5.00 score from hupso.pl for:
dearscience.org



HTML Content


Titledear science » seattle's only scientist

Length: 51, Words: 7
Description pusty

Length: 0, Words: 0
Keywords pusty
Robots
Charset UTF-8
Og Meta - Title pusty
Og Meta - Description pusty
Og Meta - Site name pusty
Tytuł powinien zawierać pomiędzy 10 a 70 znaków (ze spacjami), a mniej niż 12 słów w długości.
Meta opis powinien zawierać pomiędzy 50 a 160 znaków (łącznie ze spacjami), a mniej niż 24 słów w długości.
Kodowanie znaków powinny być określone , UTF-8 jest chyba najlepszy zestaw znaków, aby przejść z powodu UTF-8 jest bardziej międzynarodowy kodowaniem.
Otwarte obiekty wykresu powinny być obecne w stronie internetowej (więcej informacji na temat protokołu OpenGraph: http://ogp.me/)

SEO Content

Words/Characters 4230
Text/HTML 50.88 %
Headings H1 0
H2 0
H3 16
H4 0
H5 0
H6 0
H1
H2
H3
lead article
featured articles










please donate:
sponsored by:
categories
archives
H4
H5
H6
strong
we should talk about sustainability
our response to discovering chlorofluorocarbons (cfcs) destroy the ozone layer of our atmosphere
the challenge of cfcs is quite similar (and in fact intertwined with) the problem we face with carbon emissions
how have environmentalists been more successful saving the ozone layer than combating global warming?
viable alternatives were available
energy-industry heavyweights think of themselves as fossil-fuel companies, not energy companies
3/12/2011
3/14/2011
3/15/2011
3/16/2011
3/17/2011
b
i
em we should talk about sustainability
our response to discovering chlorofluorocarbons (cfcs) destroy the ozone layer of our atmosphere
the challenge of cfcs is quite similar (and in fact intertwined with) the problem we face with carbon emissions
how have environmentalists been more successful saving the ozone layer than combating global warming?
viable alternatives were available
energy-industry heavyweights think of themselves as fossil-fuel companies, not energy companies
3/12/2011
3/14/2011
3/15/2011
3/16/2011
3/17/2011
Bolds strong 11
b 0
i 0
em 11
Zawartość strony internetowej powinno zawierać więcej niż 250 słów, z stopa tekst / kod jest wyższy niż 20%.
Pozycji używać znaczników (h1, h2, h3, ...), aby określić temat sekcji lub ustępów na stronie, ale zwykle, użyj mniej niż 6 dla każdego tagu pozycje zachować swoją stronę zwięzły.
Styl używać silnych i kursywy znaczniki podkreślić swoje słowa kluczowe swojej stronie, ale nie nadużywać (mniej niż 16 silnych tagi i 16 znaczników kursywy)

Statystyki strony

twitter:title pusty
twitter:description pusty
google+ itemprop=name pusty
Pliki zewnętrzne 16
Pliki CSS 6
Pliki javascript 10
Plik należy zmniejszyć całkowite odwołanie plików (CSS + JavaScript) do 7-8 maksymalnie.

Linki wewnętrzne i zewnętrzne

Linki 166
Linki wewnętrzne 2
Linki zewnętrzne 164
Linki bez atrybutu Title 153
Linki z atrybutem NOFOLLOW 0
Linki - Użyj atrybutu tytuł dla każdego łącza. Nofollow link jest link, który nie pozwala wyszukiwarkom boty zrealizują są odnośniki no follow. Należy zwracać uwagę na ich użytkowania

Linki wewnętrzne

lead article #fragment-1
new articles #fragment-2

Linki zewnętrzne

http://dearscience.org/
home http://dearscience.org/
about http://dearscience.org/about/
bio http://dearscience.org/bio/
nuclear power http://dearscience.org/nuclear-power/
lead article http://dearscience.org/category/lead/
sustainability, not fear: what cfcs can teach us about beating climate change http://dearscience.org/2015/10/28/sustainability-not-fear-what-cfcs-can-teach-us-about-beating-climate-change/
sustainability, not fear: what cfcs can teach us about beating climate change http://dearscience.org/2015/10/28/sustainability-not-fear-what-cfcs-can-teach-us-about-beating-climate-change/
jonathan golob http://dearscience.org/author/jgolob/
energy http://dearscience.org/category/energy/
environmental http://dearscience.org/category/environmental/
featured articles http://dearscience.org/category/featured/
lead article http://dearscience.org/category/lead/
science and society http://dearscience.org/category/societyandsci/
makes an interesting point in a recent post http://cliffmass.blogspot.com/2015/10/global-warming-why-are.html
we’ve been modestly successful at this challenge http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2000/ast12dec_1/
ebola thrives on poverty and disparity http://dearscience.org/2014/10/01/ebola-thrives-on-poverty-and-disparity/
jonathan http://dearscience.org/author/admin/
featured articles http://dearscience.org/category/featured/
lead article http://dearscience.org/category/lead/
public health http://dearscience.org/category/societyandsci/public-health/
- http://dearscience.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/ebola.jpg
ebola in the united states http://www.cdc.gov/vhf/ebola/outbreaks/2014-west-africa/united-states-imported-case.html
reams of guidelines are available http://www.cdc.gov/vhf/ebola/index.html
the american health care market just became less opaque http://dearscience.org/2013/05/08/the-american-health-care-market/
jonathan golob http://dearscience.org/author/jgolob/
featured articles http://dearscience.org/category/featured/
lead article http://dearscience.org/category/lead/
medicine http://dearscience.org/category/medicine/
adam smith sense of the word http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/invisible_hand
center for medicare services http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/centers_for_medicare_and_medicaid_services
list prices charged by hospitals https://www.cms.gov/research-statistics-data-and-systems/statistics-trends-and-reports/medicare-provider-charge-data/index.html
- http://dearscience.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/pneumonia.gif
- http://dearscience.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/copd.gif
- http://dearscience.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/cad-des.gif
the fukushima disaster http://dearscience.org/2011/03/17/the-fukushima-disaster/
jonathan golob http://dearscience.org/author/jgolob/
featured articles http://dearscience.org/category/featured/
lead article http://dearscience.org/category/lead/
nukes http://dearscience.org/category/energy/nukes/
- http://dearscience.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/reactor-leak.jpg
explosion at fukushima nuclear plant, cesium detected http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2011/03/12/explosion-at-fukushima-nuclear-plant-cesium-detected
don’t panic http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2011/03/14/dont-panic
geiger counter readings rise in tokyo http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2011/03/14/geiger-counter-readings-rise-in-tokyo
what’s on fire at the fukushima reactor? http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2011/03/15/whats-on-fire-at-the-fukushima-reactor
will radioactive particles from the leaking reactor reach washington state? http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2011/03/15/will-radioactive-particles-from-the-leaking-reactor-reach-washington-state
the fukushima fifty http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2011/03/15/the-fukushima-fifty
“we believe that radiation levels are extremely high” http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2011/03/16/we-believe-that-radiation-levels-are-extremely-high
video from a helicopter flyover of the fukushima plant http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2011/03/17/video-from-a-helicopter-flyover-of-the-fukushima-plant
the health effects of radioactive isotopes from fukushima http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2011/03/17/the-health-effects-of-radioactive-isotopes-from-fukushima
radiation from fukushima, in seattle http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2011/03/23/radiation-from-fukushima-in-seattle
