3.11 score from hupso.pl for:
eliasmunshya.org



HTML Content


Titleelias munshya, llm, mba, mdiv | law | culture | politics | theology

Length: 67, Words: 9
Description law | culture | politics | theology

Length: 35, Words: 4
Keywords pusty
Robots
Charset UTF-8
Og Meta - Title exist
Og Meta - Description exist
Og Meta - Site name exist
Tytuł powinien zawierać pomiędzy 10 a 70 znaków (ze spacjami), a mniej niż 12 słów w długości.
Meta opis powinien zawierać pomiędzy 50 a 160 znaków (łącznie ze spacjami), a mniej niż 24 słów w długości.
Kodowanie znaków powinny być określone , UTF-8 jest chyba najlepszy zestaw znaków, aby przejść z powodu UTF-8 jest bardziej międzynarodowy kodowaniem.
Otwarte obiekty wykresu powinny być obecne w stronie internetowej (więcej informacji na temat protokołu OpenGraph: http://ogp.me/)

SEO Content

Words/Characters 6778
Text/HTML 31.08 %
Headings H1 1
H2 7
H3 22
H4 0
H5 0
H6 0
H1
elias munshya, llm, mba, mdiv
H2
when “icishimba” goes rogue: dr. kambwili and the future of the ruling patriotic front (pf)
review of the zambian supreme court’s decision in folayinka esan v attorney general (2016)
president edgar lungu is not eligible to stand in 2021: here is why
the law association of zambia: my proposals for reform
amos chanda, judges and the challenge of reforming the law association of zambia
luo falls in munali: my analysis of justice musona’s ruling in mwamba v nkandu luo (2016)
amending the zambian constitution should not be done in the dark
H3
share this:
like this:
share this:
like this:
share this:
like this:
share this:
like this:
share this:
like this:
share this:
like this:
share this:
like this:
top posts & pages
my recent articles
like me on facebook
follow me on twitter
read by month
goodreads
meta
follow blog via email
H4
H5
H6
strong
e. munshya, llm, mba, m.div.
by e. munshya, llm, mba, mdiv.
immigration and deportation act
munalula and kajimanga v. attorney general
citation:
by elias munshya & michael chishala
hold office
assume office
held office
suggested citation:
about the co-authors
michael chishala
elias munshya
by e. munshya, llm, mba, mdiv.
e. munshya, llm, mba, m.div.
by e. munshya, llm, mba, mdiv.
by e. munshya, llm, mba, mdiv (of the alberta bar)
b
i
em e. munshya, llm, mba, m.div.
by e. munshya, llm, mba, mdiv.
immigration and deportation act
munalula and kajimanga v. attorney general
citation:
by elias munshya & michael chishala
hold office
assume office
held office
suggested citation:
about the co-authors
michael chishala
elias munshya
by e. munshya, llm, mba, mdiv.
e. munshya, llm, mba, m.div.
by e. munshya, llm, mba, mdiv.
by e. munshya, llm, mba, mdiv (of the alberta bar)
Bolds strong 17
b 0
i 0
em 17
Zawartość strony internetowej powinno zawierać więcej niż 250 słów, z stopa tekst / kod jest wyższy niż 20%.
Pozycji używać znaczników (h1, h2, h3, ...), aby określić temat sekcji lub ustępów na stronie, ale zwykle, użyj mniej niż 6 dla każdego tagu pozycje zachować swoją stronę zwięzły.
Styl używać silnych i kursywy znaczniki podkreślić swoje słowa kluczowe swojej stronie, ale nie nadużywać (mniej niż 16 silnych tagi i 16 znaczników kursywy)

Statystyki strony

twitter:title pusty
twitter:description pusty
google+ itemprop=name pusty
Pliki zewnętrzne 32
Pliki CSS 5
Pliki javascript 27
Plik należy zmniejszyć całkowite odwołanie plików (CSS + JavaScript) do 7-8 maksymalnie.

Linki wewnętrzne i zewnętrzne

Linki 197
Linki wewnętrzne 18
Linki zewnętrzne 179
Linki bez atrybutu Title 172
Linki z atrybutem NOFOLLOW 0
Linki - Użyj atrybutu tytuł dla każdego łącza. Nofollow link jest link, który nie pozwala wyszukiwarkom boty zrealizują są odnośniki no follow. Należy zwracać uwagę na ich użytkowania

Linki wewnętrzne

skip to content #content
- //www.pinterest.com/pin/create/button/?url=https%3a%2f%2feliasmunshya.org%2f2017%2f01%2f15%2fwhen-icishimba-goes-rogue-dr-kambwili-and-the-future-of-the-ruling-patriotic-front-pf%2f&media=https%3a%2f%2feliasmunshya.files.wordpress.com%2f2016%2f06%2felias-munshya-new.jpg%3fw%3d1170&description=when%20%22icishimba%22%20goes%20rogue%3a%20dr.%20kambwili%20and%20the%20future%20of%20the%20ruling%20patriotic%20front%20%28pf%29
- //www.pinterest.com/pin/create/button/?url=https%3a%2f%2feliasmunshya.org%2f2017%2f01%2f15%2freview-of-the-zambian-supreme-courts-decision-in-folayinka-esan-v-attorney-general-2016%2f&media=https%3a%2f%2feliasmunshya.files.wordpress.com%2f2016%2f07%2f13524379_10154251631640528_1091952662934062325_n.jpg&description=review%20of%20the%20zambian%20supreme%20court%e2%80%99s%20decision%20in%20folayinka%20esan%20v%20attorney%20general%20%282016%29
- //www.pinterest.com/pin/create/button/?url=https%3a%2f%2feliasmunshya.org%2f2017%2f01%2f10%2fpresident-edgar-lungu-is-not-eligible-to-stand-in-2021-here-is-why%2f&media=https%3a%2f%2feliasmunshya.files.wordpress.com%2f2016%2f06%2felias-munshya-new.jpg%3fw%3d1170&description=president%20edgar%20lungu%20is%20not%20eligible%20to%20stand%20in%202021%3a%20here%20is%20why
- //www.pinterest.com/pin/create/button/?url=https%3a%2f%2feliasmunshya.org%2f2016%2f12%2f11%2fthe-law-association-of-zambia-my-proposals-for-reform%2f&media=https%3a%2f%2feliasmunshya.files.wordpress.com%2f2016%2f06%2felias-munshya-new.jpg%3fw%3d1170&description=the%20law%20association%20of%20zambia%3a%20my%20proposals%20for%20reform
- //www.pinterest.com/pin/create/button/?url=https%3a%2f%2feliasmunshya.org%2f2016%2f12%2f02%2famos-chanda-judges-and-the-challenge-of-reforming-the-law-association-of-zambia%2f&media=https%3a%2f%2feliasmunshya.files.wordpress.com%2f2016%2f06%2felias-munshya-new.jpg%3fw%3d1170&description=amos%20chanda%2c%20judges%20and%20the%20challenge%20of%20reforming%20the%20law%20association%20of%20zambia
- //www.pinterest.com/pin/create/button/?url=https%3a%2f%2feliasmunshya.org%2f2016%2f11%2f25%2fluo-falls-in-munali-my-analysis-of-justice-musonas-ruling-in-mwamba-v-nkandu-luo-2016%2f&media=https%3a%2f%2feliasmunshya.files.wordpress.com%2f2016%2f06%2felias-munshya-new.jpg%3fw%3d1170&description=luo%20falls%20in%20munali%3a%20my%20analysis%20of%20justice%20musona%e2%80%99s%20ruling%20in%20mwamba%20v%20nkandu%20luo%20%20%282016%29
- //www.pinterest.com/pin/create/button/?url=https%3a%2f%2feliasmunshya.org%2f2016%2f11%2f10%2famending-the-zambian-constitution-should-not-be-done-in-the-dark%2f&media=https%3a%2f%2feliasmunshya.files.wordpress.com%2f2016%2f07%2f13524379_10154251631640528_1091952662934062325_n.jpg&description=amending%20the%20zambian%20constitution%20should%20not%20be%20done%20in%20the%20dark
my tweets
cancel #
cancel #cancel

