2.79 score from hupso.pl for:
engageonline.wordpress.com



HTML Content


Titleengage | the anti-racist campaign against antisemitism

Length: 54, Words: 6
Description the anti-racist campaign against antisemitism

Length: 45, Words: 5
Keywords pusty
Robots
Charset UTF-8
Og Meta - Title exist
Og Meta - Description exist
Og Meta - Site name exist
Tytuł powinien zawierać pomiędzy 10 a 70 znaków (ze spacjami), a mniej niż 12 słów w długości.
Meta opis powinien zawierać pomiędzy 50 a 160 znaków (łącznie ze spacjami), a mniej niż 24 słów w długości.
Kodowanie znaków powinny być określone , UTF-8 jest chyba najlepszy zestaw znaków, aby przejść z powodu UTF-8 jest bardziej międzynarodowy kodowaniem.
Otwarte obiekty wykresu powinny być obecne w stronie internetowej (więcej informacji na temat protokołu OpenGraph: http://ogp.me/)

SEO Content

Words/Characters 4789
Text/HTML 27.88 %
Headings H1 1
H2 22
H3 15
H4 0
H5 0
H6 0
H1
engage
H2
about engage
sign up
archives
posts by date
categories
admin
jenny tonge’s outrageous response to cst report
some resources for the struggle against the campaign to boycott israeli universities
boycott, divestment and sanctions (bds) and antisemitism
the new definition of antisemitism is only a threat to antisemites – david hirsh
david hirsh podcast – academic engagement network
summer institute for curriculum development in critical antisemitism studies st. john’s college, oxford, uk
regulator raps university that sided with jew-baiting palsoc – lesley klaff
search
subscribe
recent posts
recent comments
engage on twitter
academic
blogroll
peace and coexistence
top posts
H3
share this:
like this:
archived debate – martin shaw, david hirsh, norman geras – is the proposal to boycott israeli academics antisemitic?
share this:
like this:
share this:
like this:
share this:
like this:
share this:
like this:
share this:
like this:
share this:
like this:
H4
H5
H6
strong
the pamphlet is available as a pdf on the aen website.
to listen to the podcast,  “making democracy sexy: david hirsh on combating bds and antisemitism by rediscovering democracy”, follow this link. 
 
 published in inside higher ed is available here.
why bds is antisemitic. 
david hirsh in debate with ilan pappé.
hirsh, david. 2012. portia, shylock and the exclusion of israeli actors from the global cultural community.
david hirsh discussion with claire potter about support for the campaign to boycott israel:
the myth of the institutional boycott – jon pike
is an academic boycott of israel justified? – michael yudkin – engage journal special issue – april 2007  
the pamphlet is available as a pdf on the aen website.  to download it, follow this link. 
to listen to the podcast,   “making democracy sexy: david hirsh on combating bds and antisemitism by rediscovering democracy”, follow this link. 
follow this link for a pre-history of the new definition of antisemitism. 
academic engagement network
july 16, 2017 to july 29, 2017
february 22, 2017
lesley klaff
lecturer in law, sheffield hallam university
b
the pamphlet is available as a pdf on the aen website.
to listen to the podcast,  “making democracy sexy: david hirsh on combating bds and antisemitism by rediscovering democracy”, follow this link. 
 
 published in inside higher ed is available here.
why bds is antisemitic. 
david hirsh in debate with ilan pappé.
hirsh, david. 2012. portia, shylock and the exclusion of israeli actors from the global cultural community.
david hirsh discussion with claire potter about support for the campaign to boycott israel:
the myth of the institutional boycott – jon pike
is an academic boycott of israel justified? – michael yudkin – engage journal special issue – april 2007  
the pamphlet is available as a pdf on the aen website.  to download it, follow this link. 
to listen to the podcast,   “making democracy sexy: david hirsh on combating bds and antisemitism by rediscovering democracy”, follow this link. 
follow this link for a pre-history of the new definition of antisemitism. 
academic engagement network
july 16, 2017 to july 29, 2017
february 22, 2017
lesley klaff
lecturer in law, sheffield hallam university
i
em the pamphlet is available as a pdf on the aen website.
to listen to the podcast,  “making democracy sexy: david hirsh on combating bds and antisemitism by rediscovering democracy”, follow this link. 
 
 published in inside higher ed is available here.
why bds is antisemitic. 
david hirsh in debate with ilan pappé.
hirsh, david. 2012. portia, shylock and the exclusion of israeli actors from the global cultural community.
david hirsh discussion with claire potter about support for the campaign to boycott israel:
the myth of the institutional boycott – jon pike
is an academic boycott of israel justified? – michael yudkin – engage journal special issue – april 2007  
the pamphlet is available as a pdf on the aen website.  to download it, follow this link. 
to listen to the podcast,   “making democracy sexy: david hirsh on combating bds and antisemitism by rediscovering democracy”, follow this link. 
follow this link for a pre-history of the new definition of antisemitism. 
academic engagement network
july 16, 2017 to july 29, 2017
february 22, 2017
lesley klaff
lecturer in law, sheffield hallam university
Bolds strong 18
b 18
i 0
em 18
Zawartość strony internetowej powinno zawierać więcej niż 250 słów, z stopa tekst / kod jest wyższy niż 20%.
Pozycji używać znaczników (h1, h2, h3, ...), aby określić temat sekcji lub ustępów na stronie, ale zwykle, użyj mniej niż 6 dla każdego tagu pozycje zachować swoją stronę zwięzły.
Styl używać silnych i kursywy znaczniki podkreślić swoje słowa kluczowe swojej stronie, ale nie nadużywać (mniej niż 16 silnych tagi i 16 znaczników kursywy)

Statystyki strony

twitter:title pusty
twitter:description pusty
google+ itemprop=name pusty
Pliki zewnętrzne 28
Pliki CSS 6
Pliki javascript 22
Plik należy zmniejszyć całkowite odwołanie plików (CSS + JavaScript) do 7-8 maksymalnie.

Linki wewnętrzne i zewnętrzne

Linki 259
Linki wewnętrzne 9
Linki zewnętrzne 250
Linki bez atrybutu Title 228
Linki z atrybutem NOFOLLOW 0
Linki - Użyj atrybutu tytuł dla każdego łącza. Nofollow link jest link, który nie pozwala wyszukiwarkom boty zrealizują są odnośniki no follow. Należy zwracać uwagę na ich użytkowania