how radiation is measured http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2011/03/24/how-radiation-is-measured
radiation from fukushima, in seattle, tells the story http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2011/03/27/radiation-from-fukushima-in-seattle
the gold standard: inflation, wealth and economic growth http://dearscience.org/2010/10/12/the-gold-standard-inflation-wealth-and-economic-growth/
jonathan golob http://dearscience.org/author/jgolob/
economics http://dearscience.org/category/economics/
featured articles http://dearscience.org/category/featured/
lead article http://dearscience.org/category/lead/
well-crafted prototype of this line of reasoning http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lns8iy_td14
basket of goods http://www.bls.gov/cpi/
featured articles http://dearscience.org/category/featured/
sustainability, not fear: what cfcs can teach us about beating climate change http://dearscience.org/2015/10/28/sustainability-not-fear-what-cfcs-can-teach-us-about-beating-climate-change/
- http://dearscience.org/2014/10/01/ebola-thrives-on-poverty-and-disparity/
ebola thrives on poverty and disparity http://dearscience.org/2014/10/01/ebola-thrives-on-poverty-and-disparity/
the american health care market just became less opaque http://dearscience.org/2013/05/08/the-american-health-care-market/
the fukushima disaster http://dearscience.org/2011/03/17/the-fukushima-disaster/
the gold standard: inflation, wealth and economic growth http://dearscience.org/2010/10/12/the-gold-standard-inflation-wealth-and-economic-growth/
- http://dearscience.org/2009/10/07/the-health-care-debate/
the health care debate http://dearscience.org/2009/10/07/the-health-care-debate/
drugs and devices http://dearscience.org/2009/10/01/drugs-and-devices/
why are american doctors so damn expensive? http://dearscience.org/2009/09/15/why-are-american-doctors-so-damn-expensive/
extraterrestrial saltwater ocean on saturn moon http://dearscience.org/2009/06/25/extraterrestrial-saltwater-ocean-on-saturn-moon/
good work dendreon http://dearscience.org/2009/04/15/good-work-dendreon/
phase iii trial http://www.fda.gov/cder/handbook/phase3.htm
entirely new kind of cancer treatment http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/15/business/15cancer.html
http://dearscience.org/category/column/
it’s difficult to say nice things about nds http://dearscience.org/2009/05/27/its-difficult-to-say-nice-things-about-nds/
http://dearscience.org/category/societyandsci/
sustainability, not fear: what cfcs can teach us about beating climate change http://dearscience.org/2015/10/28/sustainability-not-fear-what-cfcs-can-teach-us-about-beating-climate-change/
http://dearscience.org/category/medicine/
the american health care market just became less opaque http://dearscience.org/2013/05/08/the-american-health-care-market/
http://dearscience.org/category/energy/
sustainability, not fear: what cfcs can teach us about beating climate change http://dearscience.org/2015/10/28/sustainability-not-fear-what-cfcs-can-teach-us-about-beating-climate-change/
http://dearscience.org/category/environmental/
sustainability, not fear: what cfcs can teach us about beating climate change http://dearscience.org/2015/10/28/sustainability-not-fear-what-cfcs-can-teach-us-about-beating-climate-change/
http://dearscience.org/category/lit-round-up/
take your generosity and shove it, buddy http://dearscience.org/2010/09/03/take-your-generosity-and-shove-it-buddy/
http://dearscience.org/category/economics/
the gold standard: inflation, wealth and economic growth http://dearscience.org/2010/10/12/the-gold-standard-inflation-wealth-and-economic-growth/
http://dearscience.org/category/disciplines/
the apollo guidance computer http://dearscience.org/2009/07/20/the-apollo-guidance-computer/
http://dearscience.org/category/pretty-natural/
- http://dearscience.org/2007/09/17/circumnavigating-the-olympic-coast/
circumnavigating the olympic coast http://dearscience.org/2007/09/17/circumnavigating-the-olympic-coast/
http://dearscience.org/category/school/
every visit to the seattle central library reminds me of the cheese shop sketch http://dearscience.org/2008/07/18/every-visit-to-the-seattle-central-library-reminds-me-of-the-cheese-shop-sketch/
2008 http://dearscience.org/category/societyandsci/2008/
crappy science reporting http://dearscience.org/category/societyandsci/crappy-science-reporting/
dear science column http://dearscience.org/category/column/
economics http://dearscience.org/category/economics/
embryonic stem cell research http://dearscience.org/category/disciplines/embryonic-stem-cell-research/
energy http://dearscience.org/category/energy/
environmental http://dearscience.org/category/environmental/
evolution http://dearscience.org/category/disciplines/evolution/
featured articles http://dearscience.org/category/featured/
genetics http://dearscience.org/category/disciplines/genetics/
how it works http://dearscience.org/category/societyandsci/how-it-works/
lead article http://dearscience.org/category/lead/
life in graduate school http://dearscience.org/category/school/
lit round-up http://dearscience.org/category/lit-round-up/
medicine http://dearscience.org/category/medicine/
nukes http://dearscience.org/category/energy/nukes/
pretty natural http://dearscience.org/category/pretty-natural/
public health http://dearscience.org/category/societyandsci/public-health/
public service http://dearscience.org/category/societyandsci/public-service/
response to critique http://dearscience.org/category/column/response-to-critique/
science and society http://dearscience.org/category/societyandsci/
scientific disciplines http://dearscience.org/category/disciplines/
south lake union http://dearscience.org/category/societyandsci/south-lake-union/
space http://dearscience.org/category/disciplines/space/
stats http://dearscience.org/category/disciplines/stats/
transit http://dearscience.org/category/societyandsci/transit/
units http://dearscience.org/category/disciplines/units/
weight loss http://dearscience.org/category/medicine/weight-loss/
where i'm writing http://dearscience.org/category/school/where-im-writing/
your rights http://dearscience.org/category/societyandsci/your-rights/
october 2015 http://dearscience.org/2015/10/
october 2014 http://dearscience.org/2014/10/
may 2013 http://dearscience.org/2013/05/
march 2011 http://dearscience.org/2011/03/
october 2010 http://dearscience.org/2010/10/
september 2010 http://dearscience.org/2010/09/
october 2009 http://dearscience.org/2009/10/
september 2009 http://dearscience.org/2009/09/
august 2009 http://dearscience.org/2009/08/
july 2009 http://dearscience.org/2009/07/
june 2009 http://dearscience.org/2009/06/
may 2009 http://dearscience.org/2009/05/
april 2009 http://dearscience.org/2009/04/
march 2009 http://dearscience.org/2009/03/
february 2009 http://dearscience.org/2009/02/
january 2009 http://dearscience.org/2009/01/
december 2008 http://dearscience.org/2008/12/
november 2008 http://dearscience.org/2008/11/
october 2008 http://dearscience.org/2008/10/
september 2008 http://dearscience.org/2008/09/
august 2008 http://dearscience.org/2008/08/
july 2008 http://dearscience.org/2008/07/
june 2008 http://dearscience.org/2008/06/
may 2008 http://dearscience.org/2008/05/
april 2008 http://dearscience.org/2008/04/
march 2008 http://dearscience.org/2008/03/
february 2008 http://dearscience.org/2008/02/
december 2007 http://dearscience.org/2007/12/
november 2007 http://dearscience.org/2007/11/
october 2007 http://dearscience.org/2007/10/
september 2007 http://dearscience.org/2007/09/
august 2007 http://dearscience.org/2007/08/
wordpress http://wordpress.org/
branfordmagazine theme http://www.wp-themes.der-prinz.com/magazine/
michael oeser. http://www.der-prinz.com
mimbo http://www.darrenhoyt.com/2007/08/05/wordpress-magazine-theme-released/
revolution http://www.revolutiontheme.com/
log in http://dearscience.org/wp-login.php

