this is a significant and powerful judgement from an impeccable source. it nails the lie that as long as you say zionist and not jew it is and cannot be anti-semitic. a man supported by and invited by uk left wing organisations has been unequivocally judged to be guilty of racist hate speech. it demolishes the stock defence that there was no anti-semitic intent. the test is an objective one. what the maker of the statement says of his intention is irrelevant to the assessment. in the battle for the truth about anti-semitism this powerful judgement should be welcomed, applauded loudly and disseminated widely. this piece, by jeff samuels, is from the jewish news website.  share this:twitterfacebookemailredditlike this:like loading... posted in uncategorized. leave a comment » statement in the masuku case by expert witness david hirsh june 30, 2017 — david hirsh expert witness statement of david hirsh masuku case share this:twitterfacebookemailredditlike this:like loading... posted in uncategorized. 1 comment » the masuku judgement june 29, 2017 — david hirsh judgement (sahrc obo sajbd _ mr masuku and cosatu) share this:twitterfacebookemailredditlike this:like loading... posted in uncategorized. 3 comments » « older posts blog at wordpress.com. search search engage subscribe rss - postsrss - comments recent posts “conspiracy”  by marlon solomon showing in manchester, july 23rd to july 28th. bongani masuku and cosatu found guilty of antisemitic hate speech in the sa equality court masuku should say sorry to south africa – david hirsh how racism and conspiracy theory creeps into legitimate discourse – anti-nazis united a powerful judgement in the battle for truth about anti-semitism – jeff samuels statement in the masuku case by expert witness david hirsh the masuku judgement documentary film on antisemitism in the labour party and the chakrabarti inquiry why boycott israeli universities? a response to bricup – a 2007 engage guide antisemitic politics knocking on the door of no. 10? – david hirsh recent comments jonathan on academic boycott conference at tcd s4r4hbrown on academic boycott conference at tcd jonathan on academic boycott conference at tcd jonathan on academic boycott conference at tcd susan on “conspiracy”  by marlon solomon showing in manchester, july 23rd to july 28th. alon magen on understanding racists anti-nazis united (@antinazisunited) on how racism and conspiracy theory creeps into legitimate discourse – anti-nazis united zkharya on the masuku judgement josephinebacon on statement in the masuku case by expert witness david hirsh alans on the masuku judgement engage on twitter things can only get better? labour’s relationship with the jewish community. jlm northwest meeting, mancheste... bit.ly/2e9ydk2 8 months ago looking for old stuff on engage?: people might have noticed that the old engage website is dead. if anybody w... bit.ly/2f0msve 9 months ago the lobby: mearsheimer and walt’s conspiracy theory – robert fine:   john mearsheimer and stephen walt (lrb 2... bit.ly/2ec6qkl 9 months ago why can’t we just remember kristallnacht? david hirsh: the guardian asked paul oestreicher to write a piece o... bit.ly/2ebh9hl 9 months ago some years later: first they came for the jews and i said it was a smear, first they came for the jews, and i... bit.ly/2em5ghg 9 months ago follow @engageonline academic brandeis center european institute for the study of contemporary antisemitism european institute for the study of contemporary antisemitism institute for the study of contemporary antisemitism, indiana university journal for the study of antisemitism pears institute for the study of antisemitism stephen roth institute for the study of contemporary antisemitism and racism the vidal sassoon international center for the study of antisemitism blogroll alliance for workers' liberty bob from brockley european forum on antisemitism givat haviva harry's place ignoblus it's complicated meretz uk modernityblog mystical politics normblog obliged to offend peace now uk point of no return scholars for peace in the middle east the community security trust blog trade unions linking israel and palestine peace and coexistence common ground news service the abraham fund top posts "conspiracy"  by marlon solomon showing in manchester, july 23rd to july 28th. academic boycott conference at tcd reply to seth j frantzman, ‘hannah arendt, white supremacist’ - robert fine the livingstone formulation - david hirsh why bds is antisemitic - david hirsh submission to the labour party enquiry on anti-semitism and other forms of racism. by richard gold, member bury south clp opposing the campaign to exclude israelis from the global academic community anti-boycott arguments documentary film on antisemitism in the labour party and the chakrabarti inquiry resignation from jews for justice for palestinians - david hirsh engage blog at wordpress.com. post to cancel send to email address your name your email address cancel post was not sent - check your email addresses! email check failed, please try again sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email. %d bloggers like this:


Here you find all texts from your page as Google (googlebot) and others search engines seen it.

