3.11 score from hupso.pl for:
climateaudit.org



HTML Content


Title climate audit

Length: 14, Words: 2
Description by steve mcintyre

Length: 17, Words: 3
Keywords pusty
Robots
Charset UTF-8
Og Meta - Title exist
Og Meta - Description exist
Og Meta - Site name exist
Tytuł powinien zawierać pomiędzy 10 a 70 znaków (ze spacjami), a mniej niż 12 słów w długości.
Meta opis powinien zawierać pomiędzy 50 a 160 znaków (łącznie ze spacjami), a mniej niż 24 słów w długości.
Kodowanie znaków powinny być określone , UTF-8 jest chyba najlepszy zestaw znaków, aby przejść z powodu UTF-8 jest bardziej międzynarodowy kodowaniem.
Otwarte obiekty wykresu powinny być obecne w stronie internetowej (więcej informacji na temat protokołu OpenGraph: http://ogp.me/)

SEO Content

Words/Characters 4094
Text/HTML 31.06 %
Headings H1 1
H2 10
H3 17
H4 0
H5 0
H6 0
H1
climate audit
H2
centenary of the end of the battle of the somme
the destruction of huma abedin’s emails on the clinton server and their surprise recovery
was early onset industrial-era warming anthropogenic, as abram et al. claim?
re-examining cook’s mt read (tasmania) chronology
esper et al 2016 and the oroko swamp
gergis and law dome
joelle gergis, data torturer
gergis
are energy budget tcr estimates biased low, as richardson et al (2016) claim?
deflategate: controversy is due to scientist error
H3
a guest post by nic lewis
a guest post by nic lewis
tip jar
pages
categories
articles
blogroll
favorite posts
links
weblogs and resources
archives
notice
search
blog stats
recent posts
recent comments
meta
H4
H5
H6
strong
huma’s
a guest post by nic lewis
introduction
after
introduction and summary
b
huma’s
a guest post by nic lewis
introduction
after
introduction and summary
i
em huma’s
a guest post by nic lewis
introduction
after
introduction and summary
Bolds strong 5
b 5
i 0
em 5
Zawartość strony internetowej powinno zawierać więcej niż 250 słów, z stopa tekst / kod jest wyższy niż 20%.
Pozycji używać znaczników (h1, h2, h3, ...), aby określić temat sekcji lub ustępów na stronie, ale zwykle, użyj mniej niż 6 dla każdego tagu pozycje zachować swoją stronę zwięzły.
Styl używać silnych i kursywy znaczniki podkreślić swoje słowa kluczowe swojej stronie, ale nie nadużywać (mniej niż 16 silnych tagi i 16 znaczników kursywy)

Statystyki strony

twitter:title pusty
twitter:description pusty
google+ itemprop=name pusty
Pliki zewnętrzne 24
Pliki CSS 5
Pliki javascript 19
Plik należy zmniejszyć całkowite odwołanie plików (CSS + JavaScript) do 7-8 maksymalnie.

Linki wewnętrzne i zewnętrzne

Linki 214
Linki wewnętrzne 10
Linki zewnętrzne 204
Linki bez atrybutu Title 200
Linki z atrybutem NOFOLLOW 0
Linki - Użyj atrybutu tytuł dla każdego łącza. Nofollow link jest link, który nie pozwala wyszukiwarkom boty zrealizują są odnośniki no follow. Należy zwracać uwagę na ich użytkowania

Linki wewnętrzne

skip to content #content
[i] #_edn1
[ii] #_edn2
[iii] #_edn3
#_edn3
[iv] #_edn4
[v] #_edn5
[1] #_edn1
[2] #_edn2
cancel #