Zdjęcia

Zdjęcia 9
Zdjęcia bez atrybutu ALT 3
Zdjęcia bez atrybutu TITLE 8
Korzystanie Obraz ALT i TITLE atrybutu dla każdego obrazu.

Zdjęcia bez atrybutu TITLE

http://dearscience.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/ebola.jpg
http://dearscience.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/pneumonia.gif
http://dearscience.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/copd.gif
http://dearscience.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/cad-des.gif
http://dearscience.org/wp-content/uploads//2014/10/ebola-255.jpg
http://dearscience.org/wp-content/uploads//2009/10/sicksmaller250.jpg
http://dearscience.org/wp-content/uploads//2008/07/rubyfromabove-255.jpg
https://www.paypal.com/en_us/i/scr/pixel.gif

Zdjęcia bez atrybutu ALT

http://dearscience.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/reactor-leak.jpg
http://dearscience.org/wp-content/uploads//2008/07/rubyfromabove-255.jpg
https://www.paypal.com/en_us/i/scr/pixel.gif

Ranking:


Alexa Traffic
Daily Global Rank Trend
Daily Reach (Percent)









Majestic SEO











Text on page:

home about bio nuclear power lead article new articles link name here --> lead article sustainability, not fear: what cfcs can teach us about beating climate change cliff mass (meterologist, and a smart man with a consistently different take on global warming issues), makes an interesting point in a recent post: by focusing on global warming as a moral issue (and from his perspective, using scare tactics about the weather to promote concern) environmental activists are failing to convince the public to […] sustainability, not fear: what cfcs can teach us about beating climate change oct 28th, 2015 | by jonathan golob | category: energy, environmental, featured articles, lead article, science and society cliff mass (meterologist, and a smart man with a consistently different take on global warming issues), makes an interesting point in a recent post: by focusing on global warming as a moral issue (and from his perspective, using scare tactics about the weather to promote concern) environmental activists are failing to convince the public to make needed changes now. instead, we should talk about sustainability–switching the conversation to how to adapt to climate change and preserve out lifestyle better, less destructive, technologies. cliff mass’s prescription? 1. since substantial global warming is certain, we must prepare society for inevitable changes. that means adaptation and making society more resilient. for washington state, the probably means more storage of water during the spring, since snowpack will be less. getting folks away from rivers that will flood more often. fixing the damaged forests of eastern washington. 2. global warming is a technological problem and technology is our only hope. new energy sources, better energy storage, ways to remove co2 from the atmosphere, safe nuclear and new energy technologies that we can’t imagine today. but developing these technologies will require substantial investments for research and development on a much larger scale than occurring today…. 3. society should use cost effective energy-saving and renewable technologies that are cost effective today, like more efficient appliances, high-mileage and electric cars, smart devices, and better insulation in buildings, better mass transportation, and others. they may not solve the problem, but they will help. 4. environmentalists have hurt themselves by being fixated on global warming. they, and their political allies, should broaden their view to think about sustainability. cliff mass is worth reading on climate change matters. he in no way is a global-warming denialists. but he is skeptical, in a scientific manner, to claims made by environmentalists, science writers, and politicians. overall, the net result adds credibility to the reality of our present: we’re due for serious trouble from global warming, and unlikely to do much to avoid it. as cliff noted: few people have thought more about how societies deal with existential threats than professor jared diamond of ucla, the author of collapse and guns, germs and steel. last year, after giving a lecture at the university of washington, i asked him: “can you think of a single example when a society took economically costly and disruptive steps to avoid a future problem that had not been previously experienced?” he could not. musing, i can offer one example: joseph’s warning to pharaoh above 7 drought years. i can think of one example, in our own society, that might be a model of where to go from here: our response to discovering chlorofluorocarbons (cfcs) destroy the ozone layer of our atmosphere. it was a new problem, borne out of relatively new technologies (aerosol cans and refrigeration) people loved, involving damage to a relatively abstract thing (a particularly layer of the high atmosphere), with long-term concequences but relatively few immediate concequences to those in areas with the most emissions. a proper response to the problem required the worldwide banning of the use of cfcs. in many ways the challenge of cfcs is quite similar (and in fact intertwined with) the problem we face with carbon emissions. surprisingly, we’ve been modestly successful at this challenge. how have environmentalists been more successful saving the ozone layer than combating global warming? viable alternatives were available, in part because of direct scientific work by environmental ngos. greenpeace funded development of replacements for cfcs, hydrofluorocarbons or hfcs. your car’s ac probably uses hfcs rather than cfcs. despite aggressive propaganda, even domestic refrigerators are slowly transitioning over as well. the response by key environmental groups to ozone depletion was a sustainability focused one. in addition to education, a sustainable alternative was researched, vetted, and promoted. with the revelation that exxon knew about climate change since the late seventies, we know that such a response is unlikely to come from the industry heavyweights. much like the railroad companies thinking of themselves as rail not transportation companies, energy-industry heavyweights think of themselves as fossil-fuel companies, not energy companies–and devote their significant resources to propaganda to prop up their fatally flawed product, not r&d into sustainable energy (despite having all of the needed basic scientific knowledge about solar, wind, and nuclear power to be successful). it’s an opportunity. ebola thrives on poverty and disparity oct 1st, 2014 | by jonathan | category: featured articles, lead article, public health with the first confirmed case of ebola in the united states, i suspect at least a few of you are freaking out. ebola–like many viruses, including the recently popular enterovirus 68–is spread by filth. you need exposure to infected body fluids (blood, tears, sweat, vomit, diarrhea) to get it. ebola thrives on poverty and disparity: places were the people at the bottom of the ladder have no access to clean water to drink and wash with, no access to decent healthcare, no public health providers to track and contain outbreaks. west africa is nearly ideal for ebola. increasingly, so is central texas and the rest of the united states. to protect yourself, your household, your community from communicable diseases like ebola requires decency for the poorest, the most marginalized in your community–the people who pick your produce, make your food, clean your streets and workplace, working the myriad of minimum-wage service jobs that make most of our lives possible. decency for the poorest is what makes a developed country a developed country: a place where one does not die from easily prevented diseases (among other things). decency isn’t our long suit. *** you’d be correct to be exasperated with the emergency room in dallas, sending home with a handful of antibiotics a man recently arrived from west african, with classic symptoms of ebola. how could this happen? why weren’t we better prepared? the cdc has actually been a leader in responding to the crisis. it’s helped that so many american doctors and experts, at significant personal peril, have been involved in the response in africa. reams of guidelines are available. still, there needs to be local public health experts–someone to translate the guidelines into concrete steps and plans for a given community–before a plan can work. it’s tough work. how do you get a patient from an outlying clinic to an isolation room in a proper hospital without exposing ambulance crews? to which hospital should the patient be taken? who is going to clean up the vomit, blood, other bodily fluids, and medical waste? how will those people be protected from exposure. where will the waste be taken? who will incinerate it? who will track down others who might have been exposed, and watch them for symptoms? who will check arriving airline passengers for symptoms? which symptoms should be looked for? even in king county (still a high-water mark for public health in the united states), years of cutbacks–cheered on by the likes of the seattle times editorial board and tim eyman–have degraded the infrastructure to answer these questions and implement the answers. it’s not time to panic. honestly, the biggest risk for most people in the us remains the flu (get vaccinated!). for new things floating around, enterovirus 68 is probably a bigger risk than ebola. if you want to sleep better at night, vote for better public health funding. the american health care market just became less opaque may 8th, 2013 | by jonathan golob | category: featured articles, lead article, medicine how much a plate of spaghetti is going to cost you isn’t usually a mystery. sure, the price can vary quite a bit–from a few cents if you’re making the plate yourself from groceries, to dozens of dollars at a fancy restaurant. you shouldn’t be too surprised by the bill at the end; the price is right there on the menu, or on the box–same for you as anyone else. the american healthcare system remains remarkably opaque–particularly if you are among the uninsured. the cost of a hospitalization for a heart attack varies tremendously depending upon the hospital giving the treatment. and, unlike a restaurant, hospitals generally refuse to state the price up front. to reduce healthcare costs, the plan for the past few decades has been to pass on costs to the consumer. the idea here is to use the market (in the adam smith sense of the word) to force down prices–expecting patients to find the most efficient, cheapest, hospital for a given problem. (spoiler: it hasn’t worked.) but, how can you decide which hospital is most efficient, if you have no idea what they’re charging? the net result is most americans understand that getting sick–thanks to a lack of insurance, or tremendous copayments–is a good way to end up bankrupt, without any real sense of how to pick a more efficient provider. something exciting has happened this week, possibly changing this dynamic: the center for medicare services, for the first time, has published the list prices charged by hospitals around the country (to medicare) for the top one hundred reasons patients end up in the hospital. let’s look at what hospitals are charging, and receiving, in the seattle area. in each of these charts, the blue bars is the bill charged to medicare by the hospital, the red the payment the hospital actually received from medicare as well as all copayments or deductibles paid by the patient. you’ll note, like almost all insurers in the us, medicare pays a significant discount from the billed cost. a patient without insurance can expect the full, undiscounted rate. first up, the charge for a pneumonia admission: for a copd (rotten lungs, usually after a lifetime of smoking) flare: coronary artery disease, requiring a stent (either a heart attack or a heart-attack-to-be): the overbilling is (in part) a negotiation tactic between the hospitals and the insurers–a way of amplifying the percentage discount to a prospective insurer while maintaining revenues. the side effect is to leave the uninsured or underinsured as road-kill–charged two or three times the total bill payed from an insured person. if nothing else, the affordable care act (i.g. obamacare) will make this better by shifting a majority of people from the uninsured into the insured group–paying the discounted rate, with insurance picking up most of the total tab. the fukushima disaster mar 17th, 2011 | by jonathan golob | category: featured articles, lead article, nukes like many of you, i’ve been closely following the developments at the fukushima reactor complex. below is a set of links to articles i’ve written for the stranger, as the events have unfolded. 