3.93 score from hupso.pl for:
anthonyteacher.com



HTML Content


Titleanthony teacher.com | welcome to

Length: 32, Words: 5
Description pusty

Length: 0, Words: 0
Keywords pusty
Robots
Charset UTF-8
Og Meta - Title exist
Og Meta - Description exist
Og Meta - Site name exist
Tytuł powinien zawierać pomiędzy 10 a 70 znaków (ze spacjami), a mniej niż 12 słów w długości.
Meta opis powinien zawierać pomiędzy 50 a 160 znaków (łącznie ze spacjami), a mniej niż 24 słów w długości.
Kodowanie znaków powinny być określone , UTF-8 jest chyba najlepszy zestaw znaków, aby przejść z powodu UTF-8 jest bardziej międzynarodowy kodowaniem.
Otwarte obiekty wykresu powinny być obecne w stronie internetowej (więcej informacji na temat protokołu OpenGraph: http://ogp.me/)

SEO Content

Words/Characters 8099
Text/HTML 39.26 %
Headings H1 18
H2 1
H3 14
H4 0
H5 0
H6 0
H1
welcome to
recent posts
disclaimer
subscribe to blog via email
@twitter
off course: a comparison of university and eap coursebook writing tasks – #tesol2017
summaries, responses, and short answers…oh my! – using student samples in writing instruction
navigating newsela: eight weeks of reading instruction with newsela.com
the power of pechakucha
deconstructing the duolingo english test (det)
what do martial arts and language learning have in common?
powerpoint hack: use powerpoint like a whiteboard
posts navigation
welcome
recent posts
disclaimer
subscribe to blog via email
@twitter
H2
anthony teacher.com
H3
share this:
like this:
share this:
like this:
share this:
like this:
share this:
like this:
share this:
like this:
share this:
like this:
share this:
like this:
H4
H5
H6
strong
what does the research say?
zhang’s action research
my experiences
refers to a claim
agree or disagree
gives reasons
good evaluation
focus on the claim
questions/criteria
points
total
 __ / 12
overall impressions
references
what is newsela?
what is newsela pro?
how did i use newsela?
what activities did i do?
martin luther king, jr.
sleep
immigrants
economics
technology
empathy
assessments
how can newsela be used
newsela & newsela pro: disadvantages
student reactions
conclusion
1. they are short
2. they are visual and text-averse
4. they require practice
5. they promote “skills”
6. they can be modified
course
level
topic
class size
10×20 pechakucha (3:30)
not read
feedback
course:
level
topic
class size
10×20 pechakucha (3:30)
course:
level
topic
class size
 5 slide pechakucha (2:40)
update
original review: 
step 1: the developer tab
file -> options -> customize ribbo
step 2: adding a text box
step 3: changing the text-box properties
step 4: copy, paste, resize
step 5: save
caveats
b
what does the research say?
zhang’s action research
my experiences
refers to a claim
agree or disagree
gives reasons
good evaluation
focus on the claim
questions/criteria
points
total
 __ / 12
overall impressions
references
what is newsela?
what is newsela pro?
how did i use newsela?
what activities did i do?
martin luther king, jr.
sleep
immigrants
economics
technology
empathy
assessments
how can newsela be used
newsela & newsela pro: disadvantages
student reactions
conclusion
1. they are short
2. they are visual and text-averse
4. they require practice
5. they promote “skills”
6. they can be modified
course
level
topic
class size
10×20 pechakucha (3:30)
not read
feedback
course:
level
topic
class size
10×20 pechakucha (3:30)
course:
level
topic
class size
 5 slide pechakucha (2:40)
update
original review: 
step 1: the developer tab
file -> options -> customize ribbo
step 2: adding a text box
step 3: changing the text-box properties
step 4: copy, paste, resize
step 5: save
caveats
i
what does the research say?
zhang’s action research
my experiences
refers to a claim
agree or disagree
gives reasons
good evaluation
focus on the claim
questions/criteria
points
total
 __ / 12
overall impressions
references
what is newsela?
what is newsela pro?
how did i use newsela?
what activities did i do?
martin luther king, jr.
sleep
immigrants
economics
technology
empathy
assessments
how can newsela be used
newsela & newsela pro: disadvantages
student reactions
conclusion
1. they are short
2. they are visual and text-averse
4. they require practice
5. they promote “skills”
6. they can be modified
course
level
topic
class size
10×20 pechakucha (3:30)
not read
feedback
course:
level
topic
class size
10×20 pechakucha (3:30)
course:
level
topic
class size
 5 slide pechakucha (2:40)
update
original review: 
step 1: the developer tab
file -> options -> customize ribbo
step 2: adding a text box
step 3: changing the text-box properties
step 4: copy, paste, resize
step 5: save
caveats
em what does the research say?
zhang’s action research
my experiences
refers to a claim
agree or disagree
gives reasons
good evaluation
focus on the claim
questions/criteria
points
total
 __ / 12
overall impressions
references
what is newsela?
what is newsela pro?
how did i use newsela?
what activities did i do?
martin luther king, jr.
sleep
immigrants
economics
technology
empathy
assessments
how can newsela be used
newsela & newsela pro: disadvantages
student reactions
conclusion
1. they are short
2. they are visual and text-averse
4. they require practice
5. they promote “skills”
6. they can be modified
course
level
topic
class size
10×20 pechakucha (3:30)
not read
feedback
course:
level
topic
class size
10×20 pechakucha (3:30)
course:
level
topic
class size
 5 slide pechakucha (2:40)
update
original review: 
step 1: the developer tab
file -> options -> customize ribbo
step 2: adding a text box
step 3: changing the text-box properties
step 4: copy, paste, resize
step 5: save
caveats
Bolds strong 60
b 60
i 60
em 60
Zawartość strony internetowej powinno zawierać więcej niż 250 słów, z stopa tekst / kod jest wyższy niż 20%.
Pozycji używać znaczników (h1, h2, h3, ...), aby określić temat sekcji lub ustępów na stronie, ale zwykle, użyj mniej niż 6 dla każdego tagu pozycje zachować swoją stronę zwięzły.
Styl używać silnych i kursywy znaczniki podkreślić swoje słowa kluczowe swojej stronie, ale nie nadużywać (mniej niż 16 silnych tagi i 16 znaczników kursywy)

Statystyki strony

twitter:title pusty
twitter:description pusty
google+ itemprop=name pusty
Pliki zewnętrzne 45
Pliki CSS 11
Pliki javascript 34
Plik należy zmniejszyć całkowite odwołanie plików (CSS + JavaScript) do 7-8 maksymalnie.

Linki wewnętrzne i zewnętrzne

Linki 206
Linki wewnętrzne 14
Linki zewnętrzne 192
Linki bez atrybutu Title 162
Linki z atrybutem NOFOLLOW 0
Linki - Użyj atrybutu tytuł dla każdego łącza. Nofollow link jest link, który nie pozwala wyszukiwarkom boty zrealizują są odnośniki no follow. Należy zwracać uwagę na ich użytkowania

Linki wewnętrzne

skip to content #content
blog topics #
more #
contact #ppsshowpopup_100
my tweets
my tweets
cancel #cancel

Linki zewnętrzne

welcome to

anthony teacher.com

http://www.anthonyteacher.com/
home http://www.anthonyteacher.com
activity http://www.anthonyteacher.com/tag/activity
anthony http://www.anthonyteacher.com/tag/anthony
assessment http://www.anthonyteacher.com/tag/assessment
board http://www.anthonyteacher.com/tag/board
code http://www.anthonyteacher.com/tag/code
course books http://www.anthonyteacher.com/tag/course-books
ddl http://www.anthonyteacher.com/tag/ddl
autonomy http://www.anthonyteacher.com/tag/autonomy
eap http://www.anthonyteacher.com/tag/eap
google http://www.anthonyteacher.com/tag/google
grammar http://www.anthonyteacher.com/tag/grammar
ice breakers http://www.anthonyteacher.com/tag/ice-breakers
ideas http://www.anthonyteacher.com/tag/ideas
learning styles http://www.anthonyteacher.com/tag/learning-styles
linguistics http://www.anthonyteacher.com/tag/linguistics
listening http://www.anthonyteacher.com/tag/listening
ma tesol http://www.anthonyteacher.com/tag/ma-tesol
materials http://www.anthonyteacher.com/tag/materials
mobile learning http://www.anthonyteacher.com/tag/mobile-learning
music http://www.anthonyteacher.com/tag/music
professional development http://www.anthonyteacher.com/tag/professional-development
pronunciation http://www.anthonyteacher.com/tag/pronunciation
rant http://www.anthonyteacher.com/tag/rant
reading http://www.anthonyteacher.com/tag/reading
reflections http://www.anthonyteacher.com/tag/reflections
research http://www.anthonyteacher.com/tag/research
resumes http://www.anthonyteacher.com/tag/resumes
reviews http://www.anthonyteacher.com/tag/reviews
rubrics http://www.anthonyteacher.com/tag/rubrics
self-study http://www.anthonyteacher.com/tag/self-study
tools http://www.anthonyteacher.com/tag/tools
video http://www.anthonyteacher.com/tag/videos
vocabulary http://www.anthonyteacher.com/tag/vocabulary
website http://www.anthonyteacher.com/tag/website
writing http://www.anthonyteacher.com/tag/writing
research bites http://www.anthonyteacher.com/category/blog/researchbites
principled washback http://www.anthonyteacher.com/category/blog/principledwashback
listening resources http://www.anthonyteacher.com/listening-resources
elt job interview question database http://www.anthonyteacher.com/elt-job-interview-database
student work http://www.anthonyteacher.com/category/studentwork
facebook http://www.facebook.com/anthonyteacherr
twitter http://www.twitter.com/anthonyteacher
off course: a comparison of university and eap coursebook writing tasks – #tesol2017 http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/off-course-a-comparison-of-university-and-eap-coursebook-writing-tasks-tesol2017
summaries, responses, and short answers…oh my! – using student samples in writing instruction http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/summaries-responses-and-short-answers-oh-my-using-student-samples-in-writing-instruction
navigating newsela: eight weeks of reading instruction with newsela.com http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/navigating-newsela-eight-weeks-of-reading-instruction-with-newsela-com
the power of pechakucha http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/the-power-of-pechakucha
deconstructing the duolingo english test (det) http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/deconstructing-the-duolingo-english-test-det
what do martial arts and language learning have in common? http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/what-do-martial-arts-and-language-learning-have-in-common
powerpoint hack: use powerpoint like a whiteboard http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/powerpoint-hack-use-powerpoint-like-a-whiteboard
writing for the world / a world of writing skills: a wikipedia project http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/writing-for-the-world-a-world-of-writing-skills-a-wikipeda-project
to be or not to be or to not be: an exploration of corpora and viscera http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/to-be-or-not-to-be-or-to-not-be
one more thanksgiving lesson: four skills and synthesis writing http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/one-more-thanksgiving-lesson-four-skills-and-synthesis-writing
- https://www.greengeeks.com/track/anthonyteacher/cp-default
- http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/off-course-a-comparison-of-university-and-eap-coursebook-writing-tasks-tesol2017
off course: a comparison of university and eap coursebook writing tasks – #tesol2017 http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/off-course-a-comparison-of-university-and-eap-coursebook-writing-tasks-tesol2017
powerpoint (in pdf format) http://www.anthonyteacher.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/off-course-a-comparison-of-university-and-eap-writing-tasks.pdf
my handout http://www.anthonyteacher.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/off-course-a-comparison-of-university-and-eap-writing-tasks-handout.pdf
facebook http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/off-course-a-comparison-of-university-and-eap-coursebook-writing-tasks-tesol2017?share=facebook
twitter http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/off-course-a-comparison-of-university-and-eap-coursebook-writing-tasks-tesol2017?share=twitter
google http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/off-course-a-comparison-of-university-and-eap-coursebook-writing-tasks-tesol2017?share=google-plus-1
email http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/off-course-a-comparison-of-university-and-eap-coursebook-writing-tasks-tesol2017?share=email
http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/off-course-a-comparison-of-university-and-eap-coursebook-writing-tasks-tesol2017
anthony schmidt http://www.anthonyteacher.com/author/admin
research http://www.anthonyteacher.com/tag/research
writing http://www.anthonyteacher.com/tag/writing
leave a comment http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/off-course-a-comparison-of-university-and-eap-coursebook-writing-tasks-tesol2017#respond
- http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/summaries-responses-and-short-answers-oh-my-using-student-samples-in-writing-instruction
summaries, responses, and short answers…oh my! – using student samples in writing instruction http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/summaries-responses-and-short-answers-oh-my-using-student-samples-in-writing-instruction
for this article https://newsela.com/articles/sleepy-students/id/5128/
this article https://newsela.com/articles/eatlessmeat-procon/id/13884/
this text on driverless cars https://newsela.com/articles/selfdrivingcars-procon/id/15469/
this article about a horseless carriage https://newsela.com/articles/historic-news-horselesscarriage/id/17692/
facebook http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/summaries-responses-and-short-answers-oh-my-using-student-samples-in-writing-instruction?share=facebook
twitter http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/summaries-responses-and-short-answers-oh-my-using-student-samples-in-writing-instruction?share=twitter
google http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/summaries-responses-and-short-answers-oh-my-using-student-samples-in-writing-instruction?share=google-plus-1
email http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/summaries-responses-and-short-answers-oh-my-using-student-samples-in-writing-instruction?share=email
http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/summaries-responses-and-short-answers-oh-my-using-student-samples-in-writing-instruction
anthony schmidt http://www.anthonyteacher.com/author/admin
reading http://www.anthonyteacher.com/tag/reading
reflections http://www.anthonyteacher.com/tag/reflections
writing http://www.anthonyteacher.com/tag/writing
leave a comment http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/summaries-responses-and-short-answers-oh-my-using-student-samples-in-writing-instruction#respond
- http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/navigating-newsela-eight-weeks-of-reading-instruction-with-newsela-com
navigating newsela: eight weeks of reading instruction with newsela.com http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/navigating-newsela-eight-weeks-of-reading-instruction-with-newsela-com
newsela http://www.newsela.com
- http://www.anthonyteacher.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/newsela.jpg
this set https://newsela.com/text-sets/160153/mlk
topical knowledge http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/researchbites/research-bites-integrating-reading-and-writing
a number of sleep-related articles https://newsela.com/text-sets/159578/sleep
this article https://newsela.com/articles/immigration-primer/id/26268/
an article related to the travel ban https://newsela.com/articles/travel-ban-refugees/id/26344/
an article related to the wall https://newsela.com/articles/immigration-executive-order/id/26222/
a background article https://newsela.com/articles/overview-gdp/id/21261/
happiness planet index http://www.ted.com/talks/nic_marks_the_happy_planet_index
visual literacy http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/principledwashback/principled-washback-critical-thinking-infographics-and-ielts-task-1
this article about global warming https://newsela.com/articles/kquinn-climateoped/id/16239/
this pro/con article about meat and global warming https://newsela.com/articles/eatlessmeat-procon/id/13884/
a pro/con article about driverless cars https://newsela.com/articles/procon-self-driving-cars-future/id/21480/
tennis-style whole-class debate http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/i-told-my-students-to-choose-the-final-assessment-and-then-left-the-room-you-wont-believe-what-happened-next
this article from 1896 about the introduction of horseless carriages https://newsela.com/articles/historic-news-horselesscarriage/id/17692/
aziz abu sarah’s experiences with at the world cup http://video.nationalgeographic.com/video/news/140710-world-cup-soccer-aziz
an article about mixed-race children and teens in seattle https://newsela.com/articles/seattle-multiracial-diversity/id/20977/
an article from a text set i put together that was related to cultural conflict https://newsela.com/text-sets/181778/schmidtspeecheswieselindifference
integrate reading and writing at lower levels http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/integrating-reading-and-writing-at-lower-levels
academic reading circles http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/riding-the-arc-experiences-with-academic-reading-circles
facebook http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/navigating-newsela-eight-weeks-of-reading-instruction-with-newsela-com?share=facebook
twitter http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/navigating-newsela-eight-weeks-of-reading-instruction-with-newsela-com?share=twitter
google http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/navigating-newsela-eight-weeks-of-reading-instruction-with-newsela-com?share=google-plus-1
email http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/navigating-newsela-eight-weeks-of-reading-instruction-with-newsela-com?share=email
http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/navigating-newsela-eight-weeks-of-reading-instruction-with-newsela-com
anthony schmidt http://www.anthonyteacher.com/author/admin
reading http://www.anthonyteacher.com/tag/reading
reflections http://www.anthonyteacher.com/tag/reflections
writing http://www.anthonyteacher.com/tag/writing
leave a comment http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/navigating-newsela-eight-weeks-of-reading-instruction-with-newsela-com#respond
- http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/the-power-of-pechakucha
the power of pechakucha http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/the-power-of-pechakucha
pechakucha https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/pechakucha
pechakucha nights http://www.pechakucha.org/
model pechakucha http://www.pechakucha.org/presentations/debunking-myths-about-memory-in-court
facebook http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/the-power-of-pechakucha?share=facebook
twitter http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/the-power-of-pechakucha?share=twitter
google http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/the-power-of-pechakucha?share=google-plus-1
email http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/the-power-of-pechakucha?share=email
http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/the-power-of-pechakucha
anthony schmidt http://www.anthonyteacher.com/author/admin
ideas http://www.anthonyteacher.com/tag/ideas
presentations http://www.anthonyteacher.com/tag/presentations
speaking http://www.anthonyteacher.com/tag/speaking
6 comments http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/the-power-of-pechakucha#comments
- http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/deconstructing-the-duolingo-english-test-det
deconstructing the duolingo english test (det) http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/deconstructing-the-duolingo-english-test-det
https://www.duolingo.com/research https://www.duolingo.com/research
duolingo http://www.duolingo.com
duolingo english test https://englishtest.duolingo.com/
made some buzz http://www.slate.com/blogs/moneybox/2014/04/25/duolingo_tests_the_language_learning_app_will_offer_english_proficiency.html
continue reading http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/deconstructing-the-duolingo-english-test-det#more-8063
facebook http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/deconstructing-the-duolingo-english-test-det?share=facebook
twitter http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/deconstructing-the-duolingo-english-test-det?share=twitter
google http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/deconstructing-the-duolingo-english-test-det?share=google-plus-1
email http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/deconstructing-the-duolingo-english-test-det?share=email
http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/deconstructing-the-duolingo-english-test-det
anthony schmidt http://www.anthonyteacher.com/author/admin
assessment http://www.anthonyteacher.com/tag/assessment
leave a comment http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/deconstructing-the-duolingo-english-test-det#respond
- http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/what-do-martial-arts-and-language-learning-have-in-common
what do martial arts and language learning have in common? http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/what-do-martial-arts-and-language-learning-have-in-common
skill acquisition theory http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/researchbites/research-bites-skill-acquisition-theory-and-language-learning
spada & tomita, 2010 http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/researchbites/research-bites-explicit-vs-implicit-grammar-instruction
anderson, 2016 http://www.elted.net/uploads/7/3/1/6/7316005/3_vol.19_anderson.pdf
- http://www.anthonyteacher.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/16426246_1323987410978532_7866671329025219839_n.jpg
facebook http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/what-do-martial-arts-and-language-learning-have-in-common?share=facebook
twitter http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/what-do-martial-arts-and-language-learning-have-in-common?share=twitter
google http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/what-do-martial-arts-and-language-learning-have-in-common?share=google-plus-1
email http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/what-do-martial-arts-and-language-learning-have-in-common?share=email
http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/what-do-martial-arts-and-language-learning-have-in-common
anthony schmidt http://www.anthonyteacher.com/author/admin
anthony http://www.anthonyteacher.com/tag/anthony
reflections http://www.anthonyteacher.com/tag/reflections
leave a comment http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/what-do-martial-arts-and-language-learning-have-in-common#respond
- http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/powerpoint-hack-use-powerpoint-like-a-whiteboard
powerpoint hack: use powerpoint like a whiteboard http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/powerpoint-hack-use-powerpoint-like-a-whiteboard
- http://www.anthonyteacher.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/pptwhiteboard1.jpg
- http://www.anthonyteacher.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/developeroptions.jpg
- http://www.anthonyteacher.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/developertab.jpg
facebook http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/powerpoint-hack-use-powerpoint-like-a-whiteboard?share=facebook
twitter http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/powerpoint-hack-use-powerpoint-like-a-whiteboard?share=twitter
google http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/powerpoint-hack-use-powerpoint-like-a-whiteboard?share=google-plus-1
email http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/powerpoint-hack-use-powerpoint-like-a-whiteboard?share=email
http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/powerpoint-hack-use-powerpoint-like-a-whiteboard
anthony schmidt http://www.anthonyteacher.com/author/admin
ideas http://www.anthonyteacher.com/tag/ideas
tools http://www.anthonyteacher.com/tag/tools
2 comments http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/powerpoint-hack-use-powerpoint-like-a-whiteboard#comments
http://www.anthonyteacher.com/page/2
off course: a comparison of university and eap coursebook writing tasks – #tesol2017 http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/off-course-a-comparison-of-university-and-eap-coursebook-writing-tasks-tesol2017
summaries, responses, and short answers…oh my! – using student samples in writing instruction http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/summaries-responses-and-short-answers-oh-my-using-student-samples-in-writing-instruction
navigating newsela: eight weeks of reading instruction with newsela.com http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/navigating-newsela-eight-weeks-of-reading-instruction-with-newsela-com
the power of pechakucha http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/the-power-of-pechakucha
deconstructing the duolingo english test (det) http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/deconstructing-the-duolingo-english-test-det
what do martial arts and language learning have in common? http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/what-do-martial-arts-and-language-learning-have-in-common
powerpoint hack: use powerpoint like a whiteboard http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/powerpoint-hack-use-powerpoint-like-a-whiteboard
writing for the world / a world of writing skills: a wikipedia project http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/writing-for-the-world-a-world-of-writing-skills-a-wikipeda-project
to be or not to be or to not be: an exploration of corpora and viscera http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/to-be-or-not-to-be-or-to-not-be
one more thanksgiving lesson: four skills and synthesis writing http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/one-more-thanksgiving-lesson-four-skills-and-synthesis-writing
- https://www.greengeeks.com/track/anthonyteacher/cp-default
proudly powered by wordpress http://wordpress.org/
automattic http://automattic.com/
anthony teacher.com http://www.anthonyteacher.com/
proudly powered by wordpress https://wordpress.org/