Linki wewnętrzne

cancel #
cancel #cancel

Linki zewnętrzne

engage https://engageonline.wordpress.com/
about engage https://engageonline.wordpress.com/about-engage/
anti-boycott arguments https://engageonline.wordpress.com/key-anti-boycott-arguments/
comments policy https://engageonline.wordpress.com/comments-policy/
engage journal https://engageonline.wordpress.com/engage-journal/
links https://engageonline.wordpress.com/links/
that’s funny – steve c https://engageonline.wordpress.com/thats-funny-you-dont-look-antisemitic-steve-cohen/
ucu 06-08 https://engageonline.wordpress.com/some-links-from-the-struggles-against-antisemitism-in-ucu-2006-8/
what they say about us https://engageonline.wordpress.com/what-they-say-about-us/
front page http://www.engageonline.org.uk
about us https://engageonline.wordpress.com/about-engage/
engage on twitter http://twitter.com/engageonline
engage journal https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2015/11/04/engage-journal-2006-2007/
engage up to 2009 http://www.engageonline.org.uk/blog/index2.php
what they say about us https://engageonline.wordpress.com/what-they-say-about-us/
comments policy https://engageonline.wordpress.com/comments-policy/
contact us https://engageonline.wordpress.com/about-engage/contact-engage/
sign up for engage mailings http://www.engageonline.org.uk/blog/article.php?id=1817
archive of engage mailings http://community.icontact.com/p/engageonline/newsletters/no1
« jan https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2017/01/
2 https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2017/02/02/
academics https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/academics/
analogy – apartheid/israel https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/analogy-apartheidisrael/
analogy – holocaust/israel https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/analogy-holocaustisrael/
anti-racism https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/anti-racism/
anti-zionism https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/anti-zionism/
antisemitism https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/antisemitism/
anti-racist antisemitism https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/antisemitism/anti-racist-antisemitism/
antisemitism denial https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/antisemitism/antisemitism-denial/
jewish antisemitism https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/antisemitism/jewish-antisemitism/
open antisemitism https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/antisemitism/open-antisemitism/
street antisemitism https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/antisemitism/street-antisemitism/
art https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/art/
as-a-jew https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/as-a-jew/
book https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/book/
boycott divestment & sanctions https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/boycott-divestment-sanctions/
academic boycott https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/boycott-divestment-sanctions/academic-boycott/
boycott opposition https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/boycott-divestment-sanctions/boycott-opposition/
silent boycott https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/boycott-divestment-sanctions/silent-boycott/
sporting boycott https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/boycott-divestment-sanctions/sporting-boycott/
bridges https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/bridges/
campus activism https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/campus-activism/
cartoons https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/cartoons/
child killing https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/child-killing/
coexistence https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/coexistence/
conflict https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/conflict/
conflict resolution https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/conflict/conflict-resolution/
conspiracy beliefs https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/conspiracy-beliefs/
event https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/event/
free expression https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/free-expression/
gaza https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/gaza/
hamas https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/hamas/
holocaust https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/holocaust/
denial https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/holocaust/denial/
holocaust comparisons https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/holocaust/holocaust-comparisons/
humour https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/humour/
intelligentsia https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/intelligentsia/
iran https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/iran/
israel https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/israel/
jews as proxy israelis https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/jews-as-proxy-israelis/
law https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/law/
letter https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/letter/
media https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/media/
british media https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/media/british-media/
national identity https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/national-identity/
neo-nazi https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/neo-nazi/
palestinians https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/palestinians/
peace activism https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/peace-activism/
religion https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/religion/
suppression https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/suppression/
the left https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/the-left/
swp https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/the-left/swp/
the right https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/the-right/
trade union https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/trade-union/
ucu https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/trade-union/ucu/
uncategorized https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/uncategorized/
united nations https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/united-nations/
register https://wordpress.com/start?ref=wplogin
log in https://engageonline.wordpress.com/wp-login.php
entries rss https://engageonline.wordpress.com/feed/
comments rss https://engageonline.wordpress.com/comments/feed/
wordpress.com https://wordpress.com/
jenny tonge’s outrageous response to cst report https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2017/02/02/jenny-tonges-outrageous-response-to-cst-report/
yearly report https://cst.org.uk/public/data/file/c/4/incidents%20report%202016%20web.pdf?utm_content=bufferf606e&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer
- https://engageonline.files.wordpress.com/2017/02/screen-shot-2017-02-02-at-18-49-11.png
worked closely https://www.thejc.com/news/uk-news/former-cst-boss-will-help-muslim-group-battle-islamophobia-1.53851
nterview on j-tv https://www.thejc.com/news/uk-news/baroness-jenny-tonge-unable-to-answer-simple-questions-in-interview-on-israel-1.431464
twitter https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2017/02/02/jenny-tonges-outrageous-response-to-cst-report/?share=twitter
facebook https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2017/02/02/jenny-tonges-outrageous-response-to-cst-report/?share=facebook
email https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2017/02/02/jenny-tonges-outrageous-response-to-cst-report/?share=email
reddit https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2017/02/02/jenny-tonges-outrageous-response-to-cst-report/?share=reddit
uncategorized https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/uncategorized/
8 comments » https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2017/02/02/jenny-tonges-outrageous-response-to-cst-report/#comments
some resources for the struggle against the campaign to boycott israeli universities https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2017/01/03/some-resources-for-the-struggle-against-the-campaign-to-boycott-israeli-universities/
the pamphlet is available as a pdf on the aen website http://www.academicengagement.org/en/get-informed/pamphlet-series/david%20hirsh%20pamphlet.pdf
to listen to the podcast,  “making democracy sexy: david hirsh on combating bds and antisemitism by rediscovering democracy”, follow this link.  http://academicengagement.org/en/get-informed/podcast-series
 published in inside higher ed is available here. http://www.insidehighered.com/views/2014/01/07/essay-real-meaning-institutional-boycotts
why bds is antisemitic https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2016/06/01/why-bds-is-antisemitic-david-hirsh/
david hirsh in debate with ilan pappé https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2016/02/01/david-hirsh-in-debate-with-ilan-pappe-nadia-naser-najjab-alan-johnson/
hirsh, david. 2012. portia, shylock and the exclusion of israeli actors from the global cultural community. https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2012/05/31/portia-shylock-and-the-exclusion-of-israeli-actors-from-the-global-cultural-community-david-hirsh/
for david hirsh’s open email to claire potter, follow this link.  https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2013/12/17/open-letter-to-claire-potter-from-david-hirsh/
for claire potter’s response, follow this link. http://chronicle.com/blognetwork/tenuredradical/2013/12/blogging-across-the-water-a-response-to-david-hirsh/
for david hirsh’s response, follow this link.  https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2013/12/19/a-reply-to-claire-potter-in-a-fight-to-boycott-israelis-remain-vigilant-to-the-danger-of-antisemitism/
archived debate – martin shaw, david hirsh, norman geras – is the proposal to boycott israeli academics antisemitic? https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2013/05/22/archived-debate-martin-shaw-david-hirsh-norman-geras-is-the-proposal-to-boycott-israeli-academics-antisemitic/
the myth of the institutional boycott – jon pike https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2013/02/27/the-myth-of-the-institutional-boycott-jon-pike/
from february 2006 http://www.engageonline.org.uk/blog/article.php?id=231
is an academic boycott of israel justified? – michael yudkin – engage journal special issue – april 2007 https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2015/11/04/is-an-academic-boycott-of-israel-justified-michael-yudkin-engage-journal-special-issue-april-2007/
cure worse than the disease: academic boycott of israel in the light of the academic boycott of south africa – mira vogel – engage journal issue 4 – february 2007 https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2015/11/04/cure-worse-than-the-disease-academic-boycott-of-israel-in-the-light-of-the-academic-boycott-of-south-africa-mira-vogel-engage-journal-issue-4-february-2007/
israelis are not nazis – david hirsh – 15 november 2008 https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2008/11/15/israelis-are-not-nazis-david-hirsh-15-november-2008/
israelis are not nazis – mira vogel – 13 november 2008 https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2008/11/13/israelis-are-not-nazis-mira-vogel-13-november-2008/
esprit d’escalier: reminiscences of a silent observer of the ucu conference – robert fine 30 may 2008 https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2008/05/30/esprit-descalier-reminiscences-of-a-silent-observer-of-the-ucu-conference-robert-fine-30-may-2008/
antisemitism, boycotts and freedom of speech – robert fine – 16 may 2007 https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2007/05/16/antisemitism-boycotts-and-freedom-of-speech-robert-fine-16-may-2007/
israeli universities, israel-palestinian peace and real solidarity – paul frosh, hebrew university, jerusalem added by david hirsh – 3 november 2006 https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2006/11/03/israeli-universities-israel-palestinian-peace-and-real-solidarity-paul-frosh-hebrew-university-jerusalem-added-by-david-hirsh-3-november-2006/
the argument for the boycott – pacbi – david hirsh – 9 september 2006 https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2006/09/09/the-argument-for-the-boycott-pacbi-david-hirsh-9-september-2006/
“i would hate myself in the morning” – steve cohen – may 29 2006 https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2006/05/29/i-would-hate-myself-in-the-morning-steve-cohen-may-29-2006/
why i am against the boycott, by john strawson – 18 may 2005 https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2005/05/05/why-i-am-against-the-boycott-by-john-strawson-18-may-2005/
twitter https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2017/01/03/some-resources-for-the-struggle-against-the-campaign-to-boycott-israeli-universities/?share=twitter
facebook https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2017/01/03/some-resources-for-the-struggle-against-the-campaign-to-boycott-israeli-universities/?share=facebook
email https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2017/01/03/some-resources-for-the-struggle-against-the-campaign-to-boycott-israeli-universities/?share=email
reddit https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2017/01/03/some-resources-for-the-struggle-against-the-campaign-to-boycott-israeli-universities/?share=reddit
uncategorized https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/uncategorized/
leave a comment » https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2017/01/03/some-resources-for-the-struggle-against-the-campaign-to-boycott-israeli-universities/#respond
boycott, divestment and sanctions (bds) and antisemitism https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2016/12/14/boycott-divestment-and-sanctions-bds-and-antisemitism/
- https://engageonline.files.wordpress.com/2016/12/aen.jpg
the pamphlet is available as a pdf on the aen website.  to download it, follow this link.  http://www.academicengagement.org/en/get-informed/pamphlet-series/david%20hirsh%20pamphlet.pdf
to listen to the podcast,  “making democracy sexy: david hirsh on combating bds and antisemitism by rediscovering democracy”, follow this link.  http://academicengagement.org/en/get-informed/podcast-series
twitter https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2016/12/14/boycott-divestment-and-sanctions-bds-and-antisemitism/?share=twitter
facebook https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2016/12/14/boycott-divestment-and-sanctions-bds-and-antisemitism/?share=facebook
email https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2016/12/14/boycott-divestment-and-sanctions-bds-and-antisemitism/?share=email
reddit https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2016/12/14/boycott-divestment-and-sanctions-bds-and-antisemitism/?share=reddit
uncategorized https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/uncategorized/
leave a comment » https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2016/12/14/boycott-divestment-and-sanctions-bds-and-antisemitism/#respond
the new definition of antisemitism is only a threat to antisemites – david hirsh https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2016/12/12/the-new-definition-of-antisemitism-is-only-a-threat-to-antisemites-david-hirsh/
this piece, by david hirsh, is from thejc.com https://www.thejc.com/news/uk-news/antisemitism-definition-1.429133
- https://engageonline.files.wordpress.com/2016/05/download.png
the working definition https://www.holocaustremembrance.com/sites/default/files/press_release_document_antisemitism.pdf
, https://www.thejc.com/news/uk-news/antisemitism-definition-1.429133
this piece, by david hirsh, is from thejc.com https://www.thejc.com/news/uk-news/antisemitism-definition-1.429133
follow this link for a pre-history of the new definition of antisemitism.  http://fathomjournal.org/defining-antisemitism-down/
follow this link for the ucu’s disavowal of the working definition.   https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2011/05/20/instead-of-adressing-its-antisemitism-ucu-proposes-to-change-the-definition-of-antisemitism/
follow this link for the live blog of the debate in which ucu decided to disavow the working definition.  https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2011/05/30/live-blogging-from-ucu-congress-the-eumc-working-definition/
twitter https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2016/12/12/the-new-definition-of-antisemitism-is-only-a-threat-to-antisemites-david-hirsh/?share=twitter
facebook https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2016/12/12/the-new-definition-of-antisemitism-is-only-a-threat-to-antisemites-david-hirsh/?share=facebook
email https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2016/12/12/the-new-definition-of-antisemitism-is-only-a-threat-to-antisemites-david-hirsh/?share=email
reddit https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2016/12/12/the-new-definition-of-antisemitism-is-only-a-threat-to-antisemites-david-hirsh/?share=reddit
uncategorized https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/uncategorized/
3 comments » https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2016/12/12/the-new-definition-of-antisemitism-is-only-a-threat-to-antisemites-david-hirsh/#comments
david hirsh podcast – academic engagement network https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2016/12/07/david-hirsh-podcast/
twitter https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2016/12/07/david-hirsh-podcast/?share=twitter
facebook https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2016/12/07/david-hirsh-podcast/?share=facebook
email https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2016/12/07/david-hirsh-podcast/?share=email
reddit https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2016/12/07/david-hirsh-podcast/?share=reddit
uncategorized https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/uncategorized/
1 comment » https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2016/12/07/david-hirsh-podcast/#comments
summer institute for curriculum development in critical antisemitism studies st. john’s college, oxford, uk https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2016/12/01/summer-institute-for-curriculum-development-in-critical-antisemitism-studies-st-johns-college-oxford-uk/
click here for application and requirements. http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=0019gvkugy_pcm0gpqbs34dcw5fzc8fr1lkdd-kgjh6uggeztea00310fx788j1nj5fcw-4gcutd9t9kthc5eqabhycg151me-akogtey2xw1etfwkxmvcq-dcfpwtpxwidgcck5damqkwh_rto4v8fndm-1uloknor4poscmlzt1vxjxd0jcbp43juyv6a8qey&c=7bafz5vzuccq1mehrfjfgm2z_gpbiwgrqkblcaz4wwf_2prresu3jq==&ch=mn4yuu-q9wiax9sysp4nl-yapq5xvh1xxfylqnguxqt6ylellr0tcq==
click here http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=0019gvkugy_pcm0gpqbs34dcw5fzc8fr1lkdd-kgjh6uggeztea00310svuyq1oazr1pzaiyyw7o8slwatanv5ixb8jat2s6sqmi560ppkvtqj5nrcdhf7bury_y6x4mnhbgmwfxbbauwt_xudqb7nopshmucfju78aiuabujg3y7qje0cdt6oxypg0b20gj_nmrtjcordjwg0=&c=7bafz5vzuccq1mehrfjfgm2z_gpbiwgrqkblcaz4wwf_2prresu3jq==&ch=mn4yuu-q9wiax9sysp4nl-yapq5xvh1xxfylqnguxqt6ylellr0tcq==
twitter https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2016/12/01/summer-institute-for-curriculum-development-in-critical-antisemitism-studies-st-johns-college-oxford-uk/?share=twitter
facebook https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2016/12/01/summer-institute-for-curriculum-development-in-critical-antisemitism-studies-st-johns-college-oxford-uk/?share=facebook
email https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2016/12/01/summer-institute-for-curriculum-development-in-critical-antisemitism-studies-st-johns-college-oxford-uk/?share=email
reddit https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2016/12/01/summer-institute-for-curriculum-development-in-critical-antisemitism-studies-st-johns-college-oxford-uk/?share=reddit
uncategorized https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/uncategorized/
leave a comment » https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2016/12/01/summer-institute-for-curriculum-development-in-critical-antisemitism-studies-st-johns-college-oxford-uk/#respond
regulator raps university that sided with jew-baiting palsoc – lesley klaff https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2016/11/09/regulator-raps-university-that-sided-with-jew-baiting-palsoc-lesley-klaff/
- https://engageonline.files.wordpress.com/2016/11/lesley-2.jpg
lecturer in law, sheffield hallam university https://www.shu.ac.uk/about-us/our-people/staff-profiles/lesley-klaff
twitter https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2016/11/09/regulator-raps-university-that-sided-with-jew-baiting-palsoc-lesley-klaff/?share=twitter
facebook https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2016/11/09/regulator-raps-university-that-sided-with-jew-baiting-palsoc-lesley-klaff/?share=facebook
email https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2016/11/09/regulator-raps-university-that-sided-with-jew-baiting-palsoc-lesley-klaff/?share=email
reddit https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2016/11/09/regulator-raps-university-that-sided-with-jew-baiting-palsoc-lesley-klaff/?share=reddit
uncategorized https://engageonline.wordpress.com/category/uncategorized/
5 comments » https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2016/11/09/regulator-raps-university-that-sided-with-jew-baiting-palsoc-lesley-klaff/#comments
« older posts https://engageonline.wordpress.com/page/2/
blog at wordpress.com. https://wordpress.com/?ref=footer_blog
search engage http://www.google.com/coop/cse?cx=001363479571088777852:6_xurirf4uw
rss - posts https://engageonline.wordpress.com/feed/
rss - comments https://engageonline.wordpress.com/comments/feed/
jenny tonge’s outrageous response to cst report https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2017/02/02/jenny-tonges-outrageous-response-to-cst-report/
some resources for the struggle against the campaign to boycott israeli universities https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2017/01/03/some-resources-for-the-struggle-against-the-campaign-to-boycott-israeli-universities/
boycott, divestment and sanctions (bds) and antisemitism https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2016/12/14/boycott-divestment-and-sanctions-bds-and-antisemitism/
the new definition of antisemitism is only a threat to antisemites – david hirsh https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2016/12/12/the-new-definition-of-antisemitism-is-only-a-threat-to-antisemites-david-hirsh/
david hirsh podcast – academic engagement network https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2016/12/07/david-hirsh-podcast/
summer institute for curriculum development in critical antisemitism studies st. john’s college, oxford, uk https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2016/12/01/summer-institute-for-curriculum-development-in-critical-antisemitism-studies-st-johns-college-oxford-uk/
regulator raps university that sided with jew-baiting palsoc – lesley klaff https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2016/11/09/regulator-raps-university-that-sided-with-jew-baiting-palsoc-lesley-klaff/
things can only get better? labour’s relationship with the jewish community. jlm northwest meeting, manchester, nov 27th. mp.s louise ellman, naz shah, ruth smeeth. https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2016/11/01/things-can-only-get-better-labours-relationship-with-the-jewish-community-jlm-northwest-meeting-manchester-nov-27th-mp-s-louise-ellman-naz-shah-ruth-smeeth/
looking for old stuff on engage? https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2016/10/24/8113/
some years later https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2016/10/18/some-years-later/
jenny tonge’s outrageous response to cst report https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2017/02/02/jenny-tonges-outrageous-response-to-cst-report/#comment-34338
jenny tonge’s outrageous response to cst report https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2017/02/02/jenny-tonges-outrageous-response-to-cst-report/#comment-34272
mira vogel https://engageonline.wordpress.com
jenny tonge’s outrageous response to cst report https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2017/02/02/jenny-tonges-outrageous-response-to-cst-report/#comment-34271
mira vogel https://engageonline.wordpress.com
jenny tonge’s outrageous response to cst report https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2017/02/02/jenny-tonges-outrageous-response-to-cst-report/#comment-34270
jenny tonge’s outrageous response to cst report https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2017/02/02/jenny-tonges-outrageous-response-to-cst-report/#comment-34260
jenny tonge’s outrageous response to cst report https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2017/02/02/jenny-tonges-outrageous-response-to-cst-report/#comment-34257
jenny tonge’s outrageous response to cst report https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2017/02/02/jenny-tonges-outrageous-response-to-cst-report/#comment-34254
jenny tonge’s outrageous response to cst report https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2017/02/02/jenny-tonges-outrageous-response-to-cst-report/#comment-34249
the new definition of antisemitism is only a threat to antisemites – david hirsh https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2016/12/12/the-new-definition-of-antisemitism-is-only-a-threat-to-antisemites-david-hirsh/#comment-33976
the new definition of antisemitism is only a threat to antisemites – david hirsh https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2016/12/12/the-new-definition-of-antisemitism-is-only-a-threat-to-antisemites-david-hirsh/#comment-33972
engage on twitter http://twitter.com/engageonline
bit.ly/2e9ydk2 http://bit.ly/2e9ydk2
3 months ago http://twitter.com/engageonline/statuses/793474521218949120
bit.ly/2f0msve http://bit.ly/2f0msve
4 months ago http://twitter.com/engageonline/statuses/790590571098234880
bit.ly/2ec6qkl http://bit.ly/2ec6qkl
4 months ago http://twitter.com/engageonline/statuses/790584301557395456
bit.ly/2ebh9hl http://bit.ly/2ebh9hl
4 months ago http://twitter.com/engageonline/statuses/790517323127848960
bit.ly/2em5ghg http://bit.ly/2em5ghg
4 months ago http://twitter.com/engageonline/statuses/788313642617872384
follow @engageonline http://twitter.com/engageonline
brandeis center http://www.brandeiscenter.com/
european institute for the study of contemporary antisemitism http://www.eisca.eu/
european institute for the study of contemporary antisemitism http://www.eisca.eu/
institute for the study of contemporary antisemitism, indiana university http://www.indiana.edu/~iscaweb/index.shtml
journal for the study of antisemitism http://www.jsantisemitism.org/
pears institute for the study of antisemitism http://www.pearsinstitute.bbk.ac.uk/
stephen roth institute for the study of contemporary antisemitism and racism http://www.tau.ac.il/anti-semitism/
the vidal sassoon international center for the study of antisemitism http://sicsa.huji.ac.il/
alliance for workers' liberty http://www.workersliberty.org/
bob from brockley http://brockley.blogspot.com/
european forum on antisemitism http://www.european-forum-on-antisemitism.org
givat haviva http://www.givathaviva.org/
harry's place http://www.hurryupharry.org/
ignoblus http://ignoblus.blogspot.com/
it's complicated http://mideastparalleluniverse.blogspot.com/
meretz uk http://britishmeretz.blogspot.com/
modernityblog http://modernityblog.wordpress.com/
mystical politics http://mystical-politics.blogspot.com/
normblog http://normblog.typepad.com/
obliged to offend http://www.obligedtooffend.com/
peace now uk http://www.peacenowuk.org/
point of no return http://jewishrefugees.blogspot.com/
scholars for peace in the middle east http://www.spme.net/
the community security trust blog http://thecst.org.uk/blog/
trade unions linking israel and palestine http://www.tuliponline.org/
common ground news service http://www.commongroundnews.org
the abraham fund http://www.abrahamfund.org/
why bds is antisemitic - david hirsh https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2016/06/01/why-bds-is-antisemitic-david-hirsh/
david icke pays a lot of money in damages https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2015/03/10/david-icke-pays-a-lot-of-money-in-damages/
ian anderson to boycotters: "don't fucking tell me what to do" https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2010/08/09/jethro-tull-play-but-wont-profit/
opposing the campaign to exclude israelis from the global academic community https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2014/01/21/opposing-the-campaign-to-exclude-israelis-from-the-global-academic-community/
ilan pappe admits that bds was not initiated by a "call" from palestinian civil society https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2016/08/28/ilan-pappe-admits-that-bds-was-not-initiated-by-a-call-from-palestinian-civil-society/
isgap-oxford summer institute for curriculum development in critical antisemitism studies https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2016/01/15/isgap-oxford-summer-institute-for-curriculum-development-in-critical-antisemitism-studies/
naomi klein is wrong to call for a boycott of israel - david hirsh https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2009/01/10/klein-hirsh/
the livingstone formulation - david hirsh https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2016/04/29/the-livingstone-formulation-david-hirsh-2/
about engage https://engageonline.wordpress.com/about-engage/
bmi and airbus wipe israel off the map - for people flying to certain destinations https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2009/04/30/bmi-and-airbus-wipe-israel-off-the-map-for-people-flying-to-certain-destinations/
engage https://engageonline.wordpress.com/
blog at wordpress.com. https://wordpress.com/?ref=footer_blog