3/12/2011 explosion at fukushima nuclear plant, cesium detected 3/14/2011 don’t panic geiger counter readings rise in tokyo 3/15/2011 what’s on fire at the fukushima reactor? will radioactive particles from the leaking reactor reach washington state? the fukushima fifty 3/16/2011 “we believe that radiation levels are extremely high” (a discussion of acute radiation injury) 3/17/2011 video from a helicopter flyover of the fukushima plant the health effects of radioactive isotopes from fukushima 3/20/2011: radiation from fukushima, in seattle 3/24/2011: how radiation is measured 3/27/2011: radiation from fukushima, in seattle, tells the story the gold standard: inflation, wealth and economic growth oct 12th, 2010 | by jonathan golob | category: economics, featured articles, lead article conservative commentators have been riling up their audiences recently with lots of talk about america ‘devaluing our money’ and expressing the horrors that befell us after the united states left the gold standard in 1972. beck, as always, provides the well-crafted prototype of this line of reasoning. what’s going on here? let’s talk macroeconomic theory! money, as an abstraction, represents a sliver of the total productive ability of the economy. so, the value of the $20 bill in your pocket is ultimately determined by the productive ability of the economy divided by the total amount of money available at the moment. let’s assume that the productive capacity of the united states is stable. if north korea manufactured a million $20 bills and handed them out to people on the street, the value of your twenty dollar bill would decrease. the term for this–when the growth in the supply of money exceeds the growth in the productive capacity of the economy–is inflation. if you have a wallet thick with $20 bills (you have lots of savings), inflation is working against you. if you owe money, inflation is great. paying off the same debt (in dollar terms) requires less productive effort. assuming again the intrinsic productive capability of the economy is stable, let’s think through what would happen if trillions of dollars were suddenly evaporated–say by a gigantic retail bank failure obliterating checking accounts. now, the $20 in your pocket represents a larger share of the economic output. that’s deflation. the winners and losers are opposite from inflation. the more savings you have, the better deflation is for you. if you’re indebted, you’re doomed. borrowing and saving are both critical for the health of the economy. inflation discourages saving, deflation strongly discourages borrowing. therefore, keeping a stable relationship between the productive output of the economy and the total money supply in the economy is the goal. here’s the rub: the productive capability of the economy is constantly in flux, and affected by an astonishing multitude of factors: new technologies, the availability of resources, monopolization of supplier companies for other companies, the weather, the overall enthusiasm of entrepreneurs, the number of work-capable people, the amount of labor each person can produce, the number of new ideas worth investing in, the state of infrastructure and on and on and on. observing this, objectively, is beyond a difficult task; predicting the future productive state of the economy is even more difficult. the old way to deal with this problem was to ignore it. under the gold standard, the amount of money is fixed to be equal to the amount of gold in reserve. you could, at any time, exchange your crumpled dollar bill for a fixed amount of shiny metal. therefore, the growth in amount of money was determined by how fast this one metal could be mined and refined from the earth. you can’t eat gold. you can’t make a home out of gold. and gold clothing is just tacky. the gold production rate is a poor correlate for the growth of the overall economy. the result–particularly during periods of rapid technological advancement in areas beyond metallurgy–were repeated cycles of catastrophic crashes. when an advancement dramatically increased the productive capacity of the economy, the money supply stayed relatively fixed–resulting in sharp, rapid deflation. the deflation stopped borrowing, stopping investment in new endeavors, crashing the economy over and over again. it was a terrible system, whose success depended almost entirely upon luck and faith in divine providence. of course, beck loves it. instead, we now attempt to measure as well as we can the state of the economy, and forecast how fast it is growing, and then ‘print’ enough new money (or, in theory subtract enough money) so that the ratio of the two stays roughly the same. while not perfect, it’s the far more rational way of dealing with the problem–harnessing mathematics, economic theory and plain-old empiric data. assessing and predicting the current and future state of the dollar-based economy is the primary mission of the federal reserve. based on these predictions, the federal reserve adds (and theoretically subtracts) from the total money supply–in an attempt to keep the ratio of productive capability to money stable. hence, the beckian feverish repetition of, “…. how much money we’re printing at the federal reserve.” they (the fed) are ‘printing’ money to replace that lost by catastrophic (entirely abstract) investments and reflect growth in the productive capability of the nation. in it’s arsenal–to accomplish this herculean task–the fed collects data on almost every aspect of the economy. among all this data is a calculation of the inflation rate of the economy. a basket of goods (representing a cross section of productive output of the economy) is priced out in dollar terms on a regular basis. the rate of change in the price for the collection of goods is used as a measure of the inflation rate. this measure is probably the best sign of how well the fed has done their matching job. high inflation rates mean too much money supply, low rates of inflation (or negative rates, reflecting deflation) represent too little money is being ‘printed’. since the economic crisis that started in 2008, the rate of increase in this measure has been historically low–despite the historically large increases in the money supply by the fed. based on this measure, the federal reserve hasn’t printed enough money, to replace that lost by bankers in their spreadsheets. there are reasons to be concerned about run away printing of dollars by the fed–but it’s worth noting that the fed is a quite conservative organization. at a baseline, the federal reserve tends to err on the side of too little growth in the money supply–fitting with the catering to the needs of the wealthy before the needs of the working that dominates us leadership generally. for now, there is no reason underlying the hysteria of the right-wing commentators. featured articles sustainability, not fear: what cfcs can teach us about beating climate change cliff mass (meterologist, and a smart man with a consistently different take on global warming issues), makes an interesting point in a recent post: by focusing on global warming as a moral issue (and from his perspective, using scare tactics about the weather to promote concern) environmental activists are failing to convince the public to […] ebola thrives on poverty and disparity ebola–like many viruses, including the recently popular enterovirus 68–is spread by filth. ebola thrives on poverty and disparity. decency for the poorest is what makes a developed country a developed country: a place where one does not die from easily prevented diseases (among other things). decency isn’t our long suit. the american health care market just became less opaque how much a plate of spaghetti is going to cost you isn’t usually a mystery. sure, the price can vary quite a bit–from a few cents if you’re making the plate yourself from groceries, to dozens of dollars at a fancy restaurant. you shouldn’t be too surprised by the bill at the end; the price […] the fukushima disaster like many of you, i’ve been closely following the developments at the fukushima reactor complex. below is a set of links to articles i’ve written for the stranger, as the events have unfolded. 3/12/2011 explosion at fukushima nuclear plant, cesium detected 3/14/2011 don’t panic geiger counter readings rise in tokyo 3/15/2011 what’s on fire at […] the gold standard: inflation, wealth and economic growth conservative commentators have been riling up their audiences recently with lots of talk about america ‘devaluing our money’ and expressing the horrors that befell us after the united states left the gold standard in 1972. let’s talk macroeconomic theory, and see why they’re wrong. the health care debate the us healthcare system, in its present state, is a failure. it fails those with and without coverage. we spend more, care for fewer and are sicker than the citizens of any other industrialized nation. drugs and devices why are prescription drugs so damn expensive? or that test your doctor ordered–requiring you to be contorted into some ornate machine–that costs thousands of dollars? why are american doctors so damn expensive? the salaries of american doctors are huge, terrifying, for anyone trying to bring down health care costs in the united states. why are american doctors so damn expensive? medical school is a big part of the answer. extraterrestrial saltwater ocean on saturn moon enceladus, a moon of saturn, probably has a saltwater ocean under it’s surface, at least per an analysis of data from the cassini probe. take it away nasa and jpl: for the first time, scientists working on nasa’s cassini mission have detected sodium salts in ice grains of saturn’s outermost ring. detecting salty ice indicates […] good work dendreon dendreon, a seattle-based biotech startup, just completed a successful phase iii trial on an entirely new kind of cancer treatment. it’s difficult to say nice things about nds a recent column of mine responded to a question/rant about naturopathic medicine: a dear friend of mine is about to enter a prestigious program of naturopathic medicine. there—in exchange for hundreds of thousands of dollars and five years of his life—he will study homeopathy, osteopathy, water therapy, etc. apparently, after gaining his nd credential, he […] sustainability, not fear: what cfcs can teach us about beating climate change cliff mass (meterologist, and a smart man with a consistently different take on global warming issues), makes an interesting point in a recent post: by focusing on global warming as a moral issue (and from his perspective, using scare tactics about the weather to promote concern) environmental activists are failing to convince the public to […] the american health care market just became less opaque how much a plate of spaghetti is going to cost you isn’t usually a mystery. sure, the price can vary quite a bit–from a few cents if you’re making the plate yourself from groceries, to dozens of dollars at a fancy restaurant. you shouldn’t be too surprised by the bill at the end; the price […] sustainability, not fear: what cfcs can teach us about beating climate change cliff mass (meterologist, and a smart man with a consistently different take on global warming issues), makes an interesting point in a recent post: by focusing on global warming as a moral issue (and from his perspective, using scare tactics about the weather to promote concern) environmental activists are failing to convince the public to […] sustainability, not fear: what cfcs can teach us about beating climate change cliff mass (meterologist, and a smart man with a consistently different take on global warming issues), makes an interesting point in a recent post: by focusing on global warming as a moral issue (and from his perspective, using scare tactics about the weather to promote concern) environmental activists are failing to convince the public to […] take your generosity and shove it, buddy who would you vote off the island: the selfish ass or the generous spirit? the selfish ass, right? rational. wsu scientist craig parks along with asako stone set out to figure out exactly how much loutish behavior a group will tolerate before throwing the selfish out. what they discovered is far more interesting: …we also […] the gold standard: inflation, wealth and economic growth conservative commentators have been riling up their audiences recently with lots of talk about america ‘devaluing our money’ and expressing the horrors that befell us after the united states left the gold standard in 1972. let’s talk macroeconomic theory, and see why they’re wrong. the apollo guidance computer let’s say you’re a nasa engineer in the 1960s, wearing your snazzy black plastic glasses, thinking of landing a man on the moon and returning him safely to the earth. you start thinking navigation. getting into the right orbits is going to take a fair bit of computation–plus some fine control of rocket engines and […] circumnavigating the olympic coast every visit to the seattle central library reminds me of the cheese shop sketch “customer: it’s not much of a cheese shop, is it? owner: finest in the district! customer: (annoyed) explain the logic underlying that conclusion, please. owner: well, it’s so clean, sir! customer: it’s certainly uncontaminated by cheese….” please donate: sponsored by: categories 2008 crappy science reporting dear science column economics embryonic stem cell research energy environmental evolution featured articles genetics how it works lead article life in graduate school lit round-up medicine nukes pretty natural public health public service response to critique science and society scientific disciplines south lake union space stats transit units weight loss where i'm writing your rights archives october 2015 october 2014 may 2013 march 2011 october 2010 september 2010 october 2009 september 2009 august 2009 july 2009 june 2009 may 2009 april 2009 march 2009 february 2009 january 2009 december 2008 november 2008 october 2008 september 2008 august 2008 july 2008 june 2008 may 2008 april 2008 march 2008 february 2008 december 2007 november 2007 october 2007 september 2007 august 2007 © 2016 dear science | powered by wordpress | branfordmagazine theme by michael oeser. based on mimbo and revolution log in | 86 queries. 0.363 seconds.


