2.84 score from hupso.pl for:
anthonyteacher.com



HTML Content


Titleanthony teacher.com | welcome to

Length: 32, Words: 5
Description pusty

Length: 0, Words: 0
Keywords pusty
Robots
Charset UTF-8
Og Meta - Title exist
Og Meta - Description exist
Og Meta - Site name exist
Tytuł powinien zawierać pomiędzy 10 a 70 znaków (ze spacjami), a mniej niż 12 słów w długości.
Meta opis powinien zawierać pomiędzy 50 a 160 znaków (łącznie ze spacjami), a mniej niż 24 słów w długości.
Kodowanie znaków powinny być określone , UTF-8 jest chyba najlepszy zestaw znaków, aby przejść z powodu UTF-8 jest bardziej międzynarodowy kodowaniem.
Otwarte obiekty wykresu powinny być obecne w stronie internetowej (więcej informacji na temat protokołu OpenGraph: http://ogp.me/)

SEO Content

Words/Characters 4034
Text/HTML 28.39 %
Headings H1 18
H2 1
H3 14
H4 0
H5 0
H6 0
H1
welcome to
recent posts
disclaimer
subscribe to blog via email
@twitter
3-2-1- speak: combining peer feedback, accuracy, fluency, and academic speaking
do coursebook writing tasks engender confirmation bias?
behind the scenes of my blog(s) – #eltbehindthescenes
rethinking the five-paragraph essay: the limitations of formulaic writing (#tesol17 report)
yearning to breathe free – an anti-coursebook reflection
off course: a comparison of university and eap coursebook writing tasks – #tesol2017
summaries, responses, and short answers…oh my! – using student samples in writing instruction
posts navigation
welcome
recent posts
disclaimer
subscribe to blog via email
@twitter
H2
anthony teacher.com
H3
share this:
like this:
share this:
like this:
share this:
like this:
share this:
like this:
share this:
like this:
share this:
like this:
share this:
like this:
H4
H5
H6
strong
confirmation bias
introduction
love/hate
give me your tired, your poor,
your huddled masses yearning to breathe free…
notes
what does the research say?
zhang’s action research
my experiences
refers to a claim
agree or disagree
gives reasons
good evaluation
focus on the claim
questions/criteria
points
total
 __ / 12
overall impressions
references
b
i
confirmation bias
introduction
love/hate
give me your tired, your poor,
your huddled masses yearning to breathe free…
notes
what does the research say?
zhang’s action research
my experiences
refers to a claim
agree or disagree
gives reasons
good evaluation
focus on the claim
questions/criteria
points
total
 __ / 12
overall impressions
references
em confirmation bias
introduction
love/hate
give me your tired, your poor,
your huddled masses yearning to breathe free…
notes
what does the research say?
zhang’s action research
my experiences
refers to a claim
agree or disagree
gives reasons
good evaluation
focus on the claim
questions/criteria
points
total
 __ / 12
overall impressions
references
Bolds strong 20
b 0
i 20
em 20
Zawartość strony internetowej powinno zawierać więcej niż 250 słów, z stopa tekst / kod jest wyższy niż 20%.
Pozycji używać znaczników (h1, h2, h3, ...), aby określić temat sekcji lub ustępów na stronie, ale zwykle, użyj mniej niż 6 dla każdego tagu pozycje zachować swoją stronę zwięzły.
Styl używać silnych i kursywy znaczniki podkreślić swoje słowa kluczowe swojej stronie, ale nie nadużywać (mniej niż 16 silnych tagi i 16 znaczników kursywy)

Statystyki strony

twitter:title pusty
twitter:description pusty
google+ itemprop=name pusty
Pliki zewnętrzne 46
Pliki CSS 11
Pliki javascript 35
Plik należy zmniejszyć całkowite odwołanie plików (CSS + JavaScript) do 7-8 maksymalnie.

Linki wewnętrzne i zewnętrzne

Linki 194
Linki wewnętrzne 14
Linki zewnętrzne 180
Linki bez atrybutu Title 150
Linki z atrybutem NOFOLLOW 0
Linki - Użyj atrybutu tytuł dla każdego łącza. Nofollow link jest link, który nie pozwala wyszukiwarkom boty zrealizują są odnośniki no follow. Należy zwracać uwagę na ich użytkowania

Linki wewnętrzne

skip to content #content
blog topics #
more #
contact #ppsshowpopup_100
my tweets
my tweets
cancel #cancel