Zdjęcia

Zdjęcia 8
Zdjęcia bez atrybutu ALT 3
Zdjęcia bez atrybutu TITLE 8
Korzystanie Obraz ALT i TITLE atrybutu dla każdego obrazu.

Zdjęcia bez atrybutu TITLE

https://engageonline.files.wordpress.com/2017/02/screen-shot-2017-02-02-at-18-49-11.png?w=300&h=228
https://engageonline.files.wordpress.com/2016/12/aen.jpg?w=218&h=109
https://engageonline.files.wordpress.com/2016/05/download.png?w=780
https://engageonline.files.wordpress.com/2016/11/lesley-2.jpg?w=94&h=132
https://engageonline.files.wordpress.com/2010/09/scouring_powder.gif
https://s2.wp.com/wp-content/mu-plugins/post-flair/sharing/images/loading.gif
https://sb.scorecardresearch.com/p?c1=2&c2=7518284&c3=&c4=&c5=&c6=&c15=&cv=2.0&cj=1
https://pixel.wp.com/b.gif?v=noscript

Zdjęcia bez atrybutu ALT

https://engageonline.files.wordpress.com/2010/09/scouring_powder.gif
https://sb.scorecardresearch.com/p?c1=2&c2=7518284&c3=&c4=&c5=&c6=&c15=&cv=2.0&cj=1
https://pixel.wp.com/b.gif?v=noscript

Ranking:


Alexa Traffic
Daily Global Rank Trend
Daily Reach (Percent)









Majestic SEO











Text on page:

engage about engage anti-boycott arguments comments policy engage journal links that’s funny – steve c ucu 06-08 what they say about us about engage front page about us engage on twitter engage journal engage up to 2009 what they say about us comments policy contact us sign up sign up for engage mailings archive of engage mailings archives archives select month february 2017 (1) january 2017 (1) december 2016 (4) november 2016 (2) october 2016 (3) september 2016 (3) august 2016 (1) july 2016 (11) june 2016 (8) may 2016 (6) april 2016 (3) march 2016 (4) february 2016 (2) january 2016 (2) december 2015 (1) november 2015 (56) october 2015 (3) september 2015 (6) august 2015 (4) july 2015 (1) june 2015 (1) may 2015 (1) april 2015 (4) march 2015 (7) february 2015 (2) january 2015 (3) december 2014 (2) november 2014 (3) september 2014 (1) august 2014 (3) july 2014 (3) june 2014 (1) may 2014 (1) april 2014 (2) march 2014 (4) february 2014 (8) january 2014 (8) december 2013 (7) november 2013 (1) october 2013 (6) september 2013 (1) august 2013 (1) july 2013 (10) june 2013 (3) may 2013 (8) april 2013 (9) march 2013 (6) february 2013 (5) january 2013 (4) december 2012 (3) october 2012 (2) september 2012 (1) august 2012 (3) july 2012 (3) june 2012 (2) may 2012 (5) april 2012 (6) march 2012 (3) february 2012 (1) january 2012 (2) december 2011 (1) november 2011 (12) october 2011 (5) september 2011 (18) august 2011 (12) july 2011 (42) june 2011 (48) may 2011 (30) april 2011 (17) march 2011 (15) february 2011 (9) january 2011 (9) december 2010 (12) november 2010 (17) october 2010 (28) september 2010 (20) august 2010 (9) july 2010 (16) june 2010 (21) may 2010 (15) april 2010 (22) march 2010 (9) february 2010 (15) january 2010 (15) december 2009 (28) november 2009 (34) october 2009 (15) september 2009 (14) august 2009 (10) july 2009 (16) june 2009 (24) may 2009 (45) april 2009 (36) march 2009 (71) february 2009 (52) january 2009 (86) december 2008 (17) november 2008 (4) september 2008 (1) august 2008 (1) may 2008 (2) april 2008 (1) february 2008 (2) january 2008 (1) may 2007 (2) november 2006 (1) september 2006 (3) august 2006 (2) may 2006 (1) march 2006 (1) november 2005 (1) october 2005 (3) september 2005 (5) july 2005 (1) may 2005 (1) posts by date february 2017 m t w t f s s « jan 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 categories academics (149) analogy – apartheid/israel (37) analogy – holocaust/israel (36) anti-racism (45) anti-zionism (138) antisemitism (314) anti-racist antisemitism (60) antisemitism denial (34) jewish antisemitism (17) open antisemitism (40) street antisemitism (19) art (21) as-a-jew (37) book (6) boycott divestment & sanctions (201) academic boycott (96) boycott opposition (44) silent boycott (1) sporting boycott (2) bridges (1) campus activism (38) cartoons (5) child killing (8) coexistence (24) conflict (37) conflict resolution (20) conspiracy beliefs (34) event (22) free expression (35) gaza (27) hamas (18) holocaust (57) denial (21) holocaust comparisons (16) humour (1) intelligentsia (13) iran (21) israel (70) jews as proxy israelis (25) law (10) letter (13) media (42) british media (29) national identity (14) neo-nazi (8) palestinians (33) peace activism (23) religion (3) suppression (17) the left (91) swp (12) the right (30) trade union (99) ucu (73) uncategorized (528) united nations (12) admin register log in entries rss comments rss wordpress.com jenny tonge’s outrageous response to cst report february 2, 2017 — s4r4hbrown yesterday the cst  released their yearly report on antisemitic incidents in the uk.  the results are worrying. 1,309 cases were recorded, the highest ever total, and a 36% increase from last year.  the cst cites widely reported disputes over antisemitism in the labour party and the climate of increased racism and xenophobia following the eu referendum as possible factors in this sharp rise.  107 violent assaults were logged last year, and it is likely that underreporting masks the true total.  although these only account for a small proportion of total incidents, it’s concerning that campus related cases involving students and academics have doubled since last year. the report is characteristically measured.  there has been much discussion of antisemitism within the uk’s muslim communities and the cst is very careful to caution against reading too much into the raw statistics about perpetrator identity (where available). these figures partly reflect the fact that britain’s jewish communities tend to live in relatively diverse urban areas, and that street crime offenders (where the most common type of antisemitic incident takes place) make up a younger, and more diverse, demographic profile than the population as a whole (p. 24) the cst is also extremely careful not to conflate criticism of israel with antisemitism, while acknowledging the obvious potential for intersection.  their rationale for including (or rejecting) anti-israel discourse in their incident report is very clearly laid out on pp.27-8.  this section demonstrates the nuanced and cautious approach adopted by the cst. similarly, anti-israel material that is sent unsolicited to a synagogue at random may be recorded as an antisemitic incident (because the synagogue was targeted simply because it is jewish and the offender has failed to distinguish between a place of worship and a political organisation), when the same material sent unsolicited to specifically pro-israel organisations would not be. on the other hand, if a particular synagogue has been involved in public pro-israel advocacy and subsequently is sent anti-israel material, it may not be classified as antisemitic unless the content of the material dictates otherwise. below you can read jenny tonge’s nasty response to the cst’s report – indeed her proud promotion of her initial response. where to start? no concern is expressed over the rise in antisemitic violence.  instead she insists that jews need to distance themselves from netanyahu in order to avoid attacks.  if she thinks the cst demonstrates a ‘perpetual victim mentality’ what kind of campaigning community group against antisemitism would she countenance?  although sometimes israel is the apparent driver for antisemitism, the cst’s report also contains evidence of holocaust denial and conspiracism.  and it’s deeply unfair to imply that the cst is not concerned about ‘all racism’ – it has worked closely with tell mama to support their project countering anti-muslim bigotry. in her recent response to a much criticised interview on j-tv tonge opined my own fault i guess for being decent and wanting to connect with israel’s supporters. this rings very hollow in the light of her failure to connect with the victims of hate crimes – something which should be easily possible whether or not one is a supporter of israel. share this:twitterfacebookemailredditlike this:like loading... posted in uncategorized. 8 comments » some resources for the struggle against the campaign to boycott israeli universities january 3, 2017 — david hirsh the academic engagement network (aen) has published david hirsh’s keynote presentation at its first national conference, as a pamphlet:  the pamphlet is available as a pdf on the aen website. aen has also published a podcast of a conversation between its executive director ken waltzer, and david hirsh: to listen to the podcast,  “making democracy sexy: david hirsh on combating bds and antisemitism by rediscovering democracy”, follow this link.   the american studies association boycott resolution, academic freedom and the myth of the institutional boycott – david hirsh :   published in inside higher ed is available here. david hirsh: why bds is antisemitic.  david hirsh in debate with ilan pappé. hirsh, david. 2012. portia, shylock and the exclusion of israeli actors from the global cultural community. david hirsh discussion with claire potter about support for the campaign to boycott israel: for david hirsh’s open email to claire potter, follow this link.  for claire potter’s response, follow this link. for david hirsh’s response, follow this link.  archived debate – martin shaw, david hirsh, norman geras – is the proposal to boycott israeli academics antisemitic? the myth of the institutional boycott – jon pike: the claim that bds is a boycott campaign which is not directed at israeli individuals is doing the rounds again. the article is from february 2006 and questions this claim with regard to the academic boycott. is an academic boycott of israel justified? – michael yudkin – engage journal special issue – april 2007  the principle of the universality of science and learning – that academics do not discriminate against colleagues on the basis of factors that are irrelevant to their academic work (such as race, religion, nationality etc.) – is well established and almost universally respected. to boycott academics by reason of their country of residence breaches this principle and harms the interests of the academics concerned. two kinds of argument speak in favour of maintaining the principle of the universality of science and learning: 1) that undesirable consequences would flow from violating it, and 2) that to harm people who are innocent of wrongdoing is morally unacceptable. those who wish to boycott israeli academics attempt to defeat the second type of argument by claiming that these academics are complicit in discrimination against the arab minority in israel or the occupation of the west bank, and/or that israeli universities suppress dissenting voices. analysis of these claims shows that they are without serious substance. cure worse than the disease: academic boycott of israel in the light of the academic boycott of south africa – mira vogel – engage journal issue 4 – february 2007 israelis are not nazis – david hirsh – 15 november 2008 israelis are not nazis – mira vogel – 13 november 2008 esprit d’escalier: reminiscences of a silent observer of the ucu conference – robert fine 30 may 2008 antisemitism, boycotts and freedom of speech – robert fine – 16 may 2007 israeli universities, israel-palestinian peace and real solidarity – paul frosh, hebrew university, jerusalem added by david hirsh – 3 november 2006 the argument for the boycott – pacbi – david hirsh – 9 september 2006 “i would hate myself in the morning” – steve cohen – may 29 2006 why i am against the boycott, by john strawson – 18 may 2005 share this:twitterfacebookemailredditlike this:like loading... posted in uncategorized. leave a comment » boycott, divestment and sanctions (bds) and antisemitism december 14, 2016 — david hirsh the academic engagement network (aen) in the us has published david hirsh’s keynote presentation at its first national conference, as a pamphlet. the pamphlet is available as a pdf on the aen website.  to download it, follow this link.  aen has also published a podcast of a conversation between its executive director ken waltzer, and david hirsh. to listen to the podcast,  “making democracy sexy: david hirsh on combating bds and antisemitism by rediscovering democracy”, follow this link.  share this:twitterfacebookemailredditlike this:like loading... posted in uncategorized. leave a comment » the new definition of antisemitism is only a threat to antisemites – david hirsh december 12, 2016 — david hirsh this piece, by david hirsh, is from thejc.com characterising something as antisemitic is a political judgment. it requires knowledge about how antisemitism works, an understanding of context, some thought about intentions, but also analysis of unintended consequences. the working definition, which has now been adopted by the uk government, offers helpful guidance on the making of such political judgments. how would you decide whether a joke was antisemitic, or sexist for that matter? you could not invent a machine to do this for you. in part it would depend on whether the joke was funny, on who told it, how and why; on who laughed at it and why they laughed.  it is a matter of judgment, and there is room for legitimate disagreement and debate over judgments. in our time, people who do and think antisemitic things frequently believe themselves to be opponents of antisemitism. those who single out israelis and their supporters for boycott angrily deny that they are antisemitic; some who conflate zionism and nazism consider themselves to be antiracists; those who say jews were among the chief financiers of the slave trade or who want to address the ‘jewish question’ complain they are targets of zionist smears. on the level of words, prohibitions and taboos against racism and antisemitism remain firmly in place; but this does not prevent antisemitic and racist ways of thinking becoming ever more significant and influential in public discourse. because the veneer of respectability is still important, denial and counter-accusations of bad faith tend to drown out rational and democratic discussion. antisemitism lurks under the surface; we are reluctant to see it in our allies and we are eager to see it in those we fear or hate. the left sniffs the antisemitism on the right and the right sniffs the antisemitism on the left. the working definition does not seek to see a person’s essence to find out whether they are antisemitic. what it does instead is to help in the recognition of antisemitic actions and ways of thinking. it is concerned with what people do, what they say and what they tolerate; not what they are. many in the movement to boycott and to de-legitimize israel are afraid of the working definition. they say that it defines criticism of israel as antisemitic. it actually does the opposite. it helps us to make the distinction between what kinds of criticism may be legitimate and what kinds of hostility or demonization may either lead towards, or result from, antisemitism. some on the left will continue to say that the working definition is part of a zionist and tory conspiracy to smear left wing politics. this itself is an antisemitic claim. the left needs to understand antisemitism and to come to terms with the history of antisemitism within its own movement. it needs to educate young people to recognize and oppose antisemitism, not to accuse those who do recognize it of being the problem.  the working definition can help us to mobilize against antisemitism. it is not a threat to the left or to those who are for palestinian freedom, it is a threat to antisemitism. david hirsh is a lecturer in sociology at goldsmiths college, university of london this piece, by david hirsh, is from thejc.com follow this link for a pre-history of the new definition of antisemitism.  follow this link for the ucu’s disavowal of the working definition.   follow this link for the live blog of the debate in which ucu decided to disavow the working definition.  share this:twitterfacebookemailredditlike this:like loading... posted in uncategorized. 3 comments » david hirsh podcast – academic engagement network december 7, 2016 — david hirsh david hirsh did this podcast in new york for the academic engagement network on left antisemitism, opposing bds, and the rise of the new populist movements, brexit and trump. share this:twitterfacebookemailredditlike this:like loading... posted in uncategorized. 