Here you find all texts from your page as Google (googlebot) and others search engines seen it.

Words density analysis:

Numbers of all words: 4193

One word

Two words phrases

Three words phrases

the - 8.39% (352)
and - 2.46% (103)
you - 1.34% (56)
are - 1.29% (54)
for - 1.22% (51)
out - 1.1% (46)
one - 0.91% (38)
our - 0.86% (36)
from - 0.86% (36)
can - 0.83% (35)
eat - 0.79% (33)
red - 0.76% (32)
with - 0.74% (31)
act - 0.74% (31)
all - 0.64% (27)
that - 0.62% (26)
about - 0.6% (25)
his - 0.6% (25)
lit - 0.57% (24)
care - 0.55% (23)
money - 0.52% (22)
not - 0.5% (21)
ass - 0.48% (20)
per - 0.48% (20)
here - 0.48% (20)
article - 0.45% (19)
your - 0.45% (19)
ice - 0.45% (19)
mar - 0.45% (19)
how - 0.43% (18)
global - 0.43% (18)
warming - 0.43% (18)
rest - 0.43% (18)
old - 0.41% (17)
health - 0.41% (17)
have - 0.41% (17)
economy - 0.41% (17)
log - 0.41% (17)
king - 0.41% (17)
man - 0.41% (17)
ability - 0.38% (16)
state - 0.38% (16)
end - 0.38% (16)
over - 0.36% (15)
this - 0.36% (15)
rate - 0.36% (15)
what - 0.36% (15)
change - 0.33% (14)
him - 0.33% (14)
oct - 0.33% (14)
make - 0.31% (13)
new - 0.31% (13)
2011 - 0.31% (13)
been - 0.31% (13)
will - 0.31% (13)
hospital - 0.31% (13)
using - 0.31% (13)
2008 - 0.31% (13)
recent - 0.31% (13)
public - 0.31% (13)
productive - 0.31% (13)
was - 0.31% (13)
environmental - 0.31% (13)
fukushima - 0.29% (12)
america - 0.29% (12)
issue - 0.29% (12)
bill - 0.29% (12)
more - 0.29% (12)
than - 0.29% (12)
it’s - 0.29% (12)
inflation - 0.29% (12)
dollar - 0.29% (12)
work - 0.29% (12)
cost - 0.29% (12)
[…] - 0.29% (12)
like - 0.29% (12)
gold - 0.29% (12)
most - 0.29% (12)
economic - 0.29% (12)
use - 0.26% (11)
ebola - 0.26% (11)
any - 0.26% (11)
fed - 0.26% (11)
cfcs - 0.26% (11)
on. - 0.26% (11)
articles - 0.26% (11)
way - 0.26% (11)
take - 0.26% (11)
price - 0.26% (11)
lead - 0.24% (10)
much - 0.24% (10)
has - 0.24% (10)
2009 - 0.24% (10)
even - 0.21% (9)
sustainability - 0.21% (9)
tim - 0.21% (9)
growth - 0.21% (9)
late - 0.21% (9)
better - 0.21% (9)
cliff - 0.21% (9)
energy - 0.21% (9)
mass - 0.21% (9)
american - 0.21% (9)
each - 0.21% (9)
people - 0.21% (9)
their - 0.21% (9)
climate - 0.21% (9)
problem - 0.21% (9)
they - 0.19% (8)
thing - 0.19% (8)
few - 0.19% (8)
states - 0.19% (8)
think - 0.19% (8)
who - 0.19% (8)
united - 0.19% (8)
(and - 0.19% (8)
should - 0.19% (8)
stent - 0.19% (8)
makes - 0.19% (8)
term - 0.17% (7)
too - 0.17% (7)
supply - 0.17% (7)
dollars - 0.17% (7)
featured - 0.17% (7)
standard - 0.17% (7)
other - 0.17% (7)
talk - 0.17% (7)
promote - 0.17% (7)
weather - 0.17% (7)
interesting - 0.17% (7)
time - 0.17% (7)
them - 0.17% (7)
society - 0.17% (7)
smart - 0.17% (7)
part - 0.17% (7)
reserve - 0.17% (7)
tactic - 0.17% (7)
let’s - 0.17% (7)
place - 0.17% (7)
now - 0.17% (7)
low - 0.17% (7)
there - 0.17% (7)
seattle - 0.14% (6)
flu - 0.14% (6)
companies - 0.14% (6)
why - 0.14% (6)
mark - 0.14% (6)
get - 0.14% (6)
plate - 0.14% (6)
saving - 0.14% (6)
going - 0.14% (6)
many - 0.14% (6)
need - 0.14% (6)
well - 0.14% (6)
you’re - 0.14% (6)
plan - 0.14% (6)
patient - 0.14% (6)
total - 0.14% (6)
recently - 0.14% (6)
were - 0.14% (6)
insured - 0.14% (6)
deflation - 0.14% (6)
line - 0.14% (6)
convince - 0.14% (6)
under - 0.14% (6)
perspective, - 0.14% (6)
tactics - 0.14% (6)
measure - 0.14% (6)
concern) - 0.14% (6)
activists - 0.14% (6)
failing - 0.14% (6)
but - 0.14% (6)
focusing - 0.14% (6)
technologies - 0.14% (6)
october - 0.14% (6)
science - 0.14% (6)
present - 0.14% (6)
less - 0.14% (6)
response - 0.14% (6)
nds - 0.14% (6)
moral - 0.14% (6)
scare - 0.14% (6)
water - 0.14% (6)
(meterologist, - 0.14% (6)
sustainability, - 0.14% (6)
fear: - 0.14% (6)
own - 0.14% (6)
post: - 0.14% (6)
beating - 0.14% (6)
amount - 0.14% (6)
teach - 0.14% (6)
consistently - 0.14% (6)
after - 0.14% (6)
different - 0.14% (6)
issues), - 0.14% (6)
it. - 0.14% (6)
point - 0.14% (6)
right - 0.12% (5)
2007 - 0.12% (5)
nuclear - 0.12% (5)
mine - 0.12% (5)
enter - 0.12% (5)
die - 0.12% (5)
articles, - 0.12% (5)
bit - 0.12% (5)
just - 0.12% (5)
category: - 0.12% (5)
jonathan - 0.12% (5)
probably - 0.12% (5)
country - 0.12% (5)
wash - 0.12% (5)
decency - 0.12% (5)
isn’t - 0.12% (5)
doctor - 0.12% (5)
based - 0.12% (5)
where - 0.12% (5)
high - 0.12% (5)
economy. - 0.12% (5)
radiation - 0.12% (5)
rise - 0.12% (5)
quite - 0.12% (5)
success - 0.12% (5)
may - 0.12% (5)
theory - 0.12% (5)
ratio - 0.12% (5)
federal - 0.12% (5)
mission - 0.12% (5)
medicare - 0.12% (5)
into - 0.12% (5)
list - 0.12% (5)
prop - 0.12% (5)
stem - 0.1% (4)
capability - 0.1% (4)
owe - 0.1% (4)
i’ve - 0.1% (4)
reactor - 0.1% (4)
without - 0.1% (4)
costs - 0.1% (4)
wealth - 0.1% (4)
$20 - 0.1% (4)
stable - 0.1% (4)
idea - 0.1% (4)
conservative - 0.1% (4)
doctors - 0.1% (4)
september - 0.1% (4)
commentators - 0.1% (4)
lots - 0.1% (4)
symptoms - 0.1% (4)
poor - 0.1% (4)
represent - 0.1% (4)
err - 0.1% (4)
life - 0.1% (4)
yourself - 0.1% (4)
discount - 0.1% (4)
sign - 0.1% (4)
charge - 0.1% (4)
data - 0.1% (4)
usually - 0.1% (4)
effect - 0.1% (4)
medicine - 0.1% (4)
top - 0.1% (4)
reason - 0.1% (4)
opaque - 0.1% (4)
some - 0.1% (4)
market - 0.1% (4)
healthcare - 0.1% (4)
things - 0.1% (4)
among - 0.1% (4)
hospitals - 0.1% (4)
good - 0.1% (4)
home - 0.1% (4)
sure, - 0.1% (4)
deal - 0.1% (4)
making - 0.1% (4)
thrives - 0.1% (4)
efficient - 0.1% (4)
clean - 0.1% (4)
poverty - 0.1% (4)
working - 0.1% (4)
first - 0.1% (4)
since - 0.1% (4)
disparity - 0.1% (4)
developed - 0.1% (4)
require - 0.1% (4)
washington - 0.1% (4)
these - 0.1% (4)
could - 0.1% (4)
article, - 0.1% (4)
golob - 0.1% (4)
relatively - 0.1% (4)
successful - 0.1% (4)
result - 0.1% (4)
scientific - 0.1% (4)
long - 0.1% (4)
development - 0.1% (4)
future - 0.07% (3)
money, - 0.07% (3)
macroeconomic - 0.07% (3)
available - 0.07% (3)
when - 0.07% (3)
example - 0.07% (3)
capacity - 0.07% (3)
would - 0.07% (3)
off - 0.07% (3)
same - 0.07% (3)
again - 0.07% (3)
happen - 0.07% (3)
bank - 0.07% (3)
borrowing - 0.07% (3)
ozone - 0.07% (3)
expressing - 0.07% (3)
1972. - 0.07% (3)
standard: - 0.07% (3)
uninsured - 0.07% (3)
despite - 0.07% (3)
uses - 0.07% (3)
carbon - 0.07% (3)
fact - 0.07% (3)
set - 0.07% (3)
detected - 0.07% (3)
panic - 0.07% (3)
what’s - 0.07% (3)
plant - 0.07% (3)
inflation, - 0.07% (3)
layer - 0.07% (3)
those - 0.07% (3)
2010 - 0.07% (3)
particularly - 0.07% (3)
abstract - 0.07% (3)
riling - 0.07% (3)
audiences - 0.07% (3)
money’ - 0.07% (3)
output - 0.07% (3)
horrors - 0.07% (3)
befell - 0.07% (3)
left - 0.07% (3)
net - 0.07% (3)
reserve. - 0.07% (3)
overall - 0.07% (3)
group - 0.07% (3)
expensive? - 0.07% (3)
big - 0.07% (3)
saturn - 0.07% (3)
moon - 0.07% (3)
nasa - 0.07% (3)
trial - 0.07% (3)
say - 0.07% (3)
dear - 0.07% (3)
it, - 0.07% (3)
selfish - 0.07% (3)
start - 0.07% (3)
its - 0.07% (3)
fine - 0.07% (3)
cheese - 0.07% (3)
customer: - 0.07% (3)
logic - 0.07% (3)
weight - 0.07% (3)
march - 0.07% (3)
link - 0.07% (3)
power - 0.07% (3)
august - 0.07% (3)
bio - 0.07% (3)
damn - 0.07% (3)
getting - 0.07% (3)
person - 0.07% (3)
entirely - 0.07% (3)
difficult - 0.07% (3)
reading - 0.07% (3)
worth - 0.07% (3)
fixed - 0.07% (3)
insurance - 0.07% (3)
metal - 0.07% (3)
mined - 0.07% (3)
themselves - 0.07% (3)
environmentalists - 0.07% (3)
investment - 0.07% (3)
beck - 0.07% (3)
before - 0.07% (3)
enough - 0.07% (3)
research - 0.07% (3)
printing - 0.07% (3)
replace - 0.07% (3)
can’t - 0.07% (3)
ways - 0.07% (3)
rates - 0.07% (3)
mean - 0.07% (3)
increase - 0.07% (3)
large - 0.07% (3)
away - 0.07% (3)
insurer - 0.07% (3)
‘devaluing - 0.07% (3)
thinking - 0.07% (3)
they’re - 0.07% (3)
heart - 0.07% (3)
attack - 0.07% (3)
unlike - 0.07% (3)
answer - 0.07% (3)
(in - 0.07% (3)
community - 0.07% (3)