Linki zewnętrzne

elias munshya, llm, mba, mdiv https://eliasmunshya.org/
home https://eliasmunshya.org/
about elias munshya, llm, mba, m.div. https://eliasmunshya.org/about/
older posts https://eliasmunshya.org/page/2/
when “icishimba” goes rogue: dr. kambwili and the future of the ruling patriotic front (pf) https://eliasmunshya.org/2017/01/15/when-icishimba-goes-rogue-dr-kambwili-and-the-future-of-the-ruling-patriotic-front-pf/
https://eliasmunshya.org/2017/01/15/when-icishimba-goes-rogue-dr-kambwili-and-the-future-of-the-ruling-patriotic-front-pf/
3 comments https://eliasmunshya.org/2017/01/15/when-icishimba-goes-rogue-dr-kambwili-and-the-future-of-the-ruling-patriotic-front-pf/#comments
tweet https://twitter.com/share
email https://eliasmunshya.org/2017/01/15/when-icishimba-goes-rogue-dr-kambwili-and-the-future-of-the-ruling-patriotic-front-pf/?share=email
print https://eliasmunshya.org/2017/01/15/when-icishimba-goes-rogue-dr-kambwili-and-the-future-of-the-ruling-patriotic-front-pf/
3 comments https://eliasmunshya.org/2017/01/15/when-icishimba-goes-rogue-dr-kambwili-and-the-future-of-the-ruling-patriotic-front-pf/#comments
zambian law https://eliasmunshya.org/category/zambian-law/
zambian political theology https://eliasmunshya.org/category/zambian-political-theology/
zambian politics https://eliasmunshya.org/category/zambian-politics/
review of the zambian supreme court’s decision in folayinka esan v attorney general (2016) https://eliasmunshya.org/2017/01/15/review-of-the-zambian-supreme-courts-decision-in-folayinka-esan-v-attorney-general-2016/
https://eliasmunshya.org/2017/01/15/review-of-the-zambian-supreme-courts-decision-in-folayinka-esan-v-attorney-general-2016/
1 comment https://eliasmunshya.org/2017/01/15/review-of-the-zambian-supreme-courts-decision-in-folayinka-esan-v-attorney-general-2016/#comments
tweet https://twitter.com/share
email https://eliasmunshya.org/2017/01/15/review-of-the-zambian-supreme-courts-decision-in-folayinka-esan-v-attorney-general-2016/?share=email
print https://eliasmunshya.org/2017/01/15/review-of-the-zambian-supreme-courts-decision-in-folayinka-esan-v-attorney-general-2016/
1 comment https://eliasmunshya.org/2017/01/15/review-of-the-zambian-supreme-courts-decision-in-folayinka-esan-v-attorney-general-2016/#comments
zambian law https://eliasmunshya.org/category/zambian-law/
zambian political theology https://eliasmunshya.org/category/zambian-political-theology/
zambian politics https://eliasmunshya.org/category/zambian-politics/
folayinka esan https://eliasmunshya.org/tag/folayinka-esan/
president edgar lungu is not eligible to stand in 2021: here is why https://eliasmunshya.org/2017/01/10/president-edgar-lungu-is-not-eligible-to-stand-in-2021-here-is-why/
https://eliasmunshya.org/2017/01/10/president-edgar-lungu-is-not-eligible-to-stand-in-2021-here-is-why/
7 comments https://eliasmunshya.org/2017/01/10/president-edgar-lungu-is-not-eligible-to-stand-in-2021-here-is-why/#comments
www.eliasmunshya.org) http://www.eliasmunshya.org)
tweet https://twitter.com/share
email https://eliasmunshya.org/2017/01/10/president-edgar-lungu-is-not-eligible-to-stand-in-2021-here-is-why/?share=email
print https://eliasmunshya.org/2017/01/10/president-edgar-lungu-is-not-eligible-to-stand-in-2021-here-is-why/
7 comments https://eliasmunshya.org/2017/01/10/president-edgar-lungu-is-not-eligible-to-stand-in-2021-here-is-why/#comments
zambian law https://eliasmunshya.org/category/zambian-law/
zambian political theology https://eliasmunshya.org/category/zambian-political-theology/
zambian politics https://eliasmunshya.org/category/zambian-politics/
edgar lungu https://eliasmunshya.org/tag/edgar-lungu/
elias munshya https://eliasmunshya.org/tag/elias-munshya/
michael chishala https://eliasmunshya.org/tag/michael-chishala/
third term https://eliasmunshya.org/tag/third-term/
zambia https://eliasmunshya.org/tag/zambia/
the law association of zambia: my proposals for reform https://eliasmunshya.org/2016/12/11/the-law-association-of-zambia-my-proposals-for-reform/
https://eliasmunshya.org/2016/12/11/the-law-association-of-zambia-my-proposals-for-reform/
leave a comment https://eliasmunshya.org/2016/12/11/the-law-association-of-zambia-my-proposals-for-reform/#respond
tweet https://twitter.com/share
email https://eliasmunshya.org/2016/12/11/the-law-association-of-zambia-my-proposals-for-reform/?share=email
print https://eliasmunshya.org/2016/12/11/the-law-association-of-zambia-my-proposals-for-reform/
leave a comment https://eliasmunshya.org/2016/12/11/the-law-association-of-zambia-my-proposals-for-reform/#respond
zambian law https://eliasmunshya.org/category/zambian-law/
zambian political theology https://eliasmunshya.org/category/zambian-political-theology/
zambian politics https://eliasmunshya.org/category/zambian-politics/
amos chanda, judges and the challenge of reforming the law association of zambia https://eliasmunshya.org/2016/12/02/amos-chanda-judges-and-the-challenge-of-reforming-the-law-association-of-zambia/
https://eliasmunshya.org/2016/12/02/amos-chanda-judges-and-the-challenge-of-reforming-the-law-association-of-zambia/
leave a comment https://eliasmunshya.org/2016/12/02/amos-chanda-judges-and-the-challenge-of-reforming-the-law-association-of-zambia/#respond
tweet https://twitter.com/share
email https://eliasmunshya.org/2016/12/02/amos-chanda-judges-and-the-challenge-of-reforming-the-law-association-of-zambia/?share=email
print https://eliasmunshya.org/2016/12/02/amos-chanda-judges-and-the-challenge-of-reforming-the-law-association-of-zambia/
leave a comment https://eliasmunshya.org/2016/12/02/amos-chanda-judges-and-the-challenge-of-reforming-the-law-association-of-zambia/#respond
zambian law https://eliasmunshya.org/category/zambian-law/
zambian political theology https://eliasmunshya.org/category/zambian-political-theology/
zambian politics https://eliasmunshya.org/category/zambian-politics/
luo falls in munali: my analysis of justice musona’s ruling in mwamba v nkandu luo (2016) https://eliasmunshya.org/2016/11/25/luo-falls-in-munali-my-analysis-of-justice-musonas-ruling-in-mwamba-v-nkandu-luo-2016/
https://eliasmunshya.org/2016/11/25/luo-falls-in-munali-my-analysis-of-justice-musonas-ruling-in-mwamba-v-nkandu-luo-2016/
3 comments https://eliasmunshya.org/2016/11/25/luo-falls-in-munali-my-analysis-of-justice-musonas-ruling-in-mwamba-v-nkandu-luo-2016/#comments
mwamba-v-luo-and-others-2016 https://eliasmunshya.files.wordpress.com/2016/11/mwamba-v-luo-and-others-2016.pdf
tweet https://twitter.com/share
email https://eliasmunshya.org/2016/11/25/luo-falls-in-munali-my-analysis-of-justice-musonas-ruling-in-mwamba-v-nkandu-luo-2016/?share=email
print https://eliasmunshya.org/2016/11/25/luo-falls-in-munali-my-analysis-of-justice-musonas-ruling-in-mwamba-v-nkandu-luo-2016/
3 comments https://eliasmunshya.org/2016/11/25/luo-falls-in-munali-my-analysis-of-justice-musonas-ruling-in-mwamba-v-nkandu-luo-2016/#comments
zambian law https://eliasmunshya.org/category/zambian-law/
zambian political theology https://eliasmunshya.org/category/zambian-political-theology/
zambian politics https://eliasmunshya.org/category/zambian-politics/
munali https://eliasmunshya.org/tag/munali/
amending the zambian constitution should not be done in the dark https://eliasmunshya.org/2016/11/10/amending-the-zambian-constitution-should-not-be-done-in-the-dark/
https://eliasmunshya.org/2016/11/10/amending-the-zambian-constitution-should-not-be-done-in-the-dark/
3 comments https://eliasmunshya.org/2016/11/10/amending-the-zambian-constitution-should-not-be-done-in-the-dark/#comments
tweet https://twitter.com/share
email https://eliasmunshya.org/2016/11/10/amending-the-zambian-constitution-should-not-be-done-in-the-dark/?share=email
print https://eliasmunshya.org/2016/11/10/amending-the-zambian-constitution-should-not-be-done-in-the-dark/
3 comments https://eliasmunshya.org/2016/11/10/amending-the-zambian-constitution-should-not-be-done-in-the-dark/#comments
zambian political theology https://eliasmunshya.org/category/zambian-political-theology/
zambian politics https://eliasmunshya.org/category/zambian-politics/
older posts https://eliasmunshya.org/page/2/
when "icishimba" goes rogue: dr. kambwili and the future of the ruling patriotic front (pf) https://eliasmunshya.org/2017/01/15/when-icishimba-goes-rogue-dr-kambwili-and-the-future-of-the-ruling-patriotic-front-pf/
download zambia's new constitution (as amended) https://eliasmunshya.org/2016/01/08/download-zambias-new-constitution-as-amended/
review of the zambian supreme court’s decision in folayinka esan v attorney general (2016) https://eliasmunshya.org/2017/01/15/review-of-the-zambian-supreme-courts-decision-in-folayinka-esan-v-attorney-general-2016/
president edgar lungu is not eligible to stand in 2021: here is why https://eliasmunshya.org/2017/01/10/president-edgar-lungu-is-not-eligible-to-stand-in-2021-here-is-why/
zambia institute of advanced legal extinction: ziale, lawyers & access to justice https://eliasmunshya.org/2013/10/18/zambia-institute-of-advanced-legal-extinction-ziale-lawyers-access-to-justice/
when “icishimba” goes rogue: dr. kambwili and the future of the ruling patriotic front (pf) https://eliasmunshya.org/2017/01/15/when-icishimba-goes-rogue-dr-kambwili-and-the-future-of-the-ruling-patriotic-front-pf/
review of the zambian supreme court’s decision in folayinka esan v attorney general (2016) https://eliasmunshya.org/2017/01/15/review-of-the-zambian-supreme-courts-decision-in-folayinka-esan-v-attorney-general-2016/
president edgar lungu is not eligible to stand in 2021: here is why https://eliasmunshya.org/2017/01/10/president-edgar-lungu-is-not-eligible-to-stand-in-2021-here-is-why/
the law association of zambia: my proposals for reform https://eliasmunshya.org/2016/12/11/the-law-association-of-zambia-my-proposals-for-reform/
amos chanda, judges and the challenge of reforming the law association of zambia https://eliasmunshya.org/2016/12/02/amos-chanda-judges-and-the-challenge-of-reforming-the-law-association-of-zambia/
like me on facebook https://www.facebook.com/pages/munshya-wa-munshya-elias/124332355527
like me on facebook https://www.facebook.com/pages/munshya-wa-munshya-elias/124332355527
- http://www.eliasmunshya.org
january 2017 https://eliasmunshya.org/2017/01/
december 2016 https://eliasmunshya.org/2016/12/
november 2016 https://eliasmunshya.org/2016/11/
october 2016 https://eliasmunshya.org/2016/10/
september 2016 https://eliasmunshya.org/2016/09/
august 2016 https://eliasmunshya.org/2016/08/
july 2016 https://eliasmunshya.org/2016/07/
june 2016 https://eliasmunshya.org/2016/06/
may 2016 https://eliasmunshya.org/2016/05/
march 2016 https://eliasmunshya.org/2016/03/
february 2016 https://eliasmunshya.org/2016/02/
january 2016 https://eliasmunshya.org/2016/01/
december 2015 https://eliasmunshya.org/2015/12/
november 2015 https://eliasmunshya.org/2015/11/
october 2015 https://eliasmunshya.org/2015/10/
september 2015 https://eliasmunshya.org/2015/09/
august 2015 https://eliasmunshya.org/2015/08/
july 2015 https://eliasmunshya.org/2015/07/
june 2015 https://eliasmunshya.org/2015/06/
may 2015 https://eliasmunshya.org/2015/05/
april 2015 https://eliasmunshya.org/2015/04/
march 2015 https://eliasmunshya.org/2015/03/
february 2015 https://eliasmunshya.org/2015/02/
january 2015 https://eliasmunshya.org/2015/01/
december 2014 https://eliasmunshya.org/2014/12/
november 2014 https://eliasmunshya.org/2014/11/
october 2014 https://eliasmunshya.org/2014/10/
september 2014 https://eliasmunshya.org/2014/09/
august 2014 https://eliasmunshya.org/2014/08/
july 2014 https://eliasmunshya.org/2014/07/
june 2014 https://eliasmunshya.org/2014/06/
may 2014 https://eliasmunshya.org/2014/05/
april 2014 https://eliasmunshya.org/2014/04/
march 2014 https://eliasmunshya.org/2014/03/
february 2014 https://eliasmunshya.org/2014/02/
january 2014 https://eliasmunshya.org/2014/01/
december 2013 https://eliasmunshya.org/2013/12/
november 2013 https://eliasmunshya.org/2013/11/
october 2013 https://eliasmunshya.org/2013/10/
september 2013 https://eliasmunshya.org/2013/09/
august 2013 https://eliasmunshya.org/2013/08/
july 2013 https://eliasmunshya.org/2013/07/
april 2013 https://eliasmunshya.org/2013/04/
march 2013 https://eliasmunshya.org/2013/03/
february 2013 https://eliasmunshya.org/2013/02/
january 2013 https://eliasmunshya.org/2013/01/
december 2012 https://eliasmunshya.org/2012/12/
november 2012 https://eliasmunshya.org/2012/11/
october 2012 https://eliasmunshya.org/2012/10/
september 2012 https://eliasmunshya.org/2012/09/
august 2012 https://eliasmunshya.org/2012/08/
july 2012 https://eliasmunshya.org/2012/07/
march 2012 https://eliasmunshya.org/2012/03/
february 2012 https://eliasmunshya.org/2012/02/
january 2012 https://eliasmunshya.org/2012/01/
november 2011 https://eliasmunshya.org/2011/11/
september 2011 https://eliasmunshya.org/2011/09/
january 2011 https://eliasmunshya.org/2011/01/
december 2010 https://eliasmunshya.org/2010/12/
october 2010 https://eliasmunshya.org/2010/10/
september 2010 https://eliasmunshya.org/2010/09/
august 2010 https://eliasmunshya.org/2010/08/
july 2010 https://eliasmunshya.org/2010/07/
june 2010 https://eliasmunshya.org/2010/06/
may 2010 https://eliasmunshya.org/2010/05/
april 2010 https://eliasmunshya.org/2010/04/
march 2010 https://eliasmunshya.org/2010/03/
february 2010 https://eliasmunshya.org/2010/02/
january 2010 https://eliasmunshya.org/2010/01/
register https://wordpress.com/start?ref=wplogin
log in https://eliasmunshya.wordpress.com/wp-login.php
entries rss https://eliasmunshya.org/feed/
comments rss https://eliasmunshya.org/comments/feed/
wordpress.com https://wordpress.com/
networkedblogs http://www.networkedblogs.com/
elias munshya http://www.networkedblogs.com/blog/elias-munshya
zambia http://www.networkedblogs.com/topic/zambia
law http://www.networkedblogs.com/topic/law
africa http://www.networkedblogs.com/topic/africa
follow my blog http://www.networkedblogs.com/blog/elias-munshya
blog at wordpress.com. https://wordpress.com/?ref=footer_blog
elias munshya, llm, mba, mdiv https://eliasmunshya.org/
blog at wordpress.com. https://wordpress.com/?ref=footer_blog

Zdjęcia

Zdjęcia 20
Zdjęcia bez atrybutu ALT 10
Zdjęcia bez atrybutu TITLE 20
Korzystanie Obraz ALT i TITLE atrybutu dla każdego obrazu.

Zdjęcia bez atrybutu TITLE

https://eliasmunshya.files.wordpress.com/2017/01/hqdefault.jpg?w=384&h=288
//assets.pinterest.com/images/pidgets/pinit_fg_en_rect_gray_20.png
https://eliasmunshya.files.wordpress.com/2016/06/elias-munshya-new.jpg?w=595&h=611
//assets.pinterest.com/images/pidgets/pinit_fg_en_rect_gray_20.png
https://eliasmunshya.files.wordpress.com/2016/07/13524379_10154251631640528_1091952662934062325_n.jpg?w=351&h=396
https://eliasmunshya.files.wordpress.com/2017/01/mlxbyqem_400x400.jpeg?w=363&h=363
//assets.pinterest.com/images/pidgets/pinit_fg_en_rect_gray_20.png
https://eliasmunshya.files.wordpress.com/2016/06/elias-munshya-new.jpg?w=245&h=252
//assets.pinterest.com/images/pidgets/pinit_fg_en_rect_gray_20.png
https://eliasmunshya.files.wordpress.com/2016/12/amos-chanda.jpg?w=236&h=329
https://eliasmunshya.files.wordpress.com/2016/07/13524379_10154251631640528_1091952662934062325_n.jpg?w=299&h=337
//assets.pinterest.com/images/pidgets/pinit_fg_en_rect_gray_20.png
https://eliasmunshya.files.wordpress.com/2016/06/elias-munshya-new.jpg?w=286&h=293
//assets.pinterest.com/images/pidgets/pinit_fg_en_rect_gray_20.png
https://eliasmunshya.files.wordpress.com/2016/07/13524379_10154251631640528_1091952662934062325_n.jpg?w=253&h=285
//assets.pinterest.com/images/pidgets/pinit_fg_en_rect_gray_20.png
https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/34b34713c27cf2ab7e0a5dde93ccf696?s=96&d=identicon&r=g
https://s2.wp.com/wp-content/mu-plugins/post-flair/sharing/images/loading.gif
https://sb.scorecardresearch.com/p?c1=2&c2=7518284&c3=&c4=&c5=&c6=&c15=&cv=2.0&cj=1
https://pixel.wp.com/b.gif?v=noscript

Zdjęcia bez atrybutu ALT

//assets.pinterest.com/images/pidgets/pinit_fg_en_rect_gray_20.png
//assets.pinterest.com/images/pidgets/pinit_fg_en_rect_gray_20.png
//assets.pinterest.com/images/pidgets/pinit_fg_en_rect_gray_20.png
//assets.pinterest.com/images/pidgets/pinit_fg_en_rect_gray_20.png
//assets.pinterest.com/images/pidgets/pinit_fg_en_rect_gray_20.png
//assets.pinterest.com/images/pidgets/pinit_fg_en_rect_gray_20.png
//assets.pinterest.com/images/pidgets/pinit_fg_en_rect_gray_20.png
https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/34b34713c27cf2ab7e0a5dde93ccf696?s=96&d=identicon&r=g
https://sb.scorecardresearch.com/p?c1=2&c2=7518284&c3=&c4=&c5=&c6=&c15=&cv=2.0&cj=1
https://pixel.wp.com/b.gif?v=noscript

Ranking:


Alexa Traffic
Daily Global Rank Trend
Daily Reach (Percent)