Zdjęcia

Zdjęcia 19
Zdjęcia bez atrybutu ALT 14
Zdjęcia bez atrybutu TITLE 19
Korzystanie Obraz ALT i TITLE atrybutu dla każdego obrazu.

Zdjęcia bez atrybutu TITLE

https://ads.greengeeks.com/0001009.gif
http://www.anthonyteacher.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/welcome-e1490328998648-770x226.jpg
http://www.anthonyteacher.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/writing-1-e1488822513170-770x169.jpg
http://www.anthonyteacher.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/newsela-770x371.jpg
http://www.anthonyteacher.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/newsela.jpg
http://www.anthonyteacher.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/newsela_analytics1.jpg
http://www.anthonyteacher.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/newsela_analytics2.jpg
http://www.anthonyteacher.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/newselaeval.jpg
http://www.anthonyteacher.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/pechakucha.jpg
http://www.anthonyteacher.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/duorun.jpg
http://www.anthonyteacher.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/16426246_1323987410978532_7866671329025219839_n-e1486089544323-770x297.jpg
http://www.anthonyteacher.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/16426246_1323987410978532_7866671329025219839_n.jpg
http://www.anthonyteacher.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/developertab-770x112.jpg
http://www.anthonyteacher.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/pptwhiteboard1.jpg
http://www.anthonyteacher.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/developeroptions.jpg
http://www.anthonyteacher.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/developertab.jpg
http://www.anthonyteacher.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/propertysheet.jpg
https://ads.greengeeks.com/0001009.gif
http://www.anthonyteacher.com/wp-content/plugins/jetpack/modules/sharedaddy/images/loading.gif

Zdjęcia bez atrybutu ALT

https://ads.greengeeks.com/0001009.gif
http://www.anthonyteacher.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/welcome-e1490328998648-770x226.jpg
http://www.anthonyteacher.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/writing-1-e1488822513170-770x169.jpg
http://www.anthonyteacher.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/newsela-770x371.jpg
http://www.anthonyteacher.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/newsela.jpg
http://www.anthonyteacher.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/newsela_analytics1.jpg
http://www.anthonyteacher.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/newsela_analytics2.jpg
http://www.anthonyteacher.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/newselaeval.jpg
http://www.anthonyteacher.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/pechakucha.jpg
http://www.anthonyteacher.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/duorun.jpg
http://www.anthonyteacher.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/16426246_1323987410978532_7866671329025219839_n-e1486089544323-770x297.jpg
http://www.anthonyteacher.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/16426246_1323987410978532_7866671329025219839_n.jpg
http://www.anthonyteacher.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/developertab-770x112.jpg
https://ads.greengeeks.com/0001009.gif

Ranking:


Alexa Traffic
Daily Global Rank Trend
Daily Reach (Percent)









Majestic SEO











Text on page:

welcome to anthony teacher.com menu widgets social links search skip to content home blog topics activity anthony assessment board code course books ddl autonomy eap google grammar ice breakers ideas learning styles linguistics listening ma tesol materials mobile learning music professional development pronunciation rant reading reflections research resumes reviews rubrics self-study tools video vocabulary website writing research bites principled washback more listening resources elt job interview question database student work contact facebook twitter recent posts off course: a comparison of university and eap coursebook writing tasks – #tesol2017 summaries, responses, and short answers…oh my! – using student samples in writing instruction navigating newsela: eight weeks of reading instruction with newsela.com the power of pechakucha deconstructing the duolingo english test (det) what do martial arts and language learning have in common? powerpoint hack: use powerpoint like a whiteboard writing for the world / a world of writing skills: a wikipedia project to be or not to be or to not be: an exploration of corpora and viscera one more thanksgiving lesson: four skills and synthesis writing proudly ran with clean energy disclaimer this is a personal blog. the opinions, ideas and typos here represent my own and not those of my employer. subscribe to blog via email enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. join 103 other subscribers email address @twittermy tweets search for: off course: a comparison of university and eap coursebook writing tasks – #tesol2017 here, you can find both my powerpoint (in pdf format) and my handout from my presentation today (march 23) at tesol 2017 in seattle. my presentation looked at my research comparing university writing tasks and eap coursebook writing tasks. thanks for attending or checking out my material. comments and feedback are appreciated! share this:facebooktwittergoogleemaillike this:like loading... march 24, 2017anthony schmidt research, writing leave a comment summaries, responses, and short answers…oh my! – using student samples in writing instruction last year at the 2016 setesol conference in louisville, kentucky, i attended a presentation on using student samples in summary writing instruction. the presentation was given by dr. cui zhang, and it consisted of a literature review and her own action research. i was intrigued by the idea because, unlike peer review where effectiveness is hit or miss and the focus could be on anything from grammar to structure, analyzing student examples allows for the precise identification and evaluation of specific aspects of a writing. this type of analysis allows students to see various ways students were able to successfully or unsuccessfully achieve a specific goal, one which they also have attempted. i recently incorporated zhang’s ideas with not only summary writing but also response writing and short-answer writing, and i saw immediate positive results in student revisions and subsequent writing. therefore, i wanted to share these ideas with you. what does the research say? baba, 2009: reading comprehension plays a large role in successful summary writing, while the role of lexical proficiency varies. however, “well-structured semantic network of words and the ability to productively use this network as well as the l2 writer’s metalinguistic knowledge” also has an influence. keck, 2006: l2 writers paraphrase less and copy more of a source text than l1 writers. demaree et al., 2008: students feel that summary writing is useful, and it is better done when there is an authentic purpose (such as preparing for an exam). students feel the only summary writing audience is themselves and it is not very helpful for others. mcdonough et al., 2014: summary writing improves over time, but requires explicit instruction and may be a lengthy process. the authors looked at reference to the source (increase), verbatim copying (increase in frequency, decrease in length), a “phrase-level modifications” (no change). according to the authors: “the path toward eliminating textual misappropriation may be both indirect and lengthy.” becker, 2016: students who develop or practice applying a rubric show greater increases in summary writing performance. zhang’s action research the goal of zhang’s research was to see if students could reliably judge summaries written by their peers and then use these judgments to improve their own summary writing. zhang worked with 9 students in a university-level esl course. after a text was read and summaries were written, zhang collected the summaries and chose several for analysis. they analyzed the summaries without a rubric and discussed their judgments. they read a second article and then produced another summary. overall, zhang found that students could all find the weaknesses or strengths in the summaries and their own summary writing did improve, though not to the point of perfection. she recommends that summary improvement will take time. she also recommends that using previous students’ writing rather than writings from the current students may reduce some reluctance to judge their peers. my experiences summaries – in my classes, i followed a similar procedure for this article. however, i used a modified checklist rubric to help students evaluate the summaries. i gave students a handout with 4 summaries collected from students. they were modified for clarity (grammar, spelling) and were chosen because they represented very poor, fair, and great summaries. here is an example (note: the bullets on the right were actually check boxes): although sleepiness is a part of life, it seems difficult for schools to start school late. the students can change their schedule to get enough sleep. whether someone likes it or not, adequate sleep is important for our lives, and it’s especially necessary for children. the more sleep, the healthier and happier life people will have. this summary… …introduced the article and the author. …contained the overall main idea in the second sentence. …contained all the main ideas: not enough sleep they are busy, puberty, school should start later starting school later is difficult …had no extra details. …had no change of meaning …was written in the student’s .own words. from the four different examples, most students were able to identify the best summary and understand what it had that the others were lacking. after the group discussions, a class discussion of each summary entailed, each time highlighting the elements that were missing or included. this was an attempt to be explicit and reinforce what a good summary contained. after this activity, students revised their summaries. about a week later, they also wrote new summaries, and for many i saw great improvement. in particular, there were more references to the original source text (according to [author], in [title],…) and less verbatim copying. however, there were still issues with including main ideas and excluding irrelevant details. this showed me that being able to identify what is important was something that needed to be focused on more in class. responses – a summary is a pretty straight forward genre that requires students to simply retell important details using new words. responses, on the other hand, are more varied in terms of content. with only minor directions (“give your evaluation of the article”) and no instruction, student responses to this article went from clear evaluation of the original text to complete departures and explorations of students’ own, often unrelated, opinions. i saw another chance for students to analyze student samples and improve their writing. since no students completed the assignment correctly, i collected 3 student samples and wrote a fourth. i then created another check list rubric that students could use to evaluate the articles. students discussed the responses together and then we discussed them as a class. here is an example from the handout: i agree with the pro statement that people should eat less meat. first, eating less meat is healthy for us. people will be less obese and avoid disease. second, we should eat more fruit, vegetables and cereals. these plants need to use machines and they need to use the power. people should use more solar energy, wind energy and water energy to generate electricity. finally, we should plant more trees because the trees can help reserve the water and prevent soil erosion. the student refers to a claim in the article the student states whether they agree or disagree with a claim from the article. the student gives reasons why they agree or disagree. these reasons show good evaluation of the claim. the reasons focus on the claim and not unrelated ideas. for this rubric, i was trying to direct students to the fact that a response to an article is not simply an opinion of the topic but an analysis of the ideas contained in the article. in other words, the focus should still be on the article, not only the student’s opinion. and even when the opinion is given, it must be clearly related to the ideas in the article. this seemed like the first time students encountered such an assignment and the evaluation clearly – hence me writing a fourth example. as with the summaries, student revisions and subsequent writings showed some improvement. short answer – seeing a pattern in students writing and their familiarity with writing assignments, i preempted difficulty with short answer writing assignments and gave students explicit and step-by-step instructions in both understanding the question and writing the answer. working with this text on driverless cars, we first looked at the default writing prompt from newsela: summarize the central idea of either the pro or the con article in a few lines. what claims made by the author of the chosen article are not supported by evidence? give two-three examples from the text to better illustrate your point. we analyzed this assignment by breaking it down into parts: in your own words, write the main idea of the pro or con article in a sentence or two answer this question: what claims are weak because they lack evidence? answer this question: what are two or three examples that show there is a lack of evidence. students seemed genuinely surprised that the question was very complex. therefore, this question analysis proved to be very valuable. we then discussed how to answer this question in a paragraph and wrote a model answer together. for homework, i had students consider the driverless car article as well as this article about a horseless carriage. i then gave them the choice of answering one of these questions: what similarities exist between horseless carriages and driverless cars? provide two or three examples from the text to help support your point. how do technological advances like new types of automobiles affect everyday life? use one or two examples from each article to explain past or future changes. do you think the author of this article would share similar opinions (or tones) as the pro or con author? provide two or three examples from the text to help support your point. (no students answered this question). i collected the student examples in the next class and redistributed them to students individually. i then gave each student the following rubric: questions/criteria points did they try to answer all parts of the question? only one part: 1 point | both parts: 2 points did they provide evidence from both articles? only one article: 1 point | both articles: 2 points did they do a good job answering the question? yes (3 pts) no (1 pt) maybe (2 pts) (please explain on the back of this paper) did they use phrases such as “according to” or “the author states”? yes (1 pts) no (0 pts) did they give extra details that were unnecessary? yes (-1 pt) no (1 pt) did they write a summary? yes (-2 pts) no (1 pt) did they give an opinion that was unrelated to the questions? yes (-2 pts) no (1 pt) was the answer easy to understand? yes (1 pts) no (0 pts) total  __ / 12 students had about 20 minutes to read and analyze the answer they were given. i assisted students with answering questions, and i prompted students to leave clear feedback on the back of the paper. as students worked, i made sure their analyses were accurate, and if i disagreed with a student, i asked them to provide justification for me. sometimes i had to gently nudge students to fix their analysis because they had clearly misunderstood something. however, more times than not, students noticed something that i had overlooked. after the 20 minutes, i collected the answers and the rubrics and redistributed them to the appropriate students. i then gave students the rest of class to revise their answers, if necessary, and ask me any questions to clarify or improve their writing. for most students, there was immediate improvement. on a subsequent reading test that involved a short-answer question, i saw more answers that fully answered all parts of the questions, something they had been previously lacking. overall impressions i found that getting students to analyze student samples was very effective at not only understanding what good writing should contain, but also at helping to clarify writing expectations, something that is often hard to communicate, especially with unfamiliar genres or complex assignments. for most of these assignments, i provided rubrics beforehand, but students often do not pay attention to them. however, even if students had focused on them, i believe that providing rubrics afterward, focusing greater applied attention on them, and then allowing students to revise their writing could have a great positive impact on their writing. references baba, k. (2009). aspects of lexical proficiency in writing summaries in a foreign language. journal of second language writing, 18(3), 191-208. becker, a. (2016). student-generated scoring rubrics: examining their formative value for improving esl students’ writing performance. assessing writing, 29, 15-24. demaree, d., allie, s., low, m., & taylor, j. (2008, october). quantitative and qualitative analysis of student textbook summary writing. in c. henderson, m. sabella, & l. hsu (eds.), aip conference proceedings (vol. 1064, no. 1, pp. 107-110). aip. keck, c. (2006). the use of paraphrase in summary writing: a comparison of l1 and l2 writers. journal of second language writing, 15(4), 261-278. mcdonough, k., crawford, w. j., & de vleeschauwer, j. (2014). summary writing in a thai efl university context. journal of second language writing, 24, 20-32. share this:facebooktwittergoogleemaillike this:like loading... march 6, 2017anthony schmidt reading, reflections, writing leave a comment navigating newsela: eight weeks of reading instruction with newsela.com i was lucky enough to get a pro subscription to newsela and the chance to pilot using it as a main text source in an intermediate reading course this term. this blog post will detail my (and my students) experiences using newsela for 8 weeks, its advantages and disadvantages, and how it could be used in your own classes. what is newsela? newsela is a visually appealing, daily news website that offers readings on current events, current issues, primary sources, historical articles, and a plethora of other categories (e.g. science, art, government, etc.). you can find historical texts in the time machine, speeches, biographies, important historical documents (in primary sources), and even greek myths. there is enough content to fit almost any course. each article is offered at 5 levels, from the original level (max) to levels as low and 4th or 5th grade. articles are adapted in terms of vocabulary and sentence structure while keeping the essential ideas from the original. each article also has a 4-question quiz and a writing prompt. readers can also use highlighter/annotation tools. newsela is useful for both extensive or intensive reading. what is newsela pro? with pro, you have the ability to make classes, assign articles, collect students’ quiz scores, grade writing prompts, and access analytics about students’ reading behaviors. while you cannot customize the quiz, you can customize the writing prompt. you can provide annotations to students (with the ability for students to reply) and see student highlights. you also have access to pro teacher resources, which give ideas on how to use articles in class, including activities, companion texts, etc. this includes access to suggested annotations for many articles. finally, you can also create “text sets” – groups of newsela articles. you cannot assign a set, but you can use the set to organize related readings or give students independent reading choices (note: you do have access to students’ independent reading through the pro dashboard). information about an assignment in newsela pro how did i use newsela? our class had a main coursebook (21st century reading, level 3) and newsela was used as an equal companion (as opposed to a subordinate supplement) to this text. based on the articles in the coursebook, i found related articles on newsela and assigned them as required reading and typically included discussion and activities using the articles in class. i required students to complete a quiz for each article, though this was not for a course grade but rather to test the analytics ability of newsela pro. i sometimes added writing prompts, but more often i gave separate writing assignments via google classroom. these typically required more work, space, formatting or steps than the simple newsela writing prompt box would allow students. what activities did i do? martin luther king, jr. mlk’s birthday occurred during the beginning of our term, so i used that opportunity to introduce both newsela and mlk via his “i have a dream speech”. students read the article in class (in the lab) and then answered discussion questions. then, we had a whole-class discussion about race and mlk’s influence. i originally planned to extend the lesson by having students read this set and come to class prepared to discuss whether mlk’s “dream” has been realized or not. unfortunately, time constraints forced me to skip this extension. sleep sleep was the topic of the first unit of the book, so i thought i could use newsela to build up students topical knowledge by reading a number of sleep-related articles. some of the instruction included identifying evidence in a text, referencing evidence, and how to write a summary.  immigrants donald trump’s travel ban made news during this term. students had expressed interest in discussing this topic. instead of just giving students articles on the travel ban, i first had students gather some background on the history of immigration to the united states. students read this article to prepare them for the discussion. in addition, students practiced their ability to understand numbers by highlighting (and writing down on a worksheet) interesting statistics and the years in which they occurred. in class the next day, we discussed the numbers and the history of immigration. students then completed a jigsaw reading activity based on an article related to the travel ban and an article related to the wall. after discussing the articles in groups, students worked together to answer one question: do trumps activities support the value of the united states? they had to use the immigration background article to ascertain america’s values and then compare those against trump’s actions, making a great discussion and a great comparison activity. economics the second unit that we used in the book was about economics. the article in the book begun with an interesting quote by robert kennedy: “yet the gross national product does not allow for the health of our children, the quality of their education or the joy of their play.  it does not include the beauty of our poetry or the strength of our marriages, the intelligence of our public debate or the integrity of our public officials. it measures neither our wit nor our courage, neither our wisdom nor our learning, neither our compassion nor our devotion to our country, it measures everything in short, except that which makes life worthwhile.” the focus of this unit was to understand how a nation is measured and to introduce happiness as one metric of measurement. before reading this article, i wanted students to have a good understanding of gdp, so students read a background article, which we used to introduce the topic in class. the coursebook article was based on a ted talk by nic marks and the happiness planet index. most of the week’s focus was on visual literacy and reading different charts related to this topic. however, we also worked on inferencing and applying an author’s ideas to a different text. in the coursebook article, the author identified certain things as positive or negative. so, to extend this skill, i had students read this article about global warming and then apply marks’ perspective to it, deciding whether he would consider the article to be positive and negative, as well as offering evidence as to why. this activity was tough for students, as it required finding evidence, identifying perspective, and comparing two articles. however, it was also good practice and informed a lively discussion. continuing our work with the article in the book, we looked at how the article compared two different ideas. we then used this article to write a summary in which two ideas are compared (as opposed to a just-the-facts linear summary). to give students independent practice, we read and analyzed this pro/con article about meat and global warming and then students summarized it on their own following the comparison model we had done previously. finally, we extended our use of this pro/con article by looking at response writing as part of the summary-response genre. typically, students take the response section to be a chance for them to give their own opinion, often disconnected from the article. so, we focused on how to choose ideas for evaluation and then how our evaluations serve as opinions. after students wrote their responses, i collected 4 exemplars and we analyzed them together in class following a rubric. students then had a chance to rewrite their responses following this analysis. technology our next unit was about cyborgs and technology. newsela has a great number of articles about cyborgs and people with prostheses. however, i chose to include a pro/con article about driverless cars because i wanted students to continue working with various perspectives and evidence and the opportunities to evaluate these against each other. we used this article to prepare for a class debate. students read the article and then worked in groups to analyze the evidence on both sides of the debate. they then took sides and focused on developing arguments and counter-arguments. finally, we had a tennis-style whole-class debate that was engaging for everyone. we used this text and the coursebook text to learn how to correctly answer short-answer writing questions. students had been having trouble fully answering such questions, often times providing one part or a half-answer. this was because they were not carefully reading the questions and realizing they were actually multi-part questions asking students to do several things. so, we used this article to practice that. the questions i had students answer required them to apply authors’ ideas by looking at the definition of what a cyborg is and using that to answer, in writing, whether someone using a driverless car is a cyborg. most said yes, but some said no. they had to cite evidence from the coursebook text to support their idea. as a follow-up, students read this article from 1896 about the introduction of horseless carriages (part of newsela’s “time machine” series). students worked together to compare and contrast the horseless carriage to the driverless car. surprisingly, there were more similarities than differences. empathy the last unit in the coursebook we read dealt aziz abu sarah’s experiences with at the world cup and how that event can be seen as a bridge building event. we looked at identifying an article’s purpose and then identifying an author’s tone. we then looked at an article about mixed-race children and teens in seattle in order to analyze each student’s tone based on the words they said. assessments throughout the term, i used newsela readings as part of formal assessments in class. i took readings and made them into quizzes to assess reading comprehension, summary