mystery. - 0.07% (3)
vote - 0.07% (3)
time, - 0.07% (3)
years - 0.07% (3)
charged - 0.07% (3)
pick - 0.07% (3)
significant - 0.07% (3)
down - 0.07% (3)
system - 0.07% (3)
ebola. - 0.07% (3)
which - 0.07% (3)
dozens - 0.07% (3)
vary - 0.07% (3)
bit–from - 0.07% (3)
cents - 0.07% (3)
spread - 0.07% (3)
groceries, - 0.07% (3)
spaghetti - 0.07% (3)
fancy - 0.07% (3)
africa - 0.07% (3)
restaurant. - 0.07% (3)
shouldn’t - 0.07% (3)
enterovirus - 0.07% (3)
surprised - 0.07% (3)
end; - 0.07% (3)
became - 0.07% (3)
it? - 0.07% (3)
diseases - 0.07% (3)
poorest - 0.07% (3)
needs - 0.07% (3)
service - 0.07% (3)
almost - 0.07% (3)
payment - 0.07% (3)
companies, - 0.07% (3)
easily - 0.05% (2)
investments - 0.05% (2)
west - 0.05% (2)
transit - 0.05% (2)
keep - 0.05% (2)
guidelines - 0.05% (2)
does - 0.05% (2)
lost - 0.05% (2)
scientist - 0.05% (2)
reflect - 0.05% (2)
far - 0.05% (2)
nation. - 0.05% (2)
central - 0.05% (2)
evolution - 0.05% (2)
safe - 0.05% (2)
every - 0.05% (2)
goods - 0.05% (2)
terms - 0.05% (2)
needed - 0.05% (2)
used - 0.05% (2)
rational - 0.05% (2)
subtract - 0.05% (2)
track - 0.05% (2)
june - 0.05% (2)
advancement - 0.05% (2)
catastrophic - 0.05% (2)
things). - 0.05% (2)
economy, - 0.05% (2)
vomit, - 0.05% (2)
november - 0.05% (2)
december - 0.05% (2)
system, - 0.05% (2)
february - 0.05% (2)
problem, - 0.05% (2)
april - 0.05% (2)
july - 0.05% (2)
remains - 0.05% (2)
access - 0.05% (2)
2013 - 0.05% (2)
attempt - 0.05% (2)
(among - 0.05% (2)
actually - 0.05% (2)
leader - 0.05% (2)
effective - 0.05% (2)
8th, - 0.05% (2)
prevented - 0.05% (2)
2015 - 0.05% (2)
larger - 0.05% (2)
states. - 0.05% (2)
(or - 0.05% (2)
risk - 0.05% (2)
others - 0.05% (2)
thousands - 0.05% (2)
school - 0.05% (2)
work. - 0.05% (2)
instead, - 0.05% (2)
saltwater - 0.05% (2)
ocean - 0.05% (2)
check - 0.05% (2)
symptoms? - 0.05% (2)
produce, - 0.05% (2)
cassini - 0.05% (2)
dendreon - 0.05% (2)
state, - 0.05% (2)
adapt - 0.05% (2)
waste - 0.05% (2)
means - 0.05% (2)
column - 0.05% (2)
prepare - 0.05% (2)
naturopathic - 0.05% (2)
medical - 0.05% (2)
substantial - 0.05% (2)
blood, - 0.05% (2)
taken? - 0.05% (2)
country: - 0.05% (2)
storage - 0.05% (2)
sources, - 0.05% (2)
times - 0.05% (2)
technological - 0.05% (2)
economics - 0.05% (2)
little - 0.05% (2)
crisis - 0.05% (2)
protect - 0.05% (2)
historically - 0.05% (2)
changes - 0.05% (2)
printed - 0.05% (2)
infrastructure - 0.05% (2)
please - 0.05% (2)
underlying - 0.05% (2)
requires - 0.05% (2)
theory, - 0.05% (2)
see - 0.05% (2)
wrong. - 0.05% (2)
given - 0.05% (2)
during - 0.05% (2)
drugs - 0.05% (2)
devices - 0.05% (2)
prescription - 0.05% (2)
owner: - 0.05% (2)
shop - 0.05% (2)
rapid - 0.05% (2)
predicting - 0.05% (2)
fluids - 0.05% (2)
geiger - 0.05% (2)
written - 0.05% (2)
stranger, - 0.05% (2)
events - 0.05% (2)
unfolded. - 0.05% (2)
3/12/2011 - 0.05% (2)
explosion - 0.05% (2)
plant, - 0.05% (2)
cesium - 0.05% (2)
heavyweights - 0.05% (2)
3/14/2011 - 0.05% (2)
don’t - 0.05% (2)
reasons - 0.05% (2)
counter - 0.05% (2)
look - 0.05% (2)
readings - 0.05% (2)
cfcs. - 0.05% (2)
tokyo - 0.05% (2)
3/15/2011 - 0.05% (2)
hundred - 0.05% (2)
fire - 0.05% (2)
radioactive - 0.05% (2)
proper - 0.05% (2)
fukushima, - 0.05% (2)
emissions. - 0.05% (2)
around - 0.05% (2)
areas - 0.05% (2)
links - 0.05% (2)
below - 0.05% (2)
concequences - 0.05% (2)
two - 0.05% (2)
expect - 0.05% (2)
rate. - 0.05% (2)
up, - 0.05% (2)
industry - 0.05% (2)
requiring - 0.05% (2)
know - 0.05% (2)
alternative - 0.05% (2)
between - 0.05% (2)
insurers - 0.05% (2)
while - 0.05% (2)
side - 0.05% (2)
sustainable - 0.05% (2)
copayments - 0.05% (2)
complex. - 0.05% (2)
hfcs - 0.05% (2)
rail - 0.05% (2)
discounted - 0.05% (2)
disaster - 0.05% (2)
transportation - 0.05% (2)
face - 0.05% (2)
nukes - 0.05% (2)
you, - 0.05% (2)
closely - 0.05% (2)
following - 0.05% (2)
developments - 0.05% (2)
challenge - 0.05% (2)
prices - 0.05% (2)
resources - 0.05% (2)
gold. - 0.05% (2)
savings - 0.05% (2)
you. - 0.05% (2)
we’re - 0.05% (2)
paying - 0.05% (2)
viruses, - 0.05% (2)
anyone - 0.05% (2)
debt - 0.05% (2)
including - 0.05% (2)
adds - 0.05% (2)
popular - 0.05% (2)
failure - 0.05% (2)
now, - 0.05% (2)
deflation. - 0.05% (2)
discourages - 0.05% (2)
inflation. - 0.05% (2)
therefore, - 0.05% (2)
number - 0.05% (2)
68–is - 0.05% (2)
in, - 0.05% (2)
beyond - 0.05% (2)
us, - 0.05% (2)
filth. - 0.05% (2)
exchange - 0.05% (2)
fast - 0.05% (2)
exposure - 0.05% (2)
earth. - 0.05% (2)
being - 0.05% (2)
unlikely - 0.05% (2)
avoid - 0.05% (2)
propaganda - 0.05% (2)
least - 0.05% (2)
real - 0.05% (2)
tremendous - 0.05% (2)
damage - 0.05% (2)
cans - 0.05% (2)
room - 0.05% (2)
lack - 0.05% (2)
hasn’t - 0.05% (2)
efficient, - 0.05% (2)
patients - 0.05% (2)
sense - 0.05% (2)
2014 - 0.05% (2)
pass - 0.05% (2)
generally - 0.05% (2)
ebola–like - 0.05% (2)
represents - 0.05% (2)
might - 0.05% (2)
out. - 0.05% (2)
value - 0.05% (2)
steps - 0.05% (2)
pocket - 0.05% (2)
determined - 0.05% (2)
treatment. - 0.05% (2)
upon - 0.05% (2)
giving - 0.05% (2)
stable. - 0.05% (2)
bills - 0.05% (2)
last - 0.05% (2)
suit. - 0.05% (2)
of the - 0.98% (41)
in the - 0.52% (22)
global warming - 0.41% (17)
at the - 0.36% (15)
the economy - 0.36% (15)
on global - 0.31% (13)
or the - 0.31% (13)
for the - 0.29% (12)
the fed - 0.26% (11)
by the - 0.24% (10)
to the - 0.24% (10)
if you - 0.21% (9)
climate change - 0.21% (9)
with a - 0.21% (9)
warming is - 0.19% (8)
the price - 0.19% (8)
lead article - 0.19% (8)
makes a - 0.19% (8)
cliff mass - 0.19% (8)
from the - 0.19% (8)
the united - 0.19% (8)
united states - 0.19% (8)
the gold - 0.19% (8)
a recent - 0.17% (7)
the weather - 0.17% (7)
on the - 0.17% (7)
gold standard - 0.17% (7)
featured articles - 0.17% (7)
the productive - 0.17% (7)
the fukushima - 0.17% (7)
of dollars - 0.17% (7)
cfcs can - 0.14% (6)
from his - 0.14% (6)
perspective, using - 0.14% (6)
scare tactics - 0.14% (6)
about the - 0.14% (6)
environmental activists - 0.14% (6)
weather to - 0.14% (6)
promote concern) - 0.14% (6)
amount of - 0.14% (6)
are failing - 0.14% (6)
to convince - 0.14% (6)
the public - 0.14% (6)
what cfcs - 0.14% (6)
and the - 0.14% (6)
issue (and - 0.14% (6)
recent post: - 0.14% (6)
a moral - 0.14% (6)
public health - 0.14% (6)
about beating - 0.14% (6)
fear: what - 0.14% (6)
sustainability, not - 0.14% (6)
(meterologist, and - 0.14% (6)
a smart - 0.14% (6)
man with - 0.14% (6)
different take - 0.14% (6)
warming as - 0.14% (6)
money supply - 0.14% (6)
the total - 0.14% (6)
warming issues), - 0.14% (6)
makes an - 0.14% (6)
interesting point - 0.14% (6)
teach us - 0.14% (6)
by focusing - 0.14% (6)
a consistently - 0.14% (6)
not fear: - 0.14% (6)
using scare - 0.14% (6)
focusing on - 0.14% (6)
his perspective, - 0.14% (6)
take on - 0.14% (6)
issues), makes - 0.14% (6)
an interesting - 0.14% (6)
with the - 0.14% (6)
point in - 0.14% (6)
post: by - 0.14% (6)
moral issue - 0.14% (6)
mass (meterologist, - 0.14% (6)
(and from - 0.14% (6)
public to - 0.14% (6)
convince the - 0.14% (6)
failing to - 0.14% (6)
activists are - 0.14% (6)
concern) environmental - 0.14% (6)
to promote - 0.14% (6)
tactics about - 0.14% (6)
smart man - 0.14% (6)
consistently different - 0.14% (6)
us about - 0.14% (6)
beating climate - 0.14% (6)
can teach - 0.14% (6)
articles, lead - 0.12% (5)
| category: - 0.12% (5)
health care - 0.12% (5)
federal reserve - 0.12% (5)
featured articles, - 0.12% (5)
going to - 0.12% (5)
change cliff - 0.12% (5)
economy is - 0.12% (5)
up the - 0.12% (5)
to […] - 0.12% (5)
the federal - 0.12% (5)
the bill - 0.12% (5)
growth in - 0.12% (5)
the hospital - 0.12% (5)
by jonathan - 0.12% (5)
how much - 0.12% (5)
have been - 0.12% (5)
is going - 0.12% (5)
usually a - 0.1% (4)
poverty and - 0.1% (4)
ebola thrives - 0.1% (4)