1 comment » summer institute for curriculum development in critical antisemitism studies st. john’s college, oxford, uk december 1, 2016 — david hirsh summer institute for curriculum development  in critical antisemitism studies st. john’s college, oxford, uk the isgap-oxford summer institute is seeking scholars-in-residence for an intensive two-week workshop-based curriculum development program in interdisciplinary critical contemporary antisemitism studies. the program, dedicated to the development of antisemitism studies as a recognized academic discipline, will be held at st john’s college, in oxford, united kingdom from july 16, 2017 to july 29, 2017. the program is intended primarily for professors with full-time college or university positions, though exceptional doctoral and post-doctoral students may also be considered. under the guidance of leading international academics, scholars-in-residence will be required to develop a course syllabus and curriculum in the interdisciplinary study of critical contemporary antisemitism, to be taught in their home university upon completion for course credit. partial or full fellowships will be awarded to successful applicants. application deadline is february 22, 2017. click here for application and requirements. please click here to see a video of highlights from previous year’s programs. share this:twitterfacebookemailredditlike this:like loading... posted in uncategorized. leave a comment » regulator raps university that sided with jew-baiting palsoc – lesley klaff november 9, 2016 — david hirsh lesley klaff in a landmark ruling by the office of the independent adjudicator for higher education (oia) last week, sheffield hallam university was told to pay a disabled jewish student, brian, £3,000 in compensation for failing to properly consider his complaint about antisemitic social media posts by the university’s palestine society.  the oia ruling is particularly significant because it recognises that anti-zionist behaviour on campus can harass jewish students and because it endorses the use of the eumc working definition of antisemitism as a guide to determining when anti-zionist behaviour crosses the line into antisemitism. brian’s complaint, which was filed in may 2015, alleged that the university tolerated anti-israel activity on campus that crossed the line from legitimate criticism of israel into antisemitism and harassment. it listed appalling facebook posts and tweets by the university’s palestine society which went way beyond the right to free speech and created a hostile environment for him.  these posts, inter alia, accused israel and israelis of genocide, deliberately killing palestinian children, deliberately killing other palestinian civilians, war crimes, atrocities, using chemical weapons, ethnic cleansing, inhumanity, cruelty, behaving like nazis, sexual and other abuse of palestinian children (including abduction and human trafficking), stealing palestinian organs, being racists and fascists, and rejoicing in palestinian deaths. brian complained that these posts contributed to “an intimidating campus climate” and that he felt “intimidated and afraid to mention israel on campus or to wear my star of david or my skull cap for fear of being picked on.” he said that “they are based on lies and half-truths about jews, invoking blood libel motifs, stereotypes and defamations on campus and online, creating a threatening mob mentality.” he explained the eumc international working definition of antisemitism and invited the university to formally adopt it in order to identify all forms of antisemitic expression on campus and to identify clear protocols for addressing it. the university took nine months to consider brian’s complaint and then comprehensively rejected it.  despite an evidence file spanning 154 pages, the university concluded that evidence of antisemitism from brian’s complaint was “not conclusive” and suggested that brian was conflating criticism of israel with anti-jewish prejudice. it said, “[brian’s] complaint reflects a tendency to think that those who oppose the policies and actions of israel as a state or government are antisemitc and prejudiced against jews …. the complaint appears to conflate being anti-israel with being anti-jewish and opposition to israel on political or moral grounds with hatred on religious and racial grounds”.  the university thereby ignored parts of brian’s complaint that distinguished legitimate criticism of israel from antisemitism. for example, para 48 of brian’s complaint stated that: “i do not ask or expect the university to prevent spoken or written criticism of the state of israel; but the university must not permit such criticisms to be expressed in a form which is or might reasonably be viewed as intending to stir up religious hatred against jews or adherents of other religions”; and para 26 of his complaint explained that: “an example of a contemporary antisemitic trope is the allegation that israelis (or jews or zionists) behave like nazis. such criticism of israel must be distinguished from legitimate criticism of israel which is not antisemitic.” the university concluded that as there was no antisemitism, there was no basis for specific action to be taken to reduce antisemitism over and above its existing policies in support of good relations on campus. in fact, the university thought that brian’s use of the term “jew-baiting” in his complaint was itself more likely to “lead to poor campus relations between groups of people” than any of the palestine society’s anti-israel posts. on the issue of the eumc definition, the university said that its formal adoption was a “policy matter” that was beyond the scope of the student complaints procedure and insinuated that david lewis and i, who as (non-practising) lawyers had assisted brian throughout the process, had ‘used’ brian to pursue our own political and campaigning agendas. accordingly, the university questioned brian’s ownership of his complaint. the oia found, however, that the university ought reasonably to have engaged with brian’s request that it formally adopt the eumc definition in the consideration of his complaint because it is “more nuanced” than the university’s approach and because it is “relevant to the question of whether material which purportedly was criticising the (alleged) actions of the israeli state ‘crossed the line’ from being merely offensive or inflammatory to [brian] to amounting (or potentially amounting) to material which might reasonably be perceived as anti-semitic and likely to cause [brian], as a student identifying as jewish, to experience harassment”. this finding, in my view, amounts to a strong endorsement of the eumc definition as a guide to deciding when anti-zionist behaviour on campus crosses the line into antisemitism. on the issue of harassment, the oia found that the university had failed to ask itself whether there was evidence of antisemitic behaviour or material and failed to properly turn its mind to the question of whether “as a student identifying as jewish” brian was likely to have been harassed as a result of some of the offending material. the oia listed by way of example seven of the blood libels set out in brian’s complaint and stressed that the university should have engaged further with this aspect of the complaint because it had not explored adequately whether a hostile, intimidating, offensive or humiliating environment had been created for brian but focussed too heavily on whether brian had been personally threatened or whether the palestine intended to be threatening, abusive or insulting.  the oia also criticised the university for failing to properly take into account “sector guidance” (by which it presumably meant universities uk: freedom of speech on campus, which brian had referred to throughout his complaint). this says that “it is often the manner and form in which views are expressed, rather than the opinions themselves, which take the relevant speech or conduct into the area of unlawful harassment.” for failing to properly consider his claim of harassment relevant to his jewish identity, the oia recommended that the university compensate brian to the tune of £2,500. the oia also recommended that the university pay brian £250 for its delay in considering his complaint and £250 for the manner in which it questioned his ownership of the complaint. this means that no university in the future can treat a complaint of antisemitic harassment with the indifference and contempt seen in this case without risking criticism by the oia and a compensation award. the oia also criticised the students’ union. in june 2014, brian had submitted an earlier complaint to the university concerning the social media activity of the palestine society. he did this by means of an email, which the university had then referred to the students’ union for resolution. brian was asked to meet with the head of student engagement at the students union in late november 2014 and i accompanied him. at that meeting the head of student engagement dismissed brian’s complaint but gave no plausible reasons and no written decision was ever issued. she merely said that she did not think the content of the palestine society’s social media posts about which brian complained were antisemitc because she had seen similar statements on the internet.  i asked her which definition of antisemitism she was using and she did not reply. i asked her to give me a definition of antisemitism and she could not give me one. i asked her to give me an example of antisemitism and she remained silent. i asked her whether she had ever heard of the blood libel and she answered “no”. i asked her whether she had ever heard of the conspiracy libel and she answered “no”. finally, she admitted to knowing nothing about antisemitism. all this was recorded in minutes taken of the meeting and included with the compliant submitted to the university in may 2015 and the appeal to the oia in may 2016. although brian’s appeal to the oia in may 2016 treated the students’ union handling of his original complaint as a secondary issue and did not ask the oia to evaluate it, the oia nevertheless criticised the students’ union for failing to treat brian’s email as a formal complaint and for appointing a decision-maker who was ill-equipped to consider his complaint. it further criticised it for failing to ask the palestine society to respond to the complaint, thereby missing an opportunity to persuade the society to remove the offending social media posts at an earlier stage; for failing to issue brian with a written decision; and for failing to advise brian of his right of appeal to the university. the oia accordingly recommended that the university work with the students’ union to review its complaints handling practices in order to ensure that complaints are dealt with fairly. it further recommended that the university work with the students’ union to raise awareness across campus of the legal framework governing freedom of speech and the university’s responsibility to ensure that staff and students are protected from harassment. the oia has a record of acting fairly and justly in cases brought by jewish students and this case involving brian and sheffield hallam university and its students’ union is no exception. as my colleague david lewis has said, “this decision could really help jewish and pro-israel students to complain effectively to their universities about some of the worst abuses by anti-zionists” and i agree with him. lesley klaff lecturer in law, sheffield hallam university share this:twitterfacebookemailredditlike this:like loading... posted in uncategorized. 5 comments » « older posts blog at wordpress.com. search search engage subscribe rss - postsrss - comments recent posts jenny tonge’s outrageous response to cst report some resources for the struggle against the campaign to boycott israeli universities boycott, divestment and sanctions (bds) and antisemitism the new definition of antisemitism is only a threat to antisemites – david hirsh david hirsh podcast – academic engagement network summer institute for curriculum development in critical antisemitism studies st. john’s college, oxford, uk regulator raps university that sided with jew-baiting palsoc – lesley klaff things can only get better? labour’s relationship with the jewish community. jlm northwest meeting, manchester, nov 27th. mp.s louise ellman, naz shah, ruth smeeth. looking for old stuff on engage? some years later recent comments susan on jenny tonge’s outrageous response to cst report brian goldfarb on jenny tonge’s outrageous response to cst report mira vogel on jenny tonge’s outrageous response to cst report mira vogel on jenny tonge’s outrageous response to cst report jonathan on jenny tonge’s outrageous response to cst report soupy one on jenny tonge’s outrageous response to cst report jonathanlesser2013 on jenny tonge’s outrageous response to cst report arnaud on jenny tonge’s outrageous response to cst report yehuda erdman on the new definition of antisemitism is only a threat to antisemites – david hirsh brian goldfarb on the new definition of antisemitism is only a threat to antisemites – david hirsh engage on twitter things can only get better? labour’s relationship with the jewish community. jlm northwest meeting, mancheste... bit.ly/2e9ydk2 3 months ago looking for old stuff on engage?: people might have noticed that the old engage website is dead. if anybody w... bit.ly/2f0msve 4 months ago the lobby: mearsheimer and walt’s conspiracy theory – robert fine:   john mearsheimer and stephen walt (lrb 2... bit.ly/2ec6qkl 4 months ago why can’t we just remember kristallnacht? david hirsh: the guardian asked paul oestreicher to write a piece o... bit.ly/2ebh9hl 4 months ago some years later: first they came for the jews and i said it was a smear, first they came for the jews, and i... bit.ly/2em5ghg 4 months ago follow @engageonline academic brandeis center european institute for the study of contemporary antisemitism european institute for the study of contemporary antisemitism institute for the study of contemporary antisemitism, indiana university journal for the study of antisemitism pears institute for the study of antisemitism stephen roth institute for the study of contemporary antisemitism and racism the vidal sassoon international center for the study of antisemitism blogroll alliance for workers' liberty bob from brockley european forum on antisemitism givat haviva harry's place ignoblus it's complicated meretz uk modernityblog mystical politics normblog obliged to offend peace now uk point of no return scholars for peace in the middle east the community security trust blog trade unions linking israel and palestine peace and coexistence common ground news service the abraham fund top posts why bds is antisemitic - david hirsh david icke pays a lot of money in damages ian anderson to boycotters: "don't fucking tell me what to do" opposing the campaign to exclude israelis from the global academic community ilan pappe admits that bds was not initiated by a "call" from palestinian civil society isgap-oxford summer institute for curriculum development in critical antisemitism studies naomi klein is wrong to call for a boycott of israel - david hirsh the livingstone formulation - david hirsh about engage bmi and airbus wipe israel off the map - for people flying to certain destinations engage blog at wordpress.com. post to cancel send to email address your name your email address cancel post was not sent - check your email addresses! email check failed, please try again sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email. %d bloggers like this:


Here you find all texts from your page as Google (googlebot) and others search engines seen it.

Words density analysis:

Numbers of all words: 4896

One word

Two words phrases

Three words phrases

the - 6.72% (329)
and - 2.72% (133)
for - 1.59% (78)
antisemitism - 1.27% (62)
his - 1.21% (59)
that - 1.14% (56)
israel - 1.06% (52)
ian - 1% (49)
her - 0.98% (48)
this - 0.9% (44)
- 0.86% (42)
david - 0.84% (41)
university - 0.78% (38)
hirsh - 0.76% (37)
out - 0.74% (36)
brian - 0.69% (34)
are - 0.69% (34)
not - 0.63% (31)
with - 0.63% (31)
complain - 0.63% (31)
boycott - 0.59% (29)
(1) - 0.59% (29)
engage - 0.57% (28)
she - 0.57% (28)
all - 0.55% (27)
our - 0.55% (27)
complaint - 0.55% (27)
may - 0.51% (25)
academic - 0.49% (24)
antisemitic - 0.47% (23)
was - 0.47% (23)
post - 0.47% (23)
work - 0.45% (22)
like - 0.43% (21)
student - 0.41% (20)
from - 0.39% (19)
cst - 0.39% (19)
2016 - 0.39% (19)
definition - 0.39% (19)
which - 0.37% (18)
report - 0.35% (17)
use - 0.35% (17)
(3) - 0.33% (16)
israeli - 0.33% (16)
about - 0.33% (16)
wish - 0.33% (16)
oia - 0.33% (16)
nov - 0.33% (16)
its - 0.31% (15)
email - 0.31% (15)
who - 0.31% (15)
response - 0.31% (15)
jewish - 0.31% (15)
this: - 0.31% (15)
november - 0.31% (15)
february - 0.31% (15)
here - 0.29% (14)
they - 0.29% (14)
art - 0.29% (14)
log - 0.29% (14)
students - 0.29% (14)
can - 0.29% (14)
(2) - 0.29% (14)
2015 - 0.29% (14)
campus - 0.27% (13)
posts - 0.27% (13)
december - 0.27% (13)
brian’s - 0.27% (13)
2009 - 0.27% (13)
2014 - 0.27% (13)
2013 - 0.27% (13)
again - 0.27% (13)
had - 0.25% (12)
comment - 0.25% (12)
2010 - 0.25% (12)
 the - 0.25% (12)
september - 0.25% (12)
2012 - 0.25% (12)
whether - 0.25% (12)
ask - 0.25% (12)
2011 - 0.25% (12)
jan - 0.25% (12)
tonge - 0.25% (12)
some - 0.25% (12)
link - 0.22% (11)
has - 0.22% (11)
follow - 0.22% (11)
july - 0.22% (11)
jenny - 0.22% (11)
tonge’s - 0.22% (11)
january - 0.22% (11)
what - 0.22% (11)
also - 0.22% (11)
2008 - 0.22% (11)
against - 0.22% (11)
criticism - 0.22% (11)
august - 0.2% (10)
cause - 0.2% (10)
outrageous - 0.2% (10)
april - 0.2% (10)
off - 0.2% (10)
institute - 0.2% (10)
inter - 0.2% (10)
union - 0.2% (10)
you - 0.2% (10)
their - 0.18% (9)
over - 0.18% (9)
twitter - 0.18% (9)
bds - 0.18% (9)
old - 0.18% (9)
june - 0.18% (9)
working - 0.18% (9)
threat - 0.18% (9)
part - 0.18% (9)
2006 - 0.18% (9)
jews - 0.18% (9)
academics - 0.18% (9)
antisemitism. - 0.18% (9)
march - 0.18% (9)
blog - 0.18% (9)
because - 0.18% (9)
book - 0.18% (9)
harass - 0.18% (9)
palestinian - 0.18% (9)
october - 0.16% (8)
own - 0.16% (8)
one - 0.16% (8)
new - 0.16% (8)
2017 - 0.16% (8)
line - 0.16% (8)
comments - 0.16% (8)
ago - 0.16% (8)
antisemitism, - 0.16% (8)
form - 0.16% (8)
it. - 0.16% (8)
society - 0.16% (8)
facebook - 0.16% (8)
material - 0.16% (8)
uncategorized - 0.16% (8)
palestine - 0.16% (8)
study - 0.16% (8)
see - 0.16% (8)
consider - 0.16% (8)
left - 0.16% (8)
share - 0.16% (8)
being - 0.14% (7)
sent - 0.14% (7)
those - 0.14% (7)
this:twitterfacebookemailredditlike - 0.14% (7)
there - 0.14% (7)
naz - 0.14% (7)
late - 0.14% (7)
asked - 0.14% (7)
students’ - 0.14% (7)
harassment - 0.14% (7)
say - 0.14% (7)
failing - 0.14% (7)
develop - 0.14% (7)
contemporary - 0.14% (7)
zionist - 0.14% (7)
tend - 0.14% (7)
this:like - 0.14% (7)
month - 0.14% (7)
two - 0.14% (7)
issue - 0.14% (7)
studies - 0.14% (7)
podcast - 0.14% (7)
engagement - 0.14% (7)
(4) - 0.14% (7)
campaign - 0.14% (7)
uncategorized. - 0.14% (7)
posted - 0.14% (7)
loading... - 0.14% (7)
than - 0.14% (7)
people - 0.14% (7)
national - 0.14% (7)
ever - 0.14% (7)
only - 0.14% (7)
- 0.14% (7)
free - 0.14% (7)
israelis - 0.14% (7)
have - 0.12% (6)
meet - 0.12% (6)
support - 0.12% (6)
months - 0.12% (6)
critical - 0.12% (6)
curriculum - 0.12% (6)
development - 0.12% (6)
anti-israel - 0.12% (6)
community - 0.12% (6)
why - 0.12% (6)
concern - 0.12% (6)
would - 0.12% (6)
claim - 0.12% (6)
question - 0.12% (6)
link. - 0.12% (6)
2005 - 0.12% (6)
said - 0.12% (6)
think - 0.12% (6)
into - 0.12% (6)
were - 0.12% (6)
universities - 0.12% (6)
john - 0.12% (6)
but - 0.12% (6)
aen - 0.12% (6)
though - 0.12% (6)
college - 0.12% (6)
racism - 0.12% (6)
been - 0.12% (6)
these - 0.12% (6)
media - 0.12% (6)
(8) - 0.12% (6)
(6) - 0.12% (6)
war - 0.1% (5)
link.  - 0.1% (5)
(9) - 0.1% (5)
freedom - 0.1% (5)
summer - 0.1% (5)
state - 0.1% (5)
(12) - 0.1% (5)
(15) - 0.1% (5)
college, - 0.1% (5)
criticised - 0.1% (5)
(5) - 0.1% (5)
adopt - 0.1% (5)
eumc - 0.1% (5)
ucu - 0.1% (5)
ken - 0.1% (5)
(17) - 0.1% (5)
network - 0.1% (5)
reason - 0.1% (5)
offend - 0.1% (5)
legitimate - 0.1% (5)
right - 0.1% (5)
journal - 0.1% (5)
published - 0.1% (5)
address - 0.1% (5)
incident - 0.1% (5)
speech - 0.1% (5)
now - 0.1% (5)
case - 0.1% (5)
did - 0.1% (5)
nazis - 0.1% (5)
help - 0.1% (5)
other - 0.1% (5)
peace - 0.1% (5)
take - 0.1% (5)
between - 0.1% (5)
political - 0.1% (5)
how - 0.1% (5)
under - 0.1% (5)
antisemites - 0.08% (4)
such - 0.08% (4)
lesley - 0.08% (4)
fine - 0.08% (4)
course - 0.08% (4)
klaff - 0.08% (4)
available - 0.08% (4)
first - 0.08% (4)
“i - 0.08% (4)
vogel - 0.08% (4)
hirsh’s - 0.08% (4)
tory - 0.08% (4)
program - 0.08% (4)
does - 0.08% (4)
will - 0.08% (4)
hirsh, - 0.08% (4)
debate - 0.08% (4)
holocaust - 0.08% (4)
conspiracy - 0.08% (4)
rss - 0.08% (4)
racist - 0.08% (4)
argument - 0.08% (4)
mira - 0.08% (4)
sign - 0.08% (4)
it, - 0.08% (4)
st. - 0.08% (4)
law - 0.08% (4)
john’s - 0.08% (4)
oxford, - 0.08% (4)
 in - 0.08% (4)
democracy - 0.08% (4)
archive - 0.08% (4)
recommended - 0.08% (4)
formal - 0.08% (4)
too - 0.08% (4)
meeting - 0.08% (4)
example - 0.08% (4)
themselves - 0.08% (4)
action - 0.08% (4)
relations - 0.08% (4)
walt - 0.08% (4)
any - 0.08% (4)
(21) - 0.08% (4)
evidence - 0.08% (4)
get - 0.08% (4)
ought - 0.08% (4)
2007 - 0.08% (4)
record - 0.08% (4)
place - 0.08% (4)
decision - 0.08% (4)
relevant - 0.08% (4)
failed - 0.08% (4)
more - 0.08% (4)
kind - 0.08% (4)
identify - 0.08% (4)
university’s - 0.08% (4)
fact - 0.08% (4)
libel - 0.08% (4)
properly - 0.08% (4)
denial - 0.08% (4)
way - 0.08% (4)
last - 0.08% (4)
behaviour - 0.08% (4)
anti-zionist - 0.08% (4)
social - 0.08% (4)
call - 0.08% (4)
your - 0.08% (4)
likely - 0.08% (4)
(16) - 0.06% (3)
although - 0.06% (3)
try - 0.06% (3)
appeal - 0.06% (3)
give - 0.06% (3)
things - 0.06% (3)
bmi - 0.06% (3)
(34) - 0.06% (3)
website - 0.06% (3)
guidance - 0.06% (3)
matter - 0.06% (3)
just - 0.06% (3)
identity - 0.06% (3)
could - 0.06% (3)
policy - 0.06% (3)
ground - 0.06% (3)
piece - 0.06% (3)
european - 0.06% (3)
scholars - 0.06% (3)
making - 0.06% (3)
hallam - 0.06% (3)
complaint. - 0.06% (3)
him. - 0.06% (3)
reasonably - 0.06% (3)
sheffield - 0.06% (3)
jew-baiting - 0.06% (3)
child - 0.06% (3)
killing - 0.06% (3)
international - 0.06% (3)
sanctions - 0.06% (3)
intended - 0.06% (3)
divestment - 0.06% (3)
harassment. - 0.06% (3)
blood - 0.06% (3)
(37) - 0.06% (3)
file - 0.06% (3)
written - 0.06% (3)
might - 0.06% (3)
resolution - 0.06% (3)
treat - 0.06% (3)
definition. - 0.06% (3)
antisemitism.  - 0.06% (3)
event - 0.06% (3)
term - 0.06% (3)
recognize - 0.06% (3)
itself - 0.06% (3)
complaints - 0.06% (3)
smear - 0.06% (3)
pay - 0.06% (3)
further - 0.06% (3)
result - 0.06% (3)
lead - 0.06% (3)
movement - 0.06% (3)
actions - 0.06% (3)
silent - 0.06% (3)
wing - 0.06% (3)
 to - 0.06% (3)
much - 0.06% (3)
(or - 0.06% (3)
principle - 0.06% (3)
wordpress.com - 0.06% (3)
rounds - 0.06% (3)
claire - 0.06% (3)
potter - 0.06% (3)
community. - 0.06% (3)
actors - 0.06% (3)
antisemitic.  - 0.06% (3)
hirsh: - 0.06% (3)
(10) - 0.06% (3)
synagogue - 0.06% (3)
recorded - 0.06% (3)
discussion - 0.06% (3)
distinguish - 0.06% (3)
kinds - 0.06% (3)
need - 0.06% (3)
total - 0.06% (3)
tell - 0.06% (3)
concerned - 0.06% (3)
light - 0.06% (3)
hate - 0.06% (3)
order - 0.06% (3)
rise - 0.06% (3)
when - 0.06% (3)
expressed - 0.06% (3)
where - 0.06% (3)
supporter - 0.06% (3)
labour - 0.06% (3)
cases - 0.06% (3)
pro-israel - 0.06% (3)
residence - 0.06% (3)
recent - 0.06% (3)
crime - 0.06% (3)
west - 0.06% (3)
boycott, - 0.06% (3)
robert - 0.06% (3)
make - 0.06% (3)
trade - 0.06% (3)
conference - 0.06% (3)
leave - 0.06% (3)
conflate - 0.06% (3)
type - 0.06% (3)
24) - 0.06% (3)
very - 0.06% (3)
religion - 0.06% (3)
merely - 0.04% (2)
lewis - 0.04% (2)
offending - 0.04% (2)
concerning - 0.04% (2)
live - 0.04% (2)
cancel - 0.04% (2)
society’s - 0.04% (2)
(20) - 0.04% (2)
funny - 0.04% (2)
turn - 0.04% (2)
offensive - 0.04% (2)
involving - 0.04% (2)
cst’s - 0.04% (2)
public - 0.04% (2)
found - 0.04% (2)
[brian] - 0.04% (2)
diverse - 0.04% (2)
identifying - 0.04% (2)
throughout - 0.04% (2)
questioned - 0.04% (2)
particular - 0.04% (2)
ownership - 0.04% (2)
read - 0.04% (2)
content - 0.04% (2)
engaged - 0.04% (2)
amounting - 0.04% (2)
potential - 0.04% (2)
taken - 0.04% (2)
antisemitc - 0.04% (2)
steve - 0.04% (2)
clear - 0.04% (2)
(28) - 0.04% (2)
raw - 0.04% (2)
then - 0.04% (2)
imply - 0.04% (2)
concluded - 0.04% (2)
anti-jewish - 0.04% (2)
said, - 0.04% (2)
policies - 0.04% (2)
 and - 0.04% (2)
please - 0.04% (2)
government - 0.04% (2)
moral - 0.04% (2)
most - 0.04% (2)
grounds - 0.04% (2)
hatred - 0.04% (2)
religious - 0.04% (2)
thereby - 0.04% (2)
distinguished - 0.04% (2)
para - 0.04% (2)
that: - 0.04% (2)
analogy - 0.04% (2)
group - 0.04% (2)
must - 0.04% (2)
date - 0.04% (2)
campaigning - 0.04% (2)
victim - 0.04% (2)
check - 0.04% (2)
specific - 0.04% (2)
area - 0.04% (2)
referred - 0.04% (2)
northwest - 0.04% (2)
colleague - 0.04% (2)
politics - 0.04% (2)
agree - 0.04% (2)
wordpress.com. - 0.04% (2)
search - 0.04% (2)
section - 0.04% (2)
pears - 0.04% (2)
better? - 0.04% (2)
labour’s - 0.04% (2)
relationship - 0.04% (2)
center - 0.04% (2)
came - 0.04% (2)
jlm - 0.04% (2)
meeting, - 0.04% (2)
demonstrates - 0.04% (2)
communities - 0.04% (2)
discourse - 0.04% (2)
ruth - 0.04% (2)
looking - 0.04% (2)
(22) - 0.04% (2)
stuff - 0.04% (2)
engage? - 0.04% (2)
years - 0.04% (2)
later - 0.04% (2)
goldfarb - 0.04% (2)
jonathan - 0.04% (2)
careful - 0.04% (2)
including - 0.04% (2)
mearsheimer - 0.04% (2)
fairly - 0.04% (2)
ensure - 0.04% (2)
manner - 0.04% (2)
icke - 0.04% (2)
wrong - 0.04% (2)
stephen - 0.04% (2)
(36) - 0.04% (2)
offender - 0.04% (2)
£250 - 0.04% (2)
means - 0.04% (2)
civil - 0.04% (2)
seen - 0.04% (2)
common - 0.04% (2)
(45) - 0.04% (2)
submitted - 0.04% (2)
earlier - 0.04% (2)
society. - 0.04% (2)
(24) - 0.04% (2)
accordingly - 0.04% (2)
head - 0.04% (2)
(14) - 0.04% (2)
unsolicited - 0.04% (2)
it’s - 0.04% (2)
muslim - 0.04% (2)
similar - 0.04% (2)
adopted - 0.04% (2)
heard - 0.04% (2)
answered - 0.04% (2)