Majestic SEO











Text on page:

elias munshya, llm, mba, mdiv law | culture | politics | theology skip to content homeabout elias munshya, llm, mba, m.div. ← older posts when “icishimba” goes rogue: dr. kambwili and the future of the ruling patriotic front (pf) posted on january 15, 2017 | 3 comments e. munshya, llm, mba, m.div. even if president lungu were to turn water into wine, there is just no way the zambezi provinces (northwestern, barotse and southern) would vote for him and his ruling patriotic front. not now and not in 2021. without the zambezi provinces, president lungu and the patriotic front remain hugely dependent on at least two big constituencies: bemba provinces and the urban areas (lusaka and copperbelt). if there is any indication of the lost steam of the patriotic front, it should be seen with how it will perform and is performing in urban areas and in bemba provinces. more than ever before, the patriotic front faces a serious threat within itself because of shifting support that is beginning to take place in urban areas and in bemba speaking areas. it is this background that brings the renegade chishimba kambwili into focus. corruption charges aside, dr. kambwili matters for the pf not because he is a mover and a shaker on his own, but rather that his political treatment or maltreatment within the pf comes at a time when the pf needs to present a more unified stance to stave off any challenge to its bemba and urban hegemony. dr. kambwili’s current status in the pf is the symptom rather than the disease that will seriously challenge the viability of the patriotic front. here is why. urban areas are becoming increasingly discontented with the patriotic front. the people of lusaka are close enough to see how many times the president is flying around the world globetrotting at tax-payer expense. the people of the copperbelt have no jobs and employments are just nowhere to be found. with this urban dissatisfaction, president lungu’s firewall is very likely to collapse in the next few years, if not months. the persecution or the so called disciplining of chishimba kambwili coincides with this urban discontentment unfortunately, and if it continues, kambwili could rebrand himself as the champion of urbanites on the line of the michael sata populism. if that happened, president lungu will face a very serious test of his leadership and his status. that president lungu survived without any serious difficulties in bemba provinces came as a huge surprise in 2016. the strength of the pf, however, will be greatly challenged going forward. the patriotic front’s treatment of its bemba-speaking politicians is concerning in several circles. added to the list of sidelined influential bemba-speaking politicians will be dr. kambwili. his sidelining will continue feeding this perception that president lungu does not treat influential bemba politicians fairly. beginning from gbm, to kambwili, to emmanuel mwamba, there is a lot to argue that president lungu will not take kindly to influential bemba politicians. of course, he has tried to embrace less influential ones like defence minister chama and perhaps father frank bwalya. but beyond that, there is some perception out there, that the patriotic front’s lack of patriotism to its bemba strongholds will not end very well and chishimba kambwili becomes just the next casualty. dr. chishimba kambwili from history, politicians like dr. kambwili who have had a fallout with a president do not last long in the ruling party. so, it is almost a foregone conclusion that dr. kambwili will likely be suspended or eventually expelled from the pf. however, if he taps into urban populism, he will be chipping away support not from the united party for national development (upnd), but rather from ruling patriotic front. regardless, of what or where dr. kambwili decides to make his next political home, the loser will be the patriotic front and president lungu. if he goes with the upnd, he could be the one that finally grants the upnd an urban seat in parliament. if on the other hand he decides to form a political party, that party will most likely be very competitive in the urban areas among the disgruntled forces of the ruling patriotic front. with little to no support in the zambezi provinces and a shaking urban constituency, president lungu will have depend heavily upon the bemba-speaking provinces, another constituency that is not guaranteed to the patriotic front, come 2021. now that president lungu is somewhat confident that the constitution allows him to stand in 2021, there will be several in the ruling pf that will fight him on it. unfortunately, president lungu has very little to work with to maintain the little support from urban areas and his bemba stronghold. with the current political doldrums facing dr. kambwili, this tempestuous honorary doctor could as well be the embodiment of urban and bemba discontentment that finally topples the patriotic front’s hegemony. or is it too early to tell? share this:tweetemailprintlike this:like loading... 3 comments posted in zambian law, zambian political theology, zambian politics review of the zambian supreme court’s decision in folayinka esan v attorney general (2016) posted on january 15, 2017 | 1 comment by e. munshya, llm, mba, mdiv. the zambian state daily exercises power over the population in various ways. however, the zambian state exercises this power through designated officers tasked with the duty to perform and exercise this power. the exercise of this power generally belongs to a branch of the law known as administrative law. the power that administrative bodies and individuals use can be derived from several sources such as the common law, statute or the constitution. when evaluating whether an administrative body or officer has the power to do an act, it is important to check with the enabling statute to see whether the statute does indeed grant the power to that administrative body or officer. zambian government ministers do exercise administrative powers. this power is mostly derived from statute and some of it comes from the common law. most statutes giving the ministers administrative law powers are framed quite generally. for example, the minister of home affairs has the power to make an assessment that a particular foreigner in zambia has become a danger to zambia and must be removed. this power, known as a “discretion”, is very wide such that the statute leaves it to the minister’s good judgment and prudence to determine who can be deemed as a danger. in the past, courts of law have given great deference to ministers to exercise this power. however, this assumption is now under attack, and administrative bodies including ministers are now expected to be reasonable when exercising administrative law duties such as performed by the minister of home ministers. this is what arose in the recently concluded supreme court case of esan v attorney general (2016). mr. esan, a british national, had his work permit revoked and subsequently ordered deported after the minister made an assessment that he had become a danger to peace and good order in zambia. it was in december 2012 when mr. esan upon his return from an overseas trip got detained at the airport in lusaka and got transported to ndola where he was ordered deported as he had allegedly become a danger to zambia. mr. esan sought judicial review of the minister’s action and at first instance, the high court ruled against him declaring that section 34 of the immigration and deportation act granted the minister of home affairs unfettered discretion to declare an alien dangerous to peace and good order in zambia and deport such aliens. mr. esan appealed against the high court ruling and on december 9, 2016, the supreme court issued its ruling. this ruling, coming from chief justice i.c. mambilima, judge r.m.c. kaoma and judge m. musonda, is monumental for several reasons. it recognises within the ambit of zambian democracy that, “courts ought to be conscious of emerging trends towards more open and transparent government that promote the rule of law, human rights and curbs arbitrariness” (p.25). it is my hope that this statement is being read by all judges in zambia and being given the serious consideration it deserves. esan shows that judges of the zambian courts are willing to stand up to the potential tyranny of executive power. this looks like a great reversal from former acting chief justice lombe chibesakunda’s court which clothed the presidency with almost infallible powers in the case of munalula and kajimanga v. attorney general case. in esan, the judges are saying that the law that seems to clothe decision makers with seemingly absolute discretion must be interpreted strictly and in ways that give effect to the democratic character of the republic. the judges in esan clarify the law regarding the duty that a decision maker has to give reasons for their decision. the statute does not obligate the minister to give reasons why she decides that person a should be declared persona non-grata. nevertheless, in the “dispensation of open government”, declared chief justice mambilima, “there is a growing school of thought advocating that reasons must be given for administrative decisions to show the considerations that the decision maker relied on to arrive at the decision and most importantly, to assist the affected persons and those reviewing the decision when it is challenged” (p. 31). most importantly and crucially, “failure to give reasons for a decision amounts to a denial of justice and is, in itself, an error of law” (p.31). esan is in my opinion the most significant administrative law decision to have come out of the zambian judiciary this year 2016. we look forward to the development of the law in this area. with rulings like this one, the zambian judiciary is in good hands. ———————————————————————– citation: munshya, e. (2017). “review of the zambian supreme court’s decision in folayinka esan v attorney general (2016)”. elias munshya blog. (www.eliasmunshya.org) elias munshya, of the alberta bar share this:tweetemailprintlike this:like loading... 1 comment posted in zambian law, zambian political theology, zambian politics tagged folayinka esan president edgar lungu is not eligible to stand in 2021: here is why posted on january 10, 2017 | 7 comments by elias munshya & michael chishala “a person who has twice held office as president,” states article 106(3) of zambia’s constitution 2016, “is not eligible for election as president.” however, article 106 (6) further explains that a vice-president, or another person who assumes the presidency due to a by-election, will not be deemed to have held office if they have served as president for less than 3 years before the date of the next general election. the question zambians are facing right now is whether president edgar chagwa lungu qualifies to stand in 2021. president edgar lungu was first sworn into office in january 2015 after winning a presidential by-election to replace a dead incumbent mr. michael chilufya sata. lungu was re-elected in august 2016 after general elections. in 2015 when he first ran for office, zambia was under constitution 1996. however, in january 2016, zambia adopted an amended constitution with the provisions explained above. the question is how would this apply to president lungu. president lungu and his supporters claim that constitution 2016 allows him to stand again in 2021. however, as stated above, article 106(3) cannot be any clearer: “a person who has twice held office as president is not eligible for election as president.” we submit that president lungu has “twice held office”. the first was in january 2015, and the second was in september 2016, after the august 2016 elections. article 106(2) states as follows: “a president shall hold office from the date the president-elect is sworn into office and ending on the date the next president-elect is sworn into office.” on 25th january 2015, mr lungu was sworn-in as president. he “held office” until the next swearing-in ceremony on 13th september 2016 when as “next president-elect”, he was sworn in for a second time. thus, he is currently “holding office” for the second time until the next swearing in ceremony in 2021. some lungu supporters claim that his first term does not count because of article 106(6) which states that for the purposes of article 106(3), a term of office is only counted if it is at least three years long. since mr lungu’s first term was less than three years, they say we must discount it. this argument fails on two counts. the “three-year rule” only came in effect in 2016 and you cannot apply the law to previous events unless it is explicitly stated in the law itself. for example, before 2016, there was no provision for 50%+1 to determine the election winner. if we applied the law retroactively, it would mean mr lungu never won the 2015 elections since he never went over half the votes cast. another example is the grade 12 certificate requirement. the fact that it is now required for a candidate to stand as president does not mean the previous elections that were held without g12 certificates are invalid. the three-year rule fails because if we apply it to president lungu, he does not even qualify because it can only be applied to a vice-president who was elected as a running mate and then took over after a vacancy in the president’s office. mr lungu was never a vice-president. article 106(6) refers to article 106(5)(a) and (b) when mentioning the three-year rule and president lungu never took office under either of the two situations mentioned in article 106(5). if we followed, article 106(5), only dr. guy scott, who is now eligible to stand as zambian president, would possibly qualify. as a side issue though, it is interesting to note that dr. scott actually never “held office” since he was never sworn-in as president, even though he performed the executive functions of the president’s office. similarly, during the three months after the death of president levy mwanawasa, dr. rupiah banda never “held office”. another argument by lungu supporters is that the constitution 2016 reset the clock and everything is started afresh, including counting of terms of office previously held. this fails because there is no provision in the constitution 2016 that says that previous terms of office under the earlier constitution are not counted. the critical phrase in the constitution is “twice held office”. the definition of “holding office” has not changed since the 1991 constitution to date. constitution 1996 in article 34(9) and (10) stated as follows: a person elected as president under this article shall be sworn in and assume office immediately but not later than twenty-four hours from the time of declaring the election. the person who has held office of president shall immediately hand over the office of president to the person elected as president and shall complete the procedural and administrative handing over process within fourteen days from the date the person elected as president is sworn in. thus, it is very clear that being sworn-in is what constitutes the beginning of “holding office” with respect to article 106(3) in the 2016 constitution and this also applied previously. mr lungu has been sworn-in twice and as per article 106(3), he will have “twice held office” by 2021. the logical end of the arguments advanced by president lungu’s third term supporters would mean that if the late president fredrick chiluba were alive today, then even he could contest again. the argument could extend further to dr. kenneth kaunda as well. if everything has started on a clean slate there is no stopping kaunda or chiluba. further, if this third term argument held, then dr. rupiah banda might claim two more terms, since he too served for less than the proverbial 3 years. we doubt if the lungu argument makes any sense at all. we also note that in january 2016, there were two acts of parliament that ushered in constitution 2016. constitution act no. 1 provided for the transition between the two constitutional eras (constitution 1991 and constitution 2016) while constitution act no. 2 contains the actual text of the 2016 amendments to the constitution. to provide for the transition, act no. 1 stated that, “the president shall continue to serve as president for the unexpired term of that office as specified by the constitution in accordance with the constitution.” this provision confirms our view that the 2016 constitution (assented to on 5th january 2016) recognizes the first term of office held by mr lungu that was already running from january 2015. we understand that president lungu and his supporters are talking of taking this matter to the constitutional court. we believe that step is unnecessary in view of the circumstances. we do hope to continue participating in this dialogue. _______________________________________________________________ suggested citation: munshya e. and m. chishala (2017). “president edgar lungu is not eligible to stand in 2021: here is why”. elias munshya blog. (www.eliasmunshya.org). about the co-authors: michael chishala (michaelchishala.com) is an entrepreneur and web developer based in lusaka, zambia. trained as an engineer at the university of manchester in england, his multifaceted interests include: philosophy, economics, politics, theoretical physics, architecture, music, and the arts. elias munshya (eliasmunshya.org) is a zambian based in calgary, alberta where he practices civil litigation, administrative and human rights law. he holds graduate degrees in theology, counselling, law and business administration. elias munshya michael chishala share this:tweetemailprintlike this:like loading... 7 comments posted in zambian law, zambian political theology, zambian politics tagged edgar lungu, elias munshya, michael chishala, third term, zambia the law association of zambia: my proposals for reform posted on december 11, 2016 | leave a comment by e. munshya, llm, mba, mdiv. change must come to the law association of zambia (laz). laz in its current form lacks the institutional strength needed to serve zambians. however, the debates about the future of the association seems to be so polarised that it is sometimes confusing to tell what exactly is going on. the genuine calls for the reformation and reorganization of the law association of zambia seems now to have been hijacked by supporters of the ruling patriotic front such that it becomes difficult to distinguish between reforms that are needed to enhance the profession and reforms being advocated by the ruling party to control the legal profession.  