Words density analysis:

Numbers of all words: 4767

One word

Two words phrases

Three words phrases

the - 6.96% (332)
and - 2.56% (122)
his - 1.53% (73)
for - 1.43% (68)
masuku - 1.24% (59)
that - 1.22% (58)
jew - 1.22% (58)
this - 1.17% (56)
our - 1.09% (52)
out - 1.01% (48)
can - 0.71% (34)
not - 0.71% (34)
with - 0.69% (33)
all - 0.69% (33)
(1) - 0.67% (32)
judge - 0.65% (31)
anc - 0.63% (30)
was - 0.61% (29)
jews - 0.59% (28)
are - 0.59% (28)
who - 0.59% (28)
hirsh - 0.55% (26)
south - 0.55% (26)
july - 0.55% (26)
israel - 0.52% (25)
africa - 0.52% (25)
man - 0.52% (25)
david - 0.52% (25)
antisemitism - 0.52% (25)
jewish - 0.52% (25)
cosatu - 0.48% (23)
zionist - 0.44% (21)
log - 0.44% (21)
court - 0.44% (21)
art - 0.42% (20)
2009 - 0.4% (19)
had - 0.4% (19)
from - 0.4% (19)
like - 0.38% (18)
post - 0.38% (18)
comment - 0.38% (18)
judgement - 0.38% (18)
may - 0.38% (18)
its - 0.38% (18)
about - 0.36% (17)
one - 0.36% (17)
end - 0.36% (17)
boycott - 0.36% (17)
2017 - 0.36% (17)
state - 0.36% (17)
(3) - 0.34% (16)
expert - 0.34% (16)
engage - 0.34% (16)
which - 0.34% (16)
what - 0.34% (16)
follow - 0.34% (16)
sign - 0.31% (15)
- 0.31% (15)
(2) - 0.31% (15)
this: - 0.31% (15)
ill - 0.31% (15)
ucu - 0.31% (15)
part - 0.29% (14)
bongani - 0.29% (14)
african - 0.29% (14)
jun - 0.29% (14)
said - 0.29% (14)
how - 0.29% (14)
conspiracy - 0.27% (13)
statement - 0.27% (13)
they - 0.27% (13)
has - 0.27% (13)
june - 0.27% (13)
link - 0.27% (13)
too - 0.25% (12)
been - 0.25% (12)
2016 - 0.25% (12)
2010 - 0.25% (12)
2013 - 0.25% (12)
2011 - 0.25% (12)
were - 0.25% (12)
2015 - 0.25% (12)
case - 0.25% (12)
email - 0.25% (12)
speech - 0.25% (12)
2012 - 0.23% (11)
new - 0.23% (11)
february - 0.23% (11)
right - 0.23% (11)
2014 - 0.23% (11)
blog - 0.23% (11)
again - 0.23% (11)
racist - 0.23% (11)
you - 0.23% (11)
september - 0.23% (11)
equality - 0.23% (11)
some - 0.21% (10)
face - 0.21% (10)
january - 0.21% (10)
people - 0.21% (10)
april - 0.21% (10)
hrc - 0.21% (10)
zionists - 0.21% (10)
march - 0.21% (10)
wing - 0.21% (10)
community - 0.21% (10)
say - 0.21% (10)
august - 0.21% (10)
academic - 0.21% (10)
old - 0.21% (10)
november - 0.21% (10)
him - 0.21% (10)
hate - 0.21% (10)
have - 0.21% (10)
other - 0.21% (10)
witness - 0.19% (9)
antisemitic - 0.19% (9)
comments - 0.19% (9)
will - 0.19% (9)
twitter - 0.19% (9)
december - 0.19% (9)
make - 0.19% (9)
any - 0.19% (9)
anti-semitism - 0.19% (9)
nation - 0.19% (9)
university - 0.17% (8)
made - 0.17% (8)
show - 0.17% (8)
share - 0.17% (8)
october - 0.17% (8)
2008 - 0.17% (8)
rights - 0.17% (8)
why - 0.17% (8)