“no”. - 0.04% (2)
approach - 0.04% (2)
nuanced - 0.04% (2)
point - 0.04% (2)
handling - 0.04% (2)
within - 0.04% (2)
“an - 0.04% (2)
formally - 0.04% (2)
doing - 0.04% (2)
young - 0.04% (2)
history - 0.04% (2)
understand - 0.04% (2)
needs - 0.04% (2)
reflect - 0.04% (2)
response, - 0.04% (2)
afraid - 0.04% (2)
accuse - 0.04% (2)
universality - 0.04% (2)
science - 0.04% (2)
learning - 0.04% (2)
instead - 0.04% (2)
find - 0.04% (2)
seek - 0.04% (2)
oppose - 0.04% (2)
expression - 0.04% (2)
fear - 0.04% (2)
democracy”, - 0.04% (2)
isgap-oxford - 0.04% (2)
listen - 0.04% (2)
podcast,  “making - 0.04% (2)
sexy: - 0.04% (2)
combating - 0.04% (2)
rediscovering - 0.04% (2)
myth - 0.04% (2)
lecturer - 0.04% (2)
institutional - 0.04% (2)
opposing - 0.04% (2)
definition.  - 0.04% (2)
disavow - 0.04% (2)
higher - 0.04% (2)
ilan - 0.04% (2)
global - 0.04% (2)
sniffs - 0.04% (2)
(13) - 0.04% (2)
waltzer, - 0.04% (2)
november 2008 - 0.04% (2)
depend - 0.04% (2)
analysis - 0.04% (2)
without - 0.04% (2)
joke - 0.04% (2)
decide - 0.04% (2)
judgments. - 0.04% (2)
real - 0.04% (2)
laughed - 0.04% (2)
definition, - 0.04% (2)
paul - 0.04% (2)
thought - 0.04% (2)
thejc.com - 0.04% (2)
piece, - 0.04% (2)
(bds) - 0.04% (2)
told - 0.04% (2)
suppress - 0.04% (2)
basis - 0.04% (2)
remain - 0.04% (2)
rational - 0.04% (2)
significant - 0.04% (2)
thinking - 0.04% (2)
ways - 0.04% (2)
prevent - 0.04% (2)
nations - 0.04% (2)
consequences - 0.04% (2)
second - 0.04% (2)
harm - 0.04% (2)
want - 0.04% (2)
united - 0.04% (2)
zionism - 0.04% (2)
supporters - 0.04% (2)
archives - 0.04% (2)
mailings - 0.04% (2)
scholars-in-residence - 0.04% (2)
interdisciplinary - 0.04% (2)
explained - 0.04% (2)
open - 0.04% (2)
environment - 0.04% (2)
hostile - 0.04% (2)
created - 0.04% (2)
beyond - 0.04% (2)
something - 0.04% (2)
(42) - 0.04% (2)
listed - 0.04% (2)
deliberately - 0.04% (2)
should - 0.04% (2)
crossed - 0.04% (2)
activity - 0.04% (2)
alleged - 0.04% (2)
complaint, - 0.04% (2)
street - 0.04% (2)
crimes - 0.04% (2)
using - 0.04% (2)
crosses - 0.04% (2)
connect - 0.04% (2)
mob - 0.04% (2)
threatening - 0.04% (2)
account - 0.04% (2)
jews, - 0.04% (2)
lies - 0.04% (2)
based - 0.04% (2)
star - 0.04% (2)
(30) - 0.04% (2)
intimidating - 0.04% (2)
14, - 0.04% (2)
complained - 0.04% (2)
racists - 0.04% (2)
human - 0.04% (2)
children - 0.04% (2)
abuse - 0.04% (2)
(18) - 0.04% (2)
guide - 0.04% (2)
conflict - 0.04% (2)
pdf - 0.04% (2)
raps - 0.04% (2)
regulator - 0.04% (2)
pamphlet is - 0.04% (2)
click - 0.04% (2)
application - 0.04% (2)
full - 0.04% (2)
website. - 0.04% (2)
conference, - 0.04% (2)
coexistence - 0.04% (2)
incidents - 0.04% (2)
doctoral - 0.04% (2)
conversation - 0.04% (2)
executive - 0.04% (2)
director - 0.04% (2)
2017. - 0.04% (2)
sided - 0.04% (2)
palsoc - 0.04% (2)
 although - 0.04% (2)
page - 0.04% (2)
factors - 0.04% (2)
possible - 0.04% (2)
climate - 0.04% (2)
opposition - 0.04% (2)
year. - 0.04% (2)
resources - 0.04% (2)
struggle - 0.04% (2)
presentation - 0.04% (2)
increase - 0.04% (2)
activism - 0.04% (2)
compensation - 0.04% (2)
(7) - 0.04% (2)
(aen) - 0.04% (2)
keynote - 0.04% (2)
ruling - 0.04% (2)
(where - 0.04% (2)
of the - 0.76% (37)
david hirsh - 0.71% (35)
the university - 0.55% (27)
at the - 0.45% (22)
to the - 0.41% (20)
or the - 0.37% (18)
of antisemitism - 0.37% (18)
for the - 0.35% (17)
in the - 0.33% (16)
the oia - 0.31% (15)
that the - 0.31% (15)
of israel - 0.29% (14)
on the - 0.29% (14)
and the - 0.25% (12)
response to - 0.25% (12)
jenny tonge’s - 0.22% (11)
to cst - 0.2% (10)
tonge’s outrageous - 0.2% (10)
cst report - 0.2% (10)
outrageous response - 0.2% (10)
the cst - 0.18% (9)
working definition - 0.18% (9)
follow this - 0.18% (9)
with the - 0.18% (9)
this link - 0.18% (9)
definition of - 0.18% (9)
institute for - 0.18% (9)
to boycott - 0.16% (8)
study of - 0.16% (8)
on campus - 0.16% (8)
his complaint - 0.16% (8)
the student - 0.16% (8)
on jenny - 0.16% (8)
criticism of - 0.16% (8)
like this: - 0.16% (8)
brian’s complaint - 0.14% (7)
students’ union - 0.14% (7)
– david - 0.14% (7)
share this:twitterfacebookemailredditlike - 0.14% (7)
this:like loading... - 0.14% (7)
in uncategorized. - 0.14% (7)
posted in - 0.14% (7)
loading... posted - 0.14% (7)
this:twitterfacebookemailredditlike this:like - 0.14% (7)
for failing - 0.14% (7)
the study - 0.14% (7)
a threat - 0.14% (7)
failing to - 0.14% (7)
antisemitism studies - 0.12% (6)
the left - 0.12% (6)
and antisemitism - 0.12% (6)
and she - 0.12% (6)
antisemitism and - 0.12% (6)
the new - 0.12% (6)
this link. - 0.12% (6)
the students’ - 0.12% (6)
contemporary antisemitism - 0.12% (6)
because it - 0.12% (6)
by the - 0.12% (6)
threat to - 0.12% (6)
the academic - 0.12% (6)
— david - 0.12% (6)
they are - 0.12% (6)
those who - 0.12% (6)
of his - 0.1% (5)
academic engagement - 0.1% (5)
curriculum development - 0.1% (5)
this link.  - 0.1% (5)
the palestine - 0.1% (5)
the eumc - 0.1% (5)
academic boycott - 0.1% (5)
asked her - 0.1% (5)
i asked - 0.1% (5)
summer institute - 0.1% (5)
2016 — - 0.1% (5)
engagement network - 0.1% (5)
new definition - 0.1% (5)
only a - 0.1% (5)
(1) may - 0.1% (5)
of antisemitic - 0.1% (5)
in critical - 0.08% (4)
david hirsh’s - 0.08% (4)
against the - 0.08% (4)
from the - 0.08% (4)
campaign to - 0.08% (4)
engage journal - 0.08% (4)
boycott of - 0.08% (4)
the line - 0.08% (4)
in may - 0.08% (4)
and to - 0.08% (4)
is only - 0.08% (4)
to antisemites - 0.08% (4)
2015 (1) - 0.08% (4)
to properly - 0.08% (4)
to see - 0.08% (4)
lesley klaff - 0.08% (4)
john’s college, - 0.08% (4)
they say - 0.08% (4)
(3) september - 0.08% (4)
2012 (3) - 0.08% (4)
boycott israeli - 0.08% (4)
the right - 0.08% (4)
(1) august - 0.08% (4)
mira vogel - 0.08% (4)
4 months - 0.08% (4)
whether the - 0.08% (4)
of contemporary - 0.08% (4)
2008 (1) - 0.08% (4)
antisemites – - 0.08% (4)
the campaign - 0.08% (4)
for curriculum - 0.08% (4)
complaint and - 0.08% (4)
was no - 0.08% (4)
antisemitism is - 0.08% (4)
social media - 0.08% (4)
is not - 0.08% (4)
university to - 0.08% (4)
critical antisemitism - 0.08% (4)
recommended that - 0.08% (4)
the complaint - 0.08% (4)
than the - 0.08% (4)
as antisemitic - 0.08% (4)
sheffield hallam - 0.06% (3)
is from - 0.06% (3)
about engage - 0.06% (3)
with a - 0.06% (3)
- david - 0.06% (3)
about us - 0.06% (3)
appeal to - 0.06% (3)
a comment - 0.06% (3)
uncategorized. leave - 0.06% (3)
development in - 0.06% (3)
by david - 0.06% (3)
– robert - 0.06% (3)
of speech - 0.06% (3)
robert fine - 0.06% (3)
hirsh – - 0.06% (3)
email address - 0.06% (3)
and for - 0.06% (3)
in order - 0.06% (3)
give me - 0.06% (3)
failed to - 0.06% (3)
brian was - 0.06% (3)
blood libel - 0.06% (3)
legitimate criticism - 0.06% (3)
said that - 0.06% (3)
2016 (3) - 0.06% (3)
which is - 0.06% (3)
anti-zionist behaviour - 0.06% (3)
use of - 0.06% (3)
that it - 0.06% (3)
media posts - 0.06% (3)
consider his - 0.06% (3)
likely to - 0.06% (3)
hallam university - 0.06% (3)
her to - 0.06% (3)
brian had - 0.06% (3)
oia also - 0.06% (3)
college, oxford, - 0.06% (3)
st. john’s - 0.06% (3)
criticised the - 0.06% (3)
in which - 0.06% (3)
relevant to - 0.06% (3)
may 2016 - 0.06% (3)
hirsh david - 0.06% (3)
comments » - 0.06% (3)
working definition. - 0.06% (3)
evidence of - 0.06% (3)
did not - 0.06% (3)
2016 (2) - 0.06% (3)
to antisemitism. - 0.06% (3)
2014 (1) - 0.06% (3)
hirsh the - 0.06% (3)
jewish and - 0.06% (3)
2013 (1) - 0.06% (3)
at its - 0.06% (3)
may 2015 - 0.06% (3)
and it - 0.06% (3)
bds is - 0.06% (3)
david hirsh, - 0.06% (3)
order to - 0.06% (3)
2012 (2) - 0.06% (3)
posts by - 0.06% (3)
2005 (1) - 0.06% (3)
students and - 0.06% (3)
2014 (3) - 0.06% (3)
what kind - 0.06% (3)
(1) november - 0.06% (3)
2006 (1) - 0.06% (3)
boycott – - 0.06% (3)
kinds of - 0.06% (3)
is the - 0.06% (3)
david hirsh: - 0.06% (3)
2010 (15) - 0.06% (3)
union for - 0.04% (2)
which brian - 0.04% (2)
the manner - 0.04% (2)
written decision - 0.04% (2)
properly consider - 0.04% (2)
his claim - 0.04% (2)
comments policy - 0.04% (2)
student engagement - 0.04% (2)
head of - 0.04% (2)
an antisemitic - 0.04% (2)
of harassment - 0.04% (2)
an earlier - 0.04% (2)
adopted by - 0.04% (2)
brian to - 0.04% (2)
referred to - 0.04% (2)
sign up - 0.04% (2)
did this - 0.04% (2)
may be - 0.04% (2)
is sent - 0.04% (2)
unsolicited to - 0.04% (2)
£250 for - 0.04% (2)
in this - 0.04% (2)
a political - 0.04% (2)
some of - 0.04% (2)
content of - 0.04% (2)
offensive or - 0.04% (2)
jews or - 0.04% (2)
such criticism - 0.04% (2)
2017 (1) - 0.04% (2)
palestine society’s - 0.04% (2)
issue of - 0.04% (2)
mailings archive - 0.04% (2)
to have - 0.04% (2)
against antisemitism - 0.04% (2)
formally adopt - 0.04% (2)
complaint because - 0.04% (2)
and because - 0.04% (2)
the question - 0.04% (2)
of whether - 0.04% (2)
material which - 0.04% (2)
student identifying - 0.04% (2)
(3) july - 0.04% (2)
a guide - 0.04% (2)
when anti-zionist - 0.04% (2)
into antisemitism. - 0.04% (2)
oia found - 0.04% (2)
university had - 0.04% (2)
question of - 0.04% (2)
a student - 0.04% (2)
identifying as - 0.04% (2)
brian complained - 0.04% (2)
the offending - 0.04% (2)
the blood - 0.04% (2)
out in - 0.04% (2)
have engaged - 0.04% (2)
cst’s report - 0.04% (2)
report is - 0.04% (2)
is very - 0.04% (2)
june 2014 - 0.04% (2)
the jews - 0.04% (2)
community. jlm - 0.04% (2)
northwest meeting, - 0.04% (2)
looking for - 0.04% (2)
old stuff - 0.04% (2)
on engage? - 0.04% (2)
some years - 0.04% (2)
engage on - 0.04% (2)
brian goldfarb - 0.04% (2)
on twitter - 0.04% (2)
for old - 0.04% (2)
stuff on - 0.04% (2)
first they - 0.04% (2)
came for - 0.04% (2)
they came - 0.04% (2)
relationship with - 0.04% (2)
european institute - 0.04% (2)
(2) may - 0.04% (2)
peace and - 0.04% (2)
is antisemitic - 0.04% (2)
2008 (2) - 0.04% (2)
the global - 0.04% (2)
palestinian civil - 0.04% (2)
(16) june - 0.04% (2)
2010 (9) - 0.04% (2)
2011 (9) - 0.04% (2)
2011 (12) - 0.04% (2)
at wordpress.com. - 0.04% (2)
2012 (1) - 0.04% (2)
was not - 0.04% (2)
the jewish - 0.04% (2)
better? labour’s - 0.04% (2)
she did - 0.04% (2)
has been - 0.04% (2)
not to - 0.04% (2)
and that - 0.04% (2)
tend to - 0.04% (2)
the cst’s - 0.04% (2)
to give - 0.04% (2)
whether she - 0.04% (2)
had ever - 0.04% (2)
heard of - 0.04% (2)
libel and - 0.04% (2)
she answered - 0.04% (2)
oia in - 0.04% (2)
2014 (8) - 0.04% (2)
not ask - 0.04% (2)
his complaint. - 0.04% (2)
only get - 0.04% (2)
it further - 0.04% (2)
to ask - 0.04% (2)
society to - 0.04% (2)
university work - 0.04% (2)
to ensure - 0.04% (2)
work with - 0.04% (2)
union to - 0.04% (2)
jewish students - 0.04% (2)
last year. - 0.04% (2)
blog at - 0.04% (2)