i doubt whether the pf cadres mean well about the future of laz. it appears to me the ruling pf and its cadres are not interested in a reformed laz that serves the needs of zambians, but are much more interested in a laz that is more amiable to the desires of the ruling party politicians. to make it very clear, those of us who are asking for the reformation of the association are doing so on very different grounds than the ruling party cadres. we will be doing a great disservice to this debate if we lumped those advocating for change into one political mould. my proposals are as follows. currently, the law association of zambia primarily derives its existence from three sources: it derives its power from the legal practitioners act (lpa), an act that explains the regulation of lawyers in zambia. laz derives its powers from the law association of zambia act, which explains the objects of laz and how it is to be managed. the common law and tradition inherited from the british. curiously, both the lpa and laz act combine two elements into one entity: regulation and fraternity. laz serves as the regulator of lawyers called to the zambian bar, and it is also a fraternal association for lawyers and other allied individuals. it is this character of the law association that is problematic right from the start. my proposal is to de-link regulation from fraternity so that laz the regulator becomes distinct from laz the fraternal association. my proposal has got nothing to do with the current direction of the laz council or its leader, and has everything to do with maintaining a regulator whose sole purpose will be to train, admit, and licence lawyers for the national good while leaving the advocacy and fraternal goals to a different association. e. munshya laz already has the infrastructure for change. for example, several laz committees which carry out the regulatory function can very easily be delinked from the main association and together form the regulatory body for lawyers. this committee includes the legal practitioners committee and the disciplinary committee. to that we can add the educational committee, by whatever name called. this new body, we can for example, call the law society of zambia (lsz) would be tasked with education, training, admission to the bar and discipline of zambian legal practitioners. the lsa can also be given the mandate to licence other allied professionals such as paralegals. the law association of zambia (laz) can then continue as an association of free minded lawyers sharing information and participating in democratic advocacy and governance by intervening in noble causes such as the oasis forum or the grand coalition. the lsz as a regulator will not be making running commentary on politics. its role will be to licence lawyers and ensure that lawyers respect the rule of law and serve the public interest. the role of advocacy and political commentary can be left to an association. the lsa will be self-governing. that is, it will maintain the common-law tradition of a legal profession that regulates itself without political interference. the lsa can also become an independent arbiter for disputes that must deal with the profession. how then can we achieve these reforms? my proposal is that parliament is the right place to start. there must be political will to amend both the lpa and laz act. however, in making such statutory changes, parliament and the executive must consult with lawyers. lawyers must know that it is in their best interest to have a regulator that is not soiled by political advocacy. while there is nothing wrong with political advocacy, there is everything wrong if a regulator gets involved in political advocacy. you do not need a regulator arguing in court about how electoral petitions must be handled! leave that to lawyers and the courts or to an association of like-minded people and leave the regulator out of political squabbles, even if the squabbles have to do with the law. some citizens have gone to court to seek help from the courts to heal the law association of zambia. with due respect to those citizens who have done so, i doubt if the courts of law are the right fora to resolve such problems. courts cannot heal that which must be cured by legislative action. if the current justice minister can do anything to enhance the legal profession in zambia, he should consider pushing in reform that delinks regulation from fraternity in the way the legal profession is regulated under both the laz act and the lpa. this debate must continue and i hope to continue contributing to it in the coming weeks and months. share this:tweetemailprintlike this:like loading... leave a comment posted in zambian law, zambian political theology, zambian politics amos chanda, judges and the challenge of reforming the law association of zambia posted on december 2, 2016 | leave a comment e. munshya, llm, mba, m.div. amos chanda – state house spokesperson words alleged to have come out of mr. amos chanda’s mouth concerning the judiciary were concerning. in fact, they were dangerous. i cannot belabour any further on the points raised by the law association of zambia (laz). president lungu has defended his spokesman. he is saying that we all misunderstood mr. chanda. i hope that is true. but we cannot all be mistaken in what we heard mr. chanda say. it is a concern that the spokesperson for the president should be having a wide-ranging media interview that trots from one topic to another during the time that his principal is away visiting a foreign country. in our democracy, the president’s spokesperson is not supposed to be spewing government policy and giving political statements that outline the executive’s priorities. zambians did not elect mr. chanda. zambians elected mr. lungu. at most, mr. chanda is a senior civil servant implementing policies of elected politicians. this is the anomaly we have seen recently where after each cabinet meeting, it is mr. chanda who briefs the press about the resolutions of cabinet. president lungu should put a stop to this so there is a clear demarcation between the civil service and its supervisors, the elected politicians. in the zambian system of government, the spokesperson for the executive branch is not mr. chanda but ms. kampamba mulenga, the minister of information. she is the one who informs the public of government’s political agenda and priorities. and that is how it is supposed to be so that the people can freely debate political policy and hold politicians to account. mr. chanda’s comments that judges risk “kenya-styled” reforms are quite ill-informed. first, zambia is not kenya and we have a very different judicial and constitutional history. second, mr. chanda does not seem to make sense to the extent that he makes it sound like the executive is a very small player in the current structure of the judiciary. of all the presidents zambia has had since 1964, only two presidents have had tremendous imprint on the structure of the judiciary: president kaunda and president edgar lungu. in 2 years, president lungu has by far transformed the structure of the judiciary more than any president. it is under his rule that we have had an expanded judiciary with several new courts including the constitutional court and the court appeal. all this myriad of judges was appointed by president lungu embossing his image for many years to come. to suggest that the judiciary could be changed under the kenya-styled themes is being disingenuous to the tremendous influence of mr. chanda’s own boss on the current structure of our judiciary. point at the new courts and all the new judges and it leads to one appointing authority: edgar chagwa lungu doing in 2 years what took kaunda 27 years. on the rulings of the judges, mr. chanda may have some legitimate concerns. but mr. chanda should channel concerns in a way that respects our processes and not by throwing a tantrum on television (tantrum is an exaggeration; chanda is very soft spoken). clearly, the munali decision from justice musona does not look strong at law and common sense. it does not look convincing. but the only way to reverse it is by lodging an appeal and convince the constitutional court judges. it should not be by intimidation. the lusaka central petition decision is quite another matter and without delving any further so as not to sub-judice the case, it is a difficult case to overturn on appeal. let us wait and see. when a high court judge makes a mistake of law or fact, parties have the right to appeal. that is how we resolve legal problems. we do not resolve legal problems through veiled threats. i have tremendous faith in our constitutional court that it will fairly look at munali and lusaka central once the appeals come before it. having dealt with mr. chanda, we need to turn to the next challenging issue. the role of the law association of zambia when it makes statements that supporters of the ruling party find unfair. i believe laz, as a regulator, must not be taking sides in political battles. just as we are demanding that mr. chanda should be politically neutral, we also should demand that the regulator of legal practitioners in zambia be politically neutral. the regulator cannot take overt stands on the law that seem to contradict and divide the people it regulates. the solution, therefore, is to split laz into two independent branches: one for regulation and the other for a fraternal association of like-minded lawyers. currently, there is always confusion when laz takes a position whether it is in its capacity as a regulator or as an association of free-spirited lawyers. the calls that mr. chanda be well behaved as a spokesperson of the president, is the identical call for laz to make some effort to advocate before government that laz gets split to avoid confusion. laz is right in condemning mr. chanda, as an association. but it has no business taking such political stands as a regulatory body. if mr. chanda were to go to court or to sue the laz president for defamation (if she was wrong on what mr. chanda said), it would still be a laz regulated lawyer who would appear in court for mr. chanda against laz. this would be a potential conflict. there is more to say about the challenges for laz reform. i hope to look at it in detail in future. but for now, we are concerned with mr. chanda just as much as we are concerned with the continued politicization of the entity that is supposed to regulate legal practitioners in zambia. share this:tweetemailprintlike this:like loading... leave a comment posted in zambian law, zambian political theology, zambian politics luo falls in munali: my analysis of justice musona’s ruling in mwamba v nkandu luo (2016) posted on november 25, 2016 | 3 comments by e. munshya, llm, mba, mdiv. elias munshya (of the alberta bar) justice e. l. musona on tuesday, november 22, 2016 delivered his ruling in the munali constituency parliamentary petition. it is a 56-page judgment imbued with story. good story is what makes a good case. in fact, stories win cases. a trial is a story. gathering of evidence involves story telling. unless you learn to tell a story, you cannot win in court. going through the judgment, you can see how the petitioner doreen sefuke mwamba told her story and arranged her evidence. it was quite an emotional story too and quite compelling. it also involved some hilarious features like when one of the petition witnesses testified that they saw pf cadres give soft drinks to police men, allegedly laced with some substance that caused the police officers to fall into a deep sleep immediately after taking the drinks. it is while the police slept, testified the witness, that pf cadres helped themselves to stuffing the ballot boxes-packing and unpacking them. every story needs such twists and turns. and in the mwamba v. luo and others, you have the story, you have everything. perhaps the saddest part of the evidence was when candidate mwamba testified that she feared for her life as she and other members of the upnd were being beaten on top of the campaign double decker bus in mtendere. pf cadres were shouting among themselves and encouraging each other to do what ms. mwamba understood was going to be rape. no candidate in zambia needs to live in this kind of fear. our country can do better and must do better. rape or the threat of rape has no place in our country’s political discourse. justice musona has captured the spirit of democracy in his ruling. i find it quite thrilling. he has categorically put it very eloquently that the electoral commission of zambia has the duty to ensure that it complies with the law. particularly, mr. justice musona took issues with the form gen. 12 which in many polling stations had not been signed by polling agents. he then added this important statement on page j43: “in a democratic society like zambia, no area can be a no-go-zone to other political parties. each political party is free to campaign in any area without hindrance from any rival political parties”. this statement is a direct indictment on all of us and i hope that the electoral commission of zambia will heed mr. justice musona’s thoughts here and allow for elections that are truly free and fair for all political players. justice musona did not spare the state either. he indicted the police as having been complacent in the munali unfair election stating “the state also did not show what action the state police took regarding that merciless attack by pf supporters on upnd supporters. state police, therefore, like the electoral commission of zambia, have let down the people of munali constituency”. it cannot get any uglier than this. we had better pay heed to justice musona’s rebuke. i understand that professor luo is appealing justice musona’s ruling. for all the good things this decision is to zambian electoral jurisprudence, i believe an appeal would be in order. justice musona is quite right about the violence characteristic of the munali constituency. he is right in his concern with the general lapse of the electoral commission of zambia, but i find it difficult to accept the idea that the petitioner discharged its burden sufficiently on the charges. the greatest weakness in mr. justice musona’s legal reasoning has to do with the nexus between the illegal acts and the impact on the majority of the electorate in munali. i am finding it difficult to find the connection. for now, the matter may be appealed, or maybe it has been appealed already and we wait to hear what the constitution court will say about it. whereas mr. justice musona is right about the standard of proof required in electoral petitions, i do not see how he uses this standard considering the evidence before him. for example, how does he connect the acts of the violent cadres on the double decker bus with the candidate or her agent? the law does not punish the candidate for the acts of violence perpetrated by cadres, candidates are held accountable for the acts the candidates do or acts that are done with their knowledge or approval or approval of their electoral agents. i think that may be the question the appellant court must answer. for now, we notice the good with justice musona’s judgment, but we also face the challenge of how he came to the decision. no matter how the constitutional court looks at, we will all have to agree with justice musona that, “each political party is free to campaign in any area without hindrance from any rival political parties.” the ruling can be downloaded here:mwamba-v-luo-and-others-2016 ___________________________________________________________ elias munshya is a civil litigator and administrative law practitioner in alberta, canada. share this:tweetemailprintlike this:like loading... 3 comments posted in zambian law, zambian political theology, zambian politics tagged munali amending the zambian constitution should not be done in the dark posted on november 10, 2016 | 3 comments by e. munshya, llm, mba, mdiv (of the alberta bar) the 2016 amendments of the 1991 constitution of zambia need revision. i would be the last person to dispute that fact. from language that is ambiguous to plainly ridiculous provisions, constitution 2016 need to be reformed. wanting to change the constitution is one thing, however, and the process used is quite another. president lungu and his patriotic front must come clean and let the people of zambia know which provisions of the constitution are up for revision. this cannot be done in the dark. the zambian parliament must not move to amend the constitution in a deceitful or cantankerous manner. should parliamentarians try to do this and amend the constitution in the dark, they will hear from the million angry voices of our people. it is the people that are the true guardians of democracy and all institutions of this great nation are reposed and deposited in the people themselves. it would be ridiculous for parliament to attempt to amend the constitution without some form of public disclosure and discourse. no matter how inconvenient, discourse must be had on the way forward. the other thing that the pf must do is to speak to the upnd and other opposition parties so that they can come up with some form of consensus about amending some provisions. president lungu should not lead the country as if it comprises only his dununa reverse supporters. zambia is a republic with diverse opinions and formations. the chief executive of this nation must try to find a way to bring all sorts of people to the table. if ba hichilema and bo gbm will not meet with the president, at least mr. lungu should make effort to speak to opposition parliamentarians to forge a compromise on this issue of reforming our constitution. going it alone is ridiculously arrogant and the ruling party must guard itself in that way. we must commend some opposition parliamentarians who are already holding the pf ruling party to account in parliament concerning these amendments. they must keep up the good work. the zambian constitution should not be easily amended. a constitution that can be changed and amended overnight is not worth the paper it is written on. by trying to rush through constitutional amendments, the pf are undermining a very important principle of constitutional vitality: the fact that the constitution cannot and should not be routinely amended. it does not matter that the pf have a majority in parliament. a majority in parliament is no reason enough to bulldoze their way with constitutional amendments. my suggestions above will ensure that the pf takes the time to reflect with the people of zambia directly and to involve all parliamentarians in amending the constitution that truly needs some amendments. which provisions then need reform? the pf want to bring back deputy ministers. this is unacceptable. we already have 30 ministers and 10 additional provincial ministers, there is no need for any more ministers. zambia is supposed to be exercising some level of shrewdness and not go on a huge spending spree on more deputy ministers. if his excellency lungu comes across this article, i ask him not to give in to the temptation of over bloating cabinet and ministers. we have enough ministers. pf is also trying to amend the 50+1 provision. there is some sense in doing that. but this provision must not be amended without some discourse with all stakeholders. parliament also needs to look at the constitutional court and give it statutory jurisdiction over the bill of rights. if it has to wait for the referendum, parliament can simply give high court jurisdiction to constitutional court judges as well so that they can have the jurisdiction over the bill of rights. parliament needs to look at the ambiguous provisions of what happens during presidential petitions. another area that might need reform is local government. so far we are getting conflicting interpretation about the executive status of mayors. parliament needs to look at this very closely. the most important of the suggestions i have provided above is that the pf and president lungu must begin some form of dialogue. in discourse we trust and must trust as a true democracy. _________________________________________________________________ share this:tweetemailprintlike this:like loading... 3 comments posted in zambian political theology, zambian politics ← older posts search for: top posts & pages when "icishimba" goes rogue: dr. kambwili and the future of the ruling patriotic front (pf) download zambia's new constitution (as amended) review of the zambian supreme court’s decision in folayinka esan v attorney general (2016) president edgar lungu is not eligible to stand in 2021: here is why zambia institute of advanced legal extinction: ziale, lawyers & access to justice my recent articles when “icishimba” goes rogue: dr. kambwili and the future of the ruling patriotic front (pf) review of the zambian supreme court’s decision in folayinka esan v attorney general (2016) president edgar lungu is not eligible to stand in 2021: here is why the law association of zambia: my proposals for reform amos chanda, judges and the challenge of reforming the law association of zambia like me on facebook like me on facebook follow me on twittermy tweets using a multi-disciplinary approach, i reflect on issues affecting zambia's development. read by month january 2017 december 2016 november 2016 october 2016 september 2016 august 2016 july 2016 june 2016 may 2016 march 2016 february 2016 january 2016 december 2015 november 2015 october 2015 september 2015 august 2015 july 2015 june 2015 may 2015 april 2015 march 2015 february 2015 january 2015 december 2014 november 2014 october 2014 september 2014 august 2014 july 2014 june 2014 may 2014 april 2014 march 2014 february 2014 january 2014 december 2013 november 2013 october 2013 september 2013 august 2013 july 2013 april 2013 march 2013 february 2013 january 2013 december 2012 november 2012 october 2012 september 2012 august 2012 july 2012 march 2012 february 2012 january 2012 november 2011 september 2011 january 2011 december 2010 october 2010 september 2010 august 2010 july 2010 june 2010 may 2010 april 2010 march 2010 february 2010 january 2010 goodreads meta register log in entries rss comments rss wordpress.com networkedblogs blog: elias munshya topics: zambia, law, africa follow my blog follow blog via email enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. join 27,437 other followers blog at wordpress.com. elias munshya, llm, mba, mdiv blog at wordpress.com. post to cancel send to email address your name your email address cancel post was not sent - check your email addresses! email check failed, please try again sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email. %d bloggers like this:


Here you find all texts from your page as Google (googlebot) and others search engines seen it.

Words density analysis:

Numbers of all words: 6869

One word

Two words phrases

Three words phrases

the - 8.24% (566)
and - 3.13% (215)
that - 1.83% (126)
for - 1.69% (116)
his - 1.51% (104)
zambia - 1.31% (90)
side - 1.21% (83)
not - 1.19% (82)
her - 1.15% (79)
president - 1.05% (72)
this - 0.99% (68)
law - 0.96% (66)
our - 0.9% (62)
all - 0.89% (61)
are - 0.84% (58)
with - 0.84% (58)
constitution - 0.71% (49)
lungu - 0.68% (47)
2016 - 0.67% (46)
can - 0.66% (45)
zambian - 0.66% (45)
act - 0.63% (43)
end - 0.58% (40)
form - 0.52% (36)
court - 0.51% (35)
here - 0.51% (35)
ever - 0.51% (35)
per - 0.49% (34)
elect - 0.49% (34)
political - 0.48% (33)
off - 0.48% (33)
will - 0.47% (32)
out - 0.47% (32)
from - 0.47% (32)
office - 0.47% (32)
have - 0.45% (31)
mr. - 0.45% (31)
like - 0.44% (30)
hand - 0.42% (29)
one - 0.41% (28)
laz - 0.41% (28)
has - 0.39% (27)
on. - 0.39% (27)
how - 0.39% (27)
ruling - 0.38% (26)
must - 0.38% (26)
munshya - 0.36% (25)
just - 0.36% (25)
association - 0.36% (25)
log - 0.35% (24)
chanda - 0.35% (24)
over - 0.35% (24)
part - 0.32% (22)
very - 0.32% (22)
was - 0.32% (22)
minister - 0.32% (22)
there - 0.31% (21)
post - 0.31% (21)
ran - 0.31% (21)
justice - 0.29% (20)
amend - 0.29% (20)
other - 0.29% (20)
some - 0.28% (19)
its - 0.28% (19)
state - 0.28% (19)
parliament - 0.26% (18)
2015 - 0.26% (18)
any - 0.26% (18)
patriotic - 0.26% (18)
front - 0.26% (18)
come - 0.26% (18)
january - 0.26% (18)
comment - 0.26% (18)
need - 0.25% (17)
reform - 0.25% (17)
decision - 0.25% (17)
power - 0.25% (17)
now - 0.25% (17)
article - 0.23% (16)
person - 0.23% (16)
kambwili - 0.23% (16)
dr. - 0.23% (16)
when - 0.23% (16)
stand - 0.23% (16)
elias - 0.23% (16)
who - 0.22% (15)
held - 0.22% (15)
judge - 0.22% (15)
legal - 0.22% (15)
regulator - 0.22% (15)
lawyer - 0.22% (15)
email - 0.22% (15)
this: - 0.22% (15)
but - 0.22% (15)
should - 0.22% (15)
him - 0.22% (15)
support - 0.2% (14)
term - 0.2% (14)
what - 0.2% (14)
see - 0.2% (14)
make - 0.2% (14)
lawyers - 0.2% (14)
posted - 0.2% (14)
musona - 0.2% (14)
esan - 0.2% (14)
urban - 0.2% (14)
under - 0.19% (13)
way - 0.19% (13)
date - 0.19% (13)
year - 0.19% (13)
right - 0.19% (13)
administrative - 0.19% (13)
bemba - 0.19% (13)
count - 0.19% (13)
election - 0.19% (13)
you - 0.17% (12)
munshya, - 0.17% (12)
party - 0.17% (12)
does - 0.17% (12)
would - 0.17% (12)
ministers - 0.17% (12)
area - 0.17% (12)
constitutional - 0.17% (12)
106 - 0.17% (12)
people - 0.17% (12)
judges - 0.17% (12)
about - 0.17% (12)
give - 0.17% (12)
2014 - 0.17% (12)
use - 0.17% (12)
story - 0.16% (11)
general - 0.16% (11)
blog - 0.16% (11)
2010 - 0.16% (11)
provision - 0.16% (11)
thing - 0.16% (11)
also - 0.16% (11)
once - 0.16% (11)
such - 0.16% (11)
cannot - 0.16% (11)
good - 0.16% (11)
appeal - 0.15% (10)
more - 0.15% (10)
had - 0.15% (10)
too - 0.15% (10)
comments - 0.15% (10)
concern - 0.15% (10)
2012 - 0.15% (10)
most - 0.15% (10)
did - 0.15% (10)
december - 0.15% (10)
politics - 0.15% (10)
look - 0.15% (10)
into - 0.15% (10)
supporters - 0.15% (10)
2013 - 0.15% (10)
mba, - 0.15% (10)
two - 0.15% (10)
call - 0.15% (10)
hold - 0.15% (10)
however, - 0.15% (10)
sworn - 0.15% (10)
current - 0.15% (10)
office” - 0.13% (9)
theology - 0.13% (9)
next - 0.13% (9)
may - 0.13% (9)
than - 0.13% (9)
less - 0.13% (9)
years - 0.13% (9)
without - 0.13% (9)
add - 0.13% (9)
judiciary - 0.13% (9)
follow - 0.13% (9)
llm, - 0.13% (9)
september - 0.13% (9)
courts - 0.13% (9)
law, - 0.13% (9)
edgar - 0.13% (9)
were - 0.13% (9)
win - 0.13% (9)
politicians - 0.13% (9)
november - 0.13% (9)
try - 0.13% (9)
view - 0.13% (9)
munali - 0.13% (9)
read - 0.12% (8)
time - 0.12% (8)
theology, - 0.12% (8)
share - 0.12% (8)
needs - 0.12% (8)
late - 0.12% (8)
serve - 0.12% (8)
2016) - 0.12% (8)
executive - 0.12% (8)
challenge - 0.12% (8)
petition - 0.12% (8)
which - 0.12% (8)
take - 0.12% (8)
electoral - 0.12% (8)
august - 0.12% (8)
continue - 0.12% (8)
cadres - 0.12% (8)
change - 0.12% (8)
never - 0.12% (8)
quite - 0.12% (8)
reason - 0.12% (8)
first - 0.12% (8)
elected - 0.12% (8)
they - 0.12% (8)
after - 0.12% (8)
another - 0.12% (8)
government - 0.12% (8)
leave - 0.1% (7)
statute - 0.1% (7)
case - 0.1% (7)
matter - 0.1% (7)
become - 0.1% (7)
profession - 0.1% (7)
then - 0.1% (7)
areas - 0.1% (7)
even - 0.1% (7)
only - 0.1% (7)
top - 0.1% (7)
say - 0.1% (7)
eligible - 0.1% (7)
mwamba - 0.1% (7)
fact - 0.1% (7)
candidate - 0.1% (7)
provinces - 0.1% (7)
sue - 0.1% (7)
fair - 0.1% (7)
michael - 0.1% (7)
this:tweetemailprintlike - 0.1% (7)
this:like - 0.1% (7)
loading... - 0.1% (7)
own - 0.1% (7)
rule - 0.1% (7)
three - 0.1% (7)
twice - 0.09% (6)
great - 0.09% (6)
again - 0.09% (6)
ministers. - 0.09% (6)
before - 0.09% (6)
chishala - 0.09% (6)
provisions - 0.09% (6)
amended - 0.09% (6)
bar - 0.09% (6)
proposal - 0.09% (6)
future - 0.09% (6)
since - 0.09% (6)
zambia. - 0.09% (6)
argument - 0.09% (6)
2021. - 0.09% (6)
example - 0.09% (6)
she - 0.09% (6)
why - 0.09% (6)
president, - 0.09% (6)
being - 0.09% (6)
hope - 0.09% (6)
amendments - 0.09% (6)
2016, - 0.09% (6)
acts - 0.09% (6)
2017 - 0.09% (6)
advocacy - 0.09% (6)
issue - 0.09% (6)
exercise - 0.09% (6)
review - 0.09% (6)
important - 0.09% (6)
speak - 0.09% (6)
find - 0.09% (6)
several - 0.09% (6)
seem - 0.09% (6)
practitioner - 0.09% (6)
every - 0.09% (6)
interest - 0.09% (6)
well - 0.09% (6)
police - 0.09% (6)
where - 0.09% (6)
put - 0.09% (6)
musona’s - 0.09% (6)
upnd - 0.09% (6)
because - 0.09% (6)
(2016) - 0.09% (6)
attorney - 0.09% (6)
march - 0.09% (6)
comes - 0.09% (6)
lusaka - 0.09% (6)
danger - 0.09% (6)
supreme - 0.09% (6)
new - 0.09% (6)
free - 0.09% (6)
mdiv - 0.09% (6)
february - 0.09% (6)
october - 0.09% (6)
july - 0.09% (6)
could - 0.09% (6)
face - 0.09% (6)
test - 0.09% (6)
took - 0.07% (5)
constituency - 0.07% (5)
serious - 0.07% (5)
itself - 0.07% (5)
reasons - 0.07% (5)
parties - 0.07% (5)
their - 0.07% (5)
been - 0.07% (5)
clear - 0.07% (5)
main - 0.07% (5)
at, - 0.07% (5)
regulate - 0.07% (5)
going - 0.07% (5)
your - 0.07% (5)
zambians - 0.07% (5)
further - 0.07% (5)
106(3) - 0.07% (5)
shall - 0.07% (5)
ending - 0.07% (5)
president. - 0.07% (5)
luo - 0.07% (5)
discourse - 0.07% (5)
alberta - 0.07% (5)
nation - 0.07% (5)
get - 0.07% (5)
place - 0.07% (5)
previous - 0.07% (5)
elections - 0.07% (5)
perform - 0.07% (5)
everything - 0.07% (5)
turn - 0.07% (5)
difficult - 0.07% (5)
law. - 0.07% (5)
common - 0.07% (5)
whether - 0.07% (5)
body - 0.07% (5)
act, - 0.07% (5)
order - 0.07% (5)
know - 0.07% (5)
spokesperson - 0.07% (5)
posts - 0.07% (5)
public - 0.07% (5)
practitioners - 0.07% (5)
example, - 0.07% (5)
regulation - 0.07% (5)
home - 0.07% (5)
committee - 0.07% (5)
already - 0.07% (5)
zambia, - 0.07% (5)
democracy - 0.07% (5)
structure - 0.07% (5)
folayinka - 0.07% (5)
statement - 0.07% (5)
front. - 0.07% (5)
makes - 0.07% (5)
doing - 0.06% (4)
involve - 0.06% (4)
reforms - 0.06% (4)
ask - 0.06% (4)
let - 0.06% (4)
goes - 0.06% (4)
though - 0.06% (4)
begin - 0.06% (4)
second - 0.06% (4)
month - 0.06% (4)
lawyers. - 0.06% (4)
stated - 0.06% (4)
holding - 0.06% (4)
debate - 0.06% (4)
june - 0.06% (4)
respect - 0.06% (4)
april - 0.06% (4)
lpa - 0.06% (4)
fraternal - 0.06% (4)
suggest - 0.06% (4)
association. - 0.06% (4)
address - 0.06% (4)
above - 0.06% (4)
each - 0.06% (4)
sense - 0.06% (4)
amos - 0.06% (4)
supposed - 0.06% (4)
media - 0.06% (4)
15, - 0.06% (4)
press - 0.06% (4)
mean - 0.06% (4)
evidence - 0.06% (4)
content - 0.06% (4)
taking - 0.06% (4)
fall - 0.06% (4)
between - 0.06% (4)
chanda, - 0.06% (4)
bus - 0.06% (4)
while - 0.06% (4)
country - 0.06% (4)
commission - 0.06% (4)
civil - 0.06% (4)
consider - 0.06% (4)
point - 0.06% (4)
parliamentarians - 0.06% (4)
done - 0.06% (4)
ms. - 0.06% (4)
position - 0.06% (4)
lead - 0.06% (4)
tell - 0.06% (4)
sworn-in - 0.06% (4)
kaunda - 0.06% (4)
stance - 0.06% (4)
constitution. - 0.06% (4)
it. - 0.06% (4)
treat - 0.06% (4)
lot - 0.06% (4)
politicians. - 0.06% (4)
chishimba - 0.06% (4)
those - 0.06% (4)
speaking - 0.06% (4)
that, - 0.06% (4)
lungu. - 0.06% (4)
within - 0.06% (4)
depend - 0.06% (4)
work - 0.06% (4)
concerning - 0.06% (4)
court’s - 0.06% (4)
through - 0.06% (4)
officer - 0.06% (4)
powers - 0.06% (4)
rights - 0.06% (4)
judgment - 0.06% (4)
ought - 0.06% (4)
given - 0.06% (4)
chief - 0.06% (4)
deport - 0.06% (4)
action - 0.06% (4)
influential - 0.06% (4)
high - 0.06% (4)
2021: - 0.06% (4)
line - 0.06% (4)
bemba-speaking - 0.04% (3)
role - 0.04% (3)
ensure - 0.04% (3)
lungu’s - 0.04% (3)
grant - 0.04% (3)
check - 0.04% (3)
wrong - 0.04% (3)
older - 0.04% (3)
rather - 0.04% (3)
petitions - 0.04% (3)
resolve - 0.04% (3)
reforming - 0.04% (3)
(laz) - 0.04% (3)
alleged - 0.04% (3)
chanda’s - 0.04% (3)
fact, - 0.04% (3)
branch - 0.04% (3)
having - 0.04% (3)
power. - 0.04% (3)
duty - 0.04% (3)
m.div. - 0.04% (3)
cabinet - 0.04% (3)
minded - 0.04% (3)
lsa - 0.04% (3)
kenya - 0.04% (3)
least - 0.04% (3)
sent - 0.04% (3)
proposals - 0.04% (3)
(pf) - 0.04% (3)
got - 0.04% (3)
rogue: - 0.04% (3)
serves - 0.04% (3)
status - 0.04% (3)
dependent - 0.04% (3)
different - 0.04% (3)
derives - 0.04% (3)
treatment - 0.04% (3)
both - 0.04% (3)
including - 0.04% (3)
enough - 0.04% (3)
many - 0.04% (3)
fraternity - 0.04% (3)
licence - 0.04% (3)
regulatory - 0.04% (3)
wordpress.com - 0.04% (3)
2011 - 0.04% (3)
big - 0.04% (3)
likely - 0.04% (3)
tremendous - 0.04% (3)
mdiv. - 0.04% (3)
down - 0.04% (3)
live - 0.04% (3)
2016. - 0.04% (3)
amendments. - 0.04% (3)
better - 0.04% (3)
rape - 0.04% (3)
account - 0.04% (3)
page - 0.04% (3)
direct - 0.04% (3)
allow - 0.04% (3)
bring - 0.04% (3)
huge - 0.04% (3)
majority - 0.04% (3)
hear - 0.04% (3)
___________________________________________________________ - 0.04% (3)
opposition - 0.04% (3)
amending - 0.04% (3)
dark - 0.04% (3)
ridiculous - 0.04% (3)