press - 0.17% (8)
study - 0.17% (8)
threatened - 0.17% (8)
even - 0.17% (8)
left - 0.17% (8)
now - 0.17% (8)
uncategorized - 0.17% (8)
under - 0.17% (8)
side - 0.17% (8)
order - 0.17% (8)
masuku’s - 0.17% (8)
full - 0.17% (8)
but - 0.17% (8)
inter - 0.17% (8)
conference - 0.17% (8)
own - 0.17% (8)
against - 0.17% (8)
guilty - 0.17% (8)
lie - 0.17% (8)
racism - 0.17% (8)
book - 0.17% (8)
congress - 0.15% (7)
(4) - 0.15% (7)
evidence - 0.15% (7)
year - 0.15% (7)
only - 0.15% (7)
significance - 0.15% (7)
piece - 0.15% (7)
speech. - 0.15% (7)
way - 0.15% (7)
jews, - 0.15% (7)
(5) - 0.15% (7)
anti-semitic - 0.15% (7)
solidarity - 0.15% (7)
jeff - 0.15% (7)
samuels - 0.15% (7)
just - 0.15% (7)
palestine - 0.15% (7)
itself - 0.15% (7)
human - 0.15% (7)
union - 0.15% (7)
united - 0.15% (7)
act - 0.15% (7)
- 0.15% (7)
word - 0.15% (7)
media - 0.15% (7)
used - 0.15% (7)
refer - 0.15% (7)
effect - 0.15% (7)
get - 0.15% (7)
marlon - 0.15% (7)
posted - 0.15% (7)
uncategorized. - 0.15% (7)
loading... - 0.15% (7)
this:like - 0.15% (7)
this:twitterfacebookemailredditlike - 0.15% (7)
criticism - 0.13% (6)
those - 0.13% (6)
wrote - 0.13% (6)
did - 0.13% (6)
relevant - 0.13% (6)
month - 0.13% (6)
issue - 0.13% (6)
(8) - 0.13% (6)
fine - 0.13% (6)
took - 0.13% (6)
being - 0.13% (6)
(6) - 0.13% (6)
struggle - 0.13% (6)
powerful - 0.13% (6)
campaign - 0.13% (6)
their - 0.13% (6)
apartheid - 0.13% (6)
here - 0.13% (6)
assess - 0.13% (6)
statements - 0.13% (6)
ago - 0.13% (6)
met - 0.13% (6)
posts - 0.13% (6)
era - 0.13% (6)
commission - 0.13% (6)
must - 0.13% (6)
these - 0.13% (6)
defence - 0.1% (5)
campus - 0.1% (5)
live - 0.1% (5)
manchester - 0.1% (5)
(15) - 0.1% (5)
2006 - 0.1% (5)
test - 0.1% (5)
institute - 0.1% (5)
judgment - 0.1% (5)
should - 0.1% (5)
national - 0.1% (5)
finding - 0.1% (5)
ever - 0.1% (5)
(9) - 0.1% (5)
source - 0.1% (5)
motion - 0.1% (5)
website - 0.1% (5)
dissociate - 0.1% (5)
member - 0.1% (5)
trial - 0.1% (5)
friend - 0.1% (5)
tcd - 0.1% (5)
justice - 0.1% (5)
community. - 0.1% (5)
(17) - 0.1% (5)
support - 0.1% (5)
harm - 0.1% (5)
them - 0.1% (5)
force - 0.1% (5)
when - 0.1% (5)
labour - 0.1% (5)
constitution - 0.1% (5)
antisemitism. - 0.1% (5)
clear - 0.1% (5)
months - 0.1% (5)
know - 0.1% (5)
anti-nazis - 0.1% (5)
son - 0.1% (5)
2005 - 0.1% (5)
israeli - 0.1% (5)
course - 0.1% (5)
(12) - 0.1% (5)
wits - 0.1% (5)
found - 0.1% (5)
palestinian - 0.1% (5)
ask - 0.1% (5)
put - 0.1% (5)
free - 0.1% (5)
allegation - 0.08% (4)
very - 0.08% (4)
intention - 0.08% (4)
time - 0.08% (4)
britain - 0.08% (4)
invited - 0.08% (4)
your - 0.08% (4)
first - 0.