Linki zewnętrzne

climate audit https://climateaudit.org/
hockey stick studies https://climateaudit.org/multiproxy-pdfs/
statistics and r https://climateaudit.org/statistics-and-r/
contact steve mc https://climateaudit.org/contact-steve-mc/
proxy data https://climateaudit.org/proxy-data/
ca blog setup https://climateaudit.org/ca-blog-setup/
faq 2005 https://climateaudit.org/faq/
station data https://climateaudit.org/station-data/
high-resolution ocean sediments https://climateaudit.org/high-resolution-ocean-sediments/
subscribe to ca https://climateaudit.org/subscribe-to-ca/
econometric references https://climateaudit.org/econometric-references/
blog rules and road map https://climateaudit.org/blog-rules-and-road-map/
gridded data https://climateaudit.org/gridded-data/
tip jar https://climateaudit.org/tip-jar/
about https://climateaudit.org/about/
ca assistant https://climateaudit.org/ca-assistant/
« older posts https://climateaudit.org/page/2/
centenary of the end of the battle of the somme https://climateaudit.org/2016/11/18/centenary-of-the-end-of-the-battle-of-the-somme/
- https://climateaudit.org/2016/11/18/centenary-of-the-end-of-the-battle-of-the-somme/canadian-artillery-in-action-corrected_0/
pdf http://www.climateaudit.info/pdf/history/battle-of_the_somme.pdf
here. http://www.climateaudit.info/pdf/history/battle-of_the_somme.pdf
steve mcintyre https://climateaudit.org/author/stevemcintyre/
uncategorized https://climateaudit.org/category/uncategorized/
beckett https://climateaudit.org/tag/beckett/
langstaff https://climateaudit.org/tag/langstaff/
somme https://climateaudit.org/tag/somme/
vimy ridge https://climateaudit.org/tag/vimy-ridge/
comments (97) https://climateaudit.org/2016/11/18/centenary-of-the-end-of-the-battle-of-the-somme/#comments
the destruction of huma abedin’s emails on the clinton server and their surprise recovery https://climateaudit.org/2016/11/04/the-destruction-of-huma-abedins-emails-on-the-clinton-server-and-their-surprise-recovery/
fbi report https://vault.fbi.gov/hillary-r.-clinton/hillary-r.-clinton-part-01-of-03/at_download/file
continue reading https://climateaudit.org/2016/11/04/the-destruction-of-huma-abedins-emails-on-the-clinton-server-and-their-surprise-recovery/#more-22879
steve mcintyre https://climateaudit.org/author/stevemcintyre/
uncategorized https://climateaudit.org/category/uncategorized/
comments (547) https://climateaudit.org/2016/11/04/the-destruction-of-huma-abedins-emails-on-the-clinton-server-and-their-surprise-recovery/#comments
was early onset industrial-era warming anthropogenic, as abram et al. claim? https://climateaudit.org/2016/08/31/was-early-onset-industrial-era-warming-anthropogenic-as-abram-et-al-claim/
continue reading https://climateaudit.org/2016/08/31/was-early-onset-industrial-era-warming-anthropogenic-as-abram-et-al-claim/#more-22850
niclewis https://climateaudit.org/author/niclewis/
uncategorized https://climateaudit.org/category/uncategorized/
pages2k https://climateaudit.org/tag/pages2k/
comments (118) https://climateaudit.org/2016/08/31/was-early-onset-industrial-era-warming-anthropogenic-as-abram-et-al-claim/#comments
re-examining cook’s mt read (tasmania) chronology https://climateaudit.org/2016/08/16/re-examining-cooks-mt-read-tasmania-chronology/
continue reading https://climateaudit.org/2016/08/16/re-examining-cooks-mt-read-tasmania-chronology/#more-22805
steve mcintyre https://climateaudit.org/author/stevemcintyre/
uncategorized https://climateaudit.org/category/uncategorized/
cook https://climateaudit.org/tag/cook/
esper https://climateaudit.org/tag/esper/
gergis https://climateaudit.org/tag/gergis/
mt read https://climateaudit.org/tag/mt-read/
tasmania https://climateaudit.org/tag/tasmania/
comments (236) https://climateaudit.org/2016/08/16/re-examining-cooks-mt-read-tasmania-chronology/#comments
esper et al 2016 and the oroko swamp https://climateaudit.org/2016/08/13/esper-et-al-2016-and-the-oroko-swamp/
pdf http://www.blogs.uni-mainz.de/fb09climatology/files/2016/03/esper_2016_qsr.pdf
continue reading https://climateaudit.org/2016/08/13/esper-et-al-2016-and-the-oroko-swamp/#more-22587
steve mcintyre https://climateaudit.org/author/stevemcintyre/
uncategorized https://climateaudit.org/category/uncategorized/
esper https://climateaudit.org/tag/esper/
gergis https://climateaudit.org/tag/gergis/
oroko https://climateaudit.org/tag/oroko/
comments (52) https://climateaudit.org/2016/08/13/esper-et-al-2016-and-the-oroko-swamp/#comments
gergis and law dome https://climateaudit.org/2016/08/03/gergis-and-law-dome/
tag http://www.climateaudit.org/tag/lawdome
here) https://climateaudit.org/2010/04/05/ipcc-and-the-law-dome-graphic/
continue reading https://climateaudit.org/2016/08/03/gergis-and-law-dome/#more-22100
steve mcintyre https://climateaudit.org/author/stevemcintyre/
uncategorized https://climateaudit.org/category/uncategorized/
gergis https://climateaudit.org/tag/gergis/
lawdome https://climateaudit.org/tag/lawdome/
van ommen https://climateaudit.org/tag/van-ommen/
comments (163) https://climateaudit.org/2016/08/03/gergis-and-law-dome/#comments
joelle gergis, data torturer https://climateaudit.org/2016/07/21/joelle-gergis-data-torturer/
- https://climateaudit.org/2016/07/21/joelle-gergis-data-torturer/cheney-torture-works/
here http://www.hi-izuru.org/wp_blog/2016/07/the-gergis-saga-continues/
here http://www.hi-izuru.org/wp_blog/2016/07/very-small-differences/
continue reading https://climateaudit.org/2016/07/21/joelle-gergis-data-torturer/#more-22053
steve mcintyre https://climateaudit.org/author/stevemcintyre/
uncategorized https://climateaudit.org/category/uncategorized/
aus2k https://climateaudit.org/tag/aus2k/
gergis https://climateaudit.org/tag/gergis/
karoly https://climateaudit.org/tag/karoly/
neukom https://climateaudit.org/tag/neukom/
comments (307) https://climateaudit.org/2016/07/21/joelle-gergis-data-torturer/#comments
gergis https://climateaudit.org/2016/07/21/redirect/
here https://climateaudit.org/2016/07/21/joelle-gergis-data-torturer/
steve mcintyre https://climateaudit.org/author/stevemcintyre/
uncategorized https://climateaudit.org/category/uncategorized/
are energy budget tcr estimates biased low, as richardson et al (2016) claim? https://climateaudit.org/2016/07/12/are-energy-budget-tcr-estimates-biased-low-as-richardson-et-al-2016-claim/
continue reading https://climateaudit.org/2016/07/12/are-energy-budget-tcr-estimates-biased-low-as-richardson-et-al-2016-claim/#more-22048
niclewis https://climateaudit.org/author/niclewis/
uncategorized https://climateaudit.org/category/uncategorized/
comments (62) https://climateaudit.org/2016/07/12/are-energy-budget-tcr-estimates-biased-low-as-richardson-et-al-2016-claim/#comments
deflategate: controversy is due to scientist error https://climateaudit.org/2016/06/07/deflategate-controversy-is-due-to-scientist-error/
pdf http://www.climateaudit.info/pdf/deflategate/mcintyre_new%20light_on_deflategate_submitted.pdf
journal of sports analytics http://journalofsportsanalytics.com/
wells report https://nfllabor.files.wordpress.com/2015/05/investigative-and-expert-reports-re-footballs-used-during-afc-championsh.pdf
continue reading https://climateaudit.org/2016/06/07/deflategate-controversy-is-due-to-scientist-error/#more-22000
steve mcintyre https://climateaudit.org/author/stevemcintyre/
uncategorized https://climateaudit.org/category/uncategorized/
brady https://climateaudit.org/tag/brady/
deflategate https://climateaudit.org/tag/deflategate/
goodell https://climateaudit.org/tag/goodell/
wells https://climateaudit.org/tag/wells/
comments (171) https://climateaudit.org/2016/06/07/deflategate-controversy-is-due-to-scientist-error/#comments
« older posts https://climateaudit.org/page/2/
- http://www.climateaudit.info/tipjar.html
about https://climateaudit.org/about/
blog rules and road map https://climateaudit.org/blog-rules-and-road-map/
ca assistant https://climateaudit.org/ca-assistant/
ca blog setup https://climateaudit.org/ca-blog-setup/
contact steve mc https://climateaudit.org/contact-steve-mc/
econometric references https://climateaudit.org/econometric-references/
faq 2005 https://climateaudit.org/faq/
gridded data https://climateaudit.org/gridded-data/
high-resolution ocean sediments https://climateaudit.org/high-resolution-ocean-sediments/
hockey stick studies https://climateaudit.org/multiproxy-pdfs/
proxy data https://climateaudit.org/proxy-data/
station data https://climateaudit.org/station-data/
statistics and r https://climateaudit.org/statistics-and-r/
subscribe to ca https://climateaudit.org/subscribe-to-ca/
tip jar https://climateaudit.org/tip-jar/
ccsp workshop nov05 https://climateaudit.wordpress.com/files/2009/12/mcintyre-workshop05.pdf
mcintyre/mckitrick 2003 http://www.climateaudit.org/pdf/mcintyre.mckitrick.2003.pdf
mm05 (grl) https://climateaudit.wordpress.com/files/2009/12/mcintyre-grl-2005.pdf
mm05(ee) https://climateaudit.wordpress.com/files/2009/12/mcintyre-ee-2005.pdf
nas panel https://climateaudit.wordpress.com/files/2009/12/nas-mm.pdf
reply to huybers https://climateaudit.wordpress.com/files/2009/12/mcintyre-huybersreply.pdf
reply to von storch http://www.climateaudit.org/pdf/mcintyre.vzreply.pdf
accuweather blogs http://www.accuweather.com/news-bloggers.asp?partner=accu00458
andrew revkin http://dotearth.blogs.nytimes.com/
anthony watts http://www.wattsupwiththat.com/
bishop hill http://bishophill.squarespace.com
bob tisdale http://bobtisdale.blogspot.com/
dan hughes http://danhughes.auditblogs.com/
david stockwell http://landshape.org/enm
icecap http://icecap.us/
idsos http://www.co2science.org/
james annan http://julesandjames.blogspot.com/
jeff id http://noconsensus.wordpress.com/
josh halpern http://rabett.blogspot.com/
judith curry http://judithcurry.com/
keith kloor http://www.collide-a-scape.com/
klimazweibel http://klimazwiebel.blogspot.com
lubos motl http://motls.blogspot.com/search/label/climate
lucia's blackboard http://rankexploits.com/musings/
matt briggs http://wmbriggs.com/
nasa giss http://www.giss.nasa.gov/data/update/gistemp/
nature blogs http://blogs.nature.com/climatefeedback/
realclimate http://www.realclimate.org/
roger pielke jr http://rogerpielkejr.blogspot.com/
roger pielke sr http://pielkeclimatesci.wordpress.com/
roman m http://statpad.wordpress.com/
science of doom http://www.scienceofdoom.com
tamino http://tamino.wordpress.com/
warwick hughes http://www.warwickhughes.com/blog
watts up with that http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com
william connolley http://scienceblogs.com/stoat/
wordpress.com http://wordpress.com/
world climate report http://www.worldclimatereport.com/
bring the proxies up to date http://www.climateaudit.org/index.php?p=89
due diligence http://www.climateaudit.org/index.php?p=66
faq 2005 http://www.climateaudit.org/?page_id=1002
mckitrick: what is the hockey stick debate about? http://www.climateaudit.org/index.php?p=166
overview http://www.climateaudit.org/index.php?p=63
responses to mbh http://www.climate2003.com/mann.responses.htm
some thoughts on disclosure http://www.climateaudit.org/index.php?p=66
wegman and north reports for newbies http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=2322
acronyms http://climateaudit101.wikispot.org/glossary_of_acronyms
latex symbols http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/ctan/info/symbols/comprehensive/symbols-letter.pdf
mbh 98 ftp://holocene.evsc.virginia.edu/pub/mann/mbh98.pdf
steve’s public data archive http://www.climateaudit.info/data
wdcp http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/paleo/paleo.html
wegman reply to stupak http://www.uoguelph.ca/~rmckitri/research/stupakresponse.pdf
wegman report http://www.uoguelph.ca/~rmckitri/research/wegmanreport.pdf
ross mckitrick http://www.uoguelph.ca/~rmckitri/research/trc.html
surface stations http://www.surfacestations.org/
ca assistant https://climateaudit.org/ca-assistant/
- http://www.newstatesman.com/2010/09/global-influence-world-2
- http://2008.weblogawards.org/polls/best-science-blog//
- http://2012.bloggi.es/#canadian
centenary of the end of the battle of the somme https://climateaudit.org/2016/11/18/centenary-of-the-end-of-the-battle-of-the-somme/
the destruction of huma abedin’s emails on the clinton server and their surprise recovery https://climateaudit.org/2016/11/04/the-destruction-of-huma-abedins-emails-on-the-clinton-server-and-their-surprise-recovery/
was early onset industrial-era warming anthropogenic, as abram et al. claim? https://climateaudit.org/2016/08/31/was-early-onset-industrial-era-warming-anthropogenic-as-abram-et-al-claim/
re-examining cook’s mt read (tasmania) chronology https://climateaudit.org/2016/08/16/re-examining-cooks-mt-read-tasmania-chronology/
esper et al 2016 and the oroko swamp https://climateaudit.org/2016/08/13/esper-et-al-2016-and-the-oroko-swamp/
centenary of the end of the battle of the somme https://climateaudit.org/2016/11/18/centenary-of-the-end-of-the-battle-of-the-somme/#comment-772366
centenary of the end of the battle of the somme https://climateaudit.org/2016/11/18/centenary-of-the-end-of-the-battle-of-the-somme/#comment-772365
centenary of the end of the battle of the somme https://climateaudit.org/2016/11/18/centenary-of-the-end-of-the-battle-of-the-somme/#comment-772352
centenary of the end of the battle of the somme https://climateaudit.org/2016/11/18/centenary-of-the-end-of-the-battle-of-the-somme/#comment-772347
centenary of the end of the battle of the somme https://climateaudit.org/2016/11/18/centenary-of-the-end-of-the-battle-of-the-somme/#comment-772346
the destruction of huma abedin’s emails on the clinton server and their surprise recovery https://climateaudit.org/2016/11/04/the-destruction-of-huma-abedins-emails-on-the-clinton-server-and-their-surprise-recovery/#comment-772344
centenary of the end of the battle of the somme https://climateaudit.org/2016/11/18/centenary-of-the-end-of-the-battle-of-the-somme/#comment-772342
centenary of the end of the battle of the somme https://climateaudit.org/2016/11/18/centenary-of-the-end-of-the-battle-of-the-somme/#comment-772340
centenary of the end of the battle of the somme https://climateaudit.org/2016/11/18/centenary-of-the-end-of-the-battle-of-the-somme/#comment-772338
the destruction of huma abedin’s emails on the clinton server and their surprise recovery https://climateaudit.org/2016/11/04/the-destruction-of-huma-abedins-emails-on-the-clinton-server-and-their-surprise-recovery/#comment-772337
the destruction of huma abedin’s emails on the clinton server and their surprise recovery https://climateaudit.org/2016/11/04/the-destruction-of-huma-abedins-emails-on-the-clinton-server-and-their-surprise-recovery/#comment-772336
centenary of the end of the battle of the somme https://climateaudit.org/2016/11/18/centenary-of-the-end-of-the-battle-of-the-somme/#comment-772334
centenary of the end of the battle of the somme https://climateaudit.org/2016/11/18/centenary-of-the-end-of-the-battle-of-the-somme/#comment-772333
centenary of the end of the battle of the somme https://climateaudit.org/2016/11/18/centenary-of-the-end-of-the-battle-of-the-somme/#comment-772332
centenary of the end of the battle of the somme https://climateaudit.org/2016/11/18/centenary-of-the-end-of-the-battle-of-the-somme/#comment-772330
register https://wordpress.com/start?ref=wplogin
log in https://climateaudit.wordpress.com/wp-login.php
entries rss https://climateaudit.org/feed/
comments rss https://climateaudit.org/comments/feed/
wordpress.com https://wordpress.com/
create a free website or blog at wordpress.com. https://wordpress.com/?ref=footer_website