move - 0.04% (3)
front’s - 0.04% (3)
campaign - 0.04% (3)
beginning - 0.04% (3)
true - 0.04% (3)
threat - 0.04% (3)
appeal. - 0.04% (3)
years, - 0.04% (3)
maintain - 0.04% (3)
called - 0.04% (3)
strong - 0.04% (3)
wait - 0.04% (3)
recent - 0.04% (3)
problems - 0.04% (3)
little - 0.04% (3)
jurisdiction - 0.04% (3)
themselves - 0.04% (3)
against - 0.04% (3)
came - 0.04% (3)
decides - 0.04% (3)
development - 0.04% (3)
national - 0.04% (3)
story. - 0.04% (3)
story, - 0.04% (3)
long - 0.04% (3)
testified - 0.04% (3)
becomes - 0.04% (3)
now, - 0.04% (3)
“held - 0.04% (3)
believe - 0.04% (3)
show - 0.04% (3)
appealed - 0.04% (3)
three-year - 0.04% (3)
during - 0.04% (3)
ruling. - 0.04% (3)
coming - 0.04% (3)
states - 0.04% (3)
months - 0.04% (3)
forward - 0.04% (3)
president-elect - 0.04% (3)
no. - 0.04% (3)
“a - 0.04% (3)
tagged - 0.04% (3)
terms - 0.04% (3)
“the - 0.04% (3)
doubt - 0.04% (3)
applied - 0.04% (3)
(p. - 0.04% (3)
changed - 0.04% (3)
currently - 0.04% (3)
“holding - 0.04% (3)
1991 - 0.04% (3)
immediately - 0.04% (3)
process - 0.04% (3)
third - 0.04% (3)
president’s - 0.04% (3)
seems - 0.04% (3)
fails - 0.04% (3)
provide - 0.04% (3)
zambezi - 0.04% (3)
ways - 0.04% (3)
office”. - 0.04% (3)
maker - 0.04% (3)
discretion - 0.04% (3)
question - 0.04% (3)
office. - 0.04% (3)
declare - 0.04% (3)
apply - 0.04% (3)
running - 0.04% (3)
claim - 0.04% (3)
democratic - 0.04% (3)
explains - 0.04% (3)
“twice - 0.04% (3)
character - 0.04% (3)
(6) - 0.04% (3)
vice-president - 0.04% (3)
hindrance - 0.03% (2)
unless - 0.03% (2)
entity - 0.03% (2)
issues - 0.03% (2)
polling - 0.03% (2)
agents. - 0.03% (2)
31). - 0.03% (2)
charges - 0.03% (2)
parties. - 0.03% (2)
concerned - 0.03% (2)
almost - 0.03% (2)
drinks - 0.03% (2)
appear - 0.03% (2)
away - 0.03% (2)
rival - 0.03% (2)
importantly - 0.03% (2)
heed - 0.03% (2)
regarding - 0.03% (2)
advocate - 0.03% (2)
truly - 0.03% (2)
is, - 0.03% (2)
spare - 0.03% (2)
unfair - 0.03% (2)
attack - 0.03% (2)
parliament. - 0.03% (2)
spirit - 0.03% (2)
last - 0.03% (2)
double - 0.03% (2)
required - 0.03% (2)
(of - 0.03% (2)
declared - 0.03% (2)
decision. - 0.03% (2)
certificate - 0.03% (2)
lack - 0.03% (2)
thought - 0.03% (2)
bar) - 0.03% (2)
went - 0.03% (2)
vote - 0.03% (2)
decker - 0.03% (2)
discourse. - 0.03% (2)
perhaps - 0.03% (2)
understood - 0.03% (2)
advocating - 0.03% (2)
kind - 0.03% (2)
qualify - 0.03% (2)
so, - 0.03% (2)
mate - 0.03% (2)
finally - 0.03% (2)
petitioner - 0.03% (2)
judgment, - 0.03% (2)
lungu, - 0.03% (2)
supporters. - 0.03% (2)
kambwili, - 0.03% (2)
opinion - 0.03% (2)
sata - 0.03% (2)
facebook - 0.03% (2)
president.” - 0.03% (2)
(as - 0.03% (2)
zambia's - 0.03% (2)
download - 0.03% (2)
trust - 0.03% (2)
rights. - 0.03% (2)
unfortunately, - 0.03% (2)
bill - 0.03% (2)
follows: - 0.03% (2)
deputy - 0.03% (2)
back - 0.03% (2)
want - 0.03% (2)
reflect - 0.03% (2)
using - 0.03% (2)
discontentment - 0.03% (2)
strength - 0.03% (2)
close - 0.03% (2)
presidential - 0.03% (2)
cancel - 0.03% (2)
hegemony. - 0.03% (2)
wordpress.com. - 0.03% (2)
email. - 0.03% (2)
chagwa - 0.03% (2)
via - 0.03% (2)
2015, - 0.03% (2)
election. - 0.03% (2)
rss - 0.03% (2)
times - 0.03% (2)
copperbelt - 0.03% (2)
served - 0.03% (2)
due - 0.03% (2)
months. - 0.03% (2)
suggestions - 0.03% (2)
trying - 0.03% (2)
pay - 0.03% (2)
candidates - 0.03% (2)
revision. - 0.03% (2)
(2017). - 0.03% (2)
106(6) - 0.03% (2)
106(3), - 0.03% (2)
citation: - 0.03% (2)
approval - 0.03% (2)
connect - 0.03% (2)
ambiguous - 0.03% (2)
uses - 0.03% (2)
standard - 0.03% (2)
counted - 0.03% (2)
rulings - 0.03% (2)
accept - 0.03% (2)
lapse - 0.03% (2)
violence - 0.03% (2)
dispute - 0.03% (2)
blog. - 0.03% (2)
amended. - 0.03% (2)
republic - 0.03% (2)
10, - 0.03% (2)
challenged - 0.03% (2)
guard - 0.03% (2)
meet - 0.03% (2)
gbm - 0.03% (2)
table. - 0.03% (2)
forward. - 0.03% (2)
used - 0.03% (2)
(www.eliasmunshya.org) - 0.03% (2)
until - 0.03% (2)
ceremony - 0.03% (2)
thus, - 0.03% (2)
added - 0.03% (2)
perception - 0.03% (2)
swearing - 0.03% (2)
effort - 0.03% (2)
either - 0.03% (2)
takes - 0.03% (2)
function - 0.03% (2)
human - 0.03% (2)
disciplinary - 0.03% (2)
wide - 0.03% (2)
minister’s - 0.03% (2)
open - 0.03% (2)
easily - 0.03% (2)
prudence - 0.03% (2)
particular - 0.03% (2)
provided - 0.03% (2)
purpose - 0.03% (2)
nothing - 0.03% (2)
determine - 0.03% (2)
transition - 0.03% (2)
deemed - 0.03% (2)
start. - 0.03% (2)
name - 0.03% (2)
assessment - 0.03% (2)
mambilima, - 0.03% (2)
chiluba - 0.03% (2)
giving - 0.03% (2)
these - 0.03% (2)
profession. - 0.03% (2)
deal - 0.03% (2)
independent - 0.03% (2)
regulates - 0.03% (2)
consideration - 0.03% (2)
society - 0.03% (2)
clean - 0.03% (2)
commentary - 0.03% (2)
making - 0.03% (2)
information - 0.03% (2)
might - 0.03% (2)
affairs - 0.03% (2)
years. - 0.03% (2)
allied - 0.03% (2)
“icishimba” - 0.03% (2)
statutory - 0.03% (2)
understand - 0.03% (2)
provinces, - 0.03% (2)
needed - 0.03% (2)
5th - 0.03% (2)
(laz). - 0.03% (2)
allegedly - 0.03% (2)
judicial - 0.03% (2)
zambia: - 0.03% (2)
calls - 0.03% (2)
business - 0.03% (2)
holds - 0.03% (2)
declaring - 0.03% (2)
based - 0.03% (2)
court. - 0.03% (2)
_______________________________________________________________ - 0.03% (2)
dialogue. - 0.03% (2)
alien - 0.03% (2)
reformation - 0.03% (2)
tradition - 0.03% (2)
dangerous - 0.03% (2)
exercising - 0.03% (2)
performed - 0.03% (2)
recently - 0.03% (2)
actual - 0.03% (2)
currently, - 0.03% (2)
much - 0.03% (2)
reformed - 0.03% (2)
peace - 0.03% (2)
interested - 0.03% (2)
laz. - 0.03% (2)
esan, - 0.03% (2)
british - 0.03% (2)
ordered - 0.03% (2)
enhance - 0.03% (2)
deported - 0.03% (2)
act. - 0.03% (2)
potential - 0.03% (2)
confusion - 0.03% (2)
far - 0.03% (2)
concerns - 0.03% (2)
facing - 0.03% (2)
early - 0.03% (2)
boss - 0.03% (2)
kenya-styled - 0.03% (2)
seen - 0.03% (2)
rupiah - 0.03% (2)
soft - 0.03% (2)
presidents - 0.03% (2)
judiciary. - 0.03% (2)
banda - 0.03% (2)
player - 0.03% (2)
front, - 0.03% (2)
clothe - 0.03% (2)
exercises - 0.03% (2)
tantrum - 0.03% (2)
scott - 0.03% (2)
stop - 0.03% (2)
among - 0.03% (2)
split - 0.03% (2)
therefore, - 0.03% (2)
stands - 0.03% (2)
overt - 0.03% (2)
demand - 0.03% (2)
politically - 0.03% (2)
fairly - 0.03% (2)
note - 0.03% (2)
participating - 0.03% (2)
mistake - 0.03% (2)
upon - 0.03% (2)
allows - 0.03% (2)
central - 0.03% (2)
effect - 0.03% (2)
reverse - 0.03% (2)
service - 0.03% (2)
started - 0.03% (2)
advocacy. - 0.03% (2)
citizens - 0.03% (2)
problems. - 0.03% (2)
saying - 0.03% (2)
elections. - 0.03% (2)
heal - 0.03% (2)
help - 0.03% (2)
gone - 0.03% (2)
squabbles - 0.03% (2)
derived - 0.03% (2)
like-minded - 0.03% (2)
case. - 0.03% (2)
presidency - 0.03% (2)
looks - 0.03% (2)
involved - 0.03% (2)
gets - 0.03% (2)
advanced - 0.03% (2)
sources - 0.03% (2)
regulated - 0.03% (2)
officers - 0.03% (2)
generally - 0.03% (2)
tasked - 0.03% (2)
previously - 0.03% (2)
priorities. - 0.03% (2)
statements - 0.03% (2)
policy - 0.03% (2)
foreign - 0.03% (2)
topic - 0.03% (2)
1996 - 0.03% (2)
individuals - 0.03% (2)
assume - 0.03% (2)
chanda. - 0.03% (2)
in. - 0.03% (2)
known - 0.03% (2)
- 0.03% (2)
- 0.03% (2)
bodies - 0.03% (2)
by-election - 0.03% (2)
of the - 0.83% (57)
in the - 0.47% (32)
at the - 0.42% (29)
president lungu - 0.36% (25)
the law - 0.36% (25)
of zambia - 0.35% (24)
that the - 0.32% (22)
the constitution - 0.31% (21)
to the - 0.29% (20)
or the - 0.28% (19)
here is - 0.28% (19)
and the - 0.28% (19)
mr. chanda - 0.28% (19)
with the - 0.28% (19)
patriotic front - 0.26% (18)
on the - 0.25% (17)
association of - 0.23% (16)
in zambia - 0.23% (16)
for the - 0.22% (15)
the ruling - 0.22% (15)
the pf - 0.2% (14)
there is - 0.2% (14)
the zambian - 0.2% (14)
not be - 0.19% (13)
justice musona - 0.19% (13)
is not - 0.19% (13)
from the - 0.19% (13)
law association - 0.19% (13)
elias munshya - 0.19% (13)
as president - 0.17% (12)
that is - 0.16% (11)
and in - 0.16% (11)
out the - 0.16% (11)
to stand - 0.15% (10)
does not - 0.15% (10)
dr. kambwili - 0.15% (10)
the patriotic - 0.15% (10)
the president - 0.15% (10)
held office - 0.15% (10)
like this - 0.13% (9)
the minister - 0.13% (9)
the people - 0.13% (9)
that a - 0.13% (9)
munshya, llm, - 0.13% (9)
will be - 0.13% (9)
llm, mba, - 0.13% (9)
must be - 0.12% (8)
about the - 0.12% (8)
a regulator - 0.12% (8)
of law - 0.12% (8)
this:tweetemailprintlike this:like - 0.1% (7)
theology, zambian - 0.1% (7)
e. munshya - 0.1% (7)
ruling patriotic - 0.1% (7)
zambian political - 0.1% (7)
constitutional court - 0.1% (7)
the regulator - 0.1% (7)
president edgar - 0.1% (7)
ruling party - 0.1% (7)
constitution 2016 - 0.1% (7)
share this:tweetemailprintlike - 0.1% (7)
this:like loading... - 0.1% (7)
posted on - 0.1% (7)
is the - 0.1% (7)
if the - 0.1% (7)
posted in - 0.1% (7)
in zambian - 0.1% (7)
edgar lungu - 0.1% (7)
zambian politics - 0.1% (7)
political theology, - 0.1% (7)
the next - 0.1% (7)
can be - 0.09% (6)
justice musona’s - 0.09% (6)
3 comments - 0.09% (6)
this power - 0.09% (6)
zambian law, - 0.09% (6)
law, zambian - 0.09% (6)
e. munshya, - 0.09% (6)
urban areas - 0.09% (6)
not eligible - 0.09% (6)
and his - 0.09% (6)
stand in - 0.09% (6)
attorney general - 0.09% (6)
held office” - 0.09% (6)
mr lungu - 0.09% (6)
sworn in - 0.09% (6)
that president - 0.09% (6)
the executive - 0.09% (6)
mba, mdiv - 0.09% (6)
that it - 0.09% (6)
twice held - 0.07% (5)
article 106(3) - 0.07% (5)
january 2015 - 0.07% (5)
the constitutional - 0.07% (5)
an association - 0.07% (5)
the future - 0.07% (5)
to have - 0.07% (5)
would be - 0.07% (5)
is why - 0.07% (5)
eligible to - 0.07% (5)
legal practitioners - 0.07% (5)
administrative law - 0.07% (5)
the decision - 0.07% (5)
v attorney - 0.07% (5)
the judiciary - 0.07% (5)
the legal - 0.07% (5)
review of - 0.07% (5)
for example, - 0.07% (5)
elias munshya, - 0.07% (5)
esan v - 0.07% (5)
future of - 0.07% (5)
to make - 0.07% (5)
folayinka esan - 0.07% (5)
general (2016) - 0.07% (5)