(1) july - 0.04% (2)
2, 2017 - 0.04% (2)
2013 (6) - 0.04% (2)
things can - 0.04% (2)
example of - 0.04% (2)
analysis of - 0.04% (2)
against jews - 0.04% (2)
sniffs the - 0.04% (2)
(1) april - 0.04% (2)
whether a - 0.04% (2)
joke was - 0.04% (2)
could not - 0.04% (2)
on whether - 0.04% (2)
on who - 0.04% (2)
and why - 0.04% (2)
people who - 0.04% (2)
that they - 0.04% (2)
racism and - 0.04% (2)
of thinking - 0.04% (2)
in public - 0.04% (2)
under the - 0.04% (2)
– is - 0.04% (2)
antisemitism on - 0.04% (2)
piece, by - 0.04% (2)
the antisemitism - 0.04% (2)
does not - 0.04% (2)
ways of - 0.04% (2)
and what - 0.04% (2)
response, follow - 0.04% (2)
say that - 0.04% (2)
2015 (3) - 0.04% (2)
israel as - 0.04% (2)
what kinds - 0.04% (2)
2014 (2) - 0.04% (2)
for david - 0.04% (2)
is part - 0.04% (2)
november 2014 - 0.04% (2)
(2) december - 0.04% (2)
the myth - 0.04% (2)
institutional boycott - 0.04% (2)
antisemitism within - 0.04% (2)
of science - 0.04% (2)
– mira - 0.04% (2)
vogel – - 0.04% (2)
israelis are - 0.04% (2)
not nazis - 0.04% (2)
that israeli - 0.04% (2)
2015 (4) - 0.04% (2)
the ucu - 0.04% (2)
type of - 0.04% (2)
who are - 0.04% (2)
science and - 0.04% (2)
universality of - 0.04% (2)
the principle - 0.04% (2)
to their - 0.04% (2)
and learning - 0.04% (2)
divestment and - 0.04% (2)
a boycott - 0.04% (2)
also published - 0.04% (2)
to listen - 0.04% (2)
waltzer, and - 0.04% (2)
director ken - 0.04% (2)
its executive - 0.04% (2)
conversation between - 0.04% (2)
a podcast - 0.04% (2)
aen has - 0.04% (2)
sanctions (bds) - 0.04% (2)
aen website. - 0.04% (2)
available as - 0.04% (2)
the pamphlet is - 0.04% (2)
the us - 0.04% (2)
principle of - 0.04% (2)
the universality - 0.04% (2)
history of - 0.04% (2)
why bds - 0.04% (2)
reasonably be - 0.04% (2)
lies and - 0.04% (2)
conference, as - 0.04% (2)
guide to - 0.04% (2)
first national - 0.04% (2)
crosses the - 0.04% (2)
line into - 0.04% (2)
keynote presentation - 0.04% (2)
has published - 0.04% (2)
from legitimate - 0.04% (2)
beyond the - 0.04% (2)
a hostile - 0.04% (2)
israel and - 0.04% (2)
palestinian children - 0.04% (2)
these posts - 0.04% (2)
network (aen) - 0.04% (2)
2016 (4) - 0.04% (2)
pdf on - 0.04% (2)
the light - 0.04% (2)
denial and - 0.04% (2)
a form - 0.04% (2)
light of - 0.04% (2)
do not - 0.04% (2)
of brian’s - 0.04% (2)
to connect - 0.04% (2)
of her - 0.04% (2)
the struggle - 0.04% (2)
connect with - 0.04% (2)
concluded that - 0.04% (2)
resources for - 0.04% (2)
to consider - 0.04% (2)
campus and - 0.04% (2)
to identify - 0.04% (2)
pamphlet is available - 0.04% (2)
behaviour on - 0.04% (2)
(3) june - 0.04% (2)
isgap-oxford summer - 0.04% (2)
lecturer in - 0.04% (2)
(4) february - 0.04% (2)
the institutional - 0.04% (2)
  follow - 0.04% (2)
working definition.  - 0.04% (2)
myth of - 0.04% (2)
podcast – - 0.04% (2)
democracy”, follow - 0.04% (2)
by rediscovering - 0.04% (2)
combating bds - 0.04% (2)
hirsh on - 0.04% (2)
sexy: david - 0.04% (2)
podcast,  “making democracy - 0.04% (2)
and david - 0.04% (2)
ken waltzer, - 0.04% (2)
university’s palestine - 0.04% (2)
palsoc – - 0.04% (2)
the aen - 0.04% (2)
has also - 0.04% (2)
published a - 0.04% (2)
podcast of - 0.04% (2)
a conversation - 0.04% (2)
between its - 0.04% (2)
with jew-baiting - 0.04% (2)
executive director - 0.04% (2)
that sided - 0.04% (2)
raps university - 0.04% (2)
in their - 0.04% (2)
critical contemporary - 0.04% (2)
(3) august - 0.04% (2)
the program - 0.04% (2)
– steve - 0.04% (2)
outrageous response to - 0.2% (10)
jenny tonge’s outrageous - 0.2% (10)
tonge’s outrageous response - 0.2% (10)
to cst report - 0.2% (10)
response to cst - 0.2% (10)
definition of antisemitism - 0.18% (9)
on jenny tonge’s - 0.16% (8)
that the university - 0.16% (8)
posted in uncategorized. - 0.14% (7)
for failing to - 0.14% (7)
this:twitterfacebookemailredditlike this:like loading... - 0.14% (7)
criticism of israel - 0.14% (7)
for the study - 0.14% (7)
share this:twitterfacebookemailredditlike this:like - 0.14% (7)
loading... posted in - 0.14% (7)
this:like loading... posted - 0.14% (7)
the working definition - 0.14% (7)
the study of - 0.14% (7)
— david hirsh - 0.12% (6)
a threat to - 0.12% (6)
– david hirsh - 0.12% (6)
follow this link.  - 0.1% (5)
2016 — david - 0.1% (5)
new definition of - 0.1% (5)
the new definition - 0.1% (5)
academic engagement network - 0.1% (5)
i asked her - 0.1% (5)
institute for the - 0.1% (5)
threat to antisemites - 0.08% (4)
institute for curriculum - 0.08% (4)
the campaign to - 0.08% (4)
of contemporary antisemitism - 0.08% (4)
study of contemporary - 0.08% (4)
4 months ago - 0.08% (4)
is only a - 0.08% (4)
to antisemites – - 0.08% (4)
to boycott israeli - 0.08% (4)
critical antisemitism studies - 0.08% (4)
of antisemitism is - 0.08% (4)
only a threat - 0.08% (4)
summer institute for - 0.08% (4)
the working definition. - 0.06% (3)
a comment » - 0.06% (3)
david hirsh the - 0.06% (3)
curriculum development in - 0.06% (3)
freedom of speech - 0.06% (3)
study of antisemitism - 0.06% (3)
david hirsh david - 0.06% (3)
campaign to boycott - 0.06% (3)
appeal to the - 0.06% (3)
to the university - 0.06% (3)
the oia also - 0.06% (3)
failing to properly - 0.06% (3)
st. john’s college, - 0.06% (3)
of his complaint - 0.06% (3)
the eumc definition - 0.06% (3)
of the eumc - 0.06% (3)
of the palestine - 0.06% (3)
social media posts - 0.06% (3)
sheffield hallam university - 0.06% (3)
antisemitism studies st. - 0.06% (3)
in uncategorized. leave - 0.06% (3)
john’s college, oxford, - 0.06% (3)
– robert fine - 0.06% (3)
in order to - 0.06% (3)
academic boycott of - 0.06% (3)
boycott of israel - 0.06% (3)
the cst is - 0.06% (3)
because it is - 0.06% (3)
the academic engagement - 0.06% (3)
uncategorized. leave a - 0.06% (3)
david hirsh – - 0.06% (3)
keynote presentation at - 0.04% (2)
national conference, as - 0.04% (2)
in may 2015 - 0.04% (2)
to the oia - 0.04% (2)
in may 2016 - 0.04% (2)
students’ union for - 0.04% (2)
at its first - 0.04% (2)
heard of the - 0.04% (2)
the university work - 0.04% (2)
with the students’ - 0.04% (2)
to ensure that - 0.04% (2)
hirsh’s keynote presentation - 0.04% (2)
resources for the - 0.04% (2)
struggle against the - 0.04% (2)
she answered “no”. - 0.04% (2)
of the blood - 0.04% (2)
she had ever - 0.04% (2)
the palestine society’s - 0.04% (2)
to properly consider - 0.04% (2)
pdf on the - 0.04% (2)
criticised the students’ - 0.04% (2)
the head of - 0.04% (2)
head of student - 0.04% (2)
the content of - 0.04% (2)
available as a - 0.04% (2)
asked her whether - 0.04% (2)
to give me - 0.04% (2)
antisemitism and she - 0.04% (2)
asked her to - 0.04% (2)
her whether she - 0.04% (2)
had ever heard - 0.04% (2)
engagement network (aen) - 0.04% (2)
libel and she - 0.04% (2)
has published david - 0.04% (2)
sided with jew-baiting - 0.04% (2)
hirsh podcast – - 0.04% (2)
to connect with - 0.04% (2)
from the global - 0.04% (2)
why bds is - 0.04% (2)
say about us - 0.04% (2)
engage mailings archive - 0.04% (2)
sent unsolicited to - 0.04% (2)
content of the - 0.04% (2)
first they came - 0.04% (2)
they came for - 0.04% (2)
the cst’s report - 0.04% (2)
looking for old - 0.04% (2)
community. jlm northwest - 0.04% (2)
with the jewish - 0.04% (2)
better? labour’s relationship - 0.04% (2)
can only get - 0.04% (2)
on the new - 0.04% (2)
hirsh the academic - 0.04% (2)
jlm northwest meeting, - 0.04% (2)
raps university that - 0.04% (2)
a podcast of - 0.04% (2)
palsoc – lesley - 0.04% (2)
only get better? - 0.04% (2)
labour’s relationship with - 0.04% (2)
the jewish community. - 0.04% (2)
old stuff on - 0.04% (2)
vogel on jenny - 0.04% (2)
brian goldfarb on - 0.04% (2)
against the campaign - 0.04% (2)
for the struggle - 0.04% (2)
report mira vogel - 0.04% (2)
in the light - 0.04% (2)
cst report mira - 0.04% (2)
has also published - 0.04% (2)
the university had - 0.04% (2)
oia also criticised - 0.04% (2)
boycott israeli academics - 0.04% (2)
on the left - 0.04% (2)
are not nazis - 0.04% (2)
of the academic - 0.04% (2)
link for the - 0.04% (2)
that they are - 0.04% (2)
  follow this - 0.04% (2)
the universality of - 0.04% (2)
israelis are not - 0.04% (2)
david hirsh podcast - 0.04% (2)
– academic engagement - 0.04% (2)
the principle of - 0.04% (2)
of the new - 0.04% (2)
universality of science - 0.04% (2)
principle of the - 0.04% (2)
what kinds of - 0.04% (2)
antisemitism on the - 0.04% (2)
myth of the - 0.04% (2)
democracy”, follow this - 0.04% (2)
conference, as a - 0.04% (2)
listen to the - 0.04% (2)
podcast,  “making democracy sexy: - 0.04% (2)
david hirsh on - 0.04% (2)
combating bds and - 0.04% (2)
antisemitism by rediscovering - 0.04% (2)
published david hirsh’s - 0.04% (2)
to see it - 0.04% (2)
(bds) and antisemitism - 0.04% (2)
divestment and sanctions - 0.04% (2)
piece, by david - 0.04% (2)
hirsh, is from - 0.04% (2)
themselves to be - 0.04% (2)
ways of thinking - 0.04% (2)
see it in - 0.04% (2)
institutional boycott – - 0.04% (2)
the institutional boycott - 0.04% (2)
complaint because it - 0.04% (2)
its executive director - 0.04% (2)
there was no - 0.04% (2)
use of the - 0.04% (2)
democracy sexy: david - 0.04% (2)
on the issue - 0.04% (2)
to the podcast,  “making - 0.04% (2)
ken waltzer, and - 0.04% (2)
a conversation between - 0.04% (2)
of brian’s complaint - 0.04% (2)
and because it - 0.04% (2)
the question of - 0.04% (2)
student identifying as - 0.04% (2)
line into antisemitism. - 0.04% (2)
its first national - 0.04% (2)
some of the - 0.04% (2)
from legitimate criticism - 0.04% (2)
of israel as - 0.04% (2)
they say about - 0.04% (2)
bds and antisemitism - 0.04% (2)
regulator raps university - 0.04% (2)
that sided with - 0.04% (2)
jew-baiting palsoc – - 0.04% (2)
the myth of - 0.04% (2)
by rediscovering democracy”, - 0.04% (2)
properly consider his - 0.04% (2)
by the university’s - 0.04% (2)
the university concluded - 0.04% (2)
anti-zionist behaviour on - 0.04% (2)
jewish students and - 0.04% (2)
hirsh on combating - 0.04% (2)
as a guide - 0.04% (2)
the line into - 0.04% (2)
the university’s palestine - 0.04% (2)
on campus and - 0.04% (2)
– steve c - 0.04% (2)

Here you can find chart of all your popular one, two and three word phrases. Google and others search engines means your page is about words you use frequently.

Copyright © 2015-2016 hupso.pl. All rights reserved. FB | +G | Twitter

Hupso.pl jest serwisem internetowym, w którym jednym kliknieciem możesz szybko i łatwo sprawdź stronę www pod kątem SEO. Oferujemy darmowe pozycjonowanie stron internetowych oraz wycena domen i stron internetowych. Prowadzimy ranking polskich stron internetowych oraz ranking stron alexa.