Zdjęcia

Zdjęcia 9
Zdjęcia bez atrybutu ALT 4
Zdjęcia bez atrybutu TITLE 5
Korzystanie Obraz ALT i TITLE atrybutu dla każdego obrazu.

Zdjęcia bez atrybutu TITLE

https://climateaudit.files.wordpress.com/2016/11/canadian-artillery-in-action-corrected_0.jpg?w=256&h=162
https://climateaudit.files.wordpress.com/2016/07/cheney-torture-works.jpg?w=150&h=121
https://climateaudit.files.wordpress.com/2012/02/ca_best_canadian_blog_2012.png?w=180&h=180
https://sb.scorecardresearch.com/p?c1=2&c2=7518284&c3=&c4=&c5=&c6=&c15=&cv=2.0&cj=1
https://pixel.wp.com/b.gif?v=noscript

Zdjęcia bez atrybutu ALT

https://climateaudit.files.wordpress.com/2009/12/donation-click-button.gif
https://climateaudit.files.wordpress.com/2012/02/ca_best_canadian_blog_2012.png?w=180&h=180
https://sb.scorecardresearch.com/p?c1=2&c2=7518284&c3=&c4=&c5=&c6=&c15=&cv=2.0&cj=1
https://pixel.wp.com/b.gif?v=noscript

Ranking:


Alexa Traffic
Daily Global Rank Trend
Daily Reach (Percent)









Majestic SEO











Text on page:

climate audit by steve mcintyre skip to content hockey stick studiesstatistics and rcontact steve mcproxy dataca blog setupfaq 2005station datahigh-resolution ocean sedimentssubscribe to caeconometric referencesblog rules and road mapgridded datatip jaraboutca assistant « older posts centenary of the end of the battle of the somme nov 18, 2016 – 11:03 pm november 18 marks the centenary of the end of the battle of the somme, an event that passed essentially unnoticed, though it was a seminal event in the development of modern canada. its carnage was over 1.1 million casualties from a combined population (both sides) of about 170 million. (for a scale, there have been approximately 35,000 u.s. casualties in iraq from 2003-1016.) i became interested in the battle of the somme earlier this year due to a sheaf of papers in the back of my mother’s china cabinet, which i noticed while she was moving. the papers were copies of transcripts of letters from the front by the adjutant of the 75th canadian battalion (4th canadian division), one of the battalions which led the closing assault at the battle of the somme.  while other war-time correspondence in family archives tended to be sincere but dreary epistles, these letters were full of interesting details about life at the front – not just mud and food, but flares, “dug-outs”, young men having horse races, sightseeing at amiens cathedral five days after a battle in which 25% of the battalion were killed or wounded, the moral quandary of court-martialing soldiers who had wounded themselves to avoid further battle, typically because of what we today call post-traumatic stress disorder, with penalties shocking to today’s sensibility.  in this note, i’ve collated all of the china cabinet letters available from the china cabinet, interweaving with information from war diaries, to provide a narrative (pdf). in the transcript, neither the author nor addressee were transcribed.  from details in the letters, it is evident that the author was miles langstaff, then a recent graduate of osgoode law school.  i presume that his correspondent, who had knitted him a sweater and walked with him in the valley of the humber river in west toronto, was my grandmother. langstaff was killed on march 1, 1917 in an ill-conceived raid at vimy ridge, a month before the major victory in april 1917. transcript and narrative here. by steve mcintyre | posted in uncategorized | tagged beckett, langstaff, somme, vimy ridge | comments (97) the destruction of huma abedin’s emails on the clinton server and their surprise recovery nov 4, 2016 – 2:08 pm despite extraordinarily intense coverage of all aspects of hillary clinton’s emails, all commentary to date (to my knowledge), even the underlying fbi report, has paid little to no attention to the destruction of huma abedin’s emails, also stored on the clinton server.  further, even with the greatly increased interest in huma’s emails arising from the discoveries on anthony weiner’s laptop, speculation has mostly focused on the potential connection to deleted hillary emails, rather than the potentially much larger tranche of deleted huma emails from the clinton server (many of which would, in all probability, be connected to hillary in any event.) both hillary and huma had clintonemail accounts. huma was unique in that respect among hillary’s coterie. (chelsea clinton, under the pseudonym of diane reynolds, was the only other person with a clintonemail address.) the wiping and bleaching of the clinton server and backups can be conclusively dated to late march 2015.  all pst files for both hillary and huma’s accounts were deleted and bleached in that carnage.  while an expurgated version of hillary’s archive (her “work-related” emails) had been preserved at her lawyer’s office (thereby giving at least a talking-point against criticism), no corresponding version of huma’s archive was preserved from the clinton server. huma had accessed her clintonemail account through a web browser and, to her knowledge, had not kept a local copy on her own computer. so when huma’s pst files were deleted from the clinton server and backups, those were the only known copies of her clintonemail.com emails.  when huma was eventually asked by the state department to provide any federal records “in her possession”, her lawyers took the position that emails on the clinton server were not in huma’s possession and made no attempt to search huma’s account on the clinton server (though such an attempt would have been fruitless by the time that they were involved). huma’s ultimate production of non-gov emails was a meagre ~6k emails, while, in reality, the number of non-gov emails that she sent or received is likely to be an order of magnitude greater. hillary was also asked to return all federal records “in her possession”, but did not return huma’s emails on the clinton server.  in today’s post, i’ll examine hillary’s affidavit and answer to interrogatories in the judicial watch proceedings, both made under “penalty of perjury” to show the misdirection.  you have to watch the pea very carefully in respect to the ~600k emails recently discovered on the anthony weiner laptop, my surmise is that many, if not most, will derive from huma’s unwitting backup of her clintonemail account prior to its march 2015 destruction on the clinton server. in other words, the march 2015 destruction of pst files from the clinton server included several hundred thousand huma emails from her tenure at the state department, over and about the 30k hillary emails about “yoga”. continue reading → by steve mcintyre | posted in uncategorized | comments (547) was early onset industrial-era warming anthropogenic, as abram et al. claim? aug 31, 2016 – 12:12 pm a guest post by nic lewis introduction a recent pages 2k consortium paper in nature,[i] abram et al., that claims human-induced, greenhouse gas driven warming commenced circa 180 years ago,[ii] has been attracting some attention. the study arrives at its start dates by using a change-point analysis method, sizer, to assess when the most recent significant and sustained warming trend commenced. commendably, the lead author has provided the data and matlab code used in the study, including the sizer code.[iii] their post-1500 ad proxy-based regional reconstructions are the pages2k reconstructions, which have been discussed and criticized on many occasions at ca (see tag), with the gergis et al 2016 australian reconstruction substituted for the withdrawn version. i won’t comment on the validity of the post-1500 ad proxy-based regional reconstructions on which the observational side of their study is based – steve mcintyre is much better placed than me to do so. however, analysis of those reconstructions can only provide evidence as to when sustained warming started, not as to whether the cause was natural or anthropogenic. in this post, i will examine and question the paper’s conclusions about the early onset of warming detected in the study being attributable to the small increase in greenhouse gas emissions during the start of the industrial age. the authors’ claim that the start of anthropogenic warming can be dated to the 1830s is based on model simulations of climate change from 1500 ad on.[iv] a simple reality check points to that claim being likely to be wrong: it flies in the face of the best estimates of the evolution of radiative forcing. according to the ipcc 5th assessment [working group i] report (ar5) estimates, the change in total effective radiative forcing from preindustrial (which the ipcc takes as 1750) to 1840 was –0.01 w/m2, or +0.01 w/m2 if changes only in anthropogenic forcings, and not solar and volcanic forcings, are included. although the increase in forcing from all greenhouse gases (including ozone) is estimated to be +0.20 w/m2 by 1840, that forcing is estimated to be almost entirely cancelled out by negative forcing, primarily from anthropogenic aerosols and partly from land use change increasing planetary albedo.[v]  total anthropogenic forcing did not reach +0.20 w/m2 until 1890; in 1870 it was still under +0.10 w/m2. continue reading → by niclewis | posted in uncategorized | tagged pages2k | comments (118) re-examining cook’s mt read (tasmania) chronology aug 16, 2016 – 11:13 pm in today’s post, i’m going to re-examine (or more accurately, examine de novo) ed cook’s mt read (tasmania) chronology, a chronology recently used in gergis et al 2016, esper et al 2016, as well as numerous multiproxy reconstructions over the past 20 years. gergis et al 2016  said that they used freshly-calculated “signal-free” rcs chronologies for tree ring sites except mt read (and oroko). for these two sites, they chose older versions of the chronology,  purporting to justify the use of old versions “for consistency with published results” – a criterion that they disregarded for other tree ring sites.   the inconsistent practice immediately caught my attention.  i therefore calculated an rcs chronology for mt read from measurement data archived with esper et al 2016.  readers will probably not be astonished that the chronology disdained by gergis et al had very elevated values in the early second millennium and late first millennium relative to the late 20th century. i cannot help but observe that gergis’ decision to use the older flatter chronology was almost certainly made only after peeking at results from the new mt read chronology, yet another example of data torture (wagenmakers 2011, 2012) by gergis et al. at this point, readers are probably de-sensitized to criticism of yet more data torture. in this case, it appears probable that the decision impacts the medieval period of their reconstruction where they only used two proxies, especially when combined with their arbitrary exclusion of law dome, which also had elevated early values. further curious puzzles emerged when i looked more closely at the older chronology favored by gergis (and esper). this chronology originated with cook et al 2000 (clim dyn), which clearly stated that they had calculated an rcs chronology and even provided a succinct description of the technique (citing briffa et al 1991, 1992) as authority.  however, their reported chronology (both as illustrated in cook et al 2000 and as archived at noaa in 1998), though it has a very high correlation to my calculation, has negligible long-period variability.  in this post, i present the case that the chronology presented by cook as an rcs chronology was actually (and erroneously) calculated using a “traditional” standardization method that did not preserve low-frequency variance. although the cook chronology has been used over and over, i seriously wonder whether any climate scientist has ever closely examined it in the past 20 years. supporting this surmise are defects and errors in the cook measurement dataset, which have remained unrepaired for over 20 years.  cleaning the measurement dataset to be usable was very laborious and one wonders why these defects have been allowed to persist for so long. continue reading → by steve mcintyre | posted in uncategorized | tagged cook, esper, gergis, mt read, tasmania | comments (236) esper et al 2016 and the oroko swamp aug 13, 2016 – 4:36 pm jan esper, prominent in early climate audit posts as an adamant serial non-archiver, has joined with 17 other tree ring specialists, to publish “ranking of tree-ring based temperature reconstructions of the past millennium” (pdf). this assesses 39 long tree ring temperature reconstructions. the assessment is accompanied by an archive containing 39 reconstruction versions, together with the underlying measurement data for 33 of 39 reconstructions. (it seems odd that measurement data would continue to be withheld for six sites, but, hey, it’s climate science.) because i’ve been recently looking at data used in gergis et al, i looked first at esper’s consideration of oroko, one of two long proxies retained in gergis screening.  i’ve long sought oroko measurement data, first requesting it from ed cook in 2003.  cook refused. though oroko reconstructions have been used over the years in multiproxy studies and by ipcc, the underlying measurement data has never made archived  the archive for esper et al 2016 is thus the very first archive of oroko measurement data (though unfortunately it seems that even the present archive is incomplete and not up-to-date). despite claims to use the most recent reconstruction, esper’s oroko temperature reconstruction is decidedly out of date.  worse, it uses a n oroko “reconstruction” in which cook replaced proxy data (which went down after 1960) with instrumental data (which went up) – in a contemporary variation of what is popularly known as “mike’s nature trick”, though mike’s nature trick, as discussed at ca here, was a little different. in today’s post, i’ll look at the “new” oroko data, which, needless to say,  has some surprises. continue reading → by steve mcintyre | posted in uncategorized | tagged esper, gergis, oroko | comments (52) gergis and law dome aug 3, 2016 – 9:52 am in today’s post, i’m going to examine gergis’ dubious screening out of the law dome d18o series, a series that has been of long-standing interest at climate audit (tag). gergis et al 2016 stated that they screened proxies according to significance of the correlation to local gridcell temperature. law dome d18o not only had a significant correlation to local temperature, but had a higher correlation to local instrumental temperature than: 24 of the 28 proxies retained by gergis in her screened network; a higher t-statistic than 19 of 28 proxies retained by gergis; a higher correlation and t-statistic than either of the other two long proxies (mt read, oroko swamp tree ring chronologies); nonetheless,  the law dome d18o series was excluded from the gergis et al network. gergis effected her exclusion of law dome not because of deficient temperature correlation, but through an additional arbitrary screening criterion, which excluded law dome d18o, but no other proxy in the screened network. this is not the first occasion in which ipcc authors have arbitrarily excluded law dome d18o. ca readers may recall climategate revelations on the contortions of ipcc ar4 lead authors to keep law dome out of the ar4 diagram illustrating long southern hemisphere proxies (see ca post here). law dome d18o is intrinsically an extremely interesting proxy for readers interested in a southern hemisphere perspective on the holocene (balancing the somewhat hackneyed commentary citing the cuffey-clow reconstruction based on gisp2 ice core in greenland). the utility of law dome d18o is much reduced by inadequate publishing and archiving by the australian antarctic division,  a criticism that i make somewhat reluctantly since they have been polite in their correspondence with me, but ultimately unresponsive. continue reading → by steve mcintyre | posted in uncategorized | tagged gergis, lawdome, van ommen | comments (163) joelle gergis, data torturer jul 21, 2016 – 5:05 pm in 2012, the then much ballyhoo-ed australian temperature reconstruction of gergis et al 2012 mysteriously disappeared from journal of climate after being criticized at climate audit. now, more than four years later, a successor article has finally been published. gergis says that the only problem with the original article was a “typo” in a single word. rather than “taking the easy way out” and simply correcting the “typo”, gergis instead embarked on a program that ultimately involved nine rounds of revision, 21 individual reviews, two editors and took longer than the american involvement in world war ii.  however, rather than gergis et al 2016 being an improvement on or confirmation of gergis et al 2012, it is one of the most extraordinary examples of data torture (wagenmakers, 2011, 2012) that any of us will ever witness. also see brandon s’s recent posts here here. continue reading → by steve mcintyre | posted in uncategorized | tagged aus2k, gergis, karoly, neukom | comments (307) gergis jul 21, 2016 – 3:55 pm redirect to here by steve mcintyre | posted in uncategorized | comments off on gergis are energy budget tcr estimates biased low, as richardson et al (2016) claim? jul 12, 2016 – 10:08 am a guest post by nic lewis introduction and summary in a recently published paper (rea16),[1] mark richardson et al. claim that recent observation-based energy budget estimates of the earth’s transient climate response (tcr) are biased substantially low, with the true value some 24% higher. this claim is based purely on simulations by cmip5 climate models. as i shall show, observational evidence points to any bias actually being small. moreover, the related claims made by kyle armour, in an accompanying “news & views” opinion piece,[2] fall apart upon examination. the main claim in rea16 is that, in models, surface air-temperature warming over 1861-2009 is 24% greater than would be recorded by hadcrut4 because it preferentially samples slower-warming regions and water warms less than air. about 15 percentage points of this excess result from masking to hadcrut4v4 geographical coverage. the remaining 9 percentage points are due to hadcrut4 blending air and sea surface temperature (sst) data, and arise partly from water warming less than air over the open ocean and partly from changes in sea ice redistributing air and water measurements. rea16 infer an observation-based best estimate for tcr from 1.66°c, 24% higher than the value of 1.34°c if based on hadcrut4v4.. since the scaling factor used is based purely on simulations by cmip5 models, rather than on observations, the estimate is only valid  if those simulations realistically reproduce the spatiotemporal pattern of actual warming for both sst and near-surface air temperature (tas), and changes in sea-ice cover. it is clear that they fail to do so. for instance, the models simulate fast warming, and retreating sea-ice, in the sparsely observed southern high latitudes. the available evidence indicates that, on the contrary, warming in this region has been slower than average, pointing to the bias due to sparse observations over it being in the opposite direction to that estimated from model simulations. nor is there good observational evidence that air over the open ocean warms faster than sst. therefore, the rea16 model-based bias figure cannot be regarded as realistic for observation-based tcr estimates. continue reading → by niclewis | posted in uncategorized | comments (62) deflategate: controversy is due to scientist error jun 7, 2016 – 10:42 am i’ve submitted an article entitled “new light on deflategate: critical technical errors” pdf to journal of sports analytics. it identifies and analyzes a previously unnoticed scientific error in the technical analysis included in the wells report on deflategate. the article shows precisely how the “unexplained” deflation occurred prior to anderson’s measurement and disproves the possibility of post-measurement tampering. at present, there is insufficient information to determine whether the scientific error arose because the law firm responsible for the investigation (paul, weiss) omitted essential information in their instructions to their technical consultants (exponent) or whether the technical consultants failed to incorporate all relevant information in their analysis.  in either event, the error was missed by the nfl consultant daniel marlow of the princeton university department of physics, by the authors of the wells report and by the nfl. continue reading → by steve mcintyre | posted in uncategorized | tagged brady, deflategate, goodell, wells | comments (171) « older posts tip jar (the tip jar is working again, via a temporary location) pages about blog rules and road map ca assistant ca blog setup contact steve mc econometric references faq 2005 gridded data high-resolution ocean sediments hockey stick studies proxy data station data statistics and r subscribe to ca tip jar categories categories select category ait archiving nature science climategate cg2 data disclosure and diligence peer review foia general holocene optimum hurricane inquiries muir russell ipcc ar5 mbh98 replication source code spot the hockey stick! modeling hansen santer uk met office multiproxy studies briffa crowley d'arrigo 2006 esper et al 2002 hansen hegerl 2006 jones & mann 2003 jones et al 1998 juckes et al 2006 kaufman 2009 loehle 2007 loehle 2008 mann et al 2007 mann et al 2008 mann et al 2009 marcott 2013 moberg [2005] pages2k trouet 2009 wahl and ammann news and commentary mm proxies almagre antarctica bristlecones divergence geological ice core jacoby mann pc1 medieval noamer treeline ocean sediment post-1980 proxies solar speleothem thompson yamal and urals reports barton committee nas panel satellite and gridcell scripts sea ice sea level rise statistics multivariate regem spurious steig at al 2009 surface record cru gistemp gistemp replication jones et al 1990 sst steig at al 2009 uhi tggws uncategorized unthreaded articles ccsp workshop nov05 mcintyre/mckitrick 2003 mm05 (grl) mm05(ee) nas panel reply to huybers reply to von storch blogroll accuweather blogs andrew revkin anthony watts bishop hill bob tisdale dan hughes david stockwell icecap idsos james annan jeff id josh halpern judith curry keith kloor klimazweibel lubos motl lucia's blackboard matt briggs nasa giss nature blogs realclimate roger pielke jr roger pielke sr roman m science of doom tamino warwick hughes watts up with that william connolley wordpress.com world climate report favorite posts bring the proxies up to date due diligence faq 2005 mckitrick: what is the hockey stick debate about? overview responses to mbh some thoughts on disclosure wegman and north reports for newbies links acronyms latex symbols mbh 98 steve’s public data archive wdcp wegman reply to stupak wegman report weblogs and resources ross mckitrick surface stations archives archives select month november 2016 august 2016 july 2016 june 2016 may 2016 april 2016 march 2016 february 2016 january 2016 december 2015 september 2015 august 2015 july 2015 june 2015 april 2015 march 2015 february 2015 january 2015 december 2014 november 2014 october 2014 september 2014 august 2014 july 2014 june 2014 may 2014 april 2014 march 2014 february 2014 january 2014 december 2013 november 2013 october 2013 september 2013 august 2013 july 2013 june 2013 may 2013 april 2013 march 2013 january 2013 december 2012 november 2012 october 2012 september 2012 august 2012 july 2012 june 2012 may 2012 april 2012 march 2012 february 2012 january 2012 december 2011 november 2011 october 2011 september 2011 august 2011 july 2011 june 2011 may 2011 april 2011 march 2011 february 2011 january 2011 december 2010 november 2010 october 2010 september 2010 august 2010 july 2010 june 2010 may 2010 april 2010 march 2010 february 2010 january 2010 december 2009 november 2009 october 2009 september 2009 august 2009 july 2009 june 2009 may 2009 april 2009 march 2009 february 2009 january 2009 december 2008 november 2008 october 2008 september 2008 august 2008 july 2008 june 2008 may 2008 april 2008 march 2008 february 2008 january 2008 december 2007 november 2007 october 2007 september 2007 august 2007 july 2007 june 2007 may 2007 april 2007 march 2007 february 2007 january 2007 december 2006 november 2006 october 2006 september 2006 august 2006 july 2006 june 2006 may 2006 april 2006 march 2006 february 2006 january 2006 december 2005 november 2005 october 2005 september 2005 august 2005 july 2005 june 2005 may 2005 april 2005 march 2005 february 2005 january 2005 december 2004 october 2004 january 2000 notice click on the "reply" link to respond to a comment. frequent visitors will want the ca assistant. sort/hide comments; improved reply box, etc. search blog stats 16,800,958 hits since 2010-sep-12 recent posts centenary of the end of the battle of the somme the destruction of huma abedin’s emails on the clinton server and their surprise recovery was early onset industrial-era warming anthropogenic, as abram et al. claim? re-examining cook’s mt read (tasmania) chronology esper et al 2016 and the oroko swamp recent comments j ferguson on centenary of the end of the battle of the somme j ferguson on centenary of the end of the battle of the somme j ferguson on centenary of the end of the battle of the somme paul aubrin on centenary of the end of the battle of the somme paul aubrin on centenary of the end of the battle of the somme mpainter on the destruction of huma abedin’s emails on the clinton server and their surprise recovery mpainter on centenary of the end of the battle of the somme ed snack on centenary of the end of the battle of the somme robert stewart on centenary of the end of the battle of the somme mpainter on the destruction of huma abedin’s emails on the clinton server and their surprise recovery mpainter on the destruction of huma abedin’s emails on the clinton server and their surprise recovery ed snack on centenary of the end of the battle of the somme kim on centenary of the end of the battle of the somme mpainter on centenary of the end of the battle of the somme ed snack on centenary of the end of the battle of the somme meta register log in entries rss comments rss wordpress.com create a free website or blog at wordpress.com. | post to cancel


Here you find all texts from your page as Google (googlebot) and others search engines seen it.

Words density analysis:

Numbers of all words: 4062

One word

Two words phrases

Three words phrases

the - 7.39% (300)
and - 1.87% (76)
her - 1.53% (62)
men - 1.16% (47)
that - 0.89% (36)
for - 0.89% (36)
post - 0.76% (31)
2016 - 0.74% (30)
log - 0.74% (30)
all - 0.71% (29)
gergis - 0.69% (28)
from - 0.69% (28)
data - 0.64% (26)
over - 0.59% (24)
use - 0.59% (24)
was - 0.59% (24)
clinton - 0.54% (22)
ommen - 0.54% (22)
huma - 0.54% (22)
not - 0.54% (22)
read - 0.52% (21)
war - 0.49% (20)
emails - 0.49% (20)
with - 0.47% (19)
battle - 0.47% (19)
end - 0.47% (19)
comment - 0.44% (18)
out - 0.44% (18)
somme - 0.44% (18)
2009 - 0.44% (18)
reconstruction - 0.42% (17)
late - 0.42% (17)
aug - 0.42% (17)
2012 - 0.42% (17)
one - 0.42% (17)
nic - 0.39% (16)
than - 0.39% (16)
which - 0.39% (16)
law - 0.39% (16)
can - 0.39% (16)
march - 0.39% (16)
chronology - 0.39% (16)
nov - 0.39% (16)
2005 - 0.39% (16)
- 0.37% (15)
centenary - 0.37% (15)
jul - 0.37% (15)
had - 0.37% (15)
2006 - 0.37% (15)
server - 0.37% (15)
here - 0.37% (15)
ice - 0.34% (14)
his - 0.34% (14)
2008 - 0.34% (14)
their - 0.34% (14)
has - 0.34% (14)
2007 - 0.34% (14)
archive - 0.34% (14)
climate - 0.34% (14)
jan - 0.34% (14)
2011 - 0.34% (14)
april - 0.32% (13)
jun - 0.32% (13)
january - 0.32% (13)
steve - 0.32% (13)
this - 0.32% (13)
warming - 0.32% (13)
comments - 0.32% (13)
been - 0.32% (13)
2010 - 0.32% (13)
based - 0.32% (13)
2014 - 0.3% (12)
dome - 0.3% (12)
2013 - 0.3% (12)
november - 0.3% (12)
oroko - 0.3% (12)
2015 - 0.3% (12)
cook - 0.3% (12)
may - 0.3% (12)
esper - 0.3% (12)
recent - 0.3% (12)
december - 0.3% (12)
august - 0.3% (12)
june - 0.3% (12)
july - 0.3% (12)
temperature - 0.27% (11)
measurement - 0.27% (11)
mcintyre - 0.27% (11)
claim - 0.27% (11)
but - 0.27% (11)
hill - 0.27% (11)
uncategorized - 0.27% (11)
february - 0.27% (11)
october - 0.27% (11)
september - 0.27% (11)
posted - 0.25% (10)
hillary - 0.25% (10)
proxy - 0.25% (10)
proxies - 0.25% (10)
 i - 0.25% (10)
used - 0.25% (10)
are - 0.25% (10)
blog - 0.25% (10)
very - 0.25% (10)
other - 0.25% (10)
estimate - 0.25% (10)
report - 0.22% (9)
reconstructions - 0.22% (9)
high - 0.22% (9)
long - 0.22% (9)
sea - 0.22% (9)
any - 0.22% (9)
continue - 0.22% (9)
only - 0.22% (9)
they - 0.22% (9)
even - 0.22% (9)
huma’s - 0.22% (9)
ring - 0.22% (9)
though - 0.22% (9)
have - 0.22% (9)
about - 0.22% (9)
were - 0.22% (9)
led - 0.2% (8)
model - 0.2% (8)
air - 0.2% (8)
old - 0.2% (8)
forcing - 0.2% (8)
- 0.2% (8)
reading - 0.2% (8)
two - 0.2% (8)
destruction - 0.2% (8)
 a - 0.2% (8)
rise - 0.2% (8)
author - 0.2% (8)
change - 0.17% (7)
she - 0.17% (7)
early - 0.17% (7)
see - 0.17% (7)
sent - 0.17% (7)
d18o - 0.17% (7)
most - 0.17% (7)
tip - 0.17% (7)
date - 0.17% (7)
ever - 0.17% (7)
tagged - 0.17% (7)
tree - 0.17% (7)
anthropogenic - 0.17% (7)
year - 0.17% (7)
how - 0.17% (7)
today - 0.15% (6)
when - 0.15% (6)
ipcc - 0.15% (6)
post, - 0.15% (6)
years - 0.15% (6)
posts - 0.15% (6)
correlation - 0.15% (6)
being - 0.15% (6)
there - 0.15% (6)
some - 0.15% (6)
will - 0.15% (6)
face - 0.15% (6)
surprise - 0.15% (6)
examine - 0.15% (6)
both - 0.15% (6)
version - 0.15% (6)
interest - 0.15% (6)
cause - 0.15% (6)
met - 0.15% (6)
under - 0.15% (6)
error - 0.15% (6)
mann - 0.15% (6)
abedin’s - 0.15% (6)
al. - 0.12% (5)
cru - 0.12% (5)
pages - 0.12% (5)
reply - 0.12% (5)
clintonemail - 0.12% (5)
more - 0.12% (5)
account - 0.12% (5)
due - 0.12% (5)
mpainter - 0.12% (5)
w/m2 - 0.12% (5)
ocean - 0.12% (5)
recovery - 0.12% (5)
first - 0.12% (5)
older - 0.12% (5)
gergis, - 0.12% (5)
me, - 0.12% (5)
simulations - 0.12% (5)
nature - 0.12% (5)
respond - 0.12% (5)
event - 0.12% (5)
paper - 0.12% (5)
higher - 0.12% (5)
less - 0.12% (5)
surface - 0.12% (5)
well - 0.12% (5)
article - 0.12% (5)
provide - 0.12% (5)
estimates - 0.12% (5)
what - 0.12% (5)
because - 0.12% (5)
sst - 0.12% (5)
today’s - 0.12% (5)
made - 0.12% (5)
call - 0.12% (5)
bias - 0.12% (5)
jar - 0.1% (4)
16, - 0.1% (4)
start - 0.1% (4)
studies - 0.1% (4)
rea16 - 0.1% (4)
rcs - 0.1% (4)
 in - 0.1% (4)
server. - 0.1% (4)
assess - 0.1% (4)
also - 0.1% (4)
analysis - 0.1% (4)
notice - 0.1% (4)
emails, - 0.1% (4)
audit - 0.1% (4)
hockey - 0.1% (4)
local - 0.1% (4)
readers - 0.1% (4)
whether - 0.1% (4)
evidence - 0.1% (4)
stick - 0.1% (4)
own - 0.1% (4)
study - 0.1% (4)
state - 0.1% (4)
hadcrut4 - 0.1% (4)
industrial - 0.1% (4)
present - 0.1% (4)
tasmania - 0.1% (4)
deleted - 0.1% (4)
authors - 0.1% (4)
its - 0.1% (4)
torture - 0.1% (4)
information - 0.1% (4)
letters - 0.1% (4)
technical - 0.1% (4)
sites - 0.1% (4)
after - 0.1% (4)
since - 0.1% (4)
record - 0.1% (4)
models - 0.1% (4)
recently - 0.1% (4)
2003 - 0.1% (4)
calculated - 0.1% (4)
points - 0.1% (4)
i’ve - 0.1% (4)
lewis - 0.1% (4)
look - 0.1% (4)
would - 0.1% (4)
tcr - 0.1% (4)
value - 0.1% (4)
rather - 0.1% (4)
much - 0.1% (4)
while - 0.1% (4)
back - 0.1% (4)
region - 0.1% (4)
years. - 0.07% (3)
published - 0.07% (3)
millennium - 0.07% (3)
(tasmania) - 0.07% (3)
(and - 0.07% (3)
multiproxy - 0.07% (3)
archived - 0.07% (3)
past - 0.07% (3)
chronology, - 0.07% (3)
versions - 0.07% (3)
actual - 0.07% (3)
station - 0.07% (3)
statistics - 0.07% (3)
science - 0.07% (3)
jones - 0.07% (3)
faq - 0.07% (3)
consultant - 0.07% (3)
good - 0.07% (3)
“new - 0.07% (3)
wells - 0.07% (3)
sediment - 0.07% (3)
nas - 0.07% (3)
ferguson - 0.07% (3)
paul - 0.07% (3)
snack - 0.07% (3)
mckitrick - 0.07% (3)
wegman - 0.07% (3)
blogs - 0.07% (3)
wordpress.com - 0.07% (3)
mbh - 0.07% (3)
result - 0.07% (3)
water - 0.07% (3)
data, - 0.07% (3)
 the - 0.07% (3)
screening - 0.07% (3)
series - 0.07% (3)
retained - 0.07% (3)
swamp - 0.07% (3)
2000 - 0.07% (3)
preserve - 0.07% (3)
esper, - 0.07% (3)
screened - 0.07% (3)
either - 0.07% (3)
observation-based - 0.07% (3)
24% - 0.07% (3)
main - 0.07% (3)
12, - 0.07% (3)
off - 0.07% (3)
excluded - 0.07% (3)
southern - 0.07% (3)
make - 0.07% (3)
criticism - 0.07% (3)
estimated - 0.07% (3)
greenhouse - 0.07% (3)
gas - 0.07% (3)
transcript - 0.07% (3)
claims - 0.07% (3)
claim? - 0.07% (3)
commentary - 0.07% (3)
abram - 0.07% (3)
pages2k - 0.07% (3)
nor - 0.07% (3)
side - 0.07% (3)
further - 0.07% (3)
cabinet - 0.07% (3)
observational - 0.07% (3)
many - 0.07% (3)
australian - 0.07% (3)
onset - 0.07% (3)
underlying - 0.07% (3)
files - 0.07% (3)
ultimate - 0.07% (3)
pst - 0.07% (3)
cook’s - 0.07% (3)
web - 0.07% (3)
department - 0.07% (3)
those - 0.07% (3)
did - 0.07% (3)
hillary’s - 0.07% (3)
backup - 0.07% (3)
included - 0.07% (3)
attention - 0.07% (3)
anthony - 0.07% (3)
show - 0.07% (3)
pea - 0.07% (3)
however, - 0.07% (3)
code - 0.07% (3)
partly - 0.07% (3)
battalion - 0.07% (3)
archives - 0.07% (3)
increase - 0.07% (3)
age. - 0.07% (3)
assistant - 0.07% (3)
1500 - 0.07% (3)
(which - 0.07% (3)
changes - 0.07% (3)
these - 0.07% (3)
noticed - 0.07% (3)
china - 0.07% (3)
laptop, - 0.05% (2)
unnoticed - 0.05% (2)
interested - 0.05% (2)
working - 0.05% (2)
respect - 0.05% (2)
deflategate: - 0.05% (2)
realistic - 0.05% (2)
somme, - 0.05% (2)
carnage - 0.05% (2)
million - 0.05% (2)
potential - 0.05% (2)
(the - 0.05% (2)
consultants - 0.05% (2)
casualties - 0.05% (2)
nfl - 0.05% (2)
2004 - 0.05% (2)
little - 0.05% (2)
essential - 0.05% (2)
firm - 0.05% (2)
scientific - 0.05% (2)
link - 0.05% (2)
(both - 0.05% (2)
regarded - 0.05% (2)
combined - 0.05% (2)
sparse - 0.05% (2)
rss - 0.05% (2)
percentage - 0.05% (2)
hadcrut4v4 - 0.05% (2)
through - 0.05% (2)
rules - 0.05% (2)
office - 0.05% (2)
free - 0.05% (2)
warms - 0.05% (2)
cancel - 0.05% (2)
models, - 0.05% (2)
greater - 0.05% (2)
asked - 0.05% (2)
known - 0.05% (2)
open - 0.05% (2)
preserved - 0.05% (2)
slower - 0.05% (2)
dated - 0.05% (2)
temporary - 0.05% (2)
observations - 0.05% (2)
backups - 0.05% (2)
direction - 0.05% (2)
fast - 0.05% (2)
fail - 0.05% (2)
accounts - 0.05% (2)
valid - 0.05% (2)
road - 0.05% (2)
sea-ice - 0.05% (2)
clear - 0.05% (2)
aubrin - 0.05% (2)
cabinet, - 0.05% (2)
news - 0.05% (2)
available - 0.05% (2)
reports - 0.05% (2)
correspondence - 0.05% (2)
scripts - 0.05% (2)
panel - 0.05% (2)
narrative - 0.05% (2)
(pdf). - 0.05% (2)
langstaff, - 0.05% (2)
then - 0.05% (2)
1998 - 0.05% (2)
canadian - 0.05% (2)
loehle - 0.05% (2)
wounded - 0.05% (2)
steig - 0.05% (2)
dan - 0.05% (2)
interesting - 0.05% (2)
hughes - 0.05% (2)
roger - 0.05% (2)
full - 0.05% (2)
pielke - 0.05% (2)
watts - 0.05% (2)
details - 0.05% (2)
killed - 0.05% (2)
who - 0.05% (2)
gistemp - 0.05% (2)
mm05 - 0.05% (2)
just - 0.05% (2)
him - 0.05% (2)
1917 - 0.05% (2)
high-resolution - 0.05% (2)
gridded - 0.05% (2)
sediments - 0.05% (2)
ridge - 0.05% (2)
subscribe - 0.05% (2)
copies - 0.05% (2)
despite - 0.05% (2)
coverage - 0.05% (2)
setup - 0.05% (2)
map - 0.05% (2)
contact - 0.05% (2)
econometric - 0.05% (2)
references - 0.05% (2)
categories - 0.05% (2)
select - 0.05% (2)
source - 0.05% (2)
replication - 0.05% (2)
front - 0.05% (2)
hansen - 0.05% (2)
vimy - 0.05% (2)
ar5 - 0.05% (2)
review - 0.05% (2)
climategate - 0.05% (2)
month - 0.05% (2)
that, - 0.05% (2)
disclosure - 0.05% (2)
diligence - 0.05% (2)
papers - 0.05% (2)
low, - 0.05% (2)
looked - 0.05% (2)
dome, - 0.05% (2)
exclusion - 0.05% (2)
closely - 0.05% (2)
stated - 0.05% (2)
 however, - 0.05% (2)
briffa - 0.05% (2)
arbitrary - 0.05% (2)
period - 0.05% (2)
2011, - 0.05% (2)
example - 0.05% (2)
2012) - 0.05% (2)
so. - 0.05% (2)
medieval - 0.05% (2)
placed - 0.05% (2)
(see - 0.05% (2)
case - 0.05% (2)
regional - 0.05% (2)
dataset - 0.05% (2)
errors - 0.05% (2)
read, - 0.05% (2)
proxy-based - 0.05% (2)
sizer - 0.05% (2)
post-1500 - 0.05% (2)
defects - 0.05% (2)
discussed - 0.05% (2)
method - 0.05% (2)
actually - 0.05% (2)
criticized - 0.05% (2)
over, - 0.05% (2)
scientist - 0.05% (2)
wonder - 0.05% (2)
yet - 0.05% (2)
results - 0.05% (2)
forcings, - 0.05% (2)
solar - 0.05% (2)
although - 0.05% (2)
chronologies - 0.05% (2)
1840 - 0.05% (2)
assessment - 0.05% (2)
total - 0.05% (2)
+0.20 - 0.05% (2)
almost - 0.05% (2)
niclewis - 0.05% (2)
re-examining - 0.05% (2)
i’m - 0.05% (2)
going - 0.05% (2)
2016, - 0.05% (2)
land - 0.05% (2)
5th - 0.05% (2)
sites, - 0.05% (2)
small - 0.05% (2)
values - 0.05% (2)
cannot - 0.05% (2)
observe - 0.05% (2)
decision - 0.05% (2)
gergis’ - 0.05% (2)
elevated - 0.05% (2)
probably - 0.05% (2)
radiative - 0.05% (2)
according - 0.05% (2)
best - 0.05% (2)
criterion - 0.05% (2)
therefore - 0.05% (2)
reality - 0.05% (2)
including - 0.05% (2)
provided - 0.05% (2)
involved - 0.05% (2)
“typo” - 0.05% (2)
order - 0.05% (2)
world - 0.05% (2)
likely - 0.05% (2)
here. - 0.05% (2)
non-gov - 0.05% (2)
journal - 0.05% (2)
return - 0.05% (2)
ultimately - 0.05% (2)
watch - 0.05% (2)
van - 0.05% (2)
i’ll - 0.05% (2)
2012, - 0.05% (2)
21, - 0.05% (2)
time - 0.05% (2)
energy - 0.05% (2)
purely - 0.05% (2)
possession”, - 0.05% (2)
took - 0.05% (2)
cmip5 - 0.05% (2)
“in - 0.05% (2)
records - 0.05% (2)
related - 0.05% (2)
response - 0.05% (2)
attempt - 0.05% (2)
(though - 0.05% (2)
budget - 0.05% (2)
biased - 0.05% (2)
richardson - 0.05% (2)
mark - 0.05% (2)
search - 0.05% (2)
weiner - 0.05% (2)
antarctic - 0.05% (2)
instrumental - 0.05% (2)
went - 0.05% (2)
attention. - 0.05% (2)
commenced - 0.05% (2)
mike’s - 0.05% (2)
introduction - 0.05% (2)
 has - 0.05% (2)
using - 0.05% (2)
 cook - 0.05% (2)
seems - 0.05% (2)
reconstructions. - 0.05% (2)
esper’s - 0.05% (2)
lead - 0.05% (2)
significant - 0.05% (2)
sustained - 0.05% (2)
guest - 0.05% (2)
gridcell - 0.05% (2)
somewhat - 0.05% (2)
holocene - 0.05% (2)
citing - 0.05% (2)
surmise - 0.05% (2)
archiving - 0.05% (2)
core - 0.05% (2)
hemisphere - 0.05% (2)
ar4 - 0.05% (2)
anthropogenic, - 0.05% (2)
t-statistic - 0.05% (2)
industrial-era - 0.05% (2)
network. - 0.05% (2)
prior - 0.05% (2)
occasion - 0.05% (2)
federal - 0.05% (2)
of the - 1.75% (71)
on the - 0.52% (21)
in the - 0.52% (21)
the battle - 0.42% (17)
battle of - 0.42% (17)
at the - 0.42% (17)
the somme - 0.42% (17)
the end - 0.37% (15)
end of - 0.37% (15)
centenary of - 0.37% (15)
clinton server - 0.37% (15)
the clinton - 0.37% (15)
that the - 0.3% (12)
on centenary - 0.3% (12)
gergis et - 0.27% (11)
law dome - 0.27% (11)
| post - 0.27% (11)
al 2016 - 0.25% (10)
| comments - 0.25% (10)
uncategorized | - 0.25% (10)
2016 – - 0.25% (10)
posted in - 0.25% (10)
in uncategorized - 0.25% (10)
| posted - 0.25% (10)
steve mcintyre - 0.25% (10)
from the - 0.22% (9)
by steve - 0.22% (9)
to the - 0.2% (8)
reading → - 0.2% (8)
mt read - 0.2% (8)
mcintyre | - 0.2% (8)
→ by - 0.2% (8)
measurement data - 0.2% (8)
continue reading - 0.2% (8)
dome d18o - 0.17% (7)
| tagged - 0.17% (7)
by the - 0.17% (7)
and the - 0.17% (7)
emails on - 0.17% (7)
server and - 0.17% (7)
esper et - 0.15% (6)
post, i - 0.15% (6)
that they - 0.15% (6)
have been - 0.15% (6)
destruction of - 0.15% (6)
huma abedin’s - 0.15% (6)
with the - 0.15% (6)
by gergis - 0.12% (5)
mpainter on - 0.12% (5)
et al. - 0.12% (5)
their surprise - 0.12% (5)
in this - 0.12% (5)
tree ring - 0.12% (5)
is based - 0.1% (4)
in today’s - 0.1% (4)
march 2015 - 0.1% (4)
today’s post, - 0.1% (4)
temperature reconstruction - 0.1% (4)
clinton server. - 0.1% (4)
correlation to - 0.1% (4)
tip jar - 0.1% (4)
by nic - 0.1% (4)
due to - 0.1% (4)
data torture - 0.1% (4)
rather than - 0.1% (4)
has been - 0.1% (4)
over the - 0.1% (4)
climate audit - 0.1% (4)
hockey stick - 0.1% (4)
partly from - 0.07% (3)
cook’s mt - 0.07% (3)
read (tasmania) - 0.07% (3)
in their - 0.07% (3)
in gergis - 0.07% (3)
snack on - 0.07% (3)
the chronology - 0.07% (3)
used in - 0.07% (3)
in which - 0.07% (3)
20 years. - 0.07% (3)
early onset - 0.07% (3)
somme mpainter - 0.07% (3)
proxies retained - 0.07% (3)
one of - 0.07% (3)
whether the - 0.07% (3)
not be - 0.07% (3)
the past - 0.07% (3)
an rcs - 0.07% (3)
use of - 0.07% (3)
a recent - 0.07% (3)
to local - 0.07% (3)
a higher - 0.07% (3)
faq 2005 - 0.07% (3)
ed snack - 0.07% (3)
the underlying - 0.07% (3)
reply to - 0.07% (3)
in her - 0.07% (3)
pst files - 0.07% (3)
oroko swamp - 0.07% (3)
j ferguson - 0.07% (3)
the only - 0.07% (3)
(tasmania) chronology - 0.07% (3)
her clintonemail - 0.07% (3)
the study - 0.07% (3)
al. claim - 0.07% (3)
out of - 0.07% (3)
ocean sediment - 0.07% (3)
the most - 0.07% (3)
of law - 0.07% (3)
abram et - 0.07% (3)
rcs chronology - 0.07% (3)
ferguson on - 0.07% (3)
did not - 0.07% (3)
greenhouse gas - 0.07% (3)
al 2009 - 0.07% (3)
mann et - 0.07% (3)
china cabinet - 0.07% (3)
post by - 0.05% (2)
nic lewis - 0.05% (2)
richardson et - 0.05% (2)
al 2012 - 0.05% (2)
ice core - 0.05% (2)
is much - 0.05% (2)
jul 21, - 0.05% (2)
d18o is - 0.05% (2)
southern hemisphere - 0.05% (2)
the gergis - 0.05% (2)
is not - 0.05% (2)
purely on - 0.05% (2)
of climate - 0.05% (2)
recovery mpainter - 0.05% (2)
energy budget - 0.05% (2)
tcr estimates - 0.05% (2)
somme ed - 0.05% (2)
recent posts - 0.05% (2)
of gergis - 0.05% (2)
any of - 0.05% (2)
a guest - 0.05% (2)
somme paul - 0.05% (2)
contact steve - 0.05% (2)
ocean sediments - 0.05% (2)
subscribe to - 0.05% (2)
the hockey - 0.05% (2)
blog setup - 0.05% (2)
blog rules - 0.05% (2)
technical consultants - 0.05% (2)
the authors - 0.05% (2)
and by - 0.05% (2)
older posts - 0.05% (2)
jones et - 0.05% (2)
steig at - 0.05% (2)
anthropogenic, as - 0.05% (2)
al. claim? - 0.05% (2)
re-examining cook’s - 0.05% (2)
somme j - 0.05% (2)
industrial-era warming - 0.05% (2)
data archive - 0.05% (2)
nas panel - 0.05% (2)
roger pielke - 0.05% (2)
is the - 0.05% (2)
long proxies - 0.05% (2)
information in - 0.05% (2)
paul aubrin - 0.05% (2)
sea ice - 0.05% (2)
and water - 0.05% (2)
since the - 0.05% (2)
changes in - 0.05% (2)
the open - 0.05% (2)
less than - 0.05% (2)
percentage points - 0.05% (2)
to hadcrut4 - 0.05% (2)
air over - 0.05% (2)
aubrin on - 0.05% (2)
based purely - 0.05% (2)
by niclewis - 0.05% (2)
the technical - 0.05% (2)
wells report - 0.05% (2)
how the - 0.05% (2)
open ocean - 0.05% (2)
observational evidence - 0.05% (2)
on simulations - 0.05% (2)
by cmip5 - 0.05% (2)
to that - 0.05% (2)
simulations by - 0.05% (2)
stated that - 0.05% (2)
likely to - 0.05% (2)
2015 destruction - 0.05% (2)
over and - 0.05% (2)
about the - 0.05% (2)
non-gov emails - 0.05% (2)
of non-gov - 0.05% (2)
the state - 0.05% (2)
federal records - 0.05% (2)
“in her - 0.05% (2)
huma’s account - 0.05% (2)
was early - 0.05% (2)
onset industrial-era - 0.05% (2)
sustained warming - 0.05% (2)
lead author - 0.05% (2)
post-1500 ad - 0.05% (2)
proxy-based regional - 0.05% (2)
most recent - 0.05% (2)
using a - 0.05% (2)
warming anthropogenic, - 0.05% (2)
as abram - 0.05% (2)
guest post - 0.05% (2)
lewis introduction - 0.05% (2)
of her - 0.05% (2)
were deleted - 0.05% (2)
of what - 0.05% (2)
 in this - 0.05% (2)
china cabinet, - 0.05% (2)
to provide - 0.05% (2)
who had - 0.05% (2)
the battalion - 0.05% (2)
and road - 0.05% (2)
« older - 0.05% (2)
posts centenary - 0.05% (2)
it was - 0.05% (2)
vimy ridge - 0.05% (2)
of hillary - 0.05% (2)
and backups - 0.05% (2)
can be - 0.05% (2)
both hillary - 0.05% (2)
to her - 0.05% (2)
huma was - 0.05% (2)
huma had - 0.05% (2)
to date - 0.05% (2)
huma’s emails - 0.05% (2)
emails from - 0.05% (2)
hillary and - 0.05% (2)
ad proxy-based - 0.05% (2)
regional reconstructions - 0.05% (2)
2016 and - 0.05% (2)
the oroko - 0.05% (2)
temperature reconstructions - 0.05% (2)
39 reconstruction - 0.05% (2)
measurement dataset - 0.05% (2)
which have - 0.05% (2)
though it - 0.05% (2)
chronology was - 0.05% (2)
the cook - 0.05% (2)
been used - 0.05% (2)
underlying measurement - 0.05% (2)
two long - 0.05% (2)
3, 2016 - 0.05% (2)
t-statistic than - 0.05% (2)
28 proxies - 0.05% (2)
retained by - 0.05% (2)
post, i’ll - 0.05% (2)
mike’s nature - 0.05% (2)
oroko measurement - 0.05% (2)
used over - 0.05% (2)
of oroko - 0.05% (2)
it seems - 0.05% (2)
calculated an - 0.05% (2)
al 2000 - 0.05% (2)
that claim - 0.05% (2)
according to - 0.05% (2)
the ipcc - 0.05% (2)
forcing from - 0.05% (2)
points to - 0.05% (2)
dated to - 0.05% (2)
do so. - 0.05% (2)
this post, - 0.05% (2)
start of - 0.05% (2)
age. the - 0.05% (2)
is estimated - 0.05% (2)
+0.20 w/m2 - 0.05% (2)
the older - 0.05% (2)
2011, 2012) - 0.05% (2)
exclusion of - 0.05% (2)
i looked - 0.05% (2)
to use - 0.05% (2)
the early - 0.05% (2)
niclewis | - 0.05% (2)
i’m going - 0.05% (2)
ring sites - 0.05% (2)
other tree - 0.05% (2)
higher correlation - 0.05% (2)
battle of the - 0.42% (17)
the battle of - 0.42% (17)
of the somme - 0.42% (17)
of the end - 0.37% (15)
the clinton server - 0.37% (15)
centenary of the - 0.37% (15)
end of the - 0.37% (15)
of the battle - 0.37% (15)
the end of - 0.37% (15)
on centenary of - 0.3% (12)
gergis et al - 0.27% (11)
| posted in - 0.25% (10)
et al 2016 - 0.25% (10)
on the clinton - 0.25% (10)
in uncategorized | - 0.25% (10)
posted in uncategorized - 0.25% (10)
by steve mcintyre - 0.22% (9)
continue reading → - 0.2% (8)
mcintyre | posted - 0.2% (8)
reading → by - 0.2% (8)
steve mcintyre | - 0.2% (8)
law dome d18o - 0.17% (7)
emails on the - 0.17% (7)
uncategorized | tagged - 0.17% (7)
clinton server and - 0.17% (7)
esper et al - 0.15% (6)
of huma abedin’s - 0.15% (6)
→ by steve - 0.15% (6)
destruction of huma - 0.12% (5)
abedin’s emails on - 0.12% (5)
and their surprise - 0.12% (5)
their surprise recovery - 0.12% (5)
in today’s post, - 0.1% (4)
the clinton server. - 0.1% (4)
mt read (tasmania) - 0.07% (3)
read (tasmania) chronology - 0.07% (3)
of law dome - 0.07% (3)
mann et al - 0.07% (3)
j ferguson on - 0.07% (3)
ed snack on - 0.07% (3)
snack on centenary - 0.07% (3)
ferguson on centenary - 0.07% (3)
uncategorized | comments - 0.07% (3)
cook’s mt read - 0.07% (3)
the somme mpainter - 0.07% (3)
on the destruction - 0.07% (3)
mpainter on the - 0.07% (3)
rules and road - 0.05% (2)
ca blog setup - 0.05% (2)
« older posts - 0.05% (2)
the somme ed - 0.05% (2)
to do so. - 0.05% (2)
air over the - 0.05% (2)
over the open - 0.05% (2)
niclewis | posted - 0.05% (2)
contact steve mc - 0.05% (2)
information in their - 0.05% (2)
high-resolution ocean sediments - 0.05% (2)
somme j ferguson - 0.05% (2)
the somme j - 0.05% (2)
purely on simulations - 0.05% (2)
was early onset - 0.05% (2)
as abram et - 0.05% (2)
the hockey stick - 0.05% (2)
2008 mann et - 0.05% (2)
hockey stick studies - 0.05% (2)
industrial-era warming anthropogenic, - 0.05% (2)
jones et al - 0.05% (2)
somme paul aubrin - 0.05% (2)
paul aubrin on - 0.05% (2)
mpainter on centenary - 0.05% (2)
been used over - 0.05% (2)
post-1500 ad proxy-based - 0.05% (2)
by nic lewis - 0.05% (2)
a guest post - 0.05% (2)
proxy-based regional reconstructions - 0.05% (2)
this post, i - 0.05% (2)
and partly from - 0.05% (2)
is estimated to - 0.05% (2)
estimated to be - 0.05% (2)
et al. claim? - 0.05% (2)
anthropogenic, as abram - 0.05% (2)
to provide a - 0.05% (2)
the china cabinet - 0.05% (2)
one of the - 0.05% (2)
her clintonemail account - 0.05% (2)
records “in her - 0.05% (2)
onset industrial-era warming - 0.05% (2)
huma emails from - 0.05% (2)
“in her possession”, - 0.05% (2)
by niclewis | - 0.05% (2)
re-examining cook’s mt - 0.05% (2)
retained by gergis - 0.05% (2)
stated that they - 0.05% (2)
post, i’m going - 0.05% (2)
a higher correlation - 0.05% (2)
out of the - 0.05% (2)
of data torture - 0.05% (2)
of gergis et - 0.05% (2)
jul 21, 2016 - 0.05% (2)
two long proxies - 0.05% (2)
underlying measurement data - 0.05% (2)
calculated an rcs - 0.05% (2)
the past 20 - 0.05% (2)
i’m going to - 0.05% (2)
to use the - 0.05% (2)
exclusion of law - 0.05% (2)
and the oroko - 0.05% (2)
past 20 years. - 0.05% (2)
et al 2000 - 0.05% (2)
21, 2016 – - 0.05% (2)

Here you can find chart of all your popular one, two and three word phrases. Google and others search engines means your page is about words you use frequently.

Copyright © 2015-2016 hupso.pl. All rights reserved. FB | +G | Twitter

Hupso.pl jest serwisem internetowym, w którym jednym kliknieciem możesz szybko i łatwo sprawdź stronę www pod kątem SEO. Oferujemy darmowe pozycjonowanie stron internetowych oraz wycena domen i stron internetowych. Prowadzimy ranking polskich stron internetowych oraz ranking stron alexa.