will not - 0.07% (5)
lungu is - 0.07% (5)
look at - 0.07% (5)
needs to - 0.07% (5)
lungu has - 0.07% (5)
the current - 0.07% (5)
be the - 0.07% (5)
should not - 0.07% (5)
is very - 0.07% (5)
patriotic front. - 0.07% (5)
people of - 0.07% (5)
high court - 0.06% (4)
the electoral - 0.06% (4)
by the - 0.06% (4)
do with - 0.06% (4)
in 2021. - 0.06% (4)
mr. esan - 0.06% (4)
the 2016 - 0.06% (4)
legal profession - 0.06% (4)
amend the - 0.06% (4)
commission of - 0.06% (4)
2021: here - 0.06% (4)
law and - 0.06% (4)
michael chishala - 0.06% (4)
do not - 0.06% (4)
lungu and - 0.06% (4)
that are - 0.06% (4)
electoral commission - 0.06% (4)
comments posted - 0.06% (4)
this is - 0.06% (4)
the date - 0.06% (4)
in its - 0.06% (4)
a very - 0.06% (4)
to look - 0.06% (4)
leave a - 0.06% (4)
and other - 0.06% (4)
pf cadres - 0.06% (4)
lungu was - 0.06% (4)
chishimba kambwili - 0.06% (4)
2016 | - 0.06% (4)
is some - 0.06% (4)
to give - 0.06% (4)
has the - 0.06% (4)
mr. justice - 0.06% (4)
should be - 0.06% (4)
i hope - 0.06% (4)
a comment - 0.06% (4)
the common - 0.06% (4)
we have - 0.06% (4)
over the - 0.06% (4)
a danger - 0.06% (4)
of office - 0.06% (4)
we are - 0.06% (4)
in 2021: - 0.06% (4)
the munali - 0.06% (4)
such as - 0.06% (4)
structure of - 0.06% (4)
he was - 0.06% (4)
the power - 0.06% (4)
email address - 0.06% (4)
elected as - 0.06% (4)
zambian supreme - 0.06% (4)
court’s decision - 0.06% (4)
in folayinka - 0.06% (4)
and president - 0.06% (4)
person who - 0.06% (4)
decision in - 0.06% (4)
how the - 0.06% (4)
supreme court’s - 0.06% (4)
that we - 0.06% (4)
the upnd - 0.06% (4)
supposed to - 0.06% (4)
minister of - 0.06% (4)
so that - 0.06% (4)
in january - 0.06% (4)
amos chanda - 0.06% (4)
a vice-president - 0.04% (3)
that they - 0.04% (3)
constitution in - 0.04% (3)
of this - 0.04% (3)
your email - 0.04% (3)
the president’s - 0.04% (3)
is that - 0.04% (3)
front (pf) - 0.04% (3)
ensure that - 0.04% (3)
politics tagged - 0.04% (3)
is also - 0.04% (3)
person elected - 0.04% (3)
act no. - 0.04% (3)
kambwili and - 0.04% (3)
less than - 0.04% (3)
held office”. - 0.04% (3)
a person - 0.04% (3)
form of - 0.04% (3)
president shall - 0.04% (3)
term of - 0.04% (3)
rogue: dr. - 0.04% (3)
the person - 0.04% (3)
third term - 0.04% (3)
my proposals - 0.04% (3)
the good - 0.04% (3)
derives its - 0.04% (3)
and all - 0.04% (3)
in our - 0.04% (3)
did not - 0.04% (3)
the police - 0.04% (3)
lungu should - 0.04% (3)
is supposed - 0.04% (3)
zambia is - 0.04% (3)
and we - 0.04% (3)
zambia has - 0.04% (3)
have had - 0.04% (3)
to tell - 0.04% (3)
comments by - 0.04% (3)
judges and - 0.04% (3)
in this - 0.04% (3)
for now, - 0.04% (3)
to one - 0.04% (3)
and not - 0.04% (3)
hope to - 0.04% (3)
an appeal - 0.04% (3)
it would - 0.04% (3)
the laz - 0.04% (3)
court judge - 0.04% (3)
makes a - 0.04% (3)
have the - 0.04% (3)
the other - 0.04% (3)
challenge of - 0.04% (3)
are the - 0.04% (3)
some form - 0.04% (3)
is right - 0.04% (3)
must not - 0.04% (3)
loading... 3 - 0.04% (3)
we also - 0.04% (3)
the acts - 0.04% (3)
acts of - 0.04% (3)
in zambia. - 0.04% (3)
how it - 0.04% (3)
both the - 0.04% (3)
it has - 0.04% (3)
laz act - 0.04% (3)
difficult to - 0.04% (3)
fraternal association - 0.04% (3)
the courts - 0.04% (3)
is quite - 0.04% (3)
has no - 0.04% (3)
advocacy and - 0.04% (3)
the state - 0.04% (3)
the duty - 0.04% (3)
we can - 0.04% (3)
of zambian - 0.04% (3)
the lsa - 0.04% (3)
zambia (laz) - 0.04% (3)
be political - 0.04% (3)
the lpa - 0.04% (3)
have a - 0.04% (3)
at least - 0.04% (3)
president for - 0.04% (3)
and administrative - 0.04% (3)
its bemba - 0.04% (3)
lungu will - 0.04% (3)
for election - 0.04% (3)
see how - 0.04% (3)
sworn into - 0.04% (3)
august 2016 - 0.04% (3)
he first - 0.04% (3)
than the - 0.04% (3)
the question - 0.04% (3)
2017 | - 0.04% (3)
is how - 0.04% (3)
in bemba - 0.04% (3)
cannot be - 0.04% (3)
areas and - 0.04% (3)
who has - 0.04% (3)
office as - 0.04% (3)
president is - 0.04% (3)
“twice held - 0.04% (3)
power to - 0.04% (3)
comment posted - 0.04% (3)
is sworn - 0.04% (3)
as well - 0.04% (3)
the statute - 0.04% (3)
to zambia - 0.04% (3)
and must - 0.04% (3)
is now - 0.04% (3)
is what - 0.04% (3)
after the - 0.04% (3)
was in - 0.04% (3)
from an - 0.04% (3)
zambia and - 0.04% (3)
influential bemba - 0.04% (3)
on december - 0.04% (3)
chief justice - 0.04% (3)
hope that - 0.04% (3)
a president - 0.04% (3)
give reasons - 0.04% (3)
decision maker - 0.04% (3)
out of - 0.04% (3)
the alberta - 0.04% (3)
it will - 0.04% (3)
patriotic front’s - 0.04% (3)
into office - 0.04% (3)
as president. - 0.04% (3)
first term - 0.04% (3)
goes rogue: - 0.04% (3)
that his - 0.04% (3)
on january - 0.04% (3)
zambezi provinces - 0.04% (3)
the zambezi - 0.04% (3)
bemba provinces - 0.04% (3)
“holding office” - 0.04% (3)
september 2016 - 0.04% (3)
mba, m.div. - 0.04% (3)
date the - 0.04% (3)
of home - 0.04% (3)
concerned with - 0.03% (2)
mwamba v - 0.03% (2)
ruling in - 0.03% (2)
now that - 0.03% (2)
just as - 0.03% (2)
zambia: my - 0.03% (2)
proposals for - 0.03% (2)
will have - 0.03% (2)
like me - 0.03% (2)
allows him - 0.03% (2)
ruling pf - 0.03% (2)
that will - 0.03% (2)
maintain the - 0.03% (2)
for laz - 0.03% (2)
say about - 0.03% (2)
on november - 0.03% (2)
provinces and - 0.03% (2)
that finally - 0.03% (2)
he could - 0.03% (2)
president lungu. - 0.03% (2)
he has - 0.03% (2)
find it - 0.03% (2)
in his - 0.03% (2)
of democracy - 0.03% (2)
place in - 0.03% (2)
do better - 0.03% (2)
decker bus - 0.03% (2)
you cannot - 0.03% (2)
the evidence - 0.03% (2)
you have - 0.03% (2)
he decides - 0.03% (2)
with some - 0.03% (2)
testified that - 0.03% (2)
the urban - 0.03% (2)
(2016) president - 0.03% (2)
on facebook - 0.03% (2)
it should - 0.03% (2)
without some - 0.03% (2)
when “icishimba” - 0.03% (2)
blog at - 0.03% (2)
legal problems - 0.03% (2)
zambian state - 0.03% (2)
duty to - 0.03% (2)
exercise this - 0.03% (2)
not to - 0.03% (2)
quite another - 0.03% (2)
decision is - 0.03% (2)
to turn - 0.03% (2)
older posts - 0.03% (2)
known as - 0.03% (2)
that administrative - 0.03% (2)
at law - 0.03% (2)
derived from - 0.03% (2)
body or - 0.03% (2)
bill of - 0.03% (2)
mr. chanda, - 0.03% (2)
role of - 0.03% (2)
(2016) posted - 0.03% (2)
law that - 0.03% (2)
an association. - 0.03% (2)
right in - 0.03% (2)
effort to - 0.03% (2)
of like-minded - 0.03% (2)
2012 november - 0.03% (2)
comment by - 0.03% (2)
seem to - 0.03% (2)
practitioners in - 0.03% (2)
statements that - 0.03% (2)
be politically - 0.03% (2)
chanda should - 0.03% (2)
that mr. - 0.03% (2)
in political - 0.03% (2)
court and - 0.03% (2)
supporters of - 0.03% (2)
by email. - 0.03% (2)
but rather - 0.03% (2)
parliament is - 0.03% (2)
political parties. - 0.03% (2)
i have - 0.03% (2)
they can - 0.03% (2)
at this - 0.03% (2)
provisions of - 0.03% (2)
the most - 0.03% (2)
is one - 0.03% (2)
in urban - 0.03% (2)
be done - 0.03% (2)
need reform - 0.03% (2)
enough to - 0.03% (2)
zambian constitution - 0.03% (2)
amending the - 0.03% (2)
deputy ministers. - 0.03% (2)
this urban - 0.03% (2)
with justice - 0.03% (2)
we will - 0.03% (2)
on his - 0.03% (2)
matter how - 0.03% (2)
how he - 0.03% (2)
opposition parliamentarians - 0.03% (2)
fact that - 0.03% (2)
the bill - 0.03% (2)
of rights. - 0.03% (2)
parliament needs - 0.03% (2)
patriotic front, - 0.03% (2)
trying to - 0.03% (2)
constitution that - 0.03% (2)
speak to - 0.03% (2)
to speak - 0.03% (2)
mr. lungu - 0.03% (2)
the president, - 0.03% (2)
way to - 0.03% (2)
try to - 0.03% (2)
of what - 0.03% (2)
because of - 0.03% (2)
jurisdiction over - 0.03% (2)
no matter - 0.03% (2)
the so - 0.03% (2)
majority in - 0.03% (2)
rival political - 0.03% (2)
even if - 0.03% (2)
not take - 0.03% (2)
elections that - 0.03% (2)
to its - 0.03% (2)
who have - 0.03% (2)
a direct - 0.03% (2)
statement is - 0.03% (2)
from any - 0.03% (2)
like the - 0.03% (2)
without hindrance - 0.03% (2)
court judges - 0.03% (2)
15, 2017 - 0.03% (2)
any area - 0.03% (2)
campaign in - 0.03% (2)
free to - 0.03% (2)
party is - 0.03% (2)
state police - 0.03% (2)
of zambia, - 0.03% (2)
now, we - 0.03% (2)
i find - 0.03% (2)
← older - 0.03% (2)
may be - 0.03% (2)
with this - 0.03% (2)
line of - 0.03% (2)
perform and - 0.03% (2)
a huge - 0.03% (2)
it difficult - 0.03% (2)
forward. the - 0.03% (2)
to justice - 0.03% (2)
right about - 0.03% (2)
not in - 0.03% (2)
i believe - 0.03% (2)
way the - 0.03% (2)
just no - 0.03% (2)
for all - 0.03% (2)
were to - 0.03% (2)
each political - 0.03% (2)
article 106(3), - 0.03% (2)
edgar chagwa - 0.03% (2)
to continue - 0.03% (2)
however, in - 0.03% (2)
january 2016, - 0.03% (2)
constitution with - 0.03% (2)
human rights - 0.03% (2)
based in - 0.03% (2)
supporters claim - 0.03% (2)
citation: munshya - 0.03% (2)
participating in - 0.03% (2)
his supporters - 0.03% (2)
for reform - 0.03% (2)
the first - 0.03% (2)
5th january - 0.03% (2)
him to - 0.03% (2)
view that - 0.03% (2)
this provision - 0.03% (2)
“a person - 0.03% (2)
2016 amendments - 0.03% (2)
constitution act - 0.03% (2)
of zambia: - 0.03% (2)
must come - 0.03% (2)
office”. the - 0.03% (2)
whether the - 0.03% (2)
into one - 0.03% (2)
for change - 0.03% (2)
to this - 0.03% (2)
has twice - 0.03% (2)
who are - 0.03% (2)
it very - 0.03% (2)
interested in - 0.03% (2)
and its - 0.03% (2)
i doubt - 0.03% (2)
chagwa lungu - 0.03% (2)
party to - 0.03% (2)
enhance the - 0.03% (2)
as president.” - 0.03% (2)
the reformation - 0.03% (2)
for less - 0.03% (2)
however, the - 0.03% (2)
needed to - 0.03% (2)
election. the - 0.03% (2)
and constitution - 0.03% (2)
the second - 0.03% (2)
7 comments - 0.03% (2)
next swearing - 0.03% (2)
never “held - 0.03% (2)
that dr. - 0.03% (2)
in article - 0.03% (2)
the two - 0.03% (2)
office under - 0.03% (2)
article 106(6) - 0.03% (2)
was never - 0.03% (2)
president’s office. - 0.03% (2)
in ceremony - 0.03% (2)
until the - 0.03% (2)
it can - 0.03% (2)
the three-year - 0.03% (2)
the fact - 0.03% (2)
would mean - 0.03% (2)
the election - 0.03% (2)
no provision - 0.03% (2)
in 2016 - 0.03% (2)
three years - 0.03% (2)
as president, - 0.03% (2)
second time - 0.03% (2)
president lungu’s - 0.03% (2)
this article - 0.03% (2)
as follows: - 0.03% (2)
he will - 0.03% (2)
as per - 0.03% (2)
2016 constitution - 0.03% (2)
respect to - 0.03% (2)
very clear - 0.03% (2)
next president-elect - 0.03% (2)
office of - 0.03% (2)
january 2015, - 0.03% (2)
during the - 0.03% (2)
constitution 1996 - 0.03% (2)
1991 constitution - 0.03% (2)
of “holding - 0.03% (2)
constitution are - 0.03% (2)
fails because - 0.03% (2)
terms of - 0.03% (2)
lungu supporters - 0.03% (2)
rupiah banda - 0.03% (2)
are as - 0.03% (2)
its power - 0.03% (2)
the new - 0.03% (2)
reforming the - 0.03% (2)
spokesperson for - 0.03% (2)
all be - 0.03% (2)
mr. chanda. - 0.03% (2)
any further - 0.03% (2)
in fact, - 0.03% (2)
december 2012 - 0.03% (2)
of mr. - 0.03% (2)
come out - 0.03% (2)
lusaka and - 0.03% (2)
and good - 0.03% (2)
chanda, judges - 0.03% (2)
where he - 0.03% (2)
loading... leave - 0.03% (2)
he had - 0.03% (2)
the way - 0.03% (2)
can do - 0.03% (2)
doubt if - 0.03% (2)
to court - 0.03% (2)
order in - 0.03% (2)
to peace - 0.03% (2)
within the - 0.03% (2)
to determine - 0.03% (2)
an assessment - 0.03% (2)
of our - 0.03% (2)
current structure - 0.03% (2)
under the - 0.03% (2)
be changed - 0.03% (2)
new courts - 0.03% (2)
more than - 0.03% (2)
the minister’s - 0.03% (2)
be deemed - 0.03% (2)
chanda is - 0.03% (2)
courts of - 0.03% (2)
very different - 0.03% (2)
of article - 0.03% (2)
mr. chanda’s - 0.03% (2)
policy and - 0.03% (2)
ministers. this - 0.03% (2)
ordered deported - 0.03% (2)
that he - 0.03% (2)
the law. - 0.03% (2)
have to - 0.03% (2)
an act - 0.03% (2)
for lawyers - 0.03% (2)
the regulatory - 0.03% (2)
judges in - 0.03% (2)
a decision - 0.03% (2)
reasons for - 0.03% (2)
that laz - 0.03% (2)
regulation from - 0.03% (2)
proposal is - 0.03% (2)
when it - 0.03% (2)
most importantly - 0.03% (2)
to that - 0.03% (2)
also a - 0.03% (2)
have come - 0.03% (2)
regulation and - 0.03% (2)
lpa and - 0.03% (2)
zambian judiciary - 0.03% (2)
munshya blog. - 0.03% (2)
explains the - 0.03% (2)
of lawyers - 0.03% (2)
saying that - 0.03% (2)
case. in - 0.03% (2)
political advocacy. - 0.03% (2)
of free - 0.03% (2)
government that - 0.03% (2)
and laz - 0.03% (2)
rule of - 0.03% (2)
this statement - 0.03% (2)
the role - 0.03% (2)
licence lawyers - 0.03% (2)
is being - 0.03% (2)
minded lawyers - 0.03% (2)
read by - 0.03% (2)
case of - 0.03% (2)
given the - 0.03% (2)
other allied - 0.03% (2)
to licence - 0.03% (2)
be given - 0.03% (2)
can also - 0.03% (2)
that judges - 0.03% (2)
the presidency - 0.03% (2)
tasked with - 0.03% (2)
posts by - 0.03% (2)
the law association - 0.19% (13)
law association of - 0.17% (12)
the patriotic front - 0.15% (10)
munshya, llm, mba, - 0.13% (9)
posted in zambian - 0.1% (7)
this:tweetemailprintlike this:like loading... - 0.1% (7)
theology, zambian politics - 0.1% (7)
political theology, zambian - 0.1% (7)
of the ruling - 0.1% (7)
zambian political theology, - 0.1% (7)
ruling patriotic front - 0.1% (7)
share this:tweetemailprintlike this:like - 0.1% (7)
is not eligible - 0.09% (6)
in zambian law, - 0.09% (6)
of the zambian - 0.09% (6)
to stand in - 0.09% (6)
law, zambian political - 0.09% (6)
that president lungu - 0.09% (6)
the ruling party - 0.09% (6)
president edgar lungu - 0.09% (6)
zambian law, zambian - 0.09% (6)
the people of - 0.07% (5)
v attorney general - 0.07% (5)
of the law - 0.07% (5)
attorney general (2016) - 0.07% (5)
eligible to stand - 0.07% (5)
the constitutional court - 0.07% (5)
twice held office - 0.07% (5)
the ruling patriotic - 0.07% (5)
there is a - 0.07% (5)
review of the - 0.07% (5)
folayinka esan v - 0.06% (4)
to do with - 0.06% (4)
court’s decision in - 0.06% (4)
the zambian supreme - 0.06% (4)
lungu is not - 0.06% (4)
president lungu has - 0.06% (4)
2021: here is - 0.06% (4)
as a regulator - 0.06% (4)
there is no - 0.06% (4)
supreme court’s decision - 0.06% (4)
by e. munshya, - 0.06% (4)
the electoral commission - 0.06% (4)
future of the - 0.06% (4)
president lungu and - 0.06% (4)
that the pf - 0.06% (4)
should not be - 0.06% (4)
comments posted in - 0.06% (4)
electoral commission of - 0.06% (4)
in 2021: here - 0.06% (4)
in folayinka esan - 0.06% (4)
leave a comment - 0.06% (4)
mr. justice musona - 0.06% (4)
commission of zambia - 0.06% (4)
needs to look - 0.04% (3)
kambwili and the - 0.04% (3)
goes rogue: dr. - 0.04% (3)
loading... 3 comments - 0.04% (3)
sworn into office - 0.04% (3)
person who has - 0.04% (3)
| 3 comments - 0.04% (3)
and president lungu - 0.04% (3)
an association of - 0.04% (3)
to amend the - 0.04% (3)
that it is - 0.04% (3)
person elected as - 0.04% (3)
some form of - 0.04% (3)
is supposed to - 0.04% (3)
this:like loading... 3 - 0.04% (3)
llm, mba, m.div. - 0.04% (3)
the challenge of - 0.04% (3)
do with the - 0.04% (3)
amend the constitution - 0.04% (3)
elias munshya, llm, - 0.04% (3)
a danger to - 0.04% (3)
posted on january - 0.04% (3)
president lungu will - 0.04% (3)
minister of home - 0.04% (3)
3 comments posted - 0.04% (3)
the patriotic front’s - 0.04% (3)
the power to - 0.04% (3)
llm, mba, mdiv. - 0.04% (3)
become a danger - 0.04% (3)
patriotic front (pf) - 0.04% (3)
of the alberta - 0.04% (3)
and the future - 0.04% (3)
rogue: dr. kambwili - 0.04% (3)
comment posted in - 0.04% (3)
is right in - 0.03% (2)
that mr. chanda - 0.03% (2)
commission of zambia, - 0.03% (2)
that is not - 0.03% (2)
political party is - 0.03% (2)
the regulator of - 0.03% (2)
it difficult to - 0.03% (2)
any rival political - 0.03% (2)
without hindrance from - 0.03% (2)
in any area - 0.03% (2)
free to campaign - 0.03% (2)
the upnd an - 0.03% (2)
i hope that - 0.03% (2)
legal practitioners in - 0.03% (2)
him to stand - 0.03% (2)
that the electoral - 0.03% (2)
i find it - 0.03% (2)
double decker bus - 0.03% (2)
justice musona is - 0.03% (2)
the alberta bar) - 0.03% (2)
(2016) posted on - 0.03% (2)
january 15, 2017 - 0.03% (2)
as we are - 0.03% (2)
with mr. chanda - 0.03% (2)
we are concerned - 0.03% (2)
the zambian state - 0.03% (2)
law that seem - 0.03% (2)
in the munali - 0.03% (2)
has twice held - 0.03% (2)
right about the - 0.03% (2)
over the bill - 0.03% (2)
to its bemba - 0.03% (2)
it is this - 0.03% (2)
majority in parliament - 0.03% (2)
areas and in - 0.03% (2)
must not be - 0.03% (2)
of the patriotic - 0.03% (2)
constitutional court judges - 0.03% (2)
to speak to - 0.03% (2)
that they can - 0.03% (2)
the urban areas - 0.03% (2)
15, 2017 | - 0.03% (2)
when “icishimba” goes - 0.03% (2)
← older posts - 0.03% (2)
me on facebook - 0.03% (2)
the zambian constitution - 0.03% (2)
the patriotic front. - 0.03% (2)
the acts of - 0.03% (2)
area without hindrance - 0.03% (2)
for the acts - 0.03% (2)
the role of - 0.03% (2)
in the ruling - 0.03% (2)
no matter how - 0.03% (2)
is free to - 0.03% (2)
campaign in any - 0.03% (2)
from any rival - 0.03% (2)
people of zambia - 0.03% (2)
there is some - 0.03% (2)
influential bemba politicians - 0.03% (2)
constitution should not - 0.03% (2)
be done in - 0.03% (2)
comments by e. - 0.03% (2)
the 1991 constitution - 0.03% (2)
the duty to - 0.03% (2)
edgar chagwa lungu - 0.03% (2)
is quite another - 0.03% (2)
of “holding office” - 0.03% (2)
terms of office - 0.03% (2)
held office”. the - 0.03% (2)
character of the - 0.03% (2)
office of president - 0.03% (2)
the person elected - 0.03% (2)
from the date - 0.03% (2)
the 2016 constitution - 0.03% (2)
is that the - 0.03% (2)
in january 2016, - 0.03% (2)
act no. 1 - 0.03% (2)
constitution act no. - 0.03% (2)
the 2016 amendments - 0.03% (2)
and his supporters - 0.03% (2)
order in zambia - 0.03% (2)
the decision maker - 0.03% (2)
to stand as - 0.03% (2)
peace and good - 0.03% (2)
not eligible for - 0.03% (2)
for less than - 0.03% (2)
“a person who - 0.03% (2)
in january 2015 - 0.03% (2)
allows him to - 0.03% (2)
elias munshya blog. - 0.03% (2)
as president is - 0.03% (2)
election as president.” - 0.03% (2)
mr lungu was - 0.03% (2)
to have come - 0.03% (2)
“twice held office”. - 0.03% (2)
is sworn into - 0.03% (2)
until the next - 0.03% (2)
term of office - 0.03% (2)
the fact that - 0.03% (2)
the president’s office. - 0.03% (2)
the high court - 0.03% (2)
ministers. this is - 0.03% (2)
such as the - 0.03% (2)
president lungu should - 0.03% (2)
the statute does - 0.03% (2)
hope to continue - 0.03% (2)
loading... leave a - 0.03% (2)
judges and the - 0.03% (2)
challenge of reforming - 0.03% (2)
2016 | leave - 0.03% (2)
the spokesperson for - 0.03% (2)
lsa can also - 0.03% (2)
that is how - 0.03% (2)
current structure of - 0.03% (2)
the structure of - 0.03% (2)
constitutional court and - 0.03% (2)
eligible for election - 0.03% (2)
does not look - 0.03% (2)
lpa and laz - 0.03% (2)
rule of law - 0.03% (2)
association of zambia: - 0.03% (2)
ruling party to - 0.03% (2)
my proposals for - 0.03% (2)
| leave a - 0.03% (2)
comment by e. - 0.03% (2)
an assessment that - 0.03% (2)
about the future - 0.03% (2)
of the association - 0.03% (2)
the ruling pf - 0.03% (2)
will not be - 0.03% (2)
derives its power - 0.03% (2)
the lpa and - 0.03% (2)
a fraternal association - 0.03% (2)
my proposal is - 0.03% (2)
with the current - 0.03% (2)
can also be - 0.03% (2)
administrative body or - 0.03% (2)
like me on - 0.03% (2)

Here you can find chart of all your popular one, two and three word phrases. Google and others search engines means your page is about words you use frequently.

Copyright © 2015-2016 hupso.pl. All rights reserved. FB | +G | Twitter

Hupso.pl jest serwisem internetowym, w którym jednym kliknieciem możesz szybko i łatwo sprawdź stronę www pod kątem SEO. Oferujemy darmowe pozycjonowanie stron internetowych oraz wycena domen i stron internetowych. Prowadzimy ranking polskich stron internetowych oraz ranking stron alexa.