writing, response, short-answer writing, etc. for the final writing assessment, i asked students to choose an article from a text set i put together that was related to cultural conflict and had students submit a summary, response, and comparison. how can newsela be used as my examples show, newsela can be used in a number of ways: as a source for background reading, as a main text from which to practice various intensive reading skills, as a set of texts to build topical knowledge and expertise, as a means to integrate reading and writing at lower levels, and even as a source for articles to use with academic reading circles. really, there are any number of ways to use newsela. the main point being that there is always new content, and you can almost always find something interesting to read. it just takes a bit of creativity on how to best employ it in the classroom. newsela & newsela pro: disadvantages while i am a huge fan of newsela and have found it to be immensely helpful in this course and others, it is not without its issues. for newsela pro, i found it to be extremely convenient to be able to assign and track students’ reading assignment fromnewsela pro’s binder feature. i liked seeing analytics such as how long they read for, their quiz scores at various levels, and their independent reading. however, i found the write prompt to be less useful than giving assignments on classroom – it is far too limited and suitable only for the most basic prompts, ones that require little to no feedback or revision. in addition, while the analytics were interesting, i am not so sure about their accuracy. one of my students was ranked in the highest percentile on newsela based on quiz scores yet he was average or below average in terms of reading quizzes and writing assessments given in class. i’m not sure how to make sense of this discrepancy. is newsela too easy? am i too difficult? in addition, some of my higher level students (in class) scored lower than expected on newsela, often times owing to understanding the quiz questions, which can sometimes be difficult for students. example analytics from a student’s reading profile is the pro account worth it? in general, if your program is willing to pay for the pro account, then i would definitely go for it. however, don’t let money stand in your way of using this great resource – what they offer for free is completely adequate and can be exploited to almost the same level as i have outlined above. are there any other issues with newsela? sure. their app on iphone and android is terrible. students had a lot of issues with it, including the app not refreshing to show new assignments. they often had to log out and log back in to see assignments. on both the app and the website, the binder was not always easy for students to use. they often didn’t know they had assignments waiting for them. newsela should definitely add some way for students to be notified of assignments, or at least make it more noticeable. in addition, newsela’s cookies are terrible. by this, i mean that i am constantly having to log-in to the website. it never remembers me and keeps me logged in. this is very minor, but it is quite annoying to always have to log in. finally, in terms of content, sometimes the adapted levels are too simple and consist only of simple sentences. while this is easy to read, the overuse of simple sentences seems limiting. using complex sentences with adverbials or subordinating conjunctions would not necessarily increase difficulty. doing so would allow students to see how ideas relate more clearly. using these kinds of structures combined with simple lexis could serve as a way to introduce students more slowly to features of academic and higher level discourse. student reactions again, issues aside, i have an overall positive assessment of newslea, but, what about my students? i had 14 students in my class and i surveyed them on using newsela. here are the questions and responses. what are some reasons you liked newsela? new information, new vocabulary fun topics a lot of interesting tipics i read some article to improve my reading and know news in english. i like simple web site system have different level i can choose the level in each aticle. fresh and advanced topic. easy to know what level you are because newsela has many subjects in diffrente fileds the activities i can search meaning easly you can change the levels, which is very nice to those low level readers such like me. i felt newsela is very friendly to me. what are some reasons you disliked newsela? newsela has some negative topics too much difficult issue article is long think about newsela and the textbook. which did you like more and why? textbook, it’s more easy to understand than newsela newsela because it is more clearly than the book newsela more simple with the quiz i am prefer to newsela because it is clearly for understanding. i like newsela more then text book because it can be change the reading level. textbook have video newsela is more interesting. anytime, anywhere i can read or study english, especially i can choose appropriate level for me. newsela app. is the best tool i like. newsela. because that makes you clearly to know which level is more suit to yourself. i like newsela for tha same reason i wrote it in the previous question i will choose newsela because there are a lot of interesting articles and you can make activities newsela newsela, because i have more choices. conclusion i hope i have made it clear that newsela is a very useful tool for any reading or writing course, at almost any level. i will continue to promote newsela as both a supplement and replacement for the coursebook. i will continue to work on different ways to use newsela in the eap classroom, including integrating reading and writing at lower levels. while preparing to use newsela pro, i became a newsela certified educator, so you may even see me presenting about some of these ideas at elt-related conferences! it is my hope that students can engage with content that is recent, relevant, and interesting. i hope that students engage with this content through reading, informed writing, and informed discussion. i see newsela as an important tool to help make this happen. share this:facebooktwittergoogleemaillike this:like loading... march 3, 2017anthony schmidt reading, reflections, writing leave a comment the power of pechakucha pechakucha has become quite a popular presentation format, perhaps coming in just under ted’s level of infamy. like ted, there are a number of “pechakucha nights” popping up in cities and at universities around the world. it has enjoyed this rise in status for good reason: people like the brevity, the visual appeal, and the informality. pechakuchas are typically 6 minute 40 second presentations consisting of 20 slides (or images) displayed for 20 seconds each. each slide automatically advances until the end, ensuring a presentation that is fast-paced, information dense, and has an end in sight. this model means that a number of speakers can present in a relatively short period of time. pechakucha makes a great presentation tool for the english language classroom. the goal of this blog post is to detail some of these reasons and show how pechakucha can be adapted for almost any context. my own project examples will also be given at the end. 1. they are short 30-minute group presentations are great in theory: students can share a lot of information and display in-depth research on important topics. but, how many can you fit in one class? in one week? in one term? pechakuchas will never be as thorough as the long-form presentation, but for typical class sizes (10 or more) they can be fit easily into 1 or 2 50-minute periods, especially if they are modified. the short time of pechakuchas has a number of benefits. first, it means you can fit many presentations into a single day or two, even building in a period of q&a that still doesn’t tack on too much in terms of time. second, because you can do so much in so little time, you can give students multiple chances over a term or semester to give presentations. that is, you can give them multiple chances to hone their presentation skills. the long-form group presentation, or even the 10-minute individual presentation, does not usually allow for this. third, you are working to the audience’s attention span. paying attention is hard. paying attention in a second language is even harder. there is a place and time to have an intense focus, but perhaps presentations are not the best, especially if the presenters are struggling or they did not follow directions completely (i.e. its their first presentation ever). the pechakucha model allows students in the audience to have sustained but relatively short focus – a kind of practiced or scaffolded exercise in paying attention. and, given that the model is visual, somewhat informal, and is more conducive to speaking rather than “reading” a presentation, the pechakucha presentation itself is usually more enjoyable to watch. the typical pechakucha is a 20×20 6:40 presentation. however, as you will see below, this can easily be modified into a 10×20 3:30 presentation (for larger classes) or even a 5×30. really, any combination of times and slides could work so long as the presentation stays true to the principle of pechakucha. 2. they are visual and text-averse pechakuchas appeal to audiences because they are extremely visual. a single slide usually consists of one or two images, and, not text walls – no long blocks of text that the speaker then reads to the audience. each slide’s visual can either serve as background support for the speaker or can be directly referred to by the speaker. plus this type of minimalist structure is often considered a good design principle for presentations, namely because it puts the focus on the speaker. 4. they require practice because students cannot rely on the text on the screen, they must put greater emphasis on practicing their presentation, memorizing their presentation, and/or preparing notes. timing here is also important. because the slides automatically advance, students need to make sure their information is timed correctly. therefore, they need to practice. increased practice means increased speaking (in private or public, to one’s self or their friends), which hopefully means increase in fluency. this format moves students away from “reading a presentation” (from a script or from slides) to speaking more naturally. 5. they promote “skills” pechakuchas do not sacrifice skills for time. discourse markers used during formal presentations can also be used during pechakuchas. warming up an audience, introducing topic, background, shifting topics, exemplification, definition, explanation – all of these moves and their rhetorical phrases can still be included. while pechakuchas cannot allow for the long-form exposition or for in-depth explanations of background, research methods, stats, or analysis, they do offer something longer presentation formats do not: conciseness. for a successful pechakucha, students need to be able to explain complex ideas or details in a compact way. they need to get to the point, and quick. this is a skill that is useful inside and outside the classroom, for almost any context! 6. they can be modified as i mentioned above, pechakuchas can be modified. here are a few examples of modified pechakuchas i have recently used: course: listening and speaking level: upper-intermediate, pre-advanced topic: ___ & the brain class size: 12 10×20 pechakucha (3:30) after watching a model pechakucha and explaining the traditional pechakucha format, students were given the following instructions: you must use the ppt i give you. i distributed blank, pre-formatted ppts to students. they had to simply add images, save, and upload. there were 11 slides in total. the final slide was a “thank you for listening” slide that ended the presentation. you must not write any text. actually, on the title slide, they were allowed to write their title and their name. you must memorize not read your presentation. some students did read their presentations. while this was bad for their grade, it was a great opportunity for the class to learn that spoken english is much easier to understand than english that is read aloud. you must practice your presentation for audio diary 3. i will give feedback before your presentation. students practiced their presentation and audio recorded it. they sent it to me, along with their script or notes, and i gave feedback on grammar, structure, and pronunciation. course: listening and speaking level: upper-intermediate, pre-advanced topic: open class size: 12  10×20 pechakucha (3:30) students did a final presentation based on an interesting topic and their own survey research. i gave them an example presentation outline that could help them structure their pechakucha: slide 1: introduction to topic slide 2-3: background/context of topic slide 4: your research method/questions slide 5: your survey data/ analysis slide 7-8: your survey discussion/ interpretation/ implications slide 9-10: conclusion there was a 3-minute period of question and answer afterwards. this presentation took two classes (two days) i also took the opportunity to go over more “presentation phrases” that we had learned from listening to lectures and ted talks. course: reading level:intermediate topic: book report class size: 14  5 slide pechakucha (2:40) students used this as part of the extensive reading program. they have read various books all term and ended with a presentation on their favorite book. slide 1 – 10s – introduction/title of book slide 2 – 60s – plot/summary slide 3 – 30s – favorite scene/character/part slide 4 – 60s – evaluation and recommendation slide 5 – 0s – thank you this was a highly structured and short pechakucha due to the limited class time and the limited time during the week to do it. however, students worked hard and employed a number of skills we had worked on for reading, namely summarization and evaluation. i’m not disparaging the long-form presentation. there is certainly a place for that, especially in eap. i am, however, trying to stress that pechakucha – in its original or modified forms – may be more appropriate or more effective in certain contexts. of course, maybe you already do something like this in your class.you don’t need to call it a pechakucha (in fact, for the last example above, i didn’t). the basic principles of being brief and having only visuals is common sense and hopefully common place. for those looking for a new way to do presentation, or some ideas on how to adapt their current projects, its my hope that the principles of pechakucha inspire greater presentations for the sake of the student….and for the sake of the audience who has to listen to that student (the teacher included). share this:facebooktwittergoogleemaillike this:like loading... february 20, 2017anthony schmidt ideas, presentations, speaking 6 comments deconstructing the duolingo english test (det) update: after writing my original review, i had a chance to talk with someone from duolingo who could explain a few things about the test and answer some questions. here are some notes from our conversation: the test was designed to be both quick and efficient, which is why it does not seem like any other english test. the det was trained on and calibrated to the cefr and is meant as a test of general english ability, not academic skills because some literature has shown scores on academic tests are not predictors of academic success. the test items on this test are based on ones that have been published in the literature. these published test items were shown to have great predictive abilities that gave accurate information about students’ reading, writing, comprehension, etc. this is especially true of the real vs. fake english word test items, which is said to be predictive of writing. there are a number of articles worth reading at https://www.duolingo.com/research. original review: duolingo is a great language learning tool. it can introduce you to the basics of a number of different languages through a fun, game-like app in which grammar and vocabulary are built up and reinforced through translation practice. i can thank duolingo for my basic ability in spanish and my deeper understanding of polish grammar. the duolingo english test (det), on the other hand, is absolutely terrible. last year, it made some buzz on the internet as a kind of toefl/ielts killer, a serious competitor to the big tests – one which was affordable (at $30) and accurate. i had a chance to take the test last week to see if it could serve our institute and students. i went into it very excited and came away with a very bad taste in my mouth. continue reading → share this:facebooktwittergoogleemaillike this:like loading... february 6, 2017anthony schmidt assessment leave a comment what do martial arts and language learning have in common? i step out of class dripping with sweat. my body is shaking and sore. thirst fills my mouth. walking into the cold night air is rejuvenating compared to the hot room i was just in. no, it’s not a language class. and no, i’m not the teacher. i’m talking about an average night at my mixed martial arts (mma) gym. on my drive home, while i’m mentally rehearsing hard crosses and switching from kimura to guillotine, it dawns on me that the teaching style of the gym seems very familiar. on a typical night after warming up, a technique is demonstrated to us, then we practice it slowly with a partner, increasing speed and power as we go along. the coaches answer questions and offers tweaks or tips. our partners work with us gently, allowing us to get the form down. towards the end of the night, we add resistance and something that simulates a more realistic – yet safe and friendly – match as we try to tackle or submit each other. make no mistake about it, this is ppp. it is explicit instruction and presentation, practice with feedback, and the slow removal of support (and the increase of complexity) until we have a production stage. and you know what? it works – over time. the students that have been there a while, and even some who have been there for a few months, seem to move fluently from technique to technique without effort. they can instinctively react to what their partner is doing, often times predicting what is going to come from subtle cues. they have flow, and it is automatic. it reminds me so much of language. the unconscious and conscious ability to respond to another person. the back and forth. the flow. one of the coaches constantly says that when we are “rolling” (wrestling), our partner’s movements are telling us what they are trying to do and what we can do. it’s no surprise he says that we are having “conversations”. now, martial arts is a skill. what about language learning? some would argue it is definitely not a skill, or at least not one that is a physical skills like martial arts. it is a skill that has severe interference from other languages spoken and involves a deeper level of cognitive processes. but, it is a skill nonetheless. according to skill acquisition theory, a skill is learned by engaging in the target behavior while relying on declarative knowledge (i.e. paying attention to the rule while practicing). strengthening and fine-tuning this knowledge through practice leads to automatizing it. practice is the key to it. this is as true for martial arts as it is for language. whether this practice comes from ppp, or from tblt, or some other model, it still remains that practice is important. and there is enough evidence that indicates that both explicit instruction (see spada & tomita, 2010) and ppp are in effective (see anderson, 2016) methods of instruction (this, of course, does not speak to pre-defined, grammar-based syllabus, but rather simply a mode of instruction, whether it comes pre-planned or as a way to address and emergent language). ppp has its issues, sure, but it has evidence and logic behind it. if you want to get good at something, you need practice and refinement, support and freedom. the next time you watch a ufc fighter, a jiu-jitsu competitor, or a proficient language user, think about how they got to where they are. it is possible that they “picked up” some of their skills along the way, but more than likely, it was a combination of instruction, feedback, and tons of practice. spot the teacher. where am i? share this:facebooktwittergoogleemaillike this:like loading... february 2, 2017anthony schmidt anthony, reflections leave a comment powerpoint hack: use powerpoint like a whiteboard sometimes, i don’t feel like writing things on the whiteboard. sometimes, i want to collect student ideas, but want them to be written clearly, neatly, and quickly, this blog post will demonstrate how i use powerpoint to achieve this. the end result looks like this: recording student-elicited vocabulary into my ppt step 1: the developer tab in order to accomplish this “hack,” you will need to have the developer tab activated on your toolbar/ribbon. to do this, you will need to go to file -> options -> customize ribbon and check the “developer” in the right-hand column. this will give you the following tab: step 2: adding a text box next, you will need to add a text box to your slide. click the [abc] icon (circled red above) and then draw your box anywhere on your slide. step 3: changing the text-box properties the text box is very limited in functionality unless you make several important changes to its properties. to do so, right-click on the box and choose “property sheet.” there are numerous changes that you can make. the most important are enterkeybehavior – change to “true”. this allows you to use the “enter” key to make new lines multiline – change to “true”. this allows the text box to display multiple lines font – this sets up your font, font size, and other font properties. other properties of note include: backcolor – change the background color forecolor – change the font color scrollbars – to have scrollbars in case text goes beyond the text box dimensions step 4: copy, paste, resize to use multiple text boxes, you do not have to complete the above steps. just copy and paste the box throughout your powerpoint. step 5: save save it. any text you type will be saved, too! caveats you are limited in color and making the box transparent has never worked for me. boxes cannot be animated. if you accidentally select “view code” instead of “property sheet” when you right-click on the box, saving might become more difficult as sometimes powerpoint thinks you have edited a macro and therefore need to save as a .pptm. if this happens, delete the code. i hope that you found this useful. please let me know if you have any questions or any suggestions for creative ways to use this! share this:facebooktwittergoogleemaillike this:like loading... december 20, 2016anthony schmidt ideas, tools 2 comments posts navigation ← welcome welcome to my blog, where i share my reflections, feelings, thoughts, research and experiences about english language teaching. recent posts off course: a comparison of university and eap coursebook writing tasks – #tesol2017 summaries, responses, and short answers…oh my! – using student samples in writing instruction navigating newsela: eight weeks of reading instruction with newsela.com the power of pechakucha deconstructing the duolingo english test (det) what do martial arts and language learning have in common? powerpoint hack: use powerpoint like a whiteboard writing for the world / a world of writing skills: a wikipedia project to be or not to be or to not be: an exploration of corpora and viscera one more thanksgiving lesson: four skills and synthesis writing proudly ran with clean energy disclaimer this is a personal blog. the opinions, ideas and typos here represent my own and not those of my employer. subscribe to blog via email enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. join 103 other subscribers email address @twittermy tweets © 2009-2017 anthony schmidt | proudly powered by wordpress | theme: sorbet by automattic. the thoughts expressed on this site are my own and do not represent any other institution. anthony teacher.com proudly powered by wordpress theme: sorbet child. send to email address your name your email address cancel post was not sent - check your email addresses! email check failed, please try again sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email. %d bloggers like this:


Here you find all texts from your page as Google (googlebot) and others search engines seen it.

Words density analysis:

Numbers of all words: 8055

One word

Two words phrases

Three words phrases

the - 7.32% (590)
and - 3.31% (267)
student - 1.75% (141)
for - 1.63% (131)
students - 1.38% (111)
his - 1.38% (111)
this - 1.3% (105)
our - 1.24% (100)
her - 1.18% (95)
tha - 1.12% (90)
pro - 1.08% (87)
you - 1.07% (86)
new - 0.98% (79)
use - 0.97% (78)
writing - 0.96% (77)
not - 0.91% (73)
con - 0.89% (72)
read - 0.88% (71)
that - 0.87% (70)
article - 0.87% (70)
news - 0.84% (68)
are - 0.83% (67)
newsela - 0.79% (64)
ted - 0.78% (63)
sent - 0.74% (60)
all - 0.73% (59)
wit - 0.72% (58)
they - 0.7% (56)
present - 0.63% (51)
can - 0.63% (51)
their - 0.58% (47)
reading - 0.57% (46)
with - 0.57% (46)
text - 0.57% (46)
how - 0.56% (45)
some - 0.55% (44)
presentation - 0.55% (44)
was - 0.52% (42)
class - 0.51% (41)
out - 0.51% (41)
like - 0.5% (40)
here - 0.5% (40)
- 0.47% (38)
more - 0.46% (37)
from - 0.43% (35)
one - 0.43% (35)
book - 0.43% (35)
answer - 0.43% (35)
low - 0.43% (35)
have - 0.42% (34)
question - 0.41% (33)
eat - 0.41% (33)
had - 0.4% (32)
red - 0.4% (32)
pechakucha - 0.38% (31)
time - 0.38% (31)
idea - 0.36% (29)
then - 0.36% (29)
ice - 0.36% (29)
form - 0.36% (29)
course - 0.36% (29)
your - 0.35% (28)
what - 0.35% (28)
level - 0.34% (27)
summary - 0.34% (27)
were - 0.32% (26)
has - 0.32% (26)
slide - 0.31% (25)
about - 0.31% (25)
there - 0.31% (25)
any - 0.3% (24)
end - 0.3% (24)
ideas - 0.3% (24)
work - 0.29% (23)
but - 0.29% (23)
app - 0.29% (23)
them - 0.29% (23)
log - 0.27% (22)
other - 0.27% (22)
give - 0.27% (22)
back - 0.27% (22)
each - 0.27% (22)
used - 0.26% (21)
point - 0.26% (21)
too - 0.26% (21)
see - 0.26% (21)
less - 0.26% (21)
practice - 0.26% (21)
skill - 0.25% (20)
topic - 0.25% (20)
because - 0.25% (20)
articles - 0.25% (20)
email - 0.25% (20)
language - 0.24% (19)
own - 0.24% (19)
assign - 0.24% (19)
part - 0.24% (19)
questions - 0.22% (18)
will - 0.22% (18)
way - 0.22% (18)
add - 0.22% (18)
term - 0.22% (18)
discuss - 0.22% (18)
than - 0.22% (18)
test - 0.21% (17)
power - 0.21% (17)
example - 0.21% (17)
search - 0.21% (17)
response - 0.21% (17)
instruction - 0.21% (17)
also - 0.2% (16)
great - 0.2% (16)
which - 0.2% (16)
very - 0.2% (16)
this: - 0.2% (16)
did - 0.2% (16)
using - 0.2% (16)
summaries - 0.2% (16)
two - 0.19% (15)
assignment - 0.19% (15)
box - 0.19% (15)
short - 0.19% (15)
get - 0.19% (15)
format - 0.17% (14)
even - 0.17% (14)
these - 0.17% (14)
while - 0.17% (14)
under - 0.17% (14)
research - 0.17% (14)
most - 0.16% (13)
stand - 0.16% (13)
focus - 0.16% (13)
both - 0.16% (13)
need - 0.16% (13)
make - 0.16% (13)
however, - 0.16% (13)
allow - 0.16% (13)
relate - 0.16% (13)
evidence - 0.16% (13)
english - 0.16% (13)
blog - 0.16% (13)
number - 0.15% (12)
share - 0.15% (12)
could - 0.15% (12)
rest - 0.15% (12)
related - 0.15% (12)
learn - 0.15% (12)
let - 0.15% (12)
coursebook - 0.15% (12)
speak - 0.15% (12)
times - 0.15% (12)
anthony - 0.15% (12)
arts - 0.15% (12)
rubric - 0.15% (12)
det - 0.15% (12)
author - 0.15% (12)
skills - 0.15% (12)
understand - 0.15% (12)
long - 0.15% (12)
write - 0.15% (12)
change - 0.15% (12)
source - 0.14% (11)
second - 0.14% (11)
examples - 0.14% (11)
me. - 0.14% (11)
car - 0.14% (11)
2017 - 0.14% (11)
list - 0.14% (11)
over - 0.14% (11)
unit - 0.14% (11)
often - 0.14% (11)
clear - 0.14% (11)
writing, - 0.14% (11)
able - 0.14% (11)
after - 0.14% (11)
know - 0.14% (11)
show - 0.12% (10)
only - 0.12% (10)
improve - 0.12% (10)
sure - 0.12% (10)
opinion - 0.12% (10)
its - 0.12% (10)
something - 0.12% (10)
presentations - 0.12% (10)
responses - 0.12% (10)
assignments - 0.12% (10)
discussion - 0.12% (10)
powerpoint - 0.12% (10)
interest - 0.12% (10)
step - 0.12% (10)
twitter - 0.12% (10)
important - 0.12% (10)
quiz - 0.12% (10)
off - 0.12% (10)
post - 0.12% (10)
word - 0.11% (9)
interesting - 0.11% (9)
analyze - 0.11% (9)
assess - 0.11% (9)
owing - 0.11% (9)
require - 0.11% (9)
ask - 0.11% (9)
ways - 0.11% (9)
prompt - 0.11% (9)
google - 0.11% (9)
pechakuchas - 0.11% (9)
mean - 0.11% (9)
help - 0.11% (9)
include - 0.11% (9)
gave - 0.11% (9)
analysis - 0.11% (9)
come - 0.11% (9)
follow - 0.11% (9)
tool - 0.11% (9)
worked - 0.11% (9)
main - 0.11% (9)
background - 0.11% (9)
evaluation - 0.11% (9)
good - 0.11% (9)
week - 0.11% (9)
final - 0.1% (8)
pts) - 0.1% (8)
into - 0.1% (8)
students’ - 0.1% (8)
try - 0.1% (8)
original - 0.1% (8)
difficult - 0.1% (8)
clearly - 0.1% (8)
modified - 0.1% (8)
visual - 0.1% (8)
claim - 0.1% (8)
sleep - 0.1% (8)
chance - 0.1% (8)
based - 0.1% (8)
set - 0.1% (8)
class. - 0.1% (8)
structure - 0.1% (8)
collect - 0.1% (8)
should - 0.1% (8)
support - 0.1% (8)
comment - 0.1% (8)
address - 0.1% (8)
issue - 0.1% (8)
mode - 0.1% (8)
increase - 0.1% (8)
schmidt - 0.1% (8)
learning - 0.1% (8)
facebook - 0.1% (8)
presentation, - 0.1% (8)
(in - 0.1% (8)
writing. - 0.1% (8)
reason - 0.1% (8)
ability - 0.1% (8)
duolingo - 0.1% (8)
listen - 0.09% (7)
loading... - 0.09% (7)
martial - 0.09% (7)
real - 0.09% (7)
call - 0.09% (7)
seem - 0.09% (7)
just - 0.09% (7)
given - 0.09% (7)
this:facebooktwittergoogleemaillike - 0.09% (7)
she - 0.09% (7)
fully - 0.09% (7)
first - 0.09% (7)
minute - 0.09% (7)
found - 0.09% (7)
hope - 0.09% (7)
issues - 0.09% (7)
this:like - 0.09% (7)
feedback - 0.09% (7)
different - 0.09% (7)
detail - 0.09% (7)
drive - 0.09% (7)
through - 0.09% (7)
samples - 0.09% (7)
simple - 0.09% (7)
especially - 0.09% (7)
complete - 0.09% (7)
typical - 0.09% (7)
comparison - 0.09% (7)
ran - 0.09% (7)
whether - 0.09% (7)
reading, - 0.09% (7)
room - 0.09% (7)
levels - 0.09% (7)
looked - 0.09% (7)
check - 0.09% (7)
attention - 0.09% (7)
efl - 0.09% (7)
audience - 0.09% (7)
eap - 0.09% (7)
sometimes - 0.09% (7)
model - 0.09% (7)
lot - 0.09% (7)
does - 0.09% (7)
grammar - 0.09% (7)
would - 0.09% (7)
it. - 0.09% (7)
yes - 0.09% (7)
abu - 0.09% (7)
assessment - 0.09% (7)
may - 0.09% (7)
zhang - 0.09% (7)
content - 0.09% (7)
subscribe - 0.07% (6)
easy - 0.07% (6)
reasons - 0.07% (6)
choose - 0.07% (6)
cannot - 0.07% (6)
words - 0.07% (6)
sentence - 0.07% (6)
posts - 0.07% (6)
course: - 0.07% (6)
provide - 0.07% (6)
information - 0.07% (6)
almost - 0.07% (6)
teacher - 0.07% (6)
board - 0.07% (6)
university - 0.07% (6)
following - 0.07% (6)
speaking - 0.07% (6)
day - 0.07% (6)
together - 0.07% (6)
agree - 0.07% (6)
group - 0.07% (6)
people - 0.07% (6)
activities - 0.07% (6)
thank - 0.07% (6)
pay - 0.07% (6)
who - 0.07% (6)
driverless - 0.07% (6)
answers - 0.07% (6)
collected - 0.07% (6)
tab - 0.07% (6)
nation - 0.07% (6)
such - 0.07% (6)
understanding - 0.07% (6)
site - 0.07% (6)
though - 0.07% (6)
introduce - 0.07% (6)
note - 0.07% (6)
where - 0.07% (6)
want - 0.07% (6)
classroom - 0.07% (6)
must - 0.07% (6)
useful - 0.07% (6)
2017anthony - 0.07% (6)
develop - 0.07% (6)
offer - 0.07% (6)
students. - 0.07% (6)
made - 0.07% (6)
been - 0.07% (6)
world - 0.07% (6)
newsela. - 0.07% (6)
leave - 0.07% (6)
listening - 0.07% (6)
tesol - 0.07% (6)
identify - 0.07% (6)
night - 0.06% (5)
details - 0.06% (5)
opinions - 0.06% (5)
common - 0.06% (5)
terms - 0.06% (5)
explain - 0.06% (5)
fit - 0.06% (5)
next - 0.06% (5)
font - 0.06% (5)
save - 0.06% (5)
color - 0.06% (5)
rubrics - 0.06% (5)
vocabulary - 0.06% (5)
article, - 0.06% (5)
either - 0.06% (5)
recent - 0.06% (5)
hard - 0.06% (5)
direct - 0.06% (5)
complex - 0.06% (5)
above - 0.06% (5)
topics - 0.06% (5)
reflections - 0.06% (5)
pt) - 0.06% (5)
tasks - 0.06% (5)
newsela? - 0.06% (5)
activity - 0.06% (5)
summaries, - 0.06% (5)
responses, - 0.06% (5)
articles. - 0.06% (5)
finally, - 0.06% (5)
principle - 0.06% (5)
still - 0.06% (5)
last - 0.06% (5)
enter - 0.06% (5)
and, - 0.06% (5)
nor - 0.06% (5)
during - 0.06% (5)
serve - 0.06% (5)
enough - 0.06% (5)
is, - 0.06% (5)
having - 0.06% (5)
find - 0.06% (5)
knowledge - 0.06% (5)
article. - 0.06% (5)
classes - 0.06% (5)
positive - 0.06% (5)
presentation. - 0.06% (5)
time. - 0.06% (5)
take - 0.06% (5)
2016 - 0.06% (5)
saw - 0.06% (5)
slides - 0.06% (5)
review - 0.06% (5)
hit - 0.06% (5)
compare - 0.06% (5)
allows - 0.06% (5)
discussed - 0.06% (5)
web - 0.06% (5)
much - 0.06% (5)
included - 0.06% (5)
various - 0.06% (5)
speaker - 0.06% (5)
me, - 0.06% (5)
academic - 0.06% (5)
energy - 0.06% (5)
limited - 0.06% (5)
analytics - 0.06% (5)
copy - 0.06% (5)
those - 0.06% (5)
i’m - 0.06% (5)
four - 0.06% (5)
explicit - 0.06% (5)
wrote - 0.06% (5)
text. - 0.06% (5)
many - 0.06% (5)
true - 0.06% (5)
required - 0.06% (5)
means - 0.06% (5)
think - 0.05% (4)
talk - 0.05% (4)
always - 0.05% (4)
employ - 0.05% (4)
name - 0.05% (4)
therefore - 0.05% (4)
cyborg - 0.05% (4)
basic - 0.05% (4)
consist - 0.05% (4)
said - 0.05% (4)
certain - 0.05% (4)
things - 0.05% (4)
so, - 0.05% (4)
questions, - 0.05% (4)
apply - 0.05% (4)
parts - 0.05% (4)
it, - 0.05% (4)
warming - 0.05% (4)
formal - 0.05% (4)
continue - 0.05% (4)
event - 0.05% (4)
carriage - 0.05% (4)
took - 0.05% (4)
identifying - 0.05% (4)
properties - 0.05% (4)
levels, - 0.05% (4)
move - 0.05% (4)
independent - 0.05% (4)
texts - 0.05% (4)
teacher. - 0.05% (4)
self - 0.05% (4)
etc. - 0.05% (4)
ppt - 0.05% (4)
partner - 0.05% (4)
ended - 0.05% (4)
title - 0.05% (4)
access - 0.05% (4)
grade - 0.05% (4)
survey - 0.05% (4)
adapt - 0.05% (4)
readings - 0.05% (4)
ppp - 0.05% (4)
debate - 0.05% (4)
book, - 0.05% (4)
addition, - 0.05% (4)
giving - 0.05% (4)
effective - 0.05% (4)
period - 0.05% (4)
long-form - 0.05% (4)
build - 0.05% (4)
textbook - 0.05% (4)
typically - 0.05% (4)
multiple - 0.05% (4)
paying - 0.05% (4)
intermediate - 0.05% (4)
place - 0.05% (4)
mlk - 0.05% (4)
experiences - 0.05% (4)
scores - 0.05% (4)
again - 0.05% (4)
improvement - 0.05% (4)
(no - 0.05% (4)
written - 0.05% (4)
focused - 0.05% (4)
simply - 0.05% (4)
greater - 0.05% (4)
proudly - 0.05% (4)
according - 0.05% (4)
states - 0.05% (4)
including - 0.05% (4)
website - 0.05% (4)
why - 0.05% (4)
when - 0.05% (4)
represent - 0.05% (4)
feel - 0.05% (4)
via - 0.05% (4)
contained - 0.05% (4)
chose - 0.05% (4)
analyzed - 0.05% (4)
successful - 0.05% (4)
overall - 0.05% (4)
school - 0.05% (4)
right - 0.05% (4)
it’s - 0.05% (4)
similar - 0.05% (4)
life - 0.05% (4)
whiteboard - 0.05% (4)
current - 0.05% (4)
(det) - 0.05% (4)
newsela: - 0.05% (4)
rather - 0.05% (4)
weeks - 0.05% (4)
student’s - 0.05% (4)
previous - 0.05% (4)
best - 0.05% (4)
project - 0.05% (4)
another - 0.05% (4)
well - 0.05% (4)
elt - 0.05% (4)
march - 0.05% (4)
three - 0.05% (4)
point. - 0.05% (4)
horseless - 0.05% (4)
answering - 0.05% (4)
action - 0.05% (4)
few - 0.05% (4)
type - 0.05% (4)
short-answer - 0.05% (4)
lack - 0.05% (4)
exploration - 0.04% (3)
without - 0.04% (3)
product - 0.04% (3)
negative - 0.04% (3)
practiced - 0.04% (3)
health - 0.04% (3)
display - 0.04% (3)
resource - 0.04% (3)
joy - 0.04% (3)
discussion. - 0.04% (3)
strength - 0.04% (3)
public - 0.04% (3)
zhang’s - 0.04% (3)
corpora - 0.04% (3)
neither - 0.04% (3)
several - 0.04% (3)
makes - 0.04% (3)
book. - 0.04% (3)
before - 0.04% (3)
advanced - 0.04% (3)
year - 0.04% (3)
prepare - 0.04% (3)
peer - 0.04% (3)
course, - 0.04% (3)
start - 0.04% (3)
seems - 0.04% (3)
items - 0.04% (3)
actually - 0.04% (3)
rise - 0.04% (3)
thought - 0.04% (3)
summaries. - 0.04% (3)
evaluate - 0.04% (3)
research. - 0.04% (3)
february - 0.04% (3)
travel - 0.04% (3)
ban - 0.04% (3)
literature - 0.04% (3)
quick - 0.04% (3)
conference - 0.04% (3)
notes - 0.04% (3)
topic. - 0.04% (3)
ideas, - 0.04% (3)
but, - 0.04% (3)
immigration - 0.04% (3)
fun - 0.04% (3)
nic - 0.04% (3)
don’t - 0.04% (3)
10×20 - 0.04% (3)
practice. - 0.04% (3)
never - 0.04% (3)
lower - 0.04% (3)
therefore, - 0.04% (3)
preparing - 0.04% (3)
this, - 0.04% (3)
appeal - 0.04% (3)
wanted - 0.04% (3)
handout - 0.04% (3)
3:30 - 0.04% (3)
writers - 0.04% (3)
time, - 0.04% (3)
ones - 0.04% (3)
comprehension - 0.04% (3)
yet - 0.04% (3)
average - 0.04% (3)
email. - 0.04% (3)
terrible. - 0.04% (3)
welcome - 0.04% (3)
kind - 0.04% (3)
usually - 0.04% (3)
worth - 0.04% (3)
definitely - 0.04% (3)
put - 0.04% (3)
in. - 0.04% (3)
goal - 0.04% (3)
subsequent - 0.04% (3)
comments - 0.04% (3)
thanks - 0.04% (3)
along - 0.04% (3)
perspective - 0.04% (3)
informed - 0.04% (3)
compared - 0.04% (3)
pro/con - 0.04% (3)
looking - 0.04% (3)
sentences - 0.04% (3)
distributed - 0.04% (3)
cars - 0.04% (3)
size: - 0.04% (3)
assessments - 0.04% (3)
topic: - 0.04% (3)
correctly - 0.04% (3)
level: - 0.04% (3)
cite - 0.04% (3)
extend - 0.04% (3)
introduction - 0.04% (3)
reference - 0.04% (3)
authors - 0.04% (3)
children - 0.04% (3)
script - 0.04% (3)
tone - 0.04% (3)
lesson - 0.04% (3)
liked - 0.04% (3)
journal - 0.04% (3)
home - 0.04% (3)
reflections, - 0.04% (3)
adapted - 0.04% (3)
being - 0.04% (3)
code - 0.04% (3)
trying - 0.04% (3)
assignments. - 0.04% (3)
my! - 0.04% (3)
navigating - 0.04% (3)
tools - 0.04% (3)
boxes - 0.04% (3)
pro, - 0.04% (3)
click - 0.04% (3)
slow - 0.04% (3)
phrases - 0.04% (3)
advantages - 0.04% (3)
prompts, - 0.04% (3)
fact - 0.04% (3)
genre - 0.04% (3)
us, - 0.04% (3)
lines - 0.04% (3)
assignments, - 0.04% (3)
#tesol2017 - 0.04% (3)
revise - 0.04% (3)
meat - 0.04% (3)
(and - 0.04% (3)
answers…oh - 0.04% (3)
historical - 0.04% (3)
appropriate - 0.04% (3)
working - 0.04% (3)
watch - 0.04% (3)
key - 0.04% (3)
instruction, - 0.04% (3)
course. - 0.04% (3)
behavior - 0.04% (3)
changes - 0.04% (3)
hand, - 0.04% (3)
please - 0.04% (3)
improvement. - 0.04% (3)
technique - 0.04% (3)
mlk’s - 0.04% (3)
later - 0.04% (3)
customize - 0.04% (3)
classroom. - 0.04% (3)
answered - 0.04% (3)
value - 0.04% (3)
choice - 0.04% (3)
necessary - 0.04% (3)
past - 0.04% (3)
points - 0.04% (3)
language. - 0.04% (3)
common? - 0.04% (3)
opportunity - 0.04% (3)
hack: - 0.04% (3)
someone - 0.04% (3)
accurate - 0.04% (3)
questions. - 0.04% (3)
deconstructing - 0.04% (3)
consider - 0.04% (3)
newsela.com - 0.04% (3)
disagree - 0.04% (3)
others - 0.04% (3)
file - 0.04% (3)
style - 0.04% (3)
groups - 0.04% (3)
eight - 0.04% (3)
question: - 0.04% (3)
pp. - 0.04% (3)
developer - 0.04% (3)
down - 0.04% (3)
weak - 0.04% (3)
low, - 0.04% (3)
unrelated - 0.04% (3)
right-click - 0.02% (2)
slide. - 0.02% (2)
103 - 0.02% (2)
join - 0.02% (2)
video - 0.02% (2)
employer. - 0.02% (2)
ribbon - 0.02% (2)
properties. - 0.02% (2)
receive - 0.02% (2)
(i.e. - 0.02% (2)
rant - 0.02% (2)
combination - 0.02% (2)
notifications - 0.02% (2)
“property - 0.02% (2)
published - 0.02% (2)
subscribers - 0.02% (2)
24, - 0.02% (2)
skip - 0.02% (2)
powered - 0.02% (2)
in-depth - 0.02% (2)
wordpress - 0.02% (2)
theme: - 0.02% (2)
relatively - 0.02% (2)
until - 0.02% (2)
modified. - 0.02% (2)
automatically - 0.02% (2)
sorbet - 0.02% (2)
thoughts - 0.02% (2)
teacher.com - 0.02% (2)
ted, - 0.02% (2)
miss - 0.02% (2)
easily - 0.02% (2)
paste - 0.02% (2)
this. - 0.02% (2)
chances - 0.02% (2)
“true”. - 0.02% (2)
individual - 0.02% (2)
hone - 0.02% (2)
@twittermy - 0.02% (2)
presentations. - 0.02% (2)
tweets - 0.02% (2)
pronunciation - 0.02% (2)
single - 0.02% (2)
sets - 0.02% (2)
tack - 0.02% (2)
mobile - 0.02% (2)
images, - 0.02% (2)
books - 0.02% (2)
scrollbars - 0.02% (2)
comparing - 0.02% (2)
demonstrate - 0.02% (2)
typos - 0.02% (2)
60s - 0.02% (2)
principles - 0.02% (2)
coaches - 0.02% (2)
feedback, - 0.02% (2)
structured - 0.02% (2)
works - 0.02% (2)
react - 0.02% (2)
conscious - 0.02% (2)
up, - 0.02% (2)
favorite - 0.02% (2)
says - 0.02% (2)
learned - 0.02% (2)
viscera - 0.02% (2)
outline - 0.02% (2)
thanksgiving - 0.02% (2)
grammar, - 0.02% (2)
be: - 0.02% (2)
gym - 0.02% (2)
lesson: - 0.02% (2)
mouth. - 0.02% (2)
languages - 0.02% (2)
tests - 0.02% (2)
shown - 0.02% (2)
deeper - 0.02% (2)
general - 0.02% (2)
competitor - 0.02% (2)
came - 0.02% (2)
skills: - 0.02% (2)
sake - 0.02% (2)
air - 0.02% (2)
no, - 0.02% (2)
mixed - 0.02% (2)
format, - 0.02% (2)
20, - 0.02% (2)
teaching - 0.02% (2)
wikipedia - 0.02% (2)
surprise - 0.02% (2)
synthesis - 0.02% (2)
speaker. - 0.02% (2)
hopefully - 0.02% (2)
predictive - 0.02% (2)
“reading - 0.02% (2)
achieve - 0.02% (2)
away - 0.02% (2)
moves - 0.02% (2)
blog. - 0.02% (2)
result - 0.02% (2)
opinions, - 0.02% (2)
discourse - 0.02% (2)
increased - 0.02% (2)
important. - 0.02% (2)
practicing - 0.02% (2)
rely - 0.02% (2)
namely - 0.02% (2)
presentations, - 0.02% (2)
design - 0.02% (2)
sometimes, - 0.02% (2)
background, - 0.02% (2)
audio - 0.02% (2)
(3:30) - 0.02% (2)
spoken - 0.02% (2)
comes - 0.02% (2)
bad - 0.02% (2)
(see - 0.02% (2)
clean - 0.02% (2)
2016) - 0.02% (2)
disclaimer - 0.02% (2)
methods - 0.02% (2)
resources - 0.02% (2)
job - 0.02% (2)
pre-advanced - 0.02% (2)
upper-intermediate, - 0.02% (2)
logic - 0.02% (2)
above, - 0.02% (2)
personal - 0.02% (2)
explanation - 0.02% (2)
perhaps - 0.02% (2)
carriages - 0.02% (2)
become - 0.02% (2)
annotations - 0.02% (2)
details. - 0.02% (2)
opposed - 0.02% (2)
(as - 0.02% (2)
meaning - 0.02% (2)
choices - 0.02% (2)
words. - 0.02% (2)
create - 0.02% (2)
companion - 0.02% (2)
lacking. - 0.02% (2)
highlighting - 0.02% (2)
…had - 0.02% (2)
included. - 0.02% (2)
attempt - 0.02% (2)
reinforce - 0.02% (2)
references - 0.02% (2)
classes, - 0.02% (2)
reading. - 0.02% (2)
intensive - 0.02% (2)
extensive - 0.02% (2)
showed - 0.02% (2)
readers - 0.02% (2)
extra - 0.02% (2)
…contained - 0.02% (2)
minor - 0.02% (2)
evidence, - 0.02% (2)
numbers - 0.02% (2)
recommends - 0.02% (2)
united - 0.02% (2)
history - 0.02% (2)
instead - 0.02% (2)
discussing - 0.02% (2)
writings - 0.02% (2)
expressed - 0.02% (2)
trump’s - 0.02% (2)
topical - 0.02% (2)
work, - 0.02% (2)
(note: - 0.02% (2)
forced - 0.02% (2)
planned - 0.02% (2)
whole-class - 0.02% (2)
dream - 0.02% (2)
not, - 0.02% (2)
term, - 0.02% (2)
adequate - 0.02% (2)
occurred - 0.02% (2)
steps - 0.02% (2)
prompt. - 0.02% (2)
directions - 0.02% (2)
against - 0.02% (2)
claims - 0.02% (2)
clarify - 0.02% (2)
fourth - 0.02% (2)
seeing - 0.02% (2)
difficulty - 0.02% (2)
instructions - 0.02% (2)
answer. - 0.02% (2)
gently - 0.02% (2)
summarize - 0.02% (2)
asked - 0.02% (2)
minutes - 0.02% (2)
seemed - 0.02% (2)
total - 0.02% (2)
chosen - 0.02% (2)
(-2 - 0.02% (2)
evidence? - 0.02% (2)
maybe - 0.02% (2)
parts: - 0.02% (2)
question? - 0.02% (2)
redistributed - 0.02% (2)
(or - 0.02% (2)
similarities - 0.02% (2)
students, - 0.02% (2)
words, - 0.02% (2)
went - 0.02% (2)
generate - 0.02% (2)
opinions. - 0.02% (2)
articles, - 0.02% (2)
sources, - 0.02% (2)
primary - 0.02% (2)
issues, - 0.02% (2)
completed - 0.02% (2)
offers - 0.02% (2)
first, - 0.02% (2)
second, - 0.02% (2)
water - 0.02% (2)
term. - 0.02% (2)
previously - 0.02% (2)
plant - 0.02% (2)
trees - 0.02% (2)
context. - 0.02% (2)
no. - 0.02% (2)
aip - 0.02% (2)
allowing - 0.02% (2)
providing - 0.02% (2)
them, - 0.02% (2)
them. - 0.02% (2)
ideas. - 0.02% (2)
summary. - 0.02% (2)
making - 0.02% (2)
engage - 0.02% (2)
network - 0.02% (2)
didn’t - 0.02% (2)
baba, - 0.02% (2)
large - 0.02% (2)
same - 0.02% (2)
completely - 0.02% (2)
free - 0.02% (2)
role - 0.02% (2)
lexical - 0.02% (2)
proficiency - 0.02% (2)
program - 0.02% (2)
least - 0.02% (2)
account - 0.02% (2)
higher - 0.02% (2)
influence. - 0.02% (2)
below - 0.02% (2)
little - 0.02% (2)
keck, - 0.02% (2)
paraphrase - 0.02% (2)
writers. - 0.02% (2)
demaree - 0.02% (2)
al., - 0.02% (2)
you. - 0.02% (2)
constantly - 0.02% (2)
binder - 0.02% (2)
study - 0.02% (2)
classroom, - 0.02% (2)
supplement - 0.02% (2)
promote - 0.02% (2)
structure, - 0.02% (2)
conclusion - 0.02% (2)
newsela, - 0.02% (2)
specific - 0.02% (2)
aspects - 0.02% (2)
suit - 0.02% (2)
anywhere - 0.02% (2)
quite - 0.02% (2)
interesting. - 0.02% (2)
level. - 0.02% (2)
successfully - 0.02% (2)
recently - 0.02% (2)
friendly - 0.02% (2)
fresh - 0.02% (2)
slowly - 0.02% (2)
immediate - 0.02% (2)
doing - 0.02% (2)
revisions - 0.02% (2)
advances - 0.02% (2)
extremely - 0.02% (2)
economics - 0.02% (2)
global - 0.02% (2)
debate. - 0.02% (2)
other. - 0.02% (2)
cyborgs - 0.02% (2)
technology - 0.02% (2)
“the - 0.02% (2)
path - 0.02% (2)
toward - 0.02% (2)
becker, - 0.02% (2)
applying - 0.02% (2)
skill, - 0.02% (2)
arguments - 0.02% (2)
performance. - 0.02% (2)
author’s - 0.02% (2)
judge - 0.02% (2)
marks - 0.02% (2)
peers - 0.02% (2)
happiness - 0.02% (2)
judgments - 0.02% (2)
esl - 0.02% (2)
measures - 0.02% (2)
analysis. - 0.02% (2)
sides - 0.02% (2)
engaging - 0.02% (2)
disadvantages - 0.02% (2)
comprehension, - 0.02% (2)
better - 0.02% (2)
bit - 0.02% (2)
content, - 0.02% (2)
done - 0.02% (2)
purpose - 0.02% (2)
really, - 0.02% (2)
helpful - 0.02% (2)
submit - 0.02% (2)
mcdonough - 0.02% (2)
response, - 0.02% (2)
quizzes - 0.02% (2)
(increase - 0.02% (2)
requires - 0.02% (2)
throughout - 0.02% (2)
order - 0.02% (2)
seattle - 0.02% (2)
building - 0.02% (2)
lengthy - 0.02% (2)
newsela’s - 0.02% (2)
verbatim - 0.02% (2)
copying - 0.02% (2)
definition - 0.02% (2)
sense - 0.02% (2)
and the - 0.47% (38)
of the - 0.4% (32)
on the - 0.32% (26)
to the - 0.31% (25)
or the - 0.31% (25)
in the - 0.3% (24)
for the - 0.24% (19)
students to - 0.22% (18)
the article - 0.22% (18)
you can - 0.2% (16)
at the - 0.2% (16)
on and - 0.17% (14)
summary writing - 0.16% (13)
and then - 0.15% (12)
to use - 0.15% (12)
writing a - 0.15% (12)
in class - 0.14% (11)
this article - 0.14% (11)
need to - 0.14% (11)
that i - 0.14% (11)
from the - 0.12% (10)
number of - 0.12% (10)
like this - 0.12% (10)
the text - 0.11% (9)
the question - 0.11% (9)
can be - 0.11% (9)
the student - 0.11% (9)
with a - 0.11% (9)
have a - 0.11% (9)
that the - 0.1% (8)
because the - 0.1% (8)
here are - 0.1% (8)
how to - 0.1% (8)
a number - 0.1% (8)
what a - 0.1% (8)
the pro - 0.09% (7)
the author - 0.09% (7)
them to - 0.09% (7)
a great - 0.09% (7)
there is - 0.09% (7)
this:facebooktwittergoogleemaillike this:like - 0.09% (7)
the coursebook - 0.09% (7)
article to - 0.09% (7)
email address - 0.09% (7)
newsela pro - 0.09% (7)
based on - 0.09% (7)
share this:facebooktwittergoogleemaillike - 0.09% (7)
this:like loading... - 0.09% (7)
students read - 0.09% (7)
did they - 0.09% (7)
of new - 0.09% (7)
they are - 0.09% (7)
martial arts - 0.09% (7)
student samples - 0.09% (7)
that is - 0.09% (7)
text to - 0.07% (6)
of pechakucha - 0.07% (6)
a skill - 0.07% (6)
of this - 0.07% (6)
2017anthony schmidt - 0.07% (6)
to have - 0.07% (6)
an article - 0.07% (6)
for students - 0.07% (6)
and an - 0.07% (6)
as the - 0.07% (6)
text box - 0.07% (6)
looked at - 0.07% (6)
students in - 0.07% (6)
to understand - 0.07% (6)
able to - 0.07% (6)
a presentation - 0.07% (6)
and their - 0.07% (6)
they had - 0.07% (6)
i have - 0.07% (6)
of our - 0.07% (6)
with the - 0.07% (6)
writing as - 0.07% (6)
change the - 0.06% (5)
of these - 0.06% (5)
article about - 0.06% (5)
in writing - 0.06% (5)
english test - 0.06% (5)
to see - 0.06% (5)
in terms - 0.06% (5)
language learning - 0.06% (5)
newsela is - 0.06% (5)
the summaries - 0.06% (5)
this blog - 0.06% (5)
newsela and - 0.06% (5)
to get - 0.06% (5)
and short - 0.06% (5)
a text - 0.06% (5)
writing tasks - 0.06% (5)
there are - 0.06% (5)
terms of - 0.06% (5)
do not - 0.06% (5)
had to - 0.06% (5)
their own - 0.06% (5)
that student - 0.06% (5)
a summary - 0.06% (5)
on for - 0.06% (5)
part of - 0.06% (5)
short answer - 0.06% (5)
i like - 0.06% (5)
some of - 0.06% (5)
and writing - 0.06% (5)
article in - 0.06% (5)
a comment - 0.06% (5)
had students - 0.06% (5)
to this - 0.06% (5)
or not - 0.06% (5)
the questions - 0.06% (5)
pts) no - 0.06% (5)
students had - 0.06% (5)
we had - 0.06% (5)
use newsela - 0.06% (5)
they were - 0.06% (5)
used this - 0.06% (5)
the book - 0.06% (5)
and it - 0.06% (5)
in class. - 0.06% (5)
this was - 0.06% (5)
that we - 0.06% (5)
like a - 0.06% (5)
does not - 0.06% (5)
leave a - 0.06% (5)
because they - 0.06% (5)
their presentation - 0.06% (5)
to help - 0.05% (4)
by the - 0.05% (4)
examples from - 0.05% (4)
to analyze - 0.05% (4)
evaluation of - 0.05% (4)
and even - 0.05% (4)
the article. - 0.05% (4)
three examples - 0.05% (4)
that students - 0.05% (4)
i then - 0.05% (4)
or two - 0.05% (4)
your email - 0.05% (4)
(1 pt) - 0.05% (4)
to make - 0.05% (4)
lot of - 0.05% (4)
because it - 0.05% (4)
is more - 0.05% (4)
i will - 0.05% (4)
hope that - 0.05% (4)
the long-form - 0.05% (4)
on too - 0.05% (4)
paying attention - 0.05% (4)
you will - 0.05% (4)
the speaker - 0.05% (4)
is useful - 0.05% (4)
is the - 0.05% (4)
you must - 0.05% (4)
students worked - 0.05% (4)
a chance - 0.05% (4)
the test - 0.05% (4)
the duolingo - 0.05% (4)
according to - 0.05% (4)
the box - 0.05% (4)
– change - 0.05% (4)
if you - 0.05% (4)
my own - 0.05% (4)
is very - 0.05% (4)
of reading - 0.05% (4)
the back - 0.05% (4)
articles in - 0.05% (4)
the answer - 0.05% (4)
easy to - 0.05% (4)
their writing - 0.05% (4)
second language - 0.05% (4)
a comparison - 0.05% (4)
be used - 0.05% (4)
in your - 0.05% (4)
almost any - 0.05% (4)
ability to - 0.05% (4)
on how - 0.05% (4)
of newsela - 0.05% (4)
i found - 0.05% (4)
the articles - 0.05% (4)
reading and - 0.05% (4)
i gave - 0.05% (4)
read this - 0.05% (4)
in addition, - 0.05% (4)
discussed the - 0.05% (4)
to answer - 0.05% (4)
i collected - 0.05% (4)
chance to - 0.05% (4)
and how - 0.05% (4)
newsela be - 0.05% (4)
write a - 0.05% (4)
to students - 0.05% (4)
something that - 0.05% (4)
duolingo english - 0.05% (4)
coursebook writing - 0.05% (4)
the power - 0.05% (4)
test (det) - 0.05% (4)
what do - 0.05% (4)
using student - 0.05% (4)
samples in - 0.05% (4)
writing instruction - 0.05% (4)
main idea - 0.05% (4)
what is - 0.05% (4)
use powerpoint - 0.05% (4)
the focus - 0.05% (4)
and eap - 0.05% (4)
a good - 0.05% (4)
the original - 0.05% (4)
however, i - 0.05% (4)
comparison of - 0.05% (4)
there were - 0.05% (4)
eap coursebook - 0.05% (4)
posts by - 0.04% (3)
about the - 0.04% (3)
ideas and - 0.04% (3)
often times - 0.04% (3)
to practice - 0.04% (3)
from a - 0.04% (3)
we then - 0.04% (3)
to give - 0.04% (3)
read and - 0.04% (3)
pro/con article - 0.04% (3)
questions and - 0.04% (3)
ways to - 0.04% (3)
own and - 0.04% (3)
and my - 0.04% (3)
a source - 0.04% (3)
serve as - 0.04% (3)
i wanted - 0.04% (3)
quiz scores - 0.04% (3)
read the - 0.04% (3)
such as - 0.04% (3)
and you - 0.04% (3)
that was - 0.04% (3)
of their - 0.04% (3)
nor our - 0.04% (3)
access to - 0.04% (3)
is not - 0.04% (3)
on their - 0.04% (3)
journal of - 0.04% (3)
for an - 0.04% (3)
use of - 0.04% (3)
of second - 0.04% (3)
language writing, - 0.04% (3)
loading... march - 0.04% (3)
well as - 0.04% (3)
the ability - 0.04% (3)
article is - 0.04% (3)
is newsela - 0.04% (3)
was not - 0.04% (3)
responses, and - 0.04% (3)
i used - 0.04% (3)
come to - 0.04% (3)
the idea - 0.04% (3)
the presentation - 0.04% (3)
in summary - 0.04% (3)
travel ban - 0.04% (3)
in which - 0.04% (3)
the next - 0.04% (3)
my! – - 0.04% (3)
used in - 0.04% (3)
short answers…oh - 0.04% (3)
issues with - 0.04% (3)
any other - 0.04% (3)
are some - 0.04% (3)
to log - 0.04% (3)
summaries, responses, - 0.04% (3)
have been - 0.04% (3)
test items - 0.04% (3)
newsela: eight - 0.04% (3)
the other - 0.04% (3)
do martial - 0.04% (3)
arts and - 0.04% (3)
– using - 0.04% (3)
have in - 0.04% (3)
i’m not - 0.04% (3)
explicit instruction - 0.04% (3)
one of - 0.04% (3)
answers…oh my! - 0.04% (3)
of instruction - 0.04% (3)
which is - 0.04% (3)
simply a - 0.04% (3)
more than - 0.04% (3)
hack: use - 0.04% (3)
powerpoint like - 0.04% (3)
a whiteboard - 0.04% (3)
blog post - 0.04% (3)
will need - 0.04% (3)
give you - 0.04% (3)
– #tesol2017 - 0.04% (3)
university and - 0.04% (3)
course: a - 0.04% (3)
i hope - 0.04% (3)
you have - 0.04% (3)
weeks of - 0.04% (3)
reading instruction - 0.04% (3)
the app - 0.04% (3)
you are - 0.04% (3)
way to - 0.04% (3)
newsela? new - 0.04% (3)
newsela has - 0.04% (3)
not only - 0.04% (3)
the quiz - 0.04% (3)
newsela because - 0.04% (3)
a newsela - 0.04% (3)
writing leave - 0.04% (3)
in one - 0.04% (3)
they can - 0.04% (3)
give students - 0.04% (3)
allow for - 0.04% (3)
of writing - 0.04% (3)
with newsela.com - 0.04% (3)
are not - 0.04% (3)
powerpoint hack: - 0.04% (3)
in common? - 0.04% (3)
learning have - 0.04% (3)
be modified - 0.04% (3)
class size: - 0.04% (3)
the following - 0.04% (3)
and language - 0.04% (3)
your presentation - 0.04% (3)
as part - 0.04% (3)
trying to - 0.04% (3)
deconstructing the - 0.04% (3)
loading... february - 0.04% (3)
may be - 0.04% (3)
a class - 0.04% (3)
evaluate the - 0.04% (3)
students could - 0.04% (3)
for me. - 0.04% (3)
and for - 0.04% (3)
writing assignments - 0.04% (3)
what are - 0.04% (3)
two or - 0.04% (3)
collected the - 0.04% (3)
their writing. - 0.04% (3)
students can - 0.04% (3)
article and - 0.04% (3)
points did - 0.04% (3)
was to - 0.04% (3)
a model - 0.04% (3)
the topic - 0.04% (3)
then gave - 0.04% (3)
your point. - 0.04% (3)
to read - 0.04% (3)
for this - 0.04% (3)
as well - 0.04% (3)
gave students - 0.04% (3)
and not - 0.04% (3)
or three - 0.04% (3)
using new - 0.04% (3)
they need - 0.04% (3)
the best - 0.04% (3)
answer this - 0.04% (3)
students the - 0.04% (3)
the main - 0.04% (3)
this text - 0.04% (3)
pro or - 0.04% (3)
used a - 0.04% (3)
a rubric - 0.04% (3)
finally, we - 0.04% (3)
as with - 0.04% (3)
world / - 0.02% (2)
or from - 0.02% (2)
means increase - 0.02% (2)
the principle - 0.02% (2)
difficult for - 0.02% (2)
whiteboard writing - 0.02% (2)
working with - 0.02% (2)
the speaker. - 0.02% (2)
type of - 0.02% (2)
their presentation, - 0.02% (2)
students need - 0.02% (2)
any questions - 0.02% (2)
also be - 0.02% (2)
pre-advanced topic: - 0.02% (2)
listening and - 0.02% (2)
practiced their - 0.02% (2)
your presentation. - 0.02% (2)
write their - 0.02% (2)
to simply - 0.02% (2)
student revisions - 0.02% (2)
were given - 0.02% (2)
pechakucha (3:30) - 0.02% (2)
seeing a - 0.02% (2)
level: upper-intermediate, - 0.02% (2)
used during - 0.02% (2)
and speaking - 0.02% (2)
course: listening - 0.02% (2)
pechakuchas can - 0.02% (2)
people will - 0.02% (2)
skill that - 0.02% (2)
to explain - 0.02% (2)
be able - 0.02% (2)
a world - 0.02% (2)
or for - 0.02% (2)
even a - 0.02% (2)
multiple chances - 0.02% (2)
the pechakucha - 0.02% (2)
tool for - 0.02% (2)
engage with - 0.02% (2)
and viscera - 0.02% (2)
these ideas - 0.02% (2)
one more - 0.02% (2)
analyzed this - 0.02% (2)
newsela pro, - 0.02% (2)
writing at - 0.02% (2)
will continue - 0.02% (2)
continue to - 0.02% (2)
can make - 0.02% (2)
writing, and - 0.02% (2)
thanksgiving lesson: - 0.02% (2)
newsela for - 0.02% (2)
four skills - 0.02% (2)
like newsela - 0.02% (2)
your own - 0.02% (2)
newsela more - 0.02% (2)
and synthesis - 0.02% (2)
writing proudly - 0.02% (2)
newsela newsela - 0.02% (2)
with this - 0.02% (2)
newsela as - 0.02% (2)
kind of - 0.02% (2)
much in - 0.02% (2)
especially if - 0.02% (2)
idea of - 0.02% (2)
a part - 0.02% (2)
presentation, or - 0.02% (2)
skills: a - 0.02% (2)
upper-intermediate, pre-advanced - 0.02% (2)
modified for - 0.02% (2)
so much - 0.02% (2)
can do - 0.02% (2)
wikipedia project - 0.02% (2)
reading, reflections, - 0.02% (2)
a single - 0.02% (2)
author of - 0.02% (2)
not be: - 0.02% (2)
classroom. the - 0.02% (2)
english language - 0.02% (2)
of time. - 0.02% (2)
an exploration - 0.02% (2)
it has - 0.02% (2)
level of - 0.02% (2)
of corpora - 0.02% (2)
speaking level: - 0.02% (2)
60s – - 0.02% (2)
size: 12 - 0.02% (2)
evidence and - 0.02% (2)
developer tab - 0.02% (2)
list rubric - 0.02% (2)
collect student - 0.02% (2)
want to - 0.02% (2)
sometimes, i - 0.02% (2)
could use - 0.02% (2)
to evaluate - 0.02% (2)
then we - 0.02% (2)
combination of - 0.02% (2)
explicit and - 0.02% (2)
should eat - 0.02% (2)
samples and - 0.02% (2)
less meat - 0.02% (2)
practice is - 0.02% (2)
is for - 0.02% (2)
key to - 0.02% (2)
attention to - 0.02% (2)
be less - 0.02% (2)
class discussion - 0.02% (2)
at least - 0.02% (2)
says that - 0.02% (2)
it’s no - 0.02% (2)
wrote a - 0.02% (2)
to your - 0.02% (2)
we are - 0.02% (2)
any text - 0.02% (2)
powered by - 0.02% (2)
posts off - 0.02% (2)
on this - 0.02% (2)
by wordpress - 0.02% (2)
proudly powered - 0.02% (2)
or any - 0.02% (2)
other hand, - 0.02% (2)
instead of - 0.02% (2)
me that - 0.02% (2)
will be - 0.02% (2)
and other - 0.02% (2)
on your - 0.02% (2)
box to - 0.02% (2)
this allows - 0.02% (2)
to “true”. - 0.02% (2)
main ideas - 0.02% (2)
“true”. this - 0.02% (2)
change to - 0.02% (2)
that you - 0.02% (2)
were more - 0.02% (2)
right-click on - 0.02% (2)
limited in - 0.02% (2)
and what - 0.02% (2)
they have - 0.02% (2)
topic slide - 0.02% (2)
it. however, - 0.02% (2)
analysis of - 0.02% (2)
the sake - 0.02% (2)
ideas on - 0.02% (2)
or some - 0.02% (2)
a pechakucha - 0.02% (2)
the ideas - 0.02% (2)
no change - 0.02% (2)
a place - 0.02% (2)
still be - 0.02% (2)
enough sleep - 0.02% (2)
the week - 0.02% (2)
most students - 0.02% (2)
the limited - 0.02% (2)
slide 5 - 0.02% (2)
– 60s - 0.02% (2)
slide 4 - 0.02% (2)
you like - 0.02% (2)
presentation on - 0.02% (2)
when the - 0.02% (2)
like the - 0.02% (2)
opportunity to - 0.02% (2)
and answer - 0.02% (2)
schmidt ideas, - 0.02% (2)
that a - 0.02% (2)
feedback, and - 0.02% (2)
week to - 0.02% (2)
people should - 0.02% (2)
each other. - 0.02% (2)
the coaches - 0.02% (2)
the teacher. - 0.02% (2)
of class - 0.02% (2)
to identify - 0.02% (2)
a claim - 0.02% (2)
agree or - 0.02% (2)
my mouth. - 0.02% (2)
it could - 0.02% (2)
take the - 0.02% (2)
and is - 0.02% (2)
a kind - 0.02% (2)
they agree - 0.02% (2)
instruction navigating - 0.02% (2)
these reasons - 0.02% (2)
practice. i - 0.02% (2)
it can - 0.02% (2)
writing. there - 0.02% (2)
etc. this - 0.02% (2)
information about - 0.02% (2)
focus on - 0.02% (2)
the claim - 0.02% (2)
understand than - 0.02% (2)
question: what - 0.02% (2)
think about - 0.02% (2)
discussion and - 0.02% (2)
could be - 0.02% (2)
and evaluation - 0.02% (2)
aspects of - 0.02% (2)
(-2 pts) - 0.02% (2)
this type - 0.02% (2)
would allow - 0.02% (2)
allows students - 0.02% (2)
the analytics - 0.02% (2)
but rather - 0.02% (2)
goal of - 0.02% (2)
were able - 0.02% (2)
pt) did - 0.02% (2)
articles on - 0.02% (2)
which they - 0.02% (2)
also have - 0.02% (2)
opposed to - 0.02% (2)
used as - 0.02% (2)
our class - 0.02% (2)
only summary - 0.02% (2)
about an - 0.02% (2)
students independent - 0.02% (2)
writing and - 0.02% (2)
yes (-2 - 0.02% (2)
that were - 0.02% (2)
short-answer writing, - 0.02% (2)
the history - 0.02% (2)
an interesting - 0.02% (2)
was about - 0.02% (2)
2 points - 0.02% (2)
1 point - 0.02% (2)
| both - 0.02% (2)
background article - 0.02% (2)
worked together - 0.02% (2)
they do - 0.02% (2)
article related - 0.02% (2)
students then - 0.02% (2)
see if - 0.02% (2)
to build - 0.02% (2)
last year - 0.02% (2)
students practiced - 0.02% (2)
on using - 0.02% (2)
the united - 0.02% (2)
history of - 0.02% (2)
the travel - 0.02% (2)
(1 pts) - 0.02% (2)
they give - 0.02% (2)
extra details - 0.02% (2)
topical knowledge - 0.02% (2)
for many - 0.02% (2)
in student - 0.02% (2)
point | - 0.02% (2)
to revise - 0.02% (2)
i asked - 0.02% (2)
et al., - 0.02% (2)
applying a - 0.02% (2)
of student - 0.02% (2)
students’ writing - 0.02% (2)
be both - 0.02% (2)
the 20 - 0.02% (2)
of lexical - 0.02% (2)
students. i - 0.02% (2)
instruction and - 0.02% (2)
class to - 0.02% (2)
sure their - 0.02% (2)
on them, - 0.02% (2)
if students - 0.02% (2)
verbatim copying - 0.02% (2)
assignments, i - 0.02% (2)
is often - 0.02% (2)
but also - 0.02% (2)
revise their - 0.02% (2)
was very - 0.02% (2)
all parts - 0.02% (2)
for most - 0.02% (2)
source text - 0.02% (2)
6, 2017anthony - 0.02% (2)
writing performance. - 0.02% (2)
while the - 0.02% (2)
anthony teacher.com - 0.02% (2)
customize the - 0.02% (2)
revisions and - 0.02% (2)
about students’ - 0.02% (2)
ideas with - 0.02% (2)
have the - 0.02% (2)
20 minutes - 0.02% (2)
reading comprehension - 0.02% (2)
writing prompt. - 0.02% (2)
summary writing, - 0.02% (2)
newsela? newsela - 0.02% (2)
schmidt reading, - 0.02% (2)
lexical proficiency - 0.02% (2)
and analyze - 0.02% (2)
using newsela - 0.02% (2)
post will - 0.02% (2)
use this - 0.02% (2)
this term. - 0.02% (2)
main text - 0.02% (2)
feedback on - 0.02% (2)
has an - 0.02% (2)
reflections, writing - 0.02% (2)
not allow - 0.02% (2)
only one - 0.02% (2)
reasons you - 0.02% (2)
employer. subscribe - 0.02% (2)
understanding the - 0.02% (2)
higher level - 0.02% (2)
represent my - 0.02% (2)
on quiz - 0.02% (2)
the most - 0.02% (2)
the driverless - 0.02% (2)
found that - 0.02% (2)
not those - 0.02% (2)
found it - 0.02% (2)
pro, i - 0.02% (2)
provide two - 0.02% (2)
pro account - 0.02% (2)
levels, and - 0.02% (2)
at lower - 0.02% (2)
source for - 0.02% (2)
to blog - 0.02% (2)
via email - 0.02% (2)
text set - 0.02% (2)
a second - 0.02% (2)
in order - 0.02% (2)
in seattle - 0.02% (2)
an author’s - 0.02% (2)
typos here - 0.02% (2)
what they - 0.02% (2)
to subscribe - 0.02% (2)
have an - 0.02% (2)
or con - 0.02% (2)
ran with - 0.02% (2)
know what - 0.02% (2)
clean energy - 0.02% (2)
topics a - 0.02% (2)
to clarify - 0.02% (2)
some reasons - 0.02% (2)
disclaimer this - 0.02% (2)
class and - 0.02% (2)
what about - 0.02% (2)
of academic - 0.02% (2)
and wrote - 0.02% (2)
this question: - 0.02% (2)
could serve - 0.02% (2)
allow students - 0.02% (2)
of simple - 0.02% (2)
while this - 0.02% (2)
have to - 0.02% (2)
personal blog. - 0.02% (2)
the opinions, - 0.02% (2)
recommends that - 0.02% (2)
summaries and - 0.02% (2)
enter your - 0.02% (2)
support your - 0.02% (2)
out my - 0.02% (2)
to extend - 0.02% (2)
by looking - 0.02% (2)
and redistributed - 0.02% (2)
summary writing. - 0.02% (2)
to improve - 0.02% (2)
my presentation - 0.02% (2)
then use - 0.02% (2)
we looked - 0.02% (2)
the book, - 0.02% (2)
and informed - 0.02% (2)
try to - 0.02% (2)
worked on - 0.02% (2)
can find - 0.02% (2)
most of - 0.02% (2)
ted talk - 0.02% (2)
coursebook article - 0.02% (2)
understanding of - 0.02% (2)
parts of - 0.02% (2)
wanted students - 0.02% (2)
and to - 0.02% (2)
it measures - 0.02% (2)
the question? - 0.02% (2)
our public - 0.02% (2)
student examples - 0.02% (2)
the response - 0.02% (2)
coursebook text - 0.02% (2)
on both - 0.02% (2)
blog and - 0.02% (2)
students answer - 0.02% (2)
receive notifications - 0.02% (2)
so, we - 0.02% (2)
were actually - 0.02% (2)
one or - 0.02% (2)
one part - 0.02% (2)
they read - 0.02% (2)
email. join - 0.02% (2)
103 other - 0.02% (2)
in groups - 0.02% (2)
chance for - 0.02% (2)
analyzed the - 0.02% (2)
help support - 0.02% (2)
about cyborgs - 0.02% (2)
of articles - 0.02% (2)
cyborgs and - 0.02% (2)
subscribers email - 0.02% (2)
and we - 0.02% (2)
address @twittermy - 0.02% (2)
evaluation and - 0.02% (2)
to choose - 0.02% (2)
welcome to - 0.02% (2)
a number of - 0.1% (8)
share this:facebooktwittergoogleemaillike this:like - 0.09% (7)
this:facebooktwittergoogleemaillike this:like loading... - 0.09% (7)
leave a comment - 0.06% (5)
in terms of - 0.06% (5)
for students to - 0.05% (4)
duolingo english test - 0.05% (4)
no (1 pt) - 0.05% (4)
there is a - 0.05% (4)
your email address - 0.05% (4)
this is a - 0.05% (4)
there are a - 0.05% (4)
related to the - 0.05% (4)
students read this - 0.05% (4)
english test (det) - 0.05% (4)
eap coursebook writing - 0.05% (4)
and eap coursebook - 0.05% (4)
student samples in - 0.05% (4)
using student samples - 0.05% (4)
the duolingo english - 0.05% (4)
i then gave - 0.04% (3)
as part of - 0.04% (3)
or three examples - 0.04% (3)
short answers…oh my! - 0.04% (3)
evaluation of the - 0.04% (3)
summaries, responses, and - 0.04% (3)
the text box - 0.04% (3)
do martial arts - 0.04% (3)
as well as - 0.04% (3)
and language learning - 0.04% (3)
from the text - 0.04% (3)
to use the - 0.04% (3)
have in common? - 0.04% (3)
points did they - 0.04% (3)
two or three - 0.04% (3)
the text to - 0.04% (3)
in the article - 0.04% (3)
three examples from - 0.04% (3)
examples from the - 0.04% (3)
journal of second - 0.04% (3)
pts) no (1 - 0.04% (3)
based on a - 0.04% (3)
this article to - 0.04% (3)
we used this - 0.04% (3)
ways to use - 0.04% (3)
a chance to - 0.04% (3)
it in the - 0.04% (3)
used this article - 0.04% (3)
read this article - 0.04% (3)
i had students - 0.04% (3)
in the coursebook - 0.04% (3)
they had to - 0.04% (3)
is a skill - 0.04% (3)
the articles in - 0.04% (3)
comparison of university - 0.04% (3)
to use newsela - 0.04% (3)
this blog post - 0.04% (3)
instruction with newsela.com - 0.04% (3)
weeks of reading - 0.04% (3)
navigating newsela: eight - 0.04% (3)
the power of - 0.04% (3)
of second language - 0.04% (3)
– using student - 0.04% (3)
here is an - 0.04% (3)
off course: a - 0.04% (3)
samples in writing - 0.04% (3)
powerpoint hack: use - 0.04% (3)
writing tasks – - 0.04% (3)
and short answers…oh - 0.04% (3)
my! – using - 0.04% (3)
posts by email. - 0.04% (3)
newsela: eight weeks - 0.04% (3)
of reading instruction - 0.04% (3)
power of pechakucha - 0.04% (3)
deconstructing the duolingo - 0.04% (3)
what do martial - 0.04% (3)
arts and language - 0.04% (3)
learning have in - 0.04% (3)
use powerpoint like - 0.04% (3)
my own and - 0.04% (3)
powerpoint like a - 0.04% (3)
the pro or - 0.04% (3)
course: a comparison - 0.04% (3)
of university and - 0.04% (3)
this:like loading... march - 0.04% (3)
responses, and short - 0.04% (3)
answers…oh my! – - 0.04% (3)
in writing instruction - 0.04% (3)
reading instruction with - 0.04% (3)
tasks – #tesol2017 - 0.04% (3)
in summary writing - 0.04% (3)
eight weeks of - 0.04% (3)
recent posts off - 0.02% (2)
some reasons you - 0.02% (2)
to blog via - 0.02% (2)
reading and writing - 0.02% (2)
email enter your - 0.02% (2)
email address to - 0.02% (2)
subscribe to this - 0.02% (2)
newsela because it - 0.02% (2)
on the box - 0.02% (2)
because it is - 0.02% (2)
easy to understand - 0.02% (2)
lot of interesting - 0.02% (2)
liked newsela? new - 0.02% (2)
blog and receive - 0.02% (2)
it is not - 0.02% (2)
and writing at - 0.02% (2)
change to “true”. - 0.02% (2)
in my class - 0.02% (2)
would allow students - 0.02% (2)
my employer. subscribe - 0.02% (2)
students had a - 0.02% (2)
– change the - 0.02% (2)
a source for - 0.02% (2)
notifications of new - 0.02% (2)
a main text - 0.02% (2)
as i have - 0.02% (2)
join 103 other - 0.02% (2)
to “true”. this - 0.02% (2)
not those of - 0.02% (2)
hope that students - 0.02% (2)
whiteboard writing for - 0.02% (2)
be or not - 0.02% (2)
wikipedia project to - 0.02% (2)
the other hand, - 0.02% (2)
writing skills: a - 0.02% (2)
a world of - 0.02% (2)
the world / - 0.02% (2)
explicit instruction and - 0.02% (2)
an exploration of - 0.02% (2)
a text box - 0.02% (2)
attention to the - 0.02% (2)
there is enough - 0.02% (2)
test (det) what - 0.02% (2)
of pechakucha deconstructing - 0.02% (2)
blog post will - 0.02% (2)
newsela.com the power - 0.02% (2)
to not be: - 0.02% (2)
corpora and viscera - 0.02% (2)
the developer tab - 0.02% (2)
for almost any - 0.02% (2)
typos here represent - 0.02% (2)
opinions, ideas and - 0.02% (2)
personal blog. the - 0.02% (2)
are a number - 0.02% (2)
clean energy disclaimer - 0.02% (2)
proudly ran with - 0.02% (2)
instruction navigating newsela: - 0.02% (2)
the sake of - 0.02% (2)
lesson: four skills - 0.02% (2)
and speaking level: - 0.02% (2)
upper-intermediate, pre-advanced topic: - 0.02% (2)
one more thanksgiving - 0.02% (2)
listening and speaking - 0.02% (2)
level: upper-intermediate, pre-advanced - 0.02% (2)
– 60s – - 0.02% (2)
and synthesis writing - 0.02% (2)
based on the - 0.02% (2)
in order to - 0.02% (2)
address @twittermy tweets - 0.02% (2)
of my employer. - 0.02% (2)
subscribe to blog - 0.02% (2)
via email enter - 0.02% (2)
to subscribe to - 0.02% (2)
this blog and - 0.02% (2)
receive notifications of - 0.02% (2)
new posts by - 0.02% (2)
email. join 103 - 0.02% (2)
other subscribers email - 0.02% (2)
a presentation on - 0.02% (2)
represent my own - 0.02% (2)
this type of - 0.02% (2)
their own summary - 0.02% (2)
the summaries and - 0.02% (2)
own summary writing - 0.02% (2)
able to identify - 0.02% (2)
students to analyze - 0.02% (2)
student samples and - 0.02% (2)
improve their writing. - 0.02% (2)
focus on the - 0.02% (2)
and not those - 0.02% (2)
and typos here - 0.02% (2)
con article in - 0.02% (2)
not to be - 0.02% (2)
#tesol2017 summaries, responses, - 0.02% (2)
writing instruction navigating - 0.02% (2)
with newsela.com the - 0.02% (2)
common? powerpoint hack: - 0.02% (2)
a whiteboard writing - 0.02% (2)
for the world - 0.02% (2)
/ a world - 0.02% (2)
of writing skills: - 0.02% (2)
a wikipedia project - 0.02% (2)
or to not - 0.02% (2)
the opinions, ideas - 0.02% (2)
be: an exploration - 0.02% (2)
of corpora and - 0.02% (2)
viscera one more - 0.02% (2)
thanksgiving lesson: four - 0.02% (2)
skills and synthesis - 0.02% (2)
writing proudly ran - 0.02% (2)
with clean energy - 0.02% (2)
disclaimer this is - 0.02% (2)
a personal blog. - 0.02% (2)
in the article. - 0.02% (2)
in your own - 0.02% (2)
the questions and - 0.02% (2)
the travel ban - 0.02% (2)
as a main - 0.02% (2)
about students’ reading - 0.02% (2)
give students independent - 0.02% (2)
(as opposed to - 0.02% (2)
read the article - 0.02% (2)
history of immigration - 0.02% (2)
students practiced their - 0.02% (2)
based on an - 0.02% (2)
article related to - 0.02% (2)
article in the - 0.02% (2)
6, 2017anthony schmidt - 0.02% (2)
not allow for - 0.02% (2)
of our public - 0.02% (2)
wanted students to - 0.02% (2)
we looked at - 0.02% (2)
to write a - 0.02% (2)
pro/con article about - 0.02% (2)
students read the - 0.02% (2)
article and then - 0.02% (2)
coursebook text to - 0.02% (2)
reading, reflections, writing - 0.02% (2)
to analyze student - 0.02% (2)
answer this question: - 0.02% (2)
1 point | - 0.02% (2)
this article about - 0.02% (2)
provide two or - 0.02% (2)
help support your - 0.02% (2)
the author of - 0.02% (2)
text to help - 0.02% (2)
support your point. - 0.02% (2)
redistributed them to - 0.02% (2)
parts of the - 0.02% (2)
2 points did - 0.02% (2)
on the back - 0.02% (2)
all parts of - 0.02% (2)
yes (1 pts) - 0.02% (2)
no (0 pts) - 0.02% (2)
did they give - 0.02% (2)
(1 pt) did - 0.02% (2)
pt) did they - 0.02% (2)
yes (-2 pts) - 0.02% (2)
the back of - 0.02% (2)
something that i - 0.02% (2)
i collected the - 0.02% (2)
subscribers email address - 0.02% (2)

Here you can find chart of all your popular one, two and three word phrases. Google and others search engines means your page is about words you use frequently.

Copyright © 2015-2016 hupso.pl. All rights reserved. FB | +G | Twitter

Hupso.pl jest serwisem internetowym, w którym jednym kliknieciem możesz szybko i łatwo sprawdź stronę www pod kątem SEO. Oferujemy darmowe pozycjonowanie stron internetowych oraz wycena domen i stron internetowych. Prowadzimy ranking polskich stron internetowych oraz ranking stron alexa.