Linki zewnętrzne

welcome to

anthony teacher.com

http://www.anthonyteacher.com/
home http://www.anthonyteacher.com
activity http://www.anthonyteacher.com/tag/activity
anthony http://www.anthonyteacher.com/tag/anthony
assessment http://www.anthonyteacher.com/tag/assessment
board http://www.anthonyteacher.com/tag/board
code http://www.anthonyteacher.com/tag/code
course books http://www.anthonyteacher.com/tag/course-books
ddl http://www.anthonyteacher.com/tag/ddl
autonomy http://www.anthonyteacher.com/tag/autonomy
eap http://www.anthonyteacher.com/tag/eap
google http://www.anthonyteacher.com/tag/google
grammar http://www.anthonyteacher.com/tag/grammar
ice breakers http://www.anthonyteacher.com/tag/ice-breakers
ideas http://www.anthonyteacher.com/tag/ideas
learning styles http://www.anthonyteacher.com/tag/learning-styles
linguistics http://www.anthonyteacher.com/tag/linguistics
listening http://www.anthonyteacher.com/tag/listening
ma tesol http://www.anthonyteacher.com/tag/ma-tesol
materials http://www.anthonyteacher.com/tag/materials
mobile learning http://www.anthonyteacher.com/tag/mobile-learning
music http://www.anthonyteacher.com/tag/music
professional development http://www.anthonyteacher.com/tag/professional-development
pronunciation http://www.anthonyteacher.com/tag/pronunciation
rant http://www.anthonyteacher.com/tag/rant
reading http://www.anthonyteacher.com/tag/reading
reflections http://www.anthonyteacher.com/tag/reflections
research http://www.anthonyteacher.com/tag/research
resumes http://www.anthonyteacher.com/tag/resumes
reviews http://www.anthonyteacher.com/tag/reviews
rubrics http://www.anthonyteacher.com/tag/rubrics
self-study http://www.anthonyteacher.com/tag/self-study
tools http://www.anthonyteacher.com/tag/tools
video http://www.anthonyteacher.com/tag/videos
vocabulary http://www.anthonyteacher.com/tag/vocabulary
website http://www.anthonyteacher.com/tag/website
writing http://www.anthonyteacher.com/tag/writing
research bites http://www.anthonyteacher.com/category/blog/researchbites
principled washback http://www.anthonyteacher.com/category/blog/principledwashback
listening resources http://www.anthonyteacher.com/listening-resources
elt job interview question database http://www.anthonyteacher.com/elt-job-interview-database
student work http://www.anthonyteacher.com/category/studentwork
facebook http://www.facebook.com/anthonyteacherr
twitter http://www.twitter.com/anthonyteacher
3-2-1- speak: combining peer feedback, accuracy, fluency, and academic speaking http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/3-2-1-speak-combining-peer-feedback-accuracy-fluency-and-academic-speaking
do coursebook writing tasks engender confirmation bias? http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/do-coursebook-writing-tasks-engender-confirmation-bias
behind the scenes of my blog(s) – #eltbehindthescenes http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/behind-the-scenes-of-my-blogs-eltbehindthescenes
rethinking the five-paragraph essay: the limitations of formulaic writing (#tesol17 report) http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/rethinking-the-five-paragraph-essay-the-limitations-of-formulaic-writing-tesol17-report
yearning to breathe free – an anti-coursebook reflection http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/yearning-to-breathe-free
off course: a comparison of university and eap coursebook writing tasks – #tesol2017 http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/off-course-a-comparison-of-university-and-eap-coursebook-writing-tasks-tesol2017
summaries, responses, and short answers…oh my! – using student samples in writing instruction http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/summaries-responses-and-short-answers-oh-my-using-student-samples-in-writing-instruction
navigating newsela: eight weeks of reading instruction with newsela.com http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/navigating-newsela-eight-weeks-of-reading-instruction-with-newsela-com
the power of pechakucha http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/the-power-of-pechakucha
deconstructing the duolingo english test (det) http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/deconstructing-the-duolingo-english-test-det
- https://www.greengeeks.com/track/anthonyteacher/cp-default
- http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/3-2-1-speak-combining-peer-feedback-accuracy-fluency-and-academic-speaking
3-2-1- speak: combining peer feedback, accuracy, fluency, and academic speaking http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/3-2-1-speak-combining-peer-feedback-accuracy-fluency-and-academic-speaking
doing something again and again does lead to improvement https://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/researchbites/research-bites-skill-acquisition-theory-and-language-learning
repeated readings http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/07419325040250040801
continue reading http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/3-2-1-speak-combining-peer-feedback-accuracy-fluency-and-academic-speaking#more-8155
facebook http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/3-2-1-speak-combining-peer-feedback-accuracy-fluency-and-academic-speaking?share=facebook
twitter http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/3-2-1-speak-combining-peer-feedback-accuracy-fluency-and-academic-speaking?share=twitter
google http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/3-2-1-speak-combining-peer-feedback-accuracy-fluency-and-academic-speaking?share=google-plus-1
email http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/3-2-1-speak-combining-peer-feedback-accuracy-fluency-and-academic-speaking?share=email
http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/3-2-1-speak-combining-peer-feedback-accuracy-fluency-and-academic-speaking
anthony schmidt http://www.anthonyteacher.com/author/admin
ideas http://www.anthonyteacher.com/tag/ideas
speaking http://www.anthonyteacher.com/tag/speaking
leave a comment http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/3-2-1-speak-combining-peer-feedback-accuracy-fluency-and-academic-speaking#respond
- http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/do-coursebook-writing-tasks-engender-confirmation-bias
do coursebook writing tasks engender confirmation bias? http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/do-coursebook-writing-tasks-engender-confirmation-bias
wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/confirmation_bias
continue reading http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/do-coursebook-writing-tasks-engender-confirmation-bias#more-8136
facebook http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/do-coursebook-writing-tasks-engender-confirmation-bias?share=facebook
twitter http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/do-coursebook-writing-tasks-engender-confirmation-bias?share=twitter
google http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/do-coursebook-writing-tasks-engender-confirmation-bias?share=google-plus-1
email http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/do-coursebook-writing-tasks-engender-confirmation-bias?share=email
http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/do-coursebook-writing-tasks-engender-confirmation-bias
anthony schmidt http://www.anthonyteacher.com/author/admin
reading http://www.anthonyteacher.com/tag/reading
reflections http://www.anthonyteacher.com/tag/reflections
research http://www.anthonyteacher.com/tag/research
writing http://www.anthonyteacher.com/tag/writing
leave a comment http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/do-coursebook-writing-tasks-engender-confirmation-bias#respond
- http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/behind-the-scenes-of-my-blogs-eltbehindthescenes
behind the scenes of my blog(s) – #eltbehindthescenes http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/behind-the-scenes-of-my-blogs-eltbehindthescenes
post https://theteacherjames.com/2017/02/23/150-elt-blog-post-ideas-for-when-youve-hit-writers-block/
elt research bites http://www.eltresearchbites.com
continue reading http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/behind-the-scenes-of-my-blogs-eltbehindthescenes#more-8138
facebook http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/behind-the-scenes-of-my-blogs-eltbehindthescenes?share=facebook
twitter http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/behind-the-scenes-of-my-blogs-eltbehindthescenes?share=twitter
google http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/behind-the-scenes-of-my-blogs-eltbehindthescenes?share=google-plus-1
email http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/behind-the-scenes-of-my-blogs-eltbehindthescenes?share=email
http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/behind-the-scenes-of-my-blogs-eltbehindthescenes
anthony schmidt http://www.anthonyteacher.com/author/admin
anthony http://www.anthonyteacher.com/tag/anthony
reflections http://www.anthonyteacher.com/tag/reflections
leave a comment http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/behind-the-scenes-of-my-blogs-eltbehindthescenes#respond
- http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/rethinking-the-five-paragraph-essay-the-limitations-of-formulaic-writing-tesol17-report
rethinking the five-paragraph essay: the limitations of formulaic writing (#tesol17 report) http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/rethinking-the-five-paragraph-essay-the-limitations-of-formulaic-writing-tesol17-report
continue reading http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/rethinking-the-five-paragraph-essay-the-limitations-of-formulaic-writing-tesol17-report#more-8127
facebook http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/rethinking-the-five-paragraph-essay-the-limitations-of-formulaic-writing-tesol17-report?share=facebook
twitter http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/rethinking-the-five-paragraph-essay-the-limitations-of-formulaic-writing-tesol17-report?share=twitter
google http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/rethinking-the-five-paragraph-essay-the-limitations-of-formulaic-writing-tesol17-report?share=google-plus-1
email http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/rethinking-the-five-paragraph-essay-the-limitations-of-formulaic-writing-tesol17-report?share=email
http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/rethinking-the-five-paragraph-essay-the-limitations-of-formulaic-writing-tesol17-report
anthony schmidt http://www.anthonyteacher.com/author/admin
research http://www.anthonyteacher.com/tag/research
writing http://www.anthonyteacher.com/tag/writing
leave a comment http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/rethinking-the-five-paragraph-essay-the-limitations-of-formulaic-writing-tesol17-report#respond
- http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/yearning-to-breathe-free
yearning to breathe free – an anti-coursebook reflection http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/yearning-to-breathe-free
in their defense http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/my-favorite-coursebooks-or-not-all-coursebooks-are-the-same
most recently against them http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/off-course-a-comparison-of-university-and-eap-coursebook-writing-tasks-tesol2017
geoff jordan’s ceaseless attacks against coursebooks https://criticalelt.wordpress.com/2017/03/15/two-versions-of-task-based-language-teaching/
five paragraph essay http://blog.tesol.org/why-we-still-wont-teach-the-5-paragraph-essay/
thematic focus on us history http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/on-teaching-history
leki and carson http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/reading-with-a-purpose-connecting-reading-and-writing
in another article https://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/researchbites/research-bites-rethinking-reading-instruction
bottom-up listening practice https://www.anthonyteacher.com/tag/listening
newsela http://www.newsela.com
voa history http://manythings.org/voa/history/
the great courses http://www.thegreatcourses.com/courses/turning-points-in-american-history.html
emma lazarus https://newsela.com/articles/emma-lazarus-refugees/id/26431/
the search for general tso http://www.thesearchforgeneraltso.com/
skill acquisition theory http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/researchbites/research-bites-skill-acquisition-theory-and-language-learning
facebook http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/yearning-to-breathe-free?share=facebook
twitter http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/yearning-to-breathe-free?share=twitter
google http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/yearning-to-breathe-free?share=google-plus-1
email http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/yearning-to-breathe-free?share=email
http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/yearning-to-breathe-free
anthony schmidt http://www.anthonyteacher.com/author/admin
course books http://www.anthonyteacher.com/tag/course-books
reflections http://www.anthonyteacher.com/tag/reflections
1 comment http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/yearning-to-breathe-free#comments
- http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/off-course-a-comparison-of-university-and-eap-coursebook-writing-tasks-tesol2017
off course: a comparison of university and eap coursebook writing tasks – #tesol2017 http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/off-course-a-comparison-of-university-and-eap-coursebook-writing-tasks-tesol2017
powerpoint (in pdf format) http://www.anthonyteacher.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/off-course-a-comparison-of-university-and-eap-writing-tasks.pdf
my handout http://www.anthonyteacher.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/off-course-a-comparison-of-university-and-eap-writing-tasks-handout.pdf
facebook http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/off-course-a-comparison-of-university-and-eap-coursebook-writing-tasks-tesol2017?share=facebook
twitter http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/off-course-a-comparison-of-university-and-eap-coursebook-writing-tasks-tesol2017?share=twitter
google http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/off-course-a-comparison-of-university-and-eap-coursebook-writing-tasks-tesol2017?share=google-plus-1
email http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/off-course-a-comparison-of-university-and-eap-coursebook-writing-tasks-tesol2017?share=email
http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/off-course-a-comparison-of-university-and-eap-coursebook-writing-tasks-tesol2017
anthony schmidt http://www.anthonyteacher.com/author/admin
research http://www.anthonyteacher.com/tag/research
writing http://www.anthonyteacher.com/tag/writing
10 comments http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/off-course-a-comparison-of-university-and-eap-coursebook-writing-tasks-tesol2017#comments
- http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/summaries-responses-and-short-answers-oh-my-using-student-samples-in-writing-instruction
summaries, responses, and short answers…oh my! – using student samples in writing instruction http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/summaries-responses-and-short-answers-oh-my-using-student-samples-in-writing-instruction
for this article https://newsela.com/articles/sleepy-students/id/5128/
this article https://newsela.com/articles/eatlessmeat-procon/id/13884/
this text on driverless cars https://newsela.com/articles/selfdrivingcars-procon/id/15469/
this article about a horseless carriage https://newsela.com/articles/historic-news-horselesscarriage/id/17692/
facebook http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/summaries-responses-and-short-answers-oh-my-using-student-samples-in-writing-instruction?share=facebook
twitter http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/summaries-responses-and-short-answers-oh-my-using-student-samples-in-writing-instruction?share=twitter
google http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/summaries-responses-and-short-answers-oh-my-using-student-samples-in-writing-instruction?share=google-plus-1
email http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/summaries-responses-and-short-answers-oh-my-using-student-samples-in-writing-instruction?share=email
http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/summaries-responses-and-short-answers-oh-my-using-student-samples-in-writing-instruction
anthony schmidt http://www.anthonyteacher.com/author/admin
reading http://www.anthonyteacher.com/tag/reading
reflections http://www.anthonyteacher.com/tag/reflections
writing http://www.anthonyteacher.com/tag/writing
leave a comment http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/summaries-responses-and-short-answers-oh-my-using-student-samples-in-writing-instruction#respond
http://www.anthonyteacher.com/page/2
3-2-1- speak: combining peer feedback, accuracy, fluency, and academic speaking http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/3-2-1-speak-combining-peer-feedback-accuracy-fluency-and-academic-speaking
do coursebook writing tasks engender confirmation bias? http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/do-coursebook-writing-tasks-engender-confirmation-bias
behind the scenes of my blog(s) – #eltbehindthescenes http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/behind-the-scenes-of-my-blogs-eltbehindthescenes
rethinking the five-paragraph essay: the limitations of formulaic writing (#tesol17 report) http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/rethinking-the-five-paragraph-essay-the-limitations-of-formulaic-writing-tesol17-report
yearning to breathe free – an anti-coursebook reflection http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/yearning-to-breathe-free
off course: a comparison of university and eap coursebook writing tasks – #tesol2017 http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/off-course-a-comparison-of-university-and-eap-coursebook-writing-tasks-tesol2017
summaries, responses, and short answers…oh my! – using student samples in writing instruction http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/summaries-responses-and-short-answers-oh-my-using-student-samples-in-writing-instruction
navigating newsela: eight weeks of reading instruction with newsela.com http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/navigating-newsela-eight-weeks-of-reading-instruction-with-newsela-com
the power of pechakucha http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/the-power-of-pechakucha
deconstructing the duolingo english test (det) http://www.anthonyteacher.com/blog/deconstructing-the-duolingo-english-test-det
- https://www.greengeeks.com/track/anthonyteacher/cp-default
proudly powered by wordpress http://wordpress.org/
automattic http://automattic.com/
anthony teacher.com http://www.anthonyteacher.com/
proudly powered by wordpress https://wordpress.org/

Zdjęcia

Zdjęcia 10
Zdjęcia bez atrybutu ALT 9
Zdjęcia bez atrybutu TITLE 10
Korzystanie Obraz ALT i TITLE atrybutu dla każdego obrazu.