thrives on - 0.1% (4)
on poverty - 0.1% (4)
if you’re - 0.1% (4)
lead article, - 0.1% (4)
jonathan golob - 0.1% (4)
[…] sustainability, - 0.1% (4)
like many - 0.1% (4)
the american - 0.1% (4)
and disparity - 0.1% (4)
[…] the - 0.1% (4)
golob | - 0.1% (4)
the problem - 0.1% (4)
developed country - 0.1% (4)
up their - 0.1% (4)
productive capability - 0.1% (4)
the growth - 0.1% (4)
state of - 0.1% (4)
on and - 0.1% (4)
sure, the - 0.1% (4)
a developed - 0.1% (4)
the us - 0.1% (4)
of money - 0.1% (4)
lots of - 0.1% (4)
american health - 0.1% (4)
talk about - 0.1% (4)
with lots - 0.07% (3)
of talk - 0.07% (3)
the health - 0.07% (3)
about america - 0.07% (3)
‘devaluing our - 0.07% (3)
productive capacity - 0.07% (3)
in your - 0.07% (3)
that the - 0.07% (3)
expressing the - 0.07% (3)
in 1972. - 0.07% (3)
capability of - 0.07% (3)
money’ and - 0.07% (3)
$20 bill - 0.07% (3)
horrors that - 0.07% (3)
this measure - 0.07% (3)
rate of - 0.07% (3)
inflation rate - 0.07% (3)
left the - 0.07% (3)
after the - 0.07% (3)
as well - 0.07% (3)
the money - 0.07% (3)
capacity of - 0.07% (3)
let’s talk - 0.07% (3)
so damn - 0.07% (3)
out to - 0.07% (3)
conservative commentators - 0.07% (3)
vary quite - 0.07% (3)
a bit–from - 0.07% (3)
cents if - 0.07% (3)
you’re making - 0.07% (3)
the plate - 0.07% (3)
yourself from - 0.07% (3)
groceries, to - 0.07% (3)
dozens of - 0.07% (3)
dollars at - 0.07% (3)
a fancy - 0.07% (3)
a mystery. - 0.07% (3)
restaurant. you - 0.07% (3)
shouldn’t be - 0.07% (3)
too surprised - 0.07% (3)
bill at - 0.07% (3)
the end; - 0.07% (3)
fukushima reactor - 0.07% (3)
standard: inflation, - 0.07% (3)
economic growth - 0.07% (3)
wealth and - 0.07% (3)
price can - 0.07% (3)
isn’t usually - 0.07% (3)
the selfish - 0.07% (3)
and expressing - 0.07% (3)
the first - 0.07% (3)
damn expensive? - 0.07% (3)
why are - 0.07% (3)
talk macroeconomic - 0.07% (3)
standard in - 0.07% (3)
states left - 0.07% (3)
us after - 0.07% (3)
that befell - 0.07% (3)
the horrors - 0.07% (3)
our money’ - 0.07% (3)
cost you - 0.07% (3)
america ‘devaluing - 0.07% (3)
recently with - 0.07% (3)
their audiences - 0.07% (3)
the poorest - 0.07% (3)
riling up - 0.07% (3)
market just - 0.07% (3)
became less - 0.07% (3)
much a - 0.07% (3)
plate of - 0.07% (3)
spaghetti is - 0.07% (3)
audiences recently - 0.07% (3)
befell us - 0.07% (3)
been riling - 0.07% (3)
you isn’t - 0.07% (3)
end; the - 0.07% (3)
surprised by - 0.07% (3)
be too - 0.07% (3)
you shouldn’t - 0.07% (3)
fancy restaurant. - 0.07% (3)
to dozens - 0.07% (3)
from groceries, - 0.07% (3)
plate yourself - 0.07% (3)
making the - 0.07% (3)
few cents - 0.07% (3)
bit–from a - 0.07% (3)
quite a - 0.07% (3)
can vary - 0.07% (3)
mystery. sure, - 0.07% (3)
to cost - 0.07% (3)
the uninsured - 0.07% (3)
of spaghetti - 0.07% (3)
a plate - 0.07% (3)
category: featured - 0.07% (3)
less opaque - 0.07% (3)
just became - 0.07% (3)
care market - 0.07% (3)
enterovirus 68 - 0.07% (3)
commentators have - 0.07% (3)
who will - 0.07% (3)
the most - 0.07% (3)
decency for - 0.07% (3)
think of - 0.07% (3)
response to - 0.07% (3)
of our - 0.07% (3)
is the - 0.07% (3)
the seattle - 0.07% (3)
and economic - 0.07% (3)
gold standard: - 0.07% (3)
inflation, wealth - 0.07% (3)
the economic - 0.05% (2)
set of - 0.05% (2)
viruses, including - 0.05% (2)
of you, - 0.05% (2)
i’ve been - 0.05% (2)
closely following - 0.05% (2)
the developments - 0.05% (2)
ebola–like many - 0.05% (2)
complex. below - 0.05% (2)
links to - 0.05% (2)
the recently - 0.05% (2)
articles i’ve - 0.05% (2)
written for - 0.05% (2)
the stranger, - 0.05% (2)
as the - 0.05% (2)
events have - 0.05% (2)
unfolded. 3/12/2011 - 0.05% (2)
explosion at - 0.05% (2)
fukushima nuclear - 0.05% (2)
plant, cesium - 0.05% (2)
fukushima disaster - 0.05% (2)
68–is spread - 0.05% (2)
popular enterovirus - 0.05% (2)
developed country: - 0.05% (2)
our long - 0.05% (2)
decency isn’t - 0.05% (2)
other things). - 0.05% (2)
diseases (among - 0.05% (2)
easily prevented - 0.05% (2)
die from - 0.05% (2)
does not - 0.05% (2)
where one - 0.05% (2)
a place - 0.05% (2)
country a - 0.05% (2)
don’t panic - 0.05% (2)
what makes - 0.05% (2)
poorest is - 0.05% (2)
most of - 0.05% (2)
fukushima, in - 0.05% (2)
from fukushima, - 0.05% (2)
your community - 0.05% (2)
west africa - 0.05% (2)
to clean - 0.05% (2)
no access - 0.05% (2)
by filth. - 0.05% (2)
detected 3/14/2011 - 0.05% (2)
readings rise - 0.05% (2)
geiger counter - 0.05% (2)
off the - 0.05% (2)
the net - 0.05% (2)
thousands of - 0.05% (2)
are american - 0.05% (2)
doctors so - 0.05% (2)
more efficient - 0.05% (2)
saltwater ocean - 0.05% (2)
at least - 0.05% (2)
cost effective - 0.05% (2)
selfish ass - 0.05% (2)
see why - 0.05% (2)
technologies that - 0.05% (2)
new energy - 0.05% (2)
instead, we - 0.05% (2)
what they - 0.05% (2)
far more - 0.05% (2)
the earth. - 0.05% (2)
the right - 0.05% (2)
customer: it’s - 0.05% (2)
science and - 0.05% (2)
they’re wrong. - 0.05% (2)
theory, and - 0.05% (2)
opaque how - 0.05% (2)
the ozone - 0.05% (2)
in tokyo - 0.05% (2)
3/15/2011 what’s - 0.05% (2)
on fire - 0.05% (2)
you are - 0.05% (2)
nuclear power - 0.05% (2)
themselves as - 0.05% (2)
thinking of - 0.05% (2)
the response - 0.05% (2)
by environmental - 0.05% (2)
of cfcs - 0.05% (2)
unlikely to - 0.05% (2)
use of - 0.05% (2)
a proper - 0.05% (2)
in areas - 0.05% (2)
new technologies - 0.05% (2)
ozone layer - 0.05% (2)
when a - 0.05% (2)
deal with - 0.05% (2)
to avoid - 0.05% (2)
1972. let’s - 0.05% (2)
a plan - 0.05% (2)
room in - 0.05% (2)
deflation. the - 0.05% (2)
productive output - 0.05% (2)
ratio of - 0.05% (2)
way of - 0.05% (2)
well as - 0.05% (2)
red the - 0.05% (2)
attempt to - 0.05% (2)
replace that - 0.05% (2)
lost by - 0.05% (2)
to medicare - 0.05% (2)
economy. a - 0.05% (2)
in dollar - 0.05% (2)
it was - 0.05% (2)
to articles - 0.05% (2)
first time, - 0.05% (2)
how to - 0.05% (2)
much money - 0.05% (2)
has been - 0.05% (2)
end up - 0.05% (2)
to replace - 0.05% (2)
that lost - 0.05% (2)
too little - 0.05% (2)
a patient - 0.05% (2)
the side - 0.05% (2)
way to - 0.05% (2)
been closely - 0.05% (2)
of links - 0.05% (2)
below is - 0.05% (2)
output of - 0.05% (2)
reactor complex. - 0.05% (2)
total money - 0.05% (2)
developments at - 0.05% (2)
the number - 0.05% (2)
following the - 0.05% (2)
number of - 0.05% (2)
you, i’ve - 0.05% (2)
the economy, - 0.05% (2)
many of - 0.05% (2)
money is - 0.05% (2)
into the - 0.05% (2)
from an - 0.05% (2)
determined by - 0.05% (2)
how fast - 0.05% (2)
earth. you - 0.05% (2)
out of - 0.05% (2)
the $20 - 0.05% (2)
needs of - 0.05% (2)
have no - 0.05% (2)
which hospital - 0.05% (2)
country: a - 0.05% (2)
rise in - 0.05% (2)
tokyo 3/15/2011 - 0.05% (2)
is probably - 0.05% (2)
what’s on - 0.05% (2)
fire at - 0.05% (2)
years of - 0.05% (2)
is what - 0.05% (2)
radiation from - 0.05% (2)
be taken? - 0.05% (2)
place where - 0.05% (2)
panic geiger - 0.05% (2)
one does - 0.05% (2)
not die - 0.05% (2)
from easily - 0.05% (2)
prevented diseases - 0.05% (2)
(among other - 0.05% (2)
things). decency - 0.05% (2)
isn’t our - 0.05% (2)
long suit. - 0.05% (2)
taken? who - 0.05% (2)
counter readings - 0.05% (2)
3/14/2011 don’t - 0.05% (2)
can you - 0.05% (2)
stranger, as - 0.05% (2)
most efficient, - 0.05% (2)
sense of - 0.05% (2)
here is - 0.05% (2)
heart attack - 0.05% (2)
healthcare system - 0.05% (2)
i’ve written - 0.05% (2)
the same - 0.05% (2)
you. if - 0.05% (2)
inflation is - 0.05% (2)
dollar bill - 0.05% (2)
cesium detected - 0.05% (2)
value of - 0.05% (2)
$20 bills - 0.05% (2)
the events - 0.05% (2)
have unfolded. - 0.05% (2)
3/12/2011 explosion - 0.05% (2)
at fukushima - 0.05% (2)
nuclear plant, - 0.05% (2)
the value - 0.05% (2)
productive ability - 0.05% (2)
represents a - 0.05% (2)
and society - 0.05% (2)
on global warming - 0.31% (13)
of the economy - 0.31% (13)
global warming is - 0.19% (8)
the united states - 0.19% (8)
the gold standard - 0.17% (7)
what cfcs can - 0.14% (6)
can teach us - 0.14% (6)
fear: what cfcs - 0.14% (6)
sustainability, not fear: - 0.14% (6)
(meterologist, and a - 0.14% (6)
the public to - 0.14% (6)
failing to convince - 0.14% (6)
environmental activists are - 0.14% (6)
to promote concern) - 0.14% (6)
about the weather - 0.14% (6)
from his perspective, - 0.14% (6)
about beating climate - 0.14% (6)
smart man with - 0.14% (6)
warming as a - 0.14% (6)
a consistently different - 0.14% (6)
take on global - 0.14% (6)
warming issues), makes - 0.14% (6)
an interesting point - 0.14% (6)
in a recent - 0.14% (6)
post: by focusing - 0.14% (6)
as a moral - 0.14% (6)
issue (and from - 0.14% (6)
his perspective, using - 0.14% (6)
scare tactics about - 0.14% (6)
the weather to - 0.14% (6)
promote concern) environmental - 0.14% (6)
activists are failing - 0.14% (6)
to convince the - 0.14% (6)
moral issue (and - 0.14% (6)
using scare tactics - 0.14% (6)
focusing on global - 0.14% (6)
not fear: what - 0.14% (6)
issues), makes an - 0.14% (6)
by focusing on - 0.14% (6)
global warming as - 0.14% (6)
a moral issue - 0.14% (6)
(and from his - 0.14% (6)
perspective, using scare - 0.14% (6)
tactics about the - 0.14% (6)
weather to promote - 0.14% (6)
consistently different take - 0.14% (6)
recent post: by - 0.14% (6)
concern) environmental activists - 0.14% (6)
are failing to - 0.14% (6)
convince the public - 0.14% (6)
man with a - 0.14% (6)
interesting point in - 0.14% (6)
and a smart - 0.14% (6)
cfcs can teach - 0.14% (6)
cliff mass (meterologist, - 0.14% (6)
beating climate change - 0.14% (6)
us about beating - 0.14% (6)
teach us about - 0.14% (6)
mass (meterologist, and - 0.14% (6)
a smart man - 0.14% (6)
with a consistently - 0.14% (6)
different take on - 0.14% (6)
global warming issues), - 0.14% (6)
makes an interesting - 0.14% (6)
point in a - 0.14% (6)
a recent post: - 0.14% (6)
public to […] - 0.12% (5)
change cliff mass - 0.12% (5)
is going to - 0.12% (5)
articles, lead article - 0.12% (5)
the federal reserve - 0.12% (5)
ability of the - 0.12% (5)
featured articles, lead - 0.12% (5)
of the economy. - 0.1% (4)
the economy is - 0.1% (4)
articles, lead article, - 0.1% (4)
ebola thrives on - 0.1% (4)
poverty and disparity - 0.1% (4)
growth in the - 0.1% (4)
jonathan golob | - 0.1% (4)
by jonathan golob - 0.1% (4)
on poverty and - 0.1% (4)
[…] sustainability, not - 0.1% (4)
dollars at a - 0.07% (3)
recently with lots - 0.07% (3)
that befell us - 0.07% (3)
after the united - 0.07% (3)
states left the - 0.07% (3)
gold standard in - 0.07% (3)
so damn expensive? - 0.07% (3)
have been riling - 0.07% (3)
up their audiences - 0.07% (3)
america ‘devaluing our - 0.07% (3)
of talk about - 0.07% (3)
our money’ and - 0.07% (3)
money’ and expressing - 0.07% (3)
the horrors that - 0.07% (3)
the growth in - 0.07% (3)
amount of money - 0.07% (3)
the amount of - 0.07% (3)
befell us after - 0.07% (3)
productive capability of - 0.07% (3)
left the gold - 0.07% (3)
standard in 1972. - 0.07% (3)
expressing the horrors - 0.07% (3)
lots of talk - 0.07% (3)
capability of the - 0.07% (3)
much a plate - 0.07% (3)
yourself from groceries, - 0.07% (3)
making the plate - 0.07% (3)
cents if you’re - 0.07% (3)
bit–from a few - 0.07% (3)
vary quite a - 0.07% (3)
the price can - 0.07% (3)
a mystery. sure, - 0.07% (3)
you isn’t usually - 0.07% (3)
going to cost - 0.07% (3)
of spaghetti is - 0.07% (3)
market just became - 0.07% (3)
to dozens of - 0.07% (3)
fancy restaurant. you - 0.07% (3)
american health care - 0.07% (3)
shouldn’t be too - 0.07% (3)
surprised by the - 0.07% (3)
bill at the - 0.07% (3)
end; the price - 0.07% (3)
the gold standard: - 0.07% (3)
inflation, wealth and - 0.07% (3)
commentators have been - 0.07% (3)
riling up their - 0.07% (3)
audiences recently with - 0.07% (3)
about america ‘devaluing - 0.07% (3)
their audiences recently - 0.07% (3)
capacity of the - 0.07% (3)
a bit–from a - 0.07% (3)
the end; the - 0.07% (3)
too surprised by - 0.07% (3)
you shouldn’t be - 0.07% (3)
a fancy restaurant. - 0.07% (3)
of dollars at - 0.07% (3)
groceries, to dozens - 0.07% (3)
plate yourself from - 0.07% (3)
you’re making the - 0.07% (3)
few cents if - 0.07% (3)
can vary quite - 0.07% (3)
the fukushima reactor - 0.07% (3)
sure, the price - 0.07% (3)
usually a mystery. - 0.07% (3)
cost you isn’t - 0.07% (3)
plate of spaghetti - 0.07% (3)
how much a - 0.07% (3)
category: featured articles, - 0.07% (3)
just became less - 0.07% (3)
health care market - 0.07% (3)
in the united - 0.07% (3)
decency for the - 0.07% (3)
| category: featured - 0.07% (3)
the bill at - 0.07% (3)
us after the - 0.07% (3)
horrors that befell - 0.07% (3)
gold standard: inflation, - 0.07% (3)
wealth and economic - 0.07% (3)
conservative commentators have - 0.07% (3)
been riling up - 0.07% (3)
with lots of - 0.07% (3)
talk about america - 0.07% (3)
productive capacity of - 0.07% (3)
‘devaluing our money’ - 0.07% (3)
let’s talk macroeconomic - 0.07% (3)
and expressing the - 0.07% (3)
united states left - 0.07% (3)
(among other things). - 0.05% (2)
decency isn’t our - 0.05% (2)
for a given - 0.05% (2)
be taken? who - 0.05% (2)
easily prevented diseases - 0.05% (2)
not die from - 0.05% (2)
1972. let’s talk - 0.05% (2)
macroeconomic theory, and - 0.05% (2)
rise in tokyo - 0.05% (2)
see why they’re - 0.05% (2)
of the united - 0.05% (2)
why they’re wrong. - 0.05% (2)
theory, and see - 0.05% (2)
to […] sustainability, - 0.05% (2)
viruses, including the - 0.05% (2)
recently popular enterovirus - 0.05% (2)
68–is spread by - 0.05% (2)
no access to - 0.05% (2)
poorest is what - 0.05% (2)
where one does - 0.05% (2)
makes a developed - 0.05% (2)
country a developed - 0.05% (2)
growth conservative commentators - 0.05% (2)
country: a place - 0.05% (2)
thousands of dollars - 0.05% (2)
doctors so damn - 0.05% (2)
why are american - 0.05% (2)
the united states. - 0.05% (2)
are american doctors - 0.05% (2)
that lost by - 0.05% (2)
of the economy, - 0.05% (2)
popular enterovirus 68–is - 0.05% (2)
3/14/2011 don’t panic - 0.05% (2)
plant, cesium detected - 0.05% (2)
at fukushima nuclear - 0.05% (2)
unfolded. 3/12/2011 explosion - 0.05% (2)
the events have - 0.05% (2)
the stranger, as - 0.05% (2)
i’ve written for - 0.05% (2)
links to articles - 0.05% (2)
complex. below is - 0.05% (2)
3/15/2011 what’s on - 0.05% (2)
the developments at - 0.05% (2)
been closely following - 0.05% (2)
ebola–like many viruses, - 0.05% (2)
including the recently - 0.05% (2)
spread by filth. - 0.05% (2)
economic growth conservative - 0.05% (2)
in the productive - 0.05% (2)
the ratio of - 0.05% (2)
geiger counter readings - 0.05% (2)
the inflation rate - 0.05% (2)
productive output of - 0.05% (2)
the rate of - 0.05% (2)
the needs of - 0.05% (2)
radiation from fukushima, - 0.05% (2)
of you, i’ve - 0.05% (2)
if you have - 0.05% (2)
for the first - 0.05% (2)
as well as - 0.05% (2)
a heart attack - 0.05% (2)
less opaque how - 0.05% (2)
fukushima, in seattle - 0.05% (2)
science and society - 0.05% (2)

Here you can find chart of all your popular one, two and three word phrases. Google and others search engines means your page is about words you use frequently.

Copyright © 2015-2016 hupso.pl. All rights reserved. FB | +G | Twitter

Hupso.pl jest serwisem internetowym, w którym jednym kliknieciem możesz szybko i łatwo sprawdź stronę www pod kątem SEO. Oferujemy darmowe pozycjonowanie stron internetowych oraz wycena domen i stron internetowych. Prowadzimy ranking polskich stron internetowych oraz ranking stron alexa.