Zdjęcia bez atrybutu TITLE

https://ads.greengeeks.com/0001009.gif
http://www.anthonyteacher.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/maxresdefault-e1492871505248.jpg
http://www.anthonyteacher.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/confirmation.png
http://www.anthonyteacher.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/main-e1492001488968.jpg
http://www.anthonyteacher.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/fpts.png
http://www.anthonyteacher.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/statue-of-liberty.jpg
http://www.anthonyteacher.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/welcome-e1490328998648-770x226.jpg
http://www.anthonyteacher.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/writing-1-e1488822513170-770x169.jpg
https://ads.greengeeks.com/0001009.gif
http://www.anthonyteacher.com/wp-content/plugins/jetpack/modules/sharedaddy/images/loading.gif

Zdjęcia bez atrybutu ALT

https://ads.greengeeks.com/0001009.gif
http://www.anthonyteacher.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/maxresdefault-e1492871505248.jpg
http://www.anthonyteacher.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/confirmation.png
http://www.anthonyteacher.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/main-e1492001488968.jpg
http://www.anthonyteacher.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/fpts.png
http://www.anthonyteacher.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/statue-of-liberty.jpg
http://www.anthonyteacher.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/welcome-e1490328998648-770x226.jpg
http://www.anthonyteacher.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/writing-1-e1488822513170-770x169.jpg
https://ads.greengeeks.com/0001009.gif

Ranking:


Alexa Traffic
Daily Global Rank Trend
Daily Reach (Percent)









Majestic SEO











Text on page:

welcome to anthony teacher.com menu widgets social links search skip to content home blog topics activity anthony assessment board code course books ddl autonomy eap google grammar ice breakers ideas learning styles linguistics listening ma tesol materials mobile learning music professional development pronunciation rant reading reflections research resumes reviews rubrics self-study tools video vocabulary website writing research bites principled washback more listening resources elt job interview question database student work contact facebook twitter recent posts 3-2-1- speak: combining peer feedback, accuracy, fluency, and academic speaking do coursebook writing tasks engender confirmation bias? behind the scenes of my blog(s) – #eltbehindthescenes rethinking the five-paragraph essay: the limitations of formulaic writing (#tesol17 report) yearning to breathe free – an anti-coursebook reflection off course: a comparison of university and eap coursebook writing tasks – #tesol2017 summaries, responses, and short answers…oh my! – using student samples in writing instruction navigating newsela: eight weeks of reading instruction with newsela.com the power of pechakucha deconstructing the duolingo english test (det) proudly ran with clean energy disclaimer this is a personal blog. the opinions, ideas and typos here represent my own and not those of my employer. subscribe to blog via email enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. join 107 other subscribers email address @twittermy tweets search for: 3-2-1- speak: combining peer feedback, accuracy, fluency, and academic speaking practice makes perfect, right? it’s not as simple as that, but there is some evidence that doing something again and again does lead to improvement. i’ve just been reading research about repeated readings leading to improved comprehension. as interesting as that is, this particular post is not research-based, per se. instead, i’d like to describe an activity i have been doing in an advanced listening and speaking class, one which i first read about on twitter and then actually got to experience myself at the 2017 tesol convention in seattle. this activity, based on repeated speaking, combines a range of different skills: content and critical thinking, listening, accuracy, feedback, fluency, and academic discourse for a winning combination of great practice that students enjoy (so much so that i was inspired to write this post). continue reading → share this:facebooktwittergoogleemaillike this:like loading... april 22, 2017anthony schmidt ideas, speaking leave a comment do coursebook writing tasks engender confirmation bias? bias is part of human nature. we all have biases, many of which are implicit. one particular form of this is confirmation bias, the “tendency to search for, interpret, favor, and recall information in a way that confirms one’s preexisting beliefs” (wikipedia). in other words, it is having an opinion and accepting anything that supports it while rejecting anything that does not. critical thinking is considered a kind of antithesis or antidote to this type of bias, which is why it and related concepts (i.e. evidence-based thinking) have become so popular lately, being a major part of the united states’ common core standards and a skill that is constantly being discussed in all circles of education, elt included. continue reading → share this:facebooktwittergoogleemaillike this:like loading... april 14, 2017anthony schmidt reading, reflections, research, writing leave a comment behind the scenes of my blog(s) – #eltbehindthescenes there is a current blog challenge floating around the elt twittersphere, prompted by this post. so, needing to take a break from lesson planning and research, i thought i’d give a little behind-the-scenes look at both my blogs – anthonyteacher.com and elt research bites. continue reading → share this:facebooktwittergoogleemaillike this:like loading... april 12, 2017anthony schmidt anthony, reflections leave a comment rethinking the five-paragraph essay: the limitations of formulaic writing (#tesol17 report) introduction do you remember the scene in the dead poets society where a student reads a passage on how to measure poetry on an x- and y- axis, and then john keating (robin williams) has students rip out those pages? how can the muddled mess and maxims of poetry be codified into a formulaic scale of “greatness”? well, if you agree with that scene, then you probably agree that the five-paragraph essay must go. continue reading → share this:facebooktwittergoogleemaillike this:like loading... april 4, 2017anthony schmidt research, writing leave a comment yearning to breathe free – an anti-coursebook reflection i have had a love/hate relationship with coursebooks, moving every term close and closer to the “hate” side. i have written in their defense, and most recently against them, for the most part. i also enjoy indulging in the just cruelty of geoff jordan’s ceaseless attacks against coursebooks, with him constantly offering a summary of coursebooks’ more damning qualities: 1) they assume declarative becomes procedural knowledge1, 2) they assume language is learned in a linear fashion2, and 3) learners learn what they are taught. at the 2017 tesol conference in seattle, i gravitated towards sessions that dealt with subverting or suspending coursebooks or their content, in particular a session on the myths of the five paragraph essay (common coursebook fodder) admittedly, hate is a very strong term. depending on the book, i find some to be useful supplements, some to be annoying, others to be a nuisance, and still others to be a downright hindrance. this term, i have been lucky enough to teach coursebook free for one of my courses – an advanced listening and speaking course that has a thematic focus on us history. i can’t explain just how liberated i feel in this course! not having a book means i don’t have to become a contortionist, trying to fit in curricular goals, interesting content, and other important skills, all the while using the damn book because they students have it with them every day. instead, i’m using content in the classroom, and what i have fully realized is that textbooks are not content, and the “content” in textbooks is also not content. because they are presented as exercises, practice, tools, they seem to be mostly disconnected from the entire purpose of language: learning and communication. they are what leki and carson (1997) referred to as something that serves “to infantilize our students, denying them a stance of engagement with serious and compelling subject matter”. yes, students can learn from the texts in a book, but there is always that sense that they are in a language classroom, moving on from one page to the other, one topic to the other, without building up an substantial knowledge of a topic. leki, in another article, argued that this topical knowledge building is an important tool for true engagement with a text. in other words, when there is a greater purpose – learning rather than practice, students are truly reading for meaning and reading to go beyond only language development skills. so, does that mean we don’t have language practice? nope, not at all. there is still vocabulary, there is still grammar to work with, there is still bottom-up listening practice, structured and open speaking practice, and so on. however, this language work is all done to facilitate our main goal of learning a subject rather than learning english. so, does this mean i spend hours preparing materials? nope, not at all. in fact, i’m actually finding that i can spend less time preparing (or contorting, as i mentioned earlier) and can go slower and offer more discussion and activities because i don’t have to rush to move from my material to the book in order to feel like student’s got their money’s worth. in fact, i think that by learning a subject through english, they are getting more bang for their buck than by finishing a few units in a coursebook. so, does this mean i am scouring the internet for resources every week? nope, not at all. instead, i am using a staple of articles from newsela, voa history, and a lecture series from the great courses as my main sources of material. for example, this week, we are learning about immigration in america throughout its history. we started with several background articles on immigration, are working our way through the lecture (which includes various listening and speaking activities), and next week, we will be reading about emma lazarus, who penned the famous lines “give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free…” in the poem “the new colossus”, which was written to help fundraise the statue of liberty and can be found in the museum at its base. this article references donald trump and makes a great transition to understanding the immigration issues of the present. we’ll also be watching a clip from the search for general tso to look at chinese immigration and how to explain why chinese people make up 1.5% of our population, yet there are three times more chinese restaurants than mcdonalds. needless to say, the content is useful and numerous. i was yearning to breathe free, and now, like lady liberty, the chain lies broken at my feet. i am wondering if i can simply stop here. when i think of all the ways i could teach a course without a coursebook, lady liberty’s torch burns bright in my mind! pryjatys hen belma notes this is one of jordan’s arguments that i tend to disagree with, as skill acquisition theory is a well researched area that does show a connection between practice (with feedback) and the internalization of a skill. sometimes i wonder if jordan is only referring to grammar books, or books that rely heavily on a grammar-based syllabus. does this particular argument hold true for a book based on a functional syllabus or a topical syllabus? what about books with little to no grammar? his point, i think, is that there needs to be a greater focus on emergent grammar, and that can never be found in a book. share this:facebooktwittergoogleemaillike this:like loading... march 30, 2017anthony schmidt course books, reflections 1 comment off course: a comparison of university and eap coursebook writing tasks – #tesol2017 here, you can find both my powerpoint (in pdf format) and my handout from my presentation today (march 23) at tesol 2017 in seattle. my presentation looked at my research comparing university writing tasks and eap coursebook writing tasks. thanks for attending or checking out my material. comments and feedback are appreciated! share this:facebooktwittergoogleemaillike this:like loading... march 24, 2017anthony schmidt research, writing 10 comments summaries, responses, and short answers…oh my! – using student samples in writing instruction last year at the 2016 setesol conference in louisville, kentucky, i attended a presentation on using student samples in summary writing instruction. the presentation was given by dr. cui zhang, and it consisted of a literature review and her own action research. i was intrigued by the idea because, unlike peer review where effectiveness is hit or miss and the focus could be on anything from grammar to structure, analyzing student examples allows for the precise identification and evaluation of specific aspects of a writing. this type of analysis allows students to see various ways students were able to successfully or unsuccessfully achieve a specific goal, one which they also have attempted. i recently incorporated zhang’s ideas with not only summary writing but also response writing and short-answer writing, and i saw immediate positive results in student revisions and subsequent writing. therefore, i wanted to share these ideas with you. what does the research say? baba, 2009: reading comprehension plays a large role in successful summary writing, while the role of lexical proficiency varies. however, “well-structured semantic network of words and the ability to productively use this network as well as the l2 writer’s metalinguistic knowledge” also has an influence. keck, 2006: l2 writers paraphrase less and copy more of a source text than l1 writers. demaree et al., 2008: students feel that summary writing is useful, and it is better done when there is an authentic purpose (such as preparing for an exam). students feel the only summary writing audience is themselves and it is not very helpful for others. mcdonough et al., 2014: summary writing improves over time, but requires explicit instruction and may be a lengthy process. the authors looked at reference to the source (increase), verbatim copying (increase in frequency, decrease in length), a “phrase-level modifications” (no change). according to the authors: “the path toward eliminating textual misappropriation may be both indirect and lengthy.” becker, 2016: students who develop or practice applying a rubric show greater increases in summary writing performance. zhang’s action research the goal of zhang’s research was to see if students could reliably judge summaries written by their peers and then use these judgments to improve their own summary writing. zhang worked with 9 students in a university-level esl course. after a text was read and summaries were written, zhang collected the summaries and chose several for analysis. they analyzed the summaries without a rubric and discussed their judgments. they read a second article and then produced another summary. overall, zhang found that students could all find the weaknesses or strengths in the summaries and their own summary writing did improve, though not to the point of perfection. she recommends that summary improvement will take time. she also recommends that using previous students’ writing rather than writings from the current students may reduce some reluctance to judge their peers. my experiences summaries – in my classes, i followed a similar procedure for this article. however, i used a modified checklist rubric to help students evaluate the summaries. i gave students a handout with 4 summaries collected from students. they were modified for clarity (grammar, spelling) and were chosen because they represented very poor, fair, and great summaries. here is an example (note: the bullets on the right were actually check boxes): although sleepiness is a part of life, it seems difficult for schools to start school late. the students can change their schedule to get enough sleep. whether someone likes it or not, adequate sleep is important for our lives, and it’s especially necessary for children. the more sleep, the healthier and happier life people will have. this summary… …introduced the article and the author. …contained the overall main idea in the second sentence. …contained all the main ideas: not enough sleep they are busy, puberty, school should start later starting school later is difficult …had no extra details. …had no change of meaning …was written in the student’s .own words. from the four different examples, most students were able to identify the best summary and understand what it had that the others were lacking. after the group discussions, a class discussion of each summary entailed, each time highlighting the elements that were missing or included. this was an attempt to be explicit and reinforce what a good summary contained. after this activity, students revised their summaries. about a week later, they also wrote new summaries, and for many i saw great improvement. in particular, there were more references to the original source text (according to [author], in [title],…) and less verbatim copying. however, there were still issues with including main ideas and excluding irrelevant details. this showed me that being able to identify what is important was something that needed to be focused on more in class. responses – a summary is a pretty straight forward genre that requires students to simply retell important details using new words. responses, on the other hand, are more varied in terms of content. with only minor directions (“give your evaluation of the article”) and no instruction, student responses to this article went from clear evaluation of the original text to complete departures and explorations of students’ own, often unrelated, opinions. i saw another chance for students to analyze student samples and improve their writing. since no students completed the assignment correctly, i collected 3 student samples and wrote a fourth. i then created another check list rubric that students could use to evaluate the articles. students discussed the responses together and then we discussed them as a class. here is an example from the handout: i agree with the pro statement that people should eat less meat. first, eating less meat is healthy for us. people will be less obese and avoid disease. second, we should eat more fruit, vegetables and cereals. these plants need to use machines and they need to use the power. people should use more solar energy, wind energy and water energy to generate electricity. finally, we should plant more trees because the trees can help reserve the water and prevent soil erosion. the student refers to a claim in the article the student states whether they agree or disagree with a claim from the article. the student gives reasons why they agree or disagree. these reasons show good evaluation of the claim. the reasons focus on the claim and not unrelated ideas. for this rubric, i was trying to direct students to the fact that a response to an article is not simply an opinion of the topic but an analysis of the ideas contained in the article. in other words, the focus should still be on the article, not only the student’s opinion. and even when the opinion is given, it must be clearly related to the ideas in the article. this seemed like the first time students encountered such an assignment and the evaluation clearly – hence me writing a fourth example. as with the summaries, student revisions and subsequent writings showed some improvement. short answer – seeing a pattern in students writing and their familiarity with writing assignments, i preempted difficulty with short answer writing assignments and gave students explicit and step-by-step instructions in both understanding the question and writing the answer. working with this text on driverless cars, we first looked at the default writing prompt from newsela: summarize the central idea of either the pro or the con article in a few lines. what claims made by the author of the chosen article are not supported by evidence? give two-three examples from the text to better illustrate your point. we analyzed this assignment by breaking it down into parts: in your own words, write the main idea of the pro or con article in a sentence or two answer this question: what claims are weak because they lack evidence? answer this question: what are two or three examples that show there is a lack of evidence. students seemed genuinely surprised that the question was very complex. therefore, this question analysis proved to be very valuable. we then discussed how to answer this question in a paragraph and wrote a model answer together. for homework, i had students consider the driverless car article as well as this article about a horseless carriage. i then gave them the choice of answering one of these questions: what similarities exist between horseless carriages and driverless cars? provide two or three examples from the text to help support your point. how do technological advances like new types of automobiles affect everyday life? use one or two examples from each article to explain past or future changes. do you think the author of this article would share similar opinions (or tones) as the pro or con author? provide two or three examples from the text to help support your point. (no students answered this question). i collected the student examples in the next class and redistributed them to students individually. i then gave each student the following rubric: questions/criteria points did they try to answer all parts of the question? only one part: 1 point | both parts: 2 points did they provide evidence from both articles? only one article: 1 point | both articles: 2 points did they do a good job answering the question? yes (3 pts) no (1 pt) maybe (2 pts) (please explain on the back of this paper) did they use phrases such as “according to” or “the author states”? yes (1 pts) no (0 pts) did they give extra details that were unnecessary? yes (-1 pt) no (1 pt) did they write a summary? yes (-2 pts) no (1 pt) did they give an opinion that was unrelated to the questions? yes (-2 pts) no (1 pt) was the answer easy to understand? yes (1 pts) no (0 pts) total  __ / 12 students had about 20 minutes to read and analyze the answer they were given. i assisted students with answering questions, and i prompted students to leave clear feedback on the back of the paper. as students worked, i made sure their analyses were accurate, and if i disagreed with a student, i asked them to provide justification for me. sometimes i had to gently nudge students to fix their analysis because they had clearly misunderstood something. however, more times than not, students noticed something that i had overlooked. after the 20 minutes, i collected the answers and the rubrics and redistributed them to the appropriate students. i then gave students the rest of class to revise their answers, if necessary, and ask me any questions to clarify or improve their writing. for most students, there was immediate improvement. on a subsequent reading test that involved a short-answer question, i saw more answers that fully answered all parts of the questions, something they had been previously lacking. overall impressions i found that getting students to analyze student samples was very effective at not only understanding what good writing should contain, but also at helping to clarify writing expectations, something that is often hard to communicate, especially with unfamiliar genres or complex assignments. for most of these assignments, i provided rubrics beforehand, but students often do not pay attention to them. however, even if students had focused on them, i believe that providing rubrics afterward, focusing greater applied attention on them, and then allowing students to revise their writing could have a great positive impact on their writing. references baba, k. (2009). aspects of lexical proficiency in writing summaries in a foreign language. journal of second language writing, 18(3), 191-208. becker, a. (2016). student-generated scoring rubrics: examining their formative value for improving esl students’ writing performance. assessing writing, 29, 15-24. demaree, d., allie, s., low, m., & taylor, j. (2008, october). quantitative and qualitative analysis of student textbook summary writing. in c. henderson, m. sabella, & l. hsu (eds.), aip conference proceedings (vol. 1064, no. 1, pp. 107-110). aip. keck, c. (2006). the use of paraphrase in summary writing: a comparison of l1 and l2 writers. journal of second language writing, 15(4), 261-278. mcdonough, k., crawford, w. j., & de vleeschauwer, j. (2014). summary writing in a thai efl university context. journal of second language writing, 24, 20-32. share this:facebooktwittergoogleemaillike this:like loading... march 6, 2017anthony schmidt reading, reflections, writing leave a comment posts navigation ← welcome welcome to my blog, where i share my reflections, feelings, thoughts, research and experiences about english language teaching. recent posts 3-2-1- speak: combining peer feedback, accuracy, fluency, and academic speaking do coursebook writing tasks engender confirmation bias? behind the scenes of my blog(s) – #eltbehindthescenes rethinking the five-paragraph essay: the limitations of formulaic writing (#tesol17 report) yearning to breathe free – an anti-coursebook reflection off course: a comparison of university and eap coursebook writing tasks – #tesol2017 summaries, responses, and short answers…oh my! – using student samples in writing instruction navigating newsela: eight weeks of reading instruction with newsela.com the power of pechakucha deconstructing the duolingo english test (det) proudly ran with clean energy disclaimer this is a personal blog. the opinions, ideas and typos here represent my own and not those of my employer. subscribe to blog via email enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. join 107 other subscribers email address @twittermy tweets © 2009-2017 anthony schmidt | proudly powered by wordpress | theme: sorbet by automattic. the thoughts expressed on this site are my own and do not represent any other institution. anthony teacher.com proudly powered by wordpress theme: sorbet child. send to email address your name your email address cancel post was not sent - check your email addresses! email check failed, please try again sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email. %d bloggers like this:


Here you find all texts from your page as Google (googlebot) and others search engines seen it.

Words density analysis:

Numbers of all words: 3994

One word

Two words phrases

Three words phrases

the - 7.51% (300)
and - 3.28% (131)
student - 1.85% (74)
our - 1.58% (63)
his - 1.5% (60)
this - 1.4% (56)
writing - 1.4% (56)
her - 1.4% (56)
con - 1.28% (51)
students - 1.25% (50)
that - 1.2% (48)
for - 1.2% (48)
pro - 1.08% (43)
book - 1.03% (41)
not - 0.88% (35)
with - 0.85% (34)
are - 0.8% (32)
course - 0.75% (30)
they - 0.75% (30)
all - 0.7% (28)
eat - 0.7% (28)
here - 0.65% (26)
article - 0.65% (26)
use - 0.6% (24)
answer - 0.58% (23)
hen - 0.55% (22)
from - 0.55% (22)
like - 0.55% (22)
read - 0.53% (21)
summary - 0.53% (21)
their - 0.5% (20)
search - 0.5% (20)
you - 0.5% (20)
email - 0.5% (20)
- 0.48% (19)
one - 0.45% (18)
coursebook - 0.45% (18)
out - 0.45% (18)
how - 0.45% (18)
was - 0.45% (18)
other - 0.45% (18)
were - 0.43% (17)
question - 0.43% (17)
reading - 0.4% (16)
summaries - 0.4% (16)
there - 0.4% (16)
research - 0.4% (16)
this: - 0.38% (15)
part - 0.38% (15)
some - 0.38% (15)
blog - 0.38% (15)
more - 0.38% (15)
text - 0.38% (15)
them - 0.38% (15)
idea - 0.38% (15)
have - 0.35% (14)
your - 0.35% (14)
2017 - 0.35% (14)
less - 0.35% (14)
anthony - 0.33% (13)
sent - 0.33% (13)
can - 0.33% (13)
what - 0.33% (13)
then - 0.33% (13)
learn - 0.3% (12)
twitter - 0.3% (12)
new - 0.3% (12)
example - 0.3% (12)
per - 0.3% (12)
ice - 0.3% (12)
share - 0.28% (11)
back - 0.28% (11)
books - 0.28% (11)
own - 0.28% (11)
great - 0.28% (11)
point - 0.28% (11)
rubric - 0.28% (11)
language - 0.28% (11)
had - 0.28% (11)
improve - 0.28% (11)
tesol - 0.28% (11)
ideas - 0.28% (11)
post - 0.25% (10)
using - 0.25% (10)
very - 0.25% (10)
each - 0.25% (10)
form - 0.25% (10)
ask - 0.25% (10)
efl - 0.25% (10)
content - 0.25% (10)
think - 0.25% (10)
work - 0.25% (10)
give - 0.25% (10)
agree - 0.23% (9)
list - 0.23% (9)
scene - 0.23% (9)
class - 0.23% (9)
opinion - 0.23% (9)
response - 0.23% (9)
also - 0.23% (9)
about - 0.23% (9)
but - 0.23% (9)
practice - 0.23% (9)
time - 0.23% (9)
only - 0.23% (9)
reflection - 0.23% (9)
speaking - 0.23% (9)
instruction - 0.23% (9)
comment - 0.2% (8)
facebook - 0.2% (8)
examples - 0.2% (8)
pts) - 0.2% (8)
learning - 0.2% (8)
grammar - 0.2% (8)
author - 0.2% (8)
on. - 0.2% (8)
than - 0.2% (8)
does - 0.2% (8)
google - 0.2% (8)
two - 0.2% (8)
claim - 0.2% (8)
schmidt - 0.2% (8)
focus - 0.2% (8)
did - 0.2% (8)
tasks - 0.2% (8)
because - 0.2% (8)
elt - 0.2% (8)
writing. - 0.18% (7)
words - 0.18% (7)
samples - 0.18% (7)
feedback - 0.18% (7)
zhang - 0.18% (7)
both - 0.18% (7)
behind - 0.18% (7)
responses - 0.18% (7)
scenes - 0.18% (7)
short - 0.18% (7)
see - 0.18% (7)
should - 0.18% (7)
this:facebooktwittergoogleemaillike - 0.18% (7)
this:like - 0.18% (7)
2017anthony - 0.18% (7)
assignment - 0.18% (7)
get - 0.18% (7)
bias - 0.18% (7)
listening - 0.18% (7)
loading... - 0.18% (7)
write - 0.18% (7)
address - 0.18% (7)
ran - 0.18% (7)
any - 0.18% (7)
yes - 0.18% (7)
help - 0.18% (7)
something - 0.18% (7)
thinking - 0.15% (6)
subscribe - 0.15% (6)
skill - 0.15% (6)
analysis - 0.15% (6)
answers - 0.15% (6)
try - 0.15% (6)
leave - 0.15% (6)
off - 0.15% (6)
free - 0.15% (6)
peer - 0.15% (6)
look - 0.15% (6)
paragraph - 0.15% (6)
second - 0.15% (6)
term - 0.15% (6)
most - 0.15% (6)
source - 0.15% (6)
questions - 0.15% (6)
reflections - 0.15% (6)
could - 0.15% (6)
check - 0.15% (6)
teach - 0.15% (6)
these - 0.15% (6)
still - 0.15% (6)
writing, - 0.15% (6)
week - 0.15% (6)
car - 0.15% (6)
need - 0.15% (6)
evidence - 0.15% (6)
which - 0.15% (6)
main - 0.15% (6)
however, - 0.15% (6)
show - 0.15% (6)
topic - 0.15% (6)
power - 0.15% (6)
mean - 0.15% (6)
posts - 0.15% (6)
university - 0.15% (6)
year - 0.15% (6)
gave - 0.13% (5)
will - 0.13% (5)
important - 0.13% (5)
discussed - 0.13% (5)
sleep - 0.13% (5)
again - 0.13% (5)
feel - 0.13% (5)
yearning - 0.13% (5)
people - 0.13% (5)
rubrics - 0.13% (5)
written - 0.13% (5)
five - 0.13% (5)
energy - 0.13% (5)
over - 0.13% (5)
well - 0.13% (5)
particular - 0.13% (5)
though - 0.13% (5)
three - 0.13% (5)
essay - 0.13% (5)
articles - 0.13% (5)
collected - 0.13% (5)
improvement - 0.13% (5)
material - 0.13% (5)
summaries, - 0.13% (5)
breathe - 0.13% (5)
based - 0.13% (5)
after - 0.13% (5)
way - 0.13% (5)
english - 0.13% (5)
eap - 0.13% (5)
pt) - 0.13% (5)
provide - 0.13% (5)
clear - 0.13% (5)
analyze - 0.13% (5)
related - 0.13% (5)
evaluation - 0.13% (5)
able - 0.13% (5)
understand - 0.13% (5)
accuracy, - 0.1% (4)
march - 0.1% (4)
greater - 0.1% (4)
confirmation - 0.1% (4)
tend - 0.1% (4)
feedback, - 0.1% (4)
seem - 0.1% (4)
found - 0.1% (4)
coursebooks - 0.1% (4)
immigration - 0.1% (4)
recent - 0.1% (4)
academic - 0.1% (4)
explain - 0.1% (4)
disagree - 0.1% (4)
saw - 0.1% (4)
knowledge - 0.1% (4)
goal - 0.1% (4)
fully - 0.1% (4)
times - 0.1% (4)
another - 0.1% (4)
find - 0.1% (4)
fluency, - 0.1% (4)
practice, - 0.1% (4)
others - 0.1% (4)
presentation - 0.1% (4)
looked - 0.1% (4)
books, - 0.1% (4)
when - 0.1% (4)
right - 0.1% (4)
responses, - 0.1% (4)
rest - 0.1% (4)
parts - 0.1% (4)
research, - 0.1% (4)
change - 0.1% (4)
start - 0.1% (4)
so, - 0.1% (4)
school - 0.1% (4)
lack - 0.1% (4)
good - 0.1% (4)
continue - 0.1% (4)
comparison - 0.1% (4)
opinions - 0.1% (4)
- 0.1% (4)
april - 0.1% (4)
words, - 0.1% (4)
details - 0.1% (4)
support - 0.1% (4)
improvement. - 0.1% (4)
contained - 0.1% (4)
every - 0.1% (4)
proudly - 0.1% (4)
activity - 0.1% (4)
se. - 0.1% (4)
may - 0.1% (4)
reference - 0.1% (4)
assignments - 0.1% (4)
been - 0.1% (4)
five-paragraph - 0.1% (4)
article. - 0.1% (4)
represent - 0.1% (4)
formulaic - 0.1% (4)
first - 0.1% (4)
just - 0.1% (4)
prompt - 0.08% (3)
driverless - 0.08% (3)
jordan - 0.08% (3)
syllabus - 0.08% (3)
answering - 0.08% (3)
point. - 0.08% (3)
ways - 0.08% (3)
journal - 0.08% (3)
speak: - 0.08% (3)
textbook - 0.08% (3)
liberty - 0.08% (3)
teacher.com - 0.08% (3)
“the - 0.08% (3)
references - 0.08% (3)
understanding - 0.08% (3)
such - 0.08% (3)
points - 0.08% (3)
simply - 0.08% (3)
revise - 0.08% (3)
make - 0.08% (3)
ddl - 0.08% (3)
3-2-1- - 0.08% (3)
states - 0.08% (3)
summaries. - 0.08% (3)
subsequent - 0.08% (3)
used - 0.08% (3)
difficult - 0.08% (3)
necessary - 0.08% (3)
overall - 0.08% (3)
life - 0.08% (3)
similar - 0.08% (3)
successful - 0.08% (3)
copy - 0.08% (3)
according - 0.08% (3)
(no - 0.08% (3)
writers - 0.08% (3)
develop - 0.08% (3)
students’ - 0.08% (3)
chose - 0.08% (3)
zhang’s - 0.08% (3)
later - 0.08% (3)
direct - 0.08% (3)
unrelated - 0.08% (3)
reasons - 0.08% (3)
fact - 0.08% (3)
handout - 0.08% (3)
even - 0.08% (3)
(in - 0.08% (3)
explicit - 0.08% (3)
2016 - 0.08% (3)
wrote - 0.08% (3)
four - 0.08% (3)
often - 0.08% (3)
us. - 0.08% (3)
given - 0.08% (3)
review - 0.08% (3)
clearly - 0.08% (3)
chinese - 0.08% (3)
rethinking - 0.08% (3)
#eltbehindthescenes - 0.08% (3)
blog(s) - 0.08% (3)
them, - 0.08% (3)
essay: - 0.08% (3)
has - 0.08% (3)
report) - 0.08% (3)
(#tesol17 - 0.08% (3)
where - 0.08% (3)
bias? - 0.08% (3)
engender - 0.08% (3)
don’t - 0.08% (3)
purpose - 0.08% (3)
subject - 0.08% (3)
without - 0.08% (3)
enough - 0.08% (3)
useful - 0.08% (3)
conference - 0.08% (3)
content, - 0.08% (3)
book, - 0.08% (3)
thought - 0.08% (3)
break - 0.08% (3)
instead, - 0.08% (3)
my! - 0.08% (3)
answers…oh - 0.08% (3)
actually - 0.08% (3)
newsela: - 0.08% (3)
107 - 0.08% (3)
those - 0.08% (3)
test - 0.08% (3)
email. - 0.08% (3)
experience - 0.08% (3)
#tesol2017 - 0.08% (3)
why - 0.08% (3)
become - 0.08% (3)
being - 0.08% (3)
reflections, - 0.08% (3)
type - 0.08% (3)
while - 0.08% (3)
course: - 0.08% (3)
anti-coursebook - 0.08% (3)
anything - 0.08% (3)
tool - 0.08% (3)
limitations - 0.08% (3)
its - 0.08% (3)
discussion - 0.08% (3)
combining - 0.08% (3)
sources - 0.08% (3)
student’s - 0.08% (3)
all. - 0.08% (3)
spend - 0.08% (3)
nope, - 0.08% (3)
welcome - 0.08% (3)
rather - 0.08% (3)
through - 0.08% (3)
preparing - 0.08% (3)
week, - 0.05% (2)
poor, - 0.05% (2)
“give - 0.05% (2)
got - 0.05% (2)
water - 0.05% (2)
plant - 0.05% (2)
trees - 0.05% (2)
generate - 0.05% (2)
advanced - 0.05% (2)
assignments, - 0.05% (2)
interesting - 0.05% (2)
repeated - 0.05% (2)
eight - 0.05% (2)
doing - 0.05% (2)
lead - 0.05% (2)
fourth - 0.05% (2)
is, - 0.05% (2)
i’d - 0.05% (2)
seattle. - 0.05% (2)
who - 0.05% (2)
navigating - 0.05% (2)
seemed - 0.05% (2)
lines - 0.05% (2)
different - 0.05% (2)
having - 0.05% (2)
few - 0.05% (2)
bias, - 0.05% (2)
original - 0.05% (2)
focused - 0.05% (2)
showed - 0.05% (2)
attempt - 0.05% (2)
mobile - 0.05% (2)
donald - 0.05% (2)
identify - 0.05% (2)
lacking. - 0.05% (2)
getting - 0.05% (2)
development - 0.05% (2)
class. - 0.05% (2)
lecture - 0.05% (2)
together - 0.05% (2)
materials - 0.05% (2)
claims - 0.05% (2)
activity, - 0.05% (2)
eating - 0.05% (2)
critical - 0.05% (2)
material. - 0.05% (2)
many - 0.05% (2)
genre - 0.05% (2)
hand, - 0.05% (2)
complete - 0.05% (2)
enjoy - 0.05% (2)
meat - 0.05% (2)
chosen - 0.05% (2)
several - 0.05% (2)
employer. - 0.05% (2)
clean - 0.05% (2)
clarify - 0.05% (2)
complex - 0.05% (2)
effective - 0.05% (2)
via - 0.05% (2)
(det) - 0.05% (2)
minutes - 0.05% (2)
(-2 - 0.05% (2)
questions, - 0.05% (2)
sure - 0.05% (2)
enter - 0.05% (2)
me. - 0.05% (2)
attention - 0.05% (2)
typos - 0.05% (2)
thoughts - 0.05% (2)
sorbet - 0.05% (2)
site - 0.05% (2)
home - 0.05% (2)
personal - 0.05% (2)
please - 0.05% (2)
theme: - 0.05% (2)
wordpress - 0.05% (2)
aip - 0.05% (2)
opinions, - 0.05% (2)
blog. - 0.05% (2)
experiences - 0.05% (2)
powered - 0.05% (2)
working - 0.05% (2)
receive - 0.05% (2)
question: - 0.05% (2)
pechakucha - 0.05% (2)
weak - 0.05% (2)
it’s - 0.05% (2)
consider - 0.05% (2)
proved - 0.05% (2)
sentence - 0.05% (2)
parts: - 0.05% (2)
words. - 0.05% (2)
weeks - 0.05% (2)
evidence? - 0.05% (2)
newsela.com - 0.05% (2)
down - 0.05% (2)
makes - 0.05% (2)
horseless - 0.05% (2)
next - 0.05% (2)
duolingo - 0.05% (2)
join - 0.05% (2)
question? - 0.05% (2)
notifications - 0.05% (2)
various - 0.05% (2)
redistributed - 0.05% (2)
answered - 0.05% (2)
exist - 0.05% (2)
deconstructing - 0.05% (2)
tweets - 0.05% (2)
@twittermy - 0.05% (2)
subscribers - 0.05% (2)
made - 0.05% (2)
common - 0.05% (2)
comprehension - 0.05% (2)
baba, - 0.05% (2)
role - 0.05% (2)
lexical - 0.05% (2)
network - 0.05% (2)
proficiency - 0.05% (2)
argument - 0.05% (2)
therefore, - 0.05% (2)
immediate - 0.05% (2)
trying - 0.05% (2)
positive - 0.05% (2)
revisions - 0.05% (2)
courses - 0.05% (2)
resources - 0.05% (2)
keck, - 0.05% (2)
better - 0.05% (2)
al., - 0.05% (2)
mcdonough - 0.05% (2)
between - 0.05% (2)
assume - 0.05% (2)
requires - 0.05% (2)
demaree - 0.05% (2)
writers. - 0.05% (2)
paraphrase - 0.05% (2)
session - 0.05% (2)
wonder - 0.05% (2)
sometimes - 0.05% (2)
bites - 0.05% (2)
short-answer - 0.05% (2)
damn - 0.05% (2)
other, - 0.05% (2)
book. - 0.05% (2)
page - 0.05% (2)
grammar, - 0.05% (2)
action - 0.05% (2)
engagement - 0.05% (2)
24, - 0.05% (2)
building - 0.05% (2)
true - 0.05% (2)
text. - 0.05% (2)
topical - 0.05% (2)
article, - 0.05% (2)
comments - 0.05% (2)
students, - 0.05% (2)
miss - 0.05% (2)
job - 0.05% (2)
textbooks - 0.05% (2)
classroom, - 0.05% (2)
successfully - 0.05% (2)
i’m - 0.05% (2)
content. - 0.05% (2)
presented - 0.05% (2)
allows - 0.05% (2)
leki - 0.05% (2)
meaning - 0.05% (2)
specific - 0.05% (2)
aspects - 0.05% (2)
with, - 0.05% (2)
lengthy - 0.05% (2)
little - 0.05% (2)
lady - 0.05% (2)
students. - 0.05% (2)
rant - 0.05% (2)
take - 0.05% (2)
activities - 0.05% (2)
evaluate - 0.05% (2)
modified - 0.05% (2)
writings - 0.05% (2)
(or - 0.05% (2)
poetry - 0.05% (2)
history. - 0.05% (2)
offer - 0.05% (2)
prompted - 0.05% (2)
current - 0.05% (2)
disclaimer - 0.05% (2)
here, - 0.05% (2)
issues - 0.05% (2)
…had - 0.05% (2)
extra - 0.05% (2)
…contained - 0.05% (2)
constantly - 0.05% (2)
not, - 0.05% (2)
whether - 0.05% (2)
reading, - 0.05% (2)
especially - 0.05% (2)
included. - 0.05% (2)
previous - 0.05% (2)
fact, - 0.05% (2)
becker, - 0.05% (2)
toward - 0.05% (2)
recently - 0.05% (2)
vocabulary - 0.05% (2)
judge - 0.05% (2)
performance. - 0.05% (2)
against - 0.05% (2)
structured - 0.05% (2)
jordan’s - 0.05% (2)
authors - 0.05% (2)
verbatim - 0.05% (2)
copying - 0.05% (2)
(increase - 0.05% (2)
tools - 0.05% (2)
peers - 0.05% (2)
must - 0.05% (2)
analyzed - 0.05% (2)
into - 0.05% (2)
she - 0.05% (2)
recommends - 0.05% (2)
coursebooks, - 0.05% (2)
moving - 0.05% (2)
done - 0.05% (2)
judgments - 0.05% (2)
close - 0.05% (2)
worked - 0.05% (2)
esl - 0.05% (2)
details. - 0.05% (2)
and the - 0.4% (16)
of the - 0.38% (15)
to the - 0.33% (13)
in the - 0.33% (13)
summary writing - 0.3% (12)
on the - 0.3% (12)
at the - 0.25% (10)
from the - 0.25% (10)
there is - 0.23% (9)
that i - 0.2% (8)
students to - 0.2% (8)
the article - 0.2% (8)
writing tasks - 0.2% (8)
anthony schmidt - 0.2% (8)
like this: - 0.2% (8)
student samples - 0.18% (7)
email address - 0.18% (7)
this:like loading... - 0.18% (7)
the student - 0.18% (7)
share this:facebooktwittergoogleemaillike - 0.18% (7)
this:facebooktwittergoogleemaillike this:like - 0.18% (7)
2017anthony schmidt - 0.18% (7)
did they - 0.18% (7)
coursebook writing - 0.18% (7)
because the - 0.15% (6)
they are - 0.15% (6)
the question - 0.15% (6)
and then - 0.15% (6)
the author - 0.15% (6)
writing a - 0.15% (6)
short answer - 0.13% (5)
that the - 0.13% (5)
a comment - 0.13% (5)
pts) no - 0.13% (5)
the summaries - 0.13% (5)
leave a - 0.13% (5)
i have - 0.13% (5)
because they - 0.13% (5)
this article - 0.13% (5)
– an - 0.13% (5)
breathe free - 0.13% (5)
yearning to - 0.13% (5)
to breathe - 0.13% (5)
and academic - 0.1% (4)
eap coursebook - 0.1% (4)
continue reading - 0.1% (4)
loading... april - 0.1% (4)
→ share - 0.1% (4)
five-paragraph essay - 0.1% (4)
a great - 0.1% (4)
your email - 0.1% (4)
learning a - 0.1% (4)
and it - 0.1% (4)
three examples - 0.1% (4)
agree with - 0.1% (4)
to help - 0.1% (4)
a comparison - 0.1% (4)
fluency, and - 0.1% (4)
using student - 0.1% (4)
comparison of - 0.1% (4)
writing instruction - 0.1% (4)
samples in - 0.1% (4)
and eap - 0.1% (4)
with a - 0.1% (4)
the answer - 0.1% (4)
the five-paragraph - 0.1% (4)
the 20 - 0.1% (4)
the pro - 0.1% (4)
(1 pt) - 0.1% (4)
in writing - 0.1% (4)
the scene - 0.1% (4)
examples from - 0.1% (4)
the text - 0.1% (4)
subscribe to - 0.1% (4)
this is - 0.1% (4)
their writing - 0.1% (4)
something that - 0.1% (4)
main idea - 0.1% (4)
to this - 0.1% (4)
evaluation of - 0.1% (4)
and short - 0.1% (4)
i then - 0.1% (4)
reading → - 0.1% (4)
text to - 0.1% (4)
listening and - 0.08% (3)
nope, not - 0.08% (3)
don’t have - 0.08% (3)
rather than - 0.08% (3)
one of - 0.08% (3)
at all. - 0.08% (3)
is still - 0.08% (3)
so, does - 0.08% (3)
i think - 0.08% (3)
does this - 0.08% (3)
instead, i - 0.08% (3)
gave students - 0.08% (3)
then gave - 0.08% (3)
or three - 0.08% (3)
your point. - 0.08% (3)
two or - 0.08% (3)
answer this - 0.08% (3)
pro or - 0.08% (3)
by the - 0.08% (3)
or con - 0.08% (3)
collected the - 0.08% (3)
them to - 0.08% (3)
of second - 0.08% (3)
language writing, - 0.08% (3)
own and - 0.08% (3)
second language - 0.08% (3)
journal of - 0.08% (3)
points did - 0.08% (3)
not only - 0.08% (3)
as with - 0.08% (3)
when the - 0.08% (3)
my! – - 0.08% (3)
in summary - 0.08% (3)
the idea - 0.08% (3)
short answers…oh - 0.08% (3)
responses, and - 0.08% (3)
loading... march - 0.08% (3)
of university - 0.08% (3)
tasks – - 0.08% (3)
for the - 0.08% (3)
students could - 0.08% (3)
with the - 0.08% (3)
the article. - 0.08% (3)
in other - 0.08% (3)
that students - 0.08% (3)
their writing. - 0.08% (3)
to improve - 0.08% (3)
a summary - 0.08% (3)
focus on - 0.08% (3)
off course: - 0.08% (3)
feedback, accuracy, - 0.08% (3)
academic speaking - 0.08% (3)
combining peer - 0.08% (3)
3-2-1- speak: - 0.08% (3)
by email. - 0.08% (3)
my blog(s) - 0.08% (3)
is not - 0.08% (3)
and speaking - 0.08% (3)
other words, - 0.08% (3)
behind the - 0.08% (3)
of this - 0.08% (3)
scenes of - 0.08% (3)
which i - 0.08% (3)
part of - 0.08% (3)
rethinking the - 0.08% (3)
five-paragraph essay: - 0.08% (3)
answers…oh my! - 0.08% (3)
summaries, responses, - 0.08% (3)
– using - 0.08% (3)
the power - 0.08% (3)
my own - 0.08% (3)
and not - 0.08% (3)
– #tesol2017 - 0.08% (3)
university and - 0.08% (3)
of formulaic - 0.08% (3)
the limitations - 0.08% (3)
writing (#tesol17 - 0.08% (3)
free – - 0.08% (3)
course: a - 0.08% (3)
an anti-coursebook - 0.08% (3)
confirmation bias? - 0.08% (3)
– #eltbehindthescenes - 0.08% (3)
essay: the - 0.08% (3)
writing leave - 0.08% (3)
tasks engender - 0.08% (3)
peer feedback, - 0.08% (3)
limitations of - 0.08% (3)
formulaic writing - 0.08% (3)
accuracy, fluency, - 0.08% (3)
how to - 0.08% (3)
(#tesol17 report) - 0.08% (3)
that is - 0.08% (3)
4, 2017anthony - 0.08% (3)
anti-coursebook reflection - 0.08% (3)
speak: combining - 0.08% (3)
research bites - 0.05% (2)
weeks of - 0.05% (2)
article in - 0.05% (2)
as well - 0.05% (2)
and wrote - 0.05% (2)
the con - 0.05% (2)
author of - 0.05% (2)
powered by - 0.05% (2)
reading instruction - 0.05% (2)
theme: sorbet - 0.05% (2)
or two - 0.05% (2)
course books - 0.05% (2)
instruction navigating - 0.05% (2)
newsela: eight - 0.05% (2)
this question: - 0.05% (2)
question: what - 0.05% (2)
are my - 0.05% (2)
proudly powered - 0.05% (2)
for this - 0.05% (2)
analysis of - 0.05% (2)
the ideas - 0.05% (2)
proudly ran - 0.05% (2)
the claim - 0.05% (2)
they agree - 0.05% (2)
with clean - 0.05% (2)
a claim - 0.05% (2)
agree or - 0.05% (2)
disagree with - 0.05% (2)
test (det) - 0.05% (2)
duolingo english - 0.05% (2)
and their - 0.05% (2)
posts 3-2-1- - 0.05% (2)
writing assignments - 0.05% (2)
with newsela.com - 0.05% (2)
student revisions - 0.05% (2)
of pechakucha - 0.05% (2)
anthony teacher.com - 0.05% (2)
by wordpress - 0.05% (2)
deconstructing the - 0.05% (2)
idea of - 0.05% (2)
report) yearning - 0.05% (2)
yes (-2 - 0.05% (2)
to revise - 0.05% (2)
(-2 pts) - 0.05% (2)
on them, - 0.05% (2)
pt) did - 0.05% (2)
that were - 0.05% (2)
speaking do - 0.05% (2)
they give - 0.05% (2)
extra details - 0.05% (2)
if students - 0.05% (2)
20 minutes - 0.05% (2)
all parts - 0.05% (2)
was very - 0.05% (2)
assignments, i - 0.05% (2)
for most - 0.05% (2)
to clarify - 0.05% (2)
they had - 0.05% (2)
do not - 0.05% (2)
revise their - 0.05% (2)
(1 pts) - 0.05% (2)
the back - 0.05% (2)
of student - 0.05% (2)
student examples - 0.05% (2)
and redistributed - 0.05% (2)
but also - 0.05% (2)
help support - 0.05% (2)
provide two - 0.05% (2)
reflection off - 0.05% (2)
support your - 0.05% (2)
students’ writing - 0.05% (2)
parts of - 0.05% (2)
| both - 0.05% (2)
energy disclaimer - 0.05% (2)
of lexical - 0.05% (2)
1 point - 0.05% (2)
2 points - 0.05% (2)
the question? - 0.05% (2)
only one - 0.05% (2)
point | - 0.05% (2)
of these - 0.05% (2)
and typos - 0.05% (2)
2017 tesol - 0.05% (2)
a greater - 0.05% (2)
welcome to - 0.05% (2)
advanced listening - 0.05% (2)
as that - 0.05% (2)
sometimes i - 0.05% (2)
be found - 0.05% (2)
that does - 0.05% (2)
this type - 0.05% (2)
week, we - 0.05% (2)
will be - 0.05% (2)
me your - 0.05% (2)
but there - 0.05% (2)
@twittermy tweets - 0.05% (2)
writing and - 0.05% (2)
only summary - 0.05% (2)
in student - 0.05% (2)
revisions and - 0.05% (2)
ideas with - 0.05% (2)
were able - 0.05% (2)
to see - 0.05% (2)
other subscribers - 0.05% (2)
join 107 - 0.05% (2)
the focus - 0.05% (2)
aspects of - 0.05% (2)
this mean - 0.05% (2)
being a - 0.05% (2)
i don’t - 0.05% (2)
having a - 0.05% (2)
have to - 0.05% (2)
content, and - 0.05% (2)
and what - 0.05% (2)
written in - 0.05% (2)
others to - 0.05% (2)
conference in - 0.05% (2)
or their - 0.05% (2)
particular a - 0.05% (2)
some to - 0.05% (2)
is that - 0.05% (2)
schmidt research, - 0.05% (2)
and can - 0.05% (2)
in fact, - 0.05% (2)
from my - 0.05% (2)
the book - 0.05% (2)
a skill - 0.05% (2)
mean i - 0.05% (2)
schmidt reading, - 0.05% (2)
the other, - 0.05% (2)
a student - 0.05% (2)
when there - 0.05% (2)
goal of - 0.05% (2)
lexical proficiency - 0.05% (2)
well as - 0.05% (2)
a good - 0.05% (2)
explicit and - 0.05% (2)
the original - 0.05% (2)
there were - 0.05% (2)
main ideas - 0.05% (2)
to identify - 0.05% (2)
most students - 0.05% (2)
my employer. - 0.05% (2)
the main - 0.05% (2)
enough sleep - 0.05% (2)
no change - 0.05% (2)
those of - 0.05% (2)
here represent - 0.05% (2)
a personal - 0.05% (2)
blog. the - 0.05% (2)
should eat - 0.05% (2)
less meat - 0.05% (2)
to use - 0.05% (2)
list rubric - 0.05% (2)
wrote a - 0.05% (2)
they assume - 0.05% (2)
to analyze - 0.05% (2)
opinions, ideas - 0.05% (2)
samples and - 0.05% (2)
blog via - 0.05% (2)
people will - 0.05% (2)
notifications of - 0.05% (2)
writing performance. - 0.05% (2)
and receive - 0.05% (2)
their own - 0.05% (2)
summary writing. - 0.05% (2)
verbatim copying - 0.05% (2)
may be - 0.05% (2)
source text - 0.05% (2)
et al., - 0.05% (2)
new posts - 0.05% (2)
for an - 0.05% (2)
students in - 0.05% (2)
a text - 0.05% (2)
address to - 0.05% (2)
evaluate the - 0.05% (2)
they were - 0.05% (2)
email enter - 0.05% (2)
students can - 0.05% (2)
recommends that - 0.05% (2)
summaries and - 0.05% (2)
this blog - 0.05% (2)
a rubric - 0.05% (2)
article and - 0.05% (2)
found that - 0.05% (2)
people should - 0.05% (2)
share this:facebooktwittergoogleemaillike this:like - 0.18% (7)
coursebook writing tasks - 0.18% (7)
this:facebooktwittergoogleemaillike this:like loading... - 0.18% (7)
there is a - 0.13% (5)
leave a comment - 0.13% (5)
yearning to breathe - 0.13% (5)
to breathe free - 0.13% (5)
student samples in - 0.1% (4)
from the text - 0.1% (4)
eap coursebook writing - 0.1% (4)
no (1 pt) - 0.1% (4)
a comparison of - 0.1% (4)
the five-paragraph essay - 0.1% (4)
your email address - 0.1% (4)
using student samples - 0.1% (4)
fluency, and academic - 0.1% (4)
reading → share - 0.1% (4)
continue reading → - 0.1% (4)
here is an - 0.08% (3)
do coursebook writing - 0.08% (3)
3-2-1- speak: combining - 0.08% (3)
my! – using - 0.08% (3)
this:like loading... march - 0.08% (3)
tasks engender confirmation - 0.08% (3)
the text to - 0.08% (3)
of my blog(s) - 0.08% (3)
nope, not at - 0.08% (3)
there is still - 0.08% (3)
behind the scenes - 0.08% (3)
listening and speaking - 0.08% (3)
and short answers…oh - 0.08% (3)
of second language - 0.08% (3)
university and eap - 0.08% (3)
– an anti-coursebook - 0.08% (3)
of formulaic writing - 0.08% (3)
essay: the limitations - 0.08% (3)
responses, and short - 0.08% (3)
answers…oh my! – - 0.08% (3)
posts by email. - 0.08% (3)
my own and - 0.08% (3)
in writing instruction - 0.08% (3)
rethinking the five-paragraph - 0.08% (3)
blog(s) – #eltbehindthescenes - 0.08% (3)
points did they - 0.08% (3)
or three examples - 0.08% (3)
examples from the - 0.08% (3)
second language writing, - 0.08% (3)
speak: combining peer - 0.08% (3)
scenes of my - 0.08% (3)
and academic speaking - 0.08% (3)
feedback, accuracy, fluency, - 0.08% (3)
two or three - 0.08% (3)
in summary writing - 0.08% (3)
free – an - 0.08% (3)
course: a comparison - 0.08% (3)
writing (#tesol17 report) - 0.08% (3)
limitations of formulaic - 0.08% (3)
five-paragraph essay: the - 0.08% (3)
of university and - 0.08% (3)
tasks – #tesol2017 - 0.08% (3)
samples in writing - 0.08% (3)
– using student - 0.08% (3)
short answers…oh my! - 0.08% (3)
summaries, responses, and - 0.08% (3)
my blog(s) – - 0.08% (3)
the scenes of - 0.08% (3)
writing tasks engender - 0.08% (3)
peer feedback, accuracy, - 0.08% (3)
bias? behind the - 0.05% (2)
speaking do coursebook - 0.05% (2)
address @twittermy tweets - 0.05% (2)
powered by wordpress - 0.05% (2)
email. join 107 - 0.05% (2)
(#tesol17 report) yearning - 0.05% (2)
anti-coursebook reflection off - 0.05% (2)
new posts by - 0.05% (2)
recent posts 3-2-1- - 0.05% (2)
other subscribers email - 0.05% (2)
summary writing in - 0.05% (2)
(-2 pts) no - 0.05% (2)
and redistributed them - 0.05% (2)
did they give - 0.05% (2)
yes (-2 pts) - 0.05% (2)
pt) did they - 0.05% (2)
to revise their - 0.05% (2)
parts of the - 0.05% (2)
instruction navigating newsela: - 0.05% (2)
eight weeks of - 0.05% (2)
reading instruction with - 0.05% (2)
analyze student samples - 0.05% (2)
receive notifications of - 0.05% (2)
this blog and - 0.05% (2)
disclaimer this is - 0.05% (2)
with clean energy - 0.05% (2)
(det) proudly ran - 0.05% (2)
duolingo english test - 0.05% (2)
a personal blog. - 0.05% (2)
the opinions, ideas - 0.05% (2)
of my employer. - 0.05% (2)
and not those - 0.05% (2)
represent my own - 0.05% (2)
and typos here - 0.05% (2)
pechakucha deconstructing the - 0.05% (2)
the power of - 0.05% (2)
#eltbehindthescenes rethinking the - 0.05% (2)
– #tesol2017 summaries, - 0.05% (2)
to subscribe to - 0.05% (2)
reflection off course: - 0.05% (2)
via email enter - 0.05% (2)
(1 pts) no - 0.05% (2)
instruction with newsela.com - 0.05% (2)
weeks of reading - 0.05% (2)
navigating newsela: eight - 0.05% (2)
confirmation bias? behind - 0.05% (2)
subscribe to blog - 0.05% (2)
the back of - 0.05% (2)
enter your email - 0.05% (2)
learning a subject - 0.05% (2)
address to subscribe - 0.05% (2)
to this blog - 0.05% (2)
but there is - 0.05% (2)
to the other, - 0.05% (2)
this mean i - 0.05% (2)
at all. in - 0.05% (2)
own and not - 0.05% (2)
here represent my - 0.05% (2)
those of my - 0.05% (2)
employer. subscribe to - 0.05% (2)
in fact, i - 0.05% (2)
blog via email - 0.05% (2)
don’t have to - 0.05% (2)
an advanced listening - 0.05% (2)
2017anthony schmidt reading, - 0.05% (2)
by email. join - 0.05% (2)
107 other subscribers - 0.05% (2)
email address @twittermy - 0.05% (2)
advanced listening and - 0.05% (2)
i have been - 0.05% (2)
of new posts - 0.05% (2)
and receive notifications - 0.05% (2)
some to be - 0.05% (2)
others to be - 0.05% (2)
tesol conference in - 0.05% (2)
at the 2017 - 0.05% (2)
schmidt research, writing - 0.05% (2)
were able to - 0.05% (2)
student revisions and - 0.05% (2)
ran with clean - 0.05% (2)
text to help - 0.05% (2)
energy disclaimer this - 0.05% (2)
this question: what - 0.05% (2)
pro or con - 0.05% (2)
answer this question: - 0.05% (2)
support your point. - 0.05% (2)
test (det) proudly - 0.05% (2)
point | both - 0.05% (2)
newsela.com the power - 0.05% (2)
of pechakucha deconstructing - 0.05% (2)
1 point | - 0.05% (2)
the duolingo english - 0.05% (2)
to help support - 0.05% (2)
is a personal - 0.05% (2)
the author of - 0.05% (2)
that students could - 0.05% (2)
is an example - 0.05% (2)
ideas and typos - 0.05% (2)
and it is - 0.05% (2)
when there is - 0.05% (2)
only summary writing - 0.05% (2)
written in the - 0.05% (2)
students were able - 0.05% (2)
they agree or - 0.05% (2)
article in a - 0.05% (2)
blog. the opinions, - 0.05% (2)
to analyze student - 0.05% (2)
able to identify - 0.05% (2)
the 2017 tesol - 0.05% (2)

Here you can find chart of all your popular one, two and three word phrases. Google and others search engines means your page is about words you use frequently.

Copyright © 2015-2016 hupso.pl. All rights reserved. FB | +G | Twitter

Hupso.pl jest serwisem internetowym, w którym jednym kliknieciem możesz szybko i łatwo sprawdź stronę www pod kątem SEO. Oferujemy darmowe pozycjonowanie stron internetowych oraz wycena domen i stron internetowych. Prowadzimy ranking polskich stron internetowych oraz